logo
CONTENT TYPES

Dissecting the Few-Femtosecond Dephasing Time of Dipole and Quadrupole Modes in Gold Nanoparticles Using Polarized Photoemission Electron Microscopy

View Author Information
Research Institute for Electronic Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 001-0021, Japan
Creative Research Institution, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 001-0021, Japan
§ Institute of Physics, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba 305-8571, Japan
Department of Applied Chemistry & Institute of Molecular Science, National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu 30010, Taiwan
Cite this: ACS Nano 2016, 10, 3, 3835–3842
Publication Date (Web):February 15, 2016
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.6b00715
Copyright © 2016 American Chemical Society
ACS AuthorChoiceACS AuthorChoice
Article Views
2411
Altmetric
-
Citations
LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICS

Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.

PDF (4 MB)
Supporting Info (1)»

Abstract

Dipole and quadrupole modes are the two lowest orders of localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) eigenmodes in metallic nanoparticles. Of these two modes, the quadrupole mode is forbidden for symmetric metallic nanoparticles excited by linearly polarized light at normal incidence. Here, we demonstrate excitation of the quadrupole mode in symmetrical gold (Au) nanoblocks shined with s-polarized light at oblique incidence. In particular, we probe the near-field LSPR in Au nanoblocks using photoemission electron microscopy (PEEM) and find that at oblique incidence, the dipole and quadrupole modes can be selectively excited, in terms of near-field enhancement, by manipulating the light polarization state. More importantly, by time-resolved PEEM measurements, we experimentally demonstrate that the quadrupole mode in symmetrical Au nanoblocks has longer dephasing time than that of the dipole mode.

Localized surface plasmon resonances (LSPRs) are collective charge oscillations that are confined to the surfaces of metallic nanoparticles (NPs)(1, 2) and have been attracting considerable research interest for a broad range of applications such as sensing,(2-4) imaging,(4, 5) lasing,(6) energy harvesting,(7-10) photochemical reactions,(11, 12) and artificial photosynthesis.(13, 14) The optical properties of LSPRs are influenced by their size and shape as well as the type of metal used and the surrounding dielectric environment.(1, 2) For a given metal (typically gold or silver), when the size of the metallic NP is much smaller than the wavelength of incident light, the fundamental dipole resonance mode dominates the in-phase oscillation of the free electrons in the NP. In contrast, when the size is comparable to or even larger than the wavelength of the light, free electrons at different locations in the NP oscillate in different phases, resulting in the excitation of quadrupole or multipolar modes.(15) Multipolar LSPR modes in metal nanorods have been imaged using scanning near-field optical microscopy (SNOM)(16-18) and, very recently, using electron energy-loss spectroscopy.(19, 20)
Because of symmetry selection rules, in the dipole approximation the quadrupole mode and other even-order multipolar modes are forbidden for thin symmetric nanoparticles irradiated with linearly polarized light at normal incidence. However, the quadrupole mode becomes accessible through phase retardation or symmetry breaking.(21-24) Esteban et al. have reported the simultaneous mapping of dipole and quadrupole LSPRs for Au nanodisks of different diameters under oblique-incidence irradiation using SNOM.(22) The excitation of dipole and quadrupole modes on planar nanoparticles of the same size and their near-field properties should be very interesting and may improve the understanding of different-order LSPRs. However, no such studies have been performed to date. Furthermore, the nature of the quadrupole mode should produce a narrower line width, i.e., a higher Q-factor than that of the dipole mode, which suggests that the quadrupole mode should be more suitable for sensing applications.(2-4) When compared with the dipole mode, the damping of the quadrupole mode should be reduced, leading to a longer dephasing process. Nonetheless, there is no experimental evidence that shows quadrupole mode has longer dephasing time than dipole mode.
In addition to the SNOM technique(16-18, 25, 26) and other near-field mapping techniques,(27-30) recent development of nonlinear photoemission electron microscopy (PEEM) using femtosecond laser pulses as the excitation light source is found promising for pinpointing the near-field properties of surface plasmon resonances for both localized modes and propagation modes.(31-36) Very recently, by using PEEM, we demonstrated direct near-field imaging of Au nanoparticles with a high spatial resolution down to ≃10 nm.(37) We also succeeded in probing the ultrafast dephasing of the LSPRs on Au nanoparticles using time-resolved PEEM. In this study, by applying PEEM as a tool, we verify that the quadrupole mode could be excited by s-polarized light at oblique incidence and further explored the selective excitation of dipole and quadrupole modes through the manipulation of the polarization and wavelength of the incident light. Furthermore, our time-resolved PEEM measurements experimentally demonstrate that the quadrupole mode has a longer dephasing time than the dipole mode.

Results and Discussion

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

Characterization of Topography and Far-Field Spectra

The nanoparticles that were investigated in this study were square nanoblocks, which are symmetric structures, meaning that the quadrupole mode is forbidden at normal incidence. The Au nanoblocks were fabricated on ITO-coated glass via standard electron-beam lithography, followed by metal sputtering and lift-off. Figure 1a presents typical scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of the fabricated structures. The Au nanoblocks were arranged in a two-dimensional square array with an area of 150 × 150 μm2 and a pitch size of 500 nm. Each nanoblock had dimensions of 200 × 200 × 30 nm3. The far-field extinction spectrum was measured using a Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectrometer equipped with an infrared microscope. As seen in Figure 1b, a strong, wide extinction band centered at approximately 875 nm was observed in the spectrum. This band was attributed to the dipole LSPR of the Au nanoblocks. A weak shoulder-like peak also appeared at approximately 765 nm. This peak was attributed to the quadrupole LSPR mode, as will be proven later. This quadrupole mode was observed primarily because the light incidence was not exactly normal during the acquisition of the spectrum; instead, the Cassegrainian objective lens that was used in the FTIR spectrometer provided a range of incidence angles between 16° and 32°.

Figure 1

Figure 1. Characterization of the Au nanoblocks and PEEM measurements. (a) SEM images of the Au nanoblocks; the scale bar in the inset is 100 nm. (b) The far-field extinction spectrum of Au nanoblocks. (c) A schematic diagram of PEEM setup, in which the laser is directed onto the sample at either normal incidence or oblique incidence with an incidence angle of 74°. (d–f) PEEM images (FOV of 0.75 μm) of one nanoblock in an array under different excitation conditions: (d) femtosecond laser pulses with a central wavelength of 860 nm at normal incidence, (e) femtosecond pulses and UV light from a mercury lamp, and (f) UV light only. The laser polarization was horizontally aligned. The scale bars in (d–f) represent 100 nm.

Near-Field Mapping and Spectra

First, we performed PEEM measurements on the sample using a wavelength-tunable (720–920 nm) femtosecond laser source with a pulse duration of 100 fs. The laser light could be directed onto the sample at either normal incidence or oblique incidence at a fixed incidence angle of 74°, as shown in Figure 1c. Figure 1d presents a typical PEEM image in the field of view (FOV = 0.75 μm) of a nanoblock in an array that was irradiated by femtosecond laser pulses under normal incidence with a central wavelength of 860 nm, which was nearly at the dipole LSPR peak wavelength. As expected, four hot spots from the nanoblock are apparent in the image. This result was essentially similar to our previous observations on Au nanorods(37) and reflects on the electric field (near-field) intensity distribution of Au nanoblocks upon excitation of the LSPR. We used an additional UV light source, a mercury lamp, to further confirm that the hot spots originated from the four corners of the nanoblocks, as shown in the PEEM images presented in Figure 1e, in which the sample was simultaneously irradiated with the laser and the UV light. However, no hot spots were observed under only UV light excitation (Figure 1f). The wavelength of the UV light was far from the LSPR wavelength; thus, the one-photon PEEM image that was obtained under UV light excitation was a direct observation of the morphologies of the nanoblocks and served as a reference to determine the plasmonic hot spots that were induced by the femtosecond laser pulses. Notably, this is the first report of the acquisition of a PEEM image of a single plasmonic nanostructure for such a low FOV and demonstrates that PEEM can be used to investigate the near fields of more complex plasmonic systems at a high spatial resolution.
We systematically investigated the wavelength-dependent near-field properties of the Au nanoblocks by performing PEEM measurements. The laser wavelength was tuned from 720 to 920 nm in increments of 10 nm under three incidence conditions: normal incidence, oblique incidence with p-polarization, and oblique incidence with s-polarization. The same pulse duration and laser power were maintained for each excitation condition. We found that for normal incidence and oblique incidence with p-polarization, the strongest photoemission was obtained at a wavelength of 860 nm, which was near the far-field dipole peak wavelength. In contrast, for oblique incidence with s-polarization, the photoemission at this wavelength was very weak, and the strongest photoemission was obtained at a wavelength of 760 nm. Thus, a new mode other than the dipole mode was excited. The PEEM images (FOV = 10 μm) for five different wavelengths (720, 760, 800, 860, and 920 nm) under these three different incidence conditions are presented in Figure S1 of the Supporting Information.
By integrating the photoemission signal and plotting this integral against the incidence wavelength, we can obtain the wavelength-dependent photoemission intensity curves. Because the photoemission (PE) intensity is correlated with the near-field electric field intensity on the sample surface in a nonlinear manner, the wavelength-dependent PE curve can be treated as the nonlinear near-field spectrum of the Au nanoblocks. Usually, the peaks in the wavelength-dependent PE curve correspond to LSPR modes detected from the near field. This technique has been recently employed to investigate the near-field dark plasmon modes in a system of individual Au nanoparticles that were placed at a subnanometer distance from an Au film(34) and the dipole LSPRs in aluminum nanorods.(38) As seen in Figure 2, irradiation with light in different polarization states at oblique incidence produced clearly different near-field spectra. Under p-polarized irradiation, only the dipole mode was excited. However, under s-polarized irradiation, the dipole-mode peak did not appear, and the quadrupole mode was efficiently excited instead. The two curves were normalized to the curve that was obtained under p-polarized light excitation, revealing that the near-field enhancement at the quadrupole resonance was even higher than that at the dipole resonance. This result demonstrated that the dipole and quadrupole LSPRs could be selectively excited by manipulating the polarization of the incident light, at least within a near-field perspective, which increased the near-field enhancement of the quadrupole mode. Figure 2 (top) presents two PEEM images that were recorded at the peak wavelengths of the quadrupole and dipole modes, with the light obliquely incident from the left side. In contrast with the results that were obtained at normal incidence, the near-field intensity distribution was not symmetric under either p- or s-polarized light excitation. This result was attributed to the retardation effect and the near-field interference between the incident light field and the LSPR field. In addition, for normal incidence, only one plasmon mode centered at 850 nm appeared in the near-field spectra presented in Figure S2 in the Supporting Information, which was identified as the dipole mode.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Wavelength dependent PEEM measurements. Wavelength-dependent photoemission (PE) intensity integrated from PEEM images acquired at oblique incidence (74° from the normal) using a wavelength-tunable femtosecond laser source with different polarization states. The two curves were normalized to the maximum PE intensity observed under p-polarized laser excitation. The insets present two PEEM images corresponding to the two peak wavelengths, and the dash lines outline the Au nanoblocks.

