ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
Formation and Characterization of 2D Closely Packed Arrays of Bare Gold Nanoparticles without Aggregation
My Activity
  • Open Access
Article

Formation and Characterization of 2D Closely Packed Arrays of Bare Gold Nanoparticles without Aggregation
Click to copy article linkArticle link copied!

  • Takashi Fujita
    Takashi Fujita
    Department of Applied Chemistry, School of Engineering, Tokyo University of Technology, 1401-1 Katakura, Hachioji, Tokyo 192-0982, Japan
  • Kohei Shibamoto*
    Kohei Shibamoto
    Department of Chemistry, Graduate School of Science, Tokyo Metropolitan University, 1-1 Minami-Osawa, Hachioji, Tokyo 192-0397 Japan
    *Email: [email protected]. Phone: +81-42-677-2531.
Open PDFSupporting Information (1)

ACS Omega

Cite this: ACS Omega 2022, 7, 49, 44711–44719
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c04032
Published November 30, 2022

Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under

CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 .

Abstract

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Uniform 2D arrays of metal nanoparticles (NPs) have received significant attention in the field of molecular sensing using localized surface plasmon resonance. Generally, metal NPs bear organic surface-modifying molecules to prevent aggregation and form 2D metal NP arrays. However, surface-modifying molecules negatively affect molecular sensing. Previously, we developed a technique for forming a 2D bare metal NP array, denoted the sandwich (SW) technique. However, the formation mechanism of these 2D metal NP arrays remains unknown and therefore the experimental conditions of the SW technique are not optimized. Here, we observed the formation of a 2D Au NP (d: 60 nm) array using the SW technique with an optical microscope. Moderate drying conditions of the colloidal droplets sandwiched between two parallel substrates were necessary for forming 2D Au NP arrays. We then optimized the drying conditions and obtained a 2D Au NP array. This array was uniform, and the Au NPs were arranged at distances of 4.5 nm with hexagonal periodicity, without aggregation. Further, the 2D Au NP arrays exhibited excellent spot-to-spot reproducibility in surface-enhanced Raman scattering.

This publication is licensed under

CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 .
  • cc licence
  • by licence
  • nc licence
  • nd licence
Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society

Introduction

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Metal nanoparticle (NP) assemblies have attracted considerable interest because of their exceptional optical properties based on localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR), which is a collective oscillation of free electrons within the NPs. (1,2) Under LSPR excitation, excited electrons are localized on the surfaces of metal NPs. A strong electromagnetic (EM) field is generated from the surface at a distance similar to the diameter of the metal NP. The EM field is particularly strong at an interparticle gap of several nanometers, denoted as a “hot spot”, owing to the coupling of LSPRs between adjacent NPs. (3) This large EM field significantly increases the spectroscopic signals of molecules in the vicinity of metal NPs. For example, Raman scattering light of molecules is significantly enhanced in the vicinity of metal NPs by several orders of magnitude compared to normal Raman scattering light, which is called surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS). SERS allows the label-free identification of ultra-trace molecules. Therefore, metal NP assemblies with high-density hot spots exhibit potential as highly sensitive molecular sensors. (4,5) However, high-density hot spots are likely to cause randomness in the strength of the EM field because the EM field strength at the hot spot is sensitive to the interparticle distance. This randomness due to the nanostructure significantly reduces the spot-to-spot reproducibility in molecular sensing. (6,7) Therefore, the fabrication of uniform metal NP assemblies is required.
2D metal NP arrays, wherein metal NPs are densely arranged at equal interparticle distances of several nanometers, are promising candidates for generating such uniform metal NP assemblies. Two approaches are proposed for the design of 2D metal NP arrays. A top-down approach such as electron or ion beam lithography yields precise metal NP arrays, (8,9) but a method of generating hot spots at interparticle gaps is physically and technically challenging due to their spatial resolution. In addition, this approach generally requires large equipment and is costly. The other approach is a bottom-up approach, wherein metal NPs are assembled using a colloidal solution at liquid–liquid, (10,11) air–liquid, (12,13) or liquid–solid (14,15) interfaces. In principle, this approach may form hot spots at interparticle gaps because the interaction length of interparticle repulsion between NPs in solution is of several nanometers. Moreover, it is a low-cost approach and is suitable for mass production. Hence, the bottom-up approach is promising for producing 2D metal NP arrays for use in molecular sensing, but forming a uniform 2D metal NP array remains quite challenging.
The difficulty in forming a uniform 2D metal NP array using a bottom-up approach is mainly due to the aggregation of metal NPs, which renders the interparticle distance uncontrollable. According to Derjaguin–Landau–Verwey–Overbeek (DLVO) theory, the dispersion or aggregation of particles is determined by the energy potential expressed by the sum of van der Waals attraction and electrostatic repulsion, which depend on the interparticle distance. (16) Metal particles exhibit relatively strong van der Waals attractions compared to those of non-metal particles and thus easily aggregate. Relatively large metal NPs, in particular, with diameters of 50–100 nm, which exhibit relatively large SERS enhancement, (17,18) are more likely to aggregate because they display larger van der Waals attractions than those of small metal NPs. To prevent aggregation of metal NPs, their surfaces are generally modified using organic molecules, such as alkanethiol, (19−21) or cetyltrimethylammonium bromide. (22) However, their introduction on the metal NPs causes several disadvantages and degrades the NP properties, such as shortening the lifetimes of 2D metal NP arrays, inhibiting sample molecule entry into hot spots, and hindering sample identification due to their SERS signals. (23,24) Uniform 2D metal NP arrays without organic surface-modified molecules are desirable in molecular sensing; however, reports on bare uniform 2D metal NP arrays are limited.
To suppress the aggregation of bare metal NPs, the repulsion should dominate the van der Waals attraction until just prior to metal NP assembly. We previously suppressed the aggregation of bare Au NPs trapped at a liquid–liquid interface using the LSPR excitation of Au NPs to enhance the repulsion during the 2D Au NP array formation. (25) However, aggregation was not eliminated because a 3D fluctuation of the liquid–liquid interface interfered with the ordered assembly of the Au NPs. Thus, the key to forming a 2D bare metal NP array without aggregation is the assembly of metal NPs on a rigid surface as gently as possible without disturbing the attraction–repulsion balance between the metal NPs.
In addition, we developed another technique for assembling bare metal NPs at a liquid–solid interface, denoted as the “sandwich (SW) technique.” (26) The SW technique may yield 2D arrays of bare metal NPs with diameters of 5–200 nm by naturally drying the droplet of metal NP colloidal solution between two flat plates until complete evaporation. However, the formation mechanism of the 2D metal NP array remains unclear, and accordingly the experimental conditions of the SW technique are not optimized. Consequently, this technique exhibits low reproducibility in forming the 2D metal NP array, and the uniformity of the 2D metal NP array has not been evaluated. In this study, we initially determined the features of the formation of a 2D metal NP array by observing the formation via the SW technique using an optical microscope. Spherical Au NPs with diameters of 60 nm were used as the building blocks of the 2D metal NP array because of their excellent chemical stabilities and relatively high efficiencies of LSPR excitation. The drying conditions were then optimized. The 2D Au NP array was characterized using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and ultraviolet–visible spectroscopy. Finally, to demonstrate the uniformity of the EM field generated on the 2D Au NP array and its potential as an optical molecular sensor, the spot-to-spot reproducibility of SERS was evaluated.

