Enhanced Hemocompatibility and Cytocompatibility of Stainless SteelClick to copy article linkArticle link copied!
- Metka Benčina*Metka Benčina*Email: [email protected]Department of Surface Engineering, Joz̆ef Stefan Institute, Jamova 39, SI-1000 Ljubljana, SloveniaLaboratory of Physics, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, University of Ljubljana, Tržaška 25, SI-1000 Ljubljana, SloveniaMore by Metka Benčina
- Niharika RawatNiharika RawatLaboratory of Physics, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, University of Ljubljana, Tržaška 25, SI-1000 Ljubljana, SloveniaMore by Niharika Rawat
- Domen PaulDomen PaulDepartment of Surface Engineering, Joz̆ef Stefan Institute, Jamova 39, SI-1000 Ljubljana, SloveniaMore by Domen Paul
- Janez KovačJanez KovačDepartment of Surface Engineering, Joz̆ef Stefan Institute, Jamova 39, SI-1000 Ljubljana, SloveniaMore by Janez Kovač
- Katja LakotaKatja LakotaDepartment of Rheumatology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Vodnikova 62, SI-1000 Ljubljana, SloveniaMore by Katja Lakota
- Polona ŽigonPolona ŽigonDepartment of Rheumatology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Vodnikova 62, SI-1000 Ljubljana, SloveniaMore by Polona Žigon
- Veronika Kralj-IgličVeronika Kralj-IgličLaboratory of Clinical Biophysics, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ljubljana, Zdravstvena pot 5, SI-1000 Ljubljana, SloveniaMore by Veronika Kralj-Iglič
- Aleš IgličAleš IgličLaboratory of Physics, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, University of Ljubljana, Tržaška 25, SI-1000 Ljubljana, SloveniaLaboratory of Clinical Biophysics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Vrazov trg 2, SI-1000 Ljubljana, SloveniaMore by Aleš Iglič
- Ita JunkarIta JunkarDepartment of Surface Engineering, Joz̆ef Stefan Institute, Jamova 39, SI-1000 Ljubljana, SloveniaMore by Ita Junkar
Abstract
The present study introduces an advanced surface modification approach combining electrochemical anodization and non-thermal plasma treatment, tailored for biomedical applications on stainless steel grade 316L (SS316L) surfaces. Nanopores with various diameters (100–300 nm) were synthesized with electrochemical anodization, and samples were further modified with non-thermal oxygen plasma. The surface properties of SS316L surfaces were examined by scanning electron microscopy, atomic force microscopy, X-ray photoemission spectroscopy, and Water contact angle measurements. It has been shown that a combination of electrochemical anodization and plasma treatment significantly alters the surface properties of SS316L and affects its interactions with blood platelets and human coronary cells. Optimal performance is attained on the anodized specimen featuring pores within the 150–300 nm diameter range, subjected to subsequent oxygen plasma treatment; the absence of platelet adhesion was observed. At the same time, the sample demonstrated good endothelialization and a reduction in smooth muscle cell adhesion compared to the untreated SS316L and the sample with smaller pores (100–150 nm). This novel surface modification strategy has significant implications for improving biocompatibility and performance of SS316L in biomedical applications.
This publication is licensed under
License Summary*
You are free to share(copy and redistribute) this article in any medium or format and to adapt(remix, transform, and build upon) the material for any purpose, even commercially within the parameters below:
Creative Commons (CC): This is a Creative Commons license.
Attribution (BY): Credit must be given to the creator.
*Disclaimer
This summary highlights only some of the key features and terms of the actual license. It is not a license and has no legal value. Carefully review the actual license before using these materials.
License Summary*
You are free to share(copy and redistribute) this article in any medium or format and to adapt(remix, transform, and build upon) the material for any purpose, even commercially within the parameters below:
Creative Commons (CC): This is a Creative Commons license.
Attribution (BY): Credit must be given to the creator.
*Disclaimer
This summary highlights only some of the key features and terms of the actual license. It is not a license and has no legal value. Carefully review the actual license before using these materials.
License Summary*
You are free to share(copy and redistribute) this article in any medium or format and to adapt(remix, transform, and build upon) the material for any purpose, even commercially within the parameters below:
Creative Commons (CC): This is a Creative Commons license.
Attribution (BY): Credit must be given to the creator.
*Disclaimer
This summary highlights only some of the key features and terms of the actual license. It is not a license and has no legal value. Carefully review the actual license before using these materials.
Introduction
Experimental Section
Materials and Methods
Electrochemical Anodization
Plasma Treatment of SS316L Discs
Characterization
Scanning Electron Microscope Analysis
Water contact angle Measurements
Atomic Force Microscopy Analysis
X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy
Incubation of the Samples with Whole Blood
Interactions with Endothelial and Smooth Muscle Cells
Results and Discussion
Surface Morphology
Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematic representation of electrochemical anodization and oxygen plasma treatment of SS316L discs.
sample | C 1s | O 1s | Cr 2p3/2 | Mn 2p3/2 | Fe 2p3/2 | Ni 2p3/2 | Mo 3d | pore diameter (nm) | Ra (nm) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SS | 63.0 | 28.2 | 3.2 | 1.2 | 3.5 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 6.3 ± 0.3 | |
SS + P | 24.1 | 55.2 | 5.1 | 1.1 | 12.4 | 2.0 | 0.1 | 5.0 ± 0.5 | |
SS40 | 58.2 | 26.4 | 5.0 | 0.9 | 8.1 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 100–150 | 4.3 ± 0.4 |
SS40 + P | 16.3 | 55.0 | 6.7 | 0.4 | 18.1 | 3.3 | 0.2 | 100–150 | 4.3 ± 0.7 |
SS60 | 53.0 | 32.1 | 7.8 | 1.1 | 5.6 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 150–300 | 15.0 ± 0.6 |
SS60 + P | 19.4 | 56.9 | 6.3 | 1.5 | 15.4 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 150–300 | 14.5 ± 0.6 |
Figure 2
Figure 2. SEM and AFM images of untreated and modified SS316L; (a) SEM image of SS, AFM image of (b) SS, and (c) plasma-treated SS; (d) SEM image of SS40, AFM image of (e) SS40, and (f) plasma-treated SS40 + P; and (g) SEM image of SS60, AFM image of (h) SS60, and (i) plasma treated SS60 + P.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Height profiles of untreated (SS) and modified SS316L.
Surface Chemistry and Depth Profile Analysis
Figure 4
Figure 4. High-resolution XPS spectra of (a) C 1s and (b) O 1s for untreated (SS) and modified SS316L.
Figure 5
Figure 5. Depth profile analysis of untreated and modified SS316L; (a) SS, (b) SS + P, (c) SS40, (d) SS40 + P, (e) SS60, and (f) SS60 + P.
Surface Wettability
Figure 6
Figure 6. WCA analysis of untreated and modified SS316L.
Figure 7
Figure 7. SEM images of platelets on the surface of untreated and modified SS316L; (a) SS, (b) SS + P, (c) SS40, (d) SS40 + P, (e) SS60, and (f) SS60 + P.
Interactions with Platelets, HCAEC, and HCASMC
Figure 8
Figure 8. HCAEC on the surface of untreated and modified SS316L; (a) SS, (b) SS + P, (c) SS40, (d) SS40 + P, (e) SS60, and (f) SS60 + P.
Figure 9
Figure 9. HCASMC on the surface of untreated and modified SS316L; (a) SS, (b) SS + P, (c) SS40, (d) SS40 + P, (e) SS60, and (f) SS60 + P.
Conclusions
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to acknowledge the Slovenian Research Agency (ARIS) for funding and Tatjana Filipič for help with the XPS analysis. The authors thank also COST Action CA20114 (Therapeutical Applications of Cold Plasmas) for the stimulating environment provided.
References
This article references 47 other publications.
- 1Ullrich, H.; Olschewski, M.; Münzel, T.; Gori, T. Coronary in-stent restenosis: predictors and treatment. Dtsch. Arztebl. Int. 2021, 118 (38), 637, DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.m2021.0254Google Scholar1Coronary In-Stent Restenosis: Predictors and TreatmentUllrich Helen; Olschewski Maximilian; Munzel Thomas; Gori TommasoDeutsches Arzteblatt international (2021), 118 (38), 637-644 ISSN:.BACKGROUND: Despite the use of modern drug-eluting stents (DES), in-stent restenosis (ISR) may still occur in as many as 2-10% of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) in certain lesion/patient subsets. ISR causes increased morbidity after stent implantation; acute myocardial infarction is a frequent correlate to a clinical ISR, arising in 5-10% of cases. Compared to de novo stenosis, patients with ISR also present more frequently with symptoms of unstable angina pectoris (45% versus 61%). In this article, we discuss the risk factors for ISR and the corresponding diagnostic measures and effective treatment strategies. METHODS: This review is based on pertinent publications retrieved by a selective search in PubMed, with special attention to current international guidelines and specialist society recommendations. RESULTS: The type of implanted stent, the presence of diabetes mellitus, previous bypass surgery, and small vessel caliber are predictors for ISR. In their guidelines, the European specialist societies (ESC/EACTS) recommend repeated PCI with DES implantation or drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty as the methods of choice for the treatment of ISR. This approach is supported by evidence from meta-analyses. The RIBS-IV trial showed that revascularization treatment of the target lesion is needed less often after everolimus-eluting stent (EES) implantation than after DCB dilatation (11 [7.1%] versus 24 [15.6%]; p = 0.015; hazard ratio: 0.43; 95% confidence interval: [0.21; 0.87]). CONCLUSION: Because the pathogenesis of ISR is multifactorial, differentiated risk stratification is necessary. The identification of patient-, stent-, and lesion-related predictors is particularly important, as the most effective way to combat ISR is to prevent it.
