ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
Tailoring Gene Transfer Efficacy through the Arrangement of Cationic and Anionic Blocks in Triblock Copolymer Micelles
My Activity
  • Open Access
Letter

Tailoring Gene Transfer Efficacy through the Arrangement of Cationic and Anionic Blocks in Triblock Copolymer Micelles
Click to copy article linkArticle link copied!

  • Katharina Leer
    Katharina Leer
    Laboratory of Organic and Macromolecular Chemistry, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Humboldtstrasse 10, 07743 Jena, Germany
  • Liên S. Reichel
    Liên S. Reichel
    Laboratory of Organic and Macromolecular Chemistry, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Humboldtstrasse 10, 07743 Jena, Germany
  • Mara Wilhelmi
    Mara Wilhelmi
    Laboratory of Organic and Macromolecular Chemistry, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Humboldtstrasse 10, 07743 Jena, Germany
  • Johannes C. Brendel
    Johannes C. Brendel
    Laboratory of Organic and Macromolecular Chemistry, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Humboldtstrasse 10, 07743 Jena, Germany
    Jena Center for Soft Matter, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Philosophenweg 7, 07743 Jena, Germany
  • Anja Traeger*
    Anja Traeger
    Laboratory of Organic and Macromolecular Chemistry, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Humboldtstrasse 10, 07743 Jena, Germany
    Jena Center for Soft Matter, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Philosophenweg 7, 07743 Jena, Germany
    *E-mail: [email protected]
    More by Anja Traeger
Open PDFSupporting Information (1)

ACS Macro Letters

Cite this: ACS Macro Lett. 2024, 13, 2, 158–165
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsmacrolett.3c00633
Published January 17, 2024

Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under

CC-BY 4.0 .

Abstract

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The arrangement of charged segments in triblock copolymer micelles affects the gene delivery potential of polymeric micelles and can increase the level of gene expression when an anionic segment is incorporated in the outer shell. Triblock copolymers were synthesized by RAFT polymerzation with narrow molar mass distributions and assembled into micelles with a hydrophobic core from poly(n-butyl acrylate). The ionic shell contained either (i) an anionic segment followed by a cationic segment (HAC micelles) or (ii) a cationic block followed by an anionic block (HCA micelles). The pH-responsive anionic block contained 2-carboxyethyl acrylamide (CEAm), while the cationic block comprised 3-guanidinopropyl acrylamide (GPAm). Increasing the molar content of CEAm in HAC and HCA micelles from 6 to 13 mol % improved cytocompatibility and the endosomal escape property, while the HCA micelle with the highest mol % of anionic charges in the outer shell exhibited the highest gene expression. It became evident that improved membrane interaction of the best performing HCA micelle contributed to achieving high gene expression.

This publication is licensed under

CC-BY 4.0 .
  • cc licence
  • by licence
Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society

Research in the field of nonviral gene therapy gained greater awareness and boost with the successful development of lipid-based vaccines for COVID-19. (1,2) Despite the success of lipid nanoparticles in RNA delivery, challenges remain for more complex applications and other genetic materials, which demand further research on smart and stable delivery systems to fulfill the promise of gene therapy. Nonviral nanocarriers can also be based on polymers, which can be conveniently tailored in their composition and morphology as more versatile synthetic approaches are developed. (3−7) They can form stable complexes (polyplexes) with the negatively charged genetic material to promote cellular uptake and endosomal release, enabling high gene expression and low toxicity. (8) Among them, amphiphilic block copolymers containing hydrophobic and hydrophilic segments are attractive architectures, (9,10) which can assemble into core–shell micelles in an aqueous system. (11,12) If cationic charges are present in the shell they can form so-called micelleplexes by ionic interactions with genetic material, which exhibit increased colloidal stability and improved gene expression. (13−15) Due to their high positive charge density, cytotoxic effects were also observed for polymeric micelles, albeit not as severe as for linear and branched polymers. (16,17) The incorporation of hydrophilic polymers, such as PEG (poly(ethylene glycol)), (18) poly(N-acryloyl morpholine) (PNAM), (19) poly(2-oxazoline), (20) or polysarcosine, (21) is the most common approach to attenuate the toxicity of cationic polymers. These “stealth” polymers induce a hydration layer, which reduces interactions with serum proteins and increases circulation time in blood. (22) However, the improved biosafety profile is often accompanied by a reduced efficiency, known as the toxicity-efficiency dilemma. (18,23) Recent studies show that this dilemma can be circumvented by inserting negatively charged functionalities into the polymeric carrier instead, which partially compensate the positive charges. (4,24−26) Anionic groups can be integrated in the form of a polymer either (i) electrostatically as a coating of a cationic polyplex or (ii) by covalent incorporation into a (block) copolymer structure. (27−30) The first approach is more straightforward in terms of the synthesis of the polymers, but requires optimization of the formulation conditions (mixing order, ratio of opposite charges). (30−33) By contrast, the challenge of the second approach is the controlled synthesis of (block) copolymers containing positively and negatively charged functionalities. To date, only a few studies exist, where anionic functionalities have been covalently incorporated into polymeric micelles for gene delivery. (26,34,35) Thus, the potential of anionic charges in nanocarrier systems has not yet been fully exploited due to limited knowledge of advantageous compositions and monomer sequences.

Therefore, a structure–property study was performed to ascertain the transfection efficiency of triblock micelles with an ionic/hydrophilic shell containing ether (i) an anionic block followed by a cationic block or vice versa (ii) a cationic block followed by an anionic block. The core-forming hydrophobic block was based on poly(n-butyl acrylate) (PnBA), while the anionic copolymer block consisted of 2-carboxyethyl acrylamide (CEAm) and hydrophilic NAM and the cationic block contained 3-guanidinopropyl acrylamide (GPAm). The combination of a pH-dependent anionic group with a pH-independent cationic group represents a novel approach to gene therapy, deviating from the conventional use of pH-dependent cationic groups. The formed micelles and micelleplexes were characterized regarding their physicochemical and biological behavior, and it was clearly observed that the anionic outer block provides advantages for their application in gene delivery.