Experimental Section

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Preparations of Au NP Arrays

An aqueous colloidal solution of spherical Au NPs (diameter: 60 nm; density: 2.6 × 1010 particles/mL) with a narrow size distribution was purchased from British Biocell International (Cardiff, UK). Glass slides (thickness: 1 mm) were purchased from Matsunami Glass (Bellingham, WA, USA), and Si single crystals (100 μm) were purchased from Nilaco (Tokyo, Japan). These glass slides and Si single crystals were cleaned several times using acetone, methanol, and deionized water in an ultrasonic bath prior to use.
The colloidal solution of Au NPs (100 μL) was dropped onto a glass slide or Si single crystal. A glass slide was placed on top of the droplet, 1 mm from the bottom glass. The sandwiched droplet was placed in a thermo-hygrostat bath until the solution evaporated completely after ≤2 d. The substrate prepared using this technique is denoted as “SW substrate.” SW substrates were prepared under two sets of conditions: 60 ± 10% relative humidity at 298 K and 20 ± 5% relative humidity at 298 K for SW-substrates 1 and 2, respectively.
Two other substrates were prepared using oil–water trapping (OW) (10) and dried droplet (DD) techniques for comparison. In the OW technique, the colloidal Au NP solution (5 mL) was transferred into a 20 mL glass vial, and toluene (5 mL) was added. After an interface formed between the toluene and the Au NP colloidal solution, methanol (5 mL) was rapidly injected into the vial, inducing the 2D trapping of the Au NPs at the interface. Then, the trapped Au NP sheet was placed on a 5 × 5 mm glass slide by aspirating off the solvent. The prepared OW substrates were dried in a drying cabinet at 298 K. In the DD technique, the colloidal Au NP solution (400 μL) was dropped onto a glass slide, and it was dried in a drying cabinet at 298 K.
All substrates were rinsed with deionized water to eliminate inorganic surfactants and dried further in a drying cabinet at 298 K.

Characterizations of 2D Au NP Arrays

All the substrates were observed using SEM (VE-9800, Keyence, Itasca, IL, USA) at an accelerating voltage of 20 kV. Visible–near-infrared (vis–NIR) extinction spectroscopy was performed under normal incidence conditions using a custom-built optical system connected to a spectrometer combined with an optical microscope. The focal spot diameter was confirmed using an optical microscope as ∼100 μm.
A custom-built system was also used to conduct the Raman measurements using a 532 nm Nd:YAG laser as an excitation source. The laser power at the sample position was 5 mW, with a laser focal spot of ∼10 μm2. Raman spectroscopy was performed using a −15 °C air-cooled spectrometer (PMA-11, Hamamatsu Photonics, Hamamatsu, Japan) that was connected to a detector. Crystal violet (CV) was used as a test molecule to perform SERS investigations. Each prepared substrate was immersed in a 10–5 M CV aqueous solution for 10 min to achieve saturated adsorption of CV. The substrates were then rinsed with pure water to remove any non-chemisorbed CV molecules. The Raman spectra of the adsorbed CV molecules were recorded by integrating five spectra with an exposure time of 10 s. The difference in the focus of the different substrates was calibrated using a Si band (520 cm–1). The spectral signal representing CV is due to SERS light and fluorescence. The fluorescence component was removed from the raw data using the fluorescence spectrum of solid CV, and the intensity of the Raman scattered light was extracted.

Results and Discussion

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Formation of 2D Au NP Arrays Using the SW Technique

The formation of a 2D Au NP array using the SW technique was observed using an optical microscope. Figure 1a shows an optical microscopy image of the lateral meniscus formed by the SW technique. The meniscus exhibits a half-moon shape, which differs from those of simple droplets on a flat plate. The contact angle of the meniscus is 0°. Figure 1b shows the images of the contact line at 30 min intervals during the initial evaporation stages. At t = 45 min, the contact line is red due to the LSPR of the isolated Au NPs. The color of the contact line darkens with time until t = 45 min, with this color change corresponding to an increase in the concentration of the Au NP colloidal solution, that is, as the droplet evaporates, the Au NPs are concentrated at the edge of the contact line. From t = 45 to 105 min, the color of the contact line changes from red to deep purple. To observe this color change more clearly, the contact line at t = 45 min was observed using a reflection optical microscope, as shown in Figure 1c. A color gradation from red to gold is observed at the edge of the contact line. This gold color corresponds to an assembly of Au NPs, as confirmed by the SEM observations described below, indicating that the 2D Au NP array is formed at the edge of the contact line. At t = 105 min, the formation of a step-by-step structure is observed, corresponding to the structure observed using SEM (Figure 2a). This step-by-step structure indicates a gradual inward movement of the contact line because the 2D Au NP array is only formed at the edge of the contact line. Hence, the Au NP array is formed by an increase in the concentration of Au NPs at the contact line and the movement of the contact line during droplet evaporation. Therefore, the duration of the sandwiched droplet appears to determine the properties of the 2D Au NP array, such as the density of Au NPs, aggregation, and stacking. In subsequent studies, the sandwiched droplet was dried in a thermo-hygrostat bath to stabilize and control the evaporation rate.

Figure 1

Figure 1. (a) Optical microscopy image of the lateral meniscus image formed by the SW method at 0 min from the start. Dotted circle indicates a contact line. (b) Optical microscopy image of the contact line in the initial evaporation process (0, 45, 75, and 105 min from the start). (c) Reflection microscopy image of the contact line at t = 45 min.

Figure 2

Figure 2. (a) SEM image at ×50 magnification of SW-substrate 1 on the Si wafer, which was prepared at a relative humidity of 60 ± 10% at 298 K. (b) SEM image at ×20,000 magnification of SW-substrate 1. (c) SEM image at ×20,000 magnification of SW-substrate 2, which was prepared at a relative humidity of 20 ± 5% at 298 K. These substrates were composed of spherical Au NPs (mean diameter: 60 nm). Corresponding FFT images and their brightness distribution are shown in the higher right and lower right, respectively.

