ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
Multiplexed mRNA Sensing and Combinatorial-Targeted Drug Delivery Using DNA-Gold Nanoparticle Dimers
My Activity
  • Open Access
Article

Multiplexed mRNA Sensing and Combinatorial-Targeted Drug Delivery Using DNA-Gold Nanoparticle Dimers
Click to copy article linkArticle link copied!

  • Maria-Eleni Kyriazi
    Maria-Eleni Kyriazi
    Physics and Astronomy, Faculty of Physical Sciences and Engineering, University of Southampton, Southampton SO171BJ, United Kingdom
  • Davide Giust
    Davide Giust
    Physics and Astronomy, Faculty of Physical Sciences and Engineering, University of Southampton, Southampton SO171BJ, United Kingdom
    More by Davide Giust
  • Afaf H. El-Sagheer
    Afaf H. El-Sagheer
    Department of Chemistry, Chemistry Research Laboratory, University of Oxford, 12 Mansfield Road, Oxford OX1 3TA, United Kingdom
    Chemistry Branch, Department of Science and Mathematics, Faculty of Petroleum and Mining Engineering, Suez University, Suez 43721, Egypt
  • Peter M. Lackie
    Peter M. Lackie
    Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton SO16 6YD, United Kingdom
  • Otto L. Muskens
    Otto L. Muskens
    Physics and Astronomy, Faculty of Physical Sciences and Engineering  and  Institute for Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton SO171BJ, United Kingdom
  • Tom Brown
    Tom Brown
    Department of Chemistry, Chemistry Research Laboratory, University of Oxford, 12 Mansfield Road, Oxford OX1 3TA, United Kingdom
    More by Tom Brown
  • Antonios G. Kanaras*
    Antonios G. Kanaras
    Physics and Astronomy, Faculty of Physical Sciences and Engineering  and  Institute for Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton SO171BJ, United Kingdom
    *E-mail: [email protected]
Open PDFSupporting Information (1)

ACS Nano

Cite this: ACS Nano 2018, 12, 4, 3333–3340
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.7b08620
Published March 20, 2018

Copyright © 2018 American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under CC-BY.

Abstract

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The design of nanoparticulate systems which can perform multiple synergistic functions in cells with high specificity and selectivity is of great importance in applications. Here we combine recent advances in DNA-gold nanoparticle self-assembly and sensing to develop gold nanoparticle dimers that are able to perform multiplexed synergistic functions within a cellular environment. These dimers can sense two mRNA targets and simultaneously or independently deliver one or two DNA-intercalating anticancer drugs (doxorubicin and mitoxantrone) in live cells. Our study focuses on the design of sophisticated nanoparticle assemblies with multiple and synergistic functions that have the potential to advance sensing and drug delivery in cells.

Copyright © 2018 American Chemical Society
Progress in the field of nanoscience has rendered available a variety of inorganic nanoparticles in terms of their chemical composition and morphology and therefore their properties. Moreover, scientists have gained a better understanding of the surface chemistry of nanoparticles, which allowed the development of protocols to produce colloidally robust and functional nanoparticulate systems, an essential step toward effective applications. (1−4) Among various types of nanoparticles, gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) are broadly utilized in research and applications because of their intrinsic optical properties and the ease of surface chemical modification with various types of ligands. (5) In recent years, advances in experimental protocols to functionalize AuNPs with thiol-modified oligonucleotides have enabled the design of sophisticated nanoparticles as well as the formation of precisely organized nanostructures. (6−8) Oligonucleotides are superior ligands because of their biological relevance, high specificity, selectivity, and versatility in conjunction with the ease of their chemical manipulation. (5) Several groups have used oligonucleotide-functionalized AuNPs to create nanoparticle dimers, trimers, and tetramers with tunable nanoparticle distances as well as mesoscale structures containing millions of nanoparticles in precise arrangements (e.g., body-centered cubic and face-centered cubic). (9−13) Recently our group developed ligation methods to covalently bind DNA-AuNP assemblies, enhancing their stability under DNA denaturing conditions or biologically complex environments. (14,15) In one of these methods, a copper-free click chemistry strategy was utilized to ligate DNA-AuNP conjugates. Synthetic oligonucleotides modified by an alkyne or azide group were brought into close proximity via a templating splint strand. Partial complementarity to both modified oligonucleotides resulted in successful oligonucleotide hybridization bringing in close proximity the alkyne and azide groups, catalyzing a ligation reaction. This approach to manipulating AuNP assemblies allowed the formation of AuNP dimers and trimers in high yield, which were stable even under DNA denaturing conditions. (15)
Beside the developed strategies to accurately organize and manipulate AuNP assemblies using DNA, there has been significant progress in the design of individual oligonucleotide-coated AuNPs for biomedical applications. For example, Mirkin and co-workers synthesized AuNPs densely functionalized with a 3d monolayer of synthetic oligonucleotides termed spherical nucleic acids (SNAs). (8,16) It was demonstrated that SNAs are readily taken up by cells mainly via a caveole-mediated endocytosis pathway. (17−20) A striking observation of their study was that the oligonucleotides attached to the nanoparticle surface did not degrade by endocellular enzymes possibly due to the highly ionic and steric microenvironment around the nanoparticles, which prevented the function of DNase enzymes. (5,21) SNAs were further developed to include short, dye-functionalized oligonucleotide strands that could sense mRNA in cells in real time. (22−26)
These particles were used to detect the survivin mRNA transcript. The survivin protein functions to inhibit apoptosis of the cell while also regulating cell proliferation and is expressed in high numbers in many human cancers. SKBR3 (human breast cancer) and HeLa (human cervical cancer) cells were treated with nanoparticle probes for the detection of survivin mRNA, and a 2.5-fold higher fluorescence signal was detected compared to treatment with non-targeting nanoprobes. (23,27) SNAs have also been employed in cancer stem cells (CSC), a distinct subpopulation within a tumor, which is thought to drive tumor progression. Owen et al. designed a probe specific for the detection and isolation of viable CSC using flow cytometry via the specific detection of nanog mRNA, a marker that is highly expressed in cancer stem cells and that correlates with patient survival. (28) On the other hand, Hendrix et al. monitored the expression of nodal mRNA in melanoma, which has been shown to underlie unregulated cell growth, metastasis, and the CSC phenotype. (29) Li and co-workers adapted SNAs in order to monitor the expression of runx2 and sox9 mRNA, two targets that can be used to assess the osteogenic differentiation of human bone marrow derived mesenchymal stromal cells (hBMSCs). (30) Krane et al. demonstrated the expression of NANOG and GDF3 in embryonic stem cells and induced pluripotents stem (iPS) cells of murine, human, and porcine origin. Furthermore, they also monitored the expression of Gapdh, a common house-keeping gene, in somatic cells. (31)
In another category of studies, the design of the SNAs was altered to include hairpin-forming oligonucleotides containing a terminal dye, which were then attached to a AuNP quencher to act as fluorescent molecular beacons upon the detection of a specific mRNA. For example, Sun and co-workers designed a hairpin nanoparticle probe targeting exon8 of brca1 mRNA, a human tumor suppressor gene that plays an important role in repairing damaged DNA, while Gu and co-workers focused on the detection of stat5b mRNA, which provides insight into tumor progression, in MCF 7 cells (human breast cancer). (24,25)
As a first example of a multiplexed nanoprobe, Prigodich et al. designed an SNAs probe capable of detecting, simultaneously, two different mRNA targets related to survivin and actin, by monitoring two separate fluorescent outputs. (32) Tang and co-workers adapted this approach and developed nanoparticle probes for the simultaneous detection of three and four intracellular mRNA biomarkers (c-myc, tk1, ga1nac-t, and survivin mRNA) all related to the process of tumor progression. (33,34) However, the ratio among the sense oligonucleotide strands on the nanoparticle was not controlled, a limitation that can influence significantly the efficiency of nanoparticles to detect all the relevant mRNA targets.
Recently, our group reported how SNAs could be designed and finely tuned to achieve localized and specific endocellular drug delivery upon the detection of a specific mRNA target. (35) Using those DNA-coated AuNPs, we were able to selectively kill only mesenchymal cells without affecting epithelial cells demonstrating that they can deliver their cargo only to cells expressing a specific mRNA signature. (36)
In this work, we combine advances in nanoparticle self-assembly and nanoparticle functionalization to develop multiplexed DNA-AuNP dimers that are able to enter cells and coordinate the delivery of two different DNA intercalating drugs into the local cellular microenvironment with high selectivity and specificity. The coordinated drug delivery is feasible by qualitatively detecting independent mRNA signatures. Superiority in this design comes from the ability to precisely control the number of oligonucleotides on the surface of each nanoparticle and therefore the number of intercalating drugs that can be loaded onto the probe. This nanoparticulate design is shown to be successful in the combinatorial and highly selective treatment of cells to achieve the highest drug delivery efficiency at a localized area.

Results and Discussion

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Design of DNA-AuNP Dimers

The formation of AuNP dimers and their covalent linking using copper-free click chemistry is described into detail in Supporting Information Scheme S1. Briefly, BSPP-coated AuNPs modified with one oligonucleotide strand were prepared and purified via agarose gel electrophoresis in order to isolate AuNPs bound to only one oligonucleotide (monoconjugates). Each batch of monoconjugates was chemically modified with either an azide group (linker strand 1) or an alkyne group (linker strand 2) (see Supporting Information Figure S1 for chemical structures). Then the particles were functionalized with a shell of oligonucleotide sense strands (sense strands 1 and 2), designed to capture a specific mRNA target (see Supporting Information Table S1 and S2 for oligonucleotide sequences). Nanoparticles were then linked together via hybridization of linker strands 1 and 2, which resulted in spontaneous DNA ligation, and purified by gel electrophoresis under DNA denaturing conditions in order to disregard particles that did not form dimers or that were not chemically ligated. Successful dimer formation was also assessed by dynamic light scattering (DLS) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) (see Supporting Information Figure S5). For mRNA detection, short fluorophore-modified oligonucleotides (Flare strands 1 and 2) were added to the sample and hybridized to their complementary sense strands (see Supporting Information Table S2 for oligonucleotide sequences).
Scheme 1 shows the design of the fully assembled AuNP dimers and illustrates the process of mRNA detection. The nanoparticle dimer design includes sense strands (attached to the AuNP surface), bearing a 5′ fluorophore modification, which are partially hybridized to shorter oligonucleotide complements, termed flare strands, chemically modified at the 3′ end with another dye. Once hybridized, the fluorescence of all fluorophores is quenched, due to the close proximity to the AuNP surface. (37,38) However, once the target mRNA binds to the corresponding sense sequence via competitive hybridization, the concomitant displacement of the flare can be detected as an increase in fluorescence at the specific wavelength of the fluorophore. (22,23,27,32,39) The fluorophore on the sense strand in this design acts as a reporter that ensures the integrity and specificity of the system. A FAM signal should not be detectable unless DNA degradation due to the presence of nucleases has taken place.

Scheme 1

Scheme 1. Schematic Illustration of the Multiplexed Nanoparticle Dimer and the Process of mRNA Detectiona

aWhen the target mRNAs bind to the sense strand, a short oligonucleotide strand is released resulting in an increase in the fluorescence signal, which was previously quenched by the AuNP core. Flare strand 1 is modified with Cy3 (Dye 1) and flare strand 2 is modified with a Cy5 dye (Dye 2), whereas both sense strands have been modified with FAM (Dye 3).

