Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

You’ve supercharged your research process with ACS and Mendeley!

STEP 1:
Click to create an ACS ID

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

MENDELEY PAIRING EXPIRED
Your Mendeley pairing has expired. Please reconnect
ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
Quenching Pathways in NaYF4:Er3+,Yb3+ Upconversion Nanocrystals
My Activity
  • Open Access
Article

Quenching Pathways in NaYF4:Er3+,Yb3+ Upconversion Nanocrystals
Click to copy article linkArticle link copied!

  • Freddy T. Rabouw
    Freddy T. Rabouw
    Debye Institute for Nanomaterials Science, Utrecht University, Princetonplein 1, 3584 CC Utrecht, The Netherlands
  • P. Tim Prins
    P. Tim Prins
    Debye Institute for Nanomaterials Science, Utrecht University, Princetonplein 1, 3584 CC Utrecht, The Netherlands
    More by P. Tim Prins
  • Pedro Villanueva-Delgado
    Pedro Villanueva-Delgado
    Debye Institute for Nanomaterials Science, Utrecht University, Princetonplein 1, 3584 CC Utrecht, The Netherlands
  • Marieke Castelijns
    Marieke Castelijns
    Debye Institute for Nanomaterials Science, Utrecht University, Princetonplein 1, 3584 CC Utrecht, The Netherlands
  • Robin G. Geitenbeek
    Robin G. Geitenbeek
    Debye Institute for Nanomaterials Science, Utrecht University, Princetonplein 1, 3584 CC Utrecht, The Netherlands
  • Andries Meijerink*
    Andries Meijerink
    Debye Institute for Nanomaterials Science, Utrecht University, Princetonplein 1, 3584 CC Utrecht, The Netherlands
    *E-mail: [email protected]
Open PDFSupporting Information (1)

ACS Nano

Cite this: ACS Nano 2018, 12, 5, 4812–4823
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.8b01545
Published April 12, 2018

Copyright © 2018 American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under CC-BY-NC-ND.

Abstract

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Lanthanide-doped upconversion (UC) phosphors absorb low-energy infrared light and convert it into higher-energy visible light. Despite over 10 years of development, it has not been possible to synthesize nanocrystals (NCs) with UC efficiencies on a par with what can be achieved in bulk materials. To guide the design and realization of more efficient UC NCs, a better understanding is necessary of the loss pathways competing with UC. Here we study the excited-state dynamics of the workhorse UC material β-NaYF4 co-doped with Yb3+ and Er3+. For each of the energy levels involved in infrared-to-visible UC, we measure and model the competition between spontaneous emission, energy transfer between lanthanide ions, and other decay processes. An important quenching pathway is energy transfer to high-energy vibrations of solvent and/or ligand molecules surrounding the NCs, as evidenced by the effect of energy resonances between electronic transitions of the lanthanide ions and vibrations of the solvent molecules. We present a microscopic quantitative model for the quenching dynamics in UC NCs. It takes into account cross-relaxation at high lanthanide-doping concentration as well as Förster resonance energy transfer from lanthanide excited states to vibrational modes of molecules surrounding the UC NCs. Our model thereby provides insight in the inert-shell thickness required to prevent solvent quenching in NCs. Overall, the strongest contribution to reduced UC efficiencies in core–shell NCs comes from quenching of the near-infrared energy levels (Er3+: 4I11/2 and Yb3+: 2F5/2), which is likely due to vibrational coupling to OH defects incorporated in the NCs during synthesis.

Copyright © 2018 American Chemical Society
Upconversion (UC) materials are unconventional color-conversion materials that can absorb low-energy and emit higher-energy photons. Examples include polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, (1,2) specially designed semiconductor-quantum-dot geometries, (3,4) and crystals doped with lanthanide ions. (5−7) Of particular interest have been β-NaREF4 nanocrystals (NCs; with RE = Y, Gd, or Lu) doped with either Er3+ or Tm3+ and often co-doped with Yb3+ or other lanthanides to increase absorption or tune the emission wavelength. (8−22) Such NCs exhibit narrow-line emissions, and they are photochemically and colloidally stable, making them ideal for background-free biomedical imaging. Moreover, the small size of NCs enables their use in nanoscale designs to enhance the UC luminescence through sensitization (13) or plasmon enhancement. (23−29) However, the efficiency of UC luminescence is significantly lower for nanocrystalline doped NaREF4 than for the corresponding bulk material, because of excited-state quenching by the NC surface and the environment. (10,11,16,19−21,30) The UC efficiency is particularly low in the smallest NCs. (11,14,20)
Efforts have been made to improve the low UC luminescence efficiency of doped NaREF4 NCs. The common strategy to achieve higher efficiencies is to grow inert nonluminescent shells of undoped NaREF4 (with RE = Y, Gd, or Lu) around the doped upconverting core. (11,16) This serves to spatially isolate the active luminescent core from the NC surface and the environment. While this general concept has been well established, a quantitative understanding of UC luminescence quenching in NCs is still lacking. UC in lanthanide-doped crystals is a complicated process, involving (at least) two absorption events, multiple energy-migration and energy-transfer steps, and eventually emission of a high-energy photon. Meanwhile, the efficiency is limited by undesired competing processes such as cross-relaxation, back-transfer, nonradiative decay, and, in the case of NCs, quenching by energy transfer to high-energy vibrations on the surface and/or in the environment of the NCs. (10,11,16,18,22,30) To understand UC luminescence from NCs and minimize quenching requires detailed and quantitative studies that unravel the competition between the various processes at play.
Here, we investigate the quenching mechanisms of the various energy levels involved in UC in NaYF4 NCs co-doped with Er3+ and Yb3+, a commonly studied nanocrystalline upconverter showing green and red emissions upon near-infrared excitation. (10,13,14,16,18,20,22) The dynamics of the relevant excited states of Er3+ and Yb3+ are measured upon direct excitation in NCs with and without shell, with various dopant concentrations, and dispersed in a range of organic solvents with different refractive index and chemical nature. We observe a pronounced dependence of quenching on the chemical nature of the solvent of the NCs (aliphatic versus aromatic), pointing to Förster transfer to high-energy solvent vibrations as an important quenching mechanism. (31,32) Solvent quenching affects all energy levels of Er3+ involved in near-infrared-to-visible UC, but most notably the red-emitting 4F9/2 level. The green emission from the 2H11/2 and 4S3/2 levels is quenched by cross-relaxation and energy migration at higher Er3+ concentrations, while the red emission is hardly affected. The near-infrared levels 4I11/2 (Er3+) and 2F5/2 (Yb3+) are quenched by coupling to the solvent, by coupling to OH-vibrations of hydroxyl ions incorporated in the crystal structure, and by energy migration to the NC surface. The efficiencies of all quenching pathways are suppressed if the refractive index of the solvent is increased, because this enhances the rates of photon emission but not energy-transfer (i.e., quenching) rates. (33,34) We develop an analytical model for the various quenching pathways, which matches our experimental results and can predict the emission dynamics and efficiencies for NCs of different (quasi-)spherical core–shell geometries and dopant concentrations.

Results

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Solvent-Dependent Decay Dynamics

We study the popular UC material β-NaYF4 co-doped with Er3+ and Yb3+. (5,8) Upon excitation of Yb3+ in the near-infrared absorption band at 980 nm, this material emits green light at 520 and 540 nm and red light at 660 nm (Figure 1a). The conversion of low-energy near-infrared photons to higher-energy visible photons is made possible by successive energy-transfer steps from two (or more) Yb3+ ions to Er3+. Both the green and the red UC luminescence can arise after two energy-transfer steps followed by partial nonradiative relaxation (indicated in Figure 1b), although additional pathways involving three energy-transfer steps have been identified leading to red luminescence. (35−37) The energy-transfer processes relevant to UC compete with undesired processes such as (multi)phonon relaxation and cross-relaxation that reduce the UC emission. The spectral characteristics of nanocrystalline β-NaYF4 phosphors with diameters down to sub-10 nm (refs (20and50)) are similar to those of bulk β-NaYF4, but the emission efficiencies are significantly lower. (10,11,19−21,30) In this work we systematically study the energy-loss pathways in UC NCs (Figure 1c, Figure S1 and Table S1) that lead to these lower efficiencies, as a function of the dopant concentration, for core-only and core–shell geometries and for NCs dispersed in a range of solvents.

Figure 1

Figure 1. (a) UC emission spectrum of β-NaYF4 nanocrystals co-doped with 2% Er3+ and 18% Yb3+ dispersed in cyclohexane, upon laser excitation in the Yb3+: 2F7/22F5/2 transition at 980 nm. The nanocrystals emit green photons from the 2H11/2 (520 nm) and 4S3/2 (540 nm) states and red photons (660 nm) from the 4F9/2 state. (b) Upon excitation of Yb3+ at 980 nm (dark-red wavy arrows), two consecutive energy-transfer processes (dotted lines) excite an Er3+ ion to a high excited state. Subsequently, after one or more nonradiative decay steps (black arrows) Er3+ can emit a visible photon (red or green wavy arrows). Other, more complicated, sequences of processes also contribute to the population of visible-emitting states. (35−37) (c) Transmission electron micrograph of the core-only β-NaYF4:0.1% Er3+ nanocrystals used in this work. Images of other nanocrystal samples and the extracted size distributions are presented in Figure S1 and Table S1. (d) Schematic of solvent quenching, where an excited state on a lanthanide center (here, Er3+) doped in a nanocrystal can decay by transferring energy to high-energy vibrations in the surrounding solvent. (e) The total rate of solvent quenching by dipole–dipole interaction depends strongly on the radial position of the lanthanide center in the nanocrystal, illustrated here for a nanocrystal of 10 nm radius without (red line) and with (blue line) a 3 nm-thick nonluminescent shell. (f) The range of solvents used in our experiments below, with different chemical nature (affecting the solvent-quenching rate; eq 2) and different refractive index (affecting the radiative decay rate; eq 3).

Previous studies have identified that the environment of lanthanide-doped NCs, most notably the solvent, affects luminescence quenching. (10,11,18,22,30) It is not always realized that such quenching is a form of Förster energy transfer, by dipole–dipole coupling of an electronic transition of a lanthanide dopant to vibrations of the solvent and ligand molecules (Figure 1d). (38) The rate of energy transfer by dipole–dipole coupling, γET, scales with the inverse sixth power of the separation between the energy donor (the luminescent center) and the energy acceptor (the solvent vibration):
(1)
where r0 and r are the positions of the donor and acceptor, respectively. The parameter C is the “energy-transfer strength” prefactor, the value of which depends on the energy match of transitions in the lanthanide center to the vibrational energies of the solvent (31,32,38) as well as on the oscillator strengths of the donor and acceptor transitions involved. (43) The total solvent-quenching rate ΓQ experienced by a luminescent center is determined by its dipole–dipole coupling to all solvent vibrations surrounding the NC, which depends on the diameter of the NC and on the location of the center inside the NC. If we assume that the NC is spherical with an outer radius aout, we obtain a simple expression by integrating eq 1 over all solvent molecules outside the NC:
(2)
where Vout is the volume occupied by solvent, r0 = |r0| is the radial position of the Er3+ center, and ρ is the density of solvent vibrations involved in quenching. Interestingly, the amount of quenching depends only on the geometry of the NC (outer radius aout and radial position r0 of the dopant) and on the “quenching density” ρC—the product of the density of vibrations and the energy-transfer strength; units of volume per time—that describes the interaction with the solvent. To avoid that the quenching rate ΓQ becomes infinite at the surface of core-only NCs (r0 = aout in eq 2), we assume throughout this article that the “outer radius” aout (beyond which volume is occupied by solvent) is 0.3 nm larger than the physical radius of the NC as determined by electron microscopy. This 0.3 nm separation can be justified if one realizes that this space of approximately one atom thickness is occupied by species contributing significantly less to vibrational quenching than the solvent does, for example, fluoride anions of the host crystal or headgroups of the ligands (in our experiments, carboxylate head groups of oleate). The solvent-quenching model could be further fine-tuned, at the cost of increased complexity, by considering that the NC can be covered by long-chain organic ligands (in our experiments below, oleic acid) that occupy most of the volume up to 1–1.5 nm distance from the NC surface. Here, we approximate the combination of ligand and solvent as one continuous medium that can be described with a single quenching density ρC. In Figure 1e we plot the solvent-quenching rate normalized to the quenching density ΓQC. We see that the solvent-quenching rate differs by orders of magnitude between luminescent centers near the surface and those near the center of a core-only NC (red line). Growing a shell of 3 nm thickness can suppress the solvent-quenching rate by a factor 2–1000, depending on the location of a center in the NC (blue line). These pronounced effects of geometry on the quenching rate are manifestations of the strong distance dependence of dipole–dipole coupling. Our model can predict the distribution of solvent quenching rates for any spherical NC geometry (core-only or core–shell) if the quenching density ρC of a particular solvent to a particular dopant’s excited state is known.
In addition to inducing nonradiative quenching, the solvent—through its refractive index n—also affects the radiative decay rate Γrad of dopant centers in NCs: (33,34)
(3)
where Γradbulk is the radiative decay rate in a bulk sample, and nNC is the refractive index of the NC material [here, nNC = 1.48 (ref (39))]. This effect is the same for all luminescent centers inside a NC independent of their exact location, if the NC is (quasi-)spherical and much smaller than the emission wavelength. We measured the values of Γradbulk for each relevant level on a bulk microcrystalline sample (Figure S2). From these reference values we can calculate the radiative decay rate in any solvent, if we know its refractive index. Throughout this article we will use tabulated refractive indices in the visible, neglecting that they are in fact slightly lower (by at most 0.02 point) in the infrared where the excited states emit (partially). This translates into an acceptable error of <1% in the calculated radiative decay rates in NCs. The series of solvents used in our experiments (Figure 1f) covers a range of refractive indices from n = 1.375 (hexane) to n = 1.627 (carbon disulfide). This corresponds to a 40% variation in radiative decay rate (eq 3). Importantly, however, the solvents are different not only in terms of refractive index but also chemically. The chemical nature of the solvent affects its vibrational spectrum and thereby the dipole–dipole coupling to various Er3+ transitions. We will see below that resonances of the C–H stretch vibrational energy with transitions on the Er3+ ion affect the strength of solvent quenching. Hence, solvent effects manifest as changes in the radiative decay of lanthanide dopants in NCs (through n in eq 3) as well as in nonradiative quenching (through ρC in eq 2).
The total decay rate Γtot of a luminescent center in a nanocrystal is the sum of the rates of all available decay pathways:
(4)
where we have written explicitly that the radiative decay rate Γrad depends on the solvent refractive index n and that the solvent-quenching rate ΓQ depends on the radial coordinate r0 of the center in the NC and on the quenching density ρC of the solvent. For now we assume that Γrad and ΓQ are the only decay pathways for the luminescent centers. Assuming that the dopant centers are homogeneously distributed within the NC (which may in fact be not exactly true), (40) we obtain the expected decay dynamics of an ensemble of doped NCs by integrating ΓQ over the NC volume:
(5)
where a and V are the radius and volume of the luminescent core of the NC, respectively,
(6)
is the monoexponential radiative decay component (eq 3), and
(7)
is the multiexponential solvent-quenching component to the decay (eq 2).
As we will see below, the decay dynamics of luminescent centers in NCs are accurately described by eq 5 in many cases. In other cases, at higher doping concentrations, additional decay processes become active. One of these is energy migration, that is, hopping of the excited-state energy from center to center. The effect of energy migration on the excited-state dynamics will become apparent in our experimental data. This is however difficult to take into account quantitatively with our microscopic model, because the microscopic rate distributions (e.g., for solvent quenching) are correlated for neighboring ions involved in energy migration. In this work we will therefore discuss the effects of energy migration qualitatively. Another process relevant at high dopant concentrations is cross-relaxation, in which a luminescent center transfers part of its energy to neighbors. The effect of this on the excited-state dynamics of the donor center can be taken into account analytically. (41,42) We use that the rate of cross-relaxation energy transfer by dipole–dipole interaction depends on the inverse sixth power of the distance rda between a donor center and an acceptor center. Including this pathway adds a cross-relaxation term ΓX = ∑aCX/rda6 (where prefactor CX describes the “cross-relaxation strength”, and the summation runs over all nearby acceptor centers) to the total decay rate of a donor center (eq 4). To consider all possible local electronic environments of a luminescent center, that is, its separation from nearby acceptor centers, we have to take into account the complicated crystal structure of our β-NaYF4 NCs that has two types of cation sites for rare-earth ions (Y3+ or luminescent dopants), one of which is only 50% occupied. (5) If we assume a homogeneous dopant distribution and neglect finite-size effects in the NC, (33) then the local electronic environment of a luminescent center (determining ΓX) is uncorrelated with its radial position (determining ΓQ). Under this assumption, the total decay including solvent quenching and cross-relaxation can be written as
(8)
where the multiexponential factor X(t) in β-NaYF4 NCs reads as
(9)
where ϕ is the doping concentration of acceptor centers, that is, the fraction of nonluminescent host cations substituted, and the products run over the (next-)nearest-neighbor shells as determined by the host-crystal structure. This long expression with four products explicitly considers the two different rare-earth cation sites in β-NaYF4, in terms of the neighborlist ri,ni (refs (33,41,and42)) for like sites and ri*,ni* for unlike sites. In some of our NCs studied below, cross-relaxation takes place with both Er3+ and Yb3+ dopants as energy acceptors. The total decay function for this situation becomes
(10)
where each factor Xi(t) (i = Er, Yb) is a function as in eq 9 with ϕ = ϕi and CX = CX,i. Here we neglect correlations in the distribution of cross-relaxation rates to Er3+ neighbors and those to Yb3+ neighbors, which is justified at relatively low doping concentrations. Such correlations become important at the highest doping concentrations, because for any one excited dopant center, the cross-relaxation rates are determined by the occupation of nearby cation sites, which can each contain (apart from an inert Y3+ ion) an Yb3+ acceptor, or an Er3+ acceptor, but not both at the same time.
We note that all nonradiative decay processes considered here—solvent quenching, cross-relaxation, and energy migration—are manifestations of Förster resonance energy transfer by dipole–dipole coupling. For solvent quenching, an excited lanthanide ion in the NC is the energy donor and a vibrational mode in a solvent molecule is the energy acceptor, while for cross-relaxation and energy migration the donor and acceptor are both lanthanide ions. Dipole–dipole coupling has a strong distance dependence scaling with the donor–acceptor distance to the inverse sixth power. This, combined with the random distribution of luminescent dopants in a (nano)crystal, determines the multiexponential nature of the decay dynamics. The dipole–dipole coupling rate also depends on the spectral overlap between the donor transition (i.e., its emission spectrum) and the acceptor transition (i.e., its absorption spectrum), as we will discuss below. Importantly, the efficiency of dipole–dipole coupling—the rate of coupling compared to other decay processes of the donor, such as radiative decay—depends on the oscillator strength of the acceptor transition. (43) Since f–f transitions of lanthanide dopants are parity-forbidden, the dipole–dipole coupling to lanthanide acceptors is weak and therefore short-range (Å–nm). This is why cross-relaxation and energy migration are negligible except at higher doping concentrations, when the average distance between dopants is of the order of a nm or less. Many vibrational transitions of organic molecules, on the other hand, are dipole-allowed. As a result, the coupling of a luminescent dopant in a NC to a molecule of the surrounding solvent can be significant, even if the separations are as large as 1–10 nm.