- 2Polimeni, A.; Sorrentino, S.; Spaccarotella, C.; Mongiardo, A.; Sabatino, J.; De Rosa, S.; Gori, T.; Indolfi, C. Stent thrombosis after percutaneous coronary intervention: from bare-metal to the last generation of drug-eluting stents. Cardiol. Clin. 2020, 38 (4), 639– 647, DOI: 10.1016/j.ccl.2020.07.008Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 3Benatti, A. C. B.; Pattaro, A. F.; Rodrigues, A. A.; Xavier, M. V.; Kaasi, A.; Barbosa, M. I. R.; Jardini, A. L.; Maciel Filho, R.; Kharmandayan, P. Bioreabsorbable polymers for tissue engineering: PLA, PGA, and their copolymers. In Materials for biomedical engineering; Elsevier, 2019; pp 83– 116.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 4McMahon, C. J.; Oslizlok, P.; Walsh, K. P. Early restenosis following biodegradable stent implantation in an aortopulmonary collateral of a patient with pulmonary atresia and hypoplastic pulmonary arteries. Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv. 2007, 69 (5), 735– 738, DOI: 10.1002/ccd.21091Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 5Zhu, J.; Zhang, X.; Niu, J.; Shi, Y.; Zhu, Z.; Dai, D.; Chen, C.; Pei, J.; Yuan, G.; Zhang, R. Biosafety and efficacy evaluation of a biodegradable magnesium-based drug-eluting stent in porcine coronary artery. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11 (1), 7330, DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-86803-0Google Scholar5Biosafety and efficacy evaluation of a biodegradable magnesium-based drug-eluting stent in porcine coronary arteryZhu, Jinzhou; Zhang, Xiyuan; Niu, Jialin; Shi, Yongjuan; Zhu, Zhengbin; Dai, Daopeng; Chen, Chenxin; Pei, Jia; Yuan, Guangyin; Zhang, RuiyanScientific Reports (2021), 11 (1), 7330CODEN: SRCEC3; ISSN:2045-2322. (Nature Research)Although the drug-eluting stent (DES) has become the std. for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)-based revascularization, concerns remain regarding the use of DES, mainly due to its permanent rigid constraint to vessels. A drug-eluting bioresorbable stent (BRS) was thus developed as an alternative to DES, which can be absorbed entirely after its therapeutic period. Magnesium (Mg)-based BRSs have attracted a great deal of attention due to their suitable mech. properties, innovative chem. features, and well-proven biocompatibility. However, the primary disadvantage of Mg-based BRSs is the rapid degrdn. rate, resulting in the early loss of structural support long before the recovery of vascular function. Recently, a new type of patented Mg-Nd-Zn-Zr alloy (JDBM) was developed at Shanghai Jiao Tong University to reduce the degrdn. rate compared to com. Mg alloys. In the present investigation, a poly(D,L-lactic acid)-coated and rapamycin eluting (PDLLA/RAPA) JDBM BRS was prepd., and its biosafety and efficacy for coronary artery stenosis were evaluated via in vitro and in vivo expts. The degree of smooth muscle cell adhesion to the PDLLA/RAPA coated alloy and the rapamycin pharmacokinetics of JDBM BRS were first assessed in vitro. JDBM BRS and com. DES FIREHAWK were then implanted in the coronary arteries of a porcine model. Neointimal hyperplasia was evaluated at 30, 90, and 180 days, and re-endothelialization was evaluated at 30 days. Furthermore, Micro-CT and optical coherence tomog. (OCT) analyses were performed 180 days after stent implantation to evaluate the tech. feasibility, biocompatibility, and degrdn. characteristics of JDBM BRS in vivo. The results show the ability of a PDLLA/RAPA coated JDBM to inhibit smooth muscle cell adhesion and moderate the drug release rate of JDBM BRS in vitro. In vivo, low local and systemic risks of JDBM BRS were demonstrated in the porcine model, with preserved mech. integrity after 6 mo of implantation. We also showed that this novel BRS was assocd. with a similar efficacy profile compared with std. DES and high anti-restenosis performance. These findings may confer long term advantages for using this BRS over a traditional DES.
- 6Esmaeili, A.; Ghaffari, S. A.; Nikkhah, M.; Malek Ghaini, F.; Farzan, F.; Mohammadi, S. Biocompatibility assessments of 316L stainless steel substrates coated by Fe-based bulk metallic glass through electro-spark deposition method. Colloids Surf., B 2021, 198, 111469, DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2020.111469Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 7Resnik, M.; Benčina, M.; Levičnik, E.; Rawat, N.; Iglič, A.; Junkar, I. J. M. Strategies for improving antimicrobial properties of stainless steel. Materials 2020, 13 (13), 2944, DOI: 10.3390/ma13132944Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 8Petroušek, P.; Kvačkaj, T.; Bidulská, J.; Bidulský, R.; Grande, M. A.; Manfredi, D.; Weiss, K.-P.; Kočiško, R.; Lupták, M.; Pokorný, I. Investigation of the Properties of 316L Stainless Steel after AM and Heat Treatment. Materials 2023, 16 (11), 3935, DOI: 10.3390/ma16113935Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 9Morsiya, C. A review on parameters affecting properties of biomaterial SS 316L. Aust. J. Mech. Eng. 2022, 20 (3), 803– 813, DOI: 10.1080/14484846.2020.1752975Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 10Hu, W.; Jiang, J. Hypersensitivity and in-stent restenosis in coronary stent materials. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2022, 10, 1003322, DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.1003322Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 11Erdogan, Y. K.; Ercan, B. Anodized Nanostructured 316L Stainless Steel Enhances Osteoblast Functions and Exhibits Anti-Fouling Properties. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2023, 9 (2), 693– 704, DOI: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.2c01072Google Scholar11Anodized Nanostructured 316L Stainless Steel Enhances Osteoblast Functions and Exhibits Anti-Fouling PropertiesErdogan, Yasar Kemal; Ercan, BaturACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering (2023), 9 (2), 693-704CODEN: ABSEBA; ISSN:2373-9878. (American Chemical Society)Poor osseointegration and infection are among the major challenges of 316L stainless steel (SS) implants in orthopedic applications. Surface modifications to obtain a nanostructured topog. seem to be a promising method to enhance cellular interactions of 316L SS implants. In this study, arrays of nanodimples (NDs) having controlled feature sizes between 25 and 250 nm were obtained on 316L SS surfaces by anodic oxidn. (anodization). Results demonstrated that the fabrication of NDs increased the surface area and, at the same time, altered the surface chem. of 316L SS to provide chromium oxide- and hydroxide-rich surface oxide layers. In vitro expts. showed that ND surfaces promoted up to a 68% higher osteoblast viability on the fifth day of culture. Immunofluorescence images confirmed a well-spread cytoskeleton organization on the ND surfaces. In addn., higher alk. phosphate activity and calcium mineral synthesis were obsd. on the ND surfaces compared to non-anodized 316L SS. Furthermore, a 71% redn. in Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) and a 58% redn. in Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa) colonies were obsd. on the ND surfaces having a 200 nm feature size compared to non-anodized surfaces at 24 h of culture. Cumulatively, the results showed that a ND surface topog. fabricated on 316L SS via anodization upregulated the osteoblast viability and functions while preventing S. aureus and P. aeruginosa biofilm synthesis.
