ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
Ultrafast Charge Transfer Cascade in a Mixed-Dimensionality Nanoscale Trilayer
My Activity
  • Open Access
Article

Ultrafast Charge Transfer Cascade in a Mixed-Dimensionality Nanoscale Trilayer
Click to copy article linkArticle link copied!

Open PDFSupporting Information (1)

ACS Nano

Cite this: ACS Nano 2024, 18, 11, 8190–8198
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.3c12179
Published March 11, 2024

Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under

CC-BY 4.0 .

Abstract

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Innovation in optoelectronic semiconductor devices is driven by a fundamental understanding of how to move charges and/or excitons (electron–hole pairs) in specified directions for doing useful work, e.g., for making fuels or electricity. The diverse and tunable electronic and optical properties of two-dimensional (2D) transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDCs) and one-dimensional (1D) semiconducting single-walled carbon nanotubes (s-SWCNTs) make them good quantum confined model systems for fundamental studies of charge and exciton transfer across heterointerfaces. Here we demonstrate a mixed-dimensionality 2D/1D/2D MoS2/SWCNT/WSe2 heterotrilayer that enables ultrafast photoinduced exciton dissociation, followed by charge diffusion and slow recombination. Importantly, the heterotrilayer serves to double charge carrier yield relative to a MoS2/SWCNT heterobilayer and also demonstrates the ability of the separated charges to overcome interlayer exciton binding energies to diffuse from one TMDC/SWCNT interface to the other 2D/1D interface, resulting in Coulombically unbound charges. Interestingly, the heterotrilayer also appears to enable efficient hole transfer from SWCNTs to WSe2, which is not observed in the identically prepared WSe2/SWCNT heterobilayer, suggesting that increasing the complexity of nanoscale trilayers may modify dynamic pathways. Our work suggests ”mixed-dimensionality” TMDC/SWCNT based heterotrilayers as both interesting model systems for mechanistic studies of carrier dynamics at nanoscale heterointerfaces and for potential applications in advanced optoelectronic systems.

This publication is licensed under

CC-BY 4.0 .
  • cc licence
  • by licence
Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society

Note Added after ASAP Publication

This paper was published ASAP on March 9, 2024, without all the changes made. The corrected version was posted on March 19, 2024.

Optoelectronic semiconductor devices rely on the balance between photoexcited charge generation, charge recombination, and charge extraction. (1−3) Quantum-confined low-dimensional materials such as two-dimensional (2D) transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDCs) and one-dimensional (1D) single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) have enhanced electron–hole Coulomb interactions, weak dielectric screening, and large exciton binding energies. (3−12) Large exciton binding energies can correlate with short exciton lifetimes and increased difficulty in separating electrons and holes to generate an electrical current for photovoltaics, photodetectors, and sensors or chemical bonds in solar fuel schemes. (2,3,8,11−13) The diverse and tunable electronic and optical properties of TMDCs and semiconducting SWCNTs (s-SWCNTs) make them good quantum-confined model systems for fundamental studies on charge and exciton transfer across heterointerfaces, with relevance for applications in photovoltaics, quantum information processing, and solar fuels. (3,5,7,10,14−16) Recent studies of TMDC heterobilayers have shown charge recombination lifetimes of ca. 30–110 ps, and TMDC/organic heterojunctions have achieved a charge separated state lifetime of ca. 5 ns in a MoS2/pentacene bilayer, demonstrating that charge separation in 2D heterostructures is an efficient strategy to overcome large exciton binding energies. (3,8,17)
In analogy to the multistep charge transfer cascade found in the photosynthesis reaction center, more complex low-dimensional heterostructures provide opportunities for directing charge flow and lengthening charge separation lifetimes. (13,18) For example, TMDC hetero-trilayer interfaces have even longer lifetimes, up to ca. 1 ns, than their heterobilayer counterparts. As these heterostructures become more complex, it can be difficult to predict the range of motion and mechanism(s) for generating long-lived charges across the relevant interfaces. (1,3,5,8,14,16) For example, in an MoS2/WS2/MoSe2 Type II heterotrilayer, Ceballos et al. predicted a cascading charge transfer effect, where photoexcited electrons in MoSe2 would transfer to MoS2 via WS2. (19) However, electrons excited in MoSe2 transferred directly to MoS2 without populating the WS2. Furthermore, the seemingly ubiquitous existence of Coulomb-bound “interlayer” excitons in TMDC heterostructures, while useful for certain applications, can limit the ultimate lifetime of separated charges and impede the generation and extraction of free uncorrelated electrons and holes.
Sulas-Kern et al. recently demonstrated that a “mixed-dimensionality” heterobilayer combining TMDCs with s-SWCNTs resulted in charge-separated lifetimes on the microsecond time scale, surpassing TMDC/TMDC and TMDC/organic charge lifetimes. (3,5,19−21) Despite the success of this heterostructure in producing exceptionally long-lived charge carriers, fundamental questions still exist such as (1) if and/or how the electron–hole pair at the donor–acceptor interface can escape from the mutual “interlayer” Coulombic attraction and (2) the roles both in and out of plane carrier delocalization and/or diffusion have on stabilizing long-lived charges. (3,19,22,23) Here we use transient absorption (TA) spectroscopy to track exciton dissociation and charge diffusion in a mixed-dimensionality 2D/1D/2D MoS2/SWCNT/WSe2 heterotrilayer. Upon photoexcitation of the trilayer, we observe ultrafast electron transfer to MoS2 and hole transfer to WSe2, with microsecond charge recombination lifetimes. Interestingly, the trilayer architecture appears to facilitate ultrafast hole transfer to WSe2 (<200 fs), whereas this charge transfer reaction is not as efficient in identically prepared WSe2/SWCNT heterobilayers. By tracking multiple well-resolved spectral signatures of charge carriers in each semiconductor layer, we can experimentally monitor and simulate charge diffusion away from the site of charge generation, confirming the separation of electron–hole pairs at the TMDC/SWCNT interface and subsequent diffusion to the other 2D/1D interface. This behavior contrasts with the dominance of Coulomb-bound “interlayer” excitons in TMDC/TMDC heterobilayers or trilayers. Our results highlight the distinct photophysics and potential technological advantages of “mixed-dimensionality” heterostructures.

Results and Discussion

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

MoS2 and WSe2 Bilayers

To understand the exciton and charge dynamics in our MoS2/SWCNT/WSe2 heterotrilayer, we first studied individual bilayers made from combining s-SWCNTs with each TMDC monolayer. Monolayer TMDCs are used throughout this paper and characterized via Raman spectroscopy; see Figure 1c–e. Both MoS2/SWCNT and WSe2/SWCNT bilayers were obtained by spray coating a thin film of (6,5) SWCNTs onto the surface of the respective neat TMDC monolayer. (1,16,24) The (6,5) SWCNT film thickness was estimated to be ca. 7 nm. (16,24) Steady state absorption and Raman spectroscopy were used to confirm the successful assembly of both bilayers (Figure 1c,d). (5,25−32)

Figure 1

Figure 1. (A) Predicted energy level diagram of MoS2/SWCNT and WSe2/SWCNT bilayers (top); Calculated thermodynamic driving forces for electron and hole transfer at the MoS2/SWCNT and WSe2/SWCNT interfaces (bottom). (B) Raman spectra of (6,5) SWCNT film, MoS2 monolayer, MoS2/SWCNT bilayer, WSe2 monolayer, and the MoS2/SWCNT/WSe2 trilayer. (C) Absorbance spectra for MoS2 monolayer, (6,5) SWCNT film, and the MoS2/SWCNT heterojunction (top); Schematic of MoS2/SWCNT bilayer (bottom). (D) Absorbance spectra of WSe2 monolayer, (6,5) SWCNT film, and the WSe2/SWCNT bilayer (top); Schematic of the WSe2/SWCNT bilayer. (E) Absorbance spectra of (6,5) SWCNT film, MoS2/SWCNT bilayer, and MoS2/SWCNT/WSe2 trilayer (top); Schematic of the MoS2/SWCNT/WSe2 trilayer (bottom).

