ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
My Activity
Recently Viewed
You have not visited any articles yet, Please visit some articles to see contents here.
CONTENT TYPES
ADDITION / CORRECTIONThis article has been corrected. View the notice.

Rapid Detection of COVID-19 Causative Virus (SARS-CoV-2) in Human Nasopharyngeal Swab Specimens Using Field-Effect Transistor-Based Biosensor

  • Giwan Seo
    Giwan Seo
    Research Center for Bioconvergence Analysis, Korea Basic Science Institute, Cheongju 28119, Republic of Korea
    Center for Convergent Research of Emerging Virus Infection, Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology, Daejeon 34114, Republic of Korea
    More by Giwan Seo
  • Geonhee Lee
    Geonhee Lee
    Advanced Materials Division, Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology, Daejeon 34114, Republic of Korea
    More by Geonhee Lee
  • Mi Jeong Kim
    Mi Jeong Kim
    Research Center for Bioconvergence Analysis, Korea Basic Science Institute, Cheongju 28119, Republic of Korea
    Center for Convergent Research of Emerging Virus Infection, Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology, Daejeon 34114, Republic of Korea
    More by Mi Jeong Kim
  • Seung-Hwa Baek
    Seung-Hwa Baek
    Center for Convergent Research of Emerging Virus Infection, Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology, Daejeon 34114, Republic of Korea
    Department of Predictive Toxicology, Korea Institute of Toxicology, Daejeon 34114, Republic of Korea
  • Minsuk Choi
    Minsuk Choi
    Center for Convergent Research of Emerging Virus Infection, Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology, Daejeon 34114, Republic of Korea
    More by Minsuk Choi
  • Keun Bon Ku
    Keun Bon Ku
    Center for Convergent Research of Emerging Virus Infection, Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology, Daejeon 34114, Republic of Korea
    More by Keun Bon Ku
  • Chang-Seop Lee
    Chang-Seop Lee
    Department of Internal Medicine, Jeonbuk National University Medical School, Jeonju 54986, Republic of Korea
    Biomedical Research Institute of Jeonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonju 54907, Republic of Korea
  • Sangmi Jun
    Sangmi Jun
    Center for Convergent Research of Emerging Virus Infection, Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology, Daejeon 34114, Republic of Korea
    Center for Research Equipment, Korea Basic Science Institute, Cheongju 28119, Republic of Korea
    More by Sangmi Jun
  • Daeui Park
    Daeui Park
    Center for Convergent Research of Emerging Virus Infection, Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology, Daejeon 34114, Republic of Korea
    Department of Predictive Toxicology, Korea Institute of Toxicology, Daejeon 34114, Republic of Korea
    More by Daeui Park
  • Hong Gi Kim
    Hong Gi Kim
    Center for Convergent Research of Emerging Virus Infection, Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology, Daejeon 34114, Republic of Korea
    More by Hong Gi Kim
  • Seong-Jun Kim
    Seong-Jun Kim
    Center for Convergent Research of Emerging Virus Infection, Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology, Daejeon 34114, Republic of Korea
  • Jeong-O Lee
    Jeong-O Lee
    Advanced Materials Division, Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology, Daejeon 34114, Republic of Korea
    More by Jeong-O Lee
  • Bum Tae Kim
    Bum Tae Kim
    Center for Convergent Research of Emerging Virus Infection, Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology, Daejeon 34114, Republic of Korea
    More by Bum Tae Kim
  • Edmond Changkyun Park*
    Edmond Changkyun Park
    Research Center for Bioconvergence Analysis, Korea Basic Science Institute, Cheongju 28119, Republic of Korea
    Center for Convergent Research of Emerging Virus Infection, Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology, Daejeon 34114, Republic of Korea
    Department of Bio-Analysis Science, University of Science & Technology (UST), Daejeon 34113, Republic of Korea
    *Email: [email protected]
  • , and 
  • Seung Il Kim*
    Seung Il Kim
    Research Center for Bioconvergence Analysis, Korea Basic Science Institute, Cheongju 28119, Republic of Korea
    Center for Convergent Research of Emerging Virus Infection, Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology, Daejeon 34114, Republic of Korea
    Department of Bio-Analysis Science, University of Science & Technology (UST), Daejeon 34113, Republic of Korea
    *Email: [email protected]
    More by Seung Il Kim
Cite this: ACS Nano 2020, 14, 4, 5135–5142
Publication Date (Web):April 15, 2020
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.0c02823
Copyright © 2020 American Chemical Society
Article Views
95858
Altmetric
-
Citations
LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICS
PDF (12 MB)
Supporting Info (1)»

Abstract

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a newly emerging human infectious disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2, previously called 2019-nCoV). Based on the rapid increase in the rate of human infection, the World Health Organization (WHO) has classified the COVID-19 outbreak as a pandemic. Because no specific drugs or vaccines for COVID-19 are yet available, early diagnosis and management are crucial for containing the outbreak. Here, we report a field-effect transistor (FET)-based biosensing device for detecting SARS-CoV-2 in clinical samples. The sensor was produced by coating graphene sheets of the FET with a specific antibody against SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. The performance of the sensor was determined using antigen protein, cultured virus, and nasopharyngeal swab specimens from COVID-19 patients. Our FET device could detect the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein at concentrations of 1 fg/mL in phosphate-buffered saline and 100 fg/mL clinical transport medium. In addition, the FET sensor successfully detected SARS-CoV-2 in culture medium (limit of detection [LOD]: 1.6 × 101 pfu/mL) and clinical samples (LOD: 2.42 × 102 copies/mL). Thus, we have successfully fabricated a promising FET biosensor for SARS-CoV-2; our device is a highly sensitive immunological diagnostic method for COVID-19 that requires no sample pretreatment or labeling.

  Note

This article is made available via the ACS COVID-19 subset for unrestricted RESEARCH re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a newly emerging human infectious disease associated with severe respiratory distress. In December 2019, a series of cases of pneumonia of unknown cause were reported in Wuhan in the Hubei province of China. (1) Later, the 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCov) was identified from the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid of a patient; (2) it was subsequently renamed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) by the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses. (3) As human-to-human transmission rapidly increased, the World Health Organization (WHO) classified the COVID-19 outbreak as a pandemic on March 12, 2020. (4) As of March 29, 2020, more than 634,000 cases of COVID-19 have been confirmed around the world, resulting in 29,891 deaths. (5) The estimated basic reproduction number (R0) of COVID-19 is approximately 2.2, meaning that, on average, each patient spreads infection to 2.2 people. (6) Because no specific drugs or vaccines are yet available for COVID-19, early diagnosis and management are crucial for containing the outbreak.
Coronaviruses (CoVs) cause mild to moderate upper respiratory tract illnesses in both humans and animals. (7) SARS-CoV-2, a betacoronavirus, has a single-positive strand RNA genome. CoV genomes encode four structural proteins: spike (S), envelope (E), matrix (M), and nucleocapsid (N). Two betacoronaviruses, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) and Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV), caused serious epidemics over the past two decades. (8) Phylogenetic analysis revealed that SARS-CoV-2 is more similar to SARS-CoV than MERS-CoV. (9) Although the viral pathogenesis of SARS-CoV-2 is unknown, recent studies reported that SARS-CoV-2 uses angiotensin-converting enzyme II (ACE2) as a cellular entry receptor; ACE2 is also a well-known host cell receptor for SARS-CoV. (10) SARS-CoV-2 colocalizes with ACE2 in animal cells, (11) and its spike (S) protein binds ACE2 with high affinity. (12,13)
For emerging pathogens, real-time reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) is the primary means of diagnosis. Currently, real-time RT-PCR is used for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 based on previously published laboratory protocols. (14) SARS-CoV-2 is highly contagious and is currently spreading rapidly around the world; the rate of COVID-19 transmission is much faster than those of SARS and MERS. Moreover, cases of asymptomatic COVID-19 transmission have been reported. (15,16) Molecular diagnosis using real-time RT-PCR takes at least 3 h, including preparation of viral RNA. In addition, the RNA preparation step can affect diagnostic accuracy. Hence, highly sensitive immunological diagnostic methods that directly detect viral antigens in clinical samples without sample preparation steps are necessary for rapid and accurate diagnosis of COVID-19.
Among the many diagnostic methods currently available, field-effect transistor (FET)-based biosensing devices have several advantages, including the ability to make highly sensitive and instantaneous measurements using small amounts of analytes. (17,18) FET-based biosensors are considered to be potentially useful in clinical diagnosis, point-of-care testing, and on-site detection. Graphene is a two-dimensional sheet of hexagonally arranged carbon atoms, all of which are exposed on its surface. (19) It has proven to be a useful material for various sensing platforms due to its extraordinary properties, including high electronic conductivity, high carrier mobility, and large specific area. (20) Graphene-based FET biosensors can detect surrounding changes on their surface and provide an optimal sensing environment for ultrasensitive and low-noise detection. From this standpoint, graphene-based FET technology is very attractive for applications related to sensitive immunological diagnosis. (21,22)
In this study, we developed a graphene-based biosensing device functionalized with SARS-CoV-2 spike antibody (COVID-19 FET sensor) for use as a SARS-CoV-2 virus detection platform. SARS-CoV-2 spike antibody was immobilized onto the fabricated device through 1-pyrenebutyric acid N-hydroxysuccinimide ester (PBASE), an efficient interface coupling agent used as a probe linker (Figure 1). Our COVID-19 FET sensor detects target SARS-CoV-2 antigen protein with a limit of detection (LOD) of 1 fg/mL. Most critical of all, we confirmed the potential for clinical application by detecting SARS-CoV-2 antigen protein in transport medium used for nasopharyngeal swabs and cultured SARS-CoV-2 virus, as well as SARS-CoV-2 virus from clinical samples. Furthermore, our sensor could distinguish the SARS-CoV-2 antigen protein from those of MERS-CoV. These results demonstrate the successful fabrication of a COVID-19 FET sensor based on integration of SARS-CoV-2 spike antibody with graphene, enabling highly sensitive detection of the SARS-CoV-2 virus in clinical samples.

Figure 1

Figure 1. Schematic diagram of COVID-19 FET sensor operation procedure. Graphene as a sensing material is selected, and SARS-CoV-2 spike antibody is conjugated onto the graphene sheet via 1-pyrenebutyric acid N-hydroxysuccinimide ester, which is an interfacing molecule as a probe linker.

Results and Discussion

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

Fabrication and Characterization of Biosensing Device

Figure 2A depicts the optical image of the COVID-19 FET sensor. The dimensions of the sensing area were 100 × 100 μm2 (L × W). To reduce interference during electrical measurements, the device was passivated with SU8-2010. Details of the fabrication of the COVID-19 FET sensor is provided in Materials and Methods. To confirm that the graphene surface was chemically functionalized using PBASE, we obtained Raman spectra and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) data (Figure 2B–H). Figure 2B shows the Raman spectra of the pristine and PBASE-modified graphene surfaces. In the spectrum for the surface of pristine graphene, two major peaks (the G and 2D peaks) were observed. The G peak corresponds to the lattice vibration mode, and the 2D peak stems from second-order Raman scattering. However, the D and D′ peaks obviously appeared due to the relative resonance of sp3 bonding, orbital hybridization, and a pyrene group in the binding of PABSE to the graphene surface. To provide a visual comparison of the qualities of graphene after modification with PBASE, we converted the measured data to histograms and mapping images (Figure 2C–E). After PBASE was applied to the graphene surface, the statistical data of the 2D peak position were shifted to a higher frequency (∼3.27 cm–1), indicating p-doping by the π–π interaction between PBASE and graphene (Figure 2C). (23,24) The mapping images also show that the average I2D/IG ratio of PBASE-treated graphene (I2D/IG = ∼1.87) is significantly lower than that of pristine graphene (I2D/IG = ∼3.61) due to existence of some disorder on the graphene (Figure 2D,E).