- 12Ni, S.; Sun, L.; Ercan, B.; Liu, L.; Ziemer, K.; Webster, T. J. A mechanism for the enhanced attachment and proliferation of fibroblasts on anodized 316L stainless steel with nano-pit arrays. J. Biomed. Mater. Res., Part B 2014, 102 (6), 1297– 1303, DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.33127Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 13Herath, I.; Davies, J.; Will, G.; Tran, P. A.; Velic, A.; Sarvghad, M.; Islam, M.; Paritala, P. K.; Jaggessar, A.; Schuetz, M.; Chatterjee, K.; Yarlagadda, P. K. D. V. Anodization of medical grade stainless steel for improved corrosion resistance and nanostructure formation targeting biomedical applications. Electrochim. Acta 2022, 416, 140274, DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2022.140274Google Scholar13Anodization of medical grade stainless steel for improved corrosion resistance and nanostructure formation targeting biomedical applicationsHerath, Indika; Davies, Joseph; Will, Geoffrey; Tran, Phong A.; Velic, Amar; Sarvghad, Madjid; Islam, Majedul; Paritala, Phani Kumari; Jaggessar, Alka; Schuetz, Michael; Chatterjee, Kaushik; Yarlagadda, Prasad K. D. V.Electrochimica Acta (2022), 416 (), 140274CODEN: ELCAAV; ISSN:0013-4686. (Elsevier Ltd.)Stainless steel is extensively used in various biomedical engineering and hospital applications, including surgical equipment and furniture. Strong adhesion of bacteria and viruses on metal surfaces can restrict long-term utilization for biomedical applications. This study aims to develop an improved electrochem. etching protocol for the anodization of 316 L grade stainless steel (10 x 15 mm) to fabricate nanostructures for biomedical and hospital applications. Anodizing conditions were optimized using two different electrolyte solns.; HNO3: H2SO4 (1:1) and HNO3, by varying applied potential, electrolyte concn. and anodizing time. Morphol. and topog. of the anodized surfaces were characterized using SEM (SEM), at. force microscopy (AFM) and scanning Kelvin probe force microscopy (SKPFM). AC and DC electrochem. techniques were used to further characterize the corrosion behavior of the nanostructured surfaces. Electrochem. optimization produced two different nanostructured surfaces with the anodizing conditions of (1) 50% HNO3 at 0.465 A/cm2 for 1 min (surface 1), and (2) 0.5 M HNO3 + H2SO4 (1:1) at 0.366 A/cm2 for 5 min (surface 2). Both processes produced nanoscale surface roughness with varying corrosion susceptibility. Surfaces anodized using 50% HNO3 comprised of 'hierarchical roughness' with dense spikes (10 - 20 nm in diam.), covering rock candy-like protrusion (10 - 15μm diam.). Whereas the second set of conditions produced single scale roughness with a terrace-like topog. with nanoscale ridges of 34.8 ± 1.2 nm in width atop microscale hills. Surface 2 possessed improved corrosion resistance through the formation an oxide film, while the surface 1 was more susceptible to corrosion. Overall, this study demonstrates the importance of the careful optimization of electrochem. surface treatment for medical grade stainless steel in terms of roughness of nanostructures and corrosion susceptibility.
- 14Jang, Y.; Choi, W. T.; Johnson, C. T.; García, A. J.; Singh, P. M.; Breedveld, V.; Hess, D. W.; Champion, J. A. Inhibition of Bacterial Adhesion on Nanotextured Stainless Steel 316L by Electrochemical Etching. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2018, 4 (1), 90– 97, DOI: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.7b00544Google Scholar14Inhibition of Bacterial Adhesion on Nanotextured Stainless Steel 316L by Electrochemical EtchingJang, Yeongseon; Choi, Won Tae; Johnson, Christopher T.; Garcia, Andres J.; Singh, Preet M.; Breedveld, Victor; Hess, Dennis W.; Champion, Julie A.ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering (2018), 4 (1), 90-97CODEN: ABSEBA; ISSN:2373-9878. (American Chemical Society)Bacterial adhesion to stainless steel 316L (SS316L), which is an alloy typically used in many medical devices and food processing equipment, can cause serious infections along with substantial healthcare costs. This work demonstrates that nanotextured SS316L surfaces produced by electrochem. etching effectively inhibit bacterial adhesion of both Gram-neg. Escherichia coli and Gram-pos. Staphylococcus aureus, but exhibit cytocompatibility and no toxicity toward mammalian cells in vitro. Addnl., the electrochem. surface modification on SS316L results in formation of superior passive layer at the surface, improving corrosion resistance. The nanotextured SS316L offers significant potential for medical applications based on the surface structure-induced redn. of bacterial adhesion without use of antibiotic or chem. modifications while providing cytocompatibility and corrosion resistance in physiol. conditions.
- 15Benčina, M.; Junkar, I.; Vesel, A.; Mozetič, M.; Iglič, A. Nanoporous Stainless Steel Materials for Body Implants·Review of Synthesizing Procedures. Nanomater. 2022, 12 (17), 2924, DOI: 10.3390/nano12172924Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 16Hsu, H.-J.; Wu, C.-Y.; Huang, B.-H.; Tsai, C.-H.; Saito, T.; Ou, K.-L.; Chuo, Y.-C.; Lin, K.-L.; Peng, P.-W. Surface Characteristics and Cell Adhesion Behaviors of the Anodized Biomedical Stainless Steel. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10 (18), 6275, DOI: 10.3390/app10186275Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 17Cherian, A. M.; Joseph, J.; Nair, M. B.; Nair, S. V.; Maniyal, V.; Menon, D. Successful reduction of neointimal hyperplasia on stainless steel coronary stents by titania nanotexturing. ACS Omega 2020, 5 (28), 17582– 17591, DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.0c02045Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 18Benčina, M.; Junkar, I.; Zaplotnik, R.; Valant, M.; Iglič, A.; Mozetič, M. Plasma-induced crystallization of TiO2 nanotubes. Materials 2019, 12 (4), 626, DOI: 10.3390/ma12040626Google Scholar18Plasma-induced crystallization of TiO2 nanotubesBencina, Metka; Junkar, Ita; Zaplotnik, Rok; Valant, Matjaz; Iglic, Ales; Mozetic, MiranMaterials (2019), 12 (4), 626CODEN: MATEG9; ISSN:1996-1944. (MDPI AG)Facile crystn. of titanium oxide (TiO2) nanotubes (NTs), synthesized by electrochem. anodization, with low pressure non-thermal oxygen plasma is reported. The influence of plasma processing conditions on TiO2 NTs crystal structure and morphol. was examd. by X-ray diffraction (XRD) and SEM (SEM). For the first time we report the transition of amorphous TiO2 NTs to anatase and rutile crystal structures upon treatment with highly reactive oxygen plasma. This crystn. process has a strong advantage over the conventional heat treatments as it enables rapid crystn. of the surface. Thus the cryst. structure of NTs is obtained in a few seconds of treatment and it does not disrupt the NTs' morphol. Such a crystn. approach is esp. suitable for medical applications in which stable crystd. nanotubular morphol. is desired. The last part of the study thus deals with in vitro biol. response of whole blood to the TiO2 NTs. The results indicate that application of such surfaces for blood connecting devices is prospective, as practically no platelet adhesion or activation on crystd. TiO2 NTs surfaces was obsd.
- 19Wang, Y.; Guo, R.; Zhou, X.; Hu, G. Experimental investigation on optimal anodising parameters of nanopore preparation process on the stainless steel surface. Corros. Eng., Sci. Technol. 2020, 55 (7), 513– 519, DOI: 10.1080/1478422x.2020.1747759Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 20Lu, W.; Zou, D.; Han, Y.; Liu, R.; Tian, C. Self-organised nanoporous anodic films on superaustenitic stainless steel. Mater. Res. Innovations 2014, 18 (sup4), S4-747– S4-750, DOI: 10.1179/1432891714z.000000000776Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 21Cools, P.; De Geyter, N.; Vanderleyden, E.; Dubruel, P.; Morent, R. Surface analysis of titanium cleaning and activation processes: Non-thermal plasma versus other techniques. Plasma Chem. Plasma Process. 2014, 34, 917– 932, DOI: 10.1007/s11090-014-9552-2Google Scholar21Surface Analysis of Titanium Cleaning and Activation Processes: Non-thermal Plasma Versus Other TechniquesCools, Pieter; De Geyter, Nathalie; Vanderleyden, Els; Dubruel, Peter; Morent, RinoPlasma Chemistry and Plasma Processing (2014), 34 (4), 917-932CODEN: PCPPDW; ISSN:0272-4324. (Springer)A medium pressure (5 kPa) dielec. barrier discharge operating in different atmospheres (air and argon) is used to develop a fast and easy way to remove adsorbed carbon contamination. Chem. and phys. changes at the sample surface after plasma treatment are studied, making use of contact angle measurements, XPS anal. and at. force microscopy measurements. The obtained results are compared with other chem. and thermal treatments typically used. This comparison shows that plasma treatment at medium pressure is able to remove up to 20 % more of the adsorbed carbon compared to the classical cleaning methods, while at the same time being less aggressive, leaving the sub-surface chem. unchanged. Moreover, the anal. techniques give a fundamental insight in the reactions processes at the titanium surface when exposed to a medium pressure plasma.
- 22Belkind, A.; Gershman, S. Plasma cleaning of surfaces. Vac. Coat. Technol. 2008, 9, 46– 57Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 23Muñoz, J.; Bravo, J.; Calzada, M. Aluminum metal surface cleaning and activation by atmospheric-pressure remote plasma. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 407, 72– 81, DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.02.092Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 24Quinn, J.; McFadden, R.; Chan, C.-W.; Carson, L. Titanium for orthopedic applications: an overview of surface modification to improve biocompatibility and prevent bacterial biofilm formation. iScience 2020, 23 (11), 101745, DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2020.101745Google Scholar24Titanium for Orthopedic Applications: An Overview of Surface Modification to Improve Biocompatibility and Prevent Bacterial Biofilm FormationQuinn, James; McFadden, Ryan; Chan, Chi-Wai; Carson, LouiseiScience (2020), 23 (11), 101745CODEN: ISCICE; ISSN:2589-0042. (Elsevier B.V.)A review. Titanium and its alloys have emerged as excellent candidates for use as orthopedic biomaterials. Nevertheless, there are often complications arising after implantation of orthopedic devices, most notably prosthetic joint infection and aseptic loosening. To ensure that implanted devices remain functional in situ, innovation in surface modification has attracted much attention in the effort to develop orthopedic materials with optimal characteristics at the biomaterial-tissue interface. This will draw together metallurgy, surface engineering, biofilm microbiol., and biomaterial science. It will serve to appreciate why titanium and its alloys are frequently used orthopedic biomaterials and address some of the challenges facing these biomaterials currently, including the significant problem of device-assocd. infection. Finally, the authors shall consolidate and evaluate surface modification techniques employed to overcome some of these issues by offering a unique perspective as to the direction in which research is headed from a broad, interdisciplinary point of view.
