ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
Thermodynamics Drives the Stability of the MOF-74 Family in Water
My Activity
  • Open Access
Article

Thermodynamics Drives the Stability of the MOF-74 Family in Water
Click to copy article linkArticle link copied!

  • Albert A. Voskanyan
    Albert A. Voskanyan
    Peter A. Rock Thermochemistry Laboratory and NEAT ORU, University of California at Davis, Davis, California 95616, United States
    School of Molecular Sciences and Center for Materials of the Universe, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287, United States
  • Vitaliy G. Goncharov
    Vitaliy G. Goncharov
    Department of Chemistry and Alexandra Navrotsky Institute for Experimental Thermodynamics, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington 99164, United States
  • Novendra Novendra
    Novendra Novendra
    Peter A. Rock Thermochemistry Laboratory and NEAT ORU, University of California at Davis, Davis, California 95616, United States
  • Xiaofeng Guo
    Xiaofeng Guo
    Department of Chemistry and Alexandra Navrotsky Institute for Experimental Thermodynamics, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington 99164, United States
    More by Xiaofeng Guo
  • Alexandra Navrotsky*
    Alexandra Navrotsky
    Peter A. Rock Thermochemistry Laboratory and NEAT ORU, University of California at Davis, Davis, California 95616, United States
    School of Molecular Sciences and Center for Materials of the Universe, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287, United States
    *Email: [email protected]
Open PDFSupporting Information (1)

ACS Omega

Cite this: ACS Omega 2020, 5, 22, 13158–13163
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.0c01189
Published May 26, 2020

Copyright © 2020 American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under these Terms of Use.

Abstract

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The stability of functional materials in water-containing environments is critical for their industrial applications. A wide variety of metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) synthesized in the past decade have strikingly different apparent stabilities in contact with liquid or gaseous H2O, ranging from rapid hydrolysis to persistence over days to months. Here, we show using newly determined thermochemical data obtained by high-temperature drop combustion calorimetry that these differences are thermodynamically driven rather than primarily kinetically controlled. The formation reaction of a MOF from metal oxide (MO) and a linker generally liberates water by the reaction MO + linker = MOF + H2O. Newly measured enthalpies of formation of Mg-MOF-74(s) + H2O(l) and Ni-MOF-74(s) + H2O(l) from their crystalline dense components, namely, the divalent MO (MgO or NiO) and 2,5-dihydroxyterephthalic acid, are 303.9 ± 17.2 kJ/mol of Mg for Mg-MOF-74 and 264.4 ± 19.4 kJ/mol of Ni for Ni-MOF-74. These strongly endothermic enthalpies of formation indicate that the reverse reaction, namely, the hydrolysis of these MOFs, is highly exothermic, strongly suggesting that this large thermodynamic driving force for hydrolysis is the reason why the MOF-74 family cannot be synthesized via hydrothermal routes and why these MOFs decompose on contact with moist air or water even at room temperature. In contrast, other MOFs studied previously, namely, zeolitic imidazolate frameworks (ZIF-zni, ZIF-1, ZIF-4, Zn(CF3Im)2, and ZIF-8), show enthalpies of formation in the range 20–40 kJ per mole of metal atom. These modest endothermic enthalpies of formation can be partially compensated by positive entropy terms arising from water release, and these materials do not react appreciably with H2O under ambient conditions. Thus, these differences in reactivity with water are thermodynamically controlled and energetics of formation, either measured or predicted, can be used to assess the extent of water sensitivity for different possible MOFs.

Copyright © 2020 American Chemical Society

Introduction

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) are a fascinating class of crystalline porous materials, constructed from the coordination of inorganic metal nodes and organic linkers. (1−3) Their potential functionalities, topologies, and physicochemical properties can be readily tuned by choosing appropriate components in the process of MOF assembly through the reticular chemistry approach. (4,5) As a result, a library of nanoporous MOF materials with ultrahigh specific surface areas, tailored pore sizes, and mechanical properties has been successfully synthesized, members of which have demonstrated great promise for various applications including gas storage and separation, sensing, drug delivery, catalysis, and energy storage. (6−10) However, though MOFs possess extremely high surface areas compared to zeolites and activated carbons, many show limited hydrothermal stability. (11−13) This significantly hinders their practical applications because H2O is commonly present in different forms in industrial processes. Thus, to prevent undesirable hydrolysis reactions, different strategies have been employed, including, but not limited to, constructing carboxylate MOFs with high valence metal cations, (14) building azolate frameworks with nitrogen-donor ligands, (15) and functionalizing pore walls with hydrophobic groups. (16) Despite great progress in fabricating MOFs with enhanced water stability, producing highly water/moisture stable MOFs still remains a daunting task. Therefore, it is imperative to explore the thermodynamic stability of MOFs in the presence of water.
Specifically, the present work seeks to answer whether water sensitivity for the MOF-74 family is driven by thermodynamics or controlled by kinetic factors. For initial thermodynamic analysis, we chose the MOF-74 family because of its wide recognition, particularly Mg-MOF-74 is known as one of the best candidates for the efficient postcombustion CO2 capture from water-containing flue gas generated from coal-fired power plants. (17,18) In contrast to other carboxylate MOFs, the MOF-74 family is very water-sensitive, thus it provides a good test of the importance of thermodynamic factors in determining MOF stability in the presence of water.
This work reports the first experimental study of the thermodynamic stability of water-sensitive MOFs using high-temperature drop combustion calorimetry. Unlike traditional room temperature acid or base solution calorimetry where the thermochemical parameters of MOFs are calculated from the measured heats of dissolutions, (19−21) the new methodology utilizes the heats of combustions at elevated temperature without any solvent. By using a specially designed dropping device developed initially for the study of actinide materials, (22) the activated samples can be kept in a totally water-free environment throughout the experiment. Importantly, drop combustion calorimetry allows the investigation of the thermodynamic properties of MOFs, which are not soluble or have limited solubility in acid or base solution at room temperature, hence dramatically extending the scope of MOF choice, including the MOF-74 family. Both methods have their merits. Complete solubility of the sample can be an issue in room temperature solution calorimetry, because incomplete dissolution or unexpected side reactions in the solvent may significantly affect the measured heat effect. Drop combustion calorimetry avoids this problem because of the high temperature and oxygen atmosphere, which convert organic–inorganic materials into metal oxide (MO), CO2, and H2O. However, unlike the large heat effects of drop combustion calorimetry, the heat effects of solution calorimetry are much smaller, and hence the presence of possible impurities can have less impact on the recorded heat. Thus, combustion calorimetry needs to be carried out very carefully and with well-characterized samples. This study paves the way for the thermochemical study of a much larger variety of MOFs, which will facilitate fundamental understanding and guide rational design and fabrication of MOFs with higher hydrothermal stability.

Results and Discussion

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The isostructural Mg-MOF-74 and Ni-MOF-74 were synthesized according to the established protocols from the literature with details given in the experimental section. Powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) was used to confirm the phase purity of the materials as shown in Figure 1A. Both samples have diffractograms well matching those of Mg-MOF-74 and Ni-MOF-74 reported in the literature. (23) The porosity was analyzed by N2 physisorption measurements (Figure 1B). As expected, both materials show typical type-I sorption isotherms with sharp N2 uptake at very low pressures, indicative of the microporous structure. The calculated Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) surface areas are 1141 and 956 m2/g and give pore volumes of 0.49 and 0.47 mL/g for Mg-MOF-74 and Ni-MOF-74, respectively. The obtained surface areas are within the range reported in the literature and indicate high purity of the samples. For example, 940 m2/g was reported for Mg-MOF-74 and 941 m2/g for Ni-MOF-74. (24,25) The metal to ligand stoichiometry was confirmed by thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) in O2 (Figure S1). The weight loss was calculated from 250 to 600 °C and corresponds to 2:1 metal/ligand molar ratio within ±5 wt % uncertainty.

