logo
CONTENT TYPES

Predicting Stability of DNA Duplexes in Solutions Containing Magnesium and Monovalent Cations

View Author Information
Integrated DNA Technologies, 1710 Commercial Park, Coralville, Iowa 52241
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Telephone: +1 319 626-8459 . Fax: +1 319 626- 9621. E-mail: [email protected]
Cite this: Biochemistry 2008, 47, 19, 5336–5353
Publication Date (Web):April 19, 2008
https://doi.org/10.1021/bi702363u
Copyright © 2008 American Chemical Society
Authors ChoiceACS AuthorChoice
Article Views
16206
Altmetric
-
Citations
LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICS

Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.

PDF (1 MB)
Supporting Info (1)»

Abstract

Accurate predictions of DNA stability in physiological and enzyme buffers are important for the design of many biological and biochemical assays. We therefore investigated the effects of magnesium, potassium, sodium, Tris ions, and deoxynucleoside triphosphates on melting profiles of duplex DNA oligomers and collected large melting data sets. An empirical correction function was developed that predicts melting temperatures, transition enthalpies, entropies, and free energies in buffers containing magnesium and monovalent cations. The new correction function significantly improves the accuracy of predictions and accounts for ion concentration, G-C base pair content, and length of the oligonucleotides. The competitive effects of potassium and magnesium ions were characterized. If the concentration ratio of [Mg2+]0.5/[Mon+] is less than 0.22 M−1/2, monovalent ions (K+, Na+) are dominant. Effects of magnesium ions dominate and determine duplex stability at higher ratios. Typical reaction conditions for PCR and DNA sequencing (1.5−5 mM magnesium and 20−100 mM monovalent cations) fall within this range. Conditions were identified where monovalent and divalent cations compete and their stability effects are more complex. When duplexes denature, some of the Mg2+ ions associated with the DNA are released. The number of released magnesium ions per phosphate charge is sequence dependent and decreases surprisingly with increasing oligonucleotide length.

Interactions of magnesium, sodium and potassium ions with DNA1 and RNA molecules are important for essential functions of living cells and for molecular biology applications. Both divalent and monovalent cations bind to nucleic acid molecules and affect their physical properties (1). Magnesium cations stabilize nucleic acid duplexes and facilitate their folding into secondary and tertiary structures (2), which are biologically active. Mg2+ ions are also necessary cofactors of many enzymatic reactions involving nucleic acids (3). The total magnesium concentrations in various cells range from 5 to 30 mM; however, free Mg2+ concentrations are tightly controlled between 0.4 and 1.2 mM (4). Binding of monovalent cations also increases duplex stability. The major intracellular monovalent cation is K+, while the major monovalent cation in extracellular fluid is Na+.
1

Abbreviations: CE, capillary electrophoresis; DNA, deoxyribonucleic acid; dNTP, deoxynucleoside triphosphates; DSC, differential scanning calorimetry; EDTA, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid; MOPS, 3-(N-morpholino)-propanesulfonic acid; NIST, National Institute of Standards and Technology; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; RNA, ribonucleic acid; SVD, singular value decomposition; TBI, tightly bound ion model; Tris, tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane; UV, ultraviolet.

Several theoretical models have been proposed to describe the complex phenomena of associations between cations and nucleic acids. The most widely used approaches are the mean-field approximation of the Poisson−Boltzmann equation (5-8), the counterion condensation model (9, 10), and Monte Carlo simulations (11, 12). There have been few experimental studies addressing effects of Mg2+ ion on the stability of short DNA duplexes (13-16), and comprehensive experimental melting data are not available. The majority of melting studies in magnesium buffers investigated genomic DNAs (e.g., calf thymus) (5, 17-19), long polymeric repeats (20-22), or biologically active RNA molecules (2, 23). Pioneering experiments done over 40 years ago (17, 24) showed that magnesium ions stabilize DNA duplexes significantly more than the same concentrations of monovalent ions. For example, 10 mM Mg2+ stabilizes a six base pair duplex nearly as much as a 1 M Na+ solution (13), which is substantially more than what would be expected from the magnesium ion contribution to the ionic strength of the solution.
Numerous methods in molecular biology today (such as the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and automated DNA sequencing) rely upon enzymatic reactions performed in the presence of Mg2+. Most commonly, these buffers contain a mixture of monovalent cations (20−100 mM) and magnesium ions (1.5−5 mM). Specifically, PCR is usually done in buffers containing a mixture of magnesium chloride, tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane (Tris), deoxynucleoside triphosphates (dNTP), and KCl (3). Magnesium concentration is the critical parameter that influences both the efficiency and specificity of PCR (25-29), especially when total genomic DNA is used, long products are synthesized, or multiplex reactions are run. Low magnesium concentrations decrease the efficiency and yield of PCR. High Mg2+ concentrations increase the stability of primer−template duplexes and the efficiency of amplification; however, specificity is reduced because primers may anneal to incorrect template sites and unwanted sequences are more likely to be amplified (27). The optimal annealing temperature is 2−5 °C below the melting temperatures of primer−template duplexes (26). It is therefore desirable to predict melting temperatures accurately when PCR assays are designed.
Melting temperatures are usually predicted using the nearest-neighbor model with parameters determined for 1 M Na+ buffer (30, 31). Since biological assays are implemented in various salt conditions, melting temperatures must be “corrected” for the presence and concentrations of all ions. Several empirical equations that correct Tm values in the presence of both Mg2+ and Na+ ions have been suggested (7, 15, 16, 32), which are reviewed in the Results section. Our analysis demonstrated that use of these equations can lead to large errors in the predicted value of Tm (>10 °C). Better methods are needed to facilitate design of molecular biology experiments. We conducted a large set of UV melting experiments in solutions containing magnesium and monovalent (K+, Tris+, Na+) ions to develop improved Tm magnesium correction methods. These experiments explored a wide range of magnesium and potassium ion concentrations under well-controlled conditions. Important physiologically relevant concentrations (1−10 mM Mg2+, 50−200 mM KCl) were included. Novel, more accurate empirical formulas are presented that enable reliable Tm predictions in buffers containing dNTPs, magnesium, and monovalent ions.

Materials and Methods

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

DNA Oligonucleotides

This work employed the same sets of DNA oligomers which were used in a previous study that explored the effects of sodium cations on Tm(33). All oligonucleotides were purified by denaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Each single strand had an OH group on the 5′-end as well as on the 3′-end. All oligonucleotide samples passed two quality control tests. Capillary electrophoresis analysis (33) showed that oligonucleotides were at least 92% pure. Mass spectrometry using an Oligo HTCS system (Novatia, Princeton, NJ) confirmed DNA identity and purity. Experimentally measured molecular masses of all oligodeoxyribonucleotides deviated less than 3 g/mol from expected molecular masses.

UV Melting Studies

Typical PCR buffers contain 1.5 mM MgCl2, 50 mM KCl, and 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.3 at 25 °C). Studies of the pH effects on Tm were conducted in buffers where Tris was replaced with 10 mM potassium cacodylate for pH range from 6.5 to 7.7. The pH 8.3 buffer contained 10 mM 3-(N-morpholino)-propanesulfonic acid, MOPS. A combination glass electrode (Cat. No. 476306, Corning Inc., Corning, NY) with a Corning pH meter 240 was used to measure pH values. The electrode signal was compensated for temperature changes, which were measured by an ATC probe connected to the pH meter.
The effects of magnesium ions on Tm were examined in various buffers containing 10 mM Tris-HCl, 0−600 mM MgCl2, and 0−1 M KCl. The pH was adjusted to 8.3 ± 0.03 with 0.1 M HCl at 25 °C. Buffers without KCl contained the lowest concentrations of Tris that were found to have sufficient buffering capacity, so that the pH of solutions at 25 °C before and after melting experiments did not differ by more than 0.1 unit. Specifically, 2 mM Tris was used for 0.5−20 mM magnesium buffers and 10 mM Tris was necessary for solutions of higher magnesium concentrations. Magnesium chloride was added from a 200 mM stock solution, because solid MgCl2 is very hygroscopic and cannot be accurately estimated by weight. A complexometric assay (34) was employed to verify Mg2+ concentrations in each lot of the buffer. EDTA titrations showed that magnesium concentrations deviated less than 2% from expected values.
DNA concentrations were determined from absorbance (33). Complementary single-strands were mixed in a 1:1 molar ratio. Duplexes were desalted by dialysis against water in a 28-well microdialysis system (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, California), aliquoted based on solution weight, lyophilized in a Speed-Vac concentrator, rehydrated in magnesium melting buffers, and stored in −20 °C. Total single strand concentrations, Ct, were 2 ± 0.2 µM and were verified from recorded melting curves using absorbances of upper baselines. Several DNA duplexes were also dialyzed directly against magnesium buffers to check whether the desalting method led to complete exchange of the buffers. Since melting profiles of the same DNA sequences were superimposable, we can conclude that the desalting method exchanges melting buffers as effectively as direct dialysis against a melting buffer.
Melting experiments were conducted on a single beam Beckman DU 650 spectrophotometer with a Micro Tm Analysis accessory, a Beckman High Performance Peltier Controller, and 1 cm path length quartz cuvettes (Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA). Spectrophotometer software was modified to improve resolution and to more finely control rate of temperature changes (33). Both denaturation and renaturation transition curves were collected, and temperature was increased linearly at a rate of 24.9 ± 0.3 °C/h. Absorbance values at 268 nm were recorded every 0.1 °C. We employed Beckman cuvettes (Cat. No. 523880) wherein the top was sealed with a Teflon stopper to prevent evaporation. These cuvettes are small (∼330 µL) and have thin walls, so heat is quickly distributed and the cuvettes are easily equilibrated to desired temperatures. Accuracy of temperature measurements inside of the cuvettes was validated using an external probe with a thermistor thermometer 874C (Tegam, Inc.). The thermistor (type K) was calibrated using a NIST traceable mercury thermometer of 0.1 °C resolution when both thermometers measured temperatures of both boiling water and ice−water mixture. Temperature values reported by the spectrophotometer were found to agree with the temperature values reported by the thermistor within 0.5 °C throughout the range from 15 to 97 °C.
Melting experiments were analyzed using previously published procedures (30, 33). Melting curves of buffers alone were subtracted from raw DNA melting curves. Regions of linear increase of absorbance before and after the melting transition were least-squares fitted to lower and upper linear baselines, and the fraction of broken base pairs, θ, was calculated as described previously (33). All melting curves showed a single, S-shaped transition for all buffers studied, allowing Tm to be unambiguously determined (see Figure S1 of the Supporting Information). Both upper and lower linear baselines were well established even when the melting temperatures were above 80 °C. In such cases, absorbance values were collected up to 99 °C. Melting profiles were smoothed and Tm values were determined (35) as temperatures where θ = 0.5. Three to eight melting profiles were acquired for each DNA sample in two different cuvettes, and their Tm values were averaged. The average standard deviation of UV experimental melting temperatures, σTm, was estimated to be 0.3 °C.

Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC)

Experiments were conducted using a Nano II differential scanning calorimeter (Calorimetry Sciences Corporation, American Fork, UT) and a 60 base pair long DNA duplex, 5′-TTC GCG GAT TAG CCC TAC GCA TCG GTT ACA AAC GAG GAC CTT ATG CAC TTT GAC AGC ATG-3′. Samples were degassed for 17 min at 25 mmHg vacuum. Buffer scans were subtracted from DNA scans (33). The total single strand concentration was 2 µM. Melting temperatures at the maxima of the excess heat capacity curve, Tm(DSC), were reproducible within 0.3 °C.

Statistical Analysis of Tm Predictions

To critically evaluate the accuracy of Tm magnesium corrections, average errors of Tm predictions, ⟨|ΔTm|⟩AV, and reduced χr2 values were calculated for each Tm magnesium correction function. Experimentally observed melting temperatures, Tm(experiment,i), were compared with predicted melting temperatures, Tm(prediction,i), for a set of n measurements, (1)(2) where |Tm(prediction,i) − Tm(experiment,i)| is the absolute value of the difference between predicted and experimentally measured melting temperatures and ν is the number of degrees of freedom. F-tests (36, 37) were conducted to determine the goodness-of-fit and accuracy of Tm predictions. The χr2 values were compared between different Tm magnesium correction functions. A smaller χr2 value reflects a better ability of the model to describe experimental results. Probabilities, P, of the null hypothesis that observed differences in χr2 values were insignificant and could happen by random chance alone were evaluated. The smaller the P value is, the more significant the difference is between two magnesium corrections. If the P value was less than 0.05, the null hypothesis was rejected and the differences in goodness-of-fit were considered to be statistically significant. This analysis assumed that errors of melting data were normally distributed and was implemented using the Excel FDIST function.

Results

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

Effects of Buffer pH on Melting Temperature

Phosphate, cacodylate or citrate buffers are commonly used in DNA melting experiments. In this study, we wished to characterize melting behavior in buffers that are used in biological applications. We therefore employed Tris buffer, since this is the most widely used buffer in molecular biology applications, including PCR. The pH values of Tris buffers decrease with increasing temperature. This change is rather large in comparison with other biological buffers (38, 39). Since DNA contains several groups capable of deprotonation and protonation, questions arise about pH changes during PCR and their effects on duplex stability. We therefore measured the pH of a typical PCR buffer (1.5 mM MgCl2, 50 mM KCl and 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH = 8.3 at 25 °C) when the temperature was increased from 10 to 90 °C. The pH was found to be a linear function of temperature with a d(pH)/dT coefficient of −0.020 K−1 (data not shown). To examine effects of changes in pH on melting temperatures, the same DNA duplexes were melted in the PCR buffer and in buffers where Tris was replaced with either 10 mM potassium cacodylate or 10 mM MOPS (see Materials and Methods). These two compounds manifest a much lower dependence of pKa on temperature than Tris; the published values of d(pH)/dT are 0.0019 K−1 and −0.011 K−1 for cacodylic acid and MOPS, respectively (39, 40).
Figure 1 shows DNA melting temperatures in cacodylate and MOPS buffers of various pH. Twelve DNA oligomers ranging in length from 15 to 30 base pairs and in fraction of G·C base pairs, fGC, from 0.3 to 0.7 were studied. Melting temperatures in environments of pH from 6.5 to 8.3 varied less than 0.5 °C. Tm values were found to be independent of pH and in agreement with Tm values observed in the PCR buffer that was prepared from Tris. Although the pH of the PCR Tris buffer decreased from 8.3 to 6.9 when temperature increased from 25 to 95 °C, the resulting pH changes had insignificant effects on melting temperatures of native duplex DNAs. This result is consistent with previous studies where melting temperatures of a DNA hairpin (41), T2 phage DNA (42), and calf thymus DNA (43) did not change significantly in the range of pH values from 6.5 to 8.0.

Figure 1

Figure 1. Melting temperatures of DNA duplex oligomers are independent of pH in the range from 6.5 to 8.3. Solid symbols are 15-mers, open symbols are 30-mers, fraction of G·C base pairs vary from 0.3 to 0.7. Sequences are TTCTACCTATGTGAT (solid triangle), GCAGTGGATGTGAGA (solid circle), CAGCCTCGTCGCAGC (solid square), CTTAAGATATGAGAACTTCAACTAATGTGT (open triangle), AGTCTGGTCTGGATCTGAGAACTTCAGGCT (open circle), GACCTGACGTGGACCGCTCCTGGGCGTGGT (open square). Buffers contained 1.5 mM MgCl2, 50 mM KCl and 10 mM cacodylic acid or MOPS.

Comparison of DNA Duplex Stability in Na+ and K+ buffers

Since PCR buffers typically contain potassium and Tris ions, it is of interest to compare the stabilizing effects of these monovalent ions with sodium ions. Nakano et al. (14) found in the study of a single DNA duplex, d(GCCAGTTAA), that the effects of Na+ and K+ on Tm were equivalent. However, we recently discovered that the influence of sodium ions on duplex stability is far more complex than previously thought (33). The stabilizing effect is sequence dependent and cannot be described by a simple linear relationship with respect to ln [Na+]. We therefore examined a larger set of duplexes to compare the effects of sodium and potassium cations.
Twelve DNA duplexes were melted in buffers containing 10 mM Tris and KCl of various concentrations ranging from 50 mM to 1 M as well as in sodium buffers (33). The stabilizing effect of K+ ions is also sequence dependent, and the dependence of 1/Tm on ln [K+] is nonlinear. Comparison of melting temperatures is shown in Figure 2. Differences between Tm values measured in sodium and potassium solutions of the same concentrations are within experimental errors. The best Tm agreement is achieved when Tris ions are taken into account. About half of the Tris molecules are protonated in the PCR buffer, i.e., 10 mM Tris buffer adds approximately 5 mM to the total monovalent ion concentration, [Mon+]. In summary, K+, Na+, Tris+ ions stabilize DNA duplexes with similar potency, and their effects on duplex stability are additive, (3) The published Tm correction formula for sodium ions (33) is therefore also applicable to buffers containing Tris or KCl, (4) where Tm(Mon+) is the melting temperature in the buffer containing a mixture of monovalent ions and Tm(1 M Na+) is the melting temperature in reference 1 M Na+ buffer. Equations 3 and 4 may be less accurate in high concentrations (above 100 mM) of monovalent ions capable to form hydrogen bonds (ammonium, Tris) and for bulkier monovalent ions (tetramethylammonium). Affinity of these ions to DNA has been reported to differ slightly from the affinity of Na+ and K+(67, 68). We have not investigated the bulkier monovalent ions under such conditions.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Comparison of effects of Na+ and K+ on melting temperatures in buffers of 55 mM (open triangle) and 205 mM (closed circle) monovalent ion concentrations. Duplex sequences (Ct = 2 µM) are in Table 4. Oligonucleotide lengths range from 15 to 30 base pairs. Melting temperatures determined in 10 mM Tris-HCl and 50 or 200 mM KCl buffers are plotted versus melting temperatures measured in 10 mM sodium phosphate and NaCl buffers (33). Diagonal solid line connects points where melting temperatures in both buffers would be the same.

