ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
Electronic Structure Modulation of Metal–Organic Frameworks for Hybrid Devices
My Activity

Figure 1Loading Img
  • Open Access
Research Article

Electronic Structure Modulation of Metal–Organic Frameworks for Hybrid Devices
Click to copy article linkArticle link copied!

View Author Information
Department of Chemistry, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath BA2 7AY, United Kingdom
Open PDFSupporting Information (1)

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces

Cite this: ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 24, 22044–22050
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/am507016r
Published December 1, 2014

Copyright © 2014 American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under these Terms of Use.

Abstract

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The study of metal–organic frameworks has largely been motivated by their structural and chemical diversity; however, these materials also possess rich physics, including optical, electronic, and magnetic activity. If these materials are to be employed in devices, it is necessary to develop an understanding of their solid-state behavior. We report an approach to calculate the effect of strain on the band structure of porous frameworks. The origin of the bidirectional absolute deformation potentials can be described from perturbations of the organic and inorganic building blocks. The unified approach allows us to propose several uses for hybrid materials, beyond their traditionally posited applications, including gas sensing, photoelectrochemistry, and as hybrid transistors.

Copyright © 2014 American Chemical Society

1 Introduction

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Metal organic frameworks (MOFs) have become one of the most studied systems in materials chemistry. Their porous nature has resulted in speculation on their application as gas storage media. (1-3) This research has yielded many promising results but, as yet, no firm applications. (4) Additionally, the concentration on gas storage has somewhat overshadowed the opportunity for exploiting the chemical and structural diversity of MOFs to control their physical properties. (5, 6) There is a renaissance of the field, with an increasing number of studies demonstrating the potential of MOFs for optoelectronic processes and devices. (7-15)
In the design of hybrid devices, control of electronic energy levels is crucial. (16) The bulk electron energy levels provide a “natural” band offset between the bulk phases of materials (the Galvani potential) and can be considered a reliable first approximation to electrical barriers at a heterojunction interface. There is a long history, in the field of semiconductors, of controlling energy levels through the expansion and contraction of the crystal lattice, an idea first explored by Shockley and Bardeen. (17) MOFs display extraordinary flexibility, which allows for the accommodation of extreme lattice mismatch, (18, 19) making them ideal candidates for energy level control by application of epitaxial, uniaxial, or hydrostatic strain. Similar effects can be achieved via thermal expansion, which may be positive or negative for hybrid frameworks. (20-22) The degree to which the energy levels are deformed by strain is quantified by the deformation potential:(1)where εi is the electronic energy level of interest and v is the lattice volume. By judicious pairing of materials, based on knowledge of lattice matching and deformation potentials, the band offset at a heterojunction can be chosen for the desired application, for example, to produce an Ohmic or Schottky electrical contact. The most commonly considered deformation potential is that of the band gap (αvEg), as it is more straightforward to measure or calculate a relative change (the energy difference between the valence and conduction bands) than the absolute shifts of individual bands, that is:(2)where CB and VB refer to the lower conduction band and upper valence band, respectively.

Figure 1

Figure 1. Crystallographic unit cell of MIL-125 (right): a catalytically active and photochromic material used for the oxidation of alcohols to aldehydes. The (HSE06) band structure of MIL-125 (left) shows localized electronic states, with no significant band dispersion in reciprocal space. The energy scale is absolute, with respect to the vacuum level determined using the electrostatic potential at the center of the pore.

The determination of absolute deformation potentials (ADPs) has proved challenging for some time, even for close-packed elemental and binary semiconductors. (23, 24) From a theoretical point of view, the problem is that standard electronic structure simulations of compact semiconductors with periodic boundary conditions provide no unique, universal electronic energy reference, as there is no point in space where the wave function decays to zero. Thus, electronic eigenvalues cannot be compared over a range of deformations. A number of attempts to circumvent this difficulty have been proposed, for example, the model solid method, (25) the midgap energy, (26) and core state energy levels with an appropriate lattice summation. (27) A set of reference data is now available for simple inorganic semiconductors. (28) The prediction of these quantities for hybrid systems is rarely attempted, due to the complexity of the underlying calculations. In particular, there is no knowledge of the deformation behavior of organometallic solids.
In this contribution, we report an approach for calculating the absolute and relative deformation potentials of porous materials. The method is applied to calculate ADPs of five important frameworks: MOF-5 (ZnO-based, Figure 1) (29) and MIL-125 (TiO2-based), (30) one of the highest performing gas-storage coordination frameworks (CPO-27-Mg), (31) a zeolitic imidazolate framework (ZIF-8), (32) and also a covalent organic framework (COF-1M). (33, 34) The chosen frameworks differ in structure, composition, and functionality. The ability to predict and manipulate the band structure of MOFs raises the possibility for application in nontraditional contexts, which we shall explore.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Definition of the contributions to the total deformation potential (αα) in metal–organic frameworks. There is a change in the electronic structure following an instantaneous “vertical” volume change (αi), and an additional change following atomic relaxation (Δα) termed hybrid deformation.

As demonstrated by our calculations for these materials, the ADPs of MOFs have a number of subtleties arising from the hybrid nature of the structure. First, the band edges can be defined by either the organic or the inorganic motif; the electronic structures of the band edges are illustrated in Figure 3. Furthermore, traditional tetrahedral semiconductors have lattice points strictly defined by a crystal space-group, meaning that expansions or compressions result only in an isotropic scaling of the lattice sites. In MOFs the atomic coordinates can relax upon volume perturbation in an anisotropic manner due to their internal structural flexibility. This relaxation process means that the effective deformation potential can be broken into two contributions: a pure volume deformation (prior to relaxation) and an adiabatic deformation (postrelaxation). We term the difference between the two the “hybrid deformation” (see Figure 2) as it originates from the internal flexibility of the hybrid porous structure.

2 Computational Approach

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

All density functional theory (DFT) calculations were performed in the Vienna Ab Initio Simulation Package (VASP) (35) using plane-wave package with projector augmented wave pseudopotentials. (36) All structures were initially fully optimized using the PBESol (37) exchange and correlation functional and a cutoff energy of 500 eV and a Γ-point sampling of the Brillouin zone, allowing all ionic and lattice degrees of freedom to relax. The electronic structure was then calculated using the HSE06 (38) functional, with 25% of the short-range semilocal exchange replaced by nonlocal Hartree–Fock exchange.
Absolute valence band maxima and conduction band minima were obtained by calculating the difference between the highest occupied and lowest unoccupied one-electron eigenvalues and a reference vacuum potential. The reference vacuum potential was obtained from the Hartree potential at the center of a pore in the material, where the electrostatic potential has plateaued. This procedure for obtaining absolute band energies of porous materials was outlined in a recent publication, (39) and the analysis code and tutorials for performing the calculation are freely available in an online repository. (40)
The convergence of the band energies with respect to the density of the k-point mesh in reciprocal space was checked for MIL-125 (which displays some band dispersion and therefore is a good test for the validity of the Γ-point approximation). The results, presented in the Supporting Information, clearly demonstrate that the absolute electron energies are well converged for the properties of interest.
The instantaneous volume deformation potential was calculated by applying an isotropic perturbation of ±1% to the equilibrium lattice geometry, scaling both lattice vectors and ionic coordinates. The deformation potential was then obtained as the relationship between the offset of the band edge (εi) and the Hartree potential at the center of the pore (Φpore) and the log of the volume:(3)The total adiabatic deformation potential was calculated following the same procedure; however, the ionic positions of the framework were optimized to their equilibrium values at each point on the energy–volume curve.

3 Band Gap Deformation

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The band gap deformation potential for each framework has been calculated self-consistently from the energy separation of the upper valence and lower conduction bands as a function of the cell volume both including and excluding internal structure optimization. The values, collected in Table 1, are large and negative for each MOF. They range from −2.31 eV (MIL-125) to −0.52 eV (CPO-27-Mg). This is the standard semiconductor response; that is, as the lattice is dilated the band gap is reduced. (27) The negative sign is usually attributed to a reduction in separation of the occupied (bonding) and empty (antibonding) states as bond lengths are increased. The one exception is the covalent framework, COF-1M, which exhibits a positive band gap deformation of 1.05 eV. To understand the origin of this anomalous behavior, we need to first consider the individual changes of the valence and conduction bands.

4 Absolute Band Edge Deformation

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

While the band gap deformation is straightforward to assess using existing techniques, the underlying contributions are more difficult to compute. Here, we perform a translation of the relative electronic eigenvalues to absolute energies using the (volume-dependent) electrostatic potential at the center of the pore of the framework as a reference. It has been demonstrated that the pore potential (Φpore) represents a good approximation to the vacuum level. (39) Following the procedure outlined above, the absolute valence and conduction band deformation potentials have been calculated and are reported in Table 1 (and Figure 3).

Figure 3

Figure 3. Calculated (DFT-HSE06) valence and conduction band energy levels of the five materials studied, which are aligned through the Hartree potential in the center of their pores (following ref 39). Inset in the band gap of each material are shaded lines indicating changes in the valence and conduction band positions as the volume (external pressure) is varied. Above and below each material is the electron density associated with the band edge wave functions; note that the density is associated with organic ligands, with the exception of MOF-5 (valence band, ZnO units) and MIL-125 (conduction band, TiO2 units).

Table 1. Calculated Band Gaps, Eg, and Deformation Potentials for a Set of Hybrid Materials (DFT-HSE06), Including Deformation of Valence Band Maximum, αvVB, Conduction Band Minimum, αvCB, and Band Gap, αvEg, with Respect to Volumea
materialEgαvVBαvCBαvEg
MOF-54.640.51–0.59–1.09
(1.15)(−1.98)(−3.13)
[-0.64][1.40][2.04]
ZIF-85.470.60–0.36–0.96
(0.48)(−0.79)(−1.27)
[0.12][0.43][0.31]
COF-1M3.66–3.48–2.431.05
(−0.42)(−2.70)(−2.28)
[-3.06][0.27][-3.32]
CPO-27-Mg3.100.640.12–0.52
(−1.49)(−3.25)(−1.76)
[2.13][3.37][1.24]
MIL-1253.821.10–1.21–2.31
(0.59)(−4.10)(−4.69)
[0.51][2.89][2.38]
a

The top values are the total ADP, in parentheses below are the instantaneous ADPs, and in square brackets are the hybrid deformations, or difference between the first two terms. All values are reported in electronvolts.