Optimization of the Drying Conditions during the SW Technique

To analyze the effect of the evaporation rate on the formation of the 2D Au NP array, we prepared Au NP arrays using the SW technique at different temperatures and humidities. First, we examined the effect of temperature on the formation of 2D Au NP arrays. Figure S1a–c show SEM images (×10,000) of 2D Au NP arrays formed at a relative humidity of 60 ± 10% and temperatures of 293, 298, and 303 K, respectively. These SEM images reveal magnified views of the outermost steps of the step-by-step structures. Figure S1a shows a 2D Au NP array formed at a relatively low temperature, with large voids and several Au NP aggregates observed. Moreover, the Au NPs appear to be stacked on the left of the black centerline. Figure S1c shows a 2D Au NP array formed at a relatively high temperature, with numerous large Au NP aggregates observed.
Conversely, in Figure S1b, the 2D Au NP arrays appear to be monolayer, with almost no aggregation. Subsequently, humidity conditions were examined. Two 2D Au NP arrays prepared using the SW technique at 298 K with relative humidity of 60 ± 10% (SW-substrate 1) and 20 ± 5% (SW-substrate 2) were observed. Figure 2b shows an SEM image (×20,000) of SW-substrate 1, with the Au NPs observed in a dense 2D arrangement. Figure 2c shows an SEM image (×20,000) of SW-substrate 2. At this humidity, the evaporation rate is double that observed at a relative humidity of 60%. Numerous small islands consisting of several Au NPs are observed, and the distances between each island are several tens of nanometers. The density of Au NPs in SW-substrate 2 is lower than that in SW-substrate 1. Therefore, the optimal temperature and relative humidity are 298 K and 60 ± 10%, respectively. Moreover, the quality of the 2D Au NP array is highly and sensitively dependent on the drying temperature and humidity.
For comparison,Two substrates were also prepared using the OW and DD methods . Figure 3a shows an SEM image (×2000) of the OW-substrate, with several defects and 3D aggregates observed. Figure 3b shows an SEM image (×20,000) of the DD-substrate, with isolated Au NPs and several Au NP aggregates scattered randomly.

Figure 3

Figure 3. (a) SEM image at ×20,000 magnification of the OW-substrate on the Si wafer. (b) SEM image at ×20,000 magnification of the DD-substrate on Si wafer. These substrates were composed of spherical Au NPs (mean diameter: 60 nm). Corresponding FFT images and their brightness distribution are shown in the higher right and lower right, respectively.

Characterizations of 2D Au NP Arrays

The obtained SEM images were divided into 500 × 500 nm regions to evaluate the densities and uniformities of the 2D Au NP arrays. The packing densities in each region were determined using the areas of the Au NPs. Table 1 summarizes the packing densities and their relative standard deviations (RSDs, n = 96). The packing densities of the Au NPs are ordered as follows: SW-substrate 1 (78%) > SW-substrate 2 (73%) > OW-substrate (65%) > DD-substrate (16%). Their RSDs are ordered as follows: SW-substrate 1 (3.1%) < SW-substrate 2 (5.5%) < OW-substrate (6.1%) < DD-substrate (71%). Compared to those of OW and DD substrates, the SW substrates exhibit high Au NP densities and uniformities. Additionally, SW-substrate 1 exhibits a higher density and uniformity than those of SW-substrate 2 due to the effect of humidity on the evaporation rate of the Au NP colloidal solution.
Table 1. Packing Densities and Their RSDs of Four Substrates
substratepacking density (%)RSD (%)
SW-substrate 1783.1
SW-substrate 2735.5
OW-substrate656.1
DD-substrate1671
A highly uniform particle array likely exhibits a periodic array structure, and Fourier transform (FT) analyses were performed on SEM images to evaluate the periodicities of the arrangements. Figure 2b,c show the FTs of the SEM data of SW-substrates 1 and 2, respectively. Bright spots are observed in these two images at the vertices of hexagons. Therefore, SW-substrates 1 and 2 exhibit periodicities of six-fold symmetry. However, the packing density of 78% observed for SW-substrate 1 is smaller than that of 91% expected for an ideal 2D hexagonal close-packed structural configuration. The FT of SW-substrate 1 data was then analyzed to explain this difference. The hexagonal lattice constant of SW-substrate 1 is 64.5 nm. Because the Au NPs exhibit an average diameter of 60 nm, this indicates that the Au NPs in SW-substrate 1 are not in contact with each other, with an average interparticle distance of ∼4.5 nm. When the interparticle distance is 4.5 nm, the ideal packing density of a 2D hexagonal-packed configuration is 81%. The 3% difference in the recalculated (81%) and experimental (78%) packing densities of SW-substrate 1 may be attributed to minor defects. Conversely, as shown in Figure 3a,b, no such bright spots are observed in the FT images of the other substrates. These Au NP assemblies in the OW and DD substrates exhibit no periodicities.
Figure 4 shows the vis–NIR extinction spectra of SW-substrate 1 (black line), the OW and DD substrates (green and red lines, respectively), and Au NP colloidal solution (dotted line). The spectrum of SW-substrate 1 exhibits two peaks at 547 and 750 nm. The spectrum of the OW substrate exhibits a broad peak in the region 600–1000 nm, whereas that of the DD substrate exhibits a single peak at 540 nm. The spectrum of the Au NP colloidal solution exhibits a single peak at 537 nm, corresponding to the LSPR of isolated spherical Au NPs in water. The peaks at 547 and 540 nm in the spectra of SW-substrate 1 and the DD substrate, respectively, may be attributed to the red-shifted LSPR peak representing isolated spherical Au NPs. Therefore, either most Au NPs in SW-substrate 1 and the DD substrate are isolated from their neighbors or the numbers and sizes of the aggregated Au NPs are small. This is consistent with the SEM observations and the FT analyses. The red-shift distance from the isolated spherical Au NP LSPR peak to that observed for SW-substrate 1 is 10 nm, whereas the shift distance to that observed for the DD substrate is 3 nm. The LSPR peak wavelength depends on the plasmonic coupling of neighboring Au NPs. Therefore, the large red-shift observed for SW-substrate 1 is due to plasmonic coupling. For SW-substrate 1, a peak at 750 nm is also observed. When several Au NPs are close, with interparticle distances of several nanometers, an additional peak is observed at a longer wavelength in the vis–NIR extinction spectrum. Hentschel et al. showed that the extinction spectra of Au NP heptamers with interparticle gaps exhibited new extinction peaks in the NIR region when the gap distance was <60 nm. (27) They concluded that this additional extinction peak was caused by a plasmonic oligomer transition from isolated to collective modes. Although there are several differences between the experimental conditions in this study and those of other groups, the previously reported extinction spectra are similar to those of SW-substrate 1. Therefore, the peak in the spectrum of SW-substrate 1 at 750 nm is due to LSPR coupling. For the OW substrate, the LSPR peak representing the isolated Au NPs almost entirely disappears, with a broad peak emerging from 600 to 1000 nm. When Au NPs aggregate randomly, these aggregates exhibit broad, longer wavelength peaks due to their various plasmon modes. Therefore, the spectrum of the OW substrate indicates that almost all Au NPs are randomly aggregated.

Figure 4

Figure 4. Vis–NIR Extinction spectra of (a) SW-substrate 1, (b) OW-substrate, and (c) DD-substrate. These substrates were on glass slides. The dotted line indicates vis–NIR absorption spectra of spherical Au NP (mean diameter: 60 nm) colloidal solution, which was used for the preparation of these substrates.

