ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
Hot-Carrier Cooling in High-Quality Graphene Is Intrinsically Limited by Optical Phonons
My Activity
  • Open Access
Article

Hot-Carrier Cooling in High-Quality Graphene Is Intrinsically Limited by Optical Phonons
Click to copy article linkArticle link copied!

  • Eva A. A. Pogna
    Eva A. A. Pogna
    NEST, Istituto Nanoscienze-CNR and Scuola Normale Superiore, 56127 Pisa, Italy
    Department of Physics, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy
  • Xiaoyu Jia
    Xiaoyu Jia
    Max-Planck-Institut für Polymerforschung, 55128 Mainz, Germany
    More by Xiaoyu Jia
  • Alessandro Principi
    Alessandro Principi
    School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manchester, M13 9PL Manchester, U.K.
  • Alexander Block
    Alexander Block
    Catalan Institute of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology (ICN2), BIST & CSIC, Campus UAB, Bellaterra, Barcelona 08193, Spain
  • Luca Banszerus
    Luca Banszerus
    JARA-FIT and second Institute of Physics, RWTH Aachen University, 52074 Aachen, Germany, EU
  • Jincan Zhang
    Jincan Zhang
    Center for Nanochemistry, College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
    Beijing Graphene Institute, Beijing 100095, P. R. China
    More by Jincan Zhang
  • Xiaoting Liu
    Xiaoting Liu
    Center for Nanochemistry, College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
    Beijing Graphene Institute, Beijing 100095, P. R. China
    More by Xiaoting Liu
  • Thibault Sohier
    Thibault Sohier
    NanoMat/Q-Mat/CESAM, Université de Liège (B5), B-4000 Liège, Belgium
  • Stiven Forti
    Stiven Forti
    Center for Nanotechnology Innovation IIT@NEST, Piazza San Silvestro 12, 56127 Pisa, Italy
    More by Stiven Forti
  • Karuppasamy Soundarapandian
    Karuppasamy Soundarapandian
    ICFO - Institut de Ciències Fotòniques, BIST, Castelldefels, Barcelona 08860, Spain
  • Bernat Terrés
    Bernat Terrés
    ICFO - Institut de Ciències Fotòniques, BIST, Castelldefels, Barcelona 08860, Spain
  • Jake D. Mehew
    Jake D. Mehew
    Catalan Institute of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology (ICN2), BIST & CSIC, Campus UAB, Bellaterra, Barcelona 08193, Spain
  • Chiara Trovatello
    Chiara Trovatello
    Department of Physics, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy
  • Camilla Coletti
    Camilla Coletti
    Center for Nanotechnology Innovation IIT@NEST, Piazza San Silvestro 12, 56127 Pisa, Italy
    Graphene Laboratories, Via Morego 30, 16163 Genova, Italy
  • Frank H. L. Koppens
    Frank H. L. Koppens
    ICFO - Institut de Ciències Fotòniques, BIST, Castelldefels, Barcelona 08860, Spain
    ICREA - Institució Catalana de Reçerca i Estudis Avancats, 08010 Barcelona, Spain
  • Mischa Bonn
    Mischa Bonn
    Max-Planck-Institut für Polymerforschung, 55128 Mainz, Germany
    More by Mischa Bonn
  • Hai I. Wang
    Hai I. Wang
    Max-Planck-Institut für Polymerforschung, 55128 Mainz, Germany
    More by Hai I. Wang
  • Niek van Hulst
    Niek van Hulst
    ICFO - Institut de Ciències Fotòniques, BIST, Castelldefels, Barcelona 08860, Spain
    ICREA - Institució Catalana de Reçerca i Estudis Avancats, 08010 Barcelona, Spain
  • Matthieu J. Verstraete
    Matthieu J. Verstraete
    NanoMat/Q-Mat/CESAM, Université de Liège (B5), B-4000 Liège, Belgium
  • Hailin Peng
    Hailin Peng
    Center for Nanochemistry, College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
    Beijing Graphene Institute, Beijing 100095, P. R. China
    More by Hailin Peng
  • Zhongfan Liu
    Zhongfan Liu
    Center for Nanochemistry, College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
    Beijing Graphene Institute, Beijing 100095, P. R. China
    More by Zhongfan Liu
  • Christoph Stampfer
    Christoph Stampfer
    JARA-FIT and second Institute of Physics, RWTH Aachen University, 52074 Aachen, Germany, EU
  • Giulio Cerullo
    Giulio Cerullo
    Department of Physics, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy
  • Klaas-Jan Tielrooij*
    Klaas-Jan Tielrooij
    Catalan Institute of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology (ICN2), BIST & CSIC, Campus UAB, Bellaterra, Barcelona 08193, Spain
    *E-mail: [email protected]
Open PDFSupporting Information (1)

ACS Nano

Cite this: ACS Nano 2021, 15, 7, 11285–11295
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.0c10864
Published June 17, 2021

Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under

CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 .

Abstract

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Many promising optoelectronic devices, such as broadband photodetectors, nonlinear frequency converters, and building blocks for data communication systems, exploit photoexcited charge carriers in graphene. For these systems, it is essential to understand the relaxation dynamics after photoexcitation. These dynamics contain a sub-100 fs thermalization phase, which occurs through carrier–carrier scattering and leads to a carrier distribution with an elevated temperature. This is followed by a picosecond cooling phase, where different phonon systems play a role: graphene acoustic and optical phonons, and substrate phonons. Here, we address the cooling pathway of two technologically relevant systems, both consisting of high-quality graphene with a mobility >10 000 cm2 V–1 s–1 and environments that do not efficiently take up electronic heat from graphene: WSe2-encapsulated graphene and suspended graphene. We study the cooling dynamics using ultrafast pump–probe spectroscopy at room temperature. Cooling via disorder-assisted acoustic phonon scattering and out-of-plane heat transfer to substrate phonons is relatively inefficient in these systems, suggesting a cooling time of tens of picoseconds. However, we observe much faster cooling, on a time scale of a few picoseconds. We attribute this to an intrinsic cooling mechanism, where carriers in the high-energy tail of the hot-carrier distribution emit optical phonons. This creates a permanent heat sink, as carriers efficiently rethermalize. We develop a macroscopic model that explains the observed dynamics, where cooling is eventually limited by optical-to-acoustic phonon coupling. These fundamental insights will guide the development of graphene-based optoelectronic devices.

This publication is licensed under

CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 .
  • cc licence
  • by licence
  • nc licence
  • nd licence
Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society

Introduction

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The ultrafast dynamics of photoexcited charge carriers in graphene have received ample attention, initially driven by fundamental scientific interest in the intriguing electron–electron and electron–phonon interactions; cf. refs (1−5). More recently, interest has multiplied as a result of the emergence of highly promising technological applications that exploit these ultrafast dynamics. One example is ultrafast photodetection of visible (VIS) and infrared light, (6,7) and even terahertz (THz) radiation. (8−10) The ultrafast electronic response of graphene to incoming light has also led to the development of several concepts with relevance for data communication technologies, including modulators and receivers, (11−13) and is demonstrated to be crucial for tailoring nonlinear photonics applications. (14−17) Part of the aforementioned applications, for instance photodetectors and receivers, exploit the ultrafast photothermoelectric effect in graphene, (18,19) where a longer hot-carrier cooling time leads to an increased photoresponse. Other applications, such as modulators, could instead benefit from a short cooling time, as this can lead to a higher modulation speed, i.e., to a broader bandwidth. Generally, these applications require high-quality graphene with a high electrical mobility. Clearly, it is crucial to properly understand the cooling dynamics of hot carriers in graphene, and in particular to identify the intrinsic mechanism that ultimately determines the cooling process in high-quality systems.
The decay of photoexcited charges in graphene occurs through a variety of dynamical processes that are the result of the specific properties of Dirac electrons and graphene phonons. Photoexcited charge carriers in graphene first undergo thermalization on a <100 fs time scale, which occurs through carrier–carrier scattering and leads to a state with an elevated carrier temperature, i.e., a broadened Fermi–Dirac distribution. (2−4,20) This photoinduced heating process is very efficient (5,21) and, due to the small electronic heat capacity of graphene, (22) the electron temperature Te can be increased significantly (Te ≫ 500 K). The hot-carrier state then relaxes back to the ground state with the electronic system at ambient temperature. This cooling process occurs through the interaction between charge carriers and graphene optical phonons, graphene acoustic phonons, and substrate phonons in nearby materials. These phonon-induced relaxation mechanisms have intricate dependencies on intrinsic (sample-dependent) parameters (such as disorder density and intrinsic doping), as well as extrinsic experimental parameters (such as photon energy, incident fluence, and ambient temperature). Thus, determining the dominant cooling channel(s) for excited graphene charge carriers has been challenging.
It is generally believed that charge carriers with enough kinetic energy can relax on an ultrafast time scale of a few hundred femtoseconds by interacting with strongly coupled optical phonons. (2,23,24) These are the optical phonons at the Γ and K points with an energy of 0.2 and 0.16 eV, respectively. (25) Thus, charge carriers with an excess energy >0.16 eV above the chemical potential can efficiently cool by optical phonon emission. (26) Carriers with an excess energy <0.16 eV can only couple to acoustic phonons, generally resulting in very inefficient cooling with decay times up to the nanosecond range. (27) In the case of graphene with significant disorder, however, coupling to acoustic phonons becomes much more efficient through disorder-assisted scattering. By scattering with defects, the large momentum mismatch between electrons and acoustic phonons is overcome. (28) This disorder-assisted “supercollision” cooling process leads to typical cooling times of a few picoseconds at room temperature, as measured by electrical, (29) optical, (30,31) and optoelectronic (32) techniques. Since disorder also limits the electrical mobility, this disorder-assisted cooling mechanism tends to play an increasingly important role for graphene with lower electrical mobility. Currently, there are contrasting views in the literature regarding the role of different cooling mechanisms. In particular, some studies, such as ref (26), question the role of supercollision cooling.
In the case of graphene with a mobility above 10 000 cm2 V–1 s–1, which we here refer to as “high-quality graphene”, the disorder density is low enough that disorder-assisted cooling will not play an important role. Recent experiments on high-quality hBN-encapsulated graphene with a mobility above 30 000 cm2 V–1 s–1, however, did not show a strong increase in cooling time. (33) This is because a parallel relaxation mechanism emerges in these heterostructures: hot carriers in graphene can decay through near-field interaction with hyperbolic phonon polaritons of the hBN. (33−35) Hyperbolic phonon polaritons occur in spectral regions, where the in- and out-of-plane permittivities (ϵ and ϵ, respectively) have opposite signs, i.e., the permittivity product ϵ·ϵ is negative. (36) These hyperbolic spectral regions contain a high density of optical modes, which are accessible via near-field interaction with a large range of momentum vectors. As a result, out-of-plane super-Planckian cooling for hBN-encapsulated graphene occurs with a decay time of a few picoseconds at room temperature. (33−35)
Here, we aim to unveil the intrinsic physical mechanism that ultimately limits the cooling of hot carriers in high-quality graphene. We address this question using time-resolved optical measurements of the cooling dynamics in two specifically chosen material systems: WSe2-encapsulated graphene and suspended graphene. Both systems contain “high-quality” graphene, according to our definition of having a mobility >10 000 cm2 V–1 s–1, which is high enough to make “supercollision” cooling inefficient. Furthermore, they have basically nonhyperbolic environments, such that out-of-plane cooling to hyperbolic phonons does not play any role. We show that, despite eliminating these two relaxation channels, cooling still happens on a time scale of a few picoseconds. We attribute this to the high-energy tail of the hot-carrier distribution, where electrons with an energy >0.16 eV above the chemical potential reside. These electrons lose energy by coupling to optical phonons, which in turn couple to graphene acoustic phonons, while the electronic system continuously rethermalizes. Probing the transient optical properties of graphene in the VIS, near-infrared (NIR), and THz ranges, we will show that this cooling mechanism is consistent with the experimentally obtained cooling dynamics.

Results and Discussion

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Cooling Dynamics in High-Quality WSe2-Encapsulated Graphene

The first material system we study is WSe2-encapsulated graphene (see Figure 1a). Encapsulation with materials offering atomically planar surfaces via van der Waals stacking, is a successful route for obtaining high-quality graphene, suppressing rippling, preserving high carrier mobility (37) and partially screening long-distance Coulomb scattering with substrate charges. (38) Besides hBN, WSe2 is arguably one of the most promising encapsulation materials for various technological applications of graphene. (39) One of the main reasons is that it leads to a very high room-temperature mobility, which in a recent study reached up to 350 000 cm2 V–1 s–1 for hBN/graphene/WSe2. (40) Our sample of WSe2-encapsulated monolayer graphene was prepared using exfoliation and dry transfer. The WSe2 flakes were obtained by adhesive tape exfoliation of WSe2 crystals in the trigonal prismatic phase synthesized by chemical vapor transport, as detailed in the Methods. Bottom and top WSe2 flakes are 63 and 61 nm thick, respectively, as measured by atomic force microscopy (see Figure 1b and the Supporting Information). The WSe2/graphene/WSe2 heterostructure was transferred onto a 280 μm thick CaF2 substrate that is transparent for VIS and NIR light and allows for pump–probe measurements in transmission geometry.

Figure 1

Figure 1. Characterization of the WSe2-encapsulated graphene sample. (a) Sketch of the encapsulated graphene prepared by exfoliation and dry transfer of two flakes of WSe2 and monolayer graphene. (41) (b) Atomic force microscopy image of the sample, used to determine the thicknesses of the WSe2 flakes. (c) Raman spectra of fully encapsulated graphene (blue line) and of semiencapsulated graphene (black line) obtained with 532 nm laser source. Encapsulation gives rise to a background, reduced graphene Raman signatures’ (G and 2D peaks) intensity, and a clear blue shift of the 2D peak. (d, e) Maps of the 2D peak frequency ω2D (d) and width Γ2D (e) extracted from Raman spectra at different positions on the sample fitted with a Voigt function centered in ω2D. (f, g) Statistical distribution of ω2D (f) and Γ2D (g) in the encapsulated graphene obtained from the maps in panels d and e. The narrow width suggests a high electrical mobility.

