ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
My Activity
Recently Viewed
You have not visited any articles yet, Please visit some articles to see contents here.
CONTENT TYPES

Log Poct/SA Predicts the Thermoresponsive Behavior of P(DMA-co-RA) Statistical Copolymers

Cite this: ACS Macro Lett. 2022, 11, 4, 498–503
Publication Date (Web):March 22, 2022
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsmacrolett.1c00776
Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society
ACS AuthorChoiceACS AuthorChoiceCC: Creative CommonsCC: Creative CommonsBY: Credit must be given to the creatorBY: Credit must be given to the creator
Article Views
1671
Altmetric
-
Citations
LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICS
PDF (1 MB)
Supporting Info (1)»

Abstract

Polymers that exhibit a lower critical solution temperature (LCST) have been of great interest for various biological applications such as drug or gene delivery, controlled release systems, and biosensing. Tuning the LCST behavior through control over polymer composition (e.g., upon copolymerization of monomers with different hydrophobicity) is a widely used method, as the phase transition is greatly affected by the hydrophilic/hydrophobic balance of the copolymers. However, the lack of a general method that relates copolymer hydrophobicity to their temperature response leads to exhaustive experiments when seeking to obtain polymers with desired properties. This is particularly challenging when the target copolymers are comprised of monomers that individually form nonresponsive homopolymers, that is, only when copolymerized do they display thermoresponsive behavior. In this study, we sought to develop a predictive relationship between polymer hydrophobicity and cloud point temperature (TCP). A series of statistical copolymers were synthesized based on hydrophilic N,N-dimethyl acrylamide (DMA) and hydrophobic alkyl acrylate monomers, and their hydrophobicity was compared using surface area-normalized octanol/water partition coefficients (Log Poct/SA). Interestingly, a correlation between the Log Poct/SA of the copolymers and their TCPs was observed for the P(DMA-co-RA) copolymers, which allowed TCP prediction of a demonstrative copolymer P(DMA-co-MMA). These results highlight the strong potential of this computational tool to improve the rational design of copolymers with desired temperature responses prior to synthesis.

“Smart” polymers that change their physical or chemical structures upon exposure to external stimuli such as light, pH, redox state, ultrasound, and temperature have been used extensively in a range of applications from biosensors to drug delivery systems. (1−5) Among these stimuli, temperature has been the most widely studied on account of its easy external applicability and the abundance of methods to tune thermoresponsive behavior within the desired range. (6) Thermoresponsive polymers display either a lower critical solution temperature (LCST) or an upper critical solution temperature (UCST) behavior in water, where they undergo structural changes and thus changes in their solubility upon heating up above or cooling down below a specific temperature, respectively. (3,7) In general, LCST-based systems are more preferable than UCST-based systems, particularly for biological applications, because of the high-temperature requirements of the latter. (8,9) In an LCST-based system, polymers are soluble below their LCST on account of strong interactions between polymer chains and the solvent (water); however, upon heating above a specific temperature, they undergo a phase transition where they become immiscible as a consequence of the weakening of the polymer–solvent interactions. (10)

It is desirable to be able to tune polymer LCST temperatures in order to suit the requirements of a particular application. Several methods have been studied toward this, such as changing the polymer molecular weight, hydrophobicity, or solution concentration. (11−16) In particular, tuning polymer hydrophobicity is an interesting strategy, as changes to overall hydrophobicity can readily modulate polymer–solvent interactions. (17) For example, Sumerlin and Vogt reported a method to decrease poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) (PNIPAM) LCST by moving from a linear to branched architecture, which increased polymer hydrophobicity through an increase in hydrophobic end groups. They confirmed that the hydrophobic end groups had the greatest impact on polymer LCST (rather than branching) by showing that polymer LCSTs increased significantly upon removal of the end groups. (18) Another route to tune polymer hydrophobicity is via copolymerization of a high LCST monomer with monomers of lower LCST. (19−24) For example, Lutz and Hoth reported copolymers of oligoethylene glycol monomethyl ether methacrylate (OEGMA) and diethylene glycol methacrylate (DEGMA) where they showed that the cloud point temperature (TCP) of the copolymers decreased from 90 to 28 °C as the molar quantity of DEGMA increased. (25) Additionally, previous work has shown linear correlations of TCP to hydrophobic mole fraction for copolymers of N-isopropylacrylamide (NiPA) and N-isopropylmethacrylamide (NiPMA) and poly(ethylene glycol) monomethyl ether methacrylate (PEGMA) and methyl methacrylate (MMA); (26,27) however, nonlinear TCP behavior has also been reported. (28) These inconsistencies could be due to differences in experimentation, chain end effects, or the type of polymerization employed. Thus, despite some work in the field to date, there are still fundamental gaps in our understanding of how LCST behavior can be tuned using copolymerization, such as isolating the effect of polymer structure and specific monomer chemistry. Specifically, the ability to generate overall design rules for achieving desired thermoresponsive behavior would contribute essential knowledge toward the design of copolymers for many given applications.

Hydrophobicity is one of the most important phenomena that has been investigated to explain polymer behavior in bulk or solution; however, the influence of polymer hydrophobicity on solution behavior from a theoretical perspective is relatively underexplored. (29) In medicinal chemistry, hydrophobicity of small molecules can be quantified via octanol–water partition coefficient (Log Poct) calculations, which describes the partitioning of a substance between octanol and water. (30,31) Inspired by this, Mathers and co-workers sought to adapt this method to computationally predict the hydrophobicity of macromolecules, developing a surface-area-normalized method (Log Poct/SA). Subsequent studies have shown that the addition of the surface area normalization improves the predictive power for polymers compared to standard small molecule methods. (32−36)

In our previous study we were interested in correlating the polymer hydrophobicity to its LCST behavior by investigating the relationship between the Log Poct/SA of a series of statistical copolymers of hydrophilic OEGMA with different hydrophobic methacrylate comonomers (Figure 1A). We aimed to determine a correlation between a polymer hydrophobicity and its TCP, thereby reducing the experimental workload by predicting the TCP of new copolymers prior to synthesis. However, we found that the strongest influence of the copolymer TCP was the hydrophobic comonomer mol %, that is, the grafting density rather than the chemical identity of the comonomers, as the brushy nature of the OEGMA dominated the phase transition. (21) This finding inspired us to investigate whether a correlation could be found between polymer hydrophobicity and the TCP when using nonbrushy monomers; thus, providing a route to uniquely tune polymer LCST behavior using specific monomer chemistry (Figure 1B).

