ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
My Activity
CONTENT TYPES

Point-of-Use Detection of Environmental Fluoride via a Cell-Free Riboswitch-Based Biosensor

  • Walter Thavarajah
    Walter Thavarajah
    Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Northwestern University, 2145 Sheridan Road, Evanston, Illinois 60208, United States
    Center for Synthetic Biology, Northwestern University, 2145 Sheridan Road, Evanston, Illinois 60208, United States
    Center for Water Research, Northwestern University, 2145 Sheridan Road, Evanston, Illinois 60208, United States
  • Adam D. Silverman
    Adam D. Silverman
    Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Northwestern University, 2145 Sheridan Road, Evanston, Illinois 60208, United States
    Center for Synthetic Biology, Northwestern University, 2145 Sheridan Road, Evanston, Illinois 60208, United States
    Center for Water Research, Northwestern University, 2145 Sheridan Road, Evanston, Illinois 60208, United States
  • Matthew S. Verosloff
    Matthew S. Verosloff
    Interdisciplinary Biological Sciences Graduate Program, Northwestern University, 2204 Tech Drive, Evanston, Illinois 60208, United States
    Center for Synthetic Biology, Northwestern University, 2145 Sheridan Road, Evanston, Illinois 60208, United States
    Center for Water Research, Northwestern University, 2145 Sheridan Road, Evanston, Illinois 60208, United States
  • Nancy Kelley-Loughnane
    Nancy Kelley-Loughnane
    Materials and Manufacturing Directorate, Air Force Research Laboratory, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio 45433, United States
  • Michael C. Jewett
    Michael C. Jewett
    Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Northwestern University, 2145 Sheridan Road, Evanston, Illinois 60208, United States
    Center for Synthetic Biology, Northwestern University, 2145 Sheridan Road, Evanston, Illinois 60208, United States
  • , and 
  • Julius B. Lucks*
    Julius B. Lucks
    Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Northwestern University, 2145 Sheridan Road, Evanston, Illinois 60208, United States
    Center for Synthetic Biology, Northwestern University, 2145 Sheridan Road, Evanston, Illinois 60208, United States
    Center for Water Research, Northwestern University, 2145 Sheridan Road, Evanston, Illinois 60208, United States
    *E-mail: [email protected]
Cite this: ACS Synth. Biol. 2020, 9, 1, 10–18
Publication Date (Web):December 12, 2019
https://doi.org/10.1021/acssynbio.9b00347

Copyright © 2022 American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under these Terms of Use.

  • Open Access

Article Views

9351

Altmetric

-

Citations

LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICS
PDF (3 MB)
Supporting Info (4)»

Abstract

Advances in biosensor engineering have enabled the design of programmable molecular systems to detect a range of pathogens, nucleic acids, and chemicals. Here, we engineer and field-test a biosensor for fluoride, a major groundwater contaminant of global concern. The sensor consists of a cell-free system containing a DNA template that encodes a fluoride-responsive riboswitch regulating genes that produce a fluorescent or colorimetric output. Individual reactions can be lyophilized for long-term storage and detect fluoride at levels above 2 ppm, the Environmental Protection Agency’s most stringent regulatory standard, in both laboratory and field conditions. Through onsite detection of fluoride in a real-world water source, this work provides a critical proof-of-principle for the future engineering of riboswitches and other biosensors to address challenges for global health and the environment.

Safe drinking water availability is an important contributor to public welfare. (1) However, safe water sources are not available to a large portion of the globe, with an estimated 3 billion people using water from either an unsafe source or a source with significant sanitary risks. (2) One particularly dangerous contaminant is fluoride, which leaches into groundwater from natural sources. Long-term exposure to fluoride concentrations above 2 ppm can cause dental and skeletal fluorosis, heavily burdening communities in resource-limited settings. (3) Though large-scale remediation strategies are available, they are resource-intensive and difficult to deploy. (3,4) This problem is compounded by the reliance of gold-standard sensing methods on expensive analytical equipment, making detection difficult in areas with the greatest need. (4) While many emerging fluorescent and colorimetric chemical fluoride sensors exist, these either require supplementary imaging equipment or utilize toxic organic solvents, hampering their use in real-world conditions. (5) To facilitate targeted remediation and empower affected individuals, there is a pressing need for a more practical, rapid, and field-deployable solution to monitor the presence of fluoride in water.
Because they can be lyophilized and rehydrated on-demand, cell-free expression (CFE) systems have recently become a promising platform for field-deployable molecular diagnostics. (6−9) These systems typically consist of cellular gene expression machinery along with the required buffers, energy sources and cofactors necessary to support gene expression from added DNA templates. (10) Unlike whole cells, cell-free platforms offer an open, easily tunable reaction environment, expediting the design process for genetically encoded programs. (10) Furthermore, they circumvent the analyte toxicity, host mutation, and biocontainment concerns limiting cellular sensors. (11)
We sought to leverage the advantages of cell-free biosensing platforms to create a new approach for monitoring for the presence of fluoride in water using a fluoride-responsive riboswitch that regulates the expression of the CrcB fluoride efflux pump in Bacillus cereus. (12) By configuring the B. cereus crcB fluoride riboswitch to control the transcription of downstream reporter genes, (13) we show that a cell-free gene expression system can activate both protein and RNA reporter expression in the presence of fluoride. With an enzymatic colorimetric reporter, we demonstrate detection of fluoride concentrations at the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Secondary Maximum Contaminant Level of 2 ppm. (14) Notably, these cell-free biosensors showed more accurate sensing with a lower limit of detection than several tested commercially available consumer fluoride testing kits. We also demonstrate that our fluoride biosensor can be lyophilized for long-term storage and distribution, allowing us to detect fluoride in unprocessed groundwater obtained and tested onsite in Costa Rica. This work exemplifies the potential of riboswitches as practical biosensing tools and helps lay the foundation for utilizing cell-free biosensing systems in rapid and field-deployable water quality diagnostics to address pressing challenges in global health.

Results

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

Fluoride Riboswitch Control of Reporter Expression in Cell-Free Reactions

Our point-of-use diagnostic consists of a cell-free system containing a fluoride biosensor DNA template that can be lyophilized and stored. Rehydration activates the biosensor, which encodes the fluoride riboswitch and a reporter gene that produces a detectable output if fluoride is present (Figure 1a,b). As a starting point, we sought to characterize the regulatory activity of the B. cereus crcB riboswitch in the cell-free reaction environment. Previous characterization of the riboswitch’s cotranscriptional folding mechanism (Figure 1b) confirmed that it functions with E. coli RNA polymerase, (13) allowing us to use it in E. coli cell-free extract. We therefore constructed a reporter plasmid containing the riboswitch sequence followed by a strong ribosome binding site (RBS) and the coding sequence of the reporter protein superfolder green fluorescent protein (sfGFP), all placed downstream of a constitutive E. coli σ70 promoter (all plasmid details in Supplemental Table S1).

Figure 1

Figure 1. Cell-free fluoride biosensor engineering strategy. (a) Schematic for lyophilization of a cell-free reaction in tubes or on paper disks. Rehydration with a water sample allows the designed biosensing reaction to proceed to yield a detectable signal. (b) Schematic for fluoride riboswitch-mediated transcriptional regulation in cell-free extract. The riboswitch folds cotranscriptionally into one of two mutually exclusive states, depending on the presence of fluoride. In the absence of fluoride, the riboswitch folds into a terminating hairpin, precluding downstream gene expression. Fluoride binding stabilizes a pseudoknot structure (red paired region, inset from PDB: 4ENC) that sequesters the terminator and enables the expression of downstream reporter genes. (c) Schematic of a cell-free fluoride biosensor, consisting of a DNA template encoding the fluoride riboswitch controlling the expression of sfGFP. Eight-hour end point fluorescence measurements for reactions containing NaF (dark green) or NaCl (gray) are shown below. Error bars represent one standard deviation from three technical replicates.

After optimizing the level of Mg2+ within the reaction conditions for riboswitch performance (Supplemental Figure S1), we determined the fluoride sensor’s dose–response to fluoride by titrating across a range of NaF concentrations. All tested conditions caused a measurable increase in expression over the OFF state, with activation seen at NaF concentrations as low as 0.1 mM (Figure 1c, green line and inset). This threshold is important, since 0.1 mM NaF is equivalent to the EPA’s 2 ppm secondary maximum contaminant level for fluoride in drinking water, its most stringent risk threshold. (14) However, because the signal-to-noise ratio at 0.1 mM NaF is below 3, we estimated the reliable lower limit of detection to be 0.2 mM NaF. Importantly, the system also has low leak—we observed minimal activation of gene expression in the absence of NaF. Titration of identical concentrations of NaCl showed no increase in expression at any condition, demonstrating that the riboswitch is highly specific for fluoride (Figure 1c, gray line). This result corroborates a previous and more extensive characterization in E. coli of the switch’s specificity for fluoride. (12) Thus, without any optimization of riboswitch structure or function, the sensor can discriminate health-relevant concentrations of fluoride dosed into laboratory water samples.

Changing Reporters to Tune Sensor Speed and Detection Threshold

Biosensor field deployment requires an output that can be quickly read with minimal supplemental equipment. (16) Using the maximally activating fluoride concentration (3.5 mM), reactions achieved measurable signal above the no-fluoride OFF state in 30 min at 30 °C, with overall 20-fold activation relative to the no-fluoride condition at the end of the 8-h experiment (Figure 2a). Despite this, the sensor’s ON state was not distinguishable by eye for several hours even after excitation with a blue LED, presenting the need for a faster reporter.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Riboswitch modularity allows fluorescent protein, RNA aptamer, and enzymatic colorimetric reporter outputs. Biosensor DNA template layouts and concentrations shown above reporter information and characterization data for that reporter. (a) Superfolder GFP (sfGFP) reporter (structure from PDB: 2B3P). Time course of fluorescence in the presence of 3.5 mM NaF (dark green), 0.2 mM NaF (light green), or 0 mM NaF (gray). (b) Three-way junction dimeric Broccoli reporter (structure predicted from NUPACK (15)). Time course of fluorescence in the presence of 3.5 mM NaF (dark green), 0.2 mM NaF (light green), and 0 mM NaF (gray). (c) Catechol (2,3)-dioxygenase (C23DO) reporter. Reaction scheme shows the cleavage of the colorless catechol molecule into the yellow 2-hydroxymuconate semialdehyde. Time course of absorbance at 385 nm in the presence of 3.5 mM NaF (orange), 0.2 mM NaF (yellow), and 0 mM NaF (gray). For each plot, trajectories represent average and error shading represents one standard deviation from three technical replicates. (a) and (b) are reported in mean equivalent fluorescence (MEF).