Previously Published Tm Magnesium Corrections

The nearest-neighbor model and thermodynamic parameters (30, 31, 66) provide accurate predictions of duplex stability in 1 M Na+ buffer from DNA sequence and oligonucleotide concentration. To predict melting temperatures in magnesium buffers, Tm(Mg2+), a correction function that scales melting temperatures from the reference 1 M Na+ buffer to the magnesium buffer is applied. Although magnesium ions stabilize duplexes significantly more than the same concentration of sodium ions (13, 17), previously published Tm correction formulas generally assume that the stabilizing effects of magnesium ions are qualitatively similar to the better characterized stabilizing effects of sodium ions. These formulas use the Tm salt correction for sodium ions to predict duplex stability in Mg2+ solutions using a simple adjustment wherein Mg2+ ion concentration is converted to an “equivalent” Na+ concentration, [Na+eq], which is then directly used in the Tm sodium salt correction. The “equivalent” Na+ concentration is defined as the concentration of sodium ions in a buffer that stabilizes duplexes to the same extent as the magnesium buffer. The following formula was suggested, (5) where concentrations are in mol/L (15, 16, 32). Effects of magnesium and monovalent ions are assumed to be additive in eq 5. The total concentration of monovalent ions, [Mon+], is the sum of concentrations of alkali metal and amine cations (Na+, K+, Tris+). Values from 3.3 to 4.0 have been used for the parameter β (15, 16, 32). The equivalent [Na+eq] values are entered into the Tm corrections for sodium salts (31, 45) to correct melting temperatures for magnesium solutions. Peyret used this concept and proposed the following empirical correction in his doctoral dissertation (16) where the salt dependence was presumed to be entirely entropic: (6)Nbp is the number of base pairs in the duplex, and ΔH° is the standard enthalpy of duplex annealing (cal/mol) that can be measured experimentally or estimated from nearest-neighbor parameters (31, 66). Tm values have units of kelvins. The term Nbp − 1 is relevant for synthetic oligonucleotides and reflects the number of phosphate groups in the duplex divided by 2 (31). The melting data used to develop eq 6 have not been published, and the accuracy of Tm predictions using this method has not been established.
Ahsen et al. (15) compiled a set of melting temperatures for 162 probes determined using a real-time PCR LightCycler system. Either the probes were dye-labeled or buffers contained SYBR Green I. A revised version of eq 6 was proposed with a larger β value of the magnesium term, (7) In their analysis, Ahsen et al. did not consider thermodynamic effects of fluorescent dyes and quenchers on DNA duplex stability, although these effects can be significant (34). The authors reported that their heating rates (0.1−0.2 °C/s) were probably too fast to achieve equilibrium conditions and Tms may have been slightly overestimated. Even with these limitations, the standard error of Tm predictions was 1.8 °C for perfectly matched duplexes (15).
Mitsuhashi (32) suggested an even larger value of β and combined eq 5 with an earlier Tm sodium correction function derived by Schildkraut and Lifson (45): (8) The accuracy of eq 8 was not reported. Equations 68 are routinely used for solutions containing magnesium ions in the presence, or absence, of other monovalent ions.
Recently, Tan and chen proposed the tightly bound ion model, TBI, which employs separate treatments for tightly bound ions and for diffuse ions surrounding DNA molecules (7, 46). The model accounts for discrete modes of counterion binding. Fluctuations and correlations between the ions tightly bound to DNA are considered, while these effects were neglected in previous models based solely on the mean-field approach of the Poisson−Boltzmann equation. The TBI model provides new practical formulas for thermodynamic parameters as a function of magnesium and sodium concentrations. For Tm, the following relationship is obtained: (9) where x1 and x2 are the fractional contributions of Na+ and Mg2+ to the duplex stability and Δgl and Δg2 are the mean electrostatic folding free energies per base stack in pure Na+ or Mg2+ solutions (kcal/mol), respectively (46). The crossing term Δgl2 accounts for interference and competition of Na+ ions with Mg2+ counterions (e.g., Δgl2 = 0 for pure magnesium solutions). Expression 9 was proposed to be appropriate for duplexes with six or more base pairs (7, 46).
To examine the validity of these previous models, we initially studied melting temperatures for several duplexes ranging from 10 to 30 base pairs in length. Magnesium concentrations varied from 0.5 mM to 125 mM in the presence of 10 mM Tris buffer with no Na+ or K+. Figure 3 illustrates results of predictions using eqs 69 starting from the experimentally measured Tm in 1 M Na+ buffer for one such duplex. Predicted Tm values were found to deviate substantially from measured values over the entire range of magnesium concentrations. Qualitatively similar results were seen for the remaining sequences. Errors of greater than 10 °C in the predicted melting temperature were observed in some cases. Since the published Tm correction functions did not accurately predict melting temperatures, we proceeded to study systematically a larger data set and develop new equations to model Tm in the presence of Mg2+.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Comparison of some commonly used Tm magnesium correction functions. Experimentally measured (solid circle) and predicted melting temperatures for 30-mer duplex, ODN11, 5′-AGTCTGGTCTGGATCTGAGAACTTCAGGCT-3′ in buffers containing 10 mM Tris-HCl and various amounts of Mg2+ ions are shown.

Magnesium Ions and DNA Melting Temperatures

We first characterized the effects of magnesium ions on DNA duplex stability in a simple system where monovalent ions had negligible thermodynamic effects and magnesium ions were dominant. In this set of experiments, melting temperatures were measured in 0.5−600 mM Mg2+. To maintain stable pH, 2 mM Tris was present for 0.5−20 mM Mg2+ solutions, and 10 mM Tris was used in the 50−600 mM Mg2+ buffers. No KCl was added. As shown later, effects of Tris ions on Tm are negligible under these conditions.
Table 1 illustrates sequences studied and trends in their melting temperatures. The remaining data are presented in Table S1 of the Supporting Information. The set consisted of 92 DNA duplex oligomers (33) ranging in fGC from 0.2 to 0.8 and in the number of base pairs from 10 to 30. Oligonucleotides annealed into blunt-ended, non-self-complementary duplexes and were designed to avoid self-dimer, hairpin, or other competing structures. Circular dichroism spectra demonstrated that the secondary structure of DNA with Mg2+ as the counterion is similar to that with Na+, throughout the range of magnesium concentrations used in biological assays (Figure S2 of the Supporting Information). However, subtle changes of secondary structure occur at high magnesium concentrations (>130 mM). Long regions of consecutive G·C or A·T base pairs were removed from sequences to decrease non-two-state melting behavior. All 10 internal nearest-neighbor doublets and 2 end (initiation) interactions were well represented, so that sequence dependent properties could be examined (30, 44, 66). Over 3000 UV melting profiles were collected. All melting curves showed a single, S-shaped transition (see Figure S1). Samples were deemed to be in thermodynamic equilibrium because their denaturation and renaturation melting profiles overlapped. No decreases of absorbance at 268 nm or increases of absorbance at 350 nm, which are characteristic of DNA aggregation or precipitation (18, 19, 22), were observed during melting transitions. Representative examples of the dependence of melting temperatures on ln [Mg2+] are shown in Figure 4. The relationships are nonlinear functions of oligonucleotide length, G·C base pair content, and magnesium concentration. When Mg2+ is added to a solution of duplex DNAs, the melting temperature increases until a maximum is reached. Higher Mg2+ concentrations destabilize duplexes slightly. Figure 4 demonstrates that the peaks of maximum stability are wide. The magnesium concentration at which the maximal Tm value occurs is sequence dependent, varying from 25 mM to 350 mM Mg2+ for different duplexes in the data set. The maximum Tm shifts to a lower magnesium concentration the higher the fraction of G·C base pairs (see Figure S3 of the Supporting Information). As magnesium concentration is increased, stabilizing Tm effects are saturated first for G·C rich duplexes and later for A·T rich duplexes.
Table 1. Experimental Melting Temperatures for 18 DNA Duplex Oligomers in Buffers of a Wide Range of Magnesium Concentrations
 Tm (°C) at [Mg2+] indicateda
DNA sequence (5′ to 3′)0.5 mMb1.5 mMb3.0 mMb10 mMb20 mMb50 mMc125 mMc300 mMc600 mMc
TTGTAGTCAT27.230.932.334.936.037.337.537.135.4
ATCGTCTGGA35.138.940.643.443.443.744.443.041.6
GATGCGCTCG44.047.748.850.751.251.651.949.947.7
GGGACCGCCT48.351.953.755.555.955.456.154.952.2
CGTACACATGC40.244.245.748.148.048.148.647.044.9
CCATTGCTACC38.942.744.246.346.947.247.547.044.8
TTCTACCTATGTGAT43.346.147.850.250.451.051.550.749.4
GCAGTGGATGTGAGA52.355.156.558.158.759.259.058.256.1
CAGCCTCGTCGCAGC61.964.165.366.867.367.567.365.563.7
TGATTCTACCTATGTGATTT51.854.655.857.758.259.359.558.857.7
AGCTGCAGTGGATGTGAGAA61.163.764.866.366.867.767.366.364.7
CAGCCTCGTTCGCACAGCCC68.971.372.373.473.974.273.972.370.3
GTTCTATACTCTTGAAGTTGATTAC57.259.760.862.463.063.864.063.562.6
CTGGTCTGGATCTGAGAACTTCAGG65.667.768.769.870.370.770.669.868.6
CAGTGGGCTCCTGGGCGTGCTGGTC73.575.376.277.377.678.277.475.974.0
CTTAAGATATGAGAACTTCAACTAATGTGT61.063.164.165.566.067.167.166.265.2
AGTCTGGTCTGGATCTGAGAACTTCAGGCT69.871.672.573.673.974.274.473.572.2
GACCTGACGTGGACCGCTCCTGGGCGTGGT76.177.878.679.479.780.079.878.176.4
a

Ct = 2 ± 0.2 µM. Buffers do not contain any KCl.

b

2 mM Tris-HCl buffers.

c

10 mM Tris-HCl buffers.

Figure 4

Figure 4. Dependence of melting temperatures on magnesium concentrations is plotted for representative duplexes, which are 15 (solid symbols) and 25 (open symbols) base pairs long. Percentages of G·C base pairs were either 32−33% (circle) or 72−73% (triangle). Tris+ ions are present at low concentrations where they have negligible effects on duplex stability. Experimental data were fitted with quadratic curves to illustrate trends.

Since thermodynamic parameters and the nearest-neighbor model predict DNA stability in 1 M Na+, we employed this ionic environment as the reference salt concentration, as has been done in previous studies (15, 16, 31, 33). Differences between reciprocal Tm values in each magnesium buffer and 1 M Na+(33) were calculated. Figure 5 shows the dependence of these differences on fGC, and Nbp present in the DNA duplexes. At fixed oligonucleotide length and constant magnesium concentration, the 1/Tm differences vary approximately linearly with fGC: (10) Deviations from linear relationships seen in Figure 5 are caused by experimental errors and by additional sequence-dependent effects (e.g., nearest-neighbor interactions). However, incorporation of nearest-neighbor parameters instead of a single term for fGC did not significantly improve the accuracy of the Tm correction (Supporting Information, Table S5). Similarly, attempts to develop nearest-neighbor parameters for the effect of monovalent ions did not improve the accuracy of the Tm salt correction for sodium ions (33). The slopes SGC are negative in buffers of low magnesium concentration (Figure 5A,B) and increase with increasing magnesium concentration. The fitted lines become flat at about 14 mM Mg2+ where the difference 1/Tm(Mg2+) − 1/Tm(1 M Na+) is independent of the fraction of G·C base pairs. In buffers having higher Mg2+ concentrations, the slopes are positive (Figure 5D).

Figure 5

Figure 5. Differences between 1/Tm values in buffers of various Mg2+ concentrations and 1 M Na+ buffer are shown as a function of fGC. Inset shows colored symbols used for oligonucleotides of various lengths. (A) 0.5 mM Mg2+, (B) 3 mM Mg2+, (C) 10 mM Mg2+, (D) 125 mM Mg2+.

In comparison with experimental errors, differences in the slopes were minor. In order to simplify fitting of the data, we averaged SGC slopes at each magnesium concentration. Averages were weighted based on the number of oligonucleotides of given length. These weight-averaged SGC values are plotted versus the natural logarithm of magnesium concentration in Figure 6A. A linear relationship is observed (r2 = 0.993): (11) where the fitted parameters c and d are equal to 6.47 × 10−5 and 1.46 × 10−5 K−1, respectively ([Mg2+] is in mol/L). Substitution of eq 11 into eq 10 allows us to calculate intercepts YGC: (12)

Figure 6

Figure 6. Slopes (A) and intercepts (B) of fitted straight lines from Figure 5 are examined. Panels (C) and (D) display dependence of slopes and intercepts of fitted straight lines from Figure 6B on Mg2+ concentrations.

Figure 5 shows that YGC values change with Nbp and hence the number of negatively charged phosphate groups, Z, and seem to approach a limiting value with increasing duplex length. Since our chemically synthesized DNA duplexes do not contain phosphate groups on the 3′ or 5′ termini, Z is equal to 2(Nbp − 1). In Figure 6B, values of YGC calculated from eq 12 and averaged for each oligomer length are plotted versus 1/[2(Nbp − 1)]. Linear relationships are observed, so YGC can be described by the following equation: (13) where the slope SNbp and intercept INbp vary with magnesium concentration. Figure 6C and Figure 6D show that these relationships can be approximated as (14)(15) where a, b, e, f, and g are empirical parameters.
Combination of eqs 10, 11, and 1315 yields the Tm magnesium correction, (16) This equation can be used to scale melting temperatures of DNA duplex oligomers to different magnesium buffers when DNA concentration is fixed.
Stepwise fits allowed us to develop eq 16; however, the parameters obtained from these consecutive fits are not optimal because experimental data are not weighted equally. We therefore applied multivariate linear regression and fitted the seven parameters of eq 16 (a, b, c, d, e, f, g) in one step. The experimental data set consisted of 680 Tm values for 92 unique duplex DNAs measured in various Mg2+ concentrations (Tables 1 and S1). The set of empirically derived parameters and their errors are presented in Table 2. Extra significant figures of the parameters are included to prevent rounding errors. The multivariate fits were calculated using the Excel LINEST function as well as the numerically stable REGRL function (Matrix and Linear Algebra for Excel v.1.8.1, Foxes team, Roma, Italy, http://digilander.libero.it/foxes). Both functions gave identical results. Errors were estimated from residuals of the fit and from bootstrap simulations (47). The bootstrap estimates of the standard errors were up to 35% higher than errors from the residuals of multivariate regression and serve as a liberal estimate of the parameter errors reported in the third column of Table 2. Ten thousand bootstrap sample data sets were generated using Microsoft Excel. Each bootstrap data set was of the same size (680 Tmʼs) and was constructed by random drawing of Tm values, with replacement, from the original experimental data set. In other words, the entire experimental data set was used in each drawing. The parameters (a, b, c, d, e, f, g) were obtained from each bootstrap data set using the multivariate fit. Averages of bootstrap parameters agreed with values calculated from the original experimental data set. Standard deviation of each parameter was estimated from ten thousand bootstrap parameters (47).
Table 2. Parameters Obtained Using the Multivariate Fit to Eq 16 in Reciprocal Kelvins
parametervalue (K−1)standard error (K−1)
a3.92 × 10−50.2 × 10−5
b−9.11 × 10−60.5 × 10−6
c6.26 × 10−50.4 × 10−5
d1.42 × 10−50.08 × 10−5
e−4.82 × 10−40.7 × 10−4
f5.25 × 10−40.2 × 10−4
g8.31 × 10−50.2 × 10−5
Singular value decomposition (SVD) was employed to examine fits and correlations between parameters (37). The rank of the SVD design matrix was seven for the experimental and bootstrap data sets. Therefore, the seven fitted parameters were unique, i.e., none of the parameters could be obtained from linear combinations of the remaining parameters. An F-test was carried out to evaluate the significance of each of the parameters. The probability was estimated whether improvements in χr2 could happen by random chance alone when the parameter and its term are added to the remaining 6 parameters (36). The null hypothesis assumed that the parameter does not improve fit and does not decrease χr2 significantly. Since the probabilities were less than 10−18 for all parameters, the null hypotheses were rejected and each of the seven parameters in eq 16 was found to be statistically significant. If any single parameter is neglected, the accuracy of the Tm predictions declines.
It is important to assess the accuracy of Tm predictions obtained from eq 16. Figure S4 of the Supporting Information shows errors of the Tm predictions as a function of G·C base-pair content, number of base pairs, and magnesium concentrations. Similar accuracy is seen for various duplexes and magnesium concentrations. No systematic trends are observed. From 680 melting temperatures in the experimental data set, 96% are predicted within 1.3 °C and 99% are predicted within 2.0 °C. The average error of the Tm predictions is 0.5 °C.
Several additional terms and modifications of eq 16 were considered. Because they did not improve the fit, they are not included in the final equation. For example, if the term 1/[2(Nbp − 1)]2 was used in eq 16 instead of the 1/[2(Nbp − 1)] term, the goodness-of-fit decreased. Furthermore, addition of a (ln [Mg2+])2 term to the INbp relationship (eq 14) provided only marginal improvement of the fit, which was not statistically significant. This is consistent with Figure 6D, which shows that the dependence of INbp on ln [Mg2+] is approximately linear.
Since the YGC intercepts seem to approach a limiting value with increasing Nbp (Figure 5), we examined a model where oligonucleotide-length-dependent terms of eq 16 (e, f, g parameters) were neglected for longer duplexes (Nbp ≥ 20). The remaining parameters were optimized and fitted to the experimental Tm data set. Predictions of melting temperatures for DNA oligomers from 20 to 60 base pairs were compared with the experimental data. This simplified correction function was found to be as accurate as eq 16 at low magnesium concentrations (∼1.5 mM), but predictions in higher magnesium concentrations were less accurate. We conclude that the magnesium correction function depends significantly on oligonucleotide lengths even for these longer duplexes.