Figure 1

Figure 1. Our studies on how hydrophobicity influences thermoresponsive behavior of (A) brushy polymers and (B) nonbrushy polymers.

With the goal of realizing this, we selected hydrophilic N,N-dimethyl acrylamide (DMA) as our nonbrushy monomer of interest, due to its simple chain structure and commercial availability, and alkyl acrylates such as n-butyl acrylate (nBuA), benzyl acrylate (BA), tetrahydrofurfuryl acrylate (THFA), and tert-butyl acrylate (tBuA) for the hydrophobic component on account of their commercial availability and compatibility with polymerization conditions. Interestingly, to the best of our knowledge, no literature studies report DMA homopolymers displaying LCST behaviors under the dilute conditions that are typically employed during TCP measurements (ca. 1–10 mg mL–1 polymer), with only one study by Fischer et al. reporting a DMA homopolymer with a very high TCP at a solution concentration of 20 mg mL–1. (37) Thus, our aim was two-fold: to not only establish correlations for polymer hydrophobicity and TCP, but to investigate the intriguing LCST behavior of this largely nonthermoresponsive monomer at lower concentrations and temperature windows.

To this end, we initially synthesized a library of copolymers based on DMA and various hydrophobic alkyl acrylates (RA, R = n-butyl, benzyl, tetrahydrofurfuryl, and tert-butyl) in order to observe the effect of monomer chemistry and copolymer composition and studied their LCST response. TCP was used as a proxy of the LCST behavior as it is a macroscopic effect that can be detected easily via dynamic light scattering, (38) differential scanning calorimetry, (39) microdifferential scanning calorimetry, (21) and UV–vis spectroscopy. (21) Then, we attempted to correlate the TCP of the copolymers to their hydrophobicity, which was determined by calculating the Log Poct/SA of oligomeric models representative of the final copolymers. Overall, copolymer MW and the targeted hydrophobic mol % were maintained as consistently as possible across each series. The copolymers were prepared via reversible addition–fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) polymerization in 1,4-dioxane for 4 h until targeted DPs were reached (Figure 2A). The final molar composition of the purified copolymers was determined using 1H NMR spectroscopy by relative integration of resonances corresponding to each monomer (Figures 2B and S1–S4). Kinetic analysis showed that both DMA and RA monomers were consumed at an approximately equal rate, confirming the statistical nature of the copolymerizations (Figures S5–S8). Molecular weight distributions (MWDs) for the P(DMA-co-RA) copolymers were determined using size-exclusion chromatography (SEC). Copolymers were obtained with narrow and symmetrical MWDs (Figures 2D and S6–S8). Variations in number-average MW (Mn) and dispersity (ĐM) values were determined by calculating the coefficients of variance. Using this measure, Mn varied by only 2% across the entire data set, while ĐM varied by 0.04% with all values <1.36. Turbidity measurements were conducted using UV–vis spectroscopy in order to measure the TCP of the copolymers. Changes in the percentage transmittance were recorded at λ = 550 nm within the temperature range of 0 to 90 °C. Temperature points that correspond to 50% transmittance values were taken as the TCP of polymers (see Supporting Information for a detailed method). In general, an inverse relationship was observed between the TCP of P(DMA-co-RA) copolymers and the RA content (Figures 2E and S9).

Figure 2

Figure 2. (A) Synthetic scheme for the preparation of P(DMA-co-RA) statistical copolymers. THFA is used as the comonomer in this example. (B) Molar composition (determined by 1H NMR spectroscopy), number-average MW (Mn), and dispersity (ĐM; determined by SEC) of P(DMA-co-THFA) copolymers. (C) 1H NMR spectra of P(DMA-co-THFA) copolymers in CDCl3 (300 MHz). (D) Normalized SEC molecular weight distributions for the P(DMA-co-THFA) series (eluent: CHCl3 + 0.5 v/v% NEt3, PMMA standards). (E) Percent transmittance as a function of temperature for the P(DMA-co-THFA) copolymers dissolved in H2O at 10 mg/mL as measured by UV–vis spectroscopy (λ = 550 nm, 0–90 °C, 1 °C min–1).