Solvent Quenching of the Visible Emissions

We focus first on the dynamics of the green-emitting [4S3/2; in thermal equilibrium with 2H11/2 (ref (44)); Figure 2a] and red-emitting (4F9/2; Figure 2b) levels in NaYF4 NCs doped with 0.1% Er3+. In these NCs the interactions between Er3+ centers, for example, cross-relaxation or energy migration, are expected to be negligible because the average ion–ion separation is large at low dopant concentrations. The decay dynamics of these levels are multiexponential (Figure S3), signifying that nonradiative decay rates vary among the Er3+ centers as expected in the case of solvent quenching (Figure 1e). As a first simple analysis, we extract the average excited-state decay rates ⟨Γtot⟩ of the green-emitting (Figure 2c) and red-emitting (Figure 2d) levels from single-exponential fits, comparing core-only NCs (filled circles) and core–shell NCs (open circles) in different solvents (colors) to bulk material (black cross). The decay rates in core-only and core–shell NCs (circles) are faster than the decay rate in bulk (cross) for both levels and for all solvents, confirming the presence of nonradiative quenching pathways in NCs. Indeed, the energy gap from both the green- and red-emitting level to the next-lower-energy level is approximately 3000 cm–1 (Figure 2a,b), which can be bridged by coupling to vibrations in organic molecules, such as the C–H stretch vibration. From the fitted decay rates ⟨Γtot⟩ and eq 3 we can estimate the average quantum yield η ≈ Γrad/⟨Γtot⟩ of the Er3+ excited states in NCs, as indicated by the gray “iso-quantum-yield” contours in Figure 2c,d. (34) The quantum yields are approximately 55% (75%) for the green-emitting levels in core-only (core–shell) NCs and 15–40% (30–60%) for the red-emitting level in core-only (core–shell) NCs. Clearly, the green emission is quenched less than the red emission. Furthermore, the growth of a nonluminescent shell suppresses quenching, as expected from Figure 1e. (11,19,20)

Figure 2

Figure 2. (a) Energy-level scheme of Er3+ with the green emission from the 4S3/2 level (in thermal equilibrium with 2H11/2; ref (44)) indicated as a green arrow and the nonradiative transition to the 4F9/2 level as a black dashed arrow. (b) Same for the red emission from the 4F9/2 level and the competing nonradiative transition to the 4I9/2 level. (c) Average excited-state decay rates ⟨Γtot⟩ of the green-emitting level in NaYF4:0.1% Er3+ NCs dispersed in different solvents (different colors; see Figure 1f), compared to the decay rate in bulk NaYF4:0.1% Er3+ (black cross). Filled circles represent core-only NCs, open circles core–shell NCs. Gray lines are iso-quantum-yield contours plotting η ≈ Γrad(n)/⟨Γtot⟩ with Γrad(n) according to eq 3. (d) Same, but for the red-emitting level. (e) The emission line shapes of the 4S3/24F9/2 (green) and the 4F9/24I9/2 (red) transitions of Er3+, which are responsible for nonradiative decay of the green- and red-emitting levels (see panel a), estimated based on the data from ref (45). (f) Infrared absorption spectra of hexane (red), octane (orange), cyclohexane (yellow), chloroform (green), toluene (cyan), chlorobenzene (blue), and o-dichlorobenzene (purple), taken from the SDBS database of the National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Japan. Dashed lines indicate the approximate spectral position of the C-H stretch vibrational energy in aliphatic (∼2930 cm–1) and aromatic (∼3070 cm–1) molecules. (g) Photoluminescence decay curves of the red-emitting 4F9/2 level upon direct excitation in bulk NaYF4:0.1% Er3+ (gray), compared to core–shell NCs (dark cyan) and core-only NCs (light cyan) of the same composition dispersed in toluene. The inset shows a zoom-in of the first 0.3 ms. Solid lines are fits to the solvent-quenching model (eq 5). (h) Same, but comparing bulk to NCs dispersed in cyclohexane.

If the Er3+ excited states in NCs underwent some quenching mechanism independent of the surrounding solvent, we would observe decay rates Γtot(n) = Γrad(n) + Γnr (with a constant nonradiative component Γnr) that steadily increase with increasing solvent refractive index n. More precisely, the dependence would be approximately linear for refractive indices close to the bulk value (from a series expansion of eq 3):
(11)
if Γnr is not affected by the nature of the solvent. For the green-emitting level we observe this approximately linear increase in decay rate with refractive index (Figure 2c), but the decay rate in chloroform (green) is noticeably slower. For the red-emitting level the trend in decay rate as described by eq 11 is not apparent (Figure 2d). Instead, the decay rates in the aliphatic solvents [hexane (red), octane (orange), cyclohexane (yellow)] are nearly a factor of 2 faster than in the other solvents and even faster than in water. (18) In fact the difference between the organic solvents considered here is so large that quenching of the red emission in core–shell NCs dispersed in aliphatic solvents is similar to quenching of core-only NCs in the aromatic solvents.
We can qualitatively understand this difference in quenching rate between aliphatic and aromatic solvents by considering their vibrational energy spectra. The highest-energy vibrational modes in hydrocarbon molecules are CH-stretch modes with energies around 3000 cm–1. This nearly matches the energies of the 4S3/24F9/2 and 4F9/24I9/2 transitions of Er3+ (Figure 2e), (45) which are involved in the nonradiative decay of the green- and red-emitting levels. Since we interpret solvent quenching as dipole–dipole coupling between the excited Er3+ ion and solvent vibrations, the coupling strength should scale with the oscillator strength of the vibrational mode, the oscillator strength of the relevant Er3+ transition, and its spectral overlap of the vibrational mode with the Er3+ transition. (43) Indeed, the oscillator strength of the 4F9/24I9/2 transition is approximately 5× larger than that of the 4S3/24F9/2 transition [2.79 × 10–7versus 6.32 × 10–8 (ref (45))], consistent with the 4–10× faster solvent quenching (depending on the solvent; Figure 2c,d and Figure S3). More importantly, the significantly stronger quenching of the red emission in aliphatic solvents than in aromatic solvents is explained by the energy resonance of the 4F9/24I9/2 transition with the CH-stretch vibrational spectra of the solvents (Figure 2f). While the aliphatic solvents (CH-stretch at ∼2930 cm–1) have good spectral overlap with the 4F9/24I9/2 transition resulting in strong quenching, the aromatic solvents (CH-stretch at ∼3070 cm–1) have less overlap resulting in weaker quenching.
Based on these clear indications of solvent-related quenching confirming results from previous studies, (10,11,18,22,30) we use the solvent-quenching model introduced above (eq 5) to quantify the quenching behavior in the different solvents. As illustrative examples, we analyze the decay dynamics of the red emission from NaYF4:0.1% Er3+ NCs dispersed in aromatic toluene (Figure 2g) and in aliphatic hexane (Figure 2h). Figure S3 shows the results for other solvents and for the green emission. We compare core-only NCs (lighter colors) to core–shell NCs (darker colors) and bulk material (gray). The decay dynamics in NCs are clearly multiexponential, while those in the bulk material are not. The solvent-quenching model (solid lines) matches this multiexponential behavior very well using the quenching density ρC as the only fit parameter. More precisely, the reduced χ2 parameters representing the fit quality are 1.22 ± 0.08 for green emission from core-only NCs, 1.08 ± 0.05 for green emission in core–shell NCs, 1.56 ± 0.19 for red emission from core-only NCs, and 1.26 ± 0.16 for red emission in core–shell NCs (mean ± standard deviation over eight solvents; Figure S3). The solvent-quenching model captures the effect of shell growth particularly well, (11,19,20) as evidenced by the very similar values for ρC fitted on the core-only and core–shell dynamics (Figure S3d,h). This means that, if the quenching density ρC is known for a particular dopant excited state in a particular solvent, the model can predict the solvent-quenching behavior for any (quasi-)spherical core–shell NCs, or even—with adaptations—for other shapes. (46) For example, the model predicts that a 9 nm inert shell is required to suppress solvent quenching of the green luminescence from 20 nm-diameter NCs in hexane and achieve higher than 95% luminescence quantum yield (at low doping concentration, in the limit of negligible cross-relaxation), while it requires a 20 nm shell to achieve the same for the red luminescence (Figure 5).

Ion–Ion Interactions at Higher Doping Concentrations

While NCs doped at low concentrations of 0.1% are ideal to study the fundamentals of solvent quenching, NCs must be doped at higher concentrations to achieve optimal UC efficiencies. (47) The average dopant–dopant separations are shorter, thus enhancing the rates and efficiencies of a variety of energy-transfer processes. These include the various energy-transfer processes that are necessary to achieve UC, but also undesired energy-loss pathways such as cross-relaxation and energy migration to the NC surface. The UC brightness and efficiency are determined by a subtle balance between the impact of these different energy-transfer processes.
Figure 3a shows the average decay rate (from a simple single-exponential fit to the dynamics) of the green emitting level in NCs with different doping concentrations: 0.1% Er3+ (left), 2% Er3+ (middle), and 2% Er3+ + 18% Yb3+ (right). The decay rates increase significantly going from the low-doped sample to the higher doping concentrations, both in NCs (colored bars) and in the bulk material (white line). This is mostly the result of cross-relaxation, which occurs between dopant centers at typical separations of 1 nm and closer (42) and is therefore similar in 20 nm-diameter NCs to bulk material. However, we also see that the absolute difference in decay rate between core-only (dark-colored bars) and core–shell NCs (light-colored bars) increases with increasing Er3+ concentration. This signifies that the surface-related contribution to the total decay becomes stronger. We ascribe this to energy migration from Er3+ to Er3+ ion within the NC, which allows the excited-state energy to reach the NC surface where it is quenched rapidly by solvent vibrations (Figure 3e). Migration becomes stronger at higher Er3+ concentrations (compare 0.1% Er3+ and 2% Er3+), but its effect on the decay of the green luminescence is minimized when the energy can no longer reach the surface (compare core-only and core–shell).

Figure 3

Figure 3. (a) The average decay rate of the green-emitting level 4S3/2 for core–shell NCs (dark-colored bars) and core-only NCs (light-colors bars) with different doping concentrations (as indicated) and dispersed in different solvents (different colors), obtained from a single-exponential fit to the decay dynamics. White horizontal lines indicate the corresponding average decay rate in the bulk material. (b) Same for the red-emitting level 4F9/2. (c) Possible cross-relaxation pathways from the green-emitting levels of Er3+ to neighboring Er3+ or Yb3+ ions in the ground state. (d) Same for the red-emitting level of Er3+, where all of the possible cross-relaxation pathways exhibit a large energy mismatch between the donor and acceptor transition. (e) Schematic representation of energy migration (i.e., hopping) among Er3+ ions to the NC surface. (f) Photoluminescence decay curves of the green Er3+ emission in core–shell NCs dispersed in toluene, with doping concentrations of 0.1% Er3+ (black), 2% Er3+ (blue), and 2% Er3+ + 18% Yb3+ (green). Solid lines are fits to our model including solvent quenching and cross-relaxation (eqs 8 and 10). The inset shows a zoom-in on the first 0.2 ms. (g) Same for the green emission from core-only NCs. (h) Same for the red emission from core-only NCs, doped with 0.1% Er3+ (black), 2% Er3+ (yellow), and 2% Er3+ + 18% Yb3+ (red).

Surprisingly, the decay dynamics of the red emission do not accelerate with increasing dopant concentrations, neither in NaYF4 NCs nor in the bulk material (Figure 3b). Hence, while the green-emitting levels are quenched by cross-relaxation and energy migration, the red-emitting level is not. In fact, the quenching seems to decrease for the highest dopant concentrations, but this is an artifact due to the slightly larger sizes of our highly doped NCs (21.6 nm versus ∼19 nm diameter for the lower concentrations; Table S1), resulting in reduced solvent quenching. We can understand why cross-relaxation has a stronger effect on the green-emitting level than on the red-emitting level from the energy-level structures of Er3+ and Yb3+ (Figure 3c,d). Near-perfect energy matching is possible for cross-relaxation from the green-emitting levels of Er3+ to neighboring Er3+ ions in the ground state (blue and yellow arrows in Figure 3c), and a small mismatch exists for cross-relaxation to a neighboring ground-state Yb3+ ion (blue arrows). In contrast, possible cross-relaxation pathways of the red-emitting level of Er3+ all exhibit a larger energy mismatch (Figure 3d) and should therefore be significantly less efficient. This is consistent with previous studies on bulk NaYF4 crystals doped with Er3+. (6)
To more quantitatively analyze the quenching dynamics in NaYF4 NCs doped with high concentrations of Er3+ and Yb3+, we fit the photoluminescence decay dynamics to our full model including radiative decay, solvent quenching, and cross-relaxation (eq 8 for NCs doped with only Er3+ or eq 10 for NCs co-doped with Er3+ and Yb3+). Figure 3f shows the decay of the green emission in core–shell NCs dispersed in toluene and doped with 0.1% Er3+ (black), 2% Er3+ (blue), or co-doped with 2% Er3+ and 18% Yb3+ (green). In modeling the experimental data, we introduce only two new fit parameters, the cross-relaxation strengths CEr and CYb, while keeping the other parameters fixed based on the solvent-quenching analysis above (see Figure 2). Our model (solid lines) matches the experimental data very well using fit parameters CEr = 9.8 × 105 Å6 ms–1 and CYb = 3.2 × 103 Å6 ms–1 (see Figure S4 for fit results for the other solvents). This corresponds to a critical Förster radius of 9.2 Å for Er3+–Er3+ cross-relaxation, a typical value for Förster transfer to a lanthanide acceptor. (42,51) For Er3+–Yb3+ cross-relaxation we obtain 3.5 Å, somewhat shorter because of the energy mismatch for this pathway (Figure 3c). Alternatively, we can calculate a rate of 308 ms–1 for cross-relaxation from the green-emitting levels (2H11/2 and 4S3/2) to a nearest-neighbor Er3+ ion or 1.0 ms–1 to a nearest-neighbor Yb3+ ion, compared to a radiative decay rate of 1.6 ms–1 for NCs in toluene. Figure S5 confirms that quenching of the green emission at high Er3+ concentration is mainly due to cross-relaxation, not for example energy migration to the surface, (21) because we can perfectly reproduce the experimental decay curves from bulk NaYF4 doped with high Er3+ concentration assuming only radiative decay and cross-relaxation, with all parameters fixed. This also confirms that the distribution of donor–acceptor distances, which determines the cross-relaxation rates, in our NCs is similar to bulk material. Hence, if our NCs show deviations from a statistical distribution of dopant ions as reported by Dong et al., (40) these are not strong enough to affect the interactions between dopants significantly.
The effect of concentration quenching due to energy migration becomes apparent from the green emission dynamics from core-only NCs (Figure 3g). Our model, using the fit parameters for solvent quenching and cross-relaxation we have determined before, matches the emission dynamics shortly after the laser pulse well (inset). At later times (t > 0.2 ms) the experimental decay from NCs with high Er3+ doping (blue and green) is clearly faster than the model predicts. This is the result of energy migration, which provides a decay pathway for the excited Er3+ dopants in the NC center (Figure 3e) that would otherwise decay slowly. Energy migration from Er3+ to Er3+ can occur also in core–shell NCs. However, the effect on the emission dynamics is less significant (Figure 3f), because the undoped shell prevents migration to the NC surface. This means that our model of solvent quenching plus cross-relaxation can accurately predict the dynamics and quantum yield of green Er3+ emission at high dopant concentrations in core–shell NCs, but will overestimate the green-emission quantum yield in core-only NCs. Modeling the effect of energy migration quantitatively is beyond the scope of this article, but can be an interesting follow-up work.
The decay dynamics of the red emission from core-only NCs at high dopant concentrations (Figure 3h) are accurately predicted by the solvent-quenching model (eq 5; quenching density ρC fixed) without introducing cross-relaxation as an additional decay pathway. A small deviation between experiment and model at late times indicates that some concentration quenching and energy migration takes place in the red (i.e., among 4F9/2 levels), but weaker than in the green (i.e., among 2H11/2 and 4S3/2 levels). This modeling of the red emission dynamics is consistent with our earlier conclusion that the red emission is hardly affected by cross-relaxation or energy migration.

