Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

You’ve supercharged your research process with ACS and Mendeley!

STEP 1:
Click to create an ACS ID

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

MENDELEY PAIRING EXPIRED
Your Mendeley pairing has expired. Please reconnect
ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
Proteolytic Activation of SARS-CoV-2 Spike at the S1/S2 Boundary: Potential Role of Proteases beyond Furin
My Activity
  • Open Access
  • Editors Choice
Letter

Proteolytic Activation of SARS-CoV-2 Spike at the S1/S2 Boundary: Potential Role of Proteases beyond Furin
Click to copy article linkArticle link copied!

  • Tiffany Tang
    Tiffany Tang
    Robert Frederick Smith School of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, United States
    More by Tiffany Tang
  • Javier A. Jaimes
    Javier A. Jaimes
    Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, United States
  • Miya K. Bidon
    Miya K. Bidon
    Robert Frederick Smith School of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, United States
  • Marco R. Straus
    Marco R. Straus
    Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, United States
  • Susan Daniel*
    Susan Daniel
    Robert Frederick Smith School of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, United States
    *Email: [email protected]
    More by Susan Daniel
  • Gary R. Whittaker*
    Gary R. Whittaker
    Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, United States
    *Email: [email protected]
Open PDFSupporting Information (1)

ACS Infectious Diseases

Cite this: ACS Infect. Dis. 2021, 7, 2, 264–272
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsinfecdis.0c00701
Published January 12, 2021

Copyright © 2021 American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under these Terms of Use.

Abstract

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) uses its spike (S) protein to mediate viral entry into host cells. Cleavage of the S protein at the S1/S2 and/or S2′ site(s) is associated with viral entry, which can occur at either the cell plasma membrane (early pathway) or the endosomal membrane (late pathway), depending on the cell type. Previous studies show that SARS-CoV-2 has a unique insert at the S1/S2 site that can be cleaved by furin, which appears to expand viral tropism to cells with suitable protease and receptor expression. Here, we utilize viral pseudoparticles and protease inhibitors to study the impact of the S1/S2 cleavage on infectivity. Our results demonstrate that S1/S2 cleavage is essential for early pathway entry into Calu-3 cells, a model lung epithelial cell line, but not for late pathway entry into Vero E6 cells, a model cell line. The S1/S2 cleavage was found to be processed by other proteases beyond furin. Using bioinformatic tools, we also analyze the presence of a furin S1/S2 site in related CoVs and offer thoughts on the origin of the insertion of the furin-like cleavage site in SARS-CoV-2.

Copyright © 2021 American Chemical Society
The 21st century has seen the rise of pathogenic strains of human coronaviruses (CoVs) causing major public health concerns, first with the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) in 2002, (1) then with Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) in 2012, (2) and now, with the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). SARS-CoV-2 causes the disease syndrome known as COVID-19, (3) now classified as a pandemic with global reach and impact.
CoV host cell entry is mediated by its spike (S) glycoprotein, a large transmembrane protein that decorates the virus particle. (4) The S protein is demarcated into two domains, the S1 and S2 domains, which contain the receptor binding domain and membrane fusion domain, respectively. There are two proteolytic activation events associated with S-mediated membrane fusion. (5) The first is a priming cleavage that occurs at the interface of the S1 and S2 domain (S1/S2) for some coronaviruses, and the second is the obligatory triggering cleavage that occurs within the S2 region (S2′). (5) The priming cleavage generally converts the S protein into a fusion competent form by enabling the S protein to better bind receptors or expose hidden cleavage sites. (5) The triggering cleavage initiates a series of conformational changes that enable the S protein to harpoon into the host membrane for membrane fusion. (5)
There are a variety of proteases capable of priming and triggering CoV S proteins. While the priming event is not as well characterized and virus dependent, it has been observed that the CoV S can be triggered by proteases at the plasma membrane or endosomal membrane, enabling entry in what are termed “early” and “late” pathways, respectively. (6−8) SARS-CoV was found to utilize the transmembrane bound protease TMPRSS2 to enter using the early pathway. (8−10) However, TMPRSS2 expression is limited to epithelial cell lines, and in TMPRSS2 negative cell lines, SARS-CoV utilizes endosomal cathepsin L to enter using the late pathway. (11) MERS-CoV also utilizes TMPRSS2 and cathepsin L with one major difference. The MERS-CoV S1/S2 boundary contains an RSVR insert that can be recognized by furin or related proprotein convertases (PCs), proteases commonly found in the secretory pathway of most cell lines. (7,12) During the S maturation process, the S protein can be cleaved by furin/PCs. (7,12) Thus, MERS-CoV particles harbor cleaved S1/S2 protein, and it was observed that the S1/S2 priming is crucial for MERS-CoV, (7) but not SARS-CoV, (13) to infect via the early pathway route. However, the S1/S2 cleavage is not a requirement for MERS-CoV late pathway infection. (7)
For SARS-CoV-2, early studies showed that the S1/S2 junction contains an insert with two additional basic residues, P–R–R–A (P, proline; R, arginine; A, alanine), that were not present in SARS-CoV or its closest bat ancestor viruses. (14,15) This insert forms a P–R–R–A–R sequence and while it does contain the minimum furin recognition motif, R–X–X–R, it diverges from the preferred R–X–K/R–R motif because the SARS-CoV-2 sequence has an A in the P3 location instead of an R (16,17) (Figure 1). Intriguingly, the only other known example of this insert on FurinDB, (18) a database of furin substrates, is found in proaerolysin, a bacterial toxin, and was determined to be activated by furin. (19)

Figure 1

Figure 1. Predicted structural model of the SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 S proteins. (Inset) Magnification of the S1/S2 site with conserved R and S residues (red ribbon) and the unique four amino acid insertion P–R–R–A for SARS-CoV-2 (blue ribbon) is shown. The P’s denote the position of that amino acid from the S1/S2 cleavage site, with P1–P5 referring to the amino acids before the cleavage site and P1′ referring to the amino acids after the cleavage site.

Indeed, early studies suggest that SARS-CoV-2 is also processed by furin since SARS-CoV-2 harbors a cleaved S protein, likely due to furin processing at the S1/S2 site. (20−22) Similar to what was observed for MERS-CoV, this S1/S2 cleavage was determined to be a prerequisite for subsequent TMPRSS2 activation at the S2′ site for the infection of respiratory cell lines, such as Calu-3. (23,24) Furthermore, like MERS-CoV, SARS-CoV-2 can also utilize cathepsin L in the endosomal pathway in TMPRSS2-negative cell lines, such as Vero E6. (22)
In this study, we sought to better characterize the SARS-CoV-2 S1/S2 cleavage site and raise some intriguing possibilities for how the site might have emerged. Using pseudoparticles and protease inhibitors, we investigated the impact of S1/S2 cleavage for the successful infection of cells via the early and late pathways. Our data shows that the S1/S2 cleavage is essential for subsequent S2′ activation via TMPRSS2 for entry in Calu-3 cells but not for S2′ activation via cathepsin L for entry in Vero E6 cells and suggests that furin may not be the only protease responsible for the S1/S2 cleavage event.

Results and Discussion

MLV Pseudoparticles as a System to Study SARS-CoV-2 Entry

To assess the functional importance of the S1/S2 site for SARS-CoV-2 entry, we utilized viral pseudoparticles. These particles consist of a murine leukemia virus (MLV) core and are decorated with the viral envelope protein to accurately recapitulate the entry steps of their native counterpart. (25) These particles also contain a luciferase reporter that integrates into the host cell genome upon successful infection and drives the cells to produce luciferase, which is quantifiable. We and others have used MLV-based pseudoparticles widely to study CoV entry pathways. (12,21,26) Using the HEK293T cell line, MLV pseudoparticles containing the wild-type SARS-CoV-2 S protein (SARS-CoV-2pp) or the SARS-CoV S protein (SARS-CoVpp) were generated alongside positive control particles containing the vesicular stomatitis virus G protein (VSVpp) or negative control particles lacking envelope proteins (Δenvpp).
Since coronaviruses can enter via the “early” or “late” pathway, we chose to infect cell lines representative of each pathway, as the entry mechanism can be highly cell-type dependent. (27) We utilized the Calu-3 (early) and the Vero E6 (late) cell lines for these studies, which activate the SARS-CoV-2 S2′ using TMPRSS2 and cathepsin L, respectively. As expected, VSVpp (positive control) infected Vero E6 and Calu-3 cells with several orders of magnitude higher luciferase units than the values reported with Δenvpp infection (negative control) (Figure 2A,B). This confirms that the envelope protein is driving infection and not the particle itself. In the case of SARS-CoVpp and SARS-CoV-2pp, both particles are infectious in both cell lines as they drive luciferase production several orders of magnitude higher than Δenvpp (Figure 2A,B) with SARS-CoVpp more infectious than SARS-CoV-2pp.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Characterization of an MLVpp system. (A, B) MLVpp infectivity in Vero E6 and Calu-3 cells. Cells were infected with MLVpps exhibiting the SARS-CoV-2 S, SARS-CoV S, VSV G, or no envelope protein and assessed for luciferase activity. Error bars represent the standard error measurements of three biological replicates (n = 3). (C) Western blot analysis of SARS-CoV-2pp and SARS-CoVpp S content. S was detected using a rabbit antibody against the SARS-CoV-2 S2 region and cross reacts against the SARS-CoV S. MLV content was detected using a mouse antibody against MLV p30. The image was cropped from a singular Western blot.

The pseudoparticles were also probed for their S content via Western blot. For the SARS-CoV-2pp, we detected a band at 85 kDa and for SARS-CoVpp, we detected a strong band at 185 kDa (Figure 2C). The different bands observed between SARS-CoV-2pp and SARS-CoVpp are likely because SARS-CoV-2 S is cleaved at the S1/S2 location by furin/PCs during biosynthesis, whereas SARS-CoV S cannot be cleaved by furin/PCs. Thus, the 85 kDa band corresponds to the S2 segment (S2) of the SARS-CoV-2 S as the primary antibody recognizes the S2 region, while the 185 kDa band corresponds to the uncleaved (S0) SARS-CoV S. We note that both SARS-CoVpp and SARS-CoV-2pp exhibit bands at >185 kDa that likely correspond to dimeric and trimeric forms of S. These oligomeric forms of S have been reported in other SARS-CoV-2pp Western blots. (22,28) Since SARS-CoVpp harbors full-length S, its oligomeric S bands are of higher molecular weight than the SARS-CoV-2pp oligomeric S bands, which harbor cleaved S. Furthermore, the higher order bands may be more apparent due to the use of a polyclonal antibody to detect both the SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 S.

Use of the dec-RVKR-CMK Protease Inhibitor to Produce SARS-CoV-2pp with Uncleaved S

To examine the functional role of S priming by furin/PC proteases, we needed to produce SARS-CoV-2pp harboring uncleaved S protein. This can be accomplished by treating producer cells with an appropriate protease inhibitor to prevent S1/S2 cleavage during biosynthesis. We chose dec-RVKR-CMK because it has been shown to inhibit furin/PCs, preventing S1/S2 cleavage. (23,26,29) Furthermore, we have previously showed that the addition of dec-RVKR-CMK to producer cells generates MLV pseudotyped particles that harbor full-length MERS-CoV S protein (MERS-CoVpp), (26) and we observe a similar trend with SARS-CoV-2pp generated from cells treated with dec-RVKR-CMK (Figure 3C, lanes 1 and 2), exhibiting full-length uncleaved S0 and weak cleaved S2 bands. As mentioned, the additional bands at >185 kDa likely correspond to dimeric and trimeric S, as previously reported in other Western blots probing for SARS-CoV-2pp S, (22,28) with the higher order bands from particles produced in cells treated with dec-RVKR-CMK observed at higher molecular weights.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Impact of dec-RVKR-CMK on MLVpps. + dec-RVKR-CMK refers to MLVpp produced in HEK293T treated with 75 μM dec-RVKR-CMK at the time of transfection. + furin refers to particles treated with 6 U of recombinant furin for 3 h at 37 °C. (A, B) ± dec-RVKR-CMK and ± furin SARS-CoV-2pp were used to infect Vero E6 and Calu-3 cells. Infectivity was normalized to the – dec-RVKR-CMK, – furin condition in each cell line. Note the change in y-axis scale between A and B. Error bars represent the standard error measurements of three biological replicates (n = 3). Statistical analysis was performed using an unpaired student’s t test. Not shown: there is a ns difference between the −dec-RVKR-CMK, ± furin conditions (black bars). *, P ≤ 0.05; **, P ≤ 0.01; ns, nonsignificant, P > 0.05. (C) Western blot analysis of SARS-CoV-2pp produced in ± dec-RVKR-CMK and treated with ± furin for S protein content to complement the infection conditions. S was detected using a rabbit antibody against the SARS-CoV-2 S2 region. MLV content was detected using a mouse antibody against MLV p30. Band intensities were normalized to the MLV p30 band intensity.