Figure 1

Figure 1. (A) PXRD patterns and (B) N2 sorption isotherms of Mg-MOF-74 and Ni-MOF-74.

The heats of combustion (ΔHcom) of the activated MOFs and their corresponding ligand, 2,5-dihydroxyterephthalic acid (H4DOBDC), were measured at 800 °C in O2. The MOF completely oxidizes to a MO (MgO or NiO), and gaseous CO2, and H2O. Using an appropriate thermochemical cycle (Table 1) and the measured ΔHcom values (Table 2), the enthalpy of reaction (ΔHr°) between MO (M = Mg or Ni) and H4DOBDC ligands forming the M-MOF-74 and H2O (liquid) at room temperature was determined. The obtained values of ΔHr° are 303.9 ± 17.2 and 264.4 ± 19.4 (kJ/mol of M) for Mg-MOF-74 and Ni-MOF-74, respectively. Mg-MOF-74 is slightly more energetically unstable than Ni-MOF-74. These positive values indicate that the formation of M-MOF-74 plus liquid H2O from oxide and linker is strongly endothermic, which directly means the reverse reaction of MOF-74 and H2O (eq 1) is highly exothermic. The exothermic reaction suggests the metastability of the MOF with respect to hydrolysis
(1)
Table 1. Thermochemical Cycle Used to Calculate the Enthalpy of Reaction at Room Temperature (ΔHr°) between MO (M = Mg or Ni) and H4DOBDC Ligand Forming the M-MOF-74 and H2O via High-Temperature Drop Combustion Calorimetry at 800 °C in O2a
reactions used in the thermochemical cycleenthalpy
M2[C8H2O6](s,25°C) + 6.5O2(g,800°C) → 2MO(s,800°C) + 8CO2(g,800°C) + H2O(g,800°C)ΔH1 = ΔHcom(MOF-74)
C8H6O6(s,25°C) + 6.5O2(g,800°C) → 8CO2(g,800°C) + 3H2O(g,800°C)ΔH2 = ΔHcom(H4DOBDC)
MO(s,25°C) → MO(s,800°C)ΔH3 = H800° – H25°
H2O(l,25°C) → H2O(g,800°C)ΔH4 = H800° – H25°
2MO(s,25°C) + C8H6O6(s,25°C) → M2[C8H2O6](s,25°C) + 2H2O(l,25°C)ΔHr° = 2ΔH3 + ΔH2 – ΔH1 – 2ΔH4
a

ΔH1 and ΔH2 are experimentally measured and their values are listed in Table 2, ΔH3 and ΔH4 are the heat contents of MO and H2O at 800 °C and their corresponding values can be found in ref (35).

Table 2. Thermodynamic Data Obtained by High-Temperature Drop Combustion Calorimetry Measurements at 800 °C in O2
compoundformulaΔHcom (kJ/mol formula)ΔHr° (kJ/mol of M)H800° – H25° (kJ/mol)
Mg-MOF-74Mg2[C8H2O6]–3079.9 ± 16.44303.89 ± 17.21 
Ni-MOF-74Ni2[C8H2O6]–2989.9 ± 18.76264.38 ± 19.44 
H4DOBDCC8H6O6–2394.0 ± 5.12  
MgOMgO  34.24
NiONiO  39.73
H2OH2O  73.30
ZIF-1C6H6N4Zn 19.9 ± 2.5 (37) 
ZIF-4C6H6N4Zn 22.1 ± 2.7 (37) 
ZIF-7C14H10N4O2.24Zn 27.2 ± 3.9 (37) 
ZIF-8C8H10N4Zn 27.1 ± 1.9 (37) 
qtz-Zn(CF3Im)2C7H6N4F3Zn 27.1 ± 1.0 (41) 
SOD-Zn(CF3Im)2C7H6N4F3Zn 42.7 ± 1.1 (41) 
The release of H2O in the formation reaction and its consumption during hydrolysis will make a small entropic TΔS contribution to the free energy of reaction. The enthalpic contribution especially at room temperature and with liquid water as a reference state is by far the larger term, so the free energy of reaction is dominated by ΔH. The persistence of a phase under potential reaction conditions is governed by an interplay between thermodynamic driving forces (negative free energy of reaction) and kinetic barriers. In general, the larger the thermodynamic driving force the more likely the system is to overcome any potential kinetic barrier to reaction. Thus, given the very large exothermic driving forces for hydrolysis, it is not surprising that the two MOF-74 samples degrade in the presence of water.
In a fully dehydrated state, the metal nodes in the MOF-74 structure are coordinated with the five oxygen atoms of carboxyl and hydroxy groups of the ligand, leaving one coordinatively unsaturated metal site, which was originally occupied by water or solvent molecules. The formed structure with etb topology creates unimodal ∼1.1 nm hexagonal pores composed of square-pyramidal metal-oxide clusters forming the vertices of the pores. The exposed coordinatively unsaturated metal atoms, which serve as Lewis acid sites, are known to strongly bind with Lewis bases, such as H2O and CO2 molecules with remarkably high uptake at room temperature and low partial pressures, (26,27) which is supported by our thermodynamic results. This means that the interaction of water molecules with MOF-74 is strongly thermodynamically driven and not simply a matter of kinetics.
Because of such a high water affinity, Mg-MOF-74 undergoes structural changes or chemical transformations when exposed to water at ambient temperatures. (28−30) Specifically, it has been demonstrated that though Mg-MOF-74 exhibits superior adsorption capacity for CO2 in dry flue gas, the CO2 capacity was dramatically decreased to 16% of the initial capacity after exposure at 70% relative humidity (RH). (26) Furthermore, after 1 day of exposure at 75% RH, the surface area of Mg-MOF-74 decreased by 74% and after 14 days was only 6 m2/g. (31) This may suggest some irreversible decomposition on water exposure. Although the XRD pattern may still show some retention of the original MOF diffraction peaks, the loss of surface area strongly supports partial structural collapse and amorphization. It has been determined experimentally that Ni-MOF-74 is somewhat more water stable than the Mg-MOF-74. (32) In addition, Jiao et al. (33) observed that a small amount of Ni doping into Mg-MOF-74 can increase the percentage of surface area retained after water exposure compared to that of pure Mg-MOF-74. Density functional theory calculations demonstrate that H2O molecules bind more strongly with Mg (73.2 kJ/mol) open metal sites than with Ni (60.6 kJ/mol). (34) This persistent difference is confirmed by our thermodynamic results and 39.5 kJ/mol energetic difference between two MOFs indicates the higher hydrolytic stability of Ni-MOF-74 compared to its magnesium counterpart.
Based on molecular dynamic simulations and different experimental observations, the initial stage of MOF-74 hydrolysis involves M–OH bond formation. (12,29) This has been demonstrated by employing a reactive force field simulation for Zn-MOF-74. (36) Upon interaction with the active electrophilic metal centers, the dissociation of water molecules into H+ and OH species is influenced by the radius of the metal ion, OH combines with M2+ whereas H+ protonates the oxygen atoms on the ligand. For this reason, we have also calculated the ΔHr assuming metal hydroxide as the product instead of oxide after the hydrolysis (Tables S1 and S2). The data show that ΔHr is 378.7 ± 17.4 (kJ/mol of Mg) for Mg-MOF-74 and 294.0 ± 19.5 (kJ/mol of Ni) for Ni-MOF-74, showing that the hydrolysis of MOF-74 forming M(OH)2 is even more exothermic compared to the formation of the oxide, and maintaining the difference between Mg and Ni.
A more complete picture of the thermodynamic stability of MOFs relative to hydrolysis can be obtained by combining these new results with previously published data on MOF formation enthalpies using solution calorimetry (Table 2). (20,37−41) Compared to M-MOF-74, the ΔHr of MOF plus water forming oxide and ligand is much less exothermic for a series of zinc-containing zeolitic imidazolate frameworks (ZIFs), ranging from −42 to −19.5 kJ/mol of Zn. (37,40) This small exothermic effect, partially compensated by negative entropy terms arising from water consumption, implies the high stability of ZIFs with respect to water and indeed their hydrolytic stability has been confirmed by numerous literature reports. (42)
Such a large enthalpy difference (200–250 kJ/mol of M) between ZIFs + H2O and (Mg,Ni)-MOF-74 + H2O can be used to evaluate the magnitude of water sensitivity for different MOFs. For divalent MOs, one can find that, with increasing electronegativity of the metal atom, the stability of oxides against hydrolysis increases. The standard formation enthalpy of Mg(OH)2 from MgO plus H2O(l) is −37.4 kJ/mol and for Ni(OH)2 is −14.8 kJ/mol, (43) hence NiO is somewhat less unstable in water than MgO. Because carboxylate MOFs are composed of M–O moieties, this trend can be simply extended to explain the hydrolytic stability of MOFs as well. Therefore, Ni-MOF-74 is less hydrolytically unstable than Mg-MOF-74. It should be noted that the large enthalpy values obtained from the thermochemical cycles are specific to the overall hydrolysis reaction indicating that these MOFs will eventually undergo hydrolysis under the presiding thermodynamic driving force, perhaps slowly at room temperature or at a much higher rate at elevated temperatures.
This methodology can be generalized to investigate the thermodynamics of condensation/polycondensation reactions of various organic molecules (aldol condensation, Claisen condensation, and so on). Note, vitally important peptide bond formation is also a condensation reaction between two amino acids with the release of water molecules and, therefore, the developed method can be also employed to analyze thermodynamics in forming higher peptides from primary amino acids.
In summary, the thermodynamic stability of two MOF-74 materials in water was experimentally analyzed using a new methodology of high-temperature drop combustion calorimetry. These results, in conjunction with the previously obtained thermochemical data for other MOFs by room temperature solution calorimetry, define a general trend of energetics, indicating that the hydrolytic stability of the MOF-74 family is thermodynamically driven and not simply a matter of kinetics. This study provides a fundamental understanding to design and synthesize MOFs with high water stability for various emerging applications.