We hypothesized that we could accelerate the sensor’s response with a 3-way junction dimeric Broccoli (3WJdB) (17) reporter, an RNA aptamer that activates fluorescence of its DFHBI-1T ligand upon transcription, eliminating delays caused by translation. At all tested NaF concentrations, 3WJdB produced a signal detectable over background within 12 min at 30 °C (Figure 2b), more than twice as fast as could be achieved with sfGFP (Figure 2a). Interestingly, this result also confirms that the fluoride riboswitch is compatible with RNA reporters, despite the potential for misfolding with the upstream riboswitch sequence. However, despite the improvement in speed, exchanging sfGFP for 3WJdB resulted in a 50-fold reduction in the sensor’s fluorescent output at the maximally activating tested condition. Thus, although the RNA-level output is preferable for its speed relative to the sfGFP output if a plate reader is accessible, it is not bright enough to use for field deployment.
As an alternative to a fluorescent output, we used the colorimetric enzyme catechol (2,3)-dioxygenase (C23DO) as a reporter. C23DO has previously been used in genetically encoded biosensors for plant viruses (18) and produces a visible reporter output by oxidizing its colorless catechol substrate to the yellow-colored 2-hydroxymuconate semialdehyde. (19) This color change allows gene expression to be read out either by light absorbance at 385 nm on a plate reader or by the appearance of a yellow color, visible to the naked eye. All tested fluoride concentrations produced a visible output within 70 min at 30 °C, which we empirically defined as an absorbance of 0.8 based on our previous observations (Figure 2c). (18) Notably, there was only a 20 min time separation between the minimally and maximally activating conditions, highlighting the ability of enzymatic reporters to quickly amplify weak signals. Consistent with previous uses of C23DO as a reporter in a cell-free reaction, (19) we observed a decay in the absorbance signal after it reached peak activation, possibly due to 2-hydroxymuconate semialdehyde degradation. This effect does not compromise sensor robustness because differences in activation for an enzymatic reporter are determined by differences in time to observable signal rather than final signal magnitude, which is determined by the amount of substrate supplied. One disadvantage of this strategy is that activation time does not linearly correlate with fluoride concentration, limiting the sensor to only supplying a binary presence/absence result within a specified time window. (16) Despite this, the sensor’s sensitivity and low leak make this presence/absence result diagnostically informative, which combined with the advantages of an easily visualized output and reasonable time to detection made C23DO our reporter of choice for a field-deployable diagnostic.

Reaction Tuning and Lyophilization toward Biosensor Field Deployment

We next took steps to optimize our sensor to detect fluoride near the EPA’s secondary maximum contaminant limit of 2 ppm (100 μM). We obtained a robust ON signal with our original design, but the sensor began to leak without fluoride after 90 min (Figure 2c, gray line), complicating detection for trace amounts of fluoride. We attempted to mitigate this problem by reducing the amount of reporter DNA supplied to the reaction from 5 nM to 3 nM to diminish the sensor’s output. In doing so, we completely suppressed leak while detecting 100 μM NaF over background (Figure 3a), but at the cost of significantly delaying activation. We could detect as low as 50 μM NaF over background in this leakless sensor, but only during an extended incubation that did not reach a visually detectable threshold within 6 h.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Colorimetric reporters enable fluoride sensing at environmentally relevant concentrations. (a) Time course of 385 nm absorbance as measured by plate reader in the presence of 100 μM NaF (orange), 50 μM NaF (yellow), and 0 μM NaF (gray) using C23DO as a reporter and incubated at 30 °C. Trajectories represent average and error shading represents one standard deviation from three technical replicates. (b) Color change observed after 1-h for two different reporter template concentrations with and without 100 μM NaF. Tubes were mixed by pipetting and incubated at 37 °C before image capture at 60 min. (c) Time lapse of rehydrated lyophilized reactions incubated at 37 °C in the absence (top) and presence (bottom) of 1 mM NaF.

To solve this dilemma and maintain a practical incubation time, we sought a strategy whereby tests could be interpreted as “ON” only if the yellow color appeared within some externally specified time window. Under these constraints, sensor leak is not a problem as long as the difference in time scale between the ON and OFF state is suitably longer than the test time. To implement this strategy, we increased biosensor DNA concentration to 10 nM and also increased the temperature of the CFE reaction to 37 °C. Under these conditions, activation by 100 μM NaF resulted in a clear color change in 60 min with no visible leak in the OFF condition (Figure 3b, Supplemental Figure S2). The same conditions using 3 nM DNA template resulted in no color change within 60 min. This result highlights an appreciable advantage afforded by the open reaction environment of cell-free systems: the sensor’s limit of detection can be tuned simply by manipulating the reaction time and the DNA concentration of the biosensor.
Recent work demonstrates that CFE reactions can be lyophilized and rehydrated when needed for on-demand biomanufacturing, nucleic acid detection, and educational activities. (6,7,20,21) To expand these applications to point-of-use small molecule detection, we next aimed to demonstrate that fluoride biosensor reactions maintain functionality after being lyophilized. We measured the impact of lyophilization on fluoride detection by lyophilizing reactions containing 10 nM C23DO reporter plasmid overnight. The reactions were then rehydrated with laboratory grade Milli-Q water (Figure 3c, top) or water containing 1 mM NaF (Figure 3c, bottom) and incubated at 37 °C. Time-lapse photography shows visible activation within 60 min in the 1 mM NaF condition with no leak observed within 100 min in the no-fluoride condition (Supplemental Video S1). This finding, consistent with other recent reports from lyophilized cell-free systems, (6,7,20,21) indicates that sensing by the fluoride riboswitch in CFE reactions is not disrupted by the lyophilization process.
We also tested the viability of lyophilized reactions stored over longer periods of time. After lyophilization, reaction tubes were wrapped in Parafilm and stored in Drierite for 3 months in darkness at room temperature and atmospheric pressure before being removed and rehydrated with laboratory grade Milli-Q water or water containing 1 mM NaF. The sample rehydrated with 1 mM NaF showed strong activation within 1 h, with no leak observed in the no-fluoride condition (Supplemental Figure S3). Interestingly, lyophilization appeared to suppress leak in the no-fluoride condition without impacting the ability to activate expression with fluoride. The maintained viability of reactions after three months indicates that storage in desiccant and light shielding to prevent catechol oxidation are the only requirements for long-term storage of lyophilized cell-free reactions, a crucial step toward field-deployment.

Point-of-Use Detection of Environmental Fluoride with a Lyophilized Biosensor

Components of environmental water samples, particularly natural ions like sodium, magnesium, or potassium, could poison cell-free reactions upon rehydration. These “matrix effects” would then impede the translation of a sensor from lab experiments to field testing and must be accounted for in a field-deployable diagnostic. To test the robustness of our system against matrix effects, we created mock fluoride-containing field samples by sampling water from a municipal tap, Lake Michigan, and an outdoor swimming pool, with Milli-Q water used as a control. NaF was then added to each sample to a final concentration of 1 mM. The biosensing reactions were prepared as before and pipetted into PCR tubes (Figure 4a, top) or spotted on BSA-treated chromatography paper (Figure 4a, bottom) before being lyophilized overnight. After lyophilization, reactions were immediately rehydrated with either unaltered mock field sample (− condition) or mock field sample containing 1 mM NaF (+ condition) and incubated at 37 °C for 1 h. For all fluoride-containing samples both in tubes and on paper, a color change was observed within 1 h, with no color development in any of the no-fluoride conditions. These results confirm that the fluoride biosensor is robust against the unfiltered environmental samples tested and can be used in real-world conditions.

Figure 4

Figure 4. The cell-free fluoride riboswitch biosensor functions with real-world water samples and is not impacted by long-term storage and distribution. (a) Cell-free reactions rehydrated with various water samples with or without 1 mM NaF added. Lyophilized reactions in tubes are shown above lyophilized reactions on chromatography paper before and after 1 h incubation at 37 °C. MQ = laboratory grade Milli-Q water; Tap = tap water; Lake = unfiltered Lake Michigan water; Pool = unfiltered outdoor pool water. Uncropped photos of chromatography paper experiments are available in Supplemental Figure S8. (b) Field testing of lyophilized cell-free reactions rehydrated with water sampled in Cartago, Costa Rica. Geographical data © OpenStreetMap contributors. (22) The positive control contained 1 mM NaF in the reaction before lyophilization. The negative control was rehydrated with Milli-Q water, and the positive control and each test were rehydrated with 20 μL of unprocessed field sample followed by body-heat incubation for 5 h. Measured fluoride concentrations obtained using a fluoride sensing electrode. Field samples are from sites B and E in Supplemental Table S2.

As the culmination of our optimization process, we tested our sensor’s ability to accurately classify fluoride-containing samples in the field. We specifically sought to follow a previously published environmental fluoride study that used conventional methods to sample and test publicly available natural and municipal water sources near the Irazu volcano in Cartago, Costa Rica, an area shown to have elevated fluoride levels (Supplemental Figure S4). (23) To do this, we manufactured lyophilized fluoride biosensor reactions and transported them to Costa Rica using our simplified desiccant packaging (Supplemental Figure S5A) for field testing. Sampling regions identified in the previous study, (23) we collected samples in 50 mL conical tubes and tested for fluoride in batch by adding unprocessed water to lyophilized reactions in PCR tubes via single-use exact volume transfer pipettes (Supplemental Figure S5B).
All field-testing was done onsite in Costa Rica without access to laboratory resources or equipment. Reactions were incubated at approximately 37 °C by being held in the armpit, with reaction time increased to 5 h to control for delayed activation caused by the imprecision of body heat incubation and low environmental fluoride concentrations. (18) A strong yellow color developed in every positive control reaction within an hour, confirming robustness to reaction poisoning by potential sample matrix effects (Supplemental Table S2). No activation was observed within 5 h in any samples with fluoride concentrations less than 50 μM (∼1 ppm) as measured in cross-validation with a commercial fluoride-sensing electrode. However, a visible color change was observed after 3.5 h in a water sample collected from a roadside ditch measured to have a fluoride concentration of 60 μM (Figure 4b). This delayed activation aligns with our previous characterization in detecting trace concentrations of fluoride below 100 μM (Figure 3a). For all samples, the commercial electrode measurement confirmed the conclusions drawn from the cell-free sensors, with no false positives or false negatives observed under any conditions (n = 9) (Supplemental Table S2). By accurately detecting levels of fluoride relevant to public health concern thresholds in a real-world water source with minimal supplementary equipment, we have shown that lyophilized fluoride biosensor CFE reactions can be effectively used as low-cost, point-of-use diagnostics, demonstrating the potential of engineered biosensor elements for small molecule detection in the field.