The dec-RVKR-CMK-treated (uncleaved) particles were used to transduce cells to observe the impact of S1/S2 cleavage for subsequent S2′ activation via early acting TMPRSS2 in Calu-3 cells or late acting cathepsin L in Vero E6 cells. In Vero E6 cells, the uncleaved SARS-CoV-2pp were 30-fold more infectious than their cleaved counterparts, suggesting that uncleaved particles result in more infectious particles and that the S1/S2 cleavage is not required or hinders infection via the late pathway (Figure 3A). However, in Calu-3 cells, the opposite trend was observed; the uncleaved particles were significantly less infectious than their cleaved counterparts (Figure 3B), suggesting that S1/S2 cleavage is essential (23,24) for early entry. As a control, we also generated SARS-CoVpp, which lacks the furin/PC S1/S2 site, in the presence or absence of dec-RVKR-CMK and noted no significant impact of dec-RVKR-CMK on SARS-CoVpp infectivity in both Vero E6 and Calu-3 cells (Figure S1A,B). This affirms that the dec-RVKR-CMK impacts on infectivity are due to blocking the S1/S2 cleavage.
Thus, we were interested to see if we could restore the infection of the uncleaved particles by treating them with exogeneous furin, which has been previously shown to process purified SARS-CoV-2 S protein. (30) In Calu-3, we observed a 2-fold increase in infection when uncleaved particles were treated with exogeneous furin, but with cleaved particles, we did not observe any statistically significant increase with furin treatment (Figure 3B). In Vero E6 cells, for both types of particles, we did not observe a statistically significant increase in infection with furin treatment (Figure 3A).
Since furin treatment only modestly increased infectivity in all cases observed, we wanted to visualize how efficiently furin was processing the SARS-CoV-2 S via Western blot. For cleaved particles, exogeneous furin processed the faint full-length S0 band into S2 (Figure 3C, lanes 1 and 3). This trend was confirmed upon quantifying the intensities of the S0 and S2 bands relative to the intensity of the MLV p30 band; furin treatment reduced the relative S0 intensity from 0.35 to 0.02, resulting in an increase in relative S2 intensity from 1.74 to 2.83. For uncleaved particles, furin treatment had a more modest impact, as the relative intensity of the S0 bands was reduced from 2.61 to 2.25, resulting in a small increase in relative S2 intensity from 0.66 to 0.92 (Figure 3C, lanes 2 and 4).
The Western blot bands also reveal that the relative intensity of the uncleaved SARS-CoV-2pp S0 bands is greater than the relative intensity of the cleaved SARS-CoV-2pp S2 bands, and this trend was previously observed with MERS-CoVpp S (26) (Figure 3C, lanes 1 and 2), but not with SARS-CoV (Figure S1C). This likely suggests that the increased infectivity we observed with the uncleaved SARS-CoV-2pp in Vero E6 cells could be due to particles harboring a greater amount of S protein. A possible explanation of why uncleaved particles could harbor more S is because uncleaved S is more stable than cleaved S, as S1/S2 cleavage reduces S stability. (30) Thus, cleavage may encourage greater S degradation, reducing the amount of S available for incorporation into the pseudoparticles. However, we did not observe an increased infectivity with uncleaved SARS-CoV-2pp in Calu-3 cells because of the S1/S2 cleavage requirement, and an increased S content cannot compensate for cleavage.
Due to the limited ability of exogenous furin to rescue and cleave SARS-CoV-2 S, we re-evaluated the role of furin in processing the S1/S2 site. Since dec-RVKR-CMK can also inhibit a number of furin related PCs, the effects that have been observed with dec-RVKR-CMK on particles could have resulted from the inhibition of other PC proteases and not necessarily furin. Therefore, we produced particles in the presence of alpha1-PDX, a more selective furin inhibitor (31) than dec-RVKR-CMK. Infectivity results of these particles in Vero E6 cells show that the alpha1-PDX furin specific inhibitor failed to recapitulate the high level of enhancement provided by dec-RVKR-CMK at all tested inhibitor concentrations (Figure 4A). This indicates that dec-RVKR-CMK may have also been acting on non-furin proteases that can also process the S1/S2 site and furin itself may not be the only protease processing the S1/S2 site, as is generally assumed.

Figure 4

Figure 4. Use of specific furin (alpha1-PDX) and broad furin (dec-RVKR-CMK) inhibitors to investigate furin specificity. (A) Infectivity of particles produced in the presence of broad (dec-RVKR-CMK) and specific (alpha1-PDX) furin inhibitors. The inhibitor was applied at the indicated concentration to producer HEK293T cells. Particles were used to infect Vero E6 cells. Infectivity was normalized to the – condition. Error bars represent the standard error measurements of four biological replicates (n = 4). Statistical analysis was performed using an unpaired student’s t test compared to the – condition. *, P ≤ 0.05; ns, nonsignificant, P > 0.05. (B) Proteolytic cleavage assay of SARS-CoV-2 S1/S2 peptides to confirm alpha1-PDX and dec-RVKR-CMK inhibition specificity. Alpha1-PDX (2 μM), dec-RVKR-CMK (75 μM), or no inhibitor was incubated with either furin or trypsin recombinant protease and a fluorogenic peptide mimicking the SARS-CoV-2 S1/S2 site (TNSPRRARSVA). Results represent averages, and error bars represent the standard error measurement of three biological replicates (n = 3).

As a control, the activity of the alpha1-PDX was confirmed using a proteolytic cleavage assay, in which proteolytic cleavage of fluorogenic peptides results in a fluorescence increase used to determine the velocity of the cleavage reaction (Vmax). We have previously used this assay to observe furin cleavage of fluorogenic peptides mimicking the SARS-CoV-2 S1/S2 site (TNSPRRARSVA). (32) The addition of the alpha1-PDX or dec-RVKR-CMK inhibitor to a peptide reaction including furin resulted in almost complete inhibition of the activity, as very limited cleavage was detected. Interestingly, the addition of the alpha1-PDX or dec-RVKR-CMK to a reaction including trypsin gave different results. While alpha1-PDX did modestly inhibit the trypsin-mediated cleavage, dec-RVKR-CMK exhibited almost complete inhibition of trypsin activity. Thus, the results of this peptide cleavage assay confirm that alpha1-PDX is active on furin-like substrates and is a much more specific inhibitor compared to dec-RVKR-CMK (Figure 4B).
Our published results demonstrated that the PC protease PC1 can process SARS-CoV-2 S1/S2, (32) which opens up the possibility that non-furin proteases within the secretory pathway in producer cells can process the SARS-CoV-2 “furin-like” S1/S2 site, as originally suggested by Coutard et al. (33) In the studies reported here, we utilize HEK293T cells to produce the pseudoparticles, which may express a different repertoire of proteases than those in clinically relevant cells. In the future, it will be important to investigate the impact of S1/S2 processing by non-furin PCs in cells infected with SARS-CoV-2.

Furin-Cleavage Predictions of the SARS-CoV-2 S1/S2 Site

To gain further insights on furin processing of the S1/S2 sites, we utilized the PiTou (34) and ProP (35) cleavage prediction tools to analyze the likelihood that the S1/S2 site is processed by furin. ProP predicts furin cleavage sites based on networks derived from experimental data, whereas PiTou uses a combination of a hidden Markov model and biological knowledge-based cumulative probability score functions to characterize a 20 amino acid motif from P14 to P6′ that reflects the binding strength and accessibility of the motif in the furin binding pocket. Thus, the PiTou algorithm has been reported to be more sensitive and specific than ProP for predicting furin cleavage. (34) Both algorithms agree with each other in predicting furin cleavage, with positive scores (PiTou) and scores above 0.5 (ProP) indicating furin cleavage, strengthening the predictions (Figure 5), but since the PiTou algorithm is more sensitive and specific, we decided to focus on the PiTou values for further analysis.

Figure 5

Figure 5. Furin cleavage score analysis of CoV S1/S2 cleavage sites. CoV S sequences were analyzed using the ProP (35) 1.0 and PiTou (34) 3.0 furin prediction algorithm. Bold scores indicate the S1/S2 sequence is predicted to be cleaved by furin. Red box highlights SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 scores for reader’s convenience. Purple lines denote the position of the predicted S1/S2 cleavage site. Basic arginine (R) and lysine (K) residues are highlighted in blue. *For Bat-RmYN02, the sequence number was determined from the S alignment with SARS-CoV-2 S using Geneious. Sequences corresponding to the S1/S2 region of HCoV-HKU1 (AAT98580.1), SARS-CoV (AAT74874.1), SARS-CoV-2 (QHD43416.1), Bat-CoVRaTG13 (QHR63300.2), Bat-SL-CoVZC45 (AVP78031.1), Bat-SL-CoVZXC21 (AVP78042.1), MERS-CoV (AFS88936.1), BatCoV-HKU4 (YP_001039953.1), BatCoV-HKU5 (YP_001039962.1), BatCoV-PML (KC869678), Bat-CoV-HKU9 (YP_001039971), and Influenza A/Chicken/Hong Kong/822.1/01/H5N1 (AF509026.2) were obtained from GenBank. The sequence corresponding to the S1/S2 region of RmYN02 (EPI_ISL_412977) was obtained from GISAID.

The PiTou algorithm predicts that the SARS-CoV-2 S1/S2 site (PiTou score: 9.2) can be cleaved by furin, whereas other lineage B-betaCoVs that have been proposed as SARS-CoV-2 precursors, such as SARS-CoV, RaTG13, ZC45, ZXC21, and RmYN02, are predicted not to be cleaved by furin. Notably, the PiTou scores of traditionally accepted furin cleavage sites, such as those found in influenza H5N1 (PiTou score: 13.6) and HCoV-HKU1 (PiTou score: 14.6), are much higher than the score for SARS-CoV-2, suggesting that while the SARS-CoV-2 S1/S2 site has increased furin recognition when compared to other lineage B-betaCoVs, the site is not optimal for furin cleavage, in alignment with the experimental data shown here suggesting poor furin specific cleavage.
The modest SARS-CoV-2 PiTou score raises the question about the origin and evolution of the S1/S2 site of the virus. It is generally believed that the SARS-CoV-2 S1/S2 site is an insertion of “polybasic” residues, (36) as occurs for avian influenza virus, but as the identity of the SARS-CoV-2 ancestor virus still remains to be discovered, it is important to explore alternative explanations. It has recently been proposed that unsampled SARS-like CoV lineages(s) may be circulating in bats, which are important for the evolutionary origins of SARS-CoV-2. (37) Of note, a “breakpoint sequence hypothesis” has been proposed for the introduction of a furin-like cleavage site at S1/S2, (38) an idea further elucidated by Lytras et al. (39) in the context of the origin of SARS-like viruses. We consider that SARS-CoV-2 could have originated via recombination with a currently unknown ancestor bat virus with a robust furin cleavage site (i.e., PiTou score: approximately 13–15), but one which cannot bind to a human receptor, and that in order to gain the ability to infect human cells, the furin cleavage site may have been downregulated.
These suggested parallels are informed by lineage C-betaCoV in which MERS-CoV has a modest furin score (PiTou score: 5.2), but its closest known ancestor bat viruses, BatCoV-HKU4 (PiTou score: < 0), BatCoV-HKU5 (PiTou score: 10.3), and BatCoV-PML (PiTou score: 2.175), exhibit a wide range of furin scores. Of note is that the virus with the highest furin score, BatCoV-HKU5 (PiTou score: 10.3), cannot bind the MERS-CoV hDPP4 receptor, whereas BatCoV-HKU4 (PiTou score: <0) can, (40) so the MERS-CoV S1/S2 site can be seen as a downregulation from BatCoV-HKU5 to bind hDPP4.
Overall, our results support observations (23,24) that the role of this “gained” SARS-CoV-2 S1/S2 site is to expand viral tropism to respiratory cells, likely in the upper airways, allowing efficient transmission. The cleaved S1/S2 site is crucial for the SARS-CoV-2 S to be subsequently cleaved at the S2′ location by TMPRSS2 for early entry in respiratory cells. Without the S1/S2 cleavage, we predict that SARS-CoV-2 would be endocytosed and, due to low cathepsin L expression in respiratory endosomes, (7) SARS-CoV-2 would not efficiently infect via this route. If SARS-CoV-2 infects TMPRSS2 negative cells, it can utilize endosomal cathepsin L, an ubiquitous protease generally found throughout mammalian cells, (41) to activate the S protein, (22) though at undetermined sites. However, for cathepsin L activation, S1/S2 cleavage is not required, and our results indicate that preventing this cleavage increases the infectivity of SARS-CoV-2, at least in Vero E6 cells. This may be connected to recent work showing that S1/S2 cleavage reduces the thermal stability of SARS-CoV-2 S, (30) and by preventing this cleavage, there is more S available for incorporation into the pseudoparticles. Interestingly, the S1/S2 site activation appears to also have a role in the immune response against SARS-CoV-2, as it has been shown that SARS-CoV-2 S with a deleted S1/S2 loop can provide a better protective immune response than that with the S1/S2 loop. (42)
The role of furin in activating the S1/S2 site was also investigated. As protease inhibitors commonly employed in cell entry studies, such as dec-RVKR-CMK, can also inhibit other proteases in addition to furin, (29) it is difficult to ascertain the impact of individual proteases. While furin likely processes the SARS-CoV-2 site, our data suggests that other PCs are also involved, since Western blots show poor processing of uncleaved S upon the addition of purified furin and the use of a highly selective furin inhibitor (alpha1-PDX) has a modest impact on infectivity. All in all, as we consider protease-based inhibitors in treating COVID-19, especially those targeting furin, (43,44) it is important to thoroughly evaluate the role of these proteases to be certain that the relevant proteases are targeted.

Methods

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Predicted Structural Modeling

S protein models were built using UCSF Chimera (v.1.14, University of California) through the modeller homology tool of the Modeller extension (v.9.25, University of California) as described. (15) SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 S models were built on the basis of the SARS-CoV S structure (PDB No. 5X58).

