ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
My Activity
CONTENT TYPES

Enhanced Molecular Spin-Photon Coupling at Superconducting Nanoconstrictions

  • Ignacio Gimeno
    Ignacio Gimeno
    Instituto de Ciencia de Materiales de Aragón, CSIC-Universidad de Zaragoza, Pedro Cerbuna 12, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain
  • Wenzel Kersten
    Wenzel Kersten
    Vienna Center for Quantum Science and Technology, Atominstitut, TU Wien, 1020 Vienna, Austria
  • María C. Pallarés
    María C. Pallarés
    Laboratorio de Microscopı́as Avanzadas, Instituto de Nanociencia de Aragón, Universidad de Zaragoza, 50018 Zaragoza, Spain
  • Pablo Hermosilla
    Pablo Hermosilla
    Laboratorio de Microscopı́as Avanzadas, Instituto de Nanociencia de Aragón, Universidad de Zaragoza, 50018 Zaragoza, Spain
  • María José Martínez-Pérez
    María José Martínez-Pérez
    Instituto de Ciencia de Materiales de Aragón, CSIC-Universidad de Zaragoza, Pedro Cerbuna 12, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain
    Fundación ARAID, Av. de Ranillas 1-D, 50018 Zaragoza, Spain
  • Mark D. Jenkins
    Mark D. Jenkins
    Instituto de Ciencia de Materiales de Aragón, CSIC-Universidad de Zaragoza, Pedro Cerbuna 12, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain
  • Andreas Angerer
    Andreas Angerer
    Vienna Center for Quantum Science and Technology, Atominstitut, TU Wien, 1020 Vienna, Austria
  • Carlos Sánchez-Azqueta
    Carlos Sánchez-Azqueta
    Departamento de Fı́sica Aplicada, Universidad de Zaragoza, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain
  • David Zueco
    David Zueco
    Instituto de Ciencia de Materiales de Aragón, CSIC-Universidad de Zaragoza, Pedro Cerbuna 12, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain
    Fundación ARAID, Av. de Ranillas 1-D, 50018 Zaragoza, Spain
    More by David Zueco
  • Johannes Majer
    Johannes Majer
    Shanghai Branch, CAS Center for Excellence and Synergetic Innovation Center in Quantum Information and Quantum Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Shanghai 201315, China
    National Laboratory for Physical Sciences at Microscale and Department of Modern Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China
    Vienna Center for Quantum Science and Technology, Atominstitut, TU Wien, 1020 Vienna, Austria
  • Anabel Lostao
    Anabel Lostao
    Instituto de Ciencia de Materiales de Aragón, CSIC-Universidad de Zaragoza, Pedro Cerbuna 12, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain
    Laboratorio de Microscopı́as Avanzadas, Instituto de Nanociencia de Aragón, Universidad de Zaragoza, 50018 Zaragoza, Spain
    Fundación ARAID, Av. de Ranillas 1-D, 50018 Zaragoza, Spain
  • , and 
  • Fernando Luis*
    Fernando Luis
    Instituto de Ciencia de Materiales de Aragón, CSIC-Universidad de Zaragoza, Pedro Cerbuna 12, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain
    *E-mail: [email protected]
Cite this: ACS Nano 2020, 14, 7, 8707–8715
Publication Date (Web):May 22, 2020
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.0c03167

Copyright © 2020 American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under these Terms of Use.

  • Open Access

Article Views

2750

Altmetric

-

Citations

LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICS
PDF (4 MB)
Supporting Info (1)»

Abstract

We combine top-down and bottom-up nanolithography to optimize the coupling of small molecular spin ensembles to 1.4 GHz on-chip superconducting resonators. Nanoscopic constrictions, fabricated with a focused ion beam at the central transmission line, locally concentrate the microwave magnetic field. Drops of free-radical molecules have been deposited from solution onto the circuits. For the smallest ones, the molecules were delivered at the relevant circuit areas by means of an atomic force microscope. The number of spins Neff effectively coupled to each device was accurately determined combining Scanning Electron and Atomic Force Microscopies. The collective spin-photon coupling constant has been determined for samples with Neff ranging between 2 × 106 and 1012 spins, and for temperatures down to 44 mK. The results show the well-known collective enhancement of the coupling proportional to the square root of Neff. The average coupling of individual spins is enhanced by more than 4 orders of magnitude (from 4 mHz up to above 180 Hz), when the transmission line width is reduced from 400 μm down to 42 nm, and reaches maximum values near 1 kHz for molecules located on the smallest nanoconstrictions.

The coupling of spins to superconducting circuits lies at the basis of diverse technologies. Superconducting on-chip resonators, which concentrate the microwave magnetic field in much smaller regions than conventional three-dimensional cavities, (1,2) promise to take electron spin resonance (ESR) to its utmost sensitivity level, eventually allowing the detection of single spins. (3−6) Besides, single microwave photons “trapped” in these devices provide a way to wire-up qubits (7−9) and, therefore, form a basis for hybrid quantum computation and simulation schemes based on spins. (10−16)
Different approaches have been designed and, in some cases, put into practice, to enhance the spin sensitivity and the spin-photon coupling. They often involve the use of nonlinear superconducting circuits, parametric amplifiers, to amplify the output signal, (3,4) and of low impedance resonator designs, which increase the photon magnetic field. (4,5) Experiments performed on highly coherent magnetic impurities in semiconducting hosts show spin resonance at the level of a few tens of spins and maximum spin-photon coupling strengths of order 400 Hz at frequencies of about 7 GHz. (5)
In this work, we explore experimentally a third alternative, inspired by earlier developments of micro-ESR devices. (17−19) The underlying idea is that reducing the cavity effective volume enhances the microwave magnetic field. In a superconducting resonator, this goal can be achieved by decreasing locally the width of the resonator’s transmission line (20−22) in order to bridge the very different scale lengths of superconducting circuits, with typical line widths of a few microns, and of impurity or molecular spins, which are in the range of nanometers. This approach requires moving beyond the limits of conventional optical lithography to fabricate or modify certain regions of the circuits and is fully complementary to those methods mentioned above.
The main challenge resides in the fact that the microwave field enhancement is localized in a nanoscopic region near the superconducting constriction, as can be seen in Figure 1A and 1B. Optimally profiting from such enhancement thus calls for a method able to deliver the magnetic sample at the right location and with sufficient spatial accuracy. Spins in molecules provide a good test case for addressing this challenge. Many molecules are stable in solution or can be sublimated from the crystal and can, therefore, be transferred to a solid substrate or a device. (23−28) In addition, they are one of the most promising candidates to encode spin qubits, due to the vast possibilities for design offered by chemical nanoscience. (29−34) Here, we combine top-down and bottom-up nanolithography methods to study the coupling of microwave photons to nanoensembles of the simplest molecular spins, organic free radicals with S = 1/2, deposited near constrictions of varying size.

Figure 1

Figure 1. (A) Scanning electron microscopy image of the central line of a superconducting coplanar resonator. The line was thinned down to a width of about 158 nm by focused ion beam nanolithography. (B) Color plot of the photon magnetic field in the neighborhood of this constriction, calculated with a finite-element simulation software. (35) (C) Structure of a DPPH free-radical molecule, with spin S = 1/2 and g = 2 (left) and optical microscopy image of the constriction after the deposition of DPPH by means of the tip of an Atomic Force Microscope (AFM, right). (D) AFM image of the constriction taken before and after the molecules were deposited and the solvent had evaporated.

Results and Discussion

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

This section describes the main results of this work: how devices are modified to locally enhance the spin-photon coupling, how the molecules are deposited with sufficient spatial accuracy, and how this coupling is experimentally determined as a function of the number of molecules and of temperature. The main result refers to the coupling of individual spins and its dependence on the size of the resonator dimensions and on the molecule-to-chip interface.

Circuit Fabrication and Integration of Molecular Spin Micro- and Nano-deposits

The circuits used in this work are coplanar superconducting resonators fabricated by optical lithography on 150 nm thick Nb films, which become superconducting below Tc = 8.2 K, deposited onto single crystalline sapphire wafers. Previous studies (21) show that nanoscopic constrictions, such as the one shown in Figure 1A, can be fabricated in the central transmission line by Focused Ion Beam (FIB) nanolithography, that they do not significantly alter the operation of the devices, and that they locally enhance the photon magnetic field.
As the simulation in Figure 1B shows, the enhancement is strongly localized near the superconducting nanobridge, in a region with typical dimensions w × w × L, where w is the constriction width and L is its length. The proper integration of spins plays, then, a crucial role to achieve the maximum spin sensitivity allowed by this approach. Our samples contain organic free-radical molecules of 2, 2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl, (36−38) hereafter referred to as DPPH, whose molecular structure is shown in Figure 1. Each molecule hosts an unpaired electron with a spin S = 1/2 and a close to isotropic gyromagnetic factor g ≃ 2. Under a magnetic field H, it shows a well-defined resonance line at a frequency ΩS = μ0BH/. In a crystalline environment, the inhomogeneous broadening arising from dipolar interactions is reduced by direct exchange interactions between nearest radicals. (39,40) The resonance line width becomes then dominated by the homogeneous broadening 1/T2, where T2 ≃ 80–120 ns is the spin coherence time. Besides, these molecules can be dissolved and remain stable in diverse organic solvents. (37)
The latter property allows delivering precise amounts of DPPH molecules onto the central transmission lines of the resonators. Large (a few mm wide, a few microns thick) molecular ensembles have been deposited either in powder form or from solution, using a micropipette, onto conventional resonators with w = 400 and 14 μm. The number of molecules was varied by controlling the concentration of the original solution, keeping the volume constant. Illustrative Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) images of such deposits are shown as part of the Supporting Information. They show that DPPH has a tendency to form quasi-spherical nanoaggregates.
For smaller deposits on narrower lines, we employed Dip Pen Nanolithography (DPN), (41,42) a soft lithographic technique that uses the tip of an Atomic Force Microscope (AFM) to deposit nanoscopic volumes from a solution containing the molecules of interest onto a very small area (cf. Figure 1C). This technique has the advantage of combining high spatial resolution with good control over the molecular dose transferred to the substrate without the need for chemical functionalization, thus making it well suited for placing diverse nanosamples onto solid state sensors. (25,43,44) The size of the deposits was controlled in this case by the diameter of the drops transferred by the AFM tip to the substrate, which depend on the contact time between both, and by their concentration. The deposits are then characterized by SEM and by AFM, as shown in Figure 1D and in the Supporting Information. These deposits also form nanoaggregates after the solvent has evaporated, with sizes ranging from 50 nm to above 200 nm depending on the initial concentration of the radical at the ink solution and the size of the deposited drop. This also means that the number of molecules actually transferred into the “active” region of the constriction might vary even between depositions performed under nominally identical conditions and, therefore, needs to be determined for each case.

