Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

You’ve supercharged your research process with ACS and Mendeley!

STEP 1:
Click to create an ACS ID

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

MENDELEY PAIRING EXPIRED
Your Mendeley pairing has expired. Please reconnect
ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
Probing the Allosteric Mechanism in Pyrrolysyl-tRNA Synthetase Using Energy-Weighted Network Formalism
My Activity
    Article

    Probing the Allosteric Mechanism in Pyrrolysyl-tRNA Synthetase Using Energy-Weighted Network Formalism
    Click to copy article linkArticle link copied!

    View Author Information
    Molecular Biophysics Unit, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012, India
    Phone: +91-80-22932611. Fax: +91-80-23600535. E-mail: [email protected]
    Other Access OptionsSupporting Information (3)

    Biochemistry

    Cite this: Biochemistry 2011, 50, 28, 6225–6236
    Click to copy citationCitation copied!
    https://doi.org/10.1021/bi200306u
    Published June 8, 2011
    Copyright © 2011 American Chemical Society

    Abstract

    Click to copy section linkSection link copied!
    Abstract Image

    Pyrrolysyl-tRNA synthetase (PylRS) is an atypical enzyme responsible for charging tRNAPyl with pyrrolysine, despite lacking precise tRNA anticodon recognition. This dimeric protein exhibits allosteric regulation of function, like any other tRNA synthetases. In this study we examine the paths of allosteric communication at the atomic level, through energy-weighted networks of Desulfitobacterium hafniense PylRS (DhPylRS) and its complexes with tRNAPyl and activated pyrrolysine. We performed molecular dynamics simulations of the structures of these complexes to obtain an ensemble conformation–population perspective. Weighted graph parameters relevant to identifying key players and ties in the context of social networks such as edge/node betweenness, closeness index, and the concept of funneling are explored in identifying key residues and interactions leading to shortest paths of communication in the structure networks of DhPylRS. Further, the changes in the status of important residues and connections and the costs of communication due to ligand induced perturbations are evaluated. The optimal, suboptimal, and preexisting paths are also investigated. Many of these parameters have exhibited an enhanced asymmetry between the two subunits of the dimeric protein, especially in the pretransfer complex, leading us to conclude that encoding of function goes beyond the sequence/structure of proteins. The local and global perturbations mediated by appropriate ligands and their influence on the equilibrium ensemble of conformations also have a significant role to play in the functioning of proteins. Taking a comprehensive view of these observations, we propose that the origin of many functional aspects (allostery and half-sites reactivity in the case of DhPylRS) lies in subtle rearrangements of interactions and dynamics at a global level.

    Copyright © 2011 American Chemical Society

    Read this article

    To access this article, please review the available access options below.

    Get instant access

    Purchase Access

    Read this article for 48 hours. Check out below using your ACS ID or as a guest.

    Recommended

    Access through Your Institution

    You may have access to this article through your institution.

    Your institution does not have access to this content. Add or change your institution or let them know you’d like them to include access.

    Supporting Information

    Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

    Supporting figures (Figures S1–S18), supporting tables (Tables S1–S5), and Supplemental Methods. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.

    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

    Cited By

    Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

    This article is cited by 46 publications.