Prior to testing the function of nanoparticle dimers within a cellular environment, their stability against common nucleases such as cytosolic DNase I and lysosomal DNase II was investigated. Nanoparticle dimers were incubated with DNase I and DNase II, and the integrity of the oligonucleotide shell was determined by monitoring the fluorescence output from the fluorophore-modified sense strands. The stability of the nanoparticles dimers against DNA enzymatic degradation was also monitored via gel electrophoresis against single nanoparticle probes. Supporting Information Figure S3 shows that in both cases our nanoparticle dimers not only retained their dense oligonucleotide shell but also their dimeric structure. This is most likely due to the high density of the oligonucleotides on the AuNP surface, creating steric effects as well as high local ionic strength around nanoparticles preventing enzymatic degradation. (5)

Multiplexed mRNA Sensing

In our experiments, the oligonucleotide sequences on the surface of the nanoparticle dimers were designed to detect keratin 8 and vimentin mRNAs. The 16HBE cell line was used as a model for epithelial cells that strongly express keratin 8 while not expressing vimentin. Figure 1A shows a confocal microscopy image of live cells that were incubated with the nanoparticle dimers. The 16HBE cells display a single fluorescence signal (green) corresponding to the specific detection of keratin 8 mRNA. The absence of a fluorescence signal from the sense strands (blue) or the flare oligonucleotide strand corresponding to vimentin mRNA (red) confirmed the specific function of the nanoparticle dimers. While keratin 8 is expressed in epithelial cells, vimentin is expressed in mesenchymal cells (MRC 5). Figure 1B shows that when mesenchymal cells (MRC 5) are incubated with the same nanoparticle dimers, a red fluorescence signal corresponding to the detection of vimentin mRNA is observed, but no blue or green signals as in the case of 16HBE cells, confirming the presence of only vimentin mRNA in MRC 5 cells.

Figure 1

Figure 1. Confocal microscopy images of cells incubated with (A–C) nanoparticle dimers and (D–F) “non-targeting” scramble nanoparticle dimers. Sixteen HBE cells express only keratin 8, and MRC 5 cells express only vimentin. A549 expresses both keratin 8 and vimentin. A fluorescence signal corresponding to the presence of: keratin 8 mRNA (A), vimentin mRNA (B), and both vimentin and keratin 8 mRNA (C) is observed. All three cell lines display no response when incubated with nanoparticle dimers designed with “non-targeting” scramble sequences. Color guide: Keratin 8 “flare” strand, green; vimentin flare strand, red; vimentin and keratin 8 sense strand, blue; scrambled flare strand, green; scrambled sense strand, blue; nuclear counterstain, white. Scale bars are 15 μm.

In order to demonstrate the ability of the nanoparticle dimer to sense more than one target mRNA simultaneously, we employed the adenocarcinoma-derived human alveolar cell line A549. This cell line expresses both keratin 8 and vimentin as observed from RT-qPCR and immunostaining experiments (see Supporting Information Figure S9 and S10). Therefore, both of these mRNAs are expected to be detected in live A549 cells. Figure 1C shows that after incubation of the nanoparticle dimers with A549 cells, two fluorescence signals (red and green) corresponding to the detection of both keratin 8 and vimentin mRNAs were observed. To further confirm the specificity of the particles for targeted drug release, all three cell lines were incubated with “non-targeting” scramble oligonucleotide-functionalized nanoparticle dimers. Sense strands on these particles (for oligonucleotide sequences, see Table S2 at the Supporting Information) were not designed to target any cellular mRNA, and therefore no fluorescence signal should be observed corresponding to flare release. Figure 1D–F shows that in all three cases, no fluorescence signal was detected from either the flare strand or the anchored sense strand.
Although it has been shown that several types of functional nanoparticles, mainly coated by peptides or other transfection agents, can escape endosomes during cellular endocytosis via various ways, a mechanism for the escape of SNAs from endosomes has not been reported yet. (18,40,41) Nevertheless, experiments previously reported by our group and others indicated that SNAs are highly specific for the detection of endocellular mRNAs as well as in the release of DNA-intercalating drugs. (23,33−35) In order to identify the location of the nanoparticle dimers within a cell and to confirm that the DNA between the nanoparticles does not degrade, we analyzed several ultrathin sections of cells incubated with the nanoparticle dimers and imaged via TEM. Our TEM analysis shows that about 1–3% of nanoparticle dimers are found outside endosomes (see Supporting Information Figure S13), concluding that these ones are responsible for the highly specific signals we obtained.

Targeted Drug Delivery

After successfully testing the ability of the nanoparticle dimers to sense two mRNA signatures independently or simultaneously, we assessed their ability to act as a drug delivery vehicle of more than one drug. Doxorubicin (DOX) and mitoxantrone (MXT) were chosen as widely recognized anticancer drugs. Both bind within a DNA duplex by intercalation of the tetracyclic region (DOX) and anthraquinone ring (MXT) into the DNA base pairs. (42,43)
Scheme 2 shows the design of the nanoparticle dimers as drug delivery vehicles for DOX and MXT. DOX was intercalated in the DNA duplex that detects the keratin 8 mRNA, whereas MXT was intercalated in the DNA duplex that detects vimentin mRNA. In order to ensure that the detection of any fluorescent signal was solely due to the release of the drugs, no additional fluorophore labels were used in this experiment apart from DOX and MTX, which by themselves have specific fluorescent signatures. When intercalated in the DNA duplex, close to the AuNP surface, their fluorescence is quenched; however, when a target mRNA binds to the correspondent sense sequence, the flare is displaced leading to the release of the intercalated drug, which is detected as a corresponding increase in the fluorescence signal of the drug via confocal microscopy.

Scheme 2

Scheme 2. Schematic Illustration of Nanoparticle Dimer Used in Drug Release Experimentsa

a(Left) Dimer loaded with DOX (Drug 1) and MTX (Drug 2). No fluorophores were used in flare and sense strands. Both DOX and MTX have fluorescent properties, which are quenched due to the close proximity to the AuNP core. When the target mRNA binds to the sense strand, the intercalated drugs are released (right) causing an increase in the fluorescence signal.

The two drugs were incorporated into the nanoparticle dimers following a two-step process. First, DOX was mixed together with the flare strand 1 as well as the dimer nanoparticles and a heat–cool step was performed to smoothly intercalate the DOX between the sense and flare strand 1 duplex. The sample was purified from excess of free drug, after which the same nanoparticle dimers were mixed together with MXT and the flare strand 2. To avoid the release of DOX from the nanoparticle dimers, while at the same time maximizing the hybridization of sense and flare strands 2 and therefore the intercalation of MTX, the ionic strength of the solution was increased by adding MgCl2 (see Supporting Information Table S4). This increase in the ionic strength allowed an efficient intercalation of MXT between the sense/flare duplex that detects the vimentin mRNA. Successful drug loading was first evaluated in vitro. After purification, the nanoparticle dimers loaded with the drugs were heated to 80 °C for 10 min. An increase in temperature resulted in dehybridization of the flare strands and release of the intercalated drugs, which was monitored through their specific fluorescent signatures. Under the experimental conditions used here, it was determined that the average DOX loading was 34 ± 4 and MTX loading was 30 ± 1 molecules per nanoparticle (see Supporting Information, section S–VIII).
Having observed that the nanoparticle dimers are highly specific to mRNA detection (see Figure 1) and can be uploaded with two drugs simultaneously, we used them for drug delivery in live cells. Model epithelial (16HBE), mesenchymal (MRC 5), and cancerous (A549) cell lines were treated with the nanoparticle dimers loaded with both DOX and MXT. By relying on the fluorescence properties of both drugs, the release of DOX and MXT was monitored via confocal microscopy. Figure 2 shows confocal images where DOX and MXT were only released in the presence of the corresponding target mRNA. When the nanoparticle dimers were incubated with 16HBE epithelial cells, only a fluorescence signal corresponding to the release of DOX was observed (Figure 2A). In MRC 5 cells, only the MXT was released due to the detection of the vimentin mRNA, while the nanoparticle responsible for the detection of keratin 8 mRNA retained its payload (Figure 2B). On the other hand, when the nanoparticle dimers were incubated with A549 cells, which express both vimentin and keratin 8, a fluorescence signal corresponding to the release of both drugs was observed (Figure 2C). The specificity of the delivery of both DOX and MXT was further confirmed by using drug loaded “non-targeting” scramble nanoparticle dimers (see Supporting Information Table S2 for sequences). Each cell line was incubated with nanoparticle dimers loaded with both DOX and MXT. The scramble sequences on the nanoparticles do not have a recognition site for the mRNAs in these cells, and therefore the drugs were not released. From the absence of fluorescence in the confocal images (Figure 2D–F) it is evident that the “non-targeting” scramble nanoparticle dimers were able to retain their drug payload.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Confocal microscopy images of live cells incubated with nanoparticle dimers. The nanoparticle dimers were loaded with DOX and MXT (left column). The 16HBE cells show release of only DOX, corresponding to the presence of keratin 8 mRNA (see Figure 1). In MRC 5 cells, MTX was released corresponding to the presence of vimentin mRNA. In A549 cells, both keratin 8 and vimentin mRNA were detected, therefore both drugs MTX and DOX were released. Scramble nanoparticle dimers (D–F) did not display any fluorescence signal indicating that they retained their drug payload. Color guide: DOX release, green; MXT release, red; nuclear counterstain, white. Scale bar is 15 μm.

Cell viability assays were conducted to determine the effect of drug to the cells. For the purpose of this experiment, the loading of DOX and MTX in the nanoparticle dimers was increased. Nanoparticle dimers were hybridized with an excess of flares strands resulting in 118 ± 4 and 116 ± 2 flares hybridized for keratin 8 and vimentin, respectively. This led to an increase in the drug payload of both DOX (117 ± 2) and MXT (113 ± 3) molecules per nanoparticle (see Supporting Information Table S5). The cell viability of all three cell lines after an 18 h incubation period was evaluated using trypan blue, as shown in Figure 3. A range of conditions was tested, including nanoparticle dimers with and without drugs, “non-tageting” scramble nanoparticle dimers loaded with drugs, and free DOX and MXT without nanoprobes.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Trypan blue cell viability assay of (A) 16 HBE (B) MRC 5 and (C) A 549 cells incubated with various nanoparticle designs. Cells were incubated with: (2) nanoparticles sensing all mRNAs (gmRNA); (3) nanoparticles functionalized with scramble “non-targeting” oligonucleotides loaded with DOX and MXT; (4) free DOX; (5) free MTX; (6) nanoparticle dimers designed to sense keratin8 and vimentin mRNA loaded with DOX and MTX. Data are shown as mean ± SEM (n = 3). P-values were determined by a one-way ANOVA. *p < 0.05, ****p < 0.0001.

While the nanoparticle dimers without drugs did not exhibit any toxicity, once loaded with the drugs, a dramatic reduction in viable cells was observed for probes bearing specific mRNA sense strands. 16HBE cell lines showed a decrease in viability of over 80% when incubated with the nanoparticle dimers, while the viability of the MRC5 cells’ was reduced by up to 92% (Figure 3A and B). On the other hand, in A549 cancerous cells, the decrease in cell viability was at 70%. Although one would expect that A549 cells would be less viable because of the release of two drugs in cells at the same time, this was not observed in our experiments. This observation may be supported by recent literature which states that lung cancer cells, such as A549 cells, overexpress cytoprotective transcription factors, thus exhibiting an increased resistance to anticancer drugs. (44)
Moreover, in order to prove the specificity of the nanoparticle dimers, all three cell-lines were also incubated with the same “non-targeting” scrambled nanoparticle dimers loaded with both DOX or MXT, and no significant decrease in cell viability was observed. When using high concentrations of free DOX or MXT that had not been loaded onto a nanoparticle carrier, a reduction of viability of around 20% was observed, much less than when administering these drugs within the nanoparticle dimers. These observations emphasize the specific and efficient delivery of DOX and MTX when using the AuNP dimer platform.

Conclusion

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

In conclusion, we have successfully shown that dimers of AuNPs can be employed to sense two different mRNA targets within cells and release two different drugs in response to the presence of specific mRNA signatures. Furthermore, we have shown that selective drug release results in the death of cells expressing the specific mRNA target. This design of nanoparticle assemblies that can perform multiplexed synergistic roles of sensing and drug delivery triggered by specific biological fingerprints within cells is of great interest because it has the potential to advance therapeutic treatments by reducing nonspecific targeting and toxicity.

