Exploring Non-orthosteric Interactions with a Series of Potent and Selective A3 AntagonistsClick to copy article linkArticle link copied!
- Darío Miranda-PastorizaDarío Miranda-PastorizaCentro Singular de Investigación en Química Biolóxica e Materiais Moleculares (CIQUS) and Departamento de Química Orgánica, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, SpainMore by Darío Miranda-Pastoriza
- Rodrigo BernárdezRodrigo BernárdezCentro Singular de Investigación en Química Biolóxica e Materiais Moleculares (CIQUS) and Departamento de Química Orgánica, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, SpainMore by Rodrigo Bernárdez
- Jhonny AzuajeJhonny AzuajeCentro Singular de Investigación en Química Biolóxica e Materiais Moleculares (CIQUS) and Departamento de Química Orgánica, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, SpainMore by Jhonny Azuaje
- Rubén Prieto-DíazRubén Prieto-DíazCentro Singular de Investigación en Química Biolóxica e Materiais Moleculares (CIQUS) andDepartment of Cell and Molecular Biology, SciLifeLab, Uppsala University, Uppsala SE-75124, SwedenDepartamento de Química Orgánica, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, SpainMore by Rubén Prieto-Díaz
- Maria MajellaroMaria MajellaroCentro Singular de Investigación en Química Biolóxica e Materiais Moleculares (CIQUS) and Departamento de Química Orgánica, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, SpainMore by Maria Majellaro
- Ashish V. TamhankarAshish V. TamhankarDepartment of Cell and Molecular Biology, SciLifeLab, Uppsala University, Uppsala SE-75124, SwedenMore by Ashish V. Tamhankar
- Lucien KoenekoopLucien KoenekoopDepartment of Cell and Molecular Biology, SciLifeLab, Uppsala University, Uppsala SE-75124, SwedenMore by Lucien Koenekoop
- Alejandro GonzálezAlejandro GonzálezCentro Singular de Investigación en Medicina Molecular y Enfermedades Crónicas (CIMUS). Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, SpainMore by Alejandro González
- Claudia Gioé-GalloClaudia Gioé-GalloCentro Singular de Investigación en Química Biolóxica e Materiais Moleculares (CIQUS) and Departamento de Química Orgánica, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, SpainMore by Claudia Gioé-Gallo
- Ana Mallo-AbreuAna Mallo-AbreuCentro Singular de Investigación en Química Biolóxica e Materiais Moleculares (CIQUS) and Departamento de Química Orgánica, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, SpainMore by Ana Mallo-Abreu
- José Brea*José Brea*Email: [email protected]. Phone: +34 881815459. Fax: +34-8818115474Centro Singular de Investigación en Medicina Molecular y Enfermedades Crónicas (CIMUS). Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, SpainMore by José Brea
- M. Isabel LozaM. Isabel LozaCentro Singular de Investigación en Medicina Molecular y Enfermedades Crónicas (CIMUS). Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, SpainMore by M. Isabel Loza
- Aitor García-ReyAitor García-ReyCentro Singular de Investigación en Química Biolóxica e Materiais Moleculares (CIQUS) and Departamento de Química Orgánica, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, SpainMore by Aitor García-Rey
- Xerardo García-MeraXerardo García-MeraDepartamento de Química Orgánica, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, SpainMore by Xerardo García-Mera
- Hugo Gutiérrez-de-Terán*Hugo Gutiérrez-de-Terán*Email: [email protected]. Phone: +46(0)184715056.Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, SciLifeLab, Uppsala University, Uppsala SE-75124, SwedenMore by Hugo Gutiérrez-de-Terán
- Eddy Sotelo*Eddy Sotelo*Email: [email protected]. Phone: +34 881815732. Fax: +34-881815704.Centro Singular de Investigación en Química Biolóxica e Materiais Moleculares (CIQUS) and Departamento de Química Orgánica, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, SpainMore by Eddy Sotelo
Abstract
A library of potent and highly A3AR selective pyrimidine-based compounds was designed to explore non-orthosteric interactions within this receptor. Starting from a prototypical orthosteric A3AR antagonist (ISVY130), the structure-based design explored functionalized residues at the exocyclic amide L1 region and aimed to provide additional interactions outside the A3AR orthosteric site. The novel ligands were assembled through an efficient and succinct synthetic approach, resulting in compounds that retain the A3AR potent and selective profile while improving the solubility of the original scaffold. The experimentally demonstrated tolerability of the L1 region to structural functionalization was further assessed by molecular dynamics simulations, giving hints of the non-orthosteric interactions explored by these series. The results pave the way to explore newly functionalized A3AR ligands, including covalent drugs and molecular probes for diagnostic and delivery purposes.
This publication is licensed under
License Summary*
You are free to share(copy and redistribute) this article in any medium or format and to adapt(remix, transform, and build upon) the material for any purpose, even commercially within the parameters below:
Creative Commons (CC): This is a Creative Commons license.
Attribution (BY): Credit must be given to the creator.
*Disclaimer
This summary highlights only some of the key features and terms of the actual license. It is not a license and has no legal value. Carefully review the actual license before using these materials.
License Summary*
You are free to share(copy and redistribute) this article in any medium or format and to adapt(remix, transform, and build upon) the material for any purpose, even commercially within the parameters below:
Creative Commons (CC): This is a Creative Commons license.
Attribution (BY): Credit must be given to the creator.
*Disclaimer
This summary highlights only some of the key features and terms of the actual license. It is not a license and has no legal value. Carefully review the actual license before using these materials.
License Summary*
You are free to share(copy and redistribute) this article in any medium or format and to adapt(remix, transform, and build upon) the material for any purpose, even commercially within the parameters below:
Creative Commons (CC): This is a Creative Commons license.
Attribution (BY): Credit must be given to the creator.
*Disclaimer
This summary highlights only some of the key features and terms of the actual license. It is not a license and has no legal value. Carefully review the actual license before using these materials.
Special Issue
Published as part of the ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters virtual special issue “Medicinal Chemistry in Portugal and Spain: A Strong Iberian Alliance”.
The endogenous nucleoside adenosine (Ado) is essential for the correct operation of all the mammalian cells. (1,2) Most of Ado’s actions are triggered by the activation of four membrane receptors, namely, adenosine receptors or ARs (e.g., A1AR, A2AAR, A2BAR, and A3AR). (2,3) From a pathological point of view, extracellular levels of Ado result in two well-defined and opposed effects. (4−6) While in some cases it is shown to impede the progression of the disease, in others the overproduction of Ado has a protective and stimulant effect that facilitates the progression of the pathology. Hence, regulation of the adenosinergic signaling pathways is emerging as a highly versatile approach addressing clinical challenges in a variety of therapeutic fields. (7,8)
Adenosine A3 receptor (A3AR) is the most recent AR subtype to be characterized, (9) albeit not yet at the structural level. Expressed in heart, brain, lung, colon, and immune cells, activation of A3AR inhibits adenylate cyclase, increases phosphatidylinositol phospholipase C and D activity, and elevates intracellular Ca2+ and inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate levels. A3AR is heavily implicated in a variety of cardiovascular and neurological disorders (10) but is also overexpressed in several cancer cells, (5) making them a possible biomarker for cancer diagnosis, prognosis, and therapeutic monitoring. Despite being recognized as an attractive target to treat several pathologies (e.g., cancer, rheumatoid arthritis, or glaucoma), A3AR remains an enigmatic and controversial receptor. (11,12) Its contradictory signaling and dual behavior in various pathological conditions highlight that the molecular basis of A3AR function remains elusive. (10,11) Perhaps for these reasons only few A3AR ligands reached advanced preclinical characterization or clinical trials. (13,14) As far as we know, Palobiofarma ligands PBF-677 and PFB-1650 (structures not disclosed) are the only A3AR antagonists that entered clinical studies (for ulcerative colitis and psoriasis, respectively). (15) Furthermore, A3AR biased modulator FM101 is also in clinical trials for glaucoma and hepatitis. (16,17) Hence, there is a growing demand of A3AR modulators and pharmacological tools enabling researchers to better define its function in pathologic and physiologic settings and thus unequivocally validate its therapeutic potential.
Our laboratories have been recently focused on the development of potent and subtype-selective A3AR antagonists. (18−20) Our innovative approach combines concise and efficient synthetic methodologies with structure-based computer-aided design, allowing the identification of interesting scaffolds, including 4-amido-2,6-diarylpyrimidines (18) (Figure 1), which were demonstrated to be superior to their regiosiomers (e.g., 2-amido-4,6-diarylpyrimidines). The binding model generated for this scaffold involved a double hydrogen bond with Asn2506.55 and π–π stacking with Phe168EL2, (18,19) conserved among all ARs, while the L2 and L3 fragments were optimally accommodated within transmembrane (TM) regions TM5-TM3 and TM2-TM7, respectively (Figure 1). (19) The modeling allowed us to explain the initial structure–activity relationship (SAR) within these series and the marked selectivity for the A3AR, resulting from specific interactions in the pocket surrounding the L2 substituent, but most importantly it drove the optimization of the substitution patterns for the aryl fragments (18,19) as well as the superior affinity of pyrimidine versus pyridine scaffolds (Figure 1). (20)
Figure 1
Figure 1. Model A3AR antagonists, design strategy, and structure of herein explored ligands.
In the present study, we further explore a prototypical hit compound generated in those studies (Figure 1) by incorporating functionalized residues at the L1 region, designed to provide additional interactions out the A3AR orthosteric site. The novel ligands retain the A3AR potent and selective profile while improving the solubility, paving the way for the development of newly functionalized A3AR ligands, including covalent drugs and molecular probes for diagnostic and delivery purposes.
The synthesis of targeted structures required the structural derivatization of the 4-amino-2,6-di(4-methoxyphenyl)pyrimidine (1). Treatment of 1 with either succinic (2a) or glycolic anhydride (2b) afforded the corresponding carboxylic acids 2a,b (Scheme 1), which contain the pharmacophore while lightly differing in length and the presence of the heteroatom. Carboxylic acids (2a,b) were employed as reactive precursors for the assembly of exploratory series I and II (Scheme 1, compounds 7–10) using two convergent and highly reliable Ugi-based transformations (Scheme 1). Equimolar amounts of 2a,b, formaldehyde (3), ammonia or methylamine (4a,b), and three isocyanides (5a–c) were treated under the Ugi reaction conditions (U-4CR), in methanol at room temperature (48 h), affording the targeted adducts 7 and 8 (series I) with satisfactory yields. In a similar fashion but substituting the primary amines (4a,b) with piperazine, the piperazinyl derivatives 9 and 10 (series II) were obtained. All ligands obtained were isolated and subsequently purified by column chromatography, rendering the target structures in moderate to satisfactory yields (45–78%). A comprehensive account of the synthesis, spectroscopic and analytical data for reported ligands, as well as the HPLC traces of representative ligands herein described are provided in the Supporting Information.
Scheme 1
The adenosinergic profile (affinity and selectivity) of the 18 novel pyrimidine derivatives (7–10) was evaluated in vitro (hAR subtypes) using radioligand binding experiments (Tables 1 and 2). Briefly, hARs were expressed in transfected CHO (A1AR), HeLa (A2AAR and A3AR), and HEK-293 (A2BAR) cells. (3H)-8-Cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine ([3H]DPCPX) for A1AR and [3H]NECA for A3AR were used as radioligands in the assays. Data obtained are expressed as Ki (nM, n = 3) or as percentage inhibition of specific binding at 1 μM (n = 2, mean) for compounds that did not fully displace the specific binding of the radioligand. Ki values were calculated by fitting the data with nonlinear regression using Prism 2.1 software (GraphPad). As a complement of the pharmacological characterization of the herein reported ligands, its A3AR affinity and those of the three reference AR antagonists (XAC, ISVY-130, (18) and MRS 1220) were evaluated using a fluorescence polarization (FP) screening method (Tables 1 and 2). CELT-228, a potent (Ki = 52.7 nM) and highly selective commercially available A3AR fluorescent ligand (Celtarys Research), was employed. For calculating the affinity of the new compounds for the receptor, different concentrations of the test compounds were then incubated (30 min) at ambient temperature with membranes expressing human A3 receptors in 96-well plates in the presence of 75 nM CELT-228 and the fluorescence polarization was measured in each well. Representative curves obtained for selected compounds (7d, 9a, and 10a) are shown in Figure 2.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Concentration–percent of specific binding of CELT-228 curves obtained with compounds 7d (red), 9a (black), 9c (green), and 10a (blue). Points represent the mean ± SEM (vertical bars) of triplicate measurements.

