Investigating the Flexural Behavior of a Two-Span High-Performance Concrete Beam Using Experimentally Derived Stress Block ParametersClick to copy article linkArticle link copied!
- Asif Iqbal A. Momin*Asif Iqbal A. Momin*Email: [email protected]Department of Civil Engineering, BLDEA’s Vachana Pitamaha Dr. P.G Halakatti College of Engineering and Technology, Vijayapur, Affiliated to VTU, Belagavi, Bijapur, Karnataka 586103, IndiaMore by Asif Iqbal A. Momin
- Aijaz Ahmad Zende*Aijaz Ahmad Zende*Email: [email protected]Department of Civil Engineering, BLDEA’s Vachana Pitamaha Dr. P.G Halakatti College of Engineering and Technology, Vijayapur, Affiliated to VTU, Belagavi, Bijapur, Karnataka 586103, IndiaMore by Aijaz Ahmad Zende
- Rajesab B. KhadiranaikarRajesab B. KhadiranaikarDepartment of Civil Engineering, SECAB Institute of Engineering and Technology, Vijayapur, Affiliated to VTU, Belagavi, Bijapur, Karnataka 586109, IndiaMore by Rajesab B. Khadiranaikar
- Abdullah H. AlsabhanAbdullah H. AlsabhanDepartment of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, King Saud University, P.O. Box 800, Riyadh 11421, Saudi ArabiaMore by Abdullah H. Alsabhan
- Shamshad AlamShamshad AlamDepartment of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, King Saud University, P.O. Box 800, Riyadh 11421, Saudi ArabiaMore by Shamshad Alam
- Mohammad Amir KhanMohammad Amir KhanDepartment of Civil Engineering, Galgotia College of Engineering, Knowledge Park I, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh 201310, IndiaMore by Mohammad Amir Khan
- Mohammad Obaid QamarMohammad Obaid QamarDepartment of Civil Engineering (Environmental Science & Engineering), Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan 38541, South KoreaMore by Mohammad Obaid Qamar
Abstract
High-performance concrete (HPC) is increasingly used in construction due to its superior strength and durability. However, current stress block parameters used for designing normal-strength concrete cannot be safely applied to HPC. To address this issue, new stress block parameters have been proposed through experimental works, which are used for designing HPC members. In this study, the behavior of HPC was investigated using these stress block parameters. Two-span beams made of HPC were tested under five-point bending, and an idealized stress block curve was derived from the experimental stress–strain curve for grades 60, 80, and 100 MPa. Based on the stress block curve, equations for the ultimate moment of resistance, depth of the neutral axis, limiting moment of resistance, and maximum depth of the neutral axis were proposed. An idealized load–deformation curve was also developed, which identified four significant events: first cracking, yielding of reinforced steel, crushing of concrete with spalling of cover, and ultimate failure. The predicted values were found to be in good agreement with the experimental values, and the average location of the first crack was identified to be 0.270 L, measured from the central support on either side of the span. These findings provide important insights for the design of HPC structures, contributing to the development of more resilient and durable infrastructure.
This publication is licensed under
License Summary*
You are free to share(copy and redistribute) this article in any medium or format within the parameters below:
Creative Commons (CC): This is a Creative Commons license.
Attribution (BY): Credit must be given to the creator.
Non-Commercial (NC): Only non-commercial uses of the work are permitted.
No Derivatives (ND): Derivative works may be created for non-commercial purposes, but sharing is prohibited.
*Disclaimer
This summary highlights only some of the key features and terms of the actual license. It is not a license and has no legal value. Carefully review the actual license before using these materials.
License Summary*
You are free to share(copy and redistribute) this article in any medium or format within the parameters below:
Creative Commons (CC): This is a Creative Commons license.
Attribution (BY): Credit must be given to the creator.
Non-Commercial (NC): Only non-commercial uses of the work are permitted.
No Derivatives (ND): Derivative works may be created for non-commercial purposes, but sharing is prohibited.
*Disclaimer
This summary highlights only some of the key features and terms of the actual license. It is not a license and has no legal value. Carefully review the actual license before using these materials.
License Summary*
You are free to share(copy and redistribute) this article in any medium or format within the parameters below:
Creative Commons (CC): This is a Creative Commons license.
Attribution (BY): Credit must be given to the creator.
Non-Commercial (NC): Only non-commercial uses of the work are permitted.
No Derivatives (ND): Derivative works may be created for non-commercial purposes, but sharing is prohibited.
*Disclaimer
This summary highlights only some of the key features and terms of the actual license. It is not a license and has no legal value. Carefully review the actual license before using these materials.
License Summary*
You are free to share(copy and redistribute) this article in any medium or format within the parameters below:
Creative Commons (CC): This is a Creative Commons license.
Attribution (BY): Credit must be given to the creator.
Non-Commercial (NC): Only non-commercial uses of the work are permitted.
No Derivatives (ND): Derivative works may be created for non-commercial purposes, but sharing is prohibited.
*Disclaimer
This summary highlights only some of the key features and terms of the actual license. It is not a license and has no legal value. Carefully review the actual license before using these materials.
License Summary*
You are free to share(copy and redistribute) this article in any medium or format within the parameters below:
Creative Commons (CC): This is a Creative Commons license.
Attribution (BY): Credit must be given to the creator.
Non-Commercial (NC): Only non-commercial uses of the work are permitted.
No Derivatives (ND): Derivative works may be created for non-commercial purposes, but sharing is prohibited.