Discussion

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

In this work, we have demonstrated that a fluoride riboswitch can be implemented in a CFE system to act as a field-deployable diagnostic for environmental water samples. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first demonstration of a cell-free riboswitch-based biosensor that can detect health-relevant small molecules at regulatory levels within the field. Importantly, this work represents a significant improvement in efficacy over commercially available consumer kits (Supplemental Figure S6) and provides significant simplification and cost savings over gold standard electrochemical methods of fluoride detection, which cost hundreds to thousands of dollars and are cumbersome to use even for scientifically skilled operators. In contrast, our biosensors can currently be made for $0.40/reaction, (20) only require a drop of water, and are robust to temperature variation, enabling incubation with body heat.
A key strength of cell-free biosensing is that biochemical parameters such as cofactor and DNA concentration can be easily tuned to reduce leak and improve dynamic range, which has been a historically difficult challenge for riboswitch engineering in cells. Furthermore, since riboswitches are cis-acting, only one DNA template concentration needs to be tuned per sensor, simplifying the optimization space relative to trans-acting RNA or protein regulators. When optimizing these reactions for the field, we found that reactions lyophilized in PCR tubes had advantages over paper-based reactions, which rapidly dried out even when incubated in sealed, humidified containers. This effect was exacerbated by the longer incubation times required for low analyte concentrations, variabilities in ambient temperature, and the practical difficulty of equipment-free incubation of paper sensors using body heat, making the tube format much more amenable to the challenges of field deployment.
This work also highlights the feasibility of using transcriptional riboswitch-mediated gene expression to convert weak-binding RNA aptamers into functional biosensors. We were surprised to find that the B. cereus crcB riboswitch activated so well in an E. coli cell-free lysate system, given the sophisticated nature of its folding mechanism and transcriptional readthrough observed both in vitro and in vivo (13,24) Transcriptional riboswitches often show weak activation due to the short time scales of their regulatory decision-making, resulting in sensitivities that are kinetically, rather than thermodynamically limited. (25) Coupling transcriptional riboswitches to enzymatic outputs like C23DO can amplify weak signals, since each reporter enzyme turns over multiple molecules of substrate. (26) The combined kinetic mechanism of switching and the signal amplification afforded by a colorimetric reporter resulted in our sensor achieving a limit of detection of 50 μM, less than half of the lowest previously measured KD for any fluoride aptamer. (27) Thus, this work is a powerful example of why considering only thermodynamic binding affinities during aptamer selection can exclude promising, diagnostically relevant sensors.
The strategies we present here could be applied to optimize the performance of a large number of natural riboswitches for the detection of metabolites and ions relevant to environmental and human health monitoring. (28) Additionally, the compatibility of CFE reactions for high-throughput screening (29) and the simple format of our DNA expression construct could be used to characterize the thousands of “orphan” riboswitches that have been bioinformatically identified but bind to unknown ligands. (30) We imagine that these strategies could even be used to re-engineer riboswitches to have novel function. (31−33) As the rules of riboswitch mechanisms are deciphered at deeper levels, (13,34−36) we hope to reach a sufficient understanding to design their functional properties to meet the global needs for field-deployable environmental and health diagnostics.

Materials and Methods

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

Plasmid Construction

Plasmids were assembled using Gibson assembly (New England Biolabs, Cat#E2611S) and purified using a Qiagen QIAfilter Midiprep Kit (QIAGEN, Cat#12143). pJBL7025 and pJBL7026 were assembled from pJBL3752. A table of all plasmid sequences can be found in Supplemental Table S1.

Extract Preparation

Extracts were prepared according to published protocols using sonication and postlysis processing in the Rosetta2 (DE3) pLysS strain. (10) Briefly, cells are plated on a chloramphenicol-selective agar plate and incubated overnight then used to inoculate a 20 mL overnight starter culture for a 1 L final culture. This culture is grown to an optical density (OD600) of 3.0 ± 0.2 then pelleted and lysed by sonication before centrifugation for 10 min at 4 °C and 12 000g. After lysis, extracts were incubated with shaking for 80 min at 37 °C and 200 rpm then recentrifuged under the same conditions. The supernatant was injected into a 10K MWCO dialysis cassette (Thermo Fisher, 66380) and dialyzed at 4 °C for 3 h before a final centrifugation under the same conditions and snap-freezing in liquid nitrogen.

CFE Experiment

CFE reactions were prepared according to established protocols. (10) Briefly, reactions are composed of cell extract, a reaction buffer containing NTPs, amino acids, buffering salts, crowding agents, and an energy source, and a mix of template DNA and inducers in an approximately 30/30/40 ratio. Between reactions, the only conditions varied are DNA template and concentration, inducer concentration, and buffering magnesium glutamate concentration, the last of which is optimized by extract. Optimal magnesium glutamate concentration was 20 mM for shelf stability and field deployment experiments and 12 mM for all other data. Little variability was seen in extract performance between batches using the appropriate optimal magnesium concentrations (Supplemental Figure S7).
For an example reaction setup, refer to the Supplemental Experimental Design Spreadsheet. All kinetic CFE reactions were prepared on ice in triplicate at the 10 μL scale. 33 μL of a mixture containing the desired reaction components was prepared and then 10 μL was pipetted into three wells of a 384-well plate (Corning, 3712), taking care to avoid bubbles. Plates were sealed (Thermo Scientific, 232701) and kinetic data was monitored on a BioTek Synergy H1m plate reader for sfGFP (20 nM reporter plasmid, emission/excitation: 485/520 nm every 5 min for 8 h at 30 °C), C23DO (variable reporter plasmid concentration, 385 nm absorbance every 30 s for 4–6 h at 30 °C), and 3WJdB (20 nM reporter plasmid, emission/excitation 472/507 nm every 30 s for 2 h at 30 °C). C23DO reactions were supplemented with 1 mM catechol and 3WJdB reactions were supplemented with 20 μM DFHBI-1T. For all fluorescence experiments, a no-DNA negative control was prepared in triplicate for every extract being tested. All reported fluorescence values have been baseline-subtracted by the average of three samples from the no-DNA condition. Baseline subtraction was not performed for catechol reactions because reaction progress is determined from time to activation rather than maximal absorbance value. For the data depicted in Figure 1c, NaF and NaCl titrations were performed in separate experiments.

Mean Equivalent Fluorescence Calibration

Fluorescence measurements were calibrated to a standard curve of fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) fluorescence to give standardized fluorescence units of μM equivalent FITC following a previously established procedure. (37) Briefly, serial dilutions were performed from a 50 μM stock and prepared in a pH 9.5, 100 mM sodium borate buffer. Fluorescence values for these samples were read at an excitation wavelength of 485 nm and emission wavelength of 520 nm for sfGFP and an excitation wavelength of 472 nm and emission wavelength of 507 nm for 3WJdB. These values were then used to calculate a linear conversion factor relating the plate reader’s output in arbitrary units to the FITC standard curve.

Lyophilization

All lyophilization was performed in a Labconco FreeZone 2.5 Liter −84 °C Benchtop Freeze-Dryer (Cat# 710201000). A CFE reaction master mix was prepared and split into 20 μL aliquots in PCR strip tubes. Tube caps were then pierced with a pin and strips were wrapped in aluminum foil before being flash frozen in liquid nitrogen and lyophilized overnight at 0.04 mbar. After lyophilization, pierced PCR strip tube caps were replaced. Tubes were then sealed with parafilm and placed directly into Drierite (Cat#11001) for storage at room temperature (Supplemental Figure S5A).

Paper Sensors

Individual sensors were punched out of Whatman 1 CHR chromatography paper (3001–861) using a Swingline Commercial Desktop Punch (A7074020). Tickets were then placed in a Petri dish and immersed in 4% BSA for 1 h before being transferred to a new dish and left to air-dry overnight. After drying, tickets were spotted with 20 μL of CFE reaction and placed in plastic jars (QOSMEDIX 29258), which were loosely capped and wrapped in aluminum foil before being flash frozen in liquid nitrogen and lyophilized overnight at 0.04 mbar. For testing, tickets were transferred to new jars and rehydrated with 20 μL of sample solution. Jars were then closed and sealed with parafilm before incubation for 1 h at 37 °C.

Field Deployment

20 μL lyophilized reactions were prepared with 10 nM pJBL7025 and 1 mM catechol. As a positive control, additional reactions were lyophilized after being pre-enriched with 1 mM NaF. Supplemental Table S2 contains a complete list of sample site locations and water sources tested. 50 mL water samples were collected and stored in Falcon tubes (Fisher Scientific, Cat# 14-432-22) without any processing or filtration. Reactions were rehydrated by using 20 μL exact volume transfer pipettes (Thomas Scientific, 1207F80) to pull from collected samples. Three reactions were run at each sample site: (1) a positive control rehydrated with the sample, (2) a blank reaction rehydrated with the sample, and (3) a negative control reaction rehydrated with purified water to test for any reaction leak. Reactions were placed in a plastic bag and incubated at body temperature in the armpit for 5 h using established protocols and marked as activated if a visible yellow color was observed. (18) Quantitative measurements of fluoride concentration of the same sample were taken with an Extech ExStik Waterproof Fluoride Meter (Cat# FL700). Geographical data from OpenStreetMap is licensed under the Open Data Commons Open Database License (https://www.openstreetmap.org/copyright).

Image Capture

All images were captured with via cell phone camera, with no specialized photography setup and no postcapture editing done aside from cropping image borders. Tubes were illuminated from below via desk lamp to highlight reaction color change. Paper sensors were illuminated from above via desk lamp and photographed without removal from the plastic jars used for incubation.

Supporting Information

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acssynbio.9b00347.

  • Supplemental Figures S1–S8, Supplemental Tables S1 and S2 (PDF)

  • Supplemental experimental design spreadsheet (XLSX)

  • Supplemental Video S1: Time lapse of sensor activation depicted in Figure 3c; Tubes were rehydrated with either water (left) or 1 mM NaF (right); Total time elapsed is 100 minutes (MP4)

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Author Information

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

  • Corresponding Author
    • Julius B. Lucks - Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Northwestern University, 2145 Sheridan Road, Evanston, Illinois 60208, United StatesCenter for Synthetic Biology, Northwestern University, 2145 Sheridan Road, Evanston, Illinois 60208, United StatesCenter for Water Research, Northwestern University, 2145 Sheridan Road, Evanston, Illinois 60208, United StatesOrcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-0619-6505 Email: [email protected]
  • Authors
    • Walter Thavarajah - Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Northwestern University, 2145 Sheridan Road, Evanston, Illinois 60208, United StatesCenter for Synthetic Biology, Northwestern University, 2145 Sheridan Road, Evanston, Illinois 60208, United StatesCenter for Water Research, Northwestern University, 2145 Sheridan Road, Evanston, Illinois 60208, United States
    • Adam D. Silverman - Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Northwestern University, 2145 Sheridan Road, Evanston, Illinois 60208, United StatesCenter for Synthetic Biology, Northwestern University, 2145 Sheridan Road, Evanston, Illinois 60208, United StatesCenter for Water Research, Northwestern University, 2145 Sheridan Road, Evanston, Illinois 60208, United States
    • Matthew S. Verosloff - Interdisciplinary Biological Sciences Graduate Program, Northwestern University, 2204 Tech Drive, Evanston, Illinois 60208, United StatesCenter for Synthetic Biology, Northwestern University, 2145 Sheridan Road, Evanston, Illinois 60208, United StatesCenter for Water Research, Northwestern University, 2145 Sheridan Road, Evanston, Illinois 60208, United States
    • Nancy Kelley-Loughnane - Materials and Manufacturing Directorate, Air Force Research Laboratory, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio 45433, United StatesOrcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0003-2974-644X
    • Michael C. Jewett - Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Northwestern University, 2145 Sheridan Road, Evanston, Illinois 60208, United StatesCenter for Synthetic Biology, Northwestern University, 2145 Sheridan Road, Evanston, Illinois 60208, United StatesOrcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0003-2948-6211
  • Notes
    The authors declare the following competing financial interest(s): The authors have submitted one provisional patent application (U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 62/813,368) for the technologically important developments included in this work. J.B.L is a cofounder of Stemloop, Inc. J.B.L.s interests are reviewed and managed by Northwestern University in accordance with their conflict of interest policies.