Ki (nM) or % at 1 μM | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
compd | R1 | R2 | hA1a | hA2Ab | hA2Bc | hA3d | hA3e |
7a | H | t-Bu | 10% | 3% | 4% | 36.7 ± 7.2 | 15.0 ± 2.6 |
7b | H | Cy | 5% | 9% | 16% | 74.2 ± 10.9 | 35.1 ± 5.0 |
7c | H | Bn | 2% | 3% | 3% | 50.8 ± 9.0 | 26.9 ± 2.8 |
7d, ISAM-DM10 | Me | t-Bu | 32% | 3% | 10% | 15.8 ± 4.3 | 4.6 ± 1.6 |
7e | Me | Cy | 9% | 11% | 1% | 52.9 ± 11.8 | 18.5 ± 4.5 |
7f | Me | Bn | 32% | 20% | 2% | 35.4 ± 11.2 | 9.5 ± 3.1 |
8a | H | t-Bu | 7% | 9% | 3% | 19.7 ± 2.7 | 11.2 ± 3.7 |
8b | H | Cy | 6% | 9% | 3% | 21.4 ± 1.5 | 14.0 ± 2.9 |
8c | H | Bn | 9% | 1% | 2% | 185.2 ± 20.7 | 64.6 ± 4.6 |
8d | Me | t-Bu | 20% | 4% | 2% | 19.4 ± 3.7 | 7.2 ± 1.1 |
8e | Me | Cy | 13% | 8% | 2% | 23.7 ± 2.2 | 10.1 ± 3.1 |
8f | Me | Bn | 6% | 1% | 2% | 40.1 ± 5.7 | 19.0 ± 3.7 |
XAC | 29.1 ± 7.7 | 1.0 ± 0.2 | 141.0 ± 26.6 | 91.9 ± 16.1 | 25.3 ± 6.9 | ||
ISVY-130 (18) | 1% | 10% | 4% | 3.60 ± 0.8 | 1.7 ± 0.6 | ||
MRS 1220 | 1.70 ± 0.1 | 1.4 ± 0.4 |
Displacement of specific [3H]DPCPX binding in human CHO cells expressed as Ki ± SEM in nM (n = 3) or percentage displacement of specific binding at a concentration of 1 μM (n = 2).
Displacement of specific [3H]4-(2-[7-amino-2-(2-furyl)[1,2,4]triazolo[2,3-a][1,3,5]triazin-5-ylamino]ethyl)phenol binding in human HeLa cells expressed as Ki ± SEM in nM (n = 3) or percentage displacement of specific binding at a concentration of 1 μM (n = 2).
Displacement of specific [3H]DPCPX binding in human HEK-293 cells expressed as Ki ± SEM in nM (n = 3) or percentage displacement of specific binding at a concentration of 1 μM (n = 2).
Displacement of specific [3H]NECA binding in human HeLa cells expressed as Ki ± SEM in nM (n = 3) or percentage displacement of specific binding at a concentration of 1 μM (n = 2).
Displacement of specific binding of CELT-228 detected by means of fluorescence polarization measurements (n = 3). XAC (N-(2-aminoethyl)-2-(4-(2,6-dioxo-1,3-dipropyl-2,3,6,7-tetrahydro-1H-purin-8-yl)phenoxy)acetamide), ISVY-130 (N-(2,6-bis(4-methoxyphenyl)pyrimidin-4-yl)acetamide), and MRS 1220 (9-chloro-2-(2-furanyl)-5-((phenylacetyl)amino)-[1,2,4]triazolo[1,5-c]quinazoline) pharmacological data added as standard of A3AR antagonists.

Ki (nM) or % at 1 μM | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
compd | R2 | hA1a | hA2Ab | hA2Bc | hA3d | hA3e |
9a, ISAM-DM13 | t-Bu | 19% | 4% | 1% | 5.8 ± 0.7 | 1.8 ± 0.6 |
9b | Cy | 9% | 1% | 1% | 35.1 ± 6.4 | 10.5 ± 2.8 |
9c | Bn | 6% | 9% | 2% | 11.6 ± 3.3 | 3.4 ± 0.7 |
10a, ISAM-DM21 | t-Bu | 9% | 36% | 3% | 13.6 ± 1.3 | 4.0 ± 1.2 |
10b | Cy | 11% | 3% | 2% | 16.1 ± 3.8 | 18.3 ± 2.6 |
10c | Bn | 2% | 7% | 1% | 33.0 ± 5.4 | 9.3 ± 3.1 |
XAC | 29.1 ± 7.7 | 1.0 ± 0.2 | 141.0 ± 26.6 | 91.9 ± 16.1 | 25.3 ± 6.9 | |
ISVY-130 (18) | 1% | 10% | 4% | 3.60 ± 0.8 | 1.7 ± 0.6 | |
MRS 1220 | 1.70 ± 0.1 | 1.4 ± 0.4 |
Displacement of specific [3H]DPCPX binding in human CHO cells expressed as Ki ± SEM in nM (n = 3) or percentage displacement of specific binding at a concentration of 1 μM (n = 2).
Displacement of specific [3H]4-(2-[7-amino-2-(2-furyl)[1,2,4]triazolo[2,3-a][1,3,5]triazin-5-ylamino]ethyl)phenol binding in human HeLa cells expressed as Ki ± SEM in nM (n = 3) or percentage displacement of specific binding at a concentration of 1 μM (n = 2).
Displacement of specific [3H]DPCPX binding in human HEK-293 cells expressed as Ki ± SEM in nM (n = 3) or percentage displacement of specific binding at a concentration of 1 μM (n = 2).
Displacement of specific [3H]NECA binding in human HeLa cells expressed as Ki ± SEM in nM (n = 3) or percentage displacement of specific binding at a concentration of 1 μM (n = 2).
Displacement of specific binding of CELT-228 detected by means of fluorescence polarization measurements (n = 3). XAC (N-(2-aminoethyl)-2-(4-(2,6-dioxo-1,3-dipropyl-2,3,6,7-tetrahydro-1H-purin-8-yl)phenoxy)acetamide), ISVY-130 (N-(2,6-bis(4-methoxyphenyl)pyrimidin-4-yl)acetamide), and MRS 1220 (9-Chloro-2-(2-furanyl)-5-((phenylacetyl)amino)-[1,2,4]triazolo[1,5-c]quinazoline) pharmacological data added as standard of A3AR antagonists.
Tables 1 and 2 contain the binding data on the four ARs of series I and II, together with three reference AR antagonists (XAC, ISVY-130, (18) and MRS 1220) measured under the same conditions. The potential promiscuity on a pan-assay interference compounds (PAINS) was ruled out on the whole set of ligands by in silico evaluation using the PAINS filter in RDkit (21) With the aim to preliminarily validate the performance of a fluorescence polarization (FP) screening method, the A3AR binding affinity of the new ligands was evaluated by using both classical radioligand-based screening ([3H]NECA) and a FP assay (CELT-228). A comparative analysis of the binding data obtained (Tables 1 and 2) reveals that both assays provided affinity values that are in good agreement, although the fluorescence polarization assays provided slightly superior (not statistically significant) Ki values (mean Ki FP/radioligand ratio = 2.6 ± 0.8). These results support the use of fluorescence-based screening methods as alternatives to canonical binding assays (i.e., radioligand binding) with similar performance.
Examination of the reported Ki values (Tables 1 and 2) reveal the identification of several highly potent (Ki < 20 nM) A3AR ligands (e.g., 7d, 8a, 8d, 9a, 9c, 10a, and 10b) that exhibit outstanding selectivity profile. The A3AR pKi values are presented in Figure 3 to allow for a closer and effective analysis of SAR trends within the different subsets. A first observation is that, in both series, the tert-butyl group is the best residue at position R2, followed by cyclohexyl (Cy), regardless the nature of the linker or the substituent at R1 (Figure 3). Collectively, piperazine derivatives (series II) elicit superior A3AR affinity as compared to series I. More precisely, one can observe a tendency of affinities where piperazine > R1═N–Me > N1═NH. While the oxygenated linker (CH2–O–CH2) generally provided highly potent ligands in each subset (Figure 3), the effect of the linker nature on A3AR affinity seems to be nonsignificant. Interestingly, the most attractive A3AR antagonist discovered in the context of the study (9a, hA3AR Ki = 5.8 nM) derives of the ethyl liker.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Comparative analysis of the SAR trends within the two subsets of ligands.
The SAR observations were then put in the context of the structural model that supported the design of these series. Every compound was independently docked by structural alignment of the central 2,6-diarylpyrimidines with ISVY-130, a 4-amido-2,6-diarylpyrimidine in complex with the A3AR homology model generated in our previous work, by means of homology modeling employing the A2AAR inactive structure (PDB: 3EML) as a template. (18) This initial docking was followed by manual adjustment of the 4-amido substitution (L1), using the tools within the Maestro Schrödinger suite. (22) In cases where more than one, significantly different alternative orientation for the flexible substituent at L1 was possible, every conformation was retained for the next stage, consisting of membrane insertion within a hexagonal-prism shaped box, containing a POPC bilayer patched water molecules, followed by a 5 ns molecular dynamics (MD) equilibration as implemented in the PyMemDyn routine within the GPCR-ModSim server. (23) For each ligand, only the conformation with lowest ligand-RMSD and the highest number of protein–ligand interactions survived this stage (coordinates of each complex are provided in the Supporting Information). Finally, each equilibrated complex was subject to 3 × 100 ns unrestrained MD simulations with GROMACS, (24) and used to assess the ligand stability and compute average number of protein–ligand polar interactions.
The results of the computational analysis are summarized on Figure 4. Here, one can appreciate that all molecules adopt a conserved binding mode for the orthosteric pharmacophore, governed by interactions with the conserved Asn2506.55 (double H-bond with the N1 and the exocyclic nitrogen of the N4-amido group; see Figure 4B) and a π–π stacking interaction with Phe168EL2. The variable substituent in L1 extends toward the extracellular vestibule, exploring additional non-orthosteric interactions with the receptor. Most ligands remained quite stable from the initial docking pose, and at least two out of the three MD replica simulations reached convergence (attending to the ligand RMSD) and were further analyzed. The region explored by the L1 elongation of the 4-amido-2,6-diarylpyrimidine is located at the interface between EL2 and EL3 and the tip of TM7 and TM2, with occasional interactions of the amide with Gln167EL2 (Figure 4). The positively charged nitrogen of the piperazine (series II) formed frequent salt-bridge interactions with Glu258EL3. As for the comparison between ligands with aliphatic linker (series 7) or with the oxygenated linker (CH2–O–CH2, series 8), we frequently observed that the ether induces additional flexibility resulting in a tendency of the substituent to bend over the orthosteric site, rather than extending toward the extracellular vestibule as in series 7. In this model, no significant differences were observed between NH (7d–f) and methylated amide series (8c–f).
Figure 4
Figure 4. (A) Overlay of the representative pose for each compound, after docking to the hA3AR followed by MD simulation. (B) Heat map showing the H-bond occupancy (right-hand scale, in %, with values over 100% indicating a double H-bond, i.e., for Asn250, and a minimum cutoff of 30%) of the residues surrounding the L1 site (columns) for each ligand (rows). (C) Detailed view of compound 9a in complex with the hA3AR, showing the residues participating on receptor–ligand contacts depicted in panel B.