For the assembly of micelles, two sets of triblock copolymers were synthesized by sequential reversible addition–fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) polymerization (Figure 1A). For the multiblock synthesis, the chain transfer agent (CTA) (propanoic acid)yl butyl trithiocarbonate (PABTC) was used, since it has optimal addition and fragmentation rates for the polymerization of acrylates and acrylamides. (36,37) The synthesis of multiblock copolymers with controlled molar masses can be challenging due to the accumulation of dead chains after each consecutive chain extension, leading to high dispersity (Đ). (38) This highlights the importance of maintaining a high proportion of chains with the thiocarbonylthio group throughout the polymerization. Since acrylates and acrylamides possess high propagation rate coefficients, the initiator concentration can be reduced while still achieving high monomer conversions, and thus, the fraction of living chains remains high. (36,39) Furthermore, the azoinitiator V-65B was chosen, since it generates radicals at an optimal rate at lower temperatures (10 h half-time decomposition temperature of 51 °C in toluene). (40) First, nBA was polymerized at 50 °C in 1,4-dioxane to obtain P(nBA) as the first hydrophobic block (H) and macroCTA (Figure 1A). For the first set of triblock copolymers, P(nBA) was chain extended with tert-butyl-protected CEAm (CEAmtB) and NAM as the anionic block (A) obtaining P[(nBA)-b-(CEAmtB-co-NAM)], followed by a chain extension with diBoc-protected GPAm (GPAmdiBoc) as the cationic block (C), yielding P[(nBA)-b-(CEAmtB-co-NAM)-b-(GPAmdiBoc)] (HACpro, protected variant). For the second set of triblock copolymers, P(nBA) was first chain extended with GPAmdiBoc, followed by a chain extension with CEAmtB and NAM, obtaining P[(nBA)-b-(GPAmdiBoc)-b-(CEAmtB-co-NAM)] (HCApro, protected variant). The two sets each consisted of three triblock copolymers with a comparable degree of polymerization (DP) of the hydrophobic block (H, DP ≈ 80) and either (i) an anionic middle block followed by a cationic outer block or (ii) a cationic middle block followed by an anionic outer block (Table 1). Preliminary experiments with block copolymers showed that a molar amount of GPAm greater than 30 mol % and low amounts of CEAm are needed to achieve high transfection efficiencies, using NAM as a “stealth” moiety and for increased colloidal stability. (41) Therefore, the amount of cationic GPAm (C) was varied between 30 and 37 mol %, while the amount of anionic CEAm (A) ranged from 6 to 14 mol %, which is shown in the bar chart of Figure 1B. Numbers after hyphen (HAC-g/c and HCA-g/c) represent the mol % of GPAm (g) and the mol % of CEAm (c).

Figure 1

Figure 1. (A) Synthesis of the triblock copolymers HAC-g/c and HCA-g/c by RAFT polymerization and subsequent deprotection (X:F3CCOO). (B) Compositions of the six triblock copolymers are pictured in a bar diagram with the respective nBA, NAM, GPAm, and CEAm content in mol %.

Table 1. Overview of the Composition and Characterization of the Protected Triblock Copolymers.
polymer code-g/cacompositionbMn,theoc (kg mol–1)Mn,SECd (kg mol–1)Đd
HACpro-34/6P[(nBA)78-b-(CEAmtB11-co-NAM35)-b-(GPAmdiBoc)65]41.542.21.20
HACpro-30/9P[(nBA)78-b-(CEAmtB17-co-NAM37)-b-(GPAmdiBoc)56]39.636.71.22
HACpro-34/14P[(nBA)80-b-(CEAmtB30-co-NAM30)-b-(GPAmdiBoc)72]47.445.91.24
HCApro-37/6P[(nBA)78-b-(GPAmdiBoc)73-b-(CEAmtB11-co-NAM36)]44.650.11.29
HCApro-31/9P[(nBA)78-b-(GPAmdiBoc)61-b-(CEAmtB17-co-NAM39)]41.748.51.21
HCApro-33/13P[(nBA)80-b-(GPAmdiBoc)69-b-(CEAmtB27-co-NAM33)]46.154.21.19
a

g: mol % of GPAm, c: mol % of CEAm.

b

Numbers were determined via 1H NMR spectroscopy and represent the DP of each monomer.

c

Calculated using eq S2.

d

Determined via SEC (eluent: DMAc + 0.21% LiCl; PMMA standard).

P(nBA), the diblock and final protected triblock copolymers were analyzed by size exclusion chromatography (SEC) to determine the experimental number-average molar masses (Mn,SEC) and Đ (Table 1 and Figure S8 and Table S6, SI). Exemplary, the SEC traces of HACpro-30/9 (cationic outer block), HCApro-31/9 (anionic outer block), and their precursors are shown in Figure 2. P(nBA)78 revealing a narrow molar mass distribution with Đ = 1.07, which shifted to higher molar masses after chain extension, while maintaining their monomodal and narrow character (Figure 2A). After the second chain extension with GPAmdiBoc, the population shifted to higher molar masses, revealing a tailing towards lower molar masses. This might be due to dead polymer chains caused by recombination throughout the block extensions and precursor chains that failed to reinitiate, resulting in a broadened molar mass distribution (Đ = 1.22). (42) For the synthesis of HCApro-31/9, the first chain extension with GPAmdiBoc led to a broadened population with a slight tailing towards lower molar masses (Đ = 1.24; Figure 2B). After the subsequent chain extension with CEAmtB and NAM, the population shifted to higher molar masses and a more narrow dispersity (Đ = 1.21). The differences between experimental and theoretical number-average molar masses can be attributed to differences in hydrodynamic volume from the PMMA standards. Furthermore, the kinetics of the copolymerization of CEAmtB and NAM were investigated by 1H NMR spectroscopy and SEC (Figures S9–S11, SI), indicating a controlled copolymerization process, which resulted in a slightly gradient structure due to the more reactive NAM. Both triblock copolymers were deprotected with trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) to expose the guanidinium and carboxy group. The deprotection was successful, since the peak of the Boc-/tert-butyl group at 1.5 ppm vanished, obtaining the final deprotected HAC-g/c and HCA-g/c polymers (Figures S12–S14, SI).

Figure 2

Figure 2. SEC traces of P(nBA)78, precursors, and (A) HACpro-30/9 and (B) HCApro-31/9 (eluent: DMAc + 0.21% LiCl, PMMA-calibration).

The triblock copolymers were assembled into micelles using the solvent exchange approach, (12) where the polymers are first dissolved in a mixture of tetrahydrofuran/methanol (THF/MeOH 80/20 v/v%). Ultrapure water was added slowly, followed by dialysis against 20 mM sodium acetate buffer (pH 5), generating micelles with a hydrophobic P(nBA) core and a hydrophilic shell. Since the guanidinium group is fully charged independent of the used pH-value (apparent pKa > 12), (40) the pH-responsive element at physiological pH is the anionic block containing CEAm and NAM (apparent pKa(PCEAm) ≈ 5.1). (31) At a pH of 5, only about half of the carboxy groups are charged, while at pH 7.4 almost all are charged (92%). Therefore, initial attempts to formulate the triblock micelles at physiological pH values failed and led to precipitation. At these pH values, both polymer blocks are highly charged and interact strongly, which might destabilize the triblock micelle solutions at the given elevated concentrations.

