ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
Empowering Clinical Diagnostics with Mass Spectrometry
My Activity
  • Open Access
Mini-Review

Empowering Clinical Diagnostics with Mass Spectrometry
Click to copy article linkArticle link copied!

Open PDF

ACS Omega

Cite this: ACS Omega 2020, 5, 5, 2041–2048
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.9b03764
Published January 30, 2020

Copyright © 2020 American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under these Terms of Use.

Abstract

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The unmet need for highly accurate methods of disease diagnosis poses new challenges for developments in laboratory medicine. Advances in mass spectrometry (MS)-based disease biomarker discoveries are continuously expanding the clinical diagnostic landscape. Although a number of MS-based in vitro diagnostics are already adopted in routine clinical practices, more are expected to undergo transition from bench to bedside in the near future. The ultrahigh sensitivity, specificity, and low turnaround time in molecular detection by MS make this technology highly powerful in disease detection and therapy monitoring. This mini-review highlights how MS has created a new paradigm in clinical diagnosis, which is growing in importance for public health.

Copyright © 2020 American Chemical Society
Accurate and rapid performance of medical diagnostic tests is greatly desired to foster clinical decision making and improve human healthcare. The continuous development of new analytical methods and techniques over the last five decades has made a dramatic impact on disease detection and therapeutic treatments. While the majority of in vitro diagnostics involves immunoassays to detect the target analyte, some limitations of this method (cross-reactivity, low sensitivity, limited dynamic range, and often expensive and time-consuming processing) make us pay attention to better solutions with alternative approaches, which should be highly sensitive and specific and offer high throughput. Lately, much excitement has met the news that mass spectrometry (MS) can outperform traditional chemical/biochemical measurements in diagnostic molecular pathology with its ultrahigh sensitivity that can go up to the femtomolar range. (1) MS technologies are continuously evolving with new ion source design, enhancement of resolution and sensitivity, and miniaturization over more than a hundred years since its first invention by J. J. Thomson. Increased automation and reduced architectural complexity, size, and cost of different types of MS instruments also promise easy housing and operation. Introduction of electrospray ionization (ESI) and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI) mass spectrometry in the late 1980s had laid the foundation for large protein detection. Coupling liquid chromatography with ESI mass spectrometry (LC-MS) added another dimension to the analysis of the crude biological mixture in less time. Since then, enormous success in accurate measurement and identification of endogenous biomolecules helped in deciphering the biological mechanism of disease progression and pinpointing the potential biomarkers associated with a disease. MS-based discoveries of new diagnostic biomarkers have played increasingly important roles in disease risk assessment, screening, prognosis, therapy selection, and monitoring. The recent development of ambient ionization mass spectrometry has enabled direct analysis of biological samples (blood, urine, tissue, saliva, sweat, skin, and exhaled breath gases) with little or no sample pretreatment, providing the increased utility of the MS through rapid in situ approaches. This also opens opportunities to invoke MS as a point-of-care (POC) device in the clinical setting for rapid detection of biomarkers, while the patient is on the site, enabling early-stage diagnosis and quick medical decision-making. In this context, miniature MS systems are highly desired for their easy implementation in the field (e.g., in ambulances and health camps) and at the bedside, expanding the use of biomarkers for POC diagnostics. Indeed, recent developments of hand-held/palm-portable (weight ∼1.5 kg) and several other types (weight <15 kg) of miniature MS systems equipped with different types of mass analyzers (quadrupole, cylindrical, rectilinear, and toroidal ion traps) drive their potential for clinical integration at the POC. (2,3) Though clinical implementations of these miniature MS devices are at the early stage, assessment of their POC performance needs to be evaluated in terms of their reduced cost and size, improved detection limit and ranges, automation, robustness, versatility, and integration with ambient ionization sources.
The nature of ionization also plays a crucial role in discovering disease biomarkers of various sizes and polarities (Figure 1). After the introduction of electron ionization (EI) by Arthur J. Dempster in 1918, several types of other ionization methods have been developed in the last hundred years for mass spectrometric sampling. The classic methods, which have been used for several years, are EI and chemical ionization (CI). However, these techniques are not found to be used much for clinical diagnostics in modern days because of their limitations in analyzing a wide range of polar biomolecules. Most of the mass-spectrometry-based clinical applications nowadays use MALDI, ESI, atmospheric pressure chemical ionization (APCI), and different types of ambient ionization (AI) sources. Figure 1 shows application ranges of different types of ionization techniques in discovering biomarkers of different sizes and polarities. For example, MALDI and ESI provide excellent coverage of a wide range of molecules, especially the large biomolecules (e.g., proteins), whereas APCI and AI generally examine small metabolites and lipids in the biological sample.

Figure 1

Figure 1. Portrayal ranges of different ionization techniques in the discovery of biomarkers of various molecular weights and polarity.

MALDI- and LC-MS in Clinical Laboratories

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The recent “omics revolution” for biomarker discovery is largely being influenced by the robust performance of soft ionization MS techniques, such as MALDI- and LC-ESI-MS. An enormous amount of work on biological and clinical mass spectrometry, particularly in the last three decades, is unleashing the power of these MS techniques for their ubiquitous role in healthcare. Figure 2 shows the workflow, which is often followed in clinical diagnostics based on MALDI- or LC-MS (often through the ESI interface). Indeed, in the past ten years, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved a number of these MS-based in vitro diagnostic methods for the identification of microbes, newborn screening (NBS), quantification of therapeutic drugs in the circulation, and vitamin D assay.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Schematic overview of the workflow in clinical diagnosis based on mass spectrometry (MALDI-MS or LC-ESI-MS).

The microbial recognition by a benchtop MS (Bruker MALDI Biotyper CA) has revolutionized the way the pathogenic microbes are identified from the culture of human specimens. (4) This MS device intercepts characteristic proteome fingerprints of the microorganism colonies and matches them against the reference library spectra to detect it. Thus, the system has gained the ability to identify more than 400 clinically relevant bacteria and yeast species covering nearly 98% of typical bacterial identification tests done conventionally. This has also attained accuracy comparable to that of a nucleic acid sequencing method, but speed, easy operation, robustness, and cost-effectiveness of the MS method can achieve widespread implementation of this technique in microbial testing in the near future.
Likewise, liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) has emerged as a powerful technique for the simultaneous detection of multiple amino acids, free carnitine, and acylcarnitines from the dried blood spot, providing critical information about inborn errors of metabolism. (5) This MS-based method can successfully screen more than 50 different metabolic disorders in one rapid test. This is strikingly different from the conventional enzyme- or immunoassays, which required one test to detect one disorder. Thus, LC-MS/MS has invoked a radical change in newborn screening (NBS), which is routinely being used in many counties. This has significantly contributed to the prevention and medical intervention of many metabolic disorders before they become symptomatic.
Another success of the LC-MS/MS technique in clinical diagnosis is therapeutic drug monitoring, especially the quantification of immunosuppressant drugs in blood, which have a narrow therapeutic index. (6) Often this method is applied to estimate the concentration of cyclosporine, tacrolimus, sirolimus, and mycophenolic acid to control their levels in the blood to avoid toxicity and organ rejection during the transplantation. Although immunoassays can be performed here, MS is preferred because of its greater specificity.
Analysis of vitamin D levels in serum by LC-MS/MS is now a gold standard method in clinical laboratories. (7) While immunoassays cannot distinguish between 25-hydroxy vitamins D2 and D3, the MS method can separately quantify them with high accuracy. Information on a person’s vitamin D status is important as the deficiency of the same is linked to several skeletal disorders and other diseases. Furthermore, the mass spectrometric study of vitamin D metabolism is tremendously contributing to unraveling the pathophysiology of vitamin D related diseases as well.
The well-documented superiority of the LC-MS/MS technique over traditional immunoassays is often noticed in the literature, which investigates steroids for diagnosing several endocrine disorders. (1) Immunoassays often result in the overestimation of those steroids because of cross-reactivity. In contrast, the high specificity of the LC-MS/MS method can successfully analyze steroid hormones with high accuracy. Assessment of thyroid function is crucial in endocrinology. Similarly, the LC-MS/MS technique allows rapid evaluation of thyroid hormones following the isotope dilution method, which can outperform the conventional gold standard equilibrium dialysis method by its speed and sensitivity. These impressive diagnostic capabilities of MS in endocrinology should find potential routine applications in clinics soon. However, many such MS-based endocrinology tests can be found as laboratory-developed tests (LDT) in several companies/institutes in the US.
It is also important to note that the choice of MS instrument varies depending on the clinical application. For example, a triple-quadrupole mass spectrometer coupled to LC is often the choice for quantitative analysis of most of the small molecules for NBS, therapeutic drug monitoring, vitamin D, and steroid assays. A MALDI-TOF (time-of-flight) mass spectrometer is generally used for clinical microbiology as mentioned above.
Although the above selected MS applications in disease diagnosis are followed in several hospitals and clinical settings across the world, there are many more potential MS-based diagnostic tests, which show great promise for the future of laboratory medicine and pathology. The discovery of several diagnostic biomarkers through omics study of blood and tissue samples using MS technology has opened up a new avenue in clinical diagnosis. Several tumor biomarkers, thus, have been identified through intensive research and are awaiting their validation in cohort studies and clinical trials. Evaluation of endogenous metabolic profiles by MS has also demonstrated the usefulness of this technique in disease detection.
In the last two decades, significant trends have been observed in succeeding with artificial intelligence (machine learning) to recognize the complex pattern of omics data recorded by MS for classifying disease and healthy states. In this method, often a training set is first constructed by mining complex MS data (supervised learning) from samples with known pathology (e.g., unhealthy vs healthy) to develop a statistical classifier, which can be further tested with a cross-validation process to access the predictive accuracy within the training set. The performance of the classifier is also judged by applying that to the independent validation set of samples, propelling the discovery of MS diagnostic patterns and therapeutic targets from the omics data. This machine learning approach typically includes (a) dimensionality reduction by decreasing the number of random variables (ion signals), (b) clustering classification to organize ion signals with common characteristics into different groups, (c) density estimation which analyzes ion signals in specific space, and (d) regression analysis to recognize the ion signal patterns for developing the predictive model. More details of the method can be found somewhere else in the literature. (8) This pattern recognition approach avoids the tedious job of finding a single or a few biomarkers. Rather, evaluating all MS ion signals (hundreds to thousands) as biomarkers in this process lends much more predicting power of the data, accurately providing the diagnostic information. These types of artificial intelligence-based bioinformatics systems are also found to be vigilant, adaptive, and appropriate to handle the huge dimensionality of omics data, and they also remain open to gain experience through the constant flow of information from the training samples. This MS-based omics pattern diagnosis is also thought to have important implications in detecting diseases at a very early stage when slight but significant molecular dysregulation cascades, and crosstalk specific to a disease is set off.

