ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
Crystal-to-Crystal Transitions in Binary Mixtures of Soft Colloids
My Activity
  • Open Access
Article

Crystal-to-Crystal Transitions in Binary Mixtures of Soft Colloids
Click to copy article linkArticle link copied!

Open PDFSupporting Information (1)

ACS Nano

Cite this: ACS Nano 2020, 14, 11, 14861–14868
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.0c03966
Published November 14, 2020

Copyright © 2020 American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under CC-BY.

Abstract

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

In this article, we demonstrate a method for inducing reversible crystal-to-crystal transitions in binary mixtures of soft colloidal particles. Through a controlled decrease of salinity and increasingly dominating electrostatic interactions, a single sample is shown to reversibly organize into entropic crystals, electrostatic attraction-dominated crystals, or aggregated gels, which we quantify using microscopy and image analysis. We furthermore analyze crystalline structures with bond order analysis to discern between two crystal phases. We observe the different phases using a sample holder geometry that allows both in situ salinity control and imaging through confocal laser scanning microscopy and apply a synthesis method producing particles with high resolvability in microscopy with control over particle size. The particle softness provides for an enhanced crystallization speed, while altering the re-entrant melting behavior as compared to hard sphere systems. This work thus provides several tools for use in the reproducible manufacture and analysis of binary colloidal crystals.

Copyright © 2020 American Chemical Society
Colloids are often used as model systems in order to study various phenomena in condensed matter physics. (1) Particular attention has been devoted to the effects that interaction potentials have on the phase behavior of colloids (2,3) and to processes such as crystallization (4−8) or the mechanisms and kinetic pathways of fluid–crystal and crystal–crystal transitions. (9−11) In these contexts, colloids have been employed as an analogue of atomic systems, so that the relevant length and time scales are in a range that makes experimental investigation much simpler. The earliest investigations primarily used standard “hard” colloids such as sterically stabilized PMMA spheres. (12,13) Later, more complex particles have been studied, to explore for instance the influence of long-range electrostatic repulsions (14,15) or the effect of a short-range attraction resulting, for example, from depletion interactions in colloid–polymer mixtures. (2,16,17)
The majority of these investigations were performed with approximately monodisperse particles. Inspired by analogies with “real” atomic materials such as alloys and salts, numerous attempts have also been made to investigate binary mixtures. (18−27) However, investigating equilibrium structures in dense binary mixtures of hard spheres remains difficult, as nucleation and crystal growth may be very slow or hindered due to vitrification of the sample. (28,29) Moreover, the lack of simple annealing mechanisms and the resulting formation of crystals with many small domains make a determination of the 3D crystal structure more difficult with diffraction experiments. (30,31)
Here, the recent development of using soft particles as model systems (32−34) provides us with tools that can overcome several of these hurdles. Their weak repulsions temporarily allow particle overlap, allowing particles to overcome local energy minima and promoting crystal growth speed compared to hard spheres. (28,35) Crystallization involving soft particles has been shown to possess a larger tolerance for polydispersity, (36) and many soft particle types have inherently tunable interaction potentials, (37,38) some as a function of externally controllable parameters such as temperature. (39) Furthermore, many soft systems can be extensively modified to tailor particle behavior or simplify analysis. (40−43) For example, modifying particles with fluorescent labels allows for direct imaging using confocal scanning laser microscopy, which provides sufficient information to determine phase behavior and specific organizations and to quantify kinetics. (44,45)
In this article, we describe several crystalline phases and a crystal-to-crystal transition. We employ oppositely charged microgel particles synthesized via a synthesis method that emphasizes discernibility between particles in confocal scanning laser microscopy (CLSM). The softness of the particles allows for crystallization at very high concentrations, (3) and the thermoresponsiveness of the particles allows for additional annealing mechanisms. (46) Furthermore, these systems allow for precise fine-tuning of volume fraction and size ratio. In the absence of electrostatic interactions, i.e., at sufficiently high salt concentrations, the particles interact via soft repulsive forces. (47,48) We employ a sample geometry that allows in situ salinity control during CLSM imaging, and thus a tuning of the electrostatic contributions to the interaction potential. By applying this geometry we can easily control and analyze the phase behavior of these systems as a function of electrostatic attraction strength. Our work experimentally demonstrates the existence of multiple binary soft crystal phases and how the transition between them can be controlled using in situ control over the electrostatic interactions.

Results and Discussion

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

We synthesized core–shell particles with a small fluorescent core and several undyed cross-linked shells. By growing multiple shells, we achieve a thick shell with controllable size that allows good discernibility between individual particles in CLSM, while retaining the corona density distribution similar to a traditional microgel. (48) Particle characteristics can be found in Table 1, with negatively charged pNIPAm particles abbreviated by pN and positively charged pNIPMAm particles by pM.
Table 1. Particles Used in Experiments, with Their Polymer, Dye Type, Colors, Charge Signs, and Hydrodynamic Diameters σH at 20 °C for Final Core–Shell Particles and for Cores Only
polymerabbreviationdyecolorchargeσH(particle) [nm]σH(core) [nm]
pNIPAmpNPM546greennegative28073
pNIPMAmpMPM605redpositive336103
Samples were prepared with partial number densities of ρpN = ρpM = 4 × 1018m–3 and were inserted in a sample cell as in Figure 1, designed to allow controlled in situ variation of the ionic strength during microscopical imaging. Details on design and manufacture can be found in the Materials and Methods section. The reservoir was filled with a KCl solution and left to equilibrate for at least 24 h, kept at a constant temperature of 20 °C.

Figure 1

Figure 1. Cross-section of the sample holder design, not to scale.

In Figure 2A–D, we show CLSM images and their 3D radial distribution functions (RDFs) for four different salinities. The calculated RDFs are split into three components, pN-to-pN, pM-to-pM, and pN-to-pM (equal to pM-to-pN). At relatively high salt concentrations (2.0 × 10–3 M and up, Figure 2A), charges on the particles are sufficiently screened and the system crystallizes into a hexagonal lattice due to entropic forces. The three corresponding RDFs overlap, confirming a random distribution of pN and pM particles in the lattice. It is important to note that this crystal forms despite the size ratio of 0.83 between pN and pM, highlighting the permissiveness of crystallization in soft colloids when it comes to polydispersity (36) as compared to that in hard spheres. (49) Interestingly, the first peak of all RDFs of the high-salt crystal, and thus its lattice spacing, appears at approximately σH(pN), the hydrodynamic diameter of the smaller particle. This implies that for soft binary crystals the smaller particles govern the lattice spacing, especially when considering that the total volume fraction is significantly above the volume fraction of a hexagonal packing of spheres: based on hydrodynamic radii and number densities, the total volume fraction is ∼1.0. This confirms earlier findings, where it has been shown that dopant-quantity microgels with large radii can adopt highly compressed conformations to fit into a crystal with a much smaller lattice spacing. (36)

Figure 2

Figure 2. Analysis of one sample at different salinities. (A–D) CLSM images with their corresponding radial distribution functions (RDFs) of pN-to-pN, pM-to-pM, and pN-to-pM. (A) 2 × 10–3 M KCl, showing entropy-driven crystallinity. (B) 1.5 × 10–3 M KCl, in a fluid phase. (C) 1.25 × 10–3 M KCl, showing electrostatic forces-driven crystallinity. (D) Sample at 1 × 10–3 M KCl, in an electrostatically aggregated gel. (E) Mean-square displacements (MSDs) of pN particles for all salinities, together with a line with a slope proportional to t1 to guide the eye. The MSDs for pM are highly similar to the MSDs of pN. (F) Corresponding P(Zeq) for all salinities. Dashed lines indicate the theoretical values corresponding to AuCu (0.33) and FCC (0.5) crystal values. Each scale bar length is 10 μm.