In summary, we herein documented a focused library of pyrimidine-based compounds, functionalized on the L1 region, which retain the potent and highly selective profile of the original, orthosteric pharmacophore while improving the solubility. The molecular design aimed to explore non-orthosteric interactions within the A3AR, based on a binding model of the orthosteric scaffold to a homology-based model of the A3AR and further explored by MD simulations of the designed compound series. The structural functionalization could be performed in a rapid and efficient manner by using two Ugi-based approaches, and the pharmacological profiling on the AR family demonstrated the tolerability of the L1 region of the original, orthosteric pharmacophore for such structural functionalization. Additional studies are now underway to exploit the findings herein for the development of covalent drugs and molecular probes for diagnostic and delivery purposes.
Supporting Information
The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsmedchemlett.1c00598.
Detailed experimental information: synthesis of target compounds, spectroscopic and analytical data, pharmacological binding assays and HPLC traces of best compounds (PDF)
3D coordinates of compounds and A3AR model (ZIP)
Terms & Conditions
Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.
Acknowledgments
This work has received financial support from the Consellería de Cultura, Educación e Ordenación Universitaria [Galician Government (grant: ED431B 2020/43)], the Xunta de Galicia (Centro singular de investigación de Galicia accreditation 2019-2022, ED431G 2019/03), the European Union (European Regional Development Fund - ERDF), the Swedish Research Council (grant: 521-2014-2118), and the Swedish strategic research program eSSENCE. The computational studies were conducted with the resources available from the Swedish National Infrastructure for Computing (SNIC). The project was carried out within the framework of the collaborative EU COST action ERNEST (CA18133).
A1AR | A1 adenosine receptor |
A2AAR | A2A adenosine receptor |
A2BAR | A2B adenosine receptor |
A3AR | A3 adenosine receptor |
Ado | adenosine |
AR | adenosine receptor |
Cmpd | compound |
Cy | cyclohexyl |
MD | molecular dynamics |
PAINS | pan-assay interference compounds |
U-4CR | Ugi four component reaction. |
References
This article references 24 other publications.
- 1Fredholm, B. B. Adenosine, an Endogenous Distress Signal, Modulates Tissue Damage and Repair. Cell Death Differ. 2007, 14 (7), 1315– 1323, DOI: 10.1038/sj.cdd.4402132Google Scholar1Adenosine, an endogenous distress signal, modulates tissue damage and repairFredholm, B. B.Cell Death and Differentiation (2007), 14 (7), 1315-1323CODEN: CDDIEK; ISSN:1350-9047. (Nature Publishing Group)A review. Adenosine is formed inside cells or on their surface, mostly by breakdown of adenine nucleotides. The formation of adenosine increases in different conditions of stress and distress. Adenosine acts on four G-protein coupled receptors: two of them, A1 and A3, are primarily coupled to Gi family G proteins; and two of them, A2A and A2B, are mostly coupled to Gs like G proteins. These receptors are antagonized by xanthines including caffeine. Via these receptors it affects many cells and organs, usually having a cytoprotective function. Joel Linden recently grouped these protective effects into four general modes of action: increased oxygen supply/demand ratio, preconditioning, anti-inflammatory effects and stimulation of angiogenesis. This review will briefly summarize what is known and what is not in this regard. It is argued that drugs targeting adenosine receptors might be useful adjuncts in many therapeutic approaches.
- 2Fredholm, B. B.; Ijzerman, A. P.; Jacobson, K. A.; Linden, J.; Müller, C. E. International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology. LXXXI. Nomenclature and Classification of Adenosine Receptors-An Update. Pharmacol. Rev. 2011, 63 (1), 1– 34, DOI: 10.1124/pr.110.003285Google Scholar2International union of basic and clinical pharmacology. LXXXI. Nomenclature and classification of adenosine receptors - an updateFredholm, Bertil B.; IJzerman, Adriaan P.; Jacobson, Kenneth A.; Linden, Joel; Mueller, Christa E.Pharmacological Reviews (2011), 63 (1), 1-34CODEN: PAREAQ; ISSN:0031-6997. (American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics)A review. In the 10 years since our previous International Union of Basic and Clin. Pharmacol. report on the nomenclature and classification of adenosine receptors, no developments have led to major changes in the recommendations. However, there have been so many other developments that an update is needed. The fact that the structure of one of the adenosine receptors has recently been solved has already led to new ways of in silico screening of ligands. The evidence that adenosine receptors can form homo- and hetero-multimers has accumulated, but the functional significance of such complexes remains unclear. The availability of mice with genetic modification of all the adenosine receptors has led to a clarification of the functional roles of adenosine, and to excellent means to study the specificity of drugs. There are also interesting assocns. between disease and structural variants in one or more of the adenosine receptors. Several new selective agonists and antagonists have become available. They provide improved possibilities for receptor classification. There are also developments hinting at the usefulness of allosteric modulators. Many drugs targeting adenosine receptors are in clin. trials, but the established therapeutic use is still very limited.
- 3Fredholm, B. B.; IJzerman, A. P.; Jacobson, K. A.; Klotz, K.; Linden, J. International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology. XXV. Nomenclature and Classification of Adenosine Receptors. Pharmacol. Rev. 2001, 53 (4), 527– 247Google Scholar3International union of pharmacology. XXV. Nomenclature and classification of adenosine receptorsFredholm, Bertil B.; IJzerman, Adriaan P.; Jacobson, Kenneth A.; Klotz, Karl-Norbert; Linden, JoelPharmacological Reviews (2001), 53 (4), 527-552CODEN: PAREAQ; ISSN:0031-6997. (American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics)A review. Four adenosine receptors have been cloned and characterized from several mammalian species. The receptors are named adenosine A1, A2A, A2B, and A3. The A2A and A2B receptors preferably interact with members of the Gs family of G proteins and the A1 and A3 receptors with Gi/o proteins. However, other G protein interactions have also been described. Adenosine is the preferred endogenous agonist at all these receptors, but inosine can also activate the A3 receptor. The levels of adenosine seen under basal conditions are sufficient to cause some activation of all the receptors, at least where they are abundantly expressed. Adenosine levels during, e.g., ischemia can activate all receptors even when expressed in low abundance. Accordingly, expts. with receptor antagonists and mice with targeted disruption of adenosine A1, A2A, and A3 expression reveal roles for these receptors under physiol. and particularly pathophysiol. conditions. There are pharmacol. tools that can be used to classify A1, A2A, and A3 receptors but few drugs that interact selectively with A2B receptors. Testable models of the interaction of these drugs with their receptors have been generated by site-directed mutagenesis and homol.-based modeling. Both agonists and antagonists are being developed as potential drugs.
- 4Fredholm, B. B. Adenosine - A Physiological or Pathophysiological Agent?. J. Mol. Med. 2014, 92 (3), 201– 206, DOI: 10.1007/s00109-013-1101-6Google Scholar4Adenosine-a physiological or pathophysiological agent?Fredholm, Bertil B.Journal of Molecular Medicine (Heidelberg, Germany) (2014), 92 (3), 201-206CODEN: JMLME8; ISSN:0946-2716. (Springer)A review. This minireview briefly summarizes the evidence that adenosine, acting on four G-protein coupled receptors, can play physiol. roles, but is also critically involved in pathol. processes. The factors that decide which of these is the more important in a specific cell or organ are briefly summarized. The fact that drugs that target adenosine receptors in disease will also hit the physiol. processes will make drug development more tricky.
- 5Borea, P. A.; Gessi, S.; Merighi, S.; Vincenzi, F.; Varani, K. Pharmacology of Adenosine Receptors: The State of the Art. Physiol. Rev. 2018, 98 (3), 1591– 1625, DOI: 10.1152/physrev.00049.2017Google Scholar5Pharmacology of adenosine receptors: the state of the artBorea, Pier Andrea; Gessi, Stefania; Merighi, Stefania; Vincenzi, Fabrizio; Varani, KatiaPhysiological Reviews (2018), 98 (3), 1591-1625CODEN: PHREA7; ISSN:1522-1210. (American Physiological Society)A review. Adenosine is a ubiquitous endogenous autacoid whose effects are triggered through the enrollment of four G protein-coupled receptors: A1, A2A, A2B, and A3. Due to the rapid generation of adenosine from cellular metab., and the widespread distribution of its receptor subtypes in almost all organs and tissues, this nucleoside induces a multitude of physiopathol. effects, regulating central nervous, cardiovascular, peripheral, and immune systems. It is becoming clear that the expression patterns of adenosine receptors vary among cell types, lending wt. to the idea that they may be both markers of pathologies and useful targets for novel drugs. This review offers an overview of current knowledge on adenosine receptors, including their characteristic structural features, mol. interactions and cellular functions, as well as their essential roles in pain, cancer, and neurodegenerative, inflammatory, and autoimmune diseases. Finally, we highlight the latest findings on mols. capable of targeting adenosine receptors and report which stage of drug development they have reached.
- 6Borea, P. A.; Gessi, S.; Merighi, S.; Vincenzi, F.; Varani, K. Pathological Overproduction: The Bad Side of Adenosine. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2017, 174 (13), 1945– 1960, DOI: 10.1111/bph.13763Google Scholar6Pathological overproduction: the bad side of adenosineBorea, Pier Andrea; Gessi, Stefania; Merighi, Stefania; Vincenzi, Fabrizio; Varani, KatiaBritish Journal of Pharmacology (2017), 174 (13), 1945-1960CODEN: BJPCBM; ISSN:1476-5381. (Wiley-Blackwell)Adenosine is an endogenous ubiquitous purine nucleoside, which is increased by hypoxia, ischemia and tissue damage and mediates a no. of physiopathol. effects by interacting with four GPCRs, identified as A1, A2A, A2B and A3. Physiol. and acutely increased adenosine is mostly assocd. with beneficial effects that include vasodilatation and a decrease in inflammation. In contrast, chronic overprodn. of adenosine occurs in important pathol. states, where long-lasting increases in the nucleoside levels are responsible for the bad side of adenosine assocd. with chronic inflammation, fibrosis and organ damage. In this review, we describe and critically discuss the pathol. overprodn. of adenosine and analyze when, where and how adenosine exerts its detrimental effects throughout the body.
- 7Chen, J. F.; Eltzschig, H. K.; Fredholm, B. B. Adenosine Receptors as Drug Targets-What Are the Challenges?. Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery 2013, 12 (4), 265– 286, DOI: 10.1038/nrd3955Google Scholar7Adenosine receptors as drug targets - what are the challenges?Chen, Jiang-Fan; Eltzschig, Holger K.; Fredholm, Bertil B.Nature Reviews Drug Discovery (2013), 12 (4), 265-286CODEN: NRDDAG; ISSN:1474-1776. (Nature Publishing Group)A review. Adenosine signalling has long been a target for drug development, with adenosine itself or its derivs. being used clin. since the 1940s. In addn., methylxanthines such as caffeine have profound biol. effects as antagonists at adenosine receptors. Moreover, drugs such as dipyridamole and methotrexate act by enhancing the activation of adenosine receptors. There is strong evidence that adenosine has a functional role in many diseases, and several pharmacol. compds. specifically targeting individual adenosine receptors - either directly or indirectly - have now entered the clinic. However, only one adenosine receptor-specific agent - the adenosine A2A receptor agonist regadenoson (Lexiscan; Astellas Pharma) - has so far gained approval from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Here, we focus on the biol. of adenosine signalling to identify hurdles in the development of addnl. pharmacol. compds. targeting adenosine receptors and discuss strategies to overcome these challenges.