Size investigations by dynamic light scattering (DLS) revealed a similar Z-average value of hydrodynamic size for all six triblock micelles under acidic conditions ranging from 25 to 36 nm (Figure 3). The triblock micelles with a cationic outer block (HAC-34/6, -30/9, -34/14) showed monomodal size distributions with narrow polydispersity indices (PDIs) ranging from 0.1 to 0.2 (Figure 3, Figure S15, SI). In contrast, the triblock micelles with an anionic outer block (HCA-37/6, -31/9, -33/13) showed a bimodal intensity-weighted size distribution with increased PDIs (0.25–0.34), which was most prominent for HCA-33/13 (Figure S16, SI). Since cationic and anionic moieties were combined within the shell of the triblock micelles, an interpolyelectrolyte complex (IPEC) was expected to be formed in the shell. (43) Thus, the micelles with a cationic outer block (HAC) formed more uniform micelles compared to the HCA micelles, containing CEAm and NAM in the outer shell.

Figure 3

Figure 3. (A) Z-Average, (B) PDI, and (C) ζ-potential of the triblock copolymer micelles and micelleplexes measured by DLS. Details can be found in the Supporting Information (Figures S15–S18).

With the different micelles at hand, we now investigated the formation of micelleplexes using pDNA. In preliminary experiments, N*/P ratios (molar ratios of protonatable nitrogen atoms to phosphates of pDNA) of 20 and 3 μg mL–1 pDNA were found to be optimal to achieve high transfection efficiency and low toxicity. The complexation with the genetic material resulted in micelleplexes with sizes between 49 nm and 82 nm, which is still suitable for efficient cellular uptake by endocytosis, but larger than the initial micelles. (44) The intensity-weighted size distributions were monomodal for most of the micelleplexes with a maximum PDI of 0.36 for HCA-33/13 (Figures S17 and S18, SI). The ζ-potentials of all micelles/micelleplexes were above 20 mV independent of the sequence, which can be attributed to the excess of protonated amines due to the higher molar ratio of cationic to anionic charges in the triblock micelles and the excess of polymer micelles used for the formulation.

The cytotoxicity profiles of the polymer library were investigated via the PrestoBlue assay. Based on ISO10993–5, the mouse fibroblast cell line L929 was used. Figure 4A shows a decrease in metabolic activity with an increasing polymer concentration. The incorporation of stealth and anionic functionalities showed a positive effect on the cytocompatibility of the micelles in comparison to the cationic homopolymer poly(GPAm)71 (Gua 100), which served as control. It should be noted that the cytocompatibility improved with increasing mol % content of CEAm, whereas the sequence had lower impact (HCA-33/13 vs HAC-34/14, LC50 in Table S7).

Figure 4

Figure 4. (A) PrestoBlue assay was performed over 24 h using D10H in the L929 cell line. (B) Transfection efficiencies were investigated in D2H (dashed bars) and D10H (colored bars) for 24 + 24 h in the HEK293T cell line at N*/P 20 using 3 μg mL–1 of EGFP expressing pDNA. Values represent mean ± SD (n ≥ 3). Significances are illustrated as p* > 0.05, p** > 0.01, p*** > 0.001.

At a physiological pH value, the guanidinium group is positively charged and tends to interact with serum proteins. Therefore, a serum-reduced medium D2H (Dulbecco’s modified eagle medium (DMEM) with 2% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 10 mM 2-[4-(2-hydroxyethyl)piperazin-1-yl]ethanesulfonic acid (HEPES) buffer) was used for the transfection assays. To assess the effect of the triblock composition on gene delivery, additional transfection was performed in D10H (10% FBS), which is closer to physiological conditions. Due to the low serum concentration in D2H, higher transfection efficiencies could generally be achieved in comparison to D10H (Figure 4B: plot below, dashed bars vs colored bars).

Figure 5

Figure 5. Endosomal release was analyzed via confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) following simultaneous incubation with the non-permeable dye calcein with a final concentration of 25 μg mL–1 (green) and micelleplexes with N*/P 20 with a pDNA concentration of 3 μg mL–1 on HEK293T cells over 6 h incubation in D10H and following incubation in D20 (6 + 2 h). The cell nuclei were stained with Hoechst 33342 (blue). Green dots indicate endocytotic uptake of calcein within cellular compartments, and the diffuse green fluorescence pattern indicates calcein released to the cytosol. Non-treated and non-stained cells were used as the control.

In the case of the more cytocompatible micelles with increased content of CEAm (HCA-30/9 and HCA-33/13), the HCA micelles demonstrated superior transfection efficiencies in D2H in comparison to the HAC micelles. The order of the blocks therefore was a decisive factor and an outer anionic block appeared to be beneficial for improved transfection efficiencies, while maintaining good cytocompatibility. For the micelles with only 6 mol % CEAm (HAC-34/6 and HCA-37/6) slightly higher transfection efficiencies were achieved for the HAC micelles compared to its counterpart (HCA micelle) in D2H. In this case, the CEAm content was probably too low to result in performance differences for different block arrangements.

The transfection efficiencies in D10H were similar for both HAC-34/6 and HCA-37/6 and no significant differences in efficiency were observed between D2H and D10H (Figure 4B: plot above). Interestingly, HAC-34/14 and HCA-33/13 demonstrated the highest transfection efficiency in D10H among all tested materials despite the highest anionic CEAm content in the outer shell (HCA-33/13), which is usually considered to reduce the efficacy of a system. This is in contrast to common design principles using the cationic block at the outside due to the enhanced accessability of cationic charges for the genetic material. As this result was not expected, the membrane interaction was investigated in more detail, where commonly cationic groups play a crucial role. These are presumably less present on the outside of HCA micelles (e.g., HCA-33/13), but micelles are known to be a dynamic system and interaction with the middle block cannot be excluded. A modified hemolysis assay demonstrated an alleviating hemolytic effect with increasing molar content of anionic moiety (Figure S22A). This could be attributed to an increasing charge compensation of the excess of cationic groups, which reduced the interaction of the micelles with the membrane at physiological conditions. If the pH value decreases, as for example during endosomal uptake, the carboxylic groups become protonated and the compensation is diminished, which was also exemplified in an enhanced erythrocyte aggregation rate at pH 6 compared to pH 7.4 (Figure S22). This effect was particularly prominent for micelles with high anionic CEAm content (HAC-34/14 and HCA-33/13). Overall, the best performer HCA-33/13 featured an optimal membrane interaction adapting to pH changes and high cytocompatibility, which together yielded high performances in transfection.