We first characterize the WSe2-encapsulated graphene using Raman spectroscopy with a 532 nm laser source (see Methods for details), in order to assess the quality of graphene and extract an estimation of its Fermi energy and charge mobility. In the regions where graphene is semiencapsulated, the Raman fingerprints of graphene, the G-peak and 2D-peak, are clearly visible (see Figure 1c). In the fully encapsulated region, the spectrum is dominated by a large background. Nevertheless, by extending the exposure time, we can identify the G-peak with center frequency of ωG ∼ 1584 cm–1 and width of ΓG ∼ 20 cm–1 (spectra in the Supporting Information). From the G-peak position and width we estimate that |EF| ≤ 0.1 eV, in agreement with a previous observation for graphene supported by single-layer WSe2. (40) Examining the 2D-peak at many positions in the encapsulated portion of graphene, we find that it is blue-shifted from ∼2689 to ∼2710 cm–1 after encapsulation; see Figure 1d. The distribution of the 2D-peak widths Γ2D in Figure 1 is centered at 18 cm–1, indicating that WSe2-encapsulated graphene has a rather homogeneous strain distribution, with little intravalley scattering and high mobility. (42) On the basis of the empirical correlation of ref (43), the measured Γ2D corresponds to a mobility of ∼80 000 cm2 V–1 s–1. In order to verify this estimate, we measured the transport properties at room temperature of a similar WSe2-encapsulated graphene heterostructure with two metal contacts and a backgate. We obtained an electron (hole) mobility of ∼39 000 cm2 V–1 s–1 (∼36 000 cm2 V–1 s–1, see Supporting Information). With such high mobility values, disorder-assisted “supercollision” cooling predicts a characteristic cooling time scale of >10 ps (see Supporting Information).
Having established the high quality of our WSe2-encapsulated graphene sample, we now study its hot-carrier cooling dynamics. We perform time-resolved transient absorption (TA) measurements in the NIR range using a high-sensitivity microscope (see Methods for details on the experimental setup), which effectively serves as an ultrafast electronic thermometer. All experiments are performed under ambient conditions and at room temperature, monitoring the time-dependent differential transmission ΔT/T(t). We use pump pulses at 1550 nm (0.8 eV) with a 40 MHz repetition rate and probe pulses at 1700 nm (0.729 eV). These photon energies are chosen well below the band gap of WSe2 (∼1.35 eV for multilayer WSe2), to avoid photoexcitation of charges in the encapsulant (see reflectance measurements in the Supporting Information). Thus, the role of the WSe2 is solely that of a dielectric environment. The pump pulses are absorbed in graphene, where they induce carrier heating, i.e., a broadening of the Fermi–Dirac distribution of the electronic system. The probe pulses are sensitive to this because the broadening leads to Pauli blocking of the interband transitions at the probe photon energy. Therefore, the pump-induced increase in probe transmission is a measure of the electronic temperature. Accordingly, the ΔT/T signal in Figure 2a is positive, indicating pump-induced transmission increase, i.e., absorption bleaching. We can distinguish between fully encapsulated and semiencapsulated graphene regions in Figure 2a, as the former gives rise to a lower transient signal (at a time delay of ∼100 fs), which is likely the result of strong Fresnel reflections at the air–WSe2 and WSe2–graphene interfaces.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Hot-carrier cooling dynamics of WSe2-encapsulated graphene. (a) Transient transmission ΔT/T maps at a fixed time delay t = 100 fs between pump and probe pulses acquired with pump at 0.8 eV (1550 nm) and probe at 0.729 eV (1700 nm). White lines indicate the edges of WSe2 flakes extracted from an optical image. The panel on the right shows a zoom of the left panel, and the black cross indicates the location in the fully encapsulated region, where the ΔT/T dynamics are measured. (b) Comparison of normalized ΔT/T relaxation dynamics of graphene encapsulated by WSe2 (blue dots) and hBN (black dots), using a pump fluence of ∼1 μJ/cm2 in both cases. Encapsulation with hBN gives rise to faster dynamics, which we attribute to out-of-plane cooling to hyperbolic phonons of hBN. (33−35) This cooling mechanism is much less efficient for WSe2 encapsulation. (c) ΔT/T dynamics (dots) for WSe2-encapsulated graphene at five different pump fluences from 0.2 to 2 μJ/cm2. The positive ΔT/T is due to pump-induced heating, leading to Pauli blocking of probe interband transitions. The solid lines are the calculated ΔT/T dynamics, based on the intrinsic hot-electron cooling mechanism via the combination of optical-phonon emission, continuous rethermalization of the electron distribution, and coupling of optical to acoustic phonons. (d) Dynamical evolution of the electron temperature Te, corresponding to the calculated ΔT/T dynamics in panel c. Here, fast decay due to the electron-optical-phonon coupling is followed by slower decay via optical-to-acoustic phonon coupling. The former component shows up very strongly in the TA signal as a consequence of the strongly superlinear relation between the TA signal ΔT/T and the change in carrier temperature ΔTe.

Figure 2b shows the relaxation dynamics of the ΔT/T signal of WSe2-encapsulated graphene and compares it to the dynamics for hBN-encapsulated graphene. The decay in WSe2-encapsulated graphene is significantly slower: the signal decays to 10% of the initial value (at time zero) after a time delay of ∼5.5 ps for WSe2-encapsulated graphene, instead of a delay of ∼2 ps for the hBN-encapsulated graphene. As shown recently, in high-quality, hBN-encapsulated graphene, hot-carrier cooling is dominated by out-of-plane coupling to hyperbolic phonons in hBN. (33−35) Since the hyperbolic nature of hBN is crucial for making this cooling channel efficient, (34) we study the hyperbolicity of WSe2 using ab initio density functional theory calculations. The comparison of in-plane and out-of-plane permittivities of WSe2 and hBN, reported in the Supporting Information, shows that WSe2 is much less hyperbolic than hBN. Therefore, out-of-plane cooling to the phonons in the encapsulant will be relatively inefficient in WSe2-encapsulated graphene, in qualitative agreement with the slower cooling that we observe. Quantitatively, however, both disorder-assisted “supercollision” cooling and out-of-plane cooling to the encapsulant would predict longer cooling times (see Supporting Information), well above 10 ps for the WSe2-encapsulated graphene sample, which is not what we observe.
In order to explain the relatively fast cooling dynamics observed in the WSe2-encapsulated graphene, we therefore consider an intrinsic cooling mechanism, based on the coupling of electrons with energy >0.16 eV above the chemical potential to optical phonons. The optical phonons, at the Γ and K points, in turn, are anharmonically coupled to acoustic phonons. An important ingredient for this cooling channel is the continuous rethermalization of the electronic system. Microscopically, this means that once the electrons with high enough energy (more than 0.16 eV above the chemical potential) have relaxed by coupling to optical phonons, the remaining electrons will rethermalize through carrier–carrier scattering. This means that some electrons will end up with an energy that is high enough to emit optical phonons. Even at an electron temperature of 300 K, there is a significant fraction of electrons that can emit optical phonons. As a result, this is a rather efficient cooling channel for graphene at room temperature. We will describe the analytical model of this cooling mechanism in more detail in the following discussion and in the Supporting Information.
We calculate the cooling dynamics and compare the results to the experimental data. In the calculation, we also take into account the superlinear relation connecting the ΔT/T signal to the change in carrier temperature. As shown in Figure 2c, the experimental data and calculated signal are in good agreement when we use an optical-to-acoustic phonon decay time of 2 ps and a Fermi energy of 0.1 eV. This optical phonon lifetime lies within the range 1.2–2.55 ps, previously reported (44−48) for graphene. Figure 2d shows the temperature dynamics corresponding to the calculated transient signals in Figure 2c, which are clearly nonexponential. The fast initial decay corresponds to efficient coupling to optical phonons, whereas the slower subsequent decay is the result of the hot-phonon bottleneck, where optical phonons are cooling to acoustic phonons.

Cooling Dynamics in High-Quality Suspended Graphene

In order to determine if this cooling mechanism is intrinsic to graphene, we study a second technologically relevant material system in which any thermal exchange with the environment is inherently excluded: high-quality suspended graphene. This sample contains large-area graphene grown by chemical vapor deposition (CVD), which was then transferred onto a transmission electron microscopy (TEM) grid; see Figure 3a. This was achieved through a polymer-free approach, using the method described in ref (49). As a TEM grid we used holey carbon, which is convenient as it has locations with relatively large holes with a diameter exceeding 10 μm. It has been shown that the graphene in such samples has a mobility well over 10 000 cm2 V–1 s–1. (50) Given the large area and high quality of graphene prepared by this fabrication approach, which is furthermore scalable, this is a highly promising material system for a broad range of electronic and optoelectronic applications.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Characterization of suspended high-quality graphene. (a) Sketch of graphene suspended on a holey carbon film. (b) Scanning electron microscopy images of suspended graphene on holey carbon, showing relatively large hole sizes and high yield. (c) TEM image of the suspended graphene, showing the absence of disorder. (d) Plot of 2D peak frequency ω2D as a function of G peak frequency ωG. Dashed lines represent the expected dependence in the strain-free (red dot-dot-dashed line) and doping-free (blue dot-dashed line) material. (e) Fermi energy EF distribution extracted from vector decomposition of peaks positions in panel d, (51) and centered at |EF| ≈ 0.18 eV. (f) Obtained distribution of 2D-peak widths, indicating a mobility of >17 000 cm2 V–1 s–1, following calculations of ref (43).

We characterize our suspended graphene sample using various microscopic techniques; see Figure 3. First, we show an image taken using scanning electron microscopy, evidencing excellent graphene coverage of the holes and providing an indication of hole sizes (see Figure 3b). TEM measurements furthermore show an atomically perfect lattice (see Figure 3c). We then perform Raman spectroscopy, in order to estimate the Fermi energy and charge mobility of the suspended graphene. Performing a strain-doping analysis of the G-peak and 2D-peak, obtained from several positions on the sample (see Figure 3d), we obtain a distribution of carrier densities (see Figure 3e), which corresponds to an average Fermi energy of ∼0.18 eV. Using the measured width of the 2D-peaks in Figure 3e and the empirical correlation of ref (43), we extract a mobility of >17 000 cm2 V–1 s–1. This result is in agreement with electrical measurements performed on a sample of suspended graphene, prepared in an identical way; see ref (50). The extracted mobility confirms the high quality of the sample, for which disorder-assisted ”supercollision” cooling predicts a cooling time >10 ps (see Supporting Information).
Having established the high quality of our suspended graphene sample, we now study its hot-carrier cooling dynamics using time-resolved transient absorption microscopy (see Methods for details on the experimental setup). We use a pump tuned at 400 nm (3.1 eV) and a probe at 800 nm (1.55 eV). Similar to the NIR TA measurements, we observe photoinduced bleaching (ΔT/T > 0) of the probe, due to heating-induced Pauli blocking. The ΔT/T map at zero time delay (overlapping pump and probe pulses) in Figure 4a shows that we can resolve the individual holes spatially and that a clearly distinctive transient signal comes from inside—from the suspended graphene. For this experiment we use relatively small spot sizes (see Methods), in order to resolve individual suspended regions.

Figure 4

Figure 4. Hot-carrier cooling dynamics of suspended graphene. (a) Transient transmission ΔT/T map at time zero, showing individual holes where graphene is suspended, acquired with pump tuned at 3.1 eV (400 nm) and probe at 1.55 eV (800 nm). (b) ΔT/T dynamics (colored dots) for suspended graphene at five different pump fluences from 3 to 38 μJ/cm2. The positive ΔT/T results from the pump-induced carrier heating that leads to decreased interband conductivity due to Pauli blocking, and thus decreased absorption of the NIR probe light. The colored lines are the calculated ΔT/T dynamics, based on the intrinsic cooling mechanism where hot electrons cool via the combination of emission of optical phonons, continuous rethermalization of the electron distribution, and coupling of optical to acoustic phonons. (c) Dynamical evolution of the electron temperature Te, corresponding to the calculated ΔT/T dynamics in panel b. Here, a fast decay due to electron-optical-phonon coupling is followed by a slower decay due to optical-to-acoustic phonon coupling.

The experimental TA dynamics of our high-quality suspended graphene sample are shown in Figure 4b for five different fluences. Similar transient optical responses were observed in suspended graphene prepared by exfoliation, in the VIS (400 nm pump, 800 nm probe), (52) and in the NIR (830 nm pump, 1100–1400 nm probe). (24) We describe the dynamics with the same cooling mechanism as for WSe2-encapsulated graphene, with the same optical-to-acoustic phonon coupling time of 2 ps (details in the Supporting Information). For this sample we use an EF = 0.15 eV, close to the experimentally determined average value. Figure 4c reports the temperature dynamics corresponding to the ΔT/T dynamics in Figure 4b, again showing an initial fast decay due to coupling between electrons and optical phonons, followed by slower decay due to optical phonons coupling to acoustic phonons.
As a final experimental test, we complement our TA measurements on suspended graphene, which probe interband transitions, with optical-pump THz probe (OPTP) measurements, which probe intraband transitions; see Figure S3 of Supporting Information. Despite the different optical transitions that are probed, both techniques essentially function as ultrafast electrical thermometers for graphene. This is because in both cases the probe absorption is affected by pump-induced changes in the carrier temperature. The observed OPTP dynamics, reported in the Supporting Information, can be described with the same model as before, confirming the validity of this intrinsic cooling mechanism.
We now discuss in more detail the cooling mechanism that we have used to describe the experimentally obtained cooling dynamics (schematically shown in Figure 5a). First, we note that in many early time-resolved studies on graphene the dynamics were explained using a qualitatively similar mechanism involving electrons decaying to optical phonons, and a hot-phonon bottleneck; cf. refs (24), (46), (52), and (53). Some of these studies applied a phenomenological two- (or three-) temperature model for electron cooling via optical phonons (and acoustic phonons), which is (implicitly) based on (re)thermalization of the electronic system. Also using electrical transport measurements, signatures of cooling via optical phonons were identified (for bilayer graphene). (54) This cooling mechanism, however, was often thought to only mediate cooling for carriers with high enough energy to couple directly to optical phonons (55) and was typically used for experiments with relatively high fluence and therefore relatively high electron temperatures. For the rest of the carriers in the hot-carrier distribution, and for cooling of systems with relatively low electron temperature, alternative cooling channels were considered. In particular, for cooling below a carrier temperature of ∼1500 K, disorder-assisted “supercollision cooling” to graphene acoustic phonons (28−30,32) and out-of-plane cooling to (hyperbolic) substrate phonons, (33−35) which can both give rise to picosecond cooling at room temperature, were thought to be the dominant mechanisms. In 2016, a microscopic, numerical, simulation of the cooling dynamics of hot carriers in graphene was presented, based on electron-to-optical phonon coupling, and including rethermalization of the carrier system. (26) The calculated cooling times were used to explain qualitative trends in decay times measured by OPTP in samples of multilayer epitaxial graphene on SiC and monolayer graphene grown by CVD. These results motivated us to (re)consider cooling via optical phonons as the intrinsic cooling pathway for high-quality graphene, where disorder-assisted cooling and out-of-plane cooling are inefficient. The cooling mechanism is schematically explained in Figure 5a. We consider two phonon baths, Γ and K phonons, and we capture qualitatively the effect of temperature smearing of the electron Fermi surface in the phonon density of states. The latter is important, because we are dealing with elevated temperatures that lead to a smeared-out Fermi surface.