SERS Properties of 2D Au NP Arrays

To investigate the SERS properties of SW-substrate 1, CV was used as a test molecule because it is well studied in SERS. (28,29) Here, uniform adsorption of CV on the Au NP surfaces was required to evaluate the spot-to-spot reproducibility of SERS signals representing the nanostructures of the SERS substrates. CV molecules are chemically adsorbed on the surface of Au. Thus, by immersing the SERS substrate in the CV solution, the CV molecules may be chemically adsorbed on the surfaces of the Au NPs as a monolayer after washing and removing the physically adsorbed CV molecules. The immersion time was determined via SERS measurements using OW substrates (Figure S2), and the immersion time for saturation adsorption was set at 1000 s. Figure 5a shows the Raman spectrum of CV molecules chemically adsorbed on SW-substrate 1 at an excitation wavelength of 532 nm, and Table 2 shows the assignments of these peaks in previous studies. (30)

Figure 5

Figure 5. (a) Raman spectra of CV adsorbed on SW-substrate 1 and (b) Raman spectra of CV crystals. 532 nm lines of Nd:YAG laser was employed as the excitation laser.

Table 2. Assignment of Raman Bands of CV Crystal and CV Adsorbed on SW-Substrate 1
band (cm–1) crystalband (cm–1) on SW substrate 1assignment
16201621C-phenyl in-plane antisymmetric stretching
15831584C-phenyl in-plane antisymmetric stretching
15321537phenyl-N antisymmetric stretching
13761380C–N, phenyl-C-phenyl antisymmetric stretching
11751179C-phenyl, C–H in-plane antisymmetric stretching
No signals other than those derived from CV molecules were observed. This result suggests that no molecules other than sample CV molecules are adsorbed on the Au NPs’ surface and that the Au NPs are bare, at least after substrate fabrication. In addition, we have previously reported that laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry detects surface adsorbed species on the Au NPs with high sensitivity. (31) Like the present study, when CV molecules were adsorbed on gold NPs, no signals other than CV molecules were observed in either the positive or negative ion mode. This report also supports that the Au NPs are bare after washing with water.
To estimate the SERS enhancement factor (EF) of SW-substrate 1, the number of CV molecules adsorbed on the Au NPs was calculated using the surface area, packing density, irradiation area of the laser, and adsorption area of CV. The most prominent peak at 1621 cm–1 was used to perform the EF calculations. The laser irradiation area was 10 μm2, and the CV molecules were approximated as circles with diameters of ∼1 nm. Assuming that CV molecules were adsorbed to the upper half of an Au NP, 7200 CV molecules were adsorbed per Au NP. The number of CV molecules contributing to the Raman signal was 107–108 molecules per spot, or 1.7 × 10–16 mol. The typical Raman spectrum of the CV crystal (from 1012 to 1013 molecules per spot) was also measured, as shown in Figure 5b. Therefore, the average EF of SW-substrate 1 was 105–106. The EFs were within the range of average reported values for Au NPs on a solid substrate (104–108). (32,33) Furthermore, the OW and DD substrates exhibited sufficient SERS activities at certain points. However, the average EFs of these substrates were 1–2 orders of magnitude lower than that of SW-substrate 1.
The spot-to-spot reproducibility of SW-substrate 1 was then examined for three prominent bands at 1179, 1380, and 1621 cm–1. Figure 6a–c show the normalized peak intensity of each CV band in the SERS spectra measured at 32 different points on the same substrate, and Figure 6d shows their RSDs. The packing density is used as a uniformity index to compare the different substrates and is set as the horizontal axis. As the packing density increases, the variation in the peak intensity of each band decreases, and those observed for SW-substrate 1, with a packing density of 78%, exhibit the smallest value (3.1%). This RSD value is lower than previous SERS studies using Au NPs shown in Table S3, indicating very high spot-to-spot reproducibility, although simple comparisons are difficult due to the different experimental conditions. Surprisingly, the RSD of SW-substrate 1 is similar to that of a systematic error obtained by a spot-to-spot Raman measurement on a Si single crystal, as shown in Figure 6d. Therefore, a sufficiently uniform EM field is generated over the entire SW-substrate 1 for a spot area of ∼10 μm2. In addition, as the packing density increases, the RSD decreases significantly.

Figure 6

Figure 6. Normalized peak intensities of bands at (a) 1179 cm–1, (b) 1380 cm–1, and (c) 1621 cm–1 versus packing rates of four substrates. The mean value was normalized to 1 (dotted line). These peak intensities were obtained from different 25 spots in these substrates. (d) RSDs of SERS intensities at 1621 cm–1 versus packing rates of four substrates. The dotted line indicates the systematic error obtained from a silicon single crystal (100).

The improvement in reproducibility due to the increased packing ratio varies according to the band. The improvement in reproducibility of the band at 1621 cm–1 is particularly remarkable. Although the cause of this remains unclear, these differences are likely caused by the adsorption states of the CV molecules and their associated charge transfer (CT) enhancement, (34) which is observed for molecules chemisorbed on a bare metal surface. According to previous reports, (35,36) these factors exhibit different effects on each vibration band associated with chemisorption. As shown in Table 2, shifts due to chemisorption are observed in several vibration bands, with varying degrees of shifting. However, the band at 1621 cm–1 is not significantly shifted. Thus, the effects of CV molecule adsorption and CT enhancement on the band at 1621 cm–1 are relatively small. The EM enhancement may be relatively high for the 1621 cm–1 band, and the high uniformity of SW-substrate 1 directly reflects the reproducibility. A more detailed study should be conducted to study the contribution of CT enhancement to the reproducibility of SERS measurements.

Mechanistic Considerations of the SW Technique

A series of studies revealed that SW-substrate 1 exhibits a uniform arrangement without Au NP aggregation, although organic surface-modifying molecules are not used to modify the Au NP surfaces. Furthermore, the high spot-to-spot reproducibility of the SERS measurements supports the high uniformity of the nanostructure of SW-substrate 1. We investigated the formation of this array by observing the formation of the 2D Au NP array and the final array structure using an optical microscope.
In the early stage of evaporation at t = 45 min, the Au NPs are concentrated on the contact line, as shown in Figure 1a. In general, the solute reaches equilibrium at a uniform concentration via diffusion within the solution. Therefore, this non-equilibrium state is due to a mechanism, such as convection, which supplies Au NPs to the edge of the contact line. In addition, as shown in Figure 1a, the contact angle is 0° at the edge of the contact line. This sharp contact line hinders the formation of 3D aggregates because the height of the droplet at the edge is insufficient for supplying Au NPs to the second layer at the edge of the contact line. No stacking is observed under the optimized drying conditions.
Au NPs concentrated at the edge of the contact line remain dispersed in the liquid before forming the 2D Au NP array, as shown in Figure 1c. According to calculations based on DLVO theory, the potential barriers of Au NPs dispersed in water are located at an interparticle distance of several nanometers, and they aggregate when they are closer than the potential barrier. Because no aggregation is observed in SW-substrate 1, the Au NPs may maintain a state wherein the repulsion between the particles dominates until the 2D Au NP array is formed, with the kinetic energy not exceeding the potential barrier. On the other hand, formation of numerous aggregates when the SW technique is performed at 303 K, a relatively high temperature, as shown in Figure S1. We considered that the kinetic energy exceeds the potential barrier at this temperature, thus causing aggregation.
Smooth movement of the contact line is observed with the formation of the 2D Au NP array, as shown in Figure 1b. Generally, the contact line of a simple droplet on a flat plate is pinned, maintaining its initial position when the solvent dries. In this case, the solute concentrates at the contact line, forming a ring, denoted the coffee-ring effect. (37) This causes a concentration of the solute at the edges of the droplet, leading to aggregation. However, during the SW technique, the pinning of the contact line is suppressed. The movement of the contact line is more likely to occur than the shape variation of the meniscus that is stabilized in the capillary bridge. This movement of the contact line prevents a supply of excess Au NPs to the contact line and suppresses the aggregation of the Au NPs.
In summary, we considered three factors contributing to the formation of a uniform 2D Au NP array using the SW technique. First, Au NPs were supplied to the edge of the sharp contact line. Second, the Au NPs were gently concentrated without energy addition. Third, the half-moon meniscus moved as the droplet dried, without pinning the contact line. These factors depended on the drying conditions, such as the temperature and humidity. Under suitable drying conditions, the Au NPs were concentrated at the edge of the contact line while maintaining the repulsion between particles. As a result, the Au NP arrangement was highly ordered, without aggregation, and without an organic surface modifier. The step-by-step structures observed in Figures 1b and 2a were formed due to the balance between the supply rate of Au NPs to the edge of the contact line and the rate of motion of the contact line.