Experimental Methods

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Synthesis of 15 ± 1.5 nm AuNPs

A sodium tetrachloroaurate (1 mL, 100 mM) solution was brought to the boil while stirring. To this, a sodium citrate solution (5 mL, 2%wt) was added, and the solution was stirred for a further 15 min. Then, the reaction mixture was left to cool down while stirring. Once room temperature was reached bis-sulfonatophenylphosphine (BSPP, 42 mg in 2 mL of Milli-Q water) was added to the reaction mixture, which was left stirring overnight. Large aggregates were removed by filtering the solution through a 0.45 Millipore filter, and a concentrated solution of sodium chloride was added to the reaction mixture until a color change from wine red to gray/blue was observed indicating particle precipitation. Particles were purified through two sets of centrifugation at 10,000 rpm and redispersed in 3 mL of Milli-Q water.

Multiplexed Nanoparticle Dimers

BSPP-coated 15 nm AuNPs (1 mL, 50 nM) in attachment buffer (20 mM PBS, 5 mM NaCl) were incubated with thiol-modified single strand DNA (ssDNA) bearing alkyne or azide moieties at a 1:1 molar ratio. Additional BSPP (10 μL, 1 mg/20 μL) was added to the reaction mixture, which was then left to shake gently for 1 h. AuNPs with one DNA strand were purified by gel electrophoresis (2% agarose gel, 10 V/cm, 1 h) and stored in water.
A salt aging method was then employed to achieve a dense shell of “sense” DNA strands (targeting vimentin or keratin 8) around each batch of AuNPs functionalized with one DNA strand (monoconjugates). (8) Briefly, BSPP-coated 15 nm gold DNA monoconjugates (1 mL, 10 nM) in water were incubated with thiol-modified DNA strands (3 μM, 1 mL), and the reaction mixture was left to shake for 24 h. BSPP (10 μL, 1 mg/20 μL), phosphate buffer (0.1 M, pH 7.4), and sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS, 10%) were then added to the nanoparticles’ solution to achieve final concentrations of 0.01 M phosphate and 1% SDS respectively. A final salt concentration of 0.30 M was achieved by 6 additions of a NaCl (2 M) solution over a period of 8 h. The resulting DNA-coated AuNPs were purified by three steps of centrifugation (16,400 rpm, 20 min) and were stored at 4 °C in a hybridization buffer (5 mM phosphate buffer, 80 mM NaCl).
Nanoparticle dimers were formed by combining the DNA-coated AuNP batches at a molar ratio of 1:1 and by heating at 80 °C for 5 min and then cooling to room temperature. The close proximity between the azide and alkyne moieties after hybridization resulted in the chemical ligation of DNA between the two nanoparticles. The resulting product was subjected to denaturing conditions via incubation with formamide (50% v/v). The solution was heated to 80 °C for 15 min followed by immediate purification by gel electrophoresis (1.75% agarose gel, 10 V/cm, 30 min) and stored in PBS.
For flare hybridization, nanoparticle dimers (3.75 nM, 200 μL) were mixed with an excess of the complementary flare strands (75 nM, 200 μL). The solution was heated up to 55 °C for 5 min, followed by slow cooling to room temperature to allow hybridization to occur. Samples were purified by two rounds of centrifugation (16,400 rpm, 15 min) or until no background fluorescence was observed from flare strands within the solution and redispersed in PBS.

Drug Intercalation

For drug incorporation, nanoparticle dimers in PBS (3.75 nM, 200 μL) were first incubated with an excess of DOX (1 mg/4 mL) and keratin 8 flare strands (75 nM, 200 μL). The solution was heated up to 60 °C for 5 min and left to cool down to room temperature. The probes were purified by three rounds of centrifugation (16,400 rpm, 4 °C, 30 min) or until no fluorescence from DOX was detectable in the supernatant. The dimer nanoparticles were dispersed in a buffer (Tris 10 mM, MgCl2 7.5 mM and NaCl 300 mM) and incubated with an excess of MXT (1 mg/4 mL) and vimentin flare strands (75 nM, 200 μL). For cell viability experiments, nanoparticle dimers were loaded with more DOX and MXT by increasing the number of flare strands attached per nanoparticle for both keratin 8 (225 nM, 200 μL) and vimentin (225 nM, 200 μL). MgCl2 (7.5 mM, 200 μL) and an increased salt concentration (300 mM, 200 μL) were used. The solution was sonicated for 5 min and then left to shake overnight. After 3 rounds of purification by centrifugation (16,400 rpm, 4 °C, 30 min) and ensuring that there is no MXT fluorescence in the supernatant, the nanoparticle dimers were dispersed in PBS and used in further cellular experiments.

Cell Viability Assay

Cells were seeded in 24-well plates up to 90% confluency. Then they were incubated with the fully assembled nanoparticle dimers (500 μL, 32 nM) for 18 h. Nanoparticle dimers were loaded with an excess of keratin 8 and vimentin flare as well as an excess of DOX and MXT according to a previously stated method. Then cells were washed with Hank’s salt (HBSS) followed by incubation with trypsin (250 μL, 0.25% trypsin 0.01% EDTA solution) to detach cells from the surface. Any solution removed from the well prior to trypsinization was kept in an eppendorf and combined with the trypsinized cells, ensuring that cells detached from the surface prior to trypsinization were included in our interpretation of the cell viability. After 5 min incubation at 37 °C, the trypsin was inhibited with cell culture medium. This was combined with the previously removed medium, and the cells were pelleted by centrifugation (5000 rpm, 5 min). Pelleted cells were dispersed in fresh medium (10 μL) along with an equal amount of trypan blue (10 μL). Cells were counted using a Neubauer hemocytometer where cell viability was assessed by counting both live (clear cytoplasm) and dead (blue-colored cytoplasm) cells. Cell viability was calculated based on triplicates of experiments where the number of cells counted per experiment ranged between 624 and 2033.

Supporting Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.7b08620.

  • Additional experimental detail and data including nanoparticle characterization (TEM, DLS, melting curves, nuclease assays), detailed oligonucleotide sequences and further intracellular studies (confocal images, TEM cross sectioning, immunofluorescent labeling, RT-qPCR); the raw data for this work can be found at http://doi.org/10.5258/SOTON/D0448 (PDF)

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Author Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

  • Corresponding Author
  • Authors
    • Maria-Eleni Kyriazi - Physics and Astronomy, Faculty of Physical Sciences and Engineering and , University of Southampton, Southampton SO171BJ, United Kingdom
    • Davide Giust - Physics and Astronomy, Faculty of Physical Sciences and Engineering and , University of Southampton, Southampton SO171BJ, United Kingdom
    • Afaf H. El-Sagheer - Department of Chemistry, Chemistry Research Laboratory, University of Oxford, 12 Mansfield Road, Oxford OX1 3TA, United KingdomChemistry Branch, Department of Science and Mathematics, Faculty of Petroleum and Mining Engineering, Suez University, Suez 43721, EgyptOrcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0001-8706-1292
    • Peter M. Lackie - Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton SO16 6YD, United Kingdom
    • Otto L. Muskens - Physics and Astronomy, Faculty of Physical Sciences and Engineering  and  Institute for Life Sciences and , University of Southampton, Southampton SO171BJ, United KingdomOrcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0003-0693-5504
    • Tom Brown - Department of Chemistry, Chemistry Research Laboratory, University of Oxford, 12 Mansfield Road, Oxford OX1 3TA, United KingdomOrcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-6538-3036
  • Notes
    The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Acknowledgments

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Authors would like to thank the Leverhulme Trust (ref RPG-2015-005) and BBSRC (BB/N021150/1) for funding of this project. ATDBio is gratefully acknowledged for technical support regarding the oligonucleotide synthesis. We thank the staff at the Biomedical Imaging Unit and Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia Research Group, University of Southampton, for their assistance and technical support as well as Dr. Alastair Watson and Dr. C. Mirella Spalluto for providing us with the A549 cell line.

References

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article references 44 other publications.