Generally, valence band potentials are positive, while conduction band potentials are negative; this dictates the overall negative band gap deformation potential. Such behavior is expected for inorganic semiconductors, for example, for bulk ZnO (αvCB = −1.21 eV; αvVB = 0.42 eV), which is very similar to the response predicted for MOF-5. From the five systems studied, MOF-5, ZIF-8, and MIL-125 exhibit this standard response, while COF-1 M (negative αvVB) and CPO-27-Mg (positive αvCB) show unusual behavior.

5 Chemical Origin of Electronic Response

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

In semiconductor physics, the ADP of the band edges are commonly analyzed from the perspective of tight-binding theory. (41) The trends observed in valence and conduction band ADPs are attributed to the balance of three effects: (42) (i) The first is p–p coupling between anion and cation. In the tight-binding model, the valence band maximum is defined by coupling between anion and cation p bands. Therefore, as the volume increases and the interaction is weakened, the energy of the filled bonding state is raised. (ii) Next is electron kinetic energy. The kinetic energy of the electrons results in band broadening. As the volume is decreased, the kinetic energy of the electronic wave functions is increased and the bands become broader, resulting in an increase in the valence band energy. (iii) The final effect is p–d coupling between anion and cation. In cases where there is an active d-band (e.g., ZnII 3d104s0), the band structure is influenced by anion p–cation d coupling. The occupied antibonding state is usually at the top of the valence band, and exhibits an effect similar in magnitude and opposite in direction to (i).
Following Harrison, (42) the interaction strength is also influenced by the polarity of the material. In an elemental semiconductor, the band gap depends on a “covalent energy” (V2):(4)where d is the interatomic separation. For a compound semiconductor, where the constituent elements have a difference in electronegativity, the heteropolar bonding results in an additional “polar energy” (V3), which can be represented as the average of the anion and cation p eigenvalues (εpa and εpc). From these contributions, the valence band energy in solid-state semiconductors can be described as(5)The derivative of both of these functions with respect to volume implies that both the band gaps and the valence band edges will decrease in energy as the volume (interatomic separation) is increased. Similar behavior is also predicted for the conduction bands. (27) This interpretation is appropriate for hybrid systems where the band edges are dictated by the electronic states of the inorganic linker (e.g., MOF-5 conduction band and MIL-125 valence band).
In MOFs the band edges are often defined by electronic states on the organic ligand (see Figure 3). In this case, the splitting of the energy levels can be defined by an overlap integral (often referred to as β) between adjacent centers. In Hückel theory (43) (and extended Hückel theory (44)), the β parameter has no formal analytical dependence on interatomic separation. However, it has been demonstrated that the extended approach can be equated with the universal parameter theory of tight-binding, resulting in an analogous d–2 dependence of the energy levels. (45)
The first framework we consider is MOF-5, which uniquely has an upper valence band defined by the inorganic linker. The behavior (positive VB deformation potential of 0.51 eV) can be explained in terms of the tight-binding model. MOF-5 contains (ZnO)4 clusters, with a tetrahedral bonding structure very close to that of bulk ZnO. The absolute deformation potentials of tetrahedral ZnO have been calculated (46) as 2.85 eV in line with standard anion–cation p–p coupling. The difference in magnitude between the inorganic and hybrid materials originates from the chemical distinction between the oxygen of the carboxylate group and an inorganic oxide anion and the atomic relaxation response discussed in the next section.
For four of the systems studied, the valence band increases in energy as the volume is increased, following the arguments discussed above. The one exception is the covalent framework COF-1M, which has a large negative valence band deformation, that results in the unusual positive band gap deformation. COF-1M is distinct from the other materials as it is formed from biphenyl linkers coupled with an electron-withdrawing analogue of borazene. Under pressure, interaction between the two chemical building blocks gives rise to an antibonding response analogous to p–d repulsion in II–VI semiconductors; (27) hence, the behavior is opposite to the general trend.
Again, for four of the systems studied, the conduction band decreases in energy as the volume is increased, following the standard model. The one exception here is CPO-27-Mg, which shows a small positive conduction band deformation. In the absence of relaxation, a negative deformation of −3.12 eV is calculated, so the behavior is associated with “hybrid deformation”.

6 Hybrid Deformation

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The contribution to the deformation from atomic relaxation is reported in square brackets in Table 1. These effects are large in magnitude, with changes of up to 3.1, 3.4, and 2.4 eV to the valence, conduction, and band gap deformation potentials.
The conformational flexibility of the porous frameworks (relative to a close-packed semiconductor) means that even bands residing on inorganic linkers experience a hybrid deformation; the MOF-5 valence band and MIL-125 conduction band both display relaxation, which dampens the electronic response of the band energies to volume changes. One would expect the degree of relaxation to be largely determined by the rigidity of the structure; more rigid structures are expected to display smaller deformations. Indeed the framework with the most rigid organic ligand (ZIF-8) has the smallest hybrid deformation potentials for both the valence and the conduction bands.
The one case where hybrid deformation is responsible for a change in sign of the response is CPO-27-Mg. Under a frozen volume change, the behavior is normal; this corresponds to an isotropic change across all bonds lengths. However, the force constants of the organic ligand (2,4-dihydroxy-benzenedicarboxylate) are larger than those of the deformed heteropolar Mg–O polyhedra. Upon relaxation, conduction band states, which have a significant component on the bridging oxygen atoms, are stabilized. This change provides a hybrid deformation contribution of 3.37 eV to give the final positive conduction band deformation potential of 0.12 eV.
Depending on the type of group that defines the conduction and valence bands, our results suggest that one can engineer frameworks with different responses to external stresses. By combining different building blocks, it could be possible to access a wider range of strain-induced responses. A device consisting of several MOFs with differing deformation behavior could exhibit complex electrical responses to a single mechanical stimulus. The exploration of this parameter space and the building of a “deformation landscape” will be an important step, which can allow rational design of hybrid frameworks for a number of nontraditional functions, as explored below.

Figure 4

Figure 4. Schematic of a MOF-based sensor. (a) The functionalized system is at its equilibrium volume in the absence of an absorbate; there is a band offset with another semiconducting material inside the chemiresistor. (b) The framework selectively uptakes caffeine resulting in a volume expansion. The deformation of MOF-5 shifts the band edge reducing the resistance, which is measured as a change in the circuit voltage.

7 Toward Hybrid Devices

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

While the response functions considered here refer to the bulk material, and real devices may exploit changes in the electronic structure at a surface and/or interface, we can still use this information to suggest some alternative applications of hybrid frameworks.

i Chemical Sensors

For successful chemical sensors, two parameters are critical: analyte selectivity and signal transduction. MOFs have been shown to be highly effective in the former, while severely lacking in the latter. Mechanisms for analyte selectivity include size, chemical, and physical selectivity. (47-49) The apertures of MOF pores are widely tunable, (50) and this has been exploited to selectively absorb smaller over larger molecules. (51) Organic ligands can be modified postsynthetically (52) to make them chemically selective for certain classes of molecules, for example, through H- bonding. (53) Certain molecules can interact physically with motifs found in MOFs, such as the electrostatic interaction between CO2 and metal ions. An extensive review of the subject of MOF sensors is available, (54) in which the authors state “despite the numerous properties of MOFs that suggest them as attractive chemo-sensory materials, their implementation has been largely limited by one major challenge: signal transduction.”
By coupling selective molecular uptake with changes in electronic structure upon expansion or contraction, it is possible to envisage MOF-based chemical sensors. A number of appropriate semiconducting frameworks have recently been reported, including HKUST-1. (14) If it is incorporated into an electronic circuit, this results in a change in current, due to modified contact resistance at the MOF/metal interface. In this way, one can design molecularly sensitive sensors, at low cost. The working principle of such a device is illustrated in Figure 4. The effect could be extreme in the case of “breathing” frameworks. (55, 56)

ii Photoelectrodes

Metal oxides, such as ZnO and TiO2, have the ability to split water photoelectrochemically. However, they suffer from reduction potentials that are too low for efficient generation of H2 from H2O. In a MOF the energy levels of the metal oxide moieties are shifted to higher reduction potential, due to spatial confinement of their virtual orbitals. Furthermore, the redox energies are highly tunable by altering the framework composition and topology. (57, 58) This degree of flexibility represents a promising alternative to traditional oxide materials in the search for the combination of an optimal bandgap, which straddles the oxidation and reduction potentials of water, and allows for visible light absorption. The methodology that we have presented allows for the identification of optimal materials for chemical conversion from future computational screening studies of framework compositions.
Of particular interest is MIL-125, which maintains a conduction band similar in composition to TiO2 but placed well above the water reduction potential. We have shown that compression will result in the conduction band moving toward the vacuum level (increased reductive power). In addition, a recent experimental and computational effort has shown efficient band gap reduction by valence band (organic ligand) modification. (59) The large internal surface areas found in MOFs should provide enhanced electron transfer kinetics as compared to standard thin-film or mesoporous architectures.

iii Hybrid Transistors

Organic field effect transistors (OFETs) are becoming increasing important for flexible electronic technology, where the mechanical rigidity of traditional inorganic semiconductors is an issue. OFETs currently suffer from a number of drawbacks as compared to traditional FETs. Organic layers are more difficult to dope; therefore, the n+ source and drain emitter regions, which allow for efficient metal to semiconductor charge transfer in inorganic FETs, are difficult to achieve. Forming robust mechanical contacts between metal and organic layers is challenging, and the devices suffer poor stability. MOF-FETs offer a compromise to both technologies, providing flexibility closer to OFETs, while offering dopability and stability comparable to that of traditional FETs. Previous theoretical studies of carrier mobility in COF frameworks, such as COF-1M, indicate that these materials possess electrical conductivity of the order required for such applications. (60) An additional role for such hybrid solids is in organic photovoltaics, where electron and hole blocking layers are required to mediate between organic photoabsorbers and inorganic contacts. The electron energies of MOFs are well suited for this purpose.