Conclusions

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

We investigated the SW technique to form uniform 2D bare Au NP arrays using colloidal dispersions of Au NPs. First, the formation of the 2D Au NP arrays using the SW technique was observed using an optical microscope to determine the effective synthetic parameters of a uniform 2D bare Au NP array. The supply of Au NPs to the edge of the contact line and the formation of the Au NP assembly were observed as the droplets dried. Based on these observations, we focused on and optimized the drying conditions. The most uniform 2D Au NP array was formed at 298 K and a relative humidity of 60%. SW-substrate 1 formed under the optimized conditions exhibited a hexagonal closely packed structure with an average interparticle distance of 4.5 nm without aggregation. Although the ideal densest packing ratio in this case was 81%, the packing ratio of SW-substrate 1 was 78%, indicating a very high packing ratio. In the extinction spectrum of SW-substrate 1, peaks due to the LSPR of the Au NPs and plasmon coupling were observed. Compared to those of conventional 2D Au NP arrays, such as the DD and OW substrates, the uniformity of the SW substrate was extremely high. Furthermore, the SW substrate showed excellent SERS enhancement, with an RSD of 3.1% for its signal intensity, which is comparable to the systematic error of the present Raman measurements, indicating a very high spot-to-spot reproducibility. To the best of our knowledge, the SW technique is the simplest method that enables the formation of a uniform 2D bare Au NP array with interparticle gaps. In the future, it may be possible to control the interparticle gap by controlling the repulsion between the NPs. Thus, use of the SW technique may lead to the development of molecular sensors and plasmonics..

Supporting Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.2c04032.

  • SEM images of SW substrates, dependence of Raman peak intensity on the dipping time, and literature data for SERS substrates using Au NPs (DOCX)

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Author Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

  • Corresponding Author
  • Author
    • Takashi Fujita - Department of Applied Chemistry, School of Engineering, Tokyo University of Technology, 1401-1 Katakura, Hachioji, Tokyo 192-0982, Japan
  • Author Contributions

    The manuscript was written through contributions of all authors. All authors have given their approval to the final version of the manuscript.

  • Notes
    The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Acknowledgments

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI grant no. JP18K04730 (K.S.) and JSPS KAKENHI grant no. JP19K15410 (T.F.).

Abbreviations

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

CT

charge transfer

CV

crystal violet

DD

dried droplet

DLVO

Derjaguin–Landau–Verwey–Overbeek

EF

enhancement factor

EM

electromagnetic

FT

Fourier transform

LSPR

localized surface plasmon resonance

NP

nanoparticle

OW

oil–water trapping

RSD,

relative standard deviation;

SEM

scanning electron microscopy

SERS

surface-enhanced Raman scattering

SW

sandwich

vis–NIR

visible–near-infrared

References

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article references 37 other publications.