To explain the experimental observations, we performed a numerical simulation using a finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) method. Figure 3a shows the different characteristics of the near-field intensity spectra (the enhancement factor against the excitation wavelength) that were obtained under p- and s-polarized irradiation. For p-polarization, only a dipole band centered at approximately 900 nm was observed. However, for s-polarization, the quadrupole mode at 750 nm was excited. Since the wavelength dependent PE intensity curves shown in Figure 2 also represent the wavelength dependent near-field intensity enhancement in a nonlinear manner, it is reasonable to believe that the two plasmon modes observed in Figure 3a correspond to those which appeared in Figure 2. It is also noted that the calculated near-field enhancement of the quadrupole mode is larger than that of the dipole mode qualitatively agreeing with the experimental results shown in Figure 2. The electric field intensity distribution at the interface between the Au nanoblocks and the substrate, which is presented in the left column of Figure 3b, reproduced the measured PEEM patterns (insets of Figure 2), considering the nonlinearity of the photoemission. To further examine the origin of the plasmon resonance modes under different light polarizations, we also calculated the charge distributions on the nanoblocks under both incident light polarizations at the corresponding wavelengths. For p-polarized light excitation, the charge distribution at the resonance peak of 900 nm yielded an in-phase distribution along the in-plane direction of the light polarization, clearly indicating the fundamental nature of the dipole resonances. However, for s-polarized light excitation, the charge distribution at the corresponding wavelength of 750 nm exhibited an out-of-phase charge distribution, indicating the presence of a quadrupole mode.

Figure 3

Figure 3. FDTD numerical calculation results. (a) Calculated wavelength-dependent electric field enhancement at the interface of the nanoblocks and the substrate. (b) Calculated electric field intensity distributions (left panels) and charge distributions (right panels) for both p-polarization (top panels) and s-polarization (bottom panels) at the corresponding peak wavelengths.

Notably, under s-polarized light irradiation, no clear dipole peak was observed in the near-field spectra in either the experimental (Figure 2) or simulated results (Figure 3a), primarily because of the significant damping caused by the large phase retardation effect at grazing incidence. In terms of the near-field enhancement, we conclude that the dipole and quadrupole LSPR modes can be selectively excited at oblique incidence by switching between the p- and s-polarization states. It is also worth noting that our near-field spectra (wavelength dependent PE intensity spectra) were obtained by scanning the laser wavelength at the step of 10 nm and during tuning the wavelength, the focal spot, the pulse duration, and the nonlinear order can be slightly changed. This makes it difficult to obtain the real linear near-field intensity spectra, so that it is also difficult to estimate the spectral line width and to infer the dephasing time of the plasmon modes precisely. However, qualitatively it can be found that the bandwidth of the quadrupole mode is narrower than that of the dipole mode, which implies that the quadrupole mode has a longer dephasing time. Next, we will confirm this hypothesis using time-resolved PEEM measurements.

Dynamics of Dipole and Quadrupole LSPRs

Time-resolved PEEM measurements were performed by an interferometric pump–probe technique, which was developed to probe the dynamics of plasmon resonances first by Petek group.(32, 33) A second femtosecond laser source was used in the experiment, which delivered a 7 fs laser pulse with a bandwidth above 200 nm at a repetition rate of 77 MHz. The laser spectrum ranged from 650 to 1000 nm (central wavelength: 850 nm) as can be found in the Supporting Information (Figure S3). This laser beam was thus capable of exciting both the dipole and quadrupole modes of the Au nanoblocks that were used in this study. The femtosecond laser beam was passed through a Mach–Zehnder interferometer to form phase-correlated pump and probe optical pulses and was then focused onto the sample, as shown in the schematic presented in Figure 4a. A series of PEEM images was recorded by adjusting the delay between the pump and probe pulses, at a frame interval of 0.7 fs (π/2 rad with respect to the 850 nm carrier wave of the laser pulse). From the time evolution of PEEM images, the oscillation of the hot spots could be observed.(37)

Figure 4

Figure 4. Time-resolved PEEM measurements. (a) A schematic diagram of the setup for the time-resolved PEEM measurements. (b) Evolution of the PE intensity for both p- and s-polarized light excitation (corresponding to the dipole and quadrupole LSPR modes, respectively) within the phase delay of (0–20) × 2π rad (corresponding to the delay time of 0–56 fs). The inset in (b) shows the time-resolved PE signals expended in the phase delay within (2–6) × 2π rad. PEEM measured and numerical simulated PE intensity for the dipole mode (c) and the quadrupole mode (d) as a function of the delay time between pump and probe pulses. Careful analysis and comparison of the PEEM experimental data with calculations yield a dephasing time of 5 and 9 fs for the dipole and the quadrupole mode, respectively.

The sample used for this time-resolved study is almost identical as that used above. The near-field photoemission spectra could be found in the Supporting Information (Figure S4), which is very similar as Figure 2. The dipole and quadrupole modes are selectively excited by p-pol and s-pol light and the two modes are centered at 770 and 860 nm, respectively. Figure 4b presents the time evolution of photoemission (PE) intensity curves, in which each data represents the integrated PE intensity from one PEEM image (FOV = 10 μm) at the corresponding delay time. The measurements were performed at both the positive and the negative delays and the signals are almost symmetric. For clarity, only half of the curves is shown in Figure 4b. As discussed in our previous study,(36) over a short delay time during which the pump and probe beams overlap, the oscillation of the LSPR hot spots is nearly dominated by the interference of the pump and probe pulses such that the hot spots resonate at the laser carrier frequency. When the delay is longer, the pump and probe pulses are separated. The coherent LSPR fields that are excited by the pump pulses can preserve the memory of the optical phase of the excitation pulses; thus, the two LSPR fields that are induced by the pump and probe pulses can interfere with each other and dominate the oscillation of the hot spots. As can be seen in the inset of Figure 4b, the oscillation phase of the quadrupole LSPR mode is definitely moving inward, while that of the dipole LSPR mode is not. The observed phase difference means the eigen frequency of the quadrupole mode is higher than the carrier frequency of the 7 fs laser pulse. This is consistent with the spectral measurements shown in the Supporting Information (Figure S4). Furthermore, the total photoemission yield decays because of the dephasing of the LSPR field. If we assume two plasmon modes have the same resonance frequencies but different dephasing time, for the one that has longer dephasing time, the pump induced LSPR field should be able to interfere with the probe induced LSPR field at relatively longer time. However, in the case we have discussed here, the dipole mode and quadrupole from the nanoblocks have different resonance frequencies, so that we cannot compare the dephasing time of the two modes by simply comparing the width of the time-resolved PE curves. Instead, numerical simulations are necessary to obtain the dephasing time of the LSPR modes. Kubo et al. have obtained the dephasing times of LSPRs on silver nanostructures by fitting the time-resolved two-photon photoemission signals.(32)
In this study, we performed numerical calculation of the time-resolved nonlinear photoemission signal by employing a plasmon oscillator model with an exponential damping term and including the nonlinearity of the photoemission.(39, 40) To perform the simulations, we also have to know the driving electric field E(t) + E(t + td), where td is the time delay between the pump and probe pulses. In our experiments, E(t) was determined as a sech2-shaped pulse with the pulse duration of 7 fs (the stimulated measurement of the autocorrelation trace of the pulses at the sample position can be found in Figure S5 in the Supporting Information). Another important parameter in the simulations is the nonlinear photoemission order, which should be dependent on the laser wavelength and the work function of the material. The nonlinear order of gold irradiated by near-infrared femtosecond laser pulses from Ti:sapphire laser is typically reported to be 3 or 4.(37, 41) In the current work, the ultrashort 7 fs laser pulse has very wide spectral range (650–1000 nm), and within the whole spectral range, the nonlinear order is variable. The average nonlinear orders for the dipole and quadrupole modes are 3.7 and 3.6, respectively, which were obtained from the peak to background ratio in the time-resolved PE curves. The values are in accordance with the recently reported value of 3.5, which was measured under experimental conditions similar as that in the current work.(42) The detailed description of the simulation model can be found in the Supporting Information. In the simulations, the dephasing time was used as a fitting parameter and we compared the simulation results with the experimental data and obtained the best fitted dephasing time.
We stimulated the time-resolved photoemission intensity curves for both the p-polarization (Figure 4c) and s-polarization cases (Figure 4d). The resulting stimulated curves yielded the best fitted dephasing time of 5 and 9 fs, respectively. As demonstrated above, the dipole and quadrupole modes could be selectively excited by switching the light polarization between the p- and s-polarization states. A reasonable hypothesis is that for p-polarized and s-polarized light incidence, the photoemission was dominated by the dipole and quadrupole LSPR fields, respectively. Thus, we conclude that the quadrupole mode has a longer dephasing time than the dipole mode. Noting again that from intuition the time-resolved photoemission signal of the quadrupole mode seems to decay faster than that of the dipole mode, it does not necessarily mean that the quadrupole mode has faster dephasing time. We can argue this phenomenon from the point of view of the phase information in the time-resolved measurements. Compared to the dipole mode, the quadrupole mode is more detuned from the carrier frequency of the laser. As a consequence of “detuned” excitation, a coherent oscillation of LSPR at its natural frequency, which is sustained for a few femtoseconds after the pump–pulse leave, will cause destructive interference with probe pulses at the delay phases of n × 2π rad, where n is an integer. Suppressions of photoemission peaks and the phase leading seen for the quadrupole mode at the phase delay of (3–6) × 2π rad (Figure 4b) are induced in this manner. Eventually, the width of time-resolved photoemission signal (interferometric autocorrelation curve) of the quadrupole mode can be narrower than that of the dipole, even though the quadrupole has a longer dephasing time. As discussed above and described in the model (Supporting Information), the time-resolved photoemission signal is dependent on the driving field, LSPR wavelength, and the dephasing time. We have performed some supplementary calculations shown in Figure S6 in the Supporting Information. As we can see from Figure S6a–d, for the same LSPR wavelength, the calculated time-resolved photoemission signal decays slowly with the increase of the dephasing time, while if we fix the dephasing time, we can clearly find the signal decays slowest when the LSPR wavelength is closest to the central wavelength of the driving laser field.
To our knowledge, this study provides the first experimental measurement of the dephasing time of the quadrupole plasmon mode. More importantly, it is the first experimental proof that the dephasing of the quadrupole mode is longer than that of the dipole mode. It is noted that the nonlinear photoemission properties have been compared for the dipole and quadrupole modes of Ag nanoparticles, but the dynamical measurements have not been performed.(43) It is known that the dephasing of LSPR mainly results from the radiative damping that is the scattering loss and the nonradiative decay, which occurs via excitation of electron–hole pairs either by intraband excitation or interband excitation.(44) In this study, both the dipole and quadrupole modes are far from the interband transition region leading to negligible contribution to damping, and the damping from intraband excitation can be thought to be similar. However, for the quadrupole mode, the radiative damping is suppressed due to the less net dipole moment resulting in a longer dephasing time than the dipole mode. It is also worth mentioning that here the dephasing time of both the dipole and quadrupole modes are for the same ensemble of nanoparticles. The effect of the sample inhomogeneity on the dephasing time for both modes should be the same, although the inhomogeneity effect is considered low due to high fabrication quality of electron beam lithography. Consequently, it is more convincing to state that the quadrupole mode has longer dephasing time.