To study the uptake and endosomal release property of the library, the membrane-impermeable dye calcein was used. The endocytotic uptake of the particles leads to the concurrent internalization of calcein (punctuate fluorescence pattern), and the endosomal release leads to release of calcein (broad cytosolic fluorescence pattern). In full growth medium (D10H), all polymers revealed a fast uptake after 6 h incubation in comparison to the non-complexed pDNA (Figures S19−S20, SI). A broad cytosolic fluorescence pattern of several cells could be observed by the micelleplexes with the highest anionic CEAm content (HAC-34/14 and HCA-33/13). A further 2 h incubation (total incubation time of 8 h, 6 + 2 h) led to increased endosomal release with the following intensity pattern: HAC-34/14 > HCA-33/13 > HCA-31/9 and HCA-37/6. The result revealed an improved endosomal release by an increase of the CEAm content and underlined the impact of the anionic CEAm block. However, the HAC micelle showed more intensive calcein release in comparison to the HCA composition (HAC 34/14 vs HCA-33/13), which both outperform micelles with lower CEAm content or the Gua 100 control (Figure 5).

Hydrophobic (nBA), anionic (CEAm) and cationic (GPAm) functionalized acrylate and acrylamide monomers were used to successfully synthesize triblock copolymers with narrow molar masses (Đ < 1.30) by RAFT polymerization. The arrangement of the segments was varied to assemble triblock micelles with a hydrophobic core and an ionic shell, which contained either (i) a middle anionic block followed by a cationic block (HAC) or (ii) a middle cationic segment followed by an anionic segment (HCA). In contrast to common polymeric gene delivery vehicels, negatively charged carboxy groups (CEAm) were incorporated as the pH-responsive functionalities while the guanidinium groups (GPAm) functioned as the positively charged functionalities irrespective of pH. The HAC and HCA polymer formed stable micelles with sizes ranging from 25 to 36 nm, which formed stable micelleplexes after complexation with pDNA with sizes < 80 nm. In general, the incorporation of anionic charged CEAm block improved endosomal release property and the integration of the anionic block in the outer shell of the HCA micelles increased the transfection efficiency in full growth medium with 10% serum compared to HAC micelles, when more than 6 mol % CEAm are incorporated in the outer shell. In addition, the cytocompatibility of the triblock micelles improved with increasing CEAm content. Our results demonstrated that the incorporation of an anionic block in the polymer triblock structure can provide an interesting alternative for using stealth moieties without reducing the gene delivery potential of the polymers. In addition, it became evident that the arrangement of the anionic block in the triblock copolymer affects hemolysis, membrane interaction, and transfection efficiency of the delivery vehicle. More detailed studies supported an unusual endosomal release mechanism due to the pH dependence of the anionic and not cationic functionality. This paves the way to novel concepts including anionic polymers for the delivery of genetic material.

Supporting Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsmacrolett.3c00633.

  • Materials, methods, monomer and polymer syntheses, in detail characterization by 1H NMR, SEC, and DLS, micelle(plexe) formation, evaluation of erythrocyte aggregation, and hemolysis (PDF)

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Author Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

  • Corresponding Author
    • Anja Traeger - Laboratory of Organic and Macromolecular Chemistry, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Humboldtstrasse 10, 07743 Jena, GermanyJena Center for Soft Matter, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Philosophenweg 7, 07743 Jena, GermanyOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-7734-2293 Email: [email protected]
  • Authors
    • Katharina Leer - Laboratory of Organic and Macromolecular Chemistry, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Humboldtstrasse 10, 07743 Jena, Germany
    • Liên S. Reichel - Laboratory of Organic and Macromolecular Chemistry, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Humboldtstrasse 10, 07743 Jena, Germany
    • Mara Wilhelmi - Laboratory of Organic and Macromolecular Chemistry, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Humboldtstrasse 10, 07743 Jena, Germany
    • Johannes C. Brendel - Laboratory of Organic and Macromolecular Chemistry, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Humboldtstrasse 10, 07743 Jena, GermanyJena Center for Soft Matter, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Philosophenweg 7, 07743 Jena, GermanyPresent Address: Macromolecular Chemistry I, University of Bayreuth, Universitaetsstr. 30, 95440 Bayreuth, GermanyOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-1206-1375
  • Author Contributions

    CRediT: Katharina Leer conceptualization, investigation, methodology, visualization, writing-original draft; Lien Sabrina Reichel investigation, methodology, visualization, writing-original draft; Mara Wilhelmi investigation, methodology, writing-review & editing; Johannes C. Brendel supervision, writing-review & editing; Anja Traeger conceptualization, funding acquisition, project administration, supervision, writing-review & editing.

  • Notes
    The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Acknowledgments

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This work was supported by the Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF, Germany, #13XP5034A PolyBioMik) and by the DFG-funded Collaborative Research Center PolyTarget (SFB 1278, Projects B01 and Z01, Project ID: 316213987). The authors further acknowledge support of this work by the “Thüringer Aufbaubank (TAB)” (2021 FGI 0005) and the “Europäischer Fond für regionale Entwicklung (EFRE)” (2018FGI0025) for funding of flow cytometry devices at the JCSM. J.C.B. also thanks the German Research Foundation (DFG) for generous funding within the Emmy-Noether Programme (Project ID: 358263073). The authors gratefully acknowledge Dr. Grit Festag for maintaining the SEC facilities. The authors gratefully acknowledge Sandra Henk, Carolin Kellner, and Bärbel Beringer-Siemers for taking splendid care of the cell lines and pDNA preparation. Furthermore, the authors gratefully acknowledge Elisabeth Moek for assistance in transfection assays, and Prof. U. S. Schubert for providing excellent facilities. The graphic for the Table of Contents was created with BioRender.com.

References

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article references 44 other publications.

