Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

You’ve supercharged your research process with ACS and Mendeley!

STEP 1:
Click to create an ACS ID

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

MENDELEY PAIRING EXPIRED
Your Mendeley pairing has expired. Please reconnect
ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
Microfluidic Controlled Self-Assembly of Polylactide (PLA)-Based Linear and Graft Copolymers into Nanoparticles with Diverse Morphologies
My Activity
  • Open Access
Article

Microfluidic Controlled Self-Assembly of Polylactide (PLA)-Based Linear and Graft Copolymers into Nanoparticles with Diverse Morphologies
Click to copy article linkArticle link copied!

Open PDFSupporting Information (1)

ACS Polymers Au

Cite this: ACS Polym. Au 2024, 4, 4, 331–341
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acspolymersau.4c00033
Published May 31, 2024

Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under

CC-BY 4.0 .

Abstract

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This study outlines the microfluidic (MF) controlled self-assembly of polylactide (PLA)-based linear and graft copolymers. The PLA-based copolymers (PLA-Cs) were synthesized through a convenient one-pot/one-step ROP/RAFT technique. Three distinct vinyl monomers─triethylene glycol methacrylate (TEGMA), 2-hydroxypropyl methacrylate (HPMA), and N-(2-hydroxypropyl) methacrylamide (HPMAA) were employed to prepare various copolymers: linear thermoresponsive polylactide-b-poly(triethylene glycol methacrylate) (PLA-b-PTEGMA), graft pseudothermoresponsive poly[N-(2-hydroxypropyl)] methacrylate-g-polylactide (PHPMA-g-PLA), and graft amphiphilic poly[N-(2-hydroxypropyl)] methacrylamide-g-polylactide (PHPMAA-g-PLA). The MF technology was utilized for the controlled self-assembly of these PLA-based BCs in a solution, resulting in a range of nanoparticle (NP) morphologies. The thermoresponsive PLA-b-PTEGMA diblock copolymer formed thermodynamically stable micelles (Ms) through kinetically controlled assemblies. Similarly, employing MF channels led to the self-assembly of PHPMA-g-PLA, yielding polymersomes (PSs) with adjustable sizes under the same solution conditions. Conversely, the PHPMAA-g-PLA copolymer generated worm-like particles (Ws). The analysis of resulting nano-objects involves techniques such as transmission electron microscopy, dynamic light scattering investigations (DLS), and small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS). More specifically, the thermoresponsive behavior of PLA-b-PTEGMA and PHPMA-g-PLA nano-objects is validated through variable-temperature DLS, TEM, and SAXS methods. Furthermore, the study explored the specific interactions between the formed Ms, PSs, and/or Ws with proteins in human blood plasma, utilizing isothermal titration calorimetry.

This publication is licensed under

CC-BY 4.0 .
  • cc licence
  • by licence
Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society

Introduction

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Block copolymers (BCs) have been extensively studied, both from a practical and a theoretical point of view. (1−4) Over the last decades, most of the researcher interest have been focused on the synthesis of BCs with an amphiphilic nature and different architecture. The synthesis of well-defined BCs with a high degree of molecular, structural, and compositional homogeneity is typically achieved through the use of classic anionic and cationic polymerization methods, as well as the more recent controlled/living radical polymerization techniques. Sequential polymerization reactions are most commonly used for such syntheses. (5,6) Of particular interest is the extremely challenging combination of two or more “living” polymerization techniques in a single step to copolymerize chemically different monomers that are otherwise noncopolymerizable. (7−9) For example, olefin monomers and cyclic ester monomers, even within each type, are also difficult to copolymerize under identical conditions. One-pot simultaneous protocols utilize dual initiators, i.e., a reversible addition–fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) agent bearing a hydroxyl function in either the Z- or R-position that is capable of initiating the ring-opening polymerization (ROP) of cyclic esters. (10,11) Exploring the one-pot/simultaneous ROP/RAFT polymerization of LA with a vinyl monomer appears to be promising for the synthesis of new amphiphilic biodegradable PLA-based copolymers with different topologies. (12,13) However, over the last decades, the synthesis of amphiphilic BCs (AmBCs) with different properties has attracted the interest of many researchers. It is well-known that their ability to undergo spontaneous self-assembly in aqueous solutions has shown great potential in a wide range of applications, such as in the pharmaceutical, medical, cosmetic, and gene delivery fields. (14−17) Several parameters could be affected by the different morphologies of nano-objects, such as spheres, worms, polymersomes, toroids, and more complex shapes. (18,19) For example, the chemical nature of the monomers incorporated, composition, and total molecular weight could suggest the morphology of the corresponding nanoparticles (NPs). On the other hand, specific conditions, such as temperature, (20,21) concentration, pH, (22) and ionic strength, (22,23) determine the type of morphology as well. To overcome this issue, the major advantage of AmBCs prepared from a huge variety of different monomers is that they have the desired properties corresponding to their specific applications. (24) Indeed, thermoresponsive polymers are widely used for biomedical applications, including drug delivery, (25−27) scaffolds for tissue engineering, (28−30) and gene delivery vehicles. (31) The most well-known and extensively researched thermoresponsive polymer is poly-N-isopropylacrylamide) (PNIPAM), which has a lower critical solution temperature (LCST) in the range of 32–35 °C. (32,33) Human body temperatures are usually in the range of 35–37 °C, which makes it the most capable trigger system. Another example of thermoresponsive polymers are oligo(ethylene glycol) methacrylates, which allow precision tailoring of LCST dependent upon pendant chain length and end group and are believed to be biocompatible and suitable for drug delivery applications in a manner analogous to linear PEG, (34−42) 2-hydroxypropyl methacrylate (HPMA), and so on. Interestingly, PHPMA-based diblock copolymer NPs do not have a typical LCST profile, but they are weakly thermosensitive, which leads to shape-shifting behavior when adjusting the solution temperature. (43) Armes et al. conducted extensive studies on an aqueous dispersion of poly([N-(2-hydroxypropyl) methacrylate (PHPMA)]-based diblock copolymers. These studies have demonstrated that the copolymers exhibit spheres, worms, or vesicles morphology simply by adjusting the solution temperature. (38,44,45) It should be noted here that the thermoresponsive behavior of PHPMA strongly depends on its degree of polymerization (DP). At relatively high DP, PHPMA is no longer thermoresponsive. (37,44,46) In contrast, the study selected poly(N-(2-hydroxypropyl)methacrylamide) (PHPMAA) as a representative of nonthermosensitive polymers. PHPMAA stands out for its highly hydrophilic, nontoxic, and biocompatible properties. Additionally, it possesses protein-repelling characteristics and offers a prolonged blood circulation lifetime. (47,48) In 2010, Zentel et al. proposed a new route toward the synthesis of functional PLA-b-PHPMAA via the combination of ROP of LA and conversion into a chain transfer agent for the subsequent RAFT polymerization. (49) A one-step/simultaneous RAFT/ROP approach was found for the first time by our team for the copolymerization of PLA with different vinyl monomers. (50−52) It is well-known that PLA is a hydrophobic, aliphatic, biodegradable, and biocompatible synthetic biomaterial. (53−56) It has also been utilized in biomedical applications including sutures, bone screws, and tissue engineering scaffolds. (57,58) Nevertheless, controlling the size, shape, and polydispersity of soft-matter self-assembled nanostructures is an important strategy, which is why the application of microfluidic (MF) devices is greatly necessary. (59) Indeed, MF methods featuring precise fluid manipulation have quickly become powerful and versatile for manufacturing NPs in a highly controlled manner, which is of great importance for nanoencapsulation, biomimics, and microreactors. (60) Considering the aforementioned factors, we were motivated to develop a novel metal-free one-pot/one-step approach. Here, we combined RAFT/ROP techniques to create biodegradable and biocompatible PLA-based BCs. For this purpose, three distinct vinyl monomers: triethylene glycol methacrylate (TEGMA), HPMA, and HPMAA were used. These versatile components were instrumental in the creation of a diverse range of polymers, including the thermoresponsive linear polylactide-b-poly(triethylene glycol methacrylate) (PLA-b-PTEGMA), the pseudothermoresponsive poly([N-(2-hydroxypropyl) methacrylate-g-polylactide) (PHPMA-g-PLA), and the intriguing amphiphilic poly([N-(2-hydroxypropyl) methacrylamide-g-polylactide) (PHPMAA-g-PLA) copolymers (see, Scheme 1). Our study aims to explore the self-assembling behavior of three AmBCs using a MF chip system. Additionally, we aim to conduct a pioneering comparison of the interplay between polymer chemistry, thermoresponsivity, and the architecture formed through self-assembly on a MF chip. Three PLA-based BCs were obtained with similar molecular weights but varying composition, structural properties, and topology. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report demonstrating precise control of kinetic processing by adjusting the final polymer concentration (Cfinal), leading to the self-assembly of these three AmBCPs into micelle-like spheres (Ms), Ps, and worms (Ws). Furthermore, the specific interactions between the obtained NPs and proteins in human blood plasma were studied by isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC). We are confident that unraveling these rules and relationships governing structure, thermoresponsivity, and architecture formation will open up new avenues for customizing the self-assembly of nanosystems for biomedical applications.

Scheme 1

Scheme 1. Synthetic Scheme for the Synthesis of PLA-b-PTEGMA Diblock Copolymer, PHPMA-g-PLA, and PHPMAA-g-PLA Graft Copolymers via One-Pot/Simultaneous

Materials and Methods

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Materials

The monomer 3,6-dimethyl-1,4-dioxane-2,5-dione (d,l-lactide, LA, 99%) underwent several recrystallization steps from ethyl acetate before use. HPMA and methacryloyl chloride were purified via vacuum distillation prior to usage. The monomer N-(2-hydroxypropyl)methacrylamide (HPMAA) (as depicted in Figure S1) was synthesized following the procedure outlined in ref (61) The RAFT agent 4-cyano-4-(((ethylthio)carbonothioyl)thio)pentanoic acid (CEPA) (as shown in Scheme S1 in the Supporting Information) was synthesized in accordance with literature in ref (62). Detailed synthesis procedures for all compounds are provided in the Supporting Information file. Triethylene glycol methyl ether methacrylate (TEGMA, 95%) was purified using an inhibitor remover (Aldrich #311332) with stirring for 5 min, followed by filtration to remove the inhibitor remover. The initiator 2,2′-azobis(2-methylpropionitrile) (AIBN, ≥98%) was purified through recrystallization from methanol. The chain-transfer agent, 4-cyano-4-[(dodecylsulfanylthiocarbonyl)sulfanyl]pentanol (CDSP), was used as received. Anhydrous 1,2-dichloroethane (Cl2CH2CH2Cl2, 99.8% purity) was distilled under an Ar atmosphere. 1,4-Dioxane of the highest commercially available purity, along with all reagents and solvents, was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. The chemicals amino-2-propanol and 4-(dimethylamino)-pyridine (DMAP, 98%) were purchased from Fluka (Czech Republic). Regenerated cellulose dialysis membranes with a molecular-weight cutoff (MWCO) of 2 kDa were purchased from Spectra/Por.