Conclusions

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

In conclusion, we experimentally investigated the near-field properties of dipole and quadrupole LSPRs using PEEM. For Au nanoblocks, we found that the dipole and quadrupole modes could be selectively excited at oblique incidence. For p-polarized light excitation, solely the dipole mode was excited and dominated the plasmonic field enhancement; in contrast, for s-polarized light excitation, the quadrupole mode was dominant and provided even higher electric field enhancement. Furthermore, we used time-resolved PEEM to experimentally demonstrate that the dephasing of the quadrupole mode was slower than that of the dipole mode. These results may deepen our understanding of the quadrupole LSPR mode, and this study paves the way toward further investigations of the near field and dynamics of complex plasmonic systems in which different LSPR modes are hybridized or coupled.

Methods

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

Sample Fabrication and Characterization

Ordered arrays of Au nanoblocks were fabricated on ITO substrates using electron-beam lithography (EBL) and metal evaporation techniques. A high-resolution EBL system (ELS-7000HM, Elionix) operating at 100 kV was used in this study. A conventional copolymer resist (ZEP520, Zeon Chemicals) was diluted with a ZEP thinner (1:1) and spin coated onto the substrate at 1000 rpm for 10 s and at 4000 rpm for 90 s. The substrate was then prebaked on a hot plate for 2 min at 150 °C. The EBL was operated at an electrical current of 50 pA. After development, a 2 nm-thick titanium layer was then deposited via sputtering (MPS-4000, ULVAC) onto the substrate to serve as an adhesive layer, followed by the deposition of a 30 nm-thick Au film. Lift-off was performed by successively immersing the sample in anisole, acetone, methanol, and ultrapure water in an ultrasonic bath. Field-emission scanning electron microscopy (JSM-6700FT, JEOL) and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy (FT/IR-6000TM-M, JASCO) were used to characterize the morphologies and far-field spectral properties of the Au nanostructures, respectively.

PEEM Measurements

PEEM measurements were performed using a PEEM with an energy analyzer (Elmitec GmbH) that has a spatial resolution down to 4 nm. The femtosecond laser excitation source consisted of two mode-locked Ti:sapphire femtosecond laser systems with a repetition rate of 77 MHz. One source was a wavelength-tunable (720–920 nm) system that delivered 100 fs laser pulses at a bandwidth of approximate 15 nm. We used this source to perform the wavelength-dependent PEEM measurements. The second source could deliver 7 fs laser pulses at a central wavelength around 850 nm at bandwidths above 200 nm, and at the sample position, the pulse duration was measured to be 7 fs by a simulated measurement outside of the PEEM chamber (Figure S3 and Figure S5). This extreme ultrashort laser source was used for the time-resolved PEEM measurements. The sample was irradiated with femtosecond laser pulses at either a fixed incidence angle of 74° or normal incidence. In this work, the oblique incidence is mainly used. In this case, the laser beam was focused by a focal lens with the focal length of 150 mm, and the size of focused beam spot on the sample was estimated to be 50 × 200 μm2. The polarization of the laser beam was controlled by a λ/2 waveplate, and both p- or s-polarized light could be easily obtained at oblique incidence. In the time-resolved PEEM measurements, chirp mirror pairs and a wedge pair were used to compensate for the dispersion to obtain the shortest possible pulse duration inside the PEEM chamber. The interferometric time-resolved apparatus consisted of a Mach–Zehnder interferometer. Typically, time-resolved PEEM images were recorded by adjusting the delay time in increments corresponding to a π/2 phase delay (0.7 fs at a carrier wavelength of 850 nm).

Numerical Simulations

The FDTD Solutions software package (Lumerical, Inc.) was used to numerically calculate the field distributions of the Au nanostructures. The optical properties of Au were obtained using data from Johnson and Christy.(45) The ITO-covered glass substrate was assumed to behave as a dielectric with an average refractive index of n = 1.55. The FDTD simulations were performed on a discrete, nonuniformly spaced mesh with a maximum resolution of 3 nm.

Supporting Information

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.6b00715.

  • PEEM images of the Au nanoblocks excited with five different wavelengths under three different incidence conditions, near-field photoemission spectra under normal incidence, near-field photoemission spectra of the sample for time-resolved PEEM measurements, characterization of the incident laser field on the PEEM sample position, modeling the time-resolved photoemission signal, and some supplementary calculations of time-resolved photoemission signal (PDF)

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Author Information

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

  • Corresponding Author
    • Hiroaki Misawa - Research Institute for Electronic Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 001-0021, JapanDepartment of Applied Chemistry & Institute of Molecular Science, National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu 30010, Taiwan Email: [email protected]
  • Authors
    • Quan Sun - Research Institute for Electronic Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 001-0021, JapanCreative Research Institution, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 001-0021, Japan
    • Han Yu - Research Institute for Electronic Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 001-0021, Japan
    • Kosei Ueno - Research Institute for Electronic Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 001-0021, Japan
    • Atsushi Kubo - Institute of Physics, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba 305-8571, Japan
    • Yasutaka Matsuo - Research Institute for Electronic Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 001-0021, Japan
  • Notes

    The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Acknowledgment

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

Q.S. would like to thank Dr. O. Lecarme for helpful discussion on FDTD simulations. We acknowledge Prof. V. Biju for his careful and critical reading of the manuscript. This study was supported by KAKENHI Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (S) (No. 23225006), Young Scientist (B) (No. 26870014), and the Innovative Areas “Artificial Photosysnthesis (AnApple)” (No. 25107501) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS), the Nanotechnology Platform (Hokkaido University), and the Low-Carbon Research Network of Japan.

References

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

This article references 45 other publications.