Cells, Plasmids, and Reagents

HEK293T (accession no: CRL-11268, ATCC), Vero E6 (accession no: CRL-1586, ATCC), and Calu-3 (accession no: HTB-55) cells were maintained in an incubator at 37 °C and 5% CO2 and cultivated in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (Cellgro) supplemented with 10% Hyclone FetalClone II (GE) and 10 mM HEPES (Cellgro) (DMEMc). Cells were passaged using Dulbecco’s phosphate-buffered saline (DPBS) and Trypsin EDTA (1×; Cellgro). The pCMV-MLV-gagpol murine leukemia virus (MLV) packaging construct, the pTG-luc luciferase reporter, pCAGGS/VSV-G, pCAGGS, and pcDNA/SARS-S plasmids are as previously described. (25) The pcDNA/SARS2-S was a generous gift from the Veesler lab. (21)
Protease inhibitor decanoyl-RVKR-CMK (dec-RVKR-CMK) was purchased from Tocris and resuspended in sterile water to 10 mM. Recombinant furin was purchased from New England Biolabs. Recombinant l-1-tosylamide-2-phenylethyl chloromethyl ketone (TPCK)-treated trypsin was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich. Human alpha-1 PDX (alpha1-PDX) recombinant protein was purchased from ThermoFisher Scientific.
The SARS-CoV-2 S1/S2 fluorogenic peptide with the sequence TNSPRRARSVA, sandwiched between the (7-methoxycoumarin-4-yl)acetyl/2,4-dinitrophenyl (MCA/DNP) FRET pair, was synthesized by Biomatik.

Furin Prediction Calculations

ProP

CoV sequences were input into the ProP 1.0 Server hosted here: http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/ProP/.

PiTou

CoV sequences were analyzed using the PiTou V3 software freely available via request. (34)

Pseudoparticle Production

Pseudotyped viruses were produced from published protocols with minor modifications. (25) Briefly, HEK293T cells were seeded to 30% confluency. Cells were transfected with pTG-luc (600 ng), pCMV-MLV-gagpol (800 ng), and the respective viral envelope protein (600 ng) using polyethylenimine for 48 h. Supernatants were then harvested, centrifuged, clarified, and stored in −80 °C aliquots.
For + dec-RVKR-CMK particles, 7.5 μL of dec-RVKR-CMK was added to cells immediately after transfection and boosted with an additional 7.5 μL 24 h later (final concentration: 75 μM).
For alpha1-PDX particles, the indicated concentrations were added to cells immediately after transfection, as recommended by the manufacturer.

Pseudoparticle Assays

Infection assays were as previously described with minor modifications (25) in triplicate. Briefly, target cells were seeded to confluency. Cells were washed with DPBS, infected with particles, and incubated on a rocker for 1.5 h. Cells were supplemented with DMEMc and incubated for 72 h. Cells were lysed, and luciferase activity was assessed using the Luciferase Assay System and the Glomax 20/20 luminometer (Promega). Infectivity values were analyzed and plotted using Prism 8.

Exogeneous Protease Treatment

One milliliter of pseudoparticles was pelleted using a TLA-55 rotor with an Optima-MAX-E ultracentrifuge (Beckman Coulter) for 2 h at 42 000 rpm and 4 °C. Particles were resuspended in 30 μL of DPBS buffer supplemented with 20 mM HEPES, 0.2 mM CaCl2, and 0.2 mM β-mercaptoethanol (at pH 7.0). Particles were treated with 6 U of recombinant furin for 3 h at 37 °C.

Western Blot Analysis of Pseudoparticles

Three milliliters of pseudoparticles was pelleted and resuspended as described above, but in 20 μL. Sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) loading buffer and DTT were added to the samples, which were then heated at 65 °C for 20 min. Samples were separated on a NuPAGE Bis-Tris gel (Invitrogen) and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (GE). SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV S were detected using a rabbit polyclonal antibody that recognizes the S2 domain (Cat: 40590-T62, Sinobiological) and an AlexaFluor 488 goat anti-rabbit secondary antibody. MLV protein was detected using a mouse monoclonal antibody that recognizes the MLV p30 protein (Cat: ab130757, Abcam) and an AlexaFluor 488 goat anti-mouse secondary antibody. Bands were detected using the ChemiDoc Imaging software (Bio-Rad). S0 and S2 band intensity was calculated using the analysis tools on Biorad Image Lab 6.1 software and normalized to the MLV p30 band intensity.

Fluorogenic Peptide Assay

Peptide assays were as previously described with minor modifications (32) in triplicates. Each reaction was performed in a 100 μL volume consisting of buffer, protease, inhibitor, and SARS-CoV-2 S1/S2 fluorogenic peptide in an opaque 96-well plate. For furin catalyzed reactions, 1 U/well recombinant furin was diluted in buffer consisting of 20 mM HEPES, 0.2 mM CaCl2, and 0.2 mM β-mercaptoethanol. For trypsin catalyzed reactions, 0.8 nM/well TPCK trypsin was diluted in PBS buffer. The alpha1-PDX inhibitor or dec-RVKR-CMK inhibitor was added at a concentration of 2 or 75 μM, respectively. Peptide was added last at a concentration of 50 μM.
Fluorescence emission was measured every minute for 60 min using a SpectraMax fluorometer (Molecular Devices) at 30 °C with an excitation wavelength of 330 nm and an emission wavelength of 390 nm. Vmax was calculated by fitting the linear rise in fluorescence to the equation of a line.

Supporting Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsinfecdis.0c00701.

  • Impact of the dec-RVKR-CMK inhibitor on SARS-CoVpp production, which lacks the furin S1/S2 site (PDF)

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Author Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

  • Corresponding Authors
    • Susan Daniel - Robert Frederick Smith School of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, United StatesOrcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0001-7773-0835 Email: [email protected]
    • Gary R. Whittaker - Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, United States Email: [email protected]
  • Authors
    • Tiffany Tang - Robert Frederick Smith School of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, United StatesOrcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-5130-5248
    • Javier A. Jaimes - Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, United StatesOrcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0001-6706-092X
    • Miya K. Bidon - Robert Frederick Smith School of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, United States
    • Marco R. Straus - Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, United States
  • Notes
    The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Acknowledgments

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This work was funded by the National Institute of Health research grant R01AI35270 and Fast Grant, Mercatus Center. T.T. acknowledges support by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program under Grant No. DGE-1650441 and the Samuel C. Fleming Family Graduate Fellowship. We would especially like to thank Jean Millet for providing important insight on analyzing PiTou values and calculations for BatCoV-HKU9. We would like to thank Hector Aguilar-Carreno for helpful input and thank members of the Daniel and Whittaker groups as well as the Eliezer and Weinstein groups at Weill Cornell for helpful discussions. S.D. acknowledges funding for this project, sponsored by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) Army Research Office and accomplished under Cooperative Agreement Number W911NF-18-2-0152. The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representing the official policies, either expressed or implied, of DARPA or the Army Research Office or the U.S. Government. The U.S. Government is authorized to reproduce and distribute reprints for Government purposes notwithstanding any copyright notation herein.

References

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article references 44 other publications.

