ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
Improving the Performance of PVDF/PVDF-g-PEGMA Ultrafiltration Membranes by Partial Solvent Substitution with Green Solvent Dimethyl Sulfoxide during Fabrication
My Activity
  • Open Access
Article

Improving the Performance of PVDF/PVDF-g-PEGMA Ultrafiltration Membranes by Partial Solvent Substitution with Green Solvent Dimethyl Sulfoxide during Fabrication
Click to copy article linkArticle link copied!

  • Qidong Wu
    Qidong Wu
    College of Architecture and Environment, Institute of New Energy and Low-Carbon Technology, Institute for Disaster Management and Reconstruction, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610207, P. R. China
    More by Qidong Wu
  • Alberto Tiraferri
    Alberto Tiraferri
    Department of Environment, Land and Infrastructure Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi 24, 10129 Turin, Italy
  • Haibo Wu
    Haibo Wu
    College of Architecture and Environment, Institute of New Energy and Low-Carbon Technology, Institute for Disaster Management and Reconstruction, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610207, P. R. China
    More by Haibo Wu
  • Wancen Xie
    Wancen Xie
    College of Architecture and Environment, Institute of New Energy and Low-Carbon Technology, Institute for Disaster Management and Reconstruction, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610207, P. R. China
    More by Wancen Xie
  • Baicang Liu*
    Baicang Liu
    College of Architecture and Environment, Institute of New Energy and Low-Carbon Technology, Institute for Disaster Management and Reconstruction, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610207, P. R. China
    *E-mail: [email protected], [email protected]. Tel: +86-28-85995998. Fax: +86-28-62138325.
    More by Baicang Liu
Open PDFSupporting Information (1)

ACS Omega

Cite this: ACS Omega 2019, 4, 22, 19799–19807
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.9b02674
Published November 7, 2019

Copyright © 2019 American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under these Terms of Use.

Abstract

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Traditional organic solvents used in membrane manufacturing, such as dimethylformamide and tetrahydrofuran, are generally very hazardous and harmful to the environment and human health. Their total or partial substitution with green solvent dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) is proposed to fabricate membranes composed of poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF) blended with PVDF-graft-poly(ethylene glycol) methyl ether methacrylate (PEGMA), with the purpose to accomplish a greener chemical process and enhance the membrane performance. Various organic solvent compositions were first investigated using the Hansen solubility theory, and the best mixture was thus applied experimentally. The membrane prepared by a ratio of N,N-dimethylacetamide/DMSO = 7:3 outperformed the membranes prepared by other solvent mixtures. This membrane showed high wetting behavior with the water contact angle declining from 71 to 7° in 18 s and a pure water flux reaching values larger than 700 L m–2 h–1 under 0.07 MPa applied hydraulic pressure. The membrane rejected sodium alginate at a rate of 87%, and nearly complete flux recovery was achieved following fouling and physical cleaning. The introduction of green chemistry concepts to PVDF/PVDF-g-PEGMA blended membranes is a step forward in the goal to increase the sustainability of membrane production.

Copyright © 2019 American Chemical Society

1. Introduction

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Poly(vinylidene) fluoride (PVDF) is a well-established polymeric material to produce ultrafiltration (UF) and microfiltration (MF) membranes owing to its exceptional mechanical properties, chemical resistance, and thermal stability. (1−7) However, despite its many advantages, the hydrophobicity of PVDF can induce severe membrane fouling, which is a main obstacle that limits its applications. (8−12) Thanks to the compatibility of the PVDF matrix with amphiphilic copolymers, modifications of PVDF membranes by blending with other more hydrophilic components have been reported widely. (13−17) The atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) method can be applied to enhance the properties of polymers by grafting chains with different characteristics, making the preparation of many new copolymers possible. (18−25) Specifically, PVDF-graft-poly(ethylene glycol) methyl ether methacrylate (PVDF-g-PEGMA) has been successfully synthesized and characterized. (20,26,27) Membranes with promising fouling resistance behavior were thus produced by blending this PVDF-g-PEGMA material with traditional PVDF. (28)
Liu et al. fabricated high-performance and detect-free membranes consisting of PVDF blended with PVDF-g-PEGMA with a unique periodic nodular structure. (28) The membrane exhibited a high sodium alginate (SA) rejection and a very high water permeance of 5170 L m–2 h–1 bar–1, roughly 1 magnitude higher than that obtained by Hashim et al. or achieved by commercial membranes. (29) Chen et al. further explored the formation mechanism of the periodic nodular structure, and they found that the structure can only be obtained when PVDF-g-PEGMA and 1-methyl-2-pyrrolidinone (NMP) are deployed in the casting solution. (30) Wang et al. investigated the properties of membranes fabricated using PVDF-g-PEGMA obtained by different synthesis reaction times and found that the membrane pore size distribution of the final membrane is a function of this parameter. (31) Wang et al. also incorporated nonwoven poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) fabrics as a support layer to enhance the mechanical properties of the fabricated PVDF blended PVDF-g-PEGMA ultrafiltration membrane and to increase the resistance to a pressure up to 23.3 MPa, thus satisfying the requirements for industrial applications. (8)
Previous studies were mainly focused on the performance of the blended PVDF-based membranes. There, and in the vast majority of the membrane fabrication studies, the hazards intrinsic in the use of the traditional solvent have been neglected. Traditional organic solvents are toxic and hazardous. For example, dimethylformamide (DMF), a flammable liquid, is dangerous if inhaled or exposed to skin and may cause fertility problems. The concepts of green chemistry have been proposed for some time and have developed rapidly. (32−34) The objectives of green chemistry are to decrease the production and use of hazardous substances and reduce the energy consumption, moving toward renewable sources. (32,34,35) Anastas and Werner proposed 12 principles of green chemistry (36) with the main goal to prevent contaminations at the very beginning of the production stage. (32,33) In the membrane manufacturing process, solvents play a critical part in determining the properties of the membrane by influencing the solvent–nonsolvent and solvent–polymer interactions. Switching toward greener solvents while maintaining or improving the membrane performance is far from a trivial task. (34,37−39) Nevertheless, green solvents should be used for membrane fabrication to reduce the impact and to facilitate the operation of this industrial process, especially considering that the ultimate goal of many membrane applications is precisely the removal of contaminations from liquid streams. (40,41) Solvent dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) is a green solvent that is nontoxic and more easily recyclable compared to traditional solvents. (42−44)
Based on the concept of green chemistry and on our previous studies on PVDF-based membranes, we optimize the fabrication of membranes composed of PVDF blended with PVDF-g-PEGMA by substituting traditional solvents, e.g., tetrahydrofuran (THF), DMF, and NMP, with DMSO. The optimal partial substitution is estimated using the Hansen solubility theory to investigate quantitatively the polymer–solvent interaction and to ensure the compatibility between solvents and polymers. (45) We thus fabricate membranes using the promising solvent mixtures, and we evaluate the performance and the characteristics of the membranes under ultrafiltration conditions. The goal of this study is to fabricate a membrane with desired structural properties and high performance in terms of both productivity and removal of organic macromolecules using a greener synthesis route.

2. Materials and Methods

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

2.1. Chemicals and Materials

PVDF (average Mw = 534 K), PEGMA (Mn = 500 g mol–1), 4-4′-dimethyl-2-2′-dipyridyl (DMDP, 99.5%), NMP (anhydrous, 99.5%), silicone oil, DMF (99.8%), DMSO (99.9%), THF (≥99.9%), copper(I) chloride (CuCl, trace metals basis, ≥99.995%), N,N-dimethylacetamide (DMAc, Reagent Plus, 99%), NaCl (ACS reagent, ≥99.0%), and sodium alginate (SA, Halal grade) were purchased from MilliporeSigma (St. Louis, Missouri). Deionized water (DI water) was produced using an ultrapure water system purchased from Ulupure (Chengdu, China).

2.2. Procedure to Synthesize the Graft Copolymer PVDF-g-PEGMA

The procedure to synthesize the PVDF-g-PEGMA copolymer was conducted as follows: (28,31) 5 g of PVDF was dissolved in 40 mL of NMP at 50 °C in a conical flask while stirring. Then, 50 mL of PEGMA, 0.23 g of DMDP, and 0.04 g of CuCl were added to the same conical flask, which had already been cooled to room temperature. Right after this addition, the reaction mixture was stirred at 200 rpm and bubbled using nitrogen gas for 30 min. The flask was sealed using a rubber septum to prevent air oxygen from disturbing the ATRP. (24) Then, a silicon oil bath was used to heat the conical flask to 90 °C. The high-temperature reaction lasted for 19 h with stirring. Finally, the resulting copolymer mixture was sealed and stored at room temperature. (31)

2.3. Calculation of the Hanson Solubility Parameter

According to the Hansen solubility theory, the affinity between the solvent and polymer can be analyzed quantitatively. δt, the total solubility parameter, is the combination of three parameters: δd, δh, and δp, which quantitatively represent the dispersion parameter (δd), the hydrogen bonding parameter (δh), and the polar parameter (δp), respectively. δd, δh, and δp can be calculated using the following equations. (46)
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
where Fdi is the group contribution to the dispersion component. The parameter Ehi represents the hydrogen bonding energy for each structure group. The Fpi parameter is the group contribution to the polar force component. For mixed solvents, such as binary mixed solvents, δd, δh, and δp can be calculated using the volume fraction for each solvent by applying the following equation
(5)
Application of the mixing law allows calculation of the solubility parameters of mixed solvents as
(6)
(7)
(8)
The ternary mixed solvents can be calculated using the analogous methodology for three components. The affinity between the polymer and solvents can be represented by the value of Ra, which was calculated as follows
(9)
The detailed calculations of the solvents used in the experiments can be found in the Supporting Information (SI).