  1. 1
    Maier, S. A. Plasmonics: Fundamentals and Applications; Springer: New York, 2007.
  2. 2
    Lal, S.; Link, S.; Halas, N. J. Nano-Optics from Sensing to Waveguiding Nat. Photonics 2007, 1, 641 648 DOI: 10.1038/nphoton.2007.223
  3. 3
    Anker, J. N.; Hall, W. P.; Lyandres, O.; Shah, N. C.; Zhao, J.; Van Duyne, R. P. Biosensing with Plasmonic Nanosensors Nat. Mater. 2008, 7, 442 453 DOI: 10.1038/nmat2162
  4. 4
    Jain, P. K.; Huang, X. H.; El-Sayed, I. H.; El-Sayed, M. A. Noble Metals on the Nanoscale: Optical and Photothermal Properties and Some Applications in Imaging, Sensing, Biology, and Medicine Acc. Chem. Res. 2008, 41, 1578 1586 DOI: 10.1021/ar7002804
  5. 5
    Kawata, S.; Inouye, Y.; Verma, P. Plasmonics for Near-field Nano-Imaging and Superlensing Nat. Photonics 2009, 3, 388 394 DOI: 10.1038/nphoton.2009.111
  6. 6
    Yang, A. K.; Hoang, T. B.; Dridi, M.; Deeb, C.; Mikkelsen, M. H.; Schatz, G. C.; Odom, T. W. Real-Time Tunable Lasing from Plasmonic Nanocavity Arrays Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 6939 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms7939
  7. 7
    Atwater, H. A.; Polman, A. Plasmonics for Improved Photovoltaic Devices Nat. Mater. 2010, 9, 205 213 DOI: 10.1038/nmat2629
  8. 8
    Nishijima, Y.; Ueno, K.; Yokota, Y.; Murakoshi, K.; Misawa, H. Plasmon-Assisted Photocurrent Generation from Visible to Near-Infrared Wavelength Using a Au-Nanorods/TiO2 Electrode J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2010, 1, 2031 2036 DOI: 10.1021/jz1006675
  9. 9
    Ueno, K.; Misawa, H. Plasmon-Enhanced Photocurrent Generation and Water Oxidation from Visible to Near-Infrared Wavelengths NPG Asia Mater. 2013, 5, e61 DOI: 10.1038/am.2013.42
  10. 10
    Clavero, C. Plasmon-Induced Hot-Electron Generation at Nanoparticle/Metal-Oxide Interfaces for Photovoltaic and Photocatalytic Devices Nat. Photonics 2014, 8, 95 103 DOI: 10.1038/nphoton.2013.238
  11. 11
    Tsuboi, Y.; Shimizu, R.; Shoji, T.; Kitamura, N. Near-Infrared Continuous-Wave Light Driving a Two-Photon Photochromic Reaction with the Assistance of Localized Surface Plasmon J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 12623 12627 DOI: 10.1021/ja9016655
  12. 12
    Wu, B. T.; Ueno, K.; Yokota, Y.; Sun, K.; Zeng, H. P.; Misawa, H. Enhancement of a Two-Photon-Induced Reaction in Solution Using Light-Harvesting Gold Nanodimer Structures J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2012, 3, 1443 1447 DOI: 10.1021/jz300370b
  13. 13
    Zhong, Y.; Ueno, K.; Mori, Y.; Shi, X.; Oshikiri, T.; Murakoshi, K.; Inoue, H.; Misawa, H. Plasmon-Assisted Water Splitting Using Two Sides of the Same SrTiO3 Single-Crystal Substrate: Conversion of Visible Light to Chemical Energy Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 10350 10354 DOI: 10.1002/anie.201404926
  14. 14
    Oshikiri, T.; Ueno, K.; Misawa, H. Plasmon-Induced Ammonia Synthesis through Nitrogen Photofixation with Visible Light Irradiation Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 9802 9805 DOI: 10.1002/anie.201404748
  15. 15
    You, E. A.; Zhou, W.; Suh, J. Y.; Huntington, M. D.; Odom, T. W. Polarization-Dependent Multipolar Plasmon Resonances in Anisotropic Multiscale Au Particles ACS Nano 2012, 6, 1786 1794 DOI: 10.1021/nn204845z
  16. 16
    Imura, K.; Nagahara, T.; Okamoto, H. Plasmon Mode Imaging of Single Gold Nanorods J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 12730 12731 DOI: 10.1021/ja047836c
  17. 17
    Imura, K.; Nagahara, T.; Okamoto, H. Near-field Optical Imaging of Plasmon Modes in Gold Nanorods J. Chem. Phys. 2005, 122, 154701 DOI: 10.1063/1.1873692
  18. 18
    Denkova, D.; Verellen, N.; Silhanek, A. V.; Valev, V. K.; Van Dorpe, P.; Moshchalkov, V. V. Mapping Magnetic Near-Field Distributions of Plasmonic Nanoantennas ACS Nano 2013, 7, 3168 3176 DOI: 10.1021/nn305589t
  19. 19
    Rossouw, D.; Couillard, M.; Vickery, J.; Kumacheva, E.; Botton, G. A. Multipolar Plasmonic Resonances in Silver Nanowire Antennas Imaged with a Subnanometer Electron Probe Nano Lett. 2011, 11, 1499 1504 DOI: 10.1021/nl200634w
  20. 20
    Martin, J.; Kociak, M.; Mahfoud, Z.; Proust, J.; Gérard, D.; Plain, J. High-Resolution Imaging and Spectroscopy of Multipolar Plasmonic Resonances in Aluminum Nanoantennas Nano Lett. 2014, 14, 5517 5523 DOI: 10.1021/nl501850m
  21. 21
    Hao, F.; Larsson, E. M.; Ali, T. A.; Sutherland, D. S.; Nordlander, P. Shedding Light on Dark Plasmons in Gold Nanorings Chem. Phys. Lett. 2008, 458, 262 266 DOI: 10.1016/j.cplett.2008.04.126
  22. 22
    Esteban, R.; Vogelgesang, R.; Dorfmüller, J.; Dmitriev, A.; Rockstuhl, C.; Etrich, C.; Kern, K. Direct Near-Field Optical Imaging of Higher Order Plasmonic Resonances Nano Lett. 2008, 8, 3155 3159 DOI: 10.1021/nl801396r
  23. 23
    Zhang, Y.; Jia, T. Q.; Zhang, S. A.; Feng, D. H.; Xu, Z. Z. Dipole, Quadrupole and Octupole Plasmon Resonance Modes in Non-Concentric Nanocrescent/Nanodisk Structure: Local Field Enhancement in the Visible and Near Infrared Regions Opt. Express 2012, 20, 2924 2931 DOI: 10.1364/OE.20.002924
  24. 24
    Fang, Z. Y.; Cai, J. Y.; Yan, Z. B.; Nordlander, P.; Halas, N. J.; Zhu, X. Removing a Wedge from a Metallic Nanodisk Reveals a Fano Resonance Nano Lett. 2011, 11, 4475 4479 DOI: 10.1021/nl202804y
  25. 25
    Schnell, M.; García-Etxarri, A.; Huber, A. J.; Crozier, K.; Aizpurua, J.; Hillenbrand, R. Controlling the Near-Field Oscillations of Loaded Plasmonic Nanoantennas Nat. Photonics 2009, 3, 287 291 DOI: 10.1038/nphoton.2009.46
  26. 26
    Tanaka, Y.; Ishiguro, H.; Fujiwara, H.; Yokota, Y.; Ueno, K.; Misawa, H.; Sasaki, K. Direct Imaging of Nanogap-Mode Plasmon-Resonant Fields Opt. Express 2011, 19, 7726 7733 DOI: 10.1364/OE.19.007726
  27. 27
    Barnard, E. S.; Pala, R. A.; Brongersma, M. L. Photocurrent Mapping of Near-field Optical Antenna Resonances Nat. Nanotechnol. 2011, 6, 588 593 DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2011.131
  28. 28
    Nicoletti, O.; de la Peña, F.; Leary, R. K.; Holland, D. J.; Ducati, C.; Midgley, P. A. Three-Dimensional Imaging of Localized Surface Plasmon Resonances of Metal Nanoparticles Nature 2013, 502, 80 84 DOI: 10.1038/nature12469
  29. 29
    Leiderer, P.; Bartels, C.; König-Birk, J.; Mosbacher, M.; Boneberg, J. Imaging Optical Near-Fields of Nanostructures Appl. Phys. Lett. 2004, 85, 5370 5372 DOI: 10.1063/1.1819990
  30. 30
    Ghenuche, P.; Cherukulappurath, S.; Taminiau, T. H.; van Hulst, N. F.; Quidant, R. Spectroscopic Mode Mapping of Resonant Plasmon Nanoantennas Phys. Rev. Lett. 2008, 101, 116805 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.116805
  31. 31
    Aeschlimann, M.; Brixner, T.; Fischer, A.; Kramer, C.; Melchior, P.; Pfeiffer, W.; Schneider, C.; Strüber, C.; Tuchscherer, P.; Voronine, D. V. Coherent Two-Dimensional Nanoscopy Science 2011, 333, 1723 1726 DOI: 10.1126/science.1209206
  32. 32
    Kubo, A.; Onda, K.; Petek, H.; Sun, Z. J.; Jung, Y. S.; Kim, H. K. Femtosecond Imaging of Surface Plasmon Dynamics in a Nanostructured Silver Film Nano Lett. 2005, 5, 1123 1127 DOI: 10.1021/nl0506655
  33. 33
    Kubo, A.; Pontius, N.; Petek, H. Femtosecond Microscopy of Surface Plasmon Polariton Wave Packet Evolution at the Silver/Vacuum Interface Nano Lett. 2007, 7, 470 475 DOI: 10.1021/nl0627846
  34. 34
    Schertz, F.; Schmelzeisen, M.; Mohammadi, R.; Kreiter, M.; Elmers, H. J.; Schönhense, G. Near Field of Strongly Coupled Plasmons: Uncovering Dark Modes Nano Lett. 2012, 12, 1885 1890 DOI: 10.1021/nl204277y
  35. 35
    Lemke, C.; Schneider, C.; Leißner, T.; Bayer, D.; Radke, J. W.; Fischer, A.; Melchior, P.; Evlyukhin, A. B.; Chichkov, B. N.; Reinhardt, C.; Bauer, M.; Aeschlimann, M. Spatiotemporal Characterization of SPP Pulse Propagation in Two-Dimensional Plasmonic Focusing Devices Nano Lett. 2013, 13, 1053 1058 DOI: 10.1021/nl3042849
  36. 36
    Cinchetti, M.; Gloskovskii, A.; Nepjiko, S. A.; Schönhense, G.; Rochholz, H.; Kreiter, M. Photoemission Electron Microscopy as a Tool for the Investigation of Optical Near Fields Phys. Rev. Lett. 2005, 95, 047601 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.047601
  37. 37
    Sun, Q.; Ueno, K.; Yu, H.; Kubo, A.; Matsuo, Y.; Misawa, H. Direct Imaging of the Near Field and Dynamics of Surface Plasmon Resonance on Gold Nanostructures Using Photoemission Electron Microscopy Light: Sci. Appl. 2013, 2, e118 DOI: 10.1038/lsa.2013.74
  38. 38
    Lecarme, O.; Sun, Q.; Ueno, K.; Misawa, H. Robust and Versatile Light Absorption at Near-Infrared Wavelengths by Plasmonic Aluminum Nanorods ACS Photonics 2014, 1, 538 546 DOI: 10.1021/ph500096q
  39. 39
    Lamprecht, B.; Krenn, J. R.; Leitner, A.; Aussenegg, F. R. Resonant and Off-Resonant Light-Driven Plasmons in Metal Nanoparticles Studied by Femtosecond-resolution Third-harmonic Generation Phys. Rev. Lett. 1999, 83, 4421 4424 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.4421
  40. 40
    Hanke, T.; Krauss, G.; Träutlein, D.; Wild, B.; Bratschitsch, R.; Leitenstorfer, A. Efficient Nonlinear Light Emission of Single Gold Optical Antennas Driven by Few-Cycle Near-Infrared Pulses Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009, 103, 257404 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.257404
  41. 41
    Grubisic, A.; Schweikhard, V.; Baker, T. A.; Nesbitt, D. J. Coherent Multiphoton Photoelectron Emission from Single Au Nanorods: The Critical Role of Plasmonic Electric Near-Field Enhancement ACS Nano 2013, 7, 87 99 DOI: 10.1021/nn305194n
  42. 42
    Mårsell, E.; Losquin, A.; Svärd, R.; Miranda, M.; Guo, C.; Harth, A.; Lorek, E.; Mauritsson, J.; Arnold, C. L.; Xu, H. X.; L’Huillier, A.; Mikkelsen, A. Nanoscale Imaging of Local Few-Femtosecond Near-Field Dynamics within a Single Plasmonic Nanoantenna Nano Lett. 2015, 15, 6601 6608 DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b02363
  43. 43
    Grubisic, A.; Ringe, E.; Cobley, C. M.; Xia, Y. N.; Marks, L. D.; Van Duyne, R. P.; Nesbitt, D. J. Plasmonic Near-Electric Field Enhancement Effects in Ultrafast Photoelectron Emission: Correlated Spatial and Laser Polarization Microscopy Studies of Individual Ag Nanocubes Nano Lett. 2012, 12, 4823 4829 DOI: 10.1021/nl302271u
  44. 44
    Sönnichsen, C.; Franzl, T.; Wilk, T.; von Plessen, G.; Feldmann, J.; Wilson, O.; Mulvaney, P. Drastic Reduction of Plasmon Damping in Gold Nanorods Phys. Rev. Lett. 2002, 88, 077402 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.077402
  45. 45
    Johnson, P. B.; Christy, R. W. Optical Constants of Noble Metals Phys. Rev. B 1972, 6, 4370 4379 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.6.4370