Figure 5

Figure 5. Hot-carrier cooling dynamics in high-quality graphene. (a) Process of electronic cooling explained through schematics of the carrier density N as a function of carrier energy for three electron temperatures (1200, 800, and 400 K). Cooling occurs through a combination of (i) optical phonon emission by electrons with energy >0.16 eV above the chemical potential (red-shaded area), (ii) rethermalization of the electronic distribution, and (iii) anharmonic coupling of optical phonons to acoustic phonons. (b) Calculated “instantaneous” cooling time for a given initial electron temperature for three different Fermi energies. (c) Calculated cooling time as a function of lattice temperature TL for a very small ΔTe and EF = 0.03 eV. For panels b and c, cooling occurs through optical phonon emission and continuous rethermalization of the electronic system. The hot-phonon bottleneck is not included.

We developed an analytical model to describe the hot-carrier cooling dynamics in graphene. The details of the derivation are shown in the Supporting Information. Briefly, we solve the following rate equations for the electron temperature Te(t), and phonon temperature Tα(t):
(1)
The left-hand side of the first rate equation contains the electronic heat capacity Ce(Te(t)) and the temporal derivative of the electron temperature. For each electronic temperature, the chemical potential is obtained by imposing that the total carrier density is fixed. The description of electrons in terms of a single temperature and chemical potential implicitly assumes that electron–electron interband scattering processes occur on a much shorter time scale than the electron–phonon dynamics. The dependence of the chemical potential on carrier temperature that we use (see Supporting Information) correspond to those that follow from conservation of total carrier density, where both intraband and interband carrier–carrier scattering are taken into account. The right-hand side of eq 1 describes the emission of optical phonons, where the sum is over the two optical phonon modes (labeled by α), at the Γ and K point, ωα is the frequency of mode α, and is the rate of α-phonon emission. We calculate this rate analytically using a Boltzmann-equation approach, which contains one important input parameter, namely, the electron–phonon coupling strength. For this, we use the value 11.4 eV/Å, obtained by density functional theory calculations, and verified by experiments. (56) The left-hand side of the second rate equation contains , where nα(Tα) is the phonon occupation function. Its right-hand side contains a first term due to the emission of optical phonons by electrons, where the parameter Mα(Te) measures the size of the portion (an annulus) of the phonon Brillouin zone that is heated in the electron-cooling process. This parameter depends, assuming the phonon dispersion to be flat, on the maximum momentum that can be exchanged between electrons and phonons, and thus on the electron temperature Te. The second term describes the decay of optical phonons to acoustic phonons, where Tα(0) is the equilibrium phonon temperature, i.e., the lattice temperature TL. For the optical phonon decay term, we use the parameter γα as a phenomenological damping rate. There are essentially two adjustable parameters in our calculations: the optical phonon lifetime γα–1, and the parameter v that governs the temperature dependence of the phonon number density (see Supporting Information). We note that this thermodynamic model, characterized by a single electronic temperature and chemical potential, is based on underlying microscopic carrier–carrier interactions that lead to carrier (re)thermalization, as well as carrier–phonon and phonon–phonon interactions that lead to carrier cooling.
We have seen that this analytical model is able to accurately describe the experimentally obtained cooling dynamics. The hot-phonon bottleneck, occurring when the density of emitted optical phonons is so high that they cannot completely decay into acoustic phonons and part of their energy is scattered back to the electronic system, becomes more and more important with increasing initial Te, and it leads to an overall slower cooling of the graphene hot carriers. For applications operating with a small heating ΔTe, however, cooling is ultimately determined by electron-optical-phonon cooling. This regime is likely relevant for applications that require low power consumption with low light intensities. Therefore, we analytically study the cooling in the absence of the hot-phonon bottleneck, i.e., when γα → ∞. We calculate that in this case, cooling at room temperature takes between ∼500 fs, for EF = 0.3 eV, and ∼1.4 ps for 0.1 eV. Cooling to optical phonons will quickly become less efficient upon decreasing the lattice temperature TL. Around 200 K, we find a cooling time around 5 ps, whereas this increases to ∼4 ns at 100 K (see Figure 5c). We note that when ΔTe is not small, the effect of increased cooling time with decreased lattice temperature is much weaker. Thus, obtaining a longer intrinsic cooling time requires a reduction of both TL and ΔTe.
As a final discussion, we mention another physical mechanism that can play a significant role in the cooling process of hot carriers in high-mobility graphene (see Supporting Information for details). This mechanism is “diffusive cooling”, where the electron system cools down by in-plane heat diffusion out of the initially heated spot. Until now, this mechanism was mainly considered in the case of micron-sized channels of ultrahigh-quality graphene (≫10 000 cm2/(V s)) and at cryogenic temperatures. (22,57) Cooling via diffusion depends on the electronic heat diffusivity D, which increases with charge mobility and Fermi energy. (58) In the case of pump–probe measurements, the observed evolution of the electron temperature increase due to lateral heat diffusion depends on both pump and probe spot sizes (σpump and σpr, respectively), according to (see Supporting Information):
(2)
Using this equation, we calculate that, for spot sizes below 1 μm, “diffusive cooling” can become the dominant cooling channel in high-mobility graphene samples, even at room temperature. In the measurements we performed on WSe2-encapsulated graphene, “diffusive cooling” does not play a large role, due to the relatively large spot sizes that we used (see Figure S12 of the Supporting Information). However, for the measurements on suspended graphene, with smaller spot sizes, it is very likely that “diffusive cooling” contributes to the probed cooling dynamics, in particular in the tail of the dynamics. It is also conceivable that this leads to an overestimation of the optical phonon decay rate γα. We do note that this “diffusive cooling” is not an intrinsic cooling mechanism, since its contribution becomes negligible for sufficiently large spot sizes.

Conclusion

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Using three different time-resolved measurement techniques (NIR TA, VIS TA, and OPTP) and two different high-quality, technologically relevant, graphene systems (WSe2-encapsulated and suspended CVD graphene), we have shown that hot carriers decay through an intrinsic mechanism involving optical phonon emission and constant rethermalization of the electronic system. Electrons with an energy >0.16 eV above the chemical potential couple to optical phonons, which in turn decay to acoustic phonons while the electronic system continuously rethermalizes. The electron-to-optical-phonon cooling component gives rise to subpicosecond cooling. Due to the hot-phonon bottleneck governed by the anharmonic coupling of optical to acoustic phonons, an approximately biexponential cooling occurs, where the second decay component has a characteristic time scale of a few picoseconds. The overall decay becomes slower for increasing initial electron temperature (higher incident fluence) due to the hot-phonon bottleneck. Whereas previous studies considered a similar mechanism for cooling of high-energy carriers, we here show that this is the intrinsically limiting cooling mechanism for high-mobility graphene, also under relatively low incident fluences and therefore lower electron temperatures. Our analytical model suggests that this mechanism will quickly become less efficient upon decreasing the ambient temperature TL, provided that also the amount of heating is small ΔTe < TL. Thus, operating graphene with low incident fluence and at reduced ambient temperatures is likely a promising approach to optimize optoelectronic applications exploiting hot carriers in graphene.

Methods

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

High-Sensitivity Transient Absorption Microscopy

The transient absorption microscope for measurements in the NIR is custom-built starting from a Er-doped fiber laser (Toptica-Femto fiber pro) generating 300 mW, 150 fs pulses centered at 1550 nm with 40 MHz repetition rate. A portion of the output of the laser is used as the pump pulse, and it is modulated with an acousto-optic modulator operating at 1 MHz. The NIR probe pulse is obtained by a supercontinuum (SC) generation focusing part of the laser fundamental in a highly nonlinear fiber. The high-energy component of the SC and the fundamental frequency are filtered out with a long-pass filter cutting at 1600 nm, and the component at 1700 nm is selected with a double-grating monochromator with 5 nm spectral resolution. The pump and the probe are collinearly focused on the sample with an objective (Olympus-LCPLN-IR with magnification 100× and NA = 0.85) over a spot size of 2.8 (3.0) μm for the probe (pump) pulse. The probe transmitted by the sample is collected with an achromatic doublet with a 8 mm focal length and detected by an InGaAs balanced amplified photodiode with 4 MHz bandwidth. The component of the probe at the modulation frequency is measured with a lock-in amplifier (HFLI, Zurich Instruments) using 300 ms effective time constant resulting in a ΔT/T sensitivity below 10–6. Transient transmission dynamics is monitored by changing the pump–probe time delay with an optical delay line, while the pump–probe maps (images) at fixed time-delay are acquired by moving the sample with a motorized three-axis piezo-stack linear stage (Newport NPXYZ100). Image size of 120 × 120 pixels is used in the experiment. The width of the cross-correlation between pump and probe pulses at the sample is ∼210 fs.
The transient absorption measurements in the VIS on suspended graphene are performed using 400 nm pump and 800 nm probe pulses with 150 fs pulses at 76 MHz repetition rate. Both pump and probe pulses are carefully overlapped and focused at the same focal plane with a 40×/0.6 NA objective to focal spot sizes of 1.35 and 0.9 μm, respectively. The pump beam is modulated with an optical chopper at 6.4 kHz. The probe is delayed temporally with a mechanical delay line and detected in transmission on a balanced photodiode via lock-in detection. Further details of the setup are described in ref (59).

Raman Spectroscopy

For Raman characterization, we used an inVia confocal Raman spectrometer from Renishaw plc, equipped with 473 and 532 nm CW laser sources. The laser beam was focused onto the sample through a 100× objective lens, with 0.89 NA. The nominal fwhm of the Gaussian beam at the focus is estimated to be ∼1 μm, and the step size for the maps is set to 4 μm. The laser power hitting the sample in the selected configurations for the measurements were 1.6 mW for the 473 nm laser and 0.7 mW for the 532 nm. With an exposure time per pixel of 60 s, the fluence was 122 and 53 mJ/μm2, respectively. Depending on the measurement, a 1800 lines/mm grating or a denser 2400 lines/mm were used. The spectra are calibrated with respect to the Si peak at 520 cm–1.

Supporting Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsnano.0c10864.

  • Hyperbolic cooling model, cooling dynamics probed with terahertz pulses, topography of encapsulated graphene, electron mobility of WSe2-encapsulated graphene, Raman characterization of WSe2-encapsulated graphene, fully encapsulated vs semiencapsulated graphene, differential reflectance of WSe2-encapsulated graphene, cooling due to lateral heat diffusion, cooling via disorder-assisted acoustic phonon scattering, cooling via optical phonons (PDF)

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Author Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

  • Corresponding Author
  • Authors
    • Eva A. A. Pogna - NEST, Istituto Nanoscienze-CNR and Scuola Normale Superiore, 56127 Pisa, ItalyDepartment of Physics, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milan, ItalyOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-4779-3549
    • Xiaoyu Jia - Max-Planck-Institut für Polymerforschung, 55128 Mainz, Germany
    • Alessandro Principi - School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manchester, M13 9PL Manchester, U.K.
    • Alexander Block - Catalan Institute of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology (ICN2), BIST & CSIC, Campus UAB, Bellaterra, Barcelona 08193, Spain
    • Luca Banszerus - JARA-FIT and second Institute of Physics, RWTH Aachen University, 52074 Aachen, Germany, EUOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-1855-1287
    • Jincan Zhang - Center for Nanochemistry, College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Peking University, Beijing 100871, ChinaBeijing Graphene Institute, Beijing 100095, P. R. China
    • Xiaoting Liu - Center for Nanochemistry, College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Peking University, Beijing 100871, ChinaBeijing Graphene Institute, Beijing 100095, P. R. China
    • Thibault Sohier - NanoMat/Q-Mat/CESAM, Université de Liège (B5), B-4000 Liège, Belgium
    • Stiven Forti - Center for Nanotechnology Innovation IIT@NEST, Piazza San Silvestro 12, 56127 Pisa, Italy
    • Karuppasamy Soundarapandian - ICFO - Institut de Ciències Fotòniques, BIST, Castelldefels, Barcelona 08860, Spain
    • Bernat Terrés - ICFO - Institut de Ciències Fotòniques, BIST, Castelldefels, Barcelona 08860, Spain
    • Jake D. Mehew - Catalan Institute of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology (ICN2), BIST & CSIC, Campus UAB, Bellaterra, Barcelona 08193, Spain
    • Chiara Trovatello - Department of Physics, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milan, ItalyOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-8150-9743
    • Camilla Coletti - Center for Nanotechnology Innovation IIT@NEST, Piazza San Silvestro 12, 56127 Pisa, ItalyGraphene Laboratories, Via Morego 30, 16163 Genova, ItalyOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-8134-7633
    • Frank H. L. Koppens - ICFO - Institut de Ciències Fotòniques, BIST, Castelldefels, Barcelona 08860, SpainICREA - Institució Catalana de Reçerca i Estudis Avancats, 08010 Barcelona, SpainOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-9764-6120
    • Mischa Bonn - Max-Planck-Institut für Polymerforschung, 55128 Mainz, GermanyOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-6851-8453
    • Hai I. Wang - Max-Planck-Institut für Polymerforschung, 55128 Mainz, GermanyOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-0940-3984
    • Niek van Hulst - ICFO - Institut de Ciències Fotòniques, BIST, Castelldefels, Barcelona 08860, SpainICREA - Institució Catalana de Reçerca i Estudis Avancats, 08010 Barcelona, SpainOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-4630-1776
    • Matthieu J. Verstraete - NanoMat/Q-Mat/CESAM, Université de Liège (B5), B-4000 Liège, Belgium
    • Hailin Peng - Center for Nanochemistry, College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Peking University, Beijing 100871, ChinaBeijing Graphene Institute, Beijing 100095, P. R. ChinaOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-1569-0238
    • Zhongfan Liu - Center for Nanochemistry, College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Peking University, Beijing 100871, ChinaBeijing Graphene Institute, Beijing 100095, P. R. ChinaOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-0065-7988
    • Christoph Stampfer - JARA-FIT and second Institute of Physics, RWTH Aachen University, 52074 Aachen, Germany, EUOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-4958-7362
    • Giulio Cerullo - Department of Physics, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy
  • Notes
    The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Acknowledgments