Experimental Methods

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Synthesis of Mg-MOF-74

0.712 g of Mg(NO3)2·6H2O and 0.167 g of 2,5-dihydroxyterephthalic acid were dissolved in a mixture of 67.5 mL of dimethylformamide (DMF), 4.5 mL of ethanol, and 4.5 mL of water under sonication in a 250 mL screw cap jar. The reaction jar was capped tightly and heated in an oven at 125 °C for 26 h. After cooling to room temperature, the solvent was carefully decanted from the product and replaced with methanol. The solvent exchange was carried out six times over the next three days. The solvent was removed in a dynamic vacuum at 220 °C for 12 h.

Synthesis of Ni-MOF-74

0.602 g of Ni(NO3)2·6H2O and 0.12 g of 2,5-dihydroxyterephthalic acid were dissolved in a mixture of 45 mL of DMF, 3 mL of ethanol, and 3 mL of water under sonication in a 250 mL screw cap jar. The reaction jar was capped tightly and heated in an oven at 110 °C for 60 h. After cooling to room temperature, the solvent was carefully decanted from the product and replaced with methanol. The solvent exchange was carried out six times over the next three days. The solvent was removed in a dynamic vacuum at 220 °C for 12 h.

Characterization

The crystal structure and purity of MOFs were characterized by PXRD with a Bruker D8 (AXS) Advance diffractometer, employing Ni-filtered Cu Kα radiation at 40 kV and a detector current of 40 mA. The N2 sorption experiments were performed using a Micromeritics ASAP 2020 instrument at 77 K and specific surface areas were calculated from the BET equation. Prior to gas sorption experiments, the powders were degassed at 493 K overnight under 10–6 Torr vacuum. The TGA was conducted using a Labsys evo Setaram instrument at a ramping rate of 10 °C/min in a 30 mL/min oxygen flow.

High-Temperature Drop Combustion Calorimetry

The drop combustion enthalpies (ΔHcom) of MOFs were obtained with a Calvet-type twin calorimeter (AlexSYS Setaram Inc.) in an empty quartz crucible under continuous 70 mL min–1 oxygen flow at 800 °C. To prepare the dropping pellets, the MOF samples were degassed at 220 °C for 12 h under 10–6 Torr vacuum to remove the adsorbed water. Then, the sample containing a sealed tube was transferred into an Ar-filled glove box with <1 ppm H2O and O2 concentration, respectively. It is very important to use completely dehydrated MOF samples because a small amount of adsorbed water can affect the combustion reaction. Because of the low density of MOFs, for each experiment around 2 mg of the samples were weighed inside the glove box using a microbalance with an accuracy of 1 μg. Subsequently, the weighed pellets were placed inside the specially designed 3D printed dropper, which allows transferring the sample from the glove box to the calorimeter without exposing samples to air. For each sample, 4–6 dropping measurements were conducted and an average value was used for the thermodynamic calculations. The heat effect of benzoic acid was used to determine the calibration factor of the instrument.

Supporting Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.0c01189.

  • TGA curves and thermochemical tables (PDF)

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Author Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

  • Corresponding Author
    • Alexandra Navrotsky - Peter A. Rock Thermochemistry Laboratory and NEAT ORU, University of California at Davis, Davis, California 95616, United StatesSchool of Molecular Sciences and Center for Materials of the Universe, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287, United StatesOrcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-3260-0364 Email: [email protected]
  • Authors
    • Albert A. Voskanyan - Peter A. Rock Thermochemistry Laboratory and NEAT ORU, University of California at Davis, Davis, California 95616, United StatesSchool of Molecular Sciences and Center for Materials of the Universe, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287, United StatesOrcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0001-5639-2590
    • Vitaliy G. Goncharov - Department of Chemistry and Alexandra Navrotsky Institute for Experimental Thermodynamics, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington 99164, United States
    • Novendra Novendra - Peter A. Rock Thermochemistry Laboratory and NEAT ORU, University of California at Davis, Davis, California 95616, United StatesOrcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0003-0927-5759
    • Xiaofeng Guo - Department of Chemistry and Alexandra Navrotsky Institute for Experimental Thermodynamics, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington 99164, United StatesOrcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0003-3129-493X
  • Notes
    The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Acknowledgments

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, grant DE-FG02-03ER46053. X.G. and V.G.G. acknowledge the WSU institutional funds, facility support from the Nuclear Science Center at WSU, and support from the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Nuclear Energy, grant DE-NE0008582. We additionally thank Dr. Qiang Zhang and Jiahong Li at WSU for assistance in using the adsorption analyzer and the glovebox for handling the MOF samples and droppers.

References

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article references 43 other publications.