- 25Tan, L.; Wang, Z.; Ma, Y.; Yan, Y.; Qiao, L. Tribocorrosion investigation of 316L stainless steel: The synergistic effect between chloride ion and sulfate ion. Mater. Res. Express 2021, 8 (8), 086501, DOI: 10.1088/2053-1591/ac1825Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 26Guo, L.; Qin, S.; Yang, B.; Liang, D.; Qiao, L. Effect of hydrogen on semiconductive properties of passive film on ferrite and austenite phases in a duplex stainless steel. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7 (1), 3317, DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-03480-8Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 27Huttenlochner, K.; Müller-Renno, C.; Ziegler, C.; Merz, R.; Merz, B.; Kopnarski, M.; Chodorski, J.; Schlegel, C.; Ulber, R. Removing biofilms from stainless steel without changing surface properties relevant for bacterial attachment. Biointerphases 2017, 12 (2), 02C404, DOI: 10.1116/1.4982196Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 28Castle, J. E.; Qiu, J. H. A co-ordinated study of the passivation of alloy steels by plasma source mass spectrometry and x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy-1. characterization of the passive film. Corros. Sci. 1989, 29 (5), 591– 603, DOI: 10.1016/0010-938x(89)90010-3Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 29Clayton, C.; Lu, Y. C. A bipolar model of the passivity of stainless steel: the role of Mo addition. J. Electrochem. Soc. 1986, 133 (12), 2465– 2473, DOI: 10.1149/1.2108451Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 30Žemaitis, A.; Mimidis, A.; Papadopoulos, A.; Gečys, P.; Račiukaitis, G.; Stratakis, E.; Gedvilas, M. Controlling the wettability of stainless steel from highly-hydrophilic to super-hydrophobic by femtosecond laser-induced ripples and nanospikes. RSC Adv. 2020, 10 (62), 37956– 37961, DOI: 10.1039/d0ra05665kGoogle ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 31Chen, T.; Liu, H.; Yang, H.; Yan, W.; Zhu, W.; Liu, H. Biomimetic fabrication of robust self-assembly superhydrophobic surfaces with corrosion resistance properties on stainless steel substrate. RSC Adv. 2016, 6 (50), 43937– 43949, DOI: 10.1039/c6ra06500gGoogle ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 32Sönmez, T.; Fazeli Jadidi, M.; Kazmanli, K.; Birer, O. ̈.; Ürgen, M. Role of different plasma gases on the surface chemistry and wettability of RF plasma treated stainless steel. Vacuum 2016, 129, 63– 73, DOI: 10.1016/j.vacuum.2016.04.014Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 33Wang, L.; Wang, K.; Erkan, N.; Yuan, Y.; Chen, J.; Nie, B.; Li, F.; Okamoto, K. Metal material surface wettability increase induced by electron beam irradiation. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020, 511, 145555, DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.145555Google Scholar33Metal material surface wettability increase induced by electron beam irradiationWang, Laishun; Wang, Kai; Erkan, Nejdet; Yuan, Yuan; Chen, Jiayue; Nie, Baojie; Li, Fengchen; Okamoto, KojiApplied Surface Science (2020), 511 (), 145555CODEN: ASUSEE; ISSN:0169-4332. (Elsevier B.V.)Surface wettability is one of the important metal surface characteristics which would affect boiling heat transfer performance of metal surfaces. In this study, different metal surfaces are irradiated by electron beam to investigate whether the surface wettability of metal surfaces can be increased by electron beam irradn. The exptl. results show that electron beam irradn. can greatly improve the surface wettability of various metal surfaces. The surface wettability of all surfaces increase as irradn. dose increase and some metal surfaces become quite hydrophilic when the irradn. dose reaches 3000 kGy. Besides, electron beam irradn. shows better effect on increasing the surface wettability of pre-oxidized metal surfaces. The results are discussed and analyzed considering the characteristics of oxidn. porous layer. This finding shows that electron beam irradn. could be an effective way to increase the metal surface wettability and study the effect of surface wettability increase on boiling heat transfer.
- 34Junkar, I.; Kulkarni, M.; Bencina, M.; Kovac, J.; Mrak-Poljšak, K.; Lakota, K.; Sodin-Šemrl, S.; Mozetic, M.; Iglič, A. Titanium dioxide nanotube arrays for cardiovascular stent applications. Omega 2020, 5 (13), 7280– 7289, DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.9b04118Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 35Junkar, I.; Kulkarni, M.; Drašler, B.; Rugelj, N.; Mazare, A.; Flašker, A.; Drobne, D.; Humpolíček, P.; Resnik, M.; Schmuki, P. Influence of various sterilization procedures on TiO2 nanotubes used for biomedical devices. Bioelectrochemistry 2016, 109, 79– 86, DOI: 10.1016/j.bioelechem.2016.02.001Google Scholar35Influence of various sterilization procedures on TiO2 nanotubes used for biomedical devicesJunkar, Ita; Kulkarni, Mukta; Drasler, Barbara; Rugelj, Neza; Mazare, Anca; Flasker, Ajda; Drobne, Damjana; Humpolicek, Petr; Resnik, Matic; Schmuki, Patrik; Mozetic, Miran; Iglic, AlesBioelectrochemistry (2016), 109 (), 79-86CODEN: BIOEFK; ISSN:1567-5394. (Elsevier B.V.)Sterilization is the final surface treatment procedure of all implantable devices and is one of the key factors which have to be considered before implementation. Since different sterilization procedures for all implantable devices influence mech. properties as well as biol. response, the influence of different sterilization techniques on titanium nanotubes was studied. Commonly used sterilization techniques such as autoclaving, ultra-violet light sterilization, hydrogen peroxide plasma sterilization as well as the not so frequently used gaseous oxygen plasma sterilization were used. Three different nanotube diams.; 15 nm, 50 nm and 100 nm were employed to study the effects of various sterilization techniques. It was obsd. that autoclave sterilization resulted in destruction of nanotubular features on all three studied nanotube diams., while UV-light and both kinds of plasma sterilization did not cause any significant morphol. changes on the surfaces. Differences between the sterilization techniques employed influenced cytocompatibility, esp. in the case of nanotubes with 100 nm diam.
- 36Junkar, I.; Kulkarni, M.; Drašler, B.; Rugelj, N.; Recek, N.; Drobne, D.; Kovač, J.; Humpolicek, P.; Iglič, A.; Mozetič, M. Enhanced biocompatibility of TiO2 surfaces by highly reactive plasma. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 2016, 49 (24), 244002, DOI: 10.1088/0022-3727/49/24/244002Google Scholar36Enhanced biocompatibility of TiO2 surfaces by highly reactive plasmaJunkar, Ita; Kulkarni, Mukta; Drasler, Barbara; Rugelj, Neza; Recek, Nina; Drobne, Damjana; Kovac, Janez; Humpolicek, Petr; Iglic, Ales; Mozetic, MiranJournal of Physics D: Applied Physics (2016), 49 (24), 244002/1-244002/10CODEN: JPAPBE; ISSN:0022-3727. (IOP Publishing Ltd.)In the present study the biol. response to various nanotopog. features after gaseous plasma treatment were studied. The usefulness of nanostructured surfaces for implantable materials has already been acknowledged, while less is known on the combined effect of nanostructured plasma modified surfaces. In the present work the influence of oxygen plasma treatment on nanostructured titanium oxide (TiO2) surfaces was studied. Characterization of the TiO2 surface chem. compn. and morphol. features was analyzed after plasma modification by XPS and by SEM while surface wettability was studied with measuring the water contact angle. Cell adhesion and morphol. was assessed from images taken with SEM, whereas cell viability was measured with a calorimetric assay. The obtained results showed that oxygen plasma treatment of TiO2 nanotube surfaces significantly influences the adhesion and morphol. of osteoblast-like cells in comparison to untreated nanostructured surfaces. Marked changes in surface compn. of plasma treated surfaces were obsd., as plasma treatment removed hydrocarbon contamination and removed fluorine impurities, which were present due to the electrochem. anodization process. However no differences in wettability of untreated and plasma treated surfaces were noticed. Treatment with oxygen plasma stimulated osteoblast-like cell adhesion and spreading on the nanostructured surface, suggesting the possible use of oxygen plasma surface treatment to enhance osteoblast-like cell response.
