ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
Highly Sensitive Electrochemical Sensor for Anticancer Drug by a Zirconia Nanoparticle-Decorated Reduced Graphene Oxide Nanocomposite
My Activity
  • Open Access
Article

Highly Sensitive Electrochemical Sensor for Anticancer Drug by a Zirconia Nanoparticle-Decorated Reduced Graphene Oxide Nanocomposite
Click to copy article linkArticle link copied!

Open PDFSupporting Information (1)

ACS Omega

Cite this: ACS Omega 2018, 3, 11, 14597–14605
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.8b02129
Published November 1, 2018

Copyright © 2018 American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under CC-BY.

Abstract

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Because of their large surface area and conductivity, some inorganic materials have emerged as good candidates for the trace-level detection of pharmaceutical drugs. In the present work, we demonstrate the detection of an anticancer drug (regorafenib, REG) by using an electrochemical sensor based on a nanocomposite material. We synthesized a zirconia-nanoparticle-decorated reduced graphene oxide composite (ZrO2/rGO) using a one-pot hydrothermal method. Reduction of the graphene oxide supports of the Zr2+ ions with hydrazine hydrate helped in preventing the agglomeration of the zirconia nanoparticles and in obtaining an excellent electrocatalytic response of the nanostructure ZrO2/rGO-based electrochemical sensor. Structural and morphological characterization of the nanostructure ZrO2/rGO was performed using various analytical methods. A novel regorafenib (REG) electrochemical sensor was fabricated by immobilizing the as-prepared nanostructure ZrO2/rGO on to a glassy carbon electrode (GCE). The resulting ZrO2/rGO/GCE could be used for the rapid and selective determination of REG in the presence of ascorbic acid and uric acid. The ZrO2/rGO/GCE showed a linear response for the REG analysis in the dynamic range 11–343 nM, with a remarkable lower detection limit and limit of quantifications of 17 and 59 nM, respectively. The newly developed sensor was used for the accurate determination of REG in both serum samples and pharmaceutical formulations, with satisfactory results.

Copyright © 2018 American Chemical Society

Introduction

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Regorafenib [4-(4-(3-(4-chloro-3-(trifluromethyl) phenyl)-3-flurophenoxy)-N-ethylpicolinamide] (BAY 73-4506) is an orally bioavailable multikinase inhibitor (MKI), which also obstructs multiple tumor pathways, inhibiting targets in the receptors of the vascular endothelial growth factor 1–3 (VEGF 1–3), fibroblast growth factor, and platelet-derived growth factor, including the mutant oncogenic kinesis c-KIT, RET, and B-RAF. (1,2) This MKI generates dynamic metabolites, which could become agglomerated, particularly in elderly, malnourished patients or in patients treated for hepatocellular carcinoma, as in the case of other MKIs. (3) Oral drugs present high protein binding and poor bioavailability and are effectively metabolized by CYP3A4 and UGT1A9 in the liver. (4,5) Regorafenib (REG), being orally administrated, may lead to drug interactions and major toxicities that may lead to early termination of the treatment and thus diminish its chances of success. It is important to maintain the benefits of these treatments, particularly in the elderly or in patients treated for metastatic colon cancer and gastrointestinal tumors, which is approved by FDA. (6−11) The most serious adverse reaction was drug-induced hepatotoxicity, and a black box warning has been indicated by the US-FDA. (12) Thus, the detection of this anticancer active drug is extensively important and a universal challenge. Some of the sophisticated analytical methods such as high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), (13) liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS), (14−19) and spectrophotometry (20) are used for the detection of REG in urine, plasma, and other biological samples. However, the aforementioned methods are highly expensive, time-consuming, difficult procedures and require skilled personnel for the specimen, which restricts their particle application. To mitigate these issues, as revealed earlier, much effort has been made to develop novel substituted methods. In this concern, the electrochemical technique is one of the best methods due to its easy operation, spontaneous detection, excellent sensitivity, inexpensiveness, simple pretreatment procedure, and short analysis time for monitoring of bioelectroactive molecules and pharmaceutical drugs. However, for the detection of bioelectroactive molecules, these electrochemical methods have some analytical complications like high overpotential requirement, the reversible process at the bare and carbon paste electrode, GCE, and by-products that may be deposited on the electrode surface, which decrease its activity. Nevertheless, a familiar approach to triumph over these issues is electrodes’ surface modification with various materials, like polymers, (21−23) carbon materials, and metal-oxide nanoparticles. (24−27)
For the last few decades, graphene oxide (GO) and reduced graphene oxide (rGO) have received significant interest owing to their excellent properties in electrochemical applications, such as good electric conductivity, large surface area, high chemical activity, and wide electrochemical window. (28,29) Moreover, chemically, rGO is established as a promising supporting material for the uniform distribution of metal-oxide NPs. (30−34)
In recent years, various metal-oxide-doped graphene oxide composites have been widely used in electrochemical devices and electrocatalysis. Metal oxides, particularly, transition-metal oxides have various physicochemical properties, such as morphological structure, oxygen stoichiometry, good electrochemical conductivity, and interfacial microenvironment of the reaction. Among the transition-metal oxides, zirconium oxide nanoparticles (ZrO2 NPs) show excellent electrochemical properties, including nontoxicity, thermal stability, wide band gap, and good electrical and surface properties and are one of the most abundant metals. (35,36) A critical issue in utilizing bare ZrO2 nanoparticles is that they tend to aggregate and form large clusters during their synthesis. (37,38) In this connection, rGO is an excellent material to mitigate the agglomeration of ZrO2 NPs and subsequently enhance the electrochemical properties. Therefore, researchers have been giving dedicated extensive efforts to synthesize and explore ZrO2 decorated on rGO sheets, for example, Pt/ZrO2-RGO/GCE for significant enhancement of the catechol and hydroquinone oxidation, (39) ZrO2/rGO-based biosensor for detection of the oral cancer drug, (40) and Meth/ZrO2/rGO-based immunosensor. (41)
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first example of electrochemical REG sensing in human blood serum and pharmaceutical formulations using ZrO2/rGO/GCE. In this work, we tried to validate such a voltammetric sensor for the detection of REG. The prepared ZrO2/rGO/GCE can resolve overlapping signals from REG, uric acid (UA), and ascorbic acid (AA). In addition, the present work showed that this sensor possesses an excellent linear dynamic range (LDR) and limit of detection (LOD) for the novel REG determination (Scheme 1).

Scheme 1

Scheme 1. Synthesis of the ZrO2/rGO Nanocomposite for the Electrochemical Sensing of REG

Results and Discussion

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Characterization of the ZrO2/rGO Nanocomposite

Transmission electron microscopy (TEM), high-resolution TEM (HRTEM), and selected area electron diffraction (SAED) analyses were conducted to examine the morphology and structure of the synthesized nanocomposite. The TEM images of the pristine ZrO2, GO, and ZrO2/rGO nanocomposite are shown in Figure 1. Pristine ZrO2 nanoparticles (Figure 1a) are nearly spherical with a uniform size of size of 6–9 nm, which is in good agreement with the calculated values based on the powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) result. Moreover, the displaced-lattice spacing of 0.291 nm, determined from the HRTEM images (blue circles in Figure 1b) is consistent with the (111) plane of ZrO2. The pristine GO nanosheets are highly wrinkled, and the ZrO2 nanoparticles (blue circles) are well decorated and uniformly distributed on the surface of the wrinkled rGO (Figure 1d–f). The SAED patterns for ZrO2 (Figure 1c) and the ZrO2/rGO nanocomposite shown in Figure 1f (inset) illustrate the crystalline dots instead of amorphous rings, which indicate the polycrystalline nature of the ZrO2 nanoparticles and nanocomposite. To further confirm the formation of the nanocomposition, energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) analysis was employed. The presence of carbon, zirconium, and oxygen elements confirms the presence of ZrO2 on to the GO surface (Figure S3).

Figure 1

Figure 1. TEM, HRTEM, and SAED images of (a–c) pristine ZrO2 and (d–f) ZrO2/rGO nanocomposite.

The phase purities of the as-synthesized GO and the ZrO2/rGO nanocomposite were examined using PXRD. Figure S4a shows a diffraction peak at 2θ = 10.7°, corresponding to the (001) planes of GO. The peaks of the ZrO2/rGO nanocomposite, in Figure S4b, show the existence of both tetragonal and monoclinic mixed phases, which coincide with the standard cards (JCPDS card nos. 49-1642 and 37-1484, respectively) and also show that the peak at 2θ = 10.7°, in Figure S4a, has shifted to 22.4° (002), indicating that GO has been reduced after treating it with the ZrO2 nanoparticles. In addition, the particle size of the ZrO2 nanoparticles was calculated using the Debye–Scherrer equation (D = 0.89λ/β cos θ), where D, λ, β, and θ are the average particle size, wavelength of the Cu Kα irradiation, intensity at the full width at half-maximum of the diffraction peak, and diffraction angle of the (111). The average particle size of pristine ZrO2 is about 7 nm, in good agreement with the TEM result. These results clearly confirm the formation of the ZrO2/rGO nanocomposite.
The Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectra of the GO and ZrO2/rGO samples were recorded at wave numbers 500–4000 cm–1. Pristine GO has a large number of surface functional groups, as shown in Figure S5a, such as O–H, C═O, C═C, and C–O, which are confirmed by the IR bands at 3320, 1700, 1604, and 1009 cm–1, respectively. In the ZrO2/rGO sample shown in Figure S5b, the hydroxyl, carbonyl and epoxide functional groups had disappeared and also overall peak intensities decreased significantly, which confirm reduction of pristine GO leads to the formation of ZrO2/rGO nanocomposite.
The chemical composition was further confirmed by X-ray photoelectron spectrometry (XPS). The wide-survey scan spectrum of the ZrO2-doped rGO nanocomposite (ZrO2/rGO) is shown in Figure S6. The major peaks at 182.5, 284.9, and 530.2 eV are attributed to Zr 4p, C 1s, and O 1s, respectively. In addition, the peaks at 27, 333, and 433 eV attributed to Zr 4p, Zr 3p, and Zr 3s, respectively. The deconvolution spectrum of the Zr 3d peak, Figure S6 (inset), shows binding energies at 182.4 and 184.9 eV attributed to Zr 3d5/2 and Zr 3d3/2, respectively, which can be assigned to the Zr(IV) oxidation state. On the basis of these results, we confirmed that ZrO2 is well embedded into the wrinkled rGO.

Electrochemical Behavior of REG

Figure 2 shows the cyclic voltammograms for the electrocatalytic oxidation of REG on the bare and modified GCE electrodes, recorded in the supporting electrolyte solution (phosphate buffered saline (PBS) 0.1 M, pH 7.0) in the presence of 0.01 mM REG at 50 mV s–1. The voltammograms recorded on the bare GCE in the absence of REG did not show any redox peaks (Figure 2a), indicating that no faradic reactions occurred on the surface of the unmodified GCE electrode. Figure 2b shows that the addition of 0.01 mM REG to the supporting electrolyte solution results in the GCE exhibiting a lowest sensitivity reversible couple peak of high separation; ΔEp = 208 mV, which suggests a slow electron transfer. Figure 2c,d shows the recognizable electrochemical response of the ZrO2/GCE and ZrO2/rGO/GCE, respectively, during the oxidation of 0.01 mM REG, which is interpreted as a result of the enhanced sensitivity, electrode surface area, and improvement of the electrochemical activity of the GO support with ZrO2 NPs. Figure 2d shows the ZrO2/rGO/GCE and reveals well-defined reversible couple peaks at about Epa = 275 mV and Epc = 306 mV, attributed to the high catalytic effect during the oxidation of 0.1 mM REG. The ZrO2/rGO/GCE remarkably improved the reversible couple peaks and it should be emphasized that the peak-to-peak separation, that is ΔEp, decreased to 31 mV. Finally, the results confirmed that the prepared ZrO2/rGO/GCE significantly improves the electrocatalytic ability to oxidize REG.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Cyclic voltammograms recorded in 0.1 M PBS, pH 7.0, at the scan rate of 100 mV s–1 (a) blank and bare GCE electrode without REG, (b) bare GCE in the presence of 0.01 mM REG, (c) ZrO2-modified GC electrode in the presence of 0.01 mM REG, and (d) ZrO2/rGO/GCE in the presence of 0.01 mM REG.