The thermodynamic driving force for free carrier generation depends on the free energy difference between initially photoexcited excitons and the final separated charge carriers (electron and hole). In a type II heterojunction, the “donor” has an electron affinity and ionization potential closer to vacuum than the “acceptor”. (3) Figure 1a depicts the expected Type II heterojunction energy level offset for the MoS2/SWCNT and WSe2/SWCNT bilayers, where the conduction band (CB) and valence band (VB) energies of MoS2 and WSe2 are taken from theoretical and experimental literature reports (vide infra and SI, Table S3). We estimate the exciton dissociation driving force for each Type II bilayer using the following equation:
ΔGET/HT=|IPDEAA|Eopt,D/opt,A
(1)
where ΔGET/HT is the change in free energy following electron transfer (ET) or hole transfer (HT), IPD and EAA are the ionization potential (IP) of the donor and electron affinity (EA) of the acceptor, respectively, and Eopt,D and Eopt,A refer to the optical band gap of the donor or acceptor, respectively. (3,16) Using optical band gap energies from absorption spectra (Figure 1c–e) and EA/IP values shown in Figure 1a, we estimate that exciton dissociation in MoS2 via hole transfer to (6,5) SWCNTs is thermodynamically favorable by ca. 700 meV and electron transfer from the SWCNTs to MoS2 is favorable by ca. 70 meV. (3,15,16) Uncertainty in ΔGET and ΔGHT for WSe2 is higher due to slight variations in the wavelength for the WSe2 A exciton peak across different samples and a higher variability (and smaller number) of reported experimental and computed CB/VB values of WSe2 compared to the more widely studied MoS2. (7) To account for these variations, we used experimental data captured from steady state absorption to calculate Eopt,WSe2, resulting in a ΔGET of −490 meV and a ΔGHT of 0 meV. Theoretically, exciton dissociation at the interface can occur for both bilayers in both directions, but the hole transfer from (6,5) s-SWCNTs to WSe2 is the least energetically favorable pathway.
Transient absorption (TA) spectroscopy is used to elucidate the charge transfer dynamics at the MoS2/SWCNT and WSe2/SWCNT interfaces. The narrow and energetically distinct absorbance peaks of MoS2, WSe2 and (6,5) SWCNTs, highlighted in Figure 1e, allow for selective photoexcitation and probing of each material, making these ideal model systems for optical studies of excited-state dynamics at the TMDC heterointerface. Photoexcitation of the SWCNT S11 absorption at 1000 nm only allows for charge transfer from SWCNT to either/both TMDC, as the 1000 nm photons are too low in energy for direct excitation of MoS2 or WSe2 and energy transfer would be significantly uphill.
Figure 2 shows long-lived TA spectra of both bilayers following 1000 nm excitation of the s-SWCNT S11 excitonic transition. In the MoS2/SWCNT bilayer, we see charge separation that persists well beyond the 5 ns window of the TA experiment, consistent with previous MoS2/SWCNT studies, the Type II energetic alignment and the thermodynamic spontaneity for photoinduced electron transfer expected from Figure 1a. (3,5,25) In the near-infrared (NIR) range of photoexcited neat MoS2 monolayers there is no TA signal, since all MoS2 excitonic features occur in the visible range. However, clear signatures of an SWCNT charge population in the MoS2/SWCNT bilayer indicate photoinduced electron transfer from SWCNTs to MoS2 (Figure 2a). The well-documented signature is the SWCNT trion (X+) induced absorption (IA) at 1175 nm and the accompanying 1000 nm ground-state bleach (GSB) of the S11 transition. (5,16) These NIR features are complemented by long-lived features in the visible range, which we can attribute to the MoS2 A and B excitons (bleaches at 660 and 610 nm, respectively) and to the SWCNT S22 transition (575 nm bleach). Figure 2c demonstrates long-lived carrier separation in the MoS2 heterobilayer compared to the neat SWCNTs via charge-related kinetics at the 1175 nm SWCNT trion-induced absorption. We note the presence of a second pulse in the TA kinetics, around 10 ps, due to reflection off of the air-free holder sapphire windows. This second pulse is present in all our samples and it should not be mistaken for a delayed rise of a given population. The effect of the second pulse is explained and addressed in the Supporting Information.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Transient absorption spectra averaged over 2–5 ns following 1000 nm excitation of (A) SWCNT (black) and MoS2/SWCNT bilayer (purple) and (B) SWCNT (black) and WSe2/SWCNT bilayer (red). Kinetic traces corresponding to the SWCNT trion (X+ or X, depending on the transferred charge) induced absorption with 1000 nm excitation: (C) SWCNT (black) and MoS2/SWCNT bilayer (purple) and (D) SWCNT (black) and WSe2/SWCNT bilayer (red).

In contrast to the MoS2/SWCNT bilayer, when exciting the WSe2/SWCNT bilayer at 1000 nm, the WSe2 GSB at 750 nm is absent in the TA spectra (Figure 2b), indicating that there is negligible (or low-yield) exciton dissociation via hole transfer from the SWCNTs to WSe2. However, a small trion feature is observed in the NIR region, from which we calculated a hole transfer yield of 2% after 1000 nm excitation. This low hole transfer yield could explain why we do not observe the WSe2 GSB at 750 nm, since the GSB could be embedded in the noise. The kinetics at 1175 nm change very little relative to that of the neat SWCNT, also suggesting negligible charge generation in this bilayer. This inefficient hole transfer event may result from the low thermodynamic driving force of ca. 0 meV (Figure 1a), even though the calculated band alignment is Type II. We confirmed the absence of the WSe2 GSB at 750 nm after 1000 nm excitation in this bilayer through TA experiments on two other separately prepared bilayers that incorporated CVD-grown WSe2 monolayers that were either purchased or grown in-house at NREL (Figure S1).
Interestingly, we also observe a relatively low charge generation yield in the WSe2/SWCNT bilayer after photoexcitation of the WSe2 layer at 750 nm, approximately 10% (Figure S1). We speculate on two potential mechanisms for the somewhat low efficiency of this electron transfer event. It is possible that the large predicted thermodynamic driving force of ca. 490 meV (Figure 1a) places this electron transfer event in the Marcus inverted regime, (9) although hole transfer from MoS2 to (6,5) s-SWCNTs is substantially more efficient (ca. 39% with ΔGHT = −700 meV). Fang and co-workers have also proposed the formation of interlayer excitons in WSe2/SWCNT heterojunctions, based on PL features observed at room temperature. (33) It is unclear how these interlayer excitons would manifest in our TA measurements, so this subject will be considered in future studies.

MoS2/SWCNT/WSe2 Trilayer

We prepared the MoS2/SWCNT/WSe2 trilayer by transferring a CVD-grown WSe2 monolayer onto the existing MoS2/SWCNT bilayer. (34−36) Figure 1b,e shows Raman and steady state absorption spectra comparing MoS2, the MoS2/SWCNT bilayer, and the MoS2/SWCNT/WSe2 trilayer. The peak at 250 cm–1 in the trilayer Raman spectrum is the WSe2 out-of-plane (E2g) Raman active mode and in the trilayer absorption spectra, the WSe2 A exciton peak appears at 750 nm, indicating the successful creation of the heterotrilayer. (26,28) TA spectroscopy of the trilayer shows ultrafast exciton dissociation at both TMDC/SWCNT interfaces and a resulting long-lived charge separation. Figure 3a highlights the formation of separated carriers within femtoseconds (<200 fs) following 1000 nm excitation, evidenced by the observation of both WSe2 and MoS2 bleach features, followed by charge recombination that persists beyond the nanosecond time scale.