Log Poct values of short oligomer models that represent each P(DMA-co-RA) copolymer were calculated (at T = 298 K) for quantifying hydrophobicity. Then, the Log Poct value of each representative model was normalized by surface area using Molecular Dynamics (MD) simulations (see Supporting Information for a detailed model). Normalizing a thermodynamic parameter (i.e., Log Poct) with a structural parameter (i.e., SA) facilitates comparison of architectural differences resulting from monomer size and functionality as well as oligomer length. (36,40,41) Furthermore, this strategy conforms to the Lum–Chandler–Weeks theory, which states that above a critical length scale, hydrophobicity scales with surface area rather than volume. (29,42) Consequently, Log Poct/SA values provide a general method for correlating hydrophobicity to TCP that accommodates models with enough repeating units to represent the actual polymer. Figure 3A shows the repeating units for each of the P(DMA-co-RA) copolymers that were used to build oligomer models to calculate the Log Poct/SA values. The length of the oligomer models varied between 17 and 27 units and the models were built based on the hydrophobic mol % that each copolymer contains (see Supporting Information for detailed model). Log Poct/SA increased as the hydrophobic mol % in the copolymers increased, confirming the relationship between hydrophobicity and Log Poct (Figure 3B). (36) Comonomers nBuA, BA, and tBuA produced copolymers with similar slopes, while P(DMA-co-THFA) copolymers differed from the others. The ether oxygen in the tetrahydrofuran ring of THFA had a significant influence on Log Poct/SA values. Importantly, this data demonstrates that the comonomer chemistry plays an important role in overall hydrophobicity of P(DMA-co-RA) copolymers. Figure 3C shows the inverse linear relationships between the hydrophobic mol % and TCP of the copolymers for each series. Linear regression data for each series is shown in Table S3. This clearly illustrates that the increase in the hydrophobic comonomer content results in an increase in the overall copolymer hydrophobicity, causing the copolymer TCP to decrease. Motivated by this, we next plotted the calculated Log Poct/SA values against the measured TCPs in order to see if any correlation could be built. Figure 3D shows the inverse relationship between the Log Poct/SA (polymer hydrophobicity) and the TCP of P(DMA-co-RA) copolymers with each series possessing a similar slope. This indicates that copolymer hydrophobicity can be directly correlated to its TCP for these nonbrushy copolymers, unlike the OEGMA-based brushy copolymers we studied in our previous work. Of importance, the data shown in Figure 3D was fitted using linear, exponential, and polynomial fits. We found that the prediction capability of the linear fit was superior to the polynomial fit and very similar to the exponential fit in terms of the similarity of the measured and calculated TCP of the P(DMA-co-RA) copolymers. Therefore, we chose the linear fit for the TCP prediction due to its greater simplicity. Comparison of the measured and predicted TCP for P(DMA-co-RA) copolymers showed a reasonably strong correlation, suggesting that this tool could be used for predicting the TCP of new nonbrushy copolymers (Figure 3E). Thus, we suggest that the experimental TCP of new copolymers can be reliably predicted using this computational method.

Figure 3

Figure 3. (A) Chemical structures of the repeating units for the P(DMA-co-nBuA), P(DMA-co-BA), P(DMA-co-THFA), and P(DMA-co-tBuA) copolymers, respectively. (B) Calculated Log Poct/SA values for P(DMA-co-RA) copolymer oligomers as a function of the mol % of the hydrophobic comonomer. (C) Plot of TCP as measured by UV–vis spectroscopy vs the mol % of hydrophobic comonomer. (D) Plot of TCP as measured by UV–vis spectroscopy vs the calculated Log Poct/SA values for P(DMA-co-RA) copolymer oligomers. The solid line represents a linear fit of these data. (E) Comparison between measured TCP values of P(DMA-co-RA) copolymers and those predicted from their Log Poct/SA. The solid line represents a linear fit of these data. The equation was generated using the linear fit of the data in the plot of Figure 3D.

It is important to note the significance of these findings in the context of facilitating the targeted design of new copolymers based on monomers known to produce nonresponsive homopolymers. In such cases, conventional methods like the Flory–Fox equation, which determines the thermal properties of polymers based on both weight fraction and thermoresponse of the two homopolymers, cannot be used. Therefore, the predictive tool developed in this work significantly increases ease of access to new thermoresponsive copolymers with varied chemistries and tunable on-demand temperature responses.

Finally, to prove this hypothesis, we chose to design a new copolymer of DMA and the well-known hydrophobic monomer methyl methacrylate (MMA), which was one of the hydrophobic comonomers used in our previous work.

Log Poct/SA of the P(DMA-co-MMA) copolymer with 31% hydrophobic mol % was calculated prior to synthesis, giving a predicted TCP of 41 °C when using the equation generated based on the relationship between Log Poct/SA and measured TCP. Following the polymer synthesis, the measured TCP of the copolymer was determined as 42 °C using UV–vis spectroscopy. This confirmed that the TCP of new copolymers could be predicted using this guidance with only minor deviations from the targeted TCP. Interestingly, unlike the P(DMA-co-RA) polymerizations, the copolymerization of DMA and MMA yielded a copolymer with a gradient topology (Figure S10). Based on the fact that Log Poct/SA could still predict TCP for this copolymer, it was hypothesized that the exact copolymer sequence may not be a critical determinant of thermoresponsiveness. Further investigation is warranted to test this hypothesis.

To conclude, we report the synthesis of a series of thermoresponsive P(DMA-co-RA) copolymers via copolymerization of DMA and different alkyl acrylate monomers and the investigation of their LCST behavior by measuring the copolymer TCPs using UV–vis spectroscopy. Analysis of our experimental data using computational modeling of Log Poct/SA revealed that the thermoresponsive behavior of nonbrushy P(DMA-co-RA) copolymers could be related to their hydrophobicity. We validated this method by predicting the TCP of a P(DMA-co-MMA), which showed good correlation with the experimentally measured TCP (1 °C difference from targeted TCP). Overall, this study demonstrates the strength of the Log Poct/SA computational modeling tool for the prediction of copolymer interactions in solution. We envisage this to be particularly powerful in the study of thermoresponsive copolymers comprised of monomers that produce nonresponsive homopolymers, thus, widening access to new monomer chemistries that can be used in the rational design of polymers with thermoresponsive behavior.

Supporting Information

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsmacrolett.1c00776.

  • Materials, characterization techniques, experimental procedures, and additional data (SEC, 1H NMR, and UV–vis spectra) (PDF)

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Author Information

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

  • Corresponding Authors
  • Authors
    • Irem Akar - School of Chemistry, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom
    • Jeffrey C. Foster - School of Chemistry, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, United KingdomOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-9097-8680
    • Xiyue Leng - School of Chemistry, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom
    • Amanda K. Pearce - School of Chemistry, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, United KingdomOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3372-7380
  • Author Contributions

    The manuscript was written through contributions of all authors.

  • Notes
    The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Acknowledgments

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

This work is supported by the Turkish Ministry of National Education, the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, EPSRC, (EP/S00338X/1), and the University of Birmingham.

References

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

This article references 42 other publications.