  1. 1
    Zhong, N. S., Zheng, B. J., Li, Y. M., Poon, L. L. M., Xie, Z. H., Chan, K. H., Li, P. H., Tan, S. Y., Chang, Q., Xie, J. P., Liu, X. Q., Xu, J., Li, D. X., Yuen, K. Y., Peiris, J. S. M., and Guan, Y. (2003) Epidemiology and cause of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) in Guangdong, People’s Republic of China, in February, 2003. Lancet 362, 13531358,  DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14630-2
  2. 2
    Zaki, A. M., van Boheemen, S., Bestebroer, T. M., Osterhaus, A. D. M. E., and Fouchier, R. A. M. (2012) Isolation of a Novel Coronavirus from a Man with Pneumonia in Saudi Arabia. N. Engl. J. Med. 367, 18141820,  DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1211721
  3. 3
    Zhu, N., Zhang, D., Wang, W., Li, X., Yang, B., Song, J., Zhao, X., Huang, B., Shi, W., Lu, R., Niu, P., Zhan, F., Ma, X., Wang, D., Xu, W., Wu, G., Gao, G. F., and Tan, W. (2020) A novel coronavirus from patients with pneumonia in China, 2019. N. Engl. J. Med. 382, 727733,  DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2001017
  4. 4
    Belouzard, S., Millet, J. K., Licitra, B. N., and Whittaker, G. R. (2012) Mechanisms of coronavirus cell entry mediated by the viral spike protein. Viruses 4, 10111033,  DOI: 10.3390/v4061011
  5. 5
    White, J. M. and Whittaker, G. R. (2016) Fusion of Enveloped Viruses in Endosomes. Traffic 17, 593614,  DOI: 10.1111/tra.12389
  6. 6
    Heald-Sargent, T. and Gallagher, T. (2012) Ready, Set, Fuse! The Coronavirus Spike Protein and Acquisition of Fusion Competence. Viruses 4, 557580,  DOI: 10.3390/v4040557
  7. 7
    Park, J. E., Li, K., Barlan, A., Fehr, A. R., Perlman, S., McCray, P. B., and Gallagher, T. (2016) Proteolytic processing of middle east respiratory syndrome coronavirus spikes expands virus tropism. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 113, 1226212267,  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1608147113
  8. 8
    Shulla, A., Heald-Sargent, T., Subramanya, G., Zhao, J., Perlman, S., and Gallagher, T. (2011) A Transmembrane Serine Protease Is Linked to the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Receptor and Activates Virus Entry Downloaded from. J. Virol. 85, 873882,  DOI: 10.1128/JVI.02062-10
  9. 9
    Matsuyama, S., Nagata, N., Shirato, K., Kawase, M., Takeda, M., and Taguchi, F. (2010) Efficient Activation of the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Spike Protein by the Transmembrane Protease TMPRSS2. J. Virol. 84, 1265812664,  DOI: 10.1128/JVI.01542-10
  10. 10
    Glowacka, I., Bertram, S., Müller, M. A., Allen, P., Soilleux, E., Pfefferle, S., Steffen, I., Tsegaye, T. S., He, Y., Gnirss, K., Niemeyer, D., Schneider, H., Drosten, C., and Pöhlmann, S. (2011) Evidence that TMPRSS2 Activates the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Spike Protein for Membrane Fusion and Reduces Viral Control by the Humoral Immune Response. J. Virol. 85, 41224134,  DOI: 10.1128/JVI.02232-10
  11. 11
    Simmons, G., Gosalia, D. N., Rennekamp, A. J., Reeves, J. D., Diamond, S. L., and Bates, P. (2005) Inhibitors of cathepsin L prevent severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus entry. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 102, 1187611881,  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0505577102
  12. 12
    Millet, J. K. and Whittaker, G. R. (2014) Host cell entry of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus after two-step, furin-mediated activation of the spike protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 111, 1521415219,  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1407087111
  13. 13
    Reinke, L. M., Spiegel, M., Plegge, T., Hartleib, A., Nehlmeier, I., Gierer, S., Hoffmann, M., Hofmann-Winkler, H., Winkler, M., and Pöhlmann, S. (2017) Different residues in the SARS-CoV spike protein determine cleavage and activation by the host cell protease TMPRSS2. PLoS One 12 (6), e0179177  DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179177
  14. 14
    Wrapp, D., Wang, N., Corbett, K. S., Goldsmith, J. A., Hsieh, C.-L., Abiona, O., Graham, B. S., and McLellan, J. S. (2020) Cryo-EM structure of the 2019-nCoV spike in the prefusion conformation. Science 367, 12601263,  DOI: 10.1126/science.abb2507
  15. 15
    Jaimes, J. A., André, N. M., Chappie, J. S., Millet, J. K., and Whittaker, G. R. (2020) Phylogenetic Analysis and Structural Modeling of SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Reveals an Evolutionary Distinct and Proteolytically Sensitive Activation Loop. J. Mol. Biol. 432, 33093325,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2020.04.009
  16. 16
    Henrich, S., Lindberg, I., Bode, W., and Than, M. E. (2005) Proprotein convertase models based on the crystal structures of furin and kexin: Explanation of their specificity. J. Mol. Biol. 345, 211227,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.10.050
  17. 17
    Henrich, S., Cameron, A., Bourenkov, G. P., Kiefersauer, R., Huber, R., Lindberg, I., Bode, W., and Than, M. E. (2003) The crystal structure of the proprotein processing proteinase furin explains its stringent specificity. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 10, 520526,  DOI: 10.1038/nsb941
  18. 18
    Tian, S., Huang, Q., Fang, Y., and Wu, J. (2011) FurinDB: A Database of 20-residue furin cleavage site motifs, substrates and their associated drugs. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 12, 10601065,  DOI: 10.3390/ijms12021060
  19. 19
    Abrami, L., Fivaz, M., Decroly, E., Seidah, N. G., Jean, F., Thomas, G., Leppla, S. H., Buckley, J. T., and Van Der Goot, F. G. (1998) The pore-forming toxin proaerolysin is activated by furin. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 3265632661,  DOI: 10.1074/jbc.273.49.32656
  20. 20
    Hoffmann, M., Kleine-Weber, H., Schroeder, S., Krüger, N., Herrler, T., Erichsen, S., Schiergens, T. S., Herrler, G., Wu, N. H., Nitsche, A., Müller, M. A., Drosten, C., and Pöhlmann, S. (2020) SARS-CoV-2 Cell Entry Depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and Is Blocked by a Clinically Proven Protease Inhibitor. Cell 181, 271280.E8,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.02.052
  21. 21
    Walls, A. C., Park, Y.-J., Tortorici, M. A., Wall, A., McGuire, A. T., and Veesler, D. (2020) Structure, Function, and Antigenicity of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Glycoprotein. Cell 181, 281,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.02.058
  22. 22
    Ou, X., Liu, Y., Lei, X., Li, P., Mi, D., Ren, L., Guo, L., Guo, R., Chen, T., Hu, J., Xiang, Z., Mu, Z., Chen, X., Chen, J., Hu, K., Jin, Q., Wang, J., and Qian, Z. (2020) Characterization of spike glycoprotein of SARS-CoV-2 on virus entry and its immune cross-reactivity with SARS-CoV. Nat. Commun. 11, 1620,  DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-15562-9
  23. 23
    Hoffmann, M., Kleine-Weber, H., and Pöhlmann, S. (2020) A Multibasic Cleavage Site in the Spike Protein of SARS-CoV-2 Is Essential for Infection of Human Lung Cells. Mol. Cell 78, 779784.E5,  DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2020.04.022
  24. 24
    Bestle, D., Heindl, M. R., Limburg, H., Van Lam van, T., Pilgram, O., Moulton, H., Stein, D. A., Hardes, K., Eickmann, M., Dolnik, O., Rohde, C., Klenk, H. D., Garten, W., Steinmetzer, T., and Böttcher-Friebertshäuser, E. (2020) TMPRSS2 and furin are both essential for proteolytic activation of SARS-CoV-2 in human airway cells. Life Sci. alliance 3, e202000786,  DOI: 10.26508/lsa.202000786
  25. 25
    Millet, J. K., Tang, T., Nathan, L., Jaimes, J. A., Hsu, H. L., Daniel, S., and Whittaker, G. R. (2019) Production of pseudotyped particles to study highly pathogenic coronaviruses in a biosafety level 2 setting. J. Visualized Exp. 2019, e59010,  DOI: 10.3791/59010
  26. 26
    Straus, M. R., Tang, T., Lai, A. L., Flegel, A., Bidon, M., Freed, J. H., Daniel, S., and Whittaker, G. R. (2020) Ca 2+ ions promote fusion of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus with host cells and increase infectivity. J. Virol. 94, 426446,  DOI: 10.1128/JVI.00426-20
  27. 27
    Tang, T., Bidon, M., Jaimes, J. A., Whittaker, G. R., and Daniel, S. (2020) Coronavirus membrane fusion mechanism offers a potential target for antiviral development. Antiviral Res. 178, 104792,  DOI: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2020.104792
  28. 28
    Hyseni, I., Molesti, E., Benincasa, L., Piu, P., Casa, E., Temperton, N. J., Manenti, A., and Montomoli, E. (2020) Characterisation of SARS-CoV-2 Lentiviral Pseudotypes and Correlation between Pseudotype-Based Neutralisation Assays and Live Virus-Based Micro Neutralisation Assays. Viruses 12, 1011,  DOI: 10.3390/v12091011
  29. 29
    Matsuyama, S., Shirato, K., Kawase, M., Terada, Y., Kawachi, K., Fukushi, S., and Kamitani, W. (2018) Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Spike Protein Is Not Activated Directly by Cellular Furin during Viral Entry into Target Cells. J. Virol. 92, e00683-18,  DOI: 10.1128/JVI.00683-18
  30. 30
    Wrobel, A. G., Benton, D. J., Xu, P., Roustan, C., Martin, S. R., Rosenthal, P. B., Skehel, J. J., and Gamblin, S. J. (2020) SARS-CoV-2 and bat RaTG13 spike glycoprotein structures inform on virus evolution and furin-cleavage effects. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 27, 763767,  DOI: 10.1038/s41594-020-0468-7
  31. 31
    Jean, F., Stella, K., Thomas, L., Liu, G., Xiang, Y., Reason, A. J., and Thomas, G. (1998) α1-Antitrypsin Portland, a bioengineered serpin highly selective for furin: Application as an antipathogenic agent. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 72937298,  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.95.13.7293
  32. 32
    Jaimes, J. A., Millet, J. K., and Whittaker, G. R. (2020) Proteolytic Cleavage of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein and the Role of the Novel S1/S2 Site. iScience 23, 101212,  DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2020.101212
  33. 33
    Coutard, B., Valle, C., de Lamballerie, X., Canard, B., Seidah, N. G., and Decroly, E. (2020) The spike glycoprotein of the new coronavirus 2019-nCoV contains a furin-like cleavage site absent in CoV of the same clade. Antiviral Res. 176, 104742,  DOI: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2020.104742
  34. 34
    Tian, S., Huajun, W., and Wu, J. (2012) Computational prediction of furin cleavage sites by a hybrid method and understanding mechanism underlying diseases. Sci. Rep. 2, 261,  DOI: 10.1038/srep00261
  35. 35
    Duckert, P., Brunak, S., and Blom, N. (2004) Prediction of proprotein convertase cleavage sites. Protein Eng., Des. Sel. 17, 107112,  DOI: 10.1093/protein/gzh013
  36. 36
    Andersen, K. G., Rambaut, A., Lipkin, W. I., Holmes, E. C., and Garry, R. F. (2020) The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2. Nat. Med. 26, 450452,  DOI: 10.1038/s41591-020-0820-9
  37. 37
    Boni, M. F., Lemey, P., Jiang, X., Lam, T. T. Y., Perry, B. W., Castoe, T. A., Rambaut, A., and Robertson, D. L. (2020) Evolutionary origins of the SARS-CoV-2 sarbecovirus lineage responsible for the COVID-19 pandemic. Nat. Microbiol. 5, 14081417,  DOI: 10.1038/s41564-020-0771-4
  38. 38
    Gallaher, W. R. (2020) A palindromic RNA sequence as a common breakpoint contributor to copy-choice recombination in SARS-COV-2. Arch. Virol. 165, 23412348,  DOI: 10.1007/s00705-020-04750-z
  39. 39
    Lytras, S., MacLean, O. A., and Robertson, D. L. (2020) The Sarbecovirus origin of SARS-CoV-2’s furin cleavage site, https://virological.org/t/the-sarbecovirus-origin-of-sars-cov-2-s-furin-cleavage-site/536.
  40. 40
    Yang, Y., Du, L., Liu, C., Wang, L., Ma, C., Tang, J., Baric, R. S., Jiang, S., and Li, F. (2014) Receptor usage and cell entry of bat coronavirus HKU4 provide insight into bat-to-human transmission of MERS coronavirus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 111, 1251612521,  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1405889111
  41. 41
    Mcgrath, M. E. (1999) The Lysosomal Cysteine Proteases. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 28, 181204,  DOI: 10.1146/annurev.biophys.28.1.181
  42. 42
    Laczkó, D., Hogan, M. J., Toulmin, S. A., Hicks, P., Lederer, K., Gaudette, B. T., Castraño, D., Amanat, F., Muramatsu, H., Oguin, T. H., Ojha, A., Zhang, L., Mu, Z., Parks, R., Manzoni, T. B., Roper, B., Strohmeier, S., Tombácz, I., Arwood, L., Nachbagauer, R., Karikó, K., Greenhouse, J., Pessaint, L., Porto, M., Putman-Taylor, T., Strasbaugh, A., Campbell, T. A., Lin, P. J., Tam, Y. K., Sempowski, G. D., Farzan, M., Choe, H., Saunders, K. O., Haynes, B. F., Andersen, H., Eisenlohr, L. C., Weissman, D., Krammer, F., Bates, P., Allman, D., Locci, M., and Pardi, N. (2020) A Single Immunization with Nucleoside-Modified mRNA Vaccines Elicits Strong Cellular and Humoral Immune Responses against SARS-CoV-2 in Mice. Immunity 53, 724732.E7,  DOI: 10.1016/j.immuni.2020.07.019
  43. 43
    Cheng, Y.-W., Chao, T.-L., Li, C.-L., Chiu, M.-F., Kao, H.-C., Wang, S.-H., Pang, Y.-H., Lin, C.-H., Tsai, Y.-M., Lee, W.-H., Tao, M.-H., Ho, T.-C., Wu, P.-Y., Jang, L.-T., Chen, P.-J., Chang, S.-Y., and Yeh, S.-H. (2020) Furin Inhibitors Block SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Cleavage to Suppress Virus Production and Cytopathic Effects. Cell Rep. 33, 108254,  DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.108254
  44. 44
    Edridge, A. W. D., Kaczorowska, J., Hoste, A. C. R., Bakker, M., Klein, M., Loens, K., Jebbink, M. F., Matser, A., Kinsella, C. M., Rueda, P., Ieven, M., Goossens, H., Prins, M., Sastre, P., Deijs, M., and van der Hoek, L. (2020) Seasonal coronavirus protective immunity is short-lasting. Nat. Med. 26, 1691,  DOI: 10.1038/s41591-020-1083-1

Cited By

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article is cited by 104 publications.