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

We would like to thank Andrea Tomadin for discussions. The authors acknowledge funding from the European Union Horizon 2020 Programme under Grant Agreement No. 881603 Graphene Core 3. ICN2 was supported by the Severo Ochoa program from Spanish MINECO (Grant No. SEV-2017-0706). A.P. acknowledges support from the European Commission under the EU Horizon 2020 MSCA-RISE-2019 programme (project 873028 HYDROTRONICS) and from the Leverhulme Trust under grant RPG-2019-363. K.J.T. acknowledges funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under Grant Agreement No. 804349 (ERC StG CUHL), RyC fellowship No. RYC-2017-22330, and IAE project PID2019-111673GB-I00 and financial support through the MAINZ Visiting Professorship. X.J. acknowledges the support from the Max Planck Graduate Center with the Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz (MPGC). J.Z. acknowledges the support from National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 52072042). Z.L. acknowledges the support from National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51520105003). T.S. acknowledges support from the University of Liege under Special Funds for Research, IPD-STEMA Programme. M.J.V. gratefully acknowledges funding from the Belgian Fonds National de la Recherche Scientifique (FNRS) under PDR grant T.0103.19-ALPS. Computational resources were provided by CECI (FRS-FNRS G.A. 2.5020.11) and the Zenobe Tier-1 supercomputer (Gouvernement Wallon G.A. 1117545) and by a PRACE-3IP DECI grant 2DSpin and Pylight on Beskow (G.A. 653838 of H2020). ICFO was supported by the Severo Ochoa program for Centers of Excellence in R&D (CEX2019-000910-S), Fundació Privada Cellex, Fundació Privada Mir-Puig, and the Generalitat de Catalunya through the CERCA program. N.v.H. acknowledges funding by the European Commission (ERC AdG 670949-LightNet), the Spanish Plan Nacional (PGC2018-096875-BI00), and the Catalan AGAUR (2017SGR1369).

References

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article references 59 other publications.

  1. 1
    George, P. A.; Strait, J.; Dawlaty, J.; Shivaraman, S.; Chandrashekhar, M.; Rana, F.; Spencer, M. G. Ultrafast Optical-Pump Terahertz-Probe Spectroscopy of the Carrier Relaxation and Recombination Dynamics in Epitaxial Graphene. Nano Lett. 2008, 8, 42484251,  DOI: 10.1021/nl8019399
  2. 2
    Breusing, M.; Kuehn, S.; Winzer, T.; Malić, E.; Milde, F.; Severin, N.; Rabe, J. P.; Ropers, C.; Knorr, A.; Elsaesser, T. Ultrafast Nonequilibrium Carrier Dynamics in a Single Graphene Layer. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2011, 83, 153410,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.83.153410
  3. 3
    Brida, D.; Tomadin, A.; Manzoni, C.; Kim, Y. J.; Lombardo, A.; Milana, S.; Nair, R. R.; Novoselov, K. S.; Ferrari, A. C.; Cerullo, G.; Polini, M. Ultrafast Collinear Scattering and Carrier Multiplication in Graphene. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 1987,  DOI: 10.1038/ncomms2987
  4. 4
    Gierz, I.; Petersen, J. C.; Mitrano, M.; Cacho, C.; Turcu, I. C. E.; Springate, E.; Stöhr, A.; Köhler, A.; Starke, U.; Cavalleri, A. Snapshots of Non-Equilibrium Dirac Carrier Distributions in Graphene. Nat. Mater. 2013, 12, 11191124,  DOI: 10.1038/nmat3757
  5. 5
    Tielrooij, K.; Song, J.; Jensen, S. A.; Centeno, A.; Pesquera, A.; Elorza, A. Z.; Bonn, M.; Levitov, L.; Koppens, F. Photoexcitation Cascade and Multiple Hot-Carrier Generation in Graphene. Nat. Phys. 2013, 9, 248252,  DOI: 10.1038/nphys2564
  6. 6
    Xia, F.; Mueller, T.; Lin, Y.-m.; Valdes-Garcia, A.; Avouris, P. Ultrafast Graphene Photodetector. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2009, 4, 839843,  DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2009.292
  7. 7
    Koppens, F. H. L.; Mueller, T.; Avouris, P.; Ferrari, A. C.; Vitiello, M. S.; Polini, M. Photodetectors Based on Graphene, Other Two-Dimensional Materials and Hybrid Systems. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2014, 9, 780793,  DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2014.215
  8. 8
    Bandurin, D. A.; Svintsov, D.; Gayduchenko, I.; Xu, S. G.; Principi, A.; Moskotin, M.; Tretyakov, I.; Yagodkin, D.; Zhukov, S.; Taniguchi, T.; Watanabe, K.; Grigorieva, I. V.; Polini, M.; Goltsman, G. N.; Geim, A. K.; Fedoro, G. Resonant Terahertz Detection Using Graphene Plasmons. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 5392,  DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-07848-w
  9. 9
    Castilla, S.; Terrés, B.; Autore, M.; Viti, L.; Li, J.; Nikitin, A. Y.; Vangelidis, I.; Watanabe, K.; Taniguchi, T.; Lidorikis, E.; Vitiello, M. S.; Hillenbrand, R.; Tielrooij, K.-J.; Koppens, F. H. L. Fast and Sensitive Terahertz Detection Using an Antenna-Integrated Graphene pn Junction. Nano Lett. 2019, 19, 27652773,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b04171
  10. 10
    Viti, L.; Purdie, D. G.; Lombardo, A.; Ferrari, A. C.; Vitiello, M. S. HBN-Encapsulated, Graphene-Based, Room-Temperature Terahertz Receivers, with High Speed and Low Noise. Nano Lett. 2020, 20, 31693177,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b05207
  11. 11
    Liu, M.; Yin, X.; Ulin-Avila, E.; Geng, B.; Zentgraf, T.; Ju, L.; Wang, F.; Zhang, X. A Graphene-Based Broadband Optical Modulator. Nature 2011, 474, 6467,  DOI: 10.1038/nature10067
  12. 12
    Romagnoli, M.; Sorianello, V.; Midrio, M.; Koppens, F. H. L.; Huyghebaert, C.; Neumaier, D.; Galli, P.; Templ, W.; Ferrari, A. C. Graphene-Based Integrated Photonics for Next-Generation Datacom and Telecom. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2018, 3, 392414,  DOI: 10.1038/s41578-018-0040-9
  13. 13
    Muench, J. E.; Ruocco, A.; Giambra, M. A.; Miseikis, V.; Zhang, D.; Wang, J.; Watson, H. F. Y.; Park, G. C.; Akhavan, S.; Sorianello, V.; Midrio, M.; Tomadin, A.; Coletti, C.; Romagnoli, M.; Ferrari, A. C.; Goykhman, I. Waveguide-Integrated, Plasmonic Enhanced Graphene Photodetectors. Nano Lett. 2019, 19, 76327644,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b02238
  14. 14
    Hafez, H. A.; Kovalev, S.; Deinert, J. C.; Mics, Z.; Green, B.; Awari, N.; Chen, M.; Germanskiy, S.; Lehnert, U.; Teichert, J.; Wang, Z.; Tielrooij, K. J.; Liu, Z.; Chen, Z.; Narita, A.; Müllen, K.; Bonn, M.; Gensch, M.; Turchinovich, D. Extremely Efficient Terahertz High-Harmonic Generation in Graphene by Hot Dirac Fermions. Nature 2018, 561, 507511,  DOI: 10.1038/s41586-018-0508-1
  15. 15
    Soavi, G.; Wang, G.; Rostami, H.; Purdie, D. G.; De Fazio, D.; Ma, T.; Luo, B.; Wang, J.; Ott, A. K.; Yoon, D.; Bourelle, S. A.; Muench, J. E.; Goykhman, I.; Dal Conte, S.; Celebrano, M.; Tomadin, A.; Polini, M.; Cerullo, G.; Ferrari, A. C. Broadband, Electrically Tunable Third-Harmonic Generation in Graphene. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2018, 13, 583588,  DOI: 10.1038/s41565-018-0145-8
  16. 16
    Soavi, G.; Wang, G.; Rostami, H.; Tomadin, A.; Balci, O.; Paradisanos, I.; Pogna, E. A. A.; Cerullo, G.; Lidorikis, E.; Polini, M.; Ferrari, A. C. Hot Electrons Modulation of Third-Harmonic Generation in Graphene. ACS Photonics 2019, 6, 28412849,  DOI: 10.1021/acsphotonics.9b00928
  17. 17
    Deinert, J.-C.; Iranzo, D. A.; Perez, R.; Jia, X.; Hafez, H. A.; Ilyakov, I.; Awari, N.; Chen, M.; Bawatna, M.; Ponomaryov, A. N.; Germanskiy, S.; Bonn, M.; Koppens, F. H. L.; Turchinovich, D.; Gensch, M.; Kovalev, S.; Tielrooij, K.-J. Grating-Graphene Metamaterial as a Platform for Terahertz Nonlinear Photonics. ACS Nano 2021, 15, 11451154,  DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.0c08106
  18. 18
    Gabor, N. M.; Song, J. C.; Ma, Q.; Nair, N. L.; Taychatanapat, T.; Watanabe, K.; Taniguchi, T.; Levitov, L. S.; Jarillo-Herrero, P. Hot Carrier-Assisted Intrinsic Photoresponse in Graphene. Science 2011, 334, 648652,  DOI: 10.1126/science.1211384
  19. 19
    Tielrooij, K.-J.; Piatkowski, L.; Massicotte, M.; Woessner, A.; Ma, Q.; Lee, Y.; Myhro, K. S.; Lau, C. N.; Jarillo-Herrero, P.; van Hulst, N. F.; Koppens, F. H. L. Generation of Photovoltage in Graphene on a Femtosecond Timescale through Efficient Carrier Heating. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2015, 10, 437443,  DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2015.54
  20. 20
    Iglesias, J. M.; Pascual, E.; Martín, M. J.; Rengel, R. Relevance of Collinear Processes to the Ultrafast Dynamics of Photoexcited Carriers in Graphene. Phys. E 2020, 123, 114211,  DOI: 10.1016/j.physe.2020.114211
  21. 21
    Tomadin, A.; Hornett, S. M.; Wang, H. I.; Alexeev, E. M.; Candini, A.; Coletti, C.; Turchinovich, D.; Kläui, M.; Bonn, M.; Koppens, F. H. L.; Hendry, E.; Polini, M.; Tielrooij, K.-J. The Ultrafast Dynamics and Conductivity of Photoexcited Graphene at Different Fermi Energies. Sci. Adv. 2018, 4, eaar5313,  DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aar5313
  22. 22
    Fong, K. C.; Wollman, E. E.; Ravi, H.; Chen, W.; Clerk, A. A.; Shaw, M. D.; Leduc, H. G.; Schwab, K. C. Measurement of the Electronic Thermal Conductance Channels and Heat Capacity of Graphene at Low Temperature. Phys. Rev. X 2013, 3, 41008,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevX.3.041008
  23. 23
    Kampfrath, T.; Perfetti, L.; Schapper, F.; Frischkorn, C.; Wolf, M. Strongly Coupled Optical Phonons in the Ultrafast Dynamics of the Electronic Energy and Current Relaxation in Graphite. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2005, 95, 187403,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.187403
  24. 24
    Hale, P. J.; Hornett, S. M.; Moger, J.; Horsell, D. W.; Hendry, E. Hot Phonon Decay in Supported and Suspended Exfoliated Graphene. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2011, 83, 121404,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.83.121404
  25. 25
    Mounet, N.; Marzari, N. First-Principles Determination of the Structural, Vibrational and Thermodynamic Properties of Diamond, Graphite, and Derivatives. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2005, 71, 205214,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.71.205214