Spin-Photon Coupling versus Spin Number

The coupling of the spins to the cavity photons, with frequency ωr/2π ≃ 1.4 GHz, reduces the microwave transmission, shifts ωr, and broadens the resonance. All these effects become maximum when ΩS ≃ ωr, i.e. when spins and photons are brought into resonance with each other by an external magnetic field H. The transmission provides information on the collective coupling GN of the spin ensemble to the resonator, where N denotes here the number of free-radical spins, as well as on the spin γ and photon κ characteristic line widths.
Illustrative results of transmission measurements performed at T = 4.2 K on resonators without and with a 158 nm wide constriction are shown in Figure 2A and 2B, respectively. In both cases, the sample was a DPPH drop with an approximate diameter of about 30 μm deposited onto the central line by DPN. This amount corresponds approximately to the sensitivity limit for the former device. By contrast, under the same conditions, the resonator with the constriction gives a clearly visible absorption signal, thus providing direct evidence for the enhancement of GN.

Figure 2

Figure 2. (Top) Color scale plots of the microwave transmission through 1.4 GHz on-chip superconducting resonators with a 14 μm wide central line (A) and with a 158 nm wide constriction (B) coupled to a DPPH deposit with N ≈ 5 × 109 molecules, corresponding to Neff ≈ 4 × 107 spins effectively coupled to the resonator at T = 4.2 K. The red dashed lines mark the position of the resonance frequency at each magnetic field. The inset in B shows transmission versus frequency data near resonance at the field values indicated by arrows, evidencing the detection of a net absorption (lower transmission and broader resonance) when the spins get into mutual resonance with the circuit. (Bottom) Magnetic field dependence of the resonance width κ for the same resonators (C without and D with constriction) coupled to ensembles of DPPH molecules of varying size. Solid lines are least-squares fits based on eq 1.

In order to obtain quantitative estimates of this enhancement, and estimate the average coupling to individual spins, experiments on samples with decreasing N were performed. The number of molecules effectively coupling to the resonator magnetic field was estimated from the geometry and topography of the deposits, taking into account the width of the transmission line near the deposit. For conventional resonators with a 14 μm wide central line, all spins located in a 30 μm wide region around it are counted. For a nanoconstriction, the “active” area is taken as a 2 μm wide rectangular area around it.
Experiments and simulations, described below and in the Supporting Information, confirm that the coupling of spins located outside this region lies below the sensitivity limits and can, therefore, be safely neglected. Another aspect that needs to be taken into account is that these measurements were performed at a finite temperature T = 4.2 K. This lowers the population difference, or equivalently the spin polarization , between the ground and excited levels of the DPPH spins by a factor 6.7 × 10–3 with respect to zero temperature. As a result, the number of spins that contribute to the net absorption at the given temperature is also reduced from N to .
Results from these experiments are shown in Figure 2C and 2D. They confirm that introducing a nanoconstriction enables detecting much smaller deposits: the sensitivity limit is reduced from about 108 spins to 2 × 106 spins. This enhancement in sensitivity arises here from a larger spin-photon coupling, which can be determined as follows. The broadening of the cavity resonance κ can be fitted using the following expression, (45)
(1)
where κr is the broadening of the ‘empty’ cavity, as measured when it is detuned from the spins. This fit allows extracting GN and γ. γ is found to be close to 12 MHz for all but the smallest DPN deposits. This value is compatible with a pure homogeneous broadening and a T2 ≃ 80 ns, which lies within the typical values observed for DPPH. (37) A larger line width has been observed in DPPH molecules dispersed in polymeric matrices. (40) That the same phenomenon is observed in DPPH nanoaggregates deposited from solution suggests that they tend to lose crystalline order.
Figure 3 shows the dependence of GN on Neff measured in resonators with 14 μm and 158 nm transmission line widths. In both, the coupling is approximately proportional to . This result agrees with the collective enhancement of the radiation emission and absorption by spin ensembles, (46) which predicts that
(2)
where G1 is the coupling of a single spin. The ability to modify the size of the molecular ensembles over a large range allows monitoring this well-known dependence directly. The slope then directly gives the average, or typical, value of G1. These data confirm also that a strong enhancement of G1, by a factor of order 24 (from G1/2π ≃ 3.5 to 85 Hz), occurs when w is reduced by a factor 100 (from 14 μm to 158 nm).

Figure 3

Figure 3. Collective spin-photon coupling of ensembles of free-radical molecules to coplanar resonators with a 14 μm wide transmission line (top) and a 158 nm constriction (bottom). The solid lines are least-squares fits to a linear dependence on the square root of the effective number of spins that are coupled to the devices at T = 4.2 K, as predicted by eq 2. The bottom panel compares both fits to highlight the coupling enhancement generated by the constriction.

Spin-Photon Coupling versus Temperature

In this section, we describe experiments that explore the optimal conditions in the search of a maximum spin-photon coupling: temperatures close to absolute zero, which take Neff closer to N; an average number nphotons ≃ 5 × 105 of photons in the cavity well below N, in order to avoid any saturation effects; and a central line width w ≃ 42 nm near the minimum achievable by FIB nanolithography.
Representative images of the constriction and of the DPPH nanoaggregates deposited on it by DPN are shown in Figure 4 and in the Supporting Information. The number N of DPPH molecules in the active area was, in this case, estimated to be approximately 1.6 × 108 spins, which lies below the minimum dose that was detectable in experiments performed at T = 4.2 K and for w = 158 nm (cf. Figure 3D).

Figure 4

Figure 4. AFM topographic map (A) and SEM image (B) of the region near a 42 nm wide nanoconstriction. (C and D) Color maps of the number of DPPH molecules deposited on each location and of the estimated single spin to photon couplings, respectively. The latter maps have been calculated with a discretization of space into 3 × 3 × 3 nm3 cubic cells. The number of free-radical molecules deposited in this area amounts to approximately N = 1.6 × 108, and the collective coupling estimated from the simulations is GN/2π ≃ 2.0 MHz at T = 44 mK and 2.5 MHz at T = 0.

Results of transmission measurements performed on this device are shown in Figure 5. Thanks to the much larger spin polarization, an easily discernible absorption signal is observed at the minimum temperature T ≃ 44 mK, which corresponds to a collective coupling GN/2π ≃ 1.9 MHz. The line width γ ≃ 65 MHz is 5 times larger than what would be expected from the spin coherence times. The additional broadening probably arises from the smaller size of the DPPH nanoaggregates transferred to this device and from the fact that DPPH molecules are here dispersed in a matrix of glycerol used in the DPN deposition process (see the section Methods below and the Supporting Information (SI) for more details). As mentioned above, these effects tend to suppress direct exchange interactions between free-radical spins and, then, enhance the broadening associated with hyperfine and dipole–dipole couplings.

Figure 5

Figure 5. (A) Color plot of the microwave transmission, measured at T = 44 mK, through a superconducting resonator with a 42 nm wide constriction in its central transmission line and coupled to an ensemble of N ≃ 1.6 × 108 free-radical molecules (corresponding to Neff ≃ 108 spins effectively coupled to the resonator). (B) Color plot of the microwave transmission calculated for a collective coupling GN/2π = 2.0 MHz, as follows from the simulations described in Figure 4, and a spin line width γ = 65 MHz. (C) Magnetic field dependence of the resonance width κ for the same device measured at different temperatures. Solid lines are least-squares fits using eq 2. (D) Temperature dependence of GN extracted from these experiments. (E) Same data plotted as a function of the (temperature dependent) effective number of spins coupled to the resonator , where is the spin polarization. The solid lines are least-squares fits based on eq 2 that extrapolate to GN/2π ≃ 2.3 MHz for T → 0 (when NeffN).

As expected, the spin-photon coupling strength GN decreases rapidly with increasing temperature. This dependence can be accounted for by the decrease in spin polarization that determines Neff/N (cf. Figure 5D and 5E), showing again the validity of eq 2. From these data, and using the topographic and geometrical information on the sample, we estimate an average single spin coupling G1/2π ≃ 180 Hz. This represents an enhancement of nearly 2 orders of magnitude with respect to the coupling achieved for a 14 μm wide transmission line resonator.
Taking into account that the photon energy, thus also G1 ∝ ωr, it is useful to define the dimensionless coupling G1r ≃ 1.3 × 10–7. This result compares favorably to the maximum single-spin coupling reported in the literature, of about 450 Hz for a 7 GHz resonator (for a ratio G1r ≃ 6.4 × 10–8), (5) which was achieved with especially designed lumped-element resonators coupled to impurity spins in the Si substrate on which these devices were fabricated. Yet, it still falls short of the maximum theoretically attainable enhancement, which should scale as 1/w and therefore reach a factor of 330 in this case, thus G1/2π close to 1 kHz. (16,20)
In order better understand these results and, in particular, obtain information on how each molecular spin couples to the resonator, we have performed numerical simulations of the spin-photon interaction for this specific situation. The model uses the actual geometry (length, thickness, and width) of the nanoconstriction and a three-dimensional map of the number of spins extracted from the combined analysis of SEM and AFM images. The region surrounding the constriction is divided into a grid of cubic cells with lateral dimensions d. Further details are given in the section Methods and as part of the Supporting Information.
A 2D projection of a map calculated for the smallest d = 3 nm is shown in Figure 4C. The coupling is then evaluated as follows. First, the photon energy ℏωr is used to determine the supercurrent flowing through the constriction. This electrical current generates a magnetic field at each point in space , which was calculated using the 3D-MLSI finite-element computer simulation software (35) as in the example shown in Figure 1B. For all molecules in a given cell i, the magnetic field is assigned its value at the center of the cell. Then, the coupling of each cell is calculated with the following expression (for details, see ref (20))
(3)
where ni is the effective number of spins in the cell, calculated at the given temperature, and mS = ±1/2 denote the two eigenstates associated with opposite projections of the radical spins along the external magnetic field . The contributions of all cells can then be combined to estimate the collective coupling of the whole sample as follows (47)
(4)
For the device shown in Figure 4, eq 4 gives GN/2π ≃ 2.0 MHz at 44 mK and an average G1 ≃ 200 Hz, which agree very well with the experimental values GN = 1.9 MHz and G1 = 180 Hz and, as shown in Figure 5B, account well for the transmission experiments. The difference is in fact smaller than the unavoidable errors associated with the number of molecules and with the influence that crystalline defects have on the free radicals, which are known to turn a fraction of molecules into a diamagnetic state.
Simulations can then help in understanding how these average values ensue from the distribution of spin locations and couplings in the deposit. A projection map showing the maximum coupling obtained for cells located at different xy positions (which mainly correspond to those lying closest to the device surface along the vertical axis z) is shown in Figure 4D. It confirms that the main contribution to GN comes from those spins located in the closest proximity to the constriction. It also shows that individual couplings significantly larger than the average G1 can be achieved. Looking at those spins lying closer to the constriction, we find values as high as 0.6–0.8 kHz, depending on the exact location with respect to the surface and on the orientation of the external magnetic field.

Spin-Photon Coupling versus Transmission Line Width

Results obtained for different devices enable determining how the single spin to single photon coupling G1 depends on the dimensions of the superconducting transmission line. This dependence is shown in Figure 6, which, besides those discussed already, includes also data measured on a resonator with a 400 μm wide line (cf. Supporting Information). For w ⩾ 100 nm, these results show the expected enhancement of G1 ∝ 1/w, from G1 ⩽ 5 mHz up to nearly 100 Hz. For narrower lines, however, and as we have already pointed out above, the increase slows down.

Figure 6

Figure 6. Dependence of the average single spin to single photon coupling on the width of the central transmission line of the resonator, showing the enhancement obtained by reducing the latter down to the region of (tens of) nanometers. The lines are calculations of the coupling of a spin located over the constriction, at three different heights z, as illustrated by the figure in the inset.