  1. 1
    Long, J. R.; Yaghi, O. M. Pervasive Chemistry of Metal-Organic Frameworks. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009, 38, 12131214,  DOI: 10.1039/b903811f
  2. 2
    Zhou, H.-C.; Long, J. R.; Yaghi, O. M. Introduction to Metal-organic Frameworks. Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 673674,  DOI: 10.1021/cr300014x
  3. 3
    Furukawa, H.; Cordova, K. E.; O’Keeffe, M.; Yaghi, O. M. The Chemistry and Applications of Metal-Organic-Frameworks. Science 2013, 341, 1230444,  DOI: 10.1126/science.1230444
  4. 4
    Yaghi, O. M.; O’Keeffe, M.; Ockwig, N. W.; Chae, H. K.; Eddaoudi, M.; Kim, J. Reticular synthesis and the design of new materials. Nature 2003, 423, 705714,  DOI: 10.1038/nature01650
  5. 5
    Wilmer, C. E.; Leaf, M.; Lee, C. Y.; Farha, O. K.; Hauser, B. G.; Hupp, J. T.; Snurr, R. Q. Large-scale screening of hypothetical metal–organic frameworks. Nat. Chem. 2012, 4, 8389,  DOI: 10.1038/nchem.1192
  6. 6
    Lee, J.; Farha, O. K.; Roberts, J.; Scheidt, K. A.; Nguyen, S. T.; Hupp, J. T. Metal–organic framework materials as catalysts. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009, 38, 14501459,  DOI: 10.1039/b807080f
  7. 7
    Kreno, L. E.; Leong, K.; Farha, O. K.; Allendorf, M.; Van Duyne, R. P.; Hupp, J. T. Metal–Organic Framework Materials as Chemical Sensors. Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 11051125,  DOI: 10.1021/cr200324t
  8. 8
    He, Y.; Zhou, W.; Qian, G.; Chen, B. Methane storage in metal–organic frameworks. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 56575678,  DOI: 10.1039/c4cs00032c
  9. 9
    Wu, M.-X.; Yang, Y.-W. Metal–Organic Framework (MOF)-Based Drug/Cargo Delivery and Cancer Therapy. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1606134,  DOI: 10.1002/adma.201606134
  10. 10
    Wu, H. B.; Lou, X. W. Metal-organic frameworks and their derived materials for electrochemical energy storage and conversion: Promises and challenges. Sci. Adv. 2017, 3, eaap9252  DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aap9252
  11. 11
    Schoenecker, P. M.; Carson, C. G.; Jasuja, H.; Flemming, C. J. J.; Walton, K. S. Effect of Water Adsorption on Retention of Structure and Surface Area of Metal–Organic Frameworks. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2012, 51, 65136519,  DOI: 10.1021/ie202325p
  12. 12
    Burtch, N. C.; Jasuja, H.; Walton, K. S. Water Stability and Adsorption in Metal–Organic Frameworks. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 1057510612,  DOI: 10.1021/cr5002589
  13. 13
    Wang, C.; Liu, X.; Keser Demir, N.; Chen, J. P.; Li, K. Applications of water stable metal–organic frameworks. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2016, 45, 51075134,  DOI: 10.1039/c6cs00362a
  14. 14
    Bosch, M.; Zhang, M.; Zhou, H.-C. Increasing the Stability of Metal-Organic Frameworks. Adv. Chem. 2014, 2014, 18,  DOI: 10.1155/2014/182327
  15. 15
    Zhang, J.-P.; Zhang, Y.-B.; Lin, J.-B.; Chen, X.-M. Metal Azolate Frameworks: From Crystal Engineering to Functional Materials. Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 10011033,  DOI: 10.1021/cr200139g
  16. 16
    Taylor, J. M.; Vaidhyanathan, R.; Iremonger, S. S.; Shimizu, G. K. H. Enhancing Water Stability of Metal–Organic Frameworks via Phosphonate Monoester Linkers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 1433814340,  DOI: 10.1021/ja306812r
  17. 17
    Mason, J. A.; Sumida, K.; Herm, Z. R.; Krishna, R.; Long, J. R. Evaluating metal–organic frameworks for post-combustion carbon dioxide capture via temperature swing adsorption. Energy Environ. Sci. 2011, 4, 30303040,  DOI: 10.1039/c1ee01720a
  18. 18
    Wang, Q.; Bai, J.; Lu, Z.; Pan, Y.; You, X. Finely tuning MOFs towards high-performance post-combustion CO2 capture materials. Chem. Commun. 2016, 52, 443452,  DOI: 10.1039/c5cc07751f
  19. 19
    Hughes, J. T.; Navrotsky, A. MOF-5: Enthalpy and Energy Landscape of Porous Materials. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 91849187,  DOI: 10.1021/ja202132h
  20. 20
    Hughes, J. T.; Sava, D. F.; Nenoff, T. M.; Navrotsky, A. Thermochemical Evidence for Strong Iodine Chemisorption by ZIF-8. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 1625616259,  DOI: 10.1021/ja406081r
  21. 21
    Huskić, I.; Novendra, N.; Lim, D.-W.; Topic, F.; Titi, H. M.; Pekov, I. V.; Krivovichev, S. V.; Navrotsky, A.; Kitagawa, H.; Friscic, T. Functionality in metal–organic framework minerals: proton conductivity, stability and potential for polymorphism. Chem. Sci. 2019, 10, 49234929,  DOI: 10.1039/c8sc05088k
  22. 22
    Guo, X.; Boukhalfa, H.; Mitchell, J. N.; Ramos, M.; Gaunt, A. J.; Migliori, A.; Roback, R. C.; Navrotsky, A.; Xu, H. Sample seal-and-drop device and methodology for high temperature oxide melt solution calorimetric measurements of PuO2. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2019, 90, 044101,  DOI: 10.1063/1.5093567
  23. 23
    Rosi, N. L.; Kim, J.; Eddaoudi, M.; Chen, B.; O’Keeffe, M.; Yaghi, O. M. Rod Packings and Metal–Organic Frameworks Constructed from Rod-Shaped Secondary Building Units. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 15041518,  DOI: 10.1021/ja045123o
  24. 24
    Sun, H.; Ren, D.; Kong, R.; Wang, D.; Jiang, H.; Tan, J.; Wu, D.; Chen, S.; Shen, B. Tuning 1-hexene/n-hexane adsorption on MOF-74 via constructing Co-Mg bimetallic frameworks. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2019, 284, 151160,  DOI: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2019.04.031
  25. 25
    Chen, C.; Feng, X.; Zhu, Q.; Dong, R.; Yang, R.; Cheng, Y.; He, C. Microwave-Assisted Rapid Synthesis of Well-Shaped MOF-74 (Ni) for CO2 Efficient Capture. Inorg. Chem. 2019, 58, 27172728,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.
  26. 26
    Caskey, S. R.; Wong-Foy, A. G.; Matzger, A. J. Dramatic Tuning of Carbon Dioxide Uptake via Metal Substitution in a Coordination Polymer with Cylindrical Pores. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 1087010871,  DOI: 10.1021/ja8036096
  27. 27
    Yang, D.-A.; Cho, H.-Y.; Kim, J.; Yang, S.-T.; Ahn, W.-S. CO2 capture and conversion using Mg-MOF-74 prepared by a sonochemical method. Energy Environ. Sci. 2012, 5, 64656473,  DOI: 10.1039/c1ee02234b
  28. 28
    Kizzie, A. C.; Wong-Foy, A. G.; Matzger, A. J. Effect of Humidity on the Performance of Microporous Coordination Polymers as Adsorbents for CO2 Capture. Langmuir 2011, 27, 63686373,  DOI: 10.1021/la200547k
  29. 29
    Tan, K.; Zuluaga, S.; Gong, Q.; Canepa, P.; Wang, H.; Li, J.; Chabal, Y. J.; Thonhauser, T. Water Reaction Mechanism in Metal Organic Frameworks with Coordinatively Unsaturated Metal Ions: MOF-74. Chem. Mater. 2014, 26, 68866895,  DOI: 10.1021/cm5038183
  30. 30
    Zuluaga, S.; Fuentes-Fernandez, E. M. A.; Tan, K.; Xu, F.; Li, J.; Chabal, Y. J.; Thonhauser, T. Understanding and controlling water stability of MOF-74. J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 4, 51765183,  DOI: 10.1039/c5ta10416e
  31. 31
    Kumar, A.; Madden, D. G.; Lusi, M.; Chen, K.-J.; Daniels, E. A.; Curtin, T.; Perry, J. J.; Zaworotko, M. J. Direct Air Capture of CO2 by Physisorbent Materials. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 1437214377,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201506952
  32. 32
    Liu, J.; Benin, A. I.; Furtado, A. M. B.; Jakubczak, P.; Willis, R. R.; Levan, M. D. Stability Effects on CO2 Adsorption for the DOBDC Series of Metal-Organic Frameworks. Langmuir 2011, 27, 1145111456,  DOI: 10.1021/la201774x
  33. 33
    Jiao, Y.; Morelock, C. R.; Burtch, N. C.; Mounfield, W. P.; Hungerford, J. T.; Walton, K. S. Tuning the Kinetic Water Stability and Adsorption Interactions of Mg-MOF-74 by Partial Substitution with Co or Ni. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2015, 54, 1240812414,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.5b03843
  34. 34
    Canepa, P.; Arter, C. A.; Conwill, E. M.; Johnson, D. H.; Shoemaker, B. A.; Soliman, K. Z.; Thonhauser, T. High-throughput screening of small-molecule adsorption in MOF. J. Mater. Chem. A 2013, 1, 1359713604,  DOI: 10.1039/c3ta12395b
  35. 35
    Robie, R. A.; Hemingway, B. S. Thermodynamic Properties of Minerals and Related Substances at 298.15 K and 1 Bar (105 Pascals) Pressure and at Higher Temperatures, US Geological Survey Bulletin, 2131; US Government Printing Office, 1995.
  36. 36
    Han, S. S.; Choi, S.-H.; van Duin, A. C. T. Molecular dynamics simulations of stability of metal–organic frameworks against H2O using the ReaxFF reactive force field. Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 57135715,  DOI: 10.1039/c0cc01132k
  37. 37
    Hughes, J. T.; Bennett, T. D.; Cheetham, A. K.; Navrotsky, A. Thermochemistry of Zeolitic Imidazolate Frameworks of Varying Porosity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 598601,  DOI: 10.1021/ja311237m
  38. 38
    Wu, D.; Navrotsky, A. Thermodynamics of metal-organic frameworks. J. Solid State Chem. 2015, 223, 5358,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jssc.2014.06.015
  39. 39
    Akimbekov, Z.; Wu, D.; Brozek, C. K.; Dincă, M.; Navrotsky, A. Thermodynamics of solvent interaction with the metal-organic framework MOF-5. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2016, 18, 11581162,  DOI: 10.1039/c5cp05370f
  40. 40
    Akimbekov, Z.; Katsenis, A. D.; Nagabhushana, G. P.; Ayoub, G.; Arhangelskis, M.; Morris, A. J.; Friščić, T.; Navrotsky, A. Experimental and Theoretical Evaluation of the Stability of True MOF Polymorphs Explains Their Mechanochemical Interconversions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 79527957,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.7b03144
  41. 41
    Arhangelskis, M.; Katsenis, A. D.; Novendra, N.; Akimbekov, Z.; Gandrath, D.; Marrett, J. M.; Ayoub, G.; Morris, A. J.; Farha, O. K.; Friščić, T.; Navrotsky, A. Theoretical Prediction and Experimental Evaluation of Topological Landscape and Thermodynamic Stability of a Fluorinated Zeolitic Imidazolate Framework. Chem. Mater. 2019, 31, 37773783,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.9b00994
  42. 42
    Park, K. S.; Ni, Z.; Cote, A. P.; Choi, J. Y.; Huang, R.; Uribe-Romo, F. J.; Chae, H. K.; O’Keeffe, M.; Yaghi, O. M. Exceptional chemical and thermal stability of zeolitic imidazolate frameworks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2006, 103, 1018610191,  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0602439103
  43. 43
    Allada, R. K.; Peltier, E.; Navrotsky, A.; Casey, W. H.; Johnson, C. A.; Berbeco, H. T.; Sparks, D. L. Calorimetric determination of the enthalpies of formation of hydrotalcite-like solids and their use in the geochemical modeling of metals in natural waters. Clays Clay Miner. 2006, 54, 409417,  DOI: 10.1346/ccmn.2006.0540401