A decrease in salinity leads to behavior increasingly dominated by electrostatic interactions, ultimately yielding aggregation and phase separation. Reducing salinity to 1.5 × 10–3 M KCl leads to melting of the entropic crystal (Figure 2B), caused by weak electrostatic forces driving oppositely charged particles to interpenetrate, opening free space resulting in fluid behavior. It is interesting to note here that, while colloidal attractions have been shown to lead to re-entrant melting behavior, (50) the particles’ soft repulsive potential and resulting interpenetration will cause such behavior to be enhanced, as compared to incompressible hard sphere systems. Further removal of salt to 1.25 × 10–3 M KCl allows electrostatic forces to overtake entropic contributions and causes the system to recrystallize with a specific pN–pM ordering (Figure 2C). An even further removal of salt induces an additional increase of electrostatic attraction and yields aggregated systems (1.0 × 10–3 M KCl, Figure 2D). The pN-to-pM RDF reflects the increasing electrostatic attractions, with its initial peak appearing at decreasing separations r, reflecting the larger particle interpenetration that occurs upon increasing the electrostatic attraction strength.
Mean square displacements (MSDs) for pN particles at different salinities are shown in Figure 2E and follow the trends as described above. MSDs for pM are highly similar to those of pN and are therefore left out for clarity. At high salinities, particles are strongly caged, with apparent particle motion below the noise threshold for this analysis method; removal of salt to 1.5 × 10–3 M KCl causes cage breaking and fluid-like behavior. The slightly subdiffusive behavior is due to the high density and electrostatic attractions. At 1.25 × 10–3 M KCl, particles are once again caged, but in larger cages than at high salinities due to pN–pM interpenetration. Further removal of salt to 1.0 × 10–3 M KCl causes irreversible aggregation, where displacement is caused by cluster diffusion.
We define Zeq as the total number of nearest neighbors of equal type divided by the total number of nearest neighbors, with P(Zeq) its probability distribution, plotted in Figure 2F. At high salinity, P(Zeq) is symmetric around 0.5, once again reflecting the random distribution of pN and pM particles. The weak attractions at 1.5 × 10–3 M KCl cause a preference for Zeq < 0.5. The electrostatic crystal structure at 1.25 × 10–3 M KCl, as will be discussed later, has four neighbors of equal type and eight neighbors of unequal type, reflected in the P(Zeq) peak at Zeq = 0.33. A further removal of salt and subsequent aggregation leads to a partial loss of preference for unequal particle types, caused by the amorphous nature of the aggregates.
Finally, we note that this behavior is fully reversible: bringing a sample from 2.0 × 10–3 M KCl to 1.0 × 10–3 M KCl and back to 2.0 × 10–3 M KCl causes an entropic crystal to melt, electrostatically aggregate, and re-form into entropic crystals via all described phases at intermediate salinities. Since the return to entropic crystals involves a transition via a fluid phase, remixing occurs while raising salinity, and a random distribution is obtained upon reaching 2.0 × 10–3 M KCl.
The system is thus capable of forming two different crystal structures (Figure 2A and C), and a change of salinity can reversibly induce a switch between these crystal phases. For the high-salt crystal at 2 × 10–3 M (shown in Figures 2A and 3A), a comparison with a theoretical FCC RDF confirms the FCC structure of the crystal, as seen in Figure 3B. In contrast to the high-salt crystal, the particles in the low-salt crystal (shown in Figures 2C and 3C) are no longer randomly distributed throughout the lattice, but preferentially interact with the oppositely charged particles. Accordingly, the different RDFs seen in Figures 3D–F, no longer overlap. These RDFs correspond well with the theoretically predicted AuCu crystal structure, with poor agreement with other AB-type binary crystal structures. A comparison between theoretical RDFs of several AB-type crystals and the experimental RDFs can be found in the Supporting Information. Note that the first peak height for the pN-to-pM RDF is significantly higher than its two equal counterparts, reflecting the strength of the electrostatic interactions that drive AuCu crystallization, overtaking entropic forces that drive FCC crystallization. In Figure 4, unit cells of FCC-type and AuCu-type crystal structures are depicted, made using the visualization software OVITO. (51) The AuCu lattice parameters are identical to FCC lattices (given identical particle sizes), but particle type distributions differ. Our observation of AuCu crystallinity corresponds with theoretical predictions for binary systems of weakly attracting, soft particles with size ratios between approximately 0.75 and 0.85. (52)

Figure 3

Figure 3. CLSM images of the same sample at different salinities, with their corresponding radial distribution functions (RDFs). (A) CLSM image at 2 × 10–3 M KCl. (B) Corresponding RDFs of pN-to-pN, pM-to-pM, and pN-to-pM. The overlapping RDFs illustrate the random distribution of particles throughout the lattice. The RDF peaks are in accordance with the positions and relative magnitudes of those in an FCC lattice (blue, rescaled magnitudes by arbitrary factor for visibility). (C) CLSM image at 1.25 × 10–3 M KCl. (D–F) Corresponding RDF at 1.25 × 10–3 M KCl of (D) pN-to-pN, (E) pM-to-pM, and (F) pN-to-pM. Each RDF is shown with the corresponding peaks for AuCu-type crystals. The scale bar length is 10 μm.

Figure 4

Figure 4. Unit cells of (A) a single particle type FCC and (B) a AuCu crystal. The red particles represent the larger Au atoms.

A common method of determining the crystal phase that a particle belongs to is by calculating local bond order parameters ql. (44,53) This method analyzes the local surrounding of a particle and quantifies its symmetry, with ql being a measure of the local l-fold symmetrical order around a given particle. It is obtained by (54,55)
(1)
where Z(i) is the number of nearest neighbors of particle i, l and m are integer indices, with l ≥ 0 and m = −l, −l + 1, ..., l – 1, l, Ylm(rij) are the spherical harmonics, and rij is a vector pointing from particle i to particle j. qlm(i) is transformed into ql through
(2)
The FCC and AuCu lattice parameters are nearly identical, and the unit cells differ mostly by distribution of particle type; we therefore extend the analysis method by discerning three bond order parameters per particle: ql(all), ql(equal), and ql(unequal), which are the ql calculated considering respectively all particles, only equal-type particles, and only unequal-type particles in the local surrounding. The obtained experimental values were further refined by calculating the average bond order parameter l, (55) given by
(3)
followed by the transformation in eq 2. This step suppresses individual FCC particles that randomly have surroundings similar to AuCu-type crystallinity to be designated as a particle in an AuCu phase. Order parameters for perfect FCC and AuCu crystals with identical lattice parameters are given in Table 2.
Table 2. Theoretical 3D Local Bond Order Parameters for FCC and AuCu Crystalsa
crystalq4q6q8
FCC0.190.570.40
AuCu (all)0.190.570.40
AuCu (equal)0.820.590.79
AuCu (unequal)0.440.570.53
a

ql for AuCu is split into ql(all), ql(equal), and ql(unequal).

We calculate l for particles in 3D CLSM volumes and visualize this by coloring the corresponding Voronoi cells. Average l and standard deviations of FCC and AuCu crystals can be found in the Supporting Information. Slices from this 3D volume are shown in Figure 5, with Figure 5A,B corresponding to 2.0 × 10–3 M KCl and Figure 5C,D corresponding to 1.25 × 10–3 M KCl. While it is clear that this method works well for discerning between crystal phases, it is still sensitive to local ordering and defects. The quality of the bond order analysis benefits from the statistics provided by 3D CLSM data, and 2D microscopy imaging is not sensitive enough to discern between these two crystal structures. One point of interest is the fact that AuCu cells in the FCC lattice (Figure 5B) are generally isolated or only a few cells, while FCC cells in the AuCu lattice (Figure 5D) tend to be connected to other FCC cells. We attribute this to the fact that a single-particle defect in a AuCu lattice affects the local ordering for all surrounding particles, whereas several particles need to cooperate to provide the local organized surrounding of one particle in our FCC lattice. Here, one should consider that varying the ionic strength also changes the free energy landscape, as the interaction potentials change from soft repulsive to attractive, which should also influence the distribution and lifetime of defects.

Figure 5

Figure 5. CLSM image slices from a 3D stack, compared with Voronoi cells colored according to their l. (A, B) FCC crystal at 2.0 × 10–3 M KCl. (C, D) AuCu crystal at 1.25 × 10–3 M KCl. If 4(equal) > 0.45 or 8(equal) > 0.45, AuCu crystallinity is denoted by a blue cell; if 6(all) > 0.35, but 4(equal) < 0.45 and 8(equal) < 0.45, FCC crystallinity is denoted by a red cell; and if 6(all) < 0.35 and 4(equal) < 0.45 or 8(equal) < 0.45, the cell was left white, denoting an amorphous local surrounding.