Characterization Techniques

A comprehensive explanation of the employed characterization techniques is provided in detail within the Supporting Information file.

Synthesis of PLA-Based BCs with Diverse Architectures

The PLA-b-PTEGMA diblock copolymer, (50) PHPMA-g-PLA graft copolymer (GCP), (52) and PHPMAA-g-PLA GCP (51,52) were synthesized via a one-pot/one-step protocol following previous procedures, which are detailed in the Supporting Information.

Self-Assembly of PLA-Based BCs in Microfluidic Chips and Characterization of NPs

Nano-objects with different morphologies were produced by a MF device (Dolomite Royston, United Kingdom) and using a glass micromixer chip with 12 mixing stage microchannels of 50 μm × 125 μm (depth × width). For the self-assembly of the BCs in MF chips, Nemesys pumps (CETONI, Germany) were used (see Figure S1, in Supporting Information). The self-assembly process of the BCs PLA35-b-PTEGMA64 and PHPMA75-g-PLA35 was conducted at an initial solution concentration (Cinitial) of 2.0 mg L–1 and PHPMAA82-g-PLA35 at a Cinitial of 5.0 mg L–1. The used concentration was chosen to prevent the formation of macroscopic aggregates within the MF chip. The PLA35-b-PTEGMA64 and PHPMA75-g-PLA35 copolymers were dissolved in THF, while PHPMAA82-g-PLA35 was dissolved in THF/MeOH (80/20) (v/v). The polymer solutions were pumped through the middle channel, and miliQ water was pumped through the side channels using two separate liquid steams controlled via computer software. For all cases, the final concentration (Cfinal) should be achieved at 20.0 mg mL–1. The flow rates were adjustable parameters, and the polymer colloids were obtained after evaporation of the organic solvent by a rotary vacuum evaporator. The supramolecular polymer assemblies were characterized by dynamic light scattering (DLS), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) techniques, as described in detail.

Results and Discussion

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Synthesis of Polyester PLA-Based Copolymers and Their Self-Assembly in MF Chips

Herein, we showcase kinetically controlled self-assembly in MF channels. We use various PLA-based copolymers predissolved in organic solvents, achieving a Cfinal of 20.0 mg mL–1 for all. The size, shape, and polydispersity of the self-assembled nanostructures were carefully controlled using the MF-assisted method. (47) To achieve precise control over these parameters, it was imperative to fine-tune kinetic factors during the self-assembly process.
In our recent published papers, (50−52) we showcased the synthesis of a novel category of BCPs with linear and nonlinear architecture. Likewise, all were synthesized via a metal-free one-pot/simultaneous ROP and RAFT approach. The BCPs consist of a constant block of hydrolyzable aliphatic biodegradable polyester (PLA), and a second block of methacrylic and/or methacrylamide, such as PTEGMA, PHPMA, and PHPMAA. The variation involved maintaining a similar ratio of the blocks while ensuring that they have nearly identical molecular weights. Using this set of diverse building blocks, various copolymers were prepared for all classes of amphiphiles outlined in Scheme 1. The BCPs are as follows: thermoresponsive polylactide-b-poly(triethylene glycol methacrylate) (PLA-b-PTEGMA) diblock copolymer, pseudothermoresponsive poly([N-(2-hydroxypropyl)]methacrylate-g-polylactide (PHPMA-g-PLA), and poly([N-(2-hydroxypropyl)]methacrylamide-g-polylactide (PHPMAA-g-PLA) GCPs.
The SEC chromatograms of all investigated PLA-based copolymers clearly show that the obtained curves are monomodal, symmetric, and exhibit no competitive side reactions. Notably, the molecular-weight distributions () were relatively narrow: polydispersities ranged between 1.13 and 1.21 (Table 1), which indicates that the combination of ROP and RAFT polymerization in a one-pot/one-step protocol proceeded as a living process, and the obtained PLA-based BCPs have controlled structures (see Figure 1).
Table 1. Molecular Weight Data of All BCPs Synthesized via Metal-Free One-Pot/One-Step ROP/RAFT Polymerization
BCPs[LA]0/[MRAFT]0 feed ratioMn, SEC (g·mol1)a
PLA-b-PTEGMA35/6414,3001.21
PHPMA-g-PLA35/7520,1001.20
PHPMAA-g-PLA35/8521,9001.13
a

Determined by SEC in DMF as the eluent poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) standards.

Figure 1

Figure 1. SEC chromatograms in DMF of the PLA-b-PTEGMA diblock copolymer (green curve), PHPMA-g-PLA (red curve), and PHPAA-g-PLA graft copolymers (blue curve).

Formation of PLA-B-PTEGMA Ms in MF Channels

Herein, the linear thermoresponsive PLA-b-PTEGMA diblock copolymer (T-BCP) assembled into thermodynamically stable micelle-like (Ms) spherical nano-objects at a flow rate of 300/100 μL min–1 from the WP to OP, achieving a Cfinal of 20.0 mg mL–1. It is well-known that T-BCPs sensitive to temperature changes in the environment are characterized by a LCST-type phase transition. This is a well-established feature for thermoresponsive polymers and polymeric nano-objects that display an LCST-type phase transition. (11,16,63,64) Figure 2A shows the particle size distribution of the copolymer at room temperature and 60 °C. According to DLS analysis, at lower temperatures (T < LCST), the hydrodynamic diameter (DH) values of the thermoresponsive micelles are approximately 78 nm, with a particle size distribution (PDI = 0.23), see Table 2. At higher temperatures, reaching 60 °C (T > LCST), the hydrodynamic diameter (DH) values rapidly increase to 213 nm (PDI = 0.126), see Table 2. The DLS analysis showcased the lactate moieties’ capacity to modulate the cloud point, which is governed by the thermoresponsive block (PTEGMA). Additionally, prior research conducted by our team revealed that the length of the hydrophobic PLA block influenced cloud point concerning the length of the PTEGMA block. (50)

Figure 2

Figure 2. (A) DLS plot for the hydrodynamic diameters of PLA-b-PTEGMA Ms at 25 and 60 °C; (B) temperature dependence of hydrodynamic radius (DH) of diblock polymer in aqueous solution; and TEM images of self-assembled PLA-b-PTEGMA at (C) 25 °C and (D) 60 °C.

Table 2. Physico-chemical Characteristics of the PLA-b-PTEGMA, PHPMA-g-PLA, and PHPMAA-g-PLA NPs Produced by Microfluidics
Ncopolymersflow rate (OP/WP)DH/nm, (PDI)amorphbD/nmc
1PLA-b-PTEGMA thermoresponsive block copolymerTHF/H2O 100/30025°C78 (0.23)Ms70–80
   60°C213 (0.126)A200–300
2PHPMA-g-PLA pseudothermoresponsive graft copolymerTHF/H2O 100/3005°C124 (0.06)SMs70–80
   25°C152 (0.03)PSs100–150
   60°C175 (0.04)PSs-A150–200
3PHPMAA-g-PLA amphiphilic graft copolymerTHF/MeOH/H2O (80/20 v/v) 100/300 140 (0.34)Ws15 ± 3.2
a

Hydrodynamic diameter and dispersity from DLS.

b

Nanoparticle morphology from TEM (Ms = micelles, A = aggregates, PSs = polymersomes, SMs = spherical micelles, and Ws = worms).

c

Particle diameter from TEM.

The cloud point and phase separation behavior of PLA-b-PTEGMA Ms was subsequently explored by variable-temperature DLS analysis. The temperatures ranged from 25 to 65 °C in 1.5 °C intervals (refer to Figure 2B), depicting the dependence of the Z-average DH on temperature. For Ms formulation, heating above a cloud point significantly increased the DH. This was accompanied by the formation of larger aggregates due to decreased particle solubility above their LCST. The phase transition temperature is reported here as the TCFT, recorded as the DH value at the onset of exponential particle size increase. The specified cloud point value of the PLA-b-PTEGMA exemplified in this study is around 50 °C, and TCFT is about 55 °C; see Figure 2B. Imaging of T-BCP self-assembled by TEM confirmed the presence of uniform spherical particles-Ms. In order to further additionally improve the temperature-responsive nature of the PLA-b-PTEGMA Ms explored by variable-temperature TEM.
Indeed, Figure 2C shows the TEM image of PLA-b-PTEGMA Ms at 25 °C (T < LCST), where the well-defined spherical NPs can be observed. As expected, when the temperature increased to 60 °C (T > LCST), the Ms tended to form aggregates of large size, as shown in Figure 2D, which can be attributed to the transition of PTEGMA chains from hydrophilicity to hydrophobicity. Overall, the DLS results are in good agreement with the TEM images and provide further evidence of the morphology of the resulting NPs.
Furthermore, to demonstrate the thermoresponsivity of PLA-b-PTEGMA diblock copolymer, the powerful analytical technique SAXS was used. The thermally induced micelle-to-micelle aggregation transition was verified by a series of experiments that yielded five characteristic SAXS patterns at different temperatures: 16, 30, 45, 55, and 60 °C, respectively. The experimental SAXS patterns obtained for the original T-BCP Ms are shown in Figure 3A.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Selected SAXS data (colored circles) recorded for nano-objects prepared by MF of (A) PLA-b-PTEGMA on heating from 16 to 60 °C and (B) PHPMA-g-PLA at temperatures of 5, 25, and 60 °C.