Figure 2

Figure 2. Surface analysis of pristine and PBASE-modified graphene using Raman spectroscopy, X-ray spectroscopy, and atomic force microscopy. (A) Optical image of the COVID-19 FET sensor. The dimensions were 100 × 100 μm2 (L × W). Scale bar in the image denotes 200 μm. (B) Representative Raman spectra of pristine and PBASE-modified graphene. (C) Comparison of statistical data of the 2D peak position between pristine and PBASE-modified graphene. Mapping images of average I2D/IG ratio (D) before and (E) after PBASE modification. (F) XPS survey data of pristine and PBASE-modified graphene. (G) N 1s peak of pristine and PBASE-treated graphene (shadow region in F). (H) Deconvoluted C 1s peak of PBASE-modified graphene. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) images of (I) pristine graphene (RMS = 0.961) and (J) PBASE-modified graphene (RMS = 1.530). Bottom graphs indicate the height profiles in the corresponding two AFM images. Scale bar in the image denotes 3 μm.

The XPS survey data show the principal C 1s, O 1s, and N 1s core levels (Figure 2F). Before functionalization, the graphene exhibited no meaningful N peak (black line), whereas the N 1s peak was observed in the PBASE-treated sample (red line). Figure 2G indicates the comparison of the N 1s peak intensity before and after PBASE functionalization. The increase in intensity of the N 1s peak suggests successful surface modification. The C 1s peak was composed of five components, 284.5, 285.5, 286.4, 287.7, and 288.6 eV, corresponding to C═C, C═N, C–N, C–OH, and C–C═O/C═O, respectively, originating from the substitutional doping of N atoms (Figure 2H). (25) These results suggest that the surface of PBASE-modified graphene can be successfully used as a substrate support for stable sensing.
Next, we characterized the morphology and quality of the graphene sheets using atomic force microscopy (AFM) and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HR-TEM). The surface roughness of graphene (RMS) increased slightly from ∼0.961 nm to ∼1.530 nm after PBASE modification (Figure 2I,J). The general profile of the graphene sheet and its electron diffraction pattern of the sheets reveal the fine crystallinity of the graphene on the EM grid (Figure S1).

Selection of the Antigen and Validation of the Antibody

SARS-CoV-2 encodes four structural proteins: spike, envelope, matrix, and nucleocapsid. (9) Among them, the spike protein is best suited for use as a diagnostic antigen because it is a major transmembrane protein of the virus and is highly immunogenic. In addition, the spike protein exhibits amino acid sequence diversity among coronaviruses, (9) enabling the specific detection of SARS-CoV-2. Therefore, we used SARS-CoV-2 spike antibody as a receptor to detect this virus.
Before immobilizing SARS-CoV-2 spike antibody onto the FET, we verified the performance of the antibody by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The results revealed that the antibody bound to the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein but not to the MERS-CoV spike protein or bovine serum albumin (BSA) (Figure S2). These observations confirm that the antibody is specific for the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and is therefore suitable for detecting SARS-CoV-2. The detection limit of the antibody in the ELISA platform was 4 ng/mL.

Preparation of the COVID-19 FET Sensor

To evaluate the presence of the SARS-CoV-2 spike antibody on the graphene surface, we carried out electrical measurements. Figure 3C shows the current–voltage (IV) curves of the graphene device over a range from −0.1 to +0.1 V before and after attachment of the antibody. After PBASE functionalization and immobilization of the antibody onto the graphene channel, the slopes (dI/dV) decreased. This difference in slope indicates the successful introduction of the SARS-CoV-2 spike antibody.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Electrical characterization of pristine, PBASE-modified, and SARS-CoV-2 spike antibody-immobilized graphene. (A) Schematic diagram of the aqueous-solution-gated FET (COVID-19 FET sensor) configuration using the antibody-conjugated graphene. (B) IDSVDS output curves of the antibody-conjugated FET with various gating voltages from 0 to −1.5 V in steps of −0.3 V. IDS negatively increased as VGS negatively increased. (C) Current–voltage (I–V) characteristics of the graphene-based device of each functionalization process for the antibody modification. (D) Measurement of transfer curves of the COVID-19 FET sensor in steps of the antibody conjugation (VDS = 0.01 V).

To investigate the possibility of transducing an electrical signal with the COVID-19 FET sensor, we prepared an aqueous solution-gated FET. The geometry of the COVID-19 FET sensor was designed using a graphene channel conjugated to the SARS-CoV-2 spike antibody, and the FET was covered with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; pH 7.4) buffer as the electrolyte to maintain an efficient gating effect. As shown in Figure 3A, the aqueous solution-gated FET system could detect SARS-CoV-2 based on changes in channel surface potential and the corresponding effects on the electrical response.
We measured the transfer curves of the graphene-based FET after each modification process (Figure 3D). After PBASE functionalization, an obvious positive shift was observed due to the p-doping effect of the pyrene group. However, the transfer curve was shifted negatively, suggesting that the positive charge of the antibody exerted an n-doping effect on graphene after the antibody was immobilized. Figure 3B shows the output curves of the COVID-19 FET sensor as a function of gate voltage (VG) over a range from 0 to −1.5 V in steps of −0.3 V. IDS negatively increased as VG negatively increased, corresponding to the predicted behavior of a p-type semiconductor. (26,27) Moreover, the linear I–V curves exhibited highly stable ohmic contact, indicating that the COVID-19 FET sensor provided a reliable electrical signal for detection of the target analytes (SARS-CoV-2 antigen protein, cultured SARS-CoV-2 virus, or SARS-CoV-2 virus from clinical samples).

Real-Time Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Protein

To investigate the performance of the COVID-19 FET sensor, we evaluated the dynamic response of the sensor to spike protein (Figure 4A). First, we measured the sensor’s LOD for spike protein. The sensor responded to 1 fg/mL of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in PBS (Figure 4B); that is, the LOD of the FET sensor was substantially lower than that of the ELISA platform (Figure S2). However, the pristine graphene-based device without SARS-CoV-2 spike protein conjugation did not show any remarkable signal change after the introduction of various sample concentrations (gray line in Figure 4D). The control experiment indicates that the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein is essential for specific binding with the SARS-CoV-2 antigen. In addition, the COVID-19 FET sensor exhibited no response to MERS-CoV spike proteins (Figure 4D), indicating that the COVID-19 FET sensor was both highly sensitive and specific for the SARS-CoV-2 spike antigen protein.

Figure 4

Figure 4. Detection of SARS-CoV-2 antigen protein. (A) Schematic diagram for the COVID-19 FET sensor for detection of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. (B) Real-time response of COVID-19 FET toward SARS-CoV-2 antigen protein in PBS and (C) related dose-dependent response curve (VDS = 0.01 V). Graphene-based FET without SARS-CoV-2 antibody is presented as negative control. (D) Selective response of COVID-19 FET sensor toward target SARS-CoV-2 antigen protein and MERS-CoV protein. (E) Real-time response of COVID-19 FET toward SARS-CoV-2 antigen protein in UTM and (F) related dose-dependent response curve.

In the clinic, diagnosis of COVID-19 is performed using nasopharyngeal swabs suspended in universal transport medium (UTM). The UTM contains various reagents that may affect performance of the FET sensor, such as Hank’s balanced salts and BSA. Therefore, we assessed the response of the FET sensor to antigens in UTM. To determine whether the FET sensor could be used in the field, we measured the response of the FET sensor to SARS-CoV-2 spike proteins in 0.01× UTM. The results revealed that the FET sensor could successfully detect SARS-CoV-2 spike antigen proteins starting from a concentration of 100 fg/mL (Figure 4E). This indicates that the COVID-19 FET sensor can detect antigens in clinical samples without any preparation or preprocessing. To further investigate the normalized sensitivity of the COVID-19 FET sensor, the changes in sensitivity as a function of SARS-CoV-2 antigen protein concentration were characterized by fitting each data point, as shown in Figure 4C,F.

Real-Time Detection of Cultured SARS-CoV-2 Virus

Next, we investigated whether the COVID-19 FET sensor could detect SARS-CoV-2 virus (Figure 5A). To this end, we propagated SARS-CoV-2 in cultured cells and inactivated viral infectivity by heating. Upon application of cultured SARS-CoV-2, the COVID-19 FET sensor responded to concentrations as low as 1.6 × 101 pfu/mL (Figure 5B), and the normalized response curve was linear from 1.6 × 101 to 1.6 × 104 pfu/mL (Figure 5C). This result suggests that the COVID-19 FET sensor has the potential to be used for COVID-19 diagnosis.

Figure 5

Figure 5. Detection of cultured SARS-CoV-2 virus. (A) Schematic diagram for the COVID-19 FET sensor for detection of SARS-CoV-2 cultured virus. (B) Real-time response of COVID-19 FET toward SARS-CoV-2 cultured virus and (C) related dose-dependent response curve.

Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Virus from Clinical Samples

Finally, we tested the detection performance of the COVID-19 FET sensor using clinical samples (Figure 6A). To this end, we collected nasopharyngeal swab specimens from COVID-19 patients and normal subjects and stored them in UTM. Prior to addition of patient samples to the device, we evaluated nasopharyngeal swab samples from normal subjects to determine the basal signal. The COVID-19 FET sensor clearly discriminated between patient and normal samples (Figure 6B,C). In addition, the FET sensor responded to patient samples diluted as much as 1:1 × 105 (242 copies/mL) (Figure 6D), and the normalized response curve of the FET sensor was linear (Figure 6E). Given that UTM includes various reagents and generates noise signals, we consider the LOD of the COVID-19 FET sensor to be low enough for practical use Table S2. Nevertheless, development of novel materials of the FET sensor for UTM should be necessary for more accurate detection by reducing the noise signals. For reference, the detection limit of current molecular diagnostic tests of COVID-19 is ∼50–100 copies. (28) Taken together, our findings show that our COVID-19 FET sensor successfully detected SARS-CoV-2 virus from clinical samples without any preprocessing and with a large dynamic range.

Figure 6

Figure 6. Detection of SARS-CoV-2 virus from clinical samples. (A) Schematic diagram for the COVID-19 FET sensor for detection of SARS-CoV-2 virus from COVID-19 patients. (B,C) Comparison of response signal between normal samples and patient ones. (D) Real-time response of COVID-19 FET toward SARS-CoV-2 clinical sample and (C) related dose-dependent response curve.

Conclusion

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

During the COVID-19 pandemic, the development of highly sensitive and rapid biosensing devices has become increasingly important. We developed a COVID-19 FET sensor in which the SARS-CoV-2 spike antibody is conjugated to a graphene sheet, which is used as the sensing area. The sensor was able to detect SARS-CoV-2 virus in clinical samples, the SARS-CoV-2 antigen in practical use (Table S2). standard buffer, transport medium,, and cultured SARS-CoV-2 virus. Furthermore, the device exhibited no measurable cross-reactivity with MERS-CoV antigen. Therefore, our functionalized graphene-based sensor platform provides simple, rapid, and highly responsive detection of the SARS-CoV-2 virus in clinical samples. Moreover, this technology could be adapted for diagnosis of other emerging viral diseases.