  1. Juliana Debrito Carten, George Khelashvili, Miya K. Bidon, Marco R. Straus, Tiffany Tang, Javier A. Jaimes, Gary R. Whittaker, Harel Weinstein, Susan Daniel. A Mechanistic Understanding of the Modes of Ca2+ Ion Binding to the SARS-CoV-1 Fusion Peptide and Their Role in the Dynamics of Host Membrane Penetration. ACS Infectious Diseases 2024, 10 (2) , 398-411. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsinfecdis.3c00260
  2. Angelo Spinello, Luisa D’Anna, Emmanuelle Bignon, Tom Miclot, Stéphanie Grandemange, Alessio Terenzi, Giampaolo Barone, Florent Barbault, Antonio Monari. Mechanism of the Covalent Inhibition of Human Transmembrane Protease Serine 2 as an Original Antiviral Strategy. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 2023, 127 (28) , 6287-6295. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.3c02910
  3. Celia Maya. Using PyMOL to Understand Why COVID-19 Vaccines Save Lives. Journal of Chemical Education 2023, 100 (3) , 1351-1356. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.2c00779
  4. Paul F. Gillespie, Yanjie Wang, Carl Hofmann, Laura E. Kuczynski, Michael A. Winters, Jennifer L. Teyral, Christopher M. Tubbs, Kelsey Shiflett, Nisarg Patel, Richard R. Rustandi. Understanding the Spike Protein in COVID-19 Vaccine in Recombinant Vesicular Stomatitis Virus (rVSV) Using Automated Capillary Western Blots. ACS Omega 2023, 8 (3) , 3319-3328. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c06937
  5. Essam Eldin A. Osman, Alnawaz Rehemtulla, Nouri Neamati. Why All the Fury over Furin?. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2022, 65 (4) , 2747-2784. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.1c00518
  6. Marco R. Straus, Miya K. Bidon, Tiffany Tang, Javier A. Jaimes, Gary R. Whittaker, Susan Daniel. Inhibitors of L-Type Calcium Channels Show Therapeutic Potential for Treating SARS-CoV-2 Infections by Preventing Virus Entry and Spread. ACS Infectious Diseases 2021, 7 (10) , 2807-2815. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsinfecdis.1c00023
  7. Pengfei Gao, Song Luo, Qihang Wang, Bolin Tang, Jinxin Liu, Enhao Zhang, Lili Duan. Innovative strategies for targeting furin protease and unraveling the dynamics of orthosteric and structural modulating inhibitors. Journal of Molecular Liquids 2024, 414 , 126100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2024.126100
  8. Thomas Grewal, Mai Khanh Linh Nguyen, Christa Buechler. Cholesterol and Cholesterol-Lowering Medications in COVID-19—An Unresolved Matter. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024, 25 (19) , 10489. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms251910489
  9. Hyunjoon Kim, Yeonglim Kang, Semi Kim, Dongbin Park, Seo-Young Heo, Ji-Seung Yoo, Isaac Choi, Monford Paul Abishek N, Jae-Woo Ahn, Jeong-Sun Yang, Nayeon Bak, Kyeong Kyu Kim, Joo-Yeon Lee, Young Ki Choi. The host protease KLK5 primes and activates spike proteins to promote human betacoronavirus replication and lung inflammation. Science Signaling 2024, 17 (850) https://doi.org/10.1126/scisignal.adn3785
  10. Chunyu Yan, Wei Zhou, Yan Zhang, Xuelian Zhou, Qinglong Qiao, Lu Miao, Zhaochao Xu. Super‐Resolution Imaging Reveals the Mechanism of Endosomal Acidification Inhibitors Against SARS‐CoV‐2 Infection. ChemBioChem 2024, 25 (16) https://doi.org/10.1002/cbic.202400404
  11. Feroza Begum, Shreyashi Chandra, Md Hasan Mallik, Jhilik Dey, Prem Prakash Tripathi, Upasana Ray. A SARS-CoV-2 peptide antigen purified from bacteria and displayed in a high-density repetitive manner on a virus-like particle could generate anti-SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies unlike free peptide. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 2024, 398 , 150579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2024.150579
  12. Xia Jiang, Dabing Li, Mazaher Maghsoudloo, Xinghai Zhang, Wenzhe Ma, Junjiang Fu. Targeting furin, a cellular proprotein convertase, for COVID-19 prevention and therapeutics. Drug Discovery Today 2024, 29 (7) , 104026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2024.104026
  13. Galina V. Kochneva, Gleb A. Kudrov, Sergei S. Zainutdinov, Irina S. Shulgina, Andrei V. Shipovalov, Anna V. Zaykovskaya, Mariya B. Borgoyakova, Ekaterina V. Starostina, Sergei A. Bodnev, Galina F. Sivolobova, Antonina A. Grazhdantseva, Daria I. Ivkina, Alexey M. Zadorozhny, Larisa I. Karpenko, Oleg V. P’yankov. Immunogenicity and Protective Efficacy of a Single Intranasal Dose Vectored Vaccine Based on Sendai Virus (Moscow Strain) against SARS-CoV-2 Variant of Concern. Vaccines 2024, 12 (7) , 783. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines12070783
  14. Thomas Grewal, Mai Khanh Linh Nguyen, Christa Buechler. Cholesterol and COVID-19—therapeutic opportunities at the host/virus interface during cell entry. Life Science Alliance 2024, 7 (5) , e202302453. https://doi.org/10.26508/lsa.202302453
  15. Abid Ullah Shah, Maged Gomaa Hemida. The Potential Roles of Host Cell miRNAs in Fine-Tuning Bovine Coronavirus (BCoV) Molecular Pathogenesis, Tissue Tropism, and Immune Regulation. Microorganisms 2024, 12 (5) , 897. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12050897
  16. Priyo Budi Purwono, Vimvara Vacharathit, Suwimon Manopwisedjaroen, Natali Ludowyke, Ampa Suksatu, Arunee Thitithanyanont, . Infection kinetics, syncytia formation, and inflammatory biomarkers as predictive indicators for the pathogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 Variants of Concern in Calu-3 cells. PLOS ONE 2024, 19 (4) , e0301330. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0301330
  17. Pranav Garg, Shawn C.C. Hsueh, Steven S. Plotkin. Testing the feasibility of targeting a conserved region on the S2 domain of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. Biophysical Journal 2024, 123 (8) , 992-1005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2024.03.018
  18. Khaja Moinuddin shaik, Vijay Patibandla, Sukhendu Nandi. Impact of anabolic androgenic steroids on COVID-19. Steroids 2024, 203 , 109361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.steroids.2023.109361
  19. Muhammad Asif Ali, Gustavo Caetano-Anollés. AlphaFold2 Reveals Structural Patterns of Seasonal Haplotype Diversification in SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Variants. Biology 2024, 13 (3) , 134. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13030134
  20. Evgenii V. Matveev, Gennady V. Ponomarev, Marat D. Kazanov, . Genome-wide bioinformatics analysis of human protease capacity for proteolytic cleavage of the SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein. Microbiology Spectrum 2024, 12 (2) https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.03530-23
  21. Rosamaria Pennisi, Davide Gentile, Antonio Rescifina, Edoardo Napoli, Paola Trischitta, Anna Piperno, Maria Teresa Sciortino. An Integrated In Silico and In Vitro Approach for the Identification of Natural Products Active against SARS-CoV-2. Biomolecules 2024, 14 (1) , 43. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom14010043
  22. Ximena A. Olarte-Castillo, Laura Plimpton, Holly McQueary, Yining Sun, Y. Tina Yu, Sarah Cover, Amy N. Richardson, Yuhan Jin, Jennifer K. Grenier, Kevin J. Cummings, Elizabeth Bunting, Maria Diuk-Wasser, David Needle, Krysten Schuler, Michael J. Stanhope, Gary Whittaker, Laura B. Goodman, . Detection and characterization of novel luchacoviruses, genus Alphacoronavirus , in saliva and feces of meso-carnivores in the northeastern United States. Journal of Virology 2023, 97 (11) https://doi.org/10.1128/jvi.00829-23
  23. Maryam Barkhordarian, Arezoo Behbood, Maryam Ranjbar, Zahra Rahimian, Anand Prasad. Overview of the cardio-metabolic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Endocrine 2023, 80 (3) , 477-490. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-023-03337-3
  24. Zhaoxuan Low, Rafidah Lani, Vunjia Tiong, Chitlaa Poh, Sazaly AbuBakar, Pouya Hassandarvish. COVID-19 Therapeutic Potential of Natural Products. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2023, 24 (11) , 9589. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24119589
  25. Feroza Begum, Amit K. Srivastava, Prem Prakash Tripathi, Upasana Ray. A substrate for a cell free in vitro assay system to screen drugs targeting trypsin like protease‐based cleavage of SARS‐CoV‐2 spike glycoprotein and viral entry. Journal of Medical Virology 2023, 95 (5) https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.28796
  26. Abd Al-Aziz A. Abu-Saleh, Arpita Yadav, Raymond A. Poirier. Accelerating the discovery of the beyond rule of five compounds that have high affinities toward SARS-CoV-2 spike RBD. Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics 2023, 41 (6) , 2518-2527. https://doi.org/10.1080/07391102.2022.2036640
  27. Alexander A. Mironov, Maksim A. Savin, Galina V. Beznoussenko. COVID-19 Biogenesis and Intracellular Transport. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2023, 24 (5) , 4523. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24054523
  28. Jessica D. Resnick, Michael A. Beer, Andrew Pekosz. Early Transcriptional Responses of Human Nasal Epithelial Cells to Infection with Influenza A and SARS-CoV-2 Virus Differ and Are Influenced by Physiological Temperature. Pathogens 2023, 12 (3) , 480. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12030480
  29. Vibhu Prasad, Ralf Bartenschlager. A snapshot of protein trafficking in SARS‐CoV‐2 infection. Biology of the Cell 2023, 115 (2) https://doi.org/10.1111/boc.202200073
  30. Siew Pheng Lim. Targeting SARS-CoV-2 and host cell receptor interactions. Antiviral Research 2023, 210 , 105514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.antiviral.2022.105514
  31. Reza Nejat, Maziar Fayaz Torshizi, David J. Najafi. S Protein, ACE2 and Host Cell Proteases in SARS-CoV-2 Cell Entry and Infectivity; Is Soluble ACE2 a Two Blade Sword? A Narrative Review. Vaccines 2023, 11 (2) , 204. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines11020204
  32. Aurélien F. A. Moumbock, Hoai T. T. Tran, Evelyn Lamy, Stefan Günther. BC‐11 is a covalent TMPRSS2 fragment inhibitor that impedes SARS‐CoV‐2 host cell entry. Archiv der Pharmazie 2023, 356 (1) https://doi.org/10.1002/ardp.202200371
  33. Yue Zhang, Li Zhang, Jiajing Wu, Yuanling Yu, Shuo Liu, Tao Li, Qianqian Li, Ruxia Ding, Haixin Wang, Jianhui Nie, Zhimin Cui, Yulin Wang, Weijin Huang, Youchun Wang. A second functional furin site in the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. Emerging Microbes & Infections 2022, 11 (1) , 182-194. https://doi.org/10.1080/22221751.2021.2014284
  34. Eunseok Oh, Weihong Wang, Kyu-Hyung Park, Chanyoon Park, Youbin Cho, JunI Lee, Eunmo Kang, Heonjoong Kang. (+)-Usnic acid and its salts, inhibitors of SARS‐CoV‐2, identified by using in silico methods and in vitro assay. Scientific Reports 2022, 12 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-17506-3
  35. Biswanath Dinda, Manikarna Dinda, Subhajit Dinda, Mithun Chakraborty. Some natural compounds and their analogues having potent anti- SARS-CoV-2 and anti-proteases activities as lead molecules in drug discovery for COVID-19. European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry Reports 2022, 6 , 100079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmcr.2022.100079
  36. Agustín Valenzuela-Fernández, Romina Cabrera-Rodriguez, Laura Ciuffreda, Silvia Perez-Yanes, Judith Estevez-Herrera, Rafaela González-Montelongo, Julia Alcoba-Florez, Rodrigo Trujillo-González, Diego García-Martínez de Artola, Helena Gil-Campesino, Oscar Díez-Gil, José M. Lorenzo-Salazar, Carlos Flores, Jonay Garcia-Luis. Nanomaterials to combat SARS-CoV-2: Strategies to prevent, diagnose and treat COVID-19. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology 2022, 10 https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.1052436
  37. Mehdi Benlarbi, Geneviève Laroche, Corby Fink, Kathy Fu, Rory P. Mulloy, Alexandra Phan, Ardeshir Ariana, Corina M. Stewart, Jérémie Prévost, Guillaume Beaudoin-Bussières, Redaet Daniel, Yuxia Bo, Omar El Ferri, Julien Yockell-Lelièvre, William L. Stanford, Patrick M. Giguère, Samira Mubareka, Andrés Finzi, Gregory A. Dekaban, Jimmy D. Dikeakos, Marceline Côté. Identification and differential usage of a host metalloproteinase entry pathway by SARS-CoV-2 Delta and Omicron. iScience 2022, 25 (11) , 105316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2022.105316
  38. Parvati Iyer, Takahiro Chino, David M. Ojcius. Infection of the oral cavity with SARS-CoV-2 variants: Scope of salivary diagnostics. Frontiers in Oral Health 2022, 3 https://doi.org/10.3389/froh.2022.1001790
  39. Dennis Jiménez, Marbel Torres Arias. Immunouniverse of SARS-CoV-2. Immunological Medicine 2022, 45 (4) , 186-224. https://doi.org/10.1080/25785826.2022.2066251
  40. Geetanjali Negi, Anurag Sharma, Manorama Dey, Garvita Dhanawat, Nagma Parveen. Membrane attachment and fusion of HIV-1, influenza A, and SARS-CoV-2: resolving the mechanisms with biophysical methods. Biophysical Reviews 2022, 14 (5) , 1109-1140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12551-022-00999-7
  41. Shuvomoy Banerjee, Xinyu Wang, Shujuan Du, Caixia Zhu, Yuping Jia, Yuyan Wang, Qiliang Cai. Comprehensive role of SARS‐CoV‐2 spike glycoprotein in regulating host signaling pathway. Journal of Medical Virology 2022, 94 (9) , 4071-4087. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.27820
  42. Bryan J. Fraser, Serap Beldar, Almagul Seitova, Ashley Hutchinson, Dhiraj Mannar, Yanjun Li, Daniel Kwon, Ruiyan Tan, Ryan P. Wilson, Karoline Leopold, Sriram Subramaniam, Levon Halabelian, Cheryl H. Arrowsmith, François Bénard. Structure and activity of human TMPRSS2 protease implicated in SARS-CoV-2 activation. Nature Chemical Biology 2022, 18 (9) , 963-971. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41589-022-01059-7
  43. Anna Ohradanova-Repic, Rostislav Skrabana, Laura Gebetsberger, Gabor Tajti, Peter Baráth, Gabriela Ondrovičová, Romana Praženicová, Nikola Jantova, Patricia Hrasnova, Hannes Stockinger, Vladimir Leksa. Blockade of TMPRSS2-mediated priming of SARS-CoV-2 by lactoferricin. Frontiers in Immunology 2022, 13 https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.958581
  44. Rohita Rangu, Pandora L Wander, Breanne M Barrow, Sakeneh Zraika. Going viral in the islet: mediators of SARS-CoV-2 entry beyond ACE2. Journal of Molecular Endocrinology 2022, 69 (2) , R63-R79. https://doi.org/10.1530/JME-21-0282
  45. Mehdi Oubahmane, Ismail Hdoufane, Imane Bjij, Nouhaila Ait Lahcen, Didier Villemin, Rachid Daoud, Achraf El Allali, Driss Cherqaoui. Host Cell Proteases Mediating SARS-CoV-2 Entry: An Overview. Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry 2022, 22 (21) , 1776-1792. https://doi.org/10.2174/1568026622666220726122339
  46. Kanjana Srisutthisamphan, Janya Saenboonrueng, Asawin Wanitchang, Ratchanont Viriyakitkosol, Anan Jongkaewwattana. Cross-Neutralization of SARS-CoV-2-Specific Antibodies in Convalescent and Immunized Human Sera against the Bat and Pangolin Coronaviruses. Viruses 2022, 14 (8) , 1793. https://doi.org/10.3390/v14081793
  47. Ariane Brault, Raphael Néré, Jérôme Prados, Simon Boudreault, Martin Bisaillon, Patrick Marchand, Patrick Couture, Simon Labbé. Cellulosic copper nanoparticles and a hydrogen peroxide–based disinfectant trigger rapid inactivation of pseudoviral particles expressing the Spike protein of SARS-CoV-2, SARS-CoV, and MERS-CoV. Metallomics 2022, 14 (7) https://doi.org/10.1093/mtomcs/mfac044
  48. Conrad En-Zuo Chan, Ching-Ging Ng, Angeline Pei-Chew Lim, Shirley Lay-Kheng Seah, De-Hoe Chye, Steven Ka-Khuen Wong, Jie-Hui Lim, Vanessa Zi-Yun Lim, Soak-Kuan Lai, Pui-San Wong, Kok-Mun Leong, Yi-Chun Liu, Richard J. Sugrue, Boon-Huan Tan, . The Cellular Characterization of SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein in Virus-Infected Cells Using the Receptor Binding Domain Binding Specific Human Monoclonal Antibodies. Journal of Virology 2022, 96 (13) https://doi.org/10.1128/jvi.00455-22
  49. Muriel Lavie, Jean Dubuisson, Sandrine Belouzard, . SARS-CoV-2 Spike Furin Cleavage Site and S2′ Basic Residues Modulate the Entry Process in a Host Cell-Dependent Manner. Journal of Virology 2022, 96 (13) https://doi.org/10.1128/jvi.00474-22
  50. Chuyuan Zhang, Xinjie Meng, Hanjun Zhao. Comparison of Cell Fusions Induced by Influenza Virus and SARS-CoV-2. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2022, 23 (13) , 7365. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23137365
  51. Jon Bohlin, Christian M. Page, Yunsung Lee, John H.-O. Pettersson, Astanand Jugessur, Per Magnus, Siri E. Håberg, . Age and sex effects on DNA methylation sites linked to genes implicated in severe COVID-19 and SARS-CoV-2 host cell entry. PLOS ONE 2022, 17 (6) , e0269105. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0269105
  52. Di Chen, Yan G. Zhao, Hong Zhang. Endomembrane remodeling in SARS-CoV-2 infection. Cell Insight 2022, 1 (3) , 100031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cellin.2022.100031