Ambient Ionization MS: The Future of POC Diagnostics

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The development of ambient ionization mass spectrometry (AIMS) is another game-changing invention for rapid disease diagnosis with almost no sample pretreatment. (9,10) This ionization probe can be directly applied to live organs, skins, tissues, biological fluids, and volatiles open to the air (ambient conditions), aiding instantaneous capture of molecular fingerprints from those samples. Different variants of AIMS have been developed after its first introduction as desorption electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (DESI-MS) in 2004. (11)Figure 3 represents some of the most promising AIMS, which could ignite a revolution in disease detection. Table 1 summarizes the emerging applications of these AIMS in humans for gaining crucial diagnostic information in a very short time at a much lower cost.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Schematic diagrams of (a) desorption electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (DESI-MS), (b) paper spray ionization mass spectrometry (PSI-MS), (c) touch spray ionization mass spectrometry (TSI-MS), (d) extractive electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (EESI-MS), (e) rapid evaporative ionization mass spectrometry (REIMS) or iKnife, (f) MassSpec Pen, (g) direct analysis in real-time mass spectrometry (DART-MS), and (h) matrix-assisted laser desorption electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (MALDESI-MS).

Table 1. Use of Some Ambient Ionization Mass Spectrometry Techniques (Figure 3) for the Diagnostic Study in Humans
techniqueyear of inceptiontype of diagnosisreferences
DESI-MS2004distinguishing cancer and normal specimens, determining cancer aggressiveness and grades, molecular typing of cancer, identifying cancer biomarkers, intraoperative cancer margin assessment, visualizing dermal penetration of sodium channel modulator, acquiring personal information (genders, ethnicities, and ages) from latent fingerprints. (9,10,12,13,17,21)
PSI-MS2010therapeutic drug monitoring and newborn screening from dried blood spot (10,14,15)
TSI-MS2014therapeutic drug monitoring from blood, cancer diagnosis, identification of bacteria from throat swab (10,16,17)
EESI-MS2006skin and breath metabolite detection (10,18)
REIMS/iKnife2009intraoperative tissue identification, classification of the tumor and healthy specimens from different organs (10,19,20)
MassSpec Pen2017rapid discrimination of cancer from normal specimens (3)
DART-MS2005metabolic fingerprinting and quantification (10,22)
MALDESI-MS2006mapping the distribution of endogenous and exogenous (drugs) compounds in tissue specimens (23)
DESI-MS (Figure 3a) uses a stream of high-speed charged microdroplets to strike the sample (say tissue) surface extracting and transferring molecular species from the sample to the splashed microdroplets, which subsequently undergo evolution to form charged gaseous species to be detected by the MS. (11) The DESI experiment can be performed in seconds with minimal or no sample preparation. These characteristics of DESI enable high-throughput analysis of varieties of samples like biopsy specimens, pharmaceutical formulations (tablets, ointments, etc.), and biofluids spotted onto filter paper. DESI-MS can also be operated in two dimensions by scanning the tissue surface in x and y directions, allowing detailed biochemical (lipids, metabolites, etc.) mapping of the tissue. (9,12,13) The remarkable success of this label-free molecular imaging technique in rapidly evaluating biopsy specimens promises to employ DESI-MSI as a next-generation histopathology technique (discussed later).
Paper spray ionization mass spectrometry (PSI-MS) is another variant of AIMS (Figure 3b). (14) PSI-MS is often used for analyzing a dried sample (e.g., biofluid) spot on a small triangular filter paper, which is clipped to a high-voltage power supply in front of a mass spectrometer. Upon dispensing a spray solvent, analytes are electrosprayed from the sample spot followed by their detection by the mass spectrometer. Thus, human blood, urine, and tissues can be sampled rapidly through this technique under ambient conditions for mass spectrometric analysis (Table 1). These characteristics could make PSI-MS an ideal point of care device for disease detection and clinical diagnosis as the whole workflow, starting from loading the sample to reporting the result, merely takes a few minutes. (10) To date, however, the most widespread clinical use of PSI-MS has been for qualitative and quantitative detection of therapeutic drugs in blood, which can be useful in pharmacokinetics and toxicokinetics studies. (10,15)
Touch spray ionization mass spectrometry (TSI-MS) is a minor modification of PSI-MS, where instead of a paper generally a metallic teasing needle is used for sample loading (Figure 3c). (10,16,17) Simple touching of the needle tip with the sample (tissue, blood, throat swab, etc.) causes absorption of analytes in the needle tip, which is then clipped to a high-voltage power source, and the rest of the operation is similar to the PSI source as described above. This convenient and rapid sampling makes TSI-MS remarkably attractive for having low invasiveness and high-throughput performance in blood and tissue analysis (Table 1).
Extractive electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (EESI-MS) works by the fusion of two streams of aerosols, one of which is generated by ESI (Figure 3d). (10,18) The sample (urine, serum, exhaled breath, etc.) is nebulized to form aerosol droplets, which are bombarded with the electrospray (ES) droplets, causing coalescence through liquid–liquid extraction. Subsequent droplet evolution by the ES process produces gaseous charged analytes for mass spectrometric detection (Table 1). Rapid in vivo analysis of living objects (e.g., skin) using EESI-MS has been shown to have potential applications in clinical diagnosis and homeland security. (10)
Rapid evaporative ionization mass spectrometry (REIMS) is another breakthrough in AIMS (Figure 3e). (19,20) In REIMS, generally, a heated electrosurgical probe is applied to a tissue to generate a smoke of gaseous ions (generally lipid ions), which are afterward transferred to a mass spectrometer through a flexible tube and Ventury air jet pump. This allows REIMS to provide us in vivo and ex vivo diagnostic information in real time. (20) The recent innovation of intelligent knife (iKnife) for cancer surgery is based on REIMS technology. iKnife helps surgeons in determining the cancer resection margin intraoperatively, while the same is applied for cancer ablation simultaneously. The groundbreaking success of iKnife in distinguishing cancer and normal tissues provides a strong platform for its clinical adoption in cancer surgery soon.
The latest invention of a MassSpec pen (Figure 3f) also has huge promise in rapid discrimination of cancer from normal tissues by reading the biochemical signature within ten seconds. (3) A MassSpec pen is a hand-held 3D-printed pen consisting of three ports: the incoming port for the delivery of a water droplet, a central port for gas delivery, and the outgoing port for transporting the water droplet containing a biochemical cocktail to the mass spectrometer. Once the pen tip is in contact with the tissue for a few seconds, the water droplet can extract and transfer biomolecules from the tissue to the mass spectrometer. Two important characteristics, e.g., speed and sensitivity, make this pen highly promising to identify the cancer margin rapidly and intraoperatively for complete resection of the tumor. (21)
DART (direct analysis in real-time) is another versatile ambient ionization technique (Figure 3g), which can ionize species directly desorbed from the sample surface (tablets, biofluids, living organisms, etc.), followed by their mass spectrometric detection. The electrical discharge in the DART ion source delivers excited-state gaseous atoms (e.g., metastable helium), which ionize the surrounding (atmospheric) gases and eventually the analyte species through ion–molecule reaction. As DART can be used in the open environment to analyze samples in their native states (solid, liquid, and gases), this technique promises its widespread implementation for clinical and pharmacological analysis (Table 1) or as a POC device. (22)
Matrix-assisted laser desorption electrospray ionization (MALDESI) is the hybrid ambient ionization technique combining laser ablation and electrospray post ionization as illustrated in Figure 3h. Upon laser irradiation, the neutral analyte species are desorbed from the sample surface. The plume of these desorbed analytes is allowed to interact with an orthogonal electrospray plume in front of a mass spectrometer. This causes analyte charging by the ESI-like process followed by their mass spectrometric detection. Originally UV laser was used in this ionization, but recently the use of a mid-infrared (IR) laser has been invoked (IR-MALDESI). (23) The most common clinical application of MALDESI is the assessment of the distribution of endogenous and exogenous species in the tissue specimens (Table 1). If no matrix is applied for the above ionization, the technique is called electrospray-assisted laser desorption/ionization (ELDI) when UV laser is used or laser ablation electrospray ionization (LAESI) when IR laser is used. Both of these techniques have been used for ex vivo tissue imaging.

