ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
Photocatalytic Estrogen Degradation by the Composite of Tin Oxide Fine Particles and Graphene-like Carbon Nitride
My Activity
  • Open Access
Article

Photocatalytic Estrogen Degradation by the Composite of Tin Oxide Fine Particles and Graphene-like Carbon Nitride
Click to copy article linkArticle link copied!

Open PDFSupporting Information (1)

ACS Omega

Cite this: ACS Omega 2024, 9, 50, 49064–49070
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.4c03390
Published December 6, 2024

Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under

CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 .

Abstract

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This study investigates whether 17β-estradiol (E2), a natural estrogen and one of the endocrine-disrupting chemicals responsible for water pollution, can be oxidatively decomposed under simulated solar light using a composite of tin oxide nanoparticles and graphene-like carbon nitride (g-CN) as a photocatalyst. The composite photocatalyst was prepared by heating a mixture of urea and tin acetate. FT-IR measurements revealed that g-CN possesses structural units similar to g-C3N4, a well-studied graphite-like carbon nitride. However, unlike g-C3N4, sharp diffraction lines were not observed in the XRD diffraction pattern of g-CN, indicating lower crystallinity. Elemental analysis showed that g-CN is slightly nitrogen-rich compared to g-C3N4, and UV–vis measurements indicated that the band gap of g-CN is slightly smaller than that of g-C3N4. The presence of tin in the composite of tin oxide and g-CN was clearly confirmed by XPS, although no sharp diffraction peaks were observed in the XRD patterns, suggesting the presence of microcrystals. Furthermore, FE-SEM observations did not reveal large tin oxide crystals, although EDS mapping indicated the presence of tin oxide. It was found that the prepared tin oxide and g-CN composites function effectively as photocatalysts for degrading E2 under simulated solar light. The degradation rate constant was evaluated to be k = 3.34 (0.14) × 10–2 min–1. Peroxide ion radicals were detected in ESR measurements from the irradiated solution, suggesting that peroxide ion radicals are generated through oxygen photoreduction as the counter-reaction of the oxidative decomposition of E2.

This publication is licensed under

CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 .
  • cc licence
  • by licence
  • nc licence
  • nd licence
Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society

Introduction

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The ecological impact of endocrine disruptors (environmental hormones) present in trace amounts in rivers has been a prominent concern. (1,2) Through numerous investigations, rivers have been revealed to be contaminated with natural estrogens such as estrone (E1), 17β-estradiol (E2), estriol (E3), and synthetic estrogens like ethinyl estradiol. (3,4) These compounds can cause harmful effects such as feminization, infertility, and hermaphroditism in organisms inhabiting water bodies. Therefore, there is a strong demand to remove these estrogens for environmental purification.
Since the 1990s, quantitative experiments have been conducted to evaluate the impact of the aforementioned estrogen on aquatic life, such as fish, in rivers. (5) Among the three types of estrogens mentioned, E2 is known to have a significant physiological effect. (5) It has been pointed out that as little as 10 ng/L of E2 can cause feminization in fish. In response to this, the removal of E2 in sewage treatment has become a critical issue, leading to active research into advanced oxidation processes, including the use of ozone, in addition to the general chlorine-based oxidizing agents for E2 degradation. Detailed studies on the oxidative decomposition process of E2 have also been conducted during this time, revealing the intermediate products through which the degradation progresses.
In recent years, there has been an active effort to use photocatalysts for environmental purification. (6,7) Using energy derived from fossil fuels for environmental purification can exacerbate environmental pollution during energy generation. By contrast, combining solar energy with photocatalysts for the purification process does not cause new environmental problems.
Among the various photocatalyst materials studied for this purpose, graphite-like carbon nitride (g-C3N4) has recently gained significant attention as a metal-free photocatalyst under visible light irradiation, as it is composed of only abundant elements, easy to synthesize, and chemically stable. (8−13) The basic tectonic units to establish g-C3N4 allotropes are considered to be triazine (C3N3) and tri-s-triazine/heptazine (C6N7) rings, although the samples actually synthesized may have several polymorphs with slightly different structures (Figure S1). The history of g-C3N4 dates back to 1834 when the embryonic form of melon was first developed. (14) After Wang reported its excellent photocatalytic hydrogen generation ability, g-C3N4 gained attention as a photocatalyst. (15) Subsequently, extensive research has been conducted on the photocatalytic applications of g-C3N4. Much of this research is driven by the perspective of addressing environmental issues. (16−18)
It has recently been reported that g-C3N4/SnO2 composite can be a visible light photocatalyst capable of photocatalytic degradation of Rhodamine B. (19) Ji reported that Rhodamine B is oxidatively decomposed by the holes generated by the photoexcitation of electrons. (14) If the same mechanism can be applied to the photocatalytic degradation of environmental hormones, river purification and environmental purification can be ideally achieved. To demonstrate this, this study synthesized g-C3N4/SnO2 composites and investigated their photocatalytic activity in decomposing E2 (Figure S2), which was used as the representative form of estrogen. This research aims to develop a photocatalyst that allows for the decomposition of estrogen by solar light. The specific purpose of this experiment is to verify whether a composite of tin oxide nanoparticles and graphene-like carbon nitride can effectively decompose E2 under the irradiation of solar light. Therefore, experiments were conducted using a high concentration (0.1 mM) aqueous solution of E2, compared to the actual concentration of E2 found in rivers (on the order of several ng/L).