Cited By


This article is cited by 68 publications.

  1. Lukas Wittenbecher, Emil Viñas Boström, Jan Vogelsang, Sebastian Lehman, Kimberly A. Dick, Claudio Verdozzi, Donatas Zigmantas, Anders Mikkelsen. Unraveling the Ultrafast Hot Electron Dynamics in Semiconductor Nanowires. ACS Nano 2021, 15 (1) , 1133-1144. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.0c08101
  2. Mindaugas Juodėnas, Domantas Peckus, Tomas Tamulevičius, Yusuke Yamauchi, Sigitas Tamulevičius, Joel Henzie. Effect of Ag Nanocube Optomechanical Modes on Plasmonic Surface Lattice Resonances. ACS Photonics 2020, 7 (11) , 3130-3140. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsphotonics.0c01187
  3. Maciej Da̧browski, Yanan Dai, Hrvoje Petek. Ultrafast Photoemission Electron Microscopy: Imaging Plasmons in Space and Time. Chemical Reviews 2020, 120 (13) , 6247-6287. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00146
  4. Hideki Fujiwara, Tatsuro Suzuki, Christophe Pin, Keiji Sasaki. Localized ZnO Growth on a Gold Nanoantenna by Plasmon-Assisted Hydrothermal Synthesis. Nano Letters 2020, 20 (1) , 389-394. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b04073
  5. Matthias Hensen, Bernhard Huber, Daniel Friedrich, Enno Krauss, Sebastian Pres, Philipp Grimm, Daniel Fersch, Julian Lüttig, Victor Lisinetskii, Bert Hecht, Tobias Brixner. Spatial Variations in Femtosecond Field Dynamics within a Plasmonic Nanoresonator Mode. Nano Letters 2019, 19 (7) , 4651-4658. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b01672
  6. Jingjing Wei, Claire Deeb, Jean-Luc Pelouard, Marie-Paule Pileni. Influence of Cracks on the Optical Properties of Silver Nanocrystals Supracrystal Films. ACS Nano 2019, 13 (1) , 573-581. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.8b07435
  7. Hanfa Song, Quan Sun, Jie Li, Fan Yang, Jinghuan Yang, Yaolong Li, Kosei Ueno, Qihuang Gong, Hiroaki Misawa. Exotic Mode Suppression in Plasmonic Heterotrimer System. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2019, 123 (2) , 1398-1405. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b10263
  8. Gabriel D. Bernasconi, Jérémy Butet, Olivier J. F. Martin. Dynamics of Second-Harmonic Generation in a Plasmonic Silver Nanorod. ACS Photonics 2018, 5 (8) , 3246-3254. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsphotonics.8b00479
  9. Yanan Dai, Maciej Dąbrowski, Vartkess A. Apkarian, Hrvoje Petek. Ultrafast Microscopy of Spin-Momentum-Locked Surface Plasmon Polaritons. ACS Nano 2018, 12 (7) , 6588-6596. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.8b01386
  10. Keisuke Imaeda, Seiju Hasegawa, Kohei Imura. Static and Dynamic Near-Field Measurements of High-Order Plasmon Modes Induced in a Gold Triangular Nanoplate. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 2018, 9 (14) , 4075-4081. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.8b01671
  11. Jun G. Liu, Hui Zhang, Stephan Link, Peter Nordlander. Relaxation of Plasmon-Induced Hot Carriers. ACS Photonics 2018, 5 (7) , 2584-2595. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsphotonics.7b00881
  12. Zac Thollar, Carl Wadell, Taeko Matsukata, Naoki Yamamoto, Takumi Sannomiya. Three-Dimensional Multipole Rotation in Spherical Silver Nanoparticles Observed by Cathodoluminescence. ACS Photonics 2018, 5 (7) , 2555-2560. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsphotonics.7b01293
  13. Xiaowei Lu, Qunqing Hao, Mengjia Cen, Guanhua Zhang, Julong Sun, Libang Mao, Tun Cao, Chuanyao Zhou, Peng Jiang, Xueming Yang, Xinhe Bao. Observation and Manipulation of Visible Edge Plasmons in Bi2Te3 Nanoplates. Nano Letters 2018, 18 (5) , 2879-2884. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b00023
  14. Kosei Ueno, Tomoya Oshikiri, Quan Sun, Xu Shi, Hiroaki Misawa. Solid-State Plasmonic Solar Cells. Chemical Reviews 2018, 118 (6) , 2955-2993. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00235
  15. Moshik Cohen, Yossi Abulafia, Reuven Shavit, and Zeev Zalevsky . Secondary Electron Imaging of Light at the Nanoscale. ACS Nano 2017, 11 (3) , 3274-3281. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.7b00548
  16. Sarra Mitiche, Sylvie Marguet, Fabrice Charra, and Ludovic Douillard . Near-Field Localization of Single Au Cubes: A Group Theory Description. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2017, 121 (8) , 4517-4523. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b10585
  17. Han Yu, Quan Sun, Kosei Ueno, Tomoya Oshikiri, Atsushi Kubo, Yasutaka Matsuo, and Hiroaki Misawa . Exploring Coupled Plasmonic Nanostructures in the Near Field by Photoemission Electron Microscopy. ACS Nano 2016, 10 (11) , 10373-10381. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.6b06206
  18. Jie Li, Kosei Ueno, Hiyori Uehara, Jingchun Guo, Tomoya Oshikiri, and Hiroaki Misawa . Dual Strong Couplings Between TPPS J-Aggregates and Aluminum Plasmonic States. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 2016, 7 (14) , 2786-2791. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b01224
  19. Keisuke Imaeda Kohei Imura . Raman Activity and Dynamics of Plasmons on a Rough Gold Film Studied by Ultrafast Scanning Near-Field Optical Microscopy. 2016,,, 121-137. https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-2016-1246.ch006
  20. . Frontiers of Plasmon Enhanced Spectroscopy Volume 2. 2016,,https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-2016-1246
  21. Aiqin Hu, Xiaolong Xu, Wei Liu, Shengnan Xu, Zhaohang Xue, Bo Han, Shufeng Wang, Peng Gao, Quan Sun, Qihuang Gong, Yu Ye, Guowei Lu. Relaxation and transfer of photoexcited electrons at a coplanar few-layer 1 T′/2H-MoTe2 heterojunction. Communications Materials 2020, 1 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s43246-020-00062-6
  22. Hong-jie Xue, Fa-cheng Jin, Li-Min Wei, Xiao-mei Wang, Da-peng Hao. Plasmonic Edge, Centre and Breathing Modes in Two-Dimensional Disks. Plasmonics 2020, 16 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11468-020-01306-4
  23. Dong Han, Kazuhiro Yoshida, Joon-wan Kim. Effective and efficient removing method of micromolds in UV-LIGA using CO2 laser ablation followed by O2/CF4 plasma finishing for high-aspect-ratio metallic microstructures. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 2020, 110 (11-12) , 3391-3405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-06065-4
  24. Yong Zhou, Hongliang Li, Guanhua Zhang, Dong Wei, Lan Zhang, Yujie Meng, Xianfeng Zheng, Zhibo Ma, Jie Zeng, Xueming Yang. Quantitative insights into non-uniform plasmonic hotspots due to symmetry breaking induced by oblique incidence. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 2020, 22 (35) , 19932-19939. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0CP03470C
  25. Nhu‐Nang Vu, Serge Kaliaguine, Trong‐On Do. Plasmonic Photocatalysts for Sunlight‐Driven Reduction of CO 2 : Details, Developments, and Perspectives. ChemSusChem 2020, 13 (16) , 3967-3991. https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.202000905
  26. Péter Dombi, Zsuzsanna Pápa, Jan Vogelsang, Sergey V. Yalunin, Murat Sivis, Georg Herink, Sascha Schäfer, Petra Groß, Claus Ropers, Christoph Lienau. Strong-field nano-optics. Reviews of Modern Physics 2020, 92 (2) https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.92.025003
  27. Tomoya Oshikiri, Xu Shi, Hiroaki Misawa. Enhancement of Selective Fixation of Dinitrogen to Ammonia under Modal Strong Coupling Conditions. European Journal of Inorganic Chemistry 2020, 2020 (15-16) , 1396-1401. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejic.201901260
  28. Yaolong Li, Quan Sun, Shuai Zu, Xu Shi, Yunquan Liu, Xiaoyong Hu, Kosei Ueno, Qihuang Gong, Hiroaki Misawa. Correlation between Near-Field Enhancement and Dephasing Time in Plasmonic Dimers. Physical Review Letters 2020, 124 (16) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.163901
  29. Yang Xu, Yulu Qin, Boyu Ji, Xiaowei Song, Jingquan Lin. Polarization manipulated femtosecond localized surface plasmon dephasing time in an individual bowtie structure. Optics Express 2020, 28 (7) , 9310. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.379429
  30. Kizuku Shibata, Sho Fujii, Quan Sun, Atsushi Miura, Kosei Ueno. Further enhancement of the near-field on Au nanogap dimers using quasi-dark plasmon modes. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2020, 152 (10) , 104706. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5142569
  31. Yanan Dai, Maciej Dąbrowski, Hrvoje Petek. Optical field tuning of localized plasmon modes in Ag microcrystals at the nanofemto scale. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2020, 152 (5) , 054201. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5139543
  32. Keisuke Imaeda, Kohei Imura. Advanced Function Control of Photochemical Reactions Using Mesoscopic Structures. 2020,,, 93-116. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5451-3_6