*Disclaimer
This summary highlights only some of the key features and terms of the actual license. It is not a license and has no legal value. Carefully review the actual license before using these materials.
1. Introduction
2. Methodology
Figure 1
Figure 1. Two-span continuous HPC beam specimen in flexure.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Beam specimen with LVDTs to measure ultimate strain.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Connection at mid-support.
longitudinal reinforcement | % of reinforcement (ρ) | longitudinal reinforcement ratio ρ/ρb | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
designation | target concrete strength (MPa) | cube strength (MPa), fck | tension | compression | tension | compression | balanced reinforcement, ρb | tension | compression |
60DB1 | 60 | 84.98 | 3 # 12 mm | 2 # 16 mm | 1.209 | 1.433 | 4.823 | 0.251 | 0.297 |
60DB2 | 85.85 | 2 # 16 + 1 # 10 mm | 3 # 16 mm | 1.713 | 2.150 | 4.873 | 0.352 | 0.441 | |
60DB3 | 83.64 | 3 # 16 mm | 2 # 20 + 1 # 12 mm | 2.173 | 2.671 | 4.747 | 0.458 | 0.563 | |
80DB1 | 80 | 90.21 | 3 # 10 mm | 2 # 12 + 1 # 8 mm | 0.831 | 0.975 | 5.120 | 0.162 | 0.190 |
80DB2 | 87.79 | 2 # 12 + 1 # 8 mm | 2 # 16 mm | 0.975 | 1.418 | 4.983 | 0.196 | 0.285 | |
100DB1 | 100 | 107.68 | 3 # 12 mm | 2 # 16 mm | 1.197 | 1.418 | 6.112 | 0.196 | 0.232 |
100DB2 | 108.61 | 2 # 16 + 1 # 10 mm | 3 # 16 mm | 1.713 | 2.150 | 6.165 | 0.278 | 0.349 | |
100DB3 | 102.73 | 3 # 16 mm | 2 # 20 + 1 # 12 mm | 2.173 | 2.671 | 5.831 | 0.373 | 0.458 |
3. Stress Block Parameters
Figure 4
Figure 4. Stress–strain curves for HPC.
Figure 5
Figure 5. Equivalent stress block parameters.
parameter | equation/value |
---|---|
stress factor k1 | k1 = 0.896 |
centroid factor k2 | k2 = 0.405 |
area factor k3 | k3 = 0.777 |
flexural strength of reinforced HPC beam | ![]() |
depth of NA | ![]() (6) |
limiting moment of resistance | ![]() (7) |
4. Flexural Behavior of Two-Span HPC Beams
Figure 6
Figure 6. Variation of Mu/Mexp with ρ and grade of concrete.
Figure 7
Figure 7. Variation of Mu/bd2 with ρ for M60 grade.
designation | d | fck (MPa) | ρ (%) | Pu (kN) | xu (mm) | Mu,exp (kN m) | Mu,pred (kN m) | Mu,pred/Mu,exp |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
60DB1 | 164 | 84.98 | 1.209 | 235.45 | 22.55 | 27.59 | 23.81 | 0.86 |
60DB2 | 162 | 85.85 | 1.713 | 310.50 | 31.62 | 36.39 | 32.50 | 0.89 |
60DB3 | 162 | 83.64 | 2.173 | 355.50 | 40.73 | 41.66 | 39.77 | 0.95 |
80DB1 | 237 | 90.21 | 0.831 | 228.00 | 14.75 | 26.72 | 24.67 | 0.92 |
80DB2 | 236 | 87.79 | 0.975 | 240.00 | 17.78 | 28.13 | 28.67 | 1.02 |
100DB1 | 164 | 107.68 | 1.197 | 250.00 | 17.79 | 29.30 | 24.11 | 0.82 |
100DB2 | 162 | 108.61 | 1.713 | 349.60 | 24.99 | 40.97 | 33.08 | 0.81 |
100DB3 | 162 | 102.73 | 2.173 | 367.50 | 33.16 | 43.07 | 40.61 | 0.94 |
4.1. Load–Deflection Variation
Figure 8
Figure 8. Load–deflection curve for M60 grade.
Figure 9
Figure 9. Load–deflection curve for M80 grade.
Figure 10
Figure 10. Load–deflection curves for M100 grade.
Figure 11
Figure 11. Ideal load–deflection curve.
Figure 12
Figure 12. Load at first visible crack for two-span HPC beam specimens.
beam designation | percentage of longitudinal tension steel (%) | load at first crack (kN) | deflection at first crack (mm) | location of first crack from the left support of the observer in the tension zone (mm) | crack width at failure (mm) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
60DB1 | 1.209 | 180 | 7.00 | 0.61 L | 2.5 |
60DB2 | 1.713 | 222 | 6.80 | 0.30 L | 2.5 |
60DB3 | 2.173 | 248 | 7.60 | 0.09 L | 2.3 |
80DB1 | 0.831 | 182 | 4.00 | 0.17 L | 2.2 |
80DB2 | 0.975 | 187 | 3.65 | 0.21 L | 2.1 |
100DB1 | 1.197 | 193 | 7.80 | 0.17 L | 1.8 |
100DB2 | 1.713 | 263 | 8.52 | 0.30 L | 1.7 |
100DB3 | 2.173 | 294 | 8.10 | 0.31 L | 1.7 |
4.2. Crack Propagation
Figure 13
Figure 13. Crack patterns and failure modes for M60 grade.
Figure 14
Figure 14. Crack patterns and failure modes for M80 grade.