  1. 1
    Mayer, K. M.; Hafner, J. H. Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance Sensors. Chem. Rev. 2011, 111, 38283857,  DOI: 10.1021/cr100313v
  2. 2
    Jiang, N.; Zhuo, X.; Wang, J. Active Plasmonics: Principles, Structures, and Applications. Chem. Rev. 2018, 118, 30543099,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00252
  3. 3
    Kleinman, S. L.; Frontiera, R. R.; Henry, A. I.; Dieringer, J. A.; Van Duyne, R. P. Creating, Characterizing, and Controlling Chemistry with SERS Hot Spots. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2013, 15, 2136,  DOI: 10.1039/c2cp42598j
  4. 4
    Sharma, B.; Frontiera, R. R.; Henry, A. I.; Ringe, E.; Van Duyne, R. P. SERS: Materials, Applications, and the Future. Mater. Today 2012, 15, 1625,  DOI: 10.1016/S1369-7021(12)70017-2
  5. 5
    Huang, Z.; Zhang, A.; Zhang, Q.; Cui, D.; Nanomaterial-Based, S. E. R. S. Nanomaterial-Based SERS Sensing Technology for Biomedical Application. J. Mater. Chem. B 2019, 7, 37553774,  DOI: 10.1039/C9TB00666D
  6. 6
    Sackmann, M.; Materny, A. Surface Enhanced Raman Scattering (SERS) – A Quantitative Analytical Tool?. J. Raman Spectrosc. 2006, 37, 305310,  DOI: 10.1002/jrs.1443
  7. 7
    De Rosa, C.; Auriemma, F.; Diletto, C.; Di Girolamo, R.; Malafronte, A.; Morvillo, P.; Zito, T.; Rusciano, G.; Pesce, G.; Sasso, A. Toward hyperuniform disordered plasmonic nanostructures for reproducible surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2015, 17, 80618069,  DOI: 10.1039/c4cp06024e
  8. 8
    Le Ru, E. C.; Etchegoin, P. G.; Grand, J.; Félidj, N.; Aubard, J.; Lévi, G.; Hohenau, A.; Krenn, J. R. Surface Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy on Nanolithography-Prepared Substrates. Curr. Appl. Phys. 2008, 8, 467470,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cap.2007.10.073
  9. 9
    Das, G.; Mecarini, F.; Gentile, F.; De Angelis, F.; Mohan Kumar, M.; Candeloro, P.; Liberale, C.; Cuda, G.; Di Fabrizio, E. Nano-patterned SERS substrate: Application for protein analysis vs. temperature. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2009, 24, 16931699,  DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2008.08.050
  10. 10
    Reincke, F.; Hickey, S. G.; Kegel, W. K.; Vanmaekelbergh, D. Spontaneous Assembly of a Monolayer of Charged Gold Nanocrystals at the Water/Oil Interface. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 2004, 43, 458462,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.200352339
  11. 11
    Pienpinijtham, P.; Han, X. X.; Ekgasit, S.; Ozaki, Y. An Ionic Surfactant-Mediated Langmuir – Blodgett Method to Construct Gold Nanoparticle Films for Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2012, 14, 1013210139,  DOI: 10.1039/c2cp41419h
  12. 12
    Guo, Q.; Xu, M.; Yuan, Y.; Gu, R.; Yao, J. Self-Assembled Large-Scale Monolayer of Au Nanoparticles at the Air/Water Interface Used as a SERS Substrate. Langmuir 2016, 32, 45304537,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.5b04393
  13. 13
    Liu, D.; Li, C.; Zhou, F.; Zhang, T.; Liu, G.; Cai, W.; Li, Y. Capillary Gradient-Induced Self-Assembly of Periodic Au Spherical Nanoparticle Arrays on an Ultralarge Scale via a Bisolvent System at Air/Water Interface. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 4, 1600976,  DOI: 10.1002/admi.201600976
  14. 14
    Liu, S.; Zhu, T.; Hu, R.; Liu, Z. Evaporation-Induced Self-Assembly of Gold Nanoparticles into a Highly Organized Two-Dimensional Array. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2002, 4, 60596062,  DOI: 10.1039/b208520h
  15. 15
    Yang, G.; Nanda, J.; Wang, B.; Chen, G.; Hallinan, D. T., Jr. Self-Assembly of Large Gold nanoparticles for Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 1345713470,  DOI: 10.1021/acsami.7b01121
  16. 16
    Israelachvili, J. N.; Intermolecular and Surface Forces, 3rd ed.; Academic Press, 2011.
  17. 17
    Njoki, P. N.; Lim, I. S.; Mott, D.; Park, H.; Khan, B.; Mishra, S.; Sujakumar, R.; Luo, J.; Zhong, C. Size Correlation of Optical and Spectroscopic Properties for Gold Nanoparticles. J. Phys. Chem. C 2007, 111, 1466414669,  DOI: 10.1021/jp074902z
  18. 18
    Zhang, P.; Li, Y.; Wang, D.; Xia, H. High–Yield Production of Uniform Gold Nanoparticles with Sizes from 31 to 577 nm via One-Pot Seeded Growth and Size-Dependent SERS Property. Part. Part. Syst. Charact. 2016, 33, 924932,  DOI: 10.1002/ppsc.201600188
  19. 19
    Park, Y. K.; Yoo, S. H.; Park, S. Assembly of Highly Ordered Nanoparticle Monolayers at a Water/Hexane Interface. Langmuir 2007, 23, 1050510510,  DOI: 10.1021/la701445a
  20. 20
    Kim, B.; Tripp, S. L.; Wei, A. Self-Organization of Large Gold Nanoparticle Arrays. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 79557956,  DOI: 10.1021/ja0160344
  21. 21
    Ishida, T.; Tachikiri, Y.; Sako, T.; Takahashi, Y.; Yamada, S. Structural Characterization and Plasmonic Properties of Two-Dimensional Arrays of Hydrophobic Large Gold Nanoparticles Fabricated by Langmuir-Blodgett Technique. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 404, 350356,  DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.01.304
  22. 22
    Wang, H.; Levin, C. S.; Halas, N. J. Nanosphere Arrays with Controlled Sub-10-Nm Gaps as Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy Substrates. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 1499214993,  DOI: 10.1021/ja055633y
  23. 23
    Wei, A.; Kim, B.; Pusztay, S. V.; Tripp, S. L.; Balasubramanian, R. Resorcinarene-Encapsulated Nanoparticles Building Blocks Self-Assembled Nanostructures. J. Inclusion Phenom. 2001, 41. DOI:  DOI: 10.1023/A:1014472212238
  24. 24
    Smith, S. R.; Lipkowski, J. Guided Assembly of Two-Dimensional Arrays of Gold Nanoparticles on a Polycrystalline Gold Electrode for Electrochemical Surface- Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. C 2018, 122, 73037311,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b01309
  25. 25
    Shibamoto, K.; Yasumuro, S.; Horiuchi, K.; Teraoka, T.; Fujita, T. Study of Two-dimensional Highly-ordering of Gold Nanoparticles for an Optical Sensor Using Surface Plasmon Excitation as an Assistance Effect. Bunseki Kagaku 2014, 63, 293298,  DOI: 10.2116/bunsekikagaku.63.293
  26. 26
    Shibamoto, K.; Kitajima, M.; Mohammad, K. H.; Patent, K. I. Fabrication of single layer array structure of surface unmodified metal nanoparticles. JP 4900550 B2, 2012.
  27. 27
    Hentschel, M.; Dregely, D.; Vogelgesang, R.; Giessen, H.; Liu, N. Plasmonic Oligomers: The Role of Individual Particles in Collective Behavior. ACS Nano 2011, 5, 20422050,  DOI: 10.1021/nn103172t
  28. 28
    Kneipp, K.; Kneipp, H.; Itzkan, I.; Dasari, R. R.; Feld, M. S. Single Molecule Detection Using near Infrared Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering. Single Molecule Spectroscopy; Series in Chemical Physics; Springer, 2001; pp 144160.
  29. 29
    Jiang, J. D.; Burstein, E.; Kobayashi, H. Resonant Raman Scattering by Crystal-Violet Molecules Adsorbed on a Smooth Gold Surface: Evidence for a Charge-Transfer Excitation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1986, 57, 17931796,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.57.1793
  30. 30
    Cañamares, M. V.; Chenal, C.; Birke, R. L.; Lombardi, J. R. DFT, SERS, and Single-Molecule SERS of Crystal Violet. J. Phys. Chem. C 2008, 112, 2029520300,  DOI: 10.1021/jp807807j
  31. 31
    Shibamoto, K.; Sakata, K.; Nagoshi, K.; Korenaga, T. Laser Desorption Ionization Mass Spectrometry by Using Surface Plasmon Excitation on Gold Nanoparticle. J. Phys. Chem. C 2009, 113, 1777417779,  DOI: 10.1021/jp9020432
  32. 32
    Vinod, M.; Gopchandran, K. G. Au, Ag and Au:Ag Colloidal Nanoparticles Synthesized by Pulsed Laser Ablation as SERS Substrates. Prog. Nat. Sci.: Mater. Int. 2014, 24, 569578,  DOI: 10.1016/j.pnsc.2014.10.003
  33. 33
    Lin, S.; Lin, X.; Song, X.; Han, S.; Wang, L.; Hasi, W. Fabrication of Flexible Paper - Based Surface - Enhanced Raman Scattering Substrate from Au Nanocubes Monolayer for Trace Detection of Crystal Violet on Shell. J. Raman Spectrosc. 2019, 50, 10741084,  DOI: 10.1002/jrs.5620
  34. 34
    Kneipp, K.; Kneipp, H.; Itzkan, I.; Dasari, R. R.; Feld, M. S. Ultrasensitive Chemical Analysis by Raman Spectroscopy. Chem. Rev. 1999, 99, 29572976,  DOI: 10.1021/cr980133r
  35. 35
    Shibamoto, K.; Katayama, K.; Sawada, T. Fundamental Processes of Surface Enhanced Raman Scattering Detected by Transient Reflecting Grating Spectroscopy. J. Photochem. Photobiol., A 2003, 158, 105110,  DOI: 10.1016/S1010-6030(03)00023-6
  36. 36
    Shibamoto, K.; Katayama, K.; Sawada, T. Ultrafast Charge Transfer in Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering (SERS) Processes Using Transient Reflecting Grating (TRG) Spectroscopy. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2007, 433, 385389,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cplett.2006.11.036
  37. 37
    Deegan, R. D.; Bakajin, O.; Dupont, T. F.; Huber, G.; Nagel, S. R.; Witten, T. A. Capillary Flow as the Cause of Ring Stains from Dried Liquid Drops. Nature 1997, 389, 827829,  DOI: 10.1038/39827

Cited By

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article is cited by 1 publications.