Figure 3

Figure 3. (A) Transient absorption spectra, at varying pump-probe time delays, for the MoS2/SWCNT/WSe2 trilayer, following 1000 nm excitation. (B) Transient absorption spectra averaged over 2–5 ns for the MoS2/SWCNT bilayer (purple), and MoS2/SWCNT/WSe2 trilayer (orange). (C) and (D) Kinetic traces at (C) 1175 nm, corresponding to the SWCNT trion (X+) induced absorption, and (D) 660 nm, corresponding to the ground state bleach of MoS2, following 1000 nm excitation.

Figure 3a,b demonstrates that not only does photoinduced hole transfer from MoS2 to SWCNTs occur in the trilayer (similar to what is observed for the MoS2 bilayer), but the electron transfer event from WSe2 to SWCNTs, which is inefficient for the WSe2 bilayer, is observed in the trilayer. This unexpected result suggests that some ground- or excited-state properties of the trilayer change the spontaneity/efficiency of the photoinduced hole transfer event from (6,5) SWCNTs to WSe2, relative to the corresponding WSe2/SWCNT bilayer. We speculated that releasing WSe2 from its original sapphire substrate may modify the VB energy in such a way that HT is now spontaneous in the trilayer but not in the bilayer. However, photoexcitation of a “reverse bilayer” (SWCNT/WSe2), in which the SWCNTs are sprayed onto WSe2 that remains on its original substrate, refutes this idea as hole transfer from SWCNT to WSe2 is not present in the transient data (Figure S2).
The photoinduced charge transfer quantum yield (ϕ CT) is defined as
ϕCT=Ne/hNex
(2)
where Ne/h is the number of separated charges (electrons or holes) per photogenerated exciton (Nex). (1,5,25) Using the trion-induced absorption intensity as in prior studies, we estimate the charge yield in the trilayer to be 41%, which is a summation of electron and hole transfer yields at the MoS2 and WSe2 interfaces, respectively. (37) The addition of the hole-accepting WSe2 layer to MoS2/SWCNT roughly doubles the total charge transfer yield when compared to the 23% electron transfer yield in the MoS2/SWCNT bilayer. (5) This result positions the trilayer as an effective method for significantly increasing the charge yield.
Comparing the kinetics of specific spectral features between the MoS2/SWCNT bilayer and the MoS2/SWCNT/WSe2 trilayer can provide a window into the diffusive charge dynamics that occur following photoinduced exciton dissociation in the trilayer. In Figure 3c,d, pumping at 1000 nm excites only the SWCNTs, generating both the MoS2(−)/SWCNT(+) and WSe2(+)/SWCNT(−) interfacial species. Figure 3c compares the kinetics of the SWCNT trion induced absorption in the trilayer and the MoS2/SWCNT bilayer. In the trilayer, the trion transition gets its oscillator strength from both holes (i.e., X+) at the MoS2(−)/SWCNT(+) interface and electrons (i.e., X) at the WSe2(+)/SWCNT(−) interface. In the MoS2/SWCNT bilayer, the X+ signal is long-lived and decays outside of the nanosecond window, while in the trilayer the trion signal (X+ + X) is substantially reduced by 5 ns. This depletion of SWCNT charges could arise from two diffusive processes: (1) diffusion-limited recombination of electrons from the WSe2(+)/SWCNT(−) interface with holes from the MoS2(−)/SWCNT(+) interface within the SWCNTs; (2) diffusion of electrons away from the WSe2(+)/SWCNT(−) interface to the MoS2(−)/SWCNT(+) interface where they are injected into MoS2 (and/or the reverse process for holes at the MoS2(−)/SWCNT(+) interface). Both of these processes require SWCNT-based carriers at the SWCNT/TMDC interface to escape the Coulomb potential of the oppositely charged TMDC-based carrier.
To determine if process (2) from above is active, we track the MoS2 GSB kinetics at 660 nm (Figure 3d). 1000 nm is used unless otherwise stated. Encouragingly, the MoS2 GSB does not decay as rapidly in the trilayer, relative to the MoS2/SWCNT bilayer, suggesting that this diffusion-based process may be occurring. Thus, the concomitant depletion of the trion IA and increase of the MoS2 GSB in the trilayer provide evidence for charges escaping the WSe2–SWCNT interface and diffusing to the MoS2–SWCNT interface where they inject into MoS2. When tracking the MoS2 GSB, selective excitation of WSe2 in the trilayer results in a slow rise of MoS2 charges, also supporting this diffusion based process (see Figure S4).
To confirm that charge carrier diffusion plays a role after exciton dissociation and to elaborate on the overall kinetic scheme of this complex system, we turn to a detailed model of the exciton and charge dynamics. Experimental time-dependent spectral contributions of excitons and charges are separated using singular value decomposition (SVD). (38,39) Based on initial TA information, four independent species are used in SVD analysis to extract the decay of charge-related spectral signatures (Figure S5): (1) the initial SWCNT excited state created by excitation at 1000 nm (S65*); (2) electron transfer from SWCNT to MoS2 (S65+ MoS2); (3) hole transfer from SWCNT to WSe2 (S65 WSe2+); and (4) charge (hole/electron) on s-SWCNT diffusing away to corresponding TMDC (WSe2+/MoS2), with opposite charges on TMDCs remaining on the respective layer. Figure 4a displays the kinetic scheme that ultimately simulates the 2D TA data most effectively, with the rate equations associated with this scheme provided in Supporting Information secton 1.3. The kinetic scheme and derived equations from the simulation can accurately reproduce the 2D experimental data (Figure 4c,d). Time scales for electron transfer (k11), hole transfer (k22), diffusion (k21 and k31), and each charge recombination (krec) pathway are obtained from the simulated concentration profiles in Figure 4b and are outlined in the visual schematic in Figure 5 (see SI for additional information).

Figure 4

Figure 4. (A) Proposed kinetic scheme, following SWCNT excitatoin at 1000 nm; (B) Concentration profiles for each species generated in the trilayer, with similar color-coding to panel (A); (C) Experimental TA surface plot for the visible region of the trilayer excited at 1000 nm; (D) Simulated TA surface plot from the concentration equations and associated spectra. The color bar to the right specifies intensities of the different signals. Specifically, the GSB for S22 at 575 nm, MoS2 A exciton at 660 nm and WSe2 A excitonat 740 nm can be identified. Color bar to the right specifies intensities of the different signals.

Figure 5

Figure 5. Kinetic scheme highlighting the different time constants for hole transfer (τHT) to WSe2, electron transfer (τET) to MoS2 and the charge recombination lifetimes (τCR) following selective excitation of SWCNT at 1000 nm.

Despite a greater predicted thermodynamic driving force for electron transfer (see Figure 1a, ΔGET = −70 meV), we observe faster hole transfer from the SWCNTs to WSe2HT = <0.2 ps) compared to electron transfer from the SWCNTs to MoS2 following selective excitation at 1000 nm (τET = 1.53 ps). Subsequently, diffusion of holes away from the SWCNT/WSe2 interface also occurs at a faster rate (τHT = 5 ps) than diffusion of electrons away from the SWCNT/MoS2 interface (τET = 2.5 ns). Charge recombination of both holes and electrons successfully transferred from SWCNTs to either WSe2 or MoS2 occurs with a time constant of 1.23 μs. The trilayer nearly doubles the charge recombination time, relative to the MoS2/SWCNT bilayer (τrec = 0.73 μs, see also Figure S4). (5) Thus, improved spatial separation in the TMDC/SWCNT/TMDC trilayer leads to long charge recombination lifetimes. (5,8,17)
Our study was motivated by the natural charge transfer cascades driving long-lived charge separation in photosynthesis, as well as a lack of mechanistic understanding of carrier diffusion at TMDC heterointerfaces. The TA analysis on this mixed-dimensionality heterostructure reveals several intriguing features that warrant some discussion. First, the MoS2/SWCNT/WSe2 trilayer allows us to access the HT pathway that is ineffective in the respective bilayer. As prepared, MoS2 tends to be n-type, while WSe2 is typically p-type as-grown. We speculate that having the two oppositely charged layers on either side of the s-SWCNT film may lead to the formation of an electric field or dipole that shifts the band alignment, making HT more favorable in the trilayer than in the bilayer. (2,17) Second, we demonstrate that charges within the s-SWCNT layer can escape the Coulomb attraction of the opposite charge carrier at the SWCNT/TMDC interface. In contrast, charge transfer in similar TMDC/TMDC heterojunctions is typically characterized by spatially confined and tightly bound interfacial excitons with limited mobility away from the heterointerface. The faster time scale for this diffusive process at the WSe2/SWCNT interface, relative to the MoS2/SWCNT interface, may suggest a stronger interlayer Coulomb binding energy at the MoS2/SWCNT interface. We plan to probe these interesting observations in more detail, both experimentally and theoretically, in future studies.