Materials and Methods

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

Fabrication of Graphene-Based Sensing Devices

Graphene was transferred to a SiO2/Si substrate using conventional wet-transfer methods. Poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) C4 (MicroChem, Newton, MA) was spin-coated at 500 rpm for 10 s and at 3000 rpm for 30 s onto graphene on Cu foil (Grolltex, San Diego, CA). PMMA/graphene on Cu foil was etched in CE-100 copper etchant (Transene, Oakland, CA). After the Cu foil was etched, the PMMA/graphene layers were moved using clean glass slides into a deionized (DI) water bath, and the copper etchant was washed away. Subsequently, the PMMA/graphene layer was transferred to a SiO2/Si substrate and dried under ambient conditions overnight. The PMMA layer was removed in an acetone bath for 2 h. Finally, the graphene was transferred onto the substrate, followed by isopropyl alcohol washing and drying under a stream of N2 gas.
To fabricate practical graphene-based devices, the transferred graphene was patterned into linear shapes by photolithography and etched by a reactive ion-etching method. To generate a Au/Cr electrode layer on the etched graphene layer, metallization was performed using a thermal evaporation method and a lift-off technique. The device dimensions were 100 × 100 μm2 (L × W). To reduce interference during electrical measurements, the device was passivated with SU8-2010 (MicroChem).

Immobilization of SARS-CoV-2 Antibody on the Graphene Surface

The fabricated graphene-based device was soaked in 2 mM PBASE (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) in methanol for 1 h at room temperature and then rinsed several times with PBS and DI water. Finally, the functionalized device was exposed to 250 μg/mL SARS-CoV-2 spike antibody for 4 h.

Instruments

Pristine graphene and graphene with PBASE modification were characterized by Raman spectroscopy, XPS, AFM, and HR-TEM.
Raman spectrum and mapping analysis was acquired with an inVia Raman system (Renishaw, UK). Mapping images were obtained from 196 spectra (30 × 30 μm area on graphene). The intervals between adjacent spectrum points were 2.5 μm (horizontal and vertical). Analysis of the chemical binding component was determined by XPS on a K-Alpha instrument (Thermo Fisher Scientific), with the incident beam produced by an Al X-ray source (hν = 1486.6 eV) and a pass energy of 50 eV. Surface roughness analysis was conducted by AFM on a Dimension 3000 instrument (Digital Instruments/Veeco Science). HR-TEM imaging was performed on a ZEISS Libra ultracorrected energy filtering transmission electron microscope (ZEISS, Germany) with a 200 kV acceleration voltage.

Sensing Measurement

Electrical performance was evaluated on a 2634B semiconductor analyzer (Keithley Instruments, Cleveland, OH) and probe station. A drain–source bias voltage of ∼10 mV was maintained during measurement. The detected electrical response signal was normalized as [ΔI/I0] = (II0)/I0, where I is the detected real-time current and I0 is the initial current.

Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay

A 96-well plate was coated with SARS-CoV-2 spike antigen protein (40591-V08H; Sino Biological, Inc., China) or MERS-CoV spike antigen protein (40069-V08H, Sino Biological) for 1 h at 37 °C and then blocked with 5% BSA. A proper dilution of SARS-CoV-2 spike antibody (40150-R007, Sino Biological) was added to the blocked well, and the sample was incubated for 1 h at room temperature. After being washed with TBST (Tris-buffered saline, 0.1% Tween 20), horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG antibody (#7074, Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA) was added, and the sample was incubated for 1 h at room temperature. After extensive washing with TBST, the ELISA substrate (1-Step Ultra TMB-ELISA, Thermo Fisher Scientific) was applied, and signals were obtained on a Synergy HTX plate reader (BioTek Instruments, Winooski, VT).

Virus Culture

Virus infection experiments were performed in a biosafety level 3 laboratory. African green monkey kidney Vero E6 cells were infected with a clinical isolate of SARS-CoV-2 (BetaCoV/Korea/KCDC03/2020, provided by Korea CDC). After 48 h, the culture medium containing mature infectious virions (virus medium) was collected, and viral titer was determined by plaque assay. Live virus was inactivated by heating at 100 °C for 15 min and was stored at −80 °C for further use.

Clinical Sample Preparation

The clinical samples used in this study (Figure S3 and Table S1) were collected from subjects as part of registered protocols approved by Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Jeonbuk National University Hospital, and all patients provided written informed consent (IRB registration number: CUH 2020-02-050-008). Nasopharyngeal swabs from COVID-19 patients and healthy subjects were stored in UTM (Noble Biosciences, South Korea). Viral copy number was determined by real-time RT-PCR. Clinical samples were inactivated by heating at 100 °C for 10 min and were stored at −80 °C for further use.

Supporting Information

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsnano.0c02823.

  • Figures of TEM observation of the graphene sheet, ELISA details, clinical sample information on COVID-19 patients, and performance comparison on SARS-CoV-2 detection technologies (PDF)

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Author Information

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

  • Corresponding Authors
    • Edmond Changkyun Park - Research Center for Bioconvergence Analysis, Korea Basic Science Institute, Cheongju 28119, Republic of KoreaCenter for Convergent Research of Emerging Virus Infection, Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology, Daejeon 34114, Republic of KoreaDepartment of Bio-Analysis Science, University of Science & Technology (UST), Daejeon 34113, Republic of KoreaOrcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0001-6699-4886 Email: [email protected]
    • Seung Il Kim - Research Center for Bioconvergence Analysis, Korea Basic Science Institute, Cheongju 28119, Republic of KoreaCenter for Convergent Research of Emerging Virus Infection, Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology, Daejeon 34114, Republic of KoreaDepartment of Bio-Analysis Science, University of Science & Technology (UST), Daejeon 34113, Republic of KoreaOrcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0001-6681-4486 Email: [email protected]
  • Authors
    • Giwan Seo - Research Center for Bioconvergence Analysis, Korea Basic Science Institute, Cheongju 28119, Republic of KoreaCenter for Convergent Research of Emerging Virus Infection, Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology, Daejeon 34114, Republic of KoreaOrcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-8734-6199
    • Geonhee Lee - Advanced Materials Division, Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology, Daejeon 34114, Republic of Korea
    • Mi Jeong Kim - Research Center for Bioconvergence Analysis, Korea Basic Science Institute, Cheongju 28119, Republic of KoreaCenter for Convergent Research of Emerging Virus Infection, Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology, Daejeon 34114, Republic of Korea
    • Seung-Hwa Baek - Center for Convergent Research of Emerging Virus Infection, Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology, Daejeon 34114, Republic of KoreaDepartment of Predictive Toxicology, Korea Institute of Toxicology, Daejeon 34114, Republic of Korea
    • Minsuk Choi - Center for Convergent Research of Emerging Virus Infection, Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology, Daejeon 34114, Republic of Korea
    • Keun Bon Ku - Center for Convergent Research of Emerging Virus Infection, Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology, Daejeon 34114, Republic of Korea
    • Chang-Seop Lee - Department of Internal Medicine, Jeonbuk National University Medical School, Jeonju 54986, Republic of KoreaBiomedical Research Institute of Jeonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonju 54907, Republic of Korea
    • Sangmi Jun - Center for Convergent Research of Emerging Virus Infection, Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology, Daejeon 34114, Republic of KoreaCenter for Research Equipment, Korea Basic Science Institute, Cheongju 28119, Republic of Korea
    • Daeui Park - Center for Convergent Research of Emerging Virus Infection, Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology, Daejeon 34114, Republic of KoreaDepartment of Predictive Toxicology, Korea Institute of Toxicology, Daejeon 34114, Republic of KoreaOrcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-9452-5849
    • Hong Gi Kim - Center for Convergent Research of Emerging Virus Infection, Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology, Daejeon 34114, Republic of Korea
    • Seong-Jun Kim - Center for Convergent Research of Emerging Virus Infection, Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology, Daejeon 34114, Republic of Korea
    • Jeong-O Lee - Advanced Materials Division, Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology, Daejeon 34114, Republic of KoreaOrcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-7343-4892
    • Bum Tae Kim - Center for Convergent Research of Emerging Virus Infection, Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology, Daejeon 34114, Republic of Korea
  • Notes
    The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Acknowledgments

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

This work was supported by National Research Council of Science and Technology (NST) funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT, Republic of Korea (Grant No. CRC-16-01-KRICT), and Korea Health Technology R&D Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI), funded by the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (Grant Nos. HI20C0033 and HI20C0363).

References

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

This article references 28 other publications.