    All source data for the main and SI figures were deposited open access in Northwestern’s Arch database (https://arch.library.northwestern.edu). Data can be accessed via DOI: 10.21985/N2RJ64.


    All plasmids are deposited in Addgene with accession numbers 128809–128811.

Acknowledgments

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

We would like to thank Professor Ana Gabriela Calderón Cornejo (Universidad de Costa Rica) and Eduardo Quirós Morales for assistance with biosensor field-testing. We also thank Ashty Karim (Northwestern University) and Professor Robert Batey (University of Colorado, Boulder) for helpful comments in preparing the manuscript, along with Khalid Alam (Stemloop, Inc.) for editing the supplemental video, Jaeyoung Jung (Northwestern University) for assistance with designing the graphical abstract, and Professor Thomas Shahady (University of Lynchburg) for helpful comments about water sampling in Costa Rica. This work was supported by the Air Force Research Laboratory Center of Excellence for Advanced Bioprogrammable Nanomaterials (C-ABN) Grant FA8650-15-2-5518 (to M.C.J. and J.B.L), the David and Lucile Packard Foundation (to M.C.J.), an NSF CAREER Award (1452441 to J.B.L.), and the Camille Dreyfus Teacher-Scholar Program (to M.C.J. and J.B.L.). A.D.S. was supported in part by the National Institutes of Health Training Grant (T32GM008449) through Northwestern University’s Biotechnology Training Program. The views and conclusions contained herein are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as necessarily representing the official policies or endorsements, either expressed or implied, of the Air Force Research Laboratory, Air Force Office of Scientific Research, or US Government.

References

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

This article references 37 other publications.

  1. 1
    WHO (2016) World Health Statistics 2016: Monitoring Health for the SDGs Sustainable Development Goals, World Health Organization.
  2. 2
    Onda, K., LoBuglio, J., and Bartram, J. (2012) Global Access to Safe Water: Accounting for Water Quality and the Resulting Impact on MDG Progress. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 9 (3), 880894,  DOI: 10.3390/ijerph9030880
  3. 3
    Meenakshi and Maheshwari, R.C. (2006) Fluoride in Drinking Water and Its Removal. J. Hazard. Mater. 137 (1), 456463,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.02.024
  4. 4
    World Health Organization (2011) Guidelines for Drinking-Water Quality. WHO Chron. 38 (4), 104108
  5. 5
    Zhou, Y., Zhang, J. F., and Yoon, J. (2014) Fluorescence and Colorimetric Chemosensors for Fluoride-Ion Detection. Chem. Rev. 114 (10), 55115571,  DOI: 10.1021/cr400352m
  6. 6
    Pardee, K., Green, A. A., Ferrante, T., Cameron, D. E., DaleyKeyser, A., Yin, P., and Collins, J. J. (2014) Paper-Based Synthetic Gene Networks. Cell 159 (4), 940954,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.10.004
  7. 7
    Pardee, K., Green, A. A., Takahashi, M. K., Braff, D., Lambert, G., Lee, J. W., Ferrante, T., Ma, D., Donghia, N., Fan, M. (2016) Rapid, Low-Cost Detection of Zika Virus Using Programmable Biomolecular Components. Cell 165 (5), 12551266,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.04.059
  8. 8
    Gräwe, A., Dreyer, A., Vornholt, T., Barteczko, U., Buchholz, L., Drews, G., Ho, U. L., Jackowski, M. E., Kracht, M., Lüders, J. (2019) A Paper-Based, Cell-Free Biosensor System for the Detection of Heavy Metals and Date Rape Drugs. PLoS One 14 (3), e0210940  DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210940
  9. 9
    Gupta, S., Sarkar, S., Katranidis, A., and Bhattacharya, J. (2019) Development of a Cell-Free Optical Biosensor for Detection of a Broad Range of Mercury Contaminants in Water: A Plasmid DNA-Based Approach. ACS Omega 4 (5), 94809487,  DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.9b00205
  10. 10
    Silverman, A., Kelley-Loughnane, N., Lucks, J. B., and Jewett, M. C. (2019) Deconstructing Cell-Free Extract Preparation for in Vitro Activation of Transcriptional Genetic Circuitry. ACS Synth. Biol. 8 (2), 403414,  DOI: 10.1021/acssynbio.8b00430
  11. 11
    Silverman, A. D., Karim, A. S., and Jewett, M. C. (2019) Cell-free gene expression: an expanded repertoire of applications. Nat. Rev. Genet. 1,  DOI: 10.1038/s41576-019-0186-3
  12. 12
    Baker, J. L., Sudarsan, N., Weinberg, Z., Roth, A., Stockbridge, R. B., and Breaker, R. R. (2012) Widespread Genetic Switches and Toxicity Resistance Proteins for Fluoride. Science (Washington, DC, U. S.) 335 (6065), 233235,  DOI: 10.1126/science.1215063
  13. 13
    Watters, K. E, Strobel, E. J, Yu, A. M, Lis, J. T, and Lucks, J. B (2016) Cotranscriptional Folding of a Riboswitch at Nucleotide Resolution. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 23 (12), 1124,  DOI: 10.1038/nsmb.3316
  14. 14
    Doull, J., Boekelheide, K., Farishian, B. G., Isaacson, R. L., Klotz, J. B., Kumar, J. V., Limeback, H., Poole, C., Puzas, J. E., and Reed, N. M. R. (2006) In Fluoride in Drinking Water: A Scientific Review of EPA’s Standards, pp 205223, The National Academies Press, Washington, D.C.,  DOI: 10.17226/11571 .
  15. 15
    Zadeh, J. N., Steenberg, C. D., Bois, J. S., Wolfe, B. R., Pierce, M. B., Khan, A. R., Dirks, R. M., and Pierce, N. A. (2011) NUPACK: Analysis and Design of Nucleic Acid Systems. J. Comput. Chem. 32 (1), 170173,  DOI: 10.1002/jcc.21596
  16. 16
    McNerney, M. P., Zhang, Y., Steppe, P., Silverman, A. D., Jewett, M. C., and Styczynski, M. P. (2019) Point-of-Care Biomarker Quantification Enabled by Sample-Specific Calibration. Sci. Adv. 5 (9), eaax4473,  DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aax4473
  17. 17
    Alam, K. K., Tawiah, K. D., Lichte, M. F., Porciani, D., and Burke, D. H. (2017) A Fluorescent Split Aptamer for Visualizing RNA–RNA Assembly In Vivo. ACS Synth. Biol. 6 (9), 17101721,  DOI: 10.1021/acssynbio.7b00059
  18. 18
    Verosloff, M., Chappell, J., Perry, K. L., Thompson, J. R., and Lucks, J. B. (2019) PLANT-Dx: A Molecular Diagnostic for Point-of-Use Detection of Plant Pathogens. ACS Synth. Biol. 8 (4), 902905,  DOI: 10.1021/acssynbio.8b00526
  19. 19
    Chappell, J., Westbrook, A., Verosloff, M., and Lucks, J. B. (2017) Computational Design of Small Transcription Activating RNAs for Versatile and Dynamic Gene Regulation. Nat. Commun. 8 (1), 1051,  DOI: 10.1038/s41467-017-01082-6
  20. 20
    Stark, J. C., Huang, A., Nguyen, P. Q., Dubner, R. S., Hsu, K. J., Ferrante, T. C., Anderson, M., Kanapskyte, A., Mucha, Q., Packett, J. S. (2018) BioBitsTM Bright: A Fluorescent Synthetic Biology Education Kit. Sci. Adv. 4 (8), eaat5107,  DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aat5107
  21. 21
    Huang, A., Nguyen, P. Q., Stark, J. C., Takahashi, M. K., Donghia, N., Ferrante, T., Dy, A. J., Hsu, K. J., Dubner, R. S., Pardee, K. (2018) BioBitsTM Explorer: A Modular Synthetic Biology Education Kit. Sci. Adv. 4 (8), eaat5105,  DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aat5105
  22. 22
    Haklay, M. and Weber, P. (2008) Openstreetmap: User-Generated Street Maps. Ieee Pervas Comput 7 (4), 1218,  DOI: 10.1109/MPRV.2008.80
  23. 23
    Rojas Zuniga, F., Floor, G., Malavassi, E., Martinez Cruz, M., and Van Bergen, M. (2014) Fluorosis Dental En La Población Infantil En Las Cercanías Del Volcán Irazú, Costa Rica. Congr. Latinoam. Estud. Química Paraguay.
  24. 24
    Zhao, B., Guffy, S. L., Williams, B., and Zhang, Q. (2017) An Excited State Underlies Gene Regulation of a Transcriptional Riboswitch. Nat. Chem. Biol. 13 (9), 968974,  DOI: 10.1038/nchembio.2427
  25. 25
    Wickiser, J. K., Winkler, W. C., Breaker, R. R., and Crothers, D. M. (2005) The Speed of RNA Transcription and Metabolite Binding Kinetics Operate an FMN Riboswitch. Mol. Cell 18 (1), 4960,  DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2005.02.032
  26. 26
    Karzbrun, E., Shin, J., Bar-Ziv, R. H., and Noireaux, V. (2011) Coarse-Grained Dynamics of Protein Synthesis in a Cell-Free System. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 (4), 48104,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.048104
  27. 27
    Ren, A., Rajashankar, K. R., and Patel, D. J. (2012) Fluoride Ion Encapsulation by Mg 2+ Ions and Phosphates in a Fluoride Riboswitch. Nature 486 (7401), 85,  DOI: 10.1038/nature11152
  28. 28
    McCown, P. J., Corbino, K. A., Stav, S., Sherlock, M. E., and Breaker, R. R. (2017) Riboswitch Diversity and Distribution. RNA 23 (7), 9951011,  DOI: 10.1261/rna.061234.117
  29. 29
    Moore, S. J., MacDonald, J. T., Wienecke, S., Ishwarbhai, A., Tsipa, A., Aw, R., Kylilis, N., Bell, D. J., McClymont, D. W., Jensen, K. (2018) Rapid Acquisition and Model-Based Analysis of Cell-Free Transcription–Translation Reactions from Nonmodel Bacteria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 115 (19), E4340,  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1715806115
  30. 30
    Greenlee, E. B., Stav, S., Atilho, R. M., Brewer, K. I., Harris, K. A., Malkowski, S. N., Mirihana Arachchilage, G., Perkins, K. R., Sherlock, M. E., and Breaker, R. R. (2018) Challenges of Ligand Identification for the Second Wave of Orphan Riboswitch Candidates. RNA Biol. 15 (3), 377390,  DOI: 10.1080/15476286.2017.1403002
  31. 31
    Boussebayle, A., Torka, D., Ollivaud, S., Braun, J., Bofill-Bosch, C., Dombrowski, M., Groher, F., Hamacher, K., and Suess, B. (2019) Next-Level Riboswitch Development—Implementation of Capture-SELEX Facilitates Identification of a New Synthetic Riboswitch. Nucleic Acids Res. 47 (9), 48834895,  DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkz216
  32. 32
    Espah Borujeni, A., Mishler, D. M., Wang, J., Huso, W., and Salis, H. M. (2016) Automated Physics-Based Design of Synthetic Riboswitches from Diverse RNA Aptamers. Nucleic Acids Res. 44 (1), 113,  DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkv1289
  33. 33
    Wu, M. J., Andreasson, J. O. L., Kladwang, W., Greenleaf, W. J., and Das, R. (2019) Automated Design of Diverse Stand-Alone Riboswitches. ACS Synth. Biol. 8 (8), 18381846,  DOI: 10.1021/acssynbio.9b00142
  34. 34
    Frieda, K. L. and Block, S. M. (2012) Direct Observation of Cotranscriptional Folding in an Adenine Riboswitch. Science (Washington, DC, U. S.) 338 (6105), 397400,  DOI: 10.1126/science.1225722
  35. 35
    Drogalis, L. K. and Batey, R. T. (2018) Requirements for Efficient Cotranscriptional Regulatory Switching in Designed Variants of the Bacillus subtilis PbuE Adenine-Responsive Riboswitch. bioRxiv  DOI: 10.1101/372573
  36. 36
    Strobel, E. J., Cheng, L., Berman, K. E., Carlson, P. D., and Lucks, J. B. (2019) A Ligand-Gated Strand Displacement Mechanism for ZTP Riboswitch Transcription Control. Nat. Chem. Biol. 15 (11), 10671076,  DOI: 10.1038/s41589-019-0382-7
  37. 37
    Alam, K. K., Jung, J. K., Verosloff, M. S., Clauer, P. R., Lee, J. W., Capdevila, D. A., Pastén, P. A., Giedroc, D. P., Collins, J. J., and Lucks, J. B. (2019) Rapid, Low-Cost Detection of Water Contaminants Using Regulated In Vitro Transcription. bioRxiv  DOI: 10.1101/619296