    1. Zhongjie Han, Xiaoli Wang, Zhixiang Wu, Chunhua Li. Study of the Allosteric Mechanism of Human Mitochondrial Phenylalanyl-tRNA Synthetase by Transfer Entropy via an Improved Gaussian Network Model and Co-evolution Analyses. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 2023, 14 (14) , 3452-3460. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.3c00366
    2. Amanda Tse and Gennady M. Verkhivker . Molecular Dynamics Simulations and Structural Network Analysis of c-Abl and c-Src Kinase Core Proteins: Capturing Allosteric Mechanisms and Communication Pathways from Residue Centrality. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 2015, 55 (8) , 1645-1662. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.5b00240
    3. Kristin Blacklock and Gennady M. Verkhivker . Experimentally Guided Structural Modeling and Dynamics Analysis of Hsp90–p53 Interactions: Allosteric Regulation of the Hsp90 Chaperone by a Client Protein. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 2013, 53 (11) , 2962-2978. https://doi.org/10.1021/ci400434g
    4. James M. Johnson, Brianne L. Sanford, Alexander M. Strom, Stephanie N. Tadayon, Brent P. Lehman, Arrianna M. Zirbes, Sudeep Bhattacharyya, Karin Musier-Forsyth, and Sanchita Hati . Multiple Pathways Promote Dynamical Coupling between Catalytic Domains in Escherichia coli Prolyl-tRNA Synthetase. Biochemistry 2013, 52 (25) , 4399-4412. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi400079h
    5. Ailan Huang, Fuping Lu, Fufeng Liu. Exploring the molecular mechanism of cold‐adaption of an alkaline protease mutant by molecular dynamics simulations and residue interaction network. Protein Science 2023, 32 (12) https://doi.org/10.1002/pro.4837
    6. Anushka Halder, Arinnia Anto, Varsha Subramanyan, Moitrayee Bhattacharyya, Smitha Vishveshwara, Saraswathi Vishveshwara. Surveying the Side-Chain Network Approach to Protein Structure and Dynamics: The SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein as an Illustrative Case. Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences 2020, 7 https://doi.org/10.3389/fmolb.2020.596945
    7. Qi Shao, Weikang Gong, Chunhua Li. A study on allosteric communication in U1A-snRNA binding interactions: network analysis combined with molecular dynamics data. Biophysical Chemistry 2020, 264 , 106393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpc.2020.106393
    8. Pitak Chuawong, Wirot Likittrakulwong, Suwimon Suebka, Nuttapon Wiriyatanakorn, Patchreenart Saparpakorn, Amata Taweesablamlert, Wanwisa Sudprasert, Tamara Hendrickson, Jisnuson Svasti. Anticodon‐binding domain swapping in a nondiscriminating aspartyl‐tRNA synthetase reveals contributions to tRNA specificity and catalytic activity. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics 2020, 88 (9) , 1133-1142. https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.25881
    9. Gennady M. Verkhivker, Steve Agajanian, Guang Hu, Peng Tao. Allosteric Regulation at the Crossroads of New Technologies: Multiscale Modeling, Networks, and Machine Learning. Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences 2020, 7 https://doi.org/10.3389/fmolb.2020.00136
    10. Lilian Hernández Alvarez, Diego Enry Barreto Gomes, Jorge Enrique Hernández González, Pedro Geraldo Pascutti, . Dissecting a novel allosteric mechanism of cruzain: A computer-aided approach. PLOS ONE 2019, 14 (1) , e0211227. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211227
    11. Dmitrii Shcherbinin, Alexander Veselovsky. Analysis of Protein Structures Using Residue Interaction Networks. 2019, 55-69. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05282-9_3
    12. Lindy Astl, Amanda Tse, Gennady M. Verkhivker. Interrogating Regulatory Mechanisms in Signaling Proteins by Allosteric Inhibitors and Activators: A Dynamic View Through the Lens of Residue Interaction Networks. 2019, 187-223. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8719-7_9
    13. Pau Creixell, Jai P. Pandey, Antonio Palmeri, Moitrayee Bhattacharyya, Marc Creixell, Rama Ranganathan, David Pincus, Michael B. Yaffe. Hierarchical Organization Endows the Kinase Domain with Regulatory Plasticity. Cell Systems 2018, 7 (4) , 371-383.e4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cels.2018.08.008
    14. Onur Serçinoğlu, Pemra Ozbek. gRINN: a tool for calculation of residue interaction energies and protein energy network analysis of molecular dynamics simulations. Nucleic Acids Research 2018, 46 (W1) , W554-W562. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gky381