Accuracy and Limitations of the New Tm Magnesium Correction

Accuracy of the new eq 16 was compared with previous Tm magnesium correction equations using the experimental data sets from Tables 1 and S1. The average errors of these Tm predictions are summarized in Table 3. Predictions obtained using all of the earlier equations were less accurate, showing an average Tm error of 2.9 °C or larger, compared with an error of only 0.5 °C when the new eq 16 was used. These accuracy differences are statistically significant. Probabilities, P, that differences in χr2 between eq 16 and the other corrections can occur by random chance are less than 10−300. For certain sequences, the error in prediction of Tm using the previously published formulas (eqs 69) is quite large (10−18 °C). The largest error observed with eq 16 was 2.9 °C for the entire experimental data set of 680 measurements.
Table 3. Accuracy of Various Tm Magnesium Corrections Evaluated for Data Set of 92 DNA Duplex Oligomers in Magnesium Buffers When Effects of Monovalent Ions Are Negligible and Effects of Magnesium Ions Dominate
eq no.Tm magnesium correctionχr2⟨|ΔTm|⟩AV (°C)
16this work4.60.5
6Peyret−SantaLucia163.12.9
7Ahsen−Wittwer−Schütz185.33.0
9Tan−Chen176.43.3
8Mitsuhashi350.74.7
It is important to consider limitations of the new Tm magnesium correction function. Equation 16 was derived from melting data in the range of 0.5 mM to 600 mM Mg2+ at neutral pH (7−8) and is accurate in these ranges. The parameters were obtained under conditions in which the effects of monovalent ions were negligible. At higher concentrations, monovalent ions can significantly compete with magnesium ions. In this setting, the relationship between ion concentrations and Tm becomes more complex and some of the parameters require adjustment (see below).
It is the free magnesium concentration which affects duplex stability and enters into salt correction formula 16. In our experiments, magnesium ions were present in vast excess compared to DNA. Under these conditions, the free magnesium concentration is equal to the total magnesium concentration. When concentrations of Mg2+ and DNA phosphate groups are of the same magnitude, binding of magnesium ions to DNA must be taken into account. Such low magnesium concentrations occur rarely in biological applications.
The experimental data set employed to develop eq 16 contained DNA duplexes from 10 to 30 base pairs in length. An analysis of 40 and 60 base pair duplexes shows that eq 16 remains accurate in scaling Tm for these longer DNAs (see Table S2 of Supporting Information). Although these longer duplexes showed a single transition and had a well established Tm, they may melt in a non-two-state fashion. That is, in the narrow temperature range over which melting occurs (2−3 °C), partially melted duplexes may exist. However, the derivation of eq 16 was not dependent on the two-state assumption. It is valid for short oligomers (10−20 base pairs) which do melt in a two-state fashion as well as longer sequences that exhibit a single transition.
Although UV melting experiments reported in Tables 1 and S1 were conducted at a total single strand concentration of 2 µM, the utility of eq 16 is not limited to this DNA concentration. Melting studies were performed for a subset of 21 sequences in 1.5 mM Mg2+ buffer using differential scanning calorimetry where DNA concentrations were 90-fold higher (Ct = 180 µM). See Table S4 of the Supporting Information. The Tm values under these conditions were predicted using eq 16 while the melting temperatures obtained from earlier calorimetric experiments in 1 M Na+(33) were used as the reference point. Melting temperatures of the DSC data set were predicted with an accuracy (⟨|ΔTm|⟩AV = 0.4 °C) similar to the accuracy of the UV melting data set (⟨|ΔTm|⟩AV = 0.5 °C).

Deoxynucleoside Triphosphates Decrease Effects of Magnesium Ions

PCR reactions require deoxynucleoside triphosphates (dNTPs) in mixture with short oligomer primers, probes and longer nucleic acid targets. Magnesium ions bind to all of these components, and this binding decreases the concentration of free magnesium ions. As DNA synthesis proceeds during PCR, dNTPs are incorporated into the products and pyrophosphate is released. Pyrophosphate also binds magnesium ions. Complex linked equilibria of Mg2+ binding occur. It was empirically observed in PCR reactions that magnesium ion concentration must exceed the total concentration of dNTPs to achieve efficient amplification (3, 26). It has been suggested that the free magnesium ion concentration, [Mg2+], is a critical parameter to be optimized in PCR and that it can be estimated from the difference between the total magnesium ion and the total dNTP concentrations (15). To verify this notion, melting experiments of DNA duplexes were done in the presence and absence of dNTPs. Because DNA and dNTP molecules absorb light at similar wavelengths, ultraviolet spectroscopy is not a suitable technique to study denaturation of DNA duplexes when dNTPs are present in excess. We therefore employed differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). Until recently, DSC experiments required the use of high DNA concentrations (∼100 µM), which are more than 2 orders of magnitude larger than the concentrations of primers typically used in PCR experiments (<1 µM). However, new ultrasensitive calorimeters are available that allow measurement of Tm values using less than 5 µM concentration of a duplex (48). We studied a sixty base pair long DNA duplex (see Materials and Methods) that exhibited a single, sharp reproducible melting transition. Melting temperatures were determined at the same DNA concentration (Ct = 2 µM, i.e., 0.06 mM/base pair) while buffer composition was varied. Results are presented in Figure 7. Experiments 1−3 were done in 50 mM KCl and 10 mM Tris-HCl. We found that addition of dATP or an equimolar mixture of all four dNTPs did not affect the Tm when magnesium was absent. Experiments 4−12 contained various amounts of Mg2+ ions. Comparison of experiments 4, 5, and 11 shows that raising the magnesium concentrations from 0.5 to 3 mM increased the Tm. Addition of 1 mM dATP to the 1.5 mM Mg2+ buffer decreased the Tm of the duplex from 81.6 ± 0.3 (experiment 5) to 79.7 ± 0.3 °C (experiment 6), which is identical within experimental error to the melting temperature of that duplex in 0.5 mM Mg2+ buffer alone (experiment 4, 79.5 ± 0.4 °C). Analogous observations were made for stability of the duplex in 3.0 mM Mg2+ plus 1.5 mM dATP (experiment 12). The duplex had a Tm of 81.7 ± 0.1 °C, which is equal to its Tm in 1.5 mM Mg2+ buffer when no dATP was present (81.6 ± 0.3 °C, experiment 5). Experiments 6−10 in Figure 7 demonstrate that addition of dATP, dGTP, dTTP, and dCTP impact Tm by similar amounts. Affinity for magnesium ions is grossly similar between different dNTPs and is primarily determined by properties of the triphosphate and ribose groups (49, 50).

Figure 7

Figure 7. Experimental melting temperatures of the 60-mer duplex (see Materials and Methods) were obtained using DSC at low DNA concentration (Ct = 2 µM). Buffers contained 50 mM KCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH = 8.3) and various amounts of magnesium ions and deoxynucleotide triphosphates. Concentrations (mM) used in each experiment are indicated below the graph. The first row is the free [Mg2+], which is calculated as the difference between total Mg2+ and dNTP concentrations. dNTP “mix” contained equimolar concentrations of dATP, dGTP, dCTP and dTTP. The sum of their concentrations is shown in the table below the graph.

These results confirm that dNTPs bind magnesium ions stochiometrically (1:1) with high affinity and that the remaining free magnesium ions determine the melting temperature of a DNA duplex. Therefore, in connection with the use of Tm correction eq 16, the magnesium ion concentration should be adjusted for the total concentration of dNTPs. That is, the free concentration of magnesium ions, [Mg2+], can be assumed to equal the difference between the total magnesium concentration, cMg, and the total concentration of dNTPs, cdNTP. This relationship will not hold if the total dNTP concentration is larger or similar (within 20%) to the total magnesium ion concentration. In that case, the free magnesium ion concentration will be very low and may be approximated from the relationship for the Mg-dNTP association constant, (17) By using published experimental data for ribonucleotides (49-51), we estimate that Ka is approximately 3 × 104 for the Mg−dNTP complex in a PCR buffer of 50 mM KCl and 10 mM Tris. In situations when the free magnesium ion concentration is very low, effects of monovalent ions on duplex stability will often be dominant.

Competition between Magnesium and Monovalent Ions in Duplex Stabilization

Equation 16 and its parameters were determined in solutions with very low concentrations of Tris cations (1−5 mM) where magnesium ions are dominant in their effects on melting temperatures. We next examined duplex stability in mixed buffers containing significant amounts of both magnesium and monovalent ions. Figure 8A illustrates that the observed Tm effects are a complex function of monovalent ion and magnesium ion concentrations. The highest Tm was achieved in 1 M KCl solution; the maximal Tm reached in magnesium solutions was lower. This might not be true for very short oligomers (Nbp ≤ 10) where Mg2+ ions may provide larger stabilizing effects than a 1 M solution of monovalent ions (13, 52).

Figure 8

Figure 8. Competitive effects of K+ and Mg2+ examined for the 25 bp long duplex, ODN8, CTGGTCTGGATCTGAGAACTTCAGG. (A) Dependence of Tm on concentrations of magnesium and monovalent ions. (B) Solid circles are Tms plotted against ln R, where R = [Mg2+]0.5/[Mon+]. Buffers are composed of constant 1.5 mM Mg2+ while KCl concentration varies. The solid line shows melting temperatures predicted by sodium salt correction (eq 4) when no Mg2+ is present. The dashed line indicates Tm in magnesium buffer when no KCl is present. The dominant ion crossover that occurs on average at R of 0.22 is indicated with the dotted vertical line.

Cations bound to DNA are subject to an ion-exchange reaction in which the associated cations are released into bulk solvent. NMR line-shape analysis (53), UV melting (5, 14), electrophoresis (54, 67) and buffer equilibration−atomic emission spectroscopy (68) experiments have demonstrated that the extent of Mg2+ binding to DNA decreases with increasing monovalent ion concentration indicating that magnesium and monovalent ions compete for DNA binding. Table 4 presents results of melting experiments for 12 DNA duplexes 15 to 30 base pairs long. Their GC content ranged from 30 to 73%. For each buffer and oligonucleotide, the Tm value in the mixed buffer was compared to Tm values in reference buffers, which were missing either potassium ions (first rows of Tm data in Table 4) or magnesium ions (first column of Tm data). Depending on buffer composition, either monovalent or magnesium ions were found to be dominant and largely determine the melting temperature, the remaining ions having only minor effects on duplex stability (ΔTm < 3 °C). At each Mg2+ concentration, a concentration of monovalent ions is eventually reached at which the Tm is accurately predicted by the effect of monovalent ions alone (eq 4). This analysis determined the crossover point at which the dominant ion changes from magnesium to monovalent ions. This did not occur at a unique value of the ratio [Mg2+]/[Mon+]. With increasing monovalent ion concentration, this ratio was found to increase. However, the ratio R = ([Mg2+])1/2/[Mon+] at this point is independent of ion concentrations and nearly identical for all 12 sequences. The value of R at the crossover point is 0.22 M−1/2. This provides a convenient measure to determine whether divalent or monovalent ions are dominant in their effects on Tm (Figure 8B). If R is equal to or greater than 0.22, magnesium effects dominate and Tm correction eq 16 should be employed (the influence of monovalent ions can be neglected). If R is less than 0.22, the Tm correction for monovalent ions (eq 4) should be used (33). Under these conditions, monovalent ions are dominant and determine Tm, and the presence of Mg2+ can be ignored.
Table 4. Experimental Melting Temperatures (°C) for 12 Duplex Oligodeoxynucleotides (Ct = 2 µM) in Buffers of Various Magnesium and Monovalent Ion (K+, Tris+) Concentrations
 [Mg2+]
[Mon+]0 mM0.5 mM1.5 mM3.0 mM10 mM20 mM50 mM125 mM
TTCTACCTATGTGAT (ODN1)a
1 mM 43.346.147.850.250.4  
5 mM 42.145.647.649.550.451.051.5
55 mM39.342.544.746.249.149.651.051.5
105 mM43.844.845.847.149.150.151.151.6
205 mM47.7 48.1 49.9 51.151.4
605 mM52.1 51.9 51.9 51.851.7
1.005 M53.2 53.0 53.0 52.051.4
GCAGTGGATGTGAGA (ODN2)a
1 mM 52.355.156.558.158.7  
5 mM 51.954.756.258.258.859.259.0
55 mM49.552.554.656.058.058.859.359.1
105 mM53.854.655.856.658.258.959.459.4
205 mM57.3 57.9 59.1 59.459.5
605 mM61.6 61.3 61.1 60.259.5
1.005 M62.4 62.3 61.7 60.359.6
CAGCCTCGTCGCAGC (ODN3)a
1 mM 61.964.165.366.867.3  
5 mM 61.164.265.167.267.567.567.3
55 mM58.962.064.065.266.667.468.167.4
105 mM63.163.865.065.767.567.567.867.2
205 mM66.5 67.0 68.1 67.667.3
605 mM69.9 69.8 69.4 67.967.3
1.005 M70.6 70.3 70.1 68.166.9
TGATTCTACCTATGTGATTT (ODN4)a
1 mM 51.854.655.857.758.2  
5 mM 51.054.555.858.158.559.359.5
55 mM47.651.153.855.457.958.959.459.5
105 mM51.953.054.755.457.958.459.559.7
205 mM56.1 57.0 58.7 59.459.9
605 mM61.6 61.7 61.6 60.760.3
1.005 M63.2 63.2 63.0 61.460.7
AGCTGCAGTGGATGTGAGAA (ODN5)a
1 mM 61.163.764.866.366.8  
5 mM 60.763.965.166.967.367.767.3
55 mM57.861.163.264.665.867.167.867.5
105 mM62.463.364.865.267.067.467.767.7
205 mM66.4 67.1 68.1 67.567.8
605 mM71.2 71.1 70.7 68.768.2
1.005 M72.3 72.2 71.7 69.768.5
CAGCCTCGTTCGCACAGCCC (ODN6)a
1 mM 68.971.372.373.473.9  
5 mM 68.771.372.373.874.074.273.9
55 mM65.068.770.871.973.274.074.273.8
105 mM69.470.872.072.674.074.274.473.8
205 mM73.5 74.0 74.8 74.473.9
605 mM77.6 77.6 77.0 75.274.2
1.005 M78.4 78.2 77.5 75.574.3
GTTCTATACTCTTGAAGTTGATTAC (ODN7)a
1 mM 57.259.760.862.463.0  
5 mM 56.359.460.762.663.163.864.0
55 mM50.754.657.559.161.563.063.864.2
105 mM55.957.358.960.062.263.263.964.3
205 mM60.3 61.3 63.1 63.964.4
605 mM66.1 66.2 66.0 65.264.9
1.005 M68.0 67.9 67.5 66.165.5
CTGGTCTGGATCTGAGAACTTCAGG (ODN8)a
1 mM 65.667.768.769.870.3  
5 mM 65.167.668.570.170.370.770.6
55 mM60.364.566.968.169.770.470.770.8
105 mM64.966.268.068.870.370.771.070.9
205 mM69.1 70.0 71.2 71.171.0
605 mM74.2 74.1 74.0 72.571.6
1.005 M75.8 75.6 75.2 73.272.3
CAGTGGGCTCCTGGGCGTGCTGGTC (ODN9)a
1 mM 73.575.376.277.377.6  
5 mM 73.375.976.678.078.078.277.4
55 mM70.673.975.676.577.378.178.378.0
105 mM74.375.677.277.478.778.478.377.8
205 mM78.2 79.3 79.5 78.277.8
605 mM82.6 82.6 81.9 79.478.3
1.005 M83.4 83.3 82.6 79.878.4
CTTAAGATATGAGAACTTCAACTAATGTGT (ODN10)a
1 mM 61.063.164.165.566.0  
5 mM 60.563.264.465.966.467.167.1
55 mM55.259.261.863.465.266.167.367.2
105 mM60.261.563.064.066.066.667.267.2
205 mM64.6 65.3 66.8 67.067.3
605 mM70.4 70.4 70.1 68.568.1
1.005 M72.4 72.0 71.4 69.668.5
AGTCTGGTCTGGATCTGAGAACTTCAGGCT (ODN11)a
1 mM 69.871.672.573.673.9  
5 mM 68.871.672.373.873.974.274.4
55 mM64.668.571.072.173.874.174.474.7
105 mM68.970.372.173.074.274.374.974.7
205 mM73.2 74.3 75.1 74.774.9
605 mM78.4 78.2 78.1 76.475.6
1.005 M80.1 79.9 79.4 77.276.2
GACCTGACGTGGACCGCTCCTGGGCGTGGT (ODN12)a
1 mM 76.177.878.679.479.7  
5 mM 75.978.179.079.879.980.079.8
55 mM73.276.578.079.079.580.080.379.6
105 mM77.478.679.779.980.780.680.479.7
205 mM81.2 81.8 81.8 80.579.9
605 mM85.6 85.5 84.4 81.980.6
1.005 M86.7 86.3 85.2 82.581.0
a

DNA sequence (5′ to 3′) (duplex ID).

Figure 8B also illustrates that the addition of K+ at concentrations of 50−100 mM to magnesium buffers can paradoxically decrease the value of Tm by 1−2 °C. This effect, although small, was observed for all 12 sequences. It occurs for values of R in the range of 0.22 to 6.0 and is most pronounced for oligonucleotides of low GC content. A similar effect was observed for genomic DNAs (5, 17). Importantly, PCR buffers fall in this range of R values. Therefore, it seemed worthwhile to determine if the Tm prediction could be improved by taking this effect of ion competition into account. This is best achieved by allowing the parameters a, b, c, d, e, f, g of eq 16 to vary with monovalent ion concentrations. When we allowed only two parameters to vary with [Mon+] and kept the remaining parameters constant, no significant improvements in the accuracy of Tm predictions were seen. When sets of three parameters were allowed to change, the best improvements of Tm predictions were observed for the set where parameters a, d, and g varied. Potential empirical equations for parameters were tabulated using the TableCurve 2D software package (SYSTAT Software Inc., Richmond, CA). The following simplest equations were selected: (18)(19)(20) Concentrations are in units of mol/L. Use of eq 16 modified with parameters a, d, g adjusted according to eqs 1820 predicts the drop in Tm observed when R lies in the range from 0.22 to 6.0. The overall fit of the data in Table 4 is also improved slightly when parameters a, d, g of eq 16 are allowed to vary (Table 5).
A general scheme for selecting the most accurate Tm correction function to employ based upon the relative amounts of monovalent and magnesium cations is shown in Figure 9. Starting from experimentally measured reference Tms in 1.0 M Na+ buffer (33), melting temperatures from Table 4 were predicted according to this algorithm as well as previously published equations. Statistical comparisons between these methods are reported in Table 5. The most accurate predictions, with an average error of 0.8 °C, are obtained when parameters a, d, g are allowed to vary with monovalent ion concentration. If the parameters of eq 16 are set to constant values from Table 2, the accuracy is decreased (P < 2 × 10−5). Previously published eqs 69 are significantly less accurate (P < 10−118).

Figure 9

Figure 9. Flowchart for algorithm used to select the most accurate Tm salt correction equation depending on the relative amounts of monovalent and magnesium cations present.

Table 5. Accuracy of Various Tm Magnesium Correction Equations Evaluated in Buffers Where Magnesium and Potassium Ions Compete in Their Effects on DNA Duplex Stability
  data from Table 4a (n = 456)validation data setb (n = 69)
eq no.Tm correction function⟨|ΔTm|⟩AV (°C)χr2⟨|ΔTm|⟩AV (°C)χr2
4, 16, 1820this work allowing parameters a, d, g to vary with [Mon+]0.810.00.922.8
4, 16this work with constant parameters0.915.31.023.2
6Peyret−SantaLucia2.6137.51.666.1
7Ahsen−Wittwer−Schütz2.9163.11.981.0
9Tan−Chen2.6116.51.9105.1
8Mitsuhashi3.8250.02.4102.8
a

Buffers where both Mg2+ and K+ were present.

b

Data from Table S2 of the Supporting Information.