  1. 1
    Yang, X.; Yang, M. X.; Pang, B.; Vara, M.; Xia, Y. N. Gold Nanomaterials at Work in Biomedicine. Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 1041010488,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00193
  2. 2
    Shenashen, M. A.; El-Safty, S. A.; Elshehy, E. A. Synthesis, Morphological Control, and Properties of Silver Nanoparticles in Potential Applications. Part. Part. Syst. Char. 2014, 31, 293316,  DOI: 10.1002/ppsc.201300181
  3. 3
    Pankhurst, Q.; Jones, S.; Dobson, J. Applications of Magnetic Nanoparticles in Biomedicine: The Story so Far. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 2016, 49, 501002,  DOI: 10.1088/0022-3727/49/50/501002
  4. 4
    Ling, D.; Lee, N.; Hyeon, T. Chemical Synthesis and Assembly of Uniformly Sized Iron Oxide Nanoparticles for Medical Applications. Acc. Chem. Res. 2015, 48, 12761285,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.accounts.5b00038
  5. 5
    Giljohann, D. A.; Seferos, D. S.; Daniel, W. L.; Massich, M. D.; Patel, P. C.; Mirkin, C. A. Gold Nanoparticles for Biology and Medicine. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 32803294,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.200904359
  6. 6
    Alivisatos, A. P.; Johnsson, K. P.; Peng, X. G.; Wilson, T. E.; Loweth, C. J.; Bruchez, M. P.; Schultz, P. G. Organization of ’Nanocrystal Molecules’ Using DNA. Nature 1996, 382, 609611,  DOI: 10.1038/382609a0
  7. 7
    Mirkin, C. A.; Letsinger, R. L.; Mucic, R. C.; Storhoff, J. J. A DNA-Based Method for Rationally Assembling Nanoparticles Into Macroscopic Materials. Nature 1996, 382, 607609,  DOI: 10.1038/382607a0
  8. 8
    Cutler, J. I.; Auyeung, E.; Mirkin, C. A. Spherical Nucleic Acids. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 13761391,  DOI: 10.1021/ja209351u
  9. 9
    Hurst, S. J.; Hill, H. D.; Mirkin, C. A. ″Three-Dimensional Hybridization″ With Polyvalent DNA-Gold Nanoparticle Conjugates. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 1219212200,  DOI: 10.1021/ja804266j
  10. 10
    Jones, M. R.; Macfarlane, R. J.; Lee, B.; Zhang, J. A.; Young, K. L.; Senesi, A. J.; Mirkin, C. A. DNA-Nanoparticle Superlattices Formed From Anisotropic Building Blocks. Nat. Mater. 2010, 9, 913917,  DOI: 10.1038/nmat2870
  11. 11
    Park, S. Y.; Lytton-Jean, A. K. R.; Lee, B.; Weigand, S.; Schatz, G. C.; Mirkin, C. A. DNA-Programmable Nanoparticle Crystallization. Nature 2008, 451, 553556,  DOI: 10.1038/nature06508
  12. 12
    Park, S. J.; Lazarides, A. A.; Storhoff, J. J.; Pesce, L.; Mirkin, C. A. The Structural Characterization of Oligonucleotide-Modified Gold Nanoparticle Networks Formed by DNA Hybridization. J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108, 1237512380,  DOI: 10.1021/jp040242b
  13. 13
    Nykypanchuk, D.; Maye, M. M.; van der Lelie, D.; Gang, O. DNA-Guided Crystallization of Colloidal Nanoparticles. Nature 2008, 451, 549552,  DOI: 10.1038/nature06560
  14. 14
    Harimech, P. K.; Gerrard, S. R.; El-Sagheer, A. H.; Brown, T.; Kanaras, A. G. Reversible Ligation of Programmed DNA-Gold Nanoparticle Assemblies. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 92429245,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.5b05683
  15. 15
    Heuer-Jungemann, A.; Kirkwood, R.; El-Sagheer, A. H.; Brown, T.; Kanaras, A. G. Copper-Free Click Chemistry as an Emerging Tool for the Programmed Ligation of DNA-Functionalised Gold Nanoparticles. Nanoscale 2013, 5, 72097212,  DOI: 10.1039/c3nr02362a
  16. 16
    Hurst, S. J.; Lytton-Jean, A. K. R.; Mirkin, C. A. Maximizing DNA Loading on a Range of Gold Nanoparticle Sizes. Anal. Chem. 2006, 78, 83138318,  DOI: 10.1021/ac0613582
  17. 17
    Choi, C. H. J.; Hao, L.; Narayan, S. P.; Auyeung, E.; Mirkin, C. A. Mechanism for the Endocytosis of Spherical Nucleic Acid Nanoparticle Conjugates. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2013, 110, 76257630,  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1305804110
  18. 18
    Wu, X. A.; Choi, C. H. J.; Zhang, C.; Hao, L.; Mirkin, C. A. Intracellular Fate of Spherical Nucleic Acid Nanoparticle Conjugates. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 77267733,  DOI: 10.1021/ja503010a
  19. 19
    Giljohann, D. A.; Seferos, D. S.; Patel, P. C.; Millstone, J. E.; Rosi, N. L.; Mirkin, C. A. Oligonucleotide Loading Determines Cellular Uptake of DNA-Modified Gold Nanoparticles. Nano Lett. 2007, 7, 38183821,  DOI: 10.1021/nl072471q
  20. 20
    Patel, P. C.; Giljohann, D. A.; Daniel, W. L.; Zheng, D.; Prigodich, A. E.; Mirkin, C. A. Scavenger Receptors Mediate Cellular Uptake of Polyvalent Oligonucleotide-Functionalized Gold Nanoparticles. Bioconjugate Chem. 2010, 21, 22502256,  DOI: 10.1021/bc1002423
  21. 21
    Seferos, D. S.; Prigodich, A. E.; Giljohann, D. A.; Patel, P. C.; Mirkin, C. A. Polyvalent DNA Nanoparticle Conjugates Stabilize Nucleic Acids. Nano Lett. 2009, 9, 308311,  DOI: 10.1021/nl802958f
  22. 22
    Heuer-Jungemann, A.; Harimech, P. K.; Brown, T.; Kanaras, A. G. Gold Nanoparticles and Fluorescently-Labelled DNA as a Platform for Biological Sensing. Nanoscale 2013, 5, 95039510,  DOI: 10.1039/c3nr03707j
  23. 23
    Seferos, D. S.; Giljohann, D. A.; Hill, H. D.; Prigodich, A. E.; Mirkin, C. A. Nano-flares: Probes for Transfection and mRNA Detection in Living Cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 1547715479,  DOI: 10.1021/ja0776529
  24. 24
    Xue, J.; Shan, L.; Chen, H.; Li, Y.; Zhu, H.; Deng, D.; Qian, Z.; Achilefu, S.; Gu, Y. Visual Detection of STAT5B Gene Expression in Living Cell Using the Hairpin DNA Modified Gold Nanoparticle Beacon. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2013, 41, 7177,  DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2012.06.062
  25. 25
    Shi, J.; Zhou, M.; Gong, A. H.; Li, Q. J.; Wu, Q.; Cheng, G. J.; Yang, M. Y.; Sun, Y. C. Fluorescence Lifetime Imaging of Nanoflares for mRNA Detection in Living Cells. Anal. Chem. 2016, 88, 19791983,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.5b03689
  26. 26
    Halo, T. L.; McMahon, K. M.; Angeloni, N. L.; Xu, Y.; Wang, W.; Chinen, A. B.; Malin, D.; Strekalova, E.; Cryns, V. L.; Cheng, C.; Mirkin, C. A.; Thaxton, C. S. NanoFlares for the Detection,Isolation, and Culture of Live Tumor Cells from Human Blood. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2014, 111, 1710417109,  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1418637111
  27. 27
    Prigodich, A. E.; Seferos, D. S.; Massich, M. D.; Giljohann, D. A.; Lane, B. C.; Mirkin, C. A. Nano-flares for mRNA Regulation and Detection. ACS Nano 2009, 3, 21472152,  DOI: 10.1021/nn9003814
  28. 28
    McClellan, S.; Slamecka, J.; Howze, P.; Thompson, L.; Finan, M.; Rocconi, R.; Owen, L. mRNA Detection in Living Cells: A Next Generation Cancer Stem Cell Identification Technique. Methods 2015, 82, 4754,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2015.04.022
  29. 29
    Seftor, E. A.; Seftor, R. E. B.; Weldon, D. S.; Kirsammer, G. T.; Margaryan, N. V.; Gilgur, A.; Hendrix, M. J. C. Melanoma Tumor Cell Heterogeneity: A Molecular Approach to Study Subpopulations Expressing the Embryonic Morphogen Nodal. Semin. Oncol. 2014, 41, 259266,  DOI: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2014.02.001
  30. 30
    Li, B. J.; Menzel, U.; Loebel, C.; Schmal, H.; Alini, M.; Stoddart, M. J. Monitoring Live Human Mesenchymal Stromal Cell Differentiation and Subsequent Selection Using Fluorescent RNA-Based Probes. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 26014,  DOI: 10.1038/srep26014
  31. 31
    Lahm, H.; Doppler, S.; Dressen, M.; Werner, A.; Adamczyk, K.; Schrambke, D.; Brade, T.; Laugwitz, K. L.; Deutsch, M. A.; Schiemann, M.; Lange, R.; Moretti, A.; Krane, M. Live Fluorescent RNA-Based Detection of Pluripotency Gene Expression in Embryonic and Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells of Different Species. Stem Cells 2015, 33, 392402,  DOI: 10.1002/stem.1872
  32. 32
    Prigodich, A. E.; Randeria, P. S.; Briley, W. E.; Kim, N. J.; Daniel, W. L.; Giljohann, D. A.; Mirkin, C. A. Multiplexed Nanoflares: mRNA Detection in Live Cells. Anal. Chem. 2012, 84, 20622066,  DOI: 10.1021/ac202648w
  33. 33
    Pan, W.; Zhang, T.; Yang, H.; Diao, W.; Li, N.; Tang, B. Multiplexed Detection and Imaging of Intracellular mRNAs Using a Four-Color Nanoprobe. Anal. Chem. 2013, 85, 1058110588,  DOI: 10.1021/ac402700s
  34. 34
    Li, N.; Chang, C.; Pan, W.; Tang, B. A Multicolor Nanoprobe for Detection and Imaging of Tumor-Related mRNAs in Living Cells. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 74267430,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201203767
  35. 35
    Heuer-Jungemann, A.; El-Sagheer, A. H.; Lackie, P. M.; Brown, T.; Kanaras, A. G. Selective Killing of Cells Triggered by Their mRNA Signature in the Presence of Smart Nanoparticles. Nanoscale 2016, 8, 1685716861,  DOI: 10.1039/C6NR06154K
  36. 36
    Lee, J. M.; Dedhar, S.; Kalluri, R.; Thompson, E. W. The Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition: New Insights in Signaling, Development, and Disease. J. Cell Biol. 2006, 172, 973981,  DOI: 10.1083/jcb.200601018
  37. 37
    Kang, K. A.; Wang, J.; Jasinski, J. B.; Achilefu, S. Fluorescence Manipulation by Gold Nanoparticles: From Complete Quenching to Extensive Enhancement. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2011, 9, 16,  DOI: 10.1186/1477-3155-9-16
  38. 38
    Wu, Z. S.; Jiang, J. H.; Fu, L.; Shen, G. L.; Yu, R. Q. Optical Detection of DNA Hybridization Based on Fluorescence Quenching of Tagged Oligonucleotide Probes by Gold Nanoparticles. Anal. Biochem. 2006, 353, 2229,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2006.01.018
  39. 39
    Zheng, D.; Seferos, D. S.; Giljohann, D. A.; Patel, P. C.; Mirkin, C. A. Aptamer Nano-flares for Molecular Detection in Living Cells. Nano Lett. 2009, 9, 32583261,  DOI: 10.1021/nl901517b
  40. 40
    Gilleron, J.; Querbes, W.; Zeigerer, A.; Borodovsky, A.; Marsico, G.; Schubert, U.; Manygoats, K.; Seifert, S.; Andree, C.; Stoeter, M.; Epstein-Barash, H.; Zhang, L.; Koteliansky, V.; Fitzgerald, K.; Fava, E.; Bickle, M.; Kalaidzidis, Y.; Akinc, A.; Maier, M.; Zerial, M. Image-Based Analysis of Lipid Nanoparticle-Mediated siRNA Delivery, Intracellular Trafficking and Endosomal Escape. Nat. Biotechnol. 2013, 31, 638646,  DOI: 10.1038/nbt.2612
  41. 41
    Blanco, E.; Shen, H.; Ferrari, M. Principles of Nanoparticle Design for Overcoming Biological Barriers to Drug Delivery. Nat. Biotechnol. 2015, 33, 941951,  DOI: 10.1038/nbt.3330
  42. 42
    Perez-Arnaiz, C.; Busto, N.; Leal, J. M.; Garcia, B. New Insights into the Mechanism of the DNA/Doxorubicin Interaction. J. Phys. Chem. B 2014, 118, 12881295,  DOI: 10.1021/jp411429g
  43. 43
    Hajihassan, Z.; Rabbani-Chadegani, A. Studies on the Binding Affinity of Anticancer Drug Mitoxantrone to Chromatin, DNA and Histone Proteins. J. Biomed. Sci. 2009, 16, 31,  DOI: 10.1186/1423-0127-16-31
  44. 44
    Ohnuma, T.; Matsumoto, T.; Itoi, A.; Kawana, A.; Nishiyama, T.; Ogura, K.; Hiratsuka, A. Enhanced Sensitivity of A549 Cells to the Cytotoxic Action of Anticancer Drugs via Suppression of Nrf2 by Procyanidins from Cinnamomi Cortex Extract. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2011, 413, 623629,  DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2011.09.014

Cited By

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article is cited by 111 publications.