  1. 1
    Hou, X.; Zaks, T.; Langer, R.; Dong, Y. Lipid nanoparticles for mRNA delivery. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2021, 6 (12), 10781094,  DOI: 10.1038/s41578-021-00358-0
  2. 2
    Tenchov, R.; Bird, R.; Curtze, A. E.; Zhou, Q. Lipid Nanoparticles horizontal line From Liposomes to mRNA Vaccine Delivery, a Landscape of Research Diversity and Advancement. ACS Nano 2021, 15 (11), 1698217015,  DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.1c04996
  3. 3
    Zu, H.; Gao, D. Non-viral Vectors in Gene Therapy: Recent Development, Challenges, and Prospects. AAPS J. 2021, 23 (4), 78,  DOI: 10.1208/s12248-021-00608-7
  4. 4
    Kumar, R.; Santa Chalarca, C. F.; Bockman, M. R.; Bruggen, C. V.; Grimme, C. J.; Dalal, R. J.; Hanson, M. G.; Hexum, J. K.; Reineke, T. M. Polymeric Delivery of Therapeutic Nucleic Acids. Chem. Rev. 2021, 121 (18), 1152711652,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00997
  5. 5
    Rinkenauer, A. C.; Schubert, S.; Traeger, A.; Schubert, U. S. The influence of polymer architecture on in vitro pDNA transfection. J. Mater. Chem. B 2015, 3 (38), 74777493,  DOI: 10.1039/C5TB00782H
  6. 6
    Ahmed, M.; Narain, R. Progress of RAFT based polymers in gene delivery. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2013, 38 (5), 767790,  DOI: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2012.09.008
  7. 7
    Gonçalves, S. d. Á.; Vieira, R. P. Current status of ATRP-based materials for gene therapy. React. Funct. Polym. 2020, 147, 104453,  DOI: 10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2019.104453
  8. 8
    Yin, H.; Kanasty, R. L.; Eltoukhy, A. A.; Vegas, A. J.; Dorkin, J. R.; Anderson, D. G. Non-viral vectors for gene-based therapy. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2014, 15 (8), 541555,  DOI: 10.1038/nrg3763
  9. 9
    Jarak, I.; Pereira-Silva, M.; Santos, A. C.; Veiga, F.; Cabral, H.; Figueiras, A. Multifunctional polymeric micelle-based nucleic acid delivery: Current advances and future perspectives. Appl. Mater. Today 2021, 25, 101217,  DOI: 10.1016/j.apmt.2021.101217
  10. 10
    Yousefpour Marzbali, M.; Yari Khosroushahi, A. Polymeric micelles as mighty nanocarriers for cancer gene therapy: a review. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 2017, 79 (4), 637649,  DOI: 10.1007/s00280-017-3273-1
  11. 11
    Epps, T. H., III; O'Reilly, R. K. Block copolymers: controlling nanostructure to generate functional materials - synthesis, characterization, and engineering. Chem. Sci. 2016, 7 (3), 16741689,  DOI: 10.1039/C5SC03505H
  12. 12
    Mai, Y.; Eisenberg, A. Self-assembly of block copolymers. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41 (18), 59695985,  DOI: 10.1039/c2cs35115c
  13. 13
    Pereira-Silva, M.; Jarak, I.; Santos, A. C.; Veiga, F.; Figueiras, A. Micelleplex-based nucleic acid therapeutics: from targeted stimuli-responsiveness to nanotoxicity and regulation. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2020, 153, 105461,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ejps.2020.105461
  14. 14
    Tan, Z.; Jiang, Y.; Zhang, W.; Karls, L.; Lodge, T. P.; Reineke, T. M. Polycation Architecture and Assembly Direct Successful Gene Delivery: Micelleplexes Outperform Polyplexes via Optimal DNA Packaging. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141 (40), 1580415817,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.9b06218
  15. 15
    Jiang, Y.; Reineke, T. M.; Lodge, T. P. Complexation of DNA with Cationic Copolymer Micelles: Effects of DNA Length and Topology. Macromolecules 2018, 51 (3), 11501160,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.macromol.7b02201
  16. 16
    Wang, H.; Ding, S.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, L.; You, Y. Cationic micelle: A promising nanocarrier for gene delivery with high transfection efficiency. J. Gene Med. 2019, 21 (7), e3101  DOI: 10.1002/jgm.3101
  17. 17
    Lv, H.; Zhang, S.; Wang, B.; Cui, S.; Yan, J. Toxicity of cationic lipids and cationic polymers in gene delivery. J. Controlled Release 2006, 114 (1), 100109,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2006.04.014
  18. 18
    Fang, Y.; Xue, J.; Gao, S.; Lu, A.; Yang, D.; Jiang, H.; He, Y.; Shi, K. Cleavable PEGylation: a strategy for overcoming the ″PEG dilemma″ in efficient drug delivery. Drug Delivery 2017, 24 (2), 2232,  DOI: 10.1080/10717544.2017.1388451
  19. 19
    Kierstead, P. H.; Okochi, H.; Venditto, V. J.; Chuong, T. C.; Kivimae, S.; Frechet, J. M. J.; Szoka, F. C. The effect of polymer backbone chemistry on the induction of the accelerated blood clearance in polymer modified liposomes. J. Controlled Release 2015, 213, 19,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.06.023
  20. 20
    Bludau, H.; Czapar, A. E.; Pitek, A. S.; Shukla, S.; Jordan, R.; Steinmetz, N. F. POxylation as an alternative stealth coating for biomedical applications. Eur. Polym. J. 2017, 88, 679688,  DOI: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2016.10.041
  21. 21
    Hu, Y.; Hou, Y.; Wang, H.; Lu, H. Polysarcosine as an Alternative to PEG for Therapeutic Protein Conjugation. Bioconjugate Chem. 2018, 29 (7), 22322238,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.8b00237
  22. 22
    Hu, C. M.; Fang, R. H.; Luk, B. T.; Zhang, L. Polymeric nanotherapeutics: clinical development and advances in stealth functionalization strategies. Nanoscale 2014, 6 (1), 6575,  DOI: 10.1039/C3NR05444F
  23. 23
    Zhang, Y.; Satterlee, A.; Huang, L. In vivo gene delivery by nonviral vectors: overcoming hurdles?. Mol. Ther. 2012, 20 (7), 12981304,  DOI: 10.1038/mt.2012.79
  24. 24
    Hattori, Y. Progress in the development of lipoplex and polyplex modified with anionic polymer for efficient gene delivery. J. Genet. Med. Gene Ther. 2017, 1 (1), 318,  DOI: 10.29328/journal.jgmgt.1001002
  25. 25
    Bernkop-Schnurch, A. Strategies to overcome the polycation dilemma in drug delivery. Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. 2018, 136–137, 6272,  DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2018.07.017
  26. 26
    Richter, F.; Leer, K.; Martin, L.; Mapfumo, P.; Solomun, J. I.; Kuchenbrod, M. T.; Hoeppener, S.; Brendel, J. C.; Traeger, A. The impact of anionic polymers on gene delivery: how composition and assembly help evading the toxicity-efficiency dilemma. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2021, 19 (1), 292,  DOI: 10.1186/s12951-021-00994-2
  27. 27
    Dutta, K.; Das, R.; Medeiros, J.; Kanjilal, P.; Thayumanavan, S. Charge-Conversion Strategies for Nucleic Acid Delivery. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2021, 31 (24), 2011103,  DOI: 10.1002/adfm.202011103
  28. 28
    Hu, Y.; Gong, X.; Zhang, J.; Chen, F.; Fu, C.; Li, P.; Zou, L.; Zhao, G. Polymers 2016, 8 (4), 99,  DOI: 10.3390/polym8040099
  29. 29
    Sun, Y.; Liu, H.; Yang, T.; Lang, L.; Cheng, L.; Xing, H.; Yang, L.; Ding, P. Amphoteric poly(amido amine)s with adjustable balance between transfection efficiency and cytotoxicity for gene delivery. Colloids Surf., B 2019, 175, 1017,  DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2018.11.045
  30. 30
    Ma, J.; Zhang, J.; Chi, L.; Liu, C.; Li, Y.; Tian, H. Preparation of poly (glutamic acid) shielding micelles self-assembled from polylysine-b-polyphenylalanine for gene and drug codelivery. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2020, 31 (6), 14271431,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cclet.2020.02.034
  31. 31
    Solomun, J. I.; Martin, L.; Mapfumo, P.; Moek, E.; Amro, E.; Becker, F.; Tuempel, S.; Hoeppener, S.; Rudolph, K. L.; Traeger, A. pH-sensitive packaging of cationic particles by an anionic block copolymer shell. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2022, 20 (1), 336,  DOI: 10.1186/s12951-022-01528-0
  32. 32
    Liang, K.; Bae, K. H.; Lee, F.; Xu, K.; Chung, J. E.; Gao, S. J.; Kurisawa, M. Self-assembled ternary complexes stabilized with hyaluronic acid-green tea catechin conjugates for targeted gene delivery. J. Controlled Release 2016, 226, 205216,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2016.02.004
  33. 33
    Ito, T.; Iida-Tanaka, N.; Koyama, Y. Efficient in vivo gene transfection by stable DNA/PEI complexes coated by hyaluronic acid. J. Drug Target. 2008, 16 (4), 27681,  DOI: 10.1080/10611860801900728
  34. 34
    Rinkenauer, A. C.; Schallon, A.; Günther, U.; Wagner, M.; Betthausen, E.; Schubert, U. S.; Schacher, F. H. A Paradigm Change: Efficient Transfection of Human Leukemia Cells by Stimuli-Responsive Multicompartment Micelles. ACS Nano 2013, 7 (11), 96219631,  DOI: 10.1021/nn402072d
  35. 35
    Convertine, A. J.; Benoit, D. S.; Duvall, C. L.; Hoffman, A. S.; Stayton, P. S. Development of a novel endosomolytic diblock copolymer for siRNA delivery. J. Controlled Release 2009, 133 (3), 2219,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2008.10.004
  36. 36
    Gody, G.; Maschmeyer, T.; Zetterlund, P. B.; Perrier, S. Exploitation of the Degenerative Transfer Mechanism in RAFT Polymerization for Synthesis of Polymer of High Livingness at Full Monomer Conversion. Macromolecules 2014, 47 (2), 639649,  DOI: 10.1021/ma402286e
  37. 37
    Moad, G. Mechanism and Kinetics of Dithiobenzoate-Mediated RAFT Polymerization - Status of the Dilemma. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2014, 215 (1), 926,  DOI: 10.1002/macp.201300562
  38. 38
    Keddie, D. J. A guide to the synthesis of block copolymers using reversible-addition fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) polymerization. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43 (2), 496505,  DOI: 10.1039/C3CS60290G
  39. 39
    Gody, G.; Maschmeyer, T.; Zetterlund, P. B.; Perrier, S. Pushing the Limit of the RAFT Process: Multiblock Copolymers by One-Pot Rapid Multiple Chain Extensions at Full Monomer Conversion. Macromolecules 2014, 47 (10), 34513460,  DOI: 10.1021/ma402435n
  40. 40
    Richter, F.; Martin, L.; Leer, K.; Moek, E.; Hausig, F.; Brendel, J. C.; Traeger, A. Tuning of endosomal escape and gene expression by functional groups, molecular weight and transfection medium: a structure-activity relationship study. J. Mater. Chem. B 2020, 8 (23), 50265041,  DOI: 10.1039/D0TB00340A
  41. 41
    Leer, K.; Reichel, L. S.; Kimmig, J.; Richter, F.; Hoeppener, S.; Brendel, J. C.; Zechel, S.; Schubert, U. S.; Traeger, A. Optimization of Mixed Micelles Based on Oppositely Charged Block Copolymers by Machine Learning for Application in Gene Delivery. Small 2023, e2306116  DOI: 10.1002/smll.202306116
  42. 42
    Martin, L.; Gody, G.; Perrier, S. Preparation of complex multiblock copolymers via aqueous RAFT polymerization at room temperature. Polym. Chem. 2015, 6 (27), 48754886,  DOI: 10.1039/C5PY00478K
  43. 43
    Pergushov, D. V.; Müller, A. H. E.; Schacher, F. H. Micellar interpolyelectrolyte complexes. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41 (21), 68886901,  DOI: 10.1039/c2cs35135h
  44. 44
    Solomun, J. I.; Cinar, G.; Mapfumo, P.; Richter, F.; Moek, E.; Hausig, F.; Martin, L.; Hoeppener, S.; Nischang, I.; Traeger, A. Solely aqueous formulation of hydrophobic cationic polymers for efficient gene delivery. Int. J. Pharm. 2021, 593, 120080,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2020.120080