Conclusion

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

In conclusion, we have successfully prepared a MoS2/SWCNT/WSe2 heterotrilayer that can separate charges via a charge transfer cascade. By using transient absorption spectroscopy, we have shown that this type of “mixed-dimensionality” Type-II trilayer can yield charge separated lifetimes on the microsecond time scale while significantly increasing charge yield relative to similarly prepared Type-II bilayers. The microsecond charge recombination lifetime demonstrates the significance of SWCNTs as the charge carrier medium and the role that out-of-plane carrier delocalization has on stabilizing long-lived charges. Consistently, the well-resolved SWCNT spectral signatures allowed us to track charge diffusion away from the site of charge generation and demonstrate Coulombically unbound charges moving from one TMDC/SWCNT interface to the other. The observation of a charge transfer pathway in the trilayer that is ineffective in the respective WSe2/SWCNT bilayer suggests that strategic layering in nanoscale heterojunctions provides additional routes for charge movement in specified directions. Ultimately, our results suggest that well-defined charge transfer cascades can result in longer charge separated lifetimes and higher yields of e/h+ pairs that can escape their mutual Coulombic attraction, positioning these nanoscale model systems as interesting for both fundamental studies and optoelectronic devices.

Methods

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

TMDCs

Full coverage CVD grown monolayer MoS2 and WSe2 on c-cut sapphire were purchased from 2D semiconductors. The NREL grown monolayer WSe2 was prepared via chemical vapor deposition (CVD) in a three-temperature zone furnace. An alumina boat positioned 1 in. from zone 1 (upstream, outside of the furnace) contained 500 mg of selenium, and zone 3 contained a Si/SiO2 wafer with a predeposited thin film of 10 mM ammonium metatungstate (AMT) and 10 mM NaOH. 100 sccm aliquot of Ar/2% H2 gas was supplied to the growth chamber to carry the selenium under a growth pressure of 760 Torr. Zone 1, 2, 3 had a temperature ramping rate of 35 °C/min and were heated to 530, 950, and 950 °C, respectively, and maintained for 4 min.

Absorption

Ground state absorption spectra of both neat and bilayer films were measured in air on a Cary 5000 spectrophotometer with baseline correction. The (6,5) SWCNT film thickness was estimated to be ca. 7 nm from the S11 peak optical density at 1000 nm.

Raman and Photoluminescence Spectroscopy

Measurements were taken in an air-free cell using an inVia Renishaw confocal Raman microscope with a 532 and 633 nm laser. (40) Raman scattering was detected using a 1800 lines/mm grating, and photoluminescence (PL) was recorded using a 600 lines/mm grating. A GaInP/AlGaInP sample was used as a reference to account for the day to day changes in laser power. All single Raman and PL spectra, e.g., in Figure 1, are averages of 50–100 spectra taken over a specific area of each sample and then normalized to the GaInP/AlGaInP reference.

Transient Absorption Spectroscopy

Samples for transient absorption measurements were sealed inside a nitrogen glovebox in a double window air-free sample holder to prevent exposure to the atmosphere and avoid sample degradation during TA measurements.

Ultrafast TA

Ultrafast TA was performed on a Coherent Libra Ti/Sapphire laser with a 1 kHz 800 nm output and 150 fs fwhm pulse width. The Coherent Libra output was sent through a beam splitter to generate the pump and probe. The pump was generated with a TOPAS-C optical parametric amplifier. Visible (450–800 nm) and NIR (800–1600 nm) probe pulses were generated by focusing the 800 nm fundamental into a thin or thick sapphire window, respectively. The TA was a pump–probe configuration measurement, contained in a HELIOS optical box from Ultrafast Systems controlled with a HELIOS software package. The probe beam is sent through a beam splitter to measure the reference spectrum to increase signal-to-noise ratio. The probe pulse, an 800 nm fundamental, is delayed with respect to the pump pulse using a mechanical delay stage. Data were chirp corrected and analyzed using a Surface Xplorer from Ultrafast Systems.

Nanosecond–Microsecond (100 ps to 400 μs) TA

Nanosecond–microsecond TA measurements were performed on a Coherent Libra Ti/Sapphire laser with a 1 kHz 800 nm output and 150 fs fwhm pulse width. The fundamental beam was used to generate pump pulses with a TOPAS-C optical parametric amplifier. Visible and NIR probe pulses are generated from an EOS (Ultrafast Systems) apparatus, produced in a diode-laser-pumped photonic crystal fiber, and electronically delayed relative to the pump pulse with a digital delay generator. Data acquisition was performed using the EOS software package from Ultrafast Systems.

SWCNT Preparation

(6,5) Single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) dispersions were prepared from SG65i SWCNTs (CoMoCAT, purchased from CHASM) and poly-[(9,9-dioctylfluorenyl-2,7-diyl)-alt-co-(6,60-[2,20-bipyridine])] (PFO-bpy) purchased from American Dye Source. Pure (6,5) SWCNTs were extracted from a solution of 0.5 mg/mL SWCNTs and 2 mg/mL of PFO-bpy in toluene via tip sonication (Cole-Palmer CPX 750, 0.5 in. tip) for 15 min at 40% amplitude in a flowing bath of cool water. Immediately after sonication, the dispersion was centrifuged at 13000 rpm for 5 min at 20 °C (Beckman Coulter L-100 XP ultracentrifuge, SW-32 Ti rotor). To remove excess polymer, the supernatant was separated from the pellet and centrifuged for 20 h at 24100 rpm and 20 °C. A compact pellet containing (6,5) SWNCTs and excess PFO-Bpy was redispersed in toluene in an ultrasonic bath sonicator for over an hour. The polymer removal process was then repeated for a second time.

Spray Coating SWCNTs

MoS2/SWCNT and WSe2/SWCNT bilayers were prepared by spray coating the SWCNT ink onto the respective neat substrate. The substrates were placed on a heated metal stage (130 °C) to evaporate the toluene solvent. The ink was applied from an ultrasonic sprayer (SonoTek) directed at the substrate, operated at 0.8 W with a solution flow rate of 0.3 mL/min and a nitrogen flow rate of 7.0 standard liters per minute. Each bilayer film was soaked in their respective hot (78 °C) toluene baths for 10 min to remove additional polymer from the film.

WSe2 Transfer

To transfer the WSe2 monolayer off of its sapphire growth substrate and onto the MoS2/SWCNT bilayer, the WSe2/sapphire substrate was coated with polystyrene (PS) dissolved in toluene (50 mg/mL) via spin coating at 2400 rpm for 45 s. Immediately after spin coating, all 4 sides of the film were scribed using a box cutter to create an opening for etchant to access the WSe2/sapphire interface. The substrate was placed in a hot (70 °C) 2 M NaOH bath for 10 min. The substrate was removed from the NaOH bath and the PS/WSe2 film detached in water by holding the substrate at the air/water interface. The PS/WSe2 film was transferred to the MoS2/SWCNT bilayer by lifting the substrate from underneath the film. The trilayer was then soaked in toluene for 10 min to remove the PS layer. This process was repeated for a second transfer. The film was placed in a spot different from the original transfer to maximize WSe2 surface coverage.

Supporting Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsnano.3c12179.