Effect of pH

The significant effects of the electrolyte pH on the determination of REG by electrocatalysis of ZrO2/rGO/GCE were studied for both current and potential. Figure 3 shows the effect of different pH values, in the range 5.5–8.0, investigated by differential pulse voltammetry (DPV) in a 0.01 mM REG solution and the relationship between Ipa and Epa (anionic peak current and potential, respectively) with the buffer pH. Figure 3b shows that the anodic peak current of the REG electro-oxidation increases until the pH value becomes 7.0 and then decreases until the end of the experiment (pH 8.0). For this reason, the electrolytic solution with pH 7.0 was chosen for the complete electrocatalytic study. Figure 3b also shows that the formal REG potential shifts toward lower values with the increase in the supporting electrolytic solution. A better correlation coefficient was obtained for the pH vs Epa, which was confirmed by a slope of 0.053 09 V/pH (R2 = 0.9621), in the range 5.5–8.0. According to the linear regression analysis, the slope of the dEp/dpH being close to the theoretical value of 0.059 V/pH indicates that the irreversible couple peaks involved the transfer of the same number of electrons and protons, (42) in agreement with literature data. (43) The ZrO2/rGO/GCE responds to the oxidation of REG according to the mechanism presented in Scheme 2. Thus, REG-keto oxidizes to REG-enol (the amide derivative) after an exchange of one electron and one proton via ZrO2/rGO nanocomposite. (36)

Figure 3

Figure 3. (a) DPV voltammograms obtained with the ZrO2/rGO/GCE in an electrolyte solution at different pH values, with 0.01 mM REG. (b) Calibration plot of the anodic peak current (curve-I) and the anodic peak potential (curve-II) vs the pH of the 0.1 M PBS solution, during the electro-oxidation of 0.01 mM REG, at a scan rate of 100 mV s–1.

Scheme 2

Scheme 2. Electrochemical Redox Process of REG by ZrO2/rGO/GCE

Influence of the Scan Rate

Figure 4a shows the influence of the scan rate, from 10 to 100 mV s–1, on the cyclic voltammetry (CV) peak potential and current of 0.01 mM REG in the presence of 0.1 M PBS, pH 7.0, at the ZrO2/rGO/GCE. The REG reversible couple peak current increases gradually with an increase in the scan rate. In addition, the REG oxidation and reduction peak currents (Ipa and Ipc) showed good linear correlation coefficients (R2) as a function of the square root of the scan rates of the anodic and cathodic peaks with 10–100 mV s–1 changing scan rates (Figure 4b), obeying the following linear regression equations
These results indicate that the electrochemical reactions of REG on the ZrO2/rGO/GCE are diffusion-controlled processes. The estimation of the REG electrochemical parameters, at different scan rates, was made with Laviron’s eqs 13. (44)
(1)
(2)
(3)
where α is the electron transfer coefficient (0.76), n is the number of electrons, F is the Faraday constant (96 485 C mol–1), R and T are the universal gas constant and temperature (K), respectively, and ks is the standard heterogeneous rate constant (1.18) determining the slowest step of the REG electrochemical oxidation.

Figure 4

Figure 4. (a) Cyclic voltammograms recorded at the ZrO2/rGO/GCE in the electrolyte solution at different scan rates from 10 to 100 mV s–1. (b) Calibration plot of the anodic and cathode peak currents versus the square root of the scan rate, during the electro-oxidation of 0.01 mM REG in the presence of 0.1 M PBS, pH 7.0.

Analytical Performance of ZrO2/rGO/GCE for REG Detection

The ZrO2/rGO/GCE was tested by differential pulse voltammetry (DPV), to investigate the sensitivity of its response to various REG concentrations in the linear dynamic range of 11–343 nM REG in 0.1 M PBS, pH 7.0, at pulse height 60, pulse width 10, and scan rate 100 mV s–1, as shown in Figure 5a. The intensity of the anodic peak current increased with the REG concentration. Figure 5b shows the linear dynamic-range plotting of the anodic peak current (Ipa) versus the REG concentrations and its linear regression equation Ipa = 9.4911(REG) + 3.434, (R2 = 0.9963). The limits of detection and quantification can be calculated according to eqs 4 and 5 (45,46)
(4)
(5)
where SD is the standard deviation and B is the slope of the calibration plot. From the calibration plot, a detection limit of 11 nM and quantification limit of 59 nM were calculated, on the basis of S/N = 3 (signal to noise). These results confirmed that the ZrO2/rGO/GCE is a promising platform for the electrochemical determination of ultratrace of REG concentration.

Figure 5

Figure 5. (a) Differential pulse voltammograms recorded at the ZrO2/rGO/GCE over an REG concentration of 11–343 nM in 0.1 M PBS at pH 7.0. (b) Linear calibration plot of the anodic peak current versus REG concentration.

Simultaneous Detection of REG, AA, and UA by ZrO2/rGO/GCE

The main objective of this study was sensing of REG, AA, and UA in a mixture. REG, AA, and UA mixture solution with different concentrations in 0.1 M PBS with pH 7 was prepared. DPV result for the simultaneous detection of REG, AA, and UA is presented in Figure 6. The oxidation peak current increased synchronously on increasing the concentration of REG, AA, and UA. The DPV signal shows the linear relationship between the oxidation peak current and REG concentrations (Figure 6 inset) with LDR 0.32–0.66 μM and the linear regression equation as follows: Ipa (μA) = 15.46CREG + 0.5232 (μM) (R2 = 0.9943). The oxidation current increased parallel AA and UA concentrations with LDRs 0.58–1.26 and 0.08–0.52 μM, respectively, and the linear regression equations as follows: Ipa (μA) = 3.92CAA + 2.417 (μM) (R2 = 0.9749) and Ipa (μA) = 15.85CUA + 4.97 (μM) (R2 = 0.9795). This result indicated that the proposed electrochemical sensor enables the synergetic and sensitive detection of REG in the presence of AA and UA without significant interference from each other.

Figure 6

Figure 6. DPVs recorded on the ZrO2/rGO/GCE during simultaneous determination of 0.32–0.66 μM REG, 0.58–1.26 μM AA, and 0.08–0.52 μM UA in 0.1 M PBS, pH 7.0. Insets: plots of the anodic peak currents against concentrations of REG, AA, and UA.

Effect of Interference Compounds

The effect of interferences for the determination of REG, AA, and UA mixture solution was investigated in 0.1 M PBS (pH 7.0) electrolyte solution in the presence of a possible interfering factor such as metal ions (Ca2+, Mg2+, and Zn2+), glutathione, folic acid, or l-cysteine. The observed results are summarized in Table S1. No significant signal intensity change (less than 5% difference from their original signal intensity) was observed in the presence of interfering ions and molecules. The results indicate that the designed ZrO2/rGO/GCE displays good ability for simultaneous sensing of AA, UA, and REG in a matrix mixture, without any interference of the above-mentioned species.

Real-Sample Analysis

The real-sample monitoring of the performance of the ZrO2/rGO/GCE was validated by the DPV determination of REG in human blood serum samples. To determine the accuracy of the results, 1.0 mL human blood serum samples were diluted 50 times with PBS to prevent the matrix effects of analytical determinations. The human blood serum samples were centrifuged before the measurements; the results are summarized in Table 1. The recovery rates for the different volumes of the samples ranged between 96.5 and 101.9% and the relative standard deviations were in the range 0.3–2.4%, showing the accuracy and efficiency of the constructed electrochemical sensor. Therefore, the ZrO2/rGO/GCE can be applied to real bioclinical samples.
Table 1. Real-Sample Analysis of REG Using the Proposed Method by Triplicate (n = 3) Readings
samplesspiked sample (mM)found (mM)recovery (%)RSD (%) ±SE
pharmaceutical formulation0.0100.0098982.54 ± 0.05
0.0500.0509101.81.98 ± 0.08
0.1000.0990991.32 ± 0.06
blood serum0.0100.0098982.42 ± 0.11
0.0500.048697.21.65 ± 0.07
0.1000.1026102.61.09 ± 0.05

Comparison with Other Established Methods

The sensitivity of the developed electroanalytical method was compared to that of some of the chromatography and spectrophotometry methods. Recently, Fujita et al., reported one method using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) for simultaneous quantitative determination of REG in the human plasma and achieved LOQ of 10 ng mL–1. In addition, Erp et al., reported liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) can achieve LOQ of 100 ng mL–1 for REG. The other spectroscopic method can analyze REG with an LOQ of 290 ng mL–1. Compared with the reported methods, the presented method shows a better limit of detection and limit of quantification limit (Table 2). Due to its low cost, simplicity, high sensitivity, and rapid analysis time, the presented method has advantages over the other analytical methods.
Table 2. Comparison of the Electroanalytical Method with Reported Analytical Techniques
methodLDR (ng mL–1)LOD (ng mL–1)LOQ (ng mL–1)refs
HPLC10–10 000 10.0 (13)
LC-MS/MS25–25 000 25.0 (14)
LC-MS/MS100–4000 100 (15)
spectrophotometric method500–25 000110290 (20)
electroanalytical method1.5–107 (11–343 nM)5.00 (17 nM)18.5 (59 nM)present work

Conclusions

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Inorganic metal-oxide nanoparticles have been enormously employed as electrode material for a developed efficient electrochemical sensor. A simple one-pot hydrothermal synthesis of ZrO2/rGO nanocomposite was successfully synthesized. The pristine ZrO2 nanoparticles are about 7 nm and uniformly dispersed on the reduced graphene oxide sheet. Due to reduced graphene oxide support, the ZrO2 metal-oxide nanoparticles illustrate excellent electrocatalytic performance toward REG anticancer drug. The developed ZrO2/rGO nanocomposite was characterized by TEM, EDX, PXRD, FT-IR, and XPS measurements. TEM images clearly show the zirconia nanoparticles have uniform size and uniform distribution on the surface of rGO. The inorganic nanocomposite-based electrochemical sensor was successfully applied first time for the detection of REG anticancer drug. The fabricated ZrO2/rGO nanocomposite exhibited an excellent electrocatalytic activity toward REG, with a linear dynamic range of 11–343 nM and the detection limit as low as 17 nM toward the detection of REG drug. The ZrO2/rGO/GCE was applicable for the joint determination of REG and a commonly reported interference AA and UA at pH 7.0. The calculated LOD/LOQ values by the present electrochemical method are better than those from chromatography and spectrophotometry methods. This electrochemical sensor shows promise for future exploration of rapid detection of other anticancer drugs in human blood serum and pharmaceutical formulation.