Experimental Section

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The g-C3N4/SnO2 composites were synthesized through a previously reported procedure. (16) It should be noted although referred to as g-C3N4 in this paper, the g-C3N4 synthesized in the present study is somewhat structurally distorted, as will be discussed in the next section. To synthesize the composite, a mixture of urea (Nacalai Tesque Inc.) and tin(II) acetate (Sigma-Aldrich Co.) was placed in a crucible and thermally treated at 550 °C for 2 h under N2 flow in an electric furnace to obtain the g-C3N4/SnO2 composite. Various weight percentages of tin(II) acetate (0, 0.3, 0.6, and 1.5 wt %) were used to prepare the mixture. The corresponding composites were abbreviated as CNSnO-0, CNSnO-0.3, CNSnO-0.6, and CNSnO-1.5. The synthesized composite samples were characterized through spectroscopic experiments such as Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), X-ray diffraction (XRD), and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). FT-IR, XRD and XPS measurements were performed using FT/IR-6300 (JASCO Co.), Rigaku Miniflex (Rigaku Co.) and PHI Quantes (ULVAC-PHI Inc.). Elemental analysis of H, C, N was done on vario EL cube (Elementar) and the N/C ratio was also evaluated using XPS. For the FT-IR measurements, a pellet was made by mixing KBr powder with the sample and then measuring by the transmission method. The XPS measurements were conducted by pressing the sample powder onto In foil. FE-SEM (EDS) and TEM measurements were carried out using a JSM-7800F (JEOL) and a JEM-Z2500 (JEOL), respectively. UV–vis measurements were performed using Shimadzu UV-1900i spectrophotometer, and analysis based on the Kubelka–Munk theory was conducted to estimate the band gap of the carbon nitride composite samples. (17) The AC impedance measurements of the sample were performed using an Autolab PGSTAT128N, and the flat band potential was estimated from the Mott–Schottky plot. We also performed nitrogen adsorption/desorption isotherm measurements on the prepared samples at 77 K using a Gemini 2375 (Shimadzu). The Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) surface area values of the samples were determined from the observed N2 adsorption isotherms.
Estradiol (E2) was purchased from Nacalai Tesque Inc. A solution of 0.1 mM E2 with the CNSnO composite was stirred in the dark for 3 h to avoid causing any light-induced changes prior to the photoirradiation experiment. Subsequently, the solution was irradiated with simulated sunlight from a solar simulator (AM1.5G, 1000 W/m2). After irradiation, the solution was centrifuged to remove the composite samples, and the change in E2 concentration was examined via photoluminescence (PL) measurements. PL measurements were carried out on FP-8600 (JASCO Co.). To investigate the mechanism of CNSnO-catalyzed E2 photodegradation, Electron spin resonance (ESR) measurements using 5,5-Dimethyl-4-phenyl-1-pyrroline N-Oxide (DMPO) purchased from Tokyo Chemical Industry Co. as a radical trapping agent were carried out to detect the reduced species in the degradation process. The ESR measurements were performed using a JES-FA200 (JEOL) at an observation frequency of 9.055 GHz.

Results and Discussion

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The FT-IR spectra of the prepared CNSnO-0 and CNSnO-0.3 are shown in Figure 1. In both samples, characteristic g-C3N4 peaks are observed, including the triazine breathing mode around 810 cm–1 (marked with asterisk) and peaks corresponding to C–N and C═N stretching vibrations in the range of 1100–1600 cm–1. (20) Therefore, the synthesized samples can be inferred to possess the basic units of g-C3N4. However, XRD measurements of CNSnO-0 resulted in only a broad halo pattern (Figure S3), whereas highly crystalline g-C3N4 exhibits diffraction lines indicative of a layered structure of hexagonal network planes and regular structures within the plane (Figures S1 and S4). (21) Therefore, we hypothesize that the CNSnO composites synthesized in this study have a somewhat distorted network structure of triazine and/or tri-s-triazine units.

Figure 1

Figure 1. FT-IR spectra of (a) CNSnO-0 and (b) CNSnO-0.3.

Furthermore, XRD diffraction patterns of CNSnO-0.3 also show only broad diffraction lines, and no diffraction lines attributable to SnO2 crystals are observed (Figure S3). However, XPS measurements confirm the clear presence of Sn (Figure 2A). (22) Therefore, it is plausible that CNSnO-0.3 contains amorphous Sn oxides or ultra fine Sn oxide crystals. Thermogravimetric (TG) measurements of CNSnO-0.3 in air revealed residual tin oxide of about 1.5 wt %. Additionally, elemental analysis revealed an N/C ratio of approximately 1.354, indicating a nitrogen-rich composition compared with g-C3N4.

Figure 2

Figure 2. (A) Sn 3d, (B) C 1s, (C) N 1s, (D) wide XPS spectra of CNSnO-0.3.