Figure 15
Figure 15. Crack patterns and failure modes for M100 grade.
Figure 16
Figure 16. Crack pattern at mid-support for the M60 grade HPC 60DB3 beam specimen.
Figure 17
Figure 17. Crack pattern at the center of the span for the M100 grade HPC 100DB2 beam specimen.
4.3. Crack Width
4.4. Neutral Axis (NA) Depth Variation
beam designation | percentage of longitudinal tension steel (%) | xpred/d | xexp/d | ![]() | compressive strain at 85% of Mu | tensile strain at 85% of Mu |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
60DB1 | 1.209 | 0.137 | 0.147 | 0.33 | 0.0031 | 0.01805 |
60DB2 | 1.713 | 0.195 | 0.203 | 0.46 | 0.0030 | 0.01185 |
60DB3 | 2.173 | 0.251 | 0.257 | 0.58 | 0.0031 | 0.00903 |
80DB1 | 0.831 | 0.062 | 0.064 | 0.15 | 0.0031 | 0.04580 |
80DB2 | 0.975 | 0.075 | 0.081 | 0.18 | 0.0031 | 0.03519 |
100DB1 | 1.197 | 0.108 | 0.118 | 0.27 | 0.0031 | 0.02355 |
100DB2 | 1.713 | 0.154 | 0.162 | 0.37 | 0.0032 | 0.01676 |
100DB3 | 2.173 | 0.205 | 0.213 | 0.48 | 0.0033 | 0.01208 |
5. Conclusions
1. | This research paper presents stress block parameters specifically for HPC. The coefficient values obtained are k1 = 0.896, k2 = 0.405, and k3 = 0.77. It was found that stress block parameters designed for NSC are not suitable for HPC, and new parameters are recommended for designing HPC members. | ||||
2. | The experimental results showed that increasing the percentage of longitudinal tension steel for beams of the same grade of HPC led to an increase in the load corresponding to the first visible crack. The beams failed in the tension zone, with an average of 76.70% of the ultimate load. The cracks appeared on the bottom fiber and propagated diagonally toward the top and end supports as the load increased due to an increase in shear stress. | ||||
3. | Considering the experimental stress–strain curves of HPC for grades 60, 80, and 100 MPa, an idealized stress block curve is predicted using the best fitting curve. The equation for the moment of resistance of HPC beams is derived using the idealized stress block. The moment of resistance of the HPC beam specimens predicted using the derived equation agrees quite closely with the experimental flexural strength for two-span beams. | ||||
4. | Based on the observation of experimental load–deformation curves, an ideal load–deformation curve is proposed, which follows four significant events identified as first cracking, yielding of reinforced steel, crushing of concrete with spalling of cover, and ultimate failure. | ||||
5. | The results of the study indicate that increasing the amount of tension steel reinforcement in HPC beams can lead to a decrease in deformation capacity at a similar load level. Therefore, it is suggested that ductility can be improved by reducing the amount of tension steel reinforcement, as the longitudinal steel reinforcement ratio has a greater influence than the strength of the concrete. | ||||
6. | The experimentally obtained NA depth was compared to predicted values using stress block parameters developed for HPC, and it was found that a lower tensile reinforcement assures ductile failure for HPC beams for all three grades of concrete. |
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to acknowledge the support provided by Researchers Supporting Project Number RSP2023R473, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
References
This article references 32 other publications.
- 1Parande, A. K. Role of ingredients for high strength and high performance concrete–a review. Adv. Concr. Constr. 2013 Jun, 1, 151, DOI: 10.12989/acc.2013.01.2.151Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 2Farzadnia, N.; Ali, A. A. A.; Demirboga, R. Incorporation of mineral admixtures in sustainable high performance concrete. Int. J. Sustain. Constr. Eng. Technol. 2011 Jul 13, 2 ().Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 3Cheng, B.; Gu, X.; Gao, Y.; Ma, P.; Yang, W.; Wu, J. Rheological and Mechanical Properties of High-Performance Fiber-Reinforced Cement Composites with a Low Water–Cement Ratio. ACS Omega 2022 Mar 9, 7, 9142– 9151, DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.1c05068Google Scholar3Rheological and Mechanical Properties of High-Performance Fiber-Reinforced Cement Composites with a Low Water-Cement RatioCheng, Baojun; Gu, Xiaowei; Gao, Yuxin; Ma, Pengfei; Yang, Wen; Wu, JingACS Omega (2022), 7 (11), 9142-9151CODEN: ACSODF; ISSN:2470-1343. (American Chemical Society)High-performance fiber-reinforced cement composites (HPFRCCs) have been widely used in structural engineering due to their excellent performance. With the trend of lightwt. construction, these materials, which can be used in prefabricated components, are becoming more and more important. This study investigated the influence of the water-cement (w/c) ratio, within the 0.19-0.28 range, on the rheol. and mech. properties of HPFRCCs; the pore structure and microstructure were obsd. to evaluate its effect. An elastic modulus test showed that a smaller w/c ratio would result in a higher rigidity of the material. Both the yield shear stress and plastic viscosity decreased to significantly different degrees with an increasing w/c ratio; a decrease in the yield shear stress and plastic viscosity was conducive to air discharge from the composite and, hence, reduced the air content. Most of the internal pores had a diam. of 20-100 nm or larger than 200 nm, while the proportion of those with a diam. of 100-200 nm was relatively low. When the w/c ratio was below 0.22, the flexural and compressive strengths barely increased due to an increment in the no. of larger pores (i.e., diam. >200 nm). The results showed that the yield shear stress, plastic viscosity, pore uniformity, and the no. of pores with a diam. above 200 nm are the dominant factors affecting the HPFRCC performance at a low w/c ratio.