Imaging Mass Spectrometry for Disease Diagonsis

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Mass spectrometry imaging (MSI) is a powerful emerging analytical technique that allows simultaneous visualization of the spatial distribution of hundreds of biomolecules (metabolites, lipids, peptides, proteins, etc.) across the tissue specimen without labeling them. DESI and MALDI are the most common ionization techniques used in MSI to desorb analyte species from the tissue surface. (9,13,23) Thus, the imaging experiment is performed by scanning the tissue surface in 2D followed by the pixel-to-pixel recording of the mass spectral data, which are plotted finally to construct the ion images. Thus, one MSI scan enables the visualization of hundreds of biomolecules, whatever detected. MSI has great implication in the disease pathology. For example, MSI can be used to pinpoint the biomarker localization in the tissue section for discriminating cancer and normal specimens, evaluating tumor margins from the excision biopsies and diagnosing several other diseases. (9,12,13,17,21) While DESI-MSI has the ability to map the distribution of small molecules (metabolites, lipids, etc.), MALDI-MSI can image the distribution of relatively large molecules (peptides, lipids, etc.) and proteins in the tissue. However, DESI has a major advantage over MALDI, particularly because, unlike MALDI, DESI requires minimal sample preparation and does not need a vacuum chamber or an enclosure for ionization. DESI can be operated under ambient conditions (open-air sampling) rapidly to acquire the molecular information in almost real-time. DESI-MSI can be applied to a fresh tissue section or even live organ/skin without any pretreatment. Being less destructive (when the appropriate solvent spray is used), the same section can be evaluated by conventional histopathology (H&E) after its DESI-MSI study. The H&E images can be overlaid with the metabolite/lipid ion map to empower DESI-MSI in understanding the metabolic signature of the healthy and unhealthy tissue. Figure 4 presents an example of diagnosing prostate cancer using DESI-MSI. A typical surgically resected prostate specimen (Figure 4a) was evaluated by a genitourinary pathologist to delineate the areas of cancerous (red outline) and normal (black outline) tissue. DESI-MSI of the adjacent section (Figure 4b) shows the differential distributions of PS(18:0/18:1) (m/z 788.5409) and PA(20:4/17:0) (m/z 709.4778) in cancer and normal cells. While the former (PS) was found to be downregulated, the later (PA) was upregulated in the cancerous area of the tissue. (21) Our recent study also revealed that the DESI-MS measurement of glucose and citrate levels can accurately predict the prostate cancer margin rapidly (Figure 4c). (24) Further, the application of unsupervised or supervised statistical methods in MSI data pattern recognition can perform well in discriminating the healthy and unhealthy tissues with a very high agreement with the conventional gold standard histopathology (H&E and immune histopathology, etc.). (9) Although much of the studies on humans using DESI-MSI focused on cancer, (9) the performance of this technique in other diseases (renal, infectious, skin, fertility, transplantation, and metabolic diseases), where tissue analyses are involved, needs to be evaluated in the future. It should be noted that the spatial resolution of DESI-MS images is ∼150–200 μm, which compares well with the thickness of a surgical knife. However, much lower spatial resolution (∼20 μm) can be achieved using MALDI-MSI. Indeed, MALDI-MSI also emerged as a valuable tool with several clinical applications like localizing proteins, mapping the distribution of lipids and neuropeptides at both organ and cellular levels in the context of biomarker discovery, diagnosis, and prognosis of different diseases. (23,25) Overall, great sensitivity, chemical specificity, fairly high spatial resolution, and multiplex molecular information make MSI a powerful medical imaging technique, which could serve as a useful adjunct to histology for disease diagnosis.

Figure 4

Figure 4. (a) H&E of a prostate tissue specimen that contains both normal (black outline) and cancer (red outline) areas. (b) Negative ion mode DESI-MSI of the adjacent section (15 μm thickness) mapping the differential distribution of a phosphatidic acid (m/z 709.4778) and a phosphatidylserine (m/z 788.5409) throughout the tissue (overlaid image in bicolor), distinguishing the areas of cancer and normal. (c) Extracted ion chronograms of glucose and citrate over a line scan of a typical prostate tissue specimen (H&E shown in the inset) that contains both normal (black outline) and cancer (red outline) areas. (24)

Excitements, Challenges, and Limitations to Overcome

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

All told, mass spectrometry has opened a new window in the clinical laboratory with its remarkable sensitivity and specificity, which is often not produced by other analytical techniques. Although MS is still underutilized in various clinical settings, it has the potential to extend the current capabilities of disease detection with its high level of accuracy, precision, and reproducibility. Continuous advancements in making MS more robust with various types of automation and robotics also warrant its high-throughput performance with affordable cost-to-benefit balance. From the NBS study, this is now well understood that a single MS test can detect multiple diseases. Therefore, MS can be viewed as a next-generation pathology technique for acquiring multiple pathological information, characteristic of various diseases, in a single test, reducing the financial and technical drain on hospital resources. The development of AIMS has brought a revolution, which is anticipating progression from the time-consuming LC-MS approach to the rapid spatially resolved in situ approach. The use of artificial intelligence in pattern recognition of a huge data set recorded by AIMS lends much more predictive power than that in evaluating the signal of a few diagnostic biomarkers. AIMS has been particularly useful in rapid cancer margin analysis intraoperatively, which is critically needed to augment the success rate of frozen section analysis and to circumvent the need for time in extensive sample processing in conventional histopathology during surgery. The near-future availability of low-cost miniature or hand-held mass spectrometers is likely to play an important role in clinics for the development of POC devices. Taming MS software packages by machine learning algorithms to read the MS data as a “barcode of the disease” should aid the smooth transition of the MS from bench to bedside. Considering all those capabilities, mass spectrometry is appearing as a technique of obvious public health importance, although there could be mixed feelings and anxieties in the clinical diagnostic community as MS could outperform several traditional diagnostic methods. However, cohort studies and clinical trials of many MS-based diagnostic methods should be undertaken on different populations (countries) for their transition from discovery-based approaches to standard clinical practices. Despite the remarkable promise, one of the major limitations of the clinical MS to date is the identification of blood biomarkers for the detection of a disease (say cancer) at a very early stage, when a few maker molecules are released in circulation. So far, most of the MS-based clinical studies have been conducted when the disease is well manifested. This limitation needs to be overcome by appropriate subject selection for the clinical study at the onset of the disease. A biomarker can also present the epiphenomena of a disease, or it could also be found in a similar presentation of a disease. This also needs to be clarified before the clinical practice with the biomarker. Therefore, there are still challenges to overcome in this aspect though we can be optimistic that there should be several MS-based clinical assays approved soon by healthcare regulatory authorities.

Author Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

  • Corresponding Author
    • Notes
      The author declares no competing financial interest.

    Biography

    Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

    Shibdas Banerjee completed his M.Sc in chemistry at the Indian Institute of Technology (IIT), Roorkee, India, in 2008 and Ph.D. in chemistry at the Tata Institute of Fundamental Research (TIFR), Mumbai, India, in 2014. He worked as a postdoctoral research associate in the laboratory of Prof. Richard N. Zare, Stanford University, USA, from 2014 to 2017. He is currently an assistant professor in the Department of Chemistry, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research (IISER), Tirupati, India.

    Acknowledgments

    Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

    The author is thankful to the Science and Engineering Research Board, Department of Science and Technology, Government of India, for providing a Ramanujan Fellowship Research Grant (SB/S2/RJN-130/2017) and Early Career Research Award (ECR/2018/001268).

    References

    Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

    This article references 25 other publications.