Cited By

This article is cited by 88 publications.

  1. Jaeyoung K. Jung, Blake J. Rasor, Grant A. Rybnicky, Adam D. Silverman, Janet Standeven, Robert Kuhn, Teresa Granito, Holly M. Ekas, Brenda M. Wang, Ashty S. Karim, Julius B. Lucks, Michael C. Jewett. At-Home, Cell-Free Synthetic Biology Education Modules for Transcriptional Regulation and Environmental Water Quality Monitoring. ACS Synthetic Biology 2023, Article ASAP.
  2. Xiaoze Dong, Qianqian Cheng, Shuo Qi, Mingwei Qin, Ning Ding, Yuhan Sun, Yu Xia, Yin Zhang, Zhouping Wang. Broad-Spectrum Detection of Tetracyclines by Riboswitch-Based Cell-Free Expression Biosensing. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 2023, 71 (25) , 9886-9895. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.3c02137
  3. Blake J. Rasor, Ashty S. Karim, Hal S. Alper, Michael C. Jewett. Cell Extracts from Bacteria and Yeast Retain Metabolic Activity after Extended Storage and Repeated Thawing. ACS Synthetic Biology 2023, 12 (3) , 904-908. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssynbio.2c00685
  4. Blake J. Rasor, Payal Chirania, Grant A. Rybnicky, Richard J. Giannone, Nancy L. Engle, Timothy J. Tschaplinski, Ashty S. Karim, Robert L. Hettich, Michael C. Jewett. Mechanistic Insights into Cell-Free Gene Expression through an Integrated -Omics Analysis of Extract Processing Methods. ACS Synthetic Biology 2023, 12 (2) , 405-418. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssynbio.2c00339
  5. Atsushi Ogawa, Honami Inoue, Yu Itoh, Hajime Takahashi. Facile Expansion of the Variety of Orthogonal Ligand/Aptamer Pairs for Artificial Riboswitches. ACS Synthetic Biology 2023, 12 (1) , 35-42. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssynbio.2c00475
  6. Katherine F. Warfel, Asher Williams, Derek A. Wong, Sarah E. Sobol, Primit Desai, Jie Li, Yung-Fu Chang, Matthew P. DeLisa, Ashty S. Karim, Michael C. Jewett. A Low-Cost, Thermostable, Cell-Free Protein Synthesis Platform for On-Demand Production of Conjugate Vaccines. ACS Synthetic Biology 2023, 12 (1) , 95-107. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssynbio.2c00392
  7. Amisha Patel, Pamela Peralta-Yahya. Olfactory Receptors as an Emerging Chemical Sensing Scaffold. Biochemistry 2023, 62 (2) , 187-195. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biochem.2c00486
  8. Alaa S. Selim, James M. Perry, Mohamed A. Nasr, Jay M. Pimprikar, Steve C. C. Shih. A Synthetic Biosensor for Detecting Putrescine in Beef Samples. ACS Applied Bio Materials 2022, 5 (11) , 5487-5496. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsabm.2c00824
  9. Caroline E. Copeland, Jeehye Kim, Pearce L. Copeland, Chloe J. Heitmeier, Yong-Chan Kwon. Characterizing a New Fluorescent Protein for a Low Limit of Detection Sensing in the Cell-Free System. ACS Synthetic Biology 2022, 11 (8) , 2800-2810. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssynbio.2c00180
  10. Svetlana V. Harbaugh, Adam D. Silverman, Yaroslav G. Chushak, Kathryn Zimlich, Monica Wolfe, Walter Thavarajah, Michael C. Jewett, Julius B. Lucks, Jorge L. Chávez. Engineering a Synthetic Dopamine-Responsive Riboswitch for In Vitro Biosensing. ACS Synthetic Biology 2022, 11 (7) , 2275-2283. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssynbio.1c00560
  11. Subhankar Sahu, Rohita Roy, Ruchi Anand. Harnessing the Potential of Biological Recognition Elements for Water Pollution Monitoring. ACS Sensors 2022, 7 (3) , 704-715. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssensors.1c02579
  12. You Jin Lee, Hye Jin Lim, Dong-Myung Kim. Quantitative Analysis of γ-Aminobutyric Acid by Combined Cell-Free Protein Synthesis and Transamination Reactions. ACS Synthetic Biology 2022, 11 (3) , 1208-1212. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssynbio.1c00501
  13. Grant A. Rybnicky, Radeen A. Dixon, Robert M. Kuhn, Ashty S. Karim, Michael C. Jewett. Development of a Freeze-Dried CRISPR-Cas12 Sensor for Detecting Wolbachia in the Secondary Science Classroom. ACS Synthetic Biology 2022, 11 (2) , 835-842. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssynbio.1c00503
  14. Angelo Cardoso Batista, Antoine Levrier, Paul Soudier, Peter L. Voyvodic, Tatjana Achmedov, Tristan Reif-Trauttmansdorff, Angelique DeVisch, Martin Cohen-Gonsaud, Jean-Loup Faulon, Chase L. Beisel, Jerome Bonnet, Manish Kushwaha. Differentially Optimized Cell-Free Buffer Enables Robust Expression from Unprotected Linear DNA in Exonuclease-Deficient Extracts. ACS Synthetic Biology 2022, 11 (2) , 732-746. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssynbio.1c00448
  15. Kathryn Beabout, Casey B. Bernhards, Meghna Thakur, Kendrick B. Turner, Stephanie D. Cole, Scott A. Walper, Jorge L. Chávez, Matthew W. Lux. Optimization of Heavy Metal Sensors Based on Transcription Factors and Cell-Free Expression Systems. ACS Synthetic Biology 2021, 10 (11) , 3040-3054. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssynbio.1c00331
  16. Yan Zhang, Paige L. Steppe, Maxwell W. Kazman, Mark P. Styczynski. Point-of-Care Analyte Quantification and Digital Readout via Lysate-Based Cell-Free Biosensors Interfaced with Personal Glucose Monitors. ACS Synthetic Biology 2021, 10 (11) , 2862-2869. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssynbio.1c00282
  17. Grace E. Vezeau, Howard M. Salis. Tuning Cell-Free Composition Controls the Time Delay, Dynamics, and Productivity of TX-TL Expression. ACS Synthetic Biology 2021, 10 (10) , 2508-2519. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssynbio.1c00136
  18. Namita Bhan, Alec Callisto, Jonathan Strutz, Joshua Glaser, Reza Kalhor, Edward S. Boyden, George Church, Konrad Kording, Keith E. J. Tyo. Recording Temporal Signals with Minutes Resolution Using Enzymatic DNA Synthesis. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2021, 143 (40) , 16630-16640. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.1c07331
  19. Steven M. Blum, Marilyn S. Lee, Glory E. Mgboji, Vanessa L. Funk, Kathryn Beabout, Svetlana V. Harbaugh, Pierce A. Roth, Alvin T. Liem, Aleksandr E. Miklos, Peter A. Emanuel, Scott A. Walper, Jorge Luis Chávez, Matthew W. Lux. Impact of Porous Matrices and Concentration by Lyophilization on Cell-Free Expression. ACS Synthetic Biology 2021, 10 (5) , 1116-1131. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssynbio.0c00634
  20. Sudeshna Manna, Johnny Truong, Ming C. Hammond. Guanidine Biosensors Enable Comparison of Cellular Turn-on Kinetics of Riboswitch-Based Biosensor and Reporter. ACS Synthetic Biology 2021, 10 (3) , 566-578. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssynbio.0c00583
  21. Rongfeng Cai, Shixin Zhang, Luo Chen, Maolin Li, Yuting Zhang, Nandi Zhou. Self-Assembled DNA Nanoflowers Triggered by a DNA Walker for Highly Sensitive Electrochemical Detection of Staphylococcus aureus. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2021, 13 (4) , 4905-4914. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.0c22062
  22. Atsushi Ogawa, Yu Itoh. In Vitro Selection of RNA Aptamers Binding to Nanosized DNA for Constructing Artificial Riboswitches. ACS Synthetic Biology 2020, 9 (10) , 2648-2655. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssynbio.0c00384
  23. Akkapol Suea-Ngam, Léonard Bezinge, Bogdan Mateescu, Philip D. Howes, Andrew J. deMello, Daniel A. Richards. Enzyme-Assisted Nucleic Acid Detection for Infectious Disease Diagnostics: Moving toward the Point-of-Care. ACS Sensors 2020, 5 (9) , 2701-2723. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssensors.0c01488
  24. Pierre Kugler, Deborah Fröhlich, Volker F. Wendisch. Development of a Biosensor for Crotonobetaine-CoA Ligase Screening Based on the Elucidation of Escherichia coli Carnitine Metabolism. ACS Synthetic Biology 2020, 9 (9) , 2460-2471. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssynbio.0c00234
  25. Weston Kightlinger, Katherine F. Warfel, Matthew P. DeLisa, Michael C. Jewett. Synthetic Glycobiology: Parts, Systems, and Applications. ACS Synthetic Biology 2020, 9 (7) , 1534-1562. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssynbio.0c00210
  26. Adam D. Silverman, Umut Akova, Khalid K. Alam, Michael C. Jewett, Julius B. Lucks. Design and Optimization of a Cell-Free Atrazine Biosensor. ACS Synthetic Biology 2020, 9 (3) , 671-677. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssynbio.9b00388
  27. Monica P. McNerney, Fernanda Piorino, Cirstyn L. Michel, Mark P. Styczynski. Active Analyte Import Improves the Dynamic Range and Sensitivity of a Vitamin B12 Biosensor. ACS Synthetic Biology 2020, 9 (2) , 402-411. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssynbio.9b00429
  28. Walter Thavarajah, Patrick Mbullo Owuor, Diana Ross Awuor, Karlmax Kiprotich, Rahul Aggarwal, Julius B. Lucks, Sera L. Young. The accuracy and usability of point-of-use fluoride biosensors in rural Kenya. npj Clean Water 2023, 6 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41545-023-00221-5
  29. Alex M. Yoshikawa, Alexandra E. Rangel, Liwei Zheng, Leighton Wan, Linus A. Hein, Amani A. Hariri, Michael Eisenstein, H. Tom Soh. A massively parallel screening platform for converting aptamers into molecular switches. Nature Communications 2023, 14 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-38105-4
  30. Grace E. Vezeau, Lipika R. Gadila, Howard M. Salis. Automated design of protein-binding riboswitches for sensing human biomarkers in a cell-free expression system. Nature Communications 2023, 14 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-38098-0
  31. Javad Aminian-Dehkordi, Shadi Rahimi, Mehdi Golzar-Ahmadi, Amritpal Singh, Javiera Lopez, Rodrigo Ledesma-Amaro, Ivan Mijakovic. Synthetic biology tools for environmental protection. Biotechnology Advances 2023, 68 , 108239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2023.108239
  32. Charaf Laghlimi, Abdelaziz Moutcine, Abdelilah Chtaini, Jalal Isaad, Abderrahim Zannou, Younes Ziat, M’hamed Ahari. Voltammetric investigation of the complexing effect of Capparis spinosa on heavy metals: Application in the treatment of water. Ionics 2023, 54 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11581-023-05194-6
  33. Yifan Wu, Longjiao Zhu, Yangzi Zhang, Wentao Xu. Multidimensional Applications and Challenges of Riboswitches in Biosensing and Biotherapy. Small 2023, 48 https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202304852
  34. Xian-En Zhang, Chenli Liu, Junbiao Dai, Yingjin Yuan, Caixia Gao, Yan Feng, Bian Wu, Ping Wei, Chun You, Xiaowo Wang, Tong Si. Enabling technology and core theory of synthetic biology. Science China Life Sciences 2023, 66 (8) , 1742-1785. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11427-022-2214-2
  35. Katrina J. Charles, Esther Shaylor, . Rapid water quality field tests: Data revolution or dead end?. PLOS Water 2023, 2 (6) , e0000139. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pwat.0000139
  36. Justin A. Peruzzi, Nina R. Galvez, Neha P. Kamat. Engineering transmembrane signal transduction in synthetic membranes using two-component systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2023, 120 (19) https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2218610120
  37. Xiaowen Cheng, Chen Wang, Dong Liu, Yuting Liao, Bin Wang, Xue Zhang, Hao Zheng, Yuan Lu. Dynamic artificial cells by swarm nanorobotics and synthetic life chemistry. Science China Materials 2023, 66 (5) , 2090-2099. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40843-022-2305-1
  38. Claire Husser, Stéphane Vuilleumier, Michael Ryckelynck. FluorMango, an RNA‐Based Fluorogenic Biosensor for the Direct and Specific Detection of Fluoride. Small 2023, 19 (13) https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202205232
  39. Changqing Mao, Yichun Mao, Xiaoli Zhu, Guifang Chen, Chang Feng. Synthetic biology-based bioreactor and its application in biochemical analysis. Critical Reviews in Analytical Chemistry 2023, , 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408347.2023.2180319
  40. Sara Bracaglia, Simona Ranallo, Francesco Ricci. Electrochemical Cell‐Free Biosensors for Antibody Detection. Angewandte Chemie 2023, 135 (8) https://doi.org/10.1002/ange.202216512
  41. Sara Bracaglia, Simona Ranallo, Francesco Ricci. Electrochemical Cell‐Free Biosensors for Antibody Detection. Angewandte Chemie International Edition 2023, 62 (8) https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202216512
  42. Kumari Kavita, Ronald R. Breaker. Discovering riboswitches: the past and the future. Trends in Biochemical Sciences 2023, 48 (2) , 119-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibs.2022.08.009