2.4. Membrane Casting

Table 1 lists the compositions of casting solutions used for membrane synthesis in this study. All of the membranes were synthesized at a constant room temperature of 25 °C and ∼45% humidity, controlled by an air conditioner. The casting solutions were added to a conical flask and then heated to 60 °C while stirring at 500 rpm. After the copolymer and PVDF powder were dissolved completely, the solution was degassed for at least 2 h before casting. Next, the solution was cast using an 8 in.-wide doctor blade (Universal blade applicator, Paul N. Gardner Company, Inc., Pompano Beach, FL) on a first-grade surface optical glass; the gate height of the blade was set to be 200 μm. Then, the glass was immersed in a bath that contained deionized water at room temperature (25 °C). After 48 h, some of the cast membranes were air-dried for 24 h for further investigation and the others were kept in DI water at 4 °C for further experiments.
Table 1. Compositions and Viscosities of the Casting Solutions
membrane IDPVDF (g)DMAc (g)DMSO (g)NMP (g)THF (g)DMF (g)PVDF-g-PEGMA (g)PVDF-g-PEGMA/PVDF (w/w %)viscosity (mPa·s, 25 °C)
PVDF1-DMSO12.0 86.2   1.815834
PVDF2-DMAc and DMSOa12.060.325.9   1.815595
PVDF3-DMSO and NMPb12.0 43.143.1  1.815775
PVDF4-DMSO, THF, and DMFc12.0 43.1 12.930.21.815523
a

The casting solution of PVDF2 contains 70% DMAc and 30% DMSO.

b

The casting solution of PVDF3 contains 50% DMSO and 50% NMP.

c

The casting solution of PVDF4 contains 50% DMSO, 15% THF, and 35% DMF.

2.5. Model Foulant

The antifouling performance of the membranes was evaluated using a model extracellular polymeric substance, namely, sodium alginate (SA). The SA stock solution of 2 g L–1 was prepared in deionized water and stored at 4 °C. In this experiment, the UV–vis spectrometer (Thermo Orion Aquamate 8000) was used to determine the concentrations of SA with a fixed wavelength of 220 nm. (47,48)

2.6. Membrane Characterizations

The elemental surface composition of the membrane for a depth within 5 nm was analyzed using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, Axis Ultra, Kratos Analytical Ltd., U.K.). The spectra with 1 eV scan resolution were obtained by sweeping over the electron binding energy range of 0–1200 eV; then, the atomic concentrations of the corresponding elements were calculated from peak areas following high-resolution scans with 0.1 eV resolution. The spectra of Fourier transform infrared attenuated total reflectance (FTIR-ATR, Alpha, Bruker) were obtained by collecting over the 650–4000 cm–1 wavenumber range with 64 scans of 2 cm–1 resolution. The membrane morphology was observed using field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM, JSM-7500F, JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). To observe the cross-sectional morphology, the samples were frozen using liquid nitrogen for 3 min before brittle fracture. The membrane samples were first fixed on stubs using carbon tape and then sputter-coated with a gold layer of ∼2 nm (Q150R-ES, Quorum, U.K.). The images were taken under a 5 kV accelerating voltage with different magnifications. The thickness of the membranes was measured using an electronic digital micrometer (Marathon Watch Company Ltd., Canada).
The contact angles of the blended membranes were measured using the KRÜSS DSA 25S measuring apparatus (KRÜSS GmbH, Germany). For each measurement, DI water droplets (2 μL) were placed on the sample surface to obtain the dynamic variations of the contact angle for a time period of 18 s, starting from the instant when the droplet was placed on the sample. The experiment was repeated at different locations on the membrane for about 10 spots. Atomic force microscopy (AFM, Multimode 8, Bruker, Germany) was used to obtain the surface roughness. In this test, a resonant frequency of 0.997 kHz was used to scan the membranes on 5 μm × 5 μm size areas at least 2 times. The viscosity of the casting solutions was measured by a rotary viscometer (NDJ-79, Changji Geological Instrument Co. Ltd., Shanghai) using 10 mL casting solution samples at 25 °C. The mechanical properties of the fabricated membranes were measured by an electronic single fiber strength meter (Yuanmao Instrument Co. Ltd., Laizhou, China). This experiment was repeated at least 10 times using samples with a length of 10 mm and an operational speed of 10 mm min–1. The maximum and minimum values of the tensile strength were discarded, and the average value was then calculated. The detailed mechanical performance of the fabricated membranes can be found in the SI.
A dead-end filtration cell (Amicon 8200, Millipore) was used to measure the permeability and the antifouling performance of the membranes. The membranes were cut into circular samples with an effective area of 28.7 cm2. The filtration cell (200 mL) was connected to a dispensing vessel (5 L). The permeate stream was recorded every minute. All of the experiments were performed at room temperature, and nitrogen gas was used to maintain a constant pressure of 0.07 MPa (10 psi). For each pure water filtration or antifouling experiment, the duration of the flux measurement was the lesser one between a predetermined time or the time needed to filter 4 L of feed water. First, the membrane sample was compacted using 4 L of water for 2 h, while the flux of permeate water was recorded as Jw1 (L m–2 h–1). Second, a conditioning period of the membrane followed using 4 L of NaCl solution of 10 mM L–1 as a feed for 2 h. Third, the model fouling test was conducted using 4 L of feed solution that contained 20 mg L–1 SA and 10 mmol L–1 NaCl for 5 h. During the fouling test, the concentration polarization was minimized using a stirring plate (PC-420D, Corning) adjusted to 200 rpm, on which the filtration cell was placed. The flux was recorded as Jp (L m–2 h–1). Finally, the membrane was physically cleaned using a constant DI water flow of 2.7 L min–1 for 1 min, maintaining the water surface 25 cm above the membrane surface. After cleaning, the recovery flux, Jw2 (L m–2 h–1), was measured using water as feed solution for 1 h. The flux recovery ratio (FRR), total flux decline ratio (DRt), reversible flux decline ratio (DRr), and irreversible flux decline ratio (DRir) were calculated by the following equations using an average value from three tests. (18,49,50)
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)

3. Results and Discussion

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

3.1. Elemental Composition of the Membranes

XPS results of all of the PVDF/PVDF-g-PEGMA membranes are displayed in Figure 1. The membrane was synthesized using a PVDF/PVDF-g-PEGMA mixture dissolved in different organic solvents or solvent mixtures. The composition percentage of the three main elements was within a small range, with oxygen ∼12.6%, carbon ∼61.4%, and fluorine ∼25.5%. Because the organic solvents and the unreacted PEGMA diffused out from the polymer film and into water during phase separation, the only source of oxygen in the samples was the PEGMA segments in the PVDF-g-PEGMA chains. The appearance of oxygen in the spectra, besides carbon and fluorine, reflects that the amphiphilic PEGMA segments in the PVDF-g-PEGMA migrated preferentially to the membrane surface, indicating the successful blending of PVDF-g-PEGMA with PVDF in different casting solutions. (31) As listed in Table 2, compared with other membranes cast previously from PVDF blended with PVDF-g-PEGMA, the content of carbon and oxygen was higher, while that of fluorine was lower. (8,28,30,31) This observation is explained with the smaller proportion of PVDF in the blend and the larger amount of PEGMA segments that migrated to the membrane surface. The viscosity might be an important factor affecting the migration of PEGMA segments to the membrane surface in this study. (31) A lower viscosity weakened the exchange barrier between the nonsolvent and solvent, which accelerated the phase inversion. Therefore, the migration of PEGMA segments to the membrane surface could be more effective. The existence of more PEGMA segments may improve some properties of the membranes. For example, it may decrease the surface tension and polarity to increase the hydrophilicity of the membrane; thus, potentially, the antifouling property of the membrane increased.

Figure 1

Figure 1. XPS spectra of the PVDF/PVDF-g-PEGMA membranes cast from different solvents or solvent mixtures: (a) PVDF1, DMSO; (b) PVDF2, DMSO/DMAc = 3:7; (c) PVDF3, DMSO/NMP = 5:5; and (d) PVDF4, DMSO/THF/DMF = 5:1.5:3.5. The content of the main elements was calculated and reported in the graphs.

Table 2. Performance of PVDF/PVDF-g-PEGMA Fabricated in Previous Studies
membrane IDelement composition (C/O/F) (%)Davg (nm)Dmax (nm)roughness (nm)DI permeability (L m–2 h–1 bar–1)SA rejection (%)FRR (%)CA variation (deg)
JMS7 (28)a55.8/6.73/37.43118315.3517087.193973–61° (200 s)
19H (31)b52.05/12.89/35.06185930.7106873.370.873–33° (180 s)
b (30)57.72/6.37/35.9134 ± 1912627.5374873670–67° (60 s)
d (30)c56.63/6.49/36.8942 ± 2314632.7949944774–72° (60 s)
f (30)c57.83/4.67/37.515 ± 54926.3   74–73° (60 s)
M0 (8)   55.82324760 
M1 (8)d 51 ± 411819.09294482100–92° (180 s)
M2 (8)d 47 ± 39514.2800508769–20° (35 s)
a

The membranes were all fabricated using casting solution contains 18% PVDF and 15% wt PVDF-g-PEGMA. The solvent in casting solution was THF/DMF = 3:7 unless stated.

b

The solvent in casting solution was DMF.

c

The solvent in casting solution was NMP.

d

M1 and M2 had PET support layers, M1 with a thin layer of 29 nm and M2 was 84 nm.

3.2. ATR-FTIR Spectra

Figure 2 shows the ATR-FTIR spectra of PVDF/PVDF-g-PEGMA membranes. The 1727 cm–1 band represents the C═O stretching band, while the 1638 cm–1 band represents the C═C stretching band. (17,30,51) The existence of C═O bonds indicates that the PEGMA segments were present in all of the membrane surfaces, while the absence of C═C implies that the unreacted PEGMA was removed during phase separation by diffusing out into the coagulation bath. This result suggests that PEGMA was successfully grafted onto PVDF because the synthesized PVDF-g-PEGMA contains only C═O bonds and no C═C bonds.