    1. 1
      Yan, Z.; Cheng, C.; Liu, S. Applications of Mass Spectrometry in Analyses of Steroid Hormones. In LC-MS in Drug Bioanalysis; Xu, Q. A., Madden, T. L., Eds.; Springer US: Boston, MA, 2012; pp 251286.
    2. 2
      Ferreira, C. R.; Yannell, K. E.; Jarmusch, A. K.; Pirro, V.; Ouyang, Z.; Cooks, R. G. Ambient Ionization Mass Spectrometry for Point-of-Care Diagnostics and Other Clinical Measurements. Clin. Chem. 2016, 62 (1), 99110,  DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2014.237164
    3. 3
      Zhang, J.; Rector, J.; Lin, J. Q.; Young, J. H.; Sans, M.; Katta, N.; Giese, N.; Yu, W.; Nagi, C.; Suliburk, J.; Liu, J.; Bensussan, A.; DeHoog, R. J.; Garza, K. Y.; Ludolph, B.; Sorace, A. G.; Syed, A.; Zahedivash, A.; Milner, T. E.; Eberlin, L. S. Nondestructive tissue analysis for ex vivo and in vivo cancer diagnosis using a handheld mass spectrometry system. Sci. Transl. Med. 2017, 9 (406), eaan3968  DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aan3968
    4. 4
      Kostrzewa, M. Application of the MALDI Biotyper to clinical microbiology: progress and potential. Expert Rev. Proteomics 2018, 15 (3), 193202,  DOI: 10.1080/14789450.2018.1438193
    5. 5
      Ombrone, D.; Giocaliere, E.; Forni, G.; Malvagia, S.; la Marca, G. Expanded newborn screening by mass spectrometry: New tests, future perspectives. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 2016, 35 (1), 7184,  DOI: 10.1002/mas.21463
    6. 6
      Jannetto, P. J. Chapter 8 - Therapeutic drug monitoring using mass spectrometry. In Mass Spectrometry for the Clinical Laboratory; Nair, H., Clarke, W., Eds.; Academic Press: San Diego, 2017; pp 165179.
    7. 7
      Volmer, D. A.; Mendes, L. R. B. C.; Stokes, C. S. Analysis of vitamin D metabolic markers by mass spectrometry: Current techniques, limitations of the “gold standard” method, and anticipated future directions. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 2015, 34 (1), 223,  DOI: 10.1002/mas.21408
    8. 8
      Perakakis, N.; Yazdani, A.; Karniadakis, G. E.; Mantzoros, C. Omics, big data and machine learning as tools to propel understanding of biological mechanisms and to discover novel diagnostics and therapeutics. Metab., Clin. Exp. 2018, 87, A1A9,  DOI: 10.1016/j.metabol.2018.08.002
    9. 9
      Banerjee, S. Ambient ionization mass spectrometry imaging for disease diagnosis: Excitements and challenges. J. Biosci. 2018, 43 (4), 731738,  DOI: 10.1007/s12038-018-9785-y
    10. 10
      Li, L.-H.; Hsieh, H.-Y.; Hsu, C.-C. Clinical Application of Ambient Ionization Mass Spectrometry. Mass Spectrom. 2017, 6 (2), S0060S0060,  DOI: 10.5702/massspectrometry.S0060
    11. 11
      Takáts, Z.; Wiseman, J. M.; Gologan, B.; Cooks, R. G. Mass Spectrometry Sampling Under Ambient Conditions with Desorption Electrospray Ionization. Science 2004, 306 (5695), 471473,  DOI: 10.1126/science.1104404
    12. 12
      Eberlin, L. S.; Dill, A. L.; Golby, A. J.; Ligon, K. L.; Wiseman, J. M.; Cooks, R. G.; Agar, N. Y. R. Discrimination of Human Astrocytoma Subtypes by Lipid Analysis Using Desorption Electrospray Ionization Imaging Mass Spectrometry. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49 (34), 59535956,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201001452
    13. 13
      Eberlin, L. S.; Ferreira, C. R.; Dill, A. L.; Ifa, D. R.; Cooks, R. G. Desorption electrospray ionization mass spectrometry for lipid characterization and biological tissue imaging. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, Mol. Cell Biol. Lipids 2011, 1811 (11), 946960,  DOI: 10.1016/j.bbalip.2011.05.006
    14. 14
      Liu, J.; Wang, H.; Manicke, N. E.; Lin, J.-M.; Cooks, R. G.; Ouyang, Z. Development, Characterization, and Application of Paper Spray Ionization. Anal. Chem. 2010, 82 (6), 24632471,  DOI: 10.1021/ac902854g
    15. 15
      Chiang, S.; Zhang, W.; Ouyang, Z. Paper spray ionization mass spectrometry: recent advances and clinical applications. Expert Rev. Proteomics 2018, 15 (10), 781789,  DOI: 10.1080/14789450.2018.1525295
    16. 16
      Kerian, K. S.; Jarmusch, A. K.; Cooks, R. G. Touch spray mass spectrometry for in situ analysis of complex samples. Analyst 2014, 139 (11), 27142720,  DOI: 10.1039/C4AN00548A
    17. 17
      Ifa, D. R.; Eberlin, L. S. Ambient Ionization Mass Spectrometry for Cancer Diagnosis and Surgical Margin Evaluation. Clin. Chem. 2016, 62 (1), 111123,  DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2014.237172
    18. 18
      Gu, H.; Xu, N.; Chen, H. Direct analysis of biological samples using extractive electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (EESI-MS). Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2012, 403 (8), 21452153,  DOI: 10.1007/s00216-012-5874-1
    19. 19
      Balog, J.; Sasi-Szabó, L.; Kinross, J.; Lewis, M. R.; Muirhead, L. J.; Veselkov, K.; Mirnezami, R.; Dezso, B.; Damjanovich, L.; Darzi, A.; Nicholson, J. K.; Takáts, Z. Intraoperative Tissue Identification Using Rapid Evaporative Ionization Mass Spectrometry. Sci. Transl. Med. 2013, 5 (194), 194ra93194ra93,  DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3005623
    20. 20
      Takats, Z.; Denes, J.; Kinross, J. Identifying the margin: a new method to distinguish between cancerous and noncancerous tissue during surgery. Future Oncol. 2012, 8 (2), 113116,  DOI: 10.2217/fon.11.151
    21. 21
      Banerjee, S.; Manna, S. K. Assessment of Metabolic Signature for Cancer Diagnosis Using Desorption Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometric Imaging. In Cancer Metabolism: Methods and Protocols; Haznadar, M., Ed.; Springer New York: New York, NY, 2019; pp 275297.
    22. 22
      Li, Y. Application of DART-MS in Clinical and Pharmacological Analysis. In Direct Analysis in Real Time Mass Spectrometry; Dong, Y., Ed.; Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA: 2017; pp 223240.
    23. 23
      Barry, J. A.; Robichaud, G.; Bokhart, M. T.; Thompson, C.; Sykes, C.; Kashuba, A. D. M.; Muddiman, D. C. Mapping antiretroviral drugs in tissue by IR-MALDESI MSI coupled to the Q Exactive and comparison with LC-MS/MS SRM assay. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2014, 25 (12), 20382047,  DOI: 10.1007/s13361-014-0884-1
    24. 24
      Banerjee, S.; Zare, R. N.; Tibshirani, R. J.; Kunder, C. A.; Nolley, R.; Fan, R.; Brooks, J. D.; Sonn, G. A. Diagnosis of prostate cancer by desorption electrospray ionization mass spectrometric imaging of small metabolites and lipids. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2017, 114 (13), 33343339,  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1700677114
    25. 25
      Ucal, Y.; Durer, Z. A.; Atak, H.; Kadioglu, E.; Sahin, B.; Coskun, A.; Baykal, A. T.; Ozpinar, A. Clinical applications of MALDI imaging technologies in cancer and neurodegenerative diseases. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, Proteins Proteomics 2017, 1865 (7), 795816,  DOI: 10.1016/j.bbapap.2017.01.005

    Cited By

    Click to copy section linkSection link copied!
    Citation Statements
    Explore this article's citation statements on scite.ai

    This article is cited by 79 publications.