As mentioned above, the Sn 3d peaks are clearly observed in the XPS spectrum of CNSnO-0.3 (Figure 2A), confirming the presence of Sn. Additionally, the peak energy positions (Sn 3d5/2 = 486.6, 3d3/2 = 495.0 eV) suggest that Sn is in the +4 oxidation state (Figure S5A, Table S1). However, the O 1s XPS spectrum shows a broad peak, indicating that the presence of Sn in lower oxidation states cannot be definitively ruled out (Figure S5C). The C 1s XPS spectrum of CNSnO-0.3 exhibits peaks around 284.7 and 288 eV (Figure 2B). The high-energy-side peak can be explained by C bonded with N and is consistent with the structure of g-C3N4 (Figure S1). However, the 284.7 eV peak cannot be explained by the g-C3N4 structure shown in Figure S1. This peak may be due to carbon clusters, the presence of sp3 carbon, or contaminant carbon. Changing the measurement location revealed variations in the intensity of this peak, suggesting that it is caused by some type of impurity (Figure S5B). This low-energy-side C 1s peak is often reported in studies describing the synthesis of g-C3N4.
The strong peak around 398.5 eV in the N 1s spectrum (Figure 2C) is attributed to nitrogen in the triazine structure of the g-C3N4 structural unit. The high-energy-side shoulder peak (around 400.6 eV) is attributed to nitrogen in the C–N═N–C structure, as observed in g-C3N5. (23) Taking these findings into consideration, we conclude that the synthesized CNSnO composite shares many structural similarities with g-C3N4 shown in Figure S1, but is slightly nitrogen-rich and lacks crystalline integrity (Figure 2D).
In the FE-SEM image of the CNSnO-0.3 sample (Figure S6B), sheet-like carbon nitride can be observed, but distinct crystals of tin oxide are not visible. However, as previously mentioned, tin was detected by XPS, and tin was also detected in the SEM-attached EDS (Figure S8). The specific location of Sn is difficult to determine through EDS mapping, suggesting that tin oxide is homogeneously deposited throughout the sample. TEM observations showed a sheet-like structure of CNSnO-0.3, with what appear to be Sn oxide nanoparticles dispersed on the sheet surface (Figure S7). The BET specific surface area of the CNSnO-0.3 sample, determined by N2 gas adsorption measurements, is 68.0 cm2/g (Table S2), which is relatively large for g-C3N4-related samples. This relatively large specific surface area can be attributed to the inhibition of graphene-like sheet stacking due to the simultaneous synthesis with tin oxide. This is consistent with the absence of sharp diffraction peaks related to sheet stacking in the XRD patterns (Figure S3).
Next, we discuss the photodegradation performance of the CNSnO composite. Figure 3 shows the extent of decrease in the PL peak intensity around 305 nm of E2 after 1 h of photoirradiation of the solutions including CNSnO-0 and CNSnO-0.3 composites. (24) As shown in the figure, the photoirradiation of CNSnO-0 causes no significant change in the E2 peak shape, albeit for a light decrease in the peak’s PL intensity, suggesting that E2 degradation has hardly occurred. By contrast, the photoirradiation of CNSnO-0.3 caused the peak intensity around 305 nm to decrease significantly after 1 h of photoirradiation, and a new broad peak appeared on the high-wavelength side. This indicates that upon using CNSnO-0.3, E2 is decomposed by light irradiation, leading to a decrease in the peak intensity around 305 nm and the formation of new broad peaks on the high-wavelength side due to the generation of decomposition products. In other words, the carbon nitride CNSnO-0, which is structurally similar to g-C3N4, does not cause E2 photodegradation on its own. By contrast, E2 degradation becomes possible on carbon nitride with the addition of Sn oxides. Although the amount of Sn oxide has not been optimized, we predict that the performance is sufficient at a level close to that of CNSnO-0.3, because using CNSnO-0.6 that includes twice the amount of Sn did not significantly improve the performance. For these reasons, this paper will focus on the data for CNSnO-0.3 in the main text.

Figure 3

Figure 3. PL intensity of E2 (a) before photoirradiation, and after photoirradiation for 1 h with (b) CNSnO-0 and (c) CNSnO-0.3.

In this study, we did not analyze the photodegradation process of E2 when using CNSnO-0.3 as the photocatalyst. However, based on previous reports, it is believed that the degradation proceeds via the intermediate 10ε-17β-dihydroxy-1,4-estradien-3-one (DEO) (Figure S2). (25,26) As the degradation progresses, the biological impact of E2 is, of course, eliminated. Additionally, it has been reported that the interaction of DEO, the intermediate product, with estrogen receptors is significantly reduced compared to E2. (25,26)
Next, we discuss the changes in E2 photodegradation by CNSnO-0.3 with the duration of light irradiation. As shown in Figure 4A, it is evident that the PL intensity of E2 decreases with increasing the irradiation time. The plot in the figure represents the integrated intensity of the peak around 305 nm as a function of the irradiation time.

Figure 4

Figure 4. (A) PL intensity of E2 after photoirradiation with CNSnO-0.3 for (a) 0, (b) 0.5, (c) 1.0, and (d) 2.0 h. (B) Integrated PL intensity of E2 as a function of photoirradiation time.

As observed in Figure 4B, the peak intensity exhibits an exponential decrease with respect to the irradiation time (Figure S9). Considering that the peak intensity is proportional to the concentration of E2, we calculated the first-order rate constant to be k = 3.34 (0.14) × 10–2 (min–1). (27) This rate indicates the effectiveness of E2 decomposition using the photocatalyst developed in this study.
We conducted multiple cycles of E2 photodegradation reactions followed by the recovery of CNSnO composite, and confirmed that there is insignificant difference in performance at least during the first three cycles (see Figure S10). It should be noted that while Figure S10 shows the cycling data for CNSnO-0.6, the durability of CNSnO-0.3 is not expected to differ significantly. This suggests that the efficiency of the E2 photodegradation reaction remains consistent over these cycles, highlighting the potential for cyclic utilization of CNSnO composites in the context of such photodegradation reactions.
Finally, we discuss the mechanism by which CNSnO composites contribute to the photodegradation of E2. To understand the mechanism of E2 photodecomposition by CNSnO-0.3, the surface state of CNSnO-0.3 was examined. The ζ potentials of CNSnO-0 and CNSnO-0.3 in pure water were measured using a Zetasizer Nano ZS (Malvern Panalytical Ltd., UK). The measured ζ potentials were both negative (approximately −35 mV for CNSnO-0 and −55 mV for CNSnO-0.3), indicating that the surface potential of both samples is negative (Table S3). In photocatalytic reactions, it is plausible that the adsorption of the positively polarized parts of water or E2 onto the catalyst surface is the starting point, and this aspect appears to be common to both samples. As previously discussed, the synthesized carbon nitride is structurally similar to g-C3N4. However, the band gap of CNSnO-0 (around 2.55 eV), which was evaluated by performing Kubelka–Munk analysis on the observed UV–vis spectrum (Figure S11), is slightly smaller than that of g-C3N4 (@2.7 eV). (28) This may be related to the fact that the carbon nitride synthesized in this study is slightly nitrogen-rich, as the band gap of g-C3N5 has been reported to decrease to as low as 1.76 eV. (23) Nevertheless, the results confirm that the synthesized carbon nitride is capable of absorbing visible light.
To confirm the bottom energy position of the conduction band in CNSnO-0.3, AC impedance measurements were performed in 1 M KCl aqueous solution, and the complex capacitance was obtained for a Mott–Schottky plot (Figure S12). As shown in Figure S12, the flat-band potential is approximately −1.2 V (vs Ag/AgCl). Since the potential of the Ag/AgCl reference electrode is about +0.2 V relative to the standard hydrogen electrode, it is evident that the conduction band bottom is sufficiently higher than the redox equilibrium potential of oxygen.
Unfortunately, the detailed structure of the Sn oxide contained in the composite is not well understood. However, from XPS, it can be concluded that Sn is in its tetravalent state, suggesting an oxide close to SnO2. (29) While detailed reports exist on the band gap (approximately 3.65 eV) and band positions of bulk SnO2, the Sn oxide synthesized in this study consists of amorphous Sn(IV) oxides or ultra fine SnO2 crystals, which prevents the direct use of the band structure of bulk SnO2. Furthermore, SnO2 quantum dots have been reported to have varying band positions and a smaller band gap depending on the synthesis method. (30) However, even with the reduction due to presence of quantum dots, the band gap is unlikely to be smaller than that of carbon nitride. Furthermore, SnO2 is an n-type semiconductor with its Fermi level near the bottom of the conduction band, while the Fermi level of carbon nitride is near the center of the band gap. (31,32) Therefore, assuming the alignment of the Fermi levels of SnO2 and carbon nitride results in the schematic band diagram shown in Figure 5. Furthermore, as discussed in the XPS section, the presence of lower-valence tin oxides cannot be ruled out. However, even in that case, the mechanism of E2 photooxidative decomposition by the CNSnO photocatalyst as depicted in Figure 5 is still valid. This is because, although lower-valence tin oxides have a smaller band gap compared to SnO2, there is not expected to be a significant change in the band alignment with g-CN. In addition to the above, we confirmed through PL measurements whether the separation of excited electron and hole carriers, as shown in Figure 5, is actually occurring in the CNSnO composites (Figure S13). As shown in Figure S13, the PL intensity of CNSnO-0.3 is significantly reduced compared to CNSnO-0. This suggests that the carrier separation, as indicated in Figure 5, is indeed occurring.