The reason for this can be understood in light of the simulations and arguments described in the previous subsection (cf. Figure 4D). A first limitation arises from the nonzero thickness of the superconducting film (nominally 150 nm but decreasing near the constriction as shown in Figure S2). This geometrical effect reduces slightly the local magnetic field generated by the supercurrents and, as a result, also the slope of the G1 vs 1/w theoretical curve of Figure 6 when w becomes smaller than the Nb thickness. It is, however, unable to account for the experimental results (see Figure S16 in the SI).
Since the coupling enhancement is concentrated close to the constriction, within a region with dimensions comparable to w, the sample integration becomes critical. The topography AFM images show that, once dry, DPPH molecules deposited by DPN tend to form nanoaggregates with characteristic dimensions of the order of 200 nm. Then, even those molecules located in grains that land next to the line can be too far when compared to w. This effect can be accounted for by numerical calculations of G1 (Figures 6 and S16). They show that G1 strongly depends on the height z of the molecular spins above the transmission line. While, for z ≃ 0, G1 ∝ 1/w, when z ≠ 0 the coupling tends to saturate as soon as wz. Therefore, creating an optimum interface between the molecular deposits and the circuit surface, i.e. making z as close to zero as possible, becomes of utmost importance to attain the maximum spin-photon coupling.

Conclusions

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

The experiments and simulations described in the previous sections validate a relatively straightforward method to enhance the coupling of molecular spins to on-chip superconducting resonators. Using conventional 1.4 GHz coplanar resonators, we have attained an average single spin coupling of about 180 Hz for central line widths of ∼40 nm, with estimated maximum couplings on the order of kHz. This approach is, in principle, applicable to any circuit design and to a large variety of samples, provided that they can be delivered from solution and with sufficient spatial accuracy. Introducing superconducting nanobridges into especially designed resonators, which minimize the circuit impedance and therefore maximize the superconducting current at the inductor, (4−6) should allow enhancing G1 by a further 2 orders of magnitude, thus reaching G1/2π values close to 0.1 MHz.
Devices based on these ideas can take electron spin spectroscopy to the single spin limit and become useful tools to investigate magnetic excitations in individual nanosystems ranging from nanosized particles to molecular nanomagnets, or even exotic topological states, such as vortices and skyrmions. (48) The molecular approach used here adds the possibility of serving as a suitable vehicle to deliver diverse samples, as well as to improve their interface with the circuit. A recent work shows that it is possible to synthesize thin molecular films onto a superconducting line, thereby achieving a close to optimum coverage with a minimum molecule to circuit distance. (28) The combination of these methods with DPN or other nanolithography tools with a high spatial resolution could then lead to major improvements.
Spins hosted in artificial molecules (29−34,49) and 2D molecular materials, such as graphene nanoribbons, (50,51) are also very promising candidates to encode qubits and qudits. In recent times, spin coherence times of these systems have been optimized by chemical design, up to values well above 10–50 μs, (52−55) and even close to ms, (56) and the strong coupling to superconducting resonators has been achieved for macroscopic molecular ensembles. (57−59) Our results show that attaining this regime for single molecules is within reach. This coherent coupling would allow the use of superconducting circuits to control, read-out, and connect spin qubits located in different molecules, an essential ingredient of a hybrid architecture for large scale quantum computation and simulation. (16)

Methods

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

Device Fabrication and Characterization

Superconducting resonators are fabricated on 500 μm thick C-plane sapphire wafers. A 150 nm thick niobium layer was deposited by radio frequency sputtering and then patterned by photolithography and reactive ion etching. The circuits consist of a large 400 μm central line separated from two ground planes by two 200 μm gaps that narrow down to around 14 and 7 μm, respectively, after going through gap capacitors. The devices were tuned to show an effective impedance Z0 = 50Ω, a resonance frequency ωr/2π ≃ 1.4 GHz, and maximum quality factors Q ≃ (1–2) × 105.
Nanoscale constrictions (21) were made at the midpoint of the central line by etching it with a focused beam of Ga+ ions, using a commercial dual beam system. The ion beam also locally reduces the Nb thickness below the initial 150 nm, even down to values close to the constriction width w (see Figure S2 in the Supporting Information for an illustrative image of the smallest constriction used in this work). The ionic current was kept below 20 pA to maximize the resolution in the fabrication process and to minimize the Nb layer, on the order 10 to 15 nm thick, that is implanted with Ga. In order to avoid the buildup, and eventual discharge, of electrostatic charges during the process, the central line was connected to one of the ground planes by a few nanometer wide Pt bridge, fabricated by focused ion beam deposition. Once the nanoconstriction was fabricated, this bridge was removed using the same ion beam. Images of 158 and 42 nm wide constrictions, obtained in situ by SEM, are shown in Figure 1 and in the Supporting Information.
Prior to the deposition of the molecular samples, the microwave propagation trough all devices was characterized, as described below, as a function of magnetic field, temperature, and input power. Illustrative results are shown as part of the Supporting Information. These experiments show that the constrictions do not introduce any drastic changes to ωr and Q and that they can work under magnetic fields up to 1.4 T, provided that they are applied parallel to the plane of the chip.

Molecular Pattering onto Superconducting Resonators and Characterization of the Deposits

The molecular ink used in all depositions was prepared by dissolving 10–20 mg/mL of the free radical 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH; Sigma-Aldrich) in N,N-Dimethylformamide (DMF; Sigma-Aldrich) with about 5–10% glycerol in volume (Panreac, ≥ 99.5%, ACS grade). DMF preserves the chemical properties of DPPH and does not turn the radical into its diamagnetic form. Glycerol is used as an additive to increase the viscosity and slow down the evaporation of the ink so that the solution does not dry before the creation of the pattern. (42) This is especially important in the deposition by DPN, when the drop has to be transferred to the device by the AFM tip.
The device was previously cleaned with isopropanol and acetone, dried by blowing nitrogen gas, and underwent plasma oxygen treatment before deposition. DPN deposition was performed using a DPN5000 based-AFM system (NanoInk, Inc., USA). For this, 1 μL of the ink solution was left in a reservoir of a microfluidic Inkwell delivery chip-based system (Acs-technologies LLC, USA). Afterward, a DPN silicon nitride DPN single A-S2 probe (Acs-technologies LLC, USA) was dipped and coated several times with the ink at the inkwell microchannel.
DPN patterning was optimized at 25 °C and 55% relative humidity. The quality and size of the free radical deposits were assayed previously on marked SiO2 substrates and small pieces of muscovite mica (see Supporting Information for illustrative images of the results). The deposition conditions were optimized to produce deposits ranging from 1 to 60 μm in diameter, such as the one shown in Figure S8. Then, different drops with diameters ranging between 5 and 60 μm and heights from 50 to 400 nm were patterned on the central line of resonators, both without constriction and with nanoconstrictions. The characterization of the deposits and the microwave transmission experiments were performed once the deposits had dried. Free radical deposits were also made far from the sensing areas and using different solvents and additives and characterized as controls.
The patterns were analyzed by optical microscopy, AFM and SEM imaging. AFM images were taken with a MultiMode 8 AFM system (Bruker) and a Cervantes SPM FullMode (Nanotec) at scan rates of 0.1–2.0 Hz. The samples were characterized using Peak Force TappingTM and TappingTM modes with 7–125 kHz triangular silicon nitride microlevers (SNL; Bruker Probes) having ultrasharp 2 nm end tip radii, and with an antimony (n) doped silicon 320 kHz ultraresonant microlever (TESP; Bruker Probes) having an 8 nm end tip radii. The images were analyzed using the WSxM (60) and Gwyddion (61) software for SPM image processing. SEM images were performed with an INSPECT-F50 (FEI).

Microwave Transmission Experiments

The microwave transmission measurements were done using a programmable network analyzer. Experiments performed at 4.2 K were aimed at measuring a large number of deposits of varying dose. In these experiments, the devices were mounted on a homemade probe and submerged in a liquid helium cryostat. The input power was attenuated by −52 dB, to avoid the possibility of exceeding the critical current at the nanoconstriction, and the output power was measured directly. The number of photons in the cavity was estimated to be on the order of 109. The external magnetic field was applied with a commercial 9T × 1T × 1T superconducting vector magnet, which allows rotating in situ, in order to align it along the central line of the device (y axis in Figures 1 and 4) with an accuracy better than 0.1°.
For experiments at lower temperatures, transmission measurements were carried out in an adiabatic demagnetization refrigerator, having a base temperature of about 45 mK. Magnetic fields up to 60 mT were applied using a homemade superconducting vector magnet. In this case, experimental constraints imposed a field orientation along the x axis, thus perpendicular to the central line within the plane of the device. As it is shown in the Supporting Information, this geometry leads to a substantial decrease in the spin-photon coupling with respect to the maximum achievable. The input signal was attenuated, down to a level of about 5 × 105 photons, and then amplified at 4.2 K and at room temperature before being detected.
The small asymmetry in the resonances measured (Figures 3 and 5) is likely caused by an interference, called Fano resonance, (62) between the resonator and a small continuous background. A possible source for that background is the off-resonant tail of the sample box mode. This small asymmetry has a very weak influence (of a few % at most) on the results for the coupling and peak width, because they are first-order independent.

Numerical Simulations

Our estimate of the spin-photon coupling relies on the calculation of the spatial distribution of , i.e., the rms magnetic field generated by the rms supercurrent nA circulating through the central line of the resonator, with Z0 ≈ 50 Ω its impedance. (20)
The spatial distribution of is computed using a finite-element based package (35) that solves the London equations for the given geometry of the superconducting wire, having London penetration depth λL = 90 nm, and assuming that the supercurrent distributes through 11 equidistant 2D sheets, parallel to the xy plane and homogeneously distributed across the thickness of the Nb layer. is then used to evaluate the rms magnetic field (with i = 1, 2, ... Ncell) at the center of Ncell cubic cells with lateral dimension d, each containing ni molecules. The grid size was varied from 0 up to 2 μm, and the cell size d, from 3 nm up to 100 nm. The constriction geometry, in particular its thickness, was found to have some influence on the coupling, but only for spins located very close to the constriction and for w ≤ 50 nm.
These simulations show also that spins located further than about 500 nm from the constriction give a close to negligible contribution. The mode volume of a 42 nm wide constriction is then ≃1 μm × 1 μm × 10 μm = 10 μm3 = 0.01 pico-l, or about 1.4 × 10–14λ3, with λ ≃ 88 mm being the resonance wavelength. It also follows that a 3 nm cell size is necessary to properly account for the coupling to spins that lie very close to the nanoconstriction, which give the maximum contribution. The maximum coupling G1 depends also on the orientation of the external magnetic field, which determines which components of the photon magnetic field couple to the spins. It is maximum for parallel to the central line (y axis). Further details can be found in the Supporting Information (Figures S12 to S16).

Supporting Information

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsnano.0c03167.