    1. Ankit Halder, Priyanka A. Jadhav, Archisman Maitra, Arghya Banerjee, Arti Hole, Sridhar Epari, Prakash Shetty, Aliasgar Moiyadi, Murali Krishna Chilkapati, Sanjeeva Srivastava. Serum Metabolomics Profiling Coupled with Machine Learning Identifies Potential Diagnostic and Prognostic Candidate Markers in Meningioma Using Raman Spectroscopy, ATR-FTIR, and LC–MS/MS. Journal of Proteome Research 2025, 24 (3) , 1180-1196. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jproteome.4c00806
    2. Nikini Rashmithara Subawickrama Mallika Widanaarachchige, Anirban Paul, Ivneet Kaur Banga, Ashlesha Bhide, Sriram Muthukumar, Shalini Prasad. Advancements in Breathomics: Special Focus on Electrochemical Sensing and AI for Chronic Disease Diagnosis and Monitoring. ACS Omega 2025, 10 (5) , 4187-4196. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.4c10008
    3. Jessie R. Chappel, Kaylie I. Kirkwood-Donelson, James N. Dodds, Jonathon Fleming, David M. Reif, Erin S. Baker. Streamlining Phenotype Classification and Highlighting Feature Candidates: A Screening Method for Non-Targeted Ion Mobility Spectrometry-Mass Spectrometry (IMS-MS) Data. Analytical Chemistry 2024, 96 (40) , 15970-15979. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.4c03256
    4. Alex Kachkine, Luis Fernando Velásquez-García. High-Performance, Low-Cost, Additively Manufactured Electrospray Ion Sources for Mass Spectrometry. Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry 2024, 35 (5) , 862-870. https://doi.org/10.1021/jasms.3c00409
    5. Supratim Mondal, Abhijit Nandy, Geetha Dande, Krishna Prabhu, Rajesh Ramanna Valmiki, Debasish Koner, Shibdas Banerjee. Mass Spectrometric Imaging of Anionic Phospholipids Desorbed from Human Hippocampal Sections: Discrimination between Temporal and Nontemporal Lobe Epilepsies. ACS Chemical Neuroscience 2024, 15 (5) , 983-993. https://doi.org/10.1021/acschemneuro.3c00693
    6. Jessica L. Moore, Georgia Charkoftaki. A Guide to MALDI Imaging Mass Spectrometry for Tissues. Journal of Proteome Research 2023, 22 (11) , 3401-3417. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jproteome.3c00167
    7. Allix Marie Coon, Gavin Setzen, Rabi Ann Musah. Mass Spectrometric Interrogation of Earwax: Toward the Detection of Ménière’s Disease. ACS Omega 2023, 8 (30) , 27010-27023. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c01943
    8. Supratim Mondal, Yeswanth Sthanikam, Anubhav Kumar, Abhijit Nandy, Sutirtha Chattopadhyay, Debasish Koner, Nandyala Rukmangadha, Hulikal Narendra, Shibdas Banerjee. Mass Spectrometry Imaging of Lumpectomy Specimens Deciphers Diacylglycerols as Potent Biomarkers for the Diagnosis of Breast Cancer. Analytical Chemistry 2023, 95 (20) , 8054-8062. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.3c01019
    9. Supratim Mondal, Mithlesh Prasad Singh, Anubhav Kumar, Sutirtha Chattopadhyay, Abhijit Nandy, Yeswanth Sthanikam, Uddeshya Pandey, Debasish Koner, Limesh Marisiddappa, Shibdas Banerjee. Rapid Molecular Evaluation of Human Kidney Tissue Sections by In Situ Mass Spectrometry and Machine Learning to Classify the Nephrotic Syndrome. Journal of Proteome Research 2023, 22 (3) , 967-976. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jproteome.2c00768
    10. Lucía Martín-Saiz, Beatriz Abad-García, Jon D. Solano-Iturri, Lorena Mosteiro, Javier Martín-Allende, Yuri Rueda, Amparo Pérez-Fernández, Miguel Unda, Pedro Coterón-Ochoa, Aintzane Goya, Alberto Saiz, Jennifer Martínez, Begoña Ochoa, Olatz Fresnedo, Gorka Larrinaga, José A. Fernández. Using the Synergy between HPLC-MS and MALDI-MS Imaging to Explore the Lipidomics of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma. Analytical Chemistry 2023, 95 (4) , 2285-2293. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.2c03953
    11. Sakda Jampasa, Chahya Kreangkaiwal, Kurt Kalcher, Wassa Waiwinya, Teerasit Techawiwattanaboon, Nopporn Songumpai, Passorn Sueyanyongsiri, Kampol Pattanasombatsakul, Malee Techapornroong, Saovanee Benjamanukul, Orawon Chailapakul, Kanitha Patarakul, Sudkate Chaiyo. Resistance-Based Lateral Flow Immunosensor with a NFC-Enabled Smartphone for Rapid Diagnosis of Leptospirosis in Clinical Samples. Analytical Chemistry 2022, 94 (42) , 14583-14592. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.2c02409
    12. Le Zhang, Brendan M. Floyd, Maheshwerreddy Chilamari, James Mapes, Jagannath Swaminathan, Steven Bloom, Edward M. Marcotte, Eric V. Anslyn. Photoredox-Catalyzed Decarboxylative C-Terminal Differentiation for Bulk- and Single-Molecule Proteomics. ACS Chemical Biology 2021, 16 (11) , 2595-2603. https://doi.org/10.1021/acschembio.1c00631
    13. Simon J. S. Cameron, Alvaro Perdones-Montero, Lieven Van Meulebroek, Adam Burke, Kate Alexander-Hardiman, Daniel Simon, Richard Schaffer, Julia Balog, Tamas Karancsi, Tony Rickards, Monica Rebec, Sara Stead, Lynn Vanhaecke, Zoltán Takáts. Sample Preparation Free Mass Spectrometry Using Laser-Assisted Rapid Evaporative Ionization Mass Spectrometry: Applications to Microbiology, Metabolic Biofluid Phenotyping, and Food Authenticity. Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry 2021, 32 (6) , 1393-1401. https://doi.org/10.1021/jasms.0c00452
    14. Sergey Girel, Isabel Meister, Gaetan Glauser, Serge Rudaz. Hyphenation of microflow chromatography with electrospray ionization mass spectrometry for bioanalytical applications focusing on low molecular weight compounds: A tutorial review. Mass Spectrometry Reviews 2025, 44 (3) , 491-512. https://doi.org/10.1002/mas.21898
    15. Kuen‐Tyng Lin, Gul Muneer, Pei‐Rong Huang, Ciao‐Syuan Chen, Yu‐Ju Chen. Mass Spectrometry‐Based Proteomics for Next‐Generation Precision Oncology. Mass Spectrometry Reviews 2025, 69 https://doi.org/10.1002/mas.21932
    16. D. N. Korobkov, A. S. Kononikhin, S. D. Semenov, H. L. Kordzaya, A. G. Brzhozovskiy, A. E. Bugrova, E. Yu. Vasilieva, D. Yu. Kanner, E. N. Nikolaev, A. A. Komissarov. Proteomic analysis of blood plasma as a tool for personalized diagnosis of lung adenocarcinoma. Advances in Molecular Oncology 2025, 12 (1) , 96-108. https://doi.org/10.17650/2313-805X-2025-12-1-96-108
    17. Yile Yu, Jinghan Fan, Huihui Liu, Zongxiu Nie. Mass Spectrometry Imaging for Cellular-level Analysis: Advances and Applications on Medical Research. Chemical Research in Chinese Universities 2025, 41 (2) , 254-265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40242-025-4251-5
    18. Marie-Claude Menet. La spectrométrie de masse au service de la santé en 2025. Revue Francophone des Laboratoires 2025, 2025 (570) , 16-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1773-035X(25)00017-6
    19. Andressa Cristina dos Santos Marques, Bruna Brito, Jéssica Gorett Brito Fontes, Gabriel Reis Alves Carneiro, João Felipe Dickson Rebelo, Aline Barbosa Moraes, Leonardo Vieira Neto, Monica Costa Padilha. Cortisol quantification in human plasma and urine by liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry: Validation, analysis and application in a reference population and patients with adrenal incidentalomas. Clinica Chimica Acta 2025, 566 , 120055. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2024.120055
    20. Supratim Mondal, Shibdas Banerjee. Desorption Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry Imaging for Cancer Diagnosis. 2025, 219-255. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-2088-3_9
    21. Hajar Oumoussa, Mohamed Bendany, Khalid Ait Ben Brahim, Youssra El Hamdouni, Meryem Bensemlali, Najoua Labjar, Mohamed Dalimi, Said Laasri, Souad El Hajjaji. Biosensors for the Determination of Toxic Phenolic Compounds Present in Cosmetics. 2024, 214-233. https://doi.org/10.1039/9781837676323-00214
    22. Samridh Sharma, Saurabh Arun Chandorkar. Flow-induced frequency shifts in suspended microchannel resonators with ultra-thin walls and large hydraulic diameter. Journal of Applied Physics 2024, 136 (22) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0230843
    23. Simon J. Pelletier, Mickaël Leclercq, Florence Roux-Dalvai, Matthijs B. de Geus, Shannon Leslie, Weiwei Wang, TuKiet T. Lam, Angus C. Nairn, Steven E. Arnold, Becky C. Carlyle, Frédéric Precioso, Arnaud Droit. BERNN: Enhancing classification of Liquid Chromatography Mass Spectrometry data with batch effect removal neural networks. Nature Communications 2024, 15 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-48177-5