- 4Mehta, P. K. High-performance, high-volume fly ash concrete for sustainable development. In Proceedings of the International workshop on sustainable development and concrete technology; Iowa State University: Ames, IA, USA. 2004 May 14. pp. 3– 14.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 5Kodur, V. K. R.; Dwaikat, M. Flexural response of reinforced concrete beams exposed to fire. ACI Struct. J. 2008 Mar, 9, 45– 54, DOI: 10.1680/stco.2008.9.1.45Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 6Ahmed, G. H.; Ahmed, H.; Ali, B.; Alyousef, R. Assessment of high performance self-consolidating concrete through an experimental and analytical multi-parameter approach. Materials. 2021 Feb 19, 14, 985, DOI: 10.3390/ma14040985Google Scholar6Assessment of high performance self-consolidating concrete through an experimental and analytical multi-parameter approachAhmed, Ghafur H.; Ahmed, Hawreen; Ali, Babar; Alyousef, RayedMaterials (2021), 14 (4), 985CODEN: MATEG9; ISSN:1996-1944. (MDPI AG)High-performance self-consolidating concrete is one of the most promising developments in the construction industry. Nowadays, concrete designers and ready-mix companies are seeking optimum concrete in terms of environmental impact, cost, mech. performance, as well as fresh-state properties. This can be achieved by considering the mentioned parameters simultaneously; typically, by integrating conventional concrete systems with different types of high-performance waste mineral admixts. (i.e., micro-silica and fly ash) and ultra-high range plasticizers. In this study, fresh-state properties (slump, flow, restricted flow), hardened-state properties (d., water absorption by immersion, compressive strength, splitting tensile strength, flexural strength, stress-strain relationship, modulus of elasticity, oven heating test, fire-resistance, and freeze-thaw cycles), and cost of highperformance self-consolidating concrete (HPSCC) prepd. with waste mineral admixts., were examd. and compared with three different ref. mixes, including normal strength-vibrated concrete (NSVC), high-strength self-compacted concrete (HSSCC), and high-performance highlyviscous concrete (HPVC). Then, a multi parameter anal. approach was considered to identify the optimum concrete mix in terms of cost, workability, strength, and durability.
- 7Tintero, D. L.; Benito, E. K.; Maunahan, H. S.; Madlangbayan, M. S. Estimating the flexural strength of corroded reinforced concrete beams based on rectangular compressive stress block. J. Eng. Res. 2023 Jan 20, 11, 100005 DOI: 10.1016/j.jer.2023.100005Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 8Ng, P. L.; Barros, J. A.; Kaklauskas, G.; Lam, J. Y. K. Deformation analysis of fibre-reinforced polymer reinforced concrete beams by tension-stiffening approach. Compos. Struct. 2020 Feb 15, 234, 111664 DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111664Google Scholar8Deformation analysis of fibre-reinforced polymer reinforced concrete beams by tension-stiffening approachNg, P. L.; Barros, J. A. O.; Kaklauskas, G.; Lam, J. Y. K.Composite Structures (2020), 234 (), 111664CODEN: COMSE2; ISSN:1879-1085. (Elsevier Ltd.)Fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) is free from corrosion problem and is a viable alternative reinforcement material for concrete structures in lieu of steel reinforcing bars. Since FRP has lower elastic modulus compared to steel, the serviceability aspect of FRP reinforced concrete (FRP-RC) members should be particularly considered in the structural anal. and design. This study addresses the deformation anal. of FRP-RC flexural members with thorough consideration of the tension-stiffening phenomenon in post-cracking state. The approaches for analyzing the tension-stiffening flexural response of FRP-RC beams are presented. These include the use of empirical or theor. models to compute effective flexural stiffness, the use of finite element method in conjunction with nonlinear constitutive material models, and the use of tensile stress block in combination with member anal. Among them, the latter is a relatively simple anal. approach. Aiming for serviceability assessment of FRP-RC beams in structural engineering practice to circumvent sophisticated theor. approaches and constitutive models, parametrized tensile stress block is derived based on tension stress fields computed from finite element anal., and is proposed for use in member anal. for prediction of deflections. Four FRP-RC beam specimens tested in the literature are analyzed to verify the proposed tensile stress block. Close agreement between the exptl. and anal. results is achieved, thereby endorsing the applicability and reliability of the proposed method.