  • Images of the fabrication steps of resonators and of superconducting nanoconstrictions, tests results of these devices, details and additional images of the deposition of free-radical spin ensembles by DPN and their characterization by means of SEM and AFM, results of additional microwave transmission experiments, additional information, backed with plots, on how the number of molecules effectively coupled to each device has been estimated and how the spin-photon coupling has been simulated (PDF)

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Author Information

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

  • Corresponding Author
  • Authors
    • Ignacio Gimeno - Instituto de Ciencia de Materiales de Aragón, CSIC-Universidad de Zaragoza, Pedro Cerbuna 12, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain
    • Wenzel Kersten - Vienna Center for Quantum Science and Technology, Atominstitut, TU Wien, 1020 Vienna, Austria
    • María C. Pallarés - Laboratorio de Microscopı́as Avanzadas, Instituto de Nanociencia de Aragón, Universidad de Zaragoza, 50018 Zaragoza, Spain
    • Pablo Hermosilla - Laboratorio de Microscopı́as Avanzadas, Instituto de Nanociencia de Aragón, Universidad de Zaragoza, 50018 Zaragoza, Spain
    • María José Martínez-Pérez - Instituto de Ciencia de Materiales de Aragón, CSIC-Universidad de Zaragoza, Pedro Cerbuna 12, 50009 Zaragoza, SpainFundación ARAID, Av. de Ranillas 1-D, 50018 Zaragoza, SpainOrcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-8125-877X
    • Mark D. Jenkins - Instituto de Ciencia de Materiales de Aragón, CSIC-Universidad de Zaragoza, Pedro Cerbuna 12, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain
    • Andreas Angerer - Vienna Center for Quantum Science and Technology, Atominstitut, TU Wien, 1020 Vienna, Austria
    • Carlos Sánchez-Azqueta - Departamento de Fı́sica Aplicada, Universidad de Zaragoza, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain
    • David Zueco - Instituto de Ciencia de Materiales de Aragón, CSIC-Universidad de Zaragoza, Pedro Cerbuna 12, 50009 Zaragoza, SpainFundación ARAID, Av. de Ranillas 1-D, 50018 Zaragoza, Spain
    • Johannes Majer - Shanghai Branch, CAS Center for Excellence and Synergetic Innovation Center in Quantum Information and Quantum Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Shanghai 201315, ChinaNational Laboratory for Physical Sciences at Microscale and Department of Modern Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, ChinaVienna Center for Quantum Science and Technology, Atominstitut, TU Wien, 1020 Vienna, Austria
    • Anabel Lostao - Instituto de Ciencia de Materiales de Aragón, CSIC-Universidad de Zaragoza, Pedro Cerbuna 12, 50009 Zaragoza, SpainLaboratorio de Microscopı́as Avanzadas, Instituto de Nanociencia de Aragón, Universidad de Zaragoza, 50018 Zaragoza, SpainFundación ARAID, Av. de Ranillas 1-D, 50018 Zaragoza, SpainOrcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0001-7460-5916
  • Notes
    The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Acknowledgments

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

The authors acknowledge funding from the EU (COST Action 15128 MOLSPIN, QUANTERA SUMO and MICROSENSE projects, FET-OPEN Grant 862893 FATMOLS), the Spanish MICINN (Grants RTI2018-096075-B-C21, PCI2018-093116, MAT2017-89993-R, MAT2017-88358-C3-1-R, EUR2019-103823), the Gobierno de Aragón Ggrants E09-17R Q-MAD, E35-20R, BE and LMP55-18, FANDEPAM) and the BBVA foundation (Leonardo Grants 2018 and 2019).

References

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

This article references 62 other publications.