8 Conclusions

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

We have presented a methodology for calculating the absolute deformation potentials of metal–organic frameworks, and indeed any porous material with a vanishing electrostatic field in the pore. We have applied the methodology to five functional MOFs, obtaining deformation potentials for valence bands, conduction bands, and band gaps under hydrostatic pressure. Quantum chemical and solid-state bonding models explain and predict the salient features of deformation based on the knowledge of the framework fragments that contribute to the band edge states. Moreover, we have presented new possibilities for MOF applications based on the behavior of the band structure under mechanical stress: postulating molecular sensors (e.g., MOF-5), photoelectrodes (e.g., MIL-125), and hybrid transistors (e.g., COF-1M). The approaches employed can easily be adapted for large-scale materials screening procedures. While hybrid solids exhibit many features familiar from the study of inorganic semiconductors, there exists potential for novel and unexpected phenomena. Appreciation of both the chemistry and the physics of these systems is required to unlock their full potential.

Supporting Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Additional information concerning the computational methods. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Author Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

  • Corresponding Author
    • Aron Walsh - Department of Chemistry, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath BA2 7AY, United Kingdom Email: [email protected]
  • Authors
    • Keith T. Butler - Department of Chemistry, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath BA2 7AY, United Kingdom
    • Christopher H. Hendon - Department of Chemistry, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath BA2 7AY, United Kingdom
  • Notes
    The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Acknowledgment

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

We acknowledge J. M. Frost and D. W. Davies for insightful discussions regarding organic field-effect transistor technologies. We acknowledge support from the EPSRC (Grants EP/J017361/1 and EP/I01330X/1), the Royal Society, and the European Research Council (Grant 277757). The work benefited from the University of Bath’s High Performance Computing Facility, and access to the HECToR supercomputer through membership of the UKs HPC Materials Chemistry Consortium, which is funded by EPSRC (Grant no. EP/L000202).

References

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article references 60 other publications.

  1. 1
    Mason, J. A.; Veenstra, M.; Long, J. R. Evaluating Metal-organic Frameworks for Natural Gas Storage Chem. Sci. 2014, 5, 32 51
  2. 2
    Murray, L. J.; Dincǎ, M.; Long, J. R. Hydrogen Storage in Metal-organic Frameworks Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009, 38, 1294 1314
  3. 3
    Dzubak, A. L.; Lin, L. C.; Kim, J.; Swisher, J. A.; Poloni, R.; Maximoff, S. N.; Smit, B.; Gagliardi, L. Ab initio Carbon Capture in Open-site Metal-organic Frameworks Nat. Chem. 2012, 4, 810 816
  4. 4
    Lee, S.-J.; Bae, Y.-S. Can Metal-Organic Frameworks Attain New DOE Targets for On-Board Methane Storage by Increasing Methane Heat of Adsorption? J. Phys. Chem. C 2014, 118, 19833 19841
  5. 5
    Cheetham, A. K.; Rao, C. N. R. There’s Room in the Middle Science 2007, 318, 58 59
  6. 6
    Rao, C. N. R.; Cheetham, A. K.; Thirumurugan, A. Hybrid Inorganic-organic Materials: a New Family in Condensed Matter Physics J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 2008, 20, 083202 083223
  7. 7
    Takahashi, Y.; Obara, R.; Nakagawa, K.; Nakano, M.; Tokita, J.-y.; Inabe, T. Tunable Charge Transport in Soluble Organic-Inorganic Hybrid Semiconductors Chem. Mater. 2007, 19, 6312 6316
  8. 8
    Li, H.-H.; Chen, Z.-R.; Cheng, L.-C.; Liu, J.-B.; Chen, X.-B.; Li, J.-Q. A New Hybrid Optical Semiconductor based on Polymeric Iodoplumbate Co-templated by both Organic Cation and Polyiodide Anion Cryst. Growth Des. 2008, 8, 4355 4358
  9. 9
    Turner, D. L.; Vaid, T. P.; Stephens, P. W.; Stone, K. H.; DiPasquale, A. G.; Rheingold, A. L. Semiconducting Lead-sulfur-organic Network Solids J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 14 15
  10. 10
    Ki, W.; Li, J. A Semiconductor Bulk Material that Emits Direct White Light J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 8114 8115
  11. 11
    Stroppa, A.; Jain, P.; Barone, P.; Marsman, M.; Perez-Mato, J. M.; Cheetham, A. K.; Kroto, H. W.; Picozzi, S. Electric Control of Magnetization and Interplay between Orbital Ordering and Ferroelectricity in a Multiferroic Metal-organic Framework Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 5847 5972
  12. 12
    Lee, D. Y.; Shinde, D. V.; Yoon, S. J.; Cho, K. N.; Lee, W.; Shrestha, N. K.; Han, S.-H. Cu-Based Metal-Organic Frameworks for Photovoltaic Application J. Phys. Chem. C 2013, 118, 16328 16334
  13. 13
    Hendon, C. H.; Tiana, D.; Walsh, A. Conductive metal-organic frameworks and networks: fact or fantasy? Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2012, 14, 13120 13132
  14. 14
    Talin, A. A.; Centrone, A.; Ford, A. C.; Foster, M. E.; Stavila, V.; Haney, P.; Kinney, R. A.; Szalai, V.; El Gabaly, F.; Yoon, H. P.; Léonard, F.; Allendorf, M. D. Tunable Electrical Conductivity in Metal-organic Framework Thin-film Devices Science 2014, 343, 66 69
  15. 15
    Wu, D.; Guo, Z.; Yin, X.; Pang, Q.; Tu, B.; Zhang, L.; Wang, Y.-G.; Li, Q. Metal-Organic Frameworks as Cathode Materials for Li-O2 Batteries Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 3258 3262
  16. 16
    Allendorf, M. D.; Schwartzberg, A.; Stavila, V.; Talin, A. A. A Roadmap to Implementing Metal-organic Frameworks in Electronic Devices: Challenges and Critical Directions Chem.—Eur. J. 2011, 17, 11372 11388
  17. 17
    Bardeen, J.; Shockley, W. Deformation Potentials and Mobilities in Non-Polar Crystals Phys. Rev. 1950, 80, 72 80
  18. 18
    Coudert, F.-X.; Boutin, A.; Fuchs, A. H.; Neimark, A. V. Adsorption Deformation and Structural Transitions in MetalOrganic Frameworks: From the Unit Cell to the Crystal J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2013, 4, 3198 3205
  19. 19
    Wang, Z.; Liu, J.; Lukose, B.; Gu, Z.; Weidler, P. G.; Gliemann, H.; Heine, T.; Wöll, C. Nanoporous Designer Solids with Huge Lattice Constant Gradients: Multiheteroepitaxy of Metal-Organic Frameworks Nano Lett. 2014, 14, 1526 1529
  20. 20
    Saines, P. J.; Barton, P. T.; Jura, M.; Knight, K. S.; Cheetham, A. K. Cobalt Adipate, Co(C6H8O4): Antiferromagnetic Structure, Unusual Thermal Expansion and Magnetoelastic Coupling Mater. Horiz. 2014, 1, 332 337
  21. 21
    Collings, I. E.; Tucker, M. G.; Keen, D. A.; Goodwin, A. L. Geometric Switching of Linear to Area Negative Thermal Expansion in Uniaxial Metal-organic Frameworks CrystEngComm 2014, 16, 3498 3506
  22. 22
    Goodwin, A. L.; Calleja, M.; Conterio, M. J.; Dove, M. T.; Evans, J. S. O.; Keen, D. A.; Peters, L.; Tucker, M. G. Colossal Positive and Negative Thermal Expansion in the Framework Material Ag3[Co(CN)6] Science 2008, 319, 794 797
  23. 23
    Van de Walle, C. G.; Martin, R. M. Absolute Deformation Potentials: Formulation and Ab initio Calculations for Semiconductors Phys. Rev. Lett. 1989, 62, 2028 2031