- 9Ziara, M. M.; Haldane, D.; Hood, S. Proposed changes to flexural design in BS 8110 to allow over-reinforced sections to fail in a ductile manner. Mag. Concr. Res. 2000 Dec, 52, 443– 454, DOI: 10.1680/macr.2000.52.6.443Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 10Ng, P. L.; Gribniak, V.; Jakubovskis, R.; Rimkus, A. Tension stiffening approach for deformation assessment of flexural reinforced concrete members under compressive axial load. ACI Struct. J. 2019 Dec, 20, 2056– 2068, DOI: 10.1002/suco.201800286Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 11Wang, X.; Liu, J.; Zhang, S. Behavior of short circular tubed-reinforced-concrete columns subjected to eccentric compression. Eng. Struct. 2015 Dec 15, 105, 77– 86, DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.10.001Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 12Gopalakrishnan, S.; Balasubramanian, K.; Krishnamoorthy, T. S.; Bharatkumar, B. H. Investigations on the flexural behavior of reinforced concrete beams containing supplementary cementitious materials. ACI Mater. J. 2001 Jun 1, 199, 645– 664, DOI: 10.14359/10540Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 13Momin, A. I.; Khadirnaikar, R. B.; Zende, A. A. Flexural strength and behavioral study of high-performance concrete beams using stress-block parameters. Int. J. Eng., Trans. B 2021 Nov 1, 34, 2557– 2565, DOI: 10.5829/ije.2021.34.11b.18Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 14Lee, C. S.; Jeon, J. S. Drift limit state predictions of rectangular reinforced concrete columns with superelastic shape memory alloy rebars. J. Build. Eng. 2022, 54, 104546 DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104546Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 15Kocaer, O.; Aldemir, A. Compressive stress–strain model for the estimation of the flexural capacity of reinforced geopolymer concrete members. ACI Struct. J. , 2022, DOI: 10.1002/suco.202200914 .Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 16Tran, T. T.; Pham, T. M.; Hao, H. Rectangular stress-block parameters for fly-ash and slag based geopolymer concrete. InStructures ; 2019 Jun 1. Vol. 19. pp. 143– 155 Elsevier.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 17State of the Art Report on High-Strength Concrete Columns. ACI 441R-1996; American Concrete Institute.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 18British Standard Eurocode 2: Design of concrete structures─Part; Thomas Telford 2004 Dec 23; 1(1): 230.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 19Canadian Standards Association (CSA A23.3–04). Design of concrete structures; Canadian Standards Association: Mississauga, Ont. 2004.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 20Standard I. Plain and Reinforced Concrete-Code of practice (IS-456: 2000); Bureau of Indian Standards: New Delhi, July. 2000.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 21Nedderman, W. H. Flexural stress distribution in very-high strength concrete. PhD diss., University of Texas at Arlington, 1973.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 22Rusch, H. Tests on the strength of the flexural compression zone. Bulletin Berlin, Deutscher Ausschuss Für Stahlbeton. 1955, 120, 94Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 23Ibrahim, H. H.; MacGregor, J. G. Modification of the ACI rectangular stress block for high-strength concrete. ACI Struct. J. 1997 Jan 1, 94, 40– 48, DOI: 10.14359/459Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 24Tan, T.-H.; Nguyen, N.-B. Flexural behavior of confined high-strength concrete columns. ACI Struct. J. 2005 Mar 1, 102, 198– 205, DOI: 10.14359/14270Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 25Swartz, S. E.; Nikaeen, A.; Babu, H. N.; Periyakaruppan, N.; Refai, T. M. Structural bending properties of higher strength concrete. ACI Mater. J. 1985 Sep 1, 147– 178Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 26Mertol, H. C.; Rizkalla, S.; Zia, P.; Mirmiran, A. Characteristics of compressive stress distribution in high-strength concrete. ACI Struct. J. 2008 Sep 1, 105, 626, DOI: 10.14359/19946Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 27Khadiranaikar, R. B.; Awati, M. M. Concrete stress distribution factors for high-performance concrete. J. Struct. Eng. 2012 Mar 1, 138, 402– 415, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000465Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 28Zende, A. A.; Khadiranaikar, R. B.; Momin, A. I. Shear Behavior of High Strength Self-Compacting Concrete Slender Beams Without Web Reinforcement. J. Appl. Sci. Eng. 2022 Mar, 26, 1, DOI: 10.6180/jase.202301_26(1).0001Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 29Zende, A. A.; Khadiranaikar, R. B.; Momin, A. I. A. Shear behaviour of high strength self-compacting concrete with varying stirrup spacing. Int. J. Struct. Eng. 2022, 12, 374– 387, DOI: 10.1504/IJSTRUCTE.2022.126192Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 30Aliş, B.; Yazici, C.; Özkal, F. M. Investigation of Fire Effects on Reinforced Concrete Members via Finite Element Analysis. ACS Omega 2022 Jul 20, 7, 26881– 26893, DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.2c03414Google Scholar30Investigation of Fire Effects on Reinforced Concrete Members via Finite Element AnalysisAlis, Betul; Yazici, Casim; Mehmet Ozkal, FatihACS Omega (2022), 7 (30), 26881-26893CODEN: ACSODF; ISSN:2470-1343. (American Chemical Society)Structural deterioration during fire leads to significant economic losses, severe injuries, and deaths. Research to accurately est. the impact of fire on structural security and performance, and to identify ways to reduce it, has been increasing recently with capital investments in the building and infrastructure sectors. This research aims to establish a reliable algorithm for simulating the behavior of reinforced concrete (RC) beams under thermal and structural loads. The proposed algorithm is based on the combination of thermal and structural analyses using the sequential link technique. These analyses use material characteristics such as cond., sp. heat, stress-strain relationship, and thermal expansion to capture thermal and structural responses during the heating phases according to Eurocode 1 and Eurocode 2 using the finite element method. Beam models in the study, which have been exposed to the ISO-834 fire curve, were designed to exhibit flexural failure. Nonlinear numerical anal. results have mostly coincided with the previous studies regarding the residual load-bearing capacity. Depending on the outcomes of the previous exptl. studies, an RC member's structural strength increases when the internal temp. is between 150 and 250°C and degrdn. starts after 300°C. This outcome has been supported by the previous numerical and exptl. studies, propounding the accuracy of preferred modeling and anal. approaches. As the essential distinctness of the research, the effects of elevated temps. on the bonding behavior between concrete and rebar were considered for numerical analyses.
