A Microfluidic Sensor for Continuous, in Situ Surface Charge Measurement of Single Cells
- Liwei NiLiwei NiDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Akron, Akron, Ohio 44325, United StatesMore by Liwei Ni
- Rubia ShaikRubia ShaikDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Akron, Akron, Ohio 44325, United StatesMore by Rubia Shaik
- Ruiting XuRuiting XuDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Akron, Akron, Ohio 44325, United StatesMore by Ruiting Xu
- Ge Zhang*Ge Zhang*E-mail: [email protected] (G.Z.).Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Akron, Akron, Ohio 44325, United StatesMore by Ge Zhang
- Jiang Zhe*Jiang Zhe*E-mail: [email protected] (J.Z.).Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Akron, Akron, Ohio 44325, United StatesMore by Jiang Zhe
Abstract

Cell surface charge has been recognized as an important cellular property. We developed a microfluidic sensor based on resistive pulse sensing to assess surface charge and sizes of single cells suspended in a continuous flow. The device consists of two consecutive resistive pulse sensors (RPSs) with identical dimensions. Opposite electric fields were applied on the two RPSs. A charged cell in the RPSs was accelerated or decelerated by the electric fields and thus exhibited different transit times passing through the two RPSs. The cell surface charge is measured with zeta potential that can be quantified with the transit time difference. The transit time of each cell can be accurately detected with the width of pulses generated by the RPS, while the cell size can be calculated with the pulse magnitude at the same time. This device has the ability to detect surface charges and sizes of individual cells with high tolerance in cell types and testing solutions compared with traditional electrophoretic light scattering methods. Three different types of cells including HeLa cancer cells, human dermal fibroblast cells, and human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) were tested with the sensor. Results showed a significant difference of zeta potentials between HeLa cells and fibroblasts or HUVECs. In addition, when HeLa cells were treated with various concentrations of glutamine, the effects on cancer cell surface charge were detected. Our results demonstrated the great potential of using our sensor for cell type sorting, cancer cell detection, and cell status analysis.