  24. 24
    Li, Y.-H.; Gong, X. G.; Wei, S.-H. Ab initio Calculation of Hydrostatic Absolute Deformation Potential of Semiconductors Appl. Phys. Lett. 2006, 88, 042104 042106
  25. 25
    Van de Walle, C. G. Band Lineups and Deformation Potentials in the Model-solid Theory Phys. Rev. B 1989, 39, 1871 1883
  26. 26
    Cardona, M.; Christensen, N. E. Acoustic Deformation Potentials and Heterostructure Band Offsets in Semiconductors Phys. Rev. B 1987, 35, 6182 6194
  27. 27
    Wei, S.-H.; Zunger, A. Predicted Band-gap Pressure Coefficients of all Diamond and Zinc-blende Semiconductors: Chemical Trends Phys. Rev. B 1999, 60, 5404 5411
  28. 28
    Łepkowski, S. P.; Gorczyca, I.; Stefan n¢ska Skrobas, K.; Christensen, N. E.; Svane, A. Deformation Potentials in AlGaN and InGaN Alloys and their Impact on Optical Polarization Properties of Nitride Quantum Wells Phys. Rev. B 2013, 88, 081202 081206
  29. 29
    Tranchemontagne, D.; Hunt, J.; Yaghi, O. Room Temperature Synthesis of Metal-organic Frameworks: MOF-5, MOF-74, MOF-177, MOF-199, and IRMOF-0 Tetrahedron 2008, 64, 8553 8557
  30. 30
    Dan-Hardi, M.; Serre, C.; Frot, T.; Rozes, L.; Maurin, G.; Sanchez, C.; Férey, G. A New Photoactive Crystalline Highly Porous Titanium(IV) Dicarboxylate J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 10857 10859
  31. 31
    Dietzel, P.; Georgiev, P.; Eckert, J. Interaction of Hydrogen with Accessible Metal Sites in the Metal-organic Frameworks M2(dhtp)(CPO-27-M; M= Ni, Co, Mg) Chem. Commun. 2010, 2, 4962 4964
  32. 32
    Park, K. S.; Ni, Z.; Côté, A. P.; Choi, J. Y.; Huang, R.; Uribe-Romo, F. J.; Chae, H. K.; O’Keeffe, M.; Yaghi, O. M. Exceptional Chemical and Thermal Stability of Zeolitic Imidazolate Frameworks Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2006, 103, 10186 10191
  33. 33
    Côté, A. P.; Benin, A. I.; Ockwig, N. W.; O’Keeffe, M.; Matzger, A. J.; Yaghi, O. M. Porous, Crystalline, Covalent Organic Frameworks Science 2005, 310, 1166 1170
  34. 34
    Lukose, B.; Kuc, A.; Frenzel, J.; Heine, T. On the Reticular Construction Concept of Covalent Organic Frameworks Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2010, 1, 60 70
  35. 35
    Kresse, G.; Furthmüller, J. Efficient Iterative Schemes for Ab initio Total-energy Calculations using a Plane-wave Basis Set Phys. Rev. B 1996, 54, 11169 11186
  36. 36
    Kresse, G.; Joubert, D. From Ultrasoft Pseudopotentials to the Projector Augmented-wave Method Phys. Rev. B 1999, 59, 1758 1775
  37. 37
    Perdew, J. P.; Ruzsinszky, A.; Csonka, G. I.; Vydrov, O. A.; Scuseria, G. E.; Constantin, L. A.; Zhou, X.; Burke, K. Restoring the Density-Gradient Expansion for Exchange in Solids and Surfaces Phys. Rev. Lett. 2008, 100, 136406 136409
  38. 38
    Krukau, A. V.; Vydrov, O. A.; Izmaylov, A. F.; Scuseria, G. E. Influence of the Exchange Screening Parameter on the Performance of Screened Hybrid Functionals J. Chem. Phys. 2006, 125, 224106 224110
  39. 39
    Butler, K. T.; Hendon, C. H.; Walsh, A. Electronic Chemical Potentials of Porous Metal-organic Frameworks J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 2703 2706
  40. 40
    https://github.com/WMD-Bath/MacroDensity (accessed 05/08/2014).
  41. 41
    Yu, P. Y.; Cardona, M. Fundamentals of Semiconductors, 3rd ed.; Springer: Berlin, 2005.
  42. 42
    Harrison, W. A. Electronic Structure and the Properties of Solids: The Physics of the Chemical Bond; Dover Publications: New York, 1989.
  43. 43
    Hückel, E. Quantentheoretische Beiträge zum Benzolproblem Z. Phys. 1931, 70, 204 286
  44. 44
    Hoffmann, R. An Extended Hückel Theory. I. Hydrocarbons J. Chem. Phys. 1963, 39, 1397 1412
  45. 45
    Harrison, W. A. Theory of the Two-center Bond Phys. Rev. B 1983, 27, 3592 3604
  46. 46
    Zhu, Y. Z.; Chen, G. D.; Ye, H.; Walsh, A.; Moon, C. Y.; Wei, S.-H. Electronic Structure and Phase Stability of MgO, ZnO, CdO, and Related Ternary Alloys Phys. Rev. B 2008, 77, 245209 245215
  47. 47
    Vermoortele, F.; Maes, M.; Moghadam, P. Z.; Lennox, M. J.; Ragon, F.; Boulhout, M.; Biswas, S.; Laurier, K. G. M.; Beurroies, I.; Denoyel, R.; Roeffaers, M.; Stock, N.; Düren, T.; Serre, C.; De Vos, D. E. p-Xylene-Selective Metal-Organic Frameworks: A Case of Topology-Directed Selectivity J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 18526 18529
  48. 48
    Bonifacio, L. D.; Puzzo, D. P.; Breslav, S.; Willey, B. M.; McGeer, A.; Ozin, G. A. Towards the Photonic Nose: A Novel Platform for Molecule and Bacteria Identification Adv. Mater. 2010, 22, 1351 1354
  49. 49
    Yanai, N.; Kitayama, K.; Hijikata, Y.; Sato, H.; Matsuda, R.; Kubota, Y.; Takata, M.; Mizuno, M.; Uemura, T.; Kitagawa, S. Gas Detection by Structural Variations of Fluorescent Guest Molecules in a Flexible Porous Coordination Polymer Nat. Mater. 2011, 10, 787 793
  50. 50
    Eddaoudi, M.; Kim, J.; Rosi, N.; Vodak, D.; Wachter, J.; O’Keeffe, M.; Yaghi, O. M. Systematic Design of Pore Size and Functionality in Isoreticular MOFs and their Application in Methane Storage Science 2002, 295, 469 472
  51. 51
    Dincǎ, M.; Long, J. R. Strong H2 Binding and Selective Gas Adsorption within the Microporous Coordination Solid Mg3(O2C-C+10H6-CO2)3 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 9376 9377
  52. 52
    Wang, Z.; Cohen, S. M. Postsynthetic Modification of Metal-organic Frameworks Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009, 38, 1315 1329
  53. 53
    Lin, X.; Blake, A. J.; Wilson, C.; Sun, X. Z.; Champness, N. R.; George, M. W.; Hubberstey, P.; Mokaya, R.; Schröder, M. A Porous Framework Polymer Based on a Zinc(II) 4,4′-Bipyridine-2,6,2′,6′-tetracarboxylate: Synthesis, Structure, and “Zeolite-Like” Behaviors J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 10745 10753
  54. 54
    Kreno, L. E.; Leong, K.; Farha, O. K.; Allendorf, M.; Van Duyne, R. P.; Hupp, J. T. Metal-Organic Framework Materials as Chemical Sensors Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 1105 1125
  55. 55
    Salles, F.; Ghoufi, A.; Maurin, G.; Bell, R. G.; Mellot-Draznieks, C.; Férey, G. Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Breathing MOFs: Structural Transformations of MIL-53(Cr) upon Thermal Activation and CO2 Adsorption Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 8487 8491
  56. 56
    Coudert, F.-X.; Mellot-Draznieks, C.; Fuchs, A. H.; Boutin, A. Prediction of Breathing and Gate-opening Transitions upon Binary Mixture Adsorption in Metal-organic Frameworks J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 11329 11331
  57. 57
    Brozek, C.; Dincǎ, M. Ti3+, V2+/3+, Cr2+/3+, Mn2+, and Fe2+ Substituted MOF-5 and Redox Reactivity in Cr- and Fe-MOF-5 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 12886 12891
  58. 58
    Hendon, C. H.; Tiana, D.; Vaid, T. P.; Walsh, A. Thermodynamic and Electronic Properties of Tunable II-VI and IV-VI Semiconductor based Metal-organic Frameworks from Computational Chemistry J. Mater. Chem. C 2013, 1, 95 100
  59. 59
    Hendon, C. H.; Tiana, D.; Fontecave, M.; Sanchez, C.; D’arras, L.; Sassoye, C.; Rozes, L.; Mellot-Draznieks, C.; Walsh, A. Engineering the Optical Response of the Titanium-MIL-125 Metal-Organic Framework through Ligand Functionalization J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 10942 10945
  60. 60
    Feng, X.; Ding, X.; Jiang, D. Covalent Organic Frameworks Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 6010 6022