  53. Maja C. Mezger, Carina Conzelmann, Tatjana Weil, Pascal von Maltitz, Dan P. J. Albers, Jan Münch, Thomas Stamminger, Eva-Maria Schilling. Inhibitors of Activin Receptor-like Kinase 5 Interfere with SARS-CoV-2 S-Protein Processing and Spike-Mediated Cell Fusion via Attenuation of Furin Expression. Viruses 2022, 14 (6) , 1308. https://doi.org/10.3390/v14061308
  54. Tirosh Shapira, I. Abrrey Monreal, Sébastien P. Dion, David W. Buchholz, Brian Imbiakha, Andrea D. Olmstead, Mason Jager, Antoine Désilets, Guang Gao, Mathias Martins, Thierry Vandal, Connor A. H. Thompson, Aaleigha Chin, William D. Rees, Theodore Steiner, Ivan Robert Nabi, Eric Marsault, Julie Sahler, Diego G. Diel, Gerlinde R. Van de Walle, Avery August, Gary R. Whittaker, Pierre-Luc Boudreault, Richard Leduc, Hector C. Aguilar, François Jean. A TMPRSS2 inhibitor acts as a pan-SARS-CoV-2 prophylactic and therapeutic. Nature 2022, 605 (7909) , 340-348. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04661-w
  55. Pooja Rani, Bhupinder Kapoor, Monica Gulati, Atanas G. Atanasov, Qushmua Alzahrani, Reena Gupta. Antimicrobial peptides: A plausible approach for COVID-19 treatment. Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery 2022, 17 (5) , 473-487. https://doi.org/10.1080/17460441.2022.2050693
  56. Jana Koch, Zina M. Uckeley, Pierre-Yves Lozach. Le virus SARS-CoV-2 utilise différentes voies d’entrée pour infecter les cellules. médecine/sciences 2022, 38 (5) , 419-422. https://doi.org/10.1051/medsci/2022048
  57. Kyle A. Wolf, Jason C. Kwan, Jeremy P. Kamil, . Structural Dynamics and Molecular Evolution of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein. mBio 2022, 13 (2) https://doi.org/10.1128/mbio.02030-21
  58. Kailu Yang, Chuchu Wang, K. Ian White, Richard A. Pfuetzner, Luis Esquivies, Axel T. Brunger. Structural conservation among variants of the SARS-CoV-2 spike postfusion bundle. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2022, 119 (16) https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2119467119
  59. Gary Thomas, Frédéric Couture, Anna Kwiatkowska. The Path to Therapeutic Furin Inhibitors: From Yeast Pheromones to SARS-CoV-2. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2022, 23 (7) , 3435. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23073435
  60. Antonella Bugatti, Federica Filippini, Marta Bardelli, Alberto Zani, Paola Chiodelli, Serena Messali, Arnaldo Caruso, Francesca Caccuri. SARS-CoV-2 Infects Human ACE2-Negative Endothelial Cells through an αvβ3 Integrin-Mediated Endocytosis Even in the Presence of Vaccine-Elicited Neutralizing Antibodies. Viruses 2022, 14 (4) , 705. https://doi.org/10.3390/v14040705
  61. Shouwen Du, Wang Xu, Yuhang Wang, Letian Li, Pengfei Hao, Mingyao Tian, Maopeng Wang, Tiyuan Li, Shipin Wu, Quan Liu, Jieying Bai, Xiaoyun Qu, Ningyi Jin, Boping Zhou, Ming Liao, Chang Li, . The “LLQY” Motif on SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Affects S Incorporation into Virus Particles. Journal of Virology 2022, 96 (6) https://doi.org/10.1128/jvi.01897-21
  62. Edward R Kastenhuber, Marisa Mercadante, Benjamin Nilsson-Payant, Jared L Johnson, Javier A Jaimes, Frauke Muecksch, Yiska Weisblum, Yaron Bram, Vasuretha Chandar, Gary R Whittaker, Benjamin R tenOever, Robert E Schwartz, Lewis Cantley. Coagulation factors directly cleave SARS-CoV-2 spike and enhance viral entry. eLife 2022, 11 https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.77444
  63. Alba Escalera, Ana S. Gonzalez-Reiche, Sadaf Aslam, Ignacio Mena, Manon Laporte, Rebecca L. Pearl, Andrea Fossati, Raveen Rathnasinghe, Hala Alshammary, Adriana van de Guchte, Keith Farrugia, Yiren Qin, Mehdi Bouhaddou, Thomas Kehrer, Lorena Zuliani-Alvarez, David A. Meekins, Velmurugan Balaraman, Chester McDowell, Jürgen A. Richt, Goran Bajic, Emilia Mia Sordillo, Marion Dejosez, Thomas P. Zwaka, Nevan J. Krogan, Viviana Simon, Randy A. Albrecht, Harm van Bakel, Adolfo García-Sastre, Teresa Aydillo. Mutations in SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern link to increased spike cleavage and virus transmission. Cell Host & Microbe 2022, 30 (3) , 373-387.e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2022.01.006
  64. Arjun N. Sweet, Nicole M. André, Alison E. Stout, Beth N. Licitra, Gary R. Whittaker. Clinical and Molecular Relationships between COVID-19 and Feline Infectious Peritonitis (FIP). Viruses 2022, 14 (3) , 481. https://doi.org/10.3390/v14030481
  65. Felipe Gomes Naveca, Valdinete Nascimento, Victor Souza, André de Lima Corado, Fernanda Nascimento, George Silva, Matilde Contreras Mejía, Maria Júlia Brandão, Ágatha Costa, Débora Duarte, Karina Pessoa, Michele Jesus, Luciana Gonçalves, Cristiano Fernandes, Tirza Mattos, Ligia Abdalla, João Hugo Santos, Alex Martins, Fabiola Mendonça Chui, Fernando Fonseca Val, Gisely Cardoso de Melo, Mariana Simão Xavier, Vanderson de Souza Sampaio, Maria Paula Mourão, Marcus Vinícius Lacerda, Érika Lopes Rocha Batista, Alessandro Leonardo Álvares Magalhães, Nathânia Dábilla, Lucas Carlos Gomes Pereira, Fernando Vinhal, Fabio Miyajima, Fernando Braga Stehling Dias, Eduardo Ruback dos Santos, Danilo Coêlho, Matheus Ferraz, Roberto Lins, Gabriel Luz Wallau, Edson Delatorre, Tiago Gräf, Marilda Mendonça Siqueira, Paola Cristina Resende, Gonzalo Bello, . Spread of Gamma (P.1) Sub-Lineages Carrying Spike Mutations Close to the Furin Cleavage Site and Deletions in the N-Terminal Domain Drives Ongoing Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in Amazonas, Brazil. Microbiology Spectrum 2022, 10 (1) https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.02366-21
  66. Hanora A. Van Ert, Dana W. Bohan, Kai Rogers, Mohammad Fili, Roberth A. Rojas Chávez, Enya Qing, Changze Han, Spencer Dempewolf, Guiping Hu, Nathan Schwery, Kristina Sevcik, Natalie Ruggio, Devlin Boyt, Michael A. Pentella, Tom Gallagher, J. Brooks Jackson, Anna E. Merrill, C. Michael Knudson, Grant D. Brown, Wendy Maury, Hillel Haim, . Limited Variation between SARS-CoV-2-Infected Individuals in Domain Specificity and Relative Potency of the Antibody Response against the Spike Glycoprotein. Microbiology Spectrum 2022, 10 (1) https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.02676-21
  67. Pavan Vedula, Hsin-Yao Tang, David W. Speicher, Anna Kashina, . Protein Posttranslational Signatures Identified in COVID-19 Patient Plasma. Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology 2022, 10 https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2022.807149
  68. Lukas Wettstein, Frank Kirchhoff, Jan Münch. The Transmembrane Protease TMPRSS2 as a Therapeutic Target for COVID-19 Treatment. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2022, 23 (3) , 1351. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23031351
  69. Nozethu Mjokane, Maphori Maliehe, Olufemi S. Folorunso, Adepemi O. Ogundeji, Onele M. N. Gcilitshana, Jacobus Albertyn, Carolina H. Pohl, Olihile M. Sebolai. Cryptococcal Protease(s) and the Activation of SARS-CoV-2 Spike (S) Protein. Cells 2022, 11 (3) , 437. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11030437
  70. Yongbiao Huang, Sheng Chen, Lingyan Xiao, Wan Qin, Long Li, Yali Wang, Li Ma, Xianglin Yuan. A Novel Prognostic Signature for Survival Prediction and Immune Implication Based on SARS-CoV-2–Related Genes in Kidney Renal Clear Cell Carcinoma. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology 2022, 9 https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2021.744659
  71. Massimo Pizzato, Chiara Baraldi, Giulia Boscato Sopetto, Davide Finozzi, Carmelo Gentile, Michele Domenico Gentile, Roberta Marconi, Dalila Paladino, Alberto Raoss, Ilary Riedmiller, Hamza Ur Rehman, Annalisa Santini, Valerio Succetti, Lorenzo Volpini. SARS-CoV-2 and the Host Cell: A Tale of Interactions. Frontiers in Virology 2022, 1 https://doi.org/10.3389/fviro.2021.815388
  72. Nongluk Sriwilaijaroen, Yasuo Suzuki. Roles of Sialyl Glycans in HCoV-OC43, HCoV-HKU1, MERS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 Infections. 2022, 243-271. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-2635-1_17
  73. Hanjun Zhao, Kwok-Yung Yuen. Broad-spectrum Respiratory Virus Entry Inhibitors. 2022, 137-153. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-8702-0_9
  74. Juan Mosqueda, Diego Josimar Hernández-Silva, Andrea Romero-Maldonado, Susana Mejia-López, Miguel Angel Mercado-Uriostegui. Innovative recombinant protein-based vaccines against SARS-CoV-2. 2022, 193-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-90248-9.00016-4
  75. Makoto Takeda. Proteolytic activation of SARS‐CoV‐2 spike protein. Microbiology and Immunology 2022, 66 (1) , 15-23. https://doi.org/10.1111/1348-0421.12945
  76. Seyed Nooreddin Faraji, Mohammad Javad Raee, Seyed Mohamad Ali Hashemi, Gholamreza Daryabor, Reza Tabrizi, Fateme Sadat Dashti, Emad Behboudi, Kamran Heidarnejad, Peyman Nowrouzi-Sohrabi, Gholamreza Hatam. Human interaction targets of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein: A systematic review. European Journal of Inflammation 2022, 20 , 1721727X2210953. https://doi.org/10.1177/1721727X221095382
  77. Eunhye Yoon, Dahyun Kim, Hyeeun Jeon, Yejin Kwon, Yejin Jang, Sulhee Kim, Kwang Yeon Hwang. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 variants–Possibility of universal vaccine design: A review. Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal 2022, 20 , 3533-3544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csbj.2022.06.043
  78. Bailey Lubinski, Maureen H.V. Fernandes, Laura Frazier, Tiffany Tang, Susan Daniel, Diego G. Diel, Javier A. Jaimes, Gary R. Whittaker. Functional evaluation of the P681H mutation on the proteolytic activation of the SARS-CoV-2 variant B.1.1.7 (Alpha) spike. iScience 2022, 25 (1) , 103589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2021.103589
  79. Kyle Ernzen, Aaron J. Trask, Mark E. Peeples, Vidu Garg, Ming-Tao Zhao. Human Stem Cell Models of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in the Cardiovascular System. Stem Cell Reviews and Reports 2021, 17 (6) , 2107-2119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12015-021-10229-4
  80. Meghan E. Rebuli, Stephanie A. Brocke, Ilona Jaspers. Impact of inhaled pollutants on response to viral infection in controlled exposures. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology 2021, 148 (6) , 1420-1429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2021.07.002
  81. Suman Pokhrel, Benjamin R. Kraemer, Scott Burkholz, Daria Mochly-Rosen. Natural variants in SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein pinpoint structural and functional hotspots with implications for prophylaxis and therapeutic strategies. Scientific Reports 2021, 11 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-92641-x
  82. Sabari Nath Neerukonda, Russell Vassell, Sabrina Lusvarghi, Richard Wang, Fernando Echegaray, Lisa Bentley, Ann E. Eakin, Karl J. Erlandson, Leah C. Katzelnick, Carol D. Weiss, Wei Wang. SARS-CoV-2 Delta Variant Displays Moderate Resistance to Neutralizing Antibodies and Spike Protein Properties of Higher Soluble ACE2 Sensitivity, Enhanced Cleavage and Fusogenic Activity. Viruses 2021, 13 (12) , 2485. https://doi.org/10.3390/v13122485
  83. Grigore Mihaescu, Mariana Carmen Chifiriuc, Corneliu Ovidiu Vrancianu, Marian Constantin, Roxana Filip, Mihaela Roxana Popescu, Liliana Burlibasa, Anca Cecilia Nicoara, Alexandra Bolocan, Ciprian Iliescu, Gratiela Gradisteanu Pircalabioru. Antiviral Immunity in SARS-CoV-2 Infection: From Protective to Deleterious Responses. Microorganisms 2021, 9 (12) , 2578. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9122578
  84. Arpan Acharya, Kabita Pandey, Michellie Thurman, Elizabeth Klug, Jay Trivedi, Kalicharan Sharma, Christian L. Lorson, Kamal Singh, Siddappa N. Byrareddy, . Discovery and Evaluation of Entry Inhibitors for SARS-CoV-2 and Its Emerging Variants. Journal of Virology 2021, 95 (24) https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.01437-21
  85. Gary R Whittaker. SARS-CoV-2 spike and its adaptable furin cleavage site. The Lancet Microbe 2021, 2 (10) , e488-e489. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2666-5247(21)00174-9
  86. Christian S Stevens, Kasopefoluwa Y Oguntuyo, Benhur Lee. Proteases and variants: context matters for SARS-CoV-2 entry assays. Current Opinion in Virology 2021, 50 , 49-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coviro.2021.07.004
  87. Ruchao Peng, Lian-Ao Wu, Qingling Wang, Jianxun Qi, George Fu Gao. Cell entry by SARS-CoV-2. Trends in Biochemical Sciences 2021, 46 (10) , 848-860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibs.2021.06.001
  88. Jim Baggen, Els Vanstreels, Sander Jansen, Dirk Daelemans. Cellular host factors for SARS-CoV-2 infection. Nature Microbiology 2021, 6 (10) , 1219-1232. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-021-00958-0
  89. Alison E Stout, Qinghua Guo, Jean K Millet, Gary R Whittaker. Viral and Host Attributes Underlying the Origins of Zoonotic Coronaviruses in Bats. Comparative Medicine 2021, 71 (5) , 442-450. https://doi.org/10.30802/AALAS-CM-21-000027
  90. Shibi Muralidar, Gayathri Gopal, Senthil Visaga Ambi. Targeting the viral‐entry facilitators of SARS‐CoV‐2 as a therapeutic strategy in COVID‐19. Journal of Medical Virology 2021, 93 (9) , 5260-5276. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.27019
  91. Suresh Kumar Kali, Peter Dröge, Priyatharshini Murugan. Interferon β, an enhancer of the innate immune response against SARS-CoV-2 infection. Microbial Pathogenesis 2021, 158 , 105105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2021.105105
  92. Natalia Rego, Cecilia Salazar, Mercedes Paz, Alicia Costábile, Alvaro Fajardo, Ignacio Ferrés, Paula Perbolianachis, Tamara Fernández-Calero, Veronica Noya, Matias R. Machado, Mariana Brandes, Rodrigo Arce, Mailen Arleo, Tania Possi, Natalia Reyes, María Noel Bentancor, Andrés Lizasoain, Viviana Bortagaray, Ana Moller, Odhille Chappos, Nicolas Nin, Javier Hurtado, Melissa Duquía, Maria Belén González, Luciana Griffero, Mauricio Méndez, Maria Pía Techera, Juan Zanetti, Emiliano Pereira, Bernardina Rivera, Matías Maidana, Martina Alonso, Pablo Smircich, Ighor Arantes, Daiana Mir, Cecilia Alonso, Julio Medina, Henry Albornoz, Rodney Colina, Gonzalo Bello, Pilar Moreno, Gonzalo Moratorio, Gregorio Iraola, Lucía Spangenberg. Emergence and Spread of a B.1.1.28-Derived P.6 Lineage with Q675H and Q677H Spike Mutations in Uruguay. Viruses 2021, 13 (9) , 1801. https://doi.org/10.3390/v13091801
  93. Jana Koch, Zina M Uckeley, Patricio Doldan, Megan Stanifer, Steeve Boulant, Pierre‐Yves Lozach. TMPRSS2 expression dictates the entry route used by SARS‐CoV‐2 to infect host cells. The EMBO Journal 2021, 40 (16) https://doi.org/10.15252/embj.2021107821
  94. Rossana Segreto, Yuri Deigin, Kevin McCairn, Alejandro Sousa, Dan Sirotkin, Karl Sirotkin, Jonathan J. Couey, Adrian Jones, Daoyu Zhang. Should we discount the laboratory origin of COVID-19?. Environmental Chemistry Letters 2021, 19 (4) , 2743-2757. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-021-01211-0
  95. Lakhveer Singh, Sakshi Bajaj, Manoj Gadewar, Nitin Verma, Mohd Nazam Ansari, Abdulaziz S. Saeedan, Gaurav Kaithwas, Manjari Singh. Modulation of Host Immune Response Is an Alternative Strategy to Combat SARS-CoV-2 Pathogenesis. Frontiers in Immunology 2021, 12 https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021.660632
  96. Annamaria Vianello, Serena Del Turco, Serena Babboni, Beatrice Silvestrini, Rosetta Ragusa, Chiara Caselli, Luca Melani, Luca Fanucci, Giuseppina Basta. The Fight against COVID-19 on the Multi-Protease Front and Surroundings: Could an Early Therapeutic Approach with Repositioning Drugs Prevent the Disease Severity?. Biomedicines 2021, 9 (7) , 710. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9070710
  97. Nabil G. Seidah, Antonella Pasquato, Ursula Andréo. How Do Enveloped Viruses Exploit the Secretory Proprotein Convertases to Regulate Infectivity and Spread?. Viruses 2021, 13 (7) , 1229. https://doi.org/10.3390/v13071229
  98. Wei Zou, Min Xiong, Siyuan Hao, Elizabeth Yan Zhang, Nathalie Baumlin, Michael D. Kim, Matthias Salathe, Ziying Yan, Jianming Qiu, . The SARS-CoV-2 Transcriptome and the Dynamics of the S Gene Furin Cleavage Site in Primary Human Airway Epithelia. mBio 2021, 12 (3) https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.01006-21
  99. James Michael Brimson, Mani Iyer Prasanth, Dicson Sheeja Malar, Sirikalaya Brimson, Premrutai Thitilertdecha, Tewin Tencomnao. Drugs that offer the potential to reduce hospitalization and mortality from SARS-CoV-2 infection: The possible role of the sigma-1 receptor and autophagy. Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Targets 2021, 25 (6) , 435-449. https://doi.org/10.1080/14728222.2021.1952987
  100. Gary R Whittaker, Susan Daniel, Jean K Millet. Coronavirus entry: how we arrived at SARS-CoV-2. Current Opinion in Virology 2021, 47 , 113-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coviro.2021.02.006
Load all citations
Open PDF