    15. Gennady M. Verkhivker. Computational Modeling of the Hsp90 Interactions with Cochaperones and Small-Molecule Inhibitors. 2018, 253-273. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7477-1_19
    16. , Dimos Kapetis, Jenny Sassone, Yang Yang, Barbara Galbardi, Markos N. Xenakis, Ronald L. Westra, Radek Szklarczyk, Patrick Lindsey, Catharina G. Faber, Monique Gerrits, Ingemar S. J. Merkies, Sulayman D. Dib-Hajj, Massimo Mantegazza, Stephen G. Waxman, Giuseppe Lauria. Network topology of NaV1.7 mutations in sodium channel-related painful disorders. BMC Systems Biology 2017, 11 (1) https://doi.org/10.1186/s12918-016-0382-0
    17. Francesca Fanelli, Angelo Felline. Uncovering GPCR and G Protein Function by Protein Structure Network Analysis. 2017, 198-220. https://doi.org/10.1039/9781788010139-00198
    18. Amit Kumawat, Suman Chakrabarty. Hidden electrostatic basis of dynamic allostery in a PDZ domain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2017, 114 (29) https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1705311114
    19. Gabrielle Stetz, Gennady M. Verkhivker, . Computational Analysis of Residue Interaction Networks and Coevolutionary Relationships in the Hsp70 Chaperones: A Community-Hopping Model of Allosteric Regulation and Communication. PLOS Computational Biology 2017, 13 (1) , e1005299. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005299
    20. Ora Schueler-Furman, Shoshana J Wodak. Computational approaches to investigating allostery. Current Opinion in Structural Biology 2016, 41 , 159-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbi.2016.06.017
    21. Manju M. Hingorani. Mismatch binding, ADP–ATP exchange and intramolecular signaling during mismatch repair. DNA Repair 2016, 38 , 24-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2015.11.017
    22. Kathleen F. O'Rourke, Scott D. Gorman, David D. Boehr. Biophysical and computational methods to analyze amino acid interaction networks in proteins. Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal 2016, 14 , 245-251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csbj.2016.06.002
    23. G. M. Verkhivker. Molecular dynamics simulations and modelling of the residue interaction networks in the BRAF kinase complexes with small molecule inhibitors: probing the allosteric effects of ligand-induced kinase dimerization and paradoxical activation. Molecular BioSystems 2016, 12 (10) , 3146-3165. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6MB00298F
    24. Yuanyuan Jiang, Yuan Yuan, Xi Zhang, Tao Liang, Yanzhi Guo, Menglong Li, Xumei Pu. Use of network model to explore dynamic and allosteric properties of three GPCR homodimers. RSC Advances 2016, 6 (108) , 106327-106339. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RA18243G
    25. Soma Ghosh, Nagasuma Chandra, Saraswathi Vishveshwara, . Mechanism of Iron-Dependent Repressor (IdeR) Activation and DNA Binding: A Molecular Dynamics and Protein Structure Network Study. PLOS Computational Biology 2015, 11 (12) , e1004500. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004500
    26. Wael I. Karain, Nael I. Qaraeen. Weighted protein residue networks based on joint recurrences between residues. BMC Bioinformatics 2015, 16 (1) https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-015-0621-1
    27. Sourav Roy, Sankar Basu, Dipak Dasgupta, Dhananjay Bhattacharyya, Rahul Banerjee, . The Unfolding MD Simulations of Cyclophilin: Analyzed by Surface Contact Networks and Their Associated Metrics. PLOS ONE 2015, 10 (11) , e0142173. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142173
    28. Alexandr P. Kornev, Susan S. Taylor. Dynamics-Driven Allostery in Protein Kinases. Trends in Biochemical Sciences 2015, 40 (11) , 628-647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibs.2015.09.002
    29. Laurent Vuillon, Claire Lesieur. From local to global changes in proteins: a network view. Current Opinion in Structural Biology 2015, 31 , 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbi.2015.02.015
    30. A. Tse, G. M. Verkhivker. Small-world networks of residue interactions in the Abl kinase complexes with cancer drugs: topology of allosteric communication pathways can determine drug resistance effects. Molecular BioSystems 2015, 11 (7) , 2082-2095. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5MB00246J