Cited By

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!
Citation Statements
Explore this article's citation statements on scite.ai

This article is cited by 80 publications.

  1. Matthew J. Hurlock, Matthew S. Christian, Leo J. Small, Stephen J. Percival, David X. Rademacher, Mara E. Schindelholz, Tina M. Nenoff. Exceptional Electrical Detection of Trace NO2 via Mixed Metal MOF-on-MOF Film-Based Sensors. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2024, 16 (46) , 63818-63830. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.4c15743
  2. Walter Orellana. Metal Substitutions in the MOF-5 Metal–Organic Framework: A Hybrid Density Functional Theory Study. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2024, 128 (15) , 6471-6477. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.4c00944
  3. Suprava Bhunia, Dipankar Sahoo, Basudeb Dutta, Suvendu Maity, Nabin Baran Manik, Chittaranjan Sinha. Correlation in Structural Architecture toward Fabrication of Schottky Device with a Series of Pyrazine Appended Coordination Polymers. Inorganic Chemistry 2023, 62 (51) , 20948-20960. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.3c02029
  4. Samit Pramanik, Sumanta Jana, Kinsuk Das, Sudipta Pathak, Joaquin Ortega-Castro, Antonio Frontera, Subrata Mukhopadhyay. Crystallographic Aspects, Photophysical Properties, and Theoretical Survey of Tetrachlorometallates of Group 12 Metals [Zn(II), Cd(II), and Hg(II)] with a Triply Protonated 2,4,6-Tris(2-pyridyl)-1,3,5-triazine Ligand. Inorganic Chemistry 2023, 62 (19) , 7220-7234. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.2c04521
  5. Brian Pattengale, Sarah Ostresh, Charles A. Schmuttenmaer, Jens Neu. Interrogating Light-initiated Dynamics in Metal–Organic Frameworks with Time-resolved Spectroscopy. Chemical Reviews 2022, 122 (1) , 132-166. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00528
  6. Kaushik Naskar, Arka Dey, Suvendu Maity, Partha Pratim Ray, Chittaranjan Sinha. Charge Transportation in Zn(II)/Cd(II)-Based 2D MOFs of 5-Nitro-isophthalate with Isonicotinic Hydrazide. Crystal Growth & Design 2021, 21 (9) , 4847-4856. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.cgd.1c00018
  7. Aseem Rajan Kshirsagar, Xavier Blase, Claudio Attaccalite, Roberta Poloni. Strongly Bound Excitons in Metal–Organic Framework MOF-5: A Many-Body Perturbation Theory Study. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 2021, 12 (16) , 4045-4051. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c00543
  8. Jenna L. Mancuso, Austin M. Mroz, Khoa N. Le, Christopher H. Hendon. Electronic Structure Modeling of Metal–Organic Frameworks. Chemical Reviews 2020, 120 (16) , 8641-8715. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00148
  9. Indrani Choudhuri, Donald G. Truhlar. HLE17: An Efficient Way To Predict Band Gaps of Complex Materials. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2019, 123 (28) , 17416-17424. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b04683
  10. Kaushik Naskar, Sayantan Sil, Nilima Sahu, Basudeb Dutta, A. M. Z. Slawin, Partha Pratim Ray, Chittaranjan Sinha. Enhancement of Electrical Conductivity due to Structural Distortion from Linear to Nonlinear Dicarboxylato-Bridged Zn(II) 1D-Coordination Polymers. Crystal Growth & Design 2019, 19 (5) , 2632-2641. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.cgd.8b01753
  11. Basudeb Dutta, Arka Dey, Suvendu Maity, Chittaranjan Sinha, Partha Pratim Ray, Mohammad Hedayetullah Mir. Supramolecular Assembly of a Zn(II)-Based 1D Coordination Polymer through Hydrogen Bonding and π···π Interactions: Crystal Structure and Device Applications. ACS Omega 2018, 3 (9) , 12060-12067. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.8b01924
  12. Brian Pattengale, Daniel J. SantaLucia, Sizhuo Yang, Wenhui Hu, Cunming Liu, Xiaoyi Zhang, John F. Berry, Jier Huang. Direct Observation of Node-to-Node Communication in Zeolitic Imidazolate Frameworks. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2018, 140 (37) , 11573-11576. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.8b06727
  13. Christopher H. Hendon, Adam J. Rieth, Maciej D. Korzyński, and Mircea Dincă . Grand Challenges and Future Opportunities for Metal–Organic Frameworks. ACS Central Science 2017, 3 (6) , 554-563. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscentsci.7b00197
  14. Kaushik Naskar, Arka Dey, Basudeb Dutta, Faruk Ahmed, Chandana Sen, Mohammad Hedayetullah Mir, Partha Pratim Roy, and Chittaranjan Sinha . Intercatenated Coordination Polymers (ICPs) of Carboxylato Bridged Zn(II)-Isoniazid and Their Electrical Conductivity. Crystal Growth & Design 2017, 17 (6) , 3267-3276. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.cgd.7b00251
  15. Christopher H. Hendon, Keith T. Butler, Alex M. Ganose, Yuriy Román-Leshkov, David O. Scanlon, Geoffrey A. Ozin, and Aron Walsh . Electroactive Nanoporous Metal Oxides and Chalcogenides by Chemical Design. Chemistry of Materials 2017, 29 (8) , 3663-3670. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b00464
  16. Christopher H. Hendon, Aron Walsh, and Mircea Dincă . Frontier Orbital Engineering of Metal–Organic Frameworks with Extended Inorganic Connectivity: Porous Alkaline-Earth Oxides. Inorganic Chemistry 2016, 55 (15) , 7265-7269. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.6b00979
  17. Saurabh Ghosh, Domenico Di Sante, and Alessandro Stroppa . Strain Tuning of Ferroelectric Polarization in Hybrid Organic Inorganic Perovskite Compounds. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 2015, 6 (22) , 4553-4559. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b01806
  18. Sanliang Ling and Ben Slater . Unusually Large Band Gap Changes in Breathing Metal–Organic Framework Materials. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2015, 119 (29) , 16667-16677. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b04050
  19. Lei Sun, Christopher H. Hendon, Mikael A. Minier, Aron Walsh, and Mircea Dincă . Million-Fold Electrical Conductivity Enhancement in Fe2(DEBDC) versus Mn2(DEBDC) (E = S, O). Journal of the American Chemical Society 2015, 137 (19) , 6164-6167. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.5b02897
  20. Christopher H. Hendon, Kate E. Wittering, Teng-Hao Chen, Watchareeya Kaveevivitchai, Ilya Popov, Keith T. Butler, Chick C. Wilson, Dyanne L. Cruickshank, Ognjen Š. Miljanić, and Aron Walsh . Absorbate-Induced Piezochromism in a Porous Molecular Crystal. Nano Letters 2015, 15 (3) , 2149-2154. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b00144
  21. Ruifeng Wu, Yafei Liu, Hao Sun, Aimin Chang, Bo Zhang. Suppressing intrinsic self-compensating of BaSm2Ti4O12- ceramics for high-temperature thermistor application. Journal of the European Ceramic Society 2025, 5 , 117475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2025.117475
  22. Basudeb Dutta, Arnab Samanta, Animesh Layek, Shibashis Halder. Construction of Schottky barrier diode with a novel one-dimensional Cu(II)-based coordination polymer. Journal of Solid State Chemistry 2025, 341 , 125096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssc.2024.125096
  23. Vipin Kumar, Deepanshu Sharma, Ramaraju Bendi, Sungjemmenla, Kaushik Parida, Eswaraiah Varrla, Kenji Chee, Neeraj Khare, Pooi See Lee. Flexible and Stretchable Thermoresponsive Display for Multifunctional Device Applications. Advanced Engineering Materials 2024, 26 (11) https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.202400117
  24. Arif I. Inamdar, Saqib Kamal, Muhammad Usman, Ming-Hsi Chiang, Kuang-Lieh Lu. Design strategies for dielectric metal–organic frameworks and their applications in microelectronic devices. Coordination Chemistry Reviews 2024, 502 , 215596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2023.215596
  25. Nidhi Goel, Naresh Kumar. Future prospects and grand challenges for porous coordination polymers. 2024, 393-408. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-95535-5.00019-5
  26. Kendra Hamilton, Jens Neu. Terahertz spectroscopy of MOFs reveals dynamic structure and contact free ultrafast photoconductivity. APL Materials 2024, 12 (1) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0179574
  27. Konstantin Stracke, Jack D. Evans. The use of collective variables and enhanced sampling in the simulations of existing and emerging microporous materials. Nanoscale 2024, 78 https://doi.org/10.1039/D4NR01024H
  28. Prakash Chandra, Neha Choudhary, Shaikh M. Mobin. The game between molecular photoredox catalysis and hydrogen: The golden age of hydrogen budge. Molecular Catalysis 2023, 537 , 112921. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcat.2023.112921
  29. Andrew S. Rosen, Victor Fung, Patrick Huck, Cody T. O’Donnell, Matthew K. Horton, Donald G. Truhlar, Kristin A. Persson, Justin M. Notestein, Randall Q. Snurr. High-throughput predictions of metal–organic framework electronic properties: theoretical challenges, graph neural networks, and data exploration. npj Computational Materials 2022, 8 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-022-00796-6
  30. Yigang Jin, Yang Li, Yong Sun, Mengsu Zhu, Ze Li, Liyao Liu, Ye Zou, CaiMing Liu, Yimeng Sun, Wei Xu. Facile synthesis, precise species control and chemical transformation of highly conducting organic metal chalcogenides Cu x BHT (BHT = benzenehexathiol; x = 3, 4, and 5.5). Journal of Materials Chemistry C 2022, 10 (7) , 2711-2717. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1TC03614A
  31. Nikita Kolobov, Maarten G. Goesten, Jorge Gascon. Metal–Organic Frameworks: Molecules or Semiconductors in Photocatalysis?. Angewandte Chemie 2021, 133 (50) , 26242-26256. https://doi.org/10.1002/ange.202106342
  32. Nikita Kolobov, Maarten G. Goesten, Jorge Gascon. Metal–Organic Frameworks: Molecules or Semiconductors in Photocatalysis?. Angewandte Chemie International Edition 2021, 60 (50) , 26038-26052. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202106342
  33. Pathik Sahoo, Subrata Ghosh. Space and Time Crystal Engineering in Developing Futuristic Chemical Technology. ChemEngineering 2021, 5 (4) , 67. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemengineering5040067
  34. Kheibar Dashtian, Saeed Shahbazi, Meysam Tayebi, Zohreh Masoumi. A review on metal-organic frameworks photoelectrochemistry: A headlight for future applications. Coordination Chemistry Reviews 2021, 445 , 214097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2021.214097
  35. Pounraj Thanasekaran, Cing-Huei Su, Yen-Hsiang Liu, Kuang-Lieh Lu. Weak interactions in conducting metal–organic frameworks. Coordination Chemistry Reviews 2021, 442 , 213987. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2021.213987
  36. Ji‐Won Yoon, Jae‐Hyeok Kim, Changyeon Kim, Ho Won Jang, Jong‐Heun Lee. MOF‐Based Hybrids for Solar Fuel Production. Advanced Energy Materials 2021, 11 (27) https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202003052
  37. Wenhui Hu, Brian Pattengale, Jier Huang. Zeolitic imidazolate frameworks as intrinsic light harvesting and charge separation materials for photocatalysis. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2021, 154 (24) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0048720
  38. Kousik Das, Soumyajit Roy. Oxometalate- and Soft-Oxometalate-Based Hybrid Materials: From Synthesis to Catalytic Applications. Journal of Molecular and Engineering Materials 2020, 08 (03n04) https://doi.org/10.1142/S2251237320300028
  39. Samim Khan, Soumi Halder, Arka Dey, Basudeb Dutta, Partha Pratim Ray, Shouvik Chattopadhyay. Synthesis of an electrically conductive square planar copper( ii ) complex and its utilization in the fabrication of a photosensitive Schottky diode device and DFT study. New Journal of Chemistry 2020, 44 (27) , 11622-11630. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0NJ02162H
  40. Rui Li, Wei Li, Chun Jin, Qinyu He, Yinzhen Wang. Fabrication of ZIF-8@TiO2 micron composite via hydrothermal method with enhanced absorption and photocatalytic activities in tetracycline degradation. Journal of Alloys and Compounds 2020, 825 , 154008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.154008
  41. Partha Pratim Bag, Pathik Sahoo. Designing Metal-Organic Frameworks Based Photocatalyst for Specific Photocatalytic Reactions: A Crystal Engineering Approach. 2020, 141-186. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17638-9_6
  42. Sanggyu Chong, Jihan Kim. Rational modifications of PCN-700 to induce electrical conductivity: a computational study. Dalton Transactions 2020, 49 (1) , 102-113. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9DT03865E