Cited By

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!
Citation Statements
Explore this article's citation statements on scite.ai

This article is cited by 38 publications.

  1. Shunli Shi, Bingzhen Zhang, Lei Wang, Mingwei Yuan, Jiaxuan Yang, Weiming Xiao, Shunmin Ding, Shuhua Wang, Chao Chen. Thermally Triggered In Situ Template-Escape Strategy for Controlled Construction of Hollow MOFs. Inorganic Chemistry 2025, 64 (9) , 4603-4614. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.5c00089
  2. Matthew J. Hurlock, Matthew S. Christian, Leo J. Small, Stephen J. Percival, David X. Rademacher, Mara E. Schindelholz, Tina M. Nenoff. Exceptional Electrical Detection of Trace NO2 via Mixed Metal MOF-on-MOF Film-Based Sensors. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2024, 16 (46) , 63818-63830. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.4c15743
  3. Ruth M. Mandel, Piyusha S. Lotlikar, Tomče Runčevski, Jung-Hoon Lee, Joshua J. Woods, Tristan A. Pitt, Justin J. Wilson, Phillip J. Milner. Transdermal Hydrogen Sulfide Delivery Enabled by Open-Metal-Site Metal–Organic Frameworks. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2024, 146 (28) , 18927-18937. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.4c00674
  4. Jian Shen, Abhishek Kumar, Mohammad Wahiduzzaman, Dushyant Barpaga, Guillaume Maurin, Radha Kishan Motkuri. Engineered Nanoporous Frameworks for Adsorption Cooling Applications. Chemical Reviews 2024, 124 (12) , 7619-7673. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.3c00450
  5. Russell M. Main, Simon M. Vornholt, Romy Ettlinger, Philip Netzsch, Maximillian G. Stanzione, Cameron M. Rice, Caroline Elliott, Samantha E. Russell, Mark R. Warren, Sharon E. Ashbrook, Russell E. Morris. In Situ Single-crystal X-ray Diffraction Studies of Physisorption and Chemisorption of SO2 within a Metal–Organic Framework and Its Competitive Adsorption with Water. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2024, 146 (5) , 3270-3278. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.3c11847
  6. Gerson J. Leonel, Cameron B. Lennox, Manuel Scharrer, K Jayanthi, Tomislav Friščic, Alexandra Navrotsky. Experimental Investigation of Thermodynamic Stabilization in Boron Imidazolate Frameworks (BIFs) Synthesized by Mechanochemistry. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2023, 127 (36) , 17754-17760. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.3c04164
  7. Gerson J. Leonel, Cameron B. Lennox, Joseph M. Marrett, Tomislav Friščić, Alexandra Navrotsky. Crystallographic and Compositional Dependence of Thermodynamic Stability of [Co(II), Cu(II), and Zn(II)] in 2-Methylimidazole-Containing Zeolitic Imidazolate Frameworks. Chemistry of Materials 2023, 35 (17) , 7189-7195. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.3c01464
  8. Turki Alghamdi, Peter O. Aina, Ali A. Rownaghi, Fateme Rezaei. Influence of Interfering Ions and Adsorption Temperature on Radioactive Iodine Removal Efficiency and Stability of Ni-MOF-74 and Zr-UiO-66. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2023, 15 (28) , 33621-33632. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.3c05821
  9. Kent O. Kirlikovali, Sylvia L. Hanna, Florencia A. Son, Omar K. Farha. Back to the Basics: Developing Advanced Metal–Organic Frameworks Using Fundamental Chemistry Concepts. ACS Nanoscience Au 2023, 3 (1) , 37-45. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnanoscienceau.2c00046
  10. Lei Gan, Eduardo Andres-Garcia, Guillermo Mínguez Espallargas, José Giner Planas. Adsorptive Separation of CO2 by a Hydrophobic Carborane-Based Metal–Organic Framework under Humid Conditions. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2023, 15 (4) , 5309-5316. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.2c20373
  11. Satyanarayana Bonakala, Anas Abutaha, Palani Elumalai, Ayman Samara, Said Mansour, Fedwa El-Mellouhi. Democratizing the Assessment of Thermal Robustness of Metal–Organic Frameworks. ACS Omega 2022, 7 (50) , 46515-46523. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c05345
  12. Olivia R. Brohlin, Ryanne N. Ehrman, Fabian C. Herbert, Yalini H. Wijesundara, Arun Raja, Arezoo Shahrivarkevishahi, Shashini D. Diwakara, Ronald A. Smaldone, Jeremiah J. Gassensmith. Zeolitic Imidazolate Framework Nanoencapsulation of CpG for Stabilization and Enhancement of Immunoadjuvancy. ACS Applied Nano Materials 2022, 5 (10) , 13697-13704. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.1c03555
  13. Jiahong Li, Vitaliy G. Goncharov, Andrew C. Strzelecki, Hongwu Xu, Xiaofeng Guo, Qiang Zhang. Energetic Systematics of Metal–Organic Frameworks: A Case Study of Al(III)-Trimesate MOF Isomers. Inorganic Chemistry 2022, 61 (38) , 15152-15165. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.2c02345
  14. Robert Stanton, Emma Russell, Hayden Brandt, Dhara J. Trivedi. Capture of Toxic Oxoanions from Water Using Metal–Organic Frameworks. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 2021, 12 (37) , 9175-9181. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c02550
  15. Esra Y. Mertsoy, Xianghui Zhang, Cody B. Cockreham, Vitaliy G. Goncharov, Xiaofeng Guo, Jun Wang, Nian Wei, Hui Sun, Di Wu. Thermodynamic, Thermal, and Structural Stability of Bimetallic MIL-53 (Al1–xCrx). The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2021, 125 (25) , 14039-14047. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c02623
  16. Gerson J. Leonel, Mohit Verma, Godwin A. Agbanga, Laura Bonatti, Hakim Boukhalfa, Alexandra Navrotsky, Hongwu Xu. Thermodynamic stabilization in metal organic frameworks based on 1,3,5-benzenetricarboxylate linkers and rare earth metals. Physics and Chemistry of Minerals 2025, 52 (2) https://doi.org/10.1007/s00269-024-01303-7
  17. Manuel Scharrer, Laura Bonatti, Tullio Geraci, Sergey V. Ushakov, Juraj Majzlan, Michael Bustamante, Hiroshi Kojitani, Xiaofeng Guo, Hongwu Xu, Lei Zhang, Kristina Lilova, Shmuel Hayun, Tamilarasan Subramani, Alexandra Navrotsky. The joys and jitters of high‐temperature calorimetry. Journal of the American Ceramic Society 2025, 2 https://doi.org/10.1111/jace.20381
  18. Bastian Achenbach, Aysu Yurdusen, Norbert Stock, Guillaume Maurin, Christian Serre. Synthetic Aspects and Characterization Needs in MOF Chemistry – from Discovery to Applications. Advanced Materials 2025, https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202411359