  1. Soohyun Lee, Qiang Zhao, Sungwoo Lee, Inyoung Choi, Seohyeon Lee, Insub Jung, Sungho Park. Two- and Three-Dimensional Ag–Au Nanoalloying: Heterogeneous Building Blocks Enhancing Near-Field Focusing. ACS Nano 2024, 18 (43) , 29880-29890. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.4c10219
  2. Xiaoxue Shen, Huibin He, Di Zheng, Wei Cao, Yutao Sang, Zhihong Nie. Engineering the Electrostatic Interactions between Oppositely Charged Polymer-Grafted Nanoparticles for Constructing Colloid Molecules on Substrates. ACS Nano 2024, 18 (32) , 20999-21008. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.4c01891
  3. Brian T. Scarpitti, Sanjun Fan, Madeleine Lomax-Vogt, Anthony Lutton, John W. Olesik, Zachary D. Schultz. Accurate Quantification and Imaging of Cellular Uptake Using Single-Particle Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering. ACS Sensors 2024, 9 (1) , 73-80. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssensors.3c01648
  4. Nagendra Prasad Yadav, Tarun Yadav, Sangram Pattanaik, Ehsan Shakerzadeh, Subhendu Chakroborty, Cai Xiaofeng, Anil Kumar Vishwkarma, Amit Pathak, Jitendra Malviya, Fanindra Pati Pandey. Understanding the Interaction Mechanism between the Epinephrine Neurotransmitter and Small Gold Nanoclusters (Aun; n = 6, 8, and 10): A Computational Insight. ACS Omega 2024, 9 (3) , 3373-3383. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c06382
  5. Tianyi Bao, Nan Li, Huan Chen, Zinan Zhao, Jin Fan, Yingfang Tao, Chenglong Chen, Mimi Wan, Guoyong Yin, Chun Mao. Drug-Loaded Zwitterion-Based Nanomotors for the Treatment of Spinal Cord Injury. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2023, 15 (27) , 32762-32771. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.3c05866
  6. Nhat M. Ngo, Hung-Vu Tran, T. Randall Lee. Plasmonic Nanostars: Systematic Review of their Synthesis and Applications. ACS Applied Nano Materials 2022, 5 (10) , 14051-14091. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.2c02533
  7. Ying Chen, Lei Yu, Hongwei Zhou. Fluorine-Enhanced Catalytic Activity of Polyaniline-Supported Copper Nanoparticles in Buchwald–Hartwig Couplings of Pyrimidin-2-Amines. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2022, 126 (40) , 17084-17092. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.2c05290
  8. Ning-Ning Zhang, Xiaoxue Shen, Kun Liu, Zhihong Nie, Eugenia Kumacheva. Polymer-Tethered Nanoparticles: From Surface Engineering to Directional Self-Assembly. Accounts of Chemical Research 2022, 55 (11) , 1503-1513. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.2c00066
  9. Rishika Aggrawal, Sayantan Halder, Balaji Gopalan, Swati Biswas, Subit Kumar Saha. Transformation of an Aqueous Micellar Phase to a Bilayer of Gemini Surfactants on Gold Nanoparticles: A Steady-State and Time-Resolved Fluorescence and Fluorescence Anisotropy Study by Tuning the Precise Locations of Probes. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2022, 126 (14) , 6280-6299. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c09892
  10. Yao Jiang, Wenjing Zhao, Huimin Zhou, Qiuqi Zhang, Shusheng Zhang. ATP-Triggered Intracellular In Situ Aggregation of a Gold-Nanoparticle-Equipped Triple-Helix Molecular Switch for Fluorescence Imaging and Photothermal Tumor Therapy. Langmuir 2022, 38 (12) , 3755-3764. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.1c03331
  11. Marcelo Muñoz, Cagla Eren Cimenci, Keshav Goel, Maxime Comtois-Bona, Mahir Hossain, Christopher McTiernan, Matias Zuñiga-Bustos, Alex Ross, Brenda Truong, Darryl R. Davis, Wenbin Liang, Benjamin Rotstein, Marc Ruel, Horacio Poblete, Erik J. Suuronen, Emilio I. Alarcon. Nanoengineered Sprayable Therapy for Treating Myocardial Infarction. ACS Nano 2022, 16 (3) , 3522-3537. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.1c08890
  12. Qianlong Wang, Lancong Liu, Xiaoyi Chen, Tiantian Wang, Hua Zhou, Hui Huang, Linsen Qing, Pei Luo. Noninvasive Prognosis of Postmyocardial Infarction Using Urinary miRNA Ultratrace Detection Based on Single-Target DNA-Functionalized AuNPs. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2022, 14 (3) , 3633-3642. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.1c17883
  13. Maria-Eleni Kyriazi, Afaf H. El-Sagheer, Igor L. Medintz, Tom Brown, Antonios G. Kanaras. An Investigation into the Resistance of Spherical Nucleic Acids against DNA Enzymatic Degradation. Bioconjugate Chemistry 2022, 33 (1) , 219-225. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.1c00540
  14. Zuying Feng, Qingsheng Guo, Yao Wang, Yunfei Ge, Zhiying Zhang, Yan Wu, Qilong Li, Hajar Masoomi, Hongchen Gu, Hong Xu. Evolution of “On-Barcode” Luminescence Oxygen Channeling Immunoassay by Exploring the Barcode Structure and the Assay System. ACS Omega 2022, 7 (2) , 2344-2355. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.1c06236
  15. Zhujie Li, Victor G. Ruiz, Matej Kanduč, Joachim Dzubiella. Highly Heterogeneous Polarization and Solvation of Gold Nanoparticles in Aqueous Electrolytes. ACS Nano 2021, 15 (8) , 13155-13165. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.1c02668
  16. Alisina Bazrafshan, Maria-Eleni Kyriazi, Brandon Alexander Holt, Wenxiao Deng, Selma Piranej, Hanquan Su, Yuesong Hu, Afaf H. El-Sagheer, Tom Brown, Gabriel A. Kwong, Antonios G. Kanaras, Khalid Salaita. DNA Gold Nanoparticle Motors Demonstrate Processive Motion with Bursts of Speed Up to 50 nm Per Second. ACS Nano 2021, 15 (5) , 8427-8438. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.0c10658
  17. Miguel Xavier, Maria-Eleni Kyriazi, Stuart Lanham, Konstantina Alexaki, Elloise Matthews, Afaf H. El-Sagheer, Tom Brown, Antonios G. Kanaras, Richard O. C. Oreffo. Enrichment of Skeletal Stem Cells from Human Bone Marrow Using Spherical Nucleic Acids. ACS Nano 2021, 15 (4) , 6909-6916. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.0c10683
  18. Taehyung Kim, Keonwook Nam, Young Min Kim, Kyungjik Yang, Young Hoon Roh. DNA-Assisted Smart Nanocarriers: Progress, Challenges, and Opportunities. ACS Nano 2021, 15 (2) , 1942-1951. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.0c08905
  19. Sasha B. Ebrahimi, Devleena Samanta, Chad A. Mirkin. DNA-Based Nanostructures for Live-Cell Analysis. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2020, 142 (26) , 11343-11356. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.0c04978
  20. Xiaofeng Liu, Guofu Liao, Liyuan Zou, Yan Zheng, Xiaohai Yang, Qing Wang, Xiuhua Geng, Shaoyuan Li, Yaqin Liu, Kemin Wang. Construction of Bio/Nanointerfaces: Stable Gold Nanoparticle Bioconjugates in Complex Systems. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2019, 11 (43) , 40817-40825. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b13659
  21. Jing Zhang, Yun-Xi Cui, Xue-Nan Feng, Meng Cheng, An-Na Tang, De-Ming Kong. pH-Controlled Intracellular in Situ Reversible Assembly of a Photothermal Agent for Smart Chemo-Photothermal Synergetic Therapy and ATP Imaging. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2019, 11 (43) , 39624-39632. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b14186
  22. Hao Wang, Kholud Dardir, Ki-Bum Lee, Laura Fabris. Impact of Protein Corona in Nanoflare-Based Biomolecular Detection and Quantification. Bioconjugate Chemistry 2019, 30 (10) , 2555-2562. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.9b00495
  23. Joyce C. Breger, Eunkeu Oh, Kimihiro Susumu, William P. Klein, Scott A. Walper, Mario G. Ancona, Igor L. Medintz. Nanoparticle Size Influences Localized Enzymatic Enhancement—A Case Study with Phosphotriesterase. Bioconjugate Chemistry 2019, 30 (7) , 2060-2074. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.9b00362
  24. Bing Wei, Dongbao Yao, Bin Zheng, Xiang Zhou, Yijun Guo, Xiang Li, Chengxu Li, Shiyan Xiao, Haojun Liang. Facile Strategy for Visible Disassembly of Spherical Nucleic Acids Programmed by Catalytic DNA Circuits. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2019, 11 (22) , 19724-19733. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b02107
  25. Amelie Heuer-Jungemann, Neus Feliu, Ioanna Bakaimi, Majd Hamaly, Alaaldin Alkilany, Indranath Chakraborty, Atif Masood, Maria F. Casula, Athanasia Kostopoulou, Eunkeu Oh, Kimihiro Susumu, Michael H. Stewart, Igor L. Medintz, Emmanuel Stratakis, Wolfgang J. Parak, Antonios G. Kanaras. The Role of Ligands in the Chemical Synthesis and Applications of Inorganic Nanoparticles. Chemical Reviews 2019, 119 (8) , 4819-4880. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00733
  26. Maria Moros, Maria-Eleni Kyriazi, Afaf H. El-Sagheer, Tom Brown, Claudia Tortiglione, Antonios G. Kanaras. DNA-Coated Gold Nanoparticles for the Detection of mRNA in Live Hydra Vulgaris Animals. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2019, 11 (15) , 13905-13911. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.8b17846
  27. Qinghong Ji, Qiangqiang Yang, Mengyao Ou, Min Hong. Simultaneous Down-Regulation of Intracellular MicroRNA-21 and hTERT mRNA Using AS1411-Functionallized Gold Nanoprobes to Achieve Targeted Anti-Tumor Therapy. Nanomaterials 2024, 14 (23) , 1956. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14231956
  28. Shanka Walia, Mohit J. Mehta. Recent progress on nanosystems for nucleic acid delivery. RSC Pharmaceutics 2024, 1 (4) , 645-674. https://doi.org/10.1039/D4PM00009A
  29. Miaomiao Xu, Siyuan Wei, Tong Su, Die Ma, Zhixuan Wang, Dan Zhu, Lixing Weng, Xianguang Ding. Visualizing Macrophage Polarization through Fluorescent mRNA Profiling. Biosensors 2024, 14 (10) , 475. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios14100475
  30. Le Yang, Hongye Wei, Zhihe Qing, Linlin Wu. AuNP@DNA nanoflares: Preparation and application in bioanalysis and biomedicine. Chinese Chemical Letters 2024, 28 , 110524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cclet.2024.110524
  31. Akbar Hasanzadeh, Arefeh Ebadati, Sara Saeedi, Babak Kamali, Hamid Noori, Behnam Jamei, Michael R. Hamblin, Yong Liu, Mahdi Karimi. Nucleic acid-responsive smart systems for controlled cargo delivery. Biotechnology Advances 2024, 74 , 108393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2024.108393
  32. Xuyao Liu, Qi Shi, Peng Qi, Ziming Wang, Tongyue Zhang, Sijia Zhang, Jiayan Wu, Zhaopei Guo, Jie Chen, Qiang Zhang. Recent advances in living cell nucleic acid probes based on nanomaterials for early cancer diagnosis. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 2024, 19 (3) , 100910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajps.2024.100910
  33. Jianhua Zou, Meng Li, Ziwei Liu, Wei Luo, Shiqi Han, Fan Xiao, Wei Tao, Qibiao Wu, Tian Xie, Na Kong. Unleashing the potential: integrating nano-delivery systems with traditional Chinese medicine. Nanoscale 2024, 16 (18) , 8791-8806. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3NR06102G
  34. Smita Pawar, Prashant Pingale, Atul Garkal, Riyaz Ali M. Osmani, Kavita Gajbhiye, Madhur Kulkarni, Krutika Pardeshi, Tejal Mehta, Amarjitsing Rajput. Unlocking the potential of nanocarrier-mediated mRNA delivery across diverse biomedical frontiers: A comprehensive review. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 2024, 267 , 131139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.131139
  35. Swayandipta Dey, Rodrigo Rivas-Barbosa, Francesco Sciortino, Emanuela Zaccarelli, Peter Zijlstra. Biomolecular interactions on densely coated nanoparticles: a single-molecule perspective. Nanoscale 2024, 16 (9) , 4872-4879. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3NR06140J
  36. Zahra Khoshbin, Hamed Zahraee, Khalil Abnous, Seyed Mohammad Taghdisi. Hybrid gold nanoparticles as advanced drug delivery and theranostics application. 2024, 421-444. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-19061-2.00006-7
  37. Jinru Zhou, Yanzhuo Du, Huan Li, Lei Zheng, Yan Zhang, Linglin Fu. A novel AuNRs self-assembly dimer-based aptasensor for ultrasensitive SERS sensing of wheat gluten. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical 2023, 393 , 134233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2023.134233
  38. Varsha Kumari, Sukriti Vishwas, Rajesh Kumar, Violina Kakoty, Rubiya Khursheed, Molakpogu Ravindra Babu, Vancha Harish, Neeraj Mittal, Pankaj Kumar Singh, Nahed S. Alharthi, Mohammed Ageeli Hakami, Faris F. Aba Alkhayl, Gaurav Gupta, Gabriele De Rubis, Keshav Raj Paudel, Manisha Singh, Milad Zandi, Brian G. Oliver, Kamal Dua, Sachin Kumar Singh. An overview of biomedical applications for gold nanoparticles against lung cancer. Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology 2023, 86 , 104729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jddst.2023.104729
  39. Zheng Fang, Min Li, Xiaolei Zuo. DNA Composites and Applications in Bioanalysis. Advanced Sensor Research 2023, 2 (8) https://doi.org/10.1002/adsr.202300002
  40. Shan Huang, Jun-Jie Zhu. Linkage Pathways of DNA–Nanoparticle Conjugates and Biological Applications. Chemosensors 2023, 11 (8) , 444. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors11080444
  41. Ke Li, Yanfei Liu, Beibei Lou, Yifu Tan, Liwei Chen, Zhenbao Liu. DNA-directed assembly of nanomaterials and their biomedical applications. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 2023, 245 , 125551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.125551
  42. Chenbiao Li, Peifang Chen, Xiaoyuan Ma, Xichi Lin, Shan Xu, Sobia Niazi, Zhouping Wang. Real-time in situ observation of P53-mediated cascade activation of apoptotic pathways with nucleic acid multicolor fluorescent probes based on symmetrical gold nanostars. Nano Research 2023, 16 (4) , 5391-5400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-022-5069-9
  43. Ying Luo, Yiyang Cong, Jia Liu, Lihua Huang, Wanting Cheng, Peihu Xu, Yihua Yin, Hao Hong, Wenjin Xu. A pH/ROS dual-responsive nanoparticle system for tumor targeting combined chemotherapy/phototherapy. New Journal of Chemistry 2023, 47 (7) , 3395-3405. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2NJ05078A
  44. Jiaqi Zhao, Ying Kan, Zhi Chen, Hongmei Li, Weifei Zhang. MOFs-Modified Electrochemical Sensors and the Application in the Detection of Opioids. Biosensors 2023, 13 (2) , 284. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios13020284
  45. Pavanalaxmi, Roopashree, M. Praveen Kumar, Kanmani, Sirisha Pingali. Implementation of Biomedical Engineering Tools in Targeted Cancer Therapy: Challenges and Opportunities. 2023, 43-72. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-9786-0_2
  46. Subrata Dutta. DNA functionalized gold and silver nanoparticles. 2023, 411-434. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-99454-5.00004-4
  47. Elloise Z Matthews, Stuart Lanham, Kate White, Maria-Eleni Kyriazi, Konstantina Alexaki, Afaf H El-Sagheer, Tom Brown, Antonios G Kanaras, Jonathan J West, Ben D MacArthur, Patrick S Stumpf, Richard OC Oreffo. Single-cell RNA-sequence analysis of human bone marrow reveals new targets for isolation of skeletal stem cells using spherical nucleic acids. Journal of Tissue Engineering 2023, 14 https://doi.org/10.1177/20417314231169375
  48. Juliana Santos Rosa Viegas, Maria Vitória Lopes Badra Bentley, Fabiana Testa Moura de Carvalho Vicentini. Challenges to perform an efficiently gene therapy adopting non-viral vectors: Melanoma landscape. Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology 2022, 78 , 103964. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jddst.2022.103964