  43. Margrethe A. Boyd, Walter Thavarajah, Julius B. Lucks, Neha P. Kamat. Robust and tunable performance of a cell-free biosensor encapsulated in lipid vesicles. Science Advances 2023, 9 (1) https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.add6605
  44. Yifan Wu, Longjiao Zhu, Shuting Li, Huashuo Chu, Xinxin Wang, Wentao Xu. High content design of riboswitch biosensors: All-around rational module-by-module design. Biosensors and Bioelectronics 2023, 220 , 114887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2022.114887
  45. Alexandra T. Patterson, Mark P. Styczynski. Rapid and Finely-Tuned Expression for Deployable Sensing Applications. 2023https://doi.org/10.1007/10_2023_223
  46. Xiaoze Dong, Shuo Qi, Imran Mahmood Khan, Yuhan Sun, Yin Zhang, Zhouping Wang. Advances in riboswitch‐based biosensor as food samples detection tool. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety 2023, 22 (1) , 451-472. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.13077
  47. Yun‐Nam Choi, Namjin Cho, Kanghun Lee, Da‐ae Gwon, Jeong Wook Lee, Joongoo Lee. Programmable Synthesis of Biobased Materials Using Cell‐Free Systems. Advanced Materials 2023, 35 (4) https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202203433
  48. Peter L. Voyvodic, Ismael Conejero, Khouloud Mesmoudi, Eric Renard, Philippe Courtet, Diego I. Cattoni, Jerome Bonnet. Evaluating and mitigating clinical samples matrix effects on TX-TL cell-free performance. Scientific Reports 2022, 12 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-17583-4
  49. Luyi Cheng, Elise N White, Naomi L Brandt, Angela M Yu, Alan A Chen, Julius B Lucks. Cotranscriptional RNA strand exchange underlies the gene regulation mechanism in a purine-sensing transcriptional riboswitch. Nucleic Acids Research 2022, 50 (21) , 12001-12018. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkac102
  50. Hajime Takahashi, Ryo Okubo, Atsushi Ogawa. Eukaryotic artificial ON-riboswitches that respond efficiently to mid-sized short peptides. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters 2022, 71 , 128839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmcl.2022.128839
  51. Hoang Long Pham, Hua Ling, Matthew Wook Chang. Design and fabrication of field-deployable microbial biosensing devices. Current Opinion in Biotechnology 2022, 76 , 102731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2022.102731
  52. Fernanda Piorino, Alexandra T Patterson, Mark P Styczynski. Low-cost, point-of-care biomarker quantification. Current Opinion in Biotechnology 2022, 76 , 102738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2022.102738
  53. Amy M. Ehrenworth Breedon, Kathryn R. Beabout, Heidi G. Coia, Christina M. Davis, Svetlana V. Harbaugh, Camilla A. Mauzy, M. Tyler Nelson, Roland J. Saldanha, Blake W. Stamps, Michael S. Goodson. Biological Sensors for Microbiome Diagnostics. 2022, 155-194. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527825462.ch6
  54. Aimee A. Sanford, Brea A. Manuel, Misael A. Romero-Reyes, Jennifer M. Heemstra. Combating small molecule environmental contaminants: detection and sequestration using functional nucleic acids. Chemical Science 2022, 13 (26) , 7670-7684. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2SC00117A
  55. Yangwon Jeon, Yejin Lee, Keugtae Kim, Geupil Jang, Youngdae Yoon. Transcription Factor-Based Biosensors for Detecting Pathogens. Biosensors 2022, 12 (7) , 470. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios12070470
  56. Paul Soudier, Daniel Rodriguez Pinzon, Tristan Reif-Trauttmansdorff, Hassan Hijazi, Maëva Cherrière, Cátia Goncalves Pereira, Doriane Blaise, Maxime Pispisa, Angelyne Saint-Julien, William Hamlet, Melissa Nguevo, Eva Gomes, Sophia Belkhelfa, Anna Niarakis, Manish Kushwaha, Ioana Grigoras. Toehold switch based biosensors for sensing the highly trafficked rosewood Dalbergia maritima. Synthetic and Systems Biotechnology 2022, 7 (2) , 791-801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.synbio.2022.03.003
  57. You Jin Lee, Soojin Lee, Dong-Myung Kim. Translational Detection of Indole by Complementary Cell-free Protein Synthesis Assay. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology 2022, 10 https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.900162
  58. Madison D. Bygd, Kelly G. Aukema, Jack E. Richman, Lawrence P. Wackett, . Microwell Fluoride Screen for Chemical, Enzymatic, and Cellular Reactions Reveals Latent Microbial Defluorination Capacity for −CF 3 Groups. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 2022, 88 (9) https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.00288-22
  59. Anupma Thakur, Pooja Devi. A Comprehensive Review on Water Quality Monitoring Devices: Materials Advances, Current Status, and Future Perspective. Critical Reviews in Analytical Chemistry 2022, 8 , 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408347.2022.2070838
  60. Ting Wang, Yuan Lu. Advances, Challenges and Future Trends of Cell-Free Transcription-Translation Biosensors. Biosensors 2022, 12 (5) , 318. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios12050318
  61. Takeshi Tabuchi, Yohei Yokobayashi. High-throughput screening of cell-free riboswitches by fluorescence-activated droplet sorting. Nucleic Acids Research 2022, 50 (6) , 3535-3550. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkac152
  62. Jaeyoung K. Jung, Chloé M. Archuleta, Khalid K. Alam, Julius B. Lucks. Programming cell-free biosensors with DNA strand displacement circuits. Nature Chemical Biology 2022, 18 (4) , 385-393. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41589-021-00962-9
  63. John Porter Hunt, Jackelyn Galiardi, Tyler J. Free, Seung Ook Yang, Daniel Poole, Emily Long Zhao, Joshua L. Andersen, David W. Wood, Bradley C. Bundy. Mechanistic discoveries and simulation‐guided assay optimization of portable hormone biosensors with cell‐free protein synthesis. Biotechnology Journal 2022, 17 (2) https://doi.org/10.1002/biot.202100152
  64. Alissa C. Mullin, Taylor Slouka, Javin P. Oza. Simple Extract Preparation Methods for E. coli-Based Cell-Free Expression. 2022, 51-64. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-1998-8_2
  65. Yan Zhang, Taisuke Kojima, Ge-Ah Kim, Monica P. McNerney, Shuichi Takayama, Mark P. Styczynski. Protocell arrays for simultaneous detection of diverse analytes. Nature Communications 2021, 12 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-25989-3
  66. Sierra M. Brooks, Hal S. Alper. Applications, challenges, and needs for employing synthetic biology beyond the lab. Nature Communications 2021, 12 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-21740-0
  67. Jasmine M. Hershewe, Katherine F. Warfel, Shaelyn M. Iyer, Justin A. Peruzzi, Claretta J. Sullivan, Eric W. Roth, Matthew P. DeLisa, Neha P. Kamat, Michael C. Jewett. Improving cell-free glycoprotein synthesis by characterizing and enriching native membrane vesicles. Nature Communications 2021, 12 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22329-3
  68. Chen Wang, Junzhu Yang, Yuan Lu. Modularize and Unite: Toward Creating a Functional Artificial Cell. Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences 2021, 8 https://doi.org/10.3389/fmolb.2021.781986
  69. Caroline E. Copeland, Adam Langlois, Jeehye Kim, Yong-Chan Kwon. The cell-free system: A new apparatus for affordable, sensitive, and portable healthcare. Biochemical Engineering Journal 2021, 175 , 108124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2021.108124
  70. Takeshi Tabuchi, Yohei Yokobayashi. Cell-free riboswitches. RSC Chemical Biology 2021, 2 (5) , 1430-1440. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1CB00138H
  71. Anibal Arce, Fernando Guzman Chavez, Chiara Gandini, Juan Puig, Tamara Matute, Jim Haseloff, Neil Dalchau, Jenny Molloy, Keith Pardee, Fernán Federici. Decentralizing Cell-Free RNA Sensing With the Use of Low-Cost Cell Extracts. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology 2021, 9 https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2021.727584
  72. Megan A. McSweeney, Mark P. Styczynski. Effective Use of Linear DNA in Cell-Free Expression Systems. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology 2021, 9 https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2021.715328
  73. Walter Thavarajah, Laura M. Hertz, David Z. Bushhouse, Chloé M. Archuleta, Julius B. Lucks. RNA Engineering for Public Health: Innovations in RNA-Based Diagnostics and Therapeutics. Annual Review of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering 2021, 12 (1) , 263-286. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-101420-014055
  74. , , Gonçalo Silva, Jenny Tomlinson, Nawaporn Onkokesung, Sarah Sommer, Latifa Mrisho, James Legg, Ian P. Adams, Yaiza Gutierrez-Vazquez, Thomas P. Howard, Alex Laverick, Oindrila Hossain, Qingshan Wei, Kaitlin M. Gold, Neil Boonham. Plant pest surveillance: from satellites to molecules. Emerging Topics in Life Sciences 2021, 5 (2) , 275-287. https://doi.org/10.1042/ETLS20200300
  75. Claire Husser, Natacha Dentz, Michael Ryckelynck. Structure‐Switching RNAs: From Gene Expression Regulation to Small Molecule Detection. Small Structures 2021, 2 (4) https://doi.org/10.1002/sstr.202000132
  76. Marie-Laure Fogeron, Lauriane Lecoq, Laura Cole, Matthias Harbers, Anja Böckmann. Easy Synthesis of Complex Biomolecular Assemblies: Wheat Germ Cell-Free Protein Expression in Structural Biology. Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences 2021, 8 https://doi.org/10.3389/fmolb.2021.639587
  77. Ilenne Del Valle, Emily M. Fulk, Prashant Kalvapalle, Jonathan J. Silberg, Caroline A. Masiello, Lauren B. Stadler. Translating New Synthetic Biology Advances for Biosensing Into the Earth and Environmental Sciences. Frontiers in Microbiology 2021, 11 https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.618373
  78. Lea K. Drogalis, Robert T. Batey, . Requirements for efficient ligand-gated co-transcriptional switching in designed variants of the B. subtilis pbuE adenine-responsive riboswitch in E. coli. PLOS ONE 2020, 15 (12) , e0243155. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243155
  79. Margrethe A. Boyd, Neha P. Kamat. Designing Artificial Cells towards a New Generation of Biosensors. Trends in Biotechnology 2020, 45 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2020.12.002
  80. Patricia Calero, Daniel C. Volke, Phillip T. Lowe, Charlotte H. Gotfredsen, David O’Hagan, Pablo I. Nikel. A fluoride-responsive genetic circuit enables in vivo biofluorination in engineered Pseudomonas putida. Nature Communications 2020, 11 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-18813-x
  81. Walter Thavarajah, Matthew S. Verosloff, Jaeyoung K. Jung, Khalid K. Alam, Joshua D. Miller, Michael C. Jewett, Sera L. Young, Julius B. Lucks. A primer on emerging field-deployable synthetic biology tools for global water quality monitoring. npj Clean Water 2020, 3 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41545-020-0064-8
  82. Bo Zhu, Rui Gan, Maria D. Cabezas, Takaaki Kojima, Robert Nicol, Michael C. Jewett, Hideo Nakano. Increasing cell‐free gene expression yields from linear templates in Escherichia coli and Vibrio natriegens extracts by using DNA‐binding proteins. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 2020, 117 (12) , 3849-3857. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.27538
  83. Roman S Iwasaki, Robert T Batey. SPRINT: a Cas13a-based platform for detection of small molecules. Nucleic Acids Research 2020, 48 (17) , e101-e101. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkaa673
  84. Liyuan Zhang, Wei Guo, Yuan Lu. Advances in Cell‐Free Biosensors: Principle, Mechanism, and Applications. Biotechnology Journal 2020, 15 (9) https://doi.org/10.1002/biot.202000187
  85. Lingkai Zhang, Wan-Qiu Liu, Jian Li. Establishing a Eukaryotic Pichia pastoris Cell-Free Protein Synthesis System. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology 2020, 8 https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.00536
  86. Richard J. R. Kelwick, Alexander J. Webb, Paul S. Freemont. Biological Materials: The Next Frontier for Cell-Free Synthetic Biology. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology 2020, 8 https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.00399
  87. Tin Hoang Trung Chau, Dung Hoang Anh Mai, Diep Ngoc Pham, Hoa Thi Quynh Le, Eun Yeol Lee. Developments of Riboswitches and Toehold Switches for Molecular Detection—Biosensing and Molecular Diagnostics. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2020, 21 (9) , 3192. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21093192
  88. Hanna J. Wagner, Hasti Mohsenin, Wilfried Weber. Synthetic Biology-Empowered Hydrogels for Medical Diagnostics. 2020, 197-226. https://doi.org/10.1007/10_2020_158
  • Abstract