Quenching of the Infrared Emissions

We now turn our attention to the near-infrared energy levels of Er3+ (4I11/2) and Yb3+ (2F5/2). Figure 4a shows the average decay rate (from a simple single-exponential fit) of the near-infrared emission (∼1000 nm) from the Er3+4I11/2 level in NCs doped with 2% Er3+. The decay rates, depending on the solvent, are approximately 1 ms–1 for core–shell NCs (open circles) and 6 ms–1 for core-only NCs (filled circles), compared to 0.13 ms–1 in the bulk material (at 0.1% Er3+; Figure S2). This means that the 4I11/2 level is strongly quenched in NCs, to ∼10% quantum yield for core–shell NCs and ∼2% quantum yield for core-only NCs. Quenching by cross-relaxation to neighboring Er3+ ions can be excluded, because the energy-level structure of Er3+ makes energy-conserving cross-relaxation pathways impossible (see also Figure S6). The quenching of core-only NCs is somewhat dependent on the chemical nature of the solvent, with the aliphatic solvents showing slightly faster decay rates and chloroform showing a slower decay rate. However, for core–shell NCs the linear refractive index dependence of decay rates indicates a solvent-independent nonradiative component (eq 11). Moreover, the solvent-quenching model fails to reproduce the decay dynamics of the Er3+ near-infrared emission in core-only and core–shell NCs with a single value for the quenching density (Figure 4b). We propose therefore that the major contributor to quenching of the near-infrared-emitting Er3+ level, especially in core–shell structures, is energy transfer to OH-vibrations. Indeed, the vibrational energy of approximately 3500 cm–1 precisely matches the 4I11/24I13/2 energy gap, thus explaining why quenching is strong. OH ions likely substitute some native F sites of the NC during the synthesis, where NaOH is used as a Na+ source. Indeed, preventing the inclusion of oxygen in NaYF4 crystals is notoriously difficult. (5) New synthesis procedures (20) using Na-oleate instead of NaOH as Na+ source can potentially prevent this and thus suppress quenching of the Er3+4I11/2 level.

Figure 4

Figure 4. (a) Average decay rates ⟨Γtot⟩ of the near-infrared-emitting 4I11/2 level of Er3+ in core-only NCs (filled circles) and core–shell NaYF4 NCs (open circles) doped with 2% Er3+ and dispersed in different solvents, as determined from single-exponential fits. Gray lines are iso-quantum-yield contours plotting η ≈ Γrad(n)/⟨Γtot⟩, based on the bulk decay rate (black cross). (b) Photoluminescence decay curves of the near-infrared emission from core-only (blue) and core–shell (red) NaYF4:2% Er3+ NCs dispersed in toluene. Inset is a zoom-in. Solid lines show an attempt to fit our solvent-quenching model (eq 5) to the experiments using one value for ρC. (c) Same as in (a), but for the 2F5/2 level of Yb3+. Filled symbols represent core-only NCs, open symbols core–shell NCs. The NCs have dopant concentrations of 0.1% Yb3+ (squares), 18% Yb3+ (triangles), or 2% Er3+ plus 18% Yb3+(diamonds). The Er3+ and Yb3+ emissions cannot be spectrally distinguished for the co-doped NCs, so the recorded signal will contain contributions from both. The iso-quantum-yield contours are based on the bulk decay rate of Yb3+ (black cross). (d) A cartoon of rapid energy transfer and energy back-transfer between Er3+ and Yb3+ centers. (e) Photoluminescence decay curves of the near-infrared Yb3+ emission in NCs doped with 0.1% Yb3+ (red), 18% Yb3+ (green), or co-doped with 2% Er3+ and 18% Yb3+ (blue). The signal recorded from the co-doped NCs consists for a small part of 4I11/2 emission from Er3+ ions. This constitutes an estimated <5% of the total emission, based on the elemental ratio 2/18 and the ratio of radiative decay rates (Figure S2).

Figure 4c shows the average decay rate of the near-infrared emission from Yb3+ in NCs doped with various dopant concentrations, comparing core-only to core–shell NCs. NCs doped with 0.1% Yb3+, with either core-only or core–shell geometry, show mainly radiative decay with a rate close to that in the bulk material. We conclude from this that solvent quenching by dipole–dipole coupling is negligible for the 2F5/2 excited state, and we can therefore not use the solvent-quenching model. This was to be expected, because Yb3+ is effectively a two-level system with an energy gap of approximately 10,000 cm–1, that is, over three times the highest vibrational energy in hydrocarbon molecules. At higher doping concentrations the Yb3+ decay is faster and strongly dependent on the NC geometry (core-only versus core–shell). Clearly, the Yb3+ luminescence is quenched by some pathway involving the NC surface that becomes more efficient at higher doping concentration. Undercoordinated Yb3+ centers at the NC surface could be possible quenching sites, explaining the strong concentration dependence of quenching (compare core-only NCs with 0.1% and 18% Yb3+). Higher Yb3+ concentrations would simultaneously increase the number of such defect sites per NC and enable energy migration toward them. Co-doping Er3+ and Yb3+ is likely to lead to rapid energy transfer and energy back-transfer between the nearly resonant Yb3+:2F5/2 and Er3+:4I11/2 levels (Figure 4d). As a result, the effective energy migration is enhanced, and the strong quenching pathways of Er3+ (likely by coupling to OH-vibrations; see above) become available to the Yb3+ excited state. This explains why the decay rate of near-infrared excited states in NCs co-doped with 2% Er3+ plus 18% Yb3+ is enhanced by a factor 2 compared to those doped with only 18% Yb3+ (Figure 4c). The luminescence decay curves of the near-infrared emissions at high dopant concentrations are close to single-exponential (Figure 4e). This confirms that fast migration averages out the inhomogeneities in decay pathways between the luminescent centers (e.g., those near the NC surface versus those in the center), resulting in one “effective” decay rate for all centers. (43)

Discussion

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

In Figure 5 we summarize the quantum yields of the various emitting levels involved in UC by the Er3+–Yb3+ couple in NaYF4 NCs, as a function of shell thickness, doping concentration, and solvent. The data points represent experimental quantum yields determined by integrating the experimental photoluminescence decay curves: (34)
(12)
where I(0) is the photoluminescence intensity at t = 0 and Γrad is the radiative decay rate of the emitting level, estimated from the decay rate in bulk NaYF4 (Figure S2) and correcting for solvent refractive index (eq 3). Similarly, the lines are predictions of our model including solvent quenching and cross-relaxation, obtained by integrating the theoretical decay curves (eq 5 or 10) for UC NCs with a core diameter of 20 nm. The model reproduces the increase in quantum yield with increasing shell thickness (open versus filled symbols) and with increasing solvent refractive index [from hexane (red) to chlorobenzene (blue) to carbon disulfide (gray)]. It predicts that, because of strong solvent quenching, the quantum yield of the red luminescence can be further increased with even thicker shells than we used in the experiments presented here (requiring up to 20 nm thickness for 95% luminescence quantum yield, depending on the solvent). For the green Er3+ emission, our model reproduces the dependence on dopant concentration [0.1% Er3+ (circles) versus 2% Er3+ plus 18% Yb3+ (squares)]. The red-emission quantum yield does not show a significant dependence on doping concentration, because it is not quenched by cross-relaxation or energy migration. On the other hand, strong quenching due to cross-relaxation causes the quantum yield of the green emission in high-doping NCs to saturate at approximately 20% for shells >3 nm. Qualitatively, it is clear that the near-infrared Yb3+ emission becomes more efficient with increasing shell thickness, with increasing solvent refractive index, and with lower doping concentration. However, we cannot model this quantitatively because this emission is quenched by other mechanisms than dipole–dipole coupling to solvent vibrations.

Figure 5

Figure 5. (a–c) The quantum yields of the various emitting levels in NaYF4:Er3+,Yb3+ UC NCs as a function of shell thickness. We consider (a) the green Er3+ emission from the 4S3/2 level, (b) the red Er3+ emission from the 4F9/2 level, and (c) near-infrared Yb3+ emission from the 2F5/2 level. Data points are obtained by integrating experimental photoluminescence decay curves (eq 12) from core-only NCs (filled symbols) or core–shell NCs (open symbols). We compare NCs dispersed in hexane (red), chlorobenzene (blue), and carbon disulfide (gray) and NCs doped with low concentration of the active center (0.1%; circles) to NCs co-doped with 2% Er3+ and 18% Yb3+ (squares). Lines are predictions from our solvent-quenching model for the green- and red-emitting levels at low doping (solid lines) and high doping (dashed lines; only distinct for the green emission). (d) Simplified model of UC with a ground state (0), an intermediate excited state (NIR), and a highest excited state (VIS). Arrows indicate excitation, decay, and energy-transfer processes.

To get an idea of what our results imply for the efficiency of UC luminescence from NaYF4 NCs, we consider a simplified three-level model for the UC process (Figure 5d). (48) In reality Er3+–Yb3+-based UC is of course much more complex, involving more energy levels and multiple energy-transfer pathways depending on excitation power. (49) Our simplified model consists of a ground state ‘0’, a first excited state “NIR” in the near-infrared, and a second excited state “VIS” that can emit visible photons. Excitation into the intermediate level and energy-transfer UC to the highest excited state, with rate constants Γexc and ΓUC, respectively, in combination with radiative and nonradiative decay of the states NIR and VIS lead to the following set of rate equations:
(13)
(14)
where NNIR and NVIS are the populations in the intermediate and in the highest excited state, and Γitot denotes the total decay rate (radiative + nonradiative) of state i. The visible UC luminescence is proportional to IUC ∝ ΓVISradNVIS. Solving the rate equations for steady-state conditions yields for the UC luminescence to second order in ΓexcNIRtot, that is, in the limit of weak excitation, that
(15)
We see that the UC intensity is quadratically dependent on the quantum yield ηNIR of the intermediate near-infrared-emitting level and linearly on the quantum yield ηVIS of the highest visible-emitting level. We thus conclude that the major contribution to low UC efficiencies in NCs compared to bulk material (10,11,19,20) comes from losses in the near-infrared, in line with the interpretation of Hossan et al., (49) not only because the near-infrared-emitting levels are quenched strongly at high doping concentrations (Figure 5c) but also because losses in the infrared affect the overall UC intensity more strongly than losses in the visible. Shell growth improves the quantum yields in the near-infrared at high doping concentration by as much as a factor ∼10 in our experiments (Figure 5c), which translates into a ∼100 increase in UC intensity according to eq 15. Additionally, the shell improves the UC intensity further by a smaller factor ∼2 by increasing the quantum yield in the visible (depending on the color considered and on the solvent; Figure 5a,b). The beneficial effect of shell growth on the UC intensities thus comes mainly from the inhibition of quenching in the near-infrared. We ascribe residual quenching in the infrared in core–shell NCs with a 3 nm shell to coupling of the 4I11/2 level of Er3+ to OH-vibrations of embedded hydroxide ions, which can potentially be prevented with improved synthesis procedures that avoid hydroxides and water. (20) The Yb3+2F5/2 level is indirectly quenched by the same pathway, because at high doping concentrations the Yb3+2F5/2 and Er3+4I11/2 levels rapidly exchange energy by transfer and back-transfer. Quenching of the red-emitting 4F9/2 level of Er3+ is due to solvent quenching and can be further suppressed with thicker shells (solid lines in Figure 5b) than the 3 nm we consider here or by excluding high-energy vibrations in the environment. Quenching of the green-emitting 4S3/2 and 2H11/2 levels at high doping concentration relevant to UC is mainly due to cross-relaxation to Er3+ neighbors (blue and yellow pathways in Figure 3c) and cannot be avoided by growing thicker shells. Indeed, also bulk material suffers from this loss pathway (Figure S5). (6)
Our systematic analysis of the decay dynamics of the various levels involved in Er3+–Yb3+-based UC provides important insights into the quenching pathways relevant to UC. However, many additional effects have to be considered for a full quantitative understanding of UC under all experimental conditions. For example, some studies have proposed complex population pathways for the red-emitting level, involving multiple multiphonon and/or energy-transfer processes. (35−37) Moreover, at high excitation powers the state populations can saturate, and levels higher in energy than the green- or red-emitting ones become involved in the energy-transfer and cross-relaxation pathways. (15,50) It is also important to consider that cross-relaxation and nonradiative recombination steps may not necessarily lead to irreversible energy loss, but the energy may be used in a next energy-transfer UC step. Further, the quantum yields of near-infrared and visible emission of a particular Er3+ center may be correlated, for example, if it is located near the NC surface. (49) This and other variations of and correlations between the rates of various UC steps can only be taken into account fully with a microscopic theoretical model that considers individual luminescent centers (e.g., Er3+ and Yb3+) explicitly, (51) as an alternative to the more common mean-field models. (35,52)

Conclusion

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

In summary, we have presented a detailed study on the excited-state dynamics in NaYF4 upconversion nanocrystals co-doped with Er3+ and Yb3+. By systematically varying important parameters such as doping concentration and the nature of the solvent, we were able to identify quenching pathways and energy-transfer processes responsible for the reduced upconversion efficiency in nanocrystals. A microscopic model was developed to provide quantitative insight in the contribution of quenching by molecular vibrations (ligands, solvent) and cross-relaxation processes. For the green and red Er3+ emission, the model accurately reproduces the observed decay dynamics and also demonstrates how the solvent quenching strength depends on resonances between solvent vibrational modes and electronic transitions on the Er3+ ion. Growing an undoped shell around the upconversion core reduces solvent quenching, and with the model the shell thickness required for a near-complete suppression of solvent quenching can be determined. For the near-infrared emission, the agreement between the observed excited-state dynamics and our model is not satisfactory. The systematic deviation indicates the presence of an additional quenching process. Based on the resonance of the O-H stretch vibrational energy and a transition on Er3+ for the IR emitting level, we propose that OH incorporated on F sites in NaYF4 nanocrystals is responsible. For core–shell nanocrystals, the most significant improvement in upconversion efficiency can be achieved by suppressing quenching of the near-infrared-emitting level which may be realized by alternative synthesis strategies that prevent incorporation of OH in the NaYF4 lattice.