Experimental Section

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Modification of the Glassy Carbon Electrode

Preparation of the ZrO2/rGO/GCE: prior to use, the bare GCE was polished with alumina powder (1, 0.3, and 0.05 μm) and washed with an ethanol solution, followed by Millipore water under ultrasonication. For the preparation of the electrochemical sensor, 3 mg of the prepared ZrO2/rGO was dispersed in 3 mL of Millipore water with 0.3 mL of Nafion solution and then ultrasonicated for 30 min until a uniformly dispersed ink was obtained. The ZrO2/rGO ink (7 μL) was drop cast onto the clean GCE surface and allowed to dry for 15 min at room temperature. The ZrO2/GCE was fabricated in a similar manner.

Reproducibility and Stability of the Modified Electrode

Reproducibility and stability are key elements for electrode performance. To evaluate the reproducibility of the ZrO2/rGO/GCE, we made five sensing electrodes and used them to investigate their CV current response on 1 μM REG in phosphate buffered saline (PBS), pH 7.0, as shown in Figure S1a. The calibrated histograms in Figure S1b show a relatively standard deviation (RSD) of 0.54%. The repeatability of the modified electrochemical sensor values was obtained for the detection of 1 μM REG in presence of the supporting electrolyte, PBS (pH 7.0). The ZrO2/rGO/GCE average voltammetric response for seven successive determinations was 3.34% (Figure S2a). Moreover, the stability of the ZrO2/rGO/GCE was verified by the daily detection for 7 weeks of 1 μM REG solution in presence of the supporting PBS electrolyte (pH 7.0). After each test of stability, the electrode was washed with deionized water, dried under an argon stream, and kept in empty glass tubes at room temperature. The electrochemical oxidation of the 1 μM REG solution, in presence of the supporting PBS electrolyte (pH 7.0), using the ZrO2/rGO/GCE diminished by about 9.6% of their initial response during the 7 weeks, as shown in Figure S2b. Hence, the proposed method and the modified electrochemical sensor determined REG with higher reproducibility and stability than the ZrO2/GCE sensor.

Preparation of Real Samples for Analysis

A powdered Stivarga tablet (Nexus Lifecare Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai, India) containing 40 mg of REG was dissolved by ultrasonication in 25 mL of 0.1 M PBS buffer solution at pH 7.0. This solution was filtered and quantitatively diluted with buffer solution to get 0.1 mM REG solution that was used for the analyses. Fresh human blood serum samples were collected from healthy volunteers (S. V. University Health Center, S. V. University, Tirupati, India). Approximately, 2.0 mL of human blood serum was diluted with 100 mL of 0.1 M PBS, at pH 7.0, and the solution thus prepared was used for analysis, without any further treatment.

Supporting Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.8b02129.

  • Cyclic voltammogram, EDS data, FT-IR, materials and methods, XPS analysis, XRD, and interferences of some foreign species (PDF)

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Author Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

  • Corresponding Authors
    • Vinod Kumar Gupta - Department of Applied Chemistry, University of Johannesburg, P.O. Box 524, Auckland Park 2006, South AfricaDepartment of Biological Sciences, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia Email: [email protected]
    • Minyoung Yoon - Department of Nanochemistry and , Gachon University, Sungnam 13120, Republic of KoreaOrcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0001-7436-6273 Email: [email protected]
    • Gajulapalli Madhavi - Electrochemical Research Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, Sri Venkateswara University, Tirupati 517502, India Email: [email protected]
  • Authors
    • Manthrapudi Venu - Electrochemical Research Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, Sri Venkateswara University, Tirupati 517502, India
    • Sada Venkateswarlu - Department of Nanochemistry and , Gachon University, Sungnam 13120, Republic of Korea
    • Yenugu Veera Manohara Reddy - Electrochemical Research Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, Sri Venkateswara University, Tirupati 517502, IndiaOrcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0001-8699-922X
    • Ankireddy Seshadri Reddy - Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering and , Gachon University, Sungnam 13120, Republic of KoreaOrcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-0395-3515
  • Author Contributions

    The manuscript was written through contributions of all authors. All authors have given approval to the final version of the manuscript.

    M.V. and S.V. contributed equally in this work.

    Author Contributions

    The manuscript was written through contributions of all authors. All authors have given approval to the final version of the manuscript.

    M.V. and S.V. contributed equally in this work.

  • Notes
    The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Acknowledgments

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Mr. Manthrapudi Venu is grateful to the UGC Letter No. F. 25-1/2013-14 (BSR)/7-187/2007 (BSR) dated: 19-11-2014 from Government of India, New Delhi, for providing financial assistance in the form of an award of Research Fellowships in Science for meritorious students (RFSMS). This work was also supported by a National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT (NRF-2017R1C1B5076834, S.V. and NRF-2018M2A2A6A01057259, M.Y.)

Abbreviations

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

AA

ascorbic acid

CV

cyclic voltammetry

DPV

differential pulse voltammetry

EDX

energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy

FT-IR

Fourier transform infrared

GCE

glassy carbon electrode

HRTEM

high-resolution transmission electron microscopy

LOD

lower detection limit

LOQ

limit of quantifications

REG

regorafenib

rGO

reduced graphene oxide

SAED

selected area electron diffraction pattern

TEM

transmission electron microscopy

UA

uric acid

XPS

X-ray photoelectron spectrometry

XRD

X-ray diffraction

ZrO2 NPs

zirconium oxide nanoparticles

References

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article references 46 other publications.