Cited By

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!
Citation Statements
Explore this article's citation statements on scite.ai

This article is cited by 2 publications.

  1. Shanshan Xiao, Ning Li, Shaobo Feng, Ziyuan Song. Multiblock Copolypeptides as Efficient Gene Carriers: Impact of Hydrophobic Fraction and Distribution. ACS Applied Polymer Materials 2025, Article ASAP.
  2. Anja Traeger, Meike N. Leiske. The Whole Is Greater than the Sum of Its Parts – Challenges and Perspectives in Polyelectrolytes. Biomacromolecules 2025, 26 (1) , 5-32. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.4c01061

ACS Macro Letters

Cite this: ACS Macro Lett. 2024, 13, 2, 158–165
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsmacrolett.3c00633
Published January 17, 2024

Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under

CC-BY 4.0 .

Article Views

1031

Altmetric

-

Citations

Learn about these metrics

Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.

  • Abstract

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. (A) Synthesis of the triblock copolymers HAC-g/c and HCA-g/c by RAFT polymerization and subsequent deprotection (X:F3CCOO). (B) Compositions of the six triblock copolymers are pictured in a bar diagram with the respective nBA, NAM, GPAm, and CEAm content in mol %.

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. SEC traces of P(nBA)78, precursors, and (A) HACpro-30/9 and (B) HCApro-31/9 (eluent: DMAc + 0.21% LiCl, PMMA-calibration).

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. (A) Z-Average, (B) PDI, and (C) ζ-potential of the triblock copolymer micelles and micelleplexes measured by DLS. Details can be found in the Supporting Information (Figures S15–S18).

    Figure 4

    Figure 4. (A) PrestoBlue assay was performed over 24 h using D10H in the L929 cell line. (B) Transfection efficiencies were investigated in D2H (dashed bars) and D10H (colored bars) for 24 + 24 h in the HEK293T cell line at N*/P 20 using 3 μg mL–1 of EGFP expressing pDNA. Values represent mean ± SD (n ≥ 3). Significances are illustrated as p* > 0.05, p** > 0.01, p*** > 0.001.