  1. 1
    Dai, S.; Ravi, P.; Tam, K. C. pH-Responsive polymers: synthesis, properties and applications. Soft Matter 2008, 4 (3), 435449,  DOI: 10.1039/b714741d
  2. 2
    Gibson, M. I.; O’Reilly, R. K. To aggregate, or not to aggregate? considerations in the design and application of polymeric thermally-responsive nanoparticles. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42 (17), 72047213,  DOI: 10.1039/C3CS60035A
  3. 3
    Jochum, F. D.; Theato, P. Temperature- and light-responsive smart polymer materials. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42 (17), 74687483,  DOI: 10.1039/C2CS35191A
  4. 4
    Zhang, A.; Jung, K.; Li, A.; Liu, J.; Boyer, C. Recent advances in stimuli-responsive polymer systems for remotely controlled drug release. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2019, 99, 101164,  DOI: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2019.101164
  5. 5
    Zhang, X.; Han, L.; Liu, M.; Wang, K.; Tao, L.; Wan, Q.; Wei, Y. Recent progress and advances in redox-responsive polymers as controlled delivery nanoplatforms. Mater. Chem. Front. 2017, 1 (5), 807822,  DOI: 10.1039/C6QM00135A
  6. 6
    Roy, D.; Brooks, W. L. A.; Sumerlin, B. S. New directions in thermoresponsive polymers. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42 (17), 72147243,  DOI: 10.1039/c3cs35499g
  7. 7
    Zhang, Q.; Hoogenboom, R. Polymers with upper critical solution temperature behavior in alcohol/water solvent mixtures. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2015, 48, 122142,  DOI: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2015.02.003
  8. 8
    Vanparijs, N.; Nuhn, L.; De Geest, B. G. Transiently thermoresponsive polymers and their applications in biomedicine. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46 (4), 11931239,  DOI: 10.1039/C6CS00748A
  9. 9
    Doberenz, F.; Zeng, K.; Willems, C.; Zhang, K.; Groth, T. Thermoresponsive polymers and their biomedical application in tissue engineering - a review. J. Mater. Chem. B 2020, 8 (4), 607628,  DOI: 10.1039/C9TB02052G
  10. 10
    Zhang, Q.; Weber, C.; Schubert, U. S.; Hoogenboom, R. Thermoresponsive polymers with lower critical solution temperature: from fundamental aspects and measuring techniques to recommended turbidimetry conditions. Mater. Horiz. 2017, 4 (2), 109116,  DOI: 10.1039/C7MH00016B
  11. 11
    Ieong, N. S.; Hasan, M.; Phillips, D. J.; Saaka, Y.; O’Reilly, R. K.; Gibson, M. I. Polymers with molecular weight dependent LCSTs are essential for cooperative behaviour. Polym. Chem. 2012, 3 (3), 794799,  DOI: 10.1039/c2py00604a
  12. 12
    Liu, Z.; Guo, Y.; Inomata, K. LCST-type phase behavior of poly(2-chloroethyl vinyl ether-alt-maleic anhydride) in n-butyl acetate. Polym. J. 2011, 43 (8), 676682,  DOI: 10.1038/pj.2011.41
  13. 13
    Keogh, R.; Blackman, L. D.; Foster, J. C.; Varlas, S.; O’Reilly, R. K. The Importance of Cooperativity in Polymer Blending: Toward Controlling the Thermoresponsive Behavior of Blended Block Copolymer Micelles. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2020, 41 (6), 1900599,  DOI: 10.1002/marc.201900599
  14. 14
    Miclotte, M. P. J.; Lawrenson, S. B.; Varlas, S.; Rashid, B.; Chapman, E.; O’Reilly, R. K. Tuning the Cloud-Point and Flocculation Temperature of Poly(2-(diethylamino)ethyl methacrylate)-Based Nanoparticles via a Postpolymerization Betainization Approach. ACS Polym. Au 2021, 1 (1), 4758,  DOI: 10.1021/acspolymersau.1c00010
  15. 15
    Ramírez-Jiménez, A.; Montoya-Villegas, K. A.; Licea-Claverie, A.; Gónzalez-Ayón, M. A. Tunable Thermo-Responsive Copolymers from DEGMA and OEGMA Synthesized by RAFT Polymerization and the Effect of the Concentration and Saline Phosphate Buffer on Its Phase Transition. Polymer 2019, 11 (10), 1657,  DOI: 10.3390/polym11101657
  16. 16
    Van Guyse, J. F. R.; Bera, D.; Hoogenboom, R. Adamantane Functionalized Poly(2-oxazoline)s with Broadly Tunable LCST-Behavior by Molecular Recognition. Polymer 2021, 13 (3), 374,  DOI: 10.3390/polym13030374
  17. 17
    Eggenhuisen, T. M.; Becer, C. R.; Fijten, M. W. M.; Eckardt, R.; Hoogenboom, R.; Schubert, U. S. Libraries of Statistical Hydroxypropyl Acrylate Containing Copolymers with LCST Properties Prepared by NMP. Macromolecules. 2008, 41 (14), 51325140,  DOI: 10.1021/ma800469p
  18. 18
    Vogt, A. P.; Sumerlin, B. S. Tuning the Temperature Response of Branched Poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) Prepared by RAFT Polymerization. Macromolecules. 2008, 41 (20), 73687373,  DOI: 10.1021/ma801256k
  19. 19
    Smith, A. A. A.; Maikawa, C. L.; Lopez Hernandez, H.; Appel, E. A. Controlling properties of thermogels by tuning critical solution behaviour of ternary copolymers. Polym. Chem. 2021, 12 (13), 19181923,  DOI: 10.1039/D0PY01696A
  20. 20
    Luzon, M.; Boyer, C.; Peinado, C.; Corrales, T.; Whittaker, M.; Tao, L.; Davis, T. P. Water-soluble, thermoresponsive, hyperbranched copolymers based on PEG-methacrylates: Synthesis, characterization, and LCST behavior. J. Polym. Sci. A: Polym. Chem. 2010, 48 (13), 27832792,  DOI: 10.1002/pola.24027
  21. 21
    Akar, I.; Keogh, R.; Blackman, L. D.; Foster, J. C.; Mathers, R. T.; O’Reilly, R. K. Grafting Density Governs the Thermoresponsive Behavior of P(OEGMA-co-RMA) Statistical Copolymers. ACS Macro Lett. 2020, 9 (8), 11491154,  DOI: 10.1021/acsmacrolett.0c00461
  22. 22
    Fournier, D.; Hoogenboom, R.; Thijs, H. M. L.; Paulus, R. M.; Schubert, U. S. Tunable pH- and Temperature-Sensitive Copolymer Libraries by Reversible Addition-Fragmentation Chain Transfer Copolymerizations of Methacrylates. Macromolecules 2007, 40 (4), 915920,  DOI: 10.1021/ma062199r