  1. 1
    Wallraff, A.; Schuster, D. I.; Blais, A.; Frunzio, L.; Huang, R.-S.; Majer, J.; Kumar, S.; Girvin, S. M.; Schoelkopf, R. J. Strong Coupling of a Single Photon to a Superconducting Qubit Using Circuit Quantum Electrodynamics. Nature 2004, 431, 162167,  DOI: 10.1038/nature02851
  2. 2
    Göppl, M.; Fragner, A.; Baur, M.; Bianchetti, R.; Filipp, S.; Fink, J. M.; Leek, P. J.; Puebla, G.; Steffen, L.; Wallraff, A. Coplanar Waveguide Resonators for Circuit Quantum Electrodynamics. J. Appl. Phys. 2008, 104, 113904,  DOI: 10.1063/1.3010859
  3. 3
    Bienfait, A.; Pla, A. A.; Kubo, Y.; Stern, M.; Zhou, X.; Lo, C. C.; Weis, C. D.; Schenkel, T.; Thewalt, M. L. W.; Vion, D.; Esteve, D.; Julsgaard, B.; Mølmer, K.; Morton, J. J. L.; Bertet, P. Reaching the Quantum Limit of Sensitivity in Electron Spin Resonance. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2016, 11, 253257,  DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2015.282
  4. 4
    Eichler, C.; Sigillito, A. J.; Lyon, S. A.; Petta, J. R. Electron Spin Resonance at the Level of 104 Spins Using Low Impedance Superconducting Resonators. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2017, 118, 037701,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.037701
  5. 5
    Probst, S.; Bienfait, A.; Campagne-Ibarcq, P.; Pla, J. J.; Albanese, B.; Da Silva Barbosa, J. F.; Schenkel, T.; Vion, D.; Esteve, D.; Mølmer, K.; Morton, J. J. L.; Heeres, R.; Bertet, P. Inductive-Detection Electron-Spin Resonance Spectroscopy with 65 Spins/Hz Sensitivity. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2017, 111, 202604,  DOI: 10.1063/1.5002540
  6. 6
    Sarabi, B.; Huang, P.; Zimmerman, N. M. Possible Hundredfold Enhancement in the Direct Magnetic Coupling of a Single-Atom Electron Spin to a Circuit Resonator. Phys. Rev. Appl. 2019, 11, 014001,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.11.014001
  7. 7
    Blais, A.; Huang, R.-S.; Wallraff, A.; Girvin, S. M.; Schoelkopf, R. J. Cavity Quantum Electrodynamics for Superconducting Electrical Circuits: An Architecture for Quantum Computation. Phys. Rev. A: At., Mol., Opt. Phys. 2004, 69, 062320,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.69.062320
  8. 8
    Majer, J.; Chow, J. M.; Gambetta, J. M.; Koch, J.; Johnson, B. R.; Schreier, J. A.; Frunzio, L.; Schuster, D. I.; Houck, A. A.; Wallraff, A.; Blais, A.; Devoret, M. H.; Girvin, S. M.; Schoelkopf, R. J. Coupling Superconducting Qubits via a Cavity Bus. Nature 2007, 449, 443447,  DOI: 10.1038/nature06184
  9. 9
    Schoelkopf, R. J.; Girvin, S. M. Wiring Up Quantum Systems. Nature 2008, 451, 664669,  DOI: 10.1038/451664a
  10. 10
    Imamoǧlu, A. Cavity QED Based on Collective Magnetic Dipole Coupling: Spin Ensembles as Hybrid Two-Level Systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009, 102, 083602,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.083602
  11. 11
    Wesenberg, J. H.; Ardavan, A.; Briggs, G. A. D.; Morton, J. J. L.; Schoelkopf, R. J.; Schuster, D. I.; Mølmer, K. Quantum Computing with an Electron Spin Ensemble. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009, 103, 070502,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.070502
  12. 12
    Schuster, D. I.; Sears, A. P.; Ginossar, E.; DiCarlo, L.; Frunzio, L.; Morton, J. J. L.; Wu, H.; Briggs, G. A. D.; Buckley, B. B.; Awschalom, D. D.; Schoelkopf, R. J. High-Cooperativity Coupling of Electron-Spin Ensembles to Superconducting Cavities. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2010, 105, 140501,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.140501
  13. 13
    Kubo, Y.; Ong, F. R.; Bertet, P.; Vion, D.; Jacques, V.; Zheng, D.; Dréau, A.; Roch, J.-F.; Auffeves, A.; Jelezko, F.; Wrachtrup, J.; Barthe, M. F.; Bergonzo, P.; Esteve, D. Strong Coupling of a Spin Ensemble to a Superconducting Resonator. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2010, 105, 140502,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.140502
  14. 14
    Wu, H.; George, R. E.; Wesenberg, J. H.; Mølmer, K.; Schuster, D. I.; Schoelkopf, R. J.; Itoh, K. M.; Ardavan, A.; Morton, J. J. L.; Briggs, G. A. D. Storage of Multiple Coherent Microwave Excitations in an Electron Spin Ensemble. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2010, 105, 140503,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.140503
  15. 15
    Chiorescu, I.; Groll, N.; Bertaina, S.; Mori, T.; Miyashita, S. Magnetic Strong Coupling in a Spin-Photon System and Transition to Classical Regime. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2010, 82, 024413,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.82.024413
  16. 16
    Jenkins, M. D.; Zueco, D.; Roubeau, O.; Aromí, G.; Majer, J.; Luis, F. A Scalable Architecture for Quantum Computation with Molecular Nanomagnets. Dalton Trans 2016, 45, 1668216693,  DOI: 10.1039/C6DT02664H
  17. 17
    Narkowicz, R.; Suter, D.; Stonies, R. Planar Microresonators for EPR Experiments. J. Magn. Reson. 2005, 175, 275284,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jmr.2005.04.014
  18. 18
    Narkowicz, R.; Suter, D.; Niemeyer, I. Scaling of Sensitivity and Efficiency in Planar Microresonators for Electron Spin Resonance. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2008, 79, 084702,  DOI: 10.1063/1.2964926
  19. 19
    Banholzer, A.; Narkowicz, R.; Hassel, C.; Meckenstock, R.; Stienen, S.; Posth, O.; Suter, D.; Farle, M.; Lindner, J. Visualization of Spin Dynamics in Single Nanosized Magnetic Elements. Nanotechnology 2011, 22, 295713,  DOI: 10.1088/0957-4484/22/29/295713
  20. 20
    Jenkins, M. D.; Hümmer, T.; Martínez-Pérez, M. J.; García-Ripoll, J.; Zueco, D.; Luis, F. Coupling Single-Molecule Magnets to Quantum Circuits. New J. Phys. 2013, 15, 095007,  DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/15/9/095007
  21. 21
    Jenkins, M. D.; Naether, U.; Ciria, M.; Sesé, J.; Atkinson, J.; Sánchez-Azqueta, C.; del Barco, E.; Majer, J.; Zueco, D.; Luis, F. Nanoscale Constrictions in Superconducting Coplanar Waveguide Resonators. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2014, 105, 162601,  DOI: 10.1063/1.4899141
  22. 22
    Haikka, P.; Kubo, Y.; Bienfait, A.; Bertet, P.; Mølmer, K. Proposal for Detecting a Single Electron Spin in a Microwave Resonator. Phys. Rev. A: At., Mol., Opt. Phys. 2017, 95, 022306,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.95.022306
  23. 23
    Mannini, M.; Pineider, F.; Sainctavit, P.; Danieli, C.; Otero, E.; Sciancalepore, C.; Talarico, A. M.; Arrio, M.-A.; Cornia, A.; Gatteschi, D.; Sessoli, R. Magnetic Memory of a Single-Molecule Quantum Magnet Wired to a Gold Surface. Nat. Mater. 2009, 8, 194197,  DOI: 10.1038/nmat2374
  24. 24
    Mannini, M.; Pineider, F.; Danieli, C.; Totti, F.; Sorace, L.; Sainctavit, P.; Arrio, M.-A.; Otero, E.; Joly, L.; Cezar, J. C.; Cornia, A.; Sessoli, R. Quantum Tunnelling of the Magnetization in a Monolayer of Oriented Single-Molecule Magnets. Nature 2010, 468, 417421,  DOI: 10.1038/nature09478
  25. 25
    Domingo, N.; Bellido, E.; Ruiz-Molina, D. Advances on Structuring, Integration and Magnetic Characterization of Molecular Nanomagnets on Surfaces and Devices. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 258302,  DOI: 10.1039/C1CS15096K
  26. 26
    Thiele, S.; Balestro, F.; Ballou, R.; Klyatskaya, S.; Ruben, M.; Wernsdorfer, W. Electrically Driven Nuclear Spin Resonance in Single-Molecule Magnets. Science 2014, 344, 11351138,  DOI: 10.1126/science.1249802
  27. 27
    Malavolti, L.; Briganti, M.; Hänze, M.; Serrano, G.; Cimatti, I.; McMurtrie, G.; Otero, E.; Ohresser, P.; Totti, F.; Mannini, M.; Sessoli, R.; Loth, S. Tunable Spin-Superconductor Coupling of Spin 1/2 Vanadyl Phthalocyanine Molecules. Nano Lett. 2018, 18, 7955,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b03921
  28. 28
    Urtizberea, A.; Natividad, E.; Alonso, P. J.; Pérez-Martínez, L.; Andrés, M. A.; Gascón, I.; Gimeno, I.; Luis, F.; Roubeau, O. Vanadyl Spin Qubit 2D Arrays and their Integration on Superconducting Resonators. Mater. Horiz. 2020, 7, 885897,  DOI: 10.1039/C9MH01594A
  29. 29
    Leuenberger, M.; Loss, D. Quantum Computing in Molecular Magnets. Nature 2001, 410, 789793,  DOI: 10.1038/35071024
  30. 30
    Troiani, F.; Affronte, M. Molecular Spins for Quantum Information Technologies. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011, 40, 31193129,  DOI: 10.1039/c0cs00158a
  31. 31
    Aromí, G.; Aguilà, D.; Gamez, P.; Luis, F.; Roubeau, O. Design of Magnetic Coordination Complexes for Quantum Computing. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 537546,  DOI: 10.1039/C1CS15115K
  32. 32
    Moreno-Pineda, E.; Godfrin, C.; Balestro, F.; Wernsdorfer, W.; Ruben, M. Molecular Spin Qudits for Quantum Algorithms. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018, 47, 501513,  DOI: 10.1039/C5CS00933B
  33. 33
    Gaita-Ariño, A.; Luis, F.; Hill, S.; Coronado, E. Molecular Spins for Quantum Computation. Nat. Chem. 2019, 11, 301309,  DOI: 10.1038/s41557-019-0232-y
  34. 34
    Atzori, M.; Sessoli, R. The Second Quantum Revolution: Role and Challenges of Molecular Chemistry. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 1133911352,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.9b00984
  35. 35
    Khapaev, M. M.; Kupriyanov, M. Y.; Goldobin, E.; Siegel, M. Current Distribution Simulation for Superconducting Multi-Layered Structures. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 2003, 16, 2427,  DOI: 10.1088/0953-2048/16/1/305
  36. 36
    Weil, J. A.; Anderson, J. K. 1039. The Determination and Reaction of 2,2-Diphenyl-1-Picrylhydrazyl with Thiosalicylic Acid. J. Chem. Soc. 1965, 55675570,  DOI: 10.1039/jr9650005567
  37. 37
    Yordanov, N. D. Is Our Knowledge about the Chemical and Physical Properties of DPPH Enough to Consider it as a Primary Standard for Quantitative EPR Spectrometry?. Appl. Magn. Reson. 1996, 10, 339350,  DOI: 10.1007/BF03163117
  38. 38
    Žilić, D.; Pajić, D.; Jurić, M.; Molčanov, K.; Rakvin, B.; Planinić, P.; Zadro, K. Single Crystals of DPPH Grown from Diethyl Ether and Carbon Disulfide Solutions – Crystal Structures, IR, EPR and Magnetization Studies. J. Magn. Reson. 2010, 207, 3441,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jmr.2010.08.005
  39. 39
    Anderson, P. W.; Weiss, P. R. Exchange Narrowing in Paramagnetic Resonance. Rev. Mod. Phys. 1953, 25, 269276,  DOI: 10.1103/RevModPhys.25.269
  40. 40
    Höcherl, G.; Wolf, H. C. Zur Konzentrationsabhängigkeit der Elektronenspin-Relaxationszeiten von Diphenyl-Picryl-Hydrazyl in fester Phase. Eur. Phys. J. A 1965, 183, 341351,  DOI: 10.1007/BF01380763
  41. 41
    Piner, R. D.; Zhu, J.; Xu, F.; Hong, S.; Mirkin, C. A. ”Dip-Pen” Nanolithography. Science 1999, 283, 661663,  DOI: 10.1126/science.283.5402.661
  42. 42
    Bellido, E.; de Miguel, R.; Ruiz-Molina, D.; Lostao, A.; Maspoch, D. Controlling the Number of Proteins with Dip-Pen Nanolitography. Adv. Mater. 2010, 22, 352355,  DOI: 10.1002/adma.200902372
  43. 43
    Martínez-Pérez, M. J.; Bellido, E.; de Miguel, R.; Sesé, J.; Lostao, A.; Gómez-Moreno, C.; Drung, D.; Schurig, T.; Ruiz-Molina, D.; Luis, F. Alternating Current Magnetic Susceptibility of a Molecular Magnet Submonolayer Directly Patterned onto a Micro Superconducting Quantum Interference Device. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2011, 99, 032504,  DOI: 10.1063/1.3609859
  44. 44
    Bellido, E.; González-Monje, P.; Repollés, A.; Jenkins, M.; Sesé, J.; Drung, D.; Schurig, T.; Awaga, K.; Luis, F.; Ruiz-Molina, D. Mn12 Single Molecule Magnets Deposited on μ-SQUID Sensors: the Role of Interphases and Structural Modifications. Nanoscale 2013, 5, 1256512573,  DOI: 10.1039/c3nr02359a
  45. 45
    Bushev, P.; Feofanov, A. K.; Rotzinger, H.; Protopopov, I.; Cole, J. H.; Wilson, C. M.; Fischer, G.; Lukashenko, A.; Ustinov, A. V. Ultralow-Power Spectroscopy of a Rare-Earth Spin Ensemble Using a Superconducting Resonator. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2011, 84, 060501,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.84.060501
  46. 46
    Tavis, M.; Cummings, F. W. Exact Solution for an N-Molecule-Radiation-Field Hamiltonian. Phys. Rev. 1968, 170, 379384,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRev.170.379
  47. 47
    Hümmer, T.; Reuther, G. M.; Hänggi, P.; Zueco, D. Nonequilibrium Phases in Hybrid Arrays with Flux Qubits and Nitrogen-Vacancy Centers. Phys. Rev. A: At., Mol., Opt. Phys. 2012, 85, 052320,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.85.052320
  48. 48
    Martínez-Pérez, M. J.; Zueco, D. Strong Coupling of a Single Photon to a Magnetic Vortex. ACS Photonics 2019, 6, 360367,  DOI: 10.1021/acsphotonics.8b00954
  49. 49
    Warner, M.; Din, S.; Tupitsyn, I. S.; Morley, G. W.; Stoneham, A.; Gardener, J. A.; Wu, Z.; Fisher, A. J.; Heutz, S.; Kay, C. W. M.; Aeppli, G. Ptential fot Spin-Based Information Processing in a Thin-Film Molecular Semiconductor. Nature 2013, 503, 504508,  DOI: 10.1038/nature12597
  50. 50
    Slota, M.; Keerthi, A.; Myers, W. K.; Tretyakov, E.; Baumgarten, M.; Ardavan, A.; Sadeghi, H.; Lambert, C. J.; Narita, A.; Müllen, K.; Bogani, L. Magnetic Edge States and Coherent Manipulation of Graphene Nanoribbons. Nature 2018, 557, 691695,  DOI: 10.1038/s41586-018-0154-7
  51. 51
    Lombardi, F.; Lodi, A.; Ma, J.; Liu, J.; Slota, M.; Narita, A.; Myers, W. K.; Müllen, K.; Feng, X.; Bogani, L. Quantum Units from the Topological Engineering of Molecular Graphenoids. Science 2019, 366, 11071110,  DOI: 10.1126/science.aay7203
  52. 52
    Ardavan, A.; Rival, O.; Morton, J. J. L.; Blundell, S. J.; Tyryshkin, A. M.; Timco, G. A.; Winpenny, R. E. P. Will Spin-Relaxation Times in Molecular Magnets Permit Quantum Information Processing?. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2007, 98, 057201,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.057201
  53. 53
    Wedge, C. J.; Timco, G. A.; Spielberg, E. T.; George, R. E.; Tuna, F.; Rigby, S.; McInnes, E. J. L.; Winpenny, R. E. P.; Blundell, S. J.; Ardavan, A. Chemical Engineering of Molecular Qubits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2012, 108, 107204,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.107204
  54. 54
    Bader, K.; Dengler, D.; Lenz, S.; Endeward, B.; Jiang, S.-D.; Neugebauer, P.; van Slageren, J. Room Temperature Quantum Coherence in a Potential Molecular Qubit. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 5304,  DOI: 10.1038/ncomms6304
  55. 55
    Shiddiq, M.; Komijani, D.; Duan, Y.; Gaita-Ariño, A.; Coronado, E.; Hill, S. Enhancing Coherence in Molecular Spin Qubits via Atomic Clock Transitions. Nature 2016, 531, 348351,  DOI: 10.1038/nature16984
  56. 56
    Zadrozny, J. M.; Niklas, J.; Poluektov, O. G.; Freedman, D. E. Millisecond Coherence Time in a Tunable Molecular Electronic Spin Qubit. ACS Cent. Sci. 2015, 1, 488492,  DOI: 10.1021/acscentsci.5b00338
  57. 57
    Ghirri, A.; Bonizzoni, C.; Troiani, F.; Buccheri, N.; Beverina, L.; Cassinese, A.; Affronte, M. Coherently Coupling Distinct Spin Ensembles through a High-Tc Superconducting Resonator. Phys. Rev. A: At., Mol., Opt. Phys. 2016, 93, 063855,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.93.063855
  58. 58
    Mergenthaler, M.; Liu, J.; Le Roy, J. J.; Ares, N.; Thompson, A. L.; Bogani, L.; Luis, F.; Blundell, S. J.; Lancaster, T.; Ardavan, A.; Briggs, G. A. D.; Leek, P. J.; Laird, E. A. Strong Coupling of Microwave Photons to Antiferromagnetic Fluctuations in an Organic Magnet. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2017, 119, 147701,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.147701
  59. 59
    Bonizzoni, C.; Ghirri, A.; Atzori, M.; Sorace, L.; Sessoli, R.; Affronte, M. Coherent Coupling between Vanadyl Phthalocyanine Spin Ensemble and Microwave Photons: Towards Integration of Molecular Spin Qubits into Quantum Circuits. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 13096,  DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-13271-w
  60. 60
    Horcas, I.; Fernández, R. WSXM: A Software for Scanning Probe Microscopy and a Tool for Nanotechnology. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2007, 78, 013705,  DOI: 10.1063/1.2432410
  61. 61
    Nečas, D.; Klapetek, P. Gwyddion: An Open-Source Software for SPM Data Analysis. Centr. Eur. J. Phys. 2012, 10, 181188,  DOI: 10.2478/s11534-011-0096-2
  62. 62
    Fano, U. Effects of Configuration Interaction on Intensities and phase Shifts. Phys. Rev. 1961, 124, 18661878,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRev.124.1866

Cited By

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

This article is cited by 32 publications.