  1. 1
    Chen, D.; Wei, L.; Yu, J.; Zhang, L. Regorafenib Inhibits Colorectal Tumor Growth Through Puma-Mediated Apoptosis. Clin. Cancer Res. 2014, 20, 34723484,  DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-2944
  2. 2
    Wilhelm, S. M.; Dumas, J.; Adnane, L.; Lynch, M.; Carter, C. A.; Schutz, G.; Thierauch, K. H.; Zopf, D. Regorafenib (bay 73-4506): A New Oral Multikinase Inhibitor of Angiogenic, Stromal and Oncogenic Receptor Tyrosine Kinases with Potent Preclinical Antitumor Activity. Int. J. Cancer 2011, 129, 245255,  DOI: 10.1002/ijc.25864
  3. 3
    Di Gion, P.; Kanefendt, F.; Lindauer, A.; Scheffler, M.; Doroshyenko, O.; Fuhr, U.; Wolf, J.; Jaehde, U. Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors: Focus on Pyrimidines, Pyridines, and Pyrroles. Clin. Pharmacokinet. 2011, 50, 551603,  DOI: 10.2165/11593320-000000000-00000
  4. 4
    Josephs, D. H.; Fisher, D. S.; Spicer, J.; Flanagan, R. Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors: Implications for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring. Ther. Drug Monit. 2013, 35, 562587,  DOI: 10.1097/FTD.0b013e318292b931
  5. 5
    Ly, J. Q.; Messick, K.; Qin, A.; Takahashi, R. H.; Choo, E. F. Utility of CYP3A4 and PXR-CAR-CYP3A4/3A7 Transgenic Mouse Models to Assess the Magnitude of CYP3A4 Mediated Drug–Drug Interactions. Mol. Pharmaceutics 2017, 14, 17541759,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.7b00006
  6. 6
    Cheng, A. L.; Kang, Y. K.; Lin, D. Y.; Park, J. W.; Kudo, M.; Qin, S.; Chung, H. C.; Song, X.; Xu, J.; Poggi, G.; Omata, M.; Pitman Lowenthal, S.; Lanzalone, S.; Yang, L.; Lechuga, M. J.; Raymond, E. Sunitinib Versus Sorafenib in Advanced Hepatocellular Cancer: Results of a Randomized Phase III Trial. J. Clin. Oncol. 2013, 31, 40674075,  DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2012.45.8372
  7. 7
    Cheng, A. L.; Kang, Y. K.; Chen, A. L.; Tsao, Z.; Qin, C. J.; Kim, S.; Luo, J. S.; Feng, R.; Ye, J.; Yang, S.; Xu, T. S.; Sun, J.; Liang, Y.; Liu, H.; Wang, J.; Tak, J.; Pan, W. Y.; Burock, H.; Zou, K.; Voliotis, J.; Guan, D. Z. Efficacy, and Safety of Sorafenib in Patients in the Asia-Pacific Region with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Phase III Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial. Lancet Oncol. 2009, 10, 2534,  DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70285-7
  8. 8
    Hutson, T. E.; Escudier, B.; Esteban, E.; Bjarnason, G. A.; Lim, H. Y.; Pittman, K. B.; Senico, P.; Niethammer, A.; Lu, D. R.; Hariharan, S.; Motzer, R. J. Randomized Phase III Trial of Temsirolimus versus Sorafenib as Second-Line Therapy after Sunitinib in Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma. J. Clin. Oncol. 2014, 32, 760767,  DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2013.50.3961
  9. 9
    Grothey, A.; Van Cutsem, E.; Sobrero, A.; Siena, S.; Falcone, A.; Ychou, M.; Humblet, Y.; Bouché, O.; Mineur, L.; Barone, C.; Adenis, A.; Tabernero, J.; Yoshino, T.; Lenz, H. J.; Goldberg, R. M.; Sargent, D. J.; Cihon, F.; Cupit, L.; Wagner, A.; Laurent, D. Correct Study Group, Regorafenib Monotherapy for Previously Treated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (Correct): An International, Multicentre, Randomised, Placebo-Controlled, Phase III Trial. Lancet 2013, 381, 303312,  DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61900-X
  10. 10
    Escudier, B.; Eisen, T.; Stadle, W. M.; Szczylik, C.; Oudard, S.; Siebels, M.; Negrier, S.; Chevreau, C.; Solska, E.; Desai, A. A. Sorafenib in Advanced Clear-Cell Renal-Cell Carcinoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2007, 356, 125134,  DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa060655
  11. 11
    Mross, K.; Frost, A.; Steinbild, S.; Hedbom, S.; Buchert, M.; Fasol, U.; Unger, C.; Kratzschmar, J.; Heinig, R.; Boix, O.; Christensen, O. A Phase I Dose-Escalation Study of Regorafenib (BAY 73–4506), an Inhibitor of Oncogenic, Angiogenic, and Stromal Kinases, in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors. Clin. Cancer Res. 2012, 18, 26582667,  DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-1900
  12. 12
    Crona, D. J.; Keisler, M. D.; Walko, C. M. Regorafenib: A Novel Multitargeted Tyrosinekinase Inhibitor for Colorectal Cancer and Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors. Ann. Pharmacother. 2013, 47, 16851696,  DOI: 10.1177/1060028013509792
  13. 13
    Fujita, K.; Miura, M.; Shibata, H. Quantitative Determination of Regorafenib and its Two Major Metabolites in Human Plasma with High-Performance Liquid Chromatography and Ultraviolet Detection. Biomed. Chromatogr. 2016, 30, 16111617,  DOI: 10.1002/bmc.3730
  14. 14
    Luethi, D.; Durmus, S.; Schinkel, A. H.; Schellens, J. H. M.; Beijnen, J. H.; Sparidans, R. W. Liquid Chromatography–Tandem Mass Spectrometric Assay for the Multikinase Inhibitor Regorafenib in Plasma. Biomed. Chromatogr. 2014, 28, 13661370,  DOI: 10.1002/bmc.3176
  15. 15
    van Erp, N. P.; Wit, D. D.; Guchelaar, H. J.; Gelderblom, H.; Hessing, T. J.; Hartigh, J. D. A Validated Assay for the Simultaneous Quantification of Six Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors and Two Active Metabolites in Human Serum Using Liquid Chromatography Coupled with Tandem Mass Spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. B 2013, 937, 3343,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2013.08.013
  16. 16
    Hafner, F.-T.; Werner, D.; Kaiser, M. Determination of Regorafenib (Bay 73- 4506) and its Major Human Metabolites Bay 75-7495 (M-2) and Bay 81-8752 (M-5) in Human Plasma by Stable-Isotope Dilution Liquid Chromatography–Tandem Ms. Bioanalysis 2014, 6, 19231937,  DOI: 10.4155/bio.14.52
  17. 17
    Merienne, C.; Rousset, M.; Ducint, D.; Castaing, N.; Titier, K.; Molimard, M.; Bouchet, S. High Throughput Routine Determination of 17 Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors by LC-MS/MS. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2018, 150, 112120,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2017.11.060
  18. 18
    Pang, Y. Y.; Tan, Y. L.; Ho, H. K. Investigation of the Effect of Plasma Albumin Levels on Regorafenib-Induced Hepatotoxicity Using A Validated Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry Method. J. Chromatogr. B 2017, 1061–1062, 220224,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2017.07.023
  19. 19
    Allard, M.; Khoudour, N.; Rousseau, B.; Joly, C.; Costentin, C.; Blanchet, B.; Tournigand, C.; Hulin, A. Simultaneous Analysis of Regorafenib and Sorafenib and Three of their Metabolites in Human Plasma Using LC–MS/MS. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2017, 142, 4248,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2017.04.053
  20. 20
    Albayrak, M. Development and Validation of a New Spectrophotometric Method for the Determination of Regorafenib in Pure and Tablet Dosage Form. Lat. Am. J. Pharm. 2018, 37, 13491353
  21. 21
    Ma, Z.; Chen, P.; Cheng, W.; Yan, K.; Pan, L.; Shi, Y.; Guihua, Y. Highly Sensitive, Printable Nanostructured Conductive Polymer Wireless Sensor for Food Spoilage Detection. Nano Lett. 2018, 18, 45704575,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b01825
  22. 22
    Ngo, Y. H.; Brothers, M.; Martin, J. A.; Grigsby, C. C.; Fullerton, K.; Naik, R. R.; Kim, S. S. Chemically Enhanced Polymer-Coated Carbon Nanotube Electronic Gas Sensor for Isopropyl Alcohol Detection. ACS Omega 2018, 3, 62306236,  DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.8b01039
  23. 23
    Hou, H.; Tingting, X.; Yang, W.; Shengjun, L.; Chu, R.; Zhang, J.; Liu, B. Conductive and Chiral Polymer-Modified Metal–Organic Framework for Enantioselective Adsorption and Sensing. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 2636526371,  DOI: 10.1021/acsami.8b06540
  24. 24
    Reddy, Y. V. M.; Sravani, B.; Fernandes, D. M.; Madhuri, Ch.; Subramanyam Sarma, L.; Madhavi, G. Facile One-Pot Synthesis of Bimetallic Pd-Ag/Reduced Graphene Oxide Nanocomposite as an Electrochemical Sensor for Sensitive Detection of Antihypotensive Drug. Colloids Surf., A 2018, 546, 293300,  DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2018.03.032
  25. 25
    Reddy, Y. V. M.; Bathinapatla, S.; Łuczak, T.; Osinska, M.; Maseed, H.; Ragavendhra, P.; Sarma, L. S.; Srikanth, V. V. S. S.; Madhavi, G. An Ultra-Sensitive Electrochemical Sensor for the Detection of Acetaminophen in the Presence of Etilefrine using Bimetallic Pd–Ag/Reduced Graphene Oxide Nanocomposites. New J. Chem. 2018, 42, 31373146,  DOI: 10.1039/C7NJ04775D
  26. 26
    Reddy, Y. V. M.; Sravani, B.; Agarwal, S.; Guptha, V. K.; Madhavi, G. Electrochemical Sensor for Detection of Uric acid in the Presence of Ascorbic acid and Dopamine Using the Poly (Dpa)/Sio2@Fe3o4 Modified Carbon Paste Electrode. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2018, 820, 16875,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2018.04.059
  27. 27
    Sağlam, Ş.; Aysem, U. Z.; Erol, E.; Resat, A. Electrochemical Determination of TNT, DNT, RDX, and HMX with Gold Nanoparticles/Poly (Carbazole-Aniline) Film-Modified Glassy Carbon Sensor Electrodes Imprinted for Molecular Recognition of Nitroaromatics and Nitramines. Anal. Chem. 2018, 90, 73647370,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b00715
  28. 28
    Li, L.; Chen, M.; Huang, G.; Yang, N.; Zhang, L.; Wang, H.; Liu, Y.; Wang, W.; Gao, J. A Green Method to Prepare Pd–Ag Nanoparticles Supported on Reduced Graphene Oxide and Their Electrochemical Catalysis of Methanol and Ethanol Oxidation. J. Power Sources 2014, 263, 1321,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.04.021
  29. 29
    Mazloum-Ardakani, M.; Hosseinzadeh, L.; Taleat, Z. Synthesis and Electrocatalytic Effect of Ag@Pt Core–Shell Nanoparticles Supported on Reduced Graphene Oxide for Sensitive and Simple Label-Free Electrochemical Aptasensor. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2015, 74, 3036,  DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2015.05.072
  30. 30
    Sawangphruk, M.; Srimuk, P.; Chio-chan, P.; Krittayavathananon, A.; Luanwuthi, S.; Limtrakul, J. Limtrakul. the High-Performance Supercapacitor of Manganese Oxide/Reduced Graphene Oxide Nanocomposite Coated on Flexible Carbon Fiber Paper. Carbon 2013, 60, 109116,  DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2013.03.062
  31. 31
    Jayakumar, K.; Camarada, M. B.; Venkataraman, D.; Rajendiran, R.; Rengarajan, V.; Huangxian, J.; Mahalingam, M.; Abhishek, R.; Sudipta, R. B.; Yangping, W. Layer-by-Layer-Assembled AuNPs-Decorated First-Generation Poly (amidoamine) Dendrimer with Reduced Graphene Oxide Core as Highly Sensitive Biosensing Platform with Controllable 3D Nanoarchitecture for Rapid Voltammetric Analysis of Ultratrace DNA Hybridization. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 2154121555,  DOI: 10.1021/acsami.8b03236
  32. 32
    Karthik, P.; Vinoth, R.; Zhang, P.; Wonyong, C.; Balaraman, E.; Neppolian, B. π–π Interaction Between Metal–Organic Framework and Reduced Graphene Oxide for Visible-Light Photocatalytic H2 Production. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2018, 1, 19131923,  DOI: 10.1021/acsaem.7b00245
  33. 33
    Srinivasan, V.; Mariadoss, A. J.; Kathiresan, M.; Arunkumar, K. Nanostructured Graphene Oxide Dots: Synthesis, Characterization, Photoinduced Electron Transfer Studies, and Detection of Explosives/Biomolecules. ACS Omega 2018, 3, 90969104,  DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.8b01180
  34. 34
    Dong, X. C.; Xu, H.; Wang, X. W.; Huang, Y. X.; Chan-Park, M. B.; Zhang, H.; Wang, L. H.; Huang, W.; Chen, P. 3D Graphene–Cobalt Oxide Electrode for High Performance Supercapacitor and Enzymeless Glucose Detection. ACS Nano 2012, 6, 32063213,  DOI: 10.1021/nn300097q
  35. 35
    Yang, Y.; Wang, Z.; Yang, M.; Li, J.; Zheng, F.; Shen, G.; Yu, R. Electrical Detection of Deoxyribonuclic acid Hybridization Based on Carbon-Nanotubes/Nanozirconium Dioxide/Chaitozen-Modified Electrode. Anal. Chim. Acta. 2007, 584, 268274,  DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2006.11.055
  36. 36
    Chen, A.; Zhou, Y.; Ta, N.; Li, Y.; Shen, W. Redox Properties and Catalytic Performance of Ceria–Zirconia Nanorods. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2015, 5, 41844192,  DOI: 10.1039/C5CY00564G
  37. 37
    Kumar, S.; Kumar, S.; Srivastava, S.; Yadav, B. K.; Lee, S. H.; Sharma, J. G.; Doval, D. C.; Malhotra, B. D. Reduced Graphene Oxide Modified Smart Conducting Paper for Cancer Biosensor. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2015, 73, 114122,  DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2015.05.040
  38. 38
    Zhao, N.; Pan, D.; Nie, W.; Ji, X. Two-Phase Synthesis of Shape-Controlled Colloidal Zirconia Nanocrystals and their Characterization. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 1011810124,  DOI: 10.1021/ja0612145
  39. 39
    Vilian, A. T. E.; Chen, S. M.; Huang, L. H. Simultaneous Determination of Catechol and Hydroquinone Using a Pt/ZrO2-rGO/GCE Composite Modified Glassy Carbon Electrode. Electrochim. Acta 2014, 125, 503509,  DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2014.01.092
  40. 40
    Kumar, S.; Sharma, J. G.; Maji, S.; Malhotra, B. D. Nanostructured Zirconia Decorated Reduced Graphene Oxide Based Efficient Biosensing Platform for Non-Invasive Oral Cancer Detection. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2016, 78, 497504,  DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2015.11.084
  41. 41
    Gupta, P. K.; Sachchidanand, T.; Zishan, H. K.; Pratima, S. R. Amino Acid Functionalized ZrO2 Nanoparticles Decorated Reduced Graphene Oxide Based Immunosensor. J. Mater. Chem. B 2017, 5, 20192033,  DOI: 10.1039/C6TB02594C
  42. 42
    Raj, M.; Gupta, P.; Goyal, R. N.; Shim, Y. B. Graphene/Conducting Polymer Nano-Composite Loaded Screen-Printed Carbon Sensor for Simultaneous Determination of Dopamine and 5-Hydroxytryptamine. Sens. Actuators, B 2017, 239, 9931002,  DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2016.08.083
  43. 43
    Mahmoud, B. G.; Khairy, M.; Rashwan, A. F.; Banks, C. E. Simultaneous Voltammetric Determination of Acetaminophen and Isoniazid (Hepatotoxicity-Related Drugs) Utilizing Bismuth Oxide Nanorod Modified Screen-Printed Electrochemical Sensing Platforms. Anal. Chem. 2017, 89, 21702178,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.6b05130
  44. 44
    Laviron, E. General Expression of the Linear Potential Sweep Voltammogram in the Case of Diffusion less Electrochemical Systems. J. Electroanal. Chem. Interfacial Electrochem. 1979, 101, 1928,  DOI: 10.1016/S0022-0728(79)80075-3
  45. 45
    Fan, Y.; Liu, J. H.; Lu, H. T.; Zhang, Q. Electrochemical Behavior and Voltammetric Determination of Paracetamol on Nafion/TiO2–Graphene Modified Glassy Carbon Electrode. Colloids Surf., B 2011, 85, 289292,  DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2011.02.041
  46. 46
    Xu, C. X.; Huang, K. J.; Fan, Y.; Wu, Z. W.; Li, J. Electrochemical Determination of Acetaminophen Based on TiO2–Graphene/Poly (Methyl Red) Composite Film Modified Electrode. J. Mol. Liq. 2012, 165, 3237,  DOI: 10.1016/j.molliq.2011.10.006

Cited By

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article is cited by 75 publications.