Figure 2

Figure 2. ATR-FTIR spectra of the PVDF/PVDF-g-PEGMA membranes cast using different solvents or solvent mixtures. PVDF1, DMSO; PVDF2, DMSO/DMAc = 3:7, PVDF3, DMSO/ NMP = 5:5; and PVDF4, DMSO/THF/DMF = 5:1.5:3.5. The 1727 cm−1 peak represents C═O bonds, and the 1638 cm−1 peak represents C═C bonds. Also indicated are the peaks relative to the characteristic bonds that represent the PVDF α and β crystalline phases.

The results from ATR-FTIR measurements can also be used to confirm the crystalline phase of the membrane. The mechanical strength properties of the membranes can be influenced by its crystalline phase. (37,52) The characteristic absorption bands at 410, 531, 615, 764, 796, 855, and 976 cm–1 represent the α crystalline phase, while the β phase is identified by the bands at 442, 468, 510, and 840 cm–1. (1,52−55) As shown in Figure 2, the γ-phase characteristic peaks at 776, 812, and 833 cm–1 were not observed for the samples prepared in this study, (52,54) while all of the membranes contained α and β PVDF crystalline phases. The 765 cm–1 band of PVDF2 and PVDF3 was more obvious than that of PVDF1 and PVDF4 membranes. The formation of α and β phases may be influenced by the temperature. (54) The α phase resulting from melting crystallization can be easily obtained at any temperature, while the 840 cm–1 band is common for both β and γ phases; when the temperature of solution crystallization is under 70 °C, the polymer solidification results in the β phase rather than the γ phase. (54)

3.3. Membrane Morphology

Micrographs of surface and cross-sectional morphologies were acquired using SEM, and representative images are shown in Figure 3. Using DMSO only as a solvent resulted in a surface with large pore sizes and irregular pore distribution. Therefore, total substitution of traditional solvents with DMSO was not a successful attempt, which may lead to defects on the membrane surface. After mixing DMSO with a certain percentage of traditional solvents, the pore size significantly decreased. Table 3 lists the main structural parameters of the fabricated membranes. PVDF/PVDF-g-PEGMA membranes synthesized in previous studies had pore size parameters, Davg and Dmax, of about 34 and 126 nm when using DMF/THF as the solvent mixture and 42 and 146 nm when using NMP as the solvent (Table 2). (28,30,31) In this study, the partial substitution of NMP and DMF/THF using DMSO translated in a significant pore shrinkage such that the pores could not be observed under 10k× or 100k× magnification on the surface of PVDF3 and PVDF4 membranes. (28) Relative to the cross-sectional morphologies, a top dense layer and an asymmetric structure were observed in all of the PVDF/PVDF-g-PEGMA membranes, with underlying porous fingerlike structures (PVDF1, PVDF3, and PVDF4) or macrovoids (PVDF2). The thickness of the membranes largely decreased when compared to that of PVDF/PVDF-g-PEGMA membranes synthesized in previous studies (Table 2), which was mainly due to the lower percentage of PVDF-g-PEGMA and PVDF in the casting solution. This mechanism led to a clear decrease in the mechanical strength, which was observed while handling the samples. The cross-sectional morphologies and the pore size distribution influence pure water flux, fouling, and flux recovery performance of the membrane, (37) which are discussed below.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Representative SEM micrographs of the surface and cross-section morphologies of all of the PVDF/PVDF-g-PEGMA membranes. PVDF1, DMSO (A, B); PVDF2, DMSO/DMAc = 3:7 (C, D); PVDF3, NMP/DMSO = 5:5 (E, F); and PVDF4, THF/DMF/DMSO = 1.5:3.5:5 (G, H). The membrane surface images are shown in the top row, while the cross-sectional morphologies are shown in the bottom row.

Table 3. Properties of the PVDF/PVDF-g-PEGMA Ultrafiltration Membranes Fabricated in This Study
membrane IDDavg (nm)Dmax (nm)thickness (μm)SA rejection (%)flux recovery (%)permeability (L m–2 h–1 bar–1)roughness (μm)tensile strength (MPa)
PVDF1111.02519.09155 ± 0.646.27 ± 4.1829.16214 ± 844.1 ± 0.41.04
PVDF246.47185.91173 ± 1.587.00 ± 2.4189.33735 ± 7457.5 ± 6.10.88
PVDF3a  190 ± 2.381.21 ± 1.9686.57460 ± 2754.7 ± 3.30.34
PVDF4a  216. ± 4.681.74 ± 3.3386.38532 ± 1651.1 ± 5.91.04
a

The pore sizes of PVDF3 and PVDF4 are very small that cannot be calculated by the SEM image.

3.4. Wettability

The wettability of the PVDF/PVDF-g-PEGMA membranes was estimated through sessile drop contact angle measurements. The results are reported in Figure 4. The initial contact angles were in the same range 65–70° as our previous study, whose results are reported in Table 2. However, the changes in the contact angle of our previous membranes were small (less than 10°) in 3 min. In contrast, for the membranes fabricated in this study, the contact angle reduction as a function of time was significant, especially for PVDF2. Specifically, the contact angles decreased from 63.8 ± 2.5 to 46.1 ± 4.9° in 18 s for PVDF1, from 70.8 ± 3.8 to 7.4 ± 1.4° for PVDF2, from 69.7 ± 3.9 to 49.9 ± 4.0° for PVDF3, and from 61.0 ± 2.5 to 45.3 ± 4.9° for PVDF4, which indicated that the wettability of PVDF/PVDF-g-PEGMA membranes was significantly enhanced. (56)

Figure 4

Figure 4. Contact angles as a function of time of PVDF/PVDF-g-PEGMA membranes using different solvents or solvent mixtures. PVDF1, DMSO; PVDF2, DMSO/DMAc = 7:3, PVDF3, DMSO/NMP = 5:5; and PVDF4, DMSO/THF/DMF = 5:1.5:3.5.

Many factors contribute to the wettability of the membrane, including the hydrophilic segments distribution, the surface roughness, and the surface pore size. (10) It has been reported that the air bubble/water droplet contact angle can be significantly affected by the surface roughness and solid surface heterogeneity. (57−59) According to the Wenzel model, a large quantity of surface amphiphilic or hydrophilic segments and a larger surface roughness will make the surface more hydrophilic. In this study, the enhancement in wettability is mainly attributed to the migration of a larger amount of PEGMA segments to the membrane surface, as well to the membrane morphology. In particular, the cross-sectional morphology observed for PVDF2 allowed faster spreading of water on this membrane. Wettability is important and may also enhance the antifouling properties of the membranes.

3.5. Surface Roughness

Representative AFM images of the fabricated PVDF/PVDF-g-PEGMA ultrafiltration membranes can be found in the SI (Figure S1), and their root mean square (RMS) surface roughness are shown in Table 3. The absolute RMS was within 60 nm. This value is larger than that of membranes fabricated in previous studies, which was about 15–30 nm. The reason is that the migration of PVDF-g-PEGMA segments to the surface can result in a larger RMS surface roughness, which is in accordance with the results reported by Liu et al. and Wang et al. (28,31) When using DMSO alone, the RMS roughness of the membrane was slightly lower than that of membranes fabricated by mixing traditional solvents with DMSO, showing that the solvent can also influence the membrane roughness. Usually, lower roughness translates into easier membrane cleaning and better antifouling properties. (60)

3.6. Membrane Transport and Antifouling Performance

The permeate flux of PVDF/PVDF-g-PEGMA membranes was recorded under a 0.07 MPa (10 psi) constant applied pressure. Figure 5 summarizes the flux profiles, the rejection rates of sodium alginate, and the fouling indices. The pure water permeabilities for PVDF1–PVDF4 were 214 ± 8 L, 735 ± 74, 460 ± 27, and 532 ± 16 L m–2 h–1 bar–1, respectively. All of the membranes exhibited a sharp decline in flux during the filtration of an SA solution, with the flux reaching a near steady-state value of approximately 100 L m–2 h–1. After physical cleaning for 1 min using pure water, the order of recovery fluxes for the four membranes was PVDF2 > PVDF3 > PVDF4 >PVDF1, which was similar to the order of highest to lowest water permeability. The different solvent or solvent mixture used in the casting dope had clearly a significant impact on flux, with variations above 300% for the membranes. Partial DMSO substitution achieved better results, with PVDF2 performing best possibly due to its better wettability and cross-sectional structure.

Figure 5

Figure 5. Transport performance and fouling behavior of the PVDF/PVDF-g-PEGMA membranes using different solvents or solvent mixtures. PVDF1, DMSO; PVDF2, DMSO/DMAc=3:7; PVDF3, DMSO/NMP=5:5; and PVDF4, DMSO/THF/DMF=5:1.5:3.5. (A) Flux as a function of time using pure water or sodium alginate as feed solution; B) FRR, DRt, DRr, and DRir indices; and (C) SA rejection.

SA rejection rates are reported in Figure 5C. The size of the SA particle in the experiments was in the range of 15–80 nm; thus, SA particles can easily pass through the surface pores of PVDF1, leading to a low rejection rate. PVDF2 performed best, suggesting that wettability influenced the rejection and antifouling performance more than the surface pore size. Compared with membranes fabricated previously (Table 2), using DMSO decreased the SA rejection, which however was higher than 80% for the best membranes. The FRR, DRt, DRr, and DRir values of all PVDF/PVDF-g-PEGMA membranes are summarized in Figure 5B. High DRr/DRt and FRR indices are indicative of better antifouling properties, i.e., fouling reversibility, of the fabricated membranes. (61) The order of FRR and DRr/DRt ratios was PVDF3 ∼ PVDF2 > PVDF4 ≫ PVDF1. Therefore, applying a partial substitution with green solvent DMSO produced an outstanding flux recovery rate in two cases. Despite the larger roughness of the membranes, the wettability, foulant rejection, and flux recovery ratios were beyond expectation. Therefore, we can conclude that hydrophilic segments on the surface of the membrane contribute more than the roughness to the fouling behavior of the membrane. In summary, performance of PVDF2 was outstanding, while the performance of PVDF1 was not satisfying, indicating that DMSO alone is not a good solvent for PVDF/PVDF-g-PEGMA fabrication under the tested conditions. However, using DMSO to partly substitute hazardous traditional solvents is a promising way to achieve a cleaner process as well as high-performance membranes.