Equations 6, 7, 8, 9 and the algorithm from Figure 9 were used to predict melting temperatures for a validation data set of duplex DNA oligomers in Table S2 of the Supporting Information. This independent validation data set includes both published Tm values from other groups and new data presented here, comprising 69 unique pairs of Tm measurements for 39 sequences ranging in length from 9 to 60 base pairs. These sequences were not used to develop our new Tm magnesium salt correction formulas, so this is a more meaningful test of performance than can be achieved using the original derivation data sets (Tables 1, S1 and 4). Experimentally measured melting temperatures in the absence of magnesium ions (buffer 1) were used as the reference Tm, and various correction formulas were applied to predict Tm values in the presence of magnesium ions (buffer 2). Statistical comparisons of the results are shown in the last two columns of Table 5. The new magnesium correction algorithm predicted melting temperatures with the lowest error (0.9 °C) and χr2 value. The predictions obtained from eqs 69 were significantly worse (P < 9 × 10−5). The algorithm shown in Figure 9 is therefore currently the most accurate method to scale melting temperatures between solutions of different monovalent and magnesium cation concentrations.

Example of Calculations Using the New Tm Magnesium Correction

Below we illustrate use of algorithm in Figure 9 to estimate the melting temperature for a 20 base-pair duplex, 5′-AAGGCGAGTCAGGCTCAGTG-3′ with 12 G·C base pairs (fGC = 12/20 = 0.600), in 1.5 mM Mg2+, 10 mM Tris-HCl buffer. A reference Tm(1 M Na+) of 76.3 °C was measured (33) in 1 M Na+ and Ct = 2 µM. Since total monovalent ion concentration is 5 mM, R = (0.0015)1/2/0.005 = 7.75. As the ratio R is larger than 0.22, magnesium ions will exhibit dominant effects on Tm. Because R is larger than 6.0, parameters a, d, g in the magnesium Tm correction eq 16 do not need to vary with [Mon+] but can be taken directly from Table 2, The predicted Tm(Mg2+) under these conditions is 341.0 K (67.9 °C). This compares to a value of 68.5 °C measured experimentally

Discussion

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

Melting temperatures of DNA duplex oligomers were studied systematically in buffers containing Mg2+, K+ and Tris+ ions. Novel Tm magnesium correction functions were developed that can be used to accurately scale melting temperatures between various salt environments. Statistical analysis showed that use of these new formulas significantly improves Tm predictions. Previous Tm magnesium correction eqs 68 assume “equivalent” effects of sodium and magnesium ions on duplex stability. Our analysis indicates that the effects of divalent cations on Tm differ both quantitatively and qualitatively from the effects of monovalent cations. The dependence of Tm on GC content is different for Mg2+ and monovalent ions. The relationship to oligonucleotide length is also different. Duplex melting demonstrates end-effects in magnesium solutions, which led to inclusion of terms dependent on oligonucleotide length into eq 16. In contrast, length dependent terms are unnecessary for the Tm correction function for sodium ions (eq 4) (33). Tm changes mediated by monovalent ions are independent of the number of base pairs and depend primarily on the fGC. The concept of “equivalency” of Na+ and Mg2+ effects is therefore not justified. As a result, algorithms based on insertion of an “equivalent” sodium ion concentration into equations developed to predict the effect of monovalent ions on Tm fail to give accurate estimates of Tm in magnesium solutions.
The TBI theory developed by Tan and Chen (7, 46) represents an improvement from earlier theoretical models in that it does predict the saturation effect of magnesium ions on Tm (see Figure 3). However, the overall accuracy of the prediction of Tm with this model is not improved (Table 3). It may be possible to modify certain assumptions made in the TBI theory to more accurately predict experimental melting data. However, even with such improvements it would not appear possible to account for the observed sequence dependent effects using electrostatic principles alone.
The saturation effect on Tm seen with magnesium occurs at lower concentrations the higher the GC content of the duplex (Figure S3). A similar effect was observed previously for the binding of Na+ ions (33). This sequence specific behavior is consistent with a study of repeating polymers using 25Mg NMR spectroscopy (55), in which G·C base pairs were found to bind Mg2+ up to 100-fold more strongly than A·T base pairs. Sequence dependent Mg2+ binding was also detected when hydration of DNA duplexes was investigated using ultrasonic velocity measurements (56). DNA A·T base pairs were proposed to interact with magnesium ions by outer-sphere complex formation, while G·C base pairs exhibited substantial dehydration changes typical for inner-sphere complexes.
Two modes of ion binding have been suggested for the interaction of metal ions with DNA (23, 56). “Site binding” refers to specific binding of the ion to negatively charged groups or pockets on nucleic acids. This more intimate interaction is often observed in tertiary folds of RNA molecules where phosphates are clustered (23). Unique, specific sites take up an integral number of ions. Site-bound ions may lose some of their coordinated water molecules. The second binding mode, “diffuse binding”, refers to all nonspecific interactions of ions with DNA where ions are highly delocalized in areas surrounding the DNA molecule. Specifically, this refers to the process whereby magnesium or monovalent cations form an ionic sleeve around single-stranded or double-stranded DNA and neutralize its negatively charged phosphate backbone. Localization of diffusely bound ions is difficult to determine experimentally as the ions are relatively free to move within areas of similar electrostatic potential.
Diffuse magnesium ions are thought to be bound through “outer-sphere” complexes where magnesium ions coordinate six water molecules, [Mg(H2O)6]2+, and the water molecules establish a network of hydrogen bonds. This was observed using 25Mg NMR (57) and crystallographic studies (58, 59). Electrostatic effects, therefore, cannot be completely decoupled from changes of hydration caused by counterion binding (56). Changes in the solvation shells of participating ions and hydrogen binding between water molecules in the hydration shells of Mg2+ and Na+ may make important contributions to the energetics of cation binding to DNA.
In our experiments, we found a small but significant decrease in Tm at very high magnesium concentrations (Figure 4). This agrees with a previous study of the duplex dGCATGC (13) and melting experiments of genomic DNAs (18, 19, 60). These destabilizing effects may be caused by binding of magnesium to additional sites on denatured DNA (e.g., bases), by conformational changes of DNA and/or by ion−ion repulsions in the ionic atmosphere surrounding the DNA duplex (7). Magnesium ions have a strong preference for association with phosphate groups (1, 49). If binding of magnesium ions to the bases does occur, the association constants must be several orders of magnitude smaller than the binding constants of magnesium ions with the phosphate backbone.

Binding of Magnesium Cations to Single Stranded versus Double Stranded DNA

Magnesium ions bind to nucleic acids in both the duplex and single strand states but to a greater degree in the duplex form. Denaturation of a duplex is therefore accompanied by a net release of Δn magnesium ions. Assuming a two-state melting transition, the value of Δn can be estimated from the dependence of the melting temperature on magnesium ion concentration (5): (21) Figure 10 shows analysis of Δn values normalized to the number of phosphate groups as a function of oligonucleotide length and fGC. The values of d(1/Tm)/d(ln [Mg2+]) were calculated for each DNA duplex from quadratic fits to plots of 1/Tm versus ln [Mg2+]. The enthalpy of duplex denaturation, ΔH°, was calculated from the unified nearest-neighbor thermodynamic parameters (31, 66) and was assumed to be independent of magnesium ion and monovalent ion concentrations (31, 33). The ΔH° values were also measured directly using DSC for a set of 21 sequences in 1.5 mM Mg2+ buffer (Table S3, Supporting Information). The enthalpies were found to be similar in magnesium and sodium buffers. Experimental errors are in the range of 5−10%. Therefore, the assumption that the enthalpies of duplex denaturation are salt independent is valid under the conditions studied. Equation 21 was used to calculate Δn values for oligonucleotides from 10 to 30 base pairs. Shorter oligomers (10−15 base pairs) are likely to melt in a two-state manner. The duplexes longer than 15 base pairs may show deviations from the two-state melting behavior. However, eq 21 still holds for these longer duplexes because their shapes of melting profiles are not dependent on the counterion concentration. Analysis that proves this statement is complex and requires a considerable amount of material. It is therefore shown in the end of the Supporting Information.

Figure 10

Figure 10. Release of magnesium ions associated with duplex denaturation. (A) Experimental values of dTm/d(ln [Mg2+]) are shown in 1.5 mM (open circles), and 10 mM (closed circles) magnesium buffers as well as in the buffer containing both 1.5 mM MgCl2 and 50 mM KCl (dotted line). The GC content of oligonucleotides ranges from 40 to 60%. For the sake of clarity, experimental data for individual duplexes are not shown for the last buffer; the relationships are approximated with lines fitted to experimental data points. (B) The number of released magnesium ions per phosphate group is plotted as a function of oligonucleotide lengths. Solid lines were predicted from eqs 16 and 21, and from the published average dependence of ΔH° values on oligonucleotide length (35). (C) The number of released magnesium ions per phosphate group decreases with increasing GC content in 1.5 mM Mg2+ buffer. These relationships are predicted reasonably well using eqs 16 and 21 (solid lines).

Values of Δn include contributions from the diffusely bound as well as from the site-bound Mg2+ ions. Since the value of Δn is derived from purely thermodynamic considerations, it provides no explicit information about the location of ions near the DNA molecule. Nevertheless, Δn is a useful estimate of the overall changes in ion association when the duplex denatures. Figure 10 illustrates that both thedTm/d(ln [Mg2+]) and the value of Δn decrease as the free Mg2+ concentration is increased from 1.5 to 10 mM. At higher concentrations, the stabilizing effect of magnesium on the duplex reaches a maximum (see Figure 4). These observations suggest that magnesium ion binding to the single strands increases and eventually saturates as the magnesium ion concentration of the buffer increases.
Both the value of dTm/d(ln [Mg2+]) and the value of Δn per phosphate decrease with increasing oligonucleotide length (see panels (A) and (B) of Figure 10). This is a result of significant end effects in magnesium buffers. Association of cations with ends of both single stranded and double stranded oligonucleotides is lower than with their interior. Thus the number of bound ions per phosphate group is predicted to increase with Nbp as the interior domain becomes larger. However, a larger increase is expected for duplexes because of their higher charge density (11, 46). Since Δn per phosphate group measures the difference of ion association between the duplex and the complementary single strands, it is expected to increase with Nbp. This was observed experimentally for a set of d(TA)N hairpins (63) with Na+ as the counterion. DNA duplexes formed from two complementary strands in Na+ buffers do not show a significant dependence of Δn on Nbp(33). This may be due to the fact that the number of negative charges per molecule is halved upon strand separation and thereby masking the Coulombic end effects (11, 61, 62). Surprisingly, we observe the opposite end effects with magnesium ions (Figure 10). The value of Δn per phosphate decreases when oligonucleotide length is increased. Can polyelectrolyte models based on electrostatic interactions explain the different behavior of Na+ and Mg2+ counterions? Additional theoretical studies will be needed to clarify the interpretation of these results.
Figure 10A also shows that the end effect observed in magnesium buffers is substantially diminished by the addition of monovalent ions (50 mM KCl). Although Mg2+ ions remain dominant in 1.5 mM Mg2+ and 50 mM K+, the values of Δn per phosphate decrease much less with Nbp in this mixed buffer than in 1.5 mM Mg2+ buffer where no K+was present. This observation is consistent with the study of DNA duplex stability in solutions of sodium ions (33) where the Δn per phosphate was found to be independent of oligonucleotide length.
Figures 10B and 10C demonstrate that our new Tm magnesium correction (eq 16) provides reliable predictions of Δn values. The derivative of d(1/Tm)/d(ln [Mg2+]) was entered into eq 21 to obtain an estimate of Δn. The relationships between hybridization enthalpies of duplex annealing and Nbp as well as fGC were approximated using the unified nearest-neighbor parameters (31, 35, 66)H° = −8.23(Nbp − 1) + 2.4 kcal/mol for duplexes containing 50% GC; ΔH° = −100.5 − 25.9fGC kcal/mol for 15-mers and ΔH° = −212.6 − 49.9fGC kcal/mol for 30-mers). Predicted Δn values shown by the solid lines in Figures 10B and 10C agree well with experimental observations.

Competitive Behavior of Monovalent and Magnesium Cations

Effects of ions on duplex stability are linked to the energetics of ion binding around the folded and the unfolded DNA molecules. These ion distributions are affected by bulk ionic concentrations. Sodium and magnesium ions act in concert to increase Tm at low magnesium/DNA concentration ratios (below 0.5 Mg2+ ions per nucleotide) (5). At higher magnesium/nucleotide ratios, magnesium and monovalent ions compete in their binding to DNA (5, 12, 14). We have found that the critical determinant whether magnesium ions or monovalent ions are dominant is the value of the ratio R = ([Mg2+])1/2/[Mon+]. Figure 8B illustrates the nature of this competition for a 25 base pair long duplex. When the ratio R is greater than 6, magnesium ions are dominant and the ionic clouds surrounding both single and double stranded DNA contain mostly Mg2+ counterions. Under these conditions, the effects of monovalent ions on the Tm are negligible. Data from which eq 16 was derived (Tables 1 and S1) were from experiments where all R values were greater than 20. As the K+ concentrations increase, the ratio R decreases. When the value of R falls below ∼6, bound magnesium ions are being displaced by K+. As a result, parameters of eq 16 change (eqs 1820). The melting temperature decreases slightly when potassium ions are added to solutions of magnesium ions under these conditions. This was observed for all 12 duplexes studied (see Table 4). The slight destabilization is predicted by polyectrolyte theory (5, 6, 9) and has also been observed with genomic DNAs (17). Under these conditions, the bulk potassium concentration is much higher than the bulk magnesium concentration. Therefore, the diffuse Debye−Hückel ion atmosphere will be composed mostly of potassium ions. Because of magnesium counterion condensation, a larger effective charge is present on single strands than on double strands and single strands are therefore stabilized more by addition of monovalent ions due to Debye−Hückel screening.
When the value of R falls below 0.22, monovalent ions become dominant. At this point, replacement of the magnesium ions by potassium in the ionic clouds surrounding DNA is essentially complete. The dependence of the melting temperature on the counterion concentration thereafter follows the Tm correction function developed previously for monovalent ions alone (eq 4). Duplex stability then rises with increasing monovalent ion concentration. At 1.5 mM Mg2+, the crossover point is at ∼180 mM K+. At higher concentrations of magnesium, the crossover point shifts to progressively higher concentrations of monovalent ions. Nakano et al. (14) studied Na+−Mg2+ competition for the single duplex d(GCCAGTTAA). We calculated from their Figure 6 that the dominant ion changed from magnesium to sodium at value of R equal to 0.24 in good agreement with our findings.
The ionic atmosphere around DNA as a function of Mg2+ and Na+ concentrations has been modeled using Monte Carlo simulations, Poisson−Boltzmann calculations (12, 64) and the hypernetted chain integral method (65). Using the nonlinear Poisson−Boltzmann equation, Rouzina and Bloomfield (64) predicted that, to maintain the same proportion of sodium and magnesium ions bound to DNA while varying the bulk ionic composition, one should keep the ratio [Mg2+]/[Na+]2 constant. A similar conclusion can be inferred from the theoretical study of Bacquet and Rossky (65). Our experimental results now provide convincing support for these predictions.

Effects of Magnesium Ions on Transition Enthalpies, Entropies and Free Energies

Useful salt-correction equations for free energies, ΔG°, and entropies, ΔS°, of DNA hybridization can be developed from eq 16 if the following assumptions are made: (i) Duplex melting is a two-state process. (ii) Counterion effects are mostly entropic (31, 61, 66). (iii) Enthalpies and entropies of DNA melting reactions are temperature independent, i.e., ΔCp is zero. Although the last assumption may not be correct over a wide range of temperatures, it is reasonable within the narrow range of temperatures between Tm(Mg2+) in a magnesium buffer and the reference Tm(1 M Na+) in 1 M Na+ buffer (see Table S3, Supporting Information). Using the relationship 1/Tm = ΔS°/ΔH° + (R/ΔH°) ln [Ct/4], eq 16 can be rearranged to obtain the following equations for transition entropies: (22) and transition free energies at 37 °C, (23) The units of ΔH° and ΔG °37 are cal/mol. These relationships should be useful for calculating energetics of DNA folding in the presence of magnesium ions.

Implications for PCR and DNA Sequencing

Accurate prediction of Tm in specific reaction conditions is a fundamental step when designing oligodeoxynucleotides for use in PCR, DNA sequencing and other molecular biology applications. Tm prediction is particularly important when working with closely related sequences (allelic variants, single nucleotide polymorphisms, etc.) or when designing multiplex reactions where a large number of primers must function together. We have studied a number of the solution components that can affect DNA duplex stability and therefore impact the design of DNA primers and probes.
Buffers used in molecular biology experiments generally contain a mixture of monovalent cations (Na+ or K+) and Mg2+. As shown in Figure 2, the effects of sodium and potassium ions on duplex stability are equivalent. This is true even under conditions in which Na+ and K+ compete with Mg2+ for binding to DNA. Therefore, nearest-neighbor parameters and salt correction formulas developed for buffers containing Na+ can be used interchangeably with K+.
We have found that the effect of Mg2+ on Tm is dominant over monovalent cations under typical reaction conditions used for PCR and DNA sequencing ([K+] = 20−100 mM and [Mg2+] = 1.5−5 mM). Values of R range from about 0.3 to 4 M−1/2. Accurate treatment of the effect of Mg2+ on Tm is, therefore, very important in the design of DNA primers and probes for these assays. Using the algorithm of Figure 9 with the correction formulas presented herein, the Tm can be predicted within an average accuracy of 1 °C. Earlier models are less accurate and in some cases lead to large errors (>10 °C). The procedure of converting the Mg2+ component to an “equivalent Na+ concentration” is not justified. The influence of magnesium and monovalent cations on DNA duplex stability differ with respect to both fGC and oligonucleotide length and must be treated differently.
Although metal ions present in reaction buffers (Na+, K+, Mg2+) have the greatest impact on Tm, other components contribute and should be taken into account. Most buffers used in molecular biology applications rely on Tris or other ammonium salts, which exhibit a significant dependence of ionization constant on temperature. Tris buffer adjusted to pH of 8.3 at 25 °C decreases to pH 6.9 as temperature is raised to 95 °C. This pH change, however, has little effect on the stability of DNA duplexes (see Figure 1) as pKHs of the ionizable groups of the bases lie outside of this range. Nucleic acid−bases have pKH values lower than 4.5 (dC) and greater than 9.4 (dG) in the single-stranded state which move even further from neutrality in the duplex state (43). Furthermore, the temperature range where primer hybridization and DNA synthesis occur during PCR is usually between 60 °C (the primer annealing step) and 72 °C (the enzymatic extension step). Within this narrow temperature window, pH varies only between 7.6 and 7.4. Thus the large pH shifts seen in Tris buffers with changes in temperature should have no effect on hybridization efficiency during PCR or other thermal cycling reactions. However, the protonated form of Tris is a monovalent cation and should be added to the total monovalent cation concentration when performing Tm calculations. Due to the relative extent of ionization, 10 mM Tris is equivalent to about 5 mM Na+.
We have shown that the presence of dNTPs in a reaction mixture decreases the free magnesium ion concentration, which, in turn, lowers the Tm for DNA hybridization reactions done in that buffer. The Mg−dNTP association constant is sufficiently large (50) that the free Mg2+ concentration can be approximated simply by the difference between the total magnesium concentration and the total concentration of dNTPs. In a typical PCR reaction, the four dNTPs together are usually present at a concentration of 0.8 mM. Although sample DNA, primers and probes can also bind Mg2+, their concentrations are too low to significantly affect the level of free Mg2+.
During the course of PCR, dNTPs are consumed as DNA synthesis proceeds. However, this does not necessarily imply that free Mg2+ levels increase. Pyrophosphate, a byproduct of DNA synthesis, as well as the newly synthesized double-stranded DNA amplicon can also bind magnesium ions. We have not measured the fluctuations of free magnesium concentration during PCR.