These patterns were fitted using the core–shell model, (65) and the obtained parameters at room temperature indeed demonstrated that PLA-b-PTEGMA T-BCP NPs have a micellar structure with 63 nm in diameter and a thin shell of about 3.8 nm in thickness with a slightly lower scattering length density compared to the core. With increasing temperature, the size of the Ms increased slightly to about 66.8 nm and a thin shell of about 6.3 nm in thickness at 55 °C. When the temperature was increased even further (to 60 °C), a significant shift in the morphology of the particles was observed─the size of the whole particle increased two-fold, while the core shrunk to about half its size and noticeably increased its scattering length density (see Table 3). Even after aggregation, the particles retained a predominantly spherical shape. However, their polydispersity notably increased (refer to Figure 2D), thus warranting the application of a core–shell model with a log–normal polydispersity function for fitting.
Table 3. Parameters of the Core–Shell Model for PLA-b-PTEGMA and PHPMAA-g-PLA NPs at Various Temperatures with a Log–Normal Distribution of Core and Shell Radii to Account for the Polydispersity of the Samples
PLA-b-PTEGMAPHPMAA-g-PLA
T [°C]163045556052560
rcore [nm]30.131.532.033.417.058.157.759.2
rshell [nm]4.43.84.66.350.435.741.749.3
ρcoresolvent1.231.241.261.292.251.661.651.18
ρshellsolvent1.711.801.701.660.921.561.551.48

Formation of PSs in MF Channels

Through the use of the MF method, the pseudothermoresponsive PHPMA-g-PLA GCP self-assembles to produce PSs with a controlled size. The flow rate was held constant (100 μL min–1) while the flow rate of the aqueous phase under flow velocity ratio was 300 μL min–1, resulting in vesicular shape with particle size shown in Table 2. THF was used as an organic solvent to solubilize the copolymer.
It is well-known that nano-objects containing PHPMA blocks exhibit nontypical thermoresponsive behavior, i.e., (they do not possess LCST) (14,31,66) so-called pseudothermoresponsive polymers. Inspired by the extensive research carried out by Armes et al. on PHPMA-based NPs, we invented a new shell-forming PHPMA block containing a core PLA-grafted block. In relation to the above, we conducted proof-of-concept experiments to demonstrate the thermosensitivity of the graft PHPMA-g-PLA NPs. The thermoresponsive properties of the PSs were then checked by monitoring the hydrodynamic diameter with DLS. Three different temperatures 5, 25, and 60 °C were selected. As shown in Figure 3A, the DLS intensity profile of the obtained PSs at 25 °C shows just one distinct population (DH = 152 nm) with a relatively narrow particle size distribution (PDI = 0.03; Figure 4A, Table 2).

Figure 4

Figure 4. (A) The plots depict the hydrodynamic diameter of the NPs at various temperatures, alongside TEM micrographs of self-assembled PHPMA-g-PLA at (B) 5 °C, (C) 25 °C, and (D) 60 °C.

The mean hydrodynamic diameter was slightly changed with increasing the temperature up to 60 °C (DH = 175 nm, PDI = 0.04); see Table 2. It is indicating that the PHPMA-g-PLA PSs did not exhibit thermoresponsive behavior at high temperatures. When the temperature was decreased to 5 °C, only a very modest decrease in the Z-average diameter (DH = 124 nm, PDI = 0.06) was found. A likely reason for this change is due to the fact that the PHPMA polymer becomes significantly more hydrated when the solution temperature decreases, as previously shown by Armes et al. (18,45) Despite this minor issue, it still provides an effective strategy to tune the GCP vesicular morphologies and structures. These observations suggest that the micellar morphology of the study NPs at low temperatures could undergo changes. Following this procedure, the PHPMA-g-PLA aqueous dispersion was performed at temperatures of either 5 °C (utilizing a refrigerator), 25 °C (at room temperature), or 60 °C (with the assistance of an oven), after a 24 h equilibration period. The homogeneity of the sample was subsequently confirmed through TEM micrographs (Figure 4B–D; see Table 2). The TEM study validated our hypothesis regarding a morphological change. Theoretically, within the membrane-forming PHPMA block, an increase in environmental temperature from 25 to 60 °C is anticipated to induce a transition to a hydrophobic state. This transition leads to a reduction in the packing parameter P, which in turn triggers morphological changes. As a result, this phenomenon explains the formation of vesicle-to-vesicle aggregates that have been observed. (37,67) Unlike our scenario, where no noticeable alteration in the micellar-vesicle morphology was observed upon heating to 60 °C, there was merely an increase in the DH by approximately 20 nm (Figure 4D). The larger size of the molecules measured using DLS at 60 °C could be attributed to their partial aggregation, which we can observe in TEM (Figure 4D).
For example, at rapid cooling from 25 to 5 °C, there was a partial change in the morphology from the mixture of vesicles and micelles to pure micelles with a negligible change in the particle size (Figure 4B,C). On the basis of the structural transformation of spherical micelles (SMs) along with temperature adjustments, it is hypothetically possible to conclude that SMs are connected by PHPMA domains. The NPs studied by DLS at different temperatures and the change in DH are well-consistent with TEM results (Figure 4). Regrettably, this did not facilitate the recognition of the PHPMA-g-PLA GCP under investigation as a suitable candidate for generating nanoformulations displaying spherical, worm-like, vesicular, or lamellar morphology within the specified temperature range (5, 25, and 60 °C).
To confirm the PS or SM morphologies assigned by TEM analysis, SAXS patterns were recorded for PHPMA-g-PLA aqueous copolymer dispersion at 5, 25, and 60 °C (see Figure 3B). Fitting this SAXS pattern to the spherical micelle model (65) indicated an overall sphere diameter (Dsphere). The characteristics of PHPMA-g-PLA suggest that the particles exhibit the characteristics of larger vesicles (approximately 200 nm in diameter at room temperature) with a more substantial shell (40 nm) possessing a greater scattering length density in comparison to the core. As the temperature increases, the shell thickness also increases, resulting in a growth in the overall size of the vesicle. When the temperature was raised to 60 °C, the scattering length density of the core decreased to a level similar to that of water. This observation could be interpreted as an indication of water entering the interior of the vesicle (see Table 3).

Formation of Ws in MF Channels

In our recent publication, (51) we highlighted the significant impact of self-assembly within the MF technique, particularly evident with a typical amphiphilic PHPMAA-g-PLA GCP. This copolymer enabled the formation of nano-objects with a unique worm-like (Ws) morphology at a concentration of Cfinal 20.0 mg mL–1. Achieving such a morphology is rare, especially with amphiphilic BCs rooted in PLA and PHPMAA. Typically, NPs derived from these copolymers exhibit spherical shapes. Our recent breakthrough, made possible by the MF technology, demonstrates the successful generation of nano-objects with a worm-like morphology using amphiphilic PLA-g-PHPMAA GCPs. The production of these worm-like structures was accomplished using a mixture of THF/MeOH (80/20) (v/v) as the organic solvent to dissolve the GCP. The solution was pumped at a flow rate of 100 μL min–1, and the flow diffusion occurred under a flow velocity ratio of the aqueous phase (300 μL min–1). Remarkably, the MF technique enabled the creation of uniform NPs exhibiting the distinctive worm-like morphology, a feature not typically associated with this method. In fact, there are very few instances in the literature where the formation of worm-like micelles has been successfully achieved using the MF approach. (60,68) Furthermore, it is worth highlighting that no instances of worm self-assembly using PLA–PHPMAA copolymers have been reported, even through conventional NP preparation methods like emulsion, dialysis, and others. The assembly of worm particles from PHPMAA-g-PLA copolymers within MF channels is evident in both the DLS profile (not shown) and the TEM micrograph (Figure 5A). The DLS intensity profile displayed a monomodal size distribution with an apparently DH = 140 nm and a relatively broad polydispersity (PDI = 0.34). This is a characteristic feature often observed in nano-objects exhibiting worm-like morphology. (68−71) Figure 5A depicts well-defined worms nano-objects, and it is estimated from the TEM image to be of the order of about 15 nm. These PHPMAA-g-PLA worms were further characterized by SAXS. For an optimal fit to the SAXS pattern, a combination of the WormLikeChainEXV model described by Pedersen (72) (to characterize the worm-like chains) and the extended Guinier law model (73) (to describe the corona block) was used. The effect of solvent (water) was approximated by the constant function IH2O = 3.41. The mean worm contour length or total length (Lw) was determined to be 5592 nm (see Figure 5B).

Figure 5

Figure 5. (A) TEM image and (B) SAXS data of recorded for the self-assembled of PHPMAA-g-PLA Ws. Adapted with permission under a Creative Commons [CC-BY 3.0] from ref (51) Copyright 2024 Royal Society of Chemistry.

The mean worm width (Ww) was calculated to be 13 nm, according to the circular worm cross-section. The resulting value corresponds to that estimated from TEM images (for which Ww = 15 ± 3.2 nm). For this purpose, the equation Ww = 2Rsw + 4Rg was applied, where Rsw represents the radius of the worm core cross section and Rg represents the radius of gyration of the corona chains (PHPMAA). Based on the SAXS pattern fit, the Kuhn length–length of two neighboring rigid sections RLw is about 870 nm (one segment = 435 nm), and the Rg of the corona block was determined to be 1736 nm (d = 3472 nm).
The abundant proteins found in blood plasma were used to investigate the interaction of the obtained NPs within MF. ITC experiments were conducted to assess the binding affinity of these proteins to PLA-b-PTEGMA, PHPMA-g-PLA, and PHPMAA-g-PLA nano-objects. The ITC experiments with diluted blood plasma were carried out at three different temperatures: the ambient temperature of 20 °C, the physiological temperature of 37, and 54 °C. At both 20 and 37 °C, all three polymers exhibited minimal interaction with the proteins in blood plasma, as depicted in Figure 6. A slight initial endothermic signal observed during the titration process, particularly for PHPMA-g-PLA and PHPMAA-g-PLA GCPs, indicates the dehydration of polar groups present either in the polymers or in the proteins. However, at 54 °C, an exothermic signal was observed for all three polymers. This signal can be tentatively attributed to the binding of certain proteins through hydrophobic interactions.

Figure 6

Figure 6. ITC of polymers (A) PLA-b-PTEGMA, (B) PHPMA-g-PLA, and (C) PHPMAA-g-PLA NPs in ultrapure water with human blood plasma, diluted to 10% vol/vol with PBS at 20, 37, and 54 °C.

It is noteworthy that the hydrophobicity of the polymers follows the order PLA-b-PTEGMA > PHPMAA-g-PLA > PHPMA-g-PLA. Nonetheless, the measured thermal effects resulting from the titration of polymeric solutions with diluted human blood plasma were relatively small, making it challenging to definitively confirm the binding of proteins across all the examined temperatures. As a result, it can be concluded that the NPs do not readily interact with the proteins present in human blood, thereby exhibiting nonfouling behavior.