Figure 5

Figure 5. Schematic band diagram of CNSnO composite photocatalyst to explain the photodegradation of E2.

According to the band diagram in Figure 5, we expect that the oxidative decomposition reaction of E2 is induced by holes in the valence band of carbon nitride. On the other hand, reduction reaction should occur to some extent in the conduction band of Sn oxide. To investigate this, ESR experiments were performed using DMPO as a radical trap agent, as described in the experimental section. DMPO can trap both peroxide ion radicals and OH radicals. However, the ESR spectra of DMPO trapped with peroxide ion radicals and DMPO trapped with OH radicals are distinctly different. When comparing the previous research (for example, Figure 9 in ref (33)) with Figure 6, it is believed that the radical generated in this experiment is a peroxide ion radical. (33) However, it is also possible that OH radicals are generated via peroxide ions. Therefore, OH radicals are also described in Figure 5. For the E2 photooxidative decomposition by the CNSnO photocatalyst, in addition to the direct oxidation of E2 by holes generated through photoexcitation as depicted in Figure 5, oxidation by OH radicals can also be considered. Ohko et al. have reported that E2 decomposes through DEO via both photooxidation and OH radical oxidation. (25) It is possible that in the CNSnO photocatalyst as well, E2 decomposition proceeds via these two oxidation pathways. The important point is that the reduction reaction of oxygen occurs as the counter-reaction to the E2 photooxidative decomposition. In this experiment, oxygen was not intentionally dissolved in the solution, yet E2 was efficiently photodegraded. This suggests that the photocatalyst developed in this study can be used for the photodegradation of estrogen and potentially other endocrine disruptors in river water.

Figure 6

Figure 6. ESR spectra of radical adducts trapped by DMPO (a) before and (b) after photoirradiation.

Conclusions

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Several types of composites consisting of tin oxide nanoparticles and graphene-like carbon nitride (g-CN) were synthesized by heating a mixture of urea and tin acetate at 550 °C for 2 h under N2 flow in an electric furnace. FT-IR measurements revealed that the obtained g-CN possesses structural units similar to g-C3N4, a well-studied graphite-like carbon nitride. However, unlike g-C3N4, sharp diffraction lines were not observed in the XRD diffraction pattern of g-CN, indicating lower crystallinity. Elemental analysis showed that g-CN is slightly nitrogen-rich compared to g-C3N4, and UV–vis measurements indicated that the band gap (2.55 eV) of g-CN is slightly smaller than that of g-C3N4 (2.70 eV). When simulated solar light was irradiated on CNSnO-0.3, it efficiently decomposed 17β-estradiol (E2), a natural estrogen. The degradation rate constant was evaluated to be k = 3.34 (0.14) × 10–2 (min–1). Peroxide ion radicals were detected in ESR measurements from the irradiated solution, suggesting that peroxide ion radicals are generated through the oxygen photoreduction as the counter-reaction of the oxidative decomposition of E2.

Supporting Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.4c03390.

  • Figure S1. Crystal structure of g-C3N4, S2. Oxidative degradation process of 17β-estradiol (E2), S3. XRD patterns of (a) CNSnO-0, (b) CNSnO-0.3 and (c) SnO2 crystal, S4. XRD pattern of g-C3N4 prepared from melamine, S5. (A) Sn 3d XPS spectrum of SnO2 powder sample. (B) C 1s and (C) O 1s XPS spectra of CNSnO-0.3, S6. FE-SEM images of (A) CNSnO-0 and (B) CNSnO-0.3, S7. TEM images of CNSnO-0.3, S8. EDS spectrum of CNSnO-0.3. N, O and Sn mapping images of CNSnO-0.3, S9. The figure with the vertical axis of Figure 4B replotted on a logarithmic scale, S10. Cycling performance of CNSnO-0.6, S11. Tauc plot of CNSnO-0, S12. Mott–Schottky plot of CNSnO-0.3, S13. PL spectra of (a) CNSnO-0 and (b) CNSnO-0.3. Table S1. XPS peak position and peak height of CNSnO-0.3 and SnO2 powder sample, S2. BET specific surface area of CNSnO samples, S3. ζ Potential of CNSnO-0 and −0.3 (PDF)

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Author Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

  • Corresponding Author
  • Authors
    • Yuzuki Amino - Department of Life Science and Applied Chemistry, Nagoya Institute of Technology Gokiso-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya 466-8555, Japan
    • Ayar Al-zubaidi - Department of Life Science and Applied Chemistry, Nagoya Institute of Technology Gokiso-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya 466-8555, JapanOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-6032-0207
    • Yosuke Ishii - Department of Life Science and Applied Chemistry, Nagoya Institute of Technology Gokiso-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya 466-8555, JapanOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-0334-2228
  • Notes
    The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Acknowledgments

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This work was financially supported by JSPS KAKENHI grant number 23K23448, by JKA and its promotion funds from KEIRIN RACE.