  33. , , , . Photosynergetic Responses in Molecules and Molecular Aggregates. 2020,,https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5451-3
  34. Annu Dahiya, Suraj Tamta, Manoj Verma. Modulating plasmonic signatures of gold nanoparticles by fine tuning of surface roughness. Materials Today: Proceedings 2020, 28 , 16-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.12.170
  35. 硕 王. Research Progress of Modification the Plasmon Dephasing Time. Applied Physics 2020, 10 (01) , 15-23. https://doi.org/10.12677/APP.2020.101003
  36. Alexander Gliserin, Soo Hoon Chew, Sungho Choi, Kyoungmin Kim, Daniel T. Hallinan, Jin-Woo Oh, Seungchul Kim, Dong Eon Kim. Interferometric time- and energy-resolved photoemission electron microscopy for few-femtosecond nanoplasmonic dynamics. Review of Scientific Instruments 2019, 90 (9) , 093904. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5110705
  37. Yuanyi Fan, Ran Zhang, Ze Liu, Da Huang, Jinkui Chu. Direct metallic nanostructures transfer by flexible contact UV-curable nano-imprint lithography. Applied Physics Express 2019, 12 (9) , 095004. https://doi.org/10.7567/1882-0786/ab3aa9
  38. Tomoya Oshikiri, Kosei Ueno, Hiroaki Misawa. Ammonia photosynthesis via an association pathway using a plasmonic photoanode and a zirconium cathode. Green Chemistry 2019, 21 (16) , 4443-4448. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9GC01658A
  39. Yanfeng Cao, Tomoya Oshikiri, Xu Shi, Kosei Ueno, Jie Li, Hiroaki Misawa. Efficient Hot‐Electron Transfer under Modal Strong Coupling Conditions with Sacrificial Electron Donors. ChemNanoMat 2019, 5 (8) , 1008-1014. https://doi.org/10.1002/cnma.201900178
  40. Wei‐Yi Tsai, Quan Sun, Guangwei Hu, Pin Chieh Wu, Ren Jie Lin, Cheng‐Wei Qiu, Kosei Ueno, Hiroaki Misawa, Din Ping Tsai. Twisted Surface Plasmons with Spin‐Controlled Gold Surfaces. Advanced Optical Materials 2019, 7 (8) , 1801060. https://doi.org/10.1002/adom.201801060
  41. Peng Lang, Xiaowei Song, Boyu Ji, Haiyan Tao, Yinping Dou, Xun Gao, Zuoqiang Hao, Jingquan Lin. Spatial- and energy-resolved photoemission electron from plasmonic nanoparticles in multiphoton regime. Optics Express 2019, 27 (5) , 6878. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.27.006878
  42. Kosei Ueno, Jinghuan Yang, Quan Sun, Daisuke Aoyo, Han Yu, Tomoya Oshikiri, Atsushi Kubo, Yasutaka Matsuo, Qihuang Gong, Hiroaki Misawa. Control of plasmon dephasing time using stacked nanogap gold structures for strong near-field enhancement. Applied Materials Today 2019, 14 , 159-165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmt.2018.12.004
  43. Benjamin Foerster, Vincent A. Spata, Emily A. Carter, Carsten Sönnichsen, Stephan Link. Plasmon damping depends on the chemical nature of the nanoparticle interface. Science Advances 2019, 5 (3) , eaav0704. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aav0704
  44. Jingdong Chen, Jin Xiang, Shuai Jiang, Qiaofeng Dai, Shaolong Tie, Sheng Lan. Multipole Radiations from Large Gold Nanospheres Excited by Evanescent Wave. Nanomaterials 2019, 9 (2) , 175. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9020175
  45. Yulu Qin, Boyu Ji, Xiaowei Song, Jingquan Lin. Characterization of ultrafast plasmon dynamics in individual gold bowtie by time-resolved photoemission electron microscopy. Applied Physics B 2019, 125 (1) https://doi.org/10.1007/s00340-018-7112-9
  46. 欣蔚 田. Research Progress in High Spatial-Temporal Near-Field Characterization of Dynamical Evolution of Plasmon Fields Using PEEM. Applied Physics 2019, 09 (05) , 274-286. https://doi.org/10.12677/APP.2019.95033
  47. Jinghuan Yang, Quan Sun, Kosei Ueno, Xu Shi, Tomoya Oshikiri, Hiroaki Misawa, Qihuang Gong. Manipulation of the dephasing time by strong coupling between localized and propagating surface plasmon modes. Nature Communications 2018, 9 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-07356-x
  48. Vikas Remesh, Michael Stührenberg, Lisa Saemisch, Nicolò Accanto, Niek F. van Hulst. Phase control of plasmon enhanced two-photon photoluminescence in resonant gold nanoantennas. Applied Physics Letters 2018, 113 (21) , 211101. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5051381
  49. Zhixia Xu, Xiao Cui, Siyuan Liu, Xiaoxing Yin. Excitation of surface plasmons with a long oscillation lifetime using silicon nanophotonic devices: A strong coupling system. Applied Physics Express 2018, 11 (11) , 114002. https://doi.org/10.7567/APEX.11.114002
  50. Zhuo-Chen Ma, Yong-Lai Zhang, Bing Han, Qi-Dai Chen, Hong-Bo Sun. Femtosecond-Laser Direct Writing of Metallic Micro/Nanostructures: From Fabrication Strategies to Future Applications. Small Methods 2018, 2 (7) , 1700413. https://doi.org/10.1002/smtd.201700413
  51. Boyu Ji, Xiaowei Song, Yinping Dou, Haiyan Tao, Xun Gao, Zuoqiang Hao, Jingquan Lin. Two-color multiphoton emission for comprehensive reveal of ultrafast plasmonic field distribution. New Journal of Physics 2018, 20 (7) , 073031. https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/aad145
  52. Jingquan Lin, Xiaowei Song, Boyu Ji, Peng Lang, , . Subwavelength imaging and control of ultrafast optical near field in nanosized bowtie and ring. 2018,,, 44. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2287134
  53. . Ultrafast Phenomena and Nanophotonics XXII. 2018,,https://doi.org/
  54. Jiang Qin, Boyu Ji, Peng Lang, Xiaowei Song, Haiyan Tao, Yinping Dou, Xun Gao, Zuoqiang Hao, Jingquan Lin. Investigation of ultrafast plasmon control in silver block by PEEM. Chinese Journal of Physics 2018, 56 (1) , 340-345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjph.2017.11.015
  55. Atsushi Kubo. Time-Resolved Photoemission Electron Microscopy. 2018,,, 741-748. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6156-1_119
  56. . Compendium of Surface and Interface Analysis. 2018,,https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6156-1
  57. Dongfeng Qi, Shiwei Tang, Letian Wang, Shixun Dai, Xiang Shen, Chen Wang, Songyan Chen. Pulse laser-induced size-controllable and symmetrical ordering of single-crystal Si islands. Nanoscale 2018, 10 (17) , 8133-8138. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8NR00210J
  58. Kosei Ueno, Quan Sun, Hiroaki Misawa. Near-field Spectral Properties of Nano-engineered Metallic Nanoparticles. 2018,,, NoW1J.6. https://doi.org/10.1364/NOMA.2018.NoW1J.6
  59. . Advanced Photonics 2018 (BGPP, IPR, NP, NOMA, Sensors, Networks, SPPCom, SOF). 2018,,https://doi.org/
  60. Robert C. Word, Rolf Könenkamp. Photonic and plasmonic surface field distributions characterized with normal- and oblique-incidence multi-photon PEEM. Ultramicroscopy 2017, 183 , 43-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2017.05.012
  61. Akihiro Furube, Shuichi Hashimoto. Insight into plasmonic hot-electron transfer and plasmon molecular drive: new dimensions in energy conversion and nanofabrication. NPG Asia Materials 2017, 9 (12) , e454-e454. https://doi.org/10.1038/am.2017.191
  62. Chung V. Hoang, Koki Hayashi, Yasuo Ito, Naoki Gorai, Giles Allison, Xu Shi, Quan Sun, Zhenzhou Cheng, Kosei Ueno, Keisuke Goda, Hiroaki Misawa. Interplay of hot electrons from localized and propagating plasmons. Nature Communications 2017, 8 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-00815-x
  63. Boyu Ji, Qian Wang, Xiaowei Song, Haiyan Tao, Yinping Dou, Xun Gao, Zuoqiang Hao, Jingquan Lin. Disclosing dark mode of femtosecond plasmon with photoemission electron microscopy. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics 2017, 50 (41) , 415309. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6463/aa83a0
  64. Jinghuan Yang, Quan Sun, Han Yu, Kosei Ueno, Hiroaki Misawa, Qihuang Gong. Spatial evolution of the near-field distribution on planar gold nanoparticles with the excitation wavelength across dipole and quadrupole modes. Photonics Research 2017, 5 (3) , 187. https://doi.org/10.1364/PRJ.5.000187
  65. Han Yu, Quan Sun, Jinghuan Yang, Kosei Ueno, Tomoya Oshikiri, Atsushi Kubo, Yasutaka Matsuo, Qihuang Gong, Hiroaki Misawa. Near-field spectral properties of coupled plasmonic nanoparticle arrays. Optics Express 2017, 25 (6) , 6883. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.25.006883
  66. Arthur Losquin, Tom T. A. Lummen. Electron microscopy methods for space-, energy-, and time-resolved plasmonics. Frontiers of Physics 2017, 12 (1) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11467-016-0605-2
  67. Boyu Ji, Jiang Qin, Haiyan Tao, Zuoqiang Hao, Jingquan Lin. Subwavelength imaging and control of ultrafast optical near-field under resonant- and off-resonant excitation of bowtie nanostructures. New Journal of Physics 2016, 18 (9) , 093046. https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/18/9/093046
  68. Robert C. Word, Rolf Könenkamp. Mode structure of planar optical antennas on dielectric substrates. Optics Express 2016, 24 (16) , 18727. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.24.018727
  • Abstract