Conclusions

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

In summary, the combined utilization of ROP/RAFT “living” polymerization techniques within a one-pot/simultaneous protocol presents a highly versatile synthetic strategy for producing biocompatible linear and grafted amphiphilic block copolymers. This demonstrates that the cyclic ester LA and the three distinct methacrylic monomers, namely, TEGMA, HPMA, and N-(2-hydroxypropyl) methacrylamide (HPMAA), serve as suitable comonomers that can effectively participate in ROP/RAFT processes. The central focus of this research lies in the kinetic-controlled self-assembly of three block copolymers: PLA-b-PTEGMA, PHPMA-g-PLA, and PHPMAA-g-PLA, using a capillary-based MF chip. Within the MF framework, the morphology and size of the self-assembled nanopharmaceuticals are determined by the nature and composition of the corresponding copolymers.
Among the entire spectrum of copolymers assemblies, particle size can be conveniently adjusted by modifying either the total flow velocity of water and the organic solvent, or their flow velocity ratio. Depending on the specific AmCPs and the self-assembly protocol, various morphologies can be achieved using in all cases the same Cfinal. Specifically, PLA-b-PTEGMA and T-BCP self-assemble into monodisperse (PDI <0.20) micelles with the desired size (DH = 78 nm) at room temperature. Upon raising the temperature, the particle size increases (DH = 213 nm, PDI = 0.126), leading to the aggregation of micelles. The observed temperature range for this aggregation phenomenon spans from 50 to 60 °C.
Variable-temperature DLS and TEM investigations validate that the pseudothermoresponsive PHPMA-g-PLA experiences increased solvation and/or mobility at lower temperatures. TEM analysis reveals the presence of PSs at 25 °C, undergoing an order–order transition to spherical micelles upon cooling to 5 °C. Subsequent heating to 60 °C triggers the aggregation of the PSs.
This study presents one of the initial instances of PHPMAA-g-PLA nanoformulations exhibiting a distinct worm morphology, characterized by their stable self-assembled structures.
With their inherent biocompatibility, these novel nanomaterials hold promise as platforms for crafting unique nanovectors.

Supporting Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acspolymersau.4c00033.

  • Details of synthesis and characterization techniques (PDF)

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Author Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

  • Corresponding Author
  • Authors
    • Vladimir Sincari - Institute of Macromolecular Chemistry v.v.i., Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Heyrovsky, Sq. 2, 162 06 Prague 6, Czech RepublicOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7379-066X
    • Ewa Pavlova - Institute of Macromolecular Chemistry v.v.i., Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Heyrovsky, Sq. 2, 162 06 Prague 6, Czech Republic
    • Václav Pokorný - Institute of Macromolecular Chemistry v.v.i., Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Heyrovsky, Sq. 2, 162 06 Prague 6, Czech RepublicOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-4145-7982
    • Volodymyr Lobaz - Institute of Macromolecular Chemistry v.v.i., Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Heyrovsky, Sq. 2, 162 06 Prague 6, Czech RepublicOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-0479-2837
    • Martin Hrubý - Institute of Macromolecular Chemistry v.v.i., Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Heyrovsky, Sq. 2, 162 06 Prague 6, Czech RepublicOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-5075-261X
  • Author Contributions

    S.L.P. performed one-pot/one-step synthesis of the PLA-based BCs and wrote the manuscript. V.S. performed MF and DLS experiments and analyzed the DLS data. E.P. performed TEM experiments and analyzed the data. V.P. performed X-ray experiments and analyzed the data. V.L. performed ITC experiments and analyzed the ITC data. M.H. provided financial support. All authors have given approval to the final version of the manuscript.

  • Notes
    The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Acknowledgments

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The authors thank the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic (grant # LM2023053) and the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic through the project New Technologies for Translational Research in Pharmaceutical Sciences/NETPHARM, project ID CZ.02.01.01/00/22_008/0004607, cofunded by the European Union.

References

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article references 73 other publications.