References

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article references 33 other publications.

  1. 1
    Yilmaz, B.; Terekeci, H.; Sandal, S.; Kelestimur, F. Endocrine disrupting chemicals: exposure, effects on human health, mechanism of action, models for testing and strategies for prevention. Rev. Endocr. Metab. Disord. 2020, 21, 127147,  DOI: 10.1007/s11154-019-09521-z
  2. 2
    Lintelmann, J.; Katayama, A.; Kurihara, N.; Shore, L.; Wenzel, A. Endocrine disruptors in the environment (IUPAC Technical Report). Pure Appl. Chem. 2003, 75, 631681,  DOI: 10.1351/pac200375050631
  3. 3
    Peng, Y.; Wang, J.; Wu, C. Determination of Endocrine Disruption Potential of Bisphenol A Alternatives in Food Contact Materials Using In Vitro Assays: State of the Art and Future Challenges. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2019, 67, 1261312625,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.9b01543
  4. 4
    Phillips, P. J.; Chalmers, A. T.; Gray, J. L.; Kolpin, D. W.; Foreman, W. T.; Wall, G. R. Combined Sewer Overflows: An Environmental Source of Hormones and Wastewater Micropollutants. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46, 53365343,  DOI: 10.1021/es3001294
  5. 5
    Gross-Sorokin, M. Y.; Roast, S. D.; Brighty, G. C. Assessment of Feminization of Male Fish in English Rivers by the Environment Agency of England and Wales. Environ. Health Perspect. 2006, 114, 147151,  DOI: 10.1289/ehp.8068
  6. 6
    Luo, J.; Zhang, S.; Sun, M.; Yang, L.; Luo, S.; Crittenden, J. C. A Critical Review on Energy Conversion and Environmental Remediation of Photocatalysts with Remodeling Crystal Lattice, Surface, and Interface. ACS Nano 2019, 13, 98119840,  DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.9b03649
  7. 7
    UshaVipinachandran, V.; Rajendran, S.; Haroon, K. H. B.; Ashokan, I.; Mondal, A.; Bhunia, S. K. Detoxification of Endocrine Disruptors in Water Using Visible-LightActive Nanostructures: A Review. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2020, 3, 1165911687,  DOI: 10.1021/acsanm.0c02974
  8. 8
    Zhu, Q.; Xu, Z.; Qiu, B.; Xing, M.; Zhang, J. Emerging Cocatalysts on g-C3N4 for Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution. Small 2021, 17, 2101070  DOI: 10.1002/smll.202101070
  9. 9
    Yu, X.; Ng, S.; Putri, L. K.; Tan, L.; Mohamed, A. R.; Ong, W. Point-Defect Engineering: Leveraging Imperfections in Graphitic Carbon Nitride (g-C3N4) Photocatalysts toward Artificial Photosynthesis. Small 2021, 17, 2006851  DOI: 10.1002/smll.202006851
  10. 10
    Xiao, J.; Xie, Y.; Rabeah, J.; Bruckner, A.; Cao, H. Visible-Light Photocatalytic Ozonation Using Graphitic C3N4 Catalysts: A Hydroxyl Radical Manufacturer for Wastewater Treatment. Acc. Chem. Res. 2020, 53, 10241033,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.accounts.9b00624
  11. 11
    Guan, R.; Li, J.; Zhang, J.; Zhao, Z.; Wang, D.; Zhai, H.; Sun, D. Photocatalytic Performance and Mechanistic Research of ZnO/g-C3N4 on Degradation of Methyl Orange. ACS Omega 2019, 4, 2074220747,  DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.9b03129
  12. 12
    Gu, Y.; Li, S.; Li, M.; Wang, X.; Liu, Y.; Shi, K.; Bai, X.; Yao, Q.; Wu, Z.; Yao, H. Recent advances in g-C3N4-based photo-enzyme catalysts for degrading organic pollutants. RSC Adv. 2023, 13, 937947,  DOI: 10.1039/D2RA06994F
  13. 13
    Liu, R.; Chen, Z.; Yao, Y.; Li, Y.; Cheema, W. A.; Wang, D.; Zhu, S. Recent advancements in g-C3N4-based photocatalysts for photocatalytic CO2 reduction: a mini review. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 2940829418,  DOI: 10.1039/D0RA05779G
  14. 14
    Liebig, J. Uber einige stickstoff - verbindungen. Ann. Pharm. 1834, 10, 147,  DOI: 10.1002/jlac.18340100102
  15. 15
    Wang, X.; Maeda, K.; Thomas, A.; Takanabe, K.; Xin, G.; Carlsson, J. M.; Domen, K.; Antonietti, M. A metal-free polymeric photocatalyst for hydrogen production from water under visible light. Nat. Mater. 2009, 8, 7680,  DOI: 10.1038/nmat2317
  16. 16
    Hassani, A.; Faraji, M.; Eghbali, P. Facile fabrication of mpg-C3N4/Ag/ZnO nanowires/Zn photocatalyst plates for photodegradation of dye pollutant. J. Photochem. Photobiol., A 2020, 400, 112665  DOI: 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2020.112665
  17. 17
    Hassani, A.; Eghbali, P.; Metin, O. Sonocatalytic removal of methylene blue from water solution by cobalt ferrite/mesoporous graphitic carbon nitride (CoFe2O4/mpg-C3N4) nanocomposites: response surface methodology approach. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2018, 25, 3214032155,  DOI: 10.1007/s11356-018-3151-3
  18. 18
    Hassani, A.; Krishnan, S.; Scaria, J.; Eghbali, P.; Nidheesh, P. V. Z-scheme photocatalysts for visible-light-driven pollutants degradation: A review on recent advancements. Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. 2021, 25, 100941  DOI: 10.1016/j.cossms.2021.100941
  19. 19
    Ji, H.; Fan, Y.; Yan, J.; Xu, Y.; She, X.; Gu, J.; Fei, T.; Xu, H.; Li, H. Construction of SnO2/graphene-like g-C3N4 with enhanced visible light photocatalytic activity. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 3610136111,  DOI: 10.1039/C7RA05830F
  20. 20
    Putri, L. K.; Ng, B.; Ong, W.; Lee, H. W.; Chang, W. S.; Chai, S. Engineering nanoscale p–n junction via the synergetic dual-doping of p-type boron-doped graphene hybridized with n-type oxygen-doped carbon nitride for enhanced photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6, 31813194,  DOI: 10.1039/C7TA09723A
  21. 21
    Fina, F.; Callear, S. K.; Carins, G. M.; Irvine, J. T. S. Structural Investigation of Graphitic Carbon Nitride via XRD and Neutron Diffraction. Chem. Mater. 2015, 27, 26122618,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b00411
  22. 22
    Akgul, F. A.; Gumus, C.; Er, A. O.; Farha, A. H.; Akgul, G.; Ufuktepe, Y.; Liu, Z. Structural and electronic properties of SnO2. J. Alloys Compd. 2013, 579, 5056,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2013.05.057
  23. 23
    Kumar, P.; Vahidzadeh, E.; Thakur, U. K.; Kar, P.; Alam, K. M.; Goswami, A.; Mahdi, N.; Cui, K.; Bernard, G. M.; Michaelis, V. K.; Shankar, K. C3N5: A Low Bandgap Semiconductor Containing an Azo-Linked Carbon Nitride Framework for Photocatalytic, Photovoltaic and Adsorbent Applications. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 54155436,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.9b00144
  24. 24
    Wang, H.; Duan, A.; Mao, J.; Che, B.; Wang, W.; Ma, M.; Wang, Xuedong. Effects of Ionic Liquids on Fluorescence Characteristics of 17α- and 17β-estradiol. J. Fluoresc. 2013, 23, 103113,  DOI: 10.1007/s10895-012-1123-4
  25. 25
    Ohko, Y.; Iuchi, K.; Niwa, C.; Tatsuma, T.; Nakashima, T.; Iguchi, T.; Kubota, Y.; Fujishima, A. 17β-Estradiol Degradation by TiO2 Photocatalysis as a Means of Reducing Estrogenic Activity. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2002, 36, 41754181,  DOI: 10.1021/es011500a
  26. 26
    Zhao, Y.; Hu, H.; Jin, W. Transformation of Oxidation Products and Reduction of Estrogenic Activity of 17β-Estradiol by a Heterogeneous Photo-Fenton Reaction. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42, 52775284,  DOI: 10.1021/es703253q
  27. 27
    Mitamura, K.; Narukawa, H.; Mizuguchi, T.; Shimada, K. Degradation of estrogen conjugates using titanium dioxide as a photocatalyst. Anal. Sci. 2004, 20, 34,  DOI: 10.2116/analsci.20.3
  28. 28
    Zhu, D.; Zhou, Q. Nitrogen doped g-C3N4 with the extremely narrow band gap for excellent photocatalytic activities under visible light. Appl. Catal., B 2021, 281, 119474  DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.119474
  29. 29
    Reddy, C. V.; Babu, B.; Vattikuti, S. V. P.; Ravikumar, R. V. S. S. N.; Shim, J. Structural and optical properties of vanadium doped SnO2 nanoparticles with high photocatalytic activities. J. Lumin. 2016, 179, 2634,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jlumin.2016.06.036
  30. 30
    Babu, B.; Reddy, I. N.; Yoo, K.; Kim, D.; Shim, J. Bandgap tuning and XPS study of SnO2 quantum dots. Mater. Lett. 2018, 221, 211215,  DOI: 10.1016/j.matlet.2018.03.107
  31. 31
    Villamagua, L.; Stashans, A.; Lee, P.; Liu, Y.; Liu, C.; Carini, M. Change in the electrical conductivity of SnO2 crystal from n-type to p-type conductivity. Chem. Phys. 2015, 452, 7177,  DOI: 10.1016/j.chemphys.2015.03.002
  32. 32
    Zhu, B.; Cheng, B.; Zhang, L.; Yu, J. Review on DFT calculation of s-triazine-based carbon nitride. Carbon Energy 2019, 1, 3256,  DOI: 10.1002/cey2.1
  33. 33
    Feng, J.; Jiang, T.; Han, Y.; Okoth, O. K.; Cheng, L.; Zhang, J. Construction of dual Z-scheme Bi2S3/Bi2O3/WO3 ternary film with enhanced visible light photoelectrocatalytic performance. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020, 505, 144632  DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.144632