  26. 26
    Mihnev, M. T.; Kadi, F.; Divin, C. J.; Winzer, T.; Lee, S.; Liu, C.-h.; Zhong, Z.; Berger, C.; Heer, W. A. D.; Malic, E.; Knorr, A.; Norris, T. B. Microscopic Origins of the Terahertz Carrier Relaxation and Cooling Dynamics in Graphene. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 11617,  DOI: 10.1038/ncomms11617
  27. 27
    Bistritzer, R.; MacDonald, A. H. Electronic Cooling in Graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009, 102, 206410,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.206410
  28. 28
    Song, J. C. W.; Reizer, M. Y.; Levitov, L. S. Disorder-Assisted Electron-Phonon Scattering and Cooling Pathways in Graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2012, 109, 106602,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.106602
  29. 29
    Betz, A. C.; Jhang, S. H.; Pallecchi, E.; Ferreira, R.; Fève, G.; Berroir, J.-M.; Plaçais, B. Supercollision Cooling in Undoped Graphene. Nat. Phys. 2013, 9, 109112,  DOI: 10.1038/nphys2494
  30. 30
    Graham, M. W.; Shi, S.-F.; Wang, Z.; Ralph, D. C.; Park, J.; McEuen, P. L. Transient Absorption and Photocurrent Microscopy Show that Hot Electron Supercollisions Describe the Rate-Limiting Relaxation Step in Graphene. Nano Lett. 2013, 13, 5497502,  DOI: 10.1021/nl4030787
  31. 31
    Alencar, T. V.; Silva, M. G.; Malard, L. M.; de Paula, A. M. Defect-Induced Supercollision Cooling of Photoexcited Carriers in Graphene. Nano Lett. 2014, 14, 56215624,  DOI: 10.1021/nl502163d
  32. 32
    Graham, M. W.; Shi, S. F.; Ralph, D. C.; Park, J.; McEuen, P. L. Photocurrent Measurements of Supercollision Cooling in Graphene. Nat. Phys. 2013, 9, 103108,  DOI: 10.1038/nphys2493
  33. 33
    Tielrooij, K.-J.; Hesp, N. C. H.; Principi, A.; Lundeberg, M. B.; Pogna, E. A. A.; Banszerus, L.; Mics, Z.; Massicotte, M.; Schmidt, P.; Davydovskaya, D.; Purdie, D. G.; Goykhman, I.; Soavi, G.; Lombardo, A.; Watanabe, K.; Taniguchi, T.; Bonn, M.; Turchinovich, D.; Stampfer, C.; Ferrari, A. C.; Cerullo, G.; Polini, M.; Koppens, F. H. L. Out-of-Plane Heat Transfer in van der Waals Stacks through Electron-Hyperbolic Phonon Coupling. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2018, 13, 4146,  DOI: 10.1038/s41565-017-0008-8
  34. 34
    Principi, A.; Lundeberg, M. B.; Hesp, N. C.; Tielrooij, K. J.; Koppens, F. H.; Polini, M. Super-Planckian Electron Cooling in a van der Waals Stack. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2017, 118, 126804,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.126804
  35. 35
    Yang, W.; Berthou, S.; Lu, X.; Wilmart, Q.; Denis, A.; Rosticher, M.; Taniguchi, T.; Watanabe, K.; Fève, G.; Berroir, J.-m.; Zhang, G.; Voisin, C.; Baudin, E.; Plaçais, B. A Graphene Zener-Klein Transistor Cooled by a Hyperbolic Substrate. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2018, 13, 4752,  DOI: 10.1038/s41565-017-0007-9
  36. 36
    Caldwell, J. D.; Kretinin, A. V.; Chen, Y.; Giannini, V.; Fogler, M. M.; Francescato, Y.; Ellis, C. T.; Tischler, J. G.; Woods, C. R.; Giles, A. J.; Hong, M.; Watanabe, K.; Taniguchi, T.; Maier, S. A.; Novoselov, K. S. Sub-Diffractional Volume-Confined Polaritons in the Natural Hyperbolic Material Hexagonal Boron Nitride. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 5521,  DOI: 10.1038/ncomms6221
  37. 37
    Dean, C. R.; Young, A. F.; Meric, I.; Lee, C.; Wang, L.; Sorgenfrei, S.; Watanabe, K.; Taniguchi, T.; Kim, P.; Shepard, K. L.; Hone, J. Boron Nitride Substrates for High-Quality Graphene Electronics. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2010, 5, 722726,  DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2010.172
  38. 38
    Wang, L.; Meric, I.; Huang, P.; Gao, Q.; Gao, Y.; Tran, H.; Taniguchi, T.; Watanabe, K.; Campos, L.; Muller, D. A.; Guo, J.; Kim, P.; Hone, J.; Shepard, K. L.; Dean, C. R. One-Dimensional Electrical Contact to a Two-Dimensional Material. Science 2013, 342, 614617,  DOI: 10.1126/science.1244358
  39. 39
    Banszerus, L.; Janssen, H.; Otto, M.; Epping, A.; Taniguchi, T.; Watanabe, K.; Beschoten, B.; Neumaier, D.; Stampfer, C. Identifying Suitable Substrates for High-Quality Graphene-Based Heterostructures. 2D Mater. 2017, 4, 025030,  DOI: 10.1088/2053-1583/aa5b0f
  40. 40
    Banszerus, L.; Sohier, T.; Epping, A.; Winkler, F.; Libisch, F.; Haupt, F.; Watanabe, K.; Taniguchi, T.; Müller-Caspary, K.; Marzari, N.; Mauri, F.; Beschoten, B.; Stampfer, C. Extraordinary High Room-Temperature Carrier Mobility in Graphene-WSe2 Heterostructures. arXiv:1909.09523 http://arxiv.org/abs/1909.09523 (accessed December 25, 2020).
  41. 41
    Backes, C.; Abdelkader, A. M.; Alonso, C.; Andrieux-Ledier, A.; Arenal, R.; Azpeitia, J.; Balakrishnan, N.; Banszerus, L.; Barjon, J.; Bartali, R.; Bellani, S.; Berger, C.; Berger, R.; Ortega, M. M.; Bernard, C.; Beton, P. H.; Beyer, A.; Bianco, A.; Bøggild, P.; Bonaccorso, A. Production and Processing of Graphene and Related Materials. 2D Mater. 2020, 7, 022001,  DOI: 10.1088/2053-1583/ab1e0a
  42. 42
    Neumann, C.; Banszerus, L.; Schmitz, M.; Reichardt, S.; Sonntag, J.; Taniguchi, T.; Watanabe, K.; Beschoten, B.; Stampfer, C. Line Shape of the Raman 2D Peak of Graphene in van der Waals Heterostructures. Phys. Status Solidi B 2016, 253, 23262330,  DOI: 10.1002/pssb.201600283
  43. 43
    Robinson, J. A.; Wetherington, M.; Tedesco, J. L.; Campbell, P. M.; Weng, X.; Stitt, J.; Fanton, M. A.; Frantz, E.; Snyder, D.; VanMil, B. L.; Jernigan, G. G.; Rachael, L. M. W.; Eddy, C. R.; Gaskill, D. K. Correlating Raman Spectral Signatures with Carrier Mobility in Epitaxial Graphene: A Guide to Achieving High Mobility on the Wafer Scale. Nano Lett. 2009, 9, 28732876,  DOI: 10.1021/nl901073g
  44. 44
    Kang, K.; Abdula, D.; Cahill, D. G.; Shim, M. Lifetimes of Optical Phonons in Graphene and Graphite by Time-Resolved Incoherent Anti-Stokes Raman Scattering. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2010, 81, 165405,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.165405
  45. 45
    Lui, C. H.; Mak, K. F.; Shan, J.; Heinz, T. F. Ultrafast Photoluminescence from Graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2010, 105, 127404,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.127404
  46. 46
    Wang, H.; Strait, J. H.; George, P. A.; Shivaraman, S.; Shields, V. B.; Chandrashekhar, M.; Hwang, J.; Rana, F.; Spencer, M. G.; Ruiz-Vargas, C. S.; Park, J. Ultrafast Relaxation Dynamics of Hot Optical Phonons in Graphene. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2010, 96, 081917,  DOI: 10.1063/1.3291615
  47. 47
    Wu, S.; Liu, W. T.; Liang, X.; Schuck, P. J.; Wang, F.; Shen, Y. R.; Salmeron, M. Hot Phonon Dynamics in Graphene. Nano Lett. 2012, 12, 54955499,  DOI: 10.1021/nl301997r
  48. 48
    Bonini, N.; Lazzeri, M.; Marzari, N.; Mauri, F. Phonon Anharmonicities in Graphite and Graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2007, 99, 176802,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.176802
  49. 49
    Zhang, J.; Lin, L.; Sun, L.; Huang, Y.; Koh, A. L.; Dang, W.; Yin, J.; Wang, M.; Tan, C.; Li, T.; Tan, Z.; Liu, Z.; Peng, H. Clean Transfer of Large Graphene Single Crystals for High-Intactness Suspended Membranes and Liquid Cells. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1700639,  DOI: 10.1002/adma.201700639
  50. 50
    Lin, L.; Zhang, J.; Su, H.; Li, J.; Sun, L.; Wang, Z.; Xu, F.; Liu, C.; Lopatin, S.; Zhu, Y.; Jia, K.; Chen, S.; Rui, D.; Sun, J.; Xue, R.; Gao, P.; Kang, N.; Han, Y.; Xu, H. Q.; Cao, Y. Towards Super-Clean Graphene. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 1912,  DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-09565-4
  51. 51
    Lee, J. E.; Ahn, G.; Shim, J.; Lee, Y. S.; Ryu, S. Optical Separation of Mechanical Strain from Charge Doping in Graphene. Nat. Commun. 2012, 3, 1024,  DOI: 10.1038/ncomms2022
  52. 52
    Malard, L. M.; Mak, K. F.; Neto, A. C.; Peres, N.; Heinz, T. F. Observation of Intra-and Inter-Band Transitions in the Transient Optical Response of Graphene. New J. Phys. 2013, 15, 015009,  DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/15/1/015009
  53. 53
    Huang, L.; Gao, B.; Hartland, G.; Kelly, M.; Xing, H. Ultrafast Relaxation of Hot Optical Phonons in Monolayer and Multilayer Graphene on Different Substrates. Surf. Sci. 2011, 605, 16571661,  DOI: 10.1016/j.susc.2010.12.009
  54. 54
    Laitinen, A.; Kumar, M.; Oksanen, M.; Plaçais, B.; Virtanen, P.; Hakonen, P. Coupling between Electrons and Optical Phonons in Suspended Bilayer Graphene. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2015, 91, 121414,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.91.121414
  55. 55
    Viljas, J.; Heikkilä, T. Electron-Phonon Heat Transfer in Monolayer and Bilayer Graphene. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2010, 81, 245404,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.245404
  56. 56
    Sohier, T.; Calandra, M.; Park, C.-H.; Bonini, N.; Marzari, N.; Mauri, F. Phonon-Limited Resistivity of Graphene by First-Principles Calculations: Electron-Phonon Interactions, Strain-Induced Gauge Field, and Boltzmann Equation. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2014, 90, 125414,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.90.125414
  57. 57
    Betz, A. C.; Vialla, F.; Brunel, D.; Voisin, C.; Picher, M.; Cavanna, A.; Madouri, A.; Fève, G.; Berroir, J. M.; Plaçais, B.; Pallecchi, E. Hot Electron Cooling by Acoustic Phonons in Graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2012, 109, 056805,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.056805
  58. 58
    Massicotte, M.; Soavi, G.; Principi, A.; Tielrooij, K. J. Hot Carriers in Graphene-Fundamentals and Applications. Nanoscale 2021, 13, 83768411,  DOI: 10.1039/D0NR09166A
  59. 59
    Block, A.; Liebel, M.; Yu, R.; Spector, M.; Sivan, Y.; de Abajo, F. G.; van Hulst, N. F. Tracking Ultrafast Hot-Electron Diffusion in Space and Time by Ultrafast Thermomodulation Microscopy. Sci. Adv. 2019, 5, eaav8965,  DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aav8965