  49. Mengqi Huang, Erhu Xiong, Yan Wang, Menglu Hu, Huahua Yue, Tian Tian, Debin Zhu, Hong Liu, Xiaoming Zhou. Fast microwave heating-based one-step synthesis of DNA and RNA modified gold nanoparticles. Nature Communications 2022, 13 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-28627-8
  50. Christoph Schreiber, Tim Franzen, Laura Hildebrand, René Stein, Bernhard Friedrich, Rainer Tietze, Rainer Fietkau, Luitpold V. Distel. Effect of Citrate- and Gold-Stabilized Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles on Head and Neck Tumor Cell Lines during Combination Therapy with Ionizing Radiation. Bioengineering 2022, 9 (12) , 806. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering9120806
  51. Nicholas C. Allen, Rajat Chauhan, Paula J. Bates, Martin G. O’Toole. Optimization of Tumor Targeting Gold Nanoparticles for Glioblastoma Applications. Nanomaterials 2022, 12 (21) , 3869. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12213869
  52. Jaiwoo Lee, Quoc-Viet Le, Seungbeom Ko, Sungtaek Kang, Robert B. Macgregor, Gayong Shim, Yu-Kyoung Oh. Blood-declustering excretable metal clusters assembled in DNA matrix. Biomaterials 2022, 289 , 121754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2022.121754
  53. Rebecca Claßen, Ervice Pouokam, Matthias Wickleder, Martin Diener, Annabelle Mattern. Atropine-functionalized gold nanoparticles binding to muscarinic receptors after passage across the intestinal epithelium. Royal Society Open Science 2022, 9 (10) https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.220244
  54. Makoto Komiyama, Narumi Shigi, Katsuhiko Ariga. DNA‐Based Nanoarchitectures as Eminent Vehicles for Smart Drug Delivery Systems. Advanced Functional Materials 2022, 32 (37) https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202200924
  55. Partha Roy, Srija Sur, Suvadra Das, Wong Tin Wui. Phytochemical-conjugated bio-safe gold nanoparticles in breast cancer: a comprehensive update. Breast Cancer 2022, 29 (5) , 761-777. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-022-01368-8
  56. Jianing Zhang, Jiayu Yu, Jing Jin, Xiang Zhou, Haojun Liang, Feng Zhou, Wei Jiang. Bridge DNA guided assembly of nanoparticles to program chemical reaction networks. Nanoscale 2022, 14 (33) , 12162-12173. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2NR03948F
  57. Chang Liu, Jiyu Deng, Juan Yi, Ru Zhang, Lixin Chen, Xin Fu, Shuzhen Liao, Wenjun Yi, Guoqiang Zou, Hai Yang. A novel binding-induced DNAzyme motor triggered by survivin mRNA. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry 2022, 414 (20) , 6167-6175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-022-04183-4
  58. Shalini Thakkar, Jing Liu, Ludovic F. Dumée, Braj Raj Singh, Shruti Shukla, Wenrong Yang. Arsenic ion assisted core–satellites nano-assembly of gold nanoparticles for its colorimetric determination in water. Journal of Water Process Engineering 2022, 48 , 102833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2022.102833
  59. Wai-Ki Wong, Chun-Him Nathanael Lai, Wai-Yin Cheng, Lok-Him Tung, Raymond Chuen-Chung Chang, Franco King-Chi Leung. Polymer–Metal Composite Healthcare Materials: From Nano to Device Scale. Journal of Composites Science 2022, 6 (8) , 218. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs6080218
  60. Yuqiang Hu, Zhen Zhang, Wei Zhang, Minghao Hu, Xianjin Xiao, Tongbo Wu. Probing and modulating the interactions of the DNAzyme with DNA-functionalized nanoparticles. Chinese Chemical Letters 2022, 33 (6) , 3026-3030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cclet.2021.09.039
  61. Dingkang Liu, Ye Chen, Qun Wang, Yue Ji, Lichen Bao, Wenbing Yao, Xiangdong Gao, Jun Yin. Tailored protein-conjugated DNA nanoplatform for synergistic cancer therapy. Journal of Controlled Release 2022, 346 , 250-259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2022.04.022
  62. Xinlian Liu, Ya Wang, Clement Yaw Effah, Longjie Wu, Fei Yu, Jinlan Wei, Guojiang Mao, Yamin Xiong, Leiliang He. Endocytosis and intracellular RNAs imaging of nanomaterials-based fluorescence probes. Talanta 2022, 243 , 123377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2022.123377
  63. Hongxia Li, Antony R. Warden, Jie He, Guangxia Shen, Xianting Ding. Expansion microscopy with ninefold swelling (NIFS) hydrogel permits cellular ultrastructure imaging on conventional microscope. Science Advances 2022, 8 (18) https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abm4006
  64. Sagar S. Arya, James E. Rookes, David M. Cahill, Sangram K. Lenka. Reduced Genotoxicity of Gold Nanoparticles With Protein Corona in Allium cepa. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology 2022, 10 https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.849464
  65. A. Farcas, L. Janosi, S. Astilean. Size and surface coverage density are major factors in determining thiol modified gold nanoparticles characteristics. Computational and Theoretical Chemistry 2022, 1209 , 113581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comptc.2021.113581
  66. Laxmi R. Adil, Retwik Parui, Mst N. Khatun, Moirangthem A. Chanu, Lidong Li, Shu Wang, Parameswar K. Iyer. Nanomaterials for sensors: Synthesis and applications. 2022, 121-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-85725-3.00017-9
  67. Angela F. De Fazio, Doxi Misatziou, Ysobel R. Baker, Otto L. Muskens, Tom Brown, Antonios G. Kanaras. Chemically modified nucleic acids and DNA intercalators as tools for nanoparticle assembly. Chemical Society Reviews 2021, 50 (23) , 13410-13440. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1CS00632K
  68. Jae‐Myoung Kim, Chungyeon Lee, Yeonhee Lee, Jinhaeng Lee, So‐Jung Park, Sungho Park, Jwa‐Min Nam. Synthesis, Assembly, Optical Properties, and Sensing Applications of Plasmonic Gap Nanostructures. Advanced Materials 2021, 33 (46) https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202006966
  69. Dongmei Wang, Huan Zhou, Fei Liu, Yongxin Li. A programmatic electrochemical nanosensor based on robust bipedal DNA walkers fueled by catalytic hairpin assembly. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical 2021, 347 , 130563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2021.130563
  70. Yongpeng Zhang, Yuhua Feng, Yuan Liang, Jing Yang, Cheng Zhang. Development of Synthetic DNA Circuit and Networks for Molecular Information Processing. Nanomaterials 2021, 11 (11) , 2955. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11112955
  71. Ilyas Ozcicek, Nese Aysit, Cagri Cakici, Asel Aydeger. The effects of surface functionality and size of gold nanoparticles on neuronal toxicity, apoptosis, ROS production and cellular/suborgan biodistribution. Materials Science and Engineering: C 2021, 128 , 112308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2021.112308
  72. Timofey Pylaev, Elena Avdeeva, Nikolai Khlebtsov. Plasmonic nanoparticles and nucleic acids hybrids for targeted gene delivery, bioimaging, and molecular recognition. Journal of Innovative Optical Health Sciences 2021, 14 (04) https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793545821300032
  73. Jianqiao Chang, Yu Zhang, Yike Li, Ziwei Han, Fei Tian, Chao Liu, Qiang Feng, Yuguang Wang, Jiashu Sun, Lu Zhang. Multilayer Ratiometric Fluorescent Nanomachines for Imaging mRNA in Live Cells. Small Methods 2021, 5 (4) https://doi.org/10.1002/smtd.202001047
  74. Rong Zhu, Juan Li, Lisen Lin, Jibin Song, Huanghao Yang. Emerging Plasmonic Assemblies Triggered by DNA for Biomedical Applications. Advanced Functional Materials 2021, 31 (10) https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202005709
  75. Laurent Lermusiaux, Anum Nisar, Alison M. Funston. Flexible synthesis of high-purity plasmonic assemblies. Nano Research 2021, 14 (3) , 635-645. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-020-3084-2
  76. Mohammad Mozafarinia, Sadegh Karimi, Maryam Farrokhnia, Javid Esfandiari. In vitro breast cancer targeting using Trastuzumab-conjugated mesoporous silica nanoparticles: Towards the new strategy for decreasing size and high drug loading capacity for drug delivery purposes in MSN synthesis. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials 2021, 316 , 110950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2021.110950
  77. Xiangang Huang, Nicholas Thomas Blum, Jing Lin, Jinjun Shi, Chuan Zhang, Peng Huang. Chemotherapeutic drug–DNA hybrid nanostructures for anti-tumor therapy. Materials Horizons 2021, 8 (1) , 78-101. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0MH00715C
  78. Jiaojiao Su, Xin Huang, Ming Yang. Self‐Limiting Assembly of Au Nanoparticles Induced by Localized Dynamic Metal‐Phenolic Interactions. European Journal of Inorganic Chemistry 2020, 2020 (47) , 4477-4482. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejic.202000842
  79. Fay Nicolson, Akbar Ali, Moritz F. Kircher, Suchetan Pal. DNA Nanostructures and DNA‐Functionalized Nanoparticles for Cancer Theranostics. Advanced Science 2020, 7 (23) https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202001669
  80. Chao Zhang, Fanghua Zhang, Mengnan Han, Xuming Wang, Jie Du, Honglei Zhang, Wei Li. Co-delivery of 5-fluorodeoxyuridine and doxorubicin via gold nanoparticle equipped with affibody-DNA hybrid strands for targeted synergistic chemotherapy of HER2 overexpressing breast cancer. Scientific Reports 2020, 10 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-79125-0
  81. Hamidreza Arzaghi, Bashir Adel, Hossein Jafari, Shaghayegh Askarian-Amiri, Amin Shiralizadeh Dezfuli, Abolfazl Akbarzadeh, Hamidreza Pazoki-Toroudi. Nanomaterial integration into the scaffolding materials for nerve tissue engineering: a review. Reviews in the Neurosciences 2020, 31 (8) , 843-872. https://doi.org/10.1515/revneuro-2020-0008
  82. Jing Li, Jiaoli Wang, Shiyuan Liu, Nuli Xie, Ke Quan, Yanjing Yang, Xiaohai Yang, Jin Huang, Kemin Wang. Amplified FRET Nanoflares: An Endogenous mRNA‐Powered Nanomachine for Intracellular MicroRNA Imaging. Angewandte Chemie 2020, 132 (45) , 20279-20286. https://doi.org/10.1002/ange.202008245
  83. Jing Li, Jiaoli Wang, Shiyuan Liu, Nuli Xie, Ke Quan, Yanjing Yang, Xiaohai Yang, Jin Huang, Kemin Wang. Amplified FRET Nanoflares: An Endogenous mRNA‐Powered Nanomachine for Intracellular MicroRNA Imaging. Angewandte Chemie International Edition 2020, 59 (45) , 20104-20111. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202008245
  84. Wei Mao, Song Rae Kim, Hyuk Sang Yoo. Surface-decorated nanoparticles clicked into nanoparticle clusters for oligonucleotide encapsulation. RSC Advances 2020, 10 (61) , 37040-37049. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0RA06622B
  85. René Stein, Bernhard Friedrich, Marina Mühlberger, Nadine Cebulla, Eveline Schreiber, Rainer Tietze, Iwona Cicha, Christoph Alexiou, Silvio Dutz, Aldo R. Boccaccini, Harald Unterweger. Synthesis and Characterization of Citrate-Stabilized Gold-Coated Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles for Biomedical Applications. Molecules 2020, 25 (19) , 4425. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25194425
  86. Nafiseh Khelghati, Yousef Rasmi, Navid Farahmandan, Alireza Sadeghpour, Seyed Mostafa Mir, Ansar Karimian, Bahman Yousefi. Hyperbranched polyglycerol β-cyclodextrin as magnetic platform for optimization of doxorubicin cytotoxic effects on Saos-2 bone cancerous cell line. Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology 2020, 57 , 101741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jddst.2020.101741
  87. Yikai Chen, Lu Zhang, Binxuan Ding, Fulian Chen. A criterion of the vertical spacing between fluorescent molecules in a waveguide structure. Results in Physics 2020, 17 , 103030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2020.103030
  88. Sarkar Siddique, James C. L. Chow. Gold Nanoparticles for Drug Delivery and Cancer Therapy. Applied Sciences 2020, 10 (11) , 3824. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10113824
  89. Karthik Raghunathan, Jibin Antony, Sarmad Munir, Jens-Petter Andreassen, Sulalit Bandyopadhyay. Tuning and tracking the growth of gold nanoparticles synthesized using binary surfactant mixtures. Nanoscale Advances 2020, 2 (5) , 1980-1992. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0NA00214C
  90. Renhui Zhan, Wenfei Guo, Xiaonan Gao, Xiaojun Liu, Kehua Xu, Bo Tang. Reconstruction of nano-flares based on Au–Se bonds for high-fidelity detection of RNA in living cells. Chemical Communications 2020, 56 (38) , 5178-5181. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0CC01213K
  91. Jianping Li, Man Li, Lifeng Tian, Yue Qiu, Qianwen Yu, Xuhui Wang, Rong Guo, Qin He. Facile strategy by hyaluronic acid functional carbon dot-doxorubicin nanoparticles for CD44 targeted drug delivery and enhanced breast cancer therapy. International Journal of Pharmaceutics 2020, 578 , 119122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2020.119122
  92. Konstantina Alexaki, Maria-Eleni Kyriazi, Afaf H. El-Sagheer, Tom Brown, Antonios G. Kanaras, , . Engineering functional nanoparticles for delivery in cells. 2020, 20. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2538470
  93. Xiang Li, Dongbao Yao, Junxiang Zhou, Xiang Zhou, Xianbao Sun, Bing Wei, Chengxu Li, Bin Zheng, Haojun Liang. Cascaded DNA circuits-programmed self-assembly of spherical nucleic acids for high signal amplification. Science China Chemistry 2020, 63 (1) , 92-98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11426-019-9603-3
  94. Min Xu, Nan Li. Metal-based nanocontainers for drug delivery in tumor therapy. 2020, 195-215. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-816770-0.00012-5
  95. Xiaoke Zheng, Liying Zhao, Dongxiao Wen, Xiaolan Wang, Huaixia Yang, Weisheng Feng, Jinming Kong. Ultrasensitive fluorescent detection of HTLV-II DNA based on magnetic nanoparticles and atom transfer radical polymerization signal amplification. Talanta 2020, 207 , 120290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2019.120290
  96. Qudsia Tabassam, Tahir Mehmood, Abdul Rauf Raza, Azmat Ullah, Farhan Saeed, Faqir Muhammad Anjum. <p>Synthesis, Characterization and Anti-Cancer Therapeutic Potential of Withanolide-A with 20nm sAuNPs Conjugates Against SKBR3 Breast Cancer Cell Line</p>. International Journal of Nanomedicine 2020, Volume 15 , 6649-6658. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S258528
  97. Sang-Nam Lee, Jin-Ha Choi, Hyeon-Yeol Cho, Jeong-Woo Choi. Metallic Nanoparticle-Based Optical Cell Chip for Nondestructive Monitoring of Intra/Extracellular Signals. Pharmaceutics 2020, 12 (1) , 50. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics12010050
  98. Wenfeng Liang, Lianqing Liu, Junhai Wang, Xieliu Yang, Yuechao Wang, Wen Li, Wenguang Yang. A Review on Optoelectrokinetics-Based Manipulation and Fabrication of Micro/Nanomaterials. Micromachines 2020, 11 (1) , 78. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi11010078
  99. Wenjing Wang, Sha Yu, Shan Huang, Sai Bi, Heyou Han, Jian-Rong Zhang, Yi Lu, Jun-Jie Zhu. Bioapplications of DNA nanotechnology at the solid–liquid interface. Chemical Society Reviews 2019, 48 (18) , 4892-4920. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8CS00402A
  100. Qing Ding, Rongrong Qian, Xiaobi Jing, Jie Han, Lei Yu. Reaction of aniline with KMnO4 to synthesize polyaniline-supported Mn nanocomposites: An unexpected heterogeneous free radical scavenger. Materials Letters 2019, 251 , 222-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2019.05.076
Load all citations