Cited By

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article has not yet been cited by other publications.

ACS Omega

Cite this: ACS Omega 2024, 9, 50, 49064–49070
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.4c03390
Published December 6, 2024

Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under

CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 .

Article Views

366

Altmetric

-

Citations

-
Learn about these metrics

Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.

  • Abstract

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. FT-IR spectra of (a) CNSnO-0 and (b) CNSnO-0.3.

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. (A) Sn 3d, (B) C 1s, (C) N 1s, (D) wide XPS spectra of CNSnO-0.3.

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. PL intensity of E2 (a) before photoirradiation, and after photoirradiation for 1 h with (b) CNSnO-0 and (c) CNSnO-0.3.

    Figure 4

    Figure 4. (A) PL intensity of E2 after photoirradiation with CNSnO-0.3 for (a) 0, (b) 0.5, (c) 1.0, and (d) 2.0 h. (B) Integrated PL intensity of E2 as a function of photoirradiation time.

    Figure 5

    Figure 5. Schematic band diagram of CNSnO composite photocatalyst to explain the photodegradation of E2.

    Figure 6

    Figure 6. ESR spectra of radical adducts trapped by DMPO (a) before and (b) after photoirradiation.

  • References


    This article references 33 other publications.

    1. 1
      Yilmaz, B.; Terekeci, H.; Sandal, S.; Kelestimur, F. Endocrine disrupting chemicals: exposure, effects on human health, mechanism of action, models for testing and strategies for prevention. Rev. Endocr. Metab. Disord. 2020, 21, 127147,  DOI: 10.1007/s11154-019-09521-z
    2. 2
      Lintelmann, J.; Katayama, A.; Kurihara, N.; Shore, L.; Wenzel, A. Endocrine disruptors in the environment (IUPAC Technical Report). Pure Appl. Chem. 2003, 75, 631681,  DOI: 10.1351/pac200375050631
    3. 3
      Peng, Y.; Wang, J.; Wu, C. Determination of Endocrine Disruption Potential of Bisphenol A Alternatives in Food Contact Materials Using In Vitro Assays: State of the Art and Future Challenges. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2019, 67, 1261312625,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.9b01543
    4. 4
      Phillips, P. J.; Chalmers, A. T.; Gray, J. L.; Kolpin, D. W.; Foreman, W. T.; Wall, G. R. Combined Sewer Overflows: An Environmental Source of Hormones and Wastewater Micropollutants. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46, 53365343,  DOI: 10.1021/es3001294
    5. 5
      Gross-Sorokin, M. Y.; Roast, S. D.; Brighty, G. C. Assessment of Feminization of Male Fish in English Rivers by the Environment Agency of England and Wales. Environ. Health Perspect. 2006, 114, 147151,  DOI: 10.1289/ehp.8068
    6. 6
      Luo, J.; Zhang, S.; Sun, M.; Yang, L.; Luo, S.; Crittenden, J. C. A Critical Review on Energy Conversion and Environmental Remediation of Photocatalysts with Remodeling Crystal Lattice, Surface, and Interface. ACS Nano 2019, 13, 98119840,  DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.9b03649
    7. 7
      UshaVipinachandran, V.; Rajendran, S.; Haroon, K. H. B.; Ashokan, I.; Mondal, A.; Bhunia, S. K. Detoxification of Endocrine Disruptors in Water Using Visible-LightActive Nanostructures: A Review. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2020, 3, 1165911687,  DOI: 10.1021/acsanm.0c02974
    8. 8
      Zhu, Q.; Xu, Z.; Qiu, B.; Xing, M.; Zhang, J. Emerging Cocatalysts on g-C3N4 for Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution. Small 2021, 17, 2101070  DOI: 10.1002/smll.202101070
    9. 9
      Yu, X.; Ng, S.; Putri, L. K.; Tan, L.; Mohamed, A. R.; Ong, W. Point-Defect Engineering: Leveraging Imperfections in Graphitic Carbon Nitride (g-C3N4) Photocatalysts toward Artificial Photosynthesis. Small 2021, 17, 2006851  DOI: 10.1002/smll.202006851
    10. 10
      Xiao, J.; Xie, Y.; Rabeah, J.; Bruckner, A.; Cao, H. Visible-Light Photocatalytic Ozonation Using Graphitic C3N4 Catalysts: A Hydroxyl Radical Manufacturer for Wastewater Treatment. Acc. Chem. Res. 2020, 53, 10241033,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.accounts.9b00624
    11. 11
      Guan, R.; Li, J.; Zhang, J.; Zhao, Z.; Wang, D.; Zhai, H.; Sun, D. Photocatalytic Performance and Mechanistic Research of ZnO/g-C3N4 on Degradation of Methyl Orange. ACS Omega 2019, 4, 2074220747,  DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.9b03129
    12. 12
      Gu, Y.; Li, S.; Li, M.; Wang, X.; Liu, Y.; Shi, K.; Bai, X.; Yao, Q.; Wu, Z.; Yao, H. Recent advances in g-C3N4-based photo-enzyme catalysts for degrading organic pollutants. RSC Adv. 2023, 13, 937947,  DOI: 10.1039/D2RA06994F
    13. 13
      Liu, R.; Chen, Z.; Yao, Y.; Li, Y.; Cheema, W. A.; Wang, D.; Zhu, S. Recent advancements in g-C3N4-based photocatalysts for photocatalytic CO2 reduction: a mini review. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 2940829418,  DOI: 10.1039/D0RA05779G
    14. 14
      Liebig, J. Uber einige stickstoff - verbindungen. Ann. Pharm. 1834, 10, 147,  DOI: 10.1002/jlac.18340100102
    15. 15