  1. 1
    WHO. Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Situation Report – 1. https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/20200121-sitrep-1-2019-ncov.pdf?sfvrsn=20a99c10_4 (accessed 2020-04-15).
  2. 2
    Wu, F.; Zhao, S.; Yu, B.; Chen, Y. M.; Wang, W.; Song, Z. G.; Hu, Y.; Tao, Z. W.; Tian, J. H.; Pei, Y. Y.; Yuan, M. L.; Zhang, Y. L.; Dai, F. H.; Liu, Y.; Wang, Q. M.; Zheng, J. J.; Xu, L.; Holmes, E. C.; Zhang, Y. Z. A New Coronavirus Associated with Human Respiratory Disease in China. Nature 2020, 579, 265269,  DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-2008-3
  3. 3
    Coronaviridae Study Group of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses. The Species Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-Related Coronavirus: Classifying 2019-nCoV and Naming It SARS-CoV-2. Nat. Microbiol. 2020, 5, 536544,  DOI: 10.1038/s41564-020-0695-z
  4. 4
    WHO. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): Situation Report – 52. https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/20200312-sitrep-52-covid-19.pdf?sfvrsn=e2bfc9c0_4 (accessed 2020-04-15).
  5. 5
    WHO. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): Situation Report – 69. https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/20200329-sitrep-69-covid-19.pdf?sfvrsn=8d6620fa_4 (accessed 2020-04-15).
  6. 6
    Li, Q.; Guan, X.; Wu, P.; Wang, X.; Zhou, L.; Tong, Y.; Ren, R.; Leung, K. S. M.; Lau, E. H. Y.; Wong, J. Y.; Xing, X.; Xiang, N.; Wu, Y.; Li, C.; Chen, Q.; Li, D.; Liu, T.; Zhao, J.; Liu, M.; Tu, W. Early Transmission Dynamics in Wuhan, China, of Novel Coronavirus-Infected Pneumonia. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 382, 11991207,  DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2001316
  7. 7
    Li, G.; Fan, Y.; Lai, Y.; Han, T.; Li, Z.; Zhou, P.; Pan, P.; Wang, W.; Hu, D.; Liu, X.; Zhang, Q.; Wu, J. Coronavirus Infections and Immune Responses. J. Med. Virol. 2020, 92, 424432,  DOI: 10.1002/jmv.25685
  8. 8
    de Wit, E.; van Doremalen, N.; Falzarano, D.; Munster, V. J. SARS and MERS: Recent Insights into Emerging Coronaviruses. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2016, 14, 523534,  DOI: 10.1038/nrmicro.2016.81
  9. 9
    Lu, R.; Zhao, X.; Li, J.; Niu, P.; Yang, B.; Wu, H.; Wang, W.; Song, H.; Huang, B.; Zhu, N.; Bi, Y.; Ma, X.; Zhan, F.; Wang, L.; Hu, T.; Zhou, H.; Hu, Z.; Zhou, W.; Zhao, L.; Chen, J. Genomic Characterisation and Epidemiology of 2019 Novel Coronavirus: Implications for Virus Origins and Receptor Binding. Lancet 2020, 395, 565574,  DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30251-8
  10. 10
    Li, W.; Moore, M. J.; Vasilieva, N.; Sui, J.; Wong, S. K.; Berne, M. A.; Somasundaran, M.; Sullivan, J. L.; Luzuriaga, K.; Greenough, T. C.; Choe, H.; Farzan, M. Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 Is a Functional Receptor for the SARS Coronavirus. Nature 2003, 426, 450454,  DOI: 10.1038/nature02145
  11. 11
    Zhou, P.; Yang, X. L.; Wang, X. G.; Hu, B.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, W.; Si, H. R.; Zhu, Y.; Li, B.; Huang, C. L.; Chen, H. D.; Chen, J.; Luo, Y.; Guo, H.; Jiang, R. D.; Liu, M. Q.; Chen, Y.; Shen, X. R.; Wang, X.; Zheng, X. S. A Pneumonia Outbreak Associated with a New Coronavirus of Probable Bat Origin. Nature 2020, 579, 270273,  DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-2012-7
  12. 12
    Tian, X.; Li, C.; Huang, A.; Xia, S.; Lu, S.; Shi, Z.; Lu, L.; Jiang, S.; Yang, Z.; Wu, Y.; Ying, T. Potent Binding of 2019 Novel Coronavirus Spike Protein by a SARS Coronavirus-Specific Human Monoclonal Antibody. Emerging Microbes Infect. 2020, 9, 382385,  DOI: 10.1080/22221751.2020.1729069
  13. 13
    Wrapp, D.; Wang, N.; Corbett, K. S.; Goldsmith, J. A.; Hsieh, C. L.; Abiona, O.; Graham, B. S.; McLellan, J. S. Cryo-EM Structure of the 2019-nCoV Spike in the Prefusion Conformation. Science 2020, 367, 12601263,  DOI: 10.1126/science.abb2507
  14. 14
    WHO. Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Technical Guidance: Laboratory Testing for 2019-nCoV in Humans. https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/technical-guidance/laboratory-guidance (accessed 2020-04-15).
  15. 15
    Bai, Y.; Yao, L.; Wei, T.; Tian, F.; Jin, D. Y.; Chen, L.; Wang, M. Presumed Asymptomatic Carrier Transmission of COVID-19. JAMA 2020, 323, 14061407,  DOI: 10.1001/jama.2020.2565
  16. 16
    Zou, L.; Ruan, F.; Huang, M.; Liang, L.; Huang, H.; Hong, Z.; Yu, J.; Kang, M.; Song, Y.; Xia, J.; Guo, Q.; Song, T.; He, J.; Yen, H. L.; Peiris, M.; Wu, J. SARS-CoV-2 Viral Load in Upper Respiratory Specimens of Infected Patients. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 382, 11771179,  DOI: 10.1056/NEJMc2001737
  17. 17
    Janissen, R.; Sahoo, P. K.; Santos, C. A.; da Silva, A. M.; von Zuben, A. A. G.; Souto, D. E. P.; Costa, A. D. T.; Celedon, P.; Zanchin, N. I. T.; Almeida, D. B.; Oliveira, D. S.; Kubota, L. T.; Cesar, C. L.; Souza, A. P.; Cotta, M. A. InP Nanowire Biosensor with Tailored Biofunctionalization: Ultrasensitive and Highly Selective Disease Biomarker Detection. Nano Lett. 2017, 17, 59385949,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b01803
  18. 18
    Liu, J.; Chen, X.; Wang, Q.; Xiao, M.; Zhong, D.; Sun, W.; Zhang, G.; Zhang, Z. Ultrasensitive Monolayer MoS2 Field-Effect Transistor Based DNA Sensors for Screening of Down Syndrome. Nano Lett. 2019, 19, 14371444,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b03818
  19. 19
    Cooper, D. R.; D’Anjou, B.; Ghattamaneni, N.; Harack, B.; Hilke, M.; Horth, A.; Majlis, N.; Massicotte, M.; Vandsburger, L.; Whiteway, E.; Yu, V. Experimental Review of Graphene. ISRN Condens. Matter Phys. 2012, 2012, 501686,  DOI: 10.5402/2012/501686
  20. 20
    Geim, A. K.; Novoselov, K. S. The Rise of Graphene. Nat. Mater. 2007, 6, 183191,  DOI: 10.1038/nmat1849
  21. 21
    Lei, Y. M.; Xiao, M. M.; Li, Y. T.; Xu, L.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, Z. Y.; Zhang, G. J. Detection of Heart Failure-Related Biomarker in Whole Blood with Graphene Field Effect Transistor Biosensor. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2017, 91, 17,  DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2016.12.018
  22. 22
    Zhou, L.; Mao, H.; Wu, C.; Tang, L.; Wu, Z.; Sun, H.; Zhang, H.; Zhou, H.; Jia, C.; Jin, Q.; Chen, X.; Zhao, J. Label-Free Graphene Biosensor Targeting Cancer Molecules Based on Non-Covalent Modification. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2017, 87, 701707,  DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2016.09.025
  23. 23
    Wu, G.; Tang, X.; Meyyappan, M.; Lai, K. W. C. Doping Effects of Surface Functionalization on Graphene with Aromatic Molecule and Organic Solvents. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 425, 713721,  DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.07.048
  24. 24
    Liu, Y.; Yuan, L.; Yang, M.; Zheng, Y.; Li, L.; Gao, L.; Nerngchamnong, N.; Nai, C. T.; Sangeeth, C. S.; Feng, Y. P.; Nijhuis, C. A.; Loh, K. P. Giant Enhancement in Vertical Conductivity of Stacked CVD Graphene Sheets by Self-Assembled Molecular Layers. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 5461,  DOI: 10.1038/ncomms6461
  25. 25
    Liu, J.-Y.; Chang, H.-Y.; Truong, Q. D.; Ling, Y.-C. Synthesis of nitrogen-doped graphene by pyrolysis of ionic-liquid-functionalized graphene. J. Mater. Chem. C 2013, 1, 17131716,  DOI: 10.1039/c3tc00191a
  26. 26
    Choi, Y.; Kang, J.; Jariwala, D.; Kang, M. S.; Marks, T. J.; Hersam, M. C.; Cho, J. H. Low-Voltage Complementary Electronics from Ion-Gel-Gated Vertical van der Waals Heterostructures. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 37423748,  DOI: 10.1002/adma.201506450
  27. 27
    Teng, F.; Hu, K.; Ouyang, W.; Fang, X. Photoelectric Detectors Based on Inorganic p-Type Semiconductor Materials. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1706262,  DOI: 10.1002/adma.201706262
  28. 28
    Jung, Y. J.; Park, G.-S.; Moon, J. H.; Ku, K.; Beak, S.-H.; Kim, S.; Park, E. C.; Park, D.; Lee, J.-H.; Byeon, C. W.; Lee, J. J.; Maeng, J.-S.; Kim, S. J.; Kim, S. I.; Kim, B.-T.; Lee, M. J.; Kim, H. G. Comparative Analysis of Primer-Probe Sets for the Laboratory Confirmation of SARS-CoV-2. BioRixv https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.25.964775 (accessed 2020-04-15).

Cited By


This article is cited by 527 publications.