- 8Müller, C. E.; Jacobson, K. A. Recent Developments in Adenosine Receptor Ligands and Their Potential as Novel Drugs.. Biochim. Biophys. Acta - Biomembr. 2011, 1808 (5), 1290– 1308, DOI: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2010.12.017Google Scholar8Recent developments in adenosine receptor ligands and their potential as novel drugsMueller, Christa E.; Jacobson, Kenneth A.Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, Biomembranes (2011), 1808 (5), 1290-1308CODEN: BBBMBS; ISSN:0005-2736. (Elsevier B.V.)A review. Medicinal chem. approaches have been applied to all four of the adenosine receptor (AR) subtypes (A1, A2A, A2B, and A3) to create selective agonists and antagonists for each. The most recent class of selective AR ligands to be reported is the class of A2BAR agonists. The availability of these selective ligands has facilitated research on therapeutic applications of modulating the ARs and in some cases has provided clin. candidates. Prodrug approaches have been developed which improve the bioavailability of the drugs, reduce side-effects, and/or may lead to site-selective effects. The A2A agonist regadenoson (Lexiscan), a diagnostic drug for myocardial perfusion imaging, is the first selective AR agonist to be approved. Other selective agonists and antagonists are or were undergoing clin. trials for a broad range of indications, including capadenoson and tecadenoson (A1 agonists) for atrial fibrillation, or paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia, resp., apadenoson and binodenoson (A2A agonists) for myocardial perfusion imaging, preladenant (A2A antagonist) for the treatment of Parkinson's disease, and CF101 and CF102 (A3 agonists) for inflammatory diseases and cancer, resp. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: "Adenosine Receptors".
- 9Zhou, Q. Y.; Li, C.; Olah, M. E.; Johnson, R. A.; Stiles, G. L.; Civelli, O. Molecular Cloning and Characterization of an Adenosine Receptor: The A3 Adenosine Receptor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1992, 89 (16), 7432– 7436, DOI: 10.1073/pnas.89.16.7432Google Scholar9Molecular cloning and characterization of an adenosine receptor: The A3 adenosine receptorZhou, Qun Yong; Li, Chuanyu; Olah, Mark E.; Johnson, Robert A.; Stiles, Gary L.; Civelli, OlivierProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (1992), 89 (16), 7432-6CODEN: PNASA6; ISSN:0027-8424.The authors have previously reported the selective amplification of several rat striatal cDNA sequences that encode guanine nucleotide-binding regulatory protein (G protein)-coupled receptors. One of these sequences (R226) exhibited high sequence identity (58%) with the two previously cloned adenosine receptors. A full-length cDNA clone for R226 has been isolated from a rat brain cDNA library. The cDNA clone encodes a protein of 320 amino acids that can be organized into seven transmembrane stretches. R226 has been expressed in COS-7 and CHO cells and membranes from the transfected cells were screened with adenosine receptor radioligands. R226 could bind the nonselective adenosine agonist tritiated N-ethyladenosine 5'-uronic acid ([3H]NECA) and the A1-selective agonist radioiodinated N6-2-(4-amino-3-iodophenyl)-ethyladenosine ([125I]APNEA) but not the A1-selective antagonists tritiated 1,3-dipropyl-8-cyclopentylxanthine ([3H]DPCPX) or 8-{4-[({[(2-aminoethyl)amino]carbonyl}methyl)oxy]-phenyl}-1,3-dipropylxanthine ([3H]XAC) or the A2-selective agonist ligands tritiated 2-[4-(2-carboxyethyl)phenyl]ethylamino 5'-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine ([3H]CGS21680) or radioiodinated 2-[4-({2-[(4-aminophenyl)methylcarbonylamino]ethylaminocarbonyl}ethyl)phenyl]ethylamino 5'-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine. Extensive characterization with [125I]APNEA showed that R226 binds [125I]APNEA with high affinity (Kd = 15.5 nM) and the specific [125I]APNEA binding could be inhibited by adenosine ligands with a potency order of (R)-N6-phenyl-2-propyladenosine (R-PIA) = NECA > S-PIA > adenosine > ATP = ADP but not by antagonists XAC, isobutylmethylxanthine, and DPCPX. In R226 stably transfected CHO cells, adenosine agonists R-PIA, NECA, and CGS21680 inhibited by 40-50% the forskolin-stimulated cAMP accumulation through a pertussis toxin-sensitive G protein with an EC50 of 18 nM, 23 nM, and 144 nM, resp. Based on these observations the authors conclude that R226 encodes an adenosine receptor with non-A1 and non-A2 specificity, and name it the A3 adenosine receptor. The mRNA analyses revealed that the highest expression of R226 was in the testis and low-level mRNAs were also found in the lung, kidneys, heart, and some parts of the central nervous system such as cortex, striatum, and olfactory bulb. The high-expression level of the A3 receptor in the testis suggests a possible role for adenosine in reprodn.
- 10Reiss, A. B.; Grossfeld, D.; Kasselman, L. J.; Renna, H. A.; Vernice, N. A.; Drewes, W.; Konig, J.; Carsons, S. E.; DeLeon, J. Adenosine and the Cardiovascular System. Am. J. Cardiovasc. Drugs 2019, 19 (5), 449– 464, DOI: 10.1007/s40256-019-00345-5Google Scholar10Adenosine and the Cardiovascular SystemReiss, Allison B.; Grossfeld, David; Kasselman, Lora J.; Renna, Heather A.; Vernice, Nicholas A.; Drewes, Wendy; Konig, Justin; Carsons, Steven E.; DeLeon, JoshuaAmerican Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs (2019), 19 (5), 449-464CODEN: AJCDDJ; ISSN:1175-3277. (Springer International Publishing AG)A review. Adenosine is an endogenous nucleoside with a short half-life that regulates many physiol. functions involving the heart and cardiovascular system. Among the cardioprotective properties of adenosine are its ability to improve cholesterol homeostasis, impact platelet aggregation and inhibit the inflammatory response. Through modulation of forward and reverse cholesterol transport pathways, adenosine can improve cholesterol balance and thereby protect macrophages from lipid overload and foam cell transformation. The function of adenosine is controlled through four G-protein coupled receptors: A1, A2A, A2B and A3. Of these four, it is the A2A receptor that is in a large part responsible for the anti-inflammatory effects of adenosine as well as defense against excess cholesterol accumulation. A2A receptor agonists are the focus of efforts by the pharmaceutical industry to develop new cardiovascular therapies, and pharmacol. actions of the atheroprotective and anti-inflammatory drug methotrexate are mediated via release of adenosine and activation of the A2A receptor. Also relevant are anti-platelet agents that decrease platelet activation and adhesion and reduce thrombotic occlusion of atherosclerotic arteries by antagonizing ADP-mediated effects on the P2Y12 receptor. The purpose of this review is to discuss the effects of adenosine on cell types found in the arterial wall that are involved in atherosclerosis, to describe use of adenosine and its receptor ligands to limit excess cholesterol accumulation and to explore clin. applied anti-platelet effects. Its impact on electrophysiol. and use as a clin. treatment for myocardial preservation during infarct will also be covered. Results of cell culture studies, animal expts. and human clin. trials are presented. Finally, we highlight future directions of research in the application of adenosine as an approach to improving outcomes in persons with cardiovascular disease.
- 11Gessi, S.; Merighi, S.; Varani, K.; Leung, E.; Mac Lennan, S.; Borea, P. A. The A3 Adenosine Receptor: An Enigmatic Player in Cell Biology. Pharmacol. Ther. 2008, 117 (1), 123– 140, DOI: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2007.09.002Google Scholar11The A3 adenosine receptor: An enigmatic player in cell biologyGessi, Stefania; Merighi, Stefania; Varani, Katia; Leung, Edward; Mac Lennan, Stephen; Borea, Pier AndreaPharmacology & Therapeutics (2008), 117 (1), 123-140CODEN: PHTHDT; ISSN:0163-7258. (Elsevier B.V.)A review. Adenosine is a primordial signaling mol. present in every cell of the human body that mediates its physiol. functions by interacting with 4 subtypes of G-protein-coupled receptors, termed A1, A2A, A2B and A3. The A3 subtype is perhaps the most enigmatic among adenosine receptors since, although several studies have been performed in the years to elucidate its physiol. function, it still presents in several cases a double nature in different pathophysiol. conditions. The 2 personalities of A3 often come into direct conflict, e.g., in ischemia, inflammation and cancer, rendering this receptor as a single entity behaving in 2 different ways. This review focuses on the most relevant aspects of A3 adenosine subtype activation and summarizes the pharmacol. evidence as the basis of the dichotomy of this receptor in different therapeutic fields. Although much is still to be learned about the function of the A3 receptor and in spite of its duality, at the present time it can be speculated that A3 receptor selective ligands might show utility in the treatment of ischemic conditions, glaucoma, asthma, arthritis, cancer and other disorders in which inflammation is a feature. The biggest and most intriguing challenge for the future is therefore to understand whether and where selective A3 agonists or antagonists are the best choice.
- 12Jacobson, K. A.; Klutz, A. M.; Tosh, D. K.; Ivanov, A. A.; Preti, D.; Baraldi, P. G. Medicinal Chemistry of the A3 Adenosine Receptor: Agonists, Antagonists, and Receptor Engineering. Handb. Exp. Pharmacol. 2009, 193, 123– 159, DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-89615-9_5Google Scholar12Medicinal chemistry of the A3 adenosine receptor: agonists, antagonists, and receptor engineeringJacobson, Kenneth A.; Klutz, Athena M.; Tosh, Dilip K.; Ivanov, Andrei A.; Preti, Delia; Baraldi, Pier GiovanniHandbook of Experimental Pharmacology (2009), 193 (Adenosine Receptors in Health and Disease), 123-159CODEN: HEPHD2; ISSN:0171-2004. (Springer GmbH)A review. A3 adenosine receptor (A3AR) ligands have been modified to optimize their interaction with the A3AR. Most of these modifications have been made to the N6 and C2 positions of adenine as well as the ribose moiety, and using a combination of these substitutions leads to the most efficacious, selective, and potent ligands. A3AR agonists such as IB-MECA and Cl-IB-MECA are now advancing into Phase II clin. trials for treatments targeting diseases such as cancer, arthritis, and psoriasis. Also, a wide no. of compds. exerting high potency and selectivity in antagonizing the human (h)A3AR have been discovered. These mols. are generally characterized by a notable structural diversity, taking into account that arom. nitrogen-contg. monocyclic (thiazoles and thiadiazoles), bicyclic (isoquinoline, quinozalines, (aza)adenines), tricyclic systems (pyrazoloquinolines, triazoloquinoxalines, pyrazolotriazolopyrimidines, triazolopurines, tricyclic xanthines) and nucleoside derivs. have been identified as potent and selective A3AR antagonists. Probably due to the "enigmatic" physiol. role of A3AR, whose activation may produce opposite effects (for example, concerning tissue protection in inflammatory and cancer cells) and may produce effects that are species dependent, only a few mols. have reached preclin. investigation. Indeed, the most advanced A3AR antagonists remain in preclin. testing. Among the antagonists described above, compd. OT-7999 is expected to enter clin. trials for the treatment of glaucoma, while several thiazole derivs. are in development as antiallergic, antiasthmatic and/or antiinflammatory drugs.
- 13Jacobson, K. A.; Tosh, D. K.; Jain, S.; Gao, Z. G. Historical and Current Adenosine Receptor Agonists in Preclinical and Clinical Development. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2019, 13 (March), 1– 17, DOI: 10.3389/fncel.2019.00124Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 14Vecchio, E. A.; Baltos, J. A.; Nguyen, A. T. N.; Christopoulos, A.; White, P. J.; May, L. T. New Paradigms in Adenosine Receptor Pharmacology: Allostery, Oligomerization and Biased Agonism. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2018, 175 (21), 4036– 4046, DOI: 10.1111/bph.14337Google Scholar14New paradigms in adenosine receptor pharmacology: allostery, oligomerization and biased agonismVecchio, Elizabeth A.; Baltos, Jo-Anne; Nguyen, Anh T. N.; Christopoulos, Arthur; White, Paul J.; May, Lauren T.British Journal of Pharmacology (2018), 175 (21), 4036-4046CODEN: BJPCBM; ISSN:1476-5381. (Wiley-Blackwell)A review. Adenosine receptors are a family of GPCRs contg. four subtypes (A1, A2A, A2B and A3 receptors), all of which bind the ubiquitous nucleoside adenosine. These receptors play an important role in physiol. and pathophysiol. and therefore represent attractive drug targets for a range of conditions. The theor. framework surrounding drug action at adenosine receptors now extends beyond the notion of prototypical agonism and antagonism to encompass more complex pharmacol. concepts. New paradigms include allostery, in which ligands bind a topog. distinct receptor site from that of the endogenous agonist, homomeric or heteromeric interactions across receptor oligomers and biased agonism, i.e., ligand-dependent differential intracellular signaling. This review provides a concise overview of allostery, oligomerization and biased agonism at adenosine receptors and outlines how these paradigms may enhance future drug discovery endeavours focussed on the development of novel therapeutic agents acting at adenosine receptors.