  1. Banupriya Murugan Umadevi Mahalingam Parimaladevi Ramasamy Suresh Sagadevan . Nanomaterial Functionalized Electrode for Forensic Electrochemistry for the Sensing of Psychoactive Compounds. , 151-185. https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-2024-1481.ch007
  2. Bhuvaneswari Chandran, Shanmugam Ramasamy, Sathish Kumar Ponnaiah, Elangovan Arumugam, Sharmila Chandrasekaran, Sudha Karuppaiah, Arivazhagan Ganesan. Cerium Zirconium Oxide-Decorated Reduced Graphene Oxide Nanocomposite for Low Potential Voltammetric Detection of N-Hydroxysuccinimide. ACS Applied Nano Materials 2024, 7 (7) , 6839-6850. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.3c05485
  3. Rahul P K, Chandan Kafley, Reshmi A Sukumaran, Shekher Kummari, Phani Kumar VVN, Yugender Goud Kotagiri. Electrochemical Strip Sensor Based on a Graphene-Au-PEDOT Nanocomposite for Detection and Continuous Monitoring of Dacarbazine. ACS Applied Nano Materials 2023, 6 (18) , 16915-16926. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.3c03061
  4. Chitra P. Kurup, Noor F. Mohd-Naim, Natasha A. Keasberry, Siti N. A. Zakaria, Vipul Bansal, Minhaz U. Ahmed. Label-Free Electrochemiluminescence Nano-aptasensor for the Ultrasensitive Detection of ApoA1 in Human Serum. ACS Omega 2022, 7 (43) , 38709-38716. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c04300
  5. Pushpesh Ranjan, Shalu Yadav, Mohd Abubakar Sadique, Raju Khan, Avanish Kumar Srivastava. Ionic Liquid-Functionalized ZrO2/Reduced Graphene Oxide Nanocomposites for Carcinoembryonic Antigen Electrochemical Detection. ACS Applied Nano Materials 2022, 5 (10) , 14999-15010. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.2c03212
  6. Qingfang Han, Jinbo Pang, Yufen Li, Baojun Sun, Bergoi Ibarlucea, Xiaoyan Liu, Thomas Gemming, Qilin Cheng, Shu Zhang, Hong Liu, Jingang Wang, Weijia Zhou, Gianaurelio Cuniberti, Mark H. Rümmeli. Graphene Biodevices for Early Disease Diagnosis Based on Biomarker Detection. ACS Sensors 2021, 6 (11) , 3841-3881. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssensors.1c01172
  7. Hansa Mahajan, Shiva Kumar Arumugasamy, Atanu Panda, Venkateswarlu Sada, Minyoung Yoon, Kyusik Yun. Well-Designed Au Nanorod-Doped Cu2O Core–Shell Nanocube-Embedded Reduced Graphene Oxide Composite for Efficient Removal of a Water Pollutant Dye. ACS Omega 2020, 5 (38) , 24799-24810. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.0c03487
  8. Pramod K. Gupta, Deepika Chauhan, Zishan H. Khan, Pratima R. Solanki. ZrO2 Nanoflowers Decorated with Graphene Quantum Dots for Electrochemical Immunosensing. ACS Applied Nano Materials 2020, 3 (3) , 2506-2516. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.9b02598
  9. Chunyan Li, Ning Zhou, Zhiyu Xia, Chao Yan. UiO-66 for composite template derived Cu/Zr-O with dodecahedral structure for efficient asymmetry supercapacitor. Journal of Power Sources 2024, 623 , 235506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2024.235506
  10. K Theyagarajan, Vadakke Purakkal Sruthi, Jitendra Satija, Sellappan Senthilkumar, Young-Joon Kim. Materials and design strategies for the electrochemical detection of antineoplastic drugs: Progress and perspectives. Materials Science and Engineering: R: Reports 2024, 161 , 100840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mser.2024.100840
  11. Mariya Pimpilova. A brief review on methods and materials for electrode modification: electroanalytical applications towards biologically relevant compounds. Discover Electrochemistry 2024, 1 (1) https://doi.org/10.1007/s44373-024-00012-8
  12. Poulomi Sengupta, Siddhant B. Patel. Multifaceted Applications of NanoparticleFunctionalized Graphene. 2024, 17-52. https://doi.org/10.2174/9789815305241124010004
  13. Balasubramanian Suriya Devi, Rajendran Karthikeyan, Mannarsamy Anitha, Subash Prakash. Electrochemical incorporation of PVA-ZnO composite on Screen printed carbon electrode as dopamine sensor. Surfaces and Interfaces 2024, 52 , 104882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfin.2024.104882
  14. Maryam HosseinAbadi, Amir Abbas Rafati, Ensieh Ghasemian Lemraski. Electrochemical detection of regorafenib using a graphite sheet electrode modified with nitrogen-doped reduced graphene oxide nanocomposite. Materials Science and Engineering: B 2024, 304 , 117375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mseb.2024.117375
  15. Sakshi Thakur, Vishal Mutreja, Ranjeet Kaur. Synergistic integration of ZrO2-enriched reduced graphene oxide-based nanostructures for advanced photodegradation of tetracycline hydrochloride. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 2024, 31 (21) , 31562-31576. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-024-33196-y
  16. Madheswaran Madhavan, Babu Shobana, Duraisamy Pandiaraja, Periakaruppan Prakash. An innovative experimental and mathematical approach in electrochemical sensing for mapping a drug sensor landscape. Nanoscale 2024, 16 (14) , 7211-7224. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3NR06648G
  17. Abdul Kareem, Kathavarayan Thenmozhi, Shankar Hari, Vinoth Kumar Ponnusamy, Sellappan Senthilkumar. Metal-free carbon-based anode for electrochemical degradation of tetracycline and metronidazole in wastewater. Chemosphere 2024, 351 , 141219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.141219
  18. Hosna Cheraghi, Fahimeh Jalali, Sara Sheikhi. Zirconium oxide-porous carbon derived from metal-organic frameworks as a new sensing platform: application to simultaneous voltammetric determination of ascorbic acid, dopamine and uric acid. Journal of the Iranian Chemical Society 2024, 21 (2) , 511-524. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13738-023-02942-3
  19. Aiman Saleem, Fakhar ud Din, Zakir Ali, Fatima Zahid, Ali H. Alamri, Ahmed A. Lahiq, Taha Alqahtani, Hanan M. Alharbi. Development and evaluation of regorafenib loaded liquid suppository for rectal delivery: In vitro, in vivo analyses. Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology 2024, 91 , 105239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jddst.2023.105239
  20. M. Mylarappa, S. Chandruvasan, K.S. Harisha, S.C. Sharath. Synthesis, characterization and electrochemical detection of tartaric acid and grape juice using rGO doped La2O3 nanoparticles. Materials Science and Engineering: B 2024, 299 , 116977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mseb.2023.116977
  21. suriya devi, Karthikeyan Rajendran, Anitha Mannarsamy, Prakash Subash. Electrochemical Incorporation of Pva-Zno Nanocomposite on Screen Printed Carbon Electrode as Dopamine Sensor. 2024https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4811077
  22. Mariola Brycht, Lukasz Poltorak, Simona Baluchová, Karolina Sipa, Paulina Borgul, Konrad Rudnicki, Sławomira Skrzypek. . Critical Reviews in Analytical Chemistry 2024, 54 (5) , 1017. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408347.2022.2106117
  23. Gholam Abbas Mohammadi, Somayeh Tajik, Mohammad Reza Aflatoonian, Iran Sheikhshoaie, Hadi Beitollahi. Electrochemical investigation of Mn 3 O 4 /ZrO 2 nanocomposite; a robust sensor platform for the sensitive determination of bisphenol A. International Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry 2023, 103 (18) , 6971-6983. https://doi.org/10.1080/03067319.2021.1965134
  24. Anum Zahid, Afzal Shah, Shamsa Munir. Gold Nanoparticles and Surfactant-Based Electrochemical Sensing Platform for the Detection and Electroanalysis of the Anticancer Drug Oxoplatin. ECS Advances 2023, 2 (4) , 040506. https://doi.org/10.1149/2754-2734/ad040d
  25. Salma Umme, Giulia Siciliano, Elisabetta Primiceri, Antonio Turco, Iolena Tarantini, Francesco Ferrara, Maria Serena Chiriacò. Electrochemical Sensors for Liquid Biopsy and Their Integration into Lab-on-Chip Platforms: Revolutionizing the Approach to Diseases. Chemosensors 2023, 11 (10) , 517. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors11100517
  26. Esme Isik, Lutfi Bilal Tasyurek, Emir Tosun, Necmettin Kilinc. Enhancing high sensitive hydrogen detection of Bi2O3 nanoparticle decorated TiO2 nanotubes. Materials Chemistry and Physics 2023, 3 , 128535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2023.128535
  27. Abdulazeez Tunbosun Lawal. Recent developments in electrochemical sensors based on graphene for bioanalytical applications. Sensing and Bio-Sensing Research 2023, 41 , 100571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbsr.2023.100571
  28. Elain Fu, Khadijeh Khederlou, Noël Lefevre, Stephen A. Ramsey, Matthew L. Johnston, Lael Wentland. Progress on Electrochemical Sensing of Pharmaceutical Drugs in Complex Biofluids. Chemosensors 2023, 11 (8) , 467. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors11080467
  29. Nur Azizah Ferdiana, Husein Hernandi Bahti, Dikdik Kurnia, Santhy Wyantuti. Synthesis, characterization, and electrochemical properties of rare earth element nanoparticles and its application in electrochemical nanosensor for the detection of various biomolecules and hazardous compounds: A review. Sensing and Bio-Sensing Research 2023, 41 , 100573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbsr.2023.100573
  30. Sana Ansari, Mohammad Shahnawaze Ansari, Soami Piara Satsangee, Mohd Gulfam Alam, Rajeev Jain. Electrochemical sensing platform based on ZrO2/BiVO4 nanocomposite for gastro-prokinetic drug in human blood serum. Journal of Nanostructure in Chemistry 2023, 13 (3) , 361-375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40097-022-00473-6
  31. Hassan Nasrollahpour, Balal Khalilzadeh, Mohammad Hasanzadeh, Reza Rahbarghazi, Pedro Estrela, Abdolhossein Naseri, Savas Tasoglu, Mika Sillanpää. Nanotechnology‐based electrochemical biosensors for monitoring breast cancer biomarkers. Medicinal Research Reviews 2023, 43 (3) , 464-569. https://doi.org/10.1002/med.21931
  32. Samira A. Asoka, Lary H. Slewa, Tariq A. Abbas. Multi-ion (Na+/ K+/Ca2+/Mg2+) EGFET sensor based on heterostructure of ZrO2-NPs/MacroPSi. Chemical Papers 2023, 77 (3) , 1351-1360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11696-022-02554-w
  33. Sapana Jadoun, Narendra Pal Singh Chauhan, Sampath Chinnam. Polymers in cancer research and clinical oncology. 2023, 575-593. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-823797-7.00021-6
  34. Shuyan Xiang, Shuduan Mao, Fei Chen, Shichao Zhao, Weitao Su, Li Fu, Najmeh Zare, Fatemeh Karimi. A bibliometric analysis of graphene in acetaminophen detection: Current status, development, and future directions. Chemosphere 2022, 306 , 135517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.135517
  35. Chelladurai Karuppiah, Sivakumar Musuvadhi Babulal, Tse-Wei Chen, Shen-Ming Chen, Li-Fan Hsu, Dunia A. Al Farraj, Sayee Kannan Ramaraj, Mohamed S. Elshikh, Chun-Chen Yang. A novel ammonium zinc molybdate layered double hydroxide nanoflakes/vapor grown carbon fibers nanomaterials based electrocatalyst for the monitoring of dimetridazole drug in real samples. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 2022, 10 (5) , 108227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2022.108227
  36. Shaimaa Hussein, Ayman M. Mahmoud, Hassan A. Elgebaly, Omnia Magdy Hendawy, Emad H. M. Hassanein, Shaima M. N. Moustafa, Nasser F. Alotaibi, Amr M. Nassar, . Green Synthesis of Trimetallic Nanocomposite (Ru/Ag/Pd)-Np and Its In Vitro Antimicrobial and Anticancer Activities. Journal of Chemistry 2022, 2022 , 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4593086
  37. Adel Al Fatease, Wenjuan Guo, Ahmad Umar, Chengxian Zhao, Yahya Alhamhoom, Abdullatif Bin Muhsinah, Mater H. Mahnashi, Zubaida A. Ansari. A dual-mode electrochemical aptasensor for the detection of Mucin-1 based on AuNPs-magnetic graphene composite. Microchemical Journal 2022, 180 , 107559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2022.107559
  38. Y. Veera Manohara Reddy, Jae Hwan Shin, Venkata Narayana Palakollu, Bathinapatla Sravani, Chang-Hyung Choi, Kyeongsoon Park, Sun-Ki Kim, G. Madhavi, Jong Pil Park, Nagaraj P. Shetti. Strategies, advances, and challenges associated with the use of graphene-based nanocomposites for electrochemical biosensors. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science 2022, 304 , 102664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2022.102664