Supporting Information

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

Additional sets of Tm values used to develop and validate new magnesium correction, results of DSC and CD experiments, nearest-neighbor model of Tm magnesium correction and Δn calculations for duplexes that melt in non-two-state fashion. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org. Further, the database of average melting profiles, fraction of melted base pairs versus temperature, is available at http://biophysics.idtdna.com/Paper7/Abstract7.html.

Terms & Conditions

Electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. The American Chemical Society holds a copyright ownership interest in any copyrightable Supporting Information. Files available from the ACS website may be downloaded for personal use only. Users are not otherwise permitted to reproduce, republish, redistribute, or sell any Supporting Information from the ACS website, either in whole or in part, in either machine-readable form or any other form without permission from the American Chemical Society. For permission to reproduce, republish and redistribute this material, requesters must process their own requests via the RightsLink permission system. Information about how to use the RightsLink permission system can be found at http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Acknowledgment

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

The authors thank Drs. Isard Dunietz and Zhi-Jie Tan for helpful discussions on the stability of nucleic acid duplexes.

References

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

This article references 68 other publications.

  1. 1
    Sissoëff, I., Grisvard, J., and Guillé, E. (1976) Studies on metal ions-DNA interactions: specific behaviour of reiterative DNA sequences Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 31, 165 199
  2. 2
    Misra, V. K. and Draper, D. E. (1998) On the role of magnesium ions in RNA stability Biopolymers 48, 113 135
  3. 3
    Saiki, R. K., Gelfand, D. H., Stoffel, S., Scharf, S. J., Higuchi, R., Horn, G. T., Mullis, K. B., and Erlich, H. A. (1988) Primer-directed enzymatic amplification of DNA with a thermostable DNA polymerase Science 239, 487 491
  4. 4
    Hartwig, A. (2001) Role of magnesium in genomic stability Mutat. Res. 475, 113 121
  5. 5
    Record, M. T., Jr (1975) Effects of Na+ and Mg+2 ions on the helix-coil transition of DNA Biopolymers 14, 2137 2158
  6. 6
    Korolev, N., Lyubartsev, A. P., and Nordenskiöld, L. (1998) Application of polyelectrolyte theories for analysis of DNA melting in the presence of Na+ and Mg2+ ions Biophys. J. 75, 3041 3056
  7. 7
    Tan, Z.-J. and Chen, S.-J. (2006) Nucleic acid helix stability: effects of salt concentration, cation valence and size, and chain length Biophys. J. 90, 1175 1190
  8. 8
    Wilson, R. W., Rau, D. C., and Bloomfield, V. A. (1980) Comparison of polyelectrolyte theories of the binding of cations to DNA Biophys. J. 30, 317 326
  9. 9
    Manning, G. S. (1972) On the application of polyelectrolyte “limiting laws” to the helix-coil transition of DNA. II. The effect of Mg+2 counterions Biopolymers 11, 951 955
  10. 10
    Manning, G. S. (1978) The molecular theory of polyelectrolyte solutions with applications to the electrostatic properties of polynucleotides Q. Rev. Biophys. 11, 179 246
  11. 11
    Olmsted, M. C., Anderson, C. F., and Record, M. T., Jr (1991) Importance of oligoelectrolyte end effects for the thermodynamics of conformational transitions of nucleic acid oligomers: a grand canonical Monte Carlo analysis Biopolymers 31, 1593 1604
  12. 12
    Pack, G. R., Wong, L., and Lamm, G. (1999) Divalent cations and the electrostatic potential around DNA: Monte Carlo and Poisson-Boltzmann calculations Biopolymers 49, 575 590
  13. 13
    Williams, A. P., Longfellow, C. E., Freier, S. M., Kierzek, R., and Turner, D. H. (1989) Laser temperature-jump, spectroscopic, and thermodynamic study of salt effects on duplex formation by dGCATGC Biochemistry 28, 4283 4291
  14. 14
    Nakano, S., Fujimoto, M., Hara, H., and Sugimoto, N. (1999) Nucleic acid duplex stability: influence of base composition on cation effects Nucleic Acids Res. 27, 2957 2965
  15. 15
    von Ahsen, N., Wittwer, C. T., and Schütz, E. (2001) Oligonucleotide melting temperatures under PCR conditions: nearest-neighbor corrections for Mg2+, deoxynucleotide triphosphate, and dimethyl sulfoxide concentrations with comparison to alternative empirical formulas Clin. Chem. 47, 1956 1961
  16. 16
    Peyret, N. (2000)

     Prediction of Nucleic Acid Hybridization: Parameters and Algorithms

    , Ph.D. Thesis, Section 5.4.2, pp 128, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI.
  17. 17
    Dove, W. F. and Davidson, N. (1962) Cation effects on the denaturation of DNA J. Mol. Biol. 5, 467 478
  18. 18
    Lyons, J. W. and Kotin, L. (1965) The effect of magnesium ion on the secondary structure of deoxyribonucleic acid J. Am. Chem. Soc. 87, 1781 1785
  19. 19
    Ott, G. S., Ziegler, R., and Bauer, W. R. (1975) The DNA melting transition in aqueous magnesium salt solutions Biochemistry 14, 3431 3438
  20. 20
    Krakauer, H. (1971) The binding of Mg+2 ions to polyadenylate, polyuridylate, and their complexes Biopolymers 10, 2459 2490
  21. 21
    Krakauer, H. (1974) A thermodynamic analysis of the influence of simple mono- and divalent cations on conformational transitions of polynucleotide complexes Biochemistry 13, 2579 2589
  22. 22
    Kankia, B. I. (2003) Binding of Mg2+ to single-stranded polynucleotides: hydration and optical studies Biophys. Chem. 104, 643 654
  23. 23
    Draper, D. E. (2004) A guide to ions and RNA structure RNA 10, 335 343
  24. 24
    Zubay, G. and Doty, P. (1958) Nucleic acid interactions with metal ions and amino acids Biochim. Biophys. Acta 29, 47 58
  25. 25
    Rychlik, W., Spencer, W. J., and Rhoads, R. E. (1990) Optimization of the annealing temperature for DNA amplification in vitro Nucleic Acids Res. 18, 6409 6412
  26. 26
    Harris, S. and Jones, D. B. (1997) Optimisation of the polymerase chain reaction Br. J. Biomed. Sci. 54, 166 173
  27. 27
    Henegariu, O., Heerema, N. A., Dlouhy, S. R., Vance, G. H., and Vogt, P. H. (1997) Multiplex PCR: critical parameters and step-by-step protocol BioTechniques 23, 504 511
  28. 28
    Markoulatos, P., Siafakas, N., and Moncany, M. (2002) Multiplex polymerase chain reaction: a practical approach J. Clin. Lab. Anal. 16, 47 51
  29. 29
    Ignatov, K. B., Miroshnikov, A. I., and Kramarov, V. M. (2003) A new approach to enhanced PCR specificity Rus. J. Bioorg. Chem. 29, 368 371
  30. 30
    Owczarzy, R., Vallone, P. M., Gallo, F. J., Paner, T. M., Lane, M. J., and Benight, A. S. (1997) Predicting sequence-dependent melting stability of short duplex DNA oligomers Biopolymers 44, 217 239
  31. 31
    SantaLucia, J., Jr. and Hicks, D. (2004) The thermodynamics of DNA structural motifs Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 33, 415 440
  32. 32
    Mitsuhashi, M. (1996) Technical Report: Part 1. Basic requirements for designing optimal oligonucleotide probe sequences J. Clin. Lab. Anal. 10, 277 284
  33. 33
    Owczarzy, R., You, Y., Moreira, B. G., Manthey, J. A., Huang, L., Behlke, M. A., and Walder, J. A. (2004) Effects of sodium ions on DNA duplex oligomers: improved predictions of melting temperatures Biochemistry 43, 3537 3554
  34. 34
    Moreira, B. G., You, Y., Behlke, M. A., and Owczarzy, R. (2005) Effects of fluorescent dyes, quenchers, and dangling ends on DNA duplex stability Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 327, 473 484
  35. 35
    Owczarzy, R. (2005) Melting temperatures of nucleic acids: discrepancies in analysis Biophys. Chem. 117, 207 215
  36. 36
    Bevington, P. R. and Robinson, D. K. (1992) Data Reduction and Error Analysis for the Physical Sciences, WCB/McGraw-Hill, Boston, MA.
  37. 37
    Press, W. H., Teukolsky, S. A., Vetterling, W. T., and Flannery, B. P. (1996) Numerical Recipes in Fortran 77: The Art of Scientific Computing, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  38. 38
    Good, N. E., Winget, G. D., Winter, W., Connolly, T. N., Izawa, S., and Singh, R. M. M. (1966) Hydrogen ion buffers for biological research Biochemistry 5, 467 477
  39. 39
    Dawson, R. M. C., Elliot, D. C., Elliot, W. H., and Jones, K. M. (1986) Data for Biochemical Research, Oxford University Press, Oxford, U.K., pp 424.
  40. 40
    Fukada, H. and Takahashi, K. (1998) Enthalpy and heat capacity changes for the proton dissociation of various buffer components in 0.1M potassium chloride Proteins 33, 159 166
  41. 41
    Plum, G. E. and Breslauer, K. J. (1995) Thermodynamics of an intramolecular DNA triple helix: a calorimetric and spectroscopic study of pH and salt dependence of thermally induced structural transitions J. Mol. Biol. 248, 679 695
  42. 42
    Privalov, P. L. and Ptitsyn, O. B. (1969) Determination of stability of the DNA double helix in an aqueous medium Biopolymers 8, 559 571
  43. 43
    Record, M. T., Jr (1967) Electrostatic effects on polynucleotide transitions. II. Behavior of titrated systems Biopolymers 5, 993 1008
  44. 44
    Gray, D. M. (1997) Derivation of nearest-neighbor properties from data on nucleic acid oligomers. I. Simple sets of independent sequences and the influence of absent nearest neighbors Biopolymers 42, 783 793
  45. 45
    Schildkraut, C. and Lifson, S. (1965) Dependence of the melting temperature of DNA on salt concentration Biopolymers 3, 195 208
  46. 46
    Tan, Z.-J. and Chen, S.-J. (2007) RNA helix stability in mixed Na+/Mg2+ solution Biophys. J. 92, 3615 3632
  47. 47
    Efron, B. and Tibshirani, R. J. (1993) . An Introduction to the Bootstrap, Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL.
  48. 48
    Völker, J., Klump, H. H., Manning, G. S., and Breslauer, K. J. (2001) Counterion association with native and denatured nucleic acids: an experimental approach J. Mol. Biol. 310, 1011 1025
  49. 49
    Philips, R. (1966) Adenosine and the adenine nucleotides. Ionization, metal complex formation, and conformation in solution Chem. Rev. 66, 501 527
  50. 50
    Sigel, H. (1993) Interactions of metal ions with nucleotides and nucleic acids and their constituents Chem. Soc. Rev. 22, 255 267
  51. 51
    Pecoraro, V. L., Hermes, J. D., and Cleland, W. W. (1984) Stability constants of Mg2+ and Cd2+ complexes of adenine nucleotides and thionucleotides and rate constants for formation and dissociation of MgATP and MgADP Biochemistry 23, 5262 5271
  52. 52
    Hudson, R. H. E., Uddin, A. H., and Damha, M. J. (1995) Association of branched nucleic acids: structural and physicochemical analysis of antiparallel T•AT triple-helical DNA J. Am. Chem. Soc. 117, 12470 12477
  53. 53
    Rose, D. M., Bleam, M. L., Record, M. T., Jr., and Bryant, R. G. (1980) 25Mg NMR in DNA solutions: dominance of site binding effects Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 77, 6289 6292
  54. 54
    Ma, C. and Bloomfield, V. A. (1995) Gel electrophoresis measurement of counterion condensation on DNA Biopolymers 35, 211 216
  55. 55
    Cowan, J. A., Huang, H.-W., and Hsu, L. Y. (1993) Sequence selective coordination of Mg2+(aq) to DNA J. Inorg. Biochem. 52, 121 129
  56. 56
    Buckin, V. A., Kankiya, B. I., Rentzeperis, D., and Marky, L. A. (1994) Mg2+ recognizes the sequence of DNA through its hydration shell J. Am. Chem. Soc. 116, 9423 9429
  57. 57
    Black, C. B. and Cowan, J. A. (1994) Quantitative evaluation of electrostatic and hydrogen-bonding contributions to metal cofactor binding to nucleic acids J. Am. Chem. Soc. 116, 1174 1178
  58. 58
    Gessner, R. V., Quigley, G. J., Wang, A. H.-J., van der Marel, G. A., van Boom, J. H., and Rich, A. (1985) Structural basis for stabilization of Z-DNA by cobalt hexaammine and magnesium cations Biochemistry 24, 237 240
  59. 59
    Sines, C. C., McFail-Isom, L., Howerton, S. B., VanDerveer, D., and Willimas, L. D. (2000) Cation mediate B-DNA conformational heterogeneity J. Am. Chem. Soc. 122, 11048 11056
  60. 60
    Blagoi, Y. U. P., Sorokin, V. A., Valeyev, V. A., Khomenko, S. A., and Gladchenko, G. O. (1978) Magnesium ion effect on the helix-coil transition of DNA Biopolymers 17, 1103 1118
  61. 61
    Anderson, C. F. and Record, M. T., Jr (1995) Salt-nucleic acid interactions Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 46, 657 700
  62. 62
    Shkel, I. A. and Record, M. T., Jr (2004) Effect of the number of nucleic acid oligomer charges on the salt dependence of stability (ΔG°37) and melting temperature (Tm): NLPB analysis of experimental data Biochemistry 43, 7090 7101
  63. 63
    Elson, E. L., Scheffler, I. E., and Baldwin, R. L. (1970) Helix formation by d(TA) oligomers. III. Electrostatic effects J. Mol. Biol. 54, 401 415
  64. 64
    Rouzina, I. and Bloomfield, V. A. (1997) Competitive electrostatic binding of charged ligands to polyelectrolytes: practical approach using the non-linear Poisson-Boltzmann equation Biophys. Chem. 64, 139 155
  65. 65
    Bacquet, R. J. and Rossky, P. J. (1988) Ionic distributions and competitive association in DNA/mixed salt solutions J. Phys. Chem. 92, 3604 3612
  66. 66
    SantaLucia, J., Jr (1998) A unified view of polymer, dumbbell, and oligonucleotide DNA nearest-neighbor thermodynamics Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 95, 1460 1465
  67. 67
    Stellwagen, E., Dong, Q., and Stellwagen, N. C. (2007) Quantitative analysis of monovalent counterion binding to random-sequence, double-stranded DNA using the replacement ion method Biochemistry 46, 2050 2058
  68. 68
    Bai, Y., Greenfeld, M., Travers, K. J., Chu, V. B., Lipfert, J., Doniach, S., and Herschlag, D. (2007) Quantitative and comprehensive decomposition of the ion atmosphere around nucleic acids J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129, 14981 14988

Cited By


This article is cited by 178 publications.