    Figure 5

    Figure 5. Endosomal release was analyzed via confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) following simultaneous incubation with the non-permeable dye calcein with a final concentration of 25 μg mL–1 (green) and micelleplexes with N*/P 20 with a pDNA concentration of 3 μg mL–1 on HEK293T cells over 6 h incubation in D10H and following incubation in D20 (6 + 2 h). The cell nuclei were stained with Hoechst 33342 (blue). Green dots indicate endocytotic uptake of calcein within cellular compartments, and the diffuse green fluorescence pattern indicates calcein released to the cytosol. Non-treated and non-stained cells were used as the control.

  • References


    This article references 44 other publications.

    1. 1
      Hou, X.; Zaks, T.; Langer, R.; Dong, Y. Lipid nanoparticles for mRNA delivery. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2021, 6 (12), 10781094,  DOI: 10.1038/s41578-021-00358-0
    2. 2
      Tenchov, R.; Bird, R.; Curtze, A. E.; Zhou, Q. Lipid Nanoparticles horizontal line From Liposomes to mRNA Vaccine Delivery, a Landscape of Research Diversity and Advancement. ACS Nano 2021, 15 (11), 1698217015,  DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.1c04996
    3. 3
      Zu, H.; Gao, D. Non-viral Vectors in Gene Therapy: Recent Development, Challenges, and Prospects. AAPS J. 2021, 23 (4), 78,  DOI: 10.1208/s12248-021-00608-7
    4. 4
      Kumar, R.; Santa Chalarca, C. F.; Bockman, M. R.; Bruggen, C. V.; Grimme, C. J.; Dalal, R. J.; Hanson, M. G.; Hexum, J. K.; Reineke, T. M. Polymeric Delivery of Therapeutic Nucleic Acids. Chem. Rev. 2021, 121 (18), 1152711652,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00997
    5. 5
      Rinkenauer, A. C.; Schubert, S.; Traeger, A.; Schubert, U. S. The influence of polymer architecture on in vitro pDNA transfection. J. Mater. Chem. B 2015, 3 (38), 74777493,  DOI: 10.1039/C5TB00782H
    6. 6
      Ahmed, M.; Narain, R. Progress of RAFT based polymers in gene delivery. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2013, 38 (5), 767790,  DOI: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2012.09.008
    7. 7
      Gonçalves, S. d. Á.; Vieira, R. P. Current status of ATRP-based materials for gene therapy. React. Funct. Polym. 2020, 147, 104453,  DOI: 10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2019.104453
    8. 8
      Yin, H.; Kanasty, R. L.; Eltoukhy, A. A.; Vegas, A. J.; Dorkin, J. R.; Anderson, D. G. Non-viral vectors for gene-based therapy. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2014, 15 (8), 541555,  DOI: 10.1038/nrg3763
    9. 9
      Jarak, I.; Pereira-Silva, M.; Santos, A. C.; Veiga, F.; Cabral, H.; Figueiras, A. Multifunctional polymeric micelle-based nucleic acid delivery: Current advances and future perspectives. Appl. Mater. Today 2021, 25, 101217,  DOI: 10.1016/j.apmt.2021.101217
    10. 10
      Yousefpour Marzbali, M.; Yari Khosroushahi, A. Polymeric micelles as mighty nanocarriers for cancer gene therapy: a review. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 2017, 79 (4), 637649,  DOI: 10.1007/s00280-017-3273-1
    11. 11
      Epps, T. H., III; O'Reilly, R. K. Block copolymers: controlling nanostructure to generate functional materials - synthesis, characterization, and engineering. Chem. Sci. 2016, 7 (3), 16741689,  DOI: 10.1039/C5SC03505H
    12. 12
      Mai, Y.; Eisenberg, A. Self-assembly of block copolymers. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41 (18), 59695985,  DOI: 10.1039/c2cs35115c
    13. 13
      Pereira-Silva, M.; Jarak, I.; Santos, A. C.; Veiga, F.; Figueiras, A. Micelleplex-based nucleic acid therapeutics: from targeted stimuli-responsiveness to nanotoxicity and regulation. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2020, 153, 105461,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ejps.2020.105461
    14. 14
      Tan, Z.; Jiang, Y.; Zhang, W.; Karls, L.; Lodge, T. P.; Reineke, T. M. Polycation Architecture and Assembly Direct Successful Gene Delivery: Micelleplexes Outperform Polyplexes via Optimal DNA Packaging. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141 (40), 1580415817,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.9b06218
    15. 15
      Jiang, Y.; Reineke, T. M.; Lodge, T. P. Complexation of DNA with Cationic Copolymer Micelles: Effects of DNA Length and Topology. Macromolecules 2018, 51 (3), 11501160,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.macromol.7b02201
    16. 16
      Wang, H.; Ding, S.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, L.; You, Y. Cationic micelle: A promising nanocarrier for gene delivery with high transfection efficiency. J. Gene Med. 2019, 21 (7), e3101  DOI: 10.1002/jgm.3101
    17. 17
      Lv, H.; Zhang, S.; Wang, B.; Cui, S.; Yan, J. Toxicity of cationic lipids and cationic polymers in gene delivery. J. Controlled Release 2006, 114 (1), 100109,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2006.04.014
    18. 18
      Fang, Y.; Xue, J.; Gao, S.; Lu, A.; Yang, D.; Jiang, H.; He, Y.; Shi, K. Cleavable PEGylation: a strategy for overcoming the ″PEG dilemma″ in efficient drug delivery. Drug Delivery 2017, 24 (2), 2232,  DOI: 10.1080/10717544.2017.1388451
    19. 19
      Kierstead, P. H.; Okochi, H.; Venditto, V. J.; Chuong, T. C.; Kivimae, S.; Frechet, J. M. J.; Szoka, F. C. The effect of polymer backbone chemistry on the induction of the accelerated blood clearance in polymer modified liposomes. J. Controlled Release 2015, 213, 19,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.06.023
    20. 20
      Bludau, H.; Czapar, A. E.; Pitek, A. S.; Shukla, S.; Jordan, R.; Steinmetz, N. F. POxylation as an alternative stealth coating for biomedical applications. Eur. Polym. J. 2017, 88, 679688,  DOI: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2016.10.041
    21. 21
      Hu, Y.; Hou, Y.; Wang, H.; Lu, H. Polysarcosine as an Alternative to PEG for Therapeutic Protein Conjugation. Bioconjugate Chem. 2018, 29 (7), 22322238,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.8b00237
    22. 22
      Hu, C. M.; Fang, R. H.; Luk, B. T.; Zhang, L. Polymeric nanotherapeutics: clinical development and advances in stealth functionalization strategies. Nanoscale 2014, 6 (1), 6575,  DOI: 10.1039/C3NR05444F
    23. 23