4. Conclusions

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Based on the calculation using the Hanson solubility theory, the total and partial substitution of hazardous traditional solvents with green solvent DMSO were investigated for the fabrication of PVDF membranes blended with PVDF-g-PEGMA. The total and partial substitution with DMSO generally improved the wettability and the fouling performance of the ultrafiltration membranes. Specifically, the membranes fabricated via partial substitution (PVDF2, 3, 4) performed better than the membrane fabricated from polymer solution of pure DMSO (PVDF1). The best performing membrane was cast from a solution containing DMAc and DMSO. This membrane had simultaneously high permeability of above 700 L m–2 h–1 bar–1, high alginate rejection (87%), and showed remarkable antifouling performance with flux recovery rates of nearly 100%. According to the results of these experiments, the partial substitution of traditional organic solvents using green solvent DMSO to synthesize ultrafiltration membranes consisting of PVDF blended with PVDF-g-PEGMA can achieve a greener chemical process while also significantly enhancing the membrane performance.

Supporting Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.9b02674.

  • Calculations and experiment results; AFM morphologies of the fabricated membranes; mechanical performances of the fabricated membranes; calculation process using a group contribution method to calculate the solubility parameter of PEGMA; δd, δh, and δp values and densities of some solvents; detailed calculation of the δd, δh, and δp values of mixed solvents; FRR, DRt, DRr; and DRir results of the fabricated membranes (PDF)

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Author Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

  • Corresponding Author
  • Authors
    • Qidong Wu - College of Architecture and Environment, Institute of New Energy and Low-Carbon Technology, Institute for Disaster Management and Reconstruction, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610207, P. R. China
    • Alberto Tiraferri - Department of Environment, Land and Infrastructure Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi 24, 10129 Turin, ItalyOrcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0001-9859-1328
    • Haibo Wu - College of Architecture and Environment, Institute of New Energy and Low-Carbon Technology, Institute for Disaster Management and Reconstruction, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610207, P. R. China
    • Wancen Xie - College of Architecture and Environment, Institute of New Energy and Low-Carbon Technology, Institute for Disaster Management and Reconstruction, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610207, P. R. China
  • Notes
    The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Acknowledgments

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51678377), the State Key Laboratory of Separation Membranes and Membrane Processes (Tianjin Polytechnic University) (M2-201809), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities. Alberto Tiraferri acknowledges the support from Politecnico di Torino. The authors thank Yi He at Analytical & Testing Center, Sichuan University for SEM measurements. The authors thank Sheng Chen and Yinghui Zhao at the College of Biomass Science and Engineering, Sichuan University for measurements of solution viscosity and membrane mechanical properties. The views and ideas expressed herein are solely those of the authors and do not represent the ideas of the funding agencies in any form.

References

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article references 61 other publications.