    24. Jan Kruta, Raphael Carapito, Marten Trendelenburg, Thierry Martin, Marta Rizzi, Reinhard E. Voll, Andrea Cavalli, Eriberto Natali, Patrick Meier, Marc Stawiski, Johannes Mosbacher, Annette Mollet, Aurelia Santoro, Miriam Capri, Enrico Giampieri, Erik Schkommodau, Enkelejda Miho. Machine learning for precision diagnostics of autoimmunity. Scientific Reports 2024, 14 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-76093-7
    25. Chia-Li Han, Chi-Ting Lai, Aaron James Reyes, Hao-Chin Yang, Jin-Ying Lu, Shyang-Rong Shih, Kuen-Yuan Chen, Andrew N. Hoofnagle, Sung-Liang Yu, William Bocik, Tara Hiltke, Huan-Chi Chiu, Ching-Yi Wan, Henry Rodriguez, Victoria Zhang, Yu-Ju Chen. Lessons learned: establishing a CLIA-equivalent laboratory for targeted mass spectrometry assays – navigating the transition from research to clinical practice. Clinical Proteomics 2024, 21 (1) https://doi.org/10.1186/s12014-024-09455-y
    26. Madeline C. R. Schwarz, Alex E. Moskaluk, Joshua B. Daniels, Sue VandeWoude, Melissa M. Reynolds. Current Analytical Methods and Challenges for the Clinical Diagnosis of Invasive Pulmonary Aspergillosis Infection. Journal of Fungi 2024, 10 (12) , 829. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof10120829
    27. Shweta Sharma. Recent Trends of Modern Mass Spectrometry: Application towards Drug Discovery and Development Process. 2024, 209-224. https://doi.org/10.2174/9789815050059124020008
    28. Hyun Jeong Lee, Young Sung Jung, Dongwon Seo, Eunmi Kim, Miyoung Yoo. Development and validation of QuEChERS-based LC-MS/MS method for simultaneous quantification of eleven N-nitrosamines in processed fish meat, processed meat, and salted fish products. Food Chemistry 2024, 459 , 140281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2024.140281
    29. María J Andrade, Josué Delgado, Micaela Álvarez. New perspectives in Proteomics as a significant tool to evaluate mould metabolism in foods. Current Opinion in Food Science 2024, 59 , 101202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cofs.2024.101202
    30. Marija Gjorgoska, Tea Lanišnik Rižner. Simultaneous measurement of 17 endogenous steroid hormones in human serum by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry without derivatization. The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 2024, 243 , 106578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsbmb.2024.106578
    31. Dirk R J Kuypers, Jurre J Kamphorst, Henriette de Loor, Elizabeth M O'Day. Perspective: metabolomics has the potential to change the landscape of kidney transplantation diagnostics. Biomarkers in Medicine 2024, 18 (17-18) , 787-794. https://doi.org/10.1080/17520363.2024.2394383
    32. Yanbing Zhai, Xinyan Fu, Wei Xu. Miniature mass spectrometers and their potential for clinical point‐of‐care analysis. Mass Spectrometry Reviews 2024, 43 (5) , 1172-1191. https://doi.org/10.1002/mas.21867
    33. Estefanía Núñez, María Gómez-Serrano, Enrique Calvo, Elena Bonzon-Kulichenko, Marco Trevisan-Herraz, José Manuel Rodríguez, Fernando García-Marqués, Ricardo Magni, Enrique Lara-Pezzi, José Luis Martín-Ventura, Emilio Camafeita, Jesús Vázquez. A Multiplexed Quantitative Proteomics Approach to the Human Plasma Protein Signature. Biomedicines 2024, 12 (9) , 2118. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines12092118
    34. Ahrum Son, Woojin Kim, Jongham Park, Yongho Park, Wonseok Lee, Sangwoon Lee, Hyunsoo Kim. Mass Spectrometry Advancements and Applications for Biomarker Discovery, Diagnostic Innovations, and Personalized Medicine. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024, 25 (18) , 9880. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25189880
    35. Silvia Pomella, Ombretta Melaiu, Loredana Cifaldi, Roberto Bei, Marco Gargari, Vincenzo Campanella, Giovanni Barillari. Biomarkers Identification in the Microenvironment of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review of Proteomic Studies. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024, 25 (16) , 8929. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25168929
    36. Xiaonan Chen, Yun Wang, Congcong Pei, Rongxin Li, Weikang Shu, Ziheng Qi, Yinbing Zhao, Yanhui Wang, Yingying Lin, Liang Zhao, Daihui Peng, Jingjing Wan. Vacancy‐Driven High‐Performance Metabolic Assay for Diagnosis and Therapeutic Evaluation of Depression. Advanced Materials 2024, 36 (28) https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202312755
    37. Kristin D. Kernohan, Kym M. Boycott. The expanding diagnostic toolbox for rare genetic diseases. Nature Reviews Genetics 2024, 25 (6) , 401-415. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41576-023-00683-w
    38. Norberto A. Guzman, Andrea Guzman. Human Sputum Proteomics: Advancing Non-Invasive Diagnosis of Respiratory Diseases with Enhanced Biomarker Analysis Methods. International Journal of Translational Medicine 2024, 4 (2) , 309-333. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijtm4020020
    39. Virginia Byers Kraus, Alexander Reed, Erik J. Soderblom, Yvonne M. Golightly, Amanda E. Nelson, Yi-Ju Li. Serum proteomic biomarkers diagnostic of knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 2024, 32 (3) , 329-337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2023.09.007
    40. Mashanipalya G Jagadeeshaprasad, Jianing Zeng, Naiyu Zheng. LC–MS Bioanalysis of Protein Biomarkers and Protein Therapeutics in Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded Tissue Specimens. Bioanalysis 2024, 16 (4) , 245-258. https://doi.org/10.4155/bio-2023-0210
    41. Y. Victoria Zhang, Uttam Garg. Mass Spectrometry in Clinical Laboratory: Applications in Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Toxicology. 2024, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-3541-4_1
    42. Dhara Patel, Vivek Patel, Grishma Patel, Jayvadan Patel. Proteomics in the Pharmaceutical Industry: Prospects and Challenges. 2024, 307-332. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-64021-6_14
    43. Paul S. Soma, Rushika Perera. Metabolomics Tools in Antiviral Research. 2024, 123-146. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-9195-2_5
    44. Juliemar Aponte, Patrick J. Silva, Kenneth S. Ramos. Multianalyte tests in clinical care. 2024, 221-237. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-824010-6.00030-7
    45. Katarzyna Woźniczka, Miao Yu, Nikita Looby, Anna Roszkowska. Fundamentals of in vivo sampling. 2024https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-15978-7.00091-6
    46. Shweta Jain, Pushpendra Kumar, Mudit Kumar, Ankur Vaidya. Analytical methods in the detection of proteins and peptides in tissue fluids and homogenates. 2024, 235-259. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-18925-8.00009-X
    47. Presha Rajbhandari, Taruna V. Neelakantan, Noreen Hosny, Brent R. Stockwell. Spatial pharmacology using mass spectrometry imaging. Trends in Pharmacological Sciences 2024, 45 (1) , 67-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tips.2023.11.003
    48. Federica Danzi, Raffaella Pacchiana, Andrea Mafficini, Maria T. Scupoli, Aldo Scarpa, Massimo Donadelli, Alessandra Fiore. To metabolomics and beyond: a technological portfolio to investigate cancer metabolism. Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy 2023, 8 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41392-023-01380-0
    49. Sarah Trimpin, Ellen Inutan, Hope Coffinberger, Khoa Hoang, Frank Yenchick, James Wager-Miller, Milan Pophristic, Ken Mackie, Charles N. McEwen. Instrumentation development, improvement, simplification, and miniaturization: The multifunctional plate source for use in mass spectrometry. European Journal of Mass Spectrometry 2023, 29 (5-6) , 276-291. https://doi.org/10.1177/14690667231211486
    50. Alemayehu Godana Birhanu. Mass spectrometry-based proteomics as an emerging tool in clinical laboratories. Clinical Proteomics 2023, 20 (1) https://doi.org/10.1186/s12014-023-09424-x
    51. Ankit Halder, Deeptarup Biswas, Aparna Chauhan, Adrita Saha, Shreeman Auromahima, Deeksha Yadav, Mehar Un Nissa, Gayatri Iyer, Shashwati Parihari, Gautam Sharma, Sridhar Epari, Prakash Shetty, Aliasgar Moiyadi, Graham Roy Ball, Sanjeeva Srivastava. A large-scale targeted proteomics of serum and tissue shows the utility of classifying high grade and low grade meningioma tumors. Clinical Proteomics 2023, 20 (1) https://doi.org/10.1186/s12014-023-09426-9