  23. 23
    Bebis, K.; Jones, M. W.; Haddleton, D. M.; Gibson, M. I. Thermoresponsive behaviour of poly[(oligo(ethyleneglycol methacrylate)]s and their protein conjugates: importance of concentration and solvent system. Polym. Chem. 2011, 2 (4), 975982,  DOI: 10.1039/c0py00408a
  24. 24
    Porsch, C.; Hansson, S.; Nordgren, N.; Malmström, E. Thermo-responsive cellulose-based architectures: tailoring LCST using poly(ethylene glycol) methacrylates. Polym. Chem. 2011, 2 (5), 11141123,  DOI: 10.1039/C0PY00417K
  25. 25
    Lutz, J.-F.; Hoth, A. Preparation of Ideal PEG Analogues with a Tunable Thermosensitivity by Controlled Radical Copolymerization of 2-(2-Methoxyethoxy)ethyl Methacrylate and Oligo(ethylene glycol) Methacrylate. Macromolecules 2006, 39 (2), 893896,  DOI: 10.1021/ma0517042
  26. 26
    Kokufuta, M. K.; Sato, S.; Kokufuta, E. LCST behavior of copolymers of N-isopropylacrylamide and N-isopropylmethacrylamide in water. Colloid Polym. Sci. 2012, 290 (16), 16711681,  DOI: 10.1007/s00396-012-2706-y
  27. 27
    Kumbhakar, K.; Saha, B.; De, P.; Biswas, R. Cloud Point Driven Dynamics in Aqueous Solutions of Thermoresponsive Copolymers: Are They Akin to Criticality Driven Solution Dynamics?. J. Phys. Chem. B 2019, 123 (51), 1104211054,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.9b07840
  28. 28
    Liu, H. Y.; Zhu, X. X. Lower critical solution temperatures of N-substituted acrylamide copolymers in aqueous solutions. Polymer 1999, 40 (25), 69856990,  DOI: 10.1016/S0032-3861(98)00858-1
  29. 29
    Foster, J. C.; Akar, I.; Grocott, M. C.; Pearce, A. K.; Mathers, R. T.; O’Reilly, R. K. 100th Anniversary of Macromolecular Science Viewpoint: The Role of Hydrophobicity in Polymer Phenomena. ACS Macro Lett. 2020, 9 (11), 17001707,  DOI: 10.1021/acsmacrolett.0c00645
  30. 30
    Padmanabhan, J.; Parthasarathi, R.; Subramanian, V.; Chattaraj, P. K. QSPR models for polychlorinated biphenyls: n-Octanol/water partition coefficient. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2006, 14 (4), 10211028,  DOI: 10.1016/j.bmc.2005.09.017
  31. 31
    Bannan, C. C.; Calabró, G.; Kyu, D. Y.; Mobley, D. L. Calculating Partition Coefficients of Small Molecules in Octanol/Water and Cyclohexane/Water. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2016, 12 (8), 40154024,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.6b00449
  32. 32
    Foster, J. C.; Varlas, S.; Couturaud, B.; Jones, J. R.; Keogh, R.; Mathers, R. T.; O’Reilly, R. K. Predicting Monomers for Use in Polymerization-Induced Self-Assembly. Angew. Chem. Int.l Ed. 2018, 57 (48), 1573315737,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201809614
  33. 33
    Varlas, S.; Foster, J. C.; Arkinstall, L. A.; Jones, J. R.; Keogh, R.; Mathers, R. T.; O’Reilly, R. K. Predicting Monomers for Use in Aqueous Ring-Opening Metathesis Polymerization-Induced Self-Assembly. ACS Macro Lett. 2019, 8 (4), 466472,  DOI: 10.1021/acsmacrolett.9b00117
  34. 34
    Inam, M.; Cambridge, G.; Pitto-Barry, A.; Laker, Z. P. L.; Wilson, N. R.; Mathers, R. T.; Dove, A. P.; O’Reilly, R. K. 1D vs. 2D shape selectivity in the crystallization-driven self-assembly of polylactide block copolymers. Chem. Sci. 2017, 8 (6), 42234230,  DOI: 10.1039/C7SC00641A
  35. 35
    He, Y.; Eloi, J.-C.; Harniman, R. L.; Richardson, R. M.; Whittell, G. R.; Mathers, R. T.; Dove, A. P.; O’Reilly, R. K.; Manners, I. Uniform Biodegradable Fiber-Like Micelles and Block Comicelles via “Living” Crystallization-Driven Self-Assembly of Poly(l-lactide) Block Copolymers: The Importance of Reducing Unimer Self-Nucleation via Hydrogen Bond Disruption. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141 (48), 1908819098,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.9b09885
  36. 36
    Magenau, A. J. D.; Richards, J. A.; Pasquinelli, M. A.; Savin, D. A.; Mathers, R. T. Systematic Insights from Medicinal Chemistry To Discern the Nature of Polymer Hydrophobicity. Macromolecules 2015, 48 (19), 72307236,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.macromol.5b01758
  37. 37
    Fischer, F.; Zufferey, D.; Tahoces, R. Lower critical solution temperature in superheated water: the highest in the poly(N, N-dialkylacrylamide) series. Polym. Int. 2011, 60 (8), 12591262,  DOI: 10.1002/pi.3071
  38. 38
    Lerch, A.; Käfer, F.; Prévost, S.; Agarwal, S.; Karg, M. Structural Insights into Polymethacrylamide-Based LCST Polymers in Solution: A Small-Angle Neutron Scattering Study. Macromolecules 2021, 54 (16), 76327641,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.macromol.1c00698
  39. 39
    Tsui, H.-W.; Wang, J.-H.; Hsu, Y.-H.; Chen, L.-J. Study of heat of micellization and phase separation for Pluronic aqueous solutions by using a high sensitivity differential scanning calorimetry. Colloid Polym. Sci. 2010, 288 (18), 16871696,  DOI: 10.1007/s00396-010-2308-5
  40. 40
    Dharmaratne, N. U.; Jouaneh, T. M. M.; Kiesewetter, M. K.; Mathers, R. T. Quantitative Measurements of Polymer Hydrophobicity Based on Functional Group Identity and Oligomer Length. Macromolecules 2018, 51 (21), 84618468,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.macromol.8b01747
  41. 41
    Yildirim, E.; Dakshinamoorthy, D.; Peretic, M. J.; Pasquinelli, M. A.; Mathers, R. T. Synthetic Design of Polyester Electrolytes Guided by Hydrophobicity Calculations. Macromolecules 2016, 49 (20), 78687876,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.macromol.6b01452
  42. 42
    Chandler, D. Interfaces and the driving force of hydrophobic assembly. Nature 2005, 437 (7059), 640647,  DOI: 10.1038/nature04162