- 15Pipeline; Palobiofarma. https://www.palobiofarma.com/pipeline-2/.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 16Park, C. W.; Han, C. T.; Sakaguchi, Y.; Lee, J.; Youn, H. Y. Safety Evaluation of Fm101, an A3 Adenosine Receptor Modulator, in Rat, for Developing as Therapeutics of Glaucoma and Hepatitis. EXCLI J. 2020, 19, 187– 200, DOI: 10.17179/excli2019-2058Google Scholar16Safety evaluation of FM101, an A3 adenosine receptor modulator, in rat, for developing as therapeutics of glaucoma and hepatitisPark Chong-Woo; Lee Jiyoun; Park Chong-Woo; Youn Hwa-Young; Han Chung-Tack; Sakaguchi YasueEXCLI journal (2020), 19 (), 187-200 ISSN:1611-2156.Adenosine is a critical regulator of inflammation and fibrosis, it affects endogenous cell signaling via binding to the A3 adenosine receptor. FM101 is a potent, highly selective A3 adenosine receptor modulator that has been developed as a treatment for glaucoma and hepatitis. We determined that FM101 is a biased ligand with functional activities both as a G protein agonist and a β-arrestin antagonist. The safety of FM101 was evaluated by administering an acute dose in rats, the results indicated that the approximate lethal dose was greater than 2000 mg/kg. In a subchronic toxicity study, FM101 was administered orally once per day to rats at doses of 250, 500, and 1000 mg/kg/day over a period of 28 days. Abnormal posture, irregular respiration, decreased movement, and ear flushing were observed during the early phase of dosing, and loose stools were observed sporadically among the animals that received 500 and 1000 mg/kg/day. Body weight and food consumption were decreased in one male and one female rat in the 1000 mg/kg/day group during the first 2 weeks of observation. However, there were no test substance-related changes or adverse effects observed during our ophthalmological, clinical chemistry, urine, organ weight, and histopathological analysis. These findings indicate that no observed adverse effect level of FM101 was 1000 mg/kg/day in male and female rats.
- 17A SAD, MAD, and FE Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetic Profile of FM101 in Healthy Volunteers. ClinicalTrials.gov. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03879928.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 18Yaziji, V.; Rodríguez, D.; Gutiérrez-De-Terán, H.; Coelho, A.; Caamaño, O.; García-Mera, X.; Brea, J.; Loza, M. I.; Cadavid, M. I.; Sotelo, E. Pyrimidine Derivatives as Potent and Selective A3 Adenosine Receptor Antagonists. J. Med. Chem. 2011, 54 (2), 457– 471, DOI: 10.1021/jm100843zGoogle Scholar18Pyrimidine derivatives as potent and selective A3 adenosine receptor antagonistsYaziji, Vicente; Rodriguez, David; Gutierrez-de-Teran, Hugo; Coelho, Alberto; Caamano, Olga; Garcia-Mera, Xerardo; Brea, Jose; Loza, Maria Isabel; Cadavid, Maria Isabel; Sotelo, EddyJournal of Medicinal Chemistry (2011), 54 (2), 457-471CODEN: JMCMAR; ISSN:0022-2623. (American Chemical Society)Two regioisomeric series of diaryl 2- or 4-amidopyrimidines e. g. I, II have been synthesized and their adenosine receptor affinities were detd. in radioligand binding assays at the four human adenosine receptors (hARs). Some of the ligands prepd. herein exhibit remarkable affinities (Ki < 10 nm) and, most noticeably, the absence of activity at the A1, A2A, and A2B receptors. The structural determinants that support the affinity and selectivity profiles of the series were highlighted through an integrated computational approach, combining a 3D-QSAR model built on the second generation of GRid Independent Descriptors (GRIND2) with a novel homol. model of the hA3 receptor. The robustness of the computational model was subsequently evaluated by the design of new derivs. exploring the alkyl substituent of the exocyclic amide group. The synthesis and evaluation of the novel compds. validated the predictive power of the model, exhibiting excellent agreement between predicted and exptl. activities.
- 19Yaziji, V.; Rodríguez, D.; Coelho, A.; García-Mera, X.; El Maatougui, A.; Brea, J.; Loza, M. I.; Cadavid, M. I.; Gutiérrez-De-Terán, H.; Sotelo, E. Selective and Potent Adenosine A3 Receptor Antagonists by Methoxyaryl Substitution on the N-(2,6-Diarylpyrimidin-4-Yl)Acetamide Scaffold. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2013, 59, 235– 242, DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2012.11.010Google Scholar19Selective and potent adenosine A3 receptor antagonists by methoxyaryl substitution on the N-(2,6-diarylpyrimidin-4-yl)acetamide scaffoldYaziji, Vicente; Rodriguez, David; Coelho, Alberto; Garcia-Mera, Xerardo; El Maatougui, Abdelaziz; Brea, Jose; Loza, Maria Isabel; Cadavid, Maria Isabel; Gutierrez-de-Teran, Hugo; Sotelo, EddyEuropean Journal of Medicinal Chemistry (2013), 59 (), 235-242CODEN: EJMCA5; ISSN:0223-5234. (Elsevier Masson SAS)The influence of diverse methoxyphenyl substitution patterns on the N-(2,6-diarylpyrimidin-4-yl)acetamide scaffold is herein explored in order to modulate the A3 adenosine receptor antagonistic profile. As a result, novel ligands exhibiting excellent potency (Ki on A3 AR < 20 nM) and selectivity profiles (above 100-fold within the adenosine receptors family) are reported. Moreover, our joint theor. and exptl. approach allows the identification of novel pharmacophoric elements conferring A3AR selectivity, first established by a robust computational model and thereafter characterizing the most salient features of the structure-activity and structure-selectivity relationships in this series.
- 20Azuaje, J.; Jespers, W.; Yaziji, V.; Mallo, A.; Majellaro, M.; Caamaño, O.; Loza, M. I.; Cadavid, M. I.; Brea, J.; Åqvist, J.; Sotelo, E.; Gutiérrez-De-Terán, H. Effect of Nitrogen Atom Substitution in A3 Adenosine Receptor Binding: N-(4,6-Diarylpyridin-2-Yl)Acetamides as Potent and Selective Antagonists. J. Med. Chem. 2017, 60 (17), 7502– 7511, DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.7b00860Google Scholar20Effect of Nitrogen Atom Substitution in A3 Adenosine Receptor Binding: N-(4,6-Diarylpyridin-2-yl)acetamides as Potent and Selective AntagonistsAzuaje, Jhonny; Jespers, Willem; Yaziji, Vicente; Mallo, Ana; Majellaro, Maria; Caamano, Olga; Loza, Maria I.; Cadavid, Maria I.; Brea, Jose; Aqvist, Johan; Sotelo, Eddy; Gutierrez-de-Teran, HugoJournal of Medicinal Chemistry (2017), 60 (17), 7502-7511CODEN: JMCMAR; ISSN:0022-2623. (American Chemical Society)The authors report the first family of 2-acetamidopyridines as potent and selective A3 adenosine receptor (AR) antagonists. The computer-assisted design was focused on the bioisosteric replacement of the N1 atom by a CH group in a previous series of diarylpyrimidines. Some of the generated 2-acetamidopyridines elicit an antagonistic effect with excellent affinity (Ki < 10 nM) and outstanding selectivity profiles, providing an alternative and simpler chem. scaffold to the parent series of diarylpyrimidines. In addn., using mol. dynamics and free energy perturbation simulations, the authors elucidate the effect of the second nitrogen of the parent diarylpyrimidines, which is revealed as a stabilizer of a water network in the binding site. The discovery of 2,6-diaryl-2-acetamidopyridines represents a step forward in the search of chem. simple, potent, and selective antagonists for the hA3AR, and exemplifies the benefits of a joint theor.-exptl. approach to identify novel hA3AR antagonists through succinct and efficient synthetic methodologies.
- 21RDKit.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 22Schrödinger Suite, 2012 ed.; Schrödinger, LLC, 2012.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 23Esguerra, M.; Siretskiy, A.; Bello, X.; Sallander, J.; Gutiérrez-de-Terán, H. GPCR-ModSim: A Comprehensive Web Based Solution for Modeling G-Protein Coupled Receptors. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, 44 (W1), W455– W462, DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkw403Google Scholar23GPCR-ModSim: a comprehensive web based solution for modeling G-protein coupled receptorsEsguerra, Mauricio; Siretskiy, Alexey; Bello, Xabier; Sallander, Jessica; Gutierrez-de-Teran, HugoNucleic Acids Research (2016), 44 (W1), W455-W462CODEN: NARHAD; ISSN:0305-1048. (Oxford University Press)GPCR-ModSim is a centralized and easy to use service dedicated to the structural modeling of G-protein Coupled Receptors (GPCRs). 3D mol. models can be generated from amino acid sequence by homol.-modeling techniques, considering different receptor conformations. GPCR-ModSim includes a membrane insertion and mol. dynamics (MD) equilibration protocol, which can be used to refine the generated model or any GPCR structure uploaded to the server, including if desired non-protein elements such as orthosteric or allosteric ligands, structural waters or ions. We herein revise the main characteristics of GPCR-ModSim and present new functionalities. The templates used for homol. modeling have been updated considering the latest structural data, with sep. profile structural alignments built for inactive, partially-active and active groups of templates. We have also added the possibility to perform multiple-template homol. modeling in a unique and flexible way. Finally, our new MD protocol considers a series of distance restraints derived from a recently identified conserved network of helical contacts, allowing for a smoother refinement of the generated models which is particularly advised when there is low homol. to the available templates. GPCR-ModSim has been tested on the GPCR Dock 2013 competition with satisfactory results.
- 24Hess, B.; Kutzner, C.; Van Der Spoel, D.; Lindahl, E. GRGMACS 4: Algorithms for Highly Efficient, Load-Balanced, and Scalable Molecular Simulation. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2008, 4 (3), 435– 447, DOI: 10.1021/ct700301qGoogle Scholar24GROMACS 4: Algorithms for Highly Efficient, Load-Balanced, and Scalable Molecular SimulationHess, Berk; Kutzner, Carsten; van der Spoel, David; Lindahl, ErikJournal of Chemical Theory and Computation (2008), 4 (3), 435-447CODEN: JCTCCE; ISSN:1549-9618. (American Chemical Society)Mol. simulation is an extremely useful, but computationally very expensive tool for studies of chem. and biomol. systems. Here, we present a new implementation of our mol. simulation toolkit GROMACS which now both achieves extremely high performance on single processors from algorithmic optimizations and hand-coded routines and simultaneously scales very well on parallel machines. The code encompasses a minimal-communication domain decompn. algorithm, full dynamic load balancing, a state-of-the-art parallel constraint solver, and efficient virtual site algorithms that allow removal of hydrogen atom degrees of freedom to enable integration time steps up to 5 fs for atomistic simulations also in parallel. To improve the scaling properties of the common particle mesh Ewald electrostatics algorithms, we have in addn. used a Multiple-Program, Multiple-Data approach, with sep. node domains responsible for direct and reciprocal space interactions. Not only does this combination of algorithms enable extremely long simulations of large systems but also it provides that simulation performance on quite modest nos. of std. cluster nodes.
Cited By
Smart citations by scite.ai include citation statements extracted from the full text of the citing article. The number of the statements may be higher than the number of citations provided by ACS Publications if one paper cites another multiple times or lower if scite has not yet processed some of the citing articles.