ACS Infectious Diseases

Cite this: ACS Infect. Dis. 2021, 7, 2, 264–272
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsinfecdis.0c00701
Published January 12, 2021

Copyright © 2021 American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under these Terms of Use.

Article Views

20k

Altmetric

-

Citations

Learn about these metrics

Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.

  • Abstract

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. Predicted structural model of the SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 S proteins. (Inset) Magnification of the S1/S2 site with conserved R and S residues (red ribbon) and the unique four amino acid insertion P–R–R–A for SARS-CoV-2 (blue ribbon) is shown. The P’s denote the position of that amino acid from the S1/S2 cleavage site, with P1–P5 referring to the amino acids before the cleavage site and P1′ referring to the amino acids after the cleavage site.

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. Characterization of an MLVpp system. (A, B) MLVpp infectivity in Vero E6 and Calu-3 cells. Cells were infected with MLVpps exhibiting the SARS-CoV-2 S, SARS-CoV S, VSV G, or no envelope protein and assessed for luciferase activity. Error bars represent the standard error measurements of three biological replicates (n = 3). (C) Western blot analysis of SARS-CoV-2pp and SARS-CoVpp S content. S was detected using a rabbit antibody against the SARS-CoV-2 S2 region and cross reacts against the SARS-CoV S. MLV content was detected using a mouse antibody against MLV p30. The image was cropped from a singular Western blot.

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. Impact of dec-RVKR-CMK on MLVpps. + dec-RVKR-CMK refers to MLVpp produced in HEK293T treated with 75 μM dec-RVKR-CMK at the time of transfection. + furin refers to particles treated with 6 U of recombinant furin for 3 h at 37 °C. (A, B) ± dec-RVKR-CMK and ± furin SARS-CoV-2pp were used to infect Vero E6 and Calu-3 cells. Infectivity was normalized to the – dec-RVKR-CMK, – furin condition in each cell line. Note the change in y-axis scale between A and B. Error bars represent the standard error measurements of three biological replicates (n = 3). Statistical analysis was performed using an unpaired student’s t test. Not shown: there is a ns difference between the −dec-RVKR-CMK, ± furin conditions (black bars). *, P ≤ 0.05; **, P ≤ 0.01; ns, nonsignificant, P > 0.05. (C) Western blot analysis of SARS-CoV-2pp produced in ± dec-RVKR-CMK and treated with ± furin for S protein content to complement the infection conditions. S was detected using a rabbit antibody against the SARS-CoV-2 S2 region. MLV content was detected using a mouse antibody against MLV p30. Band intensities were normalized to the MLV p30 band intensity.

    Figure 4

    Figure 4. Use of specific furin (alpha1-PDX) and broad furin (dec-RVKR-CMK) inhibitors to investigate furin specificity. (A) Infectivity of particles produced in the presence of broad (dec-RVKR-CMK) and specific (alpha1-PDX) furin inhibitors. The inhibitor was applied at the indicated concentration to producer HEK293T cells. Particles were used to infect Vero E6 cells. Infectivity was normalized to the – condition. Error bars represent the standard error measurements of four biological replicates (n = 4). Statistical analysis was performed using an unpaired student’s t test compared to the – condition. *, P ≤ 0.05; ns, nonsignificant, P > 0.05. (B) Proteolytic cleavage assay of SARS-CoV-2 S1/S2 peptides to confirm alpha1-PDX and dec-RVKR-CMK inhibition specificity. Alpha1-PDX (2 μM), dec-RVKR-CMK (75 μM), or no inhibitor was incubated with either furin or trypsin recombinant protease and a fluorogenic peptide mimicking the SARS-CoV-2 S1/S2 site (TNSPRRARSVA). Results represent averages, and error bars represent the standard error measurement of three biological replicates (n = 3).

    Figure 5

    Figure 5. Furin cleavage score analysis of CoV S1/S2 cleavage sites. CoV S sequences were analyzed using the ProP (35) 1.0 and PiTou (34) 3.0 furin prediction algorithm. Bold scores indicate the S1/S2 sequence is predicted to be cleaved by furin. Red box highlights SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 scores for reader’s convenience. Purple lines denote the position of the predicted S1/S2 cleavage site. Basic arginine (R) and lysine (K) residues are highlighted in blue. *For Bat-RmYN02, the sequence number was determined from the S alignment with SARS-CoV-2 S using Geneious. Sequences corresponding to the S1/S2 region of HCoV-HKU1 (AAT98580.1), SARS-CoV (AAT74874.1), SARS-CoV-2 (QHD43416.1), Bat-CoVRaTG13 (QHR63300.2), Bat-SL-CoVZC45 (AVP78031.1), Bat-SL-CoVZXC21 (AVP78042.1), MERS-CoV (AFS88936.1), BatCoV-HKU4 (YP_001039953.1), BatCoV-HKU5 (YP_001039962.1), BatCoV-PML (KC869678), Bat-CoV-HKU9 (YP_001039971), and Influenza A/Chicken/Hong Kong/822.1/01/H5N1 (AF509026.2) were obtained from GenBank. The sequence corresponding to the S1/S2 region of RmYN02 (EPI_ISL_412977) was obtained from GISAID.

  • References


    This article references 44 other publications.