  • Additional transient absorption spectroscopy, kinetic analysis of trilayer, ΔG calculation values, and charge transfer yield calculations (PDF)

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Author Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

  • Corresponding Authors
  • Authors
    • Alexis R. Myers - National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, Colorado 80401, United StatesDepartment of Chemistry, University of Colorado−Boulder, Boulder, Colorado 80309, United States
    • Zhaodong Li - National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, Colorado 80401, United StatesThe Institute of Technological Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430072, China
    • Melissa K. Gish - National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, Colorado 80401, United StatesOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-9886-3626
    • Justin D. Earley - National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, Colorado 80401, United StatesDepartment of Chemistry, University of Colorado−Boulder, Boulder, Colorado 80309, United StatesOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-0492-4692
    • Justin C. Johnson - National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, Colorado 80401, United StatesOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-8874-6637
  • Notes
    The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Acknowledgments

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This work was authored by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC, for the US Department of Energy(DOE) under Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308. This study was supported by the Solar Photochemistry Program, Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences, and Biosciences, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, U.S. DOE. The views expressed in the article do not necessarily represent the views of the DOE or the U.S. Government.

References

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article references 40 other publications.

  1. 1
    Dowgiallo, A.-M.; Mistry, K. S.; Johnson, J. C.; Reid, O. G.; Blackburn, J. L. Probing Exciton Diffusion and Dissociation in Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube-C60 Heterojunctions. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2016, 7, 17941799,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b00604
  2. 2
    Schulz, P.; Dowgiallo, A.-M.; Yang, M.; Zhu, K.; Blackburn, J. L.; Berry, J. J. Charge Transfer Dynamics between Carbon Nanotubes and Hybrid Organic Metal Halide Perovskite Films. J.Phys. Chem. Lett. 2016, 7, 418425,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b02721
  3. 3
    Sulas-Kern, D. B.; Miller, E. M.; Blackburn, J. L. Photoinduced charge transfer in transition metal dichalcogenide heterojunctions-towards next generation energy technologies. Energy Environ. Sci. 2020, 13, 26842740,  DOI: 10.1039/D0EE01370F
  4. 4
    Blackburn, J. L. Semiconducting Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes in Solar Energy Harvesting. ACS Energy Lett. 2017, 2, 15981613,  DOI: 10.1021/acsenergylett.7b00228
  5. 5
    Sulas-Kern, D. B.; Zhang, H.; Li, Z.; Blackburn, J. L. Microsecond charge separation at heterojunctions between transition metal dichalcogenide monolayers and single-walled carbon nanotubes. Mater. Horiz. 2019, 6, 21032111,  DOI: 10.1039/C9MH00954J
  6. 6
    Matsunaga, R.; Matsuda, K.; Kanemitsu, Y. Observation of charged excitons in hole-doped carbon nanotubes using photoluminescence and absorption spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2011, 106, 14,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.037404
  7. 7
    Ahmed, S.; Yi, J. Two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides and their charge carrier mobilities in field-effect transistors. Nano-Micro Lett. 2017, 9, 123,  DOI: 10.1007/s40820-017-0152-6
  8. 8
    Pant, A.; Mutlu, Z.; Wickramaratne, D.; Cai, H.; Lake, R. K.; Ozkan, C.; Tongay, S. Fundamentals of lateral and vertical heterojunctions of atomically thin materials. Nanoscale 2016, 8, 38703887,  DOI: 10.1039/C5NR08982D
  9. 9
    Ihly, R.; Mistry, K. S.; Ferguson, A. J.; Clikeman, T. T.; Larson, B. W.; Reid, O.; Boltalina, O. V.; Strauss, S. H.; Rumbles, G.; Blackburn, J. L. Tuning the driving force for exciton dissociation in single-walled carbon nanotube heterojunctions. Nat. Chem. 2016, 8, 603609,  DOI: 10.1038/nchem.2496
  10. 10
    Zorn, N. F.; Zaumseil, J. Charge transport in semiconducting carbon nanotube networks. Appl. Phys. Rev. 2021, 8, 041318  DOI: 10.1063/5.0065730
  11. 11
    van der Donck, M.; Zarenia, M.; Peeters, F. M. Excitons, trions, and biexcitons in transition-metal dichalcogenides: Magnetic-field dependence. Phys. Rev. B 2018, 97, 111,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.97.195408
  12. 12
    Mueller, T.; Malic, E. Exciton physics and device application of two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenide semiconductors. Npj 2D Mater. Appl. 2018, 2, 112,  DOI: 10.1038/s41699-018-0074-2
  13. 13
    Li, Z.; Attanayake, N. H.; Blackburn, J. L.; Miller, E. M. Carbon dioxide and nitrogen reduction reactions using 2D transition metal dichalcogenide (TMDC) and carbide/nitride (MXene) catalysts. Energy Environ. Sci. 2021, 14, 62426286,  DOI: 10.1039/D1EE03211A
  14. 14
    Kafle, T. R.; Kattel, B.; Yao, P.; Zereshki, P.; Zhao, H.; Chan, W.-L. Effect of the interfacial energy landscape on photoinduced charge generation at the ZnPc/MoS2 interface. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 1132811336,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.9b05893
  15. 15
    Park, S.; Mutz, N.; Schultz, T.; Blumstengel, S.; Han, A.; Aljarb, A.; Li, L.-J.; List-Kratochvil, E. J. W.; Amsalem, P.; Koch, N. Lain-Jong Direct determination of monolayer MoS2 and WSe2 exciton binding energies on insulating and metallic substrates. 2D Mater. 2018, 5, 025003  DOI: 10.1088/2053-1583/aaa4ca
  16. 16
    Kang, H. S.; Sisto, T. J.; Peurifoy, S.; Arias, D. H.; Zhang, B.; Nuckolls, C.; Blackburn, J. L. Long-Lived Charge Separation at Heterojunctions between Semiconducting Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes and Perylene Diimide Electron Acceptors. J. Phys. Chem. C 2018, 122, 1415014161,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b01400
  17. 17
    Homan, S. B.; Sangwan, V. K.; Balla, I.; Bergeron, H.; Weiss, E. A.; Hersam, M. C. Ultrafast exciton dissociation and long-lived charge separation in a photovoltaic pentacene-MoS2 van der Waals heterojunction. Nano Lett. 2017, 17, 164169,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b03704
  18. 18
    Mirkovic, T.; Ostroumov, E. E.; Anna, J. M.; van Grondelle, R.; Govindjee; Scholes, G. D. Light absorption and energy transfer in the antenna complexes of photosynthetic organisms. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 249293,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00002
  19. 19
    Ceballos, F.; Ju, M.-G.; Lane, S. D.; Zeng, X. C.; Zhao, H. Highly Efficient and Anomalous Charge Transfer in van der Waals Trilayer Semiconductors. Nano Lett. 2017, 17, 16231628,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b04815
  20. 20
    Zereshki, P.; Wei, Y.; Long, R.; Zhao, H. Layer-Coupled States Facilitate Ultrafast Charge Transfer in a Transition Metal Dichalcogenide Trilayer Heterostructure. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2018, 9, 59705978,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.8b02622
  21. 21
    Kim, J.; Jin, C.; Chen, B.; Cai, H.; Zhao, T.; Lee, P.; Kahn, S.; Watanabe, K.; Taniguchi, T.; Tongay, S.; Crommie, M. F.; Wang, F. Observation of Ultralong Valley Lifetime in WSe2/MoS2 Heterostrucures. Sci. Adv. 2017, 3, 17,  DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.1700518
  22. 22
    Wang, Z.; Sun, C.; Xu, X.; Liu, Y.; Chen, Z.; Yang, Y. â.; Zhu, H. Long-Range Hot Charge Transfer Exciton Dissociation in an Organic/2D Semiconductor Hybrid Excitonic Heterostructure. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2023, 145, 1122711235,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.3c01192
  23. 23
    Hong, X.; Kim, J.; Shi, S.-F.; Zhang, Y.; Jin, C.; Sun, Y.; Tongay, S.; Wu, J.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, F. Ultrafast charge transfer in atomically thin MoS2 /WS2 heterostructures. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2014, 9, 682686,  DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2014.167
  24. 24
    Guillot, S. L.; Mistry, K. S.; Avery, A. D.; Richard, J.; Dowgiallo, A.-M.; Ndione, P. F.; van de Lagemaat, J.; Reese, M. O.; Blackburn, J. L. Precision printing and optical modeling of ultrathin SWCNT/C60 heterojunction solar cells. Nanoscale 2015, 7, 65566566,  DOI: 10.1039/C5NR00205B
  25. 25
    Sulas-Kern, D. B.; Zhang, H.; Li, Z.; Blackburn, J. L. Interplay between microstructure, defect states, and mobile charge generation in transition metal dichalcogenide heterojunctions. Nanoscale 2021, 13, 81888198,  DOI: 10.1039/D1NR00384D
  26. 26
    Zhao, W.; Ghorannevis, Z.; Amara, K. K.; Pang, J. R.; Toh, M.; Zhang, X.; Kloc, C.; Tan, P. H.; Eda, G. Lattice dynamics in mono- and few-layer sheets of WS2 and WSe2. Nanoscale 2013, 5, 96779683,  DOI: 10.1039/c3nr03052k
  27. 27
    Zhang, X.; Qiao, X.-F.; Shi, W.; Wu, J.-B.; Jiang, D.-S.; Tan, P.-H. Phonon and Raman scattering of two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides from monolayer, multilayer to bulk material. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 27572785,  DOI: 10.1039/C4CS00282B
  28. 28
    Tonndorf, P.; Schmidt, R.; Böttger, P.; Zhang, X.; Börner, J.; Liebig, A.; Albrecht, M.; Kloc, C.; Gordan, O.; Zahn, D. R. T.; de Vasconcellos, S. M.; Bratschitsch, R. Photoluminescence emission and Raman response of monolayer MoS2, MoSe2, and WSe2. Opt. Express 2013, 21, 49084916,  DOI: 10.1364/OE.21.004908
  29. 29
    McCreary, K. M.; Hanbicki, A. T.; Sivaram, S. V.; Jonker, B. T. A- and B-exciton photoluminescence intensity ratio as a measure of sample quality for transition metal dichalcogenide monolayers. APL Materials 2018, 6, na,  DOI: 10.1063/1.5053699
  30. 30
    Dong, N.; Li, Y.; Feng, Y.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, X.; Chang, C.; Fan, J.; Zhang, L.; Wang, J. Optical limiting and theoretical modelling of layered transition metal dichalcogenide nanosheets. Opt. Express 2015, 5, 110,  DOI: 10.1038/srep14646
  31. 31
    Amani, M.; Taheri, P.; Addou, R.; Ahn, G. H.; Kiriya, D.; Lien, D.-H.; Ager, J. W.; Wallace, R. M.; Javey, A. Recombination Kinetics and Effects of Superacid Treatment in Sulfur- and Selenium-Based Transition Metal Dichalcogenides. Nano Lett. 2016, 16, 27862791,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b00536
  32. 32
    Gupta, R.; Singh, B. P.; Singh, V. N.; Gupta, T. K.; Mathur, R. B. Origin of radial breathing mode in multiwall carbon nanotubes synthesized by catalytic chemical vapor deposition. Carbon 2014, 66, 724726,  DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2013.08.057
  33. 33
    Fang, N.; Chang, Y. R.; Fujii, S.; Yamashita, D.; Maruyama, M.; Gao, Y.; Fong, C. F.; Kozawa, D.; Otsuka, K.; Nagashio, K.; Okada, S.; Kato, Y. K. Room-temperature quantum emission from interface excitons in mixed-dimensional heterostructure. arXiv:2307.15399 [cond-mat.mes-hall] 2023, na,  DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2307.15399
  34. 34
    Ma, D.; Shi, J.; Ji, Q.; Chen, K.; Yin, J.; Lin, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, M.; Feng, Q.; Song, X.; Guo, X.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, Z. A universal etching-free transfer of MoS2 films for applications in photodetectors. Nano Research 2015, 8, 36623672,  DOI: 10.1007/s12274-015-0866-z
  35. 35
    Rose, A. H.; Dunklin, J. R.; Zhang, H.; Merlo, J. M.; van de Lagemaat, J. A universal etching-free transfer of MoS2 films for applications in photodetectors. ACS Photonics 2020, 7, 11291134,  DOI: 10.1021/acsphotonics.0c00233
  36. 36
    Xu, Z.-Q.; Zhang, Y.; Lin, S.; Zheng, C.; Zhong, Y. L.; Xia, X.; Li, Z.; Sophia, P. J.; Fuhrer, M. S.; Cheng, Y.-B.; Bao, Q. Synthesis and Transfer of Large-Area Monolayer WS2 Crystals: Toward the Recyclable Use of Sapphire Substrates. ACS Nano 2015, 9, 61786187,  DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.5b01480
  37. 37
    Dowgiallo, A.-M.; Mistry, K. S.; Johnson, J. C.; Blackburn, J. L. Ultrafast Spectroscopic Signature of Charge Transfer between Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes and C60. ACS Nano 2014, 8, 85738581,  DOI: 10.1021/nn503271k
  38. 38
    Jaumot, J.; Gargallo, R.; de Juan, A.; Tauler, R. A graphical user-friendly interface for MCR-ALS: a new tool for multivariate curve resolution in MATLAB. Chemometr. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2005, 76, 101110,  DOI: 10.1016/j.chemolab.2004.12.007
  39. 39
    Jaumot, J.; de Juan, A.; Tauler, R. MCR-ALS GUI 2.0: New features and applications. Chemometr. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2015, 140, 112,  DOI: 10.1016/j.chemolab.2014.10.003
  40. 40
    Zhang, H.; Dunklin, J. R.; Reid, O. G.; Yun, S. J.; Nanayakkara, S. U.; Lee, Y. H.; Blackburn, J. L.; Miller, E. M. Disentangling oxygen and water vapor effects on optoelectronic properties of monolayer tungsten disulfide. Nanoscale 2020, 12, 83448354,  DOI: 10.1039/C9NR09326E