Methods

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Nanocrystal Synthesis

The NaYF4 core nanocrystals (NCs) doped with Er3+ and/or Yb3+ were synthesized following the procedure from ref (53) with modifications based on ref (54). A mixture of REAc3 (4 mmol; with RE = Y, Er, Yb in the desired ratio) in oleic acid (24 mL) and 1-octadecene (68 mL) was degassed at 120 °C under vacuum for 90 min and then allowed to cool down to room temperature under nitrogen atmosphere. A solution of NaOH (10 mmol) and NH4F (16 mmol) in methanol (40 mL) was injected into the reaction mixture under nitrogen, which was then stirred overnight at room temperature. Next, the methanol was removed by evaporation at 100 °C under vacuum for 30 min. The reaction mixture was then quickly heated to 300 °C for 110 min under nitrogen atmosphere while stirring, during which the NaYF4 NCs form. After cooling down, the NCs were washed three times by precipitation with ethanol, centrifugation, and redispersing them in cyclohexane. In the second to last washing step, a mixture of cyclohexane (12 mL) and oleic acid (12 mL) was used to redisperse the NCs to increase ligand coverage of the surface and improve the colloidal stability. The final product was dispersed in approximately 12 mL of cyclohexane.
Core–shell NCs were synthesized by growing a nonluminescent NaYF4 shell around (co)doped cores using the method of ref (54). A solution of YAc3 (1.5 mmol) in oleic acid (9 mL) and 1-octadecene (25.5 mL) was degassed at 120 °C under vacuum for 60 min. The temperature was then decreased to 80 °C under nitrogen, and 5.5 nmol of core particles was added (estimated from transmission electron microscopy and the dry weight of the cyclohexane stock dispersion). Cyclohexane was removed at 100 °C under vacuum. The reaction mixture was then allowed to cool down to room temperature, a solution of NaOH (3.75 mmol) and NH4F (6 mmol) in methanol (15 mL) was added, and the mixture was stirred overnight. Next, methanol was evaporated at 100 °C under vacuum for 10 min. The reaction mixture was then quickly heated to 300 °C under nitrogen for 120 min before cooling down to room temperature. The NCs were washed three times by precipitation with ethanol, centrifugation, and redispersing them in cyclohexane. In the second to last washing step, a mixture of cyclohexane (3 mL) and oleic acid (3 mL) was used to redisperse the NCs to increase ligand coverage of the surface and improve the colloidal stability. The final product was dispersed in approximately 1.7 mL of cyclohexane.
Microcrystalline powders of (co)doped β-NaYF4 were prepared as described in ref (5).

Spectroscopic Experiments

Photoluminescence decay dynamics of the various Er3+ and Yb3+ emissions were recorded using an Edinburgh Instruments FLS920 fluorescence spectrometer. The samples were excited with 10 ns pulses (20 Hz) from a color-tunable optical parametric oscillator (OPO) system (Opotek HE 355 II) pumped by the third harmonic of a Nd:YAG laser. The luminescence was detected with a Hamamatsu H74220–60 photomultiplier tube for visible wavelength or with a N2-cooled R5507-73 photomultiplier tube for the near-infrared. To measure the decay dynamics of a certain energy level, we tuned the excitation laser on the same level but a few nm blue-shifted from the detection wavelength, except for the green emission where we excited in the 2H11/2 level and detected emission from the 4S3/2 level. These levels are thermally coupled and show the same decay dynamics. (44) To minimize reabsorption of emitted light, the NCs were dispersed in an organic solvent at low concentration, while the microcrystalline powders were diluted with white BaSO4 powder, typically to 1% w/w or lower.

Supporting Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.8b01545.

  • Tranmission electron microscopy of the upconversion nanocrystals, photoluminescence decay of bulk material, and a complete data set and modeling of excited-state decay dynamics of the visible-emitting levels (PDF)

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Author Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

  • Corresponding Author
  • Authors
    • Freddy T. Rabouw - Debye Institute for Nanomaterials Science, Utrecht University, Princetonplein 1, 3584 CC Utrecht, The NetherlandsOrcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-4775-0859
    • P. Tim Prins - Debye Institute for Nanomaterials Science, Utrecht University, Princetonplein 1, 3584 CC Utrecht, The NetherlandsOrcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-8258-0074
    • Pedro Villanueva-Delgado - Debye Institute for Nanomaterials Science, Utrecht University, Princetonplein 1, 3584 CC Utrecht, The Netherlands
    • Marieke Castelijns - Debye Institute for Nanomaterials Science, Utrecht University, Princetonplein 1, 3584 CC Utrecht, The Netherlands
    • Robin G. Geitenbeek - Debye Institute for Nanomaterials Science, Utrecht University, Princetonplein 1, 3584 CC Utrecht, The Netherlands
  • Notes
    The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Acknowledgments

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The work was supported by The Netherlands Center for Multiscale Catalytic Energy Conversion (MCEC), an NWO Gravitation programme funded by the Ministry of Education, Culture and Science of the government of The Netherlands. F.T.R. acknowledges financial support from The Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research NWO (VENI grant number 722.017.002). P.V.-D. acknowledges financial support from the Swiss National Science Foundation SNSF (grant number P2BEP2_172238). We are grateful to R. Brechbühler for critical reading of the manuscript.

References

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article references 54 other publications.

  1. 1
    Cao, X.; Hu, B.; Zhang, P. High Upconversion Efficiency from Hetero Triplet–Triplet Annihilation in Multiacceptor Systems. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2013, 4, 23342338,  DOI: 10.1021/jz401213w
  2. 2
    Wu, M.; Congreve, D. N.; Wilson, M. W. B.; Jean, J.; Geva, N.; Welborn, M.; Van Voorhis, T.; Bulović, V.; Bawendi, M. G.; Baldo, M. A. Solid-State Infrared-to-Visible Upconversion Sensitized by Colloidal Nanocrystals. Nat. Photonics 2016, 10, 3134,  DOI: 10.1038/nphoton.2015.226
  3. 3
    Deutsch, Z.; Neeman, L.; Oron, D. Luminescence Upconversion in Colloidal Double Quantum Dots. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2014, 8, 649653,  DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2013.146
  4. 4
    Makarov, N. S.; Lin, Q.; Pietryga, J. M.; Robel, I.; Klimov, V. I. Auger Up-Conversion of Low-Intensity Infrared Light in Engineered Quantum Dots. ACS Nano 2016, 10, 1082910841,  DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.6b04928
  5. 5
    Krämer, K. W.; Biner, D.; Frei, G.; Güdel, H. U.; Hehlen, M. P.; Lüthi, S. R. Hexagonal Sodium Yttrium Fluoride Based Green and Blue Emitting Upconversion Phosphors. Chem. Mater. 2004, 16, 12441251,  DOI: 10.1021/cm031124o
  6. 6
    Suyver, J. F.; Grimm, J.; van Veen, M. K.; Biner, D.; Krämer, K. W.; Güdel, H. U. Upconversion Spectroscopy and Properties of NaYF4 Doped with Er3+, Tm3+ and/or Yb3+. J. Lumin. 2006, 117, 112,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jlumin.2005.03.011
  7. 7
    Martín-Rodríguez, R.; Fischer, S.; Ivaturi, A.; Froehlich, B.; Krämer, K. W.; Goldschmidt, J. C.; Richards, B. S.; Meijerink, A. Highly Efficient IR to NIR Upconversion in Gd2O2S:Er3+ for Photovoltaic Applications. Chem. Mater. 2013, 25, 19121921,  DOI: 10.1021/cm4005745
  8. 8
    Heer, S.; Kömpe, K.; Güdel, H.-U.; Haase, M. Highly Efficient Multicolour Upconversion Emission in Transparent Colloids of Lanthanide-Doped NaYF4 Nanocrystals. Adv. Mater. 2004, 16, 21022105,  DOI: 10.1002/adma.200400772
  9. 9
    Boyer, J.-C.; Vetrone, F.; Cuccia, L. A.; Capobianco, J. A. Synthesis of Colloidal Upconverting NaYF4 Nanocrystals Doped with Er3+, Yb3+ and Tm3+, Yb3+ via Thermal Decomposition of Lanthanide Trifluoroacetate Precursors. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 74447445,  DOI: 10.1021/ja061848b
  10. 10
    Boyer, J.-C.; Manseau, M.-P.; Murray, J. I.; van Veggel, F. C. J. M. Surface Modification of Upconverting NaYF4 Nanoparticles with PEG–Phosphate Ligands for NIR (800 nm) Biolabeling within the Biological Window. Langmuir 2010, 26, 11571164,  DOI: 10.1021/la902260j
  11. 11
    Wang, F.; Wang, J.; Liu, X. Direct Evidence of a Surface Quenching Effect on Size-Dependent Luminescence of Upconversion Nanoparticles. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 74567460,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201003959
  12. 12
    Wang, F.; Deng, R.; Wang, J.; Wang, Q.; Han, Y.; Zhu, H.; Chen, X.; Liu, X. Tuning Upconversion through Energy Migration in Core–Shell Nanoparticles. Nat. Mater. 2011, 10, 968973,  DOI: 10.1038/nmat3149
  13. 13
    Zou, W.; Visser, C.; Maduro, J. A.; Pshenichnikov, M. S.; Hummelen, J. C. Broadband Dye-Sensitized Upconversion of Near-Infrared Light. Nat. Photonics 2012, 6, 560564,  DOI: 10.1038/nphoton.2012.158
  14. 14
    Zhao, J.; Lu, Z.; Yin, Y.; McRae, C.; Piper, J. A.; Dawes, J. M.; Jin, D.; Goldys, E. M. Upconversion Luminescence with Tunable Lifetime in NaYF4:Yb,Er Nanocrystals: Role of Nanocrystal Size. Nanoscale 2013, 5, 944952,  DOI: 10.1039/C2NR32482B
  15. 15
    Zhao, J.; Jin, D.; Schartner, E. P.; Lu, Y.; Liu, Y.; Zvyagin, A. V.; Zhang, L.; Dawes, J. M.; Xi, P.; Piper, J. A.; Goldys, E. M.; Monro, T. M. Single-Nanocrystal Sensitivity Achieved by Enhanced Upconversion Luminescence. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2013, 8, 729734,  DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2013.171
  16. 16
    Chen, D.; Huang, P. Highly Intense Upconversion Luminescence in Yb/Er:NaGdF4 @NaYF4 Core–Shell Nanocrystals with Complete Shell Enclosure of the Core. Dalton Trans. 2014, 43, 1129911304,  DOI: 10.1039/c4dt01237b
  17. 17
    Liu, Y.; Zhao, J.; Zhang, R.; Liu, Y.; Liu, D.; Goldys, E. M.; Yang, X.; Xi, P.; Sunna, A.; Lu, J.; Shi, Y.; Leif, R. C.; Huo, Y.; Shen, J.; Piper, J. A.; Robinson, J. P.; Jin, D. Tunable Lifetime Multiplexing Using Luminescent Nanocrystals. Nat. Photonics 2014, 8, 3236,  DOI: 10.1038/nphoton.2013.322
  18. 18
    Arppe, R.; Hyppänen, I.; Perälä, N.; Peltomaa, R.; Kaiser, M.; Würth, C.; Christ, S.; Resch-Genger, U.; Schäferling, M.; Soukka, T. Quenching of the Upconversion Luminescence of NaYF4:Yb3+,Er3+ and NaYF4:Yb3+,Tm3+ Nanophosphors by Water: the Role of the Sensitizer Yb3+ in Non-Radiative Relaxation. Nanoscale 2015, 7, 1174611757,  DOI: 10.1039/C5NR02100F
  19. 19
    Fischer, S.; Johnson, N. J. J.; Pichaandi, J.; Goldschmidt, J. C.; van Veggel, F. C. J. M. Upconverting Core–Shell Nanocrystals with High Quantum Yield under Low Irradiance: On the Role of Isotropic and Thick Shells. J. Appl. Phys. 2015, 118, 193105,  DOI: 10.1063/1.4936119
  20. 20
    Rinkel, T.; Raj, A. N.; Dühnen, S.; Haase, M. Synthesis of 10 nm β-NaYF4:Yb,Er/NaYF4 Core/Shell Upconversion Nanocrystals with 5 nm Particle Cores. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 11641167,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201508838
  21. 21
    Johnson, N. J. J.; He, S.; Diao, S.; Chan, E. M.; Dai, H.; Almutairi, A. Direct Evidence for Coupled Surface and Concentration Quenching Dynamics in Lanthanide-Doped Nanocrystals. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 32753282,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.7b00223
  22. 22
    Hyppänen, I.; Höysniemi, N.; Arppe, R.; Schäferling, M.; Soukka, T. Environmental Impact on the Excitation Path of the Red Upconversion Emission of Nanocrystalline NaYF4:Yb3+,Er3+. J. Phys. Chem. C 2017, 121, 69246929,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b01019
  23. 23
    Schietinger, S.; Aichele, T.; Wang, H.-Q.; Nann, T.; Benson, O. Plasmon-Enhanced Upconversion in Single NaYF4:Yb3+/Er3+ Codoped Nanocrystals. Nano Lett. 2010, 10, 134138,  DOI: 10.1021/nl903046r
  24. 24
    Han, S.; Deng, R.; Xie, X.; Liu, X. Enhancing Luminescence in Lanthanide-Doped Upconversion Nanoparticles. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 1170211715,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201403408
  25. 25
    Sun, Q.-C.; Mundoor, H.; Ribot, J. C.; Singh, V.; Smalyukh, I. I.; Nagpal, P. Plasmon-Enhanced Energy Transfer for Improved Upconversion of Infrared Radiation in Doped-Lanthanide Nanocrystals. Nano Lett. 2014, 14, 101106,  DOI: 10.1021/nl403383w
  26. 26
    Fischer, S.; Kumar, D.; Hallermann, F.; von Plessen, G.; Goldschmidt, J. C. Enhanced Upconversion Quantum Yield near Spherical Gold Nanoparticles – a Comprehensive Simulation Based Analysis. Opt. Express 2016, 24, A460A475,  DOI: 10.1364/OE.24.00A460
  27. 27
    Yin, Z.; Li, H.; Xu, W.; Cui, S.; Zhou, D.; Chen, X.; Zhu, Y.; Qin, G.; Song, H. Local Field Modulation Induced Three-Order Upconversion Enhancement: Combining Surface Plasmon Effect and Photonic Crystal Effect. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 25182525,  DOI: 10.1002/adma.201502943
  28. 28
    Zhou, D.; Liu, D.; Xu, W.; Yin, Z.; Chen, X.; Zhou, P.; Cui, S.; Chen, Z.; Song, H. Observation of Considerable Upconversion Enhancement Induced by Cu2–xS Plasmon Nanoparticles. ACS Nano 2016, 10, 51695179,  DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.6b00649
  29. 29
    Xu, W.; Chen, X.; Song, H. Upconversion Manipulation by Local Electromagnetic Field. Nano Today 2017, 17, 5458,  DOI: 10.1016/j.nantod.2017.10.011
  30. 30
    Stouwdam, J. W.; Hebbink, G. A.; Huskens, J.; van Veggel, F. C. J. M. Lanthanide-Doped Nanoparticles with Excellent Luminescent Properties in Organic Media. Chem. Mater. 2003, 15, 46044616,  DOI: 10.1021/cm034495d
  31. 31
    Guyot-Sionnest, P.; Wehrenberg, B.; Yu, D. Intraband Relaxation in CdSe Nanocrystals and the Strong Influence of the Surface Ligands. J. Chem. Phys. 2005, 123, 074709,  DOI: 10.1063/1.2004818
  32. 32
    Aharoni, A.; Oron, D.; Banin, U.; Rabani, E.; Jortner, J. Long-Range Electronic-to-Vibrational Energy Transfer from Nanocrystals to Their Surrounding Matrix Environment. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2008, 100, 057404,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.057404
  33. 33
    Rabouw, F. T.; Den Hartog, S. A.; Senden, T.; Meijerink, A. Photonic Effects on the Förster Resonance Energy Transfer Efficiency. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 3610,  DOI: 10.1038/ncomms4610
  34. 34
    Senden, T.; Rabouw, F. T.; Meijerink, A. Photonic Effects on the Radiative Decay Rate and Luminescence Quantum Yield of Doped Nanocrystals. ACS Nano 2015, 9, 18011808,  DOI: 10.1021/nn506715t
  35. 35
    Anderson, R. B.; Smith, S. J.; May, P. S.; Berry, M. T. Revisiting the NIR-to-Visible Upconversion Mechanism in β-NaYF4:Yb3+,Er3+. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2014, 5, 3642,  DOI: 10.1021/jz402366r
  36. 36
    Berry, M. T.; May, P. S. Disputed Mechanism for NIR-to-Red Upconversion Luminescence in NaYF4:Yb3+,Er3+. J. Phys. Chem. A 2015, 119, 98059811,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpca.5b08324
  37. 37
    Zhang, J.; Hao, Z.; Li, J.; Zhang, X.; Luo, Y.; Pan, G. Observation of Efficient Population of the Red-Emitting State from the Green State by Non-Multiphonon Relaxation in the Er3+–Yb3+ System. Light: Sci. Appl. 2015, 4, e239,  DOI: 10.1038/lsa.2015.12
  38. 38
    van Dijk, J. M. F.; Schuurmans, M. F. H. On the Nonradiative and Radiative Decay Rates and a Modified Exponential Energy Gap Law for 4f–4f Transitions in Rare-Earth Ions. J. Chem. Phys. 1983, 78, 53175323,  DOI: 10.1063/1.445485
  39. 39
    Sokolov, V. I.; Zvyagin, A. V.; Igumnov, S. M.; Molchanova, S. I.; Nazarov, M. M.; Nechaev, A. V.; Savelyev, A. G.; Tyutyunov, A. A.; Khaydukov, E. V.; Panchenko, V. Ya. Determination of the Refractive Index of β-NaYF4/Yb3+/Er3+/Tm3+ Nanocrystals Using Spectroscopic Refractometry. Opt. Spectrosc. 2015, 118, 609613,  DOI: 10.1134/S0030400X15040190
  40. 40
    Dong, C.; Pichaandi, J.; Regier, T.; van Veggel, F. C. J. M. Nonstatistical Dopant Distribution of Ln3+-Doped NaGdF4 Nanoparticles. J. Phys. Chem. C 2011, 115, 1595015958,  DOI: 10.1021/jp206441u
  41. 41
    van Wijngaarden, J. T.; Scheidelaar, S.; Vlugt, T. J. H.; Reid, M. F.; Meijerink, A. Energy Transfer Mechanism for Downconversion in the (Pr3+, Yb3+) Couple. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2010, 81, 155112,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.155112
  42. 42
    Yu, D. C.; Martín-Rodrïguez, R.; Zhang, Q. Y.; Meijerink, A.; Rabouw, F. T. Multi-Photon Quantum Cutting in Gd2O2S:Tm3+ to Enhance the Photo-Response of Solar Cells. Light: Sci. Appl. 2015, 4, e344,  DOI: 10.1038/lsa.2015.117
  43. 43
    Henderson, B.; Imbusch, G. F. Optical Spectroscopy of Inorganic Solids; Clarendon Press: Oxford, 1989.
  44. 44
    Geitenbeek, R. G.; Prins, P. T.; Albrecht, W.; van Blaaderen, A.; Weckhuysen, B. M.; Meijerink, A. NaYF4:Er3+,Yb3+/SiO2 Core/Shell Upconverting Nanocrystals for Luminescence Thermometry up to 900 K. J. Phys. Chem. C 2017, 121, 35033510,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b10279
  45. 45
    Villanueva-Delgado, P.; Biner, D.; Krämer, K. W. Judd–Ofelt Analysis of β-NaGdF4: Yb3+, Tm3+ and β-NaGdF4:Er3+ Single Crystals. J. Lumin. 2017, 189, 8490,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jlumin.2016.04.023
  46. 46
    Fischer, S.; Swabeck, J. K.; Alivisatos, A. P. Controlled Isotropic and Anisotropic Shell Growth in β-NaLnF4 Nanocrystals Induced by Precursor Injection Rate. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 1232512332,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.7b07496
  47. 47
    Wang, F.; Liu, X. Upconversion Multicolor Fine-Tuning: Visible to Near-Infrared Emission from Lanthanide-Doped NaYF4 Nanoparticles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 56425643,  DOI: 10.1021/ja800868a
  48. 48
    Pollnau, M.; Gamelin, D. R.; Lüthi, S. R.; Güdel, H. U.; Hehlen, M. P. Power Dependence of Upconversion Luminescence in Lanthanide and Transition-Metal-Ion Systems. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2000, 61, 33373346,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.61.3337
  49. 49
    Hossan, M. Y.; Hor, A.; Luu, Q.; Smith, S. J.; May, S.; Berry, M. T. Explaining the Nanoscale Effect in the Upconversion Dynamics of β-NaYF4:Yb3+,Er3+ Core and Core–Shell Nanocrystals. J. Phys. Chem. C 2017, 121, 1659216606,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b04567
  50. 50
    Gargas, D. J.; Chan, E. M.; Ostrowski, A. D.; Aloni, S.; Altoe, M. V. P.; Barnard, E. S.; Sanii, B.; Urban, J. J.; Milliron, D. J.; Cohen, B. E.; Schuck, P. J. Engineering Bright Sub-10-nm Upconverting Nanocrystals for Single-Molecule Imaging. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2014, 9, 300305,  DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2014.29
  51. 51
    Villanueva-Delgado, P.; Krämer, K. W.; Valiente, R.; de Jong, M.; Meijerink, A. Modeling Blue to UV Upconversion in β-NaYF4:Tm3+. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2016, 18, 2739627404,  DOI: 10.1039/C6CP04347J
  52. 52
    Fischer, S.; Steinkemper, H.; Löper, P.; Hermle, M.; Goldschmidt, J. C. Modeling Upconversion of Erbium Doped Microcrystals Based on Experimentally Determined Einstein Coefficients. J. Appl. Phys. 2012, 111, 013109,  DOI: 10.1063/1.3674319
  53. 53
    Li, Z.; Zhang, Y. An Efficient and User-Friendly Method for the Synthesis of Hexagonal-Phase NaYF4:Yb, Er/Tm Nanocrystals with Controllable Shape and Upconversion Fluorescence. Nanotechnology 2008, 19, 345606,  DOI: 10.1088/0957-4484/19/34/345606
  54. 54
    Wang, F.; Deng, R.; Liu, X. Preparation of Core-Shell NaGdF4 Nanoparticles Doped with Luminescent Lanthanide Ions to Be Used as Upconversion-Based Probes. Nat. Protoc. 2014, 9, 16341644,  DOI: 10.1038/nprot.2014.111