- 31Momin, A. I. A.; Khadiranaikar, R. B.; Zende, A. A. Modulus of Elasticity of High-Performance Concrete Beams Under Flexure-Experimental Approach. In: Ranadive, M. S.; Das, B. B.; Mehta, Y. A.; Gupta, R (eds) Recent Trends in Construction Technology and Management. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering , 2023: vol 260. Springer: Singapore.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 32Junaid, M. T.; Elbana, A.; Altoubat, S.; Al-Sadoon, Z. Experimental study on the effect of matrix on the flexural behavior of beams reinforced with Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer (GFRP) bars. Compos. Struct. 2019 Aug 15, 110930 DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.110930Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
Cited By
This article has not yet been cited by other publications.
Article Views
Altmetric
Citations
Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.
Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.
The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.
Recommended Articles
Abstract
Figure 1
Figure 1. Two-span continuous HPC beam specimen in flexure.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Beam specimen with LVDTs to measure ultimate strain.
Photograph courtesy of Aijaz Ahmad Zende. Copyright 2023.Figure 3
Figure 3. Connection at mid-support.
Photograph courtesy of Aijaz Ahmad Zende. Copyright 2023.Figure 4
Figure 4. Stress–strain curves for HPC.
Figure 5
Figure 5. Equivalent stress block parameters.
Figure 6
Figure 6. Variation of Mu/Mexp with ρ and grade of concrete.
Figure 7
Figure 7. Variation of Mu/bd2 with ρ for M60 grade.
Figure 8
Figure 8. Load–deflection curve for M60 grade.
Figure 9
Figure 9. Load–deflection curve for M80 grade.
Figure 10
Figure 10. Load–deflection curves for M100 grade.
Figure 11
Figure 11. Ideal load–deflection curve.
Figure 12
Figure 12. Load at first visible crack for two-span HPC beam specimens.
Figure 13
Figure 13. Crack patterns and failure modes for M60 grade.
Photograph courtesy of Aijaz Ahmad Zende. Copyright 2023.Figure 14
Figure 14. Crack patterns and failure modes for M80 grade.
Photograph courtesy of Aijaz Ahmad Zende. Copyright 2023.Figure 15
Figure 15. Crack patterns and failure modes for M100 grade.
Photograph courtesy of Aijaz Ahmad Zende. Copyright 2023.Figure 16
Figure 16. Crack pattern at mid-support for the M60 grade HPC 60DB3 beam specimen.
Photograph courtesy of Aijaz Ahmad Zende. Copyright 2023.Figure 17
Figure 17. Crack pattern at the center of the span for the M100 grade HPC 100DB2 beam specimen.
Photograph courtesy of Aijaz Ahmad Zende. Copyright 2023.References
This article references 32 other publications.
- 1Parande, A. K. Role of ingredients for high strength and high performance concrete–a review. Adv. Concr. Constr. 2013 Jun, 1, 151, DOI: 10.12989/acc.2013.01.2.151There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 2Farzadnia, N.; Ali, A. A. A.; Demirboga, R. Incorporation of mineral admixtures in sustainable high performance concrete. Int. J. Sustain. Constr. Eng. Technol. 2011 Jul 13, 2 ().There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 3Cheng, B.; Gu, X.; Gao, Y.; Ma, P.; Yang, W.; Wu, J. Rheological and Mechanical Properties of High-Performance Fiber-Reinforced Cement Composites with a Low Water–Cement Ratio. ACS Omega 2022 Mar 9, 7, 9142– 9151, DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.1c050683Rheological and Mechanical Properties of High-Performance Fiber-Reinforced Cement Composites with a Low Water-Cement RatioCheng, Baojun; Gu, Xiaowei; Gao, Yuxin; Ma, Pengfei; Yang, Wen; Wu, JingACS Omega (2022), 7 (11), 9142-9151CODEN: ACSODF; ISSN:2470-1343. (American Chemical Society)High-performance fiber-reinforced cement composites (HPFRCCs) have been widely used in structural engineering due to their excellent performance. With the trend of lightwt. construction, these materials, which can be used in prefabricated components, are becoming more and more important. This study investigated the influence of the water-cement (w/c) ratio, within the 0.19-0.28 range, on the rheol. and mech. properties of HPFRCCs; the pore structure and microstructure were obsd. to evaluate its effect. An elastic modulus test showed that a smaller w/c ratio would result in a higher rigidity of the material. Both the yield shear stress and plastic viscosity decreased to significantly different degrees with an increasing w/c ratio; a decrease in the yield shear stress and plastic viscosity was conducive to air discharge from the composite and, hence, reduced the air content. Most of the internal pores had a diam. of 20-100 nm or larger than 200 nm, while the proportion of those with a diam. of 100-200 nm was relatively low. When the w/c ratio was below 0.22, the flexural and compressive strengths barely increased due to an increment in the no. of larger pores (i.e., diam. >200 nm). The results showed that the yield shear stress, plastic viscosity, pore uniformity, and the no. of pores with a diam. above 200 nm are the dominant factors affecting the HPFRCC performance at a low w/c ratio.