This article is cited by 3 publications.
- Margarita Stampelou, Graham Ladds, Antonios Kolocouris. Computational Workflow for Refining AlphaFold Models in Drug Design Using Kinetic and Thermodynamic Binding Calculations: A Case Study for the Unresolved Inactive Human Adenosine A3 Receptor. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 2024, 128
(4)
, 914-936. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.3c05986
- Maria João Matos, (Guest Editor)Maria-Jesus Blanco (ACS Med. Chem. Lett. Associate Editor). Medicinal Chemistry in Portugal and Spain: A Strong Iberian Alliance. ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters 2022, 13
(6)
, 871-872. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsmedchemlett.2c00194
- Kenneth A. Jacobson, Paola Oliva, R. Rama Suresh. A3 Adenosine Receptor Ligands: From Discovery to Clinical Trials. 2023, 157-177. https://doi.org/10.1007/7355_2023_161
Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.
Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.
The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.
Recommended Articles
Abstract
Figure 1
Figure 1. Model A3AR antagonists, design strategy, and structure of herein explored ligands.
Scheme 1
Scheme 1. Ugi-Based Assembly of Designed 2-Amino-5-Substituted Pyrimidine Ligands (7–10)Figure 2
Figure 2. Concentration–percent of specific binding of CELT-228 curves obtained with compounds 7d (red), 9a (black), 9c (green), and 10a (blue). Points represent the mean ± SEM (vertical bars) of triplicate measurements.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Comparative analysis of the SAR trends within the two subsets of ligands.
Figure 4
Figure 4. (A) Overlay of the representative pose for each compound, after docking to the hA3AR followed by MD simulation. (B) Heat map showing the H-bond occupancy (right-hand scale, in %, with values over 100% indicating a double H-bond, i.e., for Asn250, and a minimum cutoff of 30%) of the residues surrounding the L1 site (columns) for each ligand (rows). (C) Detailed view of compound 9a in complex with the hA3AR, showing the residues participating on receptor–ligand contacts depicted in panel B.
References
This article references 24 other publications.
- 1Fredholm, B. B. Adenosine, an Endogenous Distress Signal, Modulates Tissue Damage and Repair. Cell Death Differ. 2007, 14 (7), 1315– 1323, DOI: 10.1038/sj.cdd.44021321Adenosine, an endogenous distress signal, modulates tissue damage and repairFredholm, B. B.Cell Death and Differentiation (2007), 14 (7), 1315-1323CODEN: CDDIEK; ISSN:1350-9047. (Nature Publishing Group)A review. Adenosine is formed inside cells or on their surface, mostly by breakdown of adenine nucleotides. The formation of adenosine increases in different conditions of stress and distress. Adenosine acts on four G-protein coupled receptors: two of them, A1 and A3, are primarily coupled to Gi family G proteins; and two of them, A2A and A2B, are mostly coupled to Gs like G proteins. These receptors are antagonized by xanthines including caffeine. Via these receptors it affects many cells and organs, usually having a cytoprotective function. Joel Linden recently grouped these protective effects into four general modes of action: increased oxygen supply/demand ratio, preconditioning, anti-inflammatory effects and stimulation of angiogenesis. This review will briefly summarize what is known and what is not in this regard. It is argued that drugs targeting adenosine receptors might be useful adjuncts in many therapeutic approaches.
- 2Fredholm, B. B.; Ijzerman, A. P.; Jacobson, K. A.; Linden, J.; Müller, C. E. International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology. LXXXI. Nomenclature and Classification of Adenosine Receptors-An Update. Pharmacol. Rev. 2011, 63 (1), 1– 34, DOI: 10.1124/pr.110.0032852International union of basic and clinical pharmacology. LXXXI. Nomenclature and classification of adenosine receptors - an updateFredholm, Bertil B.; IJzerman, Adriaan P.; Jacobson, Kenneth A.; Linden, Joel; Mueller, Christa E.Pharmacological Reviews (2011), 63 (1), 1-34CODEN: PAREAQ; ISSN:0031-6997. (American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics)A review. In the 10 years since our previous International Union of Basic and Clin. Pharmacol. report on the nomenclature and classification of adenosine receptors, no developments have led to major changes in the recommendations. However, there have been so many other developments that an update is needed. The fact that the structure of one of the adenosine receptors has recently been solved has already led to new ways of in silico screening of ligands. The evidence that adenosine receptors can form homo- and hetero-multimers has accumulated, but the functional significance of such complexes remains unclear. The availability of mice with genetic modification of all the adenosine receptors has led to a clarification of the functional roles of adenosine, and to excellent means to study the specificity of drugs. There are also interesting assocns. between disease and structural variants in one or more of the adenosine receptors. Several new selective agonists and antagonists have become available. They provide improved possibilities for receptor classification. There are also developments hinting at the usefulness of allosteric modulators. Many drugs targeting adenosine receptors are in clin. trials, but the established therapeutic use is still very limited.
- 3Fredholm, B. B.; IJzerman, A. P.; Jacobson, K. A.; Klotz, K.; Linden, J. International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology. XXV. Nomenclature and Classification of Adenosine Receptors. Pharmacol. Rev. 2001, 53 (4), 527– 2473International union of pharmacology. XXV. Nomenclature and classification of adenosine receptorsFredholm, Bertil B.; IJzerman, Adriaan P.; Jacobson, Kenneth A.; Klotz, Karl-Norbert; Linden, JoelPharmacological Reviews (2001), 53 (4), 527-552CODEN: PAREAQ; ISSN:0031-6997. (American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics)A review. Four adenosine receptors have been cloned and characterized from several mammalian species. The receptors are named adenosine A1, A2A, A2B, and A3. The A2A and A2B receptors preferably interact with members of the Gs family of G proteins and the A1 and A3 receptors with Gi/o proteins. However, other G protein interactions have also been described. Adenosine is the preferred endogenous agonist at all these receptors, but inosine can also activate the A3 receptor. The levels of adenosine seen under basal conditions are sufficient to cause some activation of all the receptors, at least where they are abundantly expressed. Adenosine levels during, e.g., ischemia can activate all receptors even when expressed in low abundance. Accordingly, expts. with receptor antagonists and mice with targeted disruption of adenosine A1, A2A, and A3 expression reveal roles for these receptors under physiol. and particularly pathophysiol. conditions. There are pharmacol. tools that can be used to classify A1, A2A, and A3 receptors but few drugs that interact selectively with A2B receptors. Testable models of the interaction of these drugs with their receptors have been generated by site-directed mutagenesis and homol.-based modeling. Both agonists and antagonists are being developed as potential drugs.
- 4Fredholm, B. B. Adenosine - A Physiological or Pathophysiological Agent?. J. Mol. Med. 2014, 92 (3), 201– 206, DOI: 10.1007/s00109-013-1101-64Adenosine-a physiological or pathophysiological agent?Fredholm, Bertil B.Journal of Molecular Medicine (Heidelberg, Germany) (2014), 92 (3), 201-206CODEN: JMLME8; ISSN:0946-2716. (Springer)A review. This minireview briefly summarizes the evidence that adenosine, acting on four G-protein coupled receptors, can play physiol. roles, but is also critically involved in pathol. processes. The factors that decide which of these is the more important in a specific cell or organ are briefly summarized. The fact that drugs that target adenosine receptors in disease will also hit the physiol. processes will make drug development more tricky.
- 5Borea, P. A.; Gessi, S.; Merighi, S.; Vincenzi, F.; Varani, K. Pharmacology of Adenosine Receptors: The State of the Art. Physiol. Rev. 2018, 98 (3), 1591– 1625, DOI: 10.1152/physrev.00049.20175Pharmacology of adenosine receptors: the state of the artBorea, Pier Andrea; Gessi, Stefania; Merighi, Stefania; Vincenzi, Fabrizio; Varani, KatiaPhysiological Reviews (2018), 98 (3), 1591-1625CODEN: PHREA7; ISSN:1522-1210. (American Physiological Society)A review. Adenosine is a ubiquitous endogenous autacoid whose effects are triggered through the enrollment of four G protein-coupled receptors: A1, A2A, A2B, and A3. Due to the rapid generation of adenosine from cellular metab., and the widespread distribution of its receptor subtypes in almost all organs and tissues, this nucleoside induces a multitude of physiopathol. effects, regulating central nervous, cardiovascular, peripheral, and immune systems. It is becoming clear that the expression patterns of adenosine receptors vary among cell types, lending wt. to the idea that they may be both markers of pathologies and useful targets for novel drugs. This review offers an overview of current knowledge on adenosine receptors, including their characteristic structural features, mol. interactions and cellular functions, as well as their essential roles in pain, cancer, and neurodegenerative, inflammatory, and autoimmune diseases. Finally, we highlight the latest findings on mols. capable of targeting adenosine receptors and report which stage of drug development they have reached.
- 6Borea, P. A.; Gessi, S.; Merighi, S.; Vincenzi, F.; Varani, K. Pathological Overproduction: The Bad Side of Adenosine. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2017, 174 (13), 1945– 1960, DOI: 10.1111/bph.137636Pathological overproduction: the bad side of adenosineBorea, Pier Andrea; Gessi, Stefania; Merighi, Stefania; Vincenzi, Fabrizio; Varani, KatiaBritish Journal of Pharmacology (2017), 174 (13), 1945-1960CODEN: BJPCBM; ISSN:1476-5381. (Wiley-Blackwell)Adenosine is an endogenous ubiquitous purine nucleoside, which is increased by hypoxia, ischemia and tissue damage and mediates a no. of physiopathol. effects by interacting with four GPCRs, identified as A1, A2A, A2B and A3. Physiol. and acutely increased adenosine is mostly assocd. with beneficial effects that include vasodilatation and a decrease in inflammation. In contrast, chronic overprodn. of adenosine occurs in important pathol. states, where long-lasting increases in the nucleoside levels are responsible for the bad side of adenosine assocd. with chronic inflammation, fibrosis and organ damage. In this review, we describe and critically discuss the pathol. overprodn. of adenosine and analyze when, where and how adenosine exerts its detrimental effects throughout the body.
- 7Chen, J. F.; Eltzschig, H. K.; Fredholm, B. B. Adenosine Receptors as Drug Targets-What Are the Challenges?. Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery 2013, 12 (4), 265– 286, DOI: 10.1038/nrd39557Adenosine receptors as drug targets - what are the challenges?Chen, Jiang-Fan; Eltzschig, Holger K.; Fredholm, Bertil B.Nature Reviews Drug Discovery (2013), 12 (4), 265-286CODEN: NRDDAG; ISSN:1474-1776. (Nature Publishing Group)A review. Adenosine signalling has long been a target for drug development, with adenosine itself or its derivs. being used clin. since the 1940s. In addn., methylxanthines such as caffeine have profound biol. effects as antagonists at adenosine receptors. Moreover, drugs such as dipyridamole and methotrexate act by enhancing the activation of adenosine receptors. There is strong evidence that adenosine has a functional role in many diseases, and several pharmacol. compds. specifically targeting individual adenosine receptors - either directly or indirectly - have now entered the clinic. However, only one adenosine receptor-specific agent - the adenosine A2A receptor agonist regadenoson (Lexiscan; Astellas Pharma) - has so far gained approval from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Here, we focus on the biol. of adenosine signalling to identify hurdles in the development of addnl. pharmacol. compds. targeting adenosine receptors and discuss strategies to overcome these challenges.