Conclusions

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

In this work, we have demonstrated the feasibility of binary mixtures of soft colloids for forming multiple crystal phases, including a crystal-to-crystal transition. Combining soft particles with opposite charges yields a pathway to a sequence of structural transitions that can be controlled externally via the ionic strength of the system through a re-entrant crystal transition, i.e., from an entropic crystal, via an intermediate fluid regime, to an electrostatic attraction-driven crystal, and into an amorphous aggregated gel state at even stronger mutual attraction. Control over ionic strength is facilitated by the sample cell design, allowing for in situ access to the effective interaction potential. Particles used in this study were synthesized according to a method that enhances discernibility in CLSM compared to other synthesis procedures, while allowing control over particle size during synthesis. We benefit from the softness of these particles, as they are less prone to becoming trapped in nonequilibrium arrested states at high densities and because of their enhanced nucleation and crystal growth that facilitate in situ studies of liquid–solid and solid–solid transitions. In addition to that, the softness and interpenetrability of the particles alter the re-entrant melting behavior as compared to hard sphere systems. Finally, we have analyzed our results using local bond order parameters adapted for discerning between systems with strong crystal similarity.
It is important to note that the use of these types of binary mixtures allows for an extra dimension of tunability: heating these mixtures has the effect that pN particles decrease in size, whereas pM particles are only slightly affected. (56) By thus manipulating the size ratio, even more crystal phases are expected, and our system provides exceptional control over both temperature and salinity. Thus, the systems introduced here are a good candidate for observing multiple in situ crystal-to-crystal transitions and, therefore, help to bring about a deeper understanding of the kinetics and mechanisms of such transitions.

Materials and Methods

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Chemicals

The monomers used were styrene (99%, contains 4-tert-butylcatechol as polymerization inhibitor, Sigma-Aldrich), N-isopropylacrylamide (97%, NIPAm, Sigma-Aldrich), and N-isopropylmethacrylamide (97%, NIPMAm, Sigma-Aldrich). The inhibitor was removed with active basic Al2O3 (for chromatography, VWR Chemicals). Surfactants used were sodium dodecyl sulfate (99%, SDS, Duchefa) and cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (99%, CTAB, Sigma-Aldrich). Dyes used were pyrromethene 546 (PM546, Exciton) and pyrromethene 605 (PM605, Exciton). Initiators used were potassium persulfate (99%, KPS, Sigma-Aldrich) and 2,2-azobis(2-methylpropionamidine) dihydrochloride (97%, V50, Sigma-Aldrich). Cross-linker was N,N′-methylene-bis-acrylamide (99%, BIS, Sigma-Aldrich).

Synthesis

A core–multishell particle synthesis method was developed combining elements from previous work, (48,57,58) yielding a small fluorescent core and an undyed soft shell, with a corona similar to traditional microgels. (48)
pNIPAm-interlaced polystyrene cores (PS-pN) were synthesized by purging 100 mL of Millipore-quality water (MQ-H2O) with N2 gas for 30 min at room temperature in a round-bottom flask. 27 mL of styrene was run over an Al2O3 column to remove polymerization inhibitor and was added to the round-bottom flask together with 3 g of NIPAm, 200 mg of SDS, and 22 mg of pyrromethene 546. The mixture was stirred and purged for 45 min with N2 at 75 °C, while the mixture was shielded from ambient light. 50 mg of KPS was dissolved in 2 mL of MQ-H2O, degassed, and added instantaneously to the reaction mixture. The mixture was left stirring for 24 h, filtered through glass wool, and purified through dialysis against MQ-H2O over the course of 2 weeks. Concentration was performed by centrifugation at 104g and removal of supernatant. pNIPMAm-interlaced polystyrene (PS-pM) cores were synthesized identically but replacing NIPAm with 3 g of NIPMAm, SDS with 100 mg of CTAB, pyrrhomethene 546 with 22 mg of pyrrhomethene 605, and KPS with 50 mg of V50. Dialysis of PS-pM particles was performed against 0.01 M CTAB.
The pNIPAm shells were formed by purging 360 mL of MQ-H2O with N2 gas while stirring for 30 min at room temperature in a round-bottom flask. 2.0 g of NIPAm and 138.8 mg of BIS (5 mol %) were added to the flask, and 3.56 g of 15.9 wt % suspended PS-pN was added to the mixture. The mixture was stirred and purged for 45 min with N2 while stirring at 75 °C, while the mixture was shielded from ambient light. 74.0 mg of KPS was dissolved in 4 mL of MQ-H2O and added dropwise to the solution over the course of 5 min. After an additional 5 min, a solution of 69.4 mg of BIS (2.5 mol %) in 20 mL of MQ-H2O was added dropwise to the mixture over the course of 30 min. After 4 h, the sample was filtered through glass wool and purified. Consecutive shell growths were performed by preparing a degassed reaction mixture with all previously grown core–shell particles suspended in a volume of 80% of the previous reaction volume and addition of 80% of the previously added NIPAm, primary BIS addition (5 mol %), secondary BIS addition (2.5 mol %), and KPS, following identical steps. This is required to compensate for reaction yield and to prevent secondary nucleation. The final shell required no secondary BIS addition, only the addition of 5 mol % BIS. pNIPMAm shells were grown following an identical procedure, but on pS-pM particles with 3.0 g of NIPMAm instead of NIPAm, 123.3 mg of BIS (5 mol %), and 61.7 mg (5 mol %) and 74.0 mg of V50 instead of KPS. Hydrodynamic diameters were determined from dynamic light scattering using a modulated 3D cross-correlation instrument (LS Instruments) with a 660 nm diode-pumped laser.

Sample Preparation

Number densities of stock solutions were obtained through preparing single crystals at appropriate volume fractions, imaging a volume in CLSM, followed by particle counting. Binary microgel dispersions were prepared and mixed at 20 °C and 10–3 M KCl.
Sample holders were prepared as in Figure 1, similar to the ones described by Sato etal. (59) A rigid, composite material (FR-4, glass-reinforced epoxy laminate) slide of dimensions 25 × 75 × 1 mm was centrally perforated with a long, thin hole of 25 × 1 mm. The hole was covered with a dialysis membrane on one side. A capillary was created covering the dialysis membrane by placing two coverslips (5 × 50 × 0.1 mm) parallel on either side of the hole and topped with a third coverslip (25 × 50 × 0.1 mm). The coverslips were glued in place with an air- and water-resistant UV glue (Thorlabs UV glue 83). The opposite side of the composite slide was fitted with a solution reservoir of a volume at least 100 times the capillary volume, with inlet and outlet tubes, and was made air and water tight using hydrophobic, malleable wax. The capillary was rinsed with MQ-H2O and excess water removed before the sample was inserted. It was then sealed with UV glue, and the reservoir was filled. Measurements can be performed with a constant flow continuously refreshing the solution in the reservoir or equilibrated at a given salinity: in this work, the latter method is used, with a minimum equilibration time of 12 h. Reversibility was tested by slowly cycling samples between low and high salinities at least three times, while checking the appearance of all states shown in Figure 2; this was successful for at least three cycles in three separately prepared samples. All samples were placed in a 0.02% (w/v) NaN3 solution for 24 h per week to prevent bacterial growth.

Imaging

Samples were mounted on an inverted CLSM (Leica TCS SP5 tandem scanner) and imaged using a 100×/1.4 NA oil immersion objective. The microscope was mounted in an enclosure that allows for temperature control with a 0.2 °C maximum variance using thermostated air circulation. Using standardized image analysis and particle tracking routines, (60) particle center coordinates were obtained for mean square displacements, radial distribution functions, and nearest-neighbor analyses. The uncertainty in these coordinates is approximately 14 nm, obtained by determining particle centers of immobilized polystyrene particles over time. (61) The particle geometry, with its small fluorescent core and large undyed shell, facilitates the enhanced particle center determination. Particle coordinates were determined using methods described in earlier work (62) for at least 10 z-stacks per different salinity.