      Wang, X.; Maeda, K.; Thomas, A.; Takanabe, K.; Xin, G.; Carlsson, J. M.; Domen, K.; Antonietti, M. A metal-free polymeric photocatalyst for hydrogen production from water under visible light. Nat. Mater. 2009, 8, 7680,  DOI: 10.1038/nmat2317
    16. 16
      Hassani, A.; Faraji, M.; Eghbali, P. Facile fabrication of mpg-C3N4/Ag/ZnO nanowires/Zn photocatalyst plates for photodegradation of dye pollutant. J. Photochem. Photobiol., A 2020, 400, 112665  DOI: 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2020.112665
    17. 17
      Hassani, A.; Eghbali, P.; Metin, O. Sonocatalytic removal of methylene blue from water solution by cobalt ferrite/mesoporous graphitic carbon nitride (CoFe2O4/mpg-C3N4) nanocomposites: response surface methodology approach. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2018, 25, 3214032155,  DOI: 10.1007/s11356-018-3151-3
    18. 18
      Hassani, A.; Krishnan, S.; Scaria, J.; Eghbali, P.; Nidheesh, P. V. Z-scheme photocatalysts for visible-light-driven pollutants degradation: A review on recent advancements. Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. 2021, 25, 100941  DOI: 10.1016/j.cossms.2021.100941
    19. 19
      Ji, H.; Fan, Y.; Yan, J.; Xu, Y.; She, X.; Gu, J.; Fei, T.; Xu, H.; Li, H. Construction of SnO2/graphene-like g-C3N4 with enhanced visible light photocatalytic activity. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 3610136111,  DOI: 10.1039/C7RA05830F
    20. 20
      Putri, L. K.; Ng, B.; Ong, W.; Lee, H. W.; Chang, W. S.; Chai, S. Engineering nanoscale p–n junction via the synergetic dual-doping of p-type boron-doped graphene hybridized with n-type oxygen-doped carbon nitride for enhanced photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6, 31813194,  DOI: 10.1039/C7TA09723A
    21. 21
      Fina, F.; Callear, S. K.; Carins, G. M.; Irvine, J. T. S. Structural Investigation of Graphitic Carbon Nitride via XRD and Neutron Diffraction. Chem. Mater. 2015, 27, 26122618,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b00411
    22. 22
      Akgul, F. A.; Gumus, C.; Er, A. O.; Farha, A. H.; Akgul, G.; Ufuktepe, Y.; Liu, Z. Structural and electronic properties of SnO2. J. Alloys Compd. 2013, 579, 5056,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2013.05.057
    23. 23
      Kumar, P.; Vahidzadeh, E.; Thakur, U. K.; Kar, P.; Alam, K. M.; Goswami, A.; Mahdi, N.; Cui, K.; Bernard, G. M.; Michaelis, V. K.; Shankar, K. C3N5: A Low Bandgap Semiconductor Containing an Azo-Linked Carbon Nitride Framework for Photocatalytic, Photovoltaic and Adsorbent Applications. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 54155436,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.9b00144
    24. 24
      Wang, H.; Duan, A.; Mao, J.; Che, B.; Wang, W.; Ma, M.; Wang, Xuedong. Effects of Ionic Liquids on Fluorescence Characteristics of 17α- and 17β-estradiol. J. Fluoresc. 2013, 23, 103113,  DOI: 10.1007/s10895-012-1123-4
    25. 25
      Ohko, Y.; Iuchi, K.; Niwa, C.; Tatsuma, T.; Nakashima, T.; Iguchi, T.; Kubota, Y.; Fujishima, A. 17β-Estradiol Degradation by TiO2 Photocatalysis as a Means of Reducing Estrogenic Activity. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2002, 36, 41754181,  DOI: 10.1021/es011500a
    26. 26
      Zhao, Y.; Hu, H.; Jin, W. Transformation of Oxidation Products and Reduction of Estrogenic Activity of 17β-Estradiol by a Heterogeneous Photo-Fenton Reaction. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42, 52775284,  DOI: 10.1021/es703253q
    27. 27
      Mitamura, K.; Narukawa, H.; Mizuguchi, T.; Shimada, K. Degradation of estrogen conjugates using titanium dioxide as a photocatalyst. Anal. Sci. 2004, 20, 34,  DOI: 10.2116/analsci.20.3
    28. 28
      Zhu, D.; Zhou, Q. Nitrogen doped g-C3N4 with the extremely narrow band gap for excellent photocatalytic activities under visible light. Appl. Catal., B 2021, 281, 119474  DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.119474
    29. 29
      Reddy, C. V.; Babu, B.; Vattikuti, S. V. P.; Ravikumar, R. V. S. S. N.; Shim, J. Structural and optical properties of vanadium doped SnO2 nanoparticles with high photocatalytic activities. J. Lumin. 2016, 179, 2634,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jlumin.2016.06.036
    30. 30
      Babu, B.; Reddy, I. N.; Yoo, K.; Kim, D.; Shim, J. Bandgap tuning and XPS study of SnO2 quantum dots. Mater. Lett. 2018, 221, 211215,  DOI: 10.1016/j.matlet.2018.03.107
    31. 31
      Villamagua, L.; Stashans, A.; Lee, P.; Liu, Y.; Liu, C.; Carini, M. Change in the electrical conductivity of SnO2 crystal from n-type to p-type conductivity. Chem. Phys. 2015, 452, 7177,  DOI: 10.1016/j.chemphys.2015.03.002
    32. 32
      Zhu, B.; Cheng, B.; Zhang, L.; Yu, J. Review on DFT calculation of s-triazine-based carbon nitride. Carbon Energy 2019, 1, 3256,  DOI: 10.1002/cey2.1
    33. 33
      Feng, J.; Jiang, T.; Han, Y.; Okoth, O. K.; Cheng, L.; Zhang, J. Construction of dual Z-scheme Bi2S3/Bi2O3/WO3 ternary film with enhanced visible light photoelectrocatalytic performance. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020, 505, 144632  DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.144632
  • Supporting Information