Cited By

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article is cited by 254 publications.

  1. Tomasz Grzyb, Sylwia Ryszczyńska, Natalia Jurga, Dominika Przybylska, Inocencio R. Martín. Ultrasensitive and Adjustable Nanothermometers Based on Er3+-Sensitized Core@Shell Nanoparticles for Use in the First Biological Window. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2024, Article ASAP.
  2. Carlotta Seno, Nico Reichholf, Francesco Salutari, Maria Chiara Spadaro, Yurii P. Ivanov, Giorgio Divitini, Alexander Gogos, Inge K. Herrmann, Jordi Arbiol, Philippe F. Smet, Jonathan De Roo. Epitaxial Core/Shell Nanocrystals of (Europium-Doped) Zirconia and Hafnia. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2024, 146 (30) , 20550-20555. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.4c05037
  3. Abigale Puccini, Nan Liu, Eva Hemmer. Praseodymium-Doped Nanoparticles: Candidates for Near-Infrared-II Double- and Single-Band Nanothermometry. ACS Materials Letters 2024, 6 (4) , 1327-1337. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsmaterialslett.3c01554
  4. Thimo S. Jacobs, Thomas P. van Swieten, Sander J. W. Vonk, Isa P. Bosman, Angela E. M. Melcherts, Bas C. Janssen, Joris C. L. Janssens, Matteo Monai, Andries Meijerink, Freddy T. Rabouw, Ward van der Stam, Bert M. Weckhuysen. Mapping Temperature Heterogeneities during Catalytic CO2 Methanation with Operando Luminescence Thermometry. ACS Nano 2023, 17 (20) , 20053-20061. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.3c05622
  5. Suresh Karmegam, Monisha Kolikkaje, Aseefhali Bankapur, Sajan D. George. Excitation Laser Power and Temperature-Dependent Luminescence of Optically Trapped Upconversion Particles. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2023, 127 (41) , 20385-20397. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.3c03629
  6. Meiran Zhang, Ping Huang, Wei Zheng, Xiaorong Song, Xiaoying Shang, Wen Zhang, Dengfeng Yang, Xiaodong Yi, Xueyuan Chen. Lanthanide-Doped KMgF3 Upconversion Nanoparticles for Photon Avalanche Luminescence with Giant Nonlinearities. Nano Letters 2023, 23 (18) , 8576-8584. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.3c02377
  7. Zhengce An, Qiqing Li, Jinshu Huang, Lili Tao, Bo Zhou. Selectively Manipulating Interactions between Lanthanide Sublattices in Nanostructure toward Orthogonal Upconversion. Nano Letters 2023, 23 (13) , 6241-6248. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.3c00747
  8. Khouloud Hamraoui, Vivian Andrea Torres-Vera, Irene Zabala Gutierrez, Alejandro Casillas-Rubio, Mohammed Alqudwa Fattouh, Antonio Benayas, Riccardo Marin, Marta Maria Natile, Miguel Manso Silvan, Juan Rubio-Zuazo, Daniel Jaque, Sonia Melle, Oscar G. Calderón, Jorge Rubio-Retama. Exploring the Origin of the Thermal Sensitivity of Near-Infrared-II Emitting Rare Earth Nanoparticles. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2023, 15 (27) , 32667-32677. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.3c04125
  9. Qian Yang, Haoming Qin, Lixi Chen, Shuya Zhang, Sen Mei, Deli Wu, Yuchen Yin, Xing Dai, Nannan Shen, Ye Tao, Ni Luan, Aiping Jin, Yanlong Wang, Zhifang Chai, Liang Sun, Hanzhou Liu, Shuao Wang. Metal–Organic Framework Based Thermoluminescence Dosimeter. ACS Materials Letters 2023, 5 (6) , 1619-1626. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsmaterialslett.3c00326
  10. Lucía Labrador-Páez, Jouko Kankare, Iko Hyppänen, Tero Soukka, Elina Andresen, Ute Resch-Genger, Jerker Widengren, Haichun Liu. Frequency-Domain Method for Characterization of Upconversion Luminescence Kinetics. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 2023, 14 (14) , 3436-3444. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.3c00269
  11. Federico Pini, Laura Francés-Soriano, Vittoria Andrigo, Marta Maria Natile, Niko Hildebrandt. Optimizing Upconversion Nanoparticles for FRET Biosensing. ACS Nano 2023, 17 (5) , 4971-4984. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.2c12523
  12. Bhagyesh Purohit, Erwann Jeanneau, Yannick Guyot, David Amans, Benoit Mahler, Marie-France Joubert, Christophe Dujardin, Gilles Ledoux, Shashank Mishra. Incorporation of Upconverting LiYF4:Yb3+, Tm3+ Nanoparticles with High Quantum Yield in TiO2 Metallogels for Near Infrared-Driven Photocatalytic Dye Degradation. ACS Applied Nano Materials 2023, 6 (4) , 2310-2326. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.2c04240
  13. Mirijam Lederer, Hannes Rijckaert, Anna M. Kaczmarek. Understanding and Hindering Ion Migration in Er,Yb:LiLuF4 Core–Shell Nanoparticles for Nanothermometers with Enhanced Photoluminescence. ACS Applied Nano Materials 2023, 6 (4) , 2438-2449. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.2c04705
  14. Hongyu Bian, Caisheng Tang, He Zhao, Xian Qin, Xiaogang Liu. Anomalous Anisotropic Dopant Distribution in Hexagonal Yttrium Sublattice. Nano Letters 2023, 23 (3) , 979-984. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.2c04454
  15. Jence T. Mulder, Michael S. Meijer, J. Jasper van Blaaderen, Indy du Fossé, Kellie Jenkinson, Sara Bals, Liberato Manna, Arjan J. Houtepen. Understanding and Preventing Photoluminescence Quenching to Achieve Unity Photoluminescence Quantum Yield in Yb:YLF Nanocrystals. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2023, 15 (2) , 3274-3286. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.2c17888
  16. Marija Matulionyte, Artiom Skripka, Alma Ramos-Guerra, Antonio Benayas, Fiorenzo Vetrone. The Coming of Age of Neodymium: Redefining Its Role in Rare Earth Doped Nanoparticles. Chemical Reviews 2023, 123 (1) , 515-554. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00419
  17. Lin Yang, Hao Wu, Guo-hui Pan, Liangliang Zhang, Huajun Wu, Zhendong Hao, Feng Liu, Jiahua Zhang. Vacuum-Assisted Strong Luminescence Thermal Enhancement in NaYF4:Ho3+/Yb3+ Upconverting Nanocrystals: A Conclusive Evidence for the Effect of Water Desorption. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering 2022, 10 (50) , 16862-16870. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.2c05408
  18. Anna Borodziuk, Karolina Sulowska, Łukasz Zinkiewicz, Małgorzata Szymura, Anna Reszka, Aleksander Bogucki, Bożena Sikora, Sebastian Maćkowski, Łukasz Kłopotowski. Interaction with Silver Nanowires Disrupts the Excitation Pathways in Upconverting Nanoparticles. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2022, 126 (45) , 19219-19228. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.2c05075
  19. Yanqing Hu, Shijie Yu, Qiyue Shao, Chang Ming Li. Theory of Competition between Surface Quenching and Scattering Effect in Core/Shell Upconversion Nanocrystals. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2022, 126 (44) , 18796-18801. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.2c06017
  20. Xingwen Cheng, Jie Zhou, Jingyi Yue, Yang Wei, Chao Gao, Xiaoji Xie, Ling Huang. Recent Development in Sensitizers for Lanthanide-Doped Upconversion Luminescence. Chemical Reviews 2022, 122 (21) , 15998-16050. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00772
  21. Rui Shi, Anja-Verena Mudring. Phonon-Mediated Nonradiative Relaxation in Ln3+-Doped Luminescent Nanocrystals. ACS Materials Letters 2022, 4 (10) , 1882-1903. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsmaterialslett.2c00595
  22. Adriaan L. Frencken, Arthur M. Blackburn, Frank C. J. M. van Veggel. The Internal Structure of Lanthanide-Doped Nanoparticles and the Effect of High-Temperature Annealing on Their Luminescent Properties. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2022, 126 (38) , 16341-16348. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.2c03725
  23. Allison R. Pessoa, Jefferson A. O. Galindo, York E. Serge-Correales, Anderson M. Amaral, Sidney J. L. Ribeiro, Leonardo de S. Menezes. 2D Thermal Maps Using Hyperspectral Scanning of Single Upconverting Microcrystals: Experimental Artifacts and Image Processing. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2022, 14 (33) , 38311-38319. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.2c08709
  24. Xiaolong Chen, Xiangyu Chen, Xuesong Zhai, Yin Li, Wei Zhao, Wu Sun, Qinfang Zhang, Jing Feng. Remarkably Enhanced Red Upconversion Emission in β-NaLuF4:Er,Tm Microcrystals via Ion Exchange. Inorganic Chemistry 2022, 61 (28) , 10713-10721. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.2c00899
  25. Yongmei Li, Zhihua Liu, Rui Wang, Yuemei Li. Upconversion Luminescence and Temperature-Sensing Characteristic of Yb(III), Er(III), and Tm(III) Codoped 12CaO·7Al2O3 Single Crystals. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2022, 126 (16) , 7264-7271. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.2c00692
  26. Mark J. J. Mangnus, Jeffrey Zom, Tom A. J. Welling, Andries Meijerink, Freddy T. Rabouw. Finite-Size Effects on Energy Transfer between Dopants in Nanocrystals. ACS Nanoscience Au 2022, 2 (2) , 111-118. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnanoscienceau.1c00033
  27. Thomas P. van Swieten, Andries Meijerink, Freddy T. Rabouw. Impact of Noise and Background on Measurement Uncertainties in Luminescence Thermometry. ACS Photonics 2022, 9 (4) , 1366-1374. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsphotonics.2c00039
  28. Peng Ren, Xianlin Zheng, Jun Zhang, Simone De Camillis, Jianguo Jia, Hao Wang, Xiaozhou Liao, James A. Piper, Yiqing Lu. Quantifying the Influence of Inert Shell Coating on Luminescence Brightness of Lanthanide Upconversion Nanoparticles. ACS Photonics 2022, 9 (3) , 758-764. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsphotonics.1c01695
  29. Federico Pini, Laura Francés-Soriano, Nicola Peruffo, Antonio Barbon, Niko Hildebrandt, Marta Maria Natile. Spatial and Temporal Resolution of Luminescence Quenching in Small Upconversion Nanocrystals. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2022, 14 (9) , 11883-11894. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.1c23498
  30. Subin Yu, Dohyub Jang, Hong Yuan, Wen-Tse Huang, Minju Kim, Filipe Marques Mota, Ru-Shi Liu, Hyukjin Lee, Sehoon Kim, Dong Ha Kim. Plasmon-Triggered Upconversion Emissions and Hot Carrier Injection for Combinatorial Photothermal and Photodynamic Cancer Therapy. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2021, 13 (49) , 58422-58433. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.1c21949
  31. Micah E. Raab, Steven L. Maurizio, John A. Capobianco, Paras N. Prasad. Lifetime of the 3H4 Electronic State in Tm3+-Doped Upconverting Nanoparticles for NIR Nanothermometry. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 2021, 125 (48) , 13132-13136. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.1c07659
  32. Kumbam Lingeshwar Reddy, Jikson Pulparayil Mathew, Elizabeth Shiby, Jatish Kumar. Spectral Engineering and Morphological Tuning of Amino Acid Capped Hydrophilic Upconversion Nanophosphors. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2021, 125 (47) , 26263-26273. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c08704
  33. Himanshu Sekhar Jena, Hannes Rijckaert, Chidharth Krishnaraj, Isabel Van Driessche, Pascal Van Der Voort, Anna M. Kaczmarek. Hybrid Nanocomposites Formed by Lanthanide Nanoparticles in Zr-MOF for Local Temperature Measurements during Catalytic Reactions. Chemistry of Materials 2021, 33 (20) , 8007-8017. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.1c02126
  34. Bryce S. Richards, Damien Hudry, Dmitry Busko, Andrey Turshatov, Ian A. Howard. Photon Upconversion for Photovoltaics and Photocatalysis: A Critical Review. Chemical Reviews 2021, 121 (15) , 9165-9195. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00034
  35. Yi Wei, Peipei Dang, Zhigao Dai, Guogang Li, Jun Lin. Advances in Near-Infrared Luminescent Materials without Cr3+: Crystal Structure Design, Luminescence Properties, and Applications. Chemistry of Materials 2021, 33 (14) , 5496-5526. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.1c01325
  36. Jason R. Casar, Claire A. McLellan, Chris Siefe, Jennifer A. Dionne. Lanthanide-Based Nanosensors: Refining Nanoparticle Responsiveness for Single Particle Imaging of Stimuli. ACS Photonics 2021, 8 (1) , 3-17. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsphotonics.0c00894
  37. Ho Ying Huang, Artiom Skripka, Liana Zaroubi, Brandon L. Findlay, Fiorenzo Vetrone, Cameron Skinner, Jung Kwon Oh, Louis A. Cuccia. Electrospun Upconverting Nanofibrous Hybrids with Smart NIR-Light-Controlled Drug Release for Wound Dressing. ACS Applied Bio Materials 2020, 3 (10) , 7219-7227. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsabm.0c01019
  38. Artiom Skripka, Antonio Benayas, Carlos D. S. Brites, Inocencio R. Martín, Luís D. Carlos, Fiorenzo Vetrone. Inert Shell Effect on the Quantum Yield of Neodymium-Doped Near-Infrared Nanoparticles: The Necessary Shield in an Aqueous Dispersion. Nano Letters 2020, 20 (10) , 7648-7654. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c03187
  39. Marcin Runowski, Przemysław Woźny, Natalia Stopikowska, Inocencio R. Martín, Víctor Lavín, Stefan Lis. Luminescent Nanothermometer Operating at Very High Temperature—Sensing up to 1000 K with Upconverting Nanoparticles (Yb3+/Tm3+). ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2020, 12 (39) , 43933-43941. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.0c13011
  40. Chen Lin, Zhengyu Xia, Lu Zhang, Xiumei Chen, Qiang Sun, Min Lu, Ze Yuan, Xiaoji Xie, Ling Huang. Organic Linkers Enable Tunable Transfer of Migrated Energy from Upconversion Nanoparticles. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2020, 12 (28) , 31783-31792. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.0c07683
  41. Hui Li, Xin Wang, Xiaolong Li, Songjun Zeng, Guanying Chen. Clearable Shortwave-Infrared-Emitting NaErF4 Nanoparticles for Noninvasive Dynamic Vascular Imaging. Chemistry of Materials 2020, 32 (8) , 3365-3375. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.9b04784
  42. Aravind Baride, P. Stanley May, Jr, Mary T. Berry. Cross-Relaxation from Er3+(2H11/2,4S3/2) and Er3+(2H9/2) in β-NaYF4:Yb,Er and Implications for Modeling Upconversion Dynamics. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2020, 124 (3) , 2193-2201. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b10163
  43. Bhagyesh Purohit, Yannick Guyot, David Amans, Marie-France Joubert, Benoit Mahler, Shashank Mishra, Stephane Daniele, Christophe Dujardin, Gilles Ledoux. Multicolor Solar Absorption as a Synergetic UV Upconversion Enhancement Mechanism in LiYF4:Yb3+,Tm3+ Nanocrystals. ACS Photonics 2019, 6 (12) , 3126-3131. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsphotonics.9b01151
  44. Yunfei Shang, Qi Han, Shuwei Hao, Tong Chen, Yuyan Zhu, Zhongyang Wang, Chunhui Yang. Dual-Mode Upconversion Nanoprobe Enables Broad-Range Thermometry from Cryogenic to Room Temperature. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2019, 11 (45) , 42455-42461. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b11751
  45. Santosh K. Gupta, Maya Abdou, Jose P. Zuniga, Alexander A. Puretzky, Yuanbing Mao. Samarium-Activated La2Hf2O7 Nanoparticles as Multifunctional Phosphors. ACS Omega 2019, 4 (19) , 17956-17966. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.9b01318
  46. Chris Siefe, Randy D. Mehlenbacher, Chunte Sam Peng, Yunxiang Zhang, Stefan Fischer, Alice Lay, Claire A. McLellan, A. Paul Alivisatos, Steven Chu, Jennifer A. Dionne. Sub-20 nm Core–Shell–Shell Nanoparticles for Bright Upconversion and Enhanced Förster Resonant Energy Transfer. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2019, 141 (42) , 16997-17005. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.9b09571
  47. Antonín Hlaváček, Jana Křivánková, Jan Přikryl, František Foret. Photon-Upconversion Barcoding with Multiple Barcode Channels: Application for Droplet Microfluidics. Analytical Chemistry 2019, 91 (20) , 12630-12635. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.9b03117
  48. Yanqing Hu, Qiyue Shao, Yan Dong, Jianqing Jiang. Energy Loss Mechanism of Upconversion Core/Shell Nanocrystals. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2019, 123 (36) , 22674-22679. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b07176