Supporting Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsnano.0c03966.

  • Experimental RDFs compared to theoretical AuCu RDF; experimental RDFs compared to theoretical CsCl RDF; experimental RDFs compared to theoretical NaCl RDF; obtained bond order parameters for all particles at 2.0 × 10–3 M KCl; obtained bond order parameters for all particles at 1.25 × 10–3 M KCl (PDF)

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Author Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

  • Corresponding Author
  • Authors
    • Maxime J. Bergman - Department of Physics, University of Fribourg, 1700 Fribourg, Switzerland
    • J. J. Erik Maris - Inorganic Chemistry and Catalysis Group, Utrecht University, 3584 CS Utrecht, The NetherlandsOrcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0003-2591-4864
    • Joakim Stenhammar - Division of Physical Chemistry, Lund University, 221 00 Lund, SwedenOrcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-7543-5549
    • Peter Schurtenberger - Division of Physical Chemistry, Lund University, 221 00 Lund, SwedenLund Institute of advanced Neutron and X-ray Science (LINXS), Lund University, 221 00 Lund, SwedenOrcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-2790-8831
  • Notes
    The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Acknowledgments

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

We gratefully acknowledge financial support from the European Research Council (ERC-339678-COMPASS) and the Swedish Research Council (2015-05449 and 2018-04627).

References

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article references 62 other publications.

