ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
August 2017: Two Years of Submissions
My Activity
  • Free to Read
Editorial

August 2017: Two Years of Submissions
Click to copy article linkArticle link copied!

View Author Information
The University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
The University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
The University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai, China
Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
University of California, San Diego, United States
Arizona State University, Tempe, United States
American Chemical Society, Washington, D.C., United States
Open PDF

ACS Sensors

Cite this: ACS Sens. 2017, 2, 8, 1068–1069
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acssensors.7b00539
Published August 25, 2017

Copyright © 2017 American Chemical Society. This publication is available under these Terms of Use.

This publication is licensed for personal use by The American Chemical Society.

Copyright © 2017 American Chemical Society

August 2017 is a special time for ACS Sensors as, by the time you read this, we will have been receiving submissions for more than two years. We have learned a lot in that time, and are incredibly grateful for the faith you, the sensing community, put in the journal to be a quality outlet in which to publish your work. Our two-year anniversary is a great time to reflect on what classes of sensors have seen the most submissions, and what is citing well.

So, how have the submissions gone so far? More than we anticipated. To our delight, the sensing community has truly embraced ACS Sensors based on the sheer number of submissions we have received in our first two years. In the first 19 issues, ACS Sensors has published just over 350 research papers. In order to get a sense of the distribution of our published papers among the various sensing subdisciplines, we classified the primary research papers from 2016 in two ways. One was the transduction method: being optical, electrochemical, or other. The second was the type of sensor as determined by the type of recognition species or analyte: being biosensors, gas sensors, fluorescent sensors, other chemical sensors, and cell-based sensors. We see some interesting trends. With regard to transduction method, 54% of the papers employed optical, 30% employed electrical (being electrochemical or resistance mostly), and 16% employed other transduction methods. This breakdown shows the gradual shift that has been seen in the sensing field over the past few years—from electrochemical to optical methods as the dominant transduction mode. With regard to the classification of type of sensor, we see 38% of papers are biosensors, 3% are cell-based sensors, with the rest focusing on different types of chemical sensors. The remaining 59% of papers—all of which can be classified as chemical sensors—is composed of 16% gas sensors and 12% fluorescent ligand-based sensors, and the remaining 31% are other chemical sensors that detect solution-borne species. We had hoped for, and expected, more cell-based sensing papers, although many of the fluorescent sensing papers have cells as the sample rather than the biorecognition species. The large number of papers on gas sensors and fluorescent ligand sensors was not originally predicted by the editorial team, but a significant number of high-quality papers covering both areas of sensing have been submitted and published.

So which papers are citing well? As of the time of writing, the top 10 cited papers are in the table.

Table 1
Bandodkar, A. J.; Jeerapan, I.; Wang, J. Wearable Chemical Sensors: Present Challenges and Future Prospects. DOI:10.1021/acssensors.6b00250.
Kalantar-zadeh, K.; Ou, J. Z. Biosensors Based on Two-Dimensional MoS2. DOI:10.1021/acssensors.5b00142.
Tian, H.; Fan, H.; Li, M.; Ma, L., Zeolitic Imidazolate Framework Coated ZnO Nanorods as Molecular Sieving to Improve Selectivity of Formaldehyde Gas Sensor. DOI:10.1021/acssensors.5b00236.
Wang, C.; Cui, X.; Liu, J.; Zhou, X.; Cheng, X.; Sun, P.; Hu, X.; Li, X.; Zheng, J.; Lu, G. Design of Superior Ethanol Gas Sensor Based on Al-Doped NiO Nanorod-Flowers. DOI:10.1021/acssensors.5b00123.
Boonkitpatarakul, K.; Wang, J.; Niamnont, N.; Liu, B.; McDonald, L.; Pang, Y.; Sukwattanasinitt, M. Novel Turn-On Fluorescent Sensors with Mega Stokes Shifts for Dual Detection of Al3+ and Zn2+. DOI:10.1021/acssensors.5b00136.
Gao, M.; Li, S.; Lin, Y.; Geng, Y.; Ling, X.; Wang, L.; Qin, A.; Tang, B. Z. Fluorescent Light-Up Detection of Amine Vapors Based on Aggregation-Induced Emission. DOI:10.1021/acssensors.5b00182.
Yang, J.; Li, K.; Hou, J.-T.; Li, L.-L.; Lu, C.-Y.; Xie, Y.-M.; Wang, X.; Yu, X.-Q. Novel Tumor-Specific and Mitochondria-Targeted near-Infrared-Emission Fluorescent Probe for SO2 Derivatives in Living Cells. DOI:10.1021/acssensors.5b00165.
Shchepin, R. V.; Barskiy, D. A.; Coffey, A. M.; Theis, T.; Shi, F.; Warren, W. S.; Goodson, B. M.; Chekmenev, E. Y. 15N Hyperpolarization of Imidazole-15N2 for Magnetic Resonance pH via SABRE-SHEATH. DOI:10.1021/acssensors.6b00231.
Shyamal, M.; Mazumdar, P.; Maity, S.; Samanta, S.; Sahoo, G. P.; Misra, A. Highly Selective Turn-On Fluorogenic Chemosensor for Robust Quantification of Zn(II) Based on Aggregation Induced Emission Enhancement Feature. DOI:10.1021/acssensors.6b00289.
Hu, Y.; Ma, X.; Zhang, Y.; Che, Y.; Zhao, J. Detection of Amines with Fluorescent Nanotubes: Applications in the Assessment of Meat Spoilage. DOI:10.1021/acssensors.5b00040.

Of these 10 papers, 2 are reviews—on wearable sensors, and the application of MoS2 in sensing—4 are on intracellular fluorescent ligands, 3 are gas sensor papers, and the final paper is a chemical sensor employing magnetic resonance. The notable omission in terms of sensing categories from the top 10 are biosensor papers, but many of the next 10 papers fall in that category. So it goes to show that although we might not have originally appreciated the thematic emphasis of our submissions, the stringent criteria for acceptance of papers in ACS Sensors has resulted in high quality papers in all areas of sensing. We are delighted with the excellence and impact of our first two years of submissions, and we thank the authors and reviewers of these papers for their continued emphasis on quality.

Author Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

  • Corresponding Author
  • Authors
  • Notes
    Views expressed in this editorial are those of the authors and not necessarily the views of the ACS.

Cited By

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article has not yet been cited by other publications.

ACS Sensors

Cite this: ACS Sens. 2017, 2, 8, 1068–1069
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acssensors.7b00539
Published August 25, 2017

Copyright © 2017 American Chemical Society. This publication is available under these Terms of Use.

Article Views

1179

Altmetric

-

Citations

-
Learn about these metrics

Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.

  • This publication has no figures.
  • This publication has no References.