  43. Xin‐Ping Wu, Indrani Choudhuri, Donald G. Truhlar. Computational Studies of Photocatalysis with Metal–Organic Frameworks. ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL MATERIALS 2019, 2 (4) , 251-263. https://doi.org/10.1002/eem2.12051
  44. Velayutham Ramasubbu, Poomani Ram Kumar, Ebrahim M. Mothi, K. Karuppasamy, Hyun-Seok Kim, T. Maiyalagan, Xavier Sahaya Shajan. Highly interconnected porous TiO2-Ni-MOF composite aerogel photoanodes for high power conversion efficiency in quasi-solid dye-sensitized solar cells. Applied Surface Science 2019, 496 , 143646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.143646
  45. Harmeet Kaur, Shashank Sundriyal, Virendra Kumar, Amit L. Sharma, Ki-Hyun Kim, Bo Wang, Akash Deep. Theoretical prediction of thermal and electronic properties of metal-organic frameworks. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry 2019, 80 , 136-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2019.07.041
  46. Abhishek Pathak, Jing-Wen Shen, Muhammad Usman, Ling-Fang Wei, Shruti Mendiratta, Yu-Shin Chang, Batjargal Sainbileg, Chin-May Ngue, Ruei-San Chen, Michitoshi Hayashi, Tzuoo-Tsair Luo, Fu-Rong Chen, Kuei-Hsien Chen, Tien-Wen Tseng, Li-Chyong Chen, Kuang-Lieh Lu. Integration of a (–Cu–S–)n plane in a metal–organic framework affords high electrical conductivity. Nature Communications 2019, 10 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-09682-0
  47. David Skoda, Tomas Kazda, Lukas Munster, Barbora Hanulikova, Ales Styskalik, Pierre Eloy, Damien P. Debecker, Petr Vyroubal, Lucie Simonikova, Ivo Kuritka. Microwave-assisted synthesis of a manganese metal–organic framework and its transformation to porous MnO/carbon nanocomposite utilized as a shuttle suppressing layer in lithium–sulfur batteries. Journal of Materials Science 2019, 54 (22) , 14102-14122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-019-03871-4
  48. Rakesh Purkait, Arka Dey, Sunanda Dey, Partha Pratim Ray, Chittaranjan Sinha. Design of a coumarinyl-picolinoyl hydrazide Schiff base for the fluorescence turn-on–off sequential sensing of Al 3+ and nitroaromatics, and electronic device fabrication. New Journal of Chemistry 2019, 43 (37) , 14979-14990. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9NJ03377G
  49. Tyler H. Bennett, Michael D. Vaughn, Seyyed Ali Davari, Kiman Park, Dibyendu Mukherjee, Bamin Khomami. Jolly green MOF: confinement and photoactivation of photosystem I in a metal–organic framework. Nanoscale Advances 2019, 1 (1) , 94-104. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8NA00093J
  50. Anindita Chakraborty, Dewan Azharul Islam, Himadri Acharya. Facile synthesis of CuO nanoparticles deposited zeolitic imidazolate frameworks (ZIF-8) for efficient photocatalytic dye degradation. Journal of Solid State Chemistry 2019, 269 , 566-574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssc.2018.10.036
  51. Yu-Jie Chang, Shi-Shu Yang, Xizhong Yu, Hao Zhang, Wenbin Shang, Zhi-Yuan Gu. Ultrahigh efficient laser desorption ionization of saccharides by Ti-based metal-organic frameworks nanosheets. Analytica Chimica Acta 2018, 1032 , 91-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2018.06.035
  52. Pavel M. Usov, Chanel F. Leong, Bun Chan, Mikihiro Hayashi, Hiroshi Kitagawa, Joshua J. Sutton, Keith C. Gordon, Idan Hod, Omar K. Farha, Joseph T. Hupp, Matthew Addicoat, Agnieszka Beata Kuc, Thomas Heine, Deanna M. D’Alessandro. Probing charge transfer characteristics in a donor–acceptor metal–organic framework by Raman spectroelectrochemistry and pressure-dependence studies. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 2018, 20 (40) , 25772-25779. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8CP04157A
  53. Yuanxing Fang, Yiwen Ma, Meifang Zheng, Pengju Yang, Abdullah M. Asiri, Xinchen Wang. Metal–organic frameworks for solar energy conversion by photoredox catalysis. Coordination Chemistry Reviews 2018, 373 , 83-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2017.09.013
  54. Zhengfeng Huang, Peimei Dong, Yanzhao Zhang, Xiaoxiao Nie, Xiya Wang, Xiwen Zhang. A ZIF-8 decorated TiO2 grid-like film with high CO2 adsorption for CO2 photoreduction. Journal of CO2 Utilization 2018, 24 , 369-375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2018.01.024
  55. Basudeb Dutta, Arka Dey, Kaushik Naskar, Faruk Ahmed, Rakesh Purkait, Sakhiul Islam, Soumen Ghosh, Chittaranjan Sinha, Partha Pratim Ray, Mohammad Hedayetullah Mir. Cu( ii )-Based binuclear compound for the application of photosensitive electronic devices. New Journal of Chemistry 2018, 42 (11) , 8629-8637. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8NJ00313K
  56. Basudeb Dutta, Rajkumar Jana, Chittaranjan Sinha, Partha Pratim Ray, Mohammad Hedayetullah Mir. Synthesis of a Cd( ii ) based 1D coordination polymer by in situ ligand generation and fabrication of a photosensitive electronic device. Inorganic Chemistry Frontiers 2018, 5 (8) , 1998-2005. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8QI00530C
  57. D.A. Zatsepin, D.W. Boukhvalov, E.Z. Kurmaev, A.F. Zatsepin, S.S. Kim, N.V. Gavrilov, I.S. Zhidkov. Enhanced clustering tendency of Cu-impurities with a number of oxygen vacancies in heavy carbon-loaded TiO2 - the bulk and surface morphologies. Solid State Sciences 2017, 71 , 130-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2017.07.013
  58. N. K. Zhevago, V. I. Glebov. Channeling and electromagnetic radiation of relativistic charged particles in metal-organic frameworks. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics 2017, 124 (6) , 845-853. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063776117060176
  59. D.A. Zatsepin, D.W. Boukhvalov, N.V. Gavrilov, E.Z. Kurmaev, A.F. Zatsepin, L. Cui, V. Ya. Shur, A.A. Esin. XPS-and-DFT analyses of the Pb 4f — Zn 3s and Pb 5d — O 2s overlapped ambiguity contributions to the final electronic structure of bulk and thin-film Pb-modulated zincite. Applied Surface Science 2017, 405 , 129-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.01.310
  60. D.A. Zatsepin, D.W. Boukhvalov, N.V. Gavrilov, A.F. Zatsepin, V.Ya. Shur, A.A. Esin, S.S. Kim, E.Z. Kurmaev. Soft electronic structure modulation of surface (thin-film) and bulk (ceramics) morphologies of TiO 2 -host by Pb-implantation: XPS-and-DFT characterization. Applied Surface Science 2017, 400 , 110-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.12.154
  61. James W. Maina, Cristina Pozo-Gonzalo, Lingxue Kong, Jürg Schütz, Matthew Hill, Ludovic F. Dumée. Metal organic framework based catalysts for CO 2 conversion. Materials Horizons 2017, 4 (3) , 345-361. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6MH00484A
  62. J. G. Santaclara, F. Kapteijn, J. Gascon, M. A. van der Veen. Understanding metal–organic frameworks for photocatalytic solar fuel production. CrystEngComm 2017, 19 (29) , 4118-4125. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7CE00006E
  63. Keith T. Butler, Christopher H. Hendon, Aron Walsh. Designing porous electronic thin-film devices: band offsets and heteroepitaxy. Faraday Discussions 2017, 201 , 207-219. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7FD00019G
  64. Keith T. Butler, Stephen D. Worrall, Christopher D. Molloy, Christopher H. Hendon, Martin P. Attfield, Robert A. W. Dryfe, Aron Walsh. Electronic structure design for nanoporous, electrically conductive zeolitic imidazolate frameworks. Journal of Materials Chemistry C 2017, 5 (31) , 7726-7731. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7TC03150E
  65. Stephen D. Worrall, Mark A. Bissett, Patrick I. Hill, Aidan P. Rooney, Sarah J. Haigh, Martin P. Attfield, Robert A.W. Dryfe. Metal-organic framework templated electrodeposition of functional gold nanostructures. Electrochimica Acta 2016, 222 , 361-369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2016.10.187
  66. L. Claudia Gómez‐Aguirre, Breogán Pato‐Doldán, Alessandro Stroppa, Li‐Ming Yang, Thomas Frauenheim, Jorge Mira, Susana Yáñez‐Vilar, Ramón Artiaga, Socorro Castro‐García, Manuel Sánchez‐Andújar, María Antonia Señarís‐Rodríguez. Coexistence of Three Ferroic Orders in the Multiferroic Compound [(CH 3 ) 4 N][Mn(N 3 ) 3 ] with Perovskite‐Like Structure. Chemistry – A European Journal 2016, 22 (23) , 7863-7870. https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.201503445
  67. Maxim A. Nasalevich, Christopher H. Hendon, Jara G. Santaclara, Katrine Svane, Bart van der Linden, Sergey L. Veber, Matvey V. Fedin, Arjan J. Houtepen, Monique A. van der Veen, Freek Kapteijn, Aron Walsh, Jorge Gascon. Electronic origins of photocatalytic activity in d0 metal organic frameworks. Scientific Reports 2016, 6 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/srep23676
  68. Keith T. Butler, Scott McKechnie, Pooya Azarhoosh, Mark van Schilfgaarde, David O. Scanlon, Aron Walsh. Quasi-particle electronic band structure and alignment of the V-VI-VII semiconductors SbSI, SbSBr, and SbSeI for solar cells. Applied Physics Letters 2016, 108 (11) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4943973
  69. Christopher H. Hendon, Jonathan Bonnefoy, Elsje Alessandra Quadrelli, Jerome Canivet, Matthew B. Chambers, Gwenaelle Rousse, Aron Walsh, Marc Fontecave, Caroline Mellot‐Draznieks. A Simple and Non‐Destructive Method for Assessing the Incorporation of Bipyridine Dicarboxylates as Linkers within Metal–Organic Frameworks. Chemistry – A European Journal 2016, 22 (11) , 3713-3718. https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.201600143
  70. Lei Sun, Michael G. Campbell, Mircea Dincă. Electrically Conductive Porous Metal–Organic Frameworks. Angewandte Chemie International Edition 2016, 55 (11) , 3566-3579. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201506219
  71. Lei Sun, Michael G. Campbell, Mircea Dincă. Elektrisch leitfähige poröse Metall‐organische Gerüstverbindungen. Angewandte Chemie 2016, 128 (11) , 3628-3642. https://doi.org/10.1002/ange.201506219
  72. Keith T. Butler, Yu Kumagai, Fumiyasu Oba, Aron Walsh. Screening procedure for structurally and electronically matched contact layers for high-performance solar cells: hybrid perovskites. Journal of Materials Chemistry C 2016, 4 (6) , 1149-1158. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5TC04091D
  73. François-Xavier Coudert, Alain H. Fuchs. Computational characterization and prediction of metal–organic framework properties. Coordination Chemistry Reviews 2016, 307 , 211-236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2015.08.001
  74. S. Castellanos, F. Kapteijn, J. Gascon. Photoswitchable metal organic frameworks: turn on the lights and close the windows. CrystEngComm 2016, 18 (22) , 4006-4012. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5CE02543E
  75. Abhijeet K. Chaudhari, Matthew R. Ryder, Jin-Chong Tan. Photonic hybrid crystals constructed from in situ host–guest nanoconfinement of a light-emitting complex in metal–organic framework pores. Nanoscale 2016, 8 (12) , 6851-6859. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6NR01122E
  76. Xiangjian Wang, Gaoyang Gou, Dawei Wang, Haiyan Xiao, Yang Liu, Ming Zhang, Brahim Dkhil, Xiaobing Ren, Xiaojie Lou. Structural, electronic and magnetic properties of metal–organic-framework perovskites [AmH][Mn(HCOO) 3 ]: a first-principles study. RSC Advances 2016, 6 (54) , 48779-48787. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RA04916H
  77. Adam J. Jackson, Jonathan M. Skelton, Christopher H. Hendon, Keith T. Butler, Aron Walsh. Crystal structure optimisation using an auxiliary equation of state. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2015, 143 (18) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4934716
  78. Gregor Kieslich, Shohei Kumagai, Keith T. Butler, Takuro Okamura, Christopher H. Hendon, Shijing Sun, Masahiro Yamashita, Aron Walsh, Anthony K. Cheetham. Role of entropic effects in controlling the polymorphism in formate ABX 3 metal–organic frameworks. Chemical Communications 2015, 51 (85) , 15538-15541. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5CC06190C
  79. Keith T. Butler. Morphological control of band offsets for transparent bipolar heterojunctions: The Bädeker diode. physica status solidi (a) 2015, 212 (7) , 1461-1465. https://doi.org/10.1002/pssa.201532004
  80. Christopher H. Hendon, Aron Walsh. Chemical principles underpinning the performance of the metal–organic framework HKUST-1. Chemical Science 2015, 6 (7) , 3674-3683. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5SC01489A