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. Characterization of the Au nanoblocks and PEEM measurements. (a) SEM images of the Au nanoblocks; the scale bar in the inset is 100 nm. (b) The far-field extinction spectrum of Au nanoblocks. (c) A schematic diagram of PEEM setup, in which the laser is directed onto the sample at either normal incidence or oblique incidence with an incidence angle of 74°. (d–f) PEEM images (FOV of 0.75 μm) of one nanoblock in an array under different excitation conditions: (d) femtosecond laser pulses with a central wavelength of 860 nm at normal incidence, (e) femtosecond pulses and UV light from a mercury lamp, and (f) UV light only. The laser polarization was horizontally aligned. The scale bars in (d–f) represent 100 nm.

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. Wavelength dependent PEEM measurements. Wavelength-dependent photoemission (PE) intensity integrated from PEEM images acquired at oblique incidence (74° from the normal) using a wavelength-tunable femtosecond laser source with different polarization states. The two curves were normalized to the maximum PE intensity observed under p-polarized laser excitation. The insets present two PEEM images corresponding to the two peak wavelengths, and the dash lines outline the Au nanoblocks.

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. FDTD numerical calculation results. (a) Calculated wavelength-dependent electric field enhancement at the interface of the nanoblocks and the substrate. (b) Calculated electric field intensity distributions (left panels) and charge distributions (right panels) for both p-polarization (top panels) and s-polarization (bottom panels) at the corresponding peak wavelengths.

    Figure 4

    Figure 4. Time-resolved PEEM measurements. (a) A schematic diagram of the setup for the time-resolved PEEM measurements. (b) Evolution of the PE intensity for both p- and s-polarized light excitation (corresponding to the dipole and quadrupole LSPR modes, respectively) within the phase delay of (0–20) × 2π rad (corresponding to the delay time of 0–56 fs). The inset in (b) shows the time-resolved PE signals expended in the phase delay within (2–6) × 2π rad. PEEM measured and numerical simulated PE intensity for the dipole mode (c) and the quadrupole mode (d) as a function of the delay time between pump and probe pulses. Careful analysis and comparison of the PEEM experimental data with calculations yield a dephasing time of 5 and 9 fs for the dipole and the quadrupole mode, respectively.

  • References

    ARTICLE SECTIONS
    Jump To

    This article references 45 other publications.