    1. 1
      Zhong, N. S., Zheng, B. J., Li, Y. M., Poon, L. L. M., Xie, Z. H., Chan, K. H., Li, P. H., Tan, S. Y., Chang, Q., Xie, J. P., Liu, X. Q., Xu, J., Li, D. X., Yuen, K. Y., Peiris, J. S. M., and Guan, Y. (2003) Epidemiology and cause of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) in Guangdong, People’s Republic of China, in February, 2003. Lancet 362, 13531358,  DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14630-2
    2. 2
      Zaki, A. M., van Boheemen, S., Bestebroer, T. M., Osterhaus, A. D. M. E., and Fouchier, R. A. M. (2012) Isolation of a Novel Coronavirus from a Man with Pneumonia in Saudi Arabia. N. Engl. J. Med. 367, 18141820,  DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1211721
    3. 3
      Zhu, N., Zhang, D., Wang, W., Li, X., Yang, B., Song, J., Zhao, X., Huang, B., Shi, W., Lu, R., Niu, P., Zhan, F., Ma, X., Wang, D., Xu, W., Wu, G., Gao, G. F., and Tan, W. (2020) A novel coronavirus from patients with pneumonia in China, 2019. N. Engl. J. Med. 382, 727733,  DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2001017
    4. 4
      Belouzard, S., Millet, J. K., Licitra, B. N., and Whittaker, G. R. (2012) Mechanisms of coronavirus cell entry mediated by the viral spike protein. Viruses 4, 10111033,  DOI: 10.3390/v4061011
    5. 5
      White, J. M. and Whittaker, G. R. (2016) Fusion of Enveloped Viruses in Endosomes. Traffic 17, 593614,  DOI: 10.1111/tra.12389
    6. 6
      Heald-Sargent, T. and Gallagher, T. (2012) Ready, Set, Fuse! The Coronavirus Spike Protein and Acquisition of Fusion Competence. Viruses 4, 557580,  DOI: 10.3390/v4040557
    7. 7
      Park, J. E., Li, K., Barlan, A., Fehr, A. R., Perlman, S., McCray, P. B., and Gallagher, T. (2016) Proteolytic processing of middle east respiratory syndrome coronavirus spikes expands virus tropism. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 113, 1226212267,  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1608147113
    8. 8
      Shulla, A., Heald-Sargent, T., Subramanya, G., Zhao, J., Perlman, S., and Gallagher, T. (2011) A Transmembrane Serine Protease Is Linked to the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Receptor and Activates Virus Entry Downloaded from. J. Virol. 85, 873882,  DOI: 10.1128/JVI.02062-10
    9. 9
      Matsuyama, S., Nagata, N., Shirato, K., Kawase, M., Takeda, M., and Taguchi, F. (2010) Efficient Activation of the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Spike Protein by the Transmembrane Protease TMPRSS2. J. Virol. 84, 1265812664,  DOI: 10.1128/JVI.01542-10
    10. 10
      Glowacka, I., Bertram, S., Müller, M. A., Allen, P., Soilleux, E., Pfefferle, S., Steffen, I., Tsegaye, T. S., He, Y., Gnirss, K., Niemeyer, D., Schneider, H., Drosten, C., and Pöhlmann, S. (2011) Evidence that TMPRSS2 Activates the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Spike Protein for Membrane Fusion and Reduces Viral Control by the Humoral Immune Response. J. Virol. 85, 41224134,  DOI: 10.1128/JVI.02232-10
    11. 11
      Simmons, G., Gosalia, D. N., Rennekamp, A. J., Reeves, J. D., Diamond, S. L., and Bates, P. (2005) Inhibitors of cathepsin L prevent severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus entry. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 102, 1187611881,  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0505577102
    12. 12
      Millet, J. K. and Whittaker, G. R. (2014) Host cell entry of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus after two-step, furin-mediated activation of the spike protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 111, 1521415219,  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1407087111
    13. 13
      Reinke, L. M., Spiegel, M., Plegge, T., Hartleib, A., Nehlmeier, I., Gierer, S., Hoffmann, M., Hofmann-Winkler, H., Winkler, M., and Pöhlmann, S. (2017) Different residues in the SARS-CoV spike protein determine cleavage and activation by the host cell protease TMPRSS2. PLoS One 12 (6), e0179177  DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179177
    14. 14
      Wrapp, D., Wang, N., Corbett, K. S., Goldsmith, J. A., Hsieh, C.-L., Abiona, O., Graham, B. S., and McLellan, J. S. (2020) Cryo-EM structure of the 2019-nCoV spike in the prefusion conformation. Science 367, 12601263,  DOI: 10.1126/science.abb2507
    15. 15
      Jaimes, J. A., André, N. M., Chappie, J. S., Millet, J. K., and Whittaker, G. R. (2020) Phylogenetic Analysis and Structural Modeling of SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Reveals an Evolutionary Distinct and Proteolytically Sensitive Activation Loop. J. Mol. Biol. 432, 33093325,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2020.04.009
    16. 16
      Henrich, S., Lindberg, I., Bode, W., and Than, M. E. (2005) Proprotein convertase models based on the crystal structures of furin and kexin: Explanation of their specificity. J. Mol. Biol. 345, 211227,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.10.050
    17. 17
      Henrich, S., Cameron, A., Bourenkov, G. P., Kiefersauer, R., Huber, R., Lindberg, I., Bode, W., and Than, M. E. (2003) The crystal structure of the proprotein processing proteinase furin explains its stringent specificity. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 10, 520526,  DOI: 10.1038/nsb941
    18. 18
      Tian, S., Huang, Q., Fang, Y., and Wu, J. (2011) FurinDB: A Database of 20-residue furin cleavage site motifs, substrates and their associated drugs. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 12, 10601065,  DOI: 10.3390/ijms12021060
    19. 19
      Abrami, L., Fivaz, M., Decroly, E., Seidah, N. G., Jean, F., Thomas, G., Leppla, S. H., Buckley, J. T., and Van Der Goot, F. G. (1998) The pore-forming toxin proaerolysin is activated by furin. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 3265632661,  DOI: 10.1074/jbc.273.49.32656
    20. 20
      Hoffmann, M., Kleine-Weber, H., Schroeder, S., Krüger, N., Herrler, T., Erichsen, S., Schiergens, T. S., Herrler, G., Wu, N. H., Nitsche, A., Müller, M. A., Drosten, C., and Pöhlmann, S. (2020) SARS-CoV-2 Cell Entry Depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and Is Blocked by a Clinically Proven Protease Inhibitor. Cell 181, 271280.E8,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.02.052
    21. 21
      Walls, A. C., Park, Y.-J., Tortorici, M. A., Wall, A., McGuire, A. T., and Veesler, D. (2020) Structure, Function, and Antigenicity of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Glycoprotein. Cell 181, 281,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.02.058
    22. 22
      Ou, X., Liu, Y., Lei, X., Li, P., Mi, D., Ren, L., Guo, L., Guo, R., Chen, T., Hu, J., Xiang, Z., Mu, Z., Chen, X., Chen, J., Hu, K., Jin, Q., Wang, J., and Qian, Z. (2020) Characterization of spike glycoprotein of SARS-CoV-2 on virus entry and its immune cross-reactivity with SARS-CoV. Nat. Commun. 11, 1620,  DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-15562-9
    23. 23
      Hoffmann, M., Kleine-Weber, H., and Pöhlmann, S. (2020) A Multibasic Cleavage Site in the Spike Protein of SARS-CoV-2 Is Essential for Infection of Human Lung Cells. Mol. Cell 78, 779784.E5,  DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2020.04.022
    24. 24
      Bestle, D., Heindl, M. R., Limburg, H., Van Lam van, T., Pilgram, O., Moulton, H., Stein, D. A., Hardes, K., Eickmann, M., Dolnik, O., Rohde, C., Klenk, H. D., Garten, W., Steinmetzer, T., and Böttcher-Friebertshäuser, E. (2020) TMPRSS2 and furin are both essential for proteolytic activation of SARS-CoV-2 in human airway cells. Life Sci. alliance 3, e202000786,  DOI: 10.26508/lsa.202000786
    25. 25
      Millet, J. K., Tang, T., Nathan, L., Jaimes, J. A., Hsu, H. L., Daniel, S., and Whittaker, G. R. (2019) Production of pseudotyped particles to study highly pathogenic coronaviruses in a biosafety level 2 setting. J. Visualized Exp. 2019, e59010,  DOI: 10.3791/59010
    26. 26
      Straus, M. R., Tang, T., Lai, A. L., Flegel, A., Bidon, M., Freed, J. H., Daniel, S., and Whittaker, G. R. (2020) Ca 2+ ions promote fusion of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus with host cells and increase infectivity. J. Virol. 94, 426446,  DOI: 10.1128/JVI.00426-20
    27. 27
      Tang, T., Bidon, M., Jaimes, J. A., Whittaker, G. R., and Daniel, S. (2020) Coronavirus membrane fusion mechanism offers a potential target for antiviral development. Antiviral Res. 178, 104792,  DOI: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2020.104792
    28. 28
      Hyseni, I., Molesti, E., Benincasa, L., Piu, P., Casa, E., Temperton, N. J., Manenti, A., and Montomoli, E. (2020) Characterisation of SARS-CoV-2 Lentiviral Pseudotypes and Correlation between Pseudotype-Based Neutralisation Assays and Live Virus-Based Micro Neutralisation Assays. Viruses 12, 1011,  DOI: 10.3390/v12091011
    29. 29
      Matsuyama, S., Shirato, K., Kawase, M., Terada, Y., Kawachi, K., Fukushi, S., and Kamitani, W. (2018) Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Spike Protein Is Not Activated Directly by Cellular Furin during Viral Entry into Target Cells. J. Virol. 92, e00683-18,  DOI: 10.1128/JVI.00683-18
    30. 30
      Wrobel, A. G., Benton, D. J., Xu, P., Roustan, C., Martin, S. R., Rosenthal, P. B., Skehel, J. J., and Gamblin, S. J. (2020) SARS-CoV-2 and bat RaTG13 spike glycoprotein structures inform on virus evolution and furin-cleavage effects. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 27, 763767,  DOI: 10.1038/s41594-020-0468-7
    31. 31
      Jean, F., Stella, K., Thomas, L., Liu, G., Xiang, Y., Reason, A. J., and Thomas, G. (1998) α1-Antitrypsin Portland, a bioengineered serpin highly selective for furin: Application as an antipathogenic agent. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 72937298,  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.95.13.7293
    32. 32
      Jaimes, J. A., Millet, J. K., and Whittaker, G. R. (2020) Proteolytic Cleavage of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein and the Role of the Novel S1/S2 Site. iScience 23, 101212,  DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2020.101212
    33. 33
      Coutard, B., Valle, C., de Lamballerie, X., Canard, B., Seidah, N. G., and Decroly, E. (2020) The spike glycoprotein of the new coronavirus 2019-nCoV contains a furin-like cleavage site absent in CoV of the same clade. Antiviral Res. 176, 104742,  DOI: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2020.104742
    34. 34
      Tian, S., Huajun, W., and Wu, J. (2012) Computational prediction of furin cleavage sites by a hybrid method and understanding mechanism underlying diseases. Sci. Rep. 2, 261,  DOI: 10.1038/srep00261
    35. 35
      Duckert, P., Brunak, S., and Blom, N. (2004) Prediction of proprotein convertase cleavage sites. Protein Eng., Des. Sel. 17, 107112,  DOI: 10.1093/protein/gzh013
    36. 36
      Andersen, K. G., Rambaut, A., Lipkin, W. I., Holmes, E. C., and Garry, R. F. (2020) The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2. Nat. Med. 26, 450452,  DOI: 10.1038/s41591-020-0820-9
    37. 37
      Boni, M. F., Lemey, P., Jiang, X., Lam, T. T. Y., Perry, B. W., Castoe, T. A., Rambaut, A., and Robertson, D. L. (2020) Evolutionary origins of the SARS-CoV-2 sarbecovirus lineage responsible for the COVID-19 pandemic. Nat. Microbiol. 5, 14081417,  DOI: 10.1038/s41564-020-0771-4
    38. 38
      Gallaher, W. R. (2020) A palindromic RNA sequence as a common breakpoint contributor to copy-choice recombination in SARS-COV-2. Arch. Virol. 165, 23412348,  DOI: 10.1007/s00705-020-04750-z
    39. 39
      Lytras, S., MacLean, O. A., and Robertson, D. L. (2020) The Sarbecovirus origin of SARS-CoV-2’s furin cleavage site, https://virological.org/t/the-sarbecovirus-origin-of-sars-cov-2-s-furin-cleavage-site/536.
    40. 40
      Yang, Y., Du, L., Liu, C., Wang, L., Ma, C., Tang, J., Baric, R. S., Jiang, S., and Li, F. (2014) Receptor usage and cell entry of bat coronavirus HKU4 provide insight into bat-to-human transmission of MERS coronavirus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 111, 1251612521,  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1405889111
    41. 41
      Mcgrath, M. E. (1999) The Lysosomal Cysteine Proteases. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 28, 181204,  DOI: 10.1146/annurev.biophys.28.1.181
    42. 42
      Laczkó, D., Hogan, M. J., Toulmin, S. A., Hicks, P., Lederer, K., Gaudette, B. T., Castraño, D., Amanat, F., Muramatsu, H., Oguin, T. H., Ojha, A., Zhang, L., Mu, Z., Parks, R., Manzoni, T. B., Roper, B., Strohmeier, S., Tombácz, I., Arwood, L., Nachbagauer, R., Karikó, K., Greenhouse, J., Pessaint, L., Porto, M., Putman-Taylor, T., Strasbaugh, A., Campbell, T. A., Lin, P. J., Tam, Y. K., Sempowski, G. D., Farzan, M., Choe, H., Saunders, K. O., Haynes, B. F., Andersen, H., Eisenlohr, L. C., Weissman, D., Krammer, F., Bates, P., Allman, D., Locci, M., and Pardi, N. (2020) A Single Immunization with Nucleoside-Modified mRNA Vaccines Elicits Strong Cellular and Humoral Immune Responses against SARS-CoV-2 in Mice. Immunity 53, 724732.E7,  DOI: 10.1016/j.immuni.2020.07.019
    43. 43
      Cheng, Y.-W., Chao, T.-L., Li, C.-L., Chiu, M.-F., Kao, H.-C., Wang, S.-H., Pang, Y.-H., Lin, C.-H., Tsai, Y.-M., Lee, W.-H., Tao, M.-H., Ho, T.-C., Wu, P.-Y., Jang, L.-T., Chen, P.-J., Chang, S.-Y., and Yeh, S.-H. (2020) Furin Inhibitors Block SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Cleavage to Suppress Virus Production and Cytopathic Effects. Cell Rep. 33, 108254,  DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.108254
    44. 44
      Edridge, A. W. D., Kaczorowska, J., Hoste, A. C. R., Bakker, M., Klein, M., Loens, K., Jebbink, M. F., Matser, A., Kinsella, C. M., Rueda, P., Ieven, M., Goossens, H., Prins, M., Sastre, P., Deijs, M., and van der Hoek, L. (2020) Seasonal coronavirus protective immunity is short-lasting. Nat. Med. 26, 1691,  DOI: 10.1038/s41591-020-1083-1
  • Supporting Information

    Supporting Information


    The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsinfecdis.0c00701.

    • Impact of the dec-RVKR-CMK inhibitor on SARS-CoVpp production, which lacks the furin S1/S2 site (PDF)


    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.