Cited By

This article is cited by 1 publications.

  1. Cagla Erkoc, Erol Yildirim, Mine Yurtsever, Oguz Okay. Roadmap to Design Mechanically Robust Copolymer Hydrogels Naturally Cross-Linked by Hydrogen Bonds. Macromolecules 2022, 55 (23) , 10576-10589. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.macromol.2c01469
  • Abstract

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. Our studies on how hydrophobicity influences thermoresponsive behavior of (A) brushy polymers and (B) nonbrushy polymers.

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. (A) Synthetic scheme for the preparation of P(DMA-co-RA) statistical copolymers. THFA is used as the comonomer in this example. (B) Molar composition (determined by 1H NMR spectroscopy), number-average MW (Mn), and dispersity (ĐM; determined by SEC) of P(DMA-co-THFA) copolymers. (C) 1H NMR spectra of P(DMA-co-THFA) copolymers in CDCl3 (300 MHz). (D) Normalized SEC molecular weight distributions for the P(DMA-co-THFA) series (eluent: CHCl3 + 0.5 v/v% NEt3, PMMA standards). (E) Percent transmittance as a function of temperature for the P(DMA-co-THFA) copolymers dissolved in H2O at 10 mg/mL as measured by UV–vis spectroscopy (λ = 550 nm, 0–90 °C, 1 °C min–1).

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. (A) Chemical structures of the repeating units for the P(DMA-co-nBuA), P(DMA-co-BA), P(DMA-co-THFA), and P(DMA-co-tBuA) copolymers, respectively. (B) Calculated Log Poct/SA values for P(DMA-co-RA) copolymer oligomers as a function of the mol % of the hydrophobic comonomer. (C) Plot of TCP as measured by UV–vis spectroscopy vs the mol % of hydrophobic comonomer. (D) Plot of TCP as measured by UV–vis spectroscopy vs the calculated Log Poct/SA values for P(DMA-co-RA) copolymer oligomers. The solid line represents a linear fit of these data. (E) Comparison between measured TCP values of P(DMA-co-RA) copolymers and those predicted from their Log Poct/SA. The solid line represents a linear fit of these data. The equation was generated using the linear fit of the data in the plot of Figure 3D.

  • References

    ARTICLE SECTIONS
    Jump To

    This article references 42 other publications.