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. Cell-free fluoride biosensor engineering strategy. (a) Schematic for lyophilization of a cell-free reaction in tubes or on paper disks. Rehydration with a water sample allows the designed biosensing reaction to proceed to yield a detectable signal. (b) Schematic for fluoride riboswitch-mediated transcriptional regulation in cell-free extract. The riboswitch folds cotranscriptionally into one of two mutually exclusive states, depending on the presence of fluoride. In the absence of fluoride, the riboswitch folds into a terminating hairpin, precluding downstream gene expression. Fluoride binding stabilizes a pseudoknot structure (red paired region, inset from PDB: 4ENC) that sequesters the terminator and enables the expression of downstream reporter genes. (c) Schematic of a cell-free fluoride biosensor, consisting of a DNA template encoding the fluoride riboswitch controlling the expression of sfGFP. Eight-hour end point fluorescence measurements for reactions containing NaF (dark green) or NaCl (gray) are shown below. Error bars represent one standard deviation from three technical replicates.

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. Riboswitch modularity allows fluorescent protein, RNA aptamer, and enzymatic colorimetric reporter outputs. Biosensor DNA template layouts and concentrations shown above reporter information and characterization data for that reporter. (a) Superfolder GFP (sfGFP) reporter (structure from PDB: 2B3P). Time course of fluorescence in the presence of 3.5 mM NaF (dark green), 0.2 mM NaF (light green), or 0 mM NaF (gray). (b) Three-way junction dimeric Broccoli reporter (structure predicted from NUPACK (15)). Time course of fluorescence in the presence of 3.5 mM NaF (dark green), 0.2 mM NaF (light green), and 0 mM NaF (gray). (c) Catechol (2,3)-dioxygenase (C23DO) reporter. Reaction scheme shows the cleavage of the colorless catechol molecule into the yellow 2-hydroxymuconate semialdehyde. Time course of absorbance at 385 nm in the presence of 3.5 mM NaF (orange), 0.2 mM NaF (yellow), and 0 mM NaF (gray). For each plot, trajectories represent average and error shading represents one standard deviation from three technical replicates. (a) and (b) are reported in mean equivalent fluorescence (MEF).

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. Colorimetric reporters enable fluoride sensing at environmentally relevant concentrations. (a) Time course of 385 nm absorbance as measured by plate reader in the presence of 100 μM NaF (orange), 50 μM NaF (yellow), and 0 μM NaF (gray) using C23DO as a reporter and incubated at 30 °C. Trajectories represent average and error shading represents one standard deviation from three technical replicates. (b) Color change observed after 1-h for two different reporter template concentrations with and without 100 μM NaF. Tubes were mixed by pipetting and incubated at 37 °C before image capture at 60 min. (c) Time lapse of rehydrated lyophilized reactions incubated at 37 °C in the absence (top) and presence (bottom) of 1 mM NaF.

    Figure 4

    Figure 4. The cell-free fluoride riboswitch biosensor functions with real-world water samples and is not impacted by long-term storage and distribution. (a) Cell-free reactions rehydrated with various water samples with or without 1 mM NaF added. Lyophilized reactions in tubes are shown above lyophilized reactions on chromatography paper before and after 1 h incubation at 37 °C. MQ = laboratory grade Milli-Q water; Tap = tap water; Lake = unfiltered Lake Michigan water; Pool = unfiltered outdoor pool water. Uncropped photos of chromatography paper experiments are available in Supplemental Figure S8. (b) Field testing of lyophilized cell-free reactions rehydrated with water sampled in Cartago, Costa Rica. Geographical data © OpenStreetMap contributors. (22) The positive control contained 1 mM NaF in the reaction before lyophilization. The negative control was rehydrated with Milli-Q water, and the positive control and each test were rehydrated with 20 μL of unprocessed field sample followed by body-heat incubation for 5 h. Measured fluoride concentrations obtained using a fluoride sensing electrode. Field samples are from sites B and E in Supplemental Table S2.

  • References

    ARTICLE SECTIONS
    Jump To

    This article references 37 other publications.