  1. 1
    Frenkel, D. Soft Condensed Matter. Phys. A 2002, 313, 131,  DOI: 10.1016/S0378-4371(02)01032-4
  2. 2
    Lekkerkerker, H. N. W.; Poon, W. C. K.; Pusey, P. N.; Stroobants, A.; Warren, P. B. Phase Behaviour of Colloid + Polymer Mixtures. Europhys. Lett. 1992, 20, 559564,  DOI: 10.1209/0295-5075/20/6/015
  3. 3
    Senff, H.; Richtering, W. Temperature Sensitive Microgel Suspensions: Colloidal Phase Behavior and Rheology of Soft Spheres. J. Chem. Phys. 1999, 111, 17051711,  DOI: 10.1063/1.479430
  4. 4
    Aastuen, D. J. W.; Clark, N. A.; Cotter, L. K.; Ackerson, B. J. Nucleation and Growth of Colloidal Crystals. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1986, 57, 1733,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.57.1733
  5. 5
    Gasser, U.; Weeks, E. R.; Schofield, A.; Pusey, P. N.; Weitz, D. A. Real-Space Imaging of Nucleation and Growth in Colloidal Crystallization. Science 2001, 292, 258262,  DOI: 10.1126/science.1058457
  6. 6
    Auer, S.; Frenkel, D. Numerical Prediction of Absolute Crystallization Rates in Hard-Sphere Colloids. J. Chem. Phys. 2004, 120, 3015,  DOI: 10.1063/1.1638740
  7. 7
    Sandomirski, K.; Allahyarov, E.; Lowen, H.; Egelhaaf, S. U. Heterogeneous Crystallization of Hard-Sphere Colloids near a Wall. Soft Matter 2011, 7, 80508055,  DOI: 10.1039/c1sm05346a
  8. 8
    Montanarella, F.; Geuchies, J. J.; Dasgupta, T.; Prins, P. T.; van Overbeek, C.; Dattani, R.; Baesjou, P.; Dijkstra, M.; Petukhov, A. V.; van Blaaderen, A.; Vanmaekelbergh, D. Crystallization of Nanocrystals in Spherical Confinement Probed by in Situ X-ray Scattering. Nano Lett. 2018, 18, 36753681,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b00809
  9. 9
    Anderson, V. J.; Lekkerkerker, H. N. W. Insights into Phase Transition Kinetics from Colloid Science. Nature 2002, 416, 811815,  DOI: 10.1038/416811a
  10. 10
    Yethiraj, A.; van Blaaderen, A. A Colloidal Model System with an Interaction Tunable from Hard Sphere to Soft and Dipolar. Nature 2003, 421, 513517,  DOI: 10.1038/nature01328
  11. 11
    Bartlett, P.; Campbell, A. I. Three-Dimensional Binary Superlattices of Oppositely Charged Colloids. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2005, 95, 128302,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.128302
  12. 12
    Pusey, P. N.; van Megen, W. Phase Behaviour of Concentrated Suspensions of Nearly Hard Colloidal Spheres. Nature 1986, 320, 340342,  DOI: 10.1038/320340a0
  13. 13
    Mewis, J.; Frith, W. J.; Strivens, T. A.; Russel, W. B. The Rheology of Suspensions Containing Polymerically Stabilized Particles. AIChE J. 1989, 35, 415422,  DOI: 10.1002/aic.690350309
  14. 14
    Chu, J. H.; I, L. Direct Observation of Coulomb Crystals and Liquids in Strongly Coupled rf Dusty Plasmas. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1994, 72, 40094012,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.72.4009
  15. 15
    Levitz, P.; Lecolier, E.; Mourchid, A.; Delville, A.; Lyonnard, S. Liquid-Solid Transition of Laponite Suspensions at Very Low Ionic Strength: Long-Range Electrostatic Stabilisation of Anisotropic Colloids. Europhys. Lett. 2000, 49, 672677,  DOI: 10.1209/epl/i2000-00203-9
  16. 16
    Shah, S. A.; Chen, Y.-L.; Schweizer, K. S.; Zukoski, C. F. Viscoelasticity and Rheology of Depletion Flocculated Gels and Fluids. J. Chem. Phys. 2003, 119, 87478760,  DOI: 10.1063/1.1598192
  17. 17
    Tuinier, R.; Rieger, J.; de Kruif, C. G. Depletion-Induced Phase Separation in Colloid–Polymer Mixtures. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2003, 103, 131,  DOI: 10.1016/S0001-8686(02)00081-7
  18. 18
    Bartlett, P.; Ottewill, R. H.; Pusey, P. N. Superlattice Formation in Binary Mixtures of Hard Sphere Colloids. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1992, 68, 38013805,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.68.3801
  19. 19
    Eldridge, M. D.; Madden, P. A.; Frenkel, D. Entropy-Driven Formation of a Superlattice in a Hard-Sphere Binary Mixture. Nature 1993, 365, 3537,  DOI: 10.1038/365035a0
  20. 20
    Pusey, P. N.; Poon, W. C. K.; Ilett, S. M.; Bartlett, P. Phase Behaviour and Structure of Colloidal Suspensions. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 1994, 6, A29,  DOI: 10.1088/0953-8984/6/23A/004
  21. 21
    Imhof, A.; Dhont, J. K. G. Experimental Phase Diagram of a Binary Colloidal Hard-Sphere Mixture with a Large Size Ratio. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1995, 75, 16621665,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.1662
  22. 22
    Hunt, N.; Jardine, R.; Bartlett, P. Superlattice Formation in Mixtures of Hard-Sphere Colloids. Phys. Rev. E 2000, 62, 900913,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.62.900
  23. 23
    Schofield, A. B.; Pusey, P. N.; Radcliffe, P. Stability of the Binary Colloidal Crystals AB2 and AB13. Phys. Rev. E 2005, 72, 031407  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.72.031407
  24. 24
    Leunissen, M. E.; Christova, C. G.; Hynninen, A.-P.; Royall, C. P.; Campbell, A. I.; Imhof, A.; Dijkstra, M.; van Roij, R.; van Blaaderen, A. Ionic Colloidal Crystals of Oppositely Charged Particles. Nature 2005, 437, 235240,  DOI: 10.1038/nature03946
  25. 25
    Hynninen, A.-P.; Leunissen, M. E.; van Blaaderen, A.; Dijkstra, M. CuAu Structure in the Restricted Primitive Model and Oppositely Charged Colloids. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2006, 96, 018303  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.018303
  26. 26
    Shevchenko, E. V.; Talapin, D. V.; Kotov, N. A.; O’Brien, S.; Murray, C. B. Structural Diversity in Binary Nanoparticle Superlattices. Nature 2006, 439, 5559,  DOI: 10.1038/nature04414
  27. 27
    Diba, F. S.; Boden, A.; Thissen, H.; Bhave, M.; Kingshott, P.; Wang, P.-Y. Binary Colloidal Crystals (BCCs): Interactions, Fabrication, and Applications. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2018, 261, 102127,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cis.2018.08.005
  28. 28
    Gottwald, D.; Likos, C. N.; Kahl, G.; Löwen, H. Phase Behavior of Ionic Microgels. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004, 92, 068301  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.068301
  29. 29
    Sanz, E.; Valeriani, C.; Zaccarelli, E.; Poon, W. C. K.; Pusey, P. N.; Cates, M. E. Crystallization Mechanism of Hard Sphere Glasses. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2011, 106, 215701,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.215701
  30. 30
    Liu, Y.; Guan, Y.; Zhang, Y. Facile Assembly of 3D Binary Colloidal Crystals from Soft Microgel Spheres. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2014, 35, 630634,  DOI: 10.1002/marc.201300893
  31. 31
    Chen, M.; Zhang, Y.; Jia, S.; Zhou, L.; Guan, Y.; Zhang, Y. Photonic Crystals with a Reversibly Inducible and Erasable Defect State Using External Stimuli. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 92579261,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201503004
  32. 32
    Debord, J. D.; Eustis, S.; Debord, S. B.; Lofye, M. T.; Lyon, L. A. Color-Tunable Colloidal Crystals from Soft Hydrogel Nanoparticles. Adv. Mater. 2002, 14, 658662,  DOI: 10.1002/1521-4095(20020503)14:9<658::AID-ADMA658>3.0.CO;2-3
  33. 33
    Yunker, P. J.; Chen, K.; Gratale, M. D.; Lohr, M. A.; Still, T.; Yodh, A. G. Physics in Ordered and Disordered Colloidal Matter Composed of Poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) Microgel Particles. Rep. Prog. Phys. 2014, 77, 056601  DOI: 10.1088/0034-4885/77/5/056601
  34. 34
    Vlassopoulos, D.; Cloitre, M. Tunable Rheology of Dense Soft Deformable Colloids. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 2014, 19, 561574,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cocis.2014.09.007
  35. 35
    Tang, S.; Hu, Z.; Cheng, Z.; Wu, J. Crystallization Kinetics of Thermosensitive Colloids Probed by Transmission Spectroscopy. Langmuir 2004, 20, 88588864,  DOI: 10.1021/la049203h
  36. 36
    St. John Iyer, A.; Lyon, L. A. Self-Healing Colloidal Crystals. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 45624566,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.200901670
  37. 37
    Vlassopoulos, D. Colloidal Star Polymers: Models for Studying Dynamically Arrested States in Soft Matter. J. Polym. Sci., Part B: Polym. Phys. 2004, 42, 29312941,  DOI: 10.1002/polb.20152
  38. 38
    Cho, J. K.; Meng, Z.; Lyon, L. A.; Breedveld, V. Tunable Attractive and Repulsive Interactions Between pH-Responsive Microgels. Soft Matter 2009, 5, 35993602,  DOI: 10.1039/b912105f
  39. 39
    Lyon, L. A.; Meng, Z.; Singh, N.; Sorrell, C. D.; John, A. St. Thermoresponsive Microgel-Based Materials. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009, 38, 865874,  DOI: 10.1039/b715522k
  40. 40
    Hu, Z.; Huang, G. A New Route to Crystalline Hydrogels, Guided by a Phase Diagram. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 47994802,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.200351326
  41. 41
    Hoare, T.; Pelton, R. Highly pH and Temperature Responsive Microgels Functionalized with Vinylacetic Acid. Macromolecules 2004, 37, 25442550,  DOI: 10.1021/ma035658m
  42. 42
    Liu, Y. Y.; Liu, X. Y.; Yang, J. M.; Lin, D. L.; Chen, X.; Zha, L. S. Investigation of Ag Nanoparticles Loading Temperature Responsive Hybrid Microgels and their Temperature Controlled Catalytic Activity. Colloids Surf., A 2012, 393, 105110,  DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2011.11.007
  43. 43
    Backes, S.; Witt, M. U.; Roeben, E.; Kuhrts, L.; Aleed, S.; Schmidt, A. M.; von Klitzing, R. Loading of PNIPAM Based Microgels with CoFe2O4 Nanoparticles and Their Magnetic Response in Bulk and at Surfaces. J. Phys. Chem. B 2015, 119, 1212912137,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.5b03778
  44. 44
    Mohanty, P. S.; Bagheri, P.; Nöjd, S.; Yethiraj, A.; Schurtenberger, P. Multiple Path-Dependent Routes for Phase-Transition Kinetics in Thermoresponsive and Field-Responsive Ultrasoft Colloids. Phys. Rev. X 2015, 5, 011030  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevX.5.011030
  45. 45
    Meijer, J.-M.; Pal, A.; Ouhajji, S.; Lekkerkerker, H. N. W.; Philipse, A. P.; Petukhov, A. V. Observation of Solid–Solid Transitions in 3D Crystals of Colloidal Superballs. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 14352,  DOI: 10.1038/ncomms14352
  46. 46
    Lyon, L. A.; Debord, J. D.; Debord, S. B.; Jones, C. D.; McGrath, J. G.; Serpe, M. J. Microgel Colloidal Crystals. J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108, 1909919108,  DOI: 10.1021/jp048486j
  47. 47
    Paloli, D.; Mohanty, P. S.; Crassous, J. J.; Zaccarelli, E.; Schurtenberger, P. Fluid–Solid Transitions in Soft-Repulsive Colloids. Soft Matter 2013, 9, 30003004,  DOI: 10.1039/c2sm27654b
  48. 48
    Dulle, M.; Jaber, S.; Rosenfeldt, S.; Radulescu, A.; Förster, S.; Mulvaney, P.; Karg, M. Plasmonic Gold–poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) Core–Shell Colloids with Homogeneous Density Profiles: a Small Angle Scattering Study. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2015, 17, 13541367,  DOI: 10.1039/C4CP04816D
  49. 49
    Fasolo, M.; Sollich, P. Equilibrium Phase Behavior of Polydisperse Hard Spheres. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2003, 91, 068301  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.068301
  50. 50
    Eckert, T.; Bartsch, E. Re-entrant Glass Transition in a Colloid-Polymer Mixture with Depletion Attractions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2002, 89, 125701,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.125701
  51. 51
    Stukowski, A. Visualization and Analysis of Atomistic Simulation Data with OVITO - the Open Visualization Tool. Modell. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. , 2010, 18, 015012 DOI: 10.1088/0965-0393/18/1/015012 .
  52. 52
    Horst, N.; Travesset, A. Prediction of Binary Nanoparticle Superlattices from Soft Potentials. J. Chem. Phys. 2016, 144, 014502  DOI: 10.1063/1.4939238
  53. 53
    Yethiraj, A.; Wouterse, A.; Groh, B.; van Blaaderen, A. Nature of an Electric-Field-Induced Colloidal Martensitic Transition. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004, 92, 058301  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.058301
  54. 54
    Steinhardt, P. J.; Nelson, D. R.; Ronchetti, M. Bond-Orientational Order in Liquids and Glasses. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 1983, 28, 784,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.28.784
  55. 55
    Lechner, W.; Dellago, C. Accurate Determination of Crystal Structures Based on Averaged Local Bond Order Parameters. J. Chem. Phys. 2008, 129, 114707,  DOI: 10.1063/1.2977970
  56. 56
    Immink, J. N.; Maris, J. J. E.; Crassous, J. J.; Stenhammar, J.; Schurtenberger, P. Reversible Formation of Thermoresponsive Binary Particle Gels with Tunable Structural and Mechanical Properties. ACS Nano 2019, 13, 32923300,  DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.8b09139
  57. 57
    Appel, J.; de Lange, N.; van der Kooij, H. M.; van de Laar, T.; ten Hove, J. B.; Kodger, T. E.; Sprakel, J. Temperature Controlled Sequential Gelation in Composite Microgel Suspensions. Part. Part. Syst. Char. 2015, 32, 764770,  DOI: 10.1002/ppsc.201500007
  58. 58
    Rauh, A.; Honold, T.; Karg, M. Seeded Precipitation Polymerization for the Synthesis of Gold-Hydrogel Core-Shell Particles: the Role of Surface Functionalization and Seed Concentration. Colloid Polym. Sci. 2016, 294, 3747,  DOI: 10.1007/s00396-015-3782-6
  59. 59
    Sato, J.; Breedveld, V. Transient Rheology of Solvent-Responsive Complex Fluids by Integrating Microrheology and Microfluidics. J. Rheol. 2006, 50, 119,  DOI: 10.1122/1.2135329
  60. 60
    Crocker, J. C.; Grier, D. G. Methods of Digital Video Microscopy for Colloidal Studies. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1996, 179, 298310,  DOI: 10.1006/jcis.1996.0217
  61. 61
    Bergman, M. J.; Garting, T.; Schurtenberger, P.; Stradner, A. Experimental Evidence for a Cluster Glass Transition in Concentrated Lysozyme Solutions. J. Phys. Chem. B 2019, 123, 24322438,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.8b11781
  62. 62
    Mohanty, P. S.; Paloli, D.; Crassous, J. J.; Zaccarelli, E.; Schurtenberger, P. Effective Interactions between Soft-Repulsive Colloids: Experiments, Theory, and Simulations. J. Chem. Phys. 2014, 140, 094901  DOI: 10.1063/1.4866644