ACS Nano

Cite this: ACS Nano 2018, 12, 4, 3333–3340
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.7b08620
Published March 20, 2018

Copyright © 2018 American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under CC-BY.

Article Views

9408

Altmetric

-

Citations

Learn about these metrics

Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.

  • Abstract

    Scheme 1

    Scheme 1. Schematic Illustration of the Multiplexed Nanoparticle Dimer and the Process of mRNA Detectiona

    aWhen the target mRNAs bind to the sense strand, a short oligonucleotide strand is released resulting in an increase in the fluorescence signal, which was previously quenched by the AuNP core. Flare strand 1 is modified with Cy3 (Dye 1) and flare strand 2 is modified with a Cy5 dye (Dye 2), whereas both sense strands have been modified with FAM (Dye 3).

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. Confocal microscopy images of cells incubated with (A–C) nanoparticle dimers and (D–F) “non-targeting” scramble nanoparticle dimers. Sixteen HBE cells express only keratin 8, and MRC 5 cells express only vimentin. A549 expresses both keratin 8 and vimentin. A fluorescence signal corresponding to the presence of: keratin 8 mRNA (A), vimentin mRNA (B), and both vimentin and keratin 8 mRNA (C) is observed. All three cell lines display no response when incubated with nanoparticle dimers designed with “non-targeting” scramble sequences. Color guide: Keratin 8 “flare” strand, green; vimentin flare strand, red; vimentin and keratin 8 sense strand, blue; scrambled flare strand, green; scrambled sense strand, blue; nuclear counterstain, white. Scale bars are 15 μm.

    Scheme 2

    Scheme 2. Schematic Illustration of Nanoparticle Dimer Used in Drug Release Experimentsa

    a(Left) Dimer loaded with DOX (Drug 1) and MTX (Drug 2). No fluorophores were used in flare and sense strands. Both DOX and MTX have fluorescent properties, which are quenched due to the close proximity to the AuNP core. When the target mRNA binds to the sense strand, the intercalated drugs are released (right) causing an increase in the fluorescence signal.

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. Confocal microscopy images of live cells incubated with nanoparticle dimers. The nanoparticle dimers were loaded with DOX and MXT (left column). The 16HBE cells show release of only DOX, corresponding to the presence of keratin 8 mRNA (see Figure 1). In MRC 5 cells, MTX was released corresponding to the presence of vimentin mRNA. In A549 cells, both keratin 8 and vimentin mRNA were detected, therefore both drugs MTX and DOX were released. Scramble nanoparticle dimers (D–F) did not display any fluorescence signal indicating that they retained their drug payload. Color guide: DOX release, green; MXT release, red; nuclear counterstain, white. Scale bar is 15 μm.

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. Trypan blue cell viability assay of (A) 16 HBE (B) MRC 5 and (C) A 549 cells incubated with various nanoparticle designs. Cells were incubated with: (2) nanoparticles sensing all mRNAs (gmRNA); (3) nanoparticles functionalized with scramble “non-targeting” oligonucleotides loaded with DOX and MXT; (4) free DOX; (5) free MTX; (6) nanoparticle dimers designed to sense keratin8 and vimentin mRNA loaded with DOX and MTX. Data are shown as mean ± SEM (n = 3). P-values were determined by a one-way ANOVA. *p < 0.05, ****p < 0.0001.

  • References


    This article references 44 other publications.