    1. 1
      Dai, S.; Ravi, P.; Tam, K. C. pH-Responsive polymers: synthesis, properties and applications. Soft Matter 2008, 4 (3), 435449,  DOI: 10.1039/b714741d
    2. 2
      Gibson, M. I.; O’Reilly, R. K. To aggregate, or not to aggregate? considerations in the design and application of polymeric thermally-responsive nanoparticles. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42 (17), 72047213,  DOI: 10.1039/C3CS60035A
    3. 3
      Jochum, F. D.; Theato, P. Temperature- and light-responsive smart polymer materials. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42 (17), 74687483,  DOI: 10.1039/C2CS35191A
    4. 4
      Zhang, A.; Jung, K.; Li, A.; Liu, J.; Boyer, C. Recent advances in stimuli-responsive polymer systems for remotely controlled drug release. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2019, 99, 101164,  DOI: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2019.101164
    5. 5
      Zhang, X.; Han, L.; Liu, M.; Wang, K.; Tao, L.; Wan, Q.; Wei, Y. Recent progress and advances in redox-responsive polymers as controlled delivery nanoplatforms. Mater. Chem. Front. 2017, 1 (5), 807822,  DOI: 10.1039/C6QM00135A
    6. 6
      Roy, D.; Brooks, W. L. A.; Sumerlin, B. S. New directions in thermoresponsive polymers. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42 (17), 72147243,  DOI: 10.1039/c3cs35499g
    7. 7
      Zhang, Q.; Hoogenboom, R. Polymers with upper critical solution temperature behavior in alcohol/water solvent mixtures. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2015, 48, 122142,  DOI: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2015.02.003
    8. 8
      Vanparijs, N.; Nuhn, L.; De Geest, B. G. Transiently thermoresponsive polymers and their applications in biomedicine. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46 (4), 11931239,  DOI: 10.1039/C6CS00748A
    9. 9
      Doberenz, F.; Zeng, K.; Willems, C.; Zhang, K.; Groth, T. Thermoresponsive polymers and their biomedical application in tissue engineering - a review. J. Mater. Chem. B 2020, 8 (4), 607628,  DOI: 10.1039/C9TB02052G
    10. 10
      Zhang, Q.; Weber, C.; Schubert, U. S.; Hoogenboom, R. Thermoresponsive polymers with lower critical solution temperature: from fundamental aspects and measuring techniques to recommended turbidimetry conditions. Mater. Horiz. 2017, 4 (2), 109116,  DOI: 10.1039/C7MH00016B
    11. 11
      Ieong, N. S.; Hasan, M.; Phillips, D. J.; Saaka, Y.; O’Reilly, R. K.; Gibson, M. I. Polymers with molecular weight dependent LCSTs are essential for cooperative behaviour. Polym. Chem. 2012, 3 (3), 794799,  DOI: 10.1039/c2py00604a
    12. 12
      Liu, Z.; Guo, Y.; Inomata, K. LCST-type phase behavior of poly(2-chloroethyl vinyl ether-alt-maleic anhydride) in n-butyl acetate. Polym. J. 2011, 43 (8), 676682,  DOI: 10.1038/pj.2011.41
    13. 13
      Keogh, R.; Blackman, L. D.; Foster, J. C.; Varlas, S.; O’Reilly, R. K. The Importance of Cooperativity in Polymer Blending: Toward Controlling the Thermoresponsive Behavior of Blended Block Copolymer Micelles. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2020, 41 (6), 1900599,  DOI: 10.1002/marc.201900599
    14. 14
      Miclotte, M. P. J.; Lawrenson, S. B.; Varlas, S.; Rashid, B.; Chapman, E.; O’Reilly, R. K. Tuning the Cloud-Point and Flocculation Temperature of Poly(2-(diethylamino)ethyl methacrylate)-Based Nanoparticles via a Postpolymerization Betainization Approach. ACS Polym. Au 2021, 1 (1), 4758,  DOI: 10.1021/acspolymersau.1c00010
    15. 15
      Ramírez-Jiménez, A.; Montoya-Villegas, K. A.; Licea-Claverie, A.; Gónzalez-Ayón, M. A. Tunable Thermo-Responsive Copolymers from DEGMA and OEGMA Synthesized by RAFT Polymerization and the Effect of the Concentration and Saline Phosphate Buffer on Its Phase Transition. Polymer 2019, 11 (10), 1657,  DOI: 10.3390/polym11101657
    16. 16
      Van Guyse, J. F. R.; Bera, D.; Hoogenboom, R. Adamantane Functionalized Poly(2-oxazoline)s with Broadly Tunable LCST-Behavior by Molecular Recognition. Polymer 2021, 13 (3), 374,  DOI: 10.3390/polym13030374
    17. 17
      Eggenhuisen, T. M.; Becer, C. R.; Fijten, M. W. M.; Eckardt, R.; Hoogenboom, R.; Schubert, U. S. Libraries of Statistical Hydroxypropyl Acrylate Containing Copolymers with LCST Properties Prepared by NMP. Macromolecules. 2008, 41 (14), 51325140,  DOI: 10.1021/ma800469p
    18. 18
      Vogt, A. P.; Sumerlin, B. S. Tuning the Temperature Response of Branched Poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) Prepared by RAFT Polymerization. Macromolecules. 2008, 41 (20), 73687373,  DOI: 10.1021/ma801256k
    19. 19
      Smith, A. A. A.; Maikawa, C. L.; Lopez Hernandez, H.; Appel, E. A. Controlling properties of thermogels by tuning critical solution behaviour of ternary copolymers. Polym. Chem. 2021, 12 (13), 19181923,  DOI: 10.1039/D0PY01696A
    20. 20
      Luzon, M.; Boyer, C.; Peinado, C.; Corrales, T.; Whittaker, M.; Tao, L.; Davis, T. P. Water-soluble, thermoresponsive, hyperbranched copolymers based on PEG-methacrylates: Synthesis, characterization, and LCST behavior. J. Polym. Sci. A: Polym. Chem. 2010, 48 (13), 27832792,  DOI: 10.1002/pola.24027
    21. 21
      Akar, I.; Keogh, R.; Blackman, L. D.; Foster, J. C.; Mathers, R. T.; O’Reilly, R. K. Grafting Density Governs the Thermoresponsive Behavior of P(OEGMA-co-RMA) Statistical Copolymers. ACS Macro Lett. 2020, 9 (8), 11491154,  DOI: 10.1021/acsmacrolett.0c00461
    22. 22
      Fournier, D.; Hoogenboom, R.; Thijs, H. M. L.; Paulus, R. M.; Schubert, U. S. Tunable pH- and Temperature-Sensitive Copolymer Libraries by Reversible Addition-Fragmentation Chain Transfer Copolymerizations of Methacrylates. Macromolecules 2007, 40 (4), 915920,  DOI: 10.1021/ma062199r
    23. 23
      Bebis, K.; Jones, M. W.; Haddleton, D. M.; Gibson, M. I. Thermoresponsive behaviour of poly[(oligo(ethyleneglycol methacrylate)]s and their protein conjugates: importance of concentration and solvent system. Polym. Chem. 2011, 2 (4), 975982,  DOI: 10.1039/c0py00408a
    24. 24