- 37Seaman, G. V. F. Electrochemical features of platelet interactions. Thromb. Res. 1976, 8, 235– 246, DOI: 10.1016/0049-3848(76)90066-9Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 38Gawaz, M.; Neumann, F.-J.; Ott, I.; May, A.; Schömig, A. Platelet activation and coronary stent implantation: effect of antithrombotic therapy. Circulation 1996, 94 (3), 279– 285, DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.94.3.279Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 39Ollivier, V.; Roques, C.; Receveur, N.; Gratz, M.; Feldman, L.; Letourneur, D.; Gachet, C.; Mangin, P. H.; Jandrot-Perrus, M. Bioreactivity of stent material: Activation of platelets, coagulation, leukocytes and endothelial cell dysfunction in vitro. Platelets 2017, 28 (6), 529– 539, DOI: 10.1080/09537104.2016.1252836Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 40Liu, H. Improving the hemocompatibility of stents. Hemocompatibility of Biomaterials for Clinical Applications; Elsevier, 2018; pp 379– 394.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 41Gardiner, E. E.; Andrews, R. K. Platelets in Thrombotic and Non-Thrombotic Disorders Pathophysiology, Pharmacology and Therapeutics: an Update, Platelet Adhesion; Springer, 2017; pp 309– 319.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 42Ruggeri, Z. M.; Mendolicchio, G. L. Adhesion mechanisms in platelet function. Circ. Res. 2007, 100 (12), 1673– 1685, DOI: 10.1161/01.res.0000267878.97021.abGoogle ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 43Brass, L. F.; Stalker, T. J. Mechanisms of Platelet Activation; Cambridge University Press, 2007; pp 37– 52.Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 44Yang, T.; De La Franier, B.; Thompson, M. J. Anti-Thrombogenicity Study of a Covalently-Attached Monolayer on Stent-Grade Stainless Steel. Materials 2021, 14 (9), 2342, DOI: 10.3390/ma14092342Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 45Carmagnola, I.; Nardo, T.; Boccafoschi, F.; Chiono, V. Layer-by-layer coating of stainless steel plates mediated by surface priming treatment to improve antithrombogenic properties. Biomed. Sci. Eng. 2020, 1 (1), 1, DOI: 10.4081/bse.2016.22Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 46Phan, T.; Jones, J. E.; Chen, M.; Strawn, T.; Khoukaz, H. B.; Ji, Y.; Kumar, A.; Bowles, D. K.; Fay, W. P.; Yu, Q. In vitro biological responses of plasma nanocoatings for coronary stent applications. J. Biomed. Mater. Res., Part A 2023, 111 (11), 1768– 1780, DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.37587Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 47Ni, S.-y.; Zhang, Y.-f.; Ni, S.-r. Ordered nanopore arrays on the surface of diameter-controlled anodic alumina influence the adhesion behavior of umbilical vein endothelial cells. Chin. J. Tissue Eng. Res. 2012, 16 (29), 5336Google ScholarThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
Cited By
Smart citations by scite.ai include citation statements extracted from the full text of the citing article. The number of the statements may be higher than the number of citations provided by ACS Publications if one paper cites another multiple times or lower if scite has not yet processed some of the citing articles.
This article is cited by 3 publications.
- Metka Benčina, Niharika Rawat, Domen Paul, Janez Kovač, Aleš Iglič, Ita Junkar. Surface Modification of Stainless Steel for Enhanced Antibacterial Activity. ACS Omega 2025, 10
(13)
, 13361-13369. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.4c11424
- Gimmi Guruprasad Engoor, Sowmya Selvaraj, Nickita Acharya, Vignesh Muthuvijayan, Sivarama Krishnan, Sujatha Narayanan Unni, Nilesh Jayantilal Vasa. Laser polarization induced surface structuring of 316L stainless steel and influence on biocompatibility and antibacterial performance. Results in Surfaces and Interfaces 2025, 19 , 100547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsurfi.2025.100547
- Eleni Zingkou, Asimina Kolianou, Georgios Angelis, Michail Lykouras, Malvina Orkoula, Georgios Pampalakis, Georgia Sotiropoulou. Cytocompatibility Study of Stainless Steel 316l Against Differentiated SH-SY5Y Cells. Biomimetics 2025, 10
(3)
, 169. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics10030169
Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.
Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.
The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.
Recommended Articles
Abstract
Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematic representation of electrochemical anodization and oxygen plasma treatment of SS316L discs.
Figure 2
Figure 2. SEM and AFM images of untreated and modified SS316L; (a) SEM image of SS, AFM image of (b) SS, and (c) plasma-treated SS; (d) SEM image of SS40, AFM image of (e) SS40, and (f) plasma-treated SS40 + P; and (g) SEM image of SS60, AFM image of (h) SS60, and (i) plasma treated SS60 + P.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Height profiles of untreated (SS) and modified SS316L.
Figure 4
Figure 4. High-resolution XPS spectra of (a) C 1s and (b) O 1s for untreated (SS) and modified SS316L.
Figure 5
Figure 5. Depth profile analysis of untreated and modified SS316L; (a) SS, (b) SS + P, (c) SS40, (d) SS40 + P, (e) SS60, and (f) SS60 + P.
Figure 6
Figure 6. WCA analysis of untreated and modified SS316L.
Figure 7
Figure 7. SEM images of platelets on the surface of untreated and modified SS316L; (a) SS, (b) SS + P, (c) SS40, (d) SS40 + P, (e) SS60, and (f) SS60 + P.
Figure 8
Figure 8. HCAEC on the surface of untreated and modified SS316L; (a) SS, (b) SS + P, (c) SS40, (d) SS40 + P, (e) SS60, and (f) SS60 + P.
Figure 9
Figure 9. HCASMC on the surface of untreated and modified SS316L; (a) SS, (b) SS + P, (c) SS40, (d) SS40 + P, (e) SS60, and (f) SS60 + P.
References
This article references 47 other publications.
- 1Ullrich, H.; Olschewski, M.; Münzel, T.; Gori, T. Coronary in-stent restenosis: predictors and treatment. Dtsch. Arztebl. Int. 2021, 118 (38), 637, DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.m2021.02541Coronary In-Stent Restenosis: Predictors and TreatmentUllrich Helen; Olschewski Maximilian; Munzel Thomas; Gori TommasoDeutsches Arzteblatt international (2021), 118 (38), 637-644 ISSN:.BACKGROUND: Despite the use of modern drug-eluting stents (DES), in-stent restenosis (ISR) may still occur in as many as 2-10% of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) in certain lesion/patient subsets. ISR causes increased morbidity after stent implantation; acute myocardial infarction is a frequent correlate to a clinical ISR, arising in 5-10% of cases. Compared to de novo stenosis, patients with ISR also present more frequently with symptoms of unstable angina pectoris (45% versus 61%). In this article, we discuss the risk factors for ISR and the corresponding diagnostic measures and effective treatment strategies. METHODS: This review is based on pertinent publications retrieved by a selective search in PubMed, with special attention to current international guidelines and specialist society recommendations. RESULTS: The type of implanted stent, the presence of diabetes mellitus, previous bypass surgery, and small vessel caliber are predictors for ISR. In their guidelines, the European specialist societies (ESC/EACTS) recommend repeated PCI with DES implantation or drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty as the methods of choice for the treatment of ISR. This approach is supported by evidence from meta-analyses. The RIBS-IV trial showed that revascularization treatment of the target lesion is needed less often after everolimus-eluting stent (EES) implantation than after DCB dilatation (11 [7.1%] versus 24 [15.6%]; p = 0.015; hazard ratio: 0.43; 95% confidence interval: [0.21; 0.87]). CONCLUSION: Because the pathogenesis of ISR is multifactorial, differentiated risk stratification is necessary. The identification of patient-, stent-, and lesion-related predictors is particularly important, as the most effective way to combat ISR is to prevent it.