  1. 1
    Buonomenna, M. G.; Lopez, L. C.; Favia, P.; d’Agostino, R.; Gordano, A.; Drioli, E. New PVDF membranes: The effect of plasma surface modification on retention in nanofiltration of aqueous solution containing organic compounds. Water Res. 2007, 41, 43094316,  DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2007.06.033
  2. 2
    Chen, Y.; Deng, Q.; Mao, J.; Nie, H.; Wu, L.; Zhou, W.; Huang, B. Controlled grafting from poly(vinylidene fluoride) microfiltration membranes via reverse atom transfer radical polymerization and antifouling properties. Polymer 2007, 48, 76047613,  DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2007.10.043
  3. 3
    Bonyadi, S.; Chung, T.-S. Highly porous and macrovoid-free PVDF hollow fiber membranes for membrane distillation by a solvent-dope solution co-extrusion approach. J. Membr. Sci. 2009, 331, 6674,  DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2009.01.014
  4. 4
    Boributh, S.; Chanachai, A.; Jiraratananon, R. Modification of PVDF membrane by chitosan solution for reducing protein fouling. J. Membr. Sci. 2009, 342, 97104,  DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2009.06.022
  5. 5
    Zheng, Z.-S.; Li, B.-B.; Duan, S.-Y.; Sun, D.; Peng, C.-K. Preparation of PVDF ultrafiltration membranes using PVA as pore surface hydrophilic modification agent with improved antifouling performance. Polym. Eng. Sci. 2019, 59, E384E393,  DOI: 10.1002/pen.24996
  6. 6
    Sun, D.; Yue, D.; Li, B.; Zheng, Z.; Meng, X. Preparation and performance of the novel PVDF ultrafiltration membranes blending with PVA modified SiO2 hydrophilic nanoparticles. Polym. Eng. Sci. 2019, 59, E412E421,  DOI: 10.1002/pen.25002
  7. 7
    Benhabiles, O.; Galiano, F.; Marino, T.; Mahmoudi, H.; Lounici, H.; Figoli, A. Preparation and Characterization of TiO2-PVDF/PMMA Blend Membranes Using an Alternative Non-Toxic Solvent for UF/MF and Photocatalytic Application. Molecules 2019, 24, 724  DOI: 10.3390/molecules24040724
  8. 8
    Wang, S.; Li, T.; Chen, C.; Chen, S.; Liu, B.; Crittenden, J. Non-woven PET fabric reinforced and enhanced the performance of ultrafiltration membranes composed of PVDF blended with PVDF-g-PEGMA for industrial applications. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 435, 10721079,  DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.11.193
  9. 9
    Venault, A.; Chang, C.-Y.; Tsai, T.-C.; Chang, H.-Y.; Bouyer, D.; Lee, K.-R.; Chang, Y. Surface zwitterionization of PVDF VIPS membranes for oil and water separation. J. Membr. Sci. 2018, 563, 5464,  DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2018.05.049
  10. 10
    Younas, H.; Bai, H.; Shao, J.; Han, Q.; Ling, Y.; He, Y. Super-hydrophilic and fouling resistant PVDF ultrafiltration membranes based on a facile prefabricated surface. J. Membr. Sci. 2017, 541, 529540,  DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2017.07.035
  11. 11
    Liu, C.; Wu, L.; Zhang, C.; Chen, W.; Luo, S. Surface hydrophilic modification of PVDF membranes by trace amounts of tannin and polyethyleneimine. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 457, 695704,  DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.06.131
  12. 12
    Zeng, K.; Zhou, J.; Cui, Z.; Zhou, Y.; Shi, C.; Wang, X.; Zhou, L.; Ding, X.; Wang, Z.; Drioli, E. Insight into fouling behavior of poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF) hollow fiber membranes caused by dextran with different pore size distributions. Chin. J. Chem. Eng. 2018, 26, 268277,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cjche.2017.04.008
  13. 13
    Jayalakshmi, A.; Rajesh, S.; Mohan, D. Fouling propensity and separation efficiency of epoxidated polyethersulfone incorporated cellulose acetate ultrafiltration membrane in the retention of proteins. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2012, 258, 97709781,  DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2012.06.028
  14. 14
    Rajesh, S.; Jayalakshmi, A.; Senthilkumar, S.; Sankar, H. S. H.; Mohan, D. R. Performance Evaluation of Poly(amide-imide) Incorporated Cellulose Acetate Ultrafiltration Membranes in the Separation of Proteins and Its Fouling Propensity by AFM Imaging. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2011, 50, 1401614029,  DOI: 10.1021/ie201181h
  15. 15
    Behboudi, A.; Jafarzadeh, Y.; Yegani, R. Polyvinyl chloride/polycarbonate blend ultrafiltration membranes for water treatment. J. Membr. Sci. 2017, 534, 1824,  DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2017.04.011
  16. 16
    Ma, W.; Rajabzadeh, S.; Shaikh, A. R.; Kakihana, Y.; Sun, Y.; Matsuyama, H. Effect of type of poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) based amphiphilic copolymer on antifouling properties of copolymer/poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF) blend membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2016, 514, 429439,  DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2016.05.021
  17. 17
    Hashim, N. A.; Liu, F.; Abed, M. R. M.; Li, K. Chemistry in spinning solutions: Surface modification of PVDF membranes during phase inversion. J. Membr. Sci. 2012, 415, 399411,  DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2012.05.024
  18. 18
    Wu, H.; Li, T.; Liu, B.; Chen, C.; Wang, S.; Crittenden, J. C. Blended PVC/PVC-g-PEGMA ultrafiltration membranes with enhanced performance and antifouling properties. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 455, 987996,  DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.06.056
  19. 19
    Yang, B.; Yang, X.; Liu, B.; Chen, Z.; Chen, C.; Liang, S.; Chu, L.-Y.; Crittenden, J. PVDF blended PVDF-g-PMAA pH-responsive membrane: Effect of additives and solvents on membrane properties and performance. J. Membr. Sci. 2017, 541, 558566,  DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2017.07.045
  20. 20
    Hester, J. F.; Banerjee, P.; Won, Y. Y.; Akthakul, A.; Acar, M. H.; Mayes, A. M. ATRP of amphiphilic graft copolymers based on PVDF and their use as membrane additives. Macromolecules 2002, 35, 76527661,  DOI: 10.1021/ma0122270
  21. 21
    Ran, J.; Wu, L.; Zhang, Z.; Xu, T. Atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP): A versatile and forceful tool for functional membranes. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2014, 39, 124144,  DOI: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.09.001
  22. 22
    Xu, F. J.; Zhao, J. P.; Kang, E. T.; Neoh, K. G.; Li, J. Functionalization of nylon membranes via surface-initiated atom-transfer radical polymerization. Langmuir 2007, 23, 85858592,  DOI: 10.1021/la7011342
  23. 23
    Zhou, Z.; Rajabzadeh, S.; Shaikh, A. R.; Kakihana, Y.; Ma, W.; Matsuyama, H. Effect of surface properties on antifouling performance of poly(vinyl chloride-co-poly(ethylene glycol)methyl ether methacrylate)/PVC blend membrane. J. Membr. Sci. 2016, 514, 537546,  DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2016.05.008
  24. 24
    Matyjaszewski, K. Advanced Materials by Atom Transfer Radical Polymerization. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1706441  DOI: 10.1002/adma.201706441
  25. 25
    Matyjaszewski, K. Atom Transfer Radical Polymerization (ATRP): Current Status and Future Perspectives. Macromolecules 2012, 45, 40154039,  DOI: 10.1021/ma3001719
  26. 26
    Bhattacharya, A.; Misra, B. N. Grafting: a versatile means to modify polymers - Techniques, factors and applications. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2004, 29, 767814,  DOI: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2004.05.002
  27. 27
    Chang, Y.; Ko, C.-Y.; Shih, Y.-J.; Quemener, D.; Deratani, A.; Wei, T.-C.; Wang, D.-M.; Lai, J.-Y. Surface grafting control of PEGylated poly(vinylidene fluoride) antifouling membrane via surface-initiated radical graft copolymerization. J. Membr. Sci. 2009, 345, 160169,  DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2009.08.039
  28. 28
    Liu, B.; Chen, C.; Li, T.; Crittenden, J.; Chen, Y. High performance ultrafiltration membrane composed of PVDF blended with its derivative copolymer PVDF-g-PEGMA. J. Membr. Sci. 2013, 445, 6675,  DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2013.05.043
  29. 29
    Hashim, N. A.; Liu, F.; Li, K. A simplified method for preparation of hydrophilic PVDF membranes from an amphiphilic graft copolymer. J. Membr. Sci. 2009, 345, 134141,  DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2009.08.032
  30. 30
    Chen, C.; Tang, L.; Liu, B.; Zhang, X.; Crittenden, J.; Chen, K. L.; Chen, Y. Forming mechanism study of unique pillar-like and defect-free PVDF ultrafiltration membranes with high flux. J. Membr. Sci. 2015, 487, 111,  DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2015.03.075
  31. 31
    Wang, S.; Li, T.; Chen, C.; Liu, B.; Crittenden, J. C. PVDF ultrafiltration membranes of controlled performance via blending PVDF-g-PEGMA copolymer synthesized under different reaction times. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. 2018, 12, 3,  DOI: 10.1007/s11783-017-0980-0
  32. 32
    Sheldon, R. A. Metrics of Green Chemistry and Sustainability: Past, Present, and Future. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 2018, 6, 3248,  DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b03505
  33. 33
    Giraud, R. J.; Williams, P. A.; Sehgal, A.; Ponnusamy, E.; Phillips, A. K.; Manley, J. B. Implementing Green Chemistry in Chemical Manufacturing: A Survey Report. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 2014, 2, 22372242,  DOI: 10.1021/sc500427d
  34. 34
    Clarke, C. J.; Tu, W. C.; Levers, O.; Brohl, A.; Hallett, J. P. Green and Sustainable Solvents in Chemical Processes. Chem. Rev. 2018, 118, 747800,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00571
  35. 35
    Sheldon, R. A. The E factor 25 years on: the rise of green chemistry and sustainability. Green Chem. 2017, 19, 1843,  DOI: 10.1039/C6GC02157C
  36. 36
    Gałuszka, A.; Migaszewski, Z.; Namiesnik, J. The 12 principles of green analytical chemistry and the SIGNIFICANCE mnemonic of green analytical practices. TrAC, Trends Anal. Chem. 2013, 50, 7884,  DOI: 10.1016/j.trac.2013.04.010
  37. 37
    Liu, F.; Hashim, N. A.; Liu, Y.; Abed, M. R. M.; Li, K. Progress in the production and modification of PVDF membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2011, 375, 127,  DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2011.03.014
  38. 38
    Yeow, M. L.; Liu, Y. T.; Li, K. Morphological study of poly(vinylidene fluoride) asymmetric membranes: Effects of the solvent, additive, and dope temperature. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2004, 92, 17821789,  DOI: 10.1002/app.20141
  39. 39
    Ali, I.; Bamaga, O. A.; Gzara, L.; Bassyouni, M.; Abdel-Aziz, M. H.; Soliman, M. F.; Drioli, E.; Albeirutty, M. Assessment of Blend PVDF Membranes, and the Effect of Polymer Concentration and Blend Composition. Membranes 2018, 8, 13,  DOI: 10.3390/membranes8010013
  40. 40
    Marino, T.; Galiano, F.; Simone, S.; Figoli, A. DMSO EVOL as novel non-toxic solvent for polyethersulfone membrane preparation. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019, 26, 1477414785,  DOI: 10.1007/s11356-018-3575-9
  41. 41
    Wang, H. H.; Jung, J. T.; Kim, J. F.; Kim, S.; Drioli, E.; Lee, Y. M. A novel green solvent alternative for polymeric membrane preparation via nonsolvent-induced phase separation (NIPS). J. Membr. Sci. 2019, 574, 4454,  DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2018.12.051
  42. 42
    Arahman, N.; Mulyati, S.; Fahrina, A. Morphology and performance of pvdf membranes composed of triethylphospate and dimethyl sulfoxide solvents. Mater. Res. Express 2019, 6, 066419  DOI: 10.1088/2053-1591/ab1032
  43. 43
    Evenepoel, N.; Wen, S.; Tsehaye, M. T.; Van der Bruggen, B. Van der Bruggen, B. Potential of DMSO as greener solvent for PES ultra- and nanofiltration membrane preparation. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2018, 135, 46494  DOI: 10.1002/app.46494
  44. 44
    Xie, W.; Li, T.; Chen, C.; Wu, H.; Liang, S.; Chang, H.; Liu, B.; Drioli, E.; Wang, Q.; Crittenden, J. C. Using the Green Solvent Dimethyl Sulfoxide To Replace Traditional Solvents Partly and Fabricating PVC/PVC-g-PEGMA Blended Ultrafiltration Membranes with High Permeability and Rejection. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2019, 58, 64136423,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.9b00370
  45. 45
    Bottino, A.; Capannelli, G.; Munari, S.; Turturro, A. Solubility Parameters of Poly(vinylidene fluoride). J. Polym. Sci., Part B: Polym. Phys. 1988, 26, 785794,  DOI: 10.1002/polb.1988.090260405
  46. 46
    Van Krevelen, D. W.; Te Nijenhuis, K. Cohesive Properties and Solubility. In Properties of Polymers, 4th ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, 2009; Chapter 7, pp 189227.
  47. 47
    Liu, B.; Chen, C.; Zhang, W.; Crittenden, J.; Chen, Y. Low-cost antifouling PVC ultrafiltration membrane fabrication with Pluronic F 127: Effect of additives on properties and performance. Desalination 2012, 307, 2633,  DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2012.07.036
  48. 48
    Asatekin, A.; Kang, S.; Elimelech, M.; Mayes, A. M. Anti-fouling ultrafiltration membranes containing polyacrylonitrile-graft-poly (ethylene oxide) comb copolymer additives. J. Membr. Sci. 2007, 298, 136146,  DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2007.04.011
  49. 49
    Zhao, X.; Su, Y.; Li, Y.; Zhang, R.; Zhao, J.; Jiang, Z. Engineering amphiphilic membrane surfaces based on PEO and PDMS segments for improved antifouling performances. J. Membr. Sci. 2014, 450, 111123,  DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2013.08.044
  50. 50
    Zhao, X.; Su, Y.; Chen, W.; Peng, J.; Jiang, Z. Grafting perfluoroalkyl groups onto polyacrylonitrile membrane surface for improved fouling release property. J. Membr. Sci. 2012, 415, 824834,  DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2012.05.075
  51. 51
    Chen, Y. W.; Liu, D. M.; Deng, Q. L.; He, X. H.; Wang, X. F. Atom transfer radical polymerization directly from poly(vinylidene fluoride): Surface and antifouling properties. J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 2006, 44, 34343443,  DOI: 10.1002/pola.21456
  52. 52
    Benz, M.; Euler, W. B. Determination of the crystalline phases of poly(vinylidene fluoride) under different preparation conditions using differential scanning calorimetry and infrared spectroscopy. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2003, 89, 10931100,  DOI: 10.1002/app.12267
  53. 53
    Sencadas, V.; Gregorio, R.; Lanceros-Mendez, S. Processing and characterization of a novel nonporous poly(vinilidene fluoride) films in the beta phase. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2006, 352, 22262229,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2006.02.052
  54. 54
    Gregorio, R. Determination of the alpha, beta, and gamma crystalline phases of poly(vinylidene fluoride) films prepared at different conditions. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2006, 100, 32723279,  DOI: 10.1002/app.23137
  55. 55
    Chang, H.; Li, T.; Liu, B.; Chen, C.; He, Q.; Crittenden, J. C. Smart ultrafiltration membrane fouling control as desalination pretreatment of shale gas fracturing wastewater: The effects of backwash water. Environ. Int. 2019, 130, 104869,  DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.05.063
  56. 56
    Shen, J.; Zhang, Q.; Yin, Q.; Cui, Z.; Li, W.; Xing, W. Fabrication and characterization of amphiphilic PVDF copolymer ultrafiltration membrane with high anti-fouling property. J. Membr. Sci. 2017, 521, 95103,  DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2016.09.006
  57. 57
    Vogler, E. A. Structure and reactivity of water at biomaterial surfaces. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 1998, 74, 69117,  DOI: 10.1016/S0001-8686(97)00040-7
  58. 58
    Tang, K.; Wang, X.; Yan, W.; Yu, J.; Xu, R. Fabrication of superhydrophilic Cu2O and CuO membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 286, 279284,  DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2006.10.005
  59. 59
    Yuan, J.; Liu, X.; Akbulut, O.; Hu, J.; Suib, S. L.; Kong, J.; Stellacci, F. Superwetting nanowire membranes for selective absorption. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2008, 3, 332336,  DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2008.136
  60. 60
    Akthakul, A.; Salinaro, R. F.; Mayes, A. M. Antifouling polymer membranes with subnanometer size selectivity. Macromolecules 2004, 37, 76637668,  DOI: 10.1021/ma048837s
  61. 61
    Xu, Z.; Liao, J.; Tang, H.; Efome, J. E.; Li, N. Preparation and antifouling property improvement of Troger’s base polymer ultrafiltration membrane. J. Membr. Sci. 2018, 561, 5968,  DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2018.05.042

Cited By

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article is cited by 26 publications.