  1. Diana Sobota, Himanshu Joshi, Alexander Ohmann, Aleksei Aksimentiev, Ulrich F. Keyser. Tailoring Interleaflet Lipid Transfer with a DNA-based Synthetic Enzyme. Nano Letters 2020, 20 (6) , 4306-4311. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c00990
  2. Hung T. Nguyen, D. Thirumalai. Charge Density of Cation Determines Inner versus Outer Shell Coordination to Phosphate in RNA. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 2020, 124 (20) , 4114-4122. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.0c02371
  3. Leroy K. Davis. Intelligent Design of 14-3-3 Docking Proteins Utilizing Synthetic Evolution Artificial Intelligence (SYN-AI). ACS Omega 2019, 4 (21) , 18948-18960. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.8b03100
  4. Siyuan S. Wang, Andrew D. Ellington. Pattern Generation with Nucleic Acid Chemical Reaction Networks. Chemical Reviews 2019, 119 (10) , 6370-6383. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00625
  5. Ryan J. Menssen, Andrei Tokmakoff. Length-Dependent Melting Kinetics of Short DNA Oligonucleotides Using Temperature-Jump IR Spectroscopy. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 2019, 123 (4) , 756-767. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.8b09487
  6. Grigory Tikhomirov, Philip Petersen, Lulu Qian. Triangular DNA Origami Tilings. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2018, 140 (50) , 17361-17364. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.8b10609
  7. Laurent Lermusiaux, Sébastien Bidault. Temperature-Dependent Plasmonic Responses from Gold Nanoparticle Dimers Linked by Double-Stranded DNA. Langmuir 2018, 34 (49) , 14946-14953. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b00133
  8. Akihisa Miyagawa, Makoto Harada, Tetsuo Okada. Multiple MicroRNA Quantification Based on Acoustic Levitation of Single Microspheres after One-Pot Sandwich Interparticle Hybridizations. Analytical Chemistry 2018, 90 (22) , 13729-13735. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.8b04143
  9. Akihisa Miyagawa, Makoto Harada, Tetsuo Okada. Zeptomole Biosensing of DNA with Flexible Selectivity Based on Acoustic Levitation of a Single Microsphere Binding Gold Nanoparticles by Hybridization. ACS Sensors 2018, 3 (9) , 1870-1875. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssensors.8b00748
  10. Kunihiko Morihiro, Nicholas Ankenbruck, Bradley Lukasak, and Alexander Deiters . Small Molecule Release and Activation through DNA Computing. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2017, 139 (39) , 13909-13915. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.7b07831
  11. Joshua Fern and Rebecca Schulman . Design and Characterization of DNA Strand-Displacement Circuits in Serum-Supplemented Cell Medium. ACS Synthetic Biology 2017, 6 (9) , 1774-1783. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssynbio.7b00105
  12. Sheng Lin, Lihua Lu, Tian-Shu Kang, Jean-Louis Mergny, Chung-Hang Leung, and Dik-Lung Ma . Interaction of an Iridium(III) Complex with G-Quadruplex DNA and Its Application in Luminescent Switch-On Detection of Siglec-5. Analytical Chemistry 2016, 88 (20) , 10290-10295. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.6b03128
  13. Soumadwip Ghosh, Rajarshi Chakrabarti. Unzipping of Double-Stranded Ribonucleic Acids by Graphene and Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube: Helix Geometry versus Surface Curvature. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2016, 120 (39) , 22681-22693. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b06943
  14. Julianne M. Troiano, Thomas R. Kuech, Ariane M. Vartanian, Marco D. Torelli, Akash Sen, Lisa M. Jacob, Robert J. Hamers, Catherine J. Murphy, Joel A. Pedersen, and Franz M. Geiger . On Electronic and Charge Interference in Second Harmonic Generation Responses from Gold Metal Nanoparticles at Supported Lipid Bilayers. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2016, 120 (37) , 20659-20667. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b01786
  15. Paul J. Sanstead, Paul Stevenson, and Andrei Tokmakoff . Sequence-Dependent Mechanism of DNA Oligonucleotide Dehybridization Resolved through Infrared Spectroscopy. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2016, 138 (36) , 11792-11801. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.6b05854
  16. Mariana Medina-Sánchez, Bergoi Ibarlucea, Nicolás Pérez, Dmitriy D. Karnaushenko, Sonja M. Weiz, Larysa Baraban, Gianaurelio Cuniberti, and Oliver G. Schmidt . High-Performance Three-Dimensional Tubular Nanomembrane Sensor for DNA Detection. Nano Letters 2016, 16 (7) , 4288-4296. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b01337
  17. Silvia Hernández-Ainsa, Maria Ricci, Lloyd Hilton, Anna Aviñó, Ramon Eritja, and Ulrich F. Keyser . Controlling the Reversible Assembly of Liposomes through a Multistimuli Responsive Anchored DNA. Nano Letters 2016, 16 (7) , 4462-4466. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b01618
  18. Christopher E. Angevine, Sarah J. Seashols-Williams, and Joseph E. Reiner . Infrared Laser Heating Applied to Nanopore Sensing for DNA Duplex Analysis. Analytical Chemistry 2016, 88 (5) , 2645-2651. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.5b03631
  19. Alexander A. Lomzov, Yury N. Vorobjev, and Dmitrii V. Pyshnyi . Evaluation of the Gibbs Free Energy Changes and Melting Temperatures of DNA/DNA Duplexes Using Hybridization Enthalpy Calculated by Molecular Dynamics Simulation. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 2015, 119 (49) , 15221-15234. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.5b09645
  20. Michela Salamone, Giulia Carboni, Livia Mangiacapra, and Massimo Bietti . Binding to Redox-Inactive Alkali and Alkaline Earth Metal Ions Strongly Deactivates the C–H Bonds of Tertiary Amides toward Hydrogen Atom Transfer to Reactive Oxygen Centered Radicals. The Journal of Organic Chemistry 2015, 80 (18) , 9214-9223. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.joc.5b01661
  21. Caleb E. Wagner, Lucyano J. A. Macedo, and Aric Opdahl . Temperature Gradient Approach for Rapidly Assessing Sensor Binding Kinetics and Thermodynamics. Analytical Chemistry 2015, 87 (15) , 7825-7832. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.5b01518
  22. Tae-Gon Cha, Jing Pan, Haorong Chen, Heather N. Robinson, Xiang Li, Chengde Mao, and Jong Hyun Choi . Design Principles of DNA Enzyme-Based Walkers: Translocation Kinetics and Photoregulation. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2015, 137 (29) , 9429-9437. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.5b05522
  23. Annaël Brunet, Catherine Tardin, Laurence Salomé, Philippe Rousseau, Nicolas Destainville, and Manoel Manghi . Dependence of DNA Persistence Length on Ionic Strength of Solutions with Monovalent and Divalent Salts: A Joint Theory–Experiment Study. Macromolecules 2015, 48 (11) , 3641-3652. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.macromol.5b00735
  24. Sabrina Simoncelli, Hasitha de Alwis Weerasekera, Chiara Fasciani, Christopher N. Boddy, Pedro F. Aramendia, Emilio I. Alarcon, and Juan C. Scaiano . Thermoplasmonic ssDNA Dynamic Release from Gold Nanoparticles Examined with Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 2015, 6 (8) , 1499-1503. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b00272
  25. Curtis Hughesman, Kareem Fakhfakh, Roza Bidshahri, H. Louise Lund, and Charles Haynes . A New General Model for Predicting Melting Thermodynamics of Complementary and Mismatched B-Form Duplexes Containing Locked Nucleic Acids: Application to Probe Design for Digital PCR Detection of Somatic Mutations. Biochemistry 2015, 54 (6) , 1338-1352. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi500905b
  26. Julianne M. Troiano, Laura L. Olenick, Thomas R. Kuech, Eric S. Melby, Dehong Hu, Samuel E. Lohse, Arielle C. Mensch, Merve Dogangun, Ariane M. Vartanian, Marco D. Torelli, Eseohi Ehimiaghe, Stephanie R. Walter, Li Fu, Christopher R. Anderton, Zihua Zhu, Hongfei Wang, Galya Orr, Catherine J. Murphy, Robert J. Hamers, Joel A. Pedersen, and Franz M. Geiger . Direct Probes of 4 nm Diameter Gold Nanoparticles Interacting with Supported Lipid Bilayers. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2015, 119 (1) , 534-546. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp512107z
  27. Tyler J. Petty, Caleb E. Wagner, and Aric Opdahl . Influence of Attachment Strategy on the Thermal Stability of Hybridized DNA on Gold Surfaces. Langmuir 2014, 30 (50) , 15277-15284. https://doi.org/10.1021/la504128h
  28. Arun Kalliat Thazhathveetil, Anton Trifonov, Michael R. Wasielewski, and Frederick D. Lewis . Effect of Mg2+ Cations on the Dynamics and Efficiency of Hole Transport in DNA. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A 2014, 118 (45) , 10359-10363. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp502974s
  29. Biwu Liu, Erin Y. Kelly, and Juewen Liu . Cation-Size-Dependent DNA Adsorption Kinetics and Packing Density on Gold Nanoparticles: An Opposite Trend. Langmuir 2014, 30 (44) , 13228-13234. https://doi.org/10.1021/la503188h
  30. Haorong Chen, Te-Wei Weng, Molly M. Riccitelli, Yi Cui, Joseph Irudayaraj, and Jong Hyun Choi . Understanding the Mechanical Properties of DNA Origami Tiles and Controlling the Kinetics of Their Folding and Unfolding Reconfiguration. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2014, 136 (19) , 6995-7005. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja500612d
  31. Stefan de Kok, Leslie H. Stanton, Todd Slaby, Maxime Durot, Victor F. Holmes, Kedar G. Patel, Darren Platt, Elaine B. Shapland, Zach Serber, Jed Dean, Jack D. Newman, and Sunil S. Chandran. Rapid and Reliable DNA Assembly via Ligase Cycling Reaction. ACS Synthetic Biology 2014, 3 (2) , 97-106. https://doi.org/10.1021/sb4001992
  32. Stephanie R. Walter, Kaylie L. Young, Joseph G. Holland, Richard L. Gieseck, Chad A. Mirkin, and Franz M. Geiger . Counting the Number of Magnesium Ions Bound to the Surface-Immobilized Thymine Oligonucleotides That Comprise Spherical Nucleic Acids. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2013, 135 (46) , 17339-17348. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja406551k
  33. Zexiang Chen and Brent M. Znosko . Effect of Sodium Ions on RNA Duplex Stability. Biochemistry 2013, 52 (42) , 7477-7485. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi4008275
  34. Joseph G. Holland and Franz M. Geiger . Y(III) Interactions with Guanine Oligonucleotides Covalently Attached to Aqueous/Solid Interfaces. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 2013, 117 (3) , 825-832. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp3105858
  35. Yasumasa Kimura, Takeshi Hanami, Yuki Tanaka, Michiel J. L. de Hoon, Takahiro Soma, Matthias Harbers, Alexander Lezhava, Yoshihide Hayashizaki, and Kengo Usui . Effect of Thiazole Orange Doubly Labeled Thymidine on DNA Duplex Formation. Biochemistry 2012, 51 (31) , 6056-6067. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi300293d
  36. Peter C. Anthony, Adelene Y. L. Sim, Vincent B. Chu, Sebastian Doniach, Steven M. Block, and Daniel Herschlag . Electrostatics of Nucleic Acid Folding under Conformational Constraint. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2012, 134 (10) , 4607-4614. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja208466h
  37. Chunhua Liu, Eunsuk Kim, Bruce Demple, and Nadrian C. Seeman . A DNA-Based Nanomechanical Device Used To Characterize the Distortion of DNA by Apo-SoxR Protein. Biochemistry 2012, 51 (5) , 937-943. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi201196s
  38. Joseph G. Holland, David S. Jordan, and Franz M. Geiger . Divalent Metal Cation Speciation and Binding to Surface-Bound Oligonucleotide Single Strands Studied by Second Harmonic Generation. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 2011, 115 (25) , 8338-8345. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp202884n
  39. Joseph G. Holland, Jessica N. Malin, David S. Jordan, and Franz M. Geiger . Specific and Nonspecific Metal Ion−Nucleotide Interactions at Aqueous/Solid Interfaces Functionalized with Adenine, Thymine, Guanine, and Cytosine Oligomers. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2011, 133 (8) , 2567-2570. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja107883x
  40. David Yu Zhang . Cooperative Hybridization of Oligonucleotides. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2011, 133 (4) , 1077-1086. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja109089q
  41. Alexander R. J. Silalahi, Alexander H. Boschitsch, Robert C. Harris, and Marcia O. Fenley . Comparing the Predictions of the Nonlinear Poisson−Boltzmann Equation and the Ion Size-Modified Poisson−Boltzmann Equation for a Low-Dielectric Charged Spherical Cavity in an Aqueous Salt Solution. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 2010, 6 (12) , 3631-3639. https://doi.org/10.1021/ct1002785
  42. Carlos M. Rodríguez López, Beatriz Guzmán Asenjo, Amanda J. Lloyd, and Mike J. Wilkinson. Direct Detection and Quantification of Methylation in Nucleic Acid Sequences Using High-Resolution Melting Analysis. Analytical Chemistry 2010, 82 (21) , 9100-9108. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac1024057
  43. Aklank Jain, Albino Bacolla, Prasun Chakraborty, Frank Grosse and Karen M. Vasquez . Human DHX9 Helicase Unwinds Triple-Helical DNA Structures. Biochemistry 2010, 49 (33) , 6992-6999. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi100795m
  44. Manuel Röthlingshöfer and Clemens Richert . Chemical Primer Extension at Submillimolar Concentration of Deoxynucleotides. The Journal of Organic Chemistry 2010, 75 (12) , 3945-3952. https://doi.org/10.1021/jo1002467
  45. Wolfgang Kaiser and Ulrich Rant. Conformations of End-Tethered DNA Molecules on Gold Surfaces: Influences of Applied Electric Potential, Electrolyte Screening, and Temperature. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2010, 132 (23) , 7935-7945. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja908727d
  46. David Yu Zhang and Erik Winfree. Control of DNA Strand Displacement Kinetics Using Toehold Exchange. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2009, 131 (47) , 17303-17314. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja906987s
  47. Josephine Ruta, Sandrine Perrier, Corinne Ravelet, Jennifer Fize and Eric Peyrin. Noncompetitive Fluorescence Polarization Aptamer-based Assay for Small Molecule Detection. Analytical Chemistry 2009, 81 (17) , 7468-7473. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac9014512
  48. Ruohong Shi, Joshua Fern, Weinan Xu, Sisi Jia, Qi Huang, Gayatri Pahapale, Rebecca Schulman, David H. Gracias. Multicomponent DNA Polymerization Motor Gels. Small 2020, 16 (37) , 2002946. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202002946
  49. Dipanwita Banerjee, Hisae Tateishi-Karimata, Tatsuya Ohyama, Saptarshi Ghosh, Tamaki Endoh, Shuntaro Takahashi, Naoki Sugimoto. Improved nearest-neighbor parameters for the stability of RNA/DNA hybrids under a physiological condition. Nucleic Acids Research 2020, 49 https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkaa572
  50. Xinyang Yu, Michael J. Buck. Pioneer factors and their in vitro identification methods. Molecular Genetics and Genomics 2020, 295 (4) , 825-835. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00438-020-01675-9
  51. Yujie Wang, Taigang Liu, Ting Yu, Zhi-Jie Tan, Wenbing Zhang. Salt effect on thermodynamics and kinetics of a single RNA base pair. RNA 2020, 26 (4) , 470-480. https://doi.org/10.1261/rna.073882.119
  52. Shodai Togo, Ken Sato, Ryuzo Kawamura, Naritaka Kobayashi, Makoto Noiri, Seiichiro Nakabayashi, Yuji Teramura, Hiroshi Y. Yoshikawa. Quantitative evaluation of the impact of artificial cell adhesion via DNA hybridization on E-cadherin-mediated cell adhesion. APL Bioengineering 2020, 4 (1) , 016103. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5123749
  53. Damian Kaniowski, Katarzyna Ebenryter-Olbinska, Katarzyna Kulik, Slawomir Janczak, Anna Maciaszek, Katarzyna Bednarska-Szczepaniak, Barbara Nawrot, Zbigniew Lesnikowski. Boron clusters as a platform for new materials: composites of nucleic acids and oligofunctionalized carboranes (C 2 B 10 H 12 ) and their assembly into functional nanoparticles. Nanoscale 2020, 12 (1) , 103-114. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9NR06550D
  54. Sebastian Barthel, Sebastian Palluk, Nathan J. Hillson, Jay D. Keasling, Daniel H. Arlow. Enhancing Terminal Deoxynucleotidyl Transferase Activity on Substrates with 3′ Terminal Structures for Enzymatic De Novo DNA Synthesis. Genes 2020, 11 (1) , 102. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11010102
  55. Simon Vecchioni, Mark C. Capece, Emily Toomey, Le Nguyen, Austin Ray, Alissa Greenberg, Kosuke Fujishima, Jesica Urbina, Ivan G. Paulino-Lima, Vitor Pinheiro, Joseph Shih, Gary Wessel, Shalom J. Wind, Lynn Rothschild. Construction and characterization of metal ion-containing DNA nanowires for synthetic biology and nanotechnology. Scientific Reports 2019, 9 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-43316-1
  56. Saientan Bag, Prabal K. Maiti. Tuning molecular fluctuation to boost the conductance in DNA based molecular wires. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 2019, 21 (42) , 23514-23520. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9CP03589C
  57. Vui V. Nguyen, Samorn Ponchunchoovong, Sajeera Kupittayanant, Pakanit Kupittayanant. Effects of egg yolk and soybean lecithin on sperm quality determined by computer‐assisted sperm analysis and confocal laser scanning microscope in chilled canine sperm. Veterinary Medicine and Science 2019, 5 (3) , 345-360. https://doi.org/10.1002/vms3.158
  58. Keren Jiang, Faheem Khan, Javix Thomas, Parth Rakesh Desai, Arindam Phani, Siddhartha Das, Thomas Thundat. Thermomechanical responses of microfluidic cantilever capture DNA melting and properties of DNA premelting states using picoliters of DNA solution. Applied Physics Letters 2019, 114 (17) , 173703. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5092333
  59. Manshu Peng, Na Na, Jin Ouyang. A Fluorescence Light‐Up Silver Nanocluster Beacon Modulated by Metal Ions and Its Application in Telomerase‐Activity Detection. Chemistry – A European Journal 2019, 25 (14) , 3598-3605. https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.201805308
  60. Liang Zhao, Mang Chen, Xian Wang, Jinge Yang, Zhimin Shi, Qian Chen, Jingqiu Song, Wenhui Shen, Yusong Tu. Effects of salt on solute association behavior in nanoconfined aqueous solutions. Physics Letters A 2019, 383 (1) , 40-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2018.09.001
  61. Tomasz J. Merta, Nicholas E. Geacintov, Vladimir Shafirovich. Generation of 8-oxo-7,8-dihydroguanine in G-Quadruplexes Models of Human Telomere Sequences by One-electron Oxidation. Photochemistry and Photobiology 2019, 95 (1) , 244-251. https://doi.org/10.1111/php.12926
  62. Niels Schlichting, Felix Reinhardt, Sven Jager, Michael Schmidt, Johannes Kabisch. Optimization of the experimental parameters of the ligase cycling reaction. Synthetic Biology 2019, 4 (1) https://doi.org/10.1093/synbio/ysz020
  63. Rémi Veneziano, Tyson R. Shepherd, Sakul Ratanalert, Leila Bellou, Chaoqun Tao, Mark Bathe. In vitro synthesis of gene-length single-stranded DNA. Scientific Reports 2018, 8 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-24677-5
  64. Masahide Sato. Two-dimensional structures formed in a binary system of DNA nanoparticles with a short-range interaction potential. Japanese Journal of Applied Physics 2018, 57 (12) , 125002. https://doi.org/10.7567/JJAP.57.125002
  65. Germán Alberto Téllez, Jesica Alejandra Zapata, Lily Johana Toro, Diana Carolina Henao, Juan Pablo Bedoya, Juan David Rivera, Juan Valentin Trujillo, Bruno Rivas-Santiago, Richard Onalbi Hoyos, Jhon Carlos Castano. Identification, Characterization, Immunolocalization, and Biological Activity of Lucilin Peptide. Acta Tropica 2018, 185 , 318-326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2018.06.003
  66. Alexander Vologodskii, Maxim D. Frank-Kamenetskii. DNA melting and energetics of the double helix. Physics of Life Reviews 2018, 25 , 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2017.11.012
  67. Micah J. McCauley, Mark C. Williams. The elusive keys to nucleic acid stability. Physics of Life Reviews 2018, 25 , 37-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2018.02.002
  68. Richard Owczarzy. Predicting melting and folding of nucleic acids. Physics of Life Reviews 2018, 25 , 24-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2018.02.003
  69. Felix Ritort. Open questions about DNA melting. Physics of Life Reviews 2018, 25 , 34-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2018.03.009
  70. Charlotte Kielar, Yang Xin, Boxuan Shen, Mauri A. Kostiainen, Guido Grundmeier, Veikko Linko, Adrian Keller. On the Stability of DNA Origami Nanostructures in Low-Magnesium Buffers. Angewandte Chemie 2018, 130 (30) , 9614-9618. https://doi.org/10.1002/ange.201802890
  71. Charlotte Kielar, Yang Xin, Boxuan Shen, Mauri A. Kostiainen, Guido Grundmeier, Veikko Linko, Adrian Keller. On the Stability of DNA Origami Nanostructures in Low-Magnesium Buffers. Angewandte Chemie International Edition 2018, 57 (30) , 9470-9474. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201802890
  72. A.M.J. Smith, M. Bonato, K. Dzama, I.A. Malecki, S.W.P. Cloete. Mineral profiling of ostrich (Struthio camelus) seminal plasma and its relationship with semen traits and collection day. Animal Reproduction Science 2018, 193 , 98-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2018.04.004
  73. Ana S. Peinetti, Helena Ceretti, Martín Mizrahi, Graciela A. González, Silvana A. Ramírez, Félix G. Requejo, Javier M. Montserrat, Fernando Battaglini. Characterization and electrochemical response of DNA functionalized 2 nm gold nanoparticles confined in a nanochannel array. Bioelectrochemistry 2018, 121 , 169-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioelechem.2018.02.002
  74. Avat (Arman) Taherpour, Morteza Jamshidi, Omid Rezaei, Ali Rezaei Belverdi. Photoinduced electron transfer process on emission spectrum of N,N′-bis(salicylidene)-1,2-phenylenediamine as a Mg2+ cation chemosensor: A first principle DFT and TDDFT study. Journal of Molecular Structure 2018, 1161 , 339-344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2018.02.064
  75. Fuming Sang, Jia Liu, Xue Zhang, Jianxin Pan. An aptamer-based colorimetric Pt(II) assay based on the use of gold nanoparticles and a cationic polymer. Microchimica Acta 2018, 185 (5) https://doi.org/10.1007/s00604-018-2794-6
  76. Mario Vieweger, David J. Nesbitt. Synergistic SHAPE/Single-Molecule Deconvolution of RNA Conformation under Physiological Conditions. Biophysical Journal 2018, 114 (8) , 1762-1775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2018.02.022
  77. Kevin D. Whitley, Matthew J. Comstock, Yann R. Chemla. Ultrashort Nucleic Acid Duplexes Exhibit Long Wormlike Chain Behavior with Force-Dependent Edge Effects. Physical Review Letters 2018, 120 (6) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.068102
  78. Ang Yan Shan. Literature Review. 2018,,, 5-46. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2188-7_2
  79. Ang Yan Shan. DNA Split Proximity Circuit as a General Platform for Interrogating Biomolecular Events. 2018,,, 121-141. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2188-7_7
  80. Carl T. Wittwer, G. Mike Makrigiorgos. Nucleic Acid Techniques. 2018,,, 47-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-816061-9.00004-7
  81. Josep Maria Huguet, Marco Ribezzi-Crivellari, Cristiano Valim Bizarro, Felix Ritort. Derivation of nearest-neighbor DNA parameters in magnesium from single molecule experiments. Nucleic Acids Research 2017, 45 (22) , 12921-12931. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkx1161
  82. Matti Kaisti, Anssi Kerko, Eero Aarikka, Petri Saviranta, Zhanna Boeva, Tero Soukka, Ari Lehmusvuori. Real-time wash-free detection of unlabeled PNA-DNA hybridization using discrete FET sensor. Scientific Reports 2017, 7 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-16028-7
  83. Saminathan Ramakrishnan, Georg Krainer, Guido Grundmeier, Michael Schlierf, Adrian Keller. Cation-Induced Stabilization and Denaturation of DNA Origami Nanostructures in Urea and Guanidinium Chloride. Small 2017, 13 (44) , 1702100. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201702100
  84. Chaitali Singhal, C.S. Pundir, Jagriti Narang. A genosensor for detection of consensus DNA sequence of Dengue virus using ZnO/Pt-Pd nanocomposites. Biosensors and Bioelectronics 2017, 97 , 75-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2017.05.047
  85. Radim Knob, Daniel B. Nelson, Richard A. Robison, Adam T. Woolley. Sequence-specific DNA solid-phase extraction in an on-chip monolith: Towards detection of antibiotic resistance genes. Journal of Chromatography A 2017, 1523 , 309-315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2017.07.028
  86. Marek C. Milewski, Karol Kamel, Anna Kurzynska-Kokorniak, Marcin K. Chmielewski, Marek Figlerowicz. EvOligo: A Novel Software to Design and Group Libraries of Oligonucleotides Applicable for Nucleic Acid-Based Experiments. Journal of Computational Biology 2017, 24 (10) , 1014-1028. https://doi.org/10.1089/cmb.2016.0154
  87. Sze Y. Tan, Caleb Acquah, Sing Y. Tan, Clarence M. Ongkudon, Michael K. Danquah. Characterisation of charge distribution and stability of aptamer-thrombin binding interaction. Process Biochemistry 2017, 60 , 42-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2017.06.003