- 2Polimeni, A.; Sorrentino, S.; Spaccarotella, C.; Mongiardo, A.; Sabatino, J.; De Rosa, S.; Gori, T.; Indolfi, C. Stent thrombosis after percutaneous coronary intervention: from bare-metal to the last generation of drug-eluting stents. Cardiol. Clin. 2020, 38 (4), 639– 647, DOI: 10.1016/j.ccl.2020.07.008There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 3Benatti, A. C. B.; Pattaro, A. F.; Rodrigues, A. A.; Xavier, M. V.; Kaasi, A.; Barbosa, M. I. R.; Jardini, A. L.; Maciel Filho, R.; Kharmandayan, P. Bioreabsorbable polymers for tissue engineering: PLA, PGA, and their copolymers. In Materials for biomedical engineering; Elsevier, 2019; pp 83– 116.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 4McMahon, C. J.; Oslizlok, P.; Walsh, K. P. Early restenosis following biodegradable stent implantation in an aortopulmonary collateral of a patient with pulmonary atresia and hypoplastic pulmonary arteries. Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv. 2007, 69 (5), 735– 738, DOI: 10.1002/ccd.21091There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 5Zhu, J.; Zhang, X.; Niu, J.; Shi, Y.; Zhu, Z.; Dai, D.; Chen, C.; Pei, J.; Yuan, G.; Zhang, R. Biosafety and efficacy evaluation of a biodegradable magnesium-based drug-eluting stent in porcine coronary artery. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11 (1), 7330, DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-86803-05Biosafety and efficacy evaluation of a biodegradable magnesium-based drug-eluting stent in porcine coronary arteryZhu, Jinzhou; Zhang, Xiyuan; Niu, Jialin; Shi, Yongjuan; Zhu, Zhengbin; Dai, Daopeng; Chen, Chenxin; Pei, Jia; Yuan, Guangyin; Zhang, RuiyanScientific Reports (2021), 11 (1), 7330CODEN: SRCEC3; ISSN:2045-2322. (Nature Research)Although the drug-eluting stent (DES) has become the std. for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)-based revascularization, concerns remain regarding the use of DES, mainly due to its permanent rigid constraint to vessels. A drug-eluting bioresorbable stent (BRS) was thus developed as an alternative to DES, which can be absorbed entirely after its therapeutic period. Magnesium (Mg)-based BRSs have attracted a great deal of attention due to their suitable mech. properties, innovative chem. features, and well-proven biocompatibility. However, the primary disadvantage of Mg-based BRSs is the rapid degrdn. rate, resulting in the early loss of structural support long before the recovery of vascular function. Recently, a new type of patented Mg-Nd-Zn-Zr alloy (JDBM) was developed at Shanghai Jiao Tong University to reduce the degrdn. rate compared to com. Mg alloys. In the present investigation, a poly(D,L-lactic acid)-coated and rapamycin eluting (PDLLA/RAPA) JDBM BRS was prepd., and its biosafety and efficacy for coronary artery stenosis were evaluated via in vitro and in vivo expts. The degree of smooth muscle cell adhesion to the PDLLA/RAPA coated alloy and the rapamycin pharmacokinetics of JDBM BRS were first assessed in vitro. JDBM BRS and com. DES FIREHAWK were then implanted in the coronary arteries of a porcine model. Neointimal hyperplasia was evaluated at 30, 90, and 180 days, and re-endothelialization was evaluated at 30 days. Furthermore, Micro-CT and optical coherence tomog. (OCT) analyses were performed 180 days after stent implantation to evaluate the tech. feasibility, biocompatibility, and degrdn. characteristics of JDBM BRS in vivo. The results show the ability of a PDLLA/RAPA coated JDBM to inhibit smooth muscle cell adhesion and moderate the drug release rate of JDBM BRS in vitro. In vivo, low local and systemic risks of JDBM BRS were demonstrated in the porcine model, with preserved mech. integrity after 6 mo of implantation. We also showed that this novel BRS was assocd. with a similar efficacy profile compared with std. DES and high anti-restenosis performance. These findings may confer long term advantages for using this BRS over a traditional DES.
- 6Esmaeili, A.; Ghaffari, S. A.; Nikkhah, M.; Malek Ghaini, F.; Farzan, F.; Mohammadi, S. Biocompatibility assessments of 316L stainless steel substrates coated by Fe-based bulk metallic glass through electro-spark deposition method. Colloids Surf., B 2021, 198, 111469, DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2020.111469There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 7Resnik, M.; Benčina, M.; Levičnik, E.; Rawat, N.; Iglič, A.; Junkar, I. J. M. Strategies for improving antimicrobial properties of stainless steel. Materials 2020, 13 (13), 2944, DOI: 10.3390/ma13132944There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 8Petroušek, P.; Kvačkaj, T.; Bidulská, J.; Bidulský, R.; Grande, M. A.; Manfredi, D.; Weiss, K.-P.; Kočiško, R.; Lupták, M.; Pokorný, I. Investigation of the Properties of 316L Stainless Steel after AM and Heat Treatment. Materials 2023, 16 (11), 3935, DOI: 10.3390/ma16113935There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 9Morsiya, C. A review on parameters affecting properties of biomaterial SS 316L. Aust. J. Mech. Eng. 2022, 20 (3), 803– 813, DOI: 10.1080/14484846.2020.1752975There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 10Hu, W.; Jiang, J. Hypersensitivity and in-stent restenosis in coronary stent materials. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2022, 10, 1003322, DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.1003322There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 11Erdogan, Y. K.; Ercan, B. Anodized Nanostructured 316L Stainless Steel Enhances Osteoblast Functions and Exhibits Anti-Fouling Properties. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2023, 9 (2), 693– 704, DOI: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.2c0107211Anodized Nanostructured 316L Stainless Steel Enhances Osteoblast Functions and Exhibits Anti-Fouling PropertiesErdogan, Yasar Kemal; Ercan, BaturACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering (2023), 9 (2), 693-704CODEN: ABSEBA; ISSN:2373-9878. (American Chemical Society)Poor osseointegration and infection are among the major challenges of 316L stainless steel (SS) implants in orthopedic applications. Surface modifications to obtain a nanostructured topog. seem to be a promising method to enhance cellular interactions of 316L SS implants. In this study, arrays of nanodimples (NDs) having controlled feature sizes between 25 and 250 nm were obtained on 316L SS surfaces by anodic oxidn. (anodization). Results demonstrated that the fabrication of NDs increased the surface area and, at the same time, altered the surface chem. of 316L SS to provide chromium oxide- and hydroxide-rich surface oxide layers. In vitro expts. showed that ND surfaces promoted up to a 68% higher osteoblast viability on the fifth day of culture. Immunofluorescence images confirmed a well-spread cytoskeleton organization on the ND surfaces. In addn., higher alk. phosphate activity and calcium mineral synthesis were obsd. on the ND surfaces compared to non-anodized 316L SS. Furthermore, a 71% redn. in Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) and a 58% redn. in Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa) colonies were obsd. on the ND surfaces having a 200 nm feature size compared to non-anodized surfaces at 24 h of culture. Cumulatively, the results showed that a ND surface topog. fabricated on 316L SS via anodization upregulated the osteoblast viability and functions while preventing S. aureus and P. aeruginosa biofilm synthesis.
- 12Ni, S.; Sun, L.; Ercan, B.; Liu, L.; Ziemer, K.; Webster, T. J. A mechanism for the enhanced attachment and proliferation of fibroblasts on anodized 316L stainless steel with nano-pit arrays. J. Biomed. Mater. Res., Part B 2014, 102 (6), 1297– 1303, DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.33127There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 13Herath, I.; Davies, J.; Will, G.; Tran, P. A.; Velic, A.; Sarvghad, M.; Islam, M.; Paritala, P. K.; Jaggessar, A.; Schuetz, M.; Chatterjee, K.; Yarlagadda, P. K. D. V. Anodization of medical grade stainless steel for improved corrosion resistance and nanostructure formation targeting biomedical applications. Electrochim. Acta 2022, 416, 140274, DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2022.14027413Anodization of medical grade stainless steel for improved corrosion resistance and nanostructure formation targeting biomedical applicationsHerath, Indika; Davies, Joseph; Will, Geoffrey; Tran, Phong A.; Velic, Amar; Sarvghad, Madjid; Islam, Majedul; Paritala, Phani Kumari; Jaggessar, Alka; Schuetz, Michael; Chatterjee, Kaushik; Yarlagadda, Prasad K. D. V.Electrochimica Acta (2022), 416 (), 140274CODEN: ELCAAV; ISSN:0013-4686. (Elsevier Ltd.)Stainless steel is extensively used in various biomedical engineering and hospital applications, including surgical equipment and furniture. Strong adhesion of bacteria and viruses on metal surfaces can restrict long-term utilization for biomedical applications. This study aims to develop an improved electrochem. etching protocol for the anodization of 316 L grade stainless steel (10 x 15 mm) to fabricate nanostructures for biomedical and hospital applications. Anodizing conditions were optimized using two different electrolyte solns.; HNO3: H2SO4 (1:1) and HNO3, by varying applied potential, electrolyte concn. and anodizing time. Morphol. and topog. of the anodized surfaces were characterized using SEM (SEM), at. force microscopy (AFM) and scanning Kelvin probe force microscopy (SKPFM). AC and DC electrochem. techniques were used to further characterize the corrosion behavior of the nanostructured surfaces. Electrochem. optimization produced two different nanostructured surfaces with the anodizing conditions of (1) 50% HNO3 at 0.465 A/cm2 for 1 min (surface 1), and (2) 0.5 M HNO3 + H2SO4 (1:1) at 0.366 A/cm2 for 5 min (surface 2). Both processes produced nanoscale surface roughness with varying corrosion susceptibility. Surfaces anodized using 50% HNO3 comprised of 'hierarchical roughness' with dense spikes (10 - 20 nm in diam.), covering rock candy-like protrusion (10 - 15μm diam.). Whereas the second set of conditions produced single scale roughness with a terrace-like topog. with nanoscale ridges of 34.8 ± 1.2 nm in width atop microscale hills. Surface 2 possessed improved corrosion resistance through the formation an oxide film, while the surface 1 was more susceptible to corrosion. Overall, this study demonstrates the importance of the careful optimization of electrochem. surface treatment for medical grade stainless steel in terms of roughness of nanostructures and corrosion susceptibility.