      Zhang, Y.; Satterlee, A.; Huang, L. In vivo gene delivery by nonviral vectors: overcoming hurdles?. Mol. Ther. 2012, 20 (7), 12981304,  DOI: 10.1038/mt.2012.79
    24. 24
      Hattori, Y. Progress in the development of lipoplex and polyplex modified with anionic polymer for efficient gene delivery. J. Genet. Med. Gene Ther. 2017, 1 (1), 318,  DOI: 10.29328/journal.jgmgt.1001002
    25. 25
      Bernkop-Schnurch, A. Strategies to overcome the polycation dilemma in drug delivery. Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. 2018, 136–137, 6272,  DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2018.07.017
    26. 26
      Richter, F.; Leer, K.; Martin, L.; Mapfumo, P.; Solomun, J. I.; Kuchenbrod, M. T.; Hoeppener, S.; Brendel, J. C.; Traeger, A. The impact of anionic polymers on gene delivery: how composition and assembly help evading the toxicity-efficiency dilemma. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2021, 19 (1), 292,  DOI: 10.1186/s12951-021-00994-2
    27. 27
      Dutta, K.; Das, R.; Medeiros, J.; Kanjilal, P.; Thayumanavan, S. Charge-Conversion Strategies for Nucleic Acid Delivery. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2021, 31 (24), 2011103,  DOI: 10.1002/adfm.202011103
    28. 28
      Hu, Y.; Gong, X.; Zhang, J.; Chen, F.; Fu, C.; Li, P.; Zou, L.; Zhao, G. Polymers 2016, 8 (4), 99,  DOI: 10.3390/polym8040099
    29. 29
      Sun, Y.; Liu, H.; Yang, T.; Lang, L.; Cheng, L.; Xing, H.; Yang, L.; Ding, P. Amphoteric poly(amido amine)s with adjustable balance between transfection efficiency and cytotoxicity for gene delivery. Colloids Surf., B 2019, 175, 1017,  DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2018.11.045
    30. 30
      Ma, J.; Zhang, J.; Chi, L.; Liu, C.; Li, Y.; Tian, H. Preparation of poly (glutamic acid) shielding micelles self-assembled from polylysine-b-polyphenylalanine for gene and drug codelivery. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2020, 31 (6), 14271431,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cclet.2020.02.034
    31. 31
      Solomun, J. I.; Martin, L.; Mapfumo, P.; Moek, E.; Amro, E.; Becker, F.; Tuempel, S.; Hoeppener, S.; Rudolph, K. L.; Traeger, A. pH-sensitive packaging of cationic particles by an anionic block copolymer shell. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2022, 20 (1), 336,  DOI: 10.1186/s12951-022-01528-0
    32. 32
      Liang, K.; Bae, K. H.; Lee, F.; Xu, K.; Chung, J. E.; Gao, S. J.; Kurisawa, M. Self-assembled ternary complexes stabilized with hyaluronic acid-green tea catechin conjugates for targeted gene delivery. J. Controlled Release 2016, 226, 205216,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2016.02.004
    33. 33
      Ito, T.; Iida-Tanaka, N.; Koyama, Y. Efficient in vivo gene transfection by stable DNA/PEI complexes coated by hyaluronic acid. J. Drug Target. 2008, 16 (4), 27681,  DOI: 10.1080/10611860801900728
    34. 34
      Rinkenauer, A. C.; Schallon, A.; Günther, U.; Wagner, M.; Betthausen, E.; Schubert, U. S.; Schacher, F. H. A Paradigm Change: Efficient Transfection of Human Leukemia Cells by Stimuli-Responsive Multicompartment Micelles. ACS Nano 2013, 7 (11), 96219631,  DOI: 10.1021/nn402072d
    35. 35
      Convertine, A. J.; Benoit, D. S.; Duvall, C. L.; Hoffman, A. S.; Stayton, P. S. Development of a novel endosomolytic diblock copolymer for siRNA delivery. J. Controlled Release 2009, 133 (3), 2219,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2008.10.004
    36. 36
      Gody, G.; Maschmeyer, T.; Zetterlund, P. B.; Perrier, S. Exploitation of the Degenerative Transfer Mechanism in RAFT Polymerization for Synthesis of Polymer of High Livingness at Full Monomer Conversion. Macromolecules 2014, 47 (2), 639649,  DOI: 10.1021/ma402286e
    37. 37
      Moad, G. Mechanism and Kinetics of Dithiobenzoate-Mediated RAFT Polymerization - Status of the Dilemma. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2014, 215 (1), 926,  DOI: 10.1002/macp.201300562
    38. 38
      Keddie, D. J. A guide to the synthesis of block copolymers using reversible-addition fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) polymerization. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43 (2), 496505,  DOI: 10.1039/C3CS60290G
    39. 39
      Gody, G.; Maschmeyer, T.; Zetterlund, P. B.; Perrier, S. Pushing the Limit of the RAFT Process: Multiblock Copolymers by One-Pot Rapid Multiple Chain Extensions at Full Monomer Conversion. Macromolecules 2014, 47 (10), 34513460,  DOI: 10.1021/ma402435n
    40. 40
      Richter, F.; Martin, L.; Leer, K.; Moek, E.; Hausig, F.; Brendel, J. C.; Traeger, A. Tuning of endosomal escape and gene expression by functional groups, molecular weight and transfection medium: a structure-activity relationship study. J. Mater. Chem. B 2020, 8 (23), 50265041,  DOI: 10.1039/D0TB00340A
    41. 41
      Leer, K.; Reichel, L. S.; Kimmig, J.; Richter, F.; Hoeppener, S.; Brendel, J. C.; Zechel, S.; Schubert, U. S.; Traeger, A. Optimization of Mixed Micelles Based on Oppositely Charged Block Copolymers by Machine Learning for Application in Gene Delivery. Small 2023, e2306116  DOI: 10.1002/smll.202306116
    42. 42
      Martin, L.; Gody, G.; Perrier, S. Preparation of complex multiblock copolymers via aqueous RAFT polymerization at room temperature. Polym. Chem. 2015, 6 (27), 48754886,  DOI: 10.1039/C5PY00478K
    43. 43
      Pergushov, D. V.; Müller, A. H. E.; Schacher, F. H. Micellar interpolyelectrolyte complexes. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41 (21), 68886901,  DOI: 10.1039/c2cs35135h
    44. 44
      Solomun, J. I.; Cinar, G.; Mapfumo, P.; Richter, F.; Moek, E.; Hausig, F.; Martin, L.; Hoeppener, S.; Nischang, I.; Traeger, A. Solely aqueous formulation of hydrophobic cationic polymers for efficient gene delivery. Int. J. Pharm. 2021, 593, 120080,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2020.120080
  • Supporting Information

    Supporting Information


    The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsmacrolett.3c00633.

    • Materials, methods, monomer and polymer syntheses, in detail characterization by 1H NMR, SEC, and DLS, micelle(plexe) formation, evaluation of erythrocyte aggregation, and hemolysis (PDF)


    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.