  1. Alexandra A. Fursina, Alexander Sinitskii. Toward Molecular Spin Qubit Devices: Integration of Magnetic Molecules into Solid-State Devices. ACS Applied Electronic Materials 2023, 5 (7) , 3531-3545. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaelm.3c00472
  2. Selena J. Lockyer, Alessandro Chiesa, Adam Brookfield, Grigore A. Timco, George F. S. Whitehead, Eric J. L. McInnes, Stefano Carretta, Richard E. P. Winpenny. Five-Spin Supramolecule for Simulating Quantum Decoherence of Bell States. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2022, 144 (35) , 16086-16092. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.2c06384
  3. Christoph W. Zollitsch, Safe Khan, Vu Thanh Trung Nam, Ivan A. Verzhbitskiy, Dimitrios Sagkovits, James O’Sullivan, Oscar W. Kennedy, Mara Strungaru, Elton J. G. Santos, John J. L. Morton, Goki Eda, Hidekazu Kurebayashi. Probing spin dynamics of ultra-thin van der Waals magnets via photon-magnon coupling. Nature Communications 2023, 14 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-38322-x
  4. Gerliz M. Gutiérrez-Finol, Silvia Giménez-Santamarina, Ziqi Hu, Lorena E. Rosaleny, Salvador Cardona-Serra, Alejandro Gaita-Ariño. Lanthanide molecular nanomagnets as probabilistic bits. npj Computational Materials 2023, 9 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-023-01149-7
  5. Inés Tejedor, Ainhoa Urtizberea, Eva Natividad, Jesús I. Martínez, Ignacio Gascón, Olivier Roubeau. Dilute Gd hydroxycarbonate particles for localized spin qubit integration. Materials Horizons 2023, 10 (11) , 5214-5222. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3MH01201H
  6. Yu Wang, Wenjie Dou. Nonadiabatic dynamics near metal surfaces under Floquet engineering: Floquet electronic friction vs Floquet surface hopping. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2023, 159 (9) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0161292
  7. Chunli Tang, Laith Alahmed, Muntasir Mahdi, Yuzan Xiong, Jerad Inman, Nathan J. McLaughlin, Christoph Zollitsch, Tae Hee Kim, Chunhui Rita Du, Hidekazu Kurebayashi, Elton J.G. Santos, Wei Zhang, Peng Li, Wencan Jin. Spin dynamics in van der Waals magnetic systems. Physics Reports 2023, 1032 , 1-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2023.09.002
  8. A. Chiesa, S. Roca, S. Chicco, M.C. de Ory, A. Gómez-León, A. Gomez, D. Zueco, F. Luis, S. Carretta. Blueprint for a Molecular-Spin Quantum Processor. Physical Review Applied 2023, 19 (6) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.19.064060
  9. Lorenzo Tesi, Friedrich Stemmler, Mario Winkler, Sherri S. Y. Liu, Saunak Das, Xiuming Sun, Michael Zharnikov, Sabine Ludwigs, Joris van Slageren. Modular Approach to Creating Functionalized Surface Arrays of Molecular Qubits. Advanced Materials 2023, 35 (10) https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202208998
  10. José María De Teresa. Nanoscale direct-write fabrication of superconducting devices for application in quantum technologies. Materials for Quantum Technology 2023, 3 (1) , 013001. https://doi.org/10.1088/2633-4356/acbefb
  11. Alessandro Lunghi. Spin-Phonon Relaxation in Magnetic Molecules: Theory, Predictions and Insights. 2023, 219-289. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-31038-6_6
  12. Sergio Martínez-Losa del Rincón, Ignacio Gimeno, Jorge Pérez-Bailón, Victor Rollano, Fernando Luis, David Zueco, María José Martínez-Pérez. Measuring the Magnon-Photon Coupling in Shaped Ferromagnets: Tuning of the Resonance Frequency. Physical Review Applied 2023, 19 (1) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.19.014002
  13. Jorge Pérez-Bailón, Miguel Tarancón, Santiago Celma, Carlos Sánchez-Azqueta. Cryogenic Measurement of CMOS Devices for Quantum Technologies. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement 2023, 72 , 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2023.3325446
  14. Giulia Serrano, Lorenzo Poggini, Giuseppe Cucinotta, Andrea Luigi Sorrentino, Niccolò Giaconi, Brunetto Cortigiani, Danilo Longo, Edwige Otero, Philippe Sainctavit, Andrea Caneschi, Matteo Mannini, Roberta Sessoli. Magnetic molecules as local sensors of topological hysteresis of superconductors. Nature Communications 2022, 13 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-31320-5
  15. Victor Rollano, Marina C. de Ory, Christian D. Buch, Marcos Rubín-Osanz, David Zueco, Carlos Sánchez-Azqueta, Alessandro Chiesa, Daniel Granados, Stefano Carretta, Alicia Gomez, Stergios Piligkos, Fernando Luis. High cooperativity coupling to nuclear spins on a circuit quantum electrodynamics architecture. Communications Physics 2022, 5 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s42005-022-01017-8
  16. Claudio Bonizzoni, Mirco Tincani, Fabio Santanni, Marco Affronte. Machine-Learning-Assisted Manipulation and Readout of Molecular Spin Qubits. Physical Review Applied 2022, 18 (6) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.18.064074
  17. Alicia Forment-Aliaga, Alejandro Gaita-Ariño. Chiral, magnetic, molecule-based materials: A chemical path toward spintronics and quantum nanodevices. Journal of Applied Physics 2022, 132 (18) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0118582
  18. M. Chizzini, L. Crippa, A. Chiesa, F. Tacchino, F. Petiziol, I. Tavernelli, P. Santini, S. Carretta. Molecular nanomagnets with competing interactions as optimal units for qudit-based quantum computation. Physical Review Research 2022, 4 (4) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.4.043135
  19. Nasim Obata, Yuya Mikami, Hiroaki Yoshioka, Yuji Oki. Embedding Optical Microcavities in Nanoporous SiO 2 Film via Infill Inkjet Printing. Advanced Photonics Research 2022, 3 (8) https://doi.org/10.1002/adpr.202200018
  20. Álvaro Gómez-León. Multiqudit interactions in molecular spins. Physical Review A 2022, 106 (2) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.106.022609
  21. Juan Román-Roche, David Zueco. Effective theory for matter in non-perturbative cavity QED. SciPost Physics Lecture Notes 2022, https://doi.org/10.21468/SciPostPhysLectNotes.50
  22. Christina Psaroudaki, Gil Refael. Photon pumping in a weakly-driven quantum cavity–spin system. Annals of Physics 2021, 435 , 168553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aop.2021.168553
  23. Yi Yu, Suman Mallick, Mao Wang, Karl Börjesson. Barrier-free reverse-intersystem crossing in organic molecules by strong light-matter coupling. Nature Communications 2021, 12 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-23481-6
  24. F. Petiziol, A. Chiesa, S. Wimberger, P. Santini, S. Carretta. Counteracting dephasing in Molecular Nanomagnets by optimized qudit encodings. npj Quantum Information 2021, 7 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41534-021-00466-3
  25. Juan Román-Roche, Fernando Luis, David Zueco. Photon Condensation and Enhanced Magnetism in Cavity QED. Physical Review Letters 2021, 127 (16) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.167201
  26. F. Tacchino, A. Chiesa, R. Sessoli, I. Tavernelli, S. Carretta. A proposal for using molecular spin qudits as quantum simulators of light–matter interactions. Journal of Materials Chemistry C 2021, 9 (32) , 10266-10275. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1TC00851J
  27. Samuel Lenz, Dennis König, David Hunger, Joris van Slageren. Room‐Temperature Quantum Memories Based on Molecular Electron Spin Ensembles. Advanced Materials 2021, 33 (30) https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202101673
  28. S. Carretta, D. Zueco, A. Chiesa, Á. Gómez-León, F. Luis. A perspective on scaling up quantum computation with molecular spins. Applied Physics Letters 2021, 118 (24) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0053378
  29. Ignacio Gimeno, Ainhoa Urtizberea, Juan Román-Roche, David Zueco, Agustín Camón, Pablo J. Alonso, Olivier Roubeau, Fernando Luis. Broad-band spectroscopy of a vanadyl porphyrin: a model electronuclear spin qudit. Chemical Science 2021, 12 (15) , 5621-5630. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1SC00564B
  30. Claudio Bonizzoni, Alberto Ghirri, Fabio Santanni, Matteo Atzori, Lorenzo Sorace, Roberta Sessoli, Marco Affronte. Storage and retrieval of microwave pulses with molecular spin ensembles. npj Quantum Information 2020, 6 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41534-020-00296-9
  31. Fernando Luis, Pablo J. Alonso, Olivier Roubeau, Verónica Velasco, David Zueco, David Aguilà, Jesús I. Martínez, Leoní A. Barrios, Guillem Aromí. A dissymmetric [Gd2] coordination molecular dimer hosting six addressable spin qubits. Communications Chemistry 2020, 3 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s42004-020-00422-w
  32. Samuel Lenz, David Hunger, Joris van Slageren. Strong coupling between resonators and spin ensembles in the presence of exchange couplings. Chemical Communications 2020, 56 (84) , 12837-12840. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0CC04841K
  • Abstract

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. (A) Scanning electron microscopy image of the central line of a superconducting coplanar resonator. The line was thinned down to a width of about 158 nm by focused ion beam nanolithography. (B) Color plot of the photon magnetic field in the neighborhood of this constriction, calculated with a finite-element simulation software. (35) (C) Structure of a DPPH free-radical molecule, with spin S = 1/2 and g = 2 (left) and optical microscopy image of the constriction after the deposition of DPPH by means of the tip of an Atomic Force Microscope (AFM, right). (D) AFM image of the constriction taken before and after the molecules were deposited and the solvent had evaporated.

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. (Top) Color scale plots of the microwave transmission through 1.4 GHz on-chip superconducting resonators with a 14 μm wide central line (A) and with a 158 nm wide constriction (B) coupled to a DPPH deposit with N ≈ 5 × 109 molecules, corresponding to Neff ≈ 4 × 107 spins effectively coupled to the resonator at T = 4.2 K. The red dashed lines mark the position of the resonance frequency at each magnetic field. The inset in B shows transmission versus frequency data near resonance at the field values indicated by arrows, evidencing the detection of a net absorption (lower transmission and broader resonance) when the spins get into mutual resonance with the circuit. (Bottom) Magnetic field dependence of the resonance width κ for the same resonators (C without and D with constriction) coupled to ensembles of DPPH molecules of varying size. Solid lines are least-squares fits based on eq 1.

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. Collective spin-photon coupling of ensembles of free-radical molecules to coplanar resonators with a 14 μm wide transmission line (top) and a 158 nm constriction (bottom). The solid lines are least-squares fits to a linear dependence on the square root of the effective number of spins that are coupled to the devices at T = 4.2 K, as predicted by eq 2. The bottom panel compares both fits to highlight the coupling enhancement generated by the constriction.