- 14Jang, Y.; Choi, W. T.; Johnson, C. T.; García, A. J.; Singh, P. M.; Breedveld, V.; Hess, D. W.; Champion, J. A. Inhibition of Bacterial Adhesion on Nanotextured Stainless Steel 316L by Electrochemical Etching. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2018, 4 (1), 90– 97, DOI: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.7b0054414Inhibition of Bacterial Adhesion on Nanotextured Stainless Steel 316L by Electrochemical EtchingJang, Yeongseon; Choi, Won Tae; Johnson, Christopher T.; Garcia, Andres J.; Singh, Preet M.; Breedveld, Victor; Hess, Dennis W.; Champion, Julie A.ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering (2018), 4 (1), 90-97CODEN: ABSEBA; ISSN:2373-9878. (American Chemical Society)Bacterial adhesion to stainless steel 316L (SS316L), which is an alloy typically used in many medical devices and food processing equipment, can cause serious infections along with substantial healthcare costs. This work demonstrates that nanotextured SS316L surfaces produced by electrochem. etching effectively inhibit bacterial adhesion of both Gram-neg. Escherichia coli and Gram-pos. Staphylococcus aureus, but exhibit cytocompatibility and no toxicity toward mammalian cells in vitro. Addnl., the electrochem. surface modification on SS316L results in formation of superior passive layer at the surface, improving corrosion resistance. The nanotextured SS316L offers significant potential for medical applications based on the surface structure-induced redn. of bacterial adhesion without use of antibiotic or chem. modifications while providing cytocompatibility and corrosion resistance in physiol. conditions.
- 15Benčina, M.; Junkar, I.; Vesel, A.; Mozetič, M.; Iglič, A. Nanoporous Stainless Steel Materials for Body Implants·Review of Synthesizing Procedures. Nanomater. 2022, 12 (17), 2924, DOI: 10.3390/nano12172924There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 16Hsu, H.-J.; Wu, C.-Y.; Huang, B.-H.; Tsai, C.-H.; Saito, T.; Ou, K.-L.; Chuo, Y.-C.; Lin, K.-L.; Peng, P.-W. Surface Characteristics and Cell Adhesion Behaviors of the Anodized Biomedical Stainless Steel. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10 (18), 6275, DOI: 10.3390/app10186275There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 17Cherian, A. M.; Joseph, J.; Nair, M. B.; Nair, S. V.; Maniyal, V.; Menon, D. Successful reduction of neointimal hyperplasia on stainless steel coronary stents by titania nanotexturing. ACS Omega 2020, 5 (28), 17582– 17591, DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.0c02045There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 18Benčina, M.; Junkar, I.; Zaplotnik, R.; Valant, M.; Iglič, A.; Mozetič, M. Plasma-induced crystallization of TiO2 nanotubes. Materials 2019, 12 (4), 626, DOI: 10.3390/ma1204062618Plasma-induced crystallization of TiO2 nanotubesBencina, Metka; Junkar, Ita; Zaplotnik, Rok; Valant, Matjaz; Iglic, Ales; Mozetic, MiranMaterials (2019), 12 (4), 626CODEN: MATEG9; ISSN:1996-1944. (MDPI AG)Facile crystn. of titanium oxide (TiO2) nanotubes (NTs), synthesized by electrochem. anodization, with low pressure non-thermal oxygen plasma is reported. The influence of plasma processing conditions on TiO2 NTs crystal structure and morphol. was examd. by X-ray diffraction (XRD) and SEM (SEM). For the first time we report the transition of amorphous TiO2 NTs to anatase and rutile crystal structures upon treatment with highly reactive oxygen plasma. This crystn. process has a strong advantage over the conventional heat treatments as it enables rapid crystn. of the surface. Thus the cryst. structure of NTs is obtained in a few seconds of treatment and it does not disrupt the NTs' morphol. Such a crystn. approach is esp. suitable for medical applications in which stable crystd. nanotubular morphol. is desired. The last part of the study thus deals with in vitro biol. response of whole blood to the TiO2 NTs. The results indicate that application of such surfaces for blood connecting devices is prospective, as practically no platelet adhesion or activation on crystd. TiO2 NTs surfaces was obsd.
- 19Wang, Y.; Guo, R.; Zhou, X.; Hu, G. Experimental investigation on optimal anodising parameters of nanopore preparation process on the stainless steel surface. Corros. Eng., Sci. Technol. 2020, 55 (7), 513– 519, DOI: 10.1080/1478422x.2020.1747759There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 20Lu, W.; Zou, D.; Han, Y.; Liu, R.; Tian, C. Self-organised nanoporous anodic films on superaustenitic stainless steel. Mater. Res. Innovations 2014, 18 (sup4), S4-747– S4-750, DOI: 10.1179/1432891714z.000000000776There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 21Cools, P.; De Geyter, N.; Vanderleyden, E.; Dubruel, P.; Morent, R. Surface analysis of titanium cleaning and activation processes: Non-thermal plasma versus other techniques. Plasma Chem. Plasma Process. 2014, 34, 917– 932, DOI: 10.1007/s11090-014-9552-221Surface Analysis of Titanium Cleaning and Activation Processes: Non-thermal Plasma Versus Other TechniquesCools, Pieter; De Geyter, Nathalie; Vanderleyden, Els; Dubruel, Peter; Morent, RinoPlasma Chemistry and Plasma Processing (2014), 34 (4), 917-932CODEN: PCPPDW; ISSN:0272-4324. (Springer)A medium pressure (5 kPa) dielec. barrier discharge operating in different atmospheres (air and argon) is used to develop a fast and easy way to remove adsorbed carbon contamination. Chem. and phys. changes at the sample surface after plasma treatment are studied, making use of contact angle measurements, XPS anal. and at. force microscopy measurements. The obtained results are compared with other chem. and thermal treatments typically used. This comparison shows that plasma treatment at medium pressure is able to remove up to 20 % more of the adsorbed carbon compared to the classical cleaning methods, while at the same time being less aggressive, leaving the sub-surface chem. unchanged. Moreover, the anal. techniques give a fundamental insight in the reactions processes at the titanium surface when exposed to a medium pressure plasma.
- 22Belkind, A.; Gershman, S. Plasma cleaning of surfaces. Vac. Coat. Technol. 2008, 9, 46– 57There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 23Muñoz, J.; Bravo, J.; Calzada, M. Aluminum metal surface cleaning and activation by atmospheric-pressure remote plasma. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 407, 72– 81, DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.02.092There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 24Quinn, J.; McFadden, R.; Chan, C.-W.; Carson, L. Titanium for orthopedic applications: an overview of surface modification to improve biocompatibility and prevent bacterial biofilm formation. iScience 2020, 23 (11), 101745, DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2020.10174524Titanium for Orthopedic Applications: An Overview of Surface Modification to Improve Biocompatibility and Prevent Bacterial Biofilm FormationQuinn, James; McFadden, Ryan; Chan, Chi-Wai; Carson, LouiseiScience (2020), 23 (11), 101745CODEN: ISCICE; ISSN:2589-0042. (Elsevier B.V.)A review. Titanium and its alloys have emerged as excellent candidates for use as orthopedic biomaterials. Nevertheless, there are often complications arising after implantation of orthopedic devices, most notably prosthetic joint infection and aseptic loosening. To ensure that implanted devices remain functional in situ, innovation in surface modification has attracted much attention in the effort to develop orthopedic materials with optimal characteristics at the biomaterial-tissue interface. This will draw together metallurgy, surface engineering, biofilm microbiol., and biomaterial science. It will serve to appreciate why titanium and its alloys are frequently used orthopedic biomaterials and address some of the challenges facing these biomaterials currently, including the significant problem of device-assocd. infection. Finally, the authors shall consolidate and evaluate surface modification techniques employed to overcome some of these issues by offering a unique perspective as to the direction in which research is headed from a broad, interdisciplinary point of view.