- 8Müller, C. E.; Jacobson, K. A. Recent Developments in Adenosine Receptor Ligands and Their Potential as Novel Drugs.. Biochim. Biophys. Acta - Biomembr. 2011, 1808 (5), 1290– 1308, DOI: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2010.12.0178Recent developments in adenosine receptor ligands and their potential as novel drugsMueller, Christa E.; Jacobson, Kenneth A.Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, Biomembranes (2011), 1808 (5), 1290-1308CODEN: BBBMBS; ISSN:0005-2736. (Elsevier B.V.)A review. Medicinal chem. approaches have been applied to all four of the adenosine receptor (AR) subtypes (A1, A2A, A2B, and A3) to create selective agonists and antagonists for each. The most recent class of selective AR ligands to be reported is the class of A2BAR agonists. The availability of these selective ligands has facilitated research on therapeutic applications of modulating the ARs and in some cases has provided clin. candidates. Prodrug approaches have been developed which improve the bioavailability of the drugs, reduce side-effects, and/or may lead to site-selective effects. The A2A agonist regadenoson (Lexiscan), a diagnostic drug for myocardial perfusion imaging, is the first selective AR agonist to be approved. Other selective agonists and antagonists are or were undergoing clin. trials for a broad range of indications, including capadenoson and tecadenoson (A1 agonists) for atrial fibrillation, or paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia, resp., apadenoson and binodenoson (A2A agonists) for myocardial perfusion imaging, preladenant (A2A antagonist) for the treatment of Parkinson's disease, and CF101 and CF102 (A3 agonists) for inflammatory diseases and cancer, resp. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: "Adenosine Receptors".
- 9Zhou, Q. Y.; Li, C.; Olah, M. E.; Johnson, R. A.; Stiles, G. L.; Civelli, O. Molecular Cloning and Characterization of an Adenosine Receptor: The A3 Adenosine Receptor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1992, 89 (16), 7432– 7436, DOI: 10.1073/pnas.89.16.74329Molecular cloning and characterization of an adenosine receptor: The A3 adenosine receptorZhou, Qun Yong; Li, Chuanyu; Olah, Mark E.; Johnson, Robert A.; Stiles, Gary L.; Civelli, OlivierProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (1992), 89 (16), 7432-6CODEN: PNASA6; ISSN:0027-8424.The authors have previously reported the selective amplification of several rat striatal cDNA sequences that encode guanine nucleotide-binding regulatory protein (G protein)-coupled receptors. One of these sequences (R226) exhibited high sequence identity (58%) with the two previously cloned adenosine receptors. A full-length cDNA clone for R226 has been isolated from a rat brain cDNA library. The cDNA clone encodes a protein of 320 amino acids that can be organized into seven transmembrane stretches. R226 has been expressed in COS-7 and CHO cells and membranes from the transfected cells were screened with adenosine receptor radioligands. R226 could bind the nonselective adenosine agonist tritiated N-ethyladenosine 5'-uronic acid ([3H]NECA) and the A1-selective agonist radioiodinated N6-2-(4-amino-3-iodophenyl)-ethyladenosine ([125I]APNEA) but not the A1-selective antagonists tritiated 1,3-dipropyl-8-cyclopentylxanthine ([3H]DPCPX) or 8-{4-[({[(2-aminoethyl)amino]carbonyl}methyl)oxy]-phenyl}-1,3-dipropylxanthine ([3H]XAC) or the A2-selective agonist ligands tritiated 2-[4-(2-carboxyethyl)phenyl]ethylamino 5'-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine ([3H]CGS21680) or radioiodinated 2-[4-({2-[(4-aminophenyl)methylcarbonylamino]ethylaminocarbonyl}ethyl)phenyl]ethylamino 5'-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine. Extensive characterization with [125I]APNEA showed that R226 binds [125I]APNEA with high affinity (Kd = 15.5 nM) and the specific [125I]APNEA binding could be inhibited by adenosine ligands with a potency order of (R)-N6-phenyl-2-propyladenosine (R-PIA) = NECA > S-PIA > adenosine > ATP = ADP but not by antagonists XAC, isobutylmethylxanthine, and DPCPX. In R226 stably transfected CHO cells, adenosine agonists R-PIA, NECA, and CGS21680 inhibited by 40-50% the forskolin-stimulated cAMP accumulation through a pertussis toxin-sensitive G protein with an EC50 of 18 nM, 23 nM, and 144 nM, resp. Based on these observations the authors conclude that R226 encodes an adenosine receptor with non-A1 and non-A2 specificity, and name it the A3 adenosine receptor. The mRNA analyses revealed that the highest expression of R226 was in the testis and low-level mRNAs were also found in the lung, kidneys, heart, and some parts of the central nervous system such as cortex, striatum, and olfactory bulb. The high-expression level of the A3 receptor in the testis suggests a possible role for adenosine in reprodn.
- 10Reiss, A. B.; Grossfeld, D.; Kasselman, L. J.; Renna, H. A.; Vernice, N. A.; Drewes, W.; Konig, J.; Carsons, S. E.; DeLeon, J. Adenosine and the Cardiovascular System. Am. J. Cardiovasc. Drugs 2019, 19 (5), 449– 464, DOI: 10.1007/s40256-019-00345-510Adenosine and the Cardiovascular SystemReiss, Allison B.; Grossfeld, David; Kasselman, Lora J.; Renna, Heather A.; Vernice, Nicholas A.; Drewes, Wendy; Konig, Justin; Carsons, Steven E.; DeLeon, JoshuaAmerican Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs (2019), 19 (5), 449-464CODEN: AJCDDJ; ISSN:1175-3277. (Springer International Publishing AG)A review. Adenosine is an endogenous nucleoside with a short half-life that regulates many physiol. functions involving the heart and cardiovascular system. Among the cardioprotective properties of adenosine are its ability to improve cholesterol homeostasis, impact platelet aggregation and inhibit the inflammatory response. Through modulation of forward and reverse cholesterol transport pathways, adenosine can improve cholesterol balance and thereby protect macrophages from lipid overload and foam cell transformation. The function of adenosine is controlled through four G-protein coupled receptors: A1, A2A, A2B and A3. Of these four, it is the A2A receptor that is in a large part responsible for the anti-inflammatory effects of adenosine as well as defense against excess cholesterol accumulation. A2A receptor agonists are the focus of efforts by the pharmaceutical industry to develop new cardiovascular therapies, and pharmacol. actions of the atheroprotective and anti-inflammatory drug methotrexate are mediated via release of adenosine and activation of the A2A receptor. Also relevant are anti-platelet agents that decrease platelet activation and adhesion and reduce thrombotic occlusion of atherosclerotic arteries by antagonizing ADP-mediated effects on the P2Y12 receptor. The purpose of this review is to discuss the effects of adenosine on cell types found in the arterial wall that are involved in atherosclerosis, to describe use of adenosine and its receptor ligands to limit excess cholesterol accumulation and to explore clin. applied anti-platelet effects. Its impact on electrophysiol. and use as a clin. treatment for myocardial preservation during infarct will also be covered. Results of cell culture studies, animal expts. and human clin. trials are presented. Finally, we highlight future directions of research in the application of adenosine as an approach to improving outcomes in persons with cardiovascular disease.
- 11Gessi, S.; Merighi, S.; Varani, K.; Leung, E.; Mac Lennan, S.; Borea, P. A. The A3 Adenosine Receptor: An Enigmatic Player in Cell Biology. Pharmacol. Ther. 2008, 117 (1), 123– 140, DOI: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2007.09.00211The A3 adenosine receptor: An enigmatic player in cell biologyGessi, Stefania; Merighi, Stefania; Varani, Katia; Leung, Edward; Mac Lennan, Stephen; Borea, Pier AndreaPharmacology & Therapeutics (2008), 117 (1), 123-140CODEN: PHTHDT; ISSN:0163-7258. (Elsevier B.V.)A review. Adenosine is a primordial signaling mol. present in every cell of the human body that mediates its physiol. functions by interacting with 4 subtypes of G-protein-coupled receptors, termed A1, A2A, A2B and A3. The A3 subtype is perhaps the most enigmatic among adenosine receptors since, although several studies have been performed in the years to elucidate its physiol. function, it still presents in several cases a double nature in different pathophysiol. conditions. The 2 personalities of A3 often come into direct conflict, e.g., in ischemia, inflammation and cancer, rendering this receptor as a single entity behaving in 2 different ways. This review focuses on the most relevant aspects of A3 adenosine subtype activation and summarizes the pharmacol. evidence as the basis of the dichotomy of this receptor in different therapeutic fields. Although much is still to be learned about the function of the A3 receptor and in spite of its duality, at the present time it can be speculated that A3 receptor selective ligands might show utility in the treatment of ischemic conditions, glaucoma, asthma, arthritis, cancer and other disorders in which inflammation is a feature. The biggest and most intriguing challenge for the future is therefore to understand whether and where selective A3 agonists or antagonists are the best choice.
- 12Jacobson, K. A.; Klutz, A. M.; Tosh, D. K.; Ivanov, A. A.; Preti, D.; Baraldi, P. G. Medicinal Chemistry of the A3 Adenosine Receptor: Agonists, Antagonists, and Receptor Engineering. Handb. Exp. Pharmacol. 2009, 193, 123– 159, DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-89615-9_512Medicinal chemistry of the A3 adenosine receptor: agonists, antagonists, and receptor engineeringJacobson, Kenneth A.; Klutz, Athena M.; Tosh, Dilip K.; Ivanov, Andrei A.; Preti, Delia; Baraldi, Pier GiovanniHandbook of Experimental Pharmacology (2009), 193 (Adenosine Receptors in Health and Disease), 123-159CODEN: HEPHD2; ISSN:0171-2004. (Springer GmbH)A review. A3 adenosine receptor (A3AR) ligands have been modified to optimize their interaction with the A3AR. Most of these modifications have been made to the N6 and C2 positions of adenine as well as the ribose moiety, and using a combination of these substitutions leads to the most efficacious, selective, and potent ligands. A3AR agonists such as IB-MECA and Cl-IB-MECA are now advancing into Phase II clin. trials for treatments targeting diseases such as cancer, arthritis, and psoriasis. Also, a wide no. of compds. exerting high potency and selectivity in antagonizing the human (h)A3AR have been discovered. These mols. are generally characterized by a notable structural diversity, taking into account that arom. nitrogen-contg. monocyclic (thiazoles and thiadiazoles), bicyclic (isoquinoline, quinozalines, (aza)adenines), tricyclic systems (pyrazoloquinolines, triazoloquinoxalines, pyrazolotriazolopyrimidines, triazolopurines, tricyclic xanthines) and nucleoside derivs. have been identified as potent and selective A3AR antagonists. Probably due to the "enigmatic" physiol. role of A3AR, whose activation may produce opposite effects (for example, concerning tissue protection in inflammatory and cancer cells) and may produce effects that are species dependent, only a few mols. have reached preclin. investigation. Indeed, the most advanced A3AR antagonists remain in preclin. testing. Among the antagonists described above, compd. OT-7999 is expected to enter clin. trials for the treatment of glaucoma, while several thiazole derivs. are in development as antiallergic, antiasthmatic and/or antiinflammatory drugs.
- 13Jacobson, K. A.; Tosh, D. K.; Jain, S.; Gao, Z. G. Historical and Current Adenosine Receptor Agonists in Preclinical and Clinical Development. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2019, 13 (March), 1– 17, DOI: 10.3389/fncel.2019.00124There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 14Vecchio, E. A.; Baltos, J. A.; Nguyen, A. T. N.; Christopoulos, A.; White, P. J.; May, L. T. New Paradigms in Adenosine Receptor Pharmacology: Allostery, Oligomerization and Biased Agonism. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2018, 175 (21), 4036– 4046, DOI: 10.1111/bph.1433714New paradigms in adenosine receptor pharmacology: allostery, oligomerization and biased agonismVecchio, Elizabeth A.; Baltos, Jo-Anne; Nguyen, Anh T. N.; Christopoulos, Arthur; White, Paul J.; May, Lauren T.British Journal of Pharmacology (2018), 175 (21), 4036-4046CODEN: BJPCBM; ISSN:1476-5381. (Wiley-Blackwell)A review. Adenosine receptors are a family of GPCRs contg. four subtypes (A1, A2A, A2B and A3 receptors), all of which bind the ubiquitous nucleoside adenosine. These receptors play an important role in physiol. and pathophysiol. and therefore represent attractive drug targets for a range of conditions. The theor. framework surrounding drug action at adenosine receptors now extends beyond the notion of prototypical agonism and antagonism to encompass more complex pharmacol. concepts. New paradigms include allostery, in which ligands bind a topog. distinct receptor site from that of the endogenous agonist, homomeric or heteromeric interactions across receptor oligomers and biased agonism, i.e., ligand-dependent differential intracellular signaling. This review provides a concise overview of allostery, oligomerization and biased agonism at adenosine receptors and outlines how these paradigms may enhance future drug discovery endeavours focussed on the development of novel therapeutic agents acting at adenosine receptors.