  49. Zhenghuan Zhao, Jun Yuan, Xinyu Zhao, Aishwarya Bandla, Nitish V. Thakor, Mei Chee Tan. Engineering the Infrared Luminescence and Photothermal Properties of Double-Shelled Rare-Earth-Doped Nanoparticles for Biomedical Applications. ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering 2019, 5 (8) , 4089-4101. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b00526
  50. Alice Lay, Olivia H. Sheppard, Chris Siefe, Claire A. McLellan, Randy D. Mehlenbacher, Stefan Fischer, Miriam B. Goodman, Jennifer A. Dionne. Optically Robust and Biocompatible Mechanosensitive Upconverting Nanoparticles. ACS Central Science 2019, 5 (7) , 1211-1222. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscentsci.9b00300
  51. Yufu Ren, Hayden Winter, Justin G. Rosch, Kyungoh Jung, Allison N. Duross, Madeleine R. Landry, Guillem Pratx, Conroy Sun. PEGylated β-NaGdF4/Tb@CaF2 Core/Shell Nanophosphors for Enhanced Radioluminescence and Folate Receptor Targeting. ACS Applied Nano Materials 2019, 2 (6) , 3718-3727. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.9b00629
  52. Amirhossein Alizadehkhaledi, Adriaan L. Frencken, Mohsen Kamandar Dezfouli, Stephen Hughes, Frank C. J. M. van Veggel, Reuven Gordon. Cascaded Plasmon-Enhanced Emission from a Single Upconverting Nanocrystal. ACS Photonics 2019, 6 (5) , 1125-1131. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsphotonics.9b00285
  53. Elina Andresen, Ute Resch-Genger, Michael Schäferling. Surface Modifications for Photon-Upconversion-Based Energy-Transfer Nanoprobes. Langmuir 2019, 35 (15) , 5093-5113. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.9b00238
  54. Lihua Yu, Guowei Li, Yongsheng Liu, Feilong Jiang, Maochun Hong. Lanthanide-Doped KGd2F7 Nanocrystals: Controlled Synthesis, Optical Properties, and Spectroscopic Identification of the Optimum Core/Shell Architecture for Highly Enhanced Upconverting Luminescence. Crystal Growth & Design 2019, 19 (4) , 2340-2349. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.cgd.9b00040
  55. Kingshuk Mukhuti, Venkata N. K. B. Adusumalli, Venkataramanan Mahalingam, Bhavtosh Bansal. Classification of Transitions in Upconversion Luminescence of Lanthanides by Two-Dimensional Correlation Analysis. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A 2019, 123 (12) , 2457-2461. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.8b11052
  56. Xian Qin, Jiahui Xu, Yiming Wu, Xiaogang Liu. Energy-Transfer Editing in Lanthanide-Activated Upconversion Nanocrystals: A Toolbox for Emerging Applications. ACS Central Science 2019, 5 (1) , 29-42. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscentsci.8b00827
  57. Harish Lakhotiya, Adnan Nazir, Søren Roesgaard, Emil Eriksen, Jeppe Christiansen, Martin Bondesgaard, Frank C. J. M. van Veggel, Bo Brummerstedt Iversen, Peter Balling, Brian Julsgaard. Resonant Plasmon-Enhanced Upconversion in Monolayers of Core–Shell Nanocrystals: Role of Shell Thickness. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2019, 11 (1) , 1209-1218. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.8b15564
  58. Zhiming Zhang, Swati Shikha, Jinliang Liu, Jing Zhang, Qingsong Mei, Yong Zhang. Upconversion Nanoprobes: Recent Advances in Sensing Applications. Analytical Chemistry 2019, 91 (1) , 548-568. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.8b04049
  59. Miao Feng, Ruichan Lv, Liyang Xiao, Bo Hu, Shouping Zhu, Fei He, Piaoping Yang, Jie Tian. Highly Erbium-Doped Nanoplatform with Enhanced Red Emission for Dual-Modal Optical-Imaging-Guided Photodynamic Therapy. Inorganic Chemistry 2018, 57 (23) , 14594-14602. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.8b02257
  60. Bingru Huang, Jan Bergstrand, Sai Duan, Qiuqiang Zhan, Jerker Widengren, Hans Ågren, Haichun Liu. Overtone Vibrational Transition-Induced Lanthanide Excited-State Quenching in Yb3+/Er3+-Doped Upconversion Nanocrystals. ACS Nano 2018, 12 (11) , 10572-10575. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.8b05095
  61. Freddy T. Rabouw, P. Tim Prins, Pedro Villanueva-Delgado, Marieke Castelijns, Robin G. Geitenbeek, Andries Meijerink. Reply to “Overtone Vibrational Transition-Induced Lanthanide Excited-State Quenching in Yb3+/Er3+-Doped Upconversion Nanocrystals”. ACS Nano 2018, 12 (11) , 10576-10577. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.8b07376
  62. Yanqing Hu, Qiyue Shao, Peigen Zhang, Yan Dong, Feng Fang, Jianqing Jiang. Mechanistic Investigations on the Dramatic Thermally Induced Luminescence Enhancement in Upconversion Nanocrystals. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2018, 122 (45) , 26142-26152. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b07899
  63. Zijun Wang, Andries Meijerink. Concentration Quenching in Upconversion Nanocrystals. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2018, 122 (45) , 26298-26306. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b09371
  64. Yongyang Zhang, Jiandi Xin, Huibing Zheng, Zhengui Zhao, Junying Zhang, Yanmin Yang, Shukai Zheng, Rui Zhao, Bangfu Ding. Yb3+ Doping Monoclinic Lu2WO6: Near-Infrared Emission and Energy-Transfer Luminescence Mechanism. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2018, 122 (37) , 21607-21616. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b06636
  65. Yujun Wang, Wenxuan Han, Zeyu Sun, Wenzhen Diao, Xin Xie, Guoqiao Li, Zhenglong Zhang, Zhengkun Fu, Hairong Zheng. Photon avalanche effect and spectral control of single LiYF4:Yb3+/Pr3+microparticle. Journal of Luminescence 2025, 277 , 120893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlumin.2024.120893
  66. Yukai Wu, Fang Li, Yanan Wu, Hao Wang, Liangtao Gu, Jieying Zhang, Yukun Qi, Lingkai Meng, Na Kong, Yingjie Chai, Qian Hu, Zhenyu Xing, Wuwei Ren, Fuyou Li, Xingjun Zhu. Lanthanide luminescence nanothermometer with working wavelength beyond 1500 nm for cerebrovascular temperature imaging in vivo. Nature Communications 2024, 15 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-46727-5
  67. Simone Lamon, Haoyi Yu, Qiming Zhang, Min Gu. Lanthanide ion-doped upconversion nanoparticles for low-energy super-resolution applications. Light: Science & Applications 2024, 13 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41377-024-01547-6
  68. Xinyue Li, Xiaoke Wang, Yongwang Cao, Lizhi Xu, Long Han, Yi Ma, Wei Lv, Zhipeng Li. Highly sensitive and stable optical temperature sensing properties of Er3+/Yb3+ doped Lu2O2S phosphors. Journal of Luminescence 2024, 275 , 120751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlumin.2024.120751
  69. Hao Wu, Lin Yang, Liangliang Zhang, Huajun Wu, Guohui Pan, Yongshi Luo, Ligong Zhang, Feng Liu, Jiahua Zhang. Quantitative evaluation of various NIR-to-red upconversion mechanisms in NaYF4:20%Yb3+,2%Er3+ nanoparticles. Science China Materials 2024, 104 https://doi.org/10.1007/s40843-024-3022-y
  70. Baptiste Amouroux, Ali Eftekhari, Clément Roux, Jean‐Claude Micheau, Pierre Roblin, Mathieu Pasturel, Fabienne Gauffre, Christian Würth, Ute Resch‐Genger, Michel Sliwa, Aude Bouchet, Christophe Coudret. Synthesis and Emission Dynamics of Sub‐3 nm Upconversion Nanoparticles. Advanced Optical Materials 2024, 12 (24) https://doi.org/10.1002/adom.202303283
  71. Boyu Tian, Lin Fu, Yusong Wu, Guanyao Huang, Tairan Fu. Periodic lattice microscopic rate equation model for upconversion dynamics and determination of energy transfer microparameters. Physical Review B 2024, 110 (4) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.110.045105
  72. Qiudong Duan, Yusheng Xu, Yu Zha, Fanju Meng, Qi Wang, Yugeng Wen, Jianbei Qiu. Near‐Complete Suppression of NIR‐II Luminescence Quenching in Halide Double Perovskites for Surface Functionalization Through Facet Engineering. Advanced Science 2024, 14 https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202403198
  73. Ngoc Tram Anh Le, Yuri Jeong, Yoon Jung Jang, Kil Sik Min. Oxovanadium(IV) complexes containing tetradentate N2O2-type ligands: synthesis, crystal structure, antioxidant activity, and spectroscopic characterization. Journal of Inclusion Phenomena and Macrocyclic Chemistry 2024, 104 (5-6) , 277-287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10847-023-01215-z
  74. Yunfei Qu. Upconversion luminescence and temperature sensing properties of Tm 3+ , Yb 3+ , and Ho 3+ doped 12CaO·7Al 2 O 3 single crystals. Optical Materials Express 2024, 14 (6) , 1620. https://doi.org/10.1364/OME.525654
  75. Huan Ling, Daoming Guan, Rongrong Wen, Jialing Hu, Yanxin Zhang, Fei Zhao, Yunxiang Zhang, Qian Liu. Effect of Surface Modification on the Luminescence of Individual Upconversion Nanoparticles. Small 2024, 20 (26) https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202309035
  76. Shaoqi Zhu, Xiaofeng Xie, Xiaoyu Duan, Guanqing Song, Guanhong Lu, Yan Wang, Jing Sun. Efficiency enhancement of photovoltaic cells under infrared light irradiation by synergistic upconversion luminescence of NaYF4:Yb3+/Er3+/Tm3+@TiO2-CQDs. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry 2024, 207 , 115866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochem.2024.115866
  77. Georgios E. Arnaoutakis, Dmitry Busko, Bryce S. Richards, Aruna Ivaturi, Jeffrey M. Gordon, Eugene A. Katz. Ultra-broadband near-infrared upconversion for solar energy harvesting. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells 2024, 269 , 112783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2024.112783
  78. Ananth Kamath, Philippe Guyot-Sionnest. The “energy gap law” for mid-infrared nanocrystals. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2024, 160 (20) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0206018
  79. Shuning Zhang, Yubin Wang, Degang Deng, Su Zhou, Shiqing Xu, Lei Lei. Enhancing X‐Ray Excited Persistent Luminescence in Lanthanide‐Doped Fluoride Nanoparticles via a Versatile Acid Pickling Strategy. Laser & Photonics Reviews 2024, 13 https://doi.org/10.1002/lpor.202400357
  80. Zhihui Rao, Xiujian Zhao, Xiao Gong. Rare‐Earth‐Based Lead‐Free Halide Double Perovskites for Light Emission: Recent Advances and Applications. Advanced Functional Materials 2024, 34 https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202406424
  81. Zhuo Li, Jiacheng Gong, Shan Lu, Xingjun Li, Xiaobo Gu, Jin Xu, Jawairia Umar Khan, Dayong Jin, Xueyuan Chen. Photothermal lanthanide nanomaterials: From fundamentals to theranostic applications. BMEMat 2024, 13 https://doi.org/10.1002/bmm2.12088
  82. Chun Liu, Zhenggang Zou, Jiawei Zhu, Jinsheng Liao, Yijian Sun, Herui Wen, Guoliang Gong. Planar triangular lattice of the LuMgGaO4: Clustered site-occupancy and the upconversion luminescence of the co-doped Er,Yb ions. Journal of Luminescence 2024, 269 , 120468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlumin.2024.120468
  83. Hao Wu, Kexiu Wang, Liangliang Zhang, Yongshi Luo, Guohui Pan, Huajun Wu, Zhendong Hao, Feng Liu, Xiaojun Wang, Jiahua Zhang. Highly Efficient Three‐Photon Excited Red Emission in the Yb 3+ ‐Er 3+ Upconversion System at Low Excitation Intensities for Non‐Invasive Anti‐Counterfeiting. Advanced Optical Materials 2024, 12 (12) https://doi.org/10.1002/adom.202302530
  84. Miao Liu, Yingming Lai, Miguel Marquez, Fiorenzo Vetrone, Jinyang Liang. Short‐wave Infrared Photoluminescence Lifetime Mapping of Rare‐Earth Doped Nanoparticles Using All‐Optical Streak Imaging. Advanced Science 2024, 11 (11) https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202305284
  85. Christian Homann, Emille M. Rodrigues, Patrick Orsini, Keven Savard, Christophe-Badié Togola, Marie-Maude de Denus-Baillargeon, Maroun Massabki, Eva Hemmer. Gum Arabic-stabilized upconverting nanoparticles for printing applications. Optical Materials: X 2024, 21 , 100290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omx.2024.100290
  86. Yuqin Gao, Jingyao Liu, Jinyu Wan, Mengchao Guo, Minmin Wei, Kui Xu, Ze Yuan, Xiaoji Xie. Excitation pulse width-dependent luminescence decay of lanthanide-doped upconversion nanoparticles. Journal of Luminescence 2024, 266 , 120325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlumin.2023.120325
  87. Shaohua Wu, Yu Yang, Shuang Wu, Yanhui Dong, Hao Cui, Daguang Li, Weiping Qin. Enhanced downconversion luminescence of NaLuF:Yb,Er micrometer hexagonal prismatic crystals under 980 nm excitation. Journal of Fluorine Chemistry 2024, 44 , 110252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluchem.2024.110252
  88. Dechao Yu, Benchun Li, Arend Zhang, Jasper Pol, Dawei Zhang, Songlin Zhuang, Difei Zhou. Harnessing lanthanides for blue-to-UVB upconversion and its dye-sensitization. Journal of Materials Chemistry C 2024, 5 https://doi.org/10.1039/D4TC02187H
  89. Merin K. Abraham, Anju S. Madanan, Susan Varghese, Ali Ibrahim Shkhair, Geneva Indongo, Greeshma Rajeevan, N. S. Vijila, Sony George. NaYF 4 :Yb/Ho upconversion nanoprobe incorporated gold nanoparticle (AuNP) based FRET immunosensor for the “turn-on” detection of cardiac troponin I. The Analyst 2023, 149 (1) , 231-243. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3AN01405C
  90. Jiwei Li, Yao Xie, Renrui Sun, Junxun Zhou, Lining Sun. Exploring luminescence quenching on lanthanide-doped nanoparticles through changing the spatial distribution of sensitizer and activator. Nano Research 2023, 104 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-023-6319-1
  91. Brian N. Long, María J. Beltrán-Leíva, Joseph M. Sperling, Todd N. Poe, Cristian Celis-Barros, Thomas E. Albrecht-Schönzart. Altering the spectroscopy, electronic structure, and bonding of organometallic curium(III) upon coordination of 4,4′−bipyridine. Nature Communications 2023, 14 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-39481-7
  92. Di Wu, Dianping Tang. Recent advances on portable photoelectrochemical biosensors for diagnostics. Electroanalysis 2023, 35 (12) https://doi.org/10.1002/elan.202300265
  93. Quansheng Ge, Yiyuan Zhu, Chengao Li, Zhijie Ju, Renren Deng. Improving dispersibility of lanthanide-doped upconversion nanoparticles for luminescence applications in medium polarity solvents. Journal of Luminescence 2023, 264 , 120192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlumin.2023.120192
  94. Mark J. J. Mangnus, Vincent R. M. Benning, Bettina Baumgartner, P. Tim Prins, Thomas P. van Swieten, Ayla J. H. Dekker, Alfons van Blaaderen, Bert M. Weckhuysen, Andries Meijerink, Freddy T. Rabouw. Probing nearby molecular vibrations with lanthanide-doped nanocrystals. Nanoscale 2023, 15 (41) , 16601-16611. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3NR02997B
  95. Xiaoqi Zhao, Yami Ling, Hao Suo, Zhiyu Zhang, Jiangrui Bai, Chongfeng Guo. Size-controlled synthesis and red up-converted luminescence of CeO2:Yb3+/Er3+ nanospheres. Journal of Rare Earths 2023, 41 (10) , 1487-1493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jre.2022.08.006
  96. Xinya Fan, Xilian Ouyang, Zheping Zhou, Ziling Zhang, Xu Zhu, Yibo Liao, Zimin Wei, Beidou Xi, Lin Tang. A highly selective self-powered sensor based on the upconversion nanoparticles/CdS nanospheres for chlorpyrifos detection. Biosensors and Bioelectronics 2023, 237 , 115475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2023.115475
  97. Luiz F. dos Santos, Jefferson A.O. Galindo, Karmel de O. Lima, Allison R. Pessoa, Anderson M. Amaral, Leonardo de S. Menezes, Rogéria R. Gonçalves. Lifetime-based luminescence thermometry from Yb3+/Er3+ codoped nanoparticles suspended in water. Journal of Luminescence 2023, 262 , 119946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlumin.2023.119946
  98. Yuyang Gu, Chang Gu, Yuxiang Zhang, Zhen Mu, Xiaogang Liu. Mastering lanthanide energy states for next-gen photonic innovation. Science China Chemistry 2023, 66 (9) , 2460-2479. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11426-023-1609-y
  99. Carlos D. S. Brites, Riccardo Marin, Markus Suta, Albano N. Carneiro Neto, Erving Ximendes, Daniel Jaque, Luís D. Carlos. Spotlight on Luminescence Thermometry: Basics, Challenges, and Cutting‐Edge Applications. Advanced Materials 2023, 35 (36) https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202302749
  100. Ruth Abramson, Hannah Wilson, Marta M. Natile, Louise S. Natrajan. Development of an Fe 2+ sensing system based on the inner filter effect between upconverting nanoparticles and ferrozine. RSC Advances 2023, 13 (37) , 26313-26322. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3RA04645A
Load more citations
Open PDF