Cited By

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!
Citation Statements
Explore this article's citation statements on scite.ai

This article is cited by 3 publications.

  1. Daria D. Blach, Dana B. Sulas-Kern, Bipeng Wang, Run Long, Qiushi Ma, Oleg V. Prezhdo, Jeffrey L. Blackburn, Libai Huang. Long-Range Charge Transport Facilitated by Electron Delocalization in MoS2 and Carbon Nanotube Heterostructures. ACS Nano 2025, 19 (3) , 3439-3447. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.4c12858
  2. Lei Tong, Hui Yan, Chunyan Xu, Weijie Bai, Can Su, Heng Li, Xinyu Wang, Wenhao Fan, Xudong Chen, Zhicheng Zhang, Qingguo Wang, Shougen Yin. Perovskite quantum dots/WSe2 mixed-dimensional van der Waals heterostructure for photoelectric enhancement and polarization sensitivity. Chemical Engineering Journal 2024, 499 , 155861. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2024.155861
  3. Alexis R. Myers, Dana B. Sulas-Kern, Rao Fei, Debjit Ghoshal, M. Alejandra Hermosilla-Palacios, Jeffrey L. Blackburn. Quantifying carrier density in monolayer MoS2 by optical spectroscopy. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2024, 161 (4) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0213720

ACS Nano

Cite this: ACS Nano 2024, 18, 11, 8190–8198
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.3c12179
Published March 11, 2024

Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under

CC-BY 4.0 .

Article Views

2058

Altmetric

-

Citations

Learn about these metrics

Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.