- 15Pipeline; Palobiofarma. https://www.palobiofarma.com/pipeline-2/.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 16Park, C. W.; Han, C. T.; Sakaguchi, Y.; Lee, J.; Youn, H. Y. Safety Evaluation of Fm101, an A3 Adenosine Receptor Modulator, in Rat, for Developing as Therapeutics of Glaucoma and Hepatitis. EXCLI J. 2020, 19, 187– 200, DOI: 10.17179/excli2019-205816Safety evaluation of FM101, an A3 adenosine receptor modulator, in rat, for developing as therapeutics of glaucoma and hepatitisPark Chong-Woo; Lee Jiyoun; Park Chong-Woo; Youn Hwa-Young; Han Chung-Tack; Sakaguchi YasueEXCLI journal (2020), 19 (), 187-200 ISSN:1611-2156.Adenosine is a critical regulator of inflammation and fibrosis, it affects endogenous cell signaling via binding to the A3 adenosine receptor. FM101 is a potent, highly selective A3 adenosine receptor modulator that has been developed as a treatment for glaucoma and hepatitis. We determined that FM101 is a biased ligand with functional activities both as a G protein agonist and a β-arrestin antagonist. The safety of FM101 was evaluated by administering an acute dose in rats, the results indicated that the approximate lethal dose was greater than 2000 mg/kg. In a subchronic toxicity study, FM101 was administered orally once per day to rats at doses of 250, 500, and 1000 mg/kg/day over a period of 28 days. Abnormal posture, irregular respiration, decreased movement, and ear flushing were observed during the early phase of dosing, and loose stools were observed sporadically among the animals that received 500 and 1000 mg/kg/day. Body weight and food consumption were decreased in one male and one female rat in the 1000 mg/kg/day group during the first 2 weeks of observation. However, there were no test substance-related changes or adverse effects observed during our ophthalmological, clinical chemistry, urine, organ weight, and histopathological analysis. These findings indicate that no observed adverse effect level of FM101 was 1000 mg/kg/day in male and female rats.
- 17A SAD, MAD, and FE Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetic Profile of FM101 in Healthy Volunteers. ClinicalTrials.gov. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03879928.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 18Yaziji, V.; Rodríguez, D.; Gutiérrez-De-Terán, H.; Coelho, A.; Caamaño, O.; García-Mera, X.; Brea, J.; Loza, M. I.; Cadavid, M. I.; Sotelo, E. Pyrimidine Derivatives as Potent and Selective A3 Adenosine Receptor Antagonists. J. Med. Chem. 2011, 54 (2), 457– 471, DOI: 10.1021/jm100843z18Pyrimidine derivatives as potent and selective A3 adenosine receptor antagonistsYaziji, Vicente; Rodriguez, David; Gutierrez-de-Teran, Hugo; Coelho, Alberto; Caamano, Olga; Garcia-Mera, Xerardo; Brea, Jose; Loza, Maria Isabel; Cadavid, Maria Isabel; Sotelo, EddyJournal of Medicinal Chemistry (2011), 54 (2), 457-471CODEN: JMCMAR; ISSN:0022-2623. (American Chemical Society)Two regioisomeric series of diaryl 2- or 4-amidopyrimidines e. g. I, II have been synthesized and their adenosine receptor affinities were detd. in radioligand binding assays at the four human adenosine receptors (hARs). Some of the ligands prepd. herein exhibit remarkable affinities (Ki < 10 nm) and, most noticeably, the absence of activity at the A1, A2A, and A2B receptors. The structural determinants that support the affinity and selectivity profiles of the series were highlighted through an integrated computational approach, combining a 3D-QSAR model built on the second generation of GRid Independent Descriptors (GRIND2) with a novel homol. model of the hA3 receptor. The robustness of the computational model was subsequently evaluated by the design of new derivs. exploring the alkyl substituent of the exocyclic amide group. The synthesis and evaluation of the novel compds. validated the predictive power of the model, exhibiting excellent agreement between predicted and exptl. activities.
- 19Yaziji, V.; Rodríguez, D.; Coelho, A.; García-Mera, X.; El Maatougui, A.; Brea, J.; Loza, M. I.; Cadavid, M. I.; Gutiérrez-De-Terán, H.; Sotelo, E. Selective and Potent Adenosine A3 Receptor Antagonists by Methoxyaryl Substitution on the N-(2,6-Diarylpyrimidin-4-Yl)Acetamide Scaffold. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2013, 59, 235– 242, DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2012.11.01019Selective and potent adenosine A3 receptor antagonists by methoxyaryl substitution on the N-(2,6-diarylpyrimidin-4-yl)acetamide scaffoldYaziji, Vicente; Rodriguez, David; Coelho, Alberto; Garcia-Mera, Xerardo; El Maatougui, Abdelaziz; Brea, Jose; Loza, Maria Isabel; Cadavid, Maria Isabel; Gutierrez-de-Teran, Hugo; Sotelo, EddyEuropean Journal of Medicinal Chemistry (2013), 59 (), 235-242CODEN: EJMCA5; ISSN:0223-5234. (Elsevier Masson SAS)The influence of diverse methoxyphenyl substitution patterns on the N-(2,6-diarylpyrimidin-4-yl)acetamide scaffold is herein explored in order to modulate the A3 adenosine receptor antagonistic profile. As a result, novel ligands exhibiting excellent potency (Ki on A3 AR < 20 nM) and selectivity profiles (above 100-fold within the adenosine receptors family) are reported. Moreover, our joint theor. and exptl. approach allows the identification of novel pharmacophoric elements conferring A3AR selectivity, first established by a robust computational model and thereafter characterizing the most salient features of the structure-activity and structure-selectivity relationships in this series.
- 20Azuaje, J.; Jespers, W.; Yaziji, V.; Mallo, A.; Majellaro, M.; Caamaño, O.; Loza, M. I.; Cadavid, M. I.; Brea, J.; Åqvist, J.; Sotelo, E.; Gutiérrez-De-Terán, H. Effect of Nitrogen Atom Substitution in A3 Adenosine Receptor Binding: N-(4,6-Diarylpyridin-2-Yl)Acetamides as Potent and Selective Antagonists. J. Med. Chem. 2017, 60 (17), 7502– 7511, DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.7b0086020Effect of Nitrogen Atom Substitution in A3 Adenosine Receptor Binding: N-(4,6-Diarylpyridin-2-yl)acetamides as Potent and Selective AntagonistsAzuaje, Jhonny; Jespers, Willem; Yaziji, Vicente; Mallo, Ana; Majellaro, Maria; Caamano, Olga; Loza, Maria I.; Cadavid, Maria I.; Brea, Jose; Aqvist, Johan; Sotelo, Eddy; Gutierrez-de-Teran, HugoJournal of Medicinal Chemistry (2017), 60 (17), 7502-7511CODEN: JMCMAR; ISSN:0022-2623. (American Chemical Society)The authors report the first family of 2-acetamidopyridines as potent and selective A3 adenosine receptor (AR) antagonists. The computer-assisted design was focused on the bioisosteric replacement of the N1 atom by a CH group in a previous series of diarylpyrimidines. Some of the generated 2-acetamidopyridines elicit an antagonistic effect with excellent affinity (Ki < 10 nM) and outstanding selectivity profiles, providing an alternative and simpler chem. scaffold to the parent series of diarylpyrimidines. In addn., using mol. dynamics and free energy perturbation simulations, the authors elucidate the effect of the second nitrogen of the parent diarylpyrimidines, which is revealed as a stabilizer of a water network in the binding site. The discovery of 2,6-diaryl-2-acetamidopyridines represents a step forward in the search of chem. simple, potent, and selective antagonists for the hA3AR, and exemplifies the benefits of a joint theor.-exptl. approach to identify novel hA3AR antagonists through succinct and efficient synthetic methodologies.
- 21RDKit.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 22Schrödinger Suite, 2012 ed.; Schrödinger, LLC, 2012.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 23Esguerra, M.; Siretskiy, A.; Bello, X.; Sallander, J.; Gutiérrez-de-Terán, H. GPCR-ModSim: A Comprehensive Web Based Solution for Modeling G-Protein Coupled Receptors. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, 44 (W1), W455– W462, DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkw40323GPCR-ModSim: a comprehensive web based solution for modeling G-protein coupled receptorsEsguerra, Mauricio; Siretskiy, Alexey; Bello, Xabier; Sallander, Jessica; Gutierrez-de-Teran, HugoNucleic Acids Research (2016), 44 (W1), W455-W462CODEN: NARHAD; ISSN:0305-1048. (Oxford University Press)GPCR-ModSim is a centralized and easy to use service dedicated to the structural modeling of G-protein Coupled Receptors (GPCRs). 3D mol. models can be generated from amino acid sequence by homol.-modeling techniques, considering different receptor conformations. GPCR-ModSim includes a membrane insertion and mol. dynamics (MD) equilibration protocol, which can be used to refine the generated model or any GPCR structure uploaded to the server, including if desired non-protein elements such as orthosteric or allosteric ligands, structural waters or ions. We herein revise the main characteristics of GPCR-ModSim and present new functionalities. The templates used for homol. modeling have been updated considering the latest structural data, with sep. profile structural alignments built for inactive, partially-active and active groups of templates. We have also added the possibility to perform multiple-template homol. modeling in a unique and flexible way. Finally, our new MD protocol considers a series of distance restraints derived from a recently identified conserved network of helical contacts, allowing for a smoother refinement of the generated models which is particularly advised when there is low homol. to the available templates. GPCR-ModSim has been tested on the GPCR Dock 2013 competition with satisfactory results.
- 24Hess, B.; Kutzner, C.; Van Der Spoel, D.; Lindahl, E. GRGMACS 4: Algorithms for Highly Efficient, Load-Balanced, and Scalable Molecular Simulation. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2008, 4 (3), 435– 447, DOI: 10.1021/ct700301q24GROMACS 4: Algorithms for Highly Efficient, Load-Balanced, and Scalable Molecular SimulationHess, Berk; Kutzner, Carsten; van der Spoel, David; Lindahl, ErikJournal of Chemical Theory and Computation (2008), 4 (3), 435-447CODEN: JCTCCE; ISSN:1549-9618. (American Chemical Society)Mol. simulation is an extremely useful, but computationally very expensive tool for studies of chem. and biomol. systems. Here, we present a new implementation of our mol. simulation toolkit GROMACS which now both achieves extremely high performance on single processors from algorithmic optimizations and hand-coded routines and simultaneously scales very well on parallel machines. The code encompasses a minimal-communication domain decompn. algorithm, full dynamic load balancing, a state-of-the-art parallel constraint solver, and efficient virtual site algorithms that allow removal of hydrogen atom degrees of freedom to enable integration time steps up to 5 fs for atomistic simulations also in parallel. To improve the scaling properties of the common particle mesh Ewald electrostatics algorithms, we have in addn. used a Multiple-Program, Multiple-Data approach, with sep. node domains responsible for direct and reciprocal space interactions. Not only does this combination of algorithms enable extremely long simulations of large systems but also it provides that simulation performance on quite modest nos. of std. cluster nodes.
Supporting Information
Supporting Information
The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsmedchemlett.1c00598.
Detailed experimental information: synthesis of target compounds, spectroscopic and analytical data, pharmacological binding assays and HPLC traces of best compounds (PDF)
3D coordinates of compounds and A3AR model (ZIP)
Terms & Conditions
Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.