Cited By

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article is cited by 55 publications.

  1. Qi Xi, Jin Yang, Jiafeng Xie, Xinyao Wang, Feihong Xu, Qi Li, Kai Zhang, Tianwu Wang, Fuhai Su. Terahertz Saturable Absorption across Charge Separation in Photoexcited Monolayer Graphene/MoS2 Heterostructure. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 2025, 16 (2) , 553-560. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.4c03138
  2. Simon Anglhuber, Martin Zizlsperger, Eva A. A. Pogna, Yaroslav A. Gerasimenko, Anastasios D. Koulouklidis, Imke Gronwald, Svenja Nerreter, Leonardo Viti, Miriam S. Vitiello, Rupert Huber, Markus A. Huber. Spacetime Imaging of Group and Phase Velocities of Terahertz Surface Plasmon Polaritons in Graphene. Nano Letters 2025, Article ASAP.
  3. Mingyu Zhang, Zhanqi Zhang, Yiyong Shang, Nannan Shi, Zhijun Li, Jun Mao, Qian Zhang. Unveiling van Hove Singularity-Boosted Photothermoelectric Response for Wearable Human-Radiation Detection. ACS Sensors 2024, 9 (12) , 6646-6654. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssensors.4c02224
  4. Lukas Rieland, Julian Wagner, Robin Bernhardt, Tianyi Wang, Omar Abdul-Aziz, Philipp Stein, Eva A. A. Pogna, Stefano Dal Conte, Giulio Cerullo, Hamoon Hedayat, Paul H. M. van Loosdrecht. Ultrafast Optical Control of Exciton Diffusion in WSe2/Graphene Heterostructures Revealed by Heterodyne Transient Grating Spectroscopy. Nano Letters 2024, 24 (32) , 9824-9831. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.4c01516
  5. Florian Ludwig, Andrey Generalov, Jakob Holstein, Anton Murros, Klaara Viisanen, Mika Prunnila, Hartmut G. Roskos. Terahertz Detection with Graphene FETs: Photothermoelectric and Resistive Self-Mixing Contributions to the Detector Response. ACS Applied Electronic Materials 2024, 6 (4) , 2197-2212. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaelm.3c01511
  6. Alessandra Di Gaspare, Osman Balci, Jincan Zhang, Adil Meersha, Sachin M. Shinde, Lianhe Li, A. Giles Davies, Edmund H. Linfield, Andrea C. Ferrari, Miriam S. Vitiello. Electrically Tunable Nonlinearity at 3.2 Terahertz in Single-Layer Graphene. ACS Photonics 2023, 10 (9) , 3171-3180. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsphotonics.3c00543
  7. Jokotadeola A. Odutola, Horatiu Szalad, Josep Albero, Hermenegildo García, Nikolai V. Tkachenko. Long-Lived Photo-Response of Multi-Layer N-Doped Graphene-Based Films. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2023, 127 (36) , 17896-17905. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.3c04670
  8. Igor Ilyakov, Alexey Ponomaryov, David Saleta Reig, Conor Murphy, Jake Dudley Mehew, Thales V.A.G. de Oliveira, Gulloo Lal Prajapati, Atiqa Arshad, Jan-Christoph Deinert, Monica Felicia Craciun, Saverio Russo, Sergey Kovalev, Klaas-Jan Tielrooij. Ultrafast Tunable Terahertz-to-Visible Light Conversion through Thermal Radiation from Graphene Metamaterials. Nano Letters 2023, 23 (9) , 3872-3878. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.3c00507
  9. Sichao Du, Hao Xie, Juxin Yin, Tao Fang, Shuo Zhang, Yunlei Sun, Chunfeng Cai, Gang Bi, Zhongbao Chen, Duo Xiao, Wenchao Chen, Xiao-Guang Yang, Dawei Wang, Wen-Yan Yin, Rongkun Zheng. Competition Pathways of Energy Relaxation of Hot Electrons through Coupling with Optical, Surface, and Acoustic Phonons. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2023, 127 (4) , 1929-1936. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.2c07791
  10. Bin Cao, Tobias Grass, Olivier Gazzano, Kishan Ashokbhai Patel, Jiuning Hu, Markus Müller, Tobias Huber-Loyola, Luca Anzi, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, David B. Newell, Michael Gullans, Roman Sordan, Mohammad Hafezi, Glenn S. Solomon. Chiral Transport of Hot Carriers in Graphene in the Quantum Hall Regime. ACS Nano 2022, 16 (11) , 18200-18209. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.2c05502
  11. Anastasios D. Koulouklidis, Anna C. Tasolamprou, Spyros Doukas, Eudokia Kyriakou, M. Said Ergoktas, Christina Daskalaki, Eleftherios N. Economou, Coskun Kocabas, Elefterios Lidorikis, Maria Kafesaki, Stelios Tzortzakis. Ultrafast Terahertz Self-Induced Absorption and Phase Modulation on a Graphene-Based Thin Film Absorber. ACS Photonics 2022, 9 (9) , 3075-3082. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsphotonics.2c00828
  12. Hang Jiang, Yuanan Zhao, Hao Ma, Yi Wu, Meiling Chen, Mengxia Wang, Weili Zhang, Yujie Peng, Yuxin Leng, Zhaoliang Cao, Jianda Shao. Broad-Band Ultrafast All-Optical Switching Based on Enhanced Nonlinear Absorption in Corrugated Indium Tin Oxide Films. ACS Nano 2022, 16 (8) , 12878-12888. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.2c05139
  13. Ioannis Vangelidis, Dimitris V. Bellas, Stephan Suckow, George Dabos, Sebastián Castilla, Frank H. L. Koppens, Andrea C. Ferrari, Nikos Pleros, Elefterios Lidorikis. Unbiased Plasmonic-Assisted Integrated Graphene Photodetectors. ACS Photonics 2022, 9 (6) , 1992-2007. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsphotonics.2c00100
  14. Eva A. A. Pogna, Andrea Tomadin, Osman Balci, Giancarlo Soavi, Ioannis Paradisanos, Michele Guizzardi, Paolo Pedrinazzi, Sandro Mignuzzi, Klaas-Jan Tielrooij, Marco Polini, Andrea C. Ferrari, Giulio Cerullo. Electrically Tunable Nonequilibrium Optical Response of Graphene. ACS Nano 2022, 16 (3) , 3613-3624. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.1c04937
  15. Tingyuan Jia, Wenjie Zhang, Zeyu Zhang, Zijun Zhan, Guohong Ma, Juan Du, Yuxin Leng. Role of the Optical–Acoustic Phonon Interaction in the Ultrafast Cooling Process of CVD Graphene. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2021, 125 (49) , 27283-27289. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c07783
  16. Stavros Katsiaounis, Andrey V. Sharkov, Eugeniy V. Khoroshilov, Georgios Paterakis, John Parthenios, Konstantinos Papagelis. Time-Resolved Raman Scattering in Exfoliated and CVD Graphene Crystals. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2021, 125 (38) , 21003-21010. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c05469
  17. Ali Maleki, Moritz B. Heindl, Yongbao Xin, Robert W. Boyd, Georg Herink, Jean-Michel Ménard. Strategies to enhance THz harmonic generation combining multilayered, gated, and metamaterial-based architectures. Light: Science & Applications 2025, 14 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41377-024-01657-1
  18. Arvind Singh, Hynek Němec, Jan Kunc, Petr Kužel. Ultrafast terahertz conductivity in epitaxial graphene nanoribbons: an interplay between photoexcited and secondary hot carriers. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics 2025, 58 (4) , 045307. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6463/ad8e71
  19. Tânia M. Ribeiro, Tiago E.C. Magalhães, Bohdan Kulyk, Alexandre F. Carvalho, Sebastian Nilsson, Henrik Feuk, António J.S. Fernandes, Florinda Costa, Paulo T. Guerreiro, Helder Crespo. Observation of thickness-independent ultrafast relaxation times in MPCVD few-layer graphene. Carbon 2025, 232 , 119700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2024.119700
  20. Shuai Fu, Heng Zhang, Klaas-Jan Tielrooij, Mischa Bonn, Hai I. Wang. Tracking and controlling ultrafast charge and energy flow in graphene-semiconductor heterostructures. The Innovation 2025, 146 , 100764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xinn.2024.100764
  21. Alessia Sorgi, Marco Meucci, Muhammad A. Umair, Francesco Cappelli, Guido Toci, Paolo De Natale, Leonardo Viti, Andrea C. Ferrari, Miriam S. Vitiello, Luigi Consolino, Jacopo Catani. QCL‐Based Cryogen‐Free THz Optical Wireless Communication Link. Laser & Photonics Reviews 2024, 2 https://doi.org/10.1002/lpor.202301082
  22. Omid Ghaebi, Sebastian Klimmer, Nele Tornow, Niels Buijssen, Takashi Taniguchi, Kenji Watanabe, Andrea Tomadin, Habib Rostami, Giancarlo Soavi. Ultrafast Opto‐Electronic and Thermal Tuning of Third‐Harmonic Generation in a Graphene Field Effect Transistor. Advanced Science 2024, 11 (31) https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202401840
  23. Samaneh Pakniyat, J. Sebastian Gomez-Diaz. Magnet-free electromagnetic nonreciprocity in two-dimensional materials. Journal of Applied Physics 2024, 136 (4) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0207377
  24. Nikolaos Matthaiakakis, Sotiris Droulias, George Kakarantzas. Ultrafast All‐Optical Control of Light Chirality with Nanostructured Graphene. Advanced Optical Materials 2024, 12 (16) https://doi.org/10.1002/adom.202303181
  25. Jake Dudley Mehew, Rafael Luque Merino, Hiroaki Ishizuka, Alexander Block, Jaime Díez Mérida, Andrés Díez Carlón, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Leonid S. Levitov, Dmitri K. Efetov, Klaas-Jan Tielrooij. Ultrafast Umklapp-assisted electron-phonon cooling in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene. Science Advances 2024, 10 (6) https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adj1361
  26. Diogo F. P. Cunha, Rui Dias, Manuel J. L. F. Rodrigues, Mikhail I. Vasilevskiy. Two-Step Relaxation of Non-Equilibrium Electrons in Graphene: The Key to Understanding Pump–Probe Experiments. Applied Sciences 2024, 14 (3) , 1250. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14031250
  27. C. Bourges, S. Chevalier, J. Maire, A. Sommier, C. Pradere, S. Dilhaire. Mid-infrared spectroscopic thermotransmittance measurements in dielectric materials for thermal imaging. Applied Physics Letters 2024, 124 (1) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0176689
  28. Eugenio Cinquanta, Eva Arianna Aurelia Pogna, Lorenzo Gatto, Salvatore Stagira, Caterina Vozzi. Charge carrier dynamics in 2D materials probed by ultrafast THzspectroscopy. Advances in Physics: X 2023, 8 (1) https://doi.org/10.1080/23746149.2022.2120416
  29. Zhengfang Wang, Zijian Wu, Ling Weng, Shengbo Ge, Dawei Jiang, Mina Huang, Daniel M. Mulvihill, Qingguo Chen, Zhanhu Guo, Abdullatif Jazzar, Ximin He, Xuehua Zhang, Ben Bin Xu. A Roadmap Review of Thermally Conductive Polymer Composites: Critical Factors, Progress, and Prospects. Advanced Functional Materials 2023, 33 (36) https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202301549
  30. Xiaoqing Yu, Alessandro Principi, Klaas-Jan Tielrooij, Mischa Bonn, Nikita Kavokine. Electron cooling in graphene enhanced by plasmon–hydron resonance. Nature Nanotechnology 2023, 18 (8) , 898-904. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-023-01421-3
  31. Heng Zhang, Elke Debroye, Shuai Fu, Miriam C. Rodriguez González, Indy du Fossé, Jaco J. Geuchies, Lei Gao, Xiaoqing Yu, Arjan J. Houtepen, Steven De Feyter, Johan Hofkens, Mischa Bonn, Hai I. Wang. Optical Switching of Hole Transfer in Double‐Perovskite/Graphene Heterostructure. Advanced Materials 2023, 35 (29) https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202211198
  32. Elisa Riccardi, Valentino Pistore, Seonggil Kang, Lukas Seitner, Anna De Vetter, Christian Jirauschek, Juliette Mangeney, Lianhe Li, A. Giles Davies, Edmund H. Linfield, Andrea C. Ferrari, Sukhdeep S. Dhillon, Miriam S. Vitiello. Short pulse generation from a graphene-coupled passively mode-locked terahertz laser. Nature Photonics 2023, 17 (7) , 607-614. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-023-01195-z
  33. Alemayehu Nana Koya, Marco Romanelli, Joel Kuttruff, Nils Henriksson, Andrei Stefancu, Gustavo Grinblat, Aitor De Andres, Fritz Schnur, Mirko Vanzan, Margherita Marsili, Mahfujur Rahaman, Alba Viejo Rodríguez, Tlek Tapani, Haifeng Lin, Bereket Dalga Dana, Jingquan Lin, Grégory Barbillon, Remo Proietti Zaccaria, Daniele Brida, Deep Jariwala, László Veisz, Emiliano Cortés, Stefano Corni, Denis Garoli, Nicolò Maccaferri. Advances in ultrafast plasmonics. Applied Physics Reviews 2023, 10 (2) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0134993
  34. Yunfeng Wang, Shujuan Xu, Jin Yang, Fuhai Su. Probing photocarrier dynamics of pressurized graphene using time-resolved terahertz spectroscopy. Chinese Physics B 2023, 32 (6) , 067802. https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-1056/acc2b1
  35. Artur Filipe Rodrigues, Catarina Rebelo, Tiago Reis, Susana Simões, Liliana Bernardino, João Peça, Lino Ferreira. Engineering optical tools for remotely controlled brain stimulation and regeneration. Biomaterials Science 2023, 11 (9) , 3034-3050. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2BM02059A
  36. Siedah J. Hall, Peter J. Budden, Anne Zats, Matthew Y. Sfeir. Optimizing the sensitivity of high repetition rate broadband transient optical spectroscopy with modified shot-to-shot detection. Review of Scientific Instruments 2023, 94 (4) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0143355
  37. Sachin Sharma, Rachael L. Myers-Ward, Kurt D. Gaskill, Ioannis Chatzakis. Ultrafast hot-carrier cooling in quasi freestanding bilayer graphene with hydrogen intercalated atoms. Nanoscale Advances 2023, 5 (2) , 485-492. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2NA00678B
  38. Hang Jiang, Yuanan Zhao, Hao Ma, Yi Wu, Meiling Chen, Mengxia Wang, Weili Zhang, Yujie Peng, Yuxin Leng, Zhaoliang Cao, Jianda Shao. Thickness-dependent loss-induced failure of an ideal ENZ-enhanced optical response in planar ultrathin transparent conducting oxide films. Optics Express 2023, 31 (2) , 2208. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.479098
  39. Fabio Caruso, Dino Novko. Ultrafast dynamics of electrons and phonons: from the two-temperature model to the time-dependent Boltzmann equation. Advances in Physics: X 2022, 7 (1) https://doi.org/10.1080/23746149.2022.2095925
  40. Klaas-Jan Tielrooij, Alessandro Principi, David Saleta Reig, Alexander Block, Sebin Varghese, Steffen Schreyeck, Karl Brunner, Grzegorz Karczewski, Igor Ilyakov, Oleksiy Ponomaryov, Thales V. A. G. de Oliveira, Min Chen, Jan-Christoph Deinert, Carmen Gomez Carbonell, Sergio O. Valenzuela, Laurens W. Molenkamp, Tobias Kiessling, Georgy V. Astakhov, Sergey Kovalev. Milliwatt terahertz harmonic generation from topological insulator metamaterials. Light: Science & Applications 2022, 11 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41377-022-01008-y
  41. Artem G. Rybkin, Artem V. Tarasov, Anna A. Rybkina, Dmitry Yu. Usachov, Anatoly E. Petukhov, Alexander V. Eryzhenkov, Dmitrii A. Pudikov, Alevtina A. Gogina, Ilya I. Klimovskikh, Giovanni Di Santo, Luca Petaccia, Andrei Varykhalov, Alexander M. Shikin. Sublattice Ferrimagnetism in Quasifreestanding Graphene. Physical Review Letters 2022, 129 (22) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.226401
  42. Kirill A. Kuznetsov, Sergey A. Tarasenko, Polina M. Kovaleva, Petr I. Kuznetsov, Denis V. Lavrukhin, Yury G. Goncharov, Alexander A. Ezhov, Dmitry S. Ponomarev, Galiya Kh. Kitaeva. Topological Insulator Films for Terahertz Photonics. Nanomaterials 2022, 12 (21) , 3779. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12213779
  43. Katsumasa Yoshioka, Taro Wakamura, Masayuki Hashisaka, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Norio Kumada. Ultrafast intrinsic optical-to-electrical conversion dynamics in a graphene photodetector. Nature Photonics 2022, 16 (10) , 718-723. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-022-01058-z
  44. Alessandro Principi, Klaas-Jan Tielrooij. Ultrafast electronic heat dissipation through surface-to-bulk Coulomb coupling in quantum materials. Physical Review B 2022, 106 (11) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.106.115422
  45. Leonardo Viti, Mahdi Asgari, Elisa Riccardi, Osman Balci, Domenico De Fazio, Sachin M. Shinde, Jincan Zhang, Sandro Mignuzzi, Frank H. L. Koppens, Andrea C. Ferrari, Miriam S. Vitiello. Chip-Scalable, Graphene-Based Terahertz Thermoelectric Photodetectors. 2022, 1-2. https://doi.org/10.1109/IRMMW-THz50927.2022.9895528
  46. Emmanuele Cappelluti, Fabio Caruso, Dino Novko. Properties and challenges of hot-phonon physics in metals: MgB2 and other compounds. Progress in Surface Science 2022, 97 (3) , 100664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progsurf.2022.100664
  47. S. Doukas, P. Sharma, I. Goykhman, E. Lidorikis. Electrical detection of graphene plasmons for mid-infrared photodetection and chemical sensing: A computational study. Applied Physics Letters 2022, 121 (5) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0093981
  48. Peng Wu, Joerg Appenzeller. Design Considerations for 2-D Dirac-Source FETs—Part II: Nonidealities and Benchmarking. IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices 2022, 69 (8) , 4681-4685. https://doi.org/10.1109/TED.2022.3181537
  49. Kai Zhang, Jiafeng Xie, Jin Yang, Huachao Jiang, Shile Zhang, Zhi Zeng, Xiaojia Chen, Tianwu Wang, Fuhai Su. Nonequilibrium electron and lattice dynamics of Sb 2 Te 3 under pressure. Physical Review B 2022, 105 (19) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.105.195109
  50. S. Doukas, P. Mensz, N. Myoung, A. C. Ferrari, I. Goykhman, E. Lidorikis. Thermionic graphene/silicon Schottky infrared photodetectors. Physical Review B 2022, 105 (11) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.105.115417
  51. Angelika Seidl, Roozbeh Anvari, Marc M. Dignam, Peter Richter, Thomas Seyller, Harald Schneider, Manfred Helm, Stephan Winnerl. Pump-induced terahertz anisotropy in bilayer graphene. Physical Review B 2022, 105 (8) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.105.085404
  52. Klaas-Jan Tielrooij. Nonlinear Terahertz Photonics with Quantum Materials. 2022, SW4G.7. https://doi.org/10.1364/CLEO_SI.2022.SW4G.7
  53. Sachin Sharma, Rachael Myers-Ward, D. Kurt Gaskill, Yijing Liu, Paola Barbara, Stephen B. Cronin, Ioannis Chatzakis. NIR/MIR Induced Ultrafast Carrier Dynamics in monolayer and bilayer Graphene. 2022, W4A.44. https://doi.org/10.1364/UP.2022.W4A.44
  54. Leonardo Viti, Miriam Serena Vitiello. Tailored nano-electronics and photonics with two-dimensional materials at terahertz frequencies. Journal of Applied Physics 2021, 130 (17) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0065595
  55. Sho Ikeda, Chiko Otani, Masatsugu Yamashita. Hot carrier dynamics and electron-optical phonon coupling in photoexcited graphene via time-resolved ultrabroadband terahertz spectroscopy. Physical Review Research 2021, 3 (4) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.043143

ACS Nano

Cite this: ACS Nano 2021, 15, 7, 11285–11295
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.0c10864
Published June 17, 2021

Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under

CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 .