  39. Engin Er. A portable electrochemical platform based on graphene nanosheets by metal intercalation engineering for anticancer drug pemetrexed sensing. FlatChem 2022, 33 , 100353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flatc.2022.100353
  40. Masoumeh Ghalkhani, Sariye Irem Kaya, Nurgul K. Bakirhan, Yalcin Ozkan, Sibel A. Ozkan. Application of Nanomaterials in Development of Electrochemical Sensors and Drug Delivery Systems for Anticancer Drugs and Cancer Biomarkers. Critical Reviews in Analytical Chemistry 2022, 52 (3) , 481-503. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408347.2020.1808442
  41. Siba Soren, Subhendu Chakroborty, Kaushik Pal. Enhanced in tunning of photochemical and electrochemical responses of inorganic metal oxide nanoparticles via rGO frameworks (MO/rGO): A comprehensive review. Materials Science and Engineering: B 2022, 278 , 115632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mseb.2022.115632
  42. Vu Thi Thu Ha, Manh B. Nguyen, Tran Nhu Tam, Vu Thi Thu, Pham Thi Hai Yen, Pham Hong Phong, Dao Ngoc Nhiem, Le Quoc Hung, Tran Quang Hai. Highly sensitive electrochemical sensor based on zirconium oxide-decorated gold nanoflakes nanocomposite 2,4-dichlorophenol detection. Journal of Applied Electrochemistry 2022, 52 (3) , 607-616. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10800-021-01655-w
  43. Farida Ashraf Ali, Dilip Kumar Mishra, Rasmita Nayak, Binita Nanda. Solid-state gas sensors: sensing mechanisms and materials. Bulletin of Materials Science 2022, 45 (1) https://doi.org/10.1007/s12034-021-02581-5
  44. Somayeh Tajik, Hadi Beitollahi, Saeed Shahsavari, Fariba Garkani Nejad. Simultaneous and selective electrochemical sensing of methotrexate and folic acid in biological fluids and pharmaceutical samples using Fe3O4/ppy/Pd nanocomposite modified screen printed graphite electrode. Chemosphere 2022, 291 , 132736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.132736
  45. Bathinapatla Sravani, S. Kiranmai, Gutturu Rajasekhara Reddy, Jong Pil Park, Y. VeeraManohara Reddy, G. Madhavi. Highly sensitive detection of anti-cancer drug based on bimetallic reduced graphene oxide nanocomposite. Chemosphere 2022, 287 , 132281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.132281
  46. Somayeh Tajik, Mahboobeh Shahsavari, Iran Sheikhshoaie, Fariba Garkani Nejad, Hadi Beitollahi. Voltammetric detection of sumatriptan in the presence of naproxen using Fe3O4@ZIF-8 nanoparticles modified screen printed graphite electrode. Scientific Reports 2021, 11 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-98598-1
  47. Motahhare Emadoddin, Sayed Ahmad Mozaffari, Fateme Ebrahimi. An antifouling impedimetric sensor based on zinc oxide embedded polyvinyl alcohol nanoplatelets for wide range dopamine determination in the presence of high concentration ascorbic acid. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis 2021, 205 , 114278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2021.114278
  48. Garima Rathee, Gaurav Bartwal, Jyotsna Rathee, Yogendra Kumar Mishra, Ajeet Kaushik, Pratima R. Solanki. Emerging Multimodel Zirconia Nanosystems for High‐Performance Biomedical Applications. Advanced NanoBiomed Research 2021, 1 (9) https://doi.org/10.1002/anbr.202100039
  49. Mohadeseh Safaei, Masoud Reza Shishehbore. A review on analytical methods with special reference to electroanalytical methods for the determination of some anticancer drugs in pharmaceutical and biological samples. Talanta 2021, 229 , 122247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2021.122247
  50. G. Bala Subbaiah, K. Venkata Ratnam, S. Janardhan, K. Shiprath, H. Manjunatha, M. Ramesha, N. V. Krishna Prasad, S. Ramesh, T. Anil Babu. Metal and Metal Oxide Based Advanced Ceramics for Electrochemical Biosensors-A Short Review. Frontiers in Materials 2021, 8 https://doi.org/10.3389/fmats.2021.682025
  51. Zhe Dong, Beibei Chen, Mengjie Zhang, Jiaye Li, Shuang Wang. One‐step preparation of carbon fiber‐ZrO 2 hybrid and its enhancement on the wear‐resistant properties of polyimide. Polymer Composites 2021, 42 (5) , 2598-2607. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.26005
  52. Elham Babaei Lashkaryani, Babak Kakavandi, Roshanak Rezaei Kalantary, Ahmad Jonidi Jafari, Mitra Gholami. Activation of peroxymonosulfate into amoxicillin degradation using cobalt ferrite nanoparticles anchored on graphene (CoFe 2 O 4 @Gr). Toxin Reviews 2021, 40 (2) , 215-224. https://doi.org/10.1080/15569543.2019.1582066
  53. Yinghui Shang, Qinghai Wang, Jian Li, Haiting Liu, Qiangqiang Zhao, Xueyuan Huang, Hang Dong, Wansong Chen, Rong Gui, Xinmin Nie. Zirconia Nanoparticles Induce HeLa Cell Death Through Mitochondrial Apoptosis and Autophagy Pathways Mediated by ROS. Frontiers in Chemistry 2021, 9 https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2021.522708
  54. Coster Kumunda, Abolanle S. Adekunle, Bhekie B. Mamba, Ntuthuko W. Hlongwa, Thabo T. I. Nkambule. Electrochemical Detection of Environmental Pollutants Based on Graphene Derivatives: A Review. Frontiers in Materials 2021, 7 https://doi.org/10.3389/fmats.2020.616787
  55. Yasamin Nasiri Khonsari, Shiguo Sun. A novel MIP-ECL sensor based on RGO–CeO 2 NP/Ru(bpy) 3 2+ -chitosan for ultratrace determination of trimipramine. Journal of Materials Chemistry B 2021, 9 (2) , 471-478. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0TB01666G
  56. Mohammad Malakootian, Zohreh Gholami, Hadi Mahmoudi-Moghaddam. Electrochemical determination of hydroxylamine in water samples using modified screen-printed electrode with TiO 2 /GO. International Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry 2021, 101 (1) , 35-47. https://doi.org/10.1080/03067319.2019.1659255
  57. Saurabh Kumar, Ashish Kalkal. Electrochemical detection: Cyclic voltammetry/differential pulse voltammetry/impedance spectroscopy. 2021, 43-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818154-6.00008-1
  58. Y. Veera Manohara Reddy, Bathinapatla Sravani, T. Łuczak, Koduru Mallikarjuna, G. Madhavi. An ultra-sensitive rifampicin electrochemical sensor based on titanium nanoparticles (TiO2) anchored reduced graphene oxide modified glassy carbon electrode. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects 2021, 608 , 125533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2020.125533
  59. Thota Trinadh, Harisankar Khuntia, Tummala Anusha, Kalli Sai Bhavani, J.V. Shanmukha Kumar, Pradeep Kumar Brahman. Synthesis and characterization of nanocomposite material based on graphene quantum dots and lanthanum doped zirconia nanoparticles: An electrochemical sensing application towards flutamide in urine samples. Diamond and Related Materials 2020, 110 , 108143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diamond.2020.108143
  60. Sayed Zia Mohammadi, Somayeh Tajik, Hamed Tashakkorian, Kaiqiang Zhang, Quyet Van Le, Soma Saeidi, Ho Won Jang, Mohammadreza Shokouhimehr, Wanxi Peng. Voltammetric Determination of Antidiabetic Drug Gliclazide in the Presence of Glibenclamide in Real Samples. International Journal of Electrochemical Science 2020, 15 (9) , 8595-8611. https://doi.org/10.20964/2020.09.49
  61. Nandini Nataraj, Tse-Wei Chen, Shen-Ming Chen, Syang-Peng Rwei. An Efficient Electrochemical Sensor Based on Zirconium Molybdate Decorated Reduced Graphene Oxide for the Detection of Hydroquinone. International Journal of Electrochemical Science 2020, 15 (8) , 8321-8335. https://doi.org/10.20964/2020.08.42
  62. Anita K. Tawade, Bhagyashri B. Kamble, Kiran Kumar K. Sharma, Shivaji N. Tayade. Simultaneous electrochemical investigations of dopamine and uric acid by in situ amino functionalized reduced grahene oxide. SN Applied Sciences 2020, 2 (6) https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-2806-0
  63. Somayeh Tajik, Hadi Beitollahi, Fariba Garkani Nejad, Kaiqiang Zhang, Quyet Van Le, Ho Won Jang, Soo Young Kim, Mohammadreza Shokouhimehr. Recent Advances in Electrochemical Sensors and Biosensors for Detecting Bisphenol A. Sensors 2020, 20 (12) , 3364. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20123364
  64. Yinghui Shang, Qinghai Wang, Jian Li, Qiangqiang Zhao, Xueyuan Huang, Hang Dong, Haiting Liu, Rong Gui, Xinmin Nie. Platelet-Membrane-Camouflaged Zirconia Nanoparticles Inhibit the Invasion and Metastasis of Hela Cells. Frontiers in Chemistry 2020, 8 https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2020.00377
  65. Khemchand Dewangan, Kamlesh Shrivas, Ramsingh Kurrey. Hybrid nanomaterials as chemical sensors. 2020, 213-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-821354-4.00009-1
  66. Jiangle Yi, Zhen Liu, Jianhui Liu, Hanbiao Liu, Fangquan Xia, Dong Tian, Changli Zhou. A label-free electrochemical aptasensor based on 3D porous CS/rGO/GCE for acetamiprid residue detection. Biosensors and Bioelectronics 2020, 148 , 111827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2019.111827
  67. Yan Wang, Xiao-ning Meng, Jian-liang Cao. Rapid detection of low concentration CO using Pt-loaded ZnO nanosheets. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2020, 381 , 120944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.120944
  68. Somayeh Mohammadi, Mohammad Ali Taher, Hadi Beitollahi, Rahman Hosseinzadeh. Voltammetric Mixture Analysis of 6-thioguanine and Folic Acid Using Ionic Liquid-Carbon Paste Electrode Modified by Nano Petal-Like MoWS 2 and N-(ferrocenylmethylidene)fluoren-2-amine. Journal of The Electrochemical Society 2020, 167 (4) , 047520. https://doi.org/10.1149/1945-7111/ab6f59
  69. Ehsan Pourtaheri, Mohammad Ali Taher, Gomaa A.M. Ali, Shilpi Agarwal, Vinod Kumar Gupta. Low-cost and Highly Sensitive Sensor for Determining Atorvastatin Using PbTe Nanoparticles-Modified Graphite Screen-Printed Electrode. International Journal of Electrochemical Science 2019, 14 (10) , 9622-9632. https://doi.org/10.20964/2019.10.01
  70. Hamid Reza Jamei, Behzad Rezaei, Ali Asghar Ensafi. An ultrasensitive electrochemical anti-lysozyme aptasensor with biorecognition surface based on aptamer/amino-rGO/ionic liquid/amino-mesosilica nanoparticles. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces 2019, 181 , 16-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2019.05.030
  71. Ehsan Pourtaheri, Mohammad Ali Taher, Gomaa A.M. Ali, Shilpi Agarwal, Vinod Kumar Gupta. Electrochemical detection of gliclazide and glibenclamide on ZnIn2S4 nanoparticles-modified carbon ionic liquid electrode. Journal of Molecular Liquids 2019, 289 , 111141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2019.111141
  72. D. Saritha, A.R. Koirala, M. Venu, G. Dinneswara Reddy, A. Vijaya Bhaskar Reddy, B. Sitaram, G. Madhavi, K. Aruna. A simple, highly sensitive and stable electrochemical sensor for the detection of quercetin in solution, onion and honey buckwheat using zinc oxide supported on carbon nanosheet (ZnO/CNS/MCPE) modified carbon paste electrode. Electrochimica Acta 2019, 313 , 523-531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2019.04.188
  73. Chougoni Madhuri, Y. Veera Manohara Reddy, S.V. Prabhakar Vattikuti, Ľubomír Švorc, Jaesool Shim, G. Madhavi. Trace-level determination of amlodipine besylate by immobilization of palladium-silver bi-metallic nanoparticles on reduced graphene oxide as an electrochemical sensor. Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry 2019, 847 , 113259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2019.113259
  74. Yuting Shi, Hui Xu, Zhulan Gu, Caiqin Wang, Yukou Du. Sensitive detection of caffeic acid with trifurcate PtCu nanocrystals modified glassy carbon electrode. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects 2019, 567 , 27-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2019.01.036
  75. Sangiliyandi Gurunathan, Muniyandi Jeyaraj, Min-Hee Kang, Jin-Hoi Kim. Graphene Oxide–Platinum Nanoparticle Nanocomposites: A Suitable Biocompatible Therapeutic Agent for Prostate Cancer. Polymers 2019, 11 (4) , 733. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11040733
  76. Siva Kumar Krishnan, Eric Singh, Pragya Singh, Meyya Meyyappan, Hari Singh Nalwa. A review on graphene-based nanocomposites for electrochemical and fluorescent biosensors. RSC Advances 2019, 9 (16) , 8778-8881. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8RA09577A