  1. Kohei Shibamoto, Takashi Fujita. Surface-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Mass Spectrometry with a Two-Dimensional Au Nanoparticle Array for Soft Ionization. ACS Omega 2024, 9 (20) , 21822-21828. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c08648

ACS Omega

Cite this: ACS Omega 2022, 7, 49, 44711–44719
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c04032
Published November 30, 2022

Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under

CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 .

Article Views

2214

Altmetric

-

Citations

Learn about these metrics

Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.

  • Abstract

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. (a) Optical microscopy image of the lateral meniscus image formed by the SW method at 0 min from the start. Dotted circle indicates a contact line. (b) Optical microscopy image of the contact line in the initial evaporation process (0, 45, 75, and 105 min from the start). (c) Reflection microscopy image of the contact line at t = 45 min.

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. (a) SEM image at ×50 magnification of SW-substrate 1 on the Si wafer, which was prepared at a relative humidity of 60 ± 10% at 298 K. (b) SEM image at ×20,000 magnification of SW-substrate 1. (c) SEM image at ×20,000 magnification of SW-substrate 2, which was prepared at a relative humidity of 20 ± 5% at 298 K. These substrates were composed of spherical Au NPs (mean diameter: 60 nm). Corresponding FFT images and their brightness distribution are shown in the higher right and lower right, respectively.

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. (a) SEM image at ×20,000 magnification of the OW-substrate on the Si wafer. (b) SEM image at ×20,000 magnification of the DD-substrate on Si wafer. These substrates were composed of spherical Au NPs (mean diameter: 60 nm). Corresponding FFT images and their brightness distribution are shown in the higher right and lower right, respectively.

    Figure 4

    Figure 4. Vis–NIR Extinction spectra of (a) SW-substrate 1, (b) OW-substrate, and (c) DD-substrate. These substrates were on glass slides. The dotted line indicates vis–NIR absorption spectra of spherical Au NP (mean diameter: 60 nm) colloidal solution, which was used for the preparation of these substrates.

    Figure 5

    Figure 5. (a) Raman spectra of CV adsorbed on SW-substrate 1 and (b) Raman spectra of CV crystals. 532 nm lines of Nd:YAG laser was employed as the excitation laser.

    Figure 6

    Figure 6. Normalized peak intensities of bands at (a) 1179 cm–1, (b) 1380 cm–1, and (c) 1621 cm–1 versus packing rates of four substrates. The mean value was normalized to 1 (dotted line). These peak intensities were obtained from different 25 spots in these substrates. (d) RSDs of SERS intensities at 1621 cm–1 versus packing rates of four substrates. The dotted line indicates the systematic error obtained from a silicon single crystal (100).

  • References


    This article references 37 other publications.