Cited By

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!
Citation Statements
Explore this article's citation statements on scite.ai

This article is cited by 12 publications.

  1. Alexander V. Petrunin, Maximilian M. Schmidt, Ralf Schweins, Judith E. Houston, Andrea Scotti. Self-Healing of Charged Microgels in Neutral and Charged Environments. Langmuir 2023, 39 (22) , 7530-7538. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.2c03054
  2. Tero Kämäräinen, Kazunori Kadota, Jun Y. Tse, Hiromasa Uchiyama, Toshio Oguchi, Hiroshi Arima-Osonoi, Yuichi Tozuka. Tuning the Phytoglycogen Size and Aggregate Structure with Solvent Quality: Influence of Water–Ethanol Mixtures Revealed by X-ray and Light Scattering Techniques. Biomacromolecules 2023, 24 (1) , 225-237. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.2c01093
  3. Yange Lin, Monica Olvera de la Cruz. Superionic Colloidal Crystals: Ionic to Metallic Bonding Transitions. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 2022, 126 (35) , 6740-6749. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.2c04041
  4. Wei Li, Yi Peng, Tim Still, A G Yodh, Yilong Han. Nucleation kinetics and virtual melting in shear-induced structural transitions. Reports on Progress in Physics 2025, 88 (1) , 010501. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6633/ad99fd
  5. David Doan, John Kulikowski, X. Wendy Gu. Direct observation of phase transitions in truncated tetrahedral microparticles under quasi-2D confinement. Nature Communications 2024, 15 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-46230-x
  6. Hikaru Namigata, Kanako Watanabe, Tom A.J. Welling, Keishi Suga, Daisuke Nagao. Colloidal photonic crystals with tunable reflection wavelengths or intensities derived from their reconfigurable structures. Colloid and Interface Science Communications 2024, 62 , 100806. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colcom.2024.100806
  7. Yanyan Liang, Grisell Díaz Leines, Ralf Drautz, Jutta Rogal. Structural transformations driven by local disorder at interfaces. Physical Review Materials 2024, 8 (3) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.8.033402
  8. Yi Peng, Wei Li, Tim Still, Arjun G. Yodh, Yilong Han. In situ observation of coalescence of nuclei in colloidal crystal-crystal transitions. Nature Communications 2023, 14 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-40627-w
  9. M. Hildebrandt, D. Pham Thuy, J. Kippenberger, T. L. Wigger, J. E. Houston, A. Scotti, M. Karg. Fluid–solid transitions in photonic crystals of soft, thermoresponsive microgels. Soft Matter 2023, 19 (37) , 7122-7135. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3SM01062G
  10. Muhammad Arif. A review on advanced research of combine life of polystyrene (hard) and organic polymer (soft) materials: from 2018 to present. Zeitschrift für Physikalische Chemie 2023, 237 (7) , 809-843. https://doi.org/10.1515/zpch-2022-0142
  11. Samuel Lopez-Godoy, Pedro Díaz-Leyva, Anna Kozina. Self-assembly in binary mixtures of spherical colloids. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science 2022, 308 , 102748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2022.102748
  12. Jasper N. Immink, J. J. Erik Maris, Ronja F. Capellmann, Stefan U. Egelhaaf, Peter Schurtenberger, Joakim Stenhammar. ArGSLab: a tool for analyzing experimental or simulated particle networks. Soft Matter 2021, 17 (36) , 8354-8362. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1SM00692D

ACS Nano

Cite this: ACS Nano 2020, 14, 11, 14861–14868
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.0c03966
Published November 14, 2020

Copyright © 2020 American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under CC-BY.

Article Views

3104

Altmetric

-

Citations

Learn about these metrics

Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.

  • Abstract

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. Cross-section of the sample holder design, not to scale.

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. Analysis of one sample at different salinities. (A–D) CLSM images with their corresponding radial distribution functions (RDFs) of pN-to-pN, pM-to-pM, and pN-to-pM. (A) 2 × 10–3 M KCl, showing entropy-driven crystallinity. (B) 1.5 × 10–3 M KCl, in a fluid phase. (C) 1.25 × 10–3 M KCl, showing electrostatic forces-driven crystallinity. (D) Sample at 1 × 10–3 M KCl, in an electrostatically aggregated gel. (E) Mean-square displacements (MSDs) of pN particles for all salinities, together with a line with a slope proportional to t1 to guide the eye. The MSDs for pM are highly similar to the MSDs of pN. (F) Corresponding P(Zeq) for all salinities. Dashed lines indicate the theoretical values corresponding to AuCu (0.33) and FCC (0.5) crystal values. Each scale bar length is 10 μm.

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. CLSM images of the same sample at different salinities, with their corresponding radial distribution functions (RDFs). (A) CLSM image at 2 × 10–3 M KCl. (B) Corresponding RDFs of pN-to-pN, pM-to-pM, and pN-to-pM. The overlapping RDFs illustrate the random distribution of particles throughout the lattice. The RDF peaks are in accordance with the positions and relative magnitudes of those in an FCC lattice (blue, rescaled magnitudes by arbitrary factor for visibility). (C) CLSM image at 1.25 × 10–3 M KCl. (D–F) Corresponding RDF at 1.25 × 10–3 M KCl of (D) pN-to-pN, (E) pM-to-pM, and (F) pN-to-pM. Each RDF is shown with the corresponding peaks for AuCu-type crystals. The scale bar length is 10 μm.

    Figure 4

    Figure 4. Unit cells of (A) a single particle type FCC and (B) a AuCu crystal. The red particles represent the larger Au atoms.

    Figure 5

    Figure 5. CLSM image slices from a 3D stack, compared with Voronoi cells colored according to their l. (A, B) FCC crystal at 2.0 × 10–3 M KCl. (C, D) AuCu crystal at 1.25 × 10–3 M KCl. If 4(equal) > 0.45 or 8(equal) > 0.45, AuCu crystallinity is denoted by a blue cell; if 6(all) > 0.35, but 4(equal) < 0.45 and 8(equal) < 0.45, FCC crystallinity is denoted by a red cell; and if 6(all) < 0.35 and 4(equal) < 0.45 or 8(equal) < 0.45, the cell was left white, denoting an amorphous local surrounding.

  • References


    This article references 62 other publications.