  19. Liliana Giraldo, Juan Carlos Moreno-Piraján. Adsorption calorimetry: a comparison between experimental measurements and theoretical modeling using gas MOFs. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry 2024, 149 (19) , 10605-10617. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-024-13083-x
  20. Daniel Mottern, Joshua Young. First principles study of perfluoroalkyl substance adsorption in M -MOF-74 metal organic frameworks. Computational Materials Science 2024, 245 , 113334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2024.113334
  21. Shengshou Ma, Jiacheng Min, Chao Yang, Changzhong Liao, Yisong Zhu, Xiaolong Zhao, Ying Zhou, Xiao-yan Li, Qi Zhao, Kaimin Shih. Developing a low-carbon, scalable strategy for the conversion of spent batteries into metal-organic framework-74 for CO2 capture. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 2024, 209 , 107707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.107707
  22. Ahmed Ahmed, Aileen Kelly, Dayle Leonard, Waleed Saleem, Andrey Bezrukov, Constantinos G. Efthymiou, Michael J. Zaworotko, Davide Tiana, Aoife Boyd, Constantina Papatriantafyllopoulou. Synthesis and characterisation of antimicrobial metal–organic frameworks as multi-drug carriers. Dalton Transactions 2024, 53 (28) , 11867-11875. https://doi.org/10.1039/D4DT01100G
  23. Hongde An, Bo Xie, Duqiang Luo. Indirect Spectrophotometric Method Based on a Selective Reaction Between Bicinchoninic Acid and Copper(I) for the Determination of Metal Ions. Journal of Analytical Chemistry 2024, 79 (5) , 595-600. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1061934824050046
  24. Shreya Mahajan, Jere Elfving, Manu Lahtinen. Evaluating the viability of ethylenediamine-functionalized Mg-MOF-74 in direct air capture: The challenges of stability and slow adsorption rate. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 2024, 12 (2) , 112193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2024.112193
  25. Javier Aguila-Rosas, Betzabeth A. García-Martínez, Camilo Ríos, Araceli Diaz-Ruiz, Juan L. Obeso, Carlos T. Quirino-Barreda, Ilich A. Ibarra, Ariel Guzmán-Vargas, Enrique Lima. Copper release by MOF-74(Cu): a novel pharmacological alternative to diseases with deficiency of a vital oligoelement. RSC Advances 2024, 14 (2) , 855-862. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3RA07109J
  26. Mohd Khalid, Samrah Kamal, Shaikh Arfa Akmal. Solubility and thermodynamic stability of metal–organic frameworks. 2024, 159-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-95939-1.00004-6
  27. Alexandra Navrotsky, Gerson J. Leonel. Thermochemistry of hybrid materials. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 2023, 381 (2259) https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2022.0334
  28. Javier Aguila-Rosas, Dalia Ramos, Carlos T. Quirino-Barreda, Juan Andrés Flores-Aguilar, Juan L. Obeso, Ariel Guzmán-Vargas, Ilich A. Ibarra, Enrique Lima. Copper( ii )-MOFs for bio-applications. Chemical Communications 2023, 59 (79) , 11753-11766. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3CC03146B
  29. Vitaliy G. Goncharov, Juejing Liu, Andrew Strzelecki, Arjen van Veelen, Chris Benmore, Hakim Boukhalfa, Joshua T. White, Hongwu Xu, Xiaofeng Guo. Energetics of oxidation and formation of uranium monocarbide. Journal of Nuclear Materials 2023, 581 , 154446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2023.154446
  30. Guomei Mu, Guangzhao Wang, Qiuping Huang, Yujie Miao, Dan Wen, Dunmin Lin, Chenggang Xu, Yinji Wan, Fengyu Xie, Wenhan Guo, Ruqiang Zou. A Kinetic Control Strategy for One‐Pot Synthesis of Efficient Bimetallic Metal‐Organic Framework/Layered Double Hydroxide Heterojunction Oxygen Evolution Electrocatalysts. Advanced Functional Materials 2023, 33 (13) https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202211260
  31. Dalia Ramos, Javier Aguila-Rosas, Carlos T. Quirino-Barreda, Alfonso Santiago-Tellez, Hugo A. Lara-García, Ariel Guzmán, Ilich A. Ibarra, Enrique Lima. Linezolid@MOF-74 as a host–guest system with antimicrobial activity. Journal of Materials Chemistry B 2022, 10 (48) , 9984-9991. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2TB01819E
  32. Nan Chieh Chiu, Ryan P. Loughran, Andrzej Gładysiak, Rebecca Vismara, Ah-Hyung Alissa Park, Kyriakos C. Stylianou. Wet flue gas CO 2 capture and utilization using one-dimensional metal–organic chains. Nanoscale 2022, 14 (40) , 14962-14969. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2NR04156A
  33. Vitaliy G. Goncharov, Juejing Liu, Arjen van Veelen, Kyle Kriegsman, Chris Benmore, Chengjun Sun, Shelly Kelly, Joshua T. White, Hongwu Xu, Xiaofeng Guo. Energetics of oxidation and formation of uranium mononitride. Journal of Nuclear Materials 2022, 569 , 153904. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2022.153904
  34. Vitaliy G. Goncharov, Haylea Nisbet, Andrew Strzelecki, Chris J. Benmore, Artaches A. Migdisov, Hongwu Xu, Xiaofeng Guo. Energetics of hydroxylbastnäsite solid solutions, La1−xNd CO3OH. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 2022, 330 , 47-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2022.04.002
  35. Mingjin Cui, Chunpeng Yang, Sooyeon Hwang, Menghao Yang, Sean Overa, Qi Dong, Yonggang Yao, Alexandra H. Brozena, David A. Cullen, Miaofang Chi, Thomas F. Blum, David Morris, Zou Finfrock, Xizheng Wang, Peng Zhang, Vitaliy G. Goncharov, Xiaofeng Guo, Jian Luo, Yifei Mo, Feng Jiao, Liangbing Hu. Multi-principal elemental intermetallic nanoparticles synthesized via a disorder-to-order transition. Science Advances 2022, 8 (4) https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abm4322
  36. Akashdeep Nath, K. S. Asha, Sukhendu Mandal. Conductive Metal‐Organic Frameworks: Electronic Structure and Electrochemical Applications. Chemistry – A European Journal 2021, 27 (45) , 11482-11538. https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.202100610
  37. Abdul G. Al Lafi, Bassem Assfour, Thaer Assaad. Spectroscopic investigations of gamma-ray irradiation effects on metal organic framework. Journal of Materials Science 2021, 56 (21) , 12154-12170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-021-06051-5
  38. Claire L. Hobday, Gregor Kieslich. Structural flexibility in crystalline coordination polymers: a journey along the underlying free energy landscape. Dalton Transactions 2021, 50 (11) , 3759-3768. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0DT04329J