    1. 1
      WHO (2016) World Health Statistics 2016: Monitoring Health for the SDGs Sustainable Development Goals, World Health Organization.
    2. 2
      Onda, K., LoBuglio, J., and Bartram, J. (2012) Global Access to Safe Water: Accounting for Water Quality and the Resulting Impact on MDG Progress. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 9 (3), 880894,  DOI: 10.3390/ijerph9030880
    3. 3
      Meenakshi and Maheshwari, R.C. (2006) Fluoride in Drinking Water and Its Removal. J. Hazard. Mater. 137 (1), 456463,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.02.024
    4. 4
      World Health Organization (2011) Guidelines for Drinking-Water Quality. WHO Chron. 38 (4), 104108
    5. 5
      Zhou, Y., Zhang, J. F., and Yoon, J. (2014) Fluorescence and Colorimetric Chemosensors for Fluoride-Ion Detection. Chem. Rev. 114 (10), 55115571,  DOI: 10.1021/cr400352m
    6. 6
      Pardee, K., Green, A. A., Ferrante, T., Cameron, D. E., DaleyKeyser, A., Yin, P., and Collins, J. J. (2014) Paper-Based Synthetic Gene Networks. Cell 159 (4), 940954,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.10.004
    7. 7
      Pardee, K., Green, A. A., Takahashi, M. K., Braff, D., Lambert, G., Lee, J. W., Ferrante, T., Ma, D., Donghia, N., Fan, M. (2016) Rapid, Low-Cost Detection of Zika Virus Using Programmable Biomolecular Components. Cell 165 (5), 12551266,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.04.059
    8. 8
      Gräwe, A., Dreyer, A., Vornholt, T., Barteczko, U., Buchholz, L., Drews, G., Ho, U. L., Jackowski, M. E., Kracht, M., Lüders, J. (2019) A Paper-Based, Cell-Free Biosensor System for the Detection of Heavy Metals and Date Rape Drugs. PLoS One 14 (3), e0210940  DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210940
    9. 9
      Gupta, S., Sarkar, S., Katranidis, A., and Bhattacharya, J. (2019) Development of a Cell-Free Optical Biosensor for Detection of a Broad Range of Mercury Contaminants in Water: A Plasmid DNA-Based Approach. ACS Omega 4 (5), 94809487,  DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.9b00205
    10. 10
      Silverman, A., Kelley-Loughnane, N., Lucks, J. B., and Jewett, M. C. (2019) Deconstructing Cell-Free Extract Preparation for in Vitro Activation of Transcriptional Genetic Circuitry. ACS Synth. Biol. 8 (2), 403414,  DOI: 10.1021/acssynbio.8b00430
    11. 11
      Silverman, A. D., Karim, A. S., and Jewett, M. C. (2019) Cell-free gene expression: an expanded repertoire of applications. Nat. Rev. Genet. 1,  DOI: 10.1038/s41576-019-0186-3
    12. 12
      Baker, J. L., Sudarsan, N., Weinberg, Z., Roth, A., Stockbridge, R. B., and Breaker, R. R. (2012) Widespread Genetic Switches and Toxicity Resistance Proteins for Fluoride. Science (Washington, DC, U. S.) 335 (6065), 233235,  DOI: 10.1126/science.1215063
    13. 13
      Watters, K. E, Strobel, E. J, Yu, A. M, Lis, J. T, and Lucks, J. B (2016) Cotranscriptional Folding of a Riboswitch at Nucleotide Resolution. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 23 (12), 1124,  DOI: 10.1038/nsmb.3316
    14. 14
      Doull, J., Boekelheide, K., Farishian, B. G., Isaacson, R. L., Klotz, J. B., Kumar, J. V., Limeback, H., Poole, C., Puzas, J. E., and Reed, N. M. R. (2006) In Fluoride in Drinking Water: A Scientific Review of EPA’s Standards, pp 205223, The National Academies Press, Washington, D.C.,  DOI: 10.17226/11571 .
    15. 15
      Zadeh, J. N., Steenberg, C. D., Bois, J. S., Wolfe, B. R., Pierce, M. B., Khan, A. R., Dirks, R. M., and Pierce, N. A. (2011) NUPACK: Analysis and Design of Nucleic Acid Systems. J. Comput. Chem. 32 (1), 170173,  DOI: 10.1002/jcc.21596
    16. 16
      McNerney, M. P., Zhang, Y., Steppe, P., Silverman, A. D., Jewett, M. C., and Styczynski, M. P. (2019) Point-of-Care Biomarker Quantification Enabled by Sample-Specific Calibration. Sci. Adv. 5 (9), eaax4473,  DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aax4473
    17. 17
      Alam, K. K., Tawiah, K. D., Lichte, M. F., Porciani, D., and Burke, D. H. (2017) A Fluorescent Split Aptamer for Visualizing RNA–RNA Assembly In Vivo. ACS Synth. Biol. 6 (9), 17101721,  DOI: 10.1021/acssynbio.7b00059
    18. 18
      Verosloff, M., Chappell, J., Perry, K. L., Thompson, J. R., and Lucks, J. B. (2019) PLANT-Dx: A Molecular Diagnostic for Point-of-Use Detection of Plant Pathogens. ACS Synth. Biol. 8 (4), 902905,  DOI: 10.1021/acssynbio.8b00526
    19. 19
      Chappell, J., Westbrook, A., Verosloff, M., and Lucks, J. B. (2017) Computational Design of Small Transcription Activating RNAs for Versatile and Dynamic Gene Regulation. Nat. Commun. 8 (1), 1051,  DOI: 10.1038/s41467-017-01082-6
    20. 20
      Stark, J. C., Huang, A., Nguyen, P. Q., Dubner, R. S., Hsu, K. J., Ferrante, T. C., Anderson, M., Kanapskyte, A., Mucha, Q., Packett, J. S. (2018) BioBitsTM Bright: A Fluorescent Synthetic Biology Education Kit. Sci. Adv. 4 (8), eaat5107,  DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aat5107
    21. 21
      Huang, A., Nguyen, P. Q., Stark, J. C., Takahashi, M. K., Donghia, N., Ferrante, T., Dy, A. J., Hsu, K. J., Dubner, R. S., Pardee, K. (2018) BioBitsTM Explorer: A Modular Synthetic Biology Education Kit. Sci. Adv. 4 (8), eaat5105,  DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aat5105
    22. 22
      Haklay, M. and Weber, P. (2008) Openstreetmap: User-Generated Street Maps. Ieee Pervas Comput 7 (4), 1218,  DOI: 10.1109/MPRV.2008.80
    23. 23
      Rojas Zuniga, F., Floor, G., Malavassi, E., Martinez Cruz, M., and Van Bergen, M. (2014) Fluorosis Dental En La Población Infantil En Las Cercanías Del Volcán Irazú, Costa Rica. Congr. Latinoam. Estud. Química Paraguay.
    24. 24
      Zhao, B., Guffy, S. L., Williams, B., and Zhang, Q. (2017) An Excited State Underlies Gene Regulation of a Transcriptional Riboswitch. Nat. Chem. Biol. 13 (9), 968974,  DOI: 10.1038/nchembio.2427
    25. 25
      Wickiser, J. K., Winkler, W. C., Breaker, R. R., and Crothers, D. M. (2005) The Speed of RNA Transcription and Metabolite Binding Kinetics Operate an FMN Riboswitch. Mol. Cell 18 (1), 4960,  DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2005.02.032
    26. 26
      Karzbrun, E., Shin, J., Bar-Ziv, R. H., and Noireaux, V. (2011) Coarse-Grained Dynamics of Protein Synthesis in a Cell-Free System. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 (4), 48104,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.048104
    27. 27
      Ren, A., Rajashankar, K. R., and Patel, D. J. (2012) Fluoride Ion Encapsulation by Mg 2+ Ions and Phosphates in a Fluoride Riboswitch. Nature 486 (7401), 85,  DOI: 10.1038/nature11152
    28. 28
      McCown, P. J., Corbino, K. A., Stav, S., Sherlock, M. E., and Breaker, R. R. (2017) Riboswitch Diversity and Distribution. RNA 23 (7), 9951011,  DOI: 10.1261/rna.061234.117
    29. 29
      Moore, S. J., MacDonald, J. T., Wienecke, S., Ishwarbhai, A., Tsipa, A., Aw, R., Kylilis, N., Bell, D. J., McClymont, D. W., Jensen, K. (2018) Rapid Acquisition and Model-Based Analysis of Cell-Free Transcription–Translation Reactions from Nonmodel Bacteria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 115 (19), E4340,  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1715806115
    30. 30
      Greenlee, E. B., Stav, S., Atilho, R. M., Brewer, K. I., Harris, K. A., Malkowski, S. N., Mirihana Arachchilage, G., Perkins, K. R., Sherlock, M. E., and Breaker, R. R. (2018) Challenges of Ligand Identification for the Second Wave of Orphan Riboswitch Candidates. RNA Biol. 15 (3), 377390,  DOI: 10.1080/15476286.2017.1403002
    31. 31
      Boussebayle, A., Torka, D., Ollivaud, S., Braun, J., Bofill-Bosch, C., Dombrowski, M., Groher, F., Hamacher, K., and Suess, B. (2019) Next-Level Riboswitch Development—Implementation of Capture-SELEX Facilitates Identification of a New Synthetic Riboswitch. Nucleic Acids Res. 47 (9), 48834895,  DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkz216
    32. 32
      Espah Borujeni, A., Mishler, D. M., Wang, J., Huso, W., and Salis, H. M. (2016) Automated Physics-Based Design of Synthetic Riboswitches from Diverse RNA Aptamers. Nucleic Acids Res. 44 (1), 113,  DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkv1289
    33. 33
      Wu, M. J., Andreasson, J. O. L., Kladwang, W., Greenleaf, W. J., and Das, R. (2019) Automated Design of Diverse Stand-Alone Riboswitches. ACS Synth. Biol. 8 (8), 18381846,  DOI: 10.1021/acssynbio.9b00142
    34. 34
      Frieda, K. L. and Block, S. M. (2012) Direct Observation of Cotranscriptional Folding in an Adenine Riboswitch. Science (Washington, DC, U. S.) 338 (6105), 397400,  DOI: 10.1126/science.1225722
    35. 35
      Drogalis, L. K. and Batey, R. T. (2018) Requirements for Efficient Cotranscriptional Regulatory Switching in Designed Variants of the Bacillus subtilis PbuE Adenine-Responsive Riboswitch. bioRxiv  DOI: 10.1101/372573
    36. 36
      Strobel, E. J., Cheng, L., Berman, K. E., Carlson, P. D., and Lucks, J. B. (2019) A Ligand-Gated Strand Displacement Mechanism for ZTP Riboswitch Transcription Control. Nat. Chem. Biol. 15 (11), 10671076,  DOI: 10.1038/s41589-019-0382-7
    37. 37
      Alam, K. K., Jung, J. K., Verosloff, M. S., Clauer, P. R., Lee, J. W., Capdevila, D. A., Pastén, P. A., Giedroc, D. P., Collins, J. J., and Lucks, J. B. (2019) Rapid, Low-Cost Detection of Water Contaminants Using Regulated In Vitro Transcription. bioRxiv  DOI: 10.1101/619296
  • Supporting Information

    Supporting Information

    ARTICLE SECTIONS
    Jump To

    The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acssynbio.9b00347.

    • Supplemental Figures S1–S8, Supplemental Tables S1 and S2 (PDF)

    • Supplemental experimental design spreadsheet (XLSX)

    • Supplemental Video S1: Time lapse of sensor activation depicted in Figure 3c; Tubes were rehydrated with either water (left) or 1 mM NaF (right); Total time elapsed is 100 minutes (MP4)


    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

You’ve supercharged your research process with ACS and Mendeley!

STEP 1:
Click to create an ACS ID

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

MENDELEY PAIRING EXPIRED
Your Mendeley pairing has expired. Please reconnect