  1. Zhong Wei Jiang, Ting Ting Zhao, Chun Mei Li, Yuan Fang Li, Cheng Zhi Huang. 2D MOF-Based Photoelectrochemical Aptasensor for SARS-CoV-2 Spike Glycoprotein Detection. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2021, 13 (42) , 49754-49761. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.1c17574
  2. Shanshan Wang, Jiangnan Shu, Aihua Lyu, Xiaoxue Huang, Weihong Zeng, Tengchuan Jin, Hua Cui. Label-Free Immunoassay for Sensitive and Rapid Detection of the SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Based on Functionalized Magnetic Nanobeads with Chemiluminescence and Immunoactivity. Analytical Chemistry 2021, 93 (42) , 14238-14246. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.1c03208
  3. Soo-Yeon Cho, Xiaojia Jin, Xun Gong, Sungyun Yang, Jianqiao Cui, Michael S. Strano. Antibody-Free Rapid Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Proteins Using Corona Phase Molecular Recognition to Accelerate Development Time. Analytical Chemistry 2021, Article ASAP.
  4. Wolfgang J. Parak, (Associate Editor)Tanja Weil, (Editorial Advisory Board and Associate Editor of the Journal of the American Chemical Society)Paul S. Weiss (Editor-in-Chief). A Virtual Issue on Nanomedicine. ACS Nano 2021, 15 (10) , 15397-15401. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.1c09106
  5. Suryasnata Tripathy, Patta Supraja, Swati Mohanty, Vallepu Mohan Sai, Tushant Agrawal, Ch. Gajendranath Chowdary, Madhuri Taranikanti, Rajiv Bandaru, Aswin Kumar Mudunuru, Lakshmi Jyothi Tadi, Swathi Suravaram, Imran Ahmed Siddiqui, Srinivas Maddur, Rohith Kumar Guntuka, Ranjana Singh, Vikrant Singh, Shiv Govind Singh. Artificial Intelligence-Based Portable Bioelectronics Platform for SARS-CoV-2 Diagnosis with Multi-nucleotide Probe Assay for Clinical Decisions. Analytical Chemistry 2021, Article ASAP.
  6. Derong Kong, Xuejun Wang, Chenjian Gu, Mingquan Guo, Yao Wang, Zhaolin Ai, Shen Zhang, Yiheng Chen, Wentao Liu, Yungen Wu, Changhao Dai, Qianying Guo, Di Qu, Zhaoqin Zhu, Youhua Xie, Yunqi Liu, Dacheng Wei. Direct SARS-CoV-2 Nucleic Acid Detection by Y-Shaped DNA Dual-Probe Transistor Assay. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2021, 143 (41) , 17004-17014. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.1c06325
  7. Hua Kang, Xuejun Wang, Mingquan Guo, Changhao Dai, Renzhong Chen, Lei Yang, Yanling Wu, Tianlei Ying, Zhaoqin Zhu, Dapeng Wei, Yunqi Liu, Dacheng Wei. Ultrasensitive Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Antibody by Graphene Field-Effect Transistors. Nano Letters 2021, 21 (19) , 7897-7904. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c00837
  8. Haiyang Yu, Zheng Zhao, Bichen Xiao, Minghua Deng, Zhaoliang Wang, Ziqin Li, Huibin Zhang, Lei Zhang, Jingwen Qian, Jinhua Li. Aptamer-Based Solution-Gated Graphene Transistors for Highly Sensitive and Real-Time Detection of Thrombin Molecules. Analytical Chemistry 2021, 93 (40) , 13673-13679. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.1c03129
  9. Hui Xi, Hanlin Jiang, Mario Juhas, Yang Zhang. Multiplex Biosensing for Simultaneous Detection of Mutations in SARS-CoV-2. ACS Omega 2021, 6 (40) , 25846-25859. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.1c04024
  10. Rameshwar L. Kumawat, Biswarup Pathak. Electronic Conductance and Current Modulation through Graphdiyne Nanopores for DNA Sequencing. ACS Applied Electronic Materials 2021, 3 (9) , 3835-3845. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaelm.1c00452
  11. Parshant Kumar Sharma, Eun-Seong Kim, Sachin Mishra, Enkhzaya Ganbold, Ryun-Sang Seong, Ajeet Kumar Kaushik, Nam-Young Kim. Ultrasensitive and Reusable Graphene Oxide-Modified Double-Interdigitated Capacitive (DIDC) Sensing Chip for Detecting SARS-CoV-2. ACS Sensors 2021, 6 (9) , 3468-3476. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssensors.1c01437
  12. Yuzhi Shi, Kim Truc Nguyen, Lip Ket Chin, Zhenyu Li, Limin Xiao, Hong Cai, Ruozhen Yu, Wei Huang, Shilun Feng, Peng Huat Yap, Jingquan Liu, Yi Zhang, Ai Qun Liu. Trapping and Detection of Single Viruses in an Optofluidic Chip. ACS Sensors 2021, 6 (9) , 3445-3450. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssensors.1c01350
  13. Esteban Piccinini, Juan A. Allegretto, Juliana Scotto, Agustín L. Cantillo, Gonzalo E. Fenoy, Waldemar A. Marmisollé, Omar Azzaroni. Surface Engineering of Graphene through Heterobifunctional Supramolecular-Covalent Scaffolds for Rapid COVID-19 Biomarker Detection. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2021, 13 (36) , 43696-43707. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.1c12142
  14. Fernando Soto, Mehmet Ozgun Ozen, Carlos F. Guimarães, Jie Wang, Kallai Hokanson, Rajib Ahmed, Rui L. Reis, Ramasamy Paulmurugan, Utkan Demirci. Wearable Collector for Noninvasive Sampling of SARS-CoV-2 from Exhaled Breath for Rapid Detection. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2021, 13 (35) , 41445-41453. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.1c09309
  15. Chongwen Wang, Xiaodan Cheng, Liyan Liu, Xiaochang Zhang, Xingsheng Yang, Shuai Zheng, Zhen Rong, Shengqi Wang. Ultrasensitive and Simultaneous Detection of Two Specific SARS-CoV-2 Antigens in Human Specimens Using Direct/Enrichment Dual-Mode Fluorescence Lateral Flow Immunoassay. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2021, 13 (34) , 40342-40353. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.1c11461
  16. Nikita Toropov, Eleanor Osborne, Lovleen Tina Joshi, James Davidson, Caitlin Morgan, Joseph Page, Justin Pepperell, Frank Vollmer. SARS-CoV-2 Tests: Bridging the Gap between Laboratory Sensors and Clinical Applications. ACS Sensors 2021, 6 (8) , 2815-2837. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssensors.1c00612
  17. Maha Alafeef, Parikshit Moitra, Ketan Dighe, Dipanjan Pan. Hyperspectral Mapping for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Using Nanomolecular Probes with Yoctomole Sensitivity. ACS Nano 2021, 15 (8) , 13742-13758. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.1c05226
  18. Ngoc Hoang Lan Nguyen, Sungjoon Kim, Garrett Lindemann, Vikas Berry. COVID-19 Spike Protein Induced Phononic Modification in Antibody-Coupled Graphene for Viral Detection Application. ACS Nano 2021, 15 (7) , 11743-11752. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.1c02549
  19. Parvin Fathi-Hafshejani, Nurul Azam, Lu Wang, Marcelo A. Kuroda, Michael C. Hamilton, Sahar Hasim, Masoud Mahjouri-Samani. Two-Dimensional-Material-Based Field-Effect Transistor Biosensor for Detecting COVID-19 Virus (SARS-CoV-2). ACS Nano 2021, 15 (7) , 11461-11469. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.1c01188
  20. Dongxiao Li, Hong Zhou, Xindan Hui, Xianming He, Xiaojing Mu. Plasmonic Biosensor Augmented by a Genetic Algorithm for Ultra-Rapid, Label-Free, and Multi-Functional Detection of COVID-19. Analytical Chemistry 2021, 93 (27) , 9437-9444. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.1c01078
  21. Javad Payandehpeyman, Neda Parvini, Kambiz Moradi, Nima Hashemian. Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Using Antibody–Antigen Interactions with Graphene-Based Nanomechanical Resonator Sensors. ACS Applied Nano Materials 2021, 4 (6) , 6189-6200. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.1c00983
  22. Tutku Beduk, Duygu Beduk, José Ilton de Oliveira Filho, Figen Zihnioglu, Candan Cicek, Ruchan Sertoz, Bilgin Arda, Tuncay Goksel, Kutsal Turhan, Khaled N. Salama, Suna Timur. Rapid Point-of-Care COVID-19 Diagnosis with a Gold-Nanoarchitecture-Assisted Laser-Scribed Graphene Biosensor. Analytical Chemistry 2021, 93 (24) , 8585-8594. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.1c01444
  23. Elham Bidram, Yasaman Esmaeili, Abbas Amini, Rossella Sartorius, Franklin R. Tay, Laleh Shariati, Pooyan Makvandi. Nanobased Platforms for Diagnosis and Treatment of COVID-19: From Benchtop to Bedside. ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering 2021, 7 (6) , 2150-2176. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.1c00318
  24. Zifang Shang, Siew Yin Chan, William J. Liu, Peng Li, Wei Huang. Recent Insights into Emerging Coronavirus: SARS-CoV-2. ACS Infectious Diseases 2021, 7 (6) , 1369-1388. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsinfecdis.0c00646
  25. Rui Chen, Cuiping Ren, Miao Liu, Xiaopeng Ge, Mingsheng Qu, Xiaobo Zhou, Mifang Liang, Yan Liu, Fuyou Li. Early Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Seroconversion in Humans with Aggregation-Induced Near-Infrared Emission Nanoparticle-Labeled Lateral Flow Immunoassay. ACS Nano 2021, 15 (5) , 8996-9004. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.1c01932
  26. Jinqi Deng, Fei Tian, Chao Liu, Yuan Liu, Shuai Zhao, Ting Fu, Jiashu Sun, Weihong Tan. Rapid One-Step Detection of Viral Particles Using an Aptamer-Based Thermophoretic Assay. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2021, 143 (19) , 7261-7266. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.1c02929
  27. Jianyong Li, Rui Lin, Yi Yang, Rongtao Zhao, Shiping Song, Yi Zhou, Jiye Shi, Lihua Wang, Hongbin Song, Rongzhang Hao. Multichannel Immunosensor Platform for the Rapid Detection of SARS-CoV-2 and Influenza A(H1N1) Virus. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2021, 13 (19) , 22262-22270. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.1c05770
  28. Jinqi Deng, Shuai Zhao, Yuan Liu, Chao Liu, Jiashu Sun. Nanosensors for Diagnosis of Infectious Diseases. ACS Applied Bio Materials 2021, 4 (5) , 3863-3879. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsabm.0c01247
  29. Guangyu Qiu, Zhibo Gai, Lanja Saleh, Jiukai Tang, Ting Gui, Gerd A. Kullak-Ublick, Jing Wang. Thermoplasmonic-Assisted Cyclic Cleavage Amplification for Self-Validating Plasmonic Detection of SARS-CoV-2. ACS Nano 2021, 15 (4) , 7536-7546. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.1c00957
  30. Hossein Rahimi, Marziyeh Salehiabar, Murat Barsbay, Mohammadreza Ghaffarlou, Taras Kavetskyy, Ali Sharafi, Soodabeh Davaran, Subhash C. Chauhan, Hossein Danafar, Saeed Kaboli, Hamed Nosrati, Murali M. Yallapu, João Conde. CRISPR Systems for COVID-19 Diagnosis. ACS Sensors 2021, 6 (4) , 1430-1445. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssensors.0c02312
  31. Zhen Song, Yihui Ma, Min Chen, Adriano Ambrosi, Caifeng Ding, Xiliang Luo. Electrochemical Biosensor with Enhanced Antifouling Capability for COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Detection in Complex Biological Media. Analytical Chemistry 2021, 93 (14) , 5963-5971. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.1c00724
  32. Jing Zhong, Enja Laureen Rösch, Thilo Viereck, Meinhard Schilling, Frank Ludwig. Toward Rapid and Sensitive Detection of SARS-CoV-2 with Functionalized Magnetic Nanoparticles. ACS Sensors 2021, 6 (3) , 976-984. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssensors.0c02160
  33. Dan Li, Hui Chen, Xianhui Gao, Xifan Mei, Liqun Yang. Development of General Methods for Detection of Virus by Engineering Fluorescent Silver Nanoclusters. ACS Sensors 2021, 6 (3) , 613-627. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssensors.0c02322
  34. Guoqiang Liu, James F. Rusling. COVID-19 Antibody Tests and Their Limitations. ACS Sensors 2021, 6 (3) , 593-612. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssensors.0c02621
  35. Ilka Engelmann, Enagnon Kazali Alidjinou, Judith Ogiez, Quentin Pagneux, Sana Miloudi, Ilyes Benhalima, Mahdi Ouafi, Famara Sane, Didier Hober, Alain Roussel, Christian Cambillau, David Devos, Rabah Boukherroub, Sabine Szunerits. Preanalytical Issues and Cycle Threshold Values in SARS-CoV-2 Real-Time RT-PCR Testing: Should Test Results Include These?. ACS Omega 2021, 6 (10) , 6528-6536. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.1c00166
  36. Yanxiao Li, Zhekun Peng, Natalie J. Holl, Md. Rifat Hassan, John M. Pappas, Congjie Wei, Omid Hoseini Izadi, Yang Wang, Xiangyang Dong, Cheng Wang, Yue-Wern Huang, DongHyun Kim, Chenglin Wu. MXene–Graphene Field-Effect Transistor Sensing of Influenza Virus and SARS-CoV-2. ACS Omega 2021, 6 (10) , 6643-6653. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.0c05421
  37. Rebecca L. Pinals, Francis Ledesma, Darwin Yang, Nicole Navarro, Sanghwa Jeong, John E. Pak, Lili Kuo, Yung-Chun Chuang, Yu-Wei Cheng, Hung-Yu Sun, Markita P. Landry. Rapid SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Detection by Carbon Nanotube-Based Near-Infrared Nanosensors. Nano Letters 2021, 21 (5) , 2272-2280. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c00118
  38. Huiwen Xiong, Xin Ye, Yang Li, Jun Qi, Xueen Fang, Jilie Kong. Efficient Microfluidic-Based Air Sampling/Monitoring Platform for Detection of Aerosol SARS-CoV-2 On-site. Analytical Chemistry 2021, 93 (9) , 4270-4276. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.0c05154
  39. Tamsyn Stanborough, Fiona M. Given, Barbara Koch, Campbell R. Sheen, André Buzas Stowers-Hull, Mark R. Waterland, Deborah L. Crittenden. Optical Detection of CoV-SARS-2 Viral Proteins to Sub-Picomolar Concentrations. ACS Omega 2021, 6 (9) , 6404-6413. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.1c00008
  40. Avijit Pramanik, Ye Gao, Shamily Patibandla, Dipanwita Mitra, Martin G. McCandless, Lauren A. Fassero, Kalein Gates, Ritesh Tandon, Paresh Chandra Ray. Aptamer Conjugated Gold Nanostar-Based Distance-Dependent Nanoparticle Surface Energy Transfer Spectroscopy for Ultrasensitive Detection and Inactivation of Corona Virus. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 2021, 12 (8) , 2166-2171. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c03570
  41. Wenting Shao, Michael R. Shurin, Sarah E. Wheeler, Xiaoyun He, Alexander Star. Rapid Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Antigens Using High-Purity Semiconducting Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube-Based Field-Effect Transistors. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2021, 13 (8) , 10321-10327. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.0c22589
  42. Sami Ramadan, Richard Lobo, Yuanzhou Zhang, Lizhou Xu, Olena Shaforost, Deana Kwong Hong Tsang, Jingyu Feng, Tianyi Yin, Mo Qiao, Anvesh Rajeshirke, Long R. Jiao, Peter K. Petrov, Iain E. Dunlop, Maria-Magdalena Titirici, Norbert Klein. Carbon-Dot-Enhanced Graphene Field-Effect Transistors for Ultrasensitive Detection of Exosomes. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2021, 13 (7) , 7854-7864. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.0c18293
  43. Pei Li, Gun-Hee Lee, Su Yeong Kim, Se Young Kwon, Hyung-Ryong Kim, Steve Park. From Diagnosis to Treatment: Recent Advances in Patient-Friendly Biosensors and Implantable Devices. ACS Nano 2021, 15 (2) , 1960-2004. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.0c06688
  44. Nagaraj P. Shetti, Amit Mishra, Shikandar D. Bukkitgar, Soumen Basu, Jagriti Narang, Kakarla Raghava Reddy, Tejraj M. Aminabhavi. Conventional and Nanotechnology-Based Sensing Methods for SARS Coronavirus (2019-nCoV). ACS Applied Bio Materials 2021, 4 (2) , 1178-1190. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsabm.0c01545
  45. Hanie Yousefi, Alam Mahmud, Dingran Chang, Jagotamoy Das, Surath Gomis, Jenise B. Chen, Hansen Wang, Terek Been, Lily Yip, Eric Coomes, Zhijie Li, Samira Mubareka, Allison McGeer, Natasha Christie, Scott Gray-Owen, Alan Cochrane, James M. Rini, Edward H. Sargent, Shana O. Kelley. Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Viral Particles Using Direct, Reagent-Free Electrochemical Sensing. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2021, 143 (4) , 1722-1727. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.0c10810
  46. Shimaa Eissa, Mohammed Zourob. Development of a Low-Cost Cotton-Tipped Electrochemical Immunosensor for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2. Analytical Chemistry 2021, 93 (3) , 1826-1833. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.0c04719
  47. Chuanzhen Zhao, Qingzhou Liu, Kevin M. Cheung, Wenfei Liu, Qing Yang, Xiaobin Xu, Tianxing Man, Paul S. Weiss, Chongwu Zhou, Anne M. Andrews. Narrower Nanoribbon Biosensors Fabricated by Chemical Lift-off Lithography Show Higher Sensitivity. ACS Nano 2021, 15 (1) , 904-915. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.0c07503
  48. Mohamed Sharafeldin, Jason J. Davis. Point of Care Sensors for Infectious Pathogens. Analytical Chemistry 2021, 93 (1) , 184-197. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.0c04677
  49. Isabela A. Mattioli, Ayaz Hassan, Osvaldo N. Oliveira, Jr., Frank N. Crespilho. On the Challenges for the Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 Based on a Review of Current Methodologies. ACS Sensors 2020, 5 (12) , 3655-3677. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssensors.0c01382