    Supporting Information


    The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.4c03390.

    • Figure S1. Crystal structure of g-C3N4, S2. Oxidative degradation process of 17β-estradiol (E2), S3. XRD patterns of (a) CNSnO-0, (b) CNSnO-0.3 and (c) SnO2 crystal, S4. XRD pattern of g-C3N4 prepared from melamine, S5. (A) Sn 3d XPS spectrum of SnO2 powder sample. (B) C 1s and (C) O 1s XPS spectra of CNSnO-0.3, S6. FE-SEM images of (A) CNSnO-0 and (B) CNSnO-0.3, S7. TEM images of CNSnO-0.3, S8. EDS spectrum of CNSnO-0.3. N, O and Sn mapping images of CNSnO-0.3, S9. The figure with the vertical axis of Figure 4B replotted on a logarithmic scale, S10. Cycling performance of CNSnO-0.6, S11. Tauc plot of CNSnO-0, S12. Mott–Schottky plot of CNSnO-0.3, S13. PL spectra of (a) CNSnO-0 and (b) CNSnO-0.3. Table S1. XPS peak position and peak height of CNSnO-0.3 and SnO2 powder sample, S2. BET specific surface area of CNSnO samples, S3. ζ Potential of CNSnO-0 and −0.3 (PDF)


    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.