    1. 1
      Frenkel, D. Soft Condensed Matter. Phys. A 2002, 313, 131,  DOI: 10.1016/S0378-4371(02)01032-4
    2. 2
      Lekkerkerker, H. N. W.; Poon, W. C. K.; Pusey, P. N.; Stroobants, A.; Warren, P. B. Phase Behaviour of Colloid + Polymer Mixtures. Europhys. Lett. 1992, 20, 559564,  DOI: 10.1209/0295-5075/20/6/015
    3. 3
      Senff, H.; Richtering, W. Temperature Sensitive Microgel Suspensions: Colloidal Phase Behavior and Rheology of Soft Spheres. J. Chem. Phys. 1999, 111, 17051711,  DOI: 10.1063/1.479430
    4. 4
      Aastuen, D. J. W.; Clark, N. A.; Cotter, L. K.; Ackerson, B. J. Nucleation and Growth of Colloidal Crystals. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1986, 57, 1733,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.57.1733
    5. 5
      Gasser, U.; Weeks, E. R.; Schofield, A.; Pusey, P. N.; Weitz, D. A. Real-Space Imaging of Nucleation and Growth in Colloidal Crystallization. Science 2001, 292, 258262,  DOI: 10.1126/science.1058457
    6. 6
      Auer, S.; Frenkel, D. Numerical Prediction of Absolute Crystallization Rates in Hard-Sphere Colloids. J. Chem. Phys. 2004, 120, 3015,  DOI: 10.1063/1.1638740
    7. 7
      Sandomirski, K.; Allahyarov, E.; Lowen, H.; Egelhaaf, S. U. Heterogeneous Crystallization of Hard-Sphere Colloids near a Wall. Soft Matter 2011, 7, 80508055,  DOI: 10.1039/c1sm05346a
    8. 8
      Montanarella, F.; Geuchies, J. J.; Dasgupta, T.; Prins, P. T.; van Overbeek, C.; Dattani, R.; Baesjou, P.; Dijkstra, M.; Petukhov, A. V.; van Blaaderen, A.; Vanmaekelbergh, D. Crystallization of Nanocrystals in Spherical Confinement Probed by in Situ X-ray Scattering. Nano Lett. 2018, 18, 36753681,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b00809
    9. 9
      Anderson, V. J.; Lekkerkerker, H. N. W. Insights into Phase Transition Kinetics from Colloid Science. Nature 2002, 416, 811815,  DOI: 10.1038/416811a
    10. 10
      Yethiraj, A.; van Blaaderen, A. A Colloidal Model System with an Interaction Tunable from Hard Sphere to Soft and Dipolar. Nature 2003, 421, 513517,  DOI: 10.1038/nature01328
    11. 11
      Bartlett, P.; Campbell, A. I. Three-Dimensional Binary Superlattices of Oppositely Charged Colloids. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2005, 95, 128302,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.128302
    12. 12
      Pusey, P. N.; van Megen, W. Phase Behaviour of Concentrated Suspensions of Nearly Hard Colloidal Spheres. Nature 1986, 320, 340342,  DOI: 10.1038/320340a0
    13. 13
      Mewis, J.; Frith, W. J.; Strivens, T. A.; Russel, W. B. The Rheology of Suspensions Containing Polymerically Stabilized Particles. AIChE J. 1989, 35, 415422,  DOI: 10.1002/aic.690350309
    14. 14
      Chu, J. H.; I, L. Direct Observation of Coulomb Crystals and Liquids in Strongly Coupled rf Dusty Plasmas. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1994, 72, 40094012,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.72.4009
    15. 15
      Levitz, P.; Lecolier, E.; Mourchid, A.; Delville, A.; Lyonnard, S. Liquid-Solid Transition of Laponite Suspensions at Very Low Ionic Strength: Long-Range Electrostatic Stabilisation of Anisotropic Colloids. Europhys. Lett. 2000, 49, 672677,  DOI: 10.1209/epl/i2000-00203-9
    16. 16
      Shah, S. A.; Chen, Y.-L.; Schweizer, K. S.; Zukoski, C. F. Viscoelasticity and Rheology of Depletion Flocculated Gels and Fluids. J. Chem. Phys. 2003, 119, 87478760,  DOI: 10.1063/1.1598192
    17. 17
      Tuinier, R.; Rieger, J.; de Kruif, C. G. Depletion-Induced Phase Separation in Colloid–Polymer Mixtures. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2003, 103, 131,  DOI: 10.1016/S0001-8686(02)00081-7
    18. 18
      Bartlett, P.; Ottewill, R. H.; Pusey, P. N. Superlattice Formation in Binary Mixtures of Hard Sphere Colloids. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1992, 68, 38013805,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.68.3801
    19. 19
      Eldridge, M. D.; Madden, P. A.; Frenkel, D. Entropy-Driven Formation of a Superlattice in a Hard-Sphere Binary Mixture. Nature 1993, 365, 3537,  DOI: 10.1038/365035a0
    20. 20
      Pusey, P. N.; Poon, W. C. K.; Ilett, S. M.; Bartlett, P. Phase Behaviour and Structure of Colloidal Suspensions. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 1994, 6, A29,  DOI: 10.1088/0953-8984/6/23A/004
    21. 21
      Imhof, A.; Dhont, J. K. G. Experimental Phase Diagram of a Binary Colloidal Hard-Sphere Mixture with a Large Size Ratio. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1995, 75, 16621665,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.1662
    22. 22
      Hunt, N.; Jardine, R.; Bartlett, P. Superlattice Formation in Mixtures of Hard-Sphere Colloids. Phys. Rev. E 2000, 62, 900913,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.62.900
    23. 23
      Schofield, A. B.; Pusey, P. N.; Radcliffe, P. Stability of the Binary Colloidal Crystals AB2 and AB13. Phys. Rev. E 2005, 72, 031407  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.72.031407
    24. 24
      Leunissen, M. E.; Christova, C. G.; Hynninen, A.-P.; Royall, C. P.; Campbell, A. I.; Imhof, A.; Dijkstra, M.; van Roij, R.; van Blaaderen, A. Ionic Colloidal Crystals of Oppositely Charged Particles. Nature 2005, 437, 235240,  DOI: 10.1038/nature03946
    25. 25
      Hynninen, A.-P.; Leunissen, M. E.; van Blaaderen, A.; Dijkstra, M. CuAu Structure in the Restricted Primitive Model and Oppositely Charged Colloids. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2006, 96, 018303  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.018303
    26. 26
      Shevchenko, E. V.; Talapin, D. V.; Kotov, N. A.; O’Brien, S.; Murray, C. B. Structural Diversity in Binary Nanoparticle Superlattices. Nature 2006, 439, 5559,  DOI: 10.1038/nature04414
    27. 27
      Diba, F. S.; Boden, A.; Thissen, H.; Bhave, M.; Kingshott, P.; Wang, P.-Y. Binary Colloidal Crystals (BCCs): Interactions, Fabrication, and Applications. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2018, 261, 102127,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cis.2018.08.005
    28. 28
      Gottwald, D.; Likos, C. N.; Kahl, G.; Löwen, H. Phase Behavior of Ionic Microgels. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004, 92, 068301  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.068301
    29. 29
      Sanz, E.; Valeriani, C.; Zaccarelli, E.; Poon, W. C. K.; Pusey, P. N.; Cates, M. E. Crystallization Mechanism of Hard Sphere Glasses. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2011, 106, 215701,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.215701
    30. 30
      Liu, Y.; Guan, Y.; Zhang, Y. Facile Assembly of 3D Binary Colloidal Crystals from Soft Microgel Spheres. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2014, 35, 630634,  DOI: 10.1002/marc.201300893
    31. 31
      Chen, M.; Zhang, Y.; Jia, S.; Zhou, L.; Guan, Y.; Zhang, Y. Photonic Crystals with a Reversibly Inducible and Erasable Defect State Using External Stimuli. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 92579261,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201503004
    32. 32
      Debord, J. D.; Eustis, S.; Debord, S. B.; Lofye, M. T.; Lyon, L. A. Color-Tunable Colloidal Crystals from Soft Hydrogel Nanoparticles. Adv. Mater. 2002, 14, 658662,  DOI: 10.1002/1521-4095(20020503)14:9<658::AID-ADMA658>3.0.CO;2-3
    33. 33
      Yunker, P. J.; Chen, K.; Gratale, M. D.; Lohr, M. A.; Still, T.; Yodh, A. G. Physics in Ordered and Disordered Colloidal Matter Composed of Poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) Microgel Particles. Rep. Prog. Phys. 2014, 77, 056601  DOI: 10.1088/0034-4885/77/5/056601