      Porsch, C.; Hansson, S.; Nordgren, N.; Malmström, E. Thermo-responsive cellulose-based architectures: tailoring LCST using poly(ethylene glycol) methacrylates. Polym. Chem. 2011, 2 (5), 11141123,  DOI: 10.1039/C0PY00417K
    25. 25
      Lutz, J.-F.; Hoth, A. Preparation of Ideal PEG Analogues with a Tunable Thermosensitivity by Controlled Radical Copolymerization of 2-(2-Methoxyethoxy)ethyl Methacrylate and Oligo(ethylene glycol) Methacrylate. Macromolecules 2006, 39 (2), 893896,  DOI: 10.1021/ma0517042
    26. 26
      Kokufuta, M. K.; Sato, S.; Kokufuta, E. LCST behavior of copolymers of N-isopropylacrylamide and N-isopropylmethacrylamide in water. Colloid Polym. Sci. 2012, 290 (16), 16711681,  DOI: 10.1007/s00396-012-2706-y
    27. 27
      Kumbhakar, K.; Saha, B.; De, P.; Biswas, R. Cloud Point Driven Dynamics in Aqueous Solutions of Thermoresponsive Copolymers: Are They Akin to Criticality Driven Solution Dynamics?. J. Phys. Chem. B 2019, 123 (51), 1104211054,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.9b07840
    28. 28
      Liu, H. Y.; Zhu, X. X. Lower critical solution temperatures of N-substituted acrylamide copolymers in aqueous solutions. Polymer 1999, 40 (25), 69856990,  DOI: 10.1016/S0032-3861(98)00858-1
    29. 29
      Foster, J. C.; Akar, I.; Grocott, M. C.; Pearce, A. K.; Mathers, R. T.; O’Reilly, R. K. 100th Anniversary of Macromolecular Science Viewpoint: The Role of Hydrophobicity in Polymer Phenomena. ACS Macro Lett. 2020, 9 (11), 17001707,  DOI: 10.1021/acsmacrolett.0c00645
    30. 30
      Padmanabhan, J.; Parthasarathi, R.; Subramanian, V.; Chattaraj, P. K. QSPR models for polychlorinated biphenyls: n-Octanol/water partition coefficient. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2006, 14 (4), 10211028,  DOI: 10.1016/j.bmc.2005.09.017
    31. 31
      Bannan, C. C.; Calabró, G.; Kyu, D. Y.; Mobley, D. L. Calculating Partition Coefficients of Small Molecules in Octanol/Water and Cyclohexane/Water. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2016, 12 (8), 40154024,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.6b00449
    32. 32
      Foster, J. C.; Varlas, S.; Couturaud, B.; Jones, J. R.; Keogh, R.; Mathers, R. T.; O’Reilly, R. K. Predicting Monomers for Use in Polymerization-Induced Self-Assembly. Angew. Chem. Int.l Ed. 2018, 57 (48), 1573315737,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201809614
    33. 33
      Varlas, S.; Foster, J. C.; Arkinstall, L. A.; Jones, J. R.; Keogh, R.; Mathers, R. T.; O’Reilly, R. K. Predicting Monomers for Use in Aqueous Ring-Opening Metathesis Polymerization-Induced Self-Assembly. ACS Macro Lett. 2019, 8 (4), 466472,  DOI: 10.1021/acsmacrolett.9b00117
    34. 34
      Inam, M.; Cambridge, G.; Pitto-Barry, A.; Laker, Z. P. L.; Wilson, N. R.; Mathers, R. T.; Dove, A. P.; O’Reilly, R. K. 1D vs. 2D shape selectivity in the crystallization-driven self-assembly of polylactide block copolymers. Chem. Sci. 2017, 8 (6), 42234230,  DOI: 10.1039/C7SC00641A
    35. 35
      He, Y.; Eloi, J.-C.; Harniman, R. L.; Richardson, R. M.; Whittell, G. R.; Mathers, R. T.; Dove, A. P.; O’Reilly, R. K.; Manners, I. Uniform Biodegradable Fiber-Like Micelles and Block Comicelles via “Living” Crystallization-Driven Self-Assembly of Poly(l-lactide) Block Copolymers: The Importance of Reducing Unimer Self-Nucleation via Hydrogen Bond Disruption. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141 (48), 1908819098,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.9b09885
    36. 36
      Magenau, A. J. D.; Richards, J. A.; Pasquinelli, M. A.; Savin, D. A.; Mathers, R. T. Systematic Insights from Medicinal Chemistry To Discern the Nature of Polymer Hydrophobicity. Macromolecules 2015, 48 (19), 72307236,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.macromol.5b01758
    37. 37
      Fischer, F.; Zufferey, D.; Tahoces, R. Lower critical solution temperature in superheated water: the highest in the poly(N, N-dialkylacrylamide) series. Polym. Int. 2011, 60 (8), 12591262,  DOI: 10.1002/pi.3071
    38. 38
      Lerch, A.; Käfer, F.; Prévost, S.; Agarwal, S.; Karg, M. Structural Insights into Polymethacrylamide-Based LCST Polymers in Solution: A Small-Angle Neutron Scattering Study. Macromolecules 2021, 54 (16), 76327641,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.macromol.1c00698
    39. 39
      Tsui, H.-W.; Wang, J.-H.; Hsu, Y.-H.; Chen, L.-J. Study of heat of micellization and phase separation for Pluronic aqueous solutions by using a high sensitivity differential scanning calorimetry. Colloid Polym. Sci. 2010, 288 (18), 16871696,  DOI: 10.1007/s00396-010-2308-5
    40. 40
      Dharmaratne, N. U.; Jouaneh, T. M. M.; Kiesewetter, M. K.; Mathers, R. T. Quantitative Measurements of Polymer Hydrophobicity Based on Functional Group Identity and Oligomer Length. Macromolecules 2018, 51 (21), 84618468,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.macromol.8b01747
    41. 41
      Yildirim, E.; Dakshinamoorthy, D.; Peretic, M. J.; Pasquinelli, M. A.; Mathers, R. T. Synthetic Design of Polyester Electrolytes Guided by Hydrophobicity Calculations. Macromolecules 2016, 49 (20), 78687876,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.macromol.6b01452
    42. 42
      Chandler, D. Interfaces and the driving force of hydrophobic assembly. Nature 2005, 437 (7059), 640647,  DOI: 10.1038/nature04162
  • Supporting Information

    Supporting Information

    ARTICLE SECTIONS
    Jump To

    The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsmacrolett.1c00776.

    • Materials, characterization techniques, experimental procedures, and additional data (SEC, 1H NMR, and UV–vis spectra) (PDF)


    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

You’ve supercharged your research process with ACS and Mendeley!

STEP 1:
Click to create an ACS ID

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

MENDELEY PAIRING EXPIRED
Your Mendeley pairing has expired. Please reconnect

This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By continuing to use the site, you are accepting our use of cookies. Read the ACS privacy policy.

CONTINUE