  • Abstract

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. (A) Predicted energy level diagram of MoS2/SWCNT and WSe2/SWCNT bilayers (top); Calculated thermodynamic driving forces for electron and hole transfer at the MoS2/SWCNT and WSe2/SWCNT interfaces (bottom). (B) Raman spectra of (6,5) SWCNT film, MoS2 monolayer, MoS2/SWCNT bilayer, WSe2 monolayer, and the MoS2/SWCNT/WSe2 trilayer. (C) Absorbance spectra for MoS2 monolayer, (6,5) SWCNT film, and the MoS2/SWCNT heterojunction (top); Schematic of MoS2/SWCNT bilayer (bottom). (D) Absorbance spectra of WSe2 monolayer, (6,5) SWCNT film, and the WSe2/SWCNT bilayer (top); Schematic of the WSe2/SWCNT bilayer. (E) Absorbance spectra of (6,5) SWCNT film, MoS2/SWCNT bilayer, and MoS2/SWCNT/WSe2 trilayer (top); Schematic of the MoS2/SWCNT/WSe2 trilayer (bottom).

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. Transient absorption spectra averaged over 2–5 ns following 1000 nm excitation of (A) SWCNT (black) and MoS2/SWCNT bilayer (purple) and (B) SWCNT (black) and WSe2/SWCNT bilayer (red). Kinetic traces corresponding to the SWCNT trion (X+ or X, depending on the transferred charge) induced absorption with 1000 nm excitation: (C) SWCNT (black) and MoS2/SWCNT bilayer (purple) and (D) SWCNT (black) and WSe2/SWCNT bilayer (red).

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. (A) Transient absorption spectra, at varying pump-probe time delays, for the MoS2/SWCNT/WSe2 trilayer, following 1000 nm excitation. (B) Transient absorption spectra averaged over 2–5 ns for the MoS2/SWCNT bilayer (purple), and MoS2/SWCNT/WSe2 trilayer (orange). (C) and (D) Kinetic traces at (C) 1175 nm, corresponding to the SWCNT trion (X+) induced absorption, and (D) 660 nm, corresponding to the ground state bleach of MoS2, following 1000 nm excitation.

    Figure 4

    Figure 4. (A) Proposed kinetic scheme, following SWCNT excitatoin at 1000 nm; (B) Concentration profiles for each species generated in the trilayer, with similar color-coding to panel (A); (C) Experimental TA surface plot for the visible region of the trilayer excited at 1000 nm; (D) Simulated TA surface plot from the concentration equations and associated spectra. The color bar to the right specifies intensities of the different signals. Specifically, the GSB for S22 at 575 nm, MoS2 A exciton at 660 nm and WSe2 A excitonat 740 nm can be identified. Color bar to the right specifies intensities of the different signals.

    Figure 5

    Figure 5. Kinetic scheme highlighting the different time constants for hole transfer (τHT) to WSe2, electron transfer (τET) to MoS2 and the charge recombination lifetimes (τCR) following selective excitation of SWCNT at 1000 nm.

  • References


    This article references 40 other publications.