- 4Mehta, P. K. High-performance, high-volume fly ash concrete for sustainable development. In Proceedings of the International workshop on sustainable development and concrete technology; Iowa State University: Ames, IA, USA. 2004 May 14. pp. 3– 14.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 5Kodur, V. K. R.; Dwaikat, M. Flexural response of reinforced concrete beams exposed to fire. ACI Struct. J. 2008 Mar, 9, 45– 54, DOI: 10.1680/stco.2008.9.1.45There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 6Ahmed, G. H.; Ahmed, H.; Ali, B.; Alyousef, R. Assessment of high performance self-consolidating concrete through an experimental and analytical multi-parameter approach. Materials. 2021 Feb 19, 14, 985, DOI: 10.3390/ma140409856Assessment of high performance self-consolidating concrete through an experimental and analytical multi-parameter approachAhmed, Ghafur H.; Ahmed, Hawreen; Ali, Babar; Alyousef, RayedMaterials (2021), 14 (4), 985CODEN: MATEG9; ISSN:1996-1944. (MDPI AG)High-performance self-consolidating concrete is one of the most promising developments in the construction industry. Nowadays, concrete designers and ready-mix companies are seeking optimum concrete in terms of environmental impact, cost, mech. performance, as well as fresh-state properties. This can be achieved by considering the mentioned parameters simultaneously; typically, by integrating conventional concrete systems with different types of high-performance waste mineral admixts. (i.e., micro-silica and fly ash) and ultra-high range plasticizers. In this study, fresh-state properties (slump, flow, restricted flow), hardened-state properties (d., water absorption by immersion, compressive strength, splitting tensile strength, flexural strength, stress-strain relationship, modulus of elasticity, oven heating test, fire-resistance, and freeze-thaw cycles), and cost of highperformance self-consolidating concrete (HPSCC) prepd. with waste mineral admixts., were examd. and compared with three different ref. mixes, including normal strength-vibrated concrete (NSVC), high-strength self-compacted concrete (HSSCC), and high-performance highlyviscous concrete (HPVC). Then, a multi parameter anal. approach was considered to identify the optimum concrete mix in terms of cost, workability, strength, and durability.
- 7Tintero, D. L.; Benito, E. K.; Maunahan, H. S.; Madlangbayan, M. S. Estimating the flexural strength of corroded reinforced concrete beams based on rectangular compressive stress block. J. Eng. Res. 2023 Jan 20, 11, 100005 DOI: 10.1016/j.jer.2023.100005There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 8Ng, P. L.; Barros, J. A.; Kaklauskas, G.; Lam, J. Y. K. Deformation analysis of fibre-reinforced polymer reinforced concrete beams by tension-stiffening approach. Compos. Struct. 2020 Feb 15, 234, 111664 DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.1116648Deformation analysis of fibre-reinforced polymer reinforced concrete beams by tension-stiffening approachNg, P. L.; Barros, J. A. O.; Kaklauskas, G.; Lam, J. Y. K.Composite Structures (2020), 234 (), 111664CODEN: COMSE2; ISSN:1879-1085. (Elsevier Ltd.)Fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) is free from corrosion problem and is a viable alternative reinforcement material for concrete structures in lieu of steel reinforcing bars. Since FRP has lower elastic modulus compared to steel, the serviceability aspect of FRP reinforced concrete (FRP-RC) members should be particularly considered in the structural anal. and design. This study addresses the deformation anal. of FRP-RC flexural members with thorough consideration of the tension-stiffening phenomenon in post-cracking state. The approaches for analyzing the tension-stiffening flexural response of FRP-RC beams are presented. These include the use of empirical or theor. models to compute effective flexural stiffness, the use of finite element method in conjunction with nonlinear constitutive material models, and the use of tensile stress block in combination with member anal. Among them, the latter is a relatively simple anal. approach. Aiming for serviceability assessment of FRP-RC beams in structural engineering practice to circumvent sophisticated theor. approaches and constitutive models, parametrized tensile stress block is derived based on tension stress fields computed from finite element anal., and is proposed for use in member anal. for prediction of deflections. Four FRP-RC beam specimens tested in the literature are analyzed to verify the proposed tensile stress block. Close agreement between the exptl. and anal. results is achieved, thereby endorsing the applicability and reliability of the proposed method.
- 9Ziara, M. M.; Haldane, D.; Hood, S. Proposed changes to flexural design in BS 8110 to allow over-reinforced sections to fail in a ductile manner. Mag. Concr. Res. 2000 Dec, 52, 443– 454, DOI: 10.1680/macr.2000.52.6.443There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 10Ng, P. L.; Gribniak, V.; Jakubovskis, R.; Rimkus, A. Tension stiffening approach for deformation assessment of flexural reinforced concrete members under compressive axial load. ACI Struct. J. 2019 Dec, 20, 2056– 2068, DOI: 10.1002/suco.201800286There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 11Wang, X.; Liu, J.; Zhang, S. Behavior of short circular tubed-reinforced-concrete columns subjected to eccentric compression. Eng. Struct. 2015 Dec 15, 105, 77– 86, DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.10.001There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 12Gopalakrishnan, S.; Balasubramanian, K.; Krishnamoorthy, T. S.; Bharatkumar, B. H. Investigations on the flexural behavior of reinforced concrete beams containing supplementary cementitious materials. ACI Mater. J. 2001 Jun 1, 199, 645– 664, DOI: 10.14359/10540There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 13Momin, A. I.; Khadirnaikar, R. B.; Zende, A. A. Flexural strength and behavioral study of high-performance concrete beams using stress-block parameters. Int. J. Eng., Trans. B 2021 Nov 1, 34, 2557– 2565, DOI: 10.5829/ije.2021.34.11b.18There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 14Lee, C. S.; Jeon, J. S. Drift limit state predictions of rectangular reinforced concrete columns with superelastic shape memory alloy rebars. J. Build. Eng. 2022, 54, 104546 DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104546There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 15Kocaer, O.; Aldemir, A. Compressive stress–strain model for the estimation of the flexural capacity of reinforced geopolymer concrete members. ACI Struct. J. , 2022, DOI: 10.1002/suco.202200914 .There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 16Tran, T. T.; Pham, T. M.; Hao, H. Rectangular stress-block parameters for fly-ash and slag based geopolymer concrete. InStructures ; 2019 Jun 1. Vol. 19. pp. 143– 155 Elsevier.