ACS Nano

Cite this: ACS Nano 2018, 12, 5, 4812–4823
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.8b01545
Published April 12, 2018

Copyright © 2018 American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under CC-BY-NC-ND.

Article Views

9741

Altmetric

-

Citations

Learn about these metrics

Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.

  • Abstract

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. (a) UC emission spectrum of β-NaYF4 nanocrystals co-doped with 2% Er3+ and 18% Yb3+ dispersed in cyclohexane, upon laser excitation in the Yb3+: 2F7/22F5/2 transition at 980 nm. The nanocrystals emit green photons from the 2H11/2 (520 nm) and 4S3/2 (540 nm) states and red photons (660 nm) from the 4F9/2 state. (b) Upon excitation of Yb3+ at 980 nm (dark-red wavy arrows), two consecutive energy-transfer processes (dotted lines) excite an Er3+ ion to a high excited state. Subsequently, after one or more nonradiative decay steps (black arrows) Er3+ can emit a visible photon (red or green wavy arrows). Other, more complicated, sequences of processes also contribute to the population of visible-emitting states. (35−37) (c) Transmission electron micrograph of the core-only β-NaYF4:0.1% Er3+ nanocrystals used in this work. Images of other nanocrystal samples and the extracted size distributions are presented in Figure S1 and Table S1. (d) Schematic of solvent quenching, where an excited state on a lanthanide center (here, Er3+) doped in a nanocrystal can decay by transferring energy to high-energy vibrations in the surrounding solvent. (e) The total rate of solvent quenching by dipole–dipole interaction depends strongly on the radial position of the lanthanide center in the nanocrystal, illustrated here for a nanocrystal of 10 nm radius without (red line) and with (blue line) a 3 nm-thick nonluminescent shell. (f) The range of solvents used in our experiments below, with different chemical nature (affecting the solvent-quenching rate; eq 2) and different refractive index (affecting the radiative decay rate; eq 3).

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. (a) Energy-level scheme of Er3+ with the green emission from the 4S3/2 level (in thermal equilibrium with 2H11/2; ref (44)) indicated as a green arrow and the nonradiative transition to the 4F9/2 level as a black dashed arrow. (b) Same for the red emission from the 4F9/2 level and the competing nonradiative transition to the 4I9/2 level. (c) Average excited-state decay rates ⟨Γtot⟩ of the green-emitting level in NaYF4:0.1% Er3+ NCs dispersed in different solvents (different colors; see Figure 1f), compared to the decay rate in bulk NaYF4:0.1% Er3+ (black cross). Filled circles represent core-only NCs, open circles core–shell NCs. Gray lines are iso-quantum-yield contours plotting η ≈ Γrad(n)/⟨Γtot⟩ with Γrad(n) according to eq 3. (d) Same, but for the red-emitting level. (e) The emission line shapes of the 4S3/24F9/2 (green) and the 4F9/24I9/2 (red) transitions of Er3+, which are responsible for nonradiative decay of the green- and red-emitting levels (see panel a), estimated based on the data from ref (45). (f) Infrared absorption spectra of hexane (red), octane (orange), cyclohexane (yellow), chloroform (green), toluene (cyan), chlorobenzene (blue), and o-dichlorobenzene (purple), taken from the SDBS database of the National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Japan. Dashed lines indicate the approximate spectral position of the C-H stretch vibrational energy in aliphatic (∼2930 cm–1) and aromatic (∼3070 cm–1) molecules. (g) Photoluminescence decay curves of the red-emitting 4F9/2 level upon direct excitation in bulk NaYF4:0.1% Er3+ (gray), compared to core–shell NCs (dark cyan) and core-only NCs (light cyan) of the same composition dispersed in toluene. The inset shows a zoom-in of the first 0.3 ms. Solid lines are fits to the solvent-quenching model (eq 5). (h) Same, but comparing bulk to NCs dispersed in cyclohexane.

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. (a) The average decay rate of the green-emitting level 4S3/2 for core–shell NCs (dark-colored bars) and core-only NCs (light-colors bars) with different doping concentrations (as indicated) and dispersed in different solvents (different colors), obtained from a single-exponential fit to the decay dynamics. White horizontal lines indicate the corresponding average decay rate in the bulk material. (b) Same for the red-emitting level 4F9/2. (c) Possible cross-relaxation pathways from the green-emitting levels of Er3+ to neighboring Er3+ or Yb3+ ions in the ground state. (d) Same for the red-emitting level of Er3+, where all of the possible cross-relaxation pathways exhibit a large energy mismatch between the donor and acceptor transition. (e) Schematic representation of energy migration (i.e., hopping) among Er3+ ions to the NC surface. (f) Photoluminescence decay curves of the green Er3+ emission in core–shell NCs dispersed in toluene, with doping concentrations of 0.1% Er3+ (black), 2% Er3+ (blue), and 2% Er3+ + 18% Yb3+ (green). Solid lines are fits to our model including solvent quenching and cross-relaxation (eqs 8 and 10). The inset shows a zoom-in on the first 0.2 ms. (g) Same for the green emission from core-only NCs. (h) Same for the red emission from core-only NCs, doped with 0.1% Er3+ (black), 2% Er3+ (yellow), and 2% Er3+ + 18% Yb3+ (red).

    Figure 4

    Figure 4. (a) Average decay rates ⟨Γtot⟩ of the near-infrared-emitting 4I11/2 level of Er3+ in core-only NCs (filled circles) and core–shell NaYF4 NCs (open circles) doped with 2% Er3+ and dispersed in different solvents, as determined from single-exponential fits. Gray lines are iso-quantum-yield contours plotting η ≈ Γrad(n)/⟨Γtot⟩, based on the bulk decay rate (black cross). (b) Photoluminescence decay curves of the near-infrared emission from core-only (blue) and core–shell (red) NaYF4:2% Er3+ NCs dispersed in toluene. Inset is a zoom-in. Solid lines show an attempt to fit our solvent-quenching model (eq 5) to the experiments using one value for ρC. (c) Same as in (a), but for the 2F5/2 level of Yb3+. Filled symbols represent core-only NCs, open symbols core–shell NCs. The NCs have dopant concentrations of 0.1% Yb3+ (squares), 18% Yb3+ (triangles), or 2% Er3+ plus 18% Yb3+(diamonds). The Er3+ and Yb3+ emissions cannot be spectrally distinguished for the co-doped NCs, so the recorded signal will contain contributions from both. The iso-quantum-yield contours are based on the bulk decay rate of Yb3+ (black cross). (d) A cartoon of rapid energy transfer and energy back-transfer between Er3+ and Yb3+ centers. (e) Photoluminescence decay curves of the near-infrared Yb3+ emission in NCs doped with 0.1% Yb3+ (red), 18% Yb3+ (green), or co-doped with 2% Er3+ and 18% Yb3+ (blue). The signal recorded from the co-doped NCs consists for a small part of 4I11/2 emission from Er3+ ions. This constitutes an estimated <5% of the total emission, based on the elemental ratio 2/18 and the ratio of radiative decay rates (Figure S2).

    Figure 5

    Figure 5. (a–c) The quantum yields of the various emitting levels in NaYF4:Er3+,Yb3+ UC NCs as a function of shell thickness. We consider (a) the green Er3+ emission from the 4S3/2 level, (b) the red Er3+ emission from the 4F9/2 level, and (c) near-infrared Yb3+ emission from the 2F5/2 level. Data points are obtained by integrating experimental photoluminescence decay curves (eq 12) from core-only NCs (filled symbols) or core–shell NCs (open symbols). We compare NCs dispersed in hexane (red), chlorobenzene (blue), and carbon disulfide (gray) and NCs doped with low concentration of the active center (0.1%; circles) to NCs co-doped with 2% Er3+ and 18% Yb3+ (squares). Lines are predictions from our solvent-quenching model for the green- and red-emitting levels at low doping (solid lines) and high doping (dashed lines; only distinct for the green emission). (d) Simplified model of UC with a ground state (0), an intermediate excited state (NIR), and a highest excited state (VIS). Arrows indicate excitation, decay, and energy-transfer processes.

  • References


    This article references 54 other publications.