  88. Lucia R. Wu, Sherry X. Chen, Yalei Wu, Abhijit A. Patel, David Yu Zhang. Multiplexed enrichment of rare DNA variants via sequence-selective and temperature-robust amplification. Nature Biomedical Engineering 2017, 1 (9) , 714-723. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-017-0126-5
  89. Junxiu Wang, Guoliang Xiong, Liang Ma, Shihui Wang, Xu Zhou, Lei Wang, Lehui Xiao, Xin Su, Changyuan Yu. A dynamic sandwich assay on magnetic beads for selective detection of single-nucleotide mutations at room temperature. Biosensors and Bioelectronics 2017, 94 , 305-311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2017.03.023
  90. D. Popiel, A. Dawidziuk, G. Koczyk, A. Mackowiak, K. Marcinkowska. Multiple facets of response to fungicides – the influence of azole treatment on expression of key mycotoxin biosynthetic genes and candidate resistance factors in the control of resistant Fusarium strains. European Journal of Plant Pathology 2017, 147 (4) , 773-785. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-016-1042-3
  91. Chakavak Esmaeili, Lee Yook Heng, Chew Poh Chiang, Zulkafli A. Rashid, Eka Safitri, Radha Swathe Priya Malon Marugan. A DNA biosensor based on kappa-carrageenan-polypyrrole-gold nanoparticles composite for gender determination of Arowana fish (Scleropages formosus). Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical 2017, 242 , 616-624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2016.11.061
  92. Arghya Maity, Amar Singh, Navin Singh. Differential stability of DNA based on salt concentration. European Biophysics Journal 2017, 46 (1) , 33-40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00249-016-1132-3
  93. Kazuya Tone, Ryuichi Fujisaki, Takashi Yamazaki, Koichi Makimura. Enhancing melting curve analysis for the discrimination of loop-mediated isothermal amplification products from four pathogenic molds: Use of inorganic pyrophosphatase and its effect in reducing the variance in melting temperature values. Journal of Microbiological Methods 2017, 132 , 41-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2016.10.020
  94. Haixiang Yu, Juan Canoura, Bhargav Guntupalli, Xinhui Lou, Yi Xiao. A cooperative-binding split aptamer assay for rapid, specific and ultra-sensitive fluorescence detection of cocaine in saliva. Chemical Science 2017, 8 (1) , 131-141. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6SC01833E
  95. Xin Song, Abeer Eshra, Chris Dwyer, John Reif. Renewable DNA seesaw logic circuits enabled by photoregulation of toehold-mediated strand displacement. RSC Advances 2017, 7 (45) , 28130-28144. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RA02607B
  96. Ross A. Keenholtz, Nigel D.F. Grindley, Graham F. Hatfull, John F. Marko. Crossover-site sequence and DNA torsional stress control strand interchanges by the Bxb1 site-specific serine recombinase. Nucleic Acids Research 2016, 44 (18) , 8921-8932. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw724
  97. F. Kilchherr, C. Wachauf, B. Pelz, M. Rief, M. Zacharias, H. Dietz. Single-molecule dissection of stacking forces in DNA. Science 2016, 353 (6304) , aaf5508-aaf5508. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf5508
  98. Wenhu Zhou, Jinsong Ding, Juewen Liu. A Selective Na + Aptamer Dissected by Sensitized Tb 3+ Luminescence. ChemBioChem 2016, 17 (16) , 1563-1570. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbic.201600174
  99. Michael T. Hwang, Preston B. Landon, Joon Lee, Duyoung Choi, Alexander H. Mo, Gennadi Glinsky, Ratnesh Lal. Highly specific SNP detection using 2D graphene electronics and DNA strand displacement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2016, 113 (26) , 7088-7093. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1603753113
  100. Keriann Oertell, Emily M. Harcourt, Michael G. Mohsen, John Petruska, Eric T. Kool, Myron F. Goodman. Kinetic selection vs. free energy of DNA base pairing in control of polymerase fidelity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2016, 113 (16) , E2277-E2285. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1600279113
  101. Qiwang Wu, Haihui Shen, Hong Shen, Yue Sun, Lifang Song. Study on sensing strategy and performance of a microfluidic chemiluminescence aptazyme sensor. Talanta 2016, 150 , 531-538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2015.12.023
  102. Chunyan Wang, Jin H. Bae, David Yu Zhang. Native characterization of nucleic acid motif thermodynamics via non-covalent catalysis. Nature Communications 2016, 7 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms10319
  103. Takumi Isogai, Eri Akada, Sakiko Nakada, Naoya Yoshida, Ryugo Tero, Shunta Harada, Toru Ujihara, Miho Tagawa. Effect of magnesium ion concentration on two-dimensional structure of DNA-functionalized nanoparticles on supported lipid bilayer. Japanese Journal of Applied Physics 2016, 55 (3S2) , 03DF11. https://doi.org/10.7567/JJAP.55.03DF11
  104. Gregory J. S. Lohman, Robert J. Bauer, Nicole M. Nichols, Laurie Mazzola, Joanna Bybee, Danielle Rivizzigno, Elizabeth Cantin, Thomas C. Evans. A high-throughput assay for the comprehensive profiling of DNA ligase fidelity. Nucleic Acids Research 2016, 44 (2) , e14-e14. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv898
  105. Pascal Auffinger, Luigi D’Ascenzo, Eric Ennifar. Sodium and Potassium Interactions with Nucleic Acids. 2016,,, 167-201. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21756-7_6
  106. Jackson Travis Del Bonis-O'Donnell, Daniel Vong, Sumita Pennathur, Deborah Kuchnir Fygenson. A universal design for a DNA probe providing ratiometric fluorescence detection by generation of silver nanoclusters. Nanoscale 2016, 8 (30) , 14489-14496. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6NR03827A
  107. Angela Schneider, Fabian J. Eber, Nana L. Wenz, Klara Altintoprak, Holger Jeske, Sabine Eiben, Christina Wege. Dynamic DNA-controlled “stop-and-go” assembly of well-defined protein domains on RNA-scaffolded TMV-like nanotubes. Nanoscale 2016, 8 (47) , 19853-19866. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6NR03897B
  108. Daniel Dibaba, Pengcheng Xun, Kuninobu Yokota, Emily White, Ka He. Magnesium intake and incidence of pancreatic cancer: the VITamins and Lifestyle study. British Journal of Cancer 2015, 113 (11) , 1615-1621. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2015.382
  109. Lucia R Wu, Juexiao Sherry Wang, John Z Fang, Emily R Evans, Alessandro Pinto, Irena Pekker, Richard Boykin, Celine Ngouenet, Philippa J Webster, Joseph Beechem, David Yu Zhang. Continuously tunable nucleic acid hybridization probes. Nature Methods 2015, 12 (12) , 1191-1196. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3626
  110. Frits Dannenberg, Katherine E. Dunn, Jonathan Bath, Marta Kwiatkowska, Andrew J. Turberfield, Thomas E. Ouldridge. Modelling DNA origami self-assembly at the domain level. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2015, 143 (16) , 165102. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4933426
  111. Florence Souard, Sandrine Perrier, Vincent Noël, Claire Fave, Emmanuelle Fiore, Eric Peyrin, Julian Garcia, Cécile Vanhaverbeke. Optimization of Experimental Parameters to Explore Small-Ligand/Aptamer Interactions through Use of 1 H NMR Spectroscopy and Molecular Modeling. Chemistry - A European Journal 2015, 21 (44) , 15740-15748. https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.201501527
  112. Katherine E. Dunn, Frits Dannenberg, Thomas E. Ouldridge, Marta Kwiatkowska, Andrew J. Turberfield, Jonathan Bath. Guiding the folding pathway of DNA origami. Nature 2015, 525 (7567) , 82-86. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14860
  113. Cheolhee Kim, O-chul Lee, Jae-Yeol Kim, Wokyung Sung, Nam Ki Lee. Dynamic Release of Bending Stress in Short dsDNA by Formation of a Kink and Forks. Angewandte Chemie 2015, 127 (31) , 9071-9075. https://doi.org/10.1002/ange.201502055
  114. Cheolhee Kim, O-chul Lee, Jae-Yeol Kim, Wokyung Sung, Nam Ki Lee. Dynamic Release of Bending Stress in Short dsDNA by Formation of a Kink and Forks. Angewandte Chemie International Edition 2015, 54 (31) , 8943-8947. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201502055
  115. Albrecht Böttcher, Danny Kowerko, Roland K.O. Sigel. Explicit analytic equations for multimolecular thermal melting curves. Biophysical Chemistry 2015, 202 , 32-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpc.2015.04.001
  116. Alexandra Peacock-Villada, Vincent Coljee, Claudia Danilowicz, Mara Prentiss, . ssDNA Pairing Accuracy Increases When Abasic Sites Divide Nucleotides into Small Groups. PLOS ONE 2015, 10 (6) , e0130875. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130875
  117. M. J. Comstock, K. D. Whitley, H. Jia, J. Sokoloski, T. M. Lohman, T. Ha, Y. R. Chemla. Direct observation of structure-function relationship in a nucleic acid-processing enzyme. Science 2015, 348 (6232) , 352-354. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa0130
  118. Mathilde Lepoitevin, Pierre Eugène Coulon, Mikhael Bechelany, Julien Cambedouzou, Jean-Marc Janot, Sebastien Balme. Influence of nanopore surface charge and magnesium ion on polyadenosine translocation. Nanotechnology 2015, 26 (14) , 144001. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/26/14/144001
  119. Arnaud Buhot, Julia Pingel, Jean-Bernard Fiche, Roberto Calemczuk, Thierry Livache. Biophysics of DNA: DNA Melting Curve Analysis with Surface Plasmon Resonance Imaging. 2015,,, 61-88. https://doi.org/10.1201/b18229-4
  120. Amar Singh, Navin Singh. Effect of salt concentration on the stability of heterogeneous DNA. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 2015, 419 , 328-334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2014.10.029
  121. Zhijie Tan, Wenbing Zhang, Yazhou Shi, Fenghua Wang. RNA Folding: Structure Prediction, Folding Kinetics and Ion Electrostatics. 2015,,, 143-183. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9245-5_11
  122. Laurie D. Girard, Karel Boissinot, Régis Peytavi, Maurice Boissinot, Michel G. Bergeron. Structured oligonucleotides for target indexing to allow single-vessel PCR amplification and solid support microarray hybridization. The Analyst 2015, 140 (3) , 912-921. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4AN01352B
  123. ANNE C. EISCHEID, SASHA M. KASKO. Quantitative Multiplex Real-Time PCR Assay for Shrimp Allergen: Comparison of Commercial Master Mixes and PCR Platforms in Rapid Cycling. Journal of Food Protection 2015, 78 (1) , 230-234. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-14-203
  124. C.B. Passos, P.S. Kuhn, M.C. Barbosa. DNA denaturation in the rodlike polyelectrolyte model. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 2014, 413 , 481-488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2014.06.059
  125. Leroy K. Davis. Engineering cellulosic bioreactors by template assisted DNA shuffling and in vitro recombination (TADSir). Biosystems 2014, 124 , 95-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystems.2014.06.007
  126. Sai Wang, Wei Yong, Jiahui Liu, Liya Zhang, Qilong Chen, Yiyang Dong. Development of an indirect competitive assay-based aptasensor for highly sensitive detection of tetracycline residue in honey. Biosensors and Bioelectronics 2014, 57 , 192-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2014.02.032
  127. A. Dawidziuk, G. Koczyk, D. Popiel, J. Kaczmarek, M. Buśko. Molecular diagnostics on the toxigenic potential of F usarium spp. plant pathogens. Journal of Applied Microbiology 2014, 116 (6) , 1607-1620. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.12488
  128. Sheila Podell, Joanne B Emerson, Claudia M Jones, Juan A Ugalde, Sue Welch, Karla B Heidelberg, Jillian F Banfield, Eric E Allen. Seasonal fluctuations in ionic concentrations drive microbial succession in a hypersaline lake community. The ISME Journal 2014, 8 (5) , 979-990. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2013.221
  129. Jacklyn W S Ng, Deborah C Holt, Patiyan Andersson, Philip M Giffard. DNA Concentration Can Specify DNA Melting Point in a High-Resolution Melting Analysis Master Mix. Clinical Chemistry 2014, 60 (2) , 414-416. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2013.215582
  130. Kellie E. Kolb, Pyae P. Hein, Robert Landick. Antisense Oligonucleotide-stimulated Transcriptional Pausing Reveals RNA Exit Channel Specificity of RNA Polymerase and Mechanistic Contributions of NusA and RfaH. Journal of Biological Chemistry 2014, 289 (2) , 1151-1163. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M113.521393
  131. Sandip Kumar, Carlo Manzo, Chiara Zurla, Suleyman Ucuncuoglu, Laura Finzi, David Dunlap. Enhanced Tethered-Particle Motion Analysis Reveals Viscous Effects. Biophysical Journal 2014, 106 (2) , 399-409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2013.11.4501
  132. William Stephenson, Sean Keller, Rachel Santiago, James E. Albrecht, Papa Nii Asare-Okai, Scott A. Tenenbaum, Michael Zuker, Pan T. X. Li. Combining temperature and force to study folding of an RNA hairpin. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2014, 16 (3) , 906-917. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3CP52042K
  133. Blake N. Johnson, Raj Mutharasan. Biosensor-based microRNA detection: techniques, design, performance, and challenges. The Analyst 2014, 139 (7) , 1576. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3an01677c
  134. Kay Terpe. Overview of thermostable DNA polymerases for classical PCR applications: from molecular and biochemical fundamentals to commercial systems. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 2013, 97 (24) , 10243-10254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-013-5290-2
  135. Niranjan Srinivas, Thomas E. Ouldridge, Petr Šulc, Joseph M. Schaeffer, Bernard Yurke, Ard A. Louis, Jonathan P. K. Doye, Erik Winfree. On the biophysics and kinetics of toehold-mediated DNA strand displacement. Nucleic Acids Research 2013, 41 (22) , 10641-10658. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkt801
  136. Ruiyang Zou, Kang Zhou, Gregory Stephanopoulos, Heng Phon Too, . Combinatorial Engineering of 1-Deoxy-D-Xylulose 5-Phosphate Pathway Using Cross-Lapping In Vitro Assembly (CLIVA) Method. PLoS ONE 2013, 8 (11) , e79557. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0079557
  137. Sanchita Mukherjee, Dhananjay Bhattacharyya. Influence of divalent magnesium ion on DNA: molecular dynamics simulation studies. Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics 2013, 31 (8) , 896-912. https://doi.org/10.1080/07391102.2012.713780
  138. Fabian J. Eber, Sabine Eiben, Holger Jeske, Christina Wege. Bottom-Up-Assembled Nanostar Colloids of Gold Cores and Tubes Derived From Tobacco Mosaic Virus. Angewandte Chemie 2013, 125 (28) , 7344-7348. https://doi.org/10.1002/ange.201300834
  139. Fabian J. Eber, Sabine Eiben, Holger Jeske, Christina Wege. Bottom-Up-Assembled Nanostar Colloids of Gold Cores and Tubes Derived From Tobacco Mosaic Virus. Angewandte Chemie International Edition 2013, 52 (28) , 7203-7207. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201300834
  140. Feng-Hua Wang, Yuan-Yan Wu, Zhi-Jie Tan. Salt contribution to the flexibility of single-stranded nucleic acid of finite length. Biopolymers 2013, 99 (6) , 370-381. https://doi.org/10.1002/bip.22189
  141. Leonardo Moreira da Costa, Glaucio Braga Ferreira, José Walkimar de M. Carneiro. DFT studies of imino and thiocarbonyl ligands with the pentaaqua Mg2+ cation: affinity and associated parameters. Journal of Molecular Modeling 2013, 19 (6) , 2669-2677. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00894-013-1811-2
  142. Kenneth Morabito, Clay Wiske, Anubhav Tripathi. Engineering Insights for Multiplexed Real-Time Nucleic Acid Sequence-Based Amplification (NASBA): Implications for Design of Point-of-Care Diagnostics. Molecular Diagnosis & Therapy 2013, 17 (3) , 185-192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40291-013-0029-4
  143. . Measuring, Interpreting And Modeling The Stabilities And Melting Temperatures Of B-form Dnas That Exhibit A Two -state Helix-to -coil Transition. 2013,,, 355-395. https://doi.org/10.1201/b15428-19
  144. Zhi Qi, Robert A Pugh, Maria Spies, Yann R Chemla. Sequence-dependent base pair stepping dynamics in XPD helicase unwinding. eLife 2013, 2 https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.00334
  145. Amar Singh, Navin Singh. Phase diagram of mechanically stretched DNA: The salt effect. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 2013, 392 (9) , 2052-2059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2013.01.029
  146. A. K. Jissy, Sukanya Konar, Ayan Datta. Molecular Switching Behavior in Isosteric DNA Base Pairs. ChemPhysChem 2013, 14 (6) , 1219-1226. https://doi.org/10.1002/cphc.201201083
  147. Xia Geng, Dapeng Zhang, Hailin Wang, Qiang Zhao. Screening interaction between ochratoxin A and aptamers by fluorescence anisotropy approach. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry 2013, 405 (8) , 2443-2449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-013-6736-1
  148. Jean-Michel Arbona, Jean-Pierre Aimé, Juan Elezgaray. Cooperativity in the annealing of DNA origamis. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2013, 138 (1) , 015105. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4773405
  149. Jaishree Garhyan, Raad Z Gharaibeh, Stephen McGee, Cynthia J Gibas. The illusion of specific capture: surface and solution studies of suboptimal oligonucleotide hybridization. BMC Research Notes 2013, 6 (1) , 72. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-6-72
  150. Marine Dumousseau, Nicolas Rodriguez, Nick Juty, Nicolas Le Novère. MELTING, a flexible platform to predict the melting temperatures of nucleic acids. BMC Bioinformatics 2012, 13 (1) https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-13-101
  151. Geik Yong Ang, Choo Yee Yu, Chan Yean Yean. Ambient temperature detection of PCR amplicons with a novel sequence-specific nucleic acid lateral flow biosensor. Biosensors and Bioelectronics 2012, 38 (1) , 151-156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2012.05.019
  152. J. M. Arbona, J. Elezgaray, J. P. Aimé. Modelling the folding of DNA origami. EPL (Europhysics Letters) 2012, 100 (2) , 28006. https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/100/28006
  153. Leonardo Moreira da Costa, Stanislav R. Stoyanov, José Walkimar de M. Carneiro. Interaction between alkaline earth cations and oxo ligands: a DFT study of the affinity of Mg2+ for carbonyl ligands. Journal of Molecular Modeling 2012, 18 (9) , 4389-4396. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00894-012-1448-6
  154. C. V. Bizarro, A. Alemany, F. Ritort. Non-specific binding of Na + and Mg 2+ to RNA determined by force spectroscopy methods. Nucleic Acids Research 2012, 40 (14) , 6922-6935. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks289
  155. Jiangtao Ren, Jiahai Wang, Jin Wang, Nathan W. Luedtke, Erkang Wang. Enantioselective and label-free detection of oligopeptide via fluorescent indicator displacement. Biosensors and Bioelectronics 2012, 35 (1) , 401-406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2012.03.028
  156. Bernhard Spingler. Metal Ion-Promoted Conformational Changes of Oligonucleotides. 2012,,, 103-118. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2172-2_3
  157. Carl T. Wittwer, Noriko Kusukawa. Nucleic Acid Techniques. 2012,,, 401-442. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-4160-6164-9.00017-2
  158. Thomas G. Martin, Hendrik Dietz. Magnesium-free self-assembly of multi-layer DNA objects. Nature Communications 2012, 3 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms2095
  159. C. Izanloo, G. A. Parsafar, H. Abroshan, H. Akbarzadeh. Denaturation of Drew-Dickerson DNA in a high salt concentration medium: Molecular dynamics simulations. Journal of Computational Chemistry 2011, 32 (16) , 3354-3361. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.21908
  160. Stephen R Doyle, Chee Kai Chan, Warwick N Grant. Enhanced annealing of mismatched oligonucleotides using a novel melting curve assay allows efficient in vitro discrimination and restriction of a single nucleotide polymorphism. BMC Biotechnology 2011, 11 (1) https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6750-11-83
  161. Gordon S. Freeman, Daniel M. Hinckley, Juan J. de Pablo. A coarse-grain three-site-per-nucleotide model for DNA with explicit ions. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2011, 135 (16) , 165104. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3652956
  162. Grigory V. Mechetin, Dmitry O. Zharkov. Mechanism of translocation of uracil–DNA glycosylase from Escherichia coli between distributed lesions. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 2011, 414 (2) , 425-430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2011.09.106
  163. N. von Ahsen, C. T. Wittwer, E. Schutz. Monovalent and divalent salt correction algorithms for Tm prediction--recommendations for Primer3 usage. Briefings in Bioinformatics 2011, 12 (5) , 514-517. https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbq081
  164. Tobias M. Louw, Scott E. Whitney, Joel R. TerMaat, Elsje Pienaar, Hendrik J. Viljoen. Oligonucleotide optimization for DNA synthesis. AIChE Journal 2011, 57 (7) , 1912-1918. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.12410
  165. W. Russ Algar, Ulrich J. Krull. Characterization of the adsorption of oligonucleotides on mercaptopropionic acid-coated CdSe/ZnS quantum dots using fluorescence resonance energy transfer. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 2011, 359 (1) , 148-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2011.03.058
  166. Jung‐Won Keum, Adam P. Hathorne, Harry Bermudez. Controlling forces and pathways in self‐assembly using viruses and DNA. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Nanomedicine and Nanobiotechnology 2011, 3 (3) , 282-297. https://doi.org/10.1002/wnan.129
  167. V.A. Sorokin, V.A. Valeev, E.L. Usenko, V.V. Andrushchenko. Divalent metal ion effect on helix–coil transition of high molecular weight DNA in neutral and alkaline solutions. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 2011, 48 (2) , 369-374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2010.12.016
  168. Helena Horáková, Iva Polakovičová, Gouse M Shaik, Jiří Eitler, Viktor Bugajev, Lubica Dráberová, Petr Dráber. 1,2-propanediol-trehalose mixture as a potent quantitative real-time PCR enhancer. BMC Biotechnology 2011, 11 (1) , 41. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6750-11-41
  169. Hany Nasef, V. Cengiz Ozalp, Valerio Beni, Ciara K. O’Sullivan. Melting temperature of surface-tethered DNA. Analytical Biochemistry 2010, 406 (1) , 34-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ab.2010.06.049
  170. Tomáš Špringer, Hana Šípová, Hana Vaisocherová, Josef Štěpánek, Jiří Homola. Shielding effect of monovalent and divalent cations on solid-phase DNA hybridization: surface plasmon resonance biosensor study. Nucleic Acids Research 2010, 38 (20) , 7343-7351. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkq577
  171. Hany Nasef, Valerio Beni, Veli C. Őzalp, Ciara K. O’Sullivan. Cystic fibrosis: a label-free detection approach based on thermally modulated electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry 2010, 396 (7) , 2565-2574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-010-3489-y
  172. Sandrine Perrier, Corinne Ravelet, Valérie Guieu, Jennifer Fize, Béatrice Roy, Christian Perigaud, Eric Peyrin. Rationally designed aptamer-based fluorescence polarization sensor dedicated to the small target analysis. Biosensors and Bioelectronics 2010, 25 (7) , 1652-1657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2009.12.005
  173. Hany Nasef, Valerio Beni, Ciara K. O'Sullivan. Labelless electrochemical melting curve analysis for rapid mutation detection. Analytical Methods 2010, 2 (10) , 1461. https://doi.org/10.1039/c0ay00344a
  174. Jing Tang, Yanqiang Li, Zhiqiang Pan, Yubai Guo, Jie Ma, Sheng Ning, Pengfeng Xiao, Zuhong Lu. Single nucleotide variation detection by ligation of universal probes on a 3D poyacrylamide gel DNA microarray. Human Mutation 2009, 30 (10) , 1460-1468. https://doi.org/10.1002/humu.21080
  175. Valérie Moreau, Emilie Voirin, Clément Paris, Mitsuharu Kotera, Marc Nothisen, Jean-Serge Rémy, Jean-Paul Behr, Patrick Erbacher, Nathalie Lenne-Samuel. Zip Nucleic Acids: new high affinity oligonucleotides as potent primers for PCR and reverse transcription. Nucleic Acids Research 2009, 37 (19) , e130-e130. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkp661
  176. Jan Hoffmann, Thorsten. L. Schmidt, Alexander Heckel, Bernd Brutschy. Probing the limits of liquid droplet laser desorption mass spectrometry in the analysis of oligonucleotides and nucleic acids. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry 2009, 23 (14) , 2176-2180. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.4129
  177. Alan A. Chen, David E. Draper, Rohit V. Pappu. Molecular Simulation Studies of Monovalent Counterion-Mediated Interactions in a Model RNA Kissing Loop. Journal of Molecular Biology 2009, 390 (4) , 805-819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2009.05.071
  178. Marcus Bode, Samuel Khor, Hongye Ye, Mo-Huang Li, Jackie Y. Ying. TmPrime: fast, flexible oligonucleotide design software for gene synthesis. Nucleic Acids Research 2009, 37 (suppl_2) , W214-W221. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkp461
  • Abstract