  1. 1
    Uhrig, D.; Mays, J. W. Synthesis of Combs, Centipedes, and Barbwires: Poly(Isoprene- Graft -Styrene) Regular Multigraft Copolymers with Trifunctional, Tetrafunctional, and Hexafunctional Branch Points. Macromolecules 2002, 35 (19), 71827190,  DOI: 10.1021/ma020427l
  2. 2
    Hadjichristidis, N.; Iatrou, H.; Pitsikalis, M.; Mays, J. Macromolecular Architectures by Living and Controlled/Living Polymerizations. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2006, 31 (12), 10681132,  DOI: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2006.07.002
  3. 3
    Oh, J. K. Polylactide (PLA)-Based Amphiphilic Block Copolymers: Synthesis, Self-Assembly, and Biomedical Applications. Soft Matter 2011, 7 (11), 5096,  DOI: 10.1039/c0sm01539c
  4. 4
    Song, J.; Xu, J.; Pispas, S.; Zhang, G. One-pot synthesis of poly(l-lactide)-b-poly(methyl methacrylate) block copolymers. RSC Adv. 2015, 5 (48), 3824338247,  DOI: 10.1039/C4RA17202G
  5. 5
    Du, J.; Armes, S. P. Patchy Multi-Compartment Micelles Are Formed by Direct Dissolution of an ABC Triblock Copolymer in Water. Soft Matter 2010, 6 (19), 4851,  DOI: 10.1039/c0sm00258e
  6. 6
    Wang, X.-J.; Li, G.-W.; Mo, M.-Y.; Shi, S.-H.; Li, S.-Y.; Liu, X.-Y.; Liu, L.-T. Synthesis of Poly(3-Hexylthiophene)- Block -Poly(Phenylisocyanide) Copolymers and Their Self-Assembly in Solution. Polym. Chem. 2022, 13 (46), 63616368,  DOI: 10.1039/D2PY01111E
  7. 7
    Trützschler, A.; Leiske, M. N.; Strumpf, M.; Brendel, J. C.; Schubert, U. S. One-Pot Synthesis of Block Copolymers by a Combination of Living Cationic and Controlled Radical Polymerization. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2019, 40 (1), 1800398,  DOI: 10.1002/marc.201800398
  8. 8
    de Freitas, A. G. O.; Trindade, S. G.; Muraro, P. I. R.; Schmidt, V.; Satti, A. J.; Villar, M. A.; Ciolino, A. E.; Giacomelli, C. Controlled One-Pot Synthesis of Polystyrene- Block -Polycaprolactone Copolymers by Simultaneous RAFT and ROP. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2013, 214 (20), 23362344,  DOI: 10.1002/macp.201300416
  9. 9
    Xu, J.; Wang, X.; Hadjichristidis, N. Diblock Dialternating Terpolymers by One-Step/One-Pot Highly Selective Organocatalytic Multimonomer Polymerization. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12 (1), 7124,  DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-27377-3
  10. 10
    Saeed, A. O.; Dey, S.; Howdle, S. M.; Thurecht, K. J.; Alexander, C. One-Pot Controlled Synthesis of Biodegradable and Biocompatible Co-Polymer Micelles. J. Mater. Chem. 2009, 19 (26), 4529,  DOI: 10.1039/b821736j
  11. 11
    You, Y.; Hong, C.; Wang, W.; Lu, W.; Pan, C. Preparation and Characterization of Thermally Responsive and Biodegradable Block Copolymer Comprised of PNIPAAM and PLA by Combination of ROP and RAFT Methods. Macromolecules 2004, 37 (26), 97619767,  DOI: 10.1021/ma048444t
  12. 12
    Seo, M.; Murphy, C. J.; Hillmyer, M. A. One-Step Synthesis of Cross-Linked Block Polymer Precursor to a Nanoporous Thermoset. ACS Macro Lett. 2013, 2 (7), 617620,  DOI: 10.1021/mz400192f
  13. 13
    Li, Y.; Themistou, E.; Zou, J.; Das, B. P.; Tsianou, M.; Cheng, C. Facile Synthesis and Visualization of Janus Double-Brush Copolymers. ACS Macro Lett. 2012, 1 (1), 5256,  DOI: 10.1021/mz200013e
  14. 14
    Warren, N. J.; Armes, S. P. Polymerization-Induced Self-Assembly of Block Copolymer Nano-Objects via RAFT Aqueous Dispersion Polymerization. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136 (29), 1017410185,  DOI: 10.1021/ja502843f
  15. 15
    Jain, S.; Bates, F. S. On the Origins of Morphological Complexity in Block Copolymer Surfactants. Science 2003, 300 (5618), 460464,  DOI: 10.1126/science.1082193
  16. 16
    Ward, M. A.; Georgiou, T. K. Thermoresponsive Polymers for Biomedical Applications. Polymers 2011, 3 (3), 12151242,  DOI: 10.3390/polym3031215
  17. 17
    Gaucher, G.; Dufresne, M.-H.; Sant, V. P.; Kang, N.; Maysinger, D.; Leroux, J.-C. Block Copolymer Micelles: Preparation, Characterization and Application in Drug Delivery. J. Controlled Release 2005, 109 (1–3), 169188,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2005.09.034
  18. 18
    Ratcliffe, L. P. D.; Derry, M. J.; Ianiro, A.; Tuinier, R.; Armes, S. P. A Single Thermoresponsive Diblock Copolymer Can Form Spheres, Worms or Vesicles in Aqueous Solution. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2019, 58 (52), 1896418970,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201909124
  19. 19
    Neal, T. J.; Parnell, A. J.; King, S. M.; Beattie, D. L.; Murray, M. W.; Williams, N. S. J.; Emmett, S. N.; Armes, S. P.; Spain, S. G.; Mykhaylyk, O. O. Control of Particle Size in the Self-Assembly of Amphiphilic Statistical Copolymers. Macromolecules 2021, 54 (3), 14251440,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.macromol.0c02341
  20. 20
    Mai, Y.; Eisenberg, A. Self-Assembly of Block Copolymers. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41 (18), 5969,  DOI: 10.1039/c2cs35115c
  21. 21
    Warren, N. J.; Rosselgong, J.; Madsen, J.; Armes, S. P. Disulfide-Functionalized Diblock Copolymer Worm Gels. Biomacromolecules 2015, 16 (8), 25142521,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.biomac.5b00767
  22. 22
    Lovett, J. R.; Ratcliffe, L. P. D.; Warren, N. J.; Armes, S. P.; Smallridge, M. J.; Cracknell, R. B.; Saunders, B. R. A Robust Cross-Linking Strategy for Block Copolymer Worms Prepared via Polymerization-Induced Self-Assembly. Macromolecules 2016, 49 (8), 29282941,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.macromol.6b00422
  23. 23
    An, Z.; Shi, Q.; Tang, W.; Tsung, C.-K.; Hawker, C. J.; Stucky, G. D. Facile RAFT Precipitation Polymerization for the Microwave-Assisted Synthesis of Well-Defined, Double Hydrophilic Block Copolymers and Nanostructured Hydrogels. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129 (46), 1449314499,  DOI: 10.1021/ja0756974
  24. 24
    Allen, C.; Maysinger, D.; Eisenberg, A. Nano-Engineering Block Copolymer Aggregates for Drug Delivery. Colloids Surf., B 1999, 16 (1–4), 327,  DOI: 10.1016/S0927-7765(99)00058-2
  25. 25
    Reineke, T. M. Stimuli-Responsive Polymers for Biological Detection and Delivery. ACS Macro Lett. 2016, 5 (1), 1418,  DOI: 10.1021/acsmacrolett.5b00862
  26. 26
    Rahikkala, A.; Aseyev, V.; Tenhu, H.; Kauppinen, E. I.; Raula, J. Thermoresponsive Nanoparticles of Self-Assembled Block Copolymers as Potential Carriers for Drug Delivery and Diagnostics. Biomacromolecules 2015, 16 (9), 27502756,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.biomac.5b00690
  27. 27
    Marsili, L.; Dal Bo, M.; Berti, F.; Toffoli, G. Chitosan-Based Biocompatible Copolymers for Thermoresponsive Drug Delivery Systems: On the Development of a Standardization System. Pharmaceutics 2021, 13 (11), 1876,  DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13111876
  28. 28
    Markvicheva, E. A.; Lozinsky, V. I.; Plieva, F. M.; Kochetkov, K. A.; Rumsh, L. D.; Zubov, V. P.; Maity, J.; Kumar, R.; Parmar, V. S.; Belokon, Y. N. Gel-Immobilized Enzymes as Promising Biocatalysts: Results from Indo-Russian Collaborative Studies. Pure Appl. Chem. 2005, 77 (1), 227236,  DOI: 10.1351/pac200577010227
  29. 29
    Markvicheva, E. A.; Kuptsova, S. V.; Mareeva, T. Y.; Vikhrov, A. A.; Dugina, T. N.; Strukova, S. M.; Belokon, Y. N.; Kochetkov, K. A.; Baranova, E. N.; Zubov, V. P.; Poncelet, D.; Parmar, V. S.; Kumar, R.; Rumsh, L. D. Immobilized Enzymes and Cells in Poly(N-Vinyl Caprolactam)-Based Hydrogels: Preparation, Properties, and Applications in Biotechnology and Medicine. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2000, 88 (1–3), 145158,  DOI: 10.1385/ABAB:88:1-3:145
  30. 30
    Galaev, I. Y.; Mattiasson, B. Affinity Thermoprecipitation of Trypsin Using Soybean Trypsin Inhibitor Conjugated with a Thermo-Reactive Polymer, Poly(N-Vinyl Caprolactam). Biotechnol. Technol. 1992, 6 (4), 353358,  DOI: 10.1007/BF02439325
  31. 31
    Duceppe, N.; Tabrizian, M. Advances in Using Chitosan-Based Nanoparticles for in Vitro and in Vivo Drug and Gene Delivery. Expert Opin. Drug Delivery 2010, 7 (10), 11911207,  DOI: 10.1517/17425247.2010.514604
  32. 32
    Maeda, T.; Akasaki, Y.; Yamamoto, K.; Aoyagi, T. Stimuli-Responsive Coacervate Induced in Binary Functionalized Poly(N -Isopropylacrylamide) Aqueous System and Novel Method for Preparing Semi-IPN Microgel Using the Coacervate. Langmuir 2009, 25 (16), 95109517,  DOI: 10.1021/la9007735
  33. 33
    Soppimath, K. S.; Aminabhavi, T. M.; Dave, A. M.; Kumbar, S. G.; Rudzinski, W. E. Stimulus-Responsive “Smart” Hydrogels as Novel Drug Delivery Systems. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 2002, 28 (8), 957974,  DOI: 10.1081/DDC-120006428
  34. 34
    Lutz, J.-F. Polymerization of Oligo(Ethylene Glycol) (Meth)Acrylates: Toward New Generations of Smart Biocompatible Materials. J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 2008, 46 (11), 34593470,  DOI: 10.1002/pola.22706
  35. 35
    Karatza, A.; Pispas, S. Poly(Hydroxyl Propyl Methacrylate)- b -Poly(Oligo Ethylene Glycol Methacrylate) Thermoresponsive Block Copolymers by RAFT Polymerization. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2018, 219 (12), 1800060,  DOI: 10.1002/macp.201800060
  36. 36
    Yamamoto, S.-I.; Pietrasik, J.; Matyjaszewski, K. The Effect of Structure on the Thermoresponsive Nature of Well-Defined Poly(Oligo(Ethylene Oxide) Methacrylates) Synthesized by ATRP. J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 2008, 46 (1), 194202,  DOI: 10.1002/pola.22371
  37. 37
    Warren, N. J.; Mykhaylyk, O. O.; Mahmood, D.; Ryan, A. J.; Armes, S. P. RAFT Aqueous Dispersion Polymerization Yields Poly(Ethylene Glycol)-Based Diblock Copolymer Nano-Objects with Predictable Single Phase Morphologies. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136 (3), 10231033,  DOI: 10.1021/ja410593n
  38. 38
    Varlas, S.; Neal, T. J.; Armes, S. P. Polymerization-Induced Self-Assembly and Disassembly during the Synthesis of Thermoresponsive ABC Triblock Copolymer Nano-Objects in Aqueous Solution. Chem. Sci. 2022, 13 (24), 72957303,  DOI: 10.1039/D2SC01611G
  39. 39
    Ning, Y.; Han, L.; Derry, M. J.; Meldrum, F. C.; Armes, S. P. Model Anionic Block Copolymer Vesicles Provide Important Design Rules for Efficient Nanoparticle Occlusion within Calcite. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141 (6), 25572567,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.8b12507
  40. 40
    Foster, J. C.; Varlas, S.; Couturaud, B.; Jones, J. R.; Keogh, R.; Mathers, R. T.; O’Reilly, R. K. Predicting Monomers for Use in Polymerization-Induced Self-Assembly. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2018, 57 (48), 1573315737,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201809614
  41. 41
    Lutz, J.-F.; Akdemir, O. ̈.; Hoth, A. Point by Point Comparison of Two Thermosensitive Polymers Exhibiting a Similar LCST: Is the Age of Poly(NIPAM) Over?. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128 (40), 1304613047,  DOI: 10.1021/ja065324n
  42. 42
    Cai, T.; Marquez, M.; Hu, Z. Monodisperse Thermoresponsive Microgels of Poly(Ethylene Glycol) Analogue-Based Biopolymers. Langmuir 2007, 23 (17), 86638666,  DOI: 10.1021/la700923r
  43. 43
    Doncom, K. E. B.; Warren, N. J.; Armes, S. P. Polysulfobetaine-Based Diblock Copolymer Nano-Objects via Polymerization-Induced Self-Assembly. Polym. Chem. 2015, 6 (41), 72647273,  DOI: 10.1039/C5PY00396B
  44. 44
    Ratcliffe, L. P. D.; Blanazs, A.; Williams, C. N.; Brown, S. L.; Armes, S. P. RAFT Polymerization of Hydroxy-Functional Methacrylic Monomers under Heterogeneous Conditions: Effect of Varying the Core-Forming Block. Polym. Chem. 2014, 5 (11), 36433655,  DOI: 10.1039/C4PY00203B
  45. 45
    Blanazs, A.; Verber, R.; Mykhaylyk, O. O.; Ryan, A. J.; Heath, J. Z.; Douglas, C. W. I.; Armes, S. P. Sterilizable Gels from Thermoresponsive Block Copolymer Worms. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134 (23), 97419748,  DOI: 10.1021/ja3024059
  46. 46
    Penfold, N. J. W.; Whatley, J. R.; Armes, S. P. Thermoreversible Block Copolymer Worm Gels Using Binary Mixtures of PEG Stabilizer Blocks. Macromolecules 2019, 52 (4), 16531662,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.macromol.8b02491
  47. 47
    Albuquerque, L. J. C.; Sincari, V.; Jäger, A.; Konefał, R.; Pánek, J.; Černoch, P.; Pavlova, E.; Štěpánek, P.; Giacomelli, F. C.; Jäger, E. Microfluidic-Assisted Engineering of Quasi-Monodisperse PH-Responsive Polymersomes toward Advanced Platforms for the Intracellular Delivery of Hydrophilic Therapeutics. Langmuir 2019, 35, 9b01009,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.9b01009
  48. 48
    Jäger, E.; Jäger, A.; Etrych, T.; Giacomelli, F. C.; Chytil, P.; Jigounov, A.; Putaux, J.-L.; Říhová, B.; Ulbrich, K.; Štěpánek, P. Self-Assembly of Biodegradable Copolyester and Reactive HPMA-Based Polymers into Nanoparticles as an Alternative Stealth Drug Delivery System. Soft Matter 2012, 8 (37), 9563,  DOI: 10.1039/c2sm26150b
  49. 49
    Barz, M.; Wolf, F. K.; Canal, F.; Koynov, K.; Vicent, M. J.; Frey, H.; Zentel, R. Synthesis, Characterization and Preliminary Biological Evaluation of P(HPMA)-b-P(LLA) Copolymers: A New Type of Functional Biocompatible Block Copolymer. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2010, 31 (17), 14921500,  DOI: 10.1002/marc.201000090
  50. 50
    Lukáš Petrova, S.; Vragović, M.; Pavlova, E.; Černochová, Z.; Jäger, A.; Jäger, E.; Konefał, R. Smart Poly(Lactide)-b-Poly(Triethylene Glycol Methyl Ether Methacrylate) (PLA-b-PTEGMA) Block Copolymers: One-Pot Synthesis, Temperature Behavior, and Controlled Release of Paclitaxel. Pharmaceutics 2023, 15 (4), 1191,  DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15041191
  51. 51
    Petrova, S. L.; Pavlova, E.; Pokorný, V.; Sincari, V. Effect of Polymer Concentration on the Morphology of the PHPMAA- g -PLA Graft Copolymer Nanoparticles Produced by Microfluidics Nanoprecipitation. Nanoscale Adv. 2024, 6 (8), 19921996,  DOI: 10.1039/D3NA01038D
  52. 52
    Lukáš Petrova, S.; Sincari, V.; Konefał, R.; Pavlova, E.; Lobaz, V.; Kočková, O.; Hrubý, M. One-Pot/Simultaneous Synthesis of PHPMA- G -PLA Copolymers via Metal-Free Rop/Raft Polymerization and Their Self-Assembly from Micelles to Thermoresponsive Vesicles. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2023, 224 (23), 2300271,  DOI: 10.1002/macp.202300271
  53. 53
    Uhrich, K. E.; Cannizzaro, S. M.; Langer, R. S.; Shakesheff, K. M. Polymeric Systems for Controlled Drug Release. Chem. Rev. 1999, 99 (11), 31813198,  DOI: 10.1021/cr940351u
  54. 54
    Singhvi, M. S.; Zinjarde, S. S.; Gokhale, D. V. Polylactic Acid: Synthesis and Biomedical Applications. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2019, 127 (6), 16121626,  DOI: 10.1111/jam.14290
  55. 55
    Jacobson, G. B.; Shinde, R.; Contag, C. H.; Zare, R. N. Sustained Release of Drugs Dispersed in Polymer Nanoparticles. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47 (41), 78807882,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.200802260
  56. 56
    Giammona, G.; Craparo, E. Biomedical Applications of Polylactide (PLA) and Its Copolymers. Molecules 2018, 23 (4), 980,  DOI: 10.3390/molecules23040980
  57. 57
    Wu, Y.-L.; Wang, H.; Qiu, Y.-K.; Loh, X. J. PLA-Based Thermogel for the Sustained Delivery of Chemotherapeutics in a Mouse Model of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. RSC Adv. 2016, 6 (50), 4450644513,  DOI: 10.1039/C6RA08022G
  58. 58
    Kramschuster, A.; Turng, L.-S. An Injection Molding Process for Manufacturing Highly Porous and Interconnected Biodegradable Polymer Matrices for Use as Tissue Engineering Scaffolds. J. Biomed. Mater. Res., Part B 2009, 92B, 366376,  DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.31523
  59. 59
    Xu, J.; Zhang, S.; Machado, A.; Lecommandoux, S.; Sandre, O.; Gu, F.; Colin, A. Controllable Microfluidic Production of Drug-Loaded PLGA Nanoparticles Using Partially Water-Miscible Mixed Solvent Microdroplets as a Precursor. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7 (1), 4794,  DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-05184-5
  60. 60
    Tan, Z.; Lan, W.; Liu, Q.; Wang, K.; Hussain, M.; Ren, M.; Geng, Z.; Zhang, L.; Luo, X.; Zhang, L.; Zhu, J. Kinetically Controlled Self-Assembly of Block Copolymers into Segmented Wormlike Micelles in Microfluidic Chips. Langmuir 2019, 35 (1), 141149,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b03028
  61. 61
    Ulbrich, K.; Šubr, V.; Strohalm, J.; Plocová, D.; Jelínková, M.; Říhová, B. Polymeric Drugs Based on Conjugates of Synthetic and Natural Macromolecules. J. Controlled Release 2000, 64 (1–3), 6379,  DOI: 10.1016/S0168-3659(99)00141-8
  62. 62
    Danial, M.; Telwatte, S.; Tyssen, D.; Cosson, S.; Tachedjian, G.; Moad, G.; Postma, A. Combination Anti-HIV Therapy via Tandem Release of Prodrugs from Macromolecular Carriers. Polym. Chem. 2016, 7 (48), 74777487,  DOI: 10.1039/C6PY01882C
  63. 63
    Zhang, Q.; Weber, C.; Schubert, U. S.; Hoogenboom, R. Thermoresponsive Polymers with Lower Critical Solution Temperature: From Fundamental Aspects and Measuring Techniques to Recommended Turbidimetry Conditions. Mater. Horiz. 2017, 4 (2), 109116,  DOI: 10.1039/C7MH00016B
  64. 64
    Halperin, A.; Kröger, M.; Winnik, F. M. Poly(N -isopropylacrylamide) Phase Diagrams: Fifty Years of Research. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2015, 54 (51), 1534215367,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201506663
  65. 65
    Guinier, A.; Fournet, G.; Walker, C. B.; Vineyard, G. H. Small-Angle Scattering of X-Rays. Phys. Today 1956, 9 (8), 3839,  DOI: 10.1063/1.3060069
  66. 66
    Themistou, E.; Battaglia, G.; Armes, S. P. Facile Synthesis of Thiol-Functionalized Amphiphilic Polylactide-Methacrylic Diblock Copolymers. Polym. Chem. 2014, 5 (4), 14051417,  DOI: 10.1039/C3PY01446K
  67. 67
    Blanazs, A.; Armes, S. P.; Ryan, A. J. Self-Assembled Block Copolymer Aggregates: From Micelles to Vesicles and Their Biological Applications. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2009, 30 (4–5), 267277,  DOI: 10.1002/marc.200800713
  68. 68
    Le Fer, G.; Portes, D.; Goudounet, G.; Guigner, J.-M.; Garanger, E.; Lecommandoux, S. Design and Self-Assembly of PBLG- b -ELP Hybrid Diblock Copolymers Based on Synthetic and Elastin-like Polypeptides. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2017, 15 (47), 1009510104,  DOI: 10.1039/C7OB01945A
  69. 69
    Tan, J.; Bai, Y.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, L. Room Temperature Synthesis of Poly(Poly(Ethylene Glycol) Methyl Ether Methacrylate)-Based Diblock Copolymer Nano-Objects via Photoinitiated Polymerization-Induced Self-Assembly (Photo-PISA). Polym. Chem. 2016, 7 (13), 23722380,  DOI: 10.1039/C6PY00022C
  70. 70
    Docherty, P. J.; Girou, C.; Derry, M. J.; Armes, S. P. Epoxy-Functional Diblock Copolymer Spheres, Worms and Vesicles via Polymerization-Induced Self-Assembly in Mineral Oil. Polym. Chem. 2020, 11 (19), 33323339,  DOI: 10.1039/D0PY00380H
  71. 71
    Parkinson, S.; Knox, S. T.; Bourne, R. A.; Warren, N. J. Rapid Production of Block Copolymer Nano-Objects via Continuous-Flow Ultrafast RAFT Dispersion Polymerisation. Polym. Chem. 2020, 11 (20), 34653474,  DOI: 10.1039/D0PY00276C
  72. 72
    Pedersen, J. S. Form Factors of Block Copolymer Micelles with Spherical, Ellipsoidal and Cylindrical Cores. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2000, 33 (3), 637640,  DOI: 10.1107/S0021889899012248
  73. 73
    Guinier, A.; Lorrain, P.; Lorrain, D. S.-M.; Gillis, J. X-Ray Diffraction in Crystals, Imperfect Crystals, and Amorphous Bodies. Phys. Today 1964, 17 (4), 7072,  DOI: 10.1063/1.3051547