  50. Jeong Moon, Hyung-Jun Kwon, Dongeun Yong, In-Chul Lee, Hongki Kim, Hyunju Kang, Eun-Kyung Lim, Kyu-Sun Lee, Juyeon Jung, Hyun Gyu Park, Taejoon Kang. Colorimetric Detection of SARS-CoV-2 and Drug-Resistant pH1N1 Using CRISPR/dCas9. ACS Sensors 2020, 5 (12) , 4017-4026. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssensors.0c01929
  51. Cécilia Ménard-Moyon, Alberto Bianco, Kourosh Kalantar-Zadeh. Two-Dimensional Material-Based Biosensors for Virus Detection. ACS Sensors 2020, 5 (12) , 3739-3769. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssensors.0c01961
  52. Maha Alafeef, Ketan Dighe, Parikshit Moitra, Dipanjan Pan. Rapid, Ultrasensitive, and Quantitative Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Using Antisense Oligonucleotides Directed Electrochemical Biosensor Chip. ACS Nano 2020, 14 (12) , 17028-17045. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.0c06392
  53. Heather Lukas, Changhao Xu, You Yu, Wei Gao. Emerging Telemedicine Tools for Remote COVID-19 Diagnosis, Monitoring, and Management. ACS Nano 2020, 14 (12) , 16180-16193. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.0c08494
  54. Alina Asandei, Loredana Mereuta, Irina Schiopu, Jonggwan Park, Chang Ho Seo, Yoonkyung Park, Tudor Luchian. Non-Receptor-Mediated Lipid Membrane Permeabilization by the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein S1 Subunit. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2020, 12 (50) , 55649-55658. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.0c17044
  55. Amin Hosseini, Richa Pandey, Enas Osman, Amanda Victorious, Feng Li, Tohid Didar, Leyla Soleymani. Roadmap to the Bioanalytical Testing of COVID-19: From Sample Collection to Disease Surveillance. ACS Sensors 2020, 5 (11) , 3328-3345. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssensors.0c01377
  56. Thierry Leïchlé, Liviu Nicu, Thomas Alava. MEMS Biosensors and COVID-19: Missed Opportunity. ACS Sensors 2020, 5 (11) , 3297-3305. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssensors.0c01463
  57. Shiyu Wang, Md. Zakir Hossain, Tao Han, Kazuo Shinozuka, Takaaki Suzuki, Anna Kuwana, Haruo Kobayashi. Avidin–Biotin Technology in Gold Nanoparticle-Decorated Graphene Field Effect Transistors for Detection of Biotinylated Macromolecules with Ultrahigh Sensitivity and Specificity. ACS Omega 2020, 5 (46) , 30037-30046. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.0c04429
  58. Deeksha Tiwari, Shweta Jakhmola, Devesh K. Pathak, Rajesh Kumar, Hem Chandra Jha. Temporal In Vitro Raman Spectroscopy for Monitoring Replication Kinetics of Epstein–Barr Virus Infection in Glial Cells. ACS Omega 2020, 5 (45) , 29547-29560. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.0c04525
  59. Ajeet Kumar Kaushik, Jaspreet Singh Dhau, Hardik Gohel, Yogendra Kumar Mishra, Babak Kateb, Nam-Young Kim, Dharendra Yogi Goswami. Electrochemical SARS-CoV-2 Sensing at Point-of-Care and Artificial Intelligence for Intelligent COVID-19 Management. ACS Applied Bio Materials 2020, 3 (11) , 7306-7325. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsabm.0c01004
  60. Arpana Parihar, Pushpesh Ranjan, Sunil K. Sanghi, Avanish K. Srivastava, Raju Khan. Point-of-Care Biosensor-Based Diagnosis of COVID-19 Holds Promise to Combat Current and Future Pandemics. ACS Applied Bio Materials 2020, 3 (11) , 7326-7343. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsabm.0c01083
  61. Amir Ata Saei, Shahriar Sharifi, Morteza Mahmoudi. COVID-19: Nanomedicine Uncovers Blood-Clot Mystery. Journal of Proteome Research 2020, 19 (11) , 4364-4373. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jproteome.0c00425
  62. Duarte Gouveia, Guylaine Miotello, Fabrice Gallais, Jean-Charles Gaillard, Stéphanie Debroas, Laurent Bellanger, Jean-Philippe Lavigne, Albert Sotto, Lucia Grenga, Olivier Pible, Jean Armengaud. Proteotyping SARS-CoV-2 Virus from Nasopharyngeal Swabs: A Proof-of-Concept Focused on a 3 Min Mass Spectrometry Window. Journal of Proteome Research 2020, 19 (11) , 4407-4416. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jproteome.0c00535
  63. Manish Shetty, Amber Walton, Sallye R. Gathmann, M. Alexander Ardagh, Joshua Gopeesingh, Joaquin Resasco, Turan Birol, Qi Zhang, Michael Tsapatsis, Dionisios G. Vlachos, Phillip Christopher, C. Daniel Frisbie, Omar A. Abdelrahman, Paul J. Dauenhauer. The Catalytic Mechanics of Dynamic Surfaces: Stimulating Methods for Promoting Catalytic Resonance. ACS Catalysis 2020, 10 (21) , 12666-12695. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.0c03336
  64. Weidong He, Yinghe Guo, Hanchao Gao, Jingxian Liu, Yang Yue, Jing Wang. Evaluation of Regeneration Processes for Filtering Facepiece Respirators in Terms of the Bacteria Inactivation Efficiency and Influences on Filtration Performance. ACS Nano 2020, 14 (10) , 13161-13171. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.0c04782
  65. Claudia Lubrano, Giovanni Maria Matrone, Gennaro Iaconis, Francesca Santoro. New Frontiers for Selective Biosensing with Biomembrane-Based Organic Transistors. ACS Nano 2020, 14 (10) , 12271-12280. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.0c07053
  66. Hyun-June Jang, Yunjia Song, Justine Wagner, Howard E. Katz. Suppression of Ionic Doping by Molecular Dopants in Conjugated Polymers for Improving Specificity and Sensitivity in Biosensing Applications. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2020, 12 (40) , 45036-45044. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.0c11125
  67. Benjie Shan, Yoav Y. Broza, Wenjuan Li, Yong Wang, Sihan Wu, Zhengzheng Liu, Jiong Wang, Shuyu Gui, Lin Wang, Zhihong Zhang, Wei Liu, Shoubing Zhou, Wei Jin, Qianyu Zhang, Dandan Hu, Lin Lin, Qiujun Zhang, Wenyu Li, Jinquan Wang, Hu Liu, Yueyin Pan, Hossam Haick. Multiplexed Nanomaterial-Based Sensor Array for Detection of COVID-19 in Exhaled Breath. ACS Nano 2020, 14 (9) , 12125-12132. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.0c05657
  68. Deepak S. Chauhan, Rajendra Prasad, Rohit Srivastava, Meena Jaggi, Subhash C. Chauhan, Murali M. Yallapu. Comprehensive Review on Current Interventions, Diagnostics, and Nanotechnology Perspectives against SARS-CoV-2. Bioconjugate Chemistry 2020, 31 (9) , 2021-2045. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.0c00323
  69. Severino Jefferson Ribeiro da Silva, Caroline Targino Alves da Silva, Klarissa Miranda Guarines, Renata Pessôa Germano Mendes, Keith Pardee, Alain Kohl, Lindomar Pena. Clinical and Laboratory Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2, the Virus Causing COVID-19. ACS Infectious Diseases 2020, 6 (9) , 2319-2336. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsinfecdis.0c00274
  70. Diana Alves, Rodrigo Curvello, Edward Henderson, Vidhishri Kesarwani, Julia A. Walker, Samuel C. Leguizamon, Heather McLiesh, Vikram Singh Raghuwanshi, Hajar Samadian, Erica M. Wood, Zoe K. McQuilten, Maryza Graham, Megan Wieringa, Tony M. Korman, Timothy F. Scott, Mark M. Banaszak Holl, Gil Garnier, Simon R. Corrie. Rapid Gel Card Agglutination Assays for Serological Analysis Following SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Humans. ACS Sensors 2020, 5 (8) , 2596-2603. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssensors.0c01050
  71. Edouard Alphandéry. The Potential of Various Nanotechnologies for Coronavirus Diagnosis/Treatment Highlighted through a Literature Analysis. Bioconjugate Chemistry 2020, 31 (8) , 1873-1882. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.0c00287
  72. Kevin M. Cheung, John M. Abendroth, Nako Nakatsuka, Bowen Zhu, Yang Yang, Anne M. Andrews, Paul S. Weiss. Detecting DNA and RNA and Differentiating Single-Nucleotide Variations via Field-Effect Transistors. Nano Letters 2020, 20 (8) , 5982-5990. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c01971
  73. Nikhil Bhalla, Yuwei Pan, Zhugen Yang, Amir Farokh Payam. Opportunities and Challenges for Biosensors and Nanoscale Analytical Tools for Pandemics: COVID-19. ACS Nano 2020, 14 (7) , 7783-7807. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.0c04421
  74. Qiuyuan Lin, Donghua Wen, Jing Wu, Liling Liu, Wenjuan Wu, Xueen Fang, Jilie Kong. Microfluidic Immunoassays for Sensitive and Simultaneous Detection of IgG/IgM/Antigen of SARS-CoV-2 within 15 min. Analytical Chemistry 2020, 92 (14) , 9454-9458. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.0c01635
  75. Carsten Weiss, Marie Carriere, Laura Fusco, Ilaria Capua, Jose Angel Regla-Nava, Matteo Pasquali, James A. Scott, Flavia Vitale, Mehmet Altay Unal, Cecilia Mattevi, Davide Bedognetti, Arben Merkoçi, Ennio Tasciotti, Açelya Yilmazer, Yury Gogotsi, Francesco Stellacci, Lucia Gemma Delogu. Toward Nanotechnology-Enabled Approaches against the COVID-19 Pandemic. ACS Nano 2020, 14 (6) , 6383-6406. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.0c03697
  76. Neeraj Kumar, Nagaraj P. Shetti, Somanath Jagannath, Tejraj M. Aminabhavi. Electrochemical sensors for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 virus. Chemical Engineering Journal 2022, 430 , 132966. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.132966
  77. Mazin A. Zamzami, Gulam Rabbani, Abrar Ahmad, Ahmad A. Basalah, Wesam H. Al-Sabban, Saeyoung Nate Ahn, Hani Choudhry. Carbon nanotube field-effect transistor (CNT-FET)-based biosensor for rapid detection of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) surface spike protein S1. Bioelectrochemistry 2022, 143 , 107982. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioelechem.2021.107982
  78. Mohsen Nami, Mark Reed. CMOS-compatible silicon nanowire field-effect transistors: Where nanotechnology pushes the limits in biosensing. 2022,,, 327-362. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-821351-3.00016-1
  79. Omar M. Abdeldayem, Areeg M. Dabbish, Mahmoud M. Habashy, Mohamed K. Mostafa, Mohamed Elhefnawy, Lobna Amin, Eslam G. Al-Sakkari, Ahmed Ragab, Eldon R. Rene. Viral outbreaks detection and surveillance using wastewater-based epidemiology, viral air sampling, and machine learning techniques: A comprehensive review and outlook. Science of The Total Environment 2022, 803 , 149834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149834
  80. Pedro Augusto Machado Vitor, Gabriela Machado Parreira. Nanomaterials for Viral Detection. 2022,,, 47-69. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86901-4_3
  81. Kshitij R.B. Singh, Shweta Rathee, Gunjan Nagpure, Jay Singh, Ravindra Pratap Singh. Smart and emerging nanomaterials-based biosensor for SARS-CoV-2 detection. Materials Letters 2022, 307 , 131092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2021.131092
  82. Mildred Quintana. 2D materials and van der Waals heterostructures platforms for advanced sensing of COVID-19. 2022,,, 241-252. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-90248-9.00015-2
  83. Mahmoud Amouzadeh Tabrizi, Juan P. Fernández-Blázquez, Dahiana Mojena Medina, Pablo Acedo. An ultrasensitive molecularly imprinted polymer-based electrochemical sensor for the determination of SARS-CoV-2-RBD by using macroporous gold screen-printed electrode. Biosensors and Bioelectronics 2022, 196 , 113729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2021.113729
  84. Dilip Kumar Agarwal, Vikas Nandwana, Stephen E. Henrich, Vara Prasad V.N. Josyula, C. Shad Thaxton, Chao Qi, Lacy M. Simons, Judd F. Hultquist, Egon A. Ozer, Gajendra S. Shekhawat, Vinayak P. Dravid. Highly sensitive and ultra-rapid antigen-based detection of SARS-CoV-2 using nanomechanical sensor platform. Biosensors and Bioelectronics 2022, 195 , 113647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2021.113647
  85. Leila Kashefi-Kheyrabadi, Huynh Vu Nguyen, Anna Go, Changyoon Baek, Nayoon Jang, Jiwon Michelle Lee, Nam-Hyuk Cho, Junhong Min, Min-Ho Lee. Rapid, multiplexed, and nucleic acid amplification-free detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA using an electrochemical biosensor. Biosensors and Bioelectronics 2022, 195 , 113649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2021.113649
  86. Hsiang-Wei Lu, Alexander A. Kane, Jonathan Parkinson, Yingning Gao, Reza Hajian, Michael Heltzen, Brett Goldsmith, Kiana Aran. The promise of graphene-based transistors for democratizing multiomics studies. Biosensors and Bioelectronics 2022, 195 , 113605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2021.113605
  87. Kamyar Behrouzi, Liwei Lin. Gold nanoparticle based plasmonic sensing for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid proteins. Biosensors and Bioelectronics 2022, 195 , 113669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2021.113669
  88. Waleed A. El-Said, Abdullah S. Al-Bogami, Wael Alshitari. Synthesis of gold [email protected] porous graphene-modified ITO electrode for spectroelectrochemical detection of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy 2022, 264 , 120237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.saa.2021.120237
  89. Paramjot Singh, Parsoua Abedini Sohi, Mojtaba Kahrizi. In silico design and analysis of Pt functionalized graphene-based FET sensor for COVID-19 biomarkers: A DFT coupled FEM study. Physica E: Low-dimensional Systems and Nanostructures 2022, 135 , 114972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physe.2021.114972
  90. Nantao Li, Taylor D. Canady, Qinglan Huang, Xing Wang, Glenn A. Fried, Brian T. Cunningham. Photonic resonator interferometric scattering microscopy. Nature Communications 2021, 12 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-21999-3
  91. Noori Kim, Kyungsup Han, Pei-Chen Su, Insup Kim, Yong-Jin Yoon. A rotationally focused flow (RFF) microfluidic biosensor by density difference for early-stage detectable diagnosis. Scientific Reports 2021, 11 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-88647-0
  92. Yasin Orooji, Hessamaddin Sohrabi, Nima Hemmat, Fatemeh Oroojalian, Behzad Baradaran, Ahad Mokhtarzadeh, Mohamad Mohaghegh, Hassan Karimi-Maleh. An Overview on SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) and Other Human Coronaviruses and Their Detection Capability via Amplification Assay, Chemical Sensing, Biosensing, Immunosensing, and Clinical Assays. Nano-Micro Letters 2021, 13 (1) https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-020-00533-y
  93. Azadeh Safarchi, Shadma Fatima, Zahra Ayati, Fatemeh Vafaee. An update on novel approaches for diagnosis and treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Cell & Bioscience 2021, 11 (1) https://doi.org/10.1186/s13578-021-00674-6
  94. Zirui Meng, Shuo Guo, Yanbing Zhou, Mengjiao Li, Minjin Wang, Binwu Ying. Applications of laboratory findings in the prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring of COVID-19. Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy 2021, 6 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41392-021-00731-z
  95. Seul-Lee Lee, Jihoon Kim, Sungwook Choi, Jinsil Han, Giwan Seo, Yong Wook Lee. Fiber-optic label-free biosensor for SARS‐CoV‐2 spike protein detection using biofunctionalized long-period fiber grating. Talanta 2021, 235 , 122801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2021.122801
  96. Kuen-Lin Chen, Zih-Yan Yang, Chin-Wei Lin. A magneto-optical biochip for rapid assay based on the Cotton–Mouton effect of γ[email protected] core/shell nanoparticles. Journal of Nanobiotechnology 2021, 19 (1) https://doi.org/10.1186/s12951-021-01030-z
  97. Zhao Fu, Weilun Zeng, Shuangfei Cai, Haolin Li, Jianwei Ding, Chen Wang, Yunfa Chen, Ning Han, Rong Yang. Porous [email protected] nanoparticles with superior peroxidase-like activity for colorimetric detection of spike protein of SARS-CoV-2. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 2021, 604 , 113-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2021.06.170
  98. Alaa F. Nahhas, Thomas J. Webster. The promising use of nano-molecular imprinted templates for improved SARS-CoV-2 detection, drug delivery and research. Journal of Nanobiotechnology 2021, 19 (1) https://doi.org/10.1186/s12951-021-01032-x
  99. M. Bahri, B. Shi, K. Djebbi, M.A. Elaguech, D. Zhou, M. Ben Ali, C. Tlili, D. Wang. Toward clean and crackless polymer-assisted transfer of CVD-grown graphene and its recent advances in GFET-based biosensors. Materials Today Chemistry 2021, 22 , 100578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtchem.2021.100578
  100. Yaofeng Zhou, Yuhao Wu, Lu Ding, Xiaolin Huang, Yonghua Xiong. Point-of-care COVID-19 diagnostics powered by lateral flow assay. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry 2021, 145 , 116452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2021.116452
Load more citations
  • Abstract