  1. Antonios Keirouz, Francesco Galiano, Francesca Russo, Enrica Fontananova, Bernardo Castro-Dominguez, Alberto Figoli, Davide Mattia, Hannah S. Leese. Cyrene-Enabled Green Electrospinning of Nanofibrous Graphene-Based Membranes for Water Desalination via Membrane Distillation. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering 2024, 12 (49) , 17713-17725. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.4c06363
  2. Seren Acarer, İnci Pir, Mertol Tüfekci, Tuǧba Erkoç, Sevgi Güneş Durak, Vehbi Öztekin, Güler Türkoǧlu Demirkol, Mehmet Şükrü Özçoban, Tuba Yelda Temelli Çoban, Selva Ćavuş, Neşe Tüfekci. Halloysite Nanotube-Enhanced Polyacrylonitrile Ultrafiltration Membranes: Fabrication, Characterization, and Performance Evaluation. ACS Omega 2023, 8 (38) , 34729-34745. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c03655
  3. Wancen Xie, Tong Li, Alberto Tiraferri, Enrico Drioli, Alberto Figoli, John C. Crittenden, Baicang Liu. Toward the Next Generation of Sustainable Membranes from Green Chemistry Principles. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering 2021, 9 (1) , 50-75. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c07119
  4. Qidong Wu, Alberto Tiraferri, Tong Li, Wancen Xie, Haiqing Chang, Yuhua Bai, Baicang Liu. Superwettable PVDF/PVDF-g-PEGMA Ultrafiltration Membranes. ACS Omega 2020, 5 (36) , 23450-23459. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.0c03429
  5. Trisha Nicole Lazo, Irish Valerie Maggay, Lemmuel Tayo, Yung Chang, Antoine Venault. Achieving antibiofouling on microporous membranes prepared with a green solvent via spraying an aqueous antifouling copolymer solution. Journal of Membrane Science 2025, 715 , 123499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2024.123499
  6. Antoine Venault, Ren-Min Lai, Irish Valerie Maggay, Shih-Hong Liou, Yung Chang. A green zwitterionic bi-continuous membranes prepared by dual-bath procedure for mitigating biofouling during bacterial removal from water. Journal of Membrane Science 2024, 710 , 123166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2024.123166
  7. Abeera Naeem, Babar Saeed, Hamad AlMohamadi, Mungyu Lee, Mazhar Amjad Gilani, R. Nawaz, Asim Laeeq Khan, Muhammad Yasin. Sustainable and green membranes for chemical separations: A review. Separation and Purification Technology 2024, 83 , 126271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2024.126271
  8. Li-Cheng Jheng, Ting-Yu Chang, Chin-Ting Fan, Tsung-Han Hsieh, Feng-Ming Hsieh, Wan-Ju Huang. Toughening of epoxy thermosets by self-assembled nanostructures of amphiphilic comb-like random copolymers. RSC Advances 2023, 13 (47) , 33484-33494. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3RA06349F
  9. Adharsh Raghavan, Christopher L. Cahill. Oxidation of dimethylsulfoxide in the presence of uranyl salts. Polyhedron 2023, 243 , 116530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poly.2023.116530
  10. Navid Rabiee, Rajni Sharma, Sahar Foorginezhad, Maryam Jouyandeh, Mohsen Asadnia, Mohammad Rabiee, Omid Akhavan, Eder C. Lima, Krzysztof Formela, Milad Ashrafizadeh, Zari Fallah, Mahnaz Hassanpour, Abbas Mohammadi, Mohammad Reza Saeb. Green and Sustainable Membranes: A review. Environmental Research 2023, 231 , 116133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2023.116133
  11. Zhihua Wang, Ling‐Chao Cheng, Xinglei He, Ke‐Yin Ye. Lithium tert ‐butoxide/DMSO‐mediated Rapid Synthesis of Naphthalenes, Benzofurans, and Indoles. Asian Journal of Organic Chemistry 2023, 12 (6) https://doi.org/10.1002/ajoc.202300135
  12. Tesfaye Abebe Geleta, Irish Valerie Maggay, Yung Chang, Antoine Venault. Recent Advances on the Fabrication of Antifouling Phase-Inversion Membranes by Physical Blending Modification Method. Membranes 2023, 13 (1) , 58. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes13010058
  13. Xuan Liu, Huang Luo, Chuanfang Yan, Yuan Liu, Hang Luo, Dou Zhang, Sheng Chen. Achieving synergistic improvement in dielectric constant and energy storage properties of all-organic liquid crystal molecule/PVDF composites. Journal of Materials Chemistry C 2022, 10 (46) , 17757-17767. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2TC03556A
  14. Hana Nur Aini, Irish Maggay, Yung Chang, Antoine Venault. A Green Stable Antifouling PEGylated PVDF Membrane Prepared by Vapor-Induced Phase Separation. Membranes 2022, 12 (12) , 1277. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes12121277
  15. Antoine Venault, Hana Nur Aini, Tesfaye Abebe Galeta, Yung Chang. Using the dimethyl sulfoxide green solvent for the making of antifouling PEGylated membranes by the vapor-induced phase separation process. Journal of Membrane Science Letters 2022, 2 (2) , 100025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memlet.2022.100025
  16. Pappu Kumar Burnwal, Priya Pal, Md. Oayes Midda, S. P. Chaurasia. Synthesis of Hybrid PVDF–PTFE Membrane Using Nonhazardous Solvent for Ethanol–Water Separation through Membrane Distillation. Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste 2022, 26 (4) https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HZ.2153-5515.0000710
  17. Nikola Papež, Tatiana Pisarenko, Erik Ščasnovič, Dinara Sobola, Ştefan Ţălu, Rashid Dallaev, Klára Částková, Petr Sedlák. A Brief Introduction and Current State of Polyvinylidene Fluoride as an Energy Harvester. Coatings 2022, 12 (10) , 1429. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12101429
  18. Lilantian Cheng, Zixun Zhou, Lei Li, Pei Xiao, Yun Ma, Fei Liu, Jian Li. PVDF/MOFs mixed matrix ultrafiltration membrane for efficient water treatment. Frontiers in Chemistry 2022, 10 https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2022.985750
  19. Rosalin Rath, Smita Mohanty, Sanjay K. Nayak, Lakshmi Unnikrishnan. Surface architecture and proton conduction in SPVDF-co-HFP based nanocomposite membrane for fuel cell applications: Influence of aprotic solvent mixture. Polymer 2021, 234 , 124248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2021.124248
  20. Yujia Tong, Wenlong Ding, Lijian Shi, Weixing Li. Fabricating novel PVDF-g-IBMA copolymer hydrophilic ultrafiltration membrane for treating papermaking wastewater with good antifouling property. Water Science and Technology 2021, 84 (9) , 2541-2556. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2021.364
  21. Vatsal Shah, Bo Wang, Kang Li. High-performance PVDF membranes prepared by the combined crystallisation and diffusion (CCD) method using a dual-casting technique: a breakthrough for water treatment applications. Energy & Environmental Science 2021, 14 (10) , 5491-5500. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1EE02009A
  22. Wancen Xie, Alberto Tiraferri, Xuanyu Ji, Chen Chen, Yuhua Bai, John C. Crittenden, Baicang Liu. Green and sustainable method of manufacturing anti-fouling zwitterionic polymers-modified poly(vinyl chloride) ultrafiltration membranes. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 2021, 591 , 343-351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2021.01.107
  23. Madeshwaran Sekkarapatti Ramasamy, Ashiqur Rahaman, Byungki Kim. Effect of phenyl-isocyanate functionalized graphene oxide on the crystalline phases, mechanical and piezoelectric properties of electrospun PVDF nanofibers. Ceramics International 2021, 47 (8) , 11010-11021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.12.223
  24. Norafiqah Ismail, Mohamed Essalhi, Mahmoud Rahmati, Zhaoliang Cui, Mohamed Khayet, Naser Tavajohi. Experimental and theoretical studies on the formation of pure β-phase polymorphs during fabrication of polyvinylidene fluoride membranes by cyclic carbonate solvents. Green Chemistry 2021, 23 (5) , 2130-2147. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1GC00122A
  25. Isabel Vázquez-Fernández, Mohamed Raghibi, Adnane Bouzina, Laure Timperman, Janick Bigarré, Mérièm Anouti. Protic ionic liquids/poly(vinylidene fluoride) composite membranes for fuel cell application. Journal of Energy Chemistry 2021, 53 , 197-207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jechem.2020.04.022
  26. Francesco Ricceri, Mattia Giagnorio, Katherine R. Zodrow, Alberto Tiraferri. Organic fouling in forward osmosis: Governing factors and a direct comparison with membrane filtration driven by hydraulic pressure. Journal of Membrane Science 2021, 619 , 118759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2020.118759

ACS Omega

Cite this: ACS Omega 2019, 4, 22, 19799–19807
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.9b02674
Published November 7, 2019

Copyright © 2019 American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under these Terms of Use.

Article Views

2547

Altmetric

-

Citations

Learn about these metrics

Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.

  • Abstract

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. XPS spectra of the PVDF/PVDF-g-PEGMA membranes cast from different solvents or solvent mixtures: (a) PVDF1, DMSO; (b) PVDF2, DMSO/DMAc = 3:7; (c) PVDF3, DMSO/NMP = 5:5; and (d) PVDF4, DMSO/THF/DMF = 5:1.5:3.5. The content of the main elements was calculated and reported in the graphs.