Cited By

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article has not yet been cited by other publications.

Open PDF

ACS Polymers Au

Cite this: ACS Polym. Au 2024, 4, 4, 331–341
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acspolymersau.4c00033
Published May 31, 2024

Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under

CC-BY 4.0 .

Article Views

896

Altmetric

-

Citations

-
Learn about these metrics

Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.

  • Abstract

    Scheme 1

    Scheme 1. Synthetic Scheme for the Synthesis of PLA-b-PTEGMA Diblock Copolymer, PHPMA-g-PLA, and PHPMAA-g-PLA Graft Copolymers via One-Pot/Simultaneous

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. SEC chromatograms in DMF of the PLA-b-PTEGMA diblock copolymer (green curve), PHPMA-g-PLA (red curve), and PHPAA-g-PLA graft copolymers (blue curve).

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. (A) DLS plot for the hydrodynamic diameters of PLA-b-PTEGMA Ms at 25 and 60 °C; (B) temperature dependence of hydrodynamic radius (DH) of diblock polymer in aqueous solution; and TEM images of self-assembled PLA-b-PTEGMA at (C) 25 °C and (D) 60 °C.

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. Selected SAXS data (colored circles) recorded for nano-objects prepared by MF of (A) PLA-b-PTEGMA on heating from 16 to 60 °C and (B) PHPMA-g-PLA at temperatures of 5, 25, and 60 °C.

    Figure 4

    Figure 4. (A) The plots depict the hydrodynamic diameter of the NPs at various temperatures, alongside TEM micrographs of self-assembled PHPMA-g-PLA at (B) 5 °C, (C) 25 °C, and (D) 60 °C.

    Figure 5

    Figure 5. (A) TEM image and (B) SAXS data of recorded for the self-assembled of PHPMAA-g-PLA Ws. Adapted with permission under a Creative Commons [CC-BY 3.0] from ref (51) Copyright 2024 Royal Society of Chemistry.

    Figure 6

    Figure 6. ITC of polymers (A) PLA-b-PTEGMA, (B) PHPMA-g-PLA, and (C) PHPMAA-g-PLA NPs in ultrapure water with human blood plasma, diluted to 10% vol/vol with PBS at 20, 37, and 54 °C.

  • References


    This article references 73 other publications.