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces

Cite this: ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 24, 22044–22050
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/am507016r
Published December 1, 2014

Copyright © 2014 American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under these Terms of Use.

Article Views

4365

Altmetric

-

Citations

Learn about these metrics

Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.

  • Abstract

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. Crystallographic unit cell of MIL-125 (right): a catalytically active and photochromic material used for the oxidation of alcohols to aldehydes. The (HSE06) band structure of MIL-125 (left) shows localized electronic states, with no significant band dispersion in reciprocal space. The energy scale is absolute, with respect to the vacuum level determined using the electrostatic potential at the center of the pore.

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. Definition of the contributions to the total deformation potential (αα) in metal–organic frameworks. There is a change in the electronic structure following an instantaneous “vertical” volume change (αi), and an additional change following atomic relaxation (Δα) termed hybrid deformation.

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. Calculated (DFT-HSE06) valence and conduction band energy levels of the five materials studied, which are aligned through the Hartree potential in the center of their pores (following ref 39). Inset in the band gap of each material are shaded lines indicating changes in the valence and conduction band positions as the volume (external pressure) is varied. Above and below each material is the electron density associated with the band edge wave functions; note that the density is associated with organic ligands, with the exception of MOF-5 (valence band, ZnO units) and MIL-125 (conduction band, TiO2 units).

    Figure 4

    Figure 4. Schematic of a MOF-based sensor. (a) The functionalized system is at its equilibrium volume in the absence of an absorbate; there is a band offset with another semiconducting material inside the chemiresistor. (b) The framework selectively uptakes caffeine resulting in a volume expansion. The deformation of MOF-5 shifts the band edge reducing the resistance, which is measured as a change in the circuit voltage.

  • References


    This article references 60 other publications.