    1. 1
      Maier, S. A. Plasmonics: Fundamentals and Applications; Springer: New York, 2007.
    2. 2
      Lal, S.; Link, S.; Halas, N. J. Nano-Optics from Sensing to Waveguiding Nat. Photonics 2007, 1, 641 648 DOI: 10.1038/nphoton.2007.223
    3. 3
      Anker, J. N.; Hall, W. P.; Lyandres, O.; Shah, N. C.; Zhao, J.; Van Duyne, R. P. Biosensing with Plasmonic Nanosensors Nat. Mater. 2008, 7, 442 453 DOI: 10.1038/nmat2162
    4. 4
      Jain, P. K.; Huang, X. H.; El-Sayed, I. H.; El-Sayed, M. A. Noble Metals on the Nanoscale: Optical and Photothermal Properties and Some Applications in Imaging, Sensing, Biology, and Medicine Acc. Chem. Res. 2008, 41, 1578 1586 DOI: 10.1021/ar7002804
    5. 5
      Kawata, S.; Inouye, Y.; Verma, P. Plasmonics for Near-field Nano-Imaging and Superlensing Nat. Photonics 2009, 3, 388 394 DOI: 10.1038/nphoton.2009.111
    6. 6
      Yang, A. K.; Hoang, T. B.; Dridi, M.; Deeb, C.; Mikkelsen, M. H.; Schatz, G. C.; Odom, T. W. Real-Time Tunable Lasing from Plasmonic Nanocavity Arrays Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 6939 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms7939
    7. 7
      Atwater, H. A.; Polman, A. Plasmonics for Improved Photovoltaic Devices Nat. Mater. 2010, 9, 205 213 DOI: 10.1038/nmat2629
    8. 8
      Nishijima, Y.; Ueno, K.; Yokota, Y.; Murakoshi, K.; Misawa, H. Plasmon-Assisted Photocurrent Generation from Visible to Near-Infrared Wavelength Using a Au-Nanorods/TiO2 Electrode J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2010, 1, 2031 2036 DOI: 10.1021/jz1006675
    9. 9
      Ueno, K.; Misawa, H. Plasmon-Enhanced Photocurrent Generation and Water Oxidation from Visible to Near-Infrared Wavelengths NPG Asia Mater. 2013, 5, e61 DOI: 10.1038/am.2013.42
    10. 10
      Clavero, C. Plasmon-Induced Hot-Electron Generation at Nanoparticle/Metal-Oxide Interfaces for Photovoltaic and Photocatalytic Devices Nat. Photonics 2014, 8, 95 103 DOI: 10.1038/nphoton.2013.238
    11. 11
      Tsuboi, Y.; Shimizu, R.; Shoji, T.; Kitamura, N. Near-Infrared Continuous-Wave Light Driving a Two-Photon Photochromic Reaction with the Assistance of Localized Surface Plasmon J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 12623 12627 DOI: 10.1021/ja9016655
    12. 12
      Wu, B. T.; Ueno, K.; Yokota, Y.; Sun, K.; Zeng, H. P.; Misawa, H. Enhancement of a Two-Photon-Induced Reaction in Solution Using Light-Harvesting Gold Nanodimer Structures J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2012, 3, 1443 1447 DOI: 10.1021/jz300370b
    13. 13
      Zhong, Y.; Ueno, K.; Mori, Y.; Shi, X.; Oshikiri, T.; Murakoshi, K.; Inoue, H.; Misawa, H. Plasmon-Assisted Water Splitting Using Two Sides of the Same SrTiO3 Single-Crystal Substrate: Conversion of Visible Light to Chemical Energy Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 10350 10354 DOI: 10.1002/anie.201404926
    14. 14
      Oshikiri, T.; Ueno, K.; Misawa, H. Plasmon-Induced Ammonia Synthesis through Nitrogen Photofixation with Visible Light Irradiation Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 9802 9805 DOI: 10.1002/anie.201404748
    15. 15
      You, E. A.; Zhou, W.; Suh, J. Y.; Huntington, M. D.; Odom, T. W. Polarization-Dependent Multipolar Plasmon Resonances in Anisotropic Multiscale Au Particles ACS Nano 2012, 6, 1786 1794 DOI: 10.1021/nn204845z
    16. 16
      Imura, K.; Nagahara, T.; Okamoto, H. Plasmon Mode Imaging of Single Gold Nanorods J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 12730 12731 DOI: 10.1021/ja047836c
    17. 17
      Imura, K.; Nagahara, T.; Okamoto, H. Near-field Optical Imaging of Plasmon Modes in Gold Nanorods J. Chem. Phys. 2005, 122, 154701 DOI: 10.1063/1.1873692
    18. 18
      Denkova, D.; Verellen, N.; Silhanek, A. V.; Valev, V. K.; Van Dorpe, P.; Moshchalkov, V. V. Mapping Magnetic Near-Field Distributions of Plasmonic Nanoantennas ACS Nano 2013, 7, 3168 3176 DOI: 10.1021/nn305589t
    19. 19
      Rossouw, D.; Couillard, M.; Vickery, J.; Kumacheva, E.; Botton, G. A. Multipolar Plasmonic Resonances in Silver Nanowire Antennas Imaged with a Subnanometer Electron Probe Nano Lett. 2011, 11, 1499 1504 DOI: 10.1021/nl200634w
    20. 20
      Martin, J.; Kociak, M.; Mahfoud, Z.; Proust, J.; Gérard, D.; Plain, J. High-Resolution Imaging and Spectroscopy of Multipolar Plasmonic Resonances in Aluminum Nanoantennas Nano Lett. 2014, 14, 5517 5523 DOI: 10.1021/nl501850m
    21. 21
      Hao, F.; Larsson, E. M.; Ali, T. A.; Sutherland, D. S.; Nordlander, P. Shedding Light on Dark Plasmons in Gold Nanorings Chem. Phys. Lett. 2008, 458, 262 266 DOI: 10.1016/j.cplett.2008.04.126
    22. 22
      Esteban, R.; Vogelgesang, R.; Dorfmüller, J.; Dmitriev, A.; Rockstuhl, C.; Etrich, C.; Kern, K. Direct Near-Field Optical Imaging of Higher Order Plasmonic Resonances Nano Lett. 2008, 8, 3155 3159 DOI: 10.1021/nl801396r
    23. 23
      Zhang, Y.; Jia, T. Q.; Zhang, S. A.; Feng, D. H.; Xu, Z. Z. Dipole, Quadrupole and Octupole Plasmon Resonance Modes in Non-Concentric Nanocrescent/Nanodisk Structure: Local Field Enhancement in the Visible and Near Infrared Regions Opt. Express 2012, 20, 2924 2931 DOI: 10.1364/OE.20.002924
    24. 24
      Fang, Z. Y.; Cai, J. Y.; Yan, Z. B.; Nordlander, P.; Halas, N. J.; Zhu, X. Removing a Wedge from a Metallic Nanodisk Reveals a Fano Resonance Nano Lett. 2011, 11, 4475 4479 DOI: 10.1021/nl202804y
    25. 25
      Schnell, M.; García-Etxarri, A.; Huber, A. J.; Crozier, K.; Aizpurua, J.; Hillenbrand, R. Controlling the Near-Field Oscillations of Loaded Plasmonic Nanoantennas Nat. Photonics 2009, 3, 287 291 DOI: 10.1038/nphoton.2009.46
    26. 26
      Tanaka, Y.; Ishiguro, H.; Fujiwara, H.; Yokota, Y.; Ueno, K.; Misawa, H.; Sasaki, K. Direct Imaging of Nanogap-Mode Plasmon-Resonant Fields Opt. Express 2011, 19, 7726 7733 DOI: 10.1364/OE.19.007726
    27. 27
      Barnard, E. S.; Pala, R. A.; Brongersma, M. L. Photocurrent Mapping of Near-field Optical Antenna Resonances Nat. Nanotechnol. 2011, 6, 588 593 DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2011.131
    28. 28
      Nicoletti, O.; de la Peña, F.; Leary, R. K.; Holland, D. J.; Ducati, C.; Midgley, P. A. Three-Dimensional Imaging of Localized Surface Plasmon Resonances of Metal Nanoparticles Nature 2013, 502, 80 84 DOI: 10.1038/nature12469
    29. 29
      Leiderer, P.; Bartels, C.; König-Birk, J.; Mosbacher, M.; Boneberg, J. Imaging Optical Near-Fields of Nanostructures Appl. Phys. Lett. 2004, 85, 5370 5372 DOI: 10.1063/1.1819990
    30. 30
      Ghenuche, P.; Cherukulappurath, S.; Taminiau, T. H.; van Hulst, N. F.; Quidant, R. Spectroscopic Mode Mapping of Resonant Plasmon Nanoantennas Phys. Rev. Lett. 2008, 101, 116805 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.116805
    31. 31
      Aeschlimann, M.; Brixner, T.; Fischer, A.; Kramer, C.; Melchior, P.; Pfeiffer, W.; Schneider, C.; Strüber, C.; Tuchscherer, P.; Voronine, D. V. Coherent Two-Dimensional Nanoscopy Science 2011, 333, 1723 1726 DOI: 10.1126/science.1209206
    32. 32
      Kubo, A.; Onda, K.; Petek, H.; Sun, Z. J.; Jung, Y. S.; Kim, H. K. Femtosecond Imaging of Surface Plasmon Dynamics in a Nanostructured Silver Film Nano Lett. 2005, 5, 1123 1127 DOI: 10.1021/nl0506655
    33. 33
      Kubo, A.; Pontius, N.; Petek, H. Femtosecond Microscopy of Surface Plasmon Polariton Wave Packet Evolution at the Silver/Vacuum Interface Nano Lett. 2007, 7, 470 475 DOI: 10.1021/nl0627846
    34. 34
      Schertz, F.; Schmelzeisen, M.; Mohammadi, R.; Kreiter, M.; Elmers, H. J.; Schönhense, G. Near Field of Strongly Coupled Plasmons: Uncovering Dark Modes Nano Lett. 2012, 12, 1885 1890 DOI: 10.1021/nl204277y
    35. 35
      Lemke, C.; Schneider, C.; Leißner, T.; Bayer, D.; Radke, J. W.; Fischer, A.; Melchior, P.; Evlyukhin, A. B.; Chichkov, B. N.; Reinhardt, C.; Bauer, M.; Aeschlimann, M. Spatiotemporal Characterization of SPP Pulse Propagation in Two-Dimensional Plasmonic Focusing Devices Nano Lett. 2013, 13, 1053 1058 DOI: 10.1021/nl3042849
    36. 36
      Cinchetti, M.; Gloskovskii, A.; Nepjiko, S. A.; Schönhense, G.; Rochholz, H.; Kreiter, M. Photoemission Electron Microscopy as a Tool for the Investigation of Optical Near Fields Phys. Rev. Lett. 2005, 95, 047601 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.047601
    37. 37
      Sun, Q.; Ueno, K.; Yu, H.; Kubo, A.; Matsuo, Y.; Misawa, H. Direct Imaging of the Near Field and Dynamics of Surface Plasmon Resonance on Gold Nanostructures Using Photoemission Electron Microscopy Light: Sci. Appl. 2013, 2, e118 DOI: 10.1038/lsa.2013.74
    38. 38
      Lecarme, O.; Sun, Q.; Ueno, K.; Misawa, H. Robust and Versatile Light Absorption at Near-Infrared Wavelengths by Plasmonic Aluminum Nanorods ACS Photonics 2014, 1, 538 546 DOI: 10.1021/ph500096q
    39. 39
      Lamprecht, B.; Krenn, J. R.; Leitner, A.; Aussenegg, F. R. Resonant and Off-Resonant Light-Driven Plasmons in Metal Nanoparticles Studied by Femtosecond-resolution Third-harmonic Generation Phys. Rev. Lett. 1999, 83, 4421 4424 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.4421
    40. 40
      Hanke, T.; Krauss, G.; Träutlein, D.; Wild, B.; Bratschitsch, R.; Leitenstorfer, A. Efficient Nonlinear Light Emission of Single Gold Optical Antennas Driven by Few-Cycle Near-Infrared Pulses Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009, 103, 257404 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.257404
    41. 41
      Grubisic, A.; Schweikhard, V.; Baker, T. A.; Nesbitt, D. J. Coherent Multiphoton Photoelectron Emission from Single Au Nanorods: The Critical Role of Plasmonic Electric Near-Field Enhancement ACS Nano 2013, 7, 87 99 DOI: 10.1021/nn305194n
    42. 42
      Mårsell, E.; Losquin, A.; Svärd, R.; Miranda, M.; Guo, C.; Harth, A.; Lorek, E.; Mauritsson, J.; Arnold, C. L.; Xu, H. X.; L’Huillier, A.; Mikkelsen, A. Nanoscale Imaging of Local Few-Femtosecond Near-Field Dynamics within a Single Plasmonic Nanoantenna Nano Lett. 2015, 15, 6601 6608 DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b02363
    43. 43
      Grubisic, A.; Ringe, E.; Cobley, C. M.; Xia, Y. N.; Marks, L. D.; Van Duyne, R. P.; Nesbitt, D. J. Plasmonic Near-Electric Field Enhancement Effects in Ultrafast Photoelectron Emission: Correlated Spatial and Laser Polarization Microscopy Studies of Individual Ag Nanocubes Nano Lett. 2012, 12, 4823 4829 DOI: 10.1021/nl302271u
    44. 44
      Sönnichsen, C.; Franzl, T.; Wilk, T.; von Plessen, G.; Feldmann, J.; Wilson, O.; Mulvaney, P. Drastic Reduction of Plasmon Damping in Gold Nanorods Phys. Rev. Lett. 2002, 88, 077402 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.077402
    45. 45
      Johnson, P. B.; Christy, R. W. Optical Constants of Noble Metals Phys. Rev. B 1972, 6, 4370 4379 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.6.4370
  • Supporting Information

    Supporting Information

    ARTICLE SECTIONS
    Jump To

    The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.6b00715.

    • PEEM images of the Au nanoblocks excited with five different wavelengths under three different incidence conditions, near-field photoemission spectra under normal incidence, near-field photoemission spectra of the sample for time-resolved PEEM measurements, characterization of the incident laser field on the PEEM sample position, modeling the time-resolved photoemission signal, and some supplementary calculations of time-resolved photoemission signal (PDF)


    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

You’ve supercharged your research process with ACS and Mendeley!

STEP 1:
Click to create an ACS ID

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

OOPS

You have to login with your ACS ID befor you can login with your Mendeley account.

MENDELEY PAIRING EXPIRED
Your Mendeley pairing has expired. Please reconnect

This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By continuing to use the site, you are accepting our use of cookies. Read the ACS privacy policy.

CONTINUE