    1. 1
      Uhrig, D.; Mays, J. W. Synthesis of Combs, Centipedes, and Barbwires: Poly(Isoprene- Graft -Styrene) Regular Multigraft Copolymers with Trifunctional, Tetrafunctional, and Hexafunctional Branch Points. Macromolecules 2002, 35 (19), 71827190,  DOI: 10.1021/ma020427l
    2. 2
      Hadjichristidis, N.; Iatrou, H.; Pitsikalis, M.; Mays, J. Macromolecular Architectures by Living and Controlled/Living Polymerizations. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2006, 31 (12), 10681132,  DOI: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2006.07.002
    3. 3
      Oh, J. K. Polylactide (PLA)-Based Amphiphilic Block Copolymers: Synthesis, Self-Assembly, and Biomedical Applications. Soft Matter 2011, 7 (11), 5096,  DOI: 10.1039/c0sm01539c
    4. 4
      Song, J.; Xu, J.; Pispas, S.; Zhang, G. One-pot synthesis of poly(l-lactide)-b-poly(methyl methacrylate) block copolymers. RSC Adv. 2015, 5 (48), 3824338247,  DOI: 10.1039/C4RA17202G
    5. 5
      Du, J.; Armes, S. P. Patchy Multi-Compartment Micelles Are Formed by Direct Dissolution of an ABC Triblock Copolymer in Water. Soft Matter 2010, 6 (19), 4851,  DOI: 10.1039/c0sm00258e
    6. 6
      Wang, X.-J.; Li, G.-W.; Mo, M.-Y.; Shi, S.-H.; Li, S.-Y.; Liu, X.-Y.; Liu, L.-T. Synthesis of Poly(3-Hexylthiophene)- Block -Poly(Phenylisocyanide) Copolymers and Their Self-Assembly in Solution. Polym. Chem. 2022, 13 (46), 63616368,  DOI: 10.1039/D2PY01111E
    7. 7
      Trützschler, A.; Leiske, M. N.; Strumpf, M.; Brendel, J. C.; Schubert, U. S. One-Pot Synthesis of Block Copolymers by a Combination of Living Cationic and Controlled Radical Polymerization. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2019, 40 (1), 1800398,  DOI: 10.1002/marc.201800398
    8. 8
      de Freitas, A. G. O.; Trindade, S. G.; Muraro, P. I. R.; Schmidt, V.; Satti, A. J.; Villar, M. A.; Ciolino, A. E.; Giacomelli, C. Controlled One-Pot Synthesis of Polystyrene- Block -Polycaprolactone Copolymers by Simultaneous RAFT and ROP. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2013, 214 (20), 23362344,  DOI: 10.1002/macp.201300416
    9. 9
      Xu, J.; Wang, X.; Hadjichristidis, N. Diblock Dialternating Terpolymers by One-Step/One-Pot Highly Selective Organocatalytic Multimonomer Polymerization. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12 (1), 7124,  DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-27377-3
    10. 10
      Saeed, A. O.; Dey, S.; Howdle, S. M.; Thurecht, K. J.; Alexander, C. One-Pot Controlled Synthesis of Biodegradable and Biocompatible Co-Polymer Micelles. J. Mater. Chem. 2009, 19 (26), 4529,  DOI: 10.1039/b821736j
    11. 11
      You, Y.; Hong, C.; Wang, W.; Lu, W.; Pan, C. Preparation and Characterization of Thermally Responsive and Biodegradable Block Copolymer Comprised of PNIPAAM and PLA by Combination of ROP and RAFT Methods. Macromolecules 2004, 37 (26), 97619767,  DOI: 10.1021/ma048444t
    12. 12
      Seo, M.; Murphy, C. J.; Hillmyer, M. A. One-Step Synthesis of Cross-Linked Block Polymer Precursor to a Nanoporous Thermoset. ACS Macro Lett. 2013, 2 (7), 617620,  DOI: 10.1021/mz400192f
    13. 13
      Li, Y.; Themistou, E.; Zou, J.; Das, B. P.; Tsianou, M.; Cheng, C. Facile Synthesis and Visualization of Janus Double-Brush Copolymers. ACS Macro Lett. 2012, 1 (1), 5256,  DOI: 10.1021/mz200013e
    14. 14
      Warren, N. J.; Armes, S. P. Polymerization-Induced Self-Assembly of Block Copolymer Nano-Objects via RAFT Aqueous Dispersion Polymerization. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136 (29), 1017410185,  DOI: 10.1021/ja502843f
    15. 15
      Jain, S.; Bates, F. S. On the Origins of Morphological Complexity in Block Copolymer Surfactants. Science 2003, 300 (5618), 460464,  DOI: 10.1126/science.1082193
    16. 16
      Ward, M. A.; Georgiou, T. K. Thermoresponsive Polymers for Biomedical Applications. Polymers 2011, 3 (3), 12151242,  DOI: 10.3390/polym3031215
    17. 17
      Gaucher, G.; Dufresne, M.-H.; Sant, V. P.; Kang, N.; Maysinger, D.; Leroux, J.-C. Block Copolymer Micelles: Preparation, Characterization and Application in Drug Delivery. J. Controlled Release 2005, 109 (1–3), 169188,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2005.09.034
    18. 18
      Ratcliffe, L. P. D.; Derry, M. J.; Ianiro, A.; Tuinier, R.; Armes, S. P. A Single Thermoresponsive Diblock Copolymer Can Form Spheres, Worms or Vesicles in Aqueous Solution. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2019, 58 (52), 1896418970,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201909124
    19. 19
      Neal, T. J.; Parnell, A. J.; King, S. M.; Beattie, D. L.; Murray, M. W.; Williams, N. S. J.; Emmett, S. N.; Armes, S. P.; Spain, S. G.; Mykhaylyk, O. O. Control of Particle Size in the Self-Assembly of Amphiphilic Statistical Copolymers. Macromolecules 2021, 54 (3), 14251440,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.macromol.0c02341
    20. 20
      Mai, Y.; Eisenberg, A. Self-Assembly of Block Copolymers. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41 (18), 5969,  DOI: 10.1039/c2cs35115c
    21. 21
      Warren, N. J.; Rosselgong, J.; Madsen, J.; Armes, S. P. Disulfide-Functionalized Diblock Copolymer Worm Gels. Biomacromolecules 2015, 16 (8), 25142521,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.biomac.5b00767
    22. 22
      Lovett, J. R.; Ratcliffe, L. P. D.; Warren, N. J.; Armes, S. P.; Smallridge, M. J.; Cracknell, R. B.; Saunders, B. R. A Robust Cross-Linking Strategy for Block Copolymer Worms Prepared via Polymerization-Induced Self-Assembly. Macromolecules 2016, 49 (8), 29282941,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.macromol.6b00422
    23. 23
      An, Z.; Shi, Q.; Tang, W.; Tsung, C.-K.; Hawker, C. J.; Stucky, G. D. Facile RAFT Precipitation Polymerization for the Microwave-Assisted Synthesis of Well-Defined, Double Hydrophilic Block Copolymers and Nanostructured Hydrogels. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129 (46), 1449314499,  DOI: 10.1021/ja0756974
    24. 24
      Allen, C.; Maysinger, D.; Eisenberg, A. Nano-Engineering Block Copolymer Aggregates for Drug Delivery. Colloids Surf., B 1999, 16 (1–4), 327,  DOI: 10.1016/S0927-7765(99)00058-2
    25. 25
      Reineke, T. M. Stimuli-Responsive Polymers for Biological Detection and Delivery. ACS Macro Lett. 2016, 5 (1), 1418,  DOI: 10.1021/acsmacrolett.5b00862
    26. 26
      Rahikkala, A.; Aseyev, V.; Tenhu, H.; Kauppinen, E. I.; Raula, J. Thermoresponsive Nanoparticles of Self-Assembled Block Copolymers as Potential Carriers for Drug Delivery and Diagnostics. Biomacromolecules 2015, 16 (9), 27502756,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.biomac.5b00690
    27. 27
      Marsili, L.; Dal Bo, M.; Berti, F.; Toffoli, G. Chitosan-Based Biocompatible Copolymers for Thermoresponsive Drug Delivery Systems: On the Development of a Standardization System. Pharmaceutics 2021, 13 (11), 1876,  DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13111876
    28. 28
      Markvicheva, E. A.; Lozinsky, V. I.; Plieva, F. M.; Kochetkov, K. A.; Rumsh, L. D.; Zubov, V. P.; Maity, J.; Kumar, R.; Parmar, V. S.; Belokon, Y. N. Gel-Immobilized Enzymes as Promising Biocatalysts: Results from Indo-Russian Collaborative Studies. Pure Appl. Chem. 2005, 77 (1), 227236,  DOI: 10.1351/pac200577010227
    29. 29
      Markvicheva, E. A.; Kuptsova, S. V.; Mareeva, T. Y.; Vikhrov, A. A.; Dugina, T. N.; Strukova, S. M.; Belokon, Y. N.; Kochetkov, K. A.; Baranova, E. N.; Zubov, V. P.; Poncelet, D.; Parmar, V. S.; Kumar, R.; Rumsh, L. D. Immobilized Enzymes and Cells in Poly(N-Vinyl Caprolactam)-Based Hydrogels: Preparation, Properties, and Applications in Biotechnology and Medicine. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2000, 88 (1–3), 145158,  DOI: 10.1385/ABAB:88:1-3:145
    30. 30
      Galaev, I. Y.; Mattiasson, B. Affinity Thermoprecipitation of Trypsin Using Soybean Trypsin Inhibitor Conjugated with a Thermo-Reactive Polymer, Poly(N-Vinyl Caprolactam). Biotechnol. Technol. 1992, 6 (4), 353358,  DOI: 10.1007/BF02439325
    31. 31
      Duceppe, N.; Tabrizian, M. Advances in Using Chitosan-Based Nanoparticles for in Vitro and in Vivo Drug and Gene Delivery. Expert Opin. Drug Delivery 2010, 7 (10), 11911207,  DOI: 10.1517/17425247.2010.514604
    32. 32
      Maeda, T.; Akasaki, Y.; Yamamoto, K.; Aoyagi, T. Stimuli-Responsive Coacervate Induced in Binary Functionalized Poly(N -Isopropylacrylamide) Aqueous System and Novel Method for Preparing Semi-IPN Microgel Using the Coacervate. Langmuir 2009, 25 (16), 95109517,  DOI: 10.1021/la9007735
    33. 33
      Soppimath, K. S.; Aminabhavi, T. M.; Dave, A. M.; Kumbar, S. G.; Rudzinski, W. E. Stimulus-Responsive “Smart” Hydrogels as Novel Drug Delivery Systems. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 2002, 28 (8), 957974,  DOI: 10.1081/DDC-120006428
    34. 34
      Lutz, J.-F. Polymerization of Oligo(Ethylene Glycol) (Meth)Acrylates: Toward New Generations of Smart Biocompatible Materials. J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 2008, 46 (11), 34593470,  DOI: 10.1002/pola.22706
    35. 35
      Karatza, A.; Pispas, S. Poly(Hydroxyl Propyl Methacrylate)- b -Poly(Oligo Ethylene Glycol Methacrylate) Thermoresponsive Block Copolymers by RAFT Polymerization. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2018, 219 (12), 1800060,  DOI: 10.1002/macp.201800060
    36. 36
      Yamamoto, S.-I.; Pietrasik, J.; Matyjaszewski, K. The Effect of Structure on the Thermoresponsive Nature of Well-Defined Poly(Oligo(Ethylene Oxide) Methacrylates) Synthesized by ATRP. J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 2008, 46 (1), 194202,  DOI: 10.1002/pola.22371
    37. 37
      Warren, N. J.; Mykhaylyk, O. O.; Mahmood, D.; Ryan, A. J.; Armes, S. P. RAFT Aqueous Dispersion Polymerization Yields Poly(Ethylene Glycol)-Based Diblock Copolymer Nano-Objects with Predictable Single Phase Morphologies. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136 (3), 10231033,  DOI: 10.1021/ja410593n
    38. 38