    1. 1
      Mason, J. A.; Veenstra, M.; Long, J. R. Evaluating Metal-organic Frameworks for Natural Gas Storage Chem. Sci. 2014, 5, 32 51
    2. 2
      Murray, L. J.; Dincǎ, M.; Long, J. R. Hydrogen Storage in Metal-organic Frameworks Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009, 38, 1294 1314
    3. 3
      Dzubak, A. L.; Lin, L. C.; Kim, J.; Swisher, J. A.; Poloni, R.; Maximoff, S. N.; Smit, B.; Gagliardi, L. Ab initio Carbon Capture in Open-site Metal-organic Frameworks Nat. Chem. 2012, 4, 810 816
    4. 4
      Lee, S.-J.; Bae, Y.-S. Can Metal-Organic Frameworks Attain New DOE Targets for On-Board Methane Storage by Increasing Methane Heat of Adsorption? J. Phys. Chem. C 2014, 118, 19833 19841
    5. 5
      Cheetham, A. K.; Rao, C. N. R. There’s Room in the Middle Science 2007, 318, 58 59
    6. 6
      Rao, C. N. R.; Cheetham, A. K.; Thirumurugan, A. Hybrid Inorganic-organic Materials: a New Family in Condensed Matter Physics J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 2008, 20, 083202 083223
    7. 7
      Takahashi, Y.; Obara, R.; Nakagawa, K.; Nakano, M.; Tokita, J.-y.; Inabe, T. Tunable Charge Transport in Soluble Organic-Inorganic Hybrid Semiconductors Chem. Mater. 2007, 19, 6312 6316
    8. 8
      Li, H.-H.; Chen, Z.-R.; Cheng, L.-C.; Liu, J.-B.; Chen, X.-B.; Li, J.-Q. A New Hybrid Optical Semiconductor based on Polymeric Iodoplumbate Co-templated by both Organic Cation and Polyiodide Anion Cryst. Growth Des. 2008, 8, 4355 4358
    9. 9
      Turner, D. L.; Vaid, T. P.; Stephens, P. W.; Stone, K. H.; DiPasquale, A. G.; Rheingold, A. L. Semiconducting Lead-sulfur-organic Network Solids J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 14 15
    10. 10
      Ki, W.; Li, J. A Semiconductor Bulk Material that Emits Direct White Light J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 8114 8115
    11. 11
      Stroppa, A.; Jain, P.; Barone, P.; Marsman, M.; Perez-Mato, J. M.; Cheetham, A. K.; Kroto, H. W.; Picozzi, S. Electric Control of Magnetization and Interplay between Orbital Ordering and Ferroelectricity in a Multiferroic Metal-organic Framework Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 5847 5972
    12. 12
      Lee, D. Y.; Shinde, D. V.; Yoon, S. J.; Cho, K. N.; Lee, W.; Shrestha, N. K.; Han, S.-H. Cu-Based Metal-Organic Frameworks for Photovoltaic Application J. Phys. Chem. C 2013, 118, 16328 16334
    13. 13
      Hendon, C. H.; Tiana, D.; Walsh, A. Conductive metal-organic frameworks and networks: fact or fantasy? Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2012, 14, 13120 13132
    14. 14
      Talin, A. A.; Centrone, A.; Ford, A. C.; Foster, M. E.; Stavila, V.; Haney, P.; Kinney, R. A.; Szalai, V.; El Gabaly, F.; Yoon, H. P.; Léonard, F.; Allendorf, M. D. Tunable Electrical Conductivity in Metal-organic Framework Thin-film Devices Science 2014, 343, 66 69
    15. 15
      Wu, D.; Guo, Z.; Yin, X.; Pang, Q.; Tu, B.; Zhang, L.; Wang, Y.-G.; Li, Q. Metal-Organic Frameworks as Cathode Materials for Li-O2 Batteries Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 3258 3262
    16. 16
      Allendorf, M. D.; Schwartzberg, A.; Stavila, V.; Talin, A. A. A Roadmap to Implementing Metal-organic Frameworks in Electronic Devices: Challenges and Critical Directions Chem.—Eur. J. 2011, 17, 11372 11388
    17. 17
      Bardeen, J.; Shockley, W. Deformation Potentials and Mobilities in Non-Polar Crystals Phys. Rev. 1950, 80, 72 80
    18. 18
      Coudert, F.-X.; Boutin, A.; Fuchs, A. H.; Neimark, A. V. Adsorption Deformation and Structural Transitions in MetalOrganic Frameworks: From the Unit Cell to the Crystal J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2013, 4, 3198 3205
    19. 19
      Wang, Z.; Liu, J.; Lukose, B.; Gu, Z.; Weidler, P. G.; Gliemann, H.; Heine, T.; Wöll, C. Nanoporous Designer Solids with Huge Lattice Constant Gradients: Multiheteroepitaxy of Metal-Organic Frameworks Nano Lett. 2014, 14, 1526 1529
    20. 20
      Saines, P. J.; Barton, P. T.; Jura, M.; Knight, K. S.; Cheetham, A. K. Cobalt Adipate, Co(C6H8O4): Antiferromagnetic Structure, Unusual Thermal Expansion and Magnetoelastic Coupling Mater. Horiz. 2014, 1, 332 337
    21. 21
      Collings, I. E.; Tucker, M. G.; Keen, D. A.; Goodwin, A. L. Geometric Switching of Linear to Area Negative Thermal Expansion in Uniaxial Metal-organic Frameworks CrystEngComm 2014, 16, 3498 3506
    22. 22
      Goodwin, A. L.; Calleja, M.; Conterio, M. J.; Dove, M. T.; Evans, J. S. O.; Keen, D. A.; Peters, L.; Tucker, M. G. Colossal Positive and Negative Thermal Expansion in the Framework Material Ag3[Co(CN)6] Science 2008, 319, 794 797
    23. 23
      Van de Walle, C. G.; Martin, R. M. Absolute Deformation Potentials: Formulation and Ab initio Calculations for Semiconductors Phys. Rev. Lett. 1989, 62, 2028 2031
    24. 24
      Li, Y.-H.; Gong, X. G.; Wei, S.-H. Ab initio Calculation of Hydrostatic Absolute Deformation Potential of Semiconductors Appl. Phys. Lett. 2006, 88, 042104 042106
    25. 25
      Van de Walle, C. G. Band Lineups and Deformation Potentials in the Model-solid Theory Phys. Rev. B 1989, 39, 1871 1883
    26. 26
      Cardona, M.; Christensen, N. E. Acoustic Deformation Potentials and Heterostructure Band Offsets in Semiconductors Phys. Rev. B 1987, 35, 6182 6194
    27. 27
      Wei, S.-H.; Zunger, A. Predicted Band-gap Pressure Coefficients of all Diamond and Zinc-blende Semiconductors: Chemical Trends Phys. Rev. B 1999, 60, 5404 5411
    28. 28
      Łepkowski, S. P.; Gorczyca, I.; Stefan n¢ska Skrobas, K.; Christensen, N. E.; Svane, A. Deformation Potentials in AlGaN and InGaN Alloys and their Impact on Optical Polarization Properties of Nitride Quantum Wells Phys. Rev. B 2013, 88, 081202 081206
    29. 29
      Tranchemontagne, D.; Hunt, J.; Yaghi, O. Room Temperature Synthesis of Metal-organic Frameworks: MOF-5, MOF-74, MOF-177, MOF-199, and IRMOF-0 Tetrahedron 2008, 64, 8553 8557
    30. 30
      Dan-Hardi, M.; Serre, C.; Frot, T.; Rozes, L.; Maurin, G.; Sanchez, C.; Férey, G. A New Photoactive Crystalline Highly Porous Titanium(IV) Dicarboxylate J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 10857 10859
    31. 31
      Dietzel, P.; Georgiev, P.; Eckert, J. Interaction of Hydrogen with Accessible Metal Sites in the Metal-organic Frameworks M2(dhtp)(CPO-27-M; M= Ni, Co, Mg) Chem. Commun. 2010, 2, 4962 4964
    32. 32
      Park, K. S.; Ni, Z.; Côté, A. P.; Choi, J. Y.; Huang, R.; Uribe-Romo, F. J.; Chae, H. K.; O’Keeffe, M.; Yaghi, O. M. Exceptional Chemical and Thermal Stability of Zeolitic Imidazolate Frameworks Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2006, 103, 10186 10191
    33. 33
      Côté, A. P.; Benin, A. I.; Ockwig, N. W.; O’Keeffe, M.; Matzger, A. J.; Yaghi, O. M. Porous, Crystalline, Covalent Organic Frameworks Science 2005, 310, 1166 1170
    34. 34
      Lukose, B.; Kuc, A.; Frenzel, J.; Heine, T. On the Reticular Construction Concept of Covalent Organic Frameworks Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2010, 1, 60 70
    35. 35
      Kresse, G.; Furthmüller, J. Efficient Iterative Schemes for Ab initio Total-energy Calculations using a Plane-wave Basis Set Phys. Rev. B 1996, 54, 11169 11186
    36. 36
      Kresse, G.; Joubert, D. From Ultrasoft Pseudopotentials to the Projector Augmented-wave Method Phys. Rev. B 1999, 59, 1758 1775
    37. 37
      Perdew, J. P.; Ruzsinszky, A.; Csonka, G. I.; Vydrov, O. A.; Scuseria, G. E.; Constantin, L. A.; Zhou, X.; Burke, K. Restoring the Density-Gradient Expansion for Exchange in Solids and Surfaces Phys. Rev. Lett. 2008, 100, 136406 136409
    38. 38
      Krukau, A. V.; Vydrov, O. A.; Izmaylov, A. F.; Scuseria, G. E. Influence of the Exchange Screening Parameter on the Performance of Screened Hybrid Functionals J. Chem. Phys. 2006, 125, 224106 224110
    39. 39
      Butler, K. T.; Hendon, C. H.; Walsh, A. Electronic Chemical Potentials of Porous Metal-organic Frameworks J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 2703 2706
    40. 40
      https://github.com/WMD-Bath/MacroDensity (accessed 05/08/2014).
    41. 41
      Yu, P. Y.; Cardona, M. Fundamentals of Semiconductors, 3rd ed.; Springer: Berlin, 2005.
    42. 42
      Harrison, W. A. Electronic Structure and the Properties of Solids: The Physics of the Chemical Bond; Dover Publications: New York, 1989.
    43. 43
      Hückel, E. Quantentheoretische Beiträge zum Benzolproblem Z. Phys. 1931, 70, 204 286
    44. 44
      Hoffmann, R. An Extended Hückel Theory. I. Hydrocarbons J. Chem. Phys. 1963, 39, 1397 1412
    45. 45
      Harrison, W. A. Theory of the Two-center Bond Phys. Rev. B 1983, 27, 3592 3604
    46. 46
      Zhu, Y. Z.; Chen, G. D.; Ye, H.; Walsh, A.; Moon, C. Y.; Wei, S.-H. Electronic Structure and Phase Stability of MgO, ZnO, CdO, and Related Ternary Alloys Phys. Rev. B 2008, 77, 245209 245215
    47. 47
      Vermoortele, F.; Maes, M.; Moghadam, P. Z.; Lennox, M. J.; Ragon, F.; Boulhout, M.; Biswas, S.; Laurier, K. G. M.; Beurroies, I.; Denoyel, R.; Roeffaers, M.; Stock, N.; Düren, T.; Serre, C.; De Vos, D. E. p-Xylene-Selective Metal-Organic Frameworks: A Case of Topology-Directed Selectivity J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 18526 18529
    48. 48
      Bonifacio, L. D.; Puzzo, D. P.; Breslav, S.; Willey, B. M.; McGeer, A.; Ozin, G. A. Towards the Photonic Nose: A Novel Platform for Molecule and Bacteria Identification Adv. Mater. 2010, 22, 1351 1354
    49. 49
      Yanai, N.; Kitayama, K.; Hijikata, Y.; Sato, H.; Matsuda, R.; Kubota, Y.; Takata, M.; Mizuno, M.; Uemura, T.; Kitagawa, S. Gas Detection by Structural Variations of Fluorescent Guest Molecules in a Flexible Porous Coordination Polymer Nat. Mater. 2011, 10, 787 793
    50. 50
      Eddaoudi, M.; Kim, J.; Rosi, N.; Vodak, D.; Wachter, J.; O’Keeffe, M.; Yaghi, O. M. Systematic Design of Pore Size and Functionality in Isoreticular MOFs and their Application in Methane Storage Science 2002, 295, 469 472
    51. 51
      Dincǎ, M.; Long, J. R. Strong H2 Binding and Selective Gas Adsorption within the Microporous Coordination Solid Mg3(O2C-C+10H6-CO2)3 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 9376 9377
    52. 52
      Wang, Z.; Cohen, S. M. Postsynthetic Modification of Metal-organic Frameworks Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009, 38, 1315 1329
    53. 53
      Lin, X.; Blake, A. J.; Wilson, C.; Sun, X. Z.; Champness, N. R.; George, M. W.; Hubberstey, P.; Mokaya, R.; Schröder, M. A Porous Framework Polymer Based on a Zinc(II) 4,4′-Bipyridine-2,6,2′,6′-tetracarboxylate: Synthesis, Structure, and “Zeolite-Like” Behaviors J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 10745 10753
    54. 54
      Kreno, L. E.; Leong, K.; Farha, O. K.; Allendorf, M.; Van Duyne, R. P.; Hupp, J. T. Metal-Organic Framework Materials as Chemical Sensors Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 1105 1125
    55. 55
      Salles, F.; Ghoufi, A.; Maurin, G.; Bell, R. G.; Mellot-Draznieks, C.; Férey, G. Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Breathing MOFs: Structural Transformations of MIL-53(Cr) upon Thermal Activation and CO2 Adsorption Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 8487 8491
    56. 56
      Coudert, F.-X.; Mellot-Draznieks, C.; Fuchs, A. H.; Boutin, A. Prediction of Breathing and Gate-opening Transitions upon Binary Mixture Adsorption in Metal-organic Frameworks J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 11329 11331
    57. 57
      Brozek, C.; Dincǎ, M. Ti3+, V2+/3+, Cr2+/3+, Mn2+, and Fe2+ Substituted MOF-5 and Redox Reactivity in Cr- and Fe-MOF-5 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 12886 12891
    58. 58
      Hendon, C. H.; Tiana, D.; Vaid, T. P.; Walsh, A. Thermodynamic and Electronic Properties of Tunable II-VI and IV-VI Semiconductor based Metal-organic Frameworks from Computational Chemistry J. Mater. Chem. C 2013, 1, 95 100
    59. 59
      Hendon, C. H.; Tiana, D.; Fontecave, M.; Sanchez, C.; D’arras, L.; Sassoye, C.; Rozes, L.; Mellot-Draznieks, C.; Walsh, A. Engineering the Optical Response of the Titanium-MIL-125 Metal-Organic Framework through Ligand Functionalization J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 10942 10945
    60. 60
      Feng, X.; Ding, X.; Jiang, D. Covalent Organic Frameworks Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 6010 6022
  • Supporting Information

    Supporting Information


    Additional information concerning the computational methods. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.


    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.