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. ATR-FTIR spectra of the PVDF/PVDF-g-PEGMA membranes cast using different solvents or solvent mixtures. PVDF1, DMSO; PVDF2, DMSO/DMAc = 3:7, PVDF3, DMSO/ NMP = 5:5; and PVDF4, DMSO/THF/DMF = 5:1.5:3.5. The 1727 cm−1 peak represents C═O bonds, and the 1638 cm−1 peak represents C═C bonds. Also indicated are the peaks relative to the characteristic bonds that represent the PVDF α and β crystalline phases.

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. Representative SEM micrographs of the surface and cross-section morphologies of all of the PVDF/PVDF-g-PEGMA membranes. PVDF1, DMSO (A, B); PVDF2, DMSO/DMAc = 3:7 (C, D); PVDF3, NMP/DMSO = 5:5 (E, F); and PVDF4, THF/DMF/DMSO = 1.5:3.5:5 (G, H). The membrane surface images are shown in the top row, while the cross-sectional morphologies are shown in the bottom row.

    Figure 4

    Figure 4. Contact angles as a function of time of PVDF/PVDF-g-PEGMA membranes using different solvents or solvent mixtures. PVDF1, DMSO; PVDF2, DMSO/DMAc = 7:3, PVDF3, DMSO/NMP = 5:5; and PVDF4, DMSO/THF/DMF = 5:1.5:3.5.

    Figure 5

    Figure 5. Transport performance and fouling behavior of the PVDF/PVDF-g-PEGMA membranes using different solvents or solvent mixtures. PVDF1, DMSO; PVDF2, DMSO/DMAc=3:7; PVDF3, DMSO/NMP=5:5; and PVDF4, DMSO/THF/DMF=5:1.5:3.5. (A) Flux as a function of time using pure water or sodium alginate as feed solution; B) FRR, DRt, DRr, and DRir indices; and (C) SA rejection.

  • References


    This article references 61 other publications.