ACS Omega

Cite this: ACS Omega 2020, 5, 22, 13158–13163
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.0c01189
Published May 26, 2020

Copyright © 2020 American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under these Terms of Use.

Article Views

7674

Altmetric

-

Citations

Learn about these metrics

Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.

  • Abstract

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. (A) PXRD patterns and (B) N2 sorption isotherms of Mg-MOF-74 and Ni-MOF-74.

  • References


    This article references 43 other publications.

    1. 1
      Long, J. R.; Yaghi, O. M. Pervasive Chemistry of Metal-Organic Frameworks. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009, 38, 12131214,  DOI: 10.1039/b903811f
    2. 2
      Zhou, H.-C.; Long, J. R.; Yaghi, O. M. Introduction to Metal-organic Frameworks. Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 673674,  DOI: 10.1021/cr300014x
    3. 3
      Furukawa, H.; Cordova, K. E.; O’Keeffe, M.; Yaghi, O. M. The Chemistry and Applications of Metal-Organic-Frameworks. Science 2013, 341, 1230444,  DOI: 10.1126/science.1230444
    4. 4
      Yaghi, O. M.; O’Keeffe, M.; Ockwig, N. W.; Chae, H. K.; Eddaoudi, M.; Kim, J. Reticular synthesis and the design of new materials. Nature 2003, 423, 705714,  DOI: 10.1038/nature01650
    5. 5
      Wilmer, C. E.; Leaf, M.; Lee, C. Y.; Farha, O. K.; Hauser, B. G.; Hupp, J. T.; Snurr, R. Q. Large-scale screening of hypothetical metal–organic frameworks. Nat. Chem. 2012, 4, 8389,  DOI: 10.1038/nchem.1192
    6. 6
      Lee, J.; Farha, O. K.; Roberts, J.; Scheidt, K. A.; Nguyen, S. T.; Hupp, J. T. Metal–organic framework materials as catalysts. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009, 38, 14501459,  DOI: 10.1039/b807080f
    7. 7
      Kreno, L. E.; Leong, K.; Farha, O. K.; Allendorf, M.; Van Duyne, R. P.; Hupp, J. T. Metal–Organic Framework Materials as Chemical Sensors. Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 11051125,  DOI: 10.1021/cr200324t
    8. 8
      He, Y.; Zhou, W.; Qian, G.; Chen, B. Methane storage in metal–organic frameworks. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 56575678,  DOI: 10.1039/c4cs00032c
    9. 9
      Wu, M.-X.; Yang, Y.-W. Metal–Organic Framework (MOF)-Based Drug/Cargo Delivery and Cancer Therapy. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1606134,  DOI: 10.1002/adma.201606134
    10. 10
      Wu, H. B.; Lou, X. W. Metal-organic frameworks and their derived materials for electrochemical energy storage and conversion: Promises and challenges. Sci. Adv. 2017, 3, eaap9252  DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aap9252
    11. 11
      Schoenecker, P. M.; Carson, C. G.; Jasuja, H.; Flemming, C. J. J.; Walton, K. S. Effect of Water Adsorption on Retention of Structure and Surface Area of Metal–Organic Frameworks. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2012, 51, 65136519,  DOI: 10.1021/ie202325p
    12. 12
      Burtch, N. C.; Jasuja, H.; Walton, K. S. Water Stability and Adsorption in Metal–Organic Frameworks. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 1057510612,  DOI: 10.1021/cr5002589
    13. 13
      Wang, C.; Liu, X.; Keser Demir, N.; Chen, J. P.; Li, K. Applications of water stable metal–organic frameworks. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2016, 45, 51075134,  DOI: 10.1039/c6cs00362a
    14. 14
      Bosch, M.; Zhang, M.; Zhou, H.-C. Increasing the Stability of Metal-Organic Frameworks. Adv. Chem. 2014, 2014, 18,  DOI: 10.1155/2014/182327
    15. 15
      Zhang, J.-P.; Zhang, Y.-B.; Lin, J.-B.; Chen, X.-M. Metal Azolate Frameworks: From Crystal Engineering to Functional Materials. Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 10011033,  DOI: 10.1021/cr200139g
    16. 16
      Taylor, J. M.; Vaidhyanathan, R.; Iremonger, S. S.; Shimizu, G. K. H. Enhancing Water Stability of Metal–Organic Frameworks via Phosphonate Monoester Linkers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 1433814340,  DOI: 10.1021/ja306812r
    17. 17
      Mason, J. A.; Sumida, K.; Herm, Z. R.; Krishna, R.; Long, J. R. Evaluating metal–organic frameworks for post-combustion carbon dioxide capture via temperature swing adsorption. Energy Environ. Sci. 2011, 4, 30303040,  DOI: 10.1039/c1ee01720a
    18. 18
      Wang, Q.; Bai, J.; Lu, Z.; Pan, Y.; You, X. Finely tuning MOFs towards high-performance post-combustion CO2 capture materials. Chem. Commun. 2016, 52, 443452,  DOI: 10.1039/c5cc07751f
    19. 19
      Hughes, J. T.; Navrotsky, A. MOF-5: Enthalpy and Energy Landscape of Porous Materials. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 91849187,  DOI: 10.1021/ja202132h
    20. 20
      Hughes, J. T.; Sava, D. F.; Nenoff, T. M.; Navrotsky, A. Thermochemical Evidence for Strong Iodine Chemisorption by ZIF-8. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 1625616259,  DOI: 10.1021/ja406081r
    21. 21
      Huskić, I.; Novendra, N.; Lim, D.-W.; Topic, F.; Titi, H. M.; Pekov, I. V.; Krivovichev, S. V.; Navrotsky, A.; Kitagawa, H.; Friscic, T. Functionality in metal–organic framework minerals: proton conductivity, stability and potential for polymorphism. Chem. Sci. 2019, 10, 49234929,  DOI: 10.1039/c8sc05088k
    22. 22
      Guo, X.; Boukhalfa, H.; Mitchell, J. N.; Ramos, M.; Gaunt, A. J.; Migliori, A.; Roback, R. C.; Navrotsky, A.; Xu, H. Sample seal-and-drop device and methodology for high temperature oxide melt solution calorimetric measurements of PuO2. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2019, 90, 044101,  DOI: 10.1063/1.5093567
    23. 23
      Rosi, N. L.; Kim, J.; Eddaoudi, M.; Chen, B.; O’Keeffe, M.; Yaghi, O. M. Rod Packings and Metal–Organic Frameworks Constructed from Rod-Shaped Secondary Building Units. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 15041518,  DOI: 10.1021/ja045123o
    24. 24