- 25Tan, L.; Wang, Z.; Ma, Y.; Yan, Y.; Qiao, L. Tribocorrosion investigation of 316L stainless steel: The synergistic effect between chloride ion and sulfate ion. Mater. Res. Express 2021, 8 (8), 086501, DOI: 10.1088/2053-1591/ac1825There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 26Guo, L.; Qin, S.; Yang, B.; Liang, D.; Qiao, L. Effect of hydrogen on semiconductive properties of passive film on ferrite and austenite phases in a duplex stainless steel. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7 (1), 3317, DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-03480-8There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 27Huttenlochner, K.; Müller-Renno, C.; Ziegler, C.; Merz, R.; Merz, B.; Kopnarski, M.; Chodorski, J.; Schlegel, C.; Ulber, R. Removing biofilms from stainless steel without changing surface properties relevant for bacterial attachment. Biointerphases 2017, 12 (2), 02C404, DOI: 10.1116/1.4982196There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 28Castle, J. E.; Qiu, J. H. A co-ordinated study of the passivation of alloy steels by plasma source mass spectrometry and x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy-1. characterization of the passive film. Corros. Sci. 1989, 29 (5), 591– 603, DOI: 10.1016/0010-938x(89)90010-3There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 29Clayton, C.; Lu, Y. C. A bipolar model of the passivity of stainless steel: the role of Mo addition. J. Electrochem. Soc. 1986, 133 (12), 2465– 2473, DOI: 10.1149/1.2108451There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 30Žemaitis, A.; Mimidis, A.; Papadopoulos, A.; Gečys, P.; Račiukaitis, G.; Stratakis, E.; Gedvilas, M. Controlling the wettability of stainless steel from highly-hydrophilic to super-hydrophobic by femtosecond laser-induced ripples and nanospikes. RSC Adv. 2020, 10 (62), 37956– 37961, DOI: 10.1039/d0ra05665kThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 31Chen, T.; Liu, H.; Yang, H.; Yan, W.; Zhu, W.; Liu, H. Biomimetic fabrication of robust self-assembly superhydrophobic surfaces with corrosion resistance properties on stainless steel substrate. RSC Adv. 2016, 6 (50), 43937– 43949, DOI: 10.1039/c6ra06500gThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 32Sönmez, T.; Fazeli Jadidi, M.; Kazmanli, K.; Birer, O. ̈.; Ürgen, M. Role of different plasma gases on the surface chemistry and wettability of RF plasma treated stainless steel. Vacuum 2016, 129, 63– 73, DOI: 10.1016/j.vacuum.2016.04.014There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 33Wang, L.; Wang, K.; Erkan, N.; Yuan, Y.; Chen, J.; Nie, B.; Li, F.; Okamoto, K. Metal material surface wettability increase induced by electron beam irradiation. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020, 511, 145555, DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.14555533Metal material surface wettability increase induced by electron beam irradiationWang, Laishun; Wang, Kai; Erkan, Nejdet; Yuan, Yuan; Chen, Jiayue; Nie, Baojie; Li, Fengchen; Okamoto, KojiApplied Surface Science (2020), 511 (), 145555CODEN: ASUSEE; ISSN:0169-4332. (Elsevier B.V.)Surface wettability is one of the important metal surface characteristics which would affect boiling heat transfer performance of metal surfaces. In this study, different metal surfaces are irradiated by electron beam to investigate whether the surface wettability of metal surfaces can be increased by electron beam irradn. The exptl. results show that electron beam irradn. can greatly improve the surface wettability of various metal surfaces. The surface wettability of all surfaces increase as irradn. dose increase and some metal surfaces become quite hydrophilic when the irradn. dose reaches 3000 kGy. Besides, electron beam irradn. shows better effect on increasing the surface wettability of pre-oxidized metal surfaces. The results are discussed and analyzed considering the characteristics of oxidn. porous layer. This finding shows that electron beam irradn. could be an effective way to increase the metal surface wettability and study the effect of surface wettability increase on boiling heat transfer.
- 34Junkar, I.; Kulkarni, M.; Bencina, M.; Kovac, J.; Mrak-Poljšak, K.; Lakota, K.; Sodin-Šemrl, S.; Mozetic, M.; Iglič, A. Titanium dioxide nanotube arrays for cardiovascular stent applications. Omega 2020, 5 (13), 7280– 7289, DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.9b04118There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 35Junkar, I.; Kulkarni, M.; Drašler, B.; Rugelj, N.; Mazare, A.; Flašker, A.; Drobne, D.; Humpolíček, P.; Resnik, M.; Schmuki, P. Influence of various sterilization procedures on TiO2 nanotubes used for biomedical devices. Bioelectrochemistry 2016, 109, 79– 86, DOI: 10.1016/j.bioelechem.2016.02.00135Influence of various sterilization procedures on TiO2 nanotubes used for biomedical devicesJunkar, Ita; Kulkarni, Mukta; Drasler, Barbara; Rugelj, Neza; Mazare, Anca; Flasker, Ajda; Drobne, Damjana; Humpolicek, Petr; Resnik, Matic; Schmuki, Patrik; Mozetic, Miran; Iglic, AlesBioelectrochemistry (2016), 109 (), 79-86CODEN: BIOEFK; ISSN:1567-5394. (Elsevier B.V.)Sterilization is the final surface treatment procedure of all implantable devices and is one of the key factors which have to be considered before implementation. Since different sterilization procedures for all implantable devices influence mech. properties as well as biol. response, the influence of different sterilization techniques on titanium nanotubes was studied. Commonly used sterilization techniques such as autoclaving, ultra-violet light sterilization, hydrogen peroxide plasma sterilization as well as the not so frequently used gaseous oxygen plasma sterilization were used. Three different nanotube diams.; 15 nm, 50 nm and 100 nm were employed to study the effects of various sterilization techniques. It was obsd. that autoclave sterilization resulted in destruction of nanotubular features on all three studied nanotube diams., while UV-light and both kinds of plasma sterilization did not cause any significant morphol. changes on the surfaces. Differences between the sterilization techniques employed influenced cytocompatibility, esp. in the case of nanotubes with 100 nm diam.
- 36Junkar, I.; Kulkarni, M.; Drašler, B.; Rugelj, N.; Recek, N.; Drobne, D.; Kovač, J.; Humpolicek, P.; Iglič, A.; Mozetič, M. Enhanced biocompatibility of TiO2 surfaces by highly reactive plasma. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 2016, 49 (24), 244002, DOI: 10.1088/0022-3727/49/24/24400236Enhanced biocompatibility of TiO2 surfaces by highly reactive plasmaJunkar, Ita; Kulkarni, Mukta; Drasler, Barbara; Rugelj, Neza; Recek, Nina; Drobne, Damjana; Kovac, Janez; Humpolicek, Petr; Iglic, Ales; Mozetic, MiranJournal of Physics D: Applied Physics (2016), 49 (24), 244002/1-244002/10CODEN: JPAPBE; ISSN:0022-3727. (IOP Publishing Ltd.)In the present study the biol. response to various nanotopog. features after gaseous plasma treatment were studied. The usefulness of nanostructured surfaces for implantable materials has already been acknowledged, while less is known on the combined effect of nanostructured plasma modified surfaces. In the present work the influence of oxygen plasma treatment on nanostructured titanium oxide (TiO2) surfaces was studied. Characterization of the TiO2 surface chem. compn. and morphol. features was analyzed after plasma modification by XPS and by SEM while surface wettability was studied with measuring the water contact angle. Cell adhesion and morphol. was assessed from images taken with SEM, whereas cell viability was measured with a calorimetric assay. The obtained results showed that oxygen plasma treatment of TiO2 nanotube surfaces significantly influences the adhesion and morphol. of osteoblast-like cells in comparison to untreated nanostructured surfaces. Marked changes in surface compn. of plasma treated surfaces were obsd., as plasma treatment removed hydrocarbon contamination and removed fluorine impurities, which were present due to the electrochem. anodization process. However no differences in wettability of untreated and plasma treated surfaces were noticed. Treatment with oxygen plasma stimulated osteoblast-like cell adhesion and spreading on the nanostructured surface, suggesting the possible use of oxygen plasma surface treatment to enhance osteoblast-like cell response.
- 37Seaman, G. V. F. Electrochemical features of platelet interactions. Thromb. Res. 1976, 8, 235– 246, DOI: 10.1016/0049-3848(76)90066-9There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 38Gawaz, M.; Neumann, F.-J.; Ott, I.; May, A.; Schömig, A. Platelet activation and coronary stent implantation: effect of antithrombotic therapy. Circulation 1996, 94 (3), 279– 285, DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.94.3.279There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 39Ollivier, V.; Roques, C.; Receveur, N.; Gratz, M.; Feldman, L.; Letourneur, D.; Gachet, C.; Mangin, P. H.; Jandrot-Perrus, M. Bioreactivity of stent material: Activation of platelets, coagulation, leukocytes and endothelial cell dysfunction in vitro. Platelets 2017, 28 (6), 529– 539, DOI: 10.1080/09537104.2016.1252836There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 40Liu, H. Improving the hemocompatibility of stents. Hemocompatibility of Biomaterials for Clinical Applications; Elsevier, 2018; pp 379– 394.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 41Gardiner, E. E.; Andrews, R. K. Platelets in Thrombotic and Non-Thrombotic Disorders Pathophysiology, Pharmacology and Therapeutics: an Update, Platelet Adhesion; Springer, 2017; pp 309– 319.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 42Ruggeri, Z. M.; Mendolicchio, G. L. Adhesion mechanisms in platelet function. Circ. Res. 2007, 100 (12), 1673– 1685, DOI: 10.1161/01.res.0000267878.97021.abThere is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 43Brass, L. F.; Stalker, T. J. Mechanisms of Platelet Activation; Cambridge University Press, 2007; pp 37– 52.There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 44Yang, T.; De La Franier, B.; Thompson, M. J. Anti-Thrombogenicity Study of a Covalently-Attached Monolayer on Stent-Grade Stainless Steel. Materials 2021, 14 (9), 2342, DOI: 10.3390/ma14092342There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 45Carmagnola, I.; Nardo, T.; Boccafoschi, F.; Chiono, V. Layer-by-layer coating of stainless steel plates mediated by surface priming treatment to improve antithrombogenic properties. Biomed. Sci. Eng. 2020, 1 (1), 1, DOI: 10.4081/bse.2016.22There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 46Phan, T.; Jones, J. E.; Chen, M.; Strawn, T.; Khoukaz, H. B.; Ji, Y.; Kumar, A.; Bowles, D. K.; Fay, W. P.; Yu, Q. In vitro biological responses of plasma nanocoatings for coronary stent applications. J. Biomed. Mater. Res., Part A 2023, 111 (11), 1768– 1780, DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.37587There is no corresponding record for this reference.
- 47Ni, S.-y.; Zhang, Y.-f.; Ni, S.-r. Ordered nanopore arrays on the surface of diameter-controlled anodic alumina influence the adhesion behavior of umbilical vein endothelial cells. Chin. J. Tissue Eng. Res. 2012, 16 (29), 5336There is no corresponding record for this reference.