    Figure 4

    Figure 4. AFM topographic map (A) and SEM image (B) of the region near a 42 nm wide nanoconstriction. (C and D) Color maps of the number of DPPH molecules deposited on each location and of the estimated single spin to photon couplings, respectively. The latter maps have been calculated with a discretization of space into 3 × 3 × 3 nm3 cubic cells. The number of free-radical molecules deposited in this area amounts to approximately N = 1.6 × 108, and the collective coupling estimated from the simulations is GN/2π ≃ 2.0 MHz at T = 44 mK and 2.5 MHz at T = 0.

    Figure 5

    Figure 5. (A) Color plot of the microwave transmission, measured at T = 44 mK, through a superconducting resonator with a 42 nm wide constriction in its central transmission line and coupled to an ensemble of N ≃ 1.6 × 108 free-radical molecules (corresponding to Neff ≃ 108 spins effectively coupled to the resonator). (B) Color plot of the microwave transmission calculated for a collective coupling GN/2π = 2.0 MHz, as follows from the simulations described in Figure 4, and a spin line width γ = 65 MHz. (C) Magnetic field dependence of the resonance width κ for the same device measured at different temperatures. Solid lines are least-squares fits using eq 2. (D) Temperature dependence of GN extracted from these experiments. (E) Same data plotted as a function of the (temperature dependent) effective number of spins coupled to the resonator , where is the spin polarization. The solid lines are least-squares fits based on eq 2 that extrapolate to GN/2π ≃ 2.3 MHz for T → 0 (when NeffN).

    Figure 6

    Figure 6. Dependence of the average single spin to single photon coupling on the width of the central transmission line of the resonator, showing the enhancement obtained by reducing the latter down to the region of (tens of) nanometers. The lines are calculations of the coupling of a spin located over the constriction, at three different heights z, as illustrated by the figure in the inset.

  • References

    ARTICLE SECTIONS
    Jump To

    This article references 62 other publications.