Article Views

7878

Altmetric

-

Citations

Learn about these metrics

Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.

  • Abstract

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. Characterization of the WSe2-encapsulated graphene sample. (a) Sketch of the encapsulated graphene prepared by exfoliation and dry transfer of two flakes of WSe2 and monolayer graphene. (41) (b) Atomic force microscopy image of the sample, used to determine the thicknesses of the WSe2 flakes. (c) Raman spectra of fully encapsulated graphene (blue line) and of semiencapsulated graphene (black line) obtained with 532 nm laser source. Encapsulation gives rise to a background, reduced graphene Raman signatures’ (G and 2D peaks) intensity, and a clear blue shift of the 2D peak. (d, e) Maps of the 2D peak frequency ω2D (d) and width Γ2D (e) extracted from Raman spectra at different positions on the sample fitted with a Voigt function centered in ω2D. (f, g) Statistical distribution of ω2D (f) and Γ2D (g) in the encapsulated graphene obtained from the maps in panels d and e. The narrow width suggests a high electrical mobility.

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. Hot-carrier cooling dynamics of WSe2-encapsulated graphene. (a) Transient transmission ΔT/T maps at a fixed time delay t = 100 fs between pump and probe pulses acquired with pump at 0.8 eV (1550 nm) and probe at 0.729 eV (1700 nm). White lines indicate the edges of WSe2 flakes extracted from an optical image. The panel on the right shows a zoom of the left panel, and the black cross indicates the location in the fully encapsulated region, where the ΔT/T dynamics are measured. (b) Comparison of normalized ΔT/T relaxation dynamics of graphene encapsulated by WSe2 (blue dots) and hBN (black dots), using a pump fluence of ∼1 μJ/cm2 in both cases. Encapsulation with hBN gives rise to faster dynamics, which we attribute to out-of-plane cooling to hyperbolic phonons of hBN. (33−35) This cooling mechanism is much less efficient for WSe2 encapsulation. (c) ΔT/T dynamics (dots) for WSe2-encapsulated graphene at five different pump fluences from 0.2 to 2 μJ/cm2. The positive ΔT/T is due to pump-induced heating, leading to Pauli blocking of probe interband transitions. The solid lines are the calculated ΔT/T dynamics, based on the intrinsic hot-electron cooling mechanism via the combination of optical-phonon emission, continuous rethermalization of the electron distribution, and coupling of optical to acoustic phonons. (d) Dynamical evolution of the electron temperature Te, corresponding to the calculated ΔT/T dynamics in panel c. Here, fast decay due to the electron-optical-phonon coupling is followed by slower decay via optical-to-acoustic phonon coupling. The former component shows up very strongly in the TA signal as a consequence of the strongly superlinear relation between the TA signal ΔT/T and the change in carrier temperature ΔTe.

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. Characterization of suspended high-quality graphene. (a) Sketch of graphene suspended on a holey carbon film. (b) Scanning electron microscopy images of suspended graphene on holey carbon, showing relatively large hole sizes and high yield. (c) TEM image of the suspended graphene, showing the absence of disorder. (d) Plot of 2D peak frequency ω2D as a function of G peak frequency ωG. Dashed lines represent the expected dependence in the strain-free (red dot-dot-dashed line) and doping-free (blue dot-dashed line) material. (e) Fermi energy EF distribution extracted from vector decomposition of peaks positions in panel d, (51) and centered at |EF| ≈ 0.18 eV. (f) Obtained distribution of 2D-peak widths, indicating a mobility of >17 000 cm2 V–1 s–1, following calculations of ref (43).

    Figure 4

    Figure 4. Hot-carrier cooling dynamics of suspended graphene. (a) Transient transmission ΔT/T map at time zero, showing individual holes where graphene is suspended, acquired with pump tuned at 3.1 eV (400 nm) and probe at 1.55 eV (800 nm). (b) ΔT/T dynamics (colored dots) for suspended graphene at five different pump fluences from 3 to 38 μJ/cm2. The positive ΔT/T results from the pump-induced carrier heating that leads to decreased interband conductivity due to Pauli blocking, and thus decreased absorption of the NIR probe light. The colored lines are the calculated ΔT/T dynamics, based on the intrinsic cooling mechanism where hot electrons cool via the combination of emission of optical phonons, continuous rethermalization of the electron distribution, and coupling of optical to acoustic phonons. (c) Dynamical evolution of the electron temperature Te, corresponding to the calculated ΔT/T dynamics in panel b. Here, a fast decay due to electron-optical-phonon coupling is followed by a slower decay due to optical-to-acoustic phonon coupling.

    Figure 5

    Figure 5. Hot-carrier cooling dynamics in high-quality graphene. (a) Process of electronic cooling explained through schematics of the carrier density N as a function of carrier energy for three electron temperatures (1200, 800, and 400 K). Cooling occurs through a combination of (i) optical phonon emission by electrons with energy >0.16 eV above the chemical potential (red-shaded area), (ii) rethermalization of the electronic distribution, and (iii) anharmonic coupling of optical phonons to acoustic phonons. (b) Calculated “instantaneous” cooling time for a given initial electron temperature for three different Fermi energies. (c) Calculated cooling time as a function of lattice temperature TL for a very small ΔTe and EF = 0.03 eV. For panels b and c, cooling occurs through optical phonon emission and continuous rethermalization of the electronic system. The hot-phonon bottleneck is not included.

  • References


    This article references 59 other publications.