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. Schematic diagram of COVID-19 FET sensor operation procedure. Graphene as a sensing material is selected, and SARS-CoV-2 spike antibody is conjugated onto the graphene sheet via 1-pyrenebutyric acid N-hydroxysuccinimide ester, which is an interfacing molecule as a probe linker.

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. Surface analysis of pristine and PBASE-modified graphene using Raman spectroscopy, X-ray spectroscopy, and atomic force microscopy. (A) Optical image of the COVID-19 FET sensor. The dimensions were 100 × 100 μm2 (L × W). Scale bar in the image denotes 200 μm. (B) Representative Raman spectra of pristine and PBASE-modified graphene. (C) Comparison of statistical data of the 2D peak position between pristine and PBASE-modified graphene. Mapping images of average I2D/IG ratio (D) before and (E) after PBASE modification. (F) XPS survey data of pristine and PBASE-modified graphene. (G) N 1s peak of pristine and PBASE-treated graphene (shadow region in F). (H) Deconvoluted C 1s peak of PBASE-modified graphene. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) images of (I) pristine graphene (RMS = 0.961) and (J) PBASE-modified graphene (RMS = 1.530). Bottom graphs indicate the height profiles in the corresponding two AFM images. Scale bar in the image denotes 3 μm.

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. Electrical characterization of pristine, PBASE-modified, and SARS-CoV-2 spike antibody-immobilized graphene. (A) Schematic diagram of the aqueous-solution-gated FET (COVID-19 FET sensor) configuration using the antibody-conjugated graphene. (B) IDSVDS output curves of the antibody-conjugated FET with various gating voltages from 0 to −1.5 V in steps of −0.3 V. IDS negatively increased as VGS negatively increased. (C) Current–voltage (I–V) characteristics of the graphene-based device of each functionalization process for the antibody modification. (D) Measurement of transfer curves of the COVID-19 FET sensor in steps of the antibody conjugation (VDS = 0.01 V).

    Figure 4

    Figure 4. Detection of SARS-CoV-2 antigen protein. (A) Schematic diagram for the COVID-19 FET sensor for detection of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. (B) Real-time response of COVID-19 FET toward SARS-CoV-2 antigen protein in PBS and (C) related dose-dependent response curve (VDS = 0.01 V). Graphene-based FET without SARS-CoV-2 antibody is presented as negative control. (D) Selective response of COVID-19 FET sensor toward target SARS-CoV-2 antigen protein and MERS-CoV protein. (E) Real-time response of COVID-19 FET toward SARS-CoV-2 antigen protein in UTM and (F) related dose-dependent response curve.