    1. 1
      Wallraff, A.; Schuster, D. I.; Blais, A.; Frunzio, L.; Huang, R.-S.; Majer, J.; Kumar, S.; Girvin, S. M.; Schoelkopf, R. J. Strong Coupling of a Single Photon to a Superconducting Qubit Using Circuit Quantum Electrodynamics. Nature 2004, 431, 162167,  DOI: 10.1038/nature02851
    2. 2
      Göppl, M.; Fragner, A.; Baur, M.; Bianchetti, R.; Filipp, S.; Fink, J. M.; Leek, P. J.; Puebla, G.; Steffen, L.; Wallraff, A. Coplanar Waveguide Resonators for Circuit Quantum Electrodynamics. J. Appl. Phys. 2008, 104, 113904,  DOI: 10.1063/1.3010859
    3. 3
      Bienfait, A.; Pla, A. A.; Kubo, Y.; Stern, M.; Zhou, X.; Lo, C. C.; Weis, C. D.; Schenkel, T.; Thewalt, M. L. W.; Vion, D.; Esteve, D.; Julsgaard, B.; Mølmer, K.; Morton, J. J. L.; Bertet, P. Reaching the Quantum Limit of Sensitivity in Electron Spin Resonance. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2016, 11, 253257,  DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2015.282
    4. 4
      Eichler, C.; Sigillito, A. J.; Lyon, S. A.; Petta, J. R. Electron Spin Resonance at the Level of 104 Spins Using Low Impedance Superconducting Resonators. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2017, 118, 037701,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.037701
    5. 5
      Probst, S.; Bienfait, A.; Campagne-Ibarcq, P.; Pla, J. J.; Albanese, B.; Da Silva Barbosa, J. F.; Schenkel, T.; Vion, D.; Esteve, D.; Mølmer, K.; Morton, J. J. L.; Heeres, R.; Bertet, P. Inductive-Detection Electron-Spin Resonance Spectroscopy with 65 Spins/Hz Sensitivity. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2017, 111, 202604,  DOI: 10.1063/1.5002540
    6. 6
      Sarabi, B.; Huang, P.; Zimmerman, N. M. Possible Hundredfold Enhancement in the Direct Magnetic Coupling of a Single-Atom Electron Spin to a Circuit Resonator. Phys. Rev. Appl. 2019, 11, 014001,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.11.014001
    7. 7
      Blais, A.; Huang, R.-S.; Wallraff, A.; Girvin, S. M.; Schoelkopf, R. J. Cavity Quantum Electrodynamics for Superconducting Electrical Circuits: An Architecture for Quantum Computation. Phys. Rev. A: At., Mol., Opt. Phys. 2004, 69, 062320,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.69.062320
    8. 8
      Majer, J.; Chow, J. M.; Gambetta, J. M.; Koch, J.; Johnson, B. R.; Schreier, J. A.; Frunzio, L.; Schuster, D. I.; Houck, A. A.; Wallraff, A.; Blais, A.; Devoret, M. H.; Girvin, S. M.; Schoelkopf, R. J. Coupling Superconducting Qubits via a Cavity Bus. Nature 2007, 449, 443447,  DOI: 10.1038/nature06184
    9. 9
      Schoelkopf, R. J.; Girvin, S. M. Wiring Up Quantum Systems. Nature 2008, 451, 664669,  DOI: 10.1038/451664a
    10. 10
      Imamoǧlu, A. Cavity QED Based on Collective Magnetic Dipole Coupling: Spin Ensembles as Hybrid Two-Level Systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009, 102, 083602,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.083602
    11. 11
      Wesenberg, J. H.; Ardavan, A.; Briggs, G. A. D.; Morton, J. J. L.; Schoelkopf, R. J.; Schuster, D. I.; Mølmer, K. Quantum Computing with an Electron Spin Ensemble. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009, 103, 070502,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.070502
    12. 12
      Schuster, D. I.; Sears, A. P.; Ginossar, E.; DiCarlo, L.; Frunzio, L.; Morton, J. J. L.; Wu, H.; Briggs, G. A. D.; Buckley, B. B.; Awschalom, D. D.; Schoelkopf, R. J. High-Cooperativity Coupling of Electron-Spin Ensembles to Superconducting Cavities. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2010, 105, 140501,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.140501
    13. 13
      Kubo, Y.; Ong, F. R.; Bertet, P.; Vion, D.; Jacques, V.; Zheng, D.; Dréau, A.; Roch, J.-F.; Auffeves, A.; Jelezko, F.; Wrachtrup, J.; Barthe, M. F.; Bergonzo, P.; Esteve, D. Strong Coupling of a Spin Ensemble to a Superconducting Resonator. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2010, 105, 140502,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.140502
    14. 14
      Wu, H.; George, R. E.; Wesenberg, J. H.; Mølmer, K.; Schuster, D. I.; Schoelkopf, R. J.; Itoh, K. M.; Ardavan, A.; Morton, J. J. L.; Briggs, G. A. D. Storage of Multiple Coherent Microwave Excitations in an Electron Spin Ensemble. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2010, 105, 140503,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.140503
    15. 15
      Chiorescu, I.; Groll, N.; Bertaina, S.; Mori, T.; Miyashita, S. Magnetic Strong Coupling in a Spin-Photon System and Transition to Classical Regime. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2010, 82, 024413,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.82.024413
    16. 16
      Jenkins, M. D.; Zueco, D.; Roubeau, O.; Aromí, G.; Majer, J.; Luis, F. A Scalable Architecture for Quantum Computation with Molecular Nanomagnets. Dalton Trans 2016, 45, 1668216693,  DOI: 10.1039/C6DT02664H
    17. 17
      Narkowicz, R.; Suter, D.; Stonies, R. Planar Microresonators for EPR Experiments. J. Magn. Reson. 2005, 175, 275284,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jmr.2005.04.014
    18. 18
      Narkowicz, R.; Suter, D.; Niemeyer, I. Scaling of Sensitivity and Efficiency in Planar Microresonators for Electron Spin Resonance. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2008, 79, 084702,  DOI: 10.1063/1.2964926
    19. 19
      Banholzer, A.; Narkowicz, R.; Hassel, C.; Meckenstock, R.; Stienen, S.; Posth, O.; Suter, D.; Farle, M.; Lindner, J. Visualization of Spin Dynamics in Single Nanosized Magnetic Elements. Nanotechnology 2011, 22, 295713,  DOI: 10.1088/0957-4484/22/29/295713
    20. 20
      Jenkins, M. D.; Hümmer, T.; Martínez-Pérez, M. J.; García-Ripoll, J.; Zueco, D.; Luis, F. Coupling Single-Molecule Magnets to Quantum Circuits. New J. Phys. 2013, 15, 095007,  DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/15/9/095007
    21. 21
      Jenkins, M. D.; Naether, U.; Ciria, M.; Sesé, J.; Atkinson, J.; Sánchez-Azqueta, C.; del Barco, E.; Majer, J.; Zueco, D.; Luis, F. Nanoscale Constrictions in Superconducting Coplanar Waveguide Resonators. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2014, 105, 162601,  DOI: 10.1063/1.4899141
    22. 22
      Haikka, P.; Kubo, Y.; Bienfait, A.; Bertet, P.; Mølmer, K. Proposal for Detecting a Single Electron Spin in a Microwave Resonator. Phys. Rev. A: At., Mol., Opt. Phys. 2017, 95, 022306,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.95.022306
    23. 23
      Mannini, M.; Pineider, F.; Sainctavit, P.; Danieli, C.; Otero, E.; Sciancalepore, C.; Talarico, A. M.; Arrio, M.-A.; Cornia, A.; Gatteschi, D.; Sessoli, R. Magnetic Memory of a Single-Molecule Quantum Magnet Wired to a Gold Surface. Nat. Mater. 2009, 8, 194197,  DOI: 10.1038/nmat2374
    24. 24
      Mannini, M.; Pineider, F.; Danieli, C.; Totti, F.; Sorace, L.; Sainctavit, P.; Arrio, M.-A.; Otero, E.; Joly, L.; Cezar, J. C.; Cornia, A.; Sessoli, R. Quantum Tunnelling of the Magnetization in a Monolayer of Oriented Single-Molecule Magnets. Nature 2010, 468, 417421,  DOI: 10.1038/nature09478
    25. 25
      Domingo, N.; Bellido, E.; Ruiz-Molina, D. Advances on Structuring, Integration and Magnetic Characterization of Molecular Nanomagnets on Surfaces and Devices. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 258302,  DOI: 10.1039/C1CS15096K
    26. 26
      Thiele, S.; Balestro, F.; Ballou, R.; Klyatskaya, S.; Ruben, M.; Wernsdorfer, W. Electrically Driven Nuclear Spin Resonance in Single-Molecule Magnets. Science 2014, 344, 11351138,  DOI: 10.1126/science.1249802
    27. 27
      Malavolti, L.; Briganti, M.; Hänze, M.; Serrano, G.; Cimatti, I.; McMurtrie, G.; Otero, E.; Ohresser, P.; Totti, F.; Mannini, M.; Sessoli, R.; Loth, S. Tunable Spin-Superconductor Coupling of Spin 1/2 Vanadyl Phthalocyanine Molecules. Nano Lett. 2018, 18, 7955,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b03921
    28. 28
      Urtizberea, A.; Natividad, E.; Alonso, P. J.; Pérez-Martínez, L.; Andrés, M. A.; Gascón, I.; Gimeno, I.; Luis, F.; Roubeau, O. Vanadyl Spin Qubit 2D Arrays and their Integration on Superconducting Resonators. Mater. Horiz. 2020, 7, 885897,  DOI: 10.1039/C9MH01594A
    29. 29
      Leuenberger, M.; Loss, D. Quantum Computing in Molecular Magnets. Nature 2001, 410, 789793,  DOI: 10.1038/35071024
    30. 30
      Troiani, F.; Affronte, M. Molecular Spins for Quantum Information Technologies. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011, 40, 31193129,  DOI: 10.1039/c0cs00158a
    31. 31
      Aromí, G.; Aguilà, D.; Gamez, P.; Luis, F.; Roubeau, O. Design of Magnetic Coordination Complexes for Quantum Computing. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 537546,  DOI: 10.1039/C1CS15115K
    32. 32
      Moreno-Pineda, E.; Godfrin, C.; Balestro, F.; Wernsdorfer, W.; Ruben, M. Molecular Spin Qudits for Quantum Algorithms. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018, 47, 501513,  DOI: 10.1039/C5CS00933B
    33. 33
      Gaita-Ariño, A.; Luis, F.; Hill, S.; Coronado, E. Molecular Spins for Quantum Computation. Nat. Chem. 2019, 11, 301309,  DOI: 10.1038/s41557-019-0232-y
    34. 34
      Atzori, M.; Sessoli, R. The Second Quantum Revolution: Role and Challenges of Molecular Chemistry. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 1133911352,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.9b00984
    35. 35
      Khapaev, M. M.; Kupriyanov, M. Y.; Goldobin, E.; Siegel, M. Current Distribution Simulation for Superconducting Multi-Layered Structures. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 2003, 16, 2427,  DOI: 10.1088/0953-2048/16/1/305
    36. 36
      Weil, J. A.; Anderson, J. K. 1039. The Determination and Reaction of 2,2-Diphenyl-1-Picrylhydrazyl with Thiosalicylic Acid. J. Chem. Soc. 1965, 55675570,  DOI: 10.1039/jr9650005567
    37. 37
      Yordanov, N. D. Is Our Knowledge about the Chemical and Physical Properties of DPPH Enough to Consider it as a Primary Standard for Quantitative EPR Spectrometry?. Appl. Magn. Reson. 1996, 10, 339350,  DOI: 10.1007/BF03163117
    38. 38
      Žilić, D.; Pajić, D.; Jurić, M.; Molčanov, K.; Rakvin, B.; Planinić, P.; Zadro, K. Single Crystals of DPPH Grown from Diethyl Ether and Carbon Disulfide Solutions – Crystal Structures, IR, EPR and Magnetization Studies. J. Magn. Reson. 2010, 207, 3441,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jmr.2010.08.005
    39. 39
      Anderson, P. W.; Weiss, P. R. Exchange Narrowing in Paramagnetic Resonance. Rev. Mod. Phys. 1953, 25, 269276,  DOI: 10.1103/RevModPhys.25.269
    40. 40
      Höcherl, G.; Wolf, H. C. Zur Konzentrationsabhängigkeit der Elektronenspin-Relaxationszeiten von Diphenyl-Picryl-Hydrazyl in fester Phase. Eur. Phys. J. A 1965, 183, 341351,  DOI: 10.1007/BF01380763
    41. 41
      Piner, R. D.; Zhu, J.; Xu, F.; Hong, S.; Mirkin, C. A. ”Dip-Pen” Nanolithography. Science 1999, 283, 661663,  DOI: 10.1126/science.283.5402.661
    42. 42
      Bellido, E.; de Miguel, R.; Ruiz-Molina, D.; Lostao, A.; Maspoch, D. Controlling the Number of Proteins with Dip-Pen Nanolitography. Adv. Mater. 2010, 22, 352355,  DOI: 10.1002/adma.200902372
    43. 43
      Martínez-Pérez, M. J.; Bellido, E.; de Miguel, R.; Sesé, J.; Lostao, A.; Gómez-Moreno, C.; Drung, D.; Schurig, T.; Ruiz-Molina, D.; Luis, F. Alternating Current Magnetic Susceptibility of a Molecular Magnet Submonolayer Directly Patterned onto a Micro Superconducting Quantum Interference Device. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2011, 99, 032504,  DOI: 10.1063/1.3609859
    44. 44
      Bellido, E.; González-Monje, P.; Repollés, A.; Jenkins, M.; Sesé, J.; Drung, D.; Schurig, T.; Awaga, K.; Luis, F.; Ruiz-Molina, D. Mn12 Single Molecule Magnets Deposited on μ-SQUID Sensors: the Role of Interphases and Structural Modifications. Nanoscale 2013, 5, 1256512573,  DOI: 10.1039/c3nr02359a
    45. 45
      Bushev, P.; Feofanov, A. K.; Rotzinger, H.; Protopopov, I.; Cole, J. H.; Wilson, C. M.; Fischer, G.; Lukashenko, A.; Ustinov, A. V. Ultralow-Power Spectroscopy of a Rare-Earth Spin Ensemble Using a Superconducting Resonator. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2011, 84, 060501,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.84.060501
    46. 46
      Tavis, M.; Cummings, F. W. Exact Solution for an N-Molecule-Radiation-Field Hamiltonian. Phys. Rev. 1968, 170, 379384,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRev.170.379
    47. 47
      Hümmer, T.; Reuther, G. M.; Hänggi, P.; Zueco, D. Nonequilibrium Phases in Hybrid Arrays with Flux Qubits and Nitrogen-Vacancy Centers. Phys. Rev. A: At., Mol., Opt. Phys. 2012, 85, 052320,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.85.052320
    48. 48
      Martínez-Pérez, M. J.; Zueco, D. Strong Coupling of a Single Photon to a Magnetic Vortex. ACS Photonics 2019, 6, 360367,  DOI: 10.1021/acsphotonics.8b00954
    49. 49
      Warner, M.; Din, S.; Tupitsyn, I. S.; Morley, G. W.; Stoneham, A.; Gardener, J. A.; Wu, Z.; Fisher, A. J.; Heutz, S.; Kay, C. W. M.; Aeppli, G. Ptential fot Spin-Based Information Processing in a Thin-Film Molecular Semiconductor. Nature 2013, 503, 504508,  DOI: 10.1038/nature12597
    50. 50
      Slota, M.; Keerthi, A.; Myers, W. K.; Tretyakov, E.; Baumgarten, M.; Ardavan, A.; Sadeghi, H.; Lambert, C. J.; Narita, A.; Müllen, K.; Bogani, L. Magnetic Edge States and Coherent Manipulation of Graphene Nanoribbons. Nature 2018, 557, 691695,  DOI: 10.1038/s41586-018-0154-7
    51. 51
      Lombardi, F.; Lodi, A.; Ma, J.; Liu, J.; Slota, M.; Narita, A.; Myers, W. K.; Müllen, K.; Feng, X.; Bogani, L. Quantum Units from the Topological Engineering of Molecular Graphenoids. Science 2019, 366, 11071110,  DOI: 10.1126/science.aay7203
    52. 52
      Ardavan, A.; Rival, O.; Morton, J. J. L.; Blundell, S. J.; Tyryshkin, A. M.; Timco, G. A.; Winpenny, R. E. P. Will Spin-Relaxation Times in Molecular Magnets Permit Quantum Information Processing?. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2007, 98, 057201,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.057201
    53. 53
      Wedge, C. J.; Timco, G. A.; Spielberg, E. T.; George, R. E.; Tuna, F.; Rigby, S.; McInnes, E. J. L.; Winpenny, R. E. P.; Blundell, S. J.; Ardavan, A. Chemical Engineering of Molecular Qubits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2012, 108, 107204,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.107204
    54. 54
      Bader, K.; Dengler, D.; Lenz, S.; Endeward, B.; Jiang, S.-D.; Neugebauer, P.; van Slageren, J. Room Temperature Quantum Coherence in a Potential Molecular Qubit. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 5304,  DOI: 10.1038/ncomms6304
    55. 55
      Shiddiq, M.; Komijani, D.; Duan, Y.; Gaita-Ariño, A.; Coronado, E.; Hill, S. Enhancing Coherence in Molecular Spin Qubits via Atomic Clock Transitions. Nature 2016, 531, 348351,  DOI: 10.1038/nature16984
    56. 56
      Zadrozny, J. M.; Niklas, J.; Poluektov, O. G.; Freedman, D. E. Millisecond Coherence Time in a Tunable Molecular Electronic Spin Qubit. ACS Cent. Sci. 2015, 1, 488492,  DOI: 10.1021/acscentsci.5b00338
    57. 57
      Ghirri, A.; Bonizzoni, C.; Troiani, F.; Buccheri, N.; Beverina, L.; Cassinese, A.; Affronte, M. Coherently Coupling Distinct Spin Ensembles through a High-Tc Superconducting Resonator. Phys. Rev. A: At., Mol., Opt. Phys. 2016, 93, 063855,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.93.063855
    58. 58
      Mergenthaler, M.; Liu, J.; Le Roy, J. J.; Ares, N.; Thompson, A. L.; Bogani, L.; Luis, F.; Blundell, S. J.; Lancaster, T.; Ardavan, A.; Briggs, G. A. D.; Leek, P. J.; Laird, E. A. Strong Coupling of Microwave Photons to Antiferromagnetic Fluctuations in an Organic Magnet. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2017, 119, 147701,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.147701
    59. 59
      Bonizzoni, C.; Ghirri, A.; Atzori, M.; Sorace, L.; Sessoli, R.; Affronte, M. Coherent Coupling between Vanadyl Phthalocyanine Spin Ensemble and Microwave Photons: Towards Integration of Molecular Spin Qubits into Quantum Circuits. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 13096,  DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-13271-w
    60. 60
      Horcas, I.; Fernández, R. WSXM: A Software for Scanning Probe Microscopy and a Tool for Nanotechnology. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2007, 78, 013705,  DOI: 10.1063/1.2432410
    61. 61
      Nečas, D.; Klapetek, P. Gwyddion: An Open-Source Software for SPM Data Analysis. Centr. Eur. J. Phys. 2012, 10, 181188,  DOI: 10.2478/s11534-011-0096-2
    62. 62
      Fano, U. Effects of Configuration Interaction on Intensities and phase Shifts. Phys. Rev. 1961, 124, 18661878,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRev.124.1866
  • Supporting Information

    Supporting Information

    ARTICLE SECTIONS
    Jump To

    The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsnano.0c03167.

    • Images of the fabrication steps of resonators and of superconducting nanoconstrictions, tests results of these devices, details and additional images of the deposition of free-radical spin ensembles by DPN and their characterization by means of SEM and AFM, results of additional microwave transmission experiments, additional information, backed with plots, on how the number of molecules effectively coupled to each device has been estimated and how the spin-photon coupling has been simulated (PDF)


    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

You’ve supercharged your research process with ACS and Mendeley!

STEP 1:
Click to create an ACS ID

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

MENDELEY PAIRING EXPIRED
Your Mendeley pairing has expired. Please reconnect