    52. Yongling Ai, Praneeth Ivan Joel FNU, Pengyi Zhao, Md Tanim‐Al Hassan, Arjun Sharma, Gracelynne Hao, Zhenghao Zhou, Hao Chen. Development of Coulometric Mass Spectrometry for Absolute Chemical Quantitation. 2023, 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470027318.a9811
    53. Bharath S. Kumar. Recent Advances and Applications of Ambient Mass Spectrometry Imaging in Cancer Research: An Overview. Mass Spectrometry 2023, 12 (1) , A0129-A0129. https://doi.org/10.5702/massspectrometry.A0129
    54. Wei Wang, Tao Zhang, Jan Nouta, Peter A. van Veelen, Noortje de Haan, Theo M. de Reijke, Manfred Wuhrer, Guinevere S.M. Lageveen-Kammeijer. Human Prostate-Specific Antigen Carries N-Glycans with Ketodeoxynononic Acid. Engineering 2023, 26 , 119-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2023.02.009
    55. Natalia Gabrielly Pereira dos Santos, Edvaldo Vasconcelos Soares Maciel, Deyber Arley Vargas Medina, Fernando Mauro Lanças. NanoLC-EI-MS: Perspectives in Biochemical Analysis. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2023, 24 (14) , 11746. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241411746
    56. Sho Kiritani, Tomohiko Iwano, Kentaro Yoshimura, Ryo Saito, Takashi Nakayama, Daisuke Yamamoto, Hiroyuki Hakoda, Genki Watanabe, Nobuhisa Akamatsu, Junichi Arita, Junichi Kaneko, Sén Takeda, Daisuke Ichikawa, Kiyoshi Hasegawa. New Diagnostic Modality Combining Mass Spectrometry and Machine Learning for the Discrimination of Malignant Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms. Annals of Surgical Oncology 2023, 30 (5) , 3150-3157. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-022-13012-y
    57. Monokesh K. Sen, Md Jakir Hossain, David A. Mahns, Bruce J. Brew. Validity of serum neurofilament light chain as a prognostic biomarker of disease activity in multiple sclerosis. Journal of Neurology 2023, 270 (4) , 1908-1930. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-022-11507-y
    58. Jayashree Selvalatchmanan, Markus R. Wenk, Anne K. Bendt. Lipidomics in Clinical Diagnostics. 2023, 557-584. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527836512.ch20
    59. Xiaonan Chen, Weikang Shu, Liang Zhao, Jingjing Wan. Advanced mass spectrometric and spectroscopic methods coupled with machine learning for in vitro diagnosis. VIEW 2023, 4 (1) https://doi.org/10.1002/VIW.20220038
    60. Yaoyao Song, Yan Zhang, Songhai Xie, Xiaowei Song. Screening and diagnosis of triple negative breast cancer based on rapid metabolic fingerprinting by conductive polymer spray ionization mass spectrometry and machine learning. Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology 2022, 10 https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2022.1075810
    61. PURVA S. DAMALE, SHIBDAS BANERJEE. Mapping the Heterogeneous Distribution of Cancer Drugs by Imaging Mass Spectrometry. 2022, 773-809. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119851042.ch23
    62. Matthew Creech, Lindsey Carvalho, Heather McCoy, Jon Jacobs, H. E. Hinson. Mass Spectrometry-Based Approaches for Clinical Biomarker Discovery in Traumatic Brain Injury. Current Treatment Options in Neurology 2022, 24 (12) , 605-618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11940-022-00742-3
    63. Abby L. Brand, Paige E. Lawler, James G. Bollinger, Yan Li, Suzanne E. Schindler, Melody Li, Samir Lopez, Vitaliy Ovod, Akinori Nakamura, Leslie M. Shaw, Henrik Zetterberg, Oskar Hansson, Randall J. Bateman. The performance of plasma amyloid beta measurements in identifying amyloid plaques in Alzheimer’s disease: a literature review. Alzheimer's Research & Therapy 2022, 14 (1) https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-022-01117-1
    64. Lizi Jin, Zhenni Liu, Jie Zeng, Haijian Zhao, Jiangtao Zhang, Bo Zhu, Yu Zhang, Tianjiao Zhang, Chuanbao Zhang. A simple method for rapid screening and diagnosis of common organic acidemias: quantitative detection of serum and urine organic acid profiles based on liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry 2022, 414 (27) , 7823-7837. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-022-04316-9
    65. Lizi Jin, Zhenni Liu, Weiyan Zhou, Jie Zeng, Minhang Wu, Yu Zhang, Tianjiao Zhang, Falin He, Chuanbao Zhang. A Rapid, Simple, Trace, Cost-Effective, and High-Throughput Stable Isotope-Dilution Liquid Chromatography–Tandem Mass Spectrometry Method for Serum Methylmalonic Acid Quantification and Its Clinical Applications. Diagnostics 2022, 12 (10) , 2273. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12102273
    66. Tingting Huang, Ting Huang, Yongyi Zou, Kang Xie, Yinqin Shen, Wen Zhang, Shuhui Huang, Yanqiu Liu, Bicheng Yang. Wooden-Tip Electrospray Mass Spectrometry Characterization of Human Hemoglobin in Whole Blood Sample for Thalassemia Screening: A Pilot Study. Molecules 2022, 27 (12) , 3952. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27123952
    67. Celine Stoica, Adilson Kleber Ferreira, Kayleigh Hannan, Marica Bakovic. Bilayer Forming Phospholipids as Targets for Cancer Therapy. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2022, 23 (9) , 5266. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23095266
    68. Anca-Narcisa Neagu, Madhuri Jayathirtha, Emma Baxter, Mary Donnelly, Brindusa Alina Petre, Costel C. Darie. Applications of Tandem Mass Spectrometry (MS/MS) in Protein Analysis for Biomedical Research. Molecules 2022, 27 (8) , 2411. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27082411
    69. Nerilson M. Lima, Bruno L.M. Fernandes, Guilherme F. Alves, Jéssica C.Q. de Souza, Marcelo M. Siqueira, Maria Patrícia do Nascimento, Olívia B.O. Moreira, Alessandra Sussulini, Marcone A.L. de Oliveira. Mass spectrometry applied to diagnosis, prognosis, and therapeutic targets identification for the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2: A review. Analytica Chimica Acta 2022, 1195 , 339385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2021.339385
    70. Y. Victoria Zhang, Uttam Garg. Introduction to Mass Spectrometry for Bimolecular Analysis in a Clinical Laboratory. 2022, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-2565-1_1
    71. Bradley J. Smith, Victor C. Carregari, Daniel Martins-de-Souza. Proteomics and Schizophrenia: The Evolution of a Great Partnership. 2022, 129-138. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-97182-3_10
    72. Mariaimmacolata Preianò, Serena Correnti, Corrado Pelaia, Rocco Savino, Rosa Terracciano. MALDI MS-Based Investigations for SARS-CoV-2 Detection. BioChem 2021, 1 (3) , 250-278. https://doi.org/10.3390/biochem1030018
    73. Gordon T. Luu, Laura M. Sanchez. Toward improvement of screening through mass spectrometry-based proteomics: Ovarian cancer as a case study. International Journal of Mass Spectrometry 2021, 469 , 116679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijms.2021.116679
    74. Sarmila Amatya Shrestha, Sangwon Cha. Ambient desorption/ionization mass spectrometry for direct solid material analysis. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry 2021, 144 , 116420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2021.116420
    75. Carrie Pierce-Ruiz, Wanda I. Santana, William J.H. Sutton, David A. Fischler, Hans C. Cooper, Lidoshka R. Marc, John R. Barr, Tracie L. Williams. Quantification of SARS-CoV-2 spike and nucleocapsid proteins using isotope dilution tandem mass spectrometry. Vaccine 2021, 39 (36) , 5106-5115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.07.066
    76. Mohammad Rubayet Hasan, Mohammed Suleiman, Andrés Pérez-López. Metabolomics in the Diagnosis and Prognosis of COVID-19. Frontiers in Genetics 2021, 12 https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2021.721556
    77. Luis Fernando Velásquez-García, Yosef Kornbluth. Biomedical Applications of Metal 3D Printing. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering 2021, 23 (1) , 307-338. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-bioeng-082020-032402
    78. Marie Dagonnier, Geoffrey A. Donnan, Stephen M. Davis, Helen M. Dewey, David W. Howells. Acute Stroke Biomarkers: Are We There Yet?. Frontiers in Neurology 2021, 12 https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.619721
    79. Khushman Taunk, Bhargab Kalita, Vaikhari Kale, Venkatesh Chanukuppa, Tufan Naiya, Surekha M. Zingde, Srikanth Rapole. The development and clinical applications of proteomics: an Indian perspective. Expert Review of Proteomics 2020, 17 (6) , 433-451. https://doi.org/10.1080/14789450.2020.1787157