    1. 1
      Dowgiallo, A.-M.; Mistry, K. S.; Johnson, J. C.; Reid, O. G.; Blackburn, J. L. Probing Exciton Diffusion and Dissociation in Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube-C60 Heterojunctions. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2016, 7, 17941799,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b00604
    2. 2
      Schulz, P.; Dowgiallo, A.-M.; Yang, M.; Zhu, K.; Blackburn, J. L.; Berry, J. J. Charge Transfer Dynamics between Carbon Nanotubes and Hybrid Organic Metal Halide Perovskite Films. J.Phys. Chem. Lett. 2016, 7, 418425,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b02721
    3. 3
      Sulas-Kern, D. B.; Miller, E. M.; Blackburn, J. L. Photoinduced charge transfer in transition metal dichalcogenide heterojunctions-towards next generation energy technologies. Energy Environ. Sci. 2020, 13, 26842740,  DOI: 10.1039/D0EE01370F
    4. 4
      Blackburn, J. L. Semiconducting Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes in Solar Energy Harvesting. ACS Energy Lett. 2017, 2, 15981613,  DOI: 10.1021/acsenergylett.7b00228
    5. 5
      Sulas-Kern, D. B.; Zhang, H.; Li, Z.; Blackburn, J. L. Microsecond charge separation at heterojunctions between transition metal dichalcogenide monolayers and single-walled carbon nanotubes. Mater. Horiz. 2019, 6, 21032111,  DOI: 10.1039/C9MH00954J
    6. 6
      Matsunaga, R.; Matsuda, K.; Kanemitsu, Y. Observation of charged excitons in hole-doped carbon nanotubes using photoluminescence and absorption spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2011, 106, 14,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.037404
    7. 7
      Ahmed, S.; Yi, J. Two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides and their charge carrier mobilities in field-effect transistors. Nano-Micro Lett. 2017, 9, 123,  DOI: 10.1007/s40820-017-0152-6
    8. 8
      Pant, A.; Mutlu, Z.; Wickramaratne, D.; Cai, H.; Lake, R. K.; Ozkan, C.; Tongay, S. Fundamentals of lateral and vertical heterojunctions of atomically thin materials. Nanoscale 2016, 8, 38703887,  DOI: 10.1039/C5NR08982D
    9. 9
      Ihly, R.; Mistry, K. S.; Ferguson, A. J.; Clikeman, T. T.; Larson, B. W.; Reid, O.; Boltalina, O. V.; Strauss, S. H.; Rumbles, G.; Blackburn, J. L. Tuning the driving force for exciton dissociation in single-walled carbon nanotube heterojunctions. Nat. Chem. 2016, 8, 603609,  DOI: 10.1038/nchem.2496
    10. 10
      Zorn, N. F.; Zaumseil, J. Charge transport in semiconducting carbon nanotube networks. Appl. Phys. Rev. 2021, 8, 041318  DOI: 10.1063/5.0065730
    11. 11
      van der Donck, M.; Zarenia, M.; Peeters, F. M. Excitons, trions, and biexcitons in transition-metal dichalcogenides: Magnetic-field dependence. Phys. Rev. B 2018, 97, 111,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.97.195408
    12. 12
      Mueller, T.; Malic, E. Exciton physics and device application of two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenide semiconductors. Npj 2D Mater. Appl. 2018, 2, 112,  DOI: 10.1038/s41699-018-0074-2
    13. 13
      Li, Z.; Attanayake, N. H.; Blackburn, J. L.; Miller, E. M. Carbon dioxide and nitrogen reduction reactions using 2D transition metal dichalcogenide (TMDC) and carbide/nitride (MXene) catalysts. Energy Environ. Sci. 2021, 14, 62426286,  DOI: 10.1039/D1EE03211A
    14. 14
      Kafle, T. R.; Kattel, B.; Yao, P.; Zereshki, P.; Zhao, H.; Chan, W.-L. Effect of the interfacial energy landscape on photoinduced charge generation at the ZnPc/MoS2 interface. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 1132811336,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.9b05893
    15. 15
      Park, S.; Mutz, N.; Schultz, T.; Blumstengel, S.; Han, A.; Aljarb, A.; Li, L.-J.; List-Kratochvil, E. J. W.; Amsalem, P.; Koch, N. Lain-Jong Direct determination of monolayer MoS2 and WSe2 exciton binding energies on insulating and metallic substrates. 2D Mater. 2018, 5, 025003  DOI: 10.1088/2053-1583/aaa4ca
    16. 16
      Kang, H. S.; Sisto, T. J.; Peurifoy, S.; Arias, D. H.; Zhang, B.; Nuckolls, C.; Blackburn, J. L. Long-Lived Charge Separation at Heterojunctions between Semiconducting Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes and Perylene Diimide Electron Acceptors. J. Phys. Chem. C 2018, 122, 1415014161,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b01400
    17. 17
      Homan, S. B.; Sangwan, V. K.; Balla, I.; Bergeron, H.; Weiss, E. A.; Hersam, M. C. Ultrafast exciton dissociation and long-lived charge separation in a photovoltaic pentacene-MoS2 van der Waals heterojunction. Nano Lett. 2017, 17, 164169,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b03704
    18. 18
      Mirkovic, T.; Ostroumov, E. E.; Anna, J. M.; van Grondelle, R.; Govindjee; Scholes, G. D. Light absorption and energy transfer in the antenna complexes of photosynthetic organisms. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 249293,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00002
    19. 19
      Ceballos, F.; Ju, M.-G.; Lane, S. D.; Zeng, X. C.; Zhao, H. Highly Efficient and Anomalous Charge Transfer in van der Waals Trilayer Semiconductors. Nano Lett. 2017, 17, 16231628,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b04815
    20. 20
      Zereshki, P.; Wei, Y.; Long, R.; Zhao, H. Layer-Coupled States Facilitate Ultrafast Charge Transfer in a Transition Metal Dichalcogenide Trilayer Heterostructure. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2018, 9, 59705978,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.8b02622
    21. 21
      Kim, J.; Jin, C.; Chen, B.; Cai, H.; Zhao, T.; Lee, P.; Kahn, S.; Watanabe, K.; Taniguchi, T.; Tongay, S.; Crommie, M. F.; Wang, F. Observation of Ultralong Valley Lifetime in WSe2/MoS2 Heterostrucures. Sci. Adv. 2017, 3, 17,  DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.1700518
    22. 22
      Wang, Z.; Sun, C.; Xu, X.; Liu, Y.; Chen, Z.; Yang, Y. â.; Zhu, H. Long-Range Hot Charge Transfer Exciton Dissociation in an Organic/2D Semiconductor Hybrid Excitonic Heterostructure. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2023, 145, 1122711235,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.3c01192
    23. 23
      Hong, X.; Kim, J.; Shi, S.-F.; Zhang, Y.; Jin, C.; Sun, Y.; Tongay, S.; Wu, J.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, F. Ultrafast charge transfer in atomically thin MoS2 /WS2 heterostructures. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2014, 9, 682686,  DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2014.167
    24. 24
      Guillot, S. L.; Mistry, K. S.; Avery, A. D.; Richard, J.; Dowgiallo, A.-M.; Ndione, P. F.; van de Lagemaat, J.; Reese, M. O.; Blackburn, J. L. Precision printing and optical modeling of ultrathin SWCNT/C60 heterojunction solar cells. Nanoscale 2015, 7, 65566566,  DOI: 10.1039/C5NR00205B
    25. 25
      Sulas-Kern, D. B.; Zhang, H.; Li, Z.; Blackburn, J. L. Interplay between microstructure, defect states, and mobile charge generation in transition metal dichalcogenide heterojunctions. Nanoscale 2021, 13, 81888198,  DOI: 10.1039/D1NR00384D
    26. 26
      Zhao, W.; Ghorannevis, Z.; Amara, K. K.; Pang, J. R.; Toh, M.; Zhang, X.; Kloc, C.; Tan, P. H.; Eda, G. Lattice dynamics in mono- and few-layer sheets of WS2 and WSe2. Nanoscale 2013, 5, 96779683,  DOI: 10.1039/c3nr03052k
    27. 27
      Zhang, X.; Qiao, X.-F.; Shi, W.; Wu, J.-B.; Jiang, D.-S.; Tan, P.-H. Phonon and Raman scattering of two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides from monolayer, multilayer to bulk material. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 27572785,  DOI: 10.1039/C4CS00282B
    28. 28
      Tonndorf, P.; Schmidt, R.; Böttger, P.; Zhang, X.; Börner, J.; Liebig, A.; Albrecht, M.; Kloc, C.; Gordan, O.; Zahn, D. R. T.; de Vasconcellos, S. M.; Bratschitsch, R. Photoluminescence emission and Raman response of monolayer MoS2, MoSe2, and WSe2. Opt. Express 2013, 21, 49084916,  DOI: 10.1364/OE.21.004908
    29. 29
      McCreary, K. M.; Hanbicki, A. T.; Sivaram, S. V.; Jonker, B. T. A- and B-exciton photoluminescence intensity ratio as a measure of sample quality for transition metal dichalcogenide monolayers. APL Materials 2018, 6, na,  DOI: 10.1063/1.5053699
    30. 30
      Dong, N.; Li, Y.; Feng, Y.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, X.; Chang, C.; Fan, J.; Zhang, L.; Wang, J. Optical limiting and theoretical modelling of layered transition metal dichalcogenide nanosheets. Opt. Express 2015, 5, 110,  DOI: 10.1038/srep14646
    31. 31
      Amani, M.; Taheri, P.; Addou, R.; Ahn, G. H.; Kiriya, D.; Lien, D.-H.; Ager, J. W.; Wallace, R. M.; Javey, A. Recombination Kinetics and Effects of Superacid Treatment in Sulfur- and Selenium-Based Transition Metal Dichalcogenides. Nano Lett. 2016, 16, 27862791,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b00536
    32. 32
      Gupta, R.; Singh, B. P.; Singh, V. N.; Gupta, T. K.; Mathur, R. B. Origin of radial breathing mode in multiwall carbon nanotubes synthesized by catalytic chemical vapor deposition. Carbon 2014, 66, 724726,  DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2013.08.057
    33. 33
      Fang, N.; Chang, Y. R.; Fujii, S.; Yamashita, D.; Maruyama, M.; Gao, Y.; Fong, C. F.; Kozawa, D.; Otsuka, K.; Nagashio, K.; Okada, S.; Kato, Y. K. Room-temperature quantum emission from interface excitons in mixed-dimensional heterostructure. arXiv:2307.15399 [cond-mat.mes-hall] 2023, na,  DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2307.15399
    34. 34
      Ma, D.; Shi, J.; Ji, Q.; Chen, K.; Yin, J.; Lin, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, M.; Feng, Q.; Song, X.; Guo, X.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, Z. A universal etching-free transfer of MoS2 films for applications in photodetectors. Nano Research 2015, 8, 36623672,  DOI: 10.1007/s12274-015-0866-z
    35. 35
      Rose, A. H.; Dunklin, J. R.; Zhang, H.; Merlo, J. M.; van de Lagemaat, J. A universal etching-free transfer of MoS2 films for applications in photodetectors. ACS Photonics 2020, 7, 11291134,  DOI: 10.1021/acsphotonics.0c00233
    36. 36
      Xu, Z.-Q.; Zhang, Y.; Lin, S.; Zheng, C.; Zhong, Y. L.; Xia, X.; Li, Z.; Sophia, P. J.; Fuhrer, M. S.; Cheng, Y.-B.; Bao, Q. Synthesis and Transfer of Large-Area Monolayer WS2 Crystals: Toward the Recyclable Use of Sapphire Substrates. ACS Nano 2015, 9, 61786187,  DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.5b01480
    37. 37
      Dowgiallo, A.-M.; Mistry, K. S.; Johnson, J. C.; Blackburn, J. L. Ultrafast Spectroscopic Signature of Charge Transfer between Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes and C60. ACS Nano 2014, 8, 85738581,  DOI: 10.1021/nn503271k
    38. 38
      Jaumot, J.; Gargallo, R.; de Juan, A.; Tauler, R. A graphical user-friendly interface for MCR-ALS: a new tool for multivariate curve resolution in MATLAB. Chemometr. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2005, 76, 101110,  DOI: 10.1016/j.chemolab.2004.12.007
    39. 39
      Jaumot, J.; de Juan, A.; Tauler, R. MCR-ALS GUI 2.0: New features and applications. Chemometr. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2015, 140, 112,  DOI: 10.1016/j.chemolab.2014.10.003
    40. 40
      Zhang, H.; Dunklin, J. R.; Reid, O. G.; Yun, S. J.; Nanayakkara, S. U.; Lee, Y. H.; Blackburn, J. L.; Miller, E. M. Disentangling oxygen and water vapor effects on optoelectronic properties of monolayer tungsten disulfide. Nanoscale 2020, 12, 83448354,  DOI: 10.1039/C9NR09326E
  • Supporting Information

    Supporting Information


    The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsnano.3c12179.

    • Additional transient absorption spectroscopy, kinetic analysis of trilayer, ΔG calculation values, and charge transfer yield calculations (PDF)


    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.