    1. 1
      Cao, X.; Hu, B.; Zhang, P. High Upconversion Efficiency from Hetero Triplet–Triplet Annihilation in Multiacceptor Systems. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2013, 4, 23342338,  DOI: 10.1021/jz401213w
    2. 2
      Wu, M.; Congreve, D. N.; Wilson, M. W. B.; Jean, J.; Geva, N.; Welborn, M.; Van Voorhis, T.; Bulović, V.; Bawendi, M. G.; Baldo, M. A. Solid-State Infrared-to-Visible Upconversion Sensitized by Colloidal Nanocrystals. Nat. Photonics 2016, 10, 3134,  DOI: 10.1038/nphoton.2015.226
    3. 3
      Deutsch, Z.; Neeman, L.; Oron, D. Luminescence Upconversion in Colloidal Double Quantum Dots. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2014, 8, 649653,  DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2013.146
    4. 4
      Makarov, N. S.; Lin, Q.; Pietryga, J. M.; Robel, I.; Klimov, V. I. Auger Up-Conversion of Low-Intensity Infrared Light in Engineered Quantum Dots. ACS Nano 2016, 10, 1082910841,  DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.6b04928
    5. 5
      Krämer, K. W.; Biner, D.; Frei, G.; Güdel, H. U.; Hehlen, M. P.; Lüthi, S. R. Hexagonal Sodium Yttrium Fluoride Based Green and Blue Emitting Upconversion Phosphors. Chem. Mater. 2004, 16, 12441251,  DOI: 10.1021/cm031124o
    6. 6
      Suyver, J. F.; Grimm, J.; van Veen, M. K.; Biner, D.; Krämer, K. W.; Güdel, H. U. Upconversion Spectroscopy and Properties of NaYF4 Doped with Er3+, Tm3+ and/or Yb3+. J. Lumin. 2006, 117, 112,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jlumin.2005.03.011
    7. 7
      Martín-Rodríguez, R.; Fischer, S.; Ivaturi, A.; Froehlich, B.; Krämer, K. W.; Goldschmidt, J. C.; Richards, B. S.; Meijerink, A. Highly Efficient IR to NIR Upconversion in Gd2O2S:Er3+ for Photovoltaic Applications. Chem. Mater. 2013, 25, 19121921,  DOI: 10.1021/cm4005745
    8. 8
      Heer, S.; Kömpe, K.; Güdel, H.-U.; Haase, M. Highly Efficient Multicolour Upconversion Emission in Transparent Colloids of Lanthanide-Doped NaYF4 Nanocrystals. Adv. Mater. 2004, 16, 21022105,  DOI: 10.1002/adma.200400772
    9. 9
      Boyer, J.-C.; Vetrone, F.; Cuccia, L. A.; Capobianco, J. A. Synthesis of Colloidal Upconverting NaYF4 Nanocrystals Doped with Er3+, Yb3+ and Tm3+, Yb3+ via Thermal Decomposition of Lanthanide Trifluoroacetate Precursors. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 74447445,  DOI: 10.1021/ja061848b
    10. 10
      Boyer, J.-C.; Manseau, M.-P.; Murray, J. I.; van Veggel, F. C. J. M. Surface Modification of Upconverting NaYF4 Nanoparticles with PEG–Phosphate Ligands for NIR (800 nm) Biolabeling within the Biological Window. Langmuir 2010, 26, 11571164,  DOI: 10.1021/la902260j
    11. 11
      Wang, F.; Wang, J.; Liu, X. Direct Evidence of a Surface Quenching Effect on Size-Dependent Luminescence of Upconversion Nanoparticles. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 74567460,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201003959
    12. 12
      Wang, F.; Deng, R.; Wang, J.; Wang, Q.; Han, Y.; Zhu, H.; Chen, X.; Liu, X. Tuning Upconversion through Energy Migration in Core–Shell Nanoparticles. Nat. Mater. 2011, 10, 968973,  DOI: 10.1038/nmat3149
    13. 13
      Zou, W.; Visser, C.; Maduro, J. A.; Pshenichnikov, M. S.; Hummelen, J. C. Broadband Dye-Sensitized Upconversion of Near-Infrared Light. Nat. Photonics 2012, 6, 560564,  DOI: 10.1038/nphoton.2012.158
    14. 14
      Zhao, J.; Lu, Z.; Yin, Y.; McRae, C.; Piper, J. A.; Dawes, J. M.; Jin, D.; Goldys, E. M. Upconversion Luminescence with Tunable Lifetime in NaYF4:Yb,Er Nanocrystals: Role of Nanocrystal Size. Nanoscale 2013, 5, 944952,  DOI: 10.1039/C2NR32482B
    15. 15
      Zhao, J.; Jin, D.; Schartner, E. P.; Lu, Y.; Liu, Y.; Zvyagin, A. V.; Zhang, L.; Dawes, J. M.; Xi, P.; Piper, J. A.; Goldys, E. M.; Monro, T. M. Single-Nanocrystal Sensitivity Achieved by Enhanced Upconversion Luminescence. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2013, 8, 729734,  DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2013.171
    16. 16
      Chen, D.; Huang, P. Highly Intense Upconversion Luminescence in Yb/Er:NaGdF4 @NaYF4 Core–Shell Nanocrystals with Complete Shell Enclosure of the Core. Dalton Trans. 2014, 43, 1129911304,  DOI: 10.1039/c4dt01237b
    17. 17
      Liu, Y.; Zhao, J.; Zhang, R.; Liu, Y.; Liu, D.; Goldys, E. M.; Yang, X.; Xi, P.; Sunna, A.; Lu, J.; Shi, Y.; Leif, R. C.; Huo, Y.; Shen, J.; Piper, J. A.; Robinson, J. P.; Jin, D. Tunable Lifetime Multiplexing Using Luminescent Nanocrystals. Nat. Photonics 2014, 8, 3236,  DOI: 10.1038/nphoton.2013.322
    18. 18
      Arppe, R.; Hyppänen, I.; Perälä, N.; Peltomaa, R.; Kaiser, M.; Würth, C.; Christ, S.; Resch-Genger, U.; Schäferling, M.; Soukka, T. Quenching of the Upconversion Luminescence of NaYF4:Yb3+,Er3+ and NaYF4:Yb3+,Tm3+ Nanophosphors by Water: the Role of the Sensitizer Yb3+ in Non-Radiative Relaxation. Nanoscale 2015, 7, 1174611757,  DOI: 10.1039/C5NR02100F
    19. 19
      Fischer, S.; Johnson, N. J. J.; Pichaandi, J.; Goldschmidt, J. C.; van Veggel, F. C. J. M. Upconverting Core–Shell Nanocrystals with High Quantum Yield under Low Irradiance: On the Role of Isotropic and Thick Shells. J. Appl. Phys. 2015, 118, 193105,  DOI: 10.1063/1.4936119
    20. 20
      Rinkel, T.; Raj, A. N.; Dühnen, S.; Haase, M. Synthesis of 10 nm β-NaYF4:Yb,Er/NaYF4 Core/Shell Upconversion Nanocrystals with 5 nm Particle Cores. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 11641167,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201508838
    21. 21
      Johnson, N. J. J.; He, S.; Diao, S.; Chan, E. M.; Dai, H.; Almutairi, A. Direct Evidence for Coupled Surface and Concentration Quenching Dynamics in Lanthanide-Doped Nanocrystals. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 32753282,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.7b00223
    22. 22
      Hyppänen, I.; Höysniemi, N.; Arppe, R.; Schäferling, M.; Soukka, T. Environmental Impact on the Excitation Path of the Red Upconversion Emission of Nanocrystalline NaYF4:Yb3+,Er3+. J. Phys. Chem. C 2017, 121, 69246929,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b01019
    23. 23
      Schietinger, S.; Aichele, T.; Wang, H.-Q.; Nann, T.; Benson, O. Plasmon-Enhanced Upconversion in Single NaYF4:Yb3+/Er3+ Codoped Nanocrystals. Nano Lett. 2010, 10, 134138,  DOI: 10.1021/nl903046r
    24. 24
      Han, S.; Deng, R.; Xie, X.; Liu, X. Enhancing Luminescence in Lanthanide-Doped Upconversion Nanoparticles. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 1170211715,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201403408
    25. 25
      Sun, Q.-C.; Mundoor, H.; Ribot, J. C.; Singh, V.; Smalyukh, I. I.; Nagpal, P. Plasmon-Enhanced Energy Transfer for Improved Upconversion of Infrared Radiation in Doped-Lanthanide Nanocrystals. Nano Lett. 2014, 14, 101106,  DOI: 10.1021/nl403383w
    26. 26
      Fischer, S.; Kumar, D.; Hallermann, F.; von Plessen, G.; Goldschmidt, J. C. Enhanced Upconversion Quantum Yield near Spherical Gold Nanoparticles – a Comprehensive Simulation Based Analysis. Opt. Express 2016, 24, A460A475,  DOI: 10.1364/OE.24.00A460
    27. 27
      Yin, Z.; Li, H.; Xu, W.; Cui, S.; Zhou, D.; Chen, X.; Zhu, Y.; Qin, G.; Song, H. Local Field Modulation Induced Three-Order Upconversion Enhancement: Combining Surface Plasmon Effect and Photonic Crystal Effect. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 25182525,  DOI: 10.1002/adma.201502943
    28. 28
      Zhou, D.; Liu, D.; Xu, W.; Yin, Z.; Chen, X.; Zhou, P.; Cui, S.; Chen, Z.; Song, H. Observation of Considerable Upconversion Enhancement Induced by Cu2–xS Plasmon Nanoparticles. ACS Nano 2016, 10, 51695179,  DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.6b00649
    29. 29
      Xu, W.; Chen, X.; Song, H. Upconversion Manipulation by Local Electromagnetic Field. Nano Today 2017, 17, 5458,  DOI: 10.1016/j.nantod.2017.10.011
    30. 30
      Stouwdam, J. W.; Hebbink, G. A.; Huskens, J.; van Veggel, F. C. J. M. Lanthanide-Doped Nanoparticles with Excellent Luminescent Properties in Organic Media. Chem. Mater. 2003, 15, 46044616,  DOI: 10.1021/cm034495d
    31. 31
      Guyot-Sionnest, P.; Wehrenberg, B.; Yu, D. Intraband Relaxation in CdSe Nanocrystals and the Strong Influence of the Surface Ligands. J. Chem. Phys. 2005, 123, 074709,  DOI: 10.1063/1.2004818
    32. 32
      Aharoni, A.; Oron, D.; Banin, U.; Rabani, E.; Jortner, J. Long-Range Electronic-to-Vibrational Energy Transfer from Nanocrystals to Their Surrounding Matrix Environment. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2008, 100, 057404,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.057404
    33. 33
      Rabouw, F. T.; Den Hartog, S. A.; Senden, T.; Meijerink, A. Photonic Effects on the Förster Resonance Energy Transfer Efficiency. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 3610,  DOI: 10.1038/ncomms4610
    34. 34
      Senden, T.; Rabouw, F. T.; Meijerink, A. Photonic Effects on the Radiative Decay Rate and Luminescence Quantum Yield of Doped Nanocrystals. ACS Nano 2015, 9, 18011808,  DOI: 10.1021/nn506715t
    35. 35
      Anderson, R. B.; Smith, S. J.; May, P. S.; Berry, M. T. Revisiting the NIR-to-Visible Upconversion Mechanism in β-NaYF4:Yb3+,Er3+. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2014, 5, 3642,  DOI: 10.1021/jz402366r
    36. 36
      Berry, M. T.; May, P. S. Disputed Mechanism for NIR-to-Red Upconversion Luminescence in NaYF4:Yb3+,Er3+. J. Phys. Chem. A 2015, 119, 98059811,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpca.5b08324
    37. 37
      Zhang, J.; Hao, Z.; Li, J.; Zhang, X.; Luo, Y.; Pan, G. Observation of Efficient Population of the Red-Emitting State from the Green State by Non-Multiphonon Relaxation in the Er3+–Yb3+ System. Light: Sci. Appl. 2015, 4, e239,  DOI: 10.1038/lsa.2015.12
    38. 38
      van Dijk, J. M. F.; Schuurmans, M. F. H. On the Nonradiative and Radiative Decay Rates and a Modified Exponential Energy Gap Law for 4f–4f Transitions in Rare-Earth Ions. J. Chem. Phys. 1983, 78, 53175323,  DOI: 10.1063/1.445485
    39. 39
      Sokolov, V. I.; Zvyagin, A. V.; Igumnov, S. M.; Molchanova, S. I.; Nazarov, M. M.; Nechaev, A. V.; Savelyev, A. G.; Tyutyunov, A. A.; Khaydukov, E. V.; Panchenko, V. Ya. Determination of the Refractive Index of β-NaYF4/Yb3+/Er3+/Tm3+ Nanocrystals Using Spectroscopic Refractometry. Opt. Spectrosc. 2015, 118, 609613,  DOI: 10.1134/S0030400X15040190
    40. 40
      Dong, C.; Pichaandi, J.; Regier, T.; van Veggel, F. C. J. M. Nonstatistical Dopant Distribution of Ln3+-Doped NaGdF4 Nanoparticles. J. Phys. Chem. C 2011, 115, 1595015958,  DOI: 10.1021/jp206441u
    41. 41
      van Wijngaarden, J. T.; Scheidelaar, S.; Vlugt, T. J. H.; Reid, M. F.; Meijerink, A. Energy Transfer Mechanism for Downconversion in the (Pr3+, Yb3+) Couple. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2010, 81, 155112,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.155112
    42. 42
      Yu, D. C.; Martín-Rodrïguez, R.; Zhang, Q. Y.; Meijerink, A.; Rabouw, F. T. Multi-Photon Quantum Cutting in Gd2O2S:Tm3+ to Enhance the Photo-Response of Solar Cells. Light: Sci. Appl. 2015, 4, e344,  DOI: 10.1038/lsa.2015.117
    43. 43
      Henderson, B.; Imbusch, G. F. Optical Spectroscopy of Inorganic Solids; Clarendon Press: Oxford, 1989.
    44. 44
      Geitenbeek, R. G.; Prins, P. T.; Albrecht, W.; van Blaaderen, A.; Weckhuysen, B. M.; Meijerink, A. NaYF4:Er3+,Yb3+/SiO2 Core/Shell Upconverting Nanocrystals for Luminescence Thermometry up to 900 K. J. Phys. Chem. C 2017, 121, 35033510,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b10279
    45. 45
      Villanueva-Delgado, P.; Biner, D.; Krämer, K. W. Judd–Ofelt Analysis of β-NaGdF4: Yb3+, Tm3+ and β-NaGdF4:Er3+ Single Crystals. J. Lumin. 2017, 189, 8490,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jlumin.2016.04.023
    46. 46
      Fischer, S.; Swabeck, J. K.; Alivisatos, A. P. Controlled Isotropic and Anisotropic Shell Growth in β-NaLnF4 Nanocrystals Induced by Precursor Injection Rate. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 1232512332,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.7b07496
    47. 47
      Wang, F.; Liu, X. Upconversion Multicolor Fine-Tuning: Visible to Near-Infrared Emission from Lanthanide-Doped NaYF4 Nanoparticles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 56425643,  DOI: 10.1021/ja800868a
    48. 48
      Pollnau, M.; Gamelin, D. R.; Lüthi, S. R.; Güdel, H. U.; Hehlen, M. P. Power Dependence of Upconversion Luminescence in Lanthanide and Transition-Metal-Ion Systems. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2000, 61, 33373346,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.61.3337
    49. 49
      Hossan, M. Y.; Hor, A.; Luu, Q.; Smith, S. J.; May, S.; Berry, M. T. Explaining the Nanoscale Effect in the Upconversion Dynamics of β-NaYF4:Yb3+,Er3+ Core and Core–Shell Nanocrystals. J. Phys. Chem. C 2017, 121, 1659216606,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b04567
    50. 50
      Gargas, D. J.; Chan, E. M.; Ostrowski, A. D.; Aloni, S.; Altoe, M. V. P.; Barnard, E. S.; Sanii, B.; Urban, J. J.; Milliron, D. J.; Cohen, B. E.; Schuck, P. J. Engineering Bright Sub-10-nm Upconverting Nanocrystals for Single-Molecule Imaging. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2014, 9, 300305,  DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2014.29
    51. 51
      Villanueva-Delgado, P.; Krämer, K. W.; Valiente, R.; de Jong, M.; Meijerink, A. Modeling Blue to UV Upconversion in β-NaYF4:Tm3+. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2016, 18, 2739627404,  DOI: 10.1039/C6CP04347J
    52. 52
      Fischer, S.; Steinkemper, H.; Löper, P.; Hermle, M.; Goldschmidt, J. C. Modeling Upconversion of Erbium Doped Microcrystals Based on Experimentally Determined Einstein Coefficients. J. Appl. Phys. 2012, 111, 013109,  DOI: 10.1063/1.3674319
    53. 53
      Li, Z.; Zhang, Y. An Efficient and User-Friendly Method for the Synthesis of Hexagonal-Phase NaYF4:Yb, Er/Tm Nanocrystals with Controllable Shape and Upconversion Fluorescence. Nanotechnology 2008, 19, 345606,  DOI: 10.1088/0957-4484/19/34/345606
    54. 54
      Wang, F.; Deng, R.; Liu, X. Preparation of Core-Shell NaGdF4 Nanoparticles Doped with Luminescent Lanthanide Ions to Be Used as Upconversion-Based Probes. Nat. Protoc. 2014, 9, 16341644,  DOI: 10.1038/nprot.2014.111
  • Supporting Information

    Supporting Information


    The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.8b01545.

    • Tranmission electron microscopy of the upconversion nanocrystals, photoluminescence decay of bulk material, and a complete data set and modeling of excited-state decay dynamics of the visible-emitting levels (PDF)


    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.