ACS Omega

Cite this: ACS Omega 2018, 3, 11, 14597–14605
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.8b02129
Published November 1, 2018

Copyright © 2018 American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under CC-BY.

Article Views

4790

Altmetric

-

Citations

Learn about these metrics

Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.

  • Abstract

    Scheme 1

    Scheme 1. Synthesis of the ZrO2/rGO Nanocomposite for the Electrochemical Sensing of REG

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. TEM, HRTEM, and SAED images of (a–c) pristine ZrO2 and (d–f) ZrO2/rGO nanocomposite.

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. Cyclic voltammograms recorded in 0.1 M PBS, pH 7.0, at the scan rate of 100 mV s–1 (a) blank and bare GCE electrode without REG, (b) bare GCE in the presence of 0.01 mM REG, (c) ZrO2-modified GC electrode in the presence of 0.01 mM REG, and (d) ZrO2/rGO/GCE in the presence of 0.01 mM REG.

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. (a) DPV voltammograms obtained with the ZrO2/rGO/GCE in an electrolyte solution at different pH values, with 0.01 mM REG. (b) Calibration plot of the anodic peak current (curve-I) and the anodic peak potential (curve-II) vs the pH of the 0.1 M PBS solution, during the electro-oxidation of 0.01 mM REG, at a scan rate of 100 mV s–1.

    Scheme 2

    Scheme 2. Electrochemical Redox Process of REG by ZrO2/rGO/GCE

    Figure 4

    Figure 4. (a) Cyclic voltammograms recorded at the ZrO2/rGO/GCE in the electrolyte solution at different scan rates from 10 to 100 mV s–1. (b) Calibration plot of the anodic and cathode peak currents versus the square root of the scan rate, during the electro-oxidation of 0.01 mM REG in the presence of 0.1 M PBS, pH 7.0.

    Figure 5

    Figure 5. (a) Differential pulse voltammograms recorded at the ZrO2/rGO/GCE over an REG concentration of 11–343 nM in 0.1 M PBS at pH 7.0. (b) Linear calibration plot of the anodic peak current versus REG concentration.

    Figure 6

    Figure 6. DPVs recorded on the ZrO2/rGO/GCE during simultaneous determination of 0.32–0.66 μM REG, 0.58–1.26 μM AA, and 0.08–0.52 μM UA in 0.1 M PBS, pH 7.0. Insets: plots of the anodic peak currents against concentrations of REG, AA, and UA.

  • References


    This article references 46 other publications.