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 17State of the Art Report on High-Strength Concrete Columns. ACI 441R-1996; American Concrete Institute.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 18British Standard Eurocode 2: Design of concrete structures─Part; Thomas Telford 2004 Dec 23; 1(1): 230.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 19Canadian Standards Association (CSA A23.3–04). Design of concrete structures; Canadian Standards Association: Mississauga, Ont. 2004.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 20Standard I. Plain and Reinforced Concrete-Code of practice (IS-456: 2000); Bureau of Indian Standards: New Delhi, July. 2000.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 21Nedderman, W. H. Flexural stress distribution in very-high strength concrete. PhD diss., University of Texas at Arlington, 1973.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 22Rusch, H. Tests on the strength of the flexural compression zone. Bulletin Berlin, Deutscher Ausschuss Für Stahlbeton. 1955, 120, 94There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 23Ibrahim, H. H.; MacGregor, J. G. Modification of the ACI rectangular stress block for high-strength concrete. ACI Struct. J. 1997 Jan 1, 94, 40– 48, DOI: 10.14359/459There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 24Tan, T.-H.; Nguyen, N.-B. Flexural behavior of confined high-strength concrete columns. ACI Struct. J. 2005 Mar 1, 102, 198– 205, DOI: 10.14359/14270There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 25Swartz, S. E.; Nikaeen, A.; Babu, H. N.; Periyakaruppan, N.; Refai, T. M. Structural bending properties of higher strength concrete. ACI Mater. J. 1985 Sep 1, 147– 178There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 26Mertol, H. C.; Rizkalla, S.; Zia, P.; Mirmiran, A. Characteristics of compressive stress distribution in high-strength concrete. ACI Struct. J. 2008 Sep 1, 105, 626, DOI: 10.14359/19946There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 27Khadiranaikar, R. B.; Awati, M. M. Concrete stress distribution factors for high-performance concrete. J. Struct. Eng. 2012 Mar 1, 138, 402– 415, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000465There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 28Zende, A. A.; Khadiranaikar, R. B.; Momin, A. I. Shear Behavior of High Strength Self-Compacting Concrete Slender Beams Without Web Reinforcement. J. Appl. Sci. Eng. 2022 Mar, 26, 1, DOI: 10.6180/jase.202301_26(1).0001There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 29Zende, A. A.; Khadiranaikar, R. B.; Momin, A. I. A. Shear behaviour of high strength self-compacting concrete with varying stirrup spacing. Int. J. Struct. Eng. 2022, 12, 374– 387, DOI: 10.1504/IJSTRUCTE.2022.126192There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 30Aliş, B.; Yazici, C.; Özkal, F. M. Investigation of Fire Effects on Reinforced Concrete Members via Finite Element Analysis. ACS Omega 2022 Jul 20, 7, 26881– 26893, DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.2c0341430Investigation of Fire Effects on Reinforced Concrete Members via Finite Element AnalysisAlis, Betul; Yazici, Casim; Mehmet Ozkal, FatihACS Omega (2022), 7 (30), 26881-26893CODEN: ACSODF; ISSN:2470-1343. (American Chemical Society)Structural deterioration during fire leads to significant economic losses, severe injuries, and deaths. Research to accurately est. the impact of fire on structural security and performance, and to identify ways to reduce it, has been increasing recently with capital investments in the building and infrastructure sectors. This research aims to establish a reliable algorithm for simulating the behavior of reinforced concrete (RC) beams under thermal and structural loads. The proposed algorithm is based on the combination of thermal and structural analyses using the sequential link technique. These analyses use material characteristics such as cond., sp. heat, stress-strain relationship, and thermal expansion to capture thermal and structural responses during the heating phases according to Eurocode 1 and Eurocode 2 using the finite element method. Beam models in the study, which have been exposed to the ISO-834 fire curve, were designed to exhibit flexural failure. Nonlinear numerical anal. results have mostly coincided with the previous studies regarding the residual load-bearing capacity. Depending on the outcomes of the previous exptl. studies, an RC member's structural strength increases when the internal temp. is between 150 and 250°C and degrdn. starts after 300°C. This outcome has been supported by the previous numerical and exptl. studies, propounding the accuracy of preferred modeling and anal. approaches. As the essential distinctness of the research, the effects of elevated temps. on the bonding behavior between concrete and rebar were considered for numerical analyses.
- 31Momin, A. I. A.; Khadiranaikar, R. B.; Zende, A. A. Modulus of Elasticity of High-Performance Concrete Beams Under Flexure-Experimental Approach. In: Ranadive, M. S.; Das, B. B.; Mehta, Y. A.; Gupta, R (eds) Recent Trends in Construction Technology and Management. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering , 2023: vol 260. Springer: Singapore.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 32Junaid, M. T.; Elbana, A.; Altoubat, S.; Al-Sadoon, Z. Experimental study on the effect of matrix on the flexural behavior of beams reinforced with Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer (GFRP) bars. Compos. Struct. 2019 Aug 15, 110930 DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.110930There is no corresponding record for this reference.