    Figure 5

    Figure 5. Detection of cultured SARS-CoV-2 virus. (A) Schematic diagram for the COVID-19 FET sensor for detection of SARS-CoV-2 cultured virus. (B) Real-time response of COVID-19 FET toward SARS-CoV-2 cultured virus and (C) related dose-dependent response curve.

    Figure 6

    Figure 6. Detection of SARS-CoV-2 virus from clinical samples. (A) Schematic diagram for the COVID-19 FET sensor for detection of SARS-CoV-2 virus from COVID-19 patients. (B,C) Comparison of response signal between normal samples and patient ones. (D) Real-time response of COVID-19 FET toward SARS-CoV-2 clinical sample and (C) related dose-dependent response curve.

  • References

    ARTICLE SECTIONS
    Jump To

    This article references 28 other publications.

    1. 1
      WHO. Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Situation Report – 1. https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/20200121-sitrep-1-2019-ncov.pdf?sfvrsn=20a99c10_4 (accessed 2020-04-15).
    2. 2
      Wu, F.; Zhao, S.; Yu, B.; Chen, Y. M.; Wang, W.; Song, Z. G.; Hu, Y.; Tao, Z. W.; Tian, J. H.; Pei, Y. Y.; Yuan, M. L.; Zhang, Y. L.; Dai, F. H.; Liu, Y.; Wang, Q. M.; Zheng, J. J.; Xu, L.; Holmes, E. C.; Zhang, Y. Z. A New Coronavirus Associated with Human Respiratory Disease in China. Nature 2020, 579, 265269,  DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-2008-3
    3. 3
      Coronaviridae Study Group of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses. The Species Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-Related Coronavirus: Classifying 2019-nCoV and Naming It SARS-CoV-2. Nat. Microbiol. 2020, 5, 536544,  DOI: 10.1038/s41564-020-0695-z
    4. 4
      WHO. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): Situation Report – 52. https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/20200312-sitrep-52-covid-19.pdf?sfvrsn=e2bfc9c0_4 (accessed 2020-04-15).
    5. 5
      WHO. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): Situation Report – 69. https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/20200329-sitrep-69-covid-19.pdf?sfvrsn=8d6620fa_4 (accessed 2020-04-15).
    6. 6
      Li, Q.; Guan, X.; Wu, P.; Wang, X.; Zhou, L.; Tong, Y.; Ren, R.; Leung, K. S. M.; Lau, E. H. Y.; Wong, J. Y.; Xing, X.; Xiang, N.; Wu, Y.; Li, C.; Chen, Q.; Li, D.; Liu, T.; Zhao, J.; Liu, M.; Tu, W. Early Transmission Dynamics in Wuhan, China, of Novel Coronavirus-Infected Pneumonia. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 382, 11991207,  DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2001316
    7. 7
      Li, G.; Fan, Y.; Lai, Y.; Han, T.; Li, Z.; Zhou, P.; Pan, P.; Wang, W.; Hu, D.; Liu, X.; Zhang, Q.; Wu, J. Coronavirus Infections and Immune Responses. J. Med. Virol. 2020, 92, 424432,  DOI: 10.1002/jmv.25685
    8. 8
      de Wit, E.; van Doremalen, N.; Falzarano, D.; Munster, V. J. SARS and MERS: Recent Insights into Emerging Coronaviruses. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2016, 14, 523534,  DOI: 10.1038/nrmicro.2016.81
    9. 9
      Lu, R.; Zhao, X.; Li, J.; Niu, P.; Yang, B.; Wu, H.; Wang, W.; Song, H.; Huang, B.; Zhu, N.; Bi, Y.; Ma, X.; Zhan, F.; Wang, L.; Hu, T.; Zhou, H.; Hu, Z.; Zhou, W.; Zhao, L.; Chen, J. Genomic Characterisation and Epidemiology of 2019 Novel Coronavirus: Implications for Virus Origins and Receptor Binding. Lancet 2020, 395, 565574,  DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30251-8
    10. 10
      Li, W.; Moore, M. J.; Vasilieva, N.; Sui, J.; Wong, S. K.; Berne, M. A.; Somasundaran, M.; Sullivan, J. L.; Luzuriaga, K.; Greenough, T. C.; Choe, H.; Farzan, M. Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 Is a Functional Receptor for the SARS Coronavirus. Nature 2003, 426, 450454,  DOI: 10.1038/nature02145
    11. 11
      Zhou, P.; Yang, X. L.; Wang, X. G.; Hu, B.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, W.; Si, H. R.; Zhu, Y.; Li, B.; Huang, C. L.; Chen, H. D.; Chen, J.; Luo, Y.; Guo, H.; Jiang, R. D.; Liu, M. Q.; Chen, Y.; Shen, X. R.; Wang, X.; Zheng, X. S. A Pneumonia Outbreak Associated with a New Coronavirus of Probable Bat Origin. Nature 2020, 579, 270273,  DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-2012-7
    12. 12
      Tian, X.; Li, C.; Huang, A.; Xia, S.; Lu, S.; Shi, Z.; Lu, L.; Jiang, S.; Yang, Z.; Wu, Y.; Ying, T. Potent Binding of 2019 Novel Coronavirus Spike Protein by a SARS Coronavirus-Specific Human Monoclonal Antibody. Emerging Microbes Infect. 2020, 9, 382385,  DOI: 10.1080/22221751.2020.1729069
    13. 13
      Wrapp, D.; Wang, N.; Corbett, K. S.; Goldsmith, J. A.; Hsieh, C. L.; Abiona, O.; Graham, B. S.; McLellan, J. S. Cryo-EM Structure of the 2019-nCoV Spike in the Prefusion Conformation. Science 2020, 367, 12601263,  DOI: 10.1126/science.abb2507
    14. 14
      WHO. Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Technical Guidance: Laboratory Testing for 2019-nCoV in Humans. https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/technical-guidance/laboratory-guidance (accessed 2020-04-15).
    15. 15
      Bai, Y.; Yao, L.; Wei, T.; Tian, F.; Jin, D. Y.; Chen, L.; Wang, M. Presumed Asymptomatic Carrier Transmission of COVID-19. JAMA 2020, 323, 14061407,  DOI: 10.1001/jama.2020.2565
    16. 16
      Zou, L.; Ruan, F.; Huang, M.; Liang, L.; Huang, H.; Hong, Z.; Yu, J.; Kang, M.; Song, Y.; Xia, J.; Guo, Q.; Song, T.; He, J.; Yen, H. L.; Peiris, M.; Wu, J. SARS-CoV-2 Viral Load in Upper Respiratory Specimens of Infected Patients. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 382, 11771179,  DOI: 10.1056/NEJMc2001737
    17. 17
      Janissen, R.; Sahoo, P. K.; Santos, C. A.; da Silva, A. M.; von Zuben, A. A. G.; Souto, D. E. P.; Costa, A. D. T.; Celedon, P.; Zanchin, N. I. T.; Almeida, D. B.; Oliveira, D. S.; Kubota, L. T.; Cesar, C. L.; Souza, A. P.; Cotta, M. A. InP Nanowire Biosensor with Tailored Biofunctionalization: Ultrasensitive and Highly Selective Disease Biomarker Detection. Nano Lett. 2017, 17, 59385949,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b01803
    18. 18
      Liu, J.; Chen, X.; Wang, Q.; Xiao, M.; Zhong, D.; Sun, W.; Zhang, G.; Zhang, Z. Ultrasensitive Monolayer MoS2 Field-Effect Transistor Based DNA Sensors for Screening of Down Syndrome. Nano Lett. 2019, 19, 14371444,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b03818
    19. 19
      Cooper, D. R.; D’Anjou, B.; Ghattamaneni, N.; Harack, B.; Hilke, M.; Horth, A.; Majlis, N.; Massicotte, M.; Vandsburger, L.; Whiteway, E.; Yu, V. Experimental Review of Graphene. ISRN Condens. Matter Phys. 2012, 2012, 501686,  DOI: 10.5402/2012/501686
    20. 20
      Geim, A. K.; Novoselov, K. S. The Rise of Graphene. Nat. Mater. 2007, 6, 183191,  DOI: 10.1038/nmat1849
    21. 21
      Lei, Y. M.; Xiao, M. M.; Li, Y. T.; Xu, L.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, Z. Y.; Zhang, G. J. Detection of Heart Failure-Related Biomarker in Whole Blood with Graphene Field Effect Transistor Biosensor. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2017, 91, 17,  DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2016.12.018
    22. 22
      Zhou, L.; Mao, H.; Wu, C.; Tang, L.; Wu, Z.; Sun, H.; Zhang, H.; Zhou, H.; Jia, C.; Jin, Q.; Chen, X.; Zhao, J. Label-Free Graphene Biosensor Targeting Cancer Molecules Based on Non-Covalent Modification. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2017, 87, 701707,  DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2016.09.025
    23. 23
      Wu, G.; Tang, X.; Meyyappan, M.; Lai, K. W. C. Doping Effects of Surface Functionalization on Graphene with Aromatic Molecule and Organic Solvents. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 425, 713721,  DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.07.048
    24. 24
      Liu, Y.; Yuan, L.; Yang, M.; Zheng, Y.; Li, L.; Gao, L.; Nerngchamnong, N.; Nai, C. T.; Sangeeth, C. S.; Feng, Y. P.; Nijhuis, C. A.; Loh, K. P. Giant Enhancement in Vertical Conductivity of Stacked CVD Graphene Sheets by Self-Assembled Molecular Layers. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 5461,  DOI: 10.1038/ncomms6461
    25. 25
      Liu, J.-Y.; Chang, H.-Y.; Truong, Q. D.; Ling, Y.-C. Synthesis of nitrogen-doped graphene by pyrolysis of ionic-liquid-functionalized graphene. J. Mater. Chem. C 2013, 1, 17131716,  DOI: 10.1039/c3tc00191a
    26. 26
      Choi, Y.; Kang, J.; Jariwala, D.; Kang, M. S.; Marks, T. J.; Hersam, M. C.; Cho, J. H. Low-Voltage Complementary Electronics from Ion-Gel-Gated Vertical van der Waals Heterostructures. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 37423748,  DOI: 10.1002/adma.201506450
    27. 27
      Teng, F.; Hu, K.; Ouyang, W.; Fang, X. Photoelectric Detectors Based on Inorganic p-Type Semiconductor Materials. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1706262,  DOI: 10.1002/adma.201706262
    28. 28
      Jung, Y. J.; Park, G.-S.; Moon, J. H.; Ku, K.; Beak, S.-H.; Kim, S.; Park, E. C.; Park, D.; Lee, J.-H.; Byeon, C. W.; Lee, J. J.; Maeng, J.-S.; Kim, S. J.; Kim, S. I.; Kim, B.-T.; Lee, M. J.; Kim, H. G. Comparative Analysis of Primer-Probe Sets for the Laboratory Confirmation of SARS-CoV-2. BioRixv https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.25.964775 (accessed 2020-04-15).
  • Supporting Information

    Supporting Information

    ARTICLE SECTIONS
    Jump To

    The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsnano.0c02823.

    • Figures of TEM observation of the graphene sheet, ELISA details, clinical sample information on COVID-19 patients, and performance comparison on SARS-CoV-2 detection technologies (PDF)


    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

You’ve supercharged your research process with ACS and Mendeley!

STEP 1:
Click to create an ACS ID

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

MENDELEY PAIRING EXPIRED
Your Mendeley pairing has expired. Please reconnect

This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By continuing to use the site, you are accepting our use of cookies. Read the ACS privacy policy.

CONTINUE