    1. 1
      Chen, D.; Wei, L.; Yu, J.; Zhang, L. Regorafenib Inhibits Colorectal Tumor Growth Through Puma-Mediated Apoptosis. Clin. Cancer Res. 2014, 20, 34723484,  DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-2944
    2. 2
      Wilhelm, S. M.; Dumas, J.; Adnane, L.; Lynch, M.; Carter, C. A.; Schutz, G.; Thierauch, K. H.; Zopf, D. Regorafenib (bay 73-4506): A New Oral Multikinase Inhibitor of Angiogenic, Stromal and Oncogenic Receptor Tyrosine Kinases with Potent Preclinical Antitumor Activity. Int. J. Cancer 2011, 129, 245255,  DOI: 10.1002/ijc.25864
    3. 3
      Di Gion, P.; Kanefendt, F.; Lindauer, A.; Scheffler, M.; Doroshyenko, O.; Fuhr, U.; Wolf, J.; Jaehde, U. Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors: Focus on Pyrimidines, Pyridines, and Pyrroles. Clin. Pharmacokinet. 2011, 50, 551603,  DOI: 10.2165/11593320-000000000-00000
    4. 4
      Josephs, D. H.; Fisher, D. S.; Spicer, J.; Flanagan, R. Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors: Implications for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring. Ther. Drug Monit. 2013, 35, 562587,  DOI: 10.1097/FTD.0b013e318292b931
    5. 5
      Ly, J. Q.; Messick, K.; Qin, A.; Takahashi, R. H.; Choo, E. F. Utility of CYP3A4 and PXR-CAR-CYP3A4/3A7 Transgenic Mouse Models to Assess the Magnitude of CYP3A4 Mediated Drug–Drug Interactions. Mol. Pharmaceutics 2017, 14, 17541759,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.7b00006
    6. 6
      Cheng, A. L.; Kang, Y. K.; Lin, D. Y.; Park, J. W.; Kudo, M.; Qin, S.; Chung, H. C.; Song, X.; Xu, J.; Poggi, G.; Omata, M.; Pitman Lowenthal, S.; Lanzalone, S.; Yang, L.; Lechuga, M. J.; Raymond, E. Sunitinib Versus Sorafenib in Advanced Hepatocellular Cancer: Results of a Randomized Phase III Trial. J. Clin. Oncol. 2013, 31, 40674075,  DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2012.45.8372
    7. 7
      Cheng, A. L.; Kang, Y. K.; Chen, A. L.; Tsao, Z.; Qin, C. J.; Kim, S.; Luo, J. S.; Feng, R.; Ye, J.; Yang, S.; Xu, T. S.; Sun, J.; Liang, Y.; Liu, H.; Wang, J.; Tak, J.; Pan, W. Y.; Burock, H.; Zou, K.; Voliotis, J.; Guan, D. Z. Efficacy, and Safety of Sorafenib in Patients in the Asia-Pacific Region with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Phase III Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial. Lancet Oncol. 2009, 10, 2534,  DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70285-7
    8. 8
      Hutson, T. E.; Escudier, B.; Esteban, E.; Bjarnason, G. A.; Lim, H. Y.; Pittman, K. B.; Senico, P.; Niethammer, A.; Lu, D. R.; Hariharan, S.; Motzer, R. J. Randomized Phase III Trial of Temsirolimus versus Sorafenib as Second-Line Therapy after Sunitinib in Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma. J. Clin. Oncol. 2014, 32, 760767,  DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2013.50.3961
    9. 9
      Grothey, A.; Van Cutsem, E.; Sobrero, A.; Siena, S.; Falcone, A.; Ychou, M.; Humblet, Y.; Bouché, O.; Mineur, L.; Barone, C.; Adenis, A.; Tabernero, J.; Yoshino, T.; Lenz, H. J.; Goldberg, R. M.; Sargent, D. J.; Cihon, F.; Cupit, L.; Wagner, A.; Laurent, D. Correct Study Group, Regorafenib Monotherapy for Previously Treated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (Correct): An International, Multicentre, Randomised, Placebo-Controlled, Phase III Trial. Lancet 2013, 381, 303312,  DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61900-X
    10. 10
      Escudier, B.; Eisen, T.; Stadle, W. M.; Szczylik, C.; Oudard, S.; Siebels, M.; Negrier, S.; Chevreau, C.; Solska, E.; Desai, A. A. Sorafenib in Advanced Clear-Cell Renal-Cell Carcinoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2007, 356, 125134,  DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa060655
    11. 11
      Mross, K.; Frost, A.; Steinbild, S.; Hedbom, S.; Buchert, M.; Fasol, U.; Unger, C.; Kratzschmar, J.; Heinig, R.; Boix, O.; Christensen, O. A Phase I Dose-Escalation Study of Regorafenib (BAY 73–4506), an Inhibitor of Oncogenic, Angiogenic, and Stromal Kinases, in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors. Clin. Cancer Res. 2012, 18, 26582667,  DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-1900
    12. 12
      Crona, D. J.; Keisler, M. D.; Walko, C. M. Regorafenib: A Novel Multitargeted Tyrosinekinase Inhibitor for Colorectal Cancer and Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors. Ann. Pharmacother. 2013, 47, 16851696,  DOI: 10.1177/1060028013509792
    13. 13
      Fujita, K.; Miura, M.; Shibata, H. Quantitative Determination of Regorafenib and its Two Major Metabolites in Human Plasma with High-Performance Liquid Chromatography and Ultraviolet Detection. Biomed. Chromatogr. 2016, 30, 16111617,  DOI: 10.1002/bmc.3730
    14. 14
      Luethi, D.; Durmus, S.; Schinkel, A. H.; Schellens, J. H. M.; Beijnen, J. H.; Sparidans, R. W. Liquid Chromatography–Tandem Mass Spectrometric Assay for the Multikinase Inhibitor Regorafenib in Plasma. Biomed. Chromatogr. 2014, 28, 13661370,  DOI: 10.1002/bmc.3176
    15. 15
      van Erp, N. P.; Wit, D. D.; Guchelaar, H. J.; Gelderblom, H.; Hessing, T. J.; Hartigh, J. D. A Validated Assay for the Simultaneous Quantification of Six Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors and Two Active Metabolites in Human Serum Using Liquid Chromatography Coupled with Tandem Mass Spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. B 2013, 937, 3343,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2013.08.013
    16. 16
      Hafner, F.-T.; Werner, D.; Kaiser, M. Determination of Regorafenib (Bay 73- 4506) and its Major Human Metabolites Bay 75-7495 (M-2) and Bay 81-8752 (M-5) in Human Plasma by Stable-Isotope Dilution Liquid Chromatography–Tandem Ms. Bioanalysis 2014, 6, 19231937,  DOI: 10.4155/bio.14.52
    17. 17
      Merienne, C.; Rousset, M.; Ducint, D.; Castaing, N.; Titier, K.; Molimard, M.; Bouchet, S. High Throughput Routine Determination of 17 Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors by LC-MS/MS. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2018, 150, 112120,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2017.11.060
    18. 18
      Pang, Y. Y.; Tan, Y. L.; Ho, H. K. Investigation of the Effect of Plasma Albumin Levels on Regorafenib-Induced Hepatotoxicity Using A Validated Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry Method. J. Chromatogr. B 2017, 1061–1062, 220224,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2017.07.023
    19. 19
      Allard, M.; Khoudour, N.; Rousseau, B.; Joly, C.; Costentin, C.; Blanchet, B.; Tournigand, C.; Hulin, A. Simultaneous Analysis of Regorafenib and Sorafenib and Three of their Metabolites in Human Plasma Using LC–MS/MS. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2017, 142, 4248,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2017.04.053
    20. 20
      Albayrak, M. Development and Validation of a New Spectrophotometric Method for the Determination of Regorafenib in Pure and Tablet Dosage Form. Lat. Am. J. Pharm. 2018, 37, 13491353
    21. 21
      Ma, Z.; Chen, P.; Cheng, W.; Yan, K.; Pan, L.; Shi, Y.; Guihua, Y. Highly Sensitive, Printable Nanostructured Conductive Polymer Wireless Sensor for Food Spoilage Detection. Nano Lett. 2018, 18, 45704575,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b01825
    22. 22
      Ngo, Y. H.; Brothers, M.; Martin, J. A.; Grigsby, C. C.; Fullerton, K.; Naik, R. R.; Kim, S. S. Chemically Enhanced Polymer-Coated Carbon Nanotube Electronic Gas Sensor for Isopropyl Alcohol Detection. ACS Omega 2018, 3, 62306236,  DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.8b01039
    23. 23
      Hou, H.; Tingting, X.; Yang, W.; Shengjun, L.; Chu, R.; Zhang, J.; Liu, B. Conductive and Chiral Polymer-Modified Metal–Organic Framework for Enantioselective Adsorption and Sensing. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 2636526371,  DOI: 10.1021/acsami.8b06540
    24. 24
      Reddy, Y. V. M.; Sravani, B.; Fernandes, D. M.; Madhuri, Ch.; Subramanyam Sarma, L.; Madhavi, G. Facile One-Pot Synthesis of Bimetallic Pd-Ag/Reduced Graphene Oxide Nanocomposite as an Electrochemical Sensor for Sensitive Detection of Antihypotensive Drug. Colloids Surf., A 2018, 546, 293300,  DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2018.03.032
    25. 25
      Reddy, Y. V. M.; Bathinapatla, S.; Łuczak, T.; Osinska, M.; Maseed, H.; Ragavendhra, P.; Sarma, L. S.; Srikanth, V. V. S. S.; Madhavi, G. An Ultra-Sensitive Electrochemical Sensor for the Detection of Acetaminophen in the Presence of Etilefrine using Bimetallic Pd–Ag/Reduced Graphene Oxide Nanocomposites. New J. Chem. 2018, 42, 31373146,  DOI: 10.1039/C7NJ04775D
    26. 26
      Reddy, Y. V. M.; Sravani, B.; Agarwal, S.; Guptha, V. K.; Madhavi, G. Electrochemical Sensor for Detection of Uric acid in the Presence of Ascorbic acid and Dopamine Using the Poly (Dpa)/Sio2@Fe3o4 Modified Carbon Paste Electrode. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2018, 820, 16875,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2018.04.059
    27. 27
      Sağlam, Ş.; Aysem, U. Z.; Erol, E.; Resat, A. Electrochemical Determination of TNT, DNT, RDX, and HMX with Gold Nanoparticles/Poly (Carbazole-Aniline) Film-Modified Glassy Carbon Sensor Electrodes Imprinted for Molecular Recognition of Nitroaromatics and Nitramines. Anal. Chem. 2018, 90, 73647370,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b00715
    28. 28
      Li, L.; Chen, M.; Huang, G.; Yang, N.; Zhang, L.; Wang, H.; Liu, Y.; Wang, W.; Gao, J. A Green Method to Prepare Pd–Ag Nanoparticles Supported on Reduced Graphene Oxide and Their Electrochemical Catalysis of Methanol and Ethanol Oxidation. J. Power Sources 2014, 263, 1321,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.04.021
    29. 29
      Mazloum-Ardakani, M.; Hosseinzadeh, L.; Taleat, Z. Synthesis and Electrocatalytic Effect of Ag@Pt Core–Shell Nanoparticles Supported on Reduced Graphene Oxide for Sensitive and Simple Label-Free Electrochemical Aptasensor. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2015, 74, 3036,  DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2015.05.072
    30. 30
      Sawangphruk, M.; Srimuk, P.; Chio-chan, P.; Krittayavathananon, A.; Luanwuthi, S.; Limtrakul, J. Limtrakul. the High-Performance Supercapacitor of Manganese Oxide/Reduced Graphene Oxide Nanocomposite Coated on Flexible Carbon Fiber Paper. Carbon 2013, 60, 109116,  DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2013.03.062
    31. 31
      Jayakumar, K.; Camarada, M. B.; Venkataraman, D.; Rajendiran, R.; Rengarajan, V.; Huangxian, J.; Mahalingam, M.; Abhishek, R.; Sudipta, R. B.; Yangping, W. Layer-by-Layer-Assembled AuNPs-Decorated First-Generation Poly (amidoamine) Dendrimer with Reduced Graphene Oxide Core as Highly Sensitive Biosensing Platform with Controllable 3D Nanoarchitecture for Rapid Voltammetric Analysis of Ultratrace DNA Hybridization. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 2154121555,  DOI: 10.1021/acsami.8b03236
    32. 32
      Karthik, P.; Vinoth, R.; Zhang, P.; Wonyong, C.; Balaraman, E.; Neppolian, B. π–π Interaction Between Metal–Organic Framework and Reduced Graphene Oxide for Visible-Light Photocatalytic H2 Production. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2018, 1, 19131923,  DOI: 10.1021/acsaem.7b00245
    33. 33
      Srinivasan, V.; Mariadoss, A. J.; Kathiresan, M.; Arunkumar, K. Nanostructured Graphene Oxide Dots: Synthesis, Characterization, Photoinduced Electron Transfer Studies, and Detection of Explosives/Biomolecules. ACS Omega 2018, 3, 90969104,  DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.8b01180
    34. 34
      Dong, X. C.; Xu, H.; Wang, X. W.; Huang, Y. X.; Chan-Park, M. B.; Zhang, H.; Wang, L. H.; Huang, W.; Chen, P. 3D Graphene–Cobalt Oxide Electrode for High Performance Supercapacitor and Enzymeless Glucose Detection. ACS Nano 2012, 6, 32063213,  DOI: 10.1021/nn300097q
    35. 35
      Yang, Y.; Wang, Z.; Yang, M.; Li, J.; Zheng, F.; Shen, G.; Yu, R. Electrical Detection of Deoxyribonuclic acid Hybridization Based on Carbon-Nanotubes/Nanozirconium Dioxide/Chaitozen-Modified Electrode. Anal. Chim. Acta. 2007, 584, 268274,  DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2006.11.055
    36. 36
      Chen, A.; Zhou, Y.; Ta, N.; Li, Y.; Shen, W. Redox Properties and Catalytic Performance of Ceria–Zirconia Nanorods. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2015, 5, 41844192,  DOI: 10.1039/C5CY00564G
    37. 37
      Kumar, S.; Kumar, S.; Srivastava, S.; Yadav, B. K.; Lee, S. H.; Sharma, J. G.; Doval, D. C.; Malhotra, B. D. Reduced Graphene Oxide Modified Smart Conducting Paper for Cancer Biosensor. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2015, 73, 114122,  DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2015.05.040
    38. 38
      Zhao, N.; Pan, D.; Nie, W.; Ji, X. Two-Phase Synthesis of Shape-Controlled Colloidal Zirconia Nanocrystals and their Characterization. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 1011810124,  DOI: 10.1021/ja0612145
    39. 39
      Vilian, A. T. E.; Chen, S. M.; Huang, L. H. Simultaneous Determination of Catechol and Hydroquinone Using a Pt/ZrO2-rGO/GCE Composite Modified Glassy Carbon Electrode. Electrochim. Acta 2014, 125, 503509,  DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2014.01.092
    40. 40
      Kumar, S.; Sharma, J. G.; Maji, S.; Malhotra, B. D. Nanostructured Zirconia Decorated Reduced Graphene Oxide Based Efficient Biosensing Platform for Non-Invasive Oral Cancer Detection. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2016, 78, 497504,  DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2015.11.084
    41. 41
      Gupta, P. K.; Sachchidanand, T.; Zishan, H. K.; Pratima, S. R. Amino Acid Functionalized ZrO2 Nanoparticles Decorated Reduced Graphene Oxide Based Immunosensor. J. Mater. Chem. B 2017, 5, 20192033,  DOI: 10.1039/C6TB02594C
    42. 42
      Raj, M.; Gupta, P.; Goyal, R. N.; Shim, Y. B. Graphene/Conducting Polymer Nano-Composite Loaded Screen-Printed Carbon Sensor for Simultaneous Determination of Dopamine and 5-Hydroxytryptamine. Sens. Actuators, B 2017, 239, 9931002,  DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2016.08.083
    43. 43
      Mahmoud, B. G.; Khairy, M.; Rashwan, A. F.; Banks, C. E. Simultaneous Voltammetric Determination of Acetaminophen and Isoniazid (Hepatotoxicity-Related Drugs) Utilizing Bismuth Oxide Nanorod Modified Screen-Printed Electrochemical Sensing Platforms. Anal. Chem. 2017, 89, 21702178,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.6b05130
    44. 44
      Laviron, E. General Expression of the Linear Potential Sweep Voltammogram in the Case of Diffusion less Electrochemical Systems. J. Electroanal. Chem. Interfacial Electrochem. 1979, 101, 1928,  DOI: 10.1016/S0022-0728(79)80075-3
    45. 45
      Fan, Y.; Liu, J. H.; Lu, H. T.; Zhang, Q. Electrochemical Behavior and Voltammetric Determination of Paracetamol on Nafion/TiO2–Graphene Modified Glassy Carbon Electrode. Colloids Surf., B 2011, 85, 289292,  DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2011.02.041
    46. 46
      Xu, C. X.; Huang, K. J.; Fan, Y.; Wu, Z. W.; Li, J. Electrochemical Determination of Acetaminophen Based on TiO2–Graphene/Poly (Methyl Red) Composite Film Modified Electrode. J. Mol. Liq. 2012, 165, 3237,  DOI: 10.1016/j.molliq.2011.10.006
  • Supporting Information

    Supporting Information


    The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.8b02129.

    • Cyclic voltammogram, EDS data, FT-IR, materials and methods, XPS analysis, XRD, and interferences of some foreign species (PDF)


    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.