    1. 1
      Mayer, K. M.; Hafner, J. H. Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance Sensors. Chem. Rev. 2011, 111, 38283857,  DOI: 10.1021/cr100313v
    2. 2
      Jiang, N.; Zhuo, X.; Wang, J. Active Plasmonics: Principles, Structures, and Applications. Chem. Rev. 2018, 118, 30543099,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00252
    3. 3
      Kleinman, S. L.; Frontiera, R. R.; Henry, A. I.; Dieringer, J. A.; Van Duyne, R. P. Creating, Characterizing, and Controlling Chemistry with SERS Hot Spots. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2013, 15, 2136,  DOI: 10.1039/c2cp42598j
    4. 4
      Sharma, B.; Frontiera, R. R.; Henry, A. I.; Ringe, E.; Van Duyne, R. P. SERS: Materials, Applications, and the Future. Mater. Today 2012, 15, 1625,  DOI: 10.1016/S1369-7021(12)70017-2
    5. 5
      Huang, Z.; Zhang, A.; Zhang, Q.; Cui, D.; Nanomaterial-Based, S. E. R. S. Nanomaterial-Based SERS Sensing Technology for Biomedical Application. J. Mater. Chem. B 2019, 7, 37553774,  DOI: 10.1039/C9TB00666D
    6. 6
      Sackmann, M.; Materny, A. Surface Enhanced Raman Scattering (SERS) – A Quantitative Analytical Tool?. J. Raman Spectrosc. 2006, 37, 305310,  DOI: 10.1002/jrs.1443
    7. 7
      De Rosa, C.; Auriemma, F.; Diletto, C.; Di Girolamo, R.; Malafronte, A.; Morvillo, P.; Zito, T.; Rusciano, G.; Pesce, G.; Sasso, A. Toward hyperuniform disordered plasmonic nanostructures for reproducible surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2015, 17, 80618069,  DOI: 10.1039/c4cp06024e
    8. 8
      Le Ru, E. C.; Etchegoin, P. G.; Grand, J.; Félidj, N.; Aubard, J.; Lévi, G.; Hohenau, A.; Krenn, J. R. Surface Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy on Nanolithography-Prepared Substrates. Curr. Appl. Phys. 2008, 8, 467470,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cap.2007.10.073
    9. 9
      Das, G.; Mecarini, F.; Gentile, F.; De Angelis, F.; Mohan Kumar, M.; Candeloro, P.; Liberale, C.; Cuda, G.; Di Fabrizio, E. Nano-patterned SERS substrate: Application for protein analysis vs. temperature. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2009, 24, 16931699,  DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2008.08.050
    10. 10
      Reincke, F.; Hickey, S. G.; Kegel, W. K.; Vanmaekelbergh, D. Spontaneous Assembly of a Monolayer of Charged Gold Nanocrystals at the Water/Oil Interface. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 2004, 43, 458462,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.200352339
    11. 11
      Pienpinijtham, P.; Han, X. X.; Ekgasit, S.; Ozaki, Y. An Ionic Surfactant-Mediated Langmuir – Blodgett Method to Construct Gold Nanoparticle Films for Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2012, 14, 1013210139,  DOI: 10.1039/c2cp41419h
    12. 12
      Guo, Q.; Xu, M.; Yuan, Y.; Gu, R.; Yao, J. Self-Assembled Large-Scale Monolayer of Au Nanoparticles at the Air/Water Interface Used as a SERS Substrate. Langmuir 2016, 32, 45304537,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.5b04393
    13. 13
      Liu, D.; Li, C.; Zhou, F.; Zhang, T.; Liu, G.; Cai, W.; Li, Y. Capillary Gradient-Induced Self-Assembly of Periodic Au Spherical Nanoparticle Arrays on an Ultralarge Scale via a Bisolvent System at Air/Water Interface. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 4, 1600976,  DOI: 10.1002/admi.201600976
    14. 14
      Liu, S.; Zhu, T.; Hu, R.; Liu, Z. Evaporation-Induced Self-Assembly of Gold Nanoparticles into a Highly Organized Two-Dimensional Array. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2002, 4, 60596062,  DOI: 10.1039/b208520h
    15. 15
      Yang, G.; Nanda, J.; Wang, B.; Chen, G.; Hallinan, D. T., Jr. Self-Assembly of Large Gold nanoparticles for Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 1345713470,  DOI: 10.1021/acsami.7b01121
    16. 16
      Israelachvili, J. N.; Intermolecular and Surface Forces, 3rd ed.; Academic Press, 2011.
    17. 17
      Njoki, P. N.; Lim, I. S.; Mott, D.; Park, H.; Khan, B.; Mishra, S.; Sujakumar, R.; Luo, J.; Zhong, C. Size Correlation of Optical and Spectroscopic Properties for Gold Nanoparticles. J. Phys. Chem. C 2007, 111, 1466414669,  DOI: 10.1021/jp074902z
    18. 18
      Zhang, P.; Li, Y.; Wang, D.; Xia, H. High–Yield Production of Uniform Gold Nanoparticles with Sizes from 31 to 577 nm via One-Pot Seeded Growth and Size-Dependent SERS Property. Part. Part. Syst. Charact. 2016, 33, 924932,  DOI: 10.1002/ppsc.201600188
    19. 19
      Park, Y. K.; Yoo, S. H.; Park, S. Assembly of Highly Ordered Nanoparticle Monolayers at a Water/Hexane Interface. Langmuir 2007, 23, 1050510510,  DOI: 10.1021/la701445a
    20. 20
      Kim, B.; Tripp, S. L.; Wei, A. Self-Organization of Large Gold Nanoparticle Arrays. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 79557956,  DOI: 10.1021/ja0160344
    21. 21
      Ishida, T.; Tachikiri, Y.; Sako, T.; Takahashi, Y.; Yamada, S. Structural Characterization and Plasmonic Properties of Two-Dimensional Arrays of Hydrophobic Large Gold Nanoparticles Fabricated by Langmuir-Blodgett Technique. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 404, 350356,  DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.01.304
    22. 22
      Wang, H.; Levin, C. S.; Halas, N. J. Nanosphere Arrays with Controlled Sub-10-Nm Gaps as Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy Substrates. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 1499214993,  DOI: 10.1021/ja055633y
    23. 23
      Wei, A.; Kim, B.; Pusztay, S. V.; Tripp, S. L.; Balasubramanian, R. Resorcinarene-Encapsulated Nanoparticles Building Blocks Self-Assembled Nanostructures. J. Inclusion Phenom. 2001, 41. DOI:  DOI: 10.1023/A:1014472212238
    24. 24
      Smith, S. R.; Lipkowski, J. Guided Assembly of Two-Dimensional Arrays of Gold Nanoparticles on a Polycrystalline Gold Electrode for Electrochemical Surface- Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. C 2018, 122, 73037311,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b01309
    25. 25
      Shibamoto, K.; Yasumuro, S.; Horiuchi, K.; Teraoka, T.; Fujita, T. Study of Two-dimensional Highly-ordering of Gold Nanoparticles for an Optical Sensor Using Surface Plasmon Excitation as an Assistance Effect. Bunseki Kagaku 2014, 63, 293298,  DOI: 10.2116/bunsekikagaku.63.293
    26. 26
      Shibamoto, K.; Kitajima, M.; Mohammad, K. H.; Patent, K. I. Fabrication of single layer array structure of surface unmodified metal nanoparticles. JP 4900550 B2, 2012.
    27. 27
      Hentschel, M.; Dregely, D.; Vogelgesang, R.; Giessen, H.; Liu, N. Plasmonic Oligomers: The Role of Individual Particles in Collective Behavior. ACS Nano 2011, 5, 20422050,  DOI: 10.1021/nn103172t
    28. 28
      Kneipp, K.; Kneipp, H.; Itzkan, I.; Dasari, R. R.; Feld, M. S. Single Molecule Detection Using near Infrared Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering. Single Molecule Spectroscopy; Series in Chemical Physics; Springer, 2001; pp 144160.
    29. 29
      Jiang, J. D.; Burstein, E.; Kobayashi, H. Resonant Raman Scattering by Crystal-Violet Molecules Adsorbed on a Smooth Gold Surface: Evidence for a Charge-Transfer Excitation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1986, 57, 17931796,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.57.1793
    30. 30
      Cañamares, M. V.; Chenal, C.; Birke, R. L.; Lombardi, J. R. DFT, SERS, and Single-Molecule SERS of Crystal Violet. J. Phys. Chem. C 2008, 112, 2029520300,  DOI: 10.1021/jp807807j
    31. 31
      Shibamoto, K.; Sakata, K.; Nagoshi, K.; Korenaga, T. Laser Desorption Ionization Mass Spectrometry by Using Surface Plasmon Excitation on Gold Nanoparticle. J. Phys. Chem. C 2009, 113, 1777417779,  DOI: 10.1021/jp9020432
    32. 32
      Vinod, M.; Gopchandran, K. G. Au, Ag and Au:Ag Colloidal Nanoparticles Synthesized by Pulsed Laser Ablation as SERS Substrates. Prog. Nat. Sci.: Mater. Int. 2014, 24, 569578,  DOI: 10.1016/j.pnsc.2014.10.003
    33. 33
      Lin, S.; Lin, X.; Song, X.; Han, S.; Wang, L.; Hasi, W. Fabrication of Flexible Paper - Based Surface - Enhanced Raman Scattering Substrate from Au Nanocubes Monolayer for Trace Detection of Crystal Violet on Shell. J. Raman Spectrosc. 2019, 50, 10741084,  DOI: 10.1002/jrs.5620
    34. 34
      Kneipp, K.; Kneipp, H.; Itzkan, I.; Dasari, R. R.; Feld, M. S. Ultrasensitive Chemical Analysis by Raman Spectroscopy. Chem. Rev. 1999, 99, 29572976,  DOI: 10.1021/cr980133r
    35. 35
      Shibamoto, K.; Katayama, K.; Sawada, T. Fundamental Processes of Surface Enhanced Raman Scattering Detected by Transient Reflecting Grating Spectroscopy. J. Photochem. Photobiol., A 2003, 158, 105110,  DOI: 10.1016/S1010-6030(03)00023-6
    36. 36
      Shibamoto, K.; Katayama, K.; Sawada, T. Ultrafast Charge Transfer in Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering (SERS) Processes Using Transient Reflecting Grating (TRG) Spectroscopy. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2007, 433, 385389,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cplett.2006.11.036
    37. 37
      Deegan, R. D.; Bakajin, O.; Dupont, T. F.; Huber, G.; Nagel, S. R.; Witten, T. A. Capillary Flow as the Cause of Ring Stains from Dried Liquid Drops. Nature 1997, 389, 827829,  DOI: 10.1038/39827
  • Supporting Information

    Supporting Information


    The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.2c04032.

    • SEM images of SW substrates, dependence of Raman peak intensity on the dipping time, and literature data for SERS substrates using Au NPs (DOCX)


    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.