    34. 34
      Vlassopoulos, D.; Cloitre, M. Tunable Rheology of Dense Soft Deformable Colloids. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 2014, 19, 561574,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cocis.2014.09.007
    35. 35
      Tang, S.; Hu, Z.; Cheng, Z.; Wu, J. Crystallization Kinetics of Thermosensitive Colloids Probed by Transmission Spectroscopy. Langmuir 2004, 20, 88588864,  DOI: 10.1021/la049203h
    36. 36
      St. John Iyer, A.; Lyon, L. A. Self-Healing Colloidal Crystals. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 45624566,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.200901670
    37. 37
      Vlassopoulos, D. Colloidal Star Polymers: Models for Studying Dynamically Arrested States in Soft Matter. J. Polym. Sci., Part B: Polym. Phys. 2004, 42, 29312941,  DOI: 10.1002/polb.20152
    38. 38
      Cho, J. K.; Meng, Z.; Lyon, L. A.; Breedveld, V. Tunable Attractive and Repulsive Interactions Between pH-Responsive Microgels. Soft Matter 2009, 5, 35993602,  DOI: 10.1039/b912105f
    39. 39
      Lyon, L. A.; Meng, Z.; Singh, N.; Sorrell, C. D.; John, A. St. Thermoresponsive Microgel-Based Materials. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009, 38, 865874,  DOI: 10.1039/b715522k
    40. 40
      Hu, Z.; Huang, G. A New Route to Crystalline Hydrogels, Guided by a Phase Diagram. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 47994802,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.200351326
    41. 41
      Hoare, T.; Pelton, R. Highly pH and Temperature Responsive Microgels Functionalized with Vinylacetic Acid. Macromolecules 2004, 37, 25442550,  DOI: 10.1021/ma035658m
    42. 42
      Liu, Y. Y.; Liu, X. Y.; Yang, J. M.; Lin, D. L.; Chen, X.; Zha, L. S. Investigation of Ag Nanoparticles Loading Temperature Responsive Hybrid Microgels and their Temperature Controlled Catalytic Activity. Colloids Surf., A 2012, 393, 105110,  DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2011.11.007
    43. 43
      Backes, S.; Witt, M. U.; Roeben, E.; Kuhrts, L.; Aleed, S.; Schmidt, A. M.; von Klitzing, R. Loading of PNIPAM Based Microgels with CoFe2O4 Nanoparticles and Their Magnetic Response in Bulk and at Surfaces. J. Phys. Chem. B 2015, 119, 1212912137,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.5b03778
    44. 44
      Mohanty, P. S.; Bagheri, P.; Nöjd, S.; Yethiraj, A.; Schurtenberger, P. Multiple Path-Dependent Routes for Phase-Transition Kinetics in Thermoresponsive and Field-Responsive Ultrasoft Colloids. Phys. Rev. X 2015, 5, 011030  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevX.5.011030
    45. 45
      Meijer, J.-M.; Pal, A.; Ouhajji, S.; Lekkerkerker, H. N. W.; Philipse, A. P.; Petukhov, A. V. Observation of Solid–Solid Transitions in 3D Crystals of Colloidal Superballs. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 14352,  DOI: 10.1038/ncomms14352
    46. 46
      Lyon, L. A.; Debord, J. D.; Debord, S. B.; Jones, C. D.; McGrath, J. G.; Serpe, M. J. Microgel Colloidal Crystals. J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108, 1909919108,  DOI: 10.1021/jp048486j
    47. 47
      Paloli, D.; Mohanty, P. S.; Crassous, J. J.; Zaccarelli, E.; Schurtenberger, P. Fluid–Solid Transitions in Soft-Repulsive Colloids. Soft Matter 2013, 9, 30003004,  DOI: 10.1039/c2sm27654b
    48. 48
      Dulle, M.; Jaber, S.; Rosenfeldt, S.; Radulescu, A.; Förster, S.; Mulvaney, P.; Karg, M. Plasmonic Gold–poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) Core–Shell Colloids with Homogeneous Density Profiles: a Small Angle Scattering Study. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2015, 17, 13541367,  DOI: 10.1039/C4CP04816D
    49. 49
      Fasolo, M.; Sollich, P. Equilibrium Phase Behavior of Polydisperse Hard Spheres. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2003, 91, 068301  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.068301
    50. 50
      Eckert, T.; Bartsch, E. Re-entrant Glass Transition in a Colloid-Polymer Mixture with Depletion Attractions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2002, 89, 125701,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.125701
    51. 51
      Stukowski, A. Visualization and Analysis of Atomistic Simulation Data with OVITO - the Open Visualization Tool. Modell. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. , 2010, 18, 015012 DOI: 10.1088/0965-0393/18/1/015012 .
    52. 52
      Horst, N.; Travesset, A. Prediction of Binary Nanoparticle Superlattices from Soft Potentials. J. Chem. Phys. 2016, 144, 014502  DOI: 10.1063/1.4939238
    53. 53
      Yethiraj, A.; Wouterse, A.; Groh, B.; van Blaaderen, A. Nature of an Electric-Field-Induced Colloidal Martensitic Transition. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004, 92, 058301  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.058301
    54. 54
      Steinhardt, P. J.; Nelson, D. R.; Ronchetti, M. Bond-Orientational Order in Liquids and Glasses. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 1983, 28, 784,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.28.784
    55. 55
      Lechner, W.; Dellago, C. Accurate Determination of Crystal Structures Based on Averaged Local Bond Order Parameters. J. Chem. Phys. 2008, 129, 114707,  DOI: 10.1063/1.2977970
    56. 56
      Immink, J. N.; Maris, J. J. E.; Crassous, J. J.; Stenhammar, J.; Schurtenberger, P. Reversible Formation of Thermoresponsive Binary Particle Gels with Tunable Structural and Mechanical Properties. ACS Nano 2019, 13, 32923300,  DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.8b09139
    57. 57
      Appel, J.; de Lange, N.; van der Kooij, H. M.; van de Laar, T.; ten Hove, J. B.; Kodger, T. E.; Sprakel, J. Temperature Controlled Sequential Gelation in Composite Microgel Suspensions. Part. Part. Syst. Char. 2015, 32, 764770,  DOI: 10.1002/ppsc.201500007
    58. 58
      Rauh, A.; Honold, T.; Karg, M. Seeded Precipitation Polymerization for the Synthesis of Gold-Hydrogel Core-Shell Particles: the Role of Surface Functionalization and Seed Concentration. Colloid Polym. Sci. 2016, 294, 3747,  DOI: 10.1007/s00396-015-3782-6
    59. 59
      Sato, J.; Breedveld, V. Transient Rheology of Solvent-Responsive Complex Fluids by Integrating Microrheology and Microfluidics. J. Rheol. 2006, 50, 119,  DOI: 10.1122/1.2135329
    60. 60
      Crocker, J. C.; Grier, D. G. Methods of Digital Video Microscopy for Colloidal Studies. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1996, 179, 298310,  DOI: 10.1006/jcis.1996.0217
    61. 61
      Bergman, M. J.; Garting, T.; Schurtenberger, P.; Stradner, A. Experimental Evidence for a Cluster Glass Transition in Concentrated Lysozyme Solutions. J. Phys. Chem. B 2019, 123, 24322438,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.8b11781
    62. 62
      Mohanty, P. S.; Paloli, D.; Crassous, J. J.; Zaccarelli, E.; Schurtenberger, P. Effective Interactions between Soft-Repulsive Colloids: Experiments, Theory, and Simulations. J. Chem. Phys. 2014, 140, 094901  DOI: 10.1063/1.4866644
  • Supporting Information

    Supporting Information


    The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsnano.0c03966.

    • Experimental RDFs compared to theoretical AuCu RDF; experimental RDFs compared to theoretical CsCl RDF; experimental RDFs compared to theoretical NaCl RDF; obtained bond order parameters for all particles at 2.0 × 10–3 M KCl; obtained bond order parameters for all particles at 1.25 × 10–3 M KCl (PDF)


    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.