      Sun, H.; Ren, D.; Kong, R.; Wang, D.; Jiang, H.; Tan, J.; Wu, D.; Chen, S.; Shen, B. Tuning 1-hexene/n-hexane adsorption on MOF-74 via constructing Co-Mg bimetallic frameworks. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2019, 284, 151160,  DOI: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2019.04.031
    25. 25
      Chen, C.; Feng, X.; Zhu, Q.; Dong, R.; Yang, R.; Cheng, Y.; He, C. Microwave-Assisted Rapid Synthesis of Well-Shaped MOF-74 (Ni) for CO2 Efficient Capture. Inorg. Chem. 2019, 58, 27172728,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.
    26. 26
      Caskey, S. R.; Wong-Foy, A. G.; Matzger, A. J. Dramatic Tuning of Carbon Dioxide Uptake via Metal Substitution in a Coordination Polymer with Cylindrical Pores. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 1087010871,  DOI: 10.1021/ja8036096
    27. 27
      Yang, D.-A.; Cho, H.-Y.; Kim, J.; Yang, S.-T.; Ahn, W.-S. CO2 capture and conversion using Mg-MOF-74 prepared by a sonochemical method. Energy Environ. Sci. 2012, 5, 64656473,  DOI: 10.1039/c1ee02234b
    28. 28
      Kizzie, A. C.; Wong-Foy, A. G.; Matzger, A. J. Effect of Humidity on the Performance of Microporous Coordination Polymers as Adsorbents for CO2 Capture. Langmuir 2011, 27, 63686373,  DOI: 10.1021/la200547k
    29. 29
      Tan, K.; Zuluaga, S.; Gong, Q.; Canepa, P.; Wang, H.; Li, J.; Chabal, Y. J.; Thonhauser, T. Water Reaction Mechanism in Metal Organic Frameworks with Coordinatively Unsaturated Metal Ions: MOF-74. Chem. Mater. 2014, 26, 68866895,  DOI: 10.1021/cm5038183
    30. 30
      Zuluaga, S.; Fuentes-Fernandez, E. M. A.; Tan, K.; Xu, F.; Li, J.; Chabal, Y. J.; Thonhauser, T. Understanding and controlling water stability of MOF-74. J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 4, 51765183,  DOI: 10.1039/c5ta10416e
    31. 31
      Kumar, A.; Madden, D. G.; Lusi, M.; Chen, K.-J.; Daniels, E. A.; Curtin, T.; Perry, J. J.; Zaworotko, M. J. Direct Air Capture of CO2 by Physisorbent Materials. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 1437214377,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201506952
    32. 32
      Liu, J.; Benin, A. I.; Furtado, A. M. B.; Jakubczak, P.; Willis, R. R.; Levan, M. D. Stability Effects on CO2 Adsorption for the DOBDC Series of Metal-Organic Frameworks. Langmuir 2011, 27, 1145111456,  DOI: 10.1021/la201774x
    33. 33
      Jiao, Y.; Morelock, C. R.; Burtch, N. C.; Mounfield, W. P.; Hungerford, J. T.; Walton, K. S. Tuning the Kinetic Water Stability and Adsorption Interactions of Mg-MOF-74 by Partial Substitution with Co or Ni. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2015, 54, 1240812414,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.5b03843
    34. 34
      Canepa, P.; Arter, C. A.; Conwill, E. M.; Johnson, D. H.; Shoemaker, B. A.; Soliman, K. Z.; Thonhauser, T. High-throughput screening of small-molecule adsorption in MOF. J. Mater. Chem. A 2013, 1, 1359713604,  DOI: 10.1039/c3ta12395b
    35. 35
      Robie, R. A.; Hemingway, B. S. Thermodynamic Properties of Minerals and Related Substances at 298.15 K and 1 Bar (105 Pascals) Pressure and at Higher Temperatures, US Geological Survey Bulletin, 2131; US Government Printing Office, 1995.
    36. 36
      Han, S. S.; Choi, S.-H.; van Duin, A. C. T. Molecular dynamics simulations of stability of metal–organic frameworks against H2O using the ReaxFF reactive force field. Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 57135715,  DOI: 10.1039/c0cc01132k
    37. 37
      Hughes, J. T.; Bennett, T. D.; Cheetham, A. K.; Navrotsky, A. Thermochemistry of Zeolitic Imidazolate Frameworks of Varying Porosity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 598601,  DOI: 10.1021/ja311237m
    38. 38
      Wu, D.; Navrotsky, A. Thermodynamics of metal-organic frameworks. J. Solid State Chem. 2015, 223, 5358,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jssc.2014.06.015
    39. 39
      Akimbekov, Z.; Wu, D.; Brozek, C. K.; Dincă, M.; Navrotsky, A. Thermodynamics of solvent interaction with the metal-organic framework MOF-5. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2016, 18, 11581162,  DOI: 10.1039/c5cp05370f
    40. 40
      Akimbekov, Z.; Katsenis, A. D.; Nagabhushana, G. P.; Ayoub, G.; Arhangelskis, M.; Morris, A. J.; Friščić, T.; Navrotsky, A. Experimental and Theoretical Evaluation of the Stability of True MOF Polymorphs Explains Their Mechanochemical Interconversions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 79527957,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.7b03144
    41. 41
      Arhangelskis, M.; Katsenis, A. D.; Novendra, N.; Akimbekov, Z.; Gandrath, D.; Marrett, J. M.; Ayoub, G.; Morris, A. J.; Farha, O. K.; Friščić, T.; Navrotsky, A. Theoretical Prediction and Experimental Evaluation of Topological Landscape and Thermodynamic Stability of a Fluorinated Zeolitic Imidazolate Framework. Chem. Mater. 2019, 31, 37773783,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.9b00994
    42. 42
      Park, K. S.; Ni, Z.; Cote, A. P.; Choi, J. Y.; Huang, R.; Uribe-Romo, F. J.; Chae, H. K.; O’Keeffe, M.; Yaghi, O. M. Exceptional chemical and thermal stability of zeolitic imidazolate frameworks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2006, 103, 1018610191,  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0602439103
    43. 43
      Allada, R. K.; Peltier, E.; Navrotsky, A.; Casey, W. H.; Johnson, C. A.; Berbeco, H. T.; Sparks, D. L. Calorimetric determination of the enthalpies of formation of hydrotalcite-like solids and their use in the geochemical modeling of metals in natural waters. Clays Clay Miner. 2006, 54, 409417,  DOI: 10.1346/ccmn.2006.0540401
  • Supporting Information

    Supporting Information


    The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.0c01189.

    • TGA curves and thermochemical tables (PDF)


    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.