    ACS Omega

    Cite this: ACS Omega 2020, 5, 5, 2041–2048
    Click to copy citationCitation copied!
    https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.9b03764
    Published January 30, 2020

    Copyright © 2020 American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under these Terms of Use.

    Article Views

    15k

    Altmetric

    -

    Citations

    Learn about these metrics

    Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

    Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

    The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.

    • Abstract

      Figure 1

      Figure 1. Portrayal ranges of different ionization techniques in the discovery of biomarkers of various molecular weights and polarity.

      Figure 2

      Figure 2. Schematic overview of the workflow in clinical diagnosis based on mass spectrometry (MALDI-MS or LC-ESI-MS).

      Figure 3

      Figure 3. Schematic diagrams of (a) desorption electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (DESI-MS), (b) paper spray ionization mass spectrometry (PSI-MS), (c) touch spray ionization mass spectrometry (TSI-MS), (d) extractive electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (EESI-MS), (e) rapid evaporative ionization mass spectrometry (REIMS) or iKnife, (f) MassSpec Pen, (g) direct analysis in real-time mass spectrometry (DART-MS), and (h) matrix-assisted laser desorption electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (MALDESI-MS).

      Figure 4

      Figure 4. (a) H&E of a prostate tissue specimen that contains both normal (black outline) and cancer (red outline) areas. (b) Negative ion mode DESI-MSI of the adjacent section (15 μm thickness) mapping the differential distribution of a phosphatidic acid (m/z 709.4778) and a phosphatidylserine (m/z 788.5409) throughout the tissue (overlaid image in bicolor), distinguishing the areas of cancer and normal. (c) Extracted ion chronograms of glucose and citrate over a line scan of a typical prostate tissue specimen (H&E shown in the inset) that contains both normal (black outline) and cancer (red outline) areas. (24)

      Shibdas Banerjee

      Shibdas Banerjee completed his M.Sc in chemistry at the Indian Institute of Technology (IIT), Roorkee, India, in 2008 and Ph.D. in chemistry at the Tata Institute of Fundamental Research (TIFR), Mumbai, India, in 2014. He worked as a postdoctoral research associate in the laboratory of Prof. Richard N. Zare, Stanford University, USA, from 2014 to 2017. He is currently an assistant professor in the Department of Chemistry, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research (IISER), Tirupati, India.

    • References


      This article references 25 other publications.

      1. 1
        Yan, Z.; Cheng, C.; Liu, S. Applications of Mass Spectrometry in Analyses of Steroid Hormones. In LC-MS in Drug Bioanalysis; Xu, Q. A., Madden, T. L., Eds.; Springer US: Boston, MA, 2012; pp 251286.
      2. 2
        Ferreira, C. R.; Yannell, K. E.; Jarmusch, A. K.; Pirro, V.; Ouyang, Z.; Cooks, R. G. Ambient Ionization Mass Spectrometry for Point-of-Care Diagnostics and Other Clinical Measurements. Clin. Chem. 2016, 62 (1), 99110,  DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2014.237164
      3. 3
        Zhang, J.; Rector, J.; Lin, J. Q.; Young, J. H.; Sans, M.; Katta, N.; Giese, N.; Yu, W.; Nagi, C.; Suliburk, J.; Liu, J.; Bensussan, A.; DeHoog, R. J.; Garza, K. Y.; Ludolph, B.; Sorace, A. G.; Syed, A.; Zahedivash, A.; Milner, T. E.; Eberlin, L. S. Nondestructive tissue analysis for ex vivo and in vivo cancer diagnosis using a handheld mass spectrometry system. Sci. Transl. Med. 2017, 9 (406), eaan3968  DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aan3968
      4. 4
        Kostrzewa, M. Application of the MALDI Biotyper to clinical microbiology: progress and potential. Expert Rev. Proteomics 2018, 15 (3), 193202,  DOI: 10.1080/14789450.2018.1438193
      5. 5
        Ombrone, D.; Giocaliere, E.; Forni, G.; Malvagia, S.; la Marca, G. Expanded newborn screening by mass spectrometry: New tests, future perspectives. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 2016, 35 (1), 7184,  DOI: 10.1002/mas.21463
      6. 6
        Jannetto, P. J. Chapter 8 - Therapeutic drug monitoring using mass spectrometry. In Mass Spectrometry for the Clinical Laboratory; Nair, H., Clarke, W., Eds.; Academic Press: San Diego, 2017; pp 165179.
      7. 7
        Volmer, D. A.; Mendes, L. R. B. C.; Stokes, C. S. Analysis of vitamin D metabolic markers by mass spectrometry: Current techniques, limitations of the “gold standard” method, and anticipated future directions. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 2015, 34 (1), 223,  DOI: 10.1002/mas.21408
      8. 8
        Perakakis, N.; Yazdani, A.; Karniadakis, G. E.; Mantzoros, C. Omics, big data and machine learning as tools to propel understanding of biological mechanisms and to discover novel diagnostics and therapeutics. Metab., Clin. Exp. 2018, 87, A1A9,  DOI: 10.1016/j.metabol.2018.08.002
      9. 9
        Banerjee, S. Ambient ionization mass spectrometry imaging for disease diagnosis: Excitements and challenges. J. Biosci. 2018, 43 (4), 731738,  DOI: 10.1007/s12038-018-9785-y
      10. 10
        Li, L.-H.; Hsieh, H.-Y.; Hsu, C.-C. Clinical Application of Ambient Ionization Mass Spectrometry. Mass Spectrom. 2017, 6 (2), S0060S0060,  DOI: 10.5702/massspectrometry.S0060
      11. 11
        Takáts, Z.; Wiseman, J. M.; Gologan, B.; Cooks, R. G. Mass Spectrometry Sampling Under Ambient Conditions with Desorption Electrospray Ionization. Science 2004, 306 (5695), 471473,  DOI: 10.1126/science.1104404
      12. 12
        Eberlin, L. S.; Dill, A. L.; Golby, A. J.; Ligon, K. L.; Wiseman, J. M.; Cooks, R. G.; Agar, N. Y. R. Discrimination of Human Astrocytoma Subtypes by Lipid Analysis Using Desorption Electrospray Ionization Imaging Mass Spectrometry. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49 (34), 59535956,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201001452
      13. 13
        Eberlin, L. S.; Ferreira, C. R.; Dill, A. L.; Ifa, D. R.; Cooks, R. G. Desorption electrospray ionization mass spectrometry for lipid characterization and biological tissue imaging. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, Mol. Cell Biol. Lipids 2011, 1811 (11), 946960,  DOI: 10.1016/j.bbalip.2011.05.006
      14. 14
        Liu, J.; Wang, H.; Manicke, N. E.; Lin, J.-M.; Cooks, R. G.; Ouyang, Z. Development, Characterization, and Application of Paper Spray Ionization. Anal. Chem. 2010, 82 (6), 24632471,  DOI: 10.1021/ac902854g
      15. 15
        Chiang, S.; Zhang, W.; Ouyang, Z. Paper spray ionization mass spectrometry: recent advances and clinical applications. Expert Rev. Proteomics 2018, 15 (10), 781789,  DOI: 10.1080/14789450.2018.1525295
      16. 16
        Kerian, K. S.; Jarmusch, A. K.; Cooks, R. G. Touch spray mass spectrometry for in situ analysis of complex samples. Analyst 2014, 139 (11), 27142720,  DOI: 10.1039/C4AN00548A
      17. 17
        Ifa, D. R.; Eberlin, L. S. Ambient Ionization Mass Spectrometry for Cancer Diagnosis and Surgical Margin Evaluation. Clin. Chem. 2016, 62 (1), 111123,  DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2014.237172
      18. 18
        Gu, H.; Xu, N.; Chen, H. Direct analysis of biological samples using extractive electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (EESI-MS). Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2012, 403 (8), 21452153,  DOI: 10.1007/s00216-012-5874-1
      19. 19
        Balog, J.; Sasi-Szabó, L.; Kinross, J.; Lewis, M. R.; Muirhead, L. J.; Veselkov, K.; Mirnezami, R.; Dezso, B.; Damjanovich, L.; Darzi, A.; Nicholson, J. K.; Takáts, Z. Intraoperative Tissue Identification Using Rapid Evaporative Ionization Mass Spectrometry. Sci. Transl. Med. 2013, 5 (194), 194ra93194ra93,  DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3005623
      20. 20
        Takats, Z.; Denes, J.; Kinross, J. Identifying the margin: a new method to distinguish between cancerous and noncancerous tissue during surgery. Future Oncol. 2012, 8 (2), 113116,  DOI: 10.2217/fon.11.151
      21. 21
        Banerjee, S.; Manna, S. K. Assessment of Metabolic Signature for Cancer Diagnosis Using Desorption Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometric Imaging. In Cancer Metabolism: Methods and Protocols; Haznadar, M., Ed.; Springer New York: New York, NY, 2019; pp 275297.
      22. 22
        Li, Y. Application of DART-MS in Clinical and Pharmacological Analysis. In Direct Analysis in Real Time Mass Spectrometry; Dong, Y., Ed.; Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA: 2017; pp 223240.
      23. 23
        Barry, J. A.; Robichaud, G.; Bokhart, M. T.; Thompson, C.; Sykes, C.; Kashuba, A. D. M.; Muddiman, D. C. Mapping antiretroviral drugs in tissue by IR-MALDESI MSI coupled to the Q Exactive and comparison with LC-MS/MS SRM assay. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2014, 25 (12), 20382047,  DOI: 10.1007/s13361-014-0884-1
      24. 24
        Banerjee, S.; Zare, R. N.; Tibshirani, R. J.; Kunder, C. A.; Nolley, R.; Fan, R.; Brooks, J. D.; Sonn, G. A. Diagnosis of prostate cancer by desorption electrospray ionization mass spectrometric imaging of small metabolites and lipids. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2017, 114 (13), 33343339,  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1700677114
      25. 25
        Ucal, Y.; Durer, Z. A.; Atak, H.; Kadioglu, E.; Sahin, B.; Coskun, A.; Baykal, A. T.; Ozpinar, A. Clinical applications of MALDI imaging technologies in cancer and neurodegenerative diseases. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, Proteins Proteomics 2017, 1865 (7), 795816,  DOI: 10.1016/j.bbapap.2017.01.005