      Varlas, S.; Neal, T. J.; Armes, S. P. Polymerization-Induced Self-Assembly and Disassembly during the Synthesis of Thermoresponsive ABC Triblock Copolymer Nano-Objects in Aqueous Solution. Chem. Sci. 2022, 13 (24), 72957303,  DOI: 10.1039/D2SC01611G
    39. 39
      Ning, Y.; Han, L.; Derry, M. J.; Meldrum, F. C.; Armes, S. P. Model Anionic Block Copolymer Vesicles Provide Important Design Rules for Efficient Nanoparticle Occlusion within Calcite. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141 (6), 25572567,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.8b12507
    40. 40
      Foster, J. C.; Varlas, S.; Couturaud, B.; Jones, J. R.; Keogh, R.; Mathers, R. T.; O’Reilly, R. K. Predicting Monomers for Use in Polymerization-Induced Self-Assembly. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2018, 57 (48), 1573315737,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201809614
    41. 41
      Lutz, J.-F.; Akdemir, O. ̈.; Hoth, A. Point by Point Comparison of Two Thermosensitive Polymers Exhibiting a Similar LCST: Is the Age of Poly(NIPAM) Over?. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128 (40), 1304613047,  DOI: 10.1021/ja065324n
    42. 42
      Cai, T.; Marquez, M.; Hu, Z. Monodisperse Thermoresponsive Microgels of Poly(Ethylene Glycol) Analogue-Based Biopolymers. Langmuir 2007, 23 (17), 86638666,  DOI: 10.1021/la700923r
    43. 43
      Doncom, K. E. B.; Warren, N. J.; Armes, S. P. Polysulfobetaine-Based Diblock Copolymer Nano-Objects via Polymerization-Induced Self-Assembly. Polym. Chem. 2015, 6 (41), 72647273,  DOI: 10.1039/C5PY00396B
    44. 44
      Ratcliffe, L. P. D.; Blanazs, A.; Williams, C. N.; Brown, S. L.; Armes, S. P. RAFT Polymerization of Hydroxy-Functional Methacrylic Monomers under Heterogeneous Conditions: Effect of Varying the Core-Forming Block. Polym. Chem. 2014, 5 (11), 36433655,  DOI: 10.1039/C4PY00203B
    45. 45
      Blanazs, A.; Verber, R.; Mykhaylyk, O. O.; Ryan, A. J.; Heath, J. Z.; Douglas, C. W. I.; Armes, S. P. Sterilizable Gels from Thermoresponsive Block Copolymer Worms. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134 (23), 97419748,  DOI: 10.1021/ja3024059
    46. 46
      Penfold, N. J. W.; Whatley, J. R.; Armes, S. P. Thermoreversible Block Copolymer Worm Gels Using Binary Mixtures of PEG Stabilizer Blocks. Macromolecules 2019, 52 (4), 16531662,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.macromol.8b02491
    47. 47
      Albuquerque, L. J. C.; Sincari, V.; Jäger, A.; Konefał, R.; Pánek, J.; Černoch, P.; Pavlova, E.; Štěpánek, P.; Giacomelli, F. C.; Jäger, E. Microfluidic-Assisted Engineering of Quasi-Monodisperse PH-Responsive Polymersomes toward Advanced Platforms for the Intracellular Delivery of Hydrophilic Therapeutics. Langmuir 2019, 35, 9b01009,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.9b01009
    48. 48
      Jäger, E.; Jäger, A.; Etrych, T.; Giacomelli, F. C.; Chytil, P.; Jigounov, A.; Putaux, J.-L.; Říhová, B.; Ulbrich, K.; Štěpánek, P. Self-Assembly of Biodegradable Copolyester and Reactive HPMA-Based Polymers into Nanoparticles as an Alternative Stealth Drug Delivery System. Soft Matter 2012, 8 (37), 9563,  DOI: 10.1039/c2sm26150b
    49. 49
      Barz, M.; Wolf, F. K.; Canal, F.; Koynov, K.; Vicent, M. J.; Frey, H.; Zentel, R. Synthesis, Characterization and Preliminary Biological Evaluation of P(HPMA)-b-P(LLA) Copolymers: A New Type of Functional Biocompatible Block Copolymer. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2010, 31 (17), 14921500,  DOI: 10.1002/marc.201000090
    50. 50
      Lukáš Petrova, S.; Vragović, M.; Pavlova, E.; Černochová, Z.; Jäger, A.; Jäger, E.; Konefał, R. Smart Poly(Lactide)-b-Poly(Triethylene Glycol Methyl Ether Methacrylate) (PLA-b-PTEGMA) Block Copolymers: One-Pot Synthesis, Temperature Behavior, and Controlled Release of Paclitaxel. Pharmaceutics 2023, 15 (4), 1191,  DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15041191
    51. 51
      Petrova, S. L.; Pavlova, E.; Pokorný, V.; Sincari, V. Effect of Polymer Concentration on the Morphology of the PHPMAA- g -PLA Graft Copolymer Nanoparticles Produced by Microfluidics Nanoprecipitation. Nanoscale Adv. 2024, 6 (8), 19921996,  DOI: 10.1039/D3NA01038D
    52. 52
      Lukáš Petrova, S.; Sincari, V.; Konefał, R.; Pavlova, E.; Lobaz, V.; Kočková, O.; Hrubý, M. One-Pot/Simultaneous Synthesis of PHPMA- G -PLA Copolymers via Metal-Free Rop/Raft Polymerization and Their Self-Assembly from Micelles to Thermoresponsive Vesicles. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2023, 224 (23), 2300271,  DOI: 10.1002/macp.202300271
    53. 53
      Uhrich, K. E.; Cannizzaro, S. M.; Langer, R. S.; Shakesheff, K. M. Polymeric Systems for Controlled Drug Release. Chem. Rev. 1999, 99 (11), 31813198,  DOI: 10.1021/cr940351u
    54. 54
      Singhvi, M. S.; Zinjarde, S. S.; Gokhale, D. V. Polylactic Acid: Synthesis and Biomedical Applications. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2019, 127 (6), 16121626,  DOI: 10.1111/jam.14290
    55. 55
      Jacobson, G. B.; Shinde, R.; Contag, C. H.; Zare, R. N. Sustained Release of Drugs Dispersed in Polymer Nanoparticles. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47 (41), 78807882,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.200802260
    56. 56
      Giammona, G.; Craparo, E. Biomedical Applications of Polylactide (PLA) and Its Copolymers. Molecules 2018, 23 (4), 980,  DOI: 10.3390/molecules23040980
    57. 57
      Wu, Y.-L.; Wang, H.; Qiu, Y.-K.; Loh, X. J. PLA-Based Thermogel for the Sustained Delivery of Chemotherapeutics in a Mouse Model of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. RSC Adv. 2016, 6 (50), 4450644513,  DOI: 10.1039/C6RA08022G
    58. 58
      Kramschuster, A.; Turng, L.-S. An Injection Molding Process for Manufacturing Highly Porous and Interconnected Biodegradable Polymer Matrices for Use as Tissue Engineering Scaffolds. J. Biomed. Mater. Res., Part B 2009, 92B, 366376,  DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.31523
    59. 59
      Xu, J.; Zhang, S.; Machado, A.; Lecommandoux, S.; Sandre, O.; Gu, F.; Colin, A. Controllable Microfluidic Production of Drug-Loaded PLGA Nanoparticles Using Partially Water-Miscible Mixed Solvent Microdroplets as a Precursor. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7 (1), 4794,  DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-05184-5
    60. 60
      Tan, Z.; Lan, W.; Liu, Q.; Wang, K.; Hussain, M.; Ren, M.; Geng, Z.; Zhang, L.; Luo, X.; Zhang, L.; Zhu, J. Kinetically Controlled Self-Assembly of Block Copolymers into Segmented Wormlike Micelles in Microfluidic Chips. Langmuir 2019, 35 (1), 141149,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b03028
    61. 61
      Ulbrich, K.; Šubr, V.; Strohalm, J.; Plocová, D.; Jelínková, M.; Říhová, B. Polymeric Drugs Based on Conjugates of Synthetic and Natural Macromolecules. J. Controlled Release 2000, 64 (1–3), 6379,  DOI: 10.1016/S0168-3659(99)00141-8
    62. 62
      Danial, M.; Telwatte, S.; Tyssen, D.; Cosson, S.; Tachedjian, G.; Moad, G.; Postma, A. Combination Anti-HIV Therapy via Tandem Release of Prodrugs from Macromolecular Carriers. Polym. Chem. 2016, 7 (48), 74777487,  DOI: 10.1039/C6PY01882C
    63. 63
      Zhang, Q.; Weber, C.; Schubert, U. S.; Hoogenboom, R. Thermoresponsive Polymers with Lower Critical Solution Temperature: From Fundamental Aspects and Measuring Techniques to Recommended Turbidimetry Conditions. Mater. Horiz. 2017, 4 (2), 109116,  DOI: 10.1039/C7MH00016B
    64. 64
      Halperin, A.; Kröger, M.; Winnik, F. M. Poly(N -isopropylacrylamide) Phase Diagrams: Fifty Years of Research. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2015, 54 (51), 1534215367,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201506663
    65. 65
      Guinier, A.; Fournet, G.; Walker, C. B.; Vineyard, G. H. Small-Angle Scattering of X-Rays. Phys. Today 1956, 9 (8), 3839,  DOI: 10.1063/1.3060069
    66. 66
      Themistou, E.; Battaglia, G.; Armes, S. P. Facile Synthesis of Thiol-Functionalized Amphiphilic Polylactide-Methacrylic Diblock Copolymers. Polym. Chem. 2014, 5 (4), 14051417,  DOI: 10.1039/C3PY01446K
    67. 67
      Blanazs, A.; Armes, S. P.; Ryan, A. J. Self-Assembled Block Copolymer Aggregates: From Micelles to Vesicles and Their Biological Applications. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2009, 30 (4–5), 267277,  DOI: 10.1002/marc.200800713
    68. 68
      Le Fer, G.; Portes, D.; Goudounet, G.; Guigner, J.-M.; Garanger, E.; Lecommandoux, S. Design and Self-Assembly of PBLG- b -ELP Hybrid Diblock Copolymers Based on Synthetic and Elastin-like Polypeptides. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2017, 15 (47), 1009510104,  DOI: 10.1039/C7OB01945A
    69. 69
      Tan, J.; Bai, Y.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, L. Room Temperature Synthesis of Poly(Poly(Ethylene Glycol) Methyl Ether Methacrylate)-Based Diblock Copolymer Nano-Objects via Photoinitiated Polymerization-Induced Self-Assembly (Photo-PISA). Polym. Chem. 2016, 7 (13), 23722380,  DOI: 10.1039/C6PY00022C
    70. 70
      Docherty, P. J.; Girou, C.; Derry, M. J.; Armes, S. P. Epoxy-Functional Diblock Copolymer Spheres, Worms and Vesicles via Polymerization-Induced Self-Assembly in Mineral Oil. Polym. Chem. 2020, 11 (19), 33323339,  DOI: 10.1039/D0PY00380H
    71. 71
      Parkinson, S.; Knox, S. T.; Bourne, R. A.; Warren, N. J. Rapid Production of Block Copolymer Nano-Objects via Continuous-Flow Ultrafast RAFT Dispersion Polymerisation. Polym. Chem. 2020, 11 (20), 34653474,  DOI: 10.1039/D0PY00276C
    72. 72
      Pedersen, J. S. Form Factors of Block Copolymer Micelles with Spherical, Ellipsoidal and Cylindrical Cores. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2000, 33 (3), 637640,  DOI: 10.1107/S0021889899012248
    73. 73
      Guinier, A.; Lorrain, P.; Lorrain, D. S.-M.; Gillis, J. X-Ray Diffraction in Crystals, Imperfect Crystals, and Amorphous Bodies. Phys. Today 1964, 17 (4), 7072,  DOI: 10.1063/1.3051547
  • Supporting Information

    Supporting Information


    The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acspolymersau.4c00033.

    • Details of synthesis and characterization techniques (PDF)


    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.