    31. Ushasi Roy, Rajdeep Kaur Grewal, Soumen Roy. Complex Networks and Systems Biology. 2015, 129-150. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9514-2_7
    32. Rachel L. French, Nirupama Gupta, Paul R. Copeland, Miljan Simonović. Structural Asymmetry of the Terminal Catalytic Complex in Selenocysteine Synthesis. Journal of Biological Chemistry 2014, 289 (42) , 28783-28794. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M114.597955
    33. Gennady M. Verkhivker. Computational Studies of Allosteric Regulation in the Hsp90 Molecular Chaperone: From Functional Dynamics and Protein Structure Networks to Allosteric Communications and Targeted Anti-Cancer Modulators. Israel Journal of Chemistry 2014, 54 (8-9) , 1052-1064. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijch.201300143
    34. Kristin Blacklock, Gennady M. Verkhivker, . Computational Modeling of Allosteric Regulation in the Hsp90 Chaperones: A Statistical Ensemble Analysis of Protein Structure Networks and Allosteric Communications. PLoS Computational Biology 2014, 10 (6) , e1003679. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003679
    35. Saraswathi Vishveshwara. Impact of theoretical chemistry on chemical and biological sciences. Resonance 2014, 19 (4) , 347-367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12045-014-0040-z
    36. Kristin Blacklock, Gennady M. Verkhivker, . Allosteric Regulation of the Hsp90 Dynamics and Stability by Client Recruiter Cochaperones: Protein Structure Network Modeling. PLoS ONE 2014, 9 (1) , e86547. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0086547
    37. Soma Ghosh, Saraswathi Vishveshwara. Ranking the quality of protein structure models using sidechain based network properties. F1000Research 2014, 3 , 17. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.3-17.v1
    38. Moitrayee Bhattacharyya, Chanda R. Bhat, Saraswathi Vishveshwara. An automated approach to network features of protein structure ensembles. Protein Science 2013, 22 (10) , 1399-1416. https://doi.org/10.1002/pro.2333
    39. Simona Mariani, Daniele Dell'Orco, Angelo Felline, Francesco Raimondi, Francesca Fanelli, . Network and Atomistic Simulations Unveil the Structural Determinants of Mutations Linked to Retinal Diseases. PLoS Computational Biology 2013, 9 (8) , e1003207. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003207
    40. Kristin Blacklock, Gennady M. Verkhivker, . Differential Modulation of Functional Dynamics and Allosteric Interactions in the Hsp90-Cochaperone Complexes with p23 and Aha1: A Computational Study. PLoS ONE 2013, 8 (8) , e71936. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0071936
    41. Richard Giegé, Mathias Springer, . Aminoacyl-tRNA Synthetases in the Bacterial World. EcoSal Plus 2012, 5 (1) https://doi.org/10.1128/ecosalplus.4.2.1
    42. John Eargle, Zaida Luthey-Schulten. NetworkView : 3D display and analysis of protein·RNA interaction networks. Bioinformatics 2012, 28 (22) , 3000-3001. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts546
    43. A. R. Atilgan, C. Atilgan. Local motifs in proteins combine to generate global functional moves. Briefings in Functional Genomics 2012, 11 (6) , 479-488. https://doi.org/10.1093/bfgp/els027
    44. M. S. Vijayabaskar, Saraswathi Vishveshwara, . Insights into the Fold Organization of TIM Barrel from Interaction Energy Based Structure Networks. PLoS Computational Biology 2012, 8 (5) , e1002505. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002505
    45. Micol De Ruvo, Alessandro Giuliani, Paola Paci, Daniele Santoni, Luisa Di Paola. Shedding light on protein–ligand binding by graph theory: The topological nature of allostery. Biophysical Chemistry 2012, 165-166 , 21-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpc.2012.03.001
    46. Tyler J. Glembo, Daniel W. Farrell, Z. Nevin Gerek, M. F. Thorpe, S. Banu Ozkan, . Collective Dynamics Differentiates Functional Divergence in Protein Evolution. PLoS Computational Biology 2012, 8 (3) , e1002428. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002428

    Biochemistry

    Cite this: Biochemistry 2011, 50, 28, 6225–6236
    Click to copy citationCitation copied!
    https://doi.org/10.1021/bi200306u
    Published June 8, 2011
    Copyright © 2011 American Chemical Society

    Article Views

    1013

    Altmetric

    -

    Citations

    Learn about these metrics

    Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

    Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

    The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.