    1. 1
      Buonomenna, M. G.; Lopez, L. C.; Favia, P.; d’Agostino, R.; Gordano, A.; Drioli, E. New PVDF membranes: The effect of plasma surface modification on retention in nanofiltration of aqueous solution containing organic compounds. Water Res. 2007, 41, 43094316,  DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2007.06.033
    2. 2
      Chen, Y.; Deng, Q.; Mao, J.; Nie, H.; Wu, L.; Zhou, W.; Huang, B. Controlled grafting from poly(vinylidene fluoride) microfiltration membranes via reverse atom transfer radical polymerization and antifouling properties. Polymer 2007, 48, 76047613,  DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2007.10.043
    3. 3
      Bonyadi, S.; Chung, T.-S. Highly porous and macrovoid-free PVDF hollow fiber membranes for membrane distillation by a solvent-dope solution co-extrusion approach. J. Membr. Sci. 2009, 331, 6674,  DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2009.01.014
    4. 4
      Boributh, S.; Chanachai, A.; Jiraratananon, R. Modification of PVDF membrane by chitosan solution for reducing protein fouling. J. Membr. Sci. 2009, 342, 97104,  DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2009.06.022
    5. 5
      Zheng, Z.-S.; Li, B.-B.; Duan, S.-Y.; Sun, D.; Peng, C.-K. Preparation of PVDF ultrafiltration membranes using PVA as pore surface hydrophilic modification agent with improved antifouling performance. Polym. Eng. Sci. 2019, 59, E384E393,  DOI: 10.1002/pen.24996
    6. 6
      Sun, D.; Yue, D.; Li, B.; Zheng, Z.; Meng, X. Preparation and performance of the novel PVDF ultrafiltration membranes blending with PVA modified SiO2 hydrophilic nanoparticles. Polym. Eng. Sci. 2019, 59, E412E421,  DOI: 10.1002/pen.25002
    7. 7
      Benhabiles, O.; Galiano, F.; Marino, T.; Mahmoudi, H.; Lounici, H.; Figoli, A. Preparation and Characterization of TiO2-PVDF/PMMA Blend Membranes Using an Alternative Non-Toxic Solvent for UF/MF and Photocatalytic Application. Molecules 2019, 24, 724  DOI: 10.3390/molecules24040724
    8. 8
      Wang, S.; Li, T.; Chen, C.; Chen, S.; Liu, B.; Crittenden, J. Non-woven PET fabric reinforced and enhanced the performance of ultrafiltration membranes composed of PVDF blended with PVDF-g-PEGMA for industrial applications. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 435, 10721079,  DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.11.193
    9. 9
      Venault, A.; Chang, C.-Y.; Tsai, T.-C.; Chang, H.-Y.; Bouyer, D.; Lee, K.-R.; Chang, Y. Surface zwitterionization of PVDF VIPS membranes for oil and water separation. J. Membr. Sci. 2018, 563, 5464,  DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2018.05.049
    10. 10
      Younas, H.; Bai, H.; Shao, J.; Han, Q.; Ling, Y.; He, Y. Super-hydrophilic and fouling resistant PVDF ultrafiltration membranes based on a facile prefabricated surface. J. Membr. Sci. 2017, 541, 529540,  DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2017.07.035
    11. 11
      Liu, C.; Wu, L.; Zhang, C.; Chen, W.; Luo, S. Surface hydrophilic modification of PVDF membranes by trace amounts of tannin and polyethyleneimine. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 457, 695704,  DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.06.131
    12. 12
      Zeng, K.; Zhou, J.; Cui, Z.; Zhou, Y.; Shi, C.; Wang, X.; Zhou, L.; Ding, X.; Wang, Z.; Drioli, E. Insight into fouling behavior of poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF) hollow fiber membranes caused by dextran with different pore size distributions. Chin. J. Chem. Eng. 2018, 26, 268277,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cjche.2017.04.008
    13. 13
      Jayalakshmi, A.; Rajesh, S.; Mohan, D. Fouling propensity and separation efficiency of epoxidated polyethersulfone incorporated cellulose acetate ultrafiltration membrane in the retention of proteins. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2012, 258, 97709781,  DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2012.06.028
    14. 14
      Rajesh, S.; Jayalakshmi, A.; Senthilkumar, S.; Sankar, H. S. H.; Mohan, D. R. Performance Evaluation of Poly(amide-imide) Incorporated Cellulose Acetate Ultrafiltration Membranes in the Separation of Proteins and Its Fouling Propensity by AFM Imaging. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2011, 50, 1401614029,  DOI: 10.1021/ie201181h
    15. 15
      Behboudi, A.; Jafarzadeh, Y.; Yegani, R. Polyvinyl chloride/polycarbonate blend ultrafiltration membranes for water treatment. J. Membr. Sci. 2017, 534, 1824,  DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2017.04.011
    16. 16
      Ma, W.; Rajabzadeh, S.; Shaikh, A. R.; Kakihana, Y.; Sun, Y.; Matsuyama, H. Effect of type of poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) based amphiphilic copolymer on antifouling properties of copolymer/poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF) blend membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2016, 514, 429439,  DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2016.05.021
    17. 17
      Hashim, N. A.; Liu, F.; Abed, M. R. M.; Li, K. Chemistry in spinning solutions: Surface modification of PVDF membranes during phase inversion. J. Membr. Sci. 2012, 415, 399411,  DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2012.05.024
    18. 18
      Wu, H.; Li, T.; Liu, B.; Chen, C.; Wang, S.; Crittenden, J. C. Blended PVC/PVC-g-PEGMA ultrafiltration membranes with enhanced performance and antifouling properties. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 455, 987996,  DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.06.056
    19. 19
      Yang, B.; Yang, X.; Liu, B.; Chen, Z.; Chen, C.; Liang, S.; Chu, L.-Y.; Crittenden, J. PVDF blended PVDF-g-PMAA pH-responsive membrane: Effect of additives and solvents on membrane properties and performance. J. Membr. Sci. 2017, 541, 558566,  DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2017.07.045
    20. 20
      Hester, J. F.; Banerjee, P.; Won, Y. Y.; Akthakul, A.; Acar, M. H.; Mayes, A. M. ATRP of amphiphilic graft copolymers based on PVDF and their use as membrane additives. Macromolecules 2002, 35, 76527661,  DOI: 10.1021/ma0122270
    21. 21
      Ran, J.; Wu, L.; Zhang, Z.; Xu, T. Atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP): A versatile and forceful tool for functional membranes. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2014, 39, 124144,  DOI: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.09.001
    22. 22
      Xu, F. J.; Zhao, J. P.; Kang, E. T.; Neoh, K. G.; Li, J. Functionalization of nylon membranes via surface-initiated atom-transfer radical polymerization. Langmuir 2007, 23, 85858592,  DOI: 10.1021/la7011342
    23. 23
      Zhou, Z.; Rajabzadeh, S.; Shaikh, A. R.; Kakihana, Y.; Ma, W.; Matsuyama, H. Effect of surface properties on antifouling performance of poly(vinyl chloride-co-poly(ethylene glycol)methyl ether methacrylate)/PVC blend membrane. J. Membr. Sci. 2016, 514, 537546,  DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2016.05.008
    24. 24
      Matyjaszewski, K. Advanced Materials by Atom Transfer Radical Polymerization. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1706441  DOI: 10.1002/adma.201706441
    25. 25
      Matyjaszewski, K. Atom Transfer Radical Polymerization (ATRP): Current Status and Future Perspectives. Macromolecules 2012, 45, 40154039,  DOI: 10.1021/ma3001719
    26. 26
      Bhattacharya, A.; Misra, B. N. Grafting: a versatile means to modify polymers - Techniques, factors and applications. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2004, 29, 767814,  DOI: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2004.05.002
    27. 27
      Chang, Y.; Ko, C.-Y.; Shih, Y.-J.; Quemener, D.; Deratani, A.; Wei, T.-C.; Wang, D.-M.; Lai, J.-Y. Surface grafting control of PEGylated poly(vinylidene fluoride) antifouling membrane via surface-initiated radical graft copolymerization. J. Membr. Sci. 2009, 345, 160169,  DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2009.08.039
    28. 28
      Liu, B.; Chen, C.; Li, T.; Crittenden, J.; Chen, Y. High performance ultrafiltration membrane composed of PVDF blended with its derivative copolymer PVDF-g-PEGMA. J. Membr. Sci. 2013, 445, 6675,  DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2013.05.043
    29. 29
      Hashim, N. A.; Liu, F.; Li, K. A simplified method for preparation of hydrophilic PVDF membranes from an amphiphilic graft copolymer. J. Membr. Sci. 2009, 345, 134141,  DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2009.08.032
    30. 30
      Chen, C.; Tang, L.; Liu, B.; Zhang, X.; Crittenden, J.; Chen, K. L.; Chen, Y. Forming mechanism study of unique pillar-like and defect-free PVDF ultrafiltration membranes with high flux. J. Membr. Sci. 2015, 487, 111,  DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2015.03.075
    31. 31
      Wang, S.; Li, T.; Chen, C.; Liu, B.; Crittenden, J. C. PVDF ultrafiltration membranes of controlled performance via blending PVDF-g-PEGMA copolymer synthesized under different reaction times. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. 2018, 12, 3,  DOI: 10.1007/s11783-017-0980-0
    32. 32
      Sheldon, R. A. Metrics of Green Chemistry and Sustainability: Past, Present, and Future. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 2018, 6, 3248,  DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b03505
    33. 33
      Giraud, R. J.; Williams, P. A.; Sehgal, A.; Ponnusamy, E.; Phillips, A. K.; Manley, J. B. Implementing Green Chemistry in Chemical Manufacturing: A Survey Report. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 2014, 2, 22372242,  DOI: 10.1021/sc500427d
    34. 34
      Clarke, C. J.; Tu, W. C.; Levers, O.; Brohl, A.; Hallett, J. P. Green and Sustainable Solvents in Chemical Processes. Chem. Rev. 2018, 118, 747800,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00571
    35. 35
      Sheldon, R. A. The E factor 25 years on: the rise of green chemistry and sustainability. Green Chem. 2017, 19, 1843,  DOI: 10.1039/C6GC02157C
    36. 36
      Gałuszka, A.; Migaszewski, Z.; Namiesnik, J. The 12 principles of green analytical chemistry and the SIGNIFICANCE mnemonic of green analytical practices. TrAC, Trends Anal. Chem. 2013, 50, 7884,  DOI: 10.1016/j.trac.2013.04.010
    37. 37
      Liu, F.; Hashim, N. A.; Liu, Y.; Abed, M. R. M.; Li, K. Progress in the production and modification of PVDF membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2011, 375, 127,  DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2011.03.014
    38. 38
      Yeow, M. L.; Liu, Y. T.; Li, K. Morphological study of poly(vinylidene fluoride) asymmetric membranes: Effects of the solvent, additive, and dope temperature. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2004, 92, 17821789,  DOI: 10.1002/app.20141
    39. 39
      Ali, I.; Bamaga, O. A.; Gzara, L.; Bassyouni, M.; Abdel-Aziz, M. H.; Soliman, M. F.; Drioli, E.; Albeirutty, M. Assessment of Blend PVDF Membranes, and the Effect of Polymer Concentration and Blend Composition. Membranes 2018, 8, 13,  DOI: 10.3390/membranes8010013
    40. 40
      Marino, T.; Galiano, F.; Simone, S.; Figoli, A. DMSO EVOL as novel non-toxic solvent for polyethersulfone membrane preparation. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019, 26, 1477414785,  DOI: 10.1007/s11356-018-3575-9
    41. 41
      Wang, H. H.; Jung, J. T.; Kim, J. F.; Kim, S.; Drioli, E.; Lee, Y. M. A novel green solvent alternative for polymeric membrane preparation via nonsolvent-induced phase separation (NIPS). J. Membr. Sci. 2019, 574, 4454,  DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2018.12.051
    42. 42
      Arahman, N.; Mulyati, S.; Fahrina, A. Morphology and performance of pvdf membranes composed of triethylphospate and dimethyl sulfoxide solvents. Mater. Res. Express 2019, 6, 066419  DOI: 10.1088/2053-1591/ab1032
    43. 43
      Evenepoel, N.; Wen, S.; Tsehaye, M. T.; Van der Bruggen, B. Van der Bruggen, B. Potential of DMSO as greener solvent for PES ultra- and nanofiltration membrane preparation. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2018, 135, 46494  DOI: 10.1002/app.46494
    44. 44
      Xie, W.; Li, T.; Chen, C.; Wu, H.; Liang, S.; Chang, H.; Liu, B.; Drioli, E.; Wang, Q.; Crittenden, J. C. Using the Green Solvent Dimethyl Sulfoxide To Replace Traditional Solvents Partly and Fabricating PVC/PVC-g-PEGMA Blended Ultrafiltration Membranes with High Permeability and Rejection. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2019, 58, 64136423,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.9b00370
    45. 45
      Bottino, A.; Capannelli, G.; Munari, S.; Turturro, A. Solubility Parameters of Poly(vinylidene fluoride). J. Polym. Sci., Part B: Polym. Phys. 1988, 26, 785794,  DOI: 10.1002/polb.1988.090260405
    46. 46
      Van Krevelen, D. W.; Te Nijenhuis, K. Cohesive Properties and Solubility. In Properties of Polymers, 4th ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, 2009; Chapter 7, pp 189227.
    47. 47
      Liu, B.; Chen, C.; Zhang, W.; Crittenden, J.; Chen, Y. Low-cost antifouling PVC ultrafiltration membrane fabrication with Pluronic F 127: Effect of additives on properties and performance. Desalination 2012, 307, 2633,  DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2012.07.036
    48. 48
      Asatekin, A.; Kang, S.; Elimelech, M.; Mayes, A. M. Anti-fouling ultrafiltration membranes containing polyacrylonitrile-graft-poly (ethylene oxide) comb copolymer additives. J. Membr. Sci. 2007, 298, 136146,  DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2007.04.011
    49. 49
      Zhao, X.; Su, Y.; Li, Y.; Zhang, R.; Zhao, J.; Jiang, Z. Engineering amphiphilic membrane surfaces based on PEO and PDMS segments for improved antifouling performances. J. Membr. Sci. 2014, 450, 111123,  DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2013.08.044
    50. 50
      Zhao, X.; Su, Y.; Chen, W.; Peng, J.; Jiang, Z. Grafting perfluoroalkyl groups onto polyacrylonitrile membrane surface for improved fouling release property. J. Membr. Sci. 2012, 415, 824834,  DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2012.05.075
    51. 51
      Chen, Y. W.; Liu, D. M.; Deng, Q. L.; He, X. H.; Wang, X. F. Atom transfer radical polymerization directly from poly(vinylidene fluoride): Surface and antifouling properties. J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 2006, 44, 34343443,  DOI: 10.1002/pola.21456
    52. 52
      Benz, M.; Euler, W. B. Determination of the crystalline phases of poly(vinylidene fluoride) under different preparation conditions using differential scanning calorimetry and infrared spectroscopy. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2003, 89, 10931100,  DOI: 10.1002/app.12267
    53. 53
      Sencadas, V.; Gregorio, R.; Lanceros-Mendez, S. Processing and characterization of a novel nonporous poly(vinilidene fluoride) films in the beta phase. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2006, 352, 22262229,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2006.02.052
    54. 54
      Gregorio, R. Determination of the alpha, beta, and gamma crystalline phases of poly(vinylidene fluoride) films prepared at different conditions. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2006, 100, 32723279,  DOI: 10.1002/app.23137
    55. 55
      Chang, H.; Li, T.; Liu, B.; Chen, C.; He, Q.; Crittenden, J. C. Smart ultrafiltration membrane fouling control as desalination pretreatment of shale gas fracturing wastewater: The effects of backwash water. Environ. Int. 2019, 130, 104869,  DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.05.063
    56. 56
      Shen, J.; Zhang, Q.; Yin, Q.; Cui, Z.; Li, W.; Xing, W. Fabrication and characterization of amphiphilic PVDF copolymer ultrafiltration membrane with high anti-fouling property. J. Membr. Sci. 2017, 521, 95103,  DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2016.09.006
    57. 57
      Vogler, E. A. Structure and reactivity of water at biomaterial surfaces. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 1998, 74, 69117,  DOI: 10.1016/S0001-8686(97)00040-7
    58. 58
      Tang, K.; Wang, X.; Yan, W.; Yu, J.; Xu, R. Fabrication of superhydrophilic Cu2O and CuO membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 286, 279284,  DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2006.10.005
    59. 59
      Yuan, J.; Liu, X.; Akbulut, O.; Hu, J.; Suib, S. L.; Kong, J.; Stellacci, F. Superwetting nanowire membranes for selective absorption. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2008, 3, 332336,  DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2008.136
    60. 60
      Akthakul, A.; Salinaro, R. F.; Mayes, A. M. Antifouling polymer membranes with subnanometer size selectivity. Macromolecules 2004, 37, 76637668,  DOI: 10.1021/ma048837s
    61. 61
      Xu, Z.; Liao, J.; Tang, H.; Efome, J. E.; Li, N. Preparation and antifouling property improvement of Troger’s base polymer ultrafiltration membrane. J. Membr. Sci. 2018, 561, 5968,  DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2018.05.042
  • Supporting Information

    Supporting Information


    The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.9b02674.

    • Calculations and experiment results; AFM morphologies of the fabricated membranes; mechanical performances of the fabricated membranes; calculation process using a group contribution method to calculate the solubility parameter of PEGMA; δd, δh, and δp values and densities of some solvents; detailed calculation of the δd, δh, and δp values of mixed solvents; FRR, DRt, DRr; and DRir results of the fabricated membranes (PDF)


    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.