    1. 1
      George, P. A.; Strait, J.; Dawlaty, J.; Shivaraman, S.; Chandrashekhar, M.; Rana, F.; Spencer, M. G. Ultrafast Optical-Pump Terahertz-Probe Spectroscopy of the Carrier Relaxation and Recombination Dynamics in Epitaxial Graphene. Nano Lett. 2008, 8, 42484251,  DOI: 10.1021/nl8019399
    2. 2
      Breusing, M.; Kuehn, S.; Winzer, T.; Malić, E.; Milde, F.; Severin, N.; Rabe, J. P.; Ropers, C.; Knorr, A.; Elsaesser, T. Ultrafast Nonequilibrium Carrier Dynamics in a Single Graphene Layer. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2011, 83, 153410,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.83.153410
    3. 3
      Brida, D.; Tomadin, A.; Manzoni, C.; Kim, Y. J.; Lombardo, A.; Milana, S.; Nair, R. R.; Novoselov, K. S.; Ferrari, A. C.; Cerullo, G.; Polini, M. Ultrafast Collinear Scattering and Carrier Multiplication in Graphene. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 1987,  DOI: 10.1038/ncomms2987
    4. 4
      Gierz, I.; Petersen, J. C.; Mitrano, M.; Cacho, C.; Turcu, I. C. E.; Springate, E.; Stöhr, A.; Köhler, A.; Starke, U.; Cavalleri, A. Snapshots of Non-Equilibrium Dirac Carrier Distributions in Graphene. Nat. Mater. 2013, 12, 11191124,  DOI: 10.1038/nmat3757
    5. 5
      Tielrooij, K.; Song, J.; Jensen, S. A.; Centeno, A.; Pesquera, A.; Elorza, A. Z.; Bonn, M.; Levitov, L.; Koppens, F. Photoexcitation Cascade and Multiple Hot-Carrier Generation in Graphene. Nat. Phys. 2013, 9, 248252,  DOI: 10.1038/nphys2564
    6. 6
      Xia, F.; Mueller, T.; Lin, Y.-m.; Valdes-Garcia, A.; Avouris, P. Ultrafast Graphene Photodetector. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2009, 4, 839843,  DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2009.292
    7. 7
      Koppens, F. H. L.; Mueller, T.; Avouris, P.; Ferrari, A. C.; Vitiello, M. S.; Polini, M. Photodetectors Based on Graphene, Other Two-Dimensional Materials and Hybrid Systems. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2014, 9, 780793,  DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2014.215
    8. 8
      Bandurin, D. A.; Svintsov, D.; Gayduchenko, I.; Xu, S. G.; Principi, A.; Moskotin, M.; Tretyakov, I.; Yagodkin, D.; Zhukov, S.; Taniguchi, T.; Watanabe, K.; Grigorieva, I. V.; Polini, M.; Goltsman, G. N.; Geim, A. K.; Fedoro, G. Resonant Terahertz Detection Using Graphene Plasmons. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 5392,  DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-07848-w
    9. 9
      Castilla, S.; Terrés, B.; Autore, M.; Viti, L.; Li, J.; Nikitin, A. Y.; Vangelidis, I.; Watanabe, K.; Taniguchi, T.; Lidorikis, E.; Vitiello, M. S.; Hillenbrand, R.; Tielrooij, K.-J.; Koppens, F. H. L. Fast and Sensitive Terahertz Detection Using an Antenna-Integrated Graphene pn Junction. Nano Lett. 2019, 19, 27652773,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b04171
    10. 10
      Viti, L.; Purdie, D. G.; Lombardo, A.; Ferrari, A. C.; Vitiello, M. S. HBN-Encapsulated, Graphene-Based, Room-Temperature Terahertz Receivers, with High Speed and Low Noise. Nano Lett. 2020, 20, 31693177,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b05207
    11. 11
      Liu, M.; Yin, X.; Ulin-Avila, E.; Geng, B.; Zentgraf, T.; Ju, L.; Wang, F.; Zhang, X. A Graphene-Based Broadband Optical Modulator. Nature 2011, 474, 6467,  DOI: 10.1038/nature10067
    12. 12
      Romagnoli, M.; Sorianello, V.; Midrio, M.; Koppens, F. H. L.; Huyghebaert, C.; Neumaier, D.; Galli, P.; Templ, W.; Ferrari, A. C. Graphene-Based Integrated Photonics for Next-Generation Datacom and Telecom. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2018, 3, 392414,  DOI: 10.1038/s41578-018-0040-9
    13. 13
      Muench, J. E.; Ruocco, A.; Giambra, M. A.; Miseikis, V.; Zhang, D.; Wang, J.; Watson, H. F. Y.; Park, G. C.; Akhavan, S.; Sorianello, V.; Midrio, M.; Tomadin, A.; Coletti, C.; Romagnoli, M.; Ferrari, A. C.; Goykhman, I. Waveguide-Integrated, Plasmonic Enhanced Graphene Photodetectors. Nano Lett. 2019, 19, 76327644,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b02238
    14. 14
      Hafez, H. A.; Kovalev, S.; Deinert, J. C.; Mics, Z.; Green, B.; Awari, N.; Chen, M.; Germanskiy, S.; Lehnert, U.; Teichert, J.; Wang, Z.; Tielrooij, K. J.; Liu, Z.; Chen, Z.; Narita, A.; Müllen, K.; Bonn, M.; Gensch, M.; Turchinovich, D. Extremely Efficient Terahertz High-Harmonic Generation in Graphene by Hot Dirac Fermions. Nature 2018, 561, 507511,  DOI: 10.1038/s41586-018-0508-1
    15. 15
      Soavi, G.; Wang, G.; Rostami, H.; Purdie, D. G.; De Fazio, D.; Ma, T.; Luo, B.; Wang, J.; Ott, A. K.; Yoon, D.; Bourelle, S. A.; Muench, J. E.; Goykhman, I.; Dal Conte, S.; Celebrano, M.; Tomadin, A.; Polini, M.; Cerullo, G.; Ferrari, A. C. Broadband, Electrically Tunable Third-Harmonic Generation in Graphene. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2018, 13, 583588,  DOI: 10.1038/s41565-018-0145-8
    16. 16
      Soavi, G.; Wang, G.; Rostami, H.; Tomadin, A.; Balci, O.; Paradisanos, I.; Pogna, E. A. A.; Cerullo, G.; Lidorikis, E.; Polini, M.; Ferrari, A. C. Hot Electrons Modulation of Third-Harmonic Generation in Graphene. ACS Photonics 2019, 6, 28412849,  DOI: 10.1021/acsphotonics.9b00928
    17. 17
      Deinert, J.-C.; Iranzo, D. A.; Perez, R.; Jia, X.; Hafez, H. A.; Ilyakov, I.; Awari, N.; Chen, M.; Bawatna, M.; Ponomaryov, A. N.; Germanskiy, S.; Bonn, M.; Koppens, F. H. L.; Turchinovich, D.; Gensch, M.; Kovalev, S.; Tielrooij, K.-J. Grating-Graphene Metamaterial as a Platform for Terahertz Nonlinear Photonics. ACS Nano 2021, 15, 11451154,  DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.0c08106
    18. 18
      Gabor, N. M.; Song, J. C.; Ma, Q.; Nair, N. L.; Taychatanapat, T.; Watanabe, K.; Taniguchi, T.; Levitov, L. S.; Jarillo-Herrero, P. Hot Carrier-Assisted Intrinsic Photoresponse in Graphene. Science 2011, 334, 648652,  DOI: 10.1126/science.1211384
    19. 19
      Tielrooij, K.-J.; Piatkowski, L.; Massicotte, M.; Woessner, A.; Ma, Q.; Lee, Y.; Myhro, K. S.; Lau, C. N.; Jarillo-Herrero, P.; van Hulst, N. F.; Koppens, F. H. L. Generation of Photovoltage in Graphene on a Femtosecond Timescale through Efficient Carrier Heating. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2015, 10, 437443,  DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2015.54
    20. 20
      Iglesias, J. M.; Pascual, E.; Martín, M. J.; Rengel, R. Relevance of Collinear Processes to the Ultrafast Dynamics of Photoexcited Carriers in Graphene. Phys. E 2020, 123, 114211,  DOI: 10.1016/j.physe.2020.114211
    21. 21
      Tomadin, A.; Hornett, S. M.; Wang, H. I.; Alexeev, E. M.; Candini, A.; Coletti, C.; Turchinovich, D.; Kläui, M.; Bonn, M.; Koppens, F. H. L.; Hendry, E.; Polini, M.; Tielrooij, K.-J. The Ultrafast Dynamics and Conductivity of Photoexcited Graphene at Different Fermi Energies. Sci. Adv. 2018, 4, eaar5313,  DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aar5313
    22. 22
      Fong, K. C.; Wollman, E. E.; Ravi, H.; Chen, W.; Clerk, A. A.; Shaw, M. D.; Leduc, H. G.; Schwab, K. C. Measurement of the Electronic Thermal Conductance Channels and Heat Capacity of Graphene at Low Temperature. Phys. Rev. X 2013, 3, 41008,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevX.3.041008
    23. 23
      Kampfrath, T.; Perfetti, L.; Schapper, F.; Frischkorn, C.; Wolf, M. Strongly Coupled Optical Phonons in the Ultrafast Dynamics of the Electronic Energy and Current Relaxation in Graphite. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2005, 95, 187403,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.187403
    24. 24
      Hale, P. J.; Hornett, S. M.; Moger, J.; Horsell, D. W.; Hendry, E. Hot Phonon Decay in Supported and Suspended Exfoliated Graphene. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2011, 83, 121404,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.83.121404
    25. 25
      Mounet, N.; Marzari, N. First-Principles Determination of the Structural, Vibrational and Thermodynamic Properties of Diamond, Graphite, and Derivatives. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2005, 71, 205214,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.71.205214
    26. 26
      Mihnev, M. T.; Kadi, F.; Divin, C. J.; Winzer, T.; Lee, S.; Liu, C.-h.; Zhong, Z.; Berger, C.; Heer, W. A. D.; Malic, E.; Knorr, A.; Norris, T. B. Microscopic Origins of the Terahertz Carrier Relaxation and Cooling Dynamics in Graphene. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 11617,  DOI: 10.1038/ncomms11617
    27. 27
      Bistritzer, R.; MacDonald, A. H. Electronic Cooling in Graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009, 102, 206410,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.206410
    28. 28
      Song, J. C. W.; Reizer, M. Y.; Levitov, L. S. Disorder-Assisted Electron-Phonon Scattering and Cooling Pathways in Graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2012, 109, 106602,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.106602
    29. 29
      Betz, A. C.; Jhang, S. H.; Pallecchi, E.; Ferreira, R.; Fève, G.; Berroir, J.-M.; Plaçais, B. Supercollision Cooling in Undoped Graphene. Nat. Phys. 2013, 9, 109112,  DOI: 10.1038/nphys2494
    30. 30
      Graham, M. W.; Shi, S.-F.; Wang, Z.; Ralph, D. C.; Park, J.; McEuen, P. L. Transient Absorption and Photocurrent Microscopy Show that Hot Electron Supercollisions Describe the Rate-Limiting Relaxation Step in Graphene. Nano Lett. 2013, 13, 5497502,  DOI: 10.1021/nl4030787
    31. 31
      Alencar, T. V.; Silva, M. G.; Malard, L. M.; de Paula, A. M. Defect-Induced Supercollision Cooling of Photoexcited Carriers in Graphene. Nano Lett. 2014, 14, 56215624,  DOI: 10.1021/nl502163d
    32. 32
      Graham, M. W.; Shi, S. F.; Ralph, D. C.; Park, J.; McEuen, P. L. Photocurrent Measurements of Supercollision Cooling in Graphene. Nat. Phys. 2013, 9, 103108,  DOI: 10.1038/nphys2493
    33. 33
      Tielrooij, K.-J.; Hesp, N. C. H.; Principi, A.; Lundeberg, M. B.; Pogna, E. A. A.; Banszerus, L.; Mics, Z.; Massicotte, M.; Schmidt, P.; Davydovskaya, D.; Purdie, D. G.; Goykhman, I.; Soavi, G.; Lombardo, A.; Watanabe, K.; Taniguchi, T.; Bonn, M.; Turchinovich, D.; Stampfer, C.; Ferrari, A. C.; Cerullo, G.; Polini, M.; Koppens, F. H. L. Out-of-Plane Heat Transfer in van der Waals Stacks through Electron-Hyperbolic Phonon Coupling. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2018, 13, 4146,  DOI: 10.1038/s41565-017-0008-8
    34. 34
      Principi, A.; Lundeberg, M. B.; Hesp, N. C.; Tielrooij, K. J.; Koppens, F. H.; Polini, M. Super-Planckian Electron Cooling in a van der Waals Stack. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2017, 118, 126804,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.126804
    35. 35
      Yang, W.; Berthou, S.; Lu, X.; Wilmart, Q.; Denis, A.; Rosticher, M.; Taniguchi, T.; Watanabe, K.; Fève, G.; Berroir, J.-m.; Zhang, G.; Voisin, C.; Baudin, E.; Plaçais, B. A Graphene Zener-Klein Transistor Cooled by a Hyperbolic Substrate. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2018, 13, 4752,  DOI: 10.1038/s41565-017-0007-9
    36. 36
      Caldwell, J. D.; Kretinin, A. V.; Chen, Y.; Giannini, V.; Fogler, M. M.; Francescato, Y.; Ellis, C. T.; Tischler, J. G.; Woods, C. R.; Giles, A. J.; Hong, M.; Watanabe, K.; Taniguchi, T.; Maier, S. A.; Novoselov, K. S. Sub-Diffractional Volume-Confined Polaritons in the Natural Hyperbolic Material Hexagonal Boron Nitride. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 5521,  DOI: 10.1038/ncomms6221
    37. 37
      Dean, C. R.; Young, A. F.; Meric, I.; Lee, C.; Wang, L.; Sorgenfrei, S.; Watanabe, K.; Taniguchi, T.; Kim, P.; Shepard, K. L.; Hone, J. Boron Nitride Substrates for High-Quality Graphene Electronics. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2010, 5, 722726,  DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2010.172
    38. 38
      Wang, L.; Meric, I.; Huang, P.; Gao, Q.; Gao, Y.; Tran, H.; Taniguchi, T.; Watanabe, K.; Campos, L.; Muller, D. A.; Guo, J.; Kim, P.; Hone, J.; Shepard, K. L.; Dean, C. R. One-Dimensional Electrical Contact to a Two-Dimensional Material. Science 2013, 342, 614617,  DOI: 10.1126/science.1244358
    39. 39
      Banszerus, L.; Janssen, H.; Otto, M.; Epping, A.; Taniguchi, T.; Watanabe, K.; Beschoten, B.; Neumaier, D.; Stampfer, C. Identifying Suitable Substrates for High-Quality Graphene-Based Heterostructures. 2D Mater. 2017, 4, 025030,  DOI: 10.1088/2053-1583/aa5b0f
    40. 40
      Banszerus, L.; Sohier, T.; Epping, A.; Winkler, F.; Libisch, F.; Haupt, F.; Watanabe, K.; Taniguchi, T.; Müller-Caspary, K.; Marzari, N.; Mauri, F.; Beschoten, B.; Stampfer, C. Extraordinary High Room-Temperature Carrier Mobility in Graphene-WSe2 Heterostructures. arXiv:1909.09523 http://arxiv.org/abs/1909.09523 (accessed December 25, 2020).
    41. 41
      Backes, C.; Abdelkader, A. M.; Alonso, C.; Andrieux-Ledier, A.; Arenal, R.; Azpeitia, J.; Balakrishnan, N.; Banszerus, L.; Barjon, J.; Bartali, R.; Bellani, S.; Berger, C.; Berger, R.; Ortega, M. M.; Bernard, C.; Beton, P. H.; Beyer, A.; Bianco, A.; Bøggild, P.; Bonaccorso, A. Production and Processing of Graphene and Related Materials. 2D Mater. 2020, 7, 022001,  DOI: 10.1088/2053-1583/ab1e0a
    42. 42
      Neumann, C.; Banszerus, L.; Schmitz, M.; Reichardt, S.; Sonntag, J.; Taniguchi, T.; Watanabe, K.; Beschoten, B.; Stampfer, C. Line Shape of the Raman 2D Peak of Graphene in van der Waals Heterostructures. Phys. Status Solidi B 2016, 253, 23262330,  DOI: 10.1002/pssb.201600283
    43. 43
      Robinson, J. A.; Wetherington, M.; Tedesco, J. L.; Campbell, P. M.; Weng, X.; Stitt, J.; Fanton, M. A.; Frantz, E.; Snyder, D.; VanMil, B. L.; Jernigan, G. G.; Rachael, L. M. W.; Eddy, C. R.; Gaskill, D. K. Correlating Raman Spectral Signatures with Carrier Mobility in Epitaxial Graphene: A Guide to Achieving High Mobility on the Wafer Scale. Nano Lett. 2009, 9, 28732876,  DOI: 10.1021/nl901073g
    44. 44
      Kang, K.; Abdula, D.; Cahill, D. G.; Shim, M. Lifetimes of Optical Phonons in Graphene and Graphite by Time-Resolved Incoherent Anti-Stokes Raman Scattering. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2010, 81, 165405,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.165405
    45. 45
      Lui, C. H.; Mak, K. F.; Shan, J.; Heinz, T. F. Ultrafast Photoluminescence from Graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2010, 105, 127404,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.127404
    46. 46
      Wang, H.; Strait, J. H.; George, P. A.; Shivaraman, S.; Shields, V. B.; Chandrashekhar, M.; Hwang, J.; Rana, F.; Spencer, M. G.; Ruiz-Vargas, C. S.; Park, J. Ultrafast Relaxation Dynamics of Hot Optical Phonons in Graphene. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2010, 96, 081917,  DOI: 10.1063/1.3291615
    47. 47
      Wu, S.; Liu, W. T.; Liang, X.; Schuck, P. J.; Wang, F.; Shen, Y. R.; Salmeron, M. Hot Phonon Dynamics in Graphene. Nano Lett. 2012, 12, 54955499,  DOI: 10.1021/nl301997r
    48. 48
      Bonini, N.; Lazzeri, M.; Marzari, N.; Mauri, F. Phonon Anharmonicities in Graphite and Graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2007, 99, 176802,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.176802
    49. 49
      Zhang, J.; Lin, L.; Sun, L.; Huang, Y.; Koh, A. L.; Dang, W.; Yin, J.; Wang, M.; Tan, C.; Li, T.; Tan, Z.; Liu, Z.; Peng, H. Clean Transfer of Large Graphene Single Crystals for High-Intactness Suspended Membranes and Liquid Cells. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1700639,  DOI: 10.1002/adma.201700639
    50. 50
      Lin, L.; Zhang, J.; Su, H.; Li, J.; Sun, L.; Wang, Z.; Xu, F.; Liu, C.; Lopatin, S.; Zhu, Y.; Jia, K.; Chen, S.; Rui, D.; Sun, J.; Xue, R.; Gao, P.; Kang, N.; Han, Y.; Xu, H. Q.; Cao, Y. Towards Super-Clean Graphene. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 1912,  DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-09565-4
    51. 51
      Lee, J. E.; Ahn, G.; Shim, J.; Lee, Y. S.; Ryu, S. Optical Separation of Mechanical Strain from Charge Doping in Graphene. Nat. Commun. 2012, 3, 1024,  DOI: 10.1038/ncomms2022
    52. 52
      Malard, L. M.; Mak, K. F.; Neto, A. C.; Peres, N.; Heinz, T. F. Observation of Intra-and Inter-Band Transitions in the Transient Optical Response of Graphene. New J. Phys. 2013, 15, 015009,  DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/15/1/015009
    53. 53
      Huang, L.; Gao, B.; Hartland, G.; Kelly, M.; Xing, H. Ultrafast Relaxation of Hot Optical Phonons in Monolayer and Multilayer Graphene on Different Substrates. Surf. Sci. 2011, 605, 16571661,  DOI: 10.1016/j.susc.2010.12.009
    54. 54
      Laitinen, A.; Kumar, M.; Oksanen, M.; Plaçais, B.; Virtanen, P.; Hakonen, P. Coupling between Electrons and Optical Phonons in Suspended Bilayer Graphene. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2015, 91, 121414,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.91.121414
    55. 55
      Viljas, J.; Heikkilä, T. Electron-Phonon Heat Transfer in Monolayer and Bilayer Graphene. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2010, 81, 245404,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.245404
    56. 56
      Sohier, T.; Calandra, M.; Park, C.-H.; Bonini, N.; Marzari, N.; Mauri, F. Phonon-Limited Resistivity of Graphene by First-Principles Calculations: Electron-Phonon Interactions, Strain-Induced Gauge Field, and Boltzmann Equation. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2014, 90, 125414,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.90.125414
    57. 57
      Betz, A. C.; Vialla, F.; Brunel, D.; Voisin, C.; Picher, M.; Cavanna, A.; Madouri, A.; Fève, G.; Berroir, J. M.; Plaçais, B.; Pallecchi, E. Hot Electron Cooling by Acoustic Phonons in Graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2012, 109, 056805,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.056805
    58. 58
      Massicotte, M.; Soavi, G.; Principi, A.; Tielrooij, K. J. Hot Carriers in Graphene-Fundamentals and Applications. Nanoscale 2021, 13, 83768411,  DOI: 10.1039/D0NR09166A
    59. 59
      Block, A.; Liebel, M.; Yu, R.; Spector, M.; Sivan, Y.; de Abajo, F. G.; van Hulst, N. F. Tracking Ultrafast Hot-Electron Diffusion in Space and Time by Ultrafast Thermomodulation Microscopy. Sci. Adv. 2019, 5, eaav8965,  DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aav8965
  • Supporting Information

    Supporting Information


    The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsnano.0c10864.

    • Hyperbolic cooling model, cooling dynamics probed with terahertz pulses, topography of encapsulated graphene, electron mobility of WSe2-encapsulated graphene, Raman characterization of WSe2-encapsulated graphene, fully encapsulated vs semiencapsulated graphene, differential reflectance of WSe2-encapsulated graphene, cooling due to lateral heat diffusion, cooling via disorder-assisted acoustic phonon scattering, cooling via optical phonons (PDF)


    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.