    1. 1
      Yang, X.; Yang, M. X.; Pang, B.; Vara, M.; Xia, Y. N. Gold Nanomaterials at Work in Biomedicine. Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 1041010488,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00193
    2. 2
      Shenashen, M. A.; El-Safty, S. A.; Elshehy, E. A. Synthesis, Morphological Control, and Properties of Silver Nanoparticles in Potential Applications. Part. Part. Syst. Char. 2014, 31, 293316,  DOI: 10.1002/ppsc.201300181
    3. 3
      Pankhurst, Q.; Jones, S.; Dobson, J. Applications of Magnetic Nanoparticles in Biomedicine: The Story so Far. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 2016, 49, 501002,  DOI: 10.1088/0022-3727/49/50/501002
    4. 4
      Ling, D.; Lee, N.; Hyeon, T. Chemical Synthesis and Assembly of Uniformly Sized Iron Oxide Nanoparticles for Medical Applications. Acc. Chem. Res. 2015, 48, 12761285,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.accounts.5b00038
    5. 5
      Giljohann, D. A.; Seferos, D. S.; Daniel, W. L.; Massich, M. D.; Patel, P. C.; Mirkin, C. A. Gold Nanoparticles for Biology and Medicine. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 32803294,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.200904359
    6. 6
      Alivisatos, A. P.; Johnsson, K. P.; Peng, X. G.; Wilson, T. E.; Loweth, C. J.; Bruchez, M. P.; Schultz, P. G. Organization of ’Nanocrystal Molecules’ Using DNA. Nature 1996, 382, 609611,  DOI: 10.1038/382609a0
    7. 7
      Mirkin, C. A.; Letsinger, R. L.; Mucic, R. C.; Storhoff, J. J. A DNA-Based Method for Rationally Assembling Nanoparticles Into Macroscopic Materials. Nature 1996, 382, 607609,  DOI: 10.1038/382607a0
    8. 8
      Cutler, J. I.; Auyeung, E.; Mirkin, C. A. Spherical Nucleic Acids. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 13761391,  DOI: 10.1021/ja209351u
    9. 9
      Hurst, S. J.; Hill, H. D.; Mirkin, C. A. ″Three-Dimensional Hybridization″ With Polyvalent DNA-Gold Nanoparticle Conjugates. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 1219212200,  DOI: 10.1021/ja804266j
    10. 10
      Jones, M. R.; Macfarlane, R. J.; Lee, B.; Zhang, J. A.; Young, K. L.; Senesi, A. J.; Mirkin, C. A. DNA-Nanoparticle Superlattices Formed From Anisotropic Building Blocks. Nat. Mater. 2010, 9, 913917,  DOI: 10.1038/nmat2870
    11. 11
      Park, S. Y.; Lytton-Jean, A. K. R.; Lee, B.; Weigand, S.; Schatz, G. C.; Mirkin, C. A. DNA-Programmable Nanoparticle Crystallization. Nature 2008, 451, 553556,  DOI: 10.1038/nature06508
    12. 12
      Park, S. J.; Lazarides, A. A.; Storhoff, J. J.; Pesce, L.; Mirkin, C. A. The Structural Characterization of Oligonucleotide-Modified Gold Nanoparticle Networks Formed by DNA Hybridization. J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108, 1237512380,  DOI: 10.1021/jp040242b
    13. 13
      Nykypanchuk, D.; Maye, M. M.; van der Lelie, D.; Gang, O. DNA-Guided Crystallization of Colloidal Nanoparticles. Nature 2008, 451, 549552,  DOI: 10.1038/nature06560
    14. 14
      Harimech, P. K.; Gerrard, S. R.; El-Sagheer, A. H.; Brown, T.; Kanaras, A. G. Reversible Ligation of Programmed DNA-Gold Nanoparticle Assemblies. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 92429245,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.5b05683
    15. 15
      Heuer-Jungemann, A.; Kirkwood, R.; El-Sagheer, A. H.; Brown, T.; Kanaras, A. G. Copper-Free Click Chemistry as an Emerging Tool for the Programmed Ligation of DNA-Functionalised Gold Nanoparticles. Nanoscale 2013, 5, 72097212,  DOI: 10.1039/c3nr02362a
    16. 16
      Hurst, S. J.; Lytton-Jean, A. K. R.; Mirkin, C. A. Maximizing DNA Loading on a Range of Gold Nanoparticle Sizes. Anal. Chem. 2006, 78, 83138318,  DOI: 10.1021/ac0613582
    17. 17
      Choi, C. H. J.; Hao, L.; Narayan, S. P.; Auyeung, E.; Mirkin, C. A. Mechanism for the Endocytosis of Spherical Nucleic Acid Nanoparticle Conjugates. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2013, 110, 76257630,  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1305804110
    18. 18
      Wu, X. A.; Choi, C. H. J.; Zhang, C.; Hao, L.; Mirkin, C. A. Intracellular Fate of Spherical Nucleic Acid Nanoparticle Conjugates. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 77267733,  DOI: 10.1021/ja503010a
    19. 19
      Giljohann, D. A.; Seferos, D. S.; Patel, P. C.; Millstone, J. E.; Rosi, N. L.; Mirkin, C. A. Oligonucleotide Loading Determines Cellular Uptake of DNA-Modified Gold Nanoparticles. Nano Lett. 2007, 7, 38183821,  DOI: 10.1021/nl072471q
    20. 20
      Patel, P. C.; Giljohann, D. A.; Daniel, W. L.; Zheng, D.; Prigodich, A. E.; Mirkin, C. A. Scavenger Receptors Mediate Cellular Uptake of Polyvalent Oligonucleotide-Functionalized Gold Nanoparticles. Bioconjugate Chem. 2010, 21, 22502256,  DOI: 10.1021/bc1002423
    21. 21
      Seferos, D. S.; Prigodich, A. E.; Giljohann, D. A.; Patel, P. C.; Mirkin, C. A. Polyvalent DNA Nanoparticle Conjugates Stabilize Nucleic Acids. Nano Lett. 2009, 9, 308311,  DOI: 10.1021/nl802958f
    22. 22
      Heuer-Jungemann, A.; Harimech, P. K.; Brown, T.; Kanaras, A. G. Gold Nanoparticles and Fluorescently-Labelled DNA as a Platform for Biological Sensing. Nanoscale 2013, 5, 95039510,  DOI: 10.1039/c3nr03707j
    23. 23
      Seferos, D. S.; Giljohann, D. A.; Hill, H. D.; Prigodich, A. E.; Mirkin, C. A. Nano-flares: Probes for Transfection and mRNA Detection in Living Cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 1547715479,  DOI: 10.1021/ja0776529
    24. 24
      Xue, J.; Shan, L.; Chen, H.; Li, Y.; Zhu, H.; Deng, D.; Qian, Z.; Achilefu, S.; Gu, Y. Visual Detection of STAT5B Gene Expression in Living Cell Using the Hairpin DNA Modified Gold Nanoparticle Beacon. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2013, 41, 7177,  DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2012.06.062
    25. 25
      Shi, J.; Zhou, M.; Gong, A. H.; Li, Q. J.; Wu, Q.; Cheng, G. J.; Yang, M. Y.; Sun, Y. C. Fluorescence Lifetime Imaging of Nanoflares for mRNA Detection in Living Cells. Anal. Chem. 2016, 88, 19791983,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.5b03689
    26. 26
      Halo, T. L.; McMahon, K. M.; Angeloni, N. L.; Xu, Y.; Wang, W.; Chinen, A. B.; Malin, D.; Strekalova, E.; Cryns, V. L.; Cheng, C.; Mirkin, C. A.; Thaxton, C. S. NanoFlares for the Detection,Isolation, and Culture of Live Tumor Cells from Human Blood. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2014, 111, 1710417109,  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1418637111
    27. 27
      Prigodich, A. E.; Seferos, D. S.; Massich, M. D.; Giljohann, D. A.; Lane, B. C.; Mirkin, C. A. Nano-flares for mRNA Regulation and Detection. ACS Nano 2009, 3, 21472152,  DOI: 10.1021/nn9003814
    28. 28
      McClellan, S.; Slamecka, J.; Howze, P.; Thompson, L.; Finan, M.; Rocconi, R.; Owen, L. mRNA Detection in Living Cells: A Next Generation Cancer Stem Cell Identification Technique. Methods 2015, 82, 4754,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2015.04.022
    29. 29
      Seftor, E. A.; Seftor, R. E. B.; Weldon, D. S.; Kirsammer, G. T.; Margaryan, N. V.; Gilgur, A.; Hendrix, M. J. C. Melanoma Tumor Cell Heterogeneity: A Molecular Approach to Study Subpopulations Expressing the Embryonic Morphogen Nodal. Semin. Oncol. 2014, 41, 259266,  DOI: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2014.02.001
    30. 30
      Li, B. J.; Menzel, U.; Loebel, C.; Schmal, H.; Alini, M.; Stoddart, M. J. Monitoring Live Human Mesenchymal Stromal Cell Differentiation and Subsequent Selection Using Fluorescent RNA-Based Probes. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 26014,  DOI: 10.1038/srep26014
    31. 31
      Lahm, H.; Doppler, S.; Dressen, M.; Werner, A.; Adamczyk, K.; Schrambke, D.; Brade, T.; Laugwitz, K. L.; Deutsch, M. A.; Schiemann, M.; Lange, R.; Moretti, A.; Krane, M. Live Fluorescent RNA-Based Detection of Pluripotency Gene Expression in Embryonic and Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells of Different Species. Stem Cells 2015, 33, 392402,  DOI: 10.1002/stem.1872
    32. 32
      Prigodich, A. E.; Randeria, P. S.; Briley, W. E.; Kim, N. J.; Daniel, W. L.; Giljohann, D. A.; Mirkin, C. A. Multiplexed Nanoflares: mRNA Detection in Live Cells. Anal. Chem. 2012, 84, 20622066,  DOI: 10.1021/ac202648w
    33. 33
      Pan, W.; Zhang, T.; Yang, H.; Diao, W.; Li, N.; Tang, B. Multiplexed Detection and Imaging of Intracellular mRNAs Using a Four-Color Nanoprobe. Anal. Chem. 2013, 85, 1058110588,  DOI: 10.1021/ac402700s
    34. 34
      Li, N.; Chang, C.; Pan, W.; Tang, B. A Multicolor Nanoprobe for Detection and Imaging of Tumor-Related mRNAs in Living Cells. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 74267430,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201203767
    35. 35
      Heuer-Jungemann, A.; El-Sagheer, A. H.; Lackie, P. M.; Brown, T.; Kanaras, A. G. Selective Killing of Cells Triggered by Their mRNA Signature in the Presence of Smart Nanoparticles. Nanoscale 2016, 8, 1685716861,  DOI: 10.1039/C6NR06154K
    36. 36
      Lee, J. M.; Dedhar, S.; Kalluri, R.; Thompson, E. W. The Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition: New Insights in Signaling, Development, and Disease. J. Cell Biol. 2006, 172, 973981,  DOI: 10.1083/jcb.200601018
    37. 37
      Kang, K. A.; Wang, J.; Jasinski, J. B.; Achilefu, S. Fluorescence Manipulation by Gold Nanoparticles: From Complete Quenching to Extensive Enhancement. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2011, 9, 16,  DOI: 10.1186/1477-3155-9-16
    38. 38
      Wu, Z. S.; Jiang, J. H.; Fu, L.; Shen, G. L.; Yu, R. Q. Optical Detection of DNA Hybridization Based on Fluorescence Quenching of Tagged Oligonucleotide Probes by Gold Nanoparticles. Anal. Biochem. 2006, 353, 2229,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2006.01.018
    39. 39
      Zheng, D.; Seferos, D. S.; Giljohann, D. A.; Patel, P. C.; Mirkin, C. A. Aptamer Nano-flares for Molecular Detection in Living Cells. Nano Lett. 2009, 9, 32583261,  DOI: 10.1021/nl901517b
    40. 40
      Gilleron, J.; Querbes, W.; Zeigerer, A.; Borodovsky, A.; Marsico, G.; Schubert, U.; Manygoats, K.; Seifert, S.; Andree, C.; Stoeter, M.; Epstein-Barash, H.; Zhang, L.; Koteliansky, V.; Fitzgerald, K.; Fava, E.; Bickle, M.; Kalaidzidis, Y.; Akinc, A.; Maier, M.; Zerial, M. Image-Based Analysis of Lipid Nanoparticle-Mediated siRNA Delivery, Intracellular Trafficking and Endosomal Escape. Nat. Biotechnol. 2013, 31, 638646,  DOI: 10.1038/nbt.2612
    41. 41
      Blanco, E.; Shen, H.; Ferrari, M. Principles of Nanoparticle Design for Overcoming Biological Barriers to Drug Delivery. Nat. Biotechnol. 2015, 33, 941951,  DOI: 10.1038/nbt.3330
    42. 42
      Perez-Arnaiz, C.; Busto, N.; Leal, J. M.; Garcia, B. New Insights into the Mechanism of the DNA/Doxorubicin Interaction. J. Phys. Chem. B 2014, 118, 12881295,  DOI: 10.1021/jp411429g
    43. 43
      Hajihassan, Z.; Rabbani-Chadegani, A. Studies on the Binding Affinity of Anticancer Drug Mitoxantrone to Chromatin, DNA and Histone Proteins. J. Biomed. Sci. 2009, 16, 31,  DOI: 10.1186/1423-0127-16-31
    44. 44
      Ohnuma, T.; Matsumoto, T.; Itoi, A.; Kawana, A.; Nishiyama, T.; Ogura, K.; Hiratsuka, A. Enhanced Sensitivity of A549 Cells to the Cytotoxic Action of Anticancer Drugs via Suppression of Nrf2 by Procyanidins from Cinnamomi Cortex Extract. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2011, 413, 623629,  DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2011.09.014
  • Supporting Information

    Supporting Information


    The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.7b08620.

    • Additional experimental detail and data including nanoparticle characterization (TEM, DLS, melting curves, nuclease assays), detailed oligonucleotide sequences and further intracellular studies (confocal images, TEM cross sectioning, immunofluorescent labeling, RT-qPCR); the raw data for this work can be found at http://doi.org/10.5258/SOTON/D0448 (PDF)


    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.