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. Melting temperatures of DNA duplex oligomers are independent of pH in the range from 6.5 to 8.3. Solid symbols are 15-mers, open symbols are 30-mers, fraction of G·C base pairs vary from 0.3 to 0.7. Sequences are TTCTACCTATGTGAT (solid triangle), GCAGTGGATGTGAGA (solid circle), CAGCCTCGTCGCAGC (solid square), CTTAAGATATGAGAACTTCAACTAATGTGT (open triangle), AGTCTGGTCTGGATCTGAGAACTTCAGGCT (open circle), GACCTGACGTGGACCGCTCCTGGGCGTGGT (open square). Buffers contained 1.5 mM MgCl2, 50 mM KCl and 10 mM cacodylic acid or MOPS.

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. Comparison of effects of Na+ and K+ on melting temperatures in buffers of 55 mM (open triangle) and 205 mM (closed circle) monovalent ion concentrations. Duplex sequences (Ct = 2 µM) are in Table 4. Oligonucleotide lengths range from 15 to 30 base pairs. Melting temperatures determined in 10 mM Tris-HCl and 50 or 200 mM KCl buffers are plotted versus melting temperatures measured in 10 mM sodium phosphate and NaCl buffers (33). Diagonal solid line connects points where melting temperatures in both buffers would be the same.

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. Comparison of some commonly used Tm magnesium correction functions. Experimentally measured (solid circle) and predicted melting temperatures for 30-mer duplex, ODN11, 5′-AGTCTGGTCTGGATCTGAGAACTTCAGGCT-3′ in buffers containing 10 mM Tris-HCl and various amounts of Mg2+ ions are shown.

    Figure 4

    Figure 4. Dependence of melting temperatures on magnesium concentrations is plotted for representative duplexes, which are 15 (solid symbols) and 25 (open symbols) base pairs long. Percentages of G·C base pairs were either 32−33% (circle) or 72−73% (triangle). Tris+ ions are present at low concentrations where they have negligible effects on duplex stability. Experimental data were fitted with quadratic curves to illustrate trends.

    Figure 5

    Figure 5. Differences between 1/Tm values in buffers of various Mg2+ concentrations and 1 M Na+ buffer are shown as a function of fGC. Inset shows colored symbols used for oligonucleotides of various lengths. (A) 0.5 mM Mg2+, (B) 3 mM Mg2+, (C) 10 mM Mg2+, (D) 125 mM Mg2+.

    Figure 6

    Figure 6. Slopes (A) and intercepts (B) of fitted straight lines from Figure 5 are examined. Panels (C) and (D) display dependence of slopes and intercepts of fitted straight lines from Figure 6B on Mg2+ concentrations.

    Figure 7

    Figure 7. Experimental melting temperatures of the 60-mer duplex (see Materials and Methods) were obtained using DSC at low DNA concentration (Ct = 2 µM). Buffers contained 50 mM KCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH = 8.3) and various amounts of magnesium ions and deoxynucleotide triphosphates. Concentrations (mM) used in each experiment are indicated below the graph. The first row is the free [Mg2+], which is calculated as the difference between total Mg2+ and dNTP concentrations. dNTP “mix” contained equimolar concentrations of dATP, dGTP, dCTP and dTTP. The sum of their concentrations is shown in the table below the graph.

    Figure 8

    Figure 8. Competitive effects of K+ and Mg2+ examined for the 25 bp long duplex, ODN8, CTGGTCTGGATCTGAGAACTTCAGG. (A) Dependence of Tm on concentrations of magnesium and monovalent ions. (B) Solid circles are Tms plotted against ln R, where R = [Mg2+]0.5/[Mon+]. Buffers are composed of constant 1.5 mM Mg2+ while KCl concentration varies. The solid line shows melting temperatures predicted by sodium salt correction (eq 4) when no Mg2+ is present. The dashed line indicates Tm in magnesium buffer when no KCl is present. The dominant ion crossover that occurs on average at R of 0.22 is indicated with the dotted vertical line.

    Figure 9

    Figure 9. Flowchart for algorithm used to select the most accurate Tm salt correction equation depending on the relative amounts of monovalent and magnesium cations present.

    Figure 10

    Figure 10. Release of magnesium ions associated with duplex denaturation. (A) Experimental values of dTm/d(ln [Mg2+]) are shown in 1.5 mM (open circles), and 10 mM (closed circles) magnesium buffers as well as in the buffer containing both 1.5 mM MgCl2 and 50 mM KCl (dotted line). The GC content of oligonucleotides ranges from 40 to 60%. For the sake of clarity, experimental data for individual duplexes are not shown for the last buffer; the relationships are approximated with lines fitted to experimental data points. (B) The number of released magnesium ions per phosphate group is plotted as a function of oligonucleotide lengths. Solid lines were predicted from eqs 16 and 21, and from the published average dependence of ΔH° values on oligonucleotide length (35). (C) The number of released magnesium ions per phosphate group decreases with increasing GC content in 1.5 mM Mg2+ buffer. These relationships are predicted reasonably well using eqs 16 and 21 (solid lines).

  • References

    ARTICLE SECTIONS
    Jump To

    This article references 68 other publications.

    1. 1
      Sissoëff, I., Grisvard, J., and Guillé, E. (1976) Studies on metal ions-DNA interactions: specific behaviour of reiterative DNA sequences Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 31, 165 199
    2. 2
      Misra, V. K. and Draper, D. E. (1998) On the role of magnesium ions in RNA stability Biopolymers 48, 113 135
    3. 3
      Saiki, R. K., Gelfand, D. H., Stoffel, S., Scharf, S. J., Higuchi, R., Horn, G. T., Mullis, K. B., and Erlich, H. A. (1988) Primer-directed enzymatic amplification of DNA with a thermostable DNA polymerase Science 239, 487 491
    4. 4
      Hartwig, A. (2001) Role of magnesium in genomic stability Mutat. Res. 475, 113 121
    5. 5
      Record, M. T., Jr (1975) Effects of Na+ and Mg+2 ions on the helix-coil transition of DNA Biopolymers 14, 2137 2158
    6. 6
      Korolev, N., Lyubartsev, A. P., and Nordenskiöld, L. (1998) Application of polyelectrolyte theories for analysis of DNA melting in the presence of Na+ and Mg2+ ions Biophys. J. 75, 3041 3056
    7. 7
      Tan, Z.-J. and Chen, S.-J. (2006) Nucleic acid helix stability: effects of salt concentration, cation valence and size, and chain length Biophys. J. 90, 1175 1190
    8. 8
      Wilson, R. W., Rau, D. C., and Bloomfield, V. A. (1980) Comparison of polyelectrolyte theories of the binding of cations to DNA Biophys. J. 30, 317 326
    9. 9
      Manning, G. S. (1972) On the application of polyelectrolyte “limiting laws” to the helix-coil transition of DNA. II. The effect of Mg+2 counterions Biopolymers 11, 951 955
    10. 10
      Manning, G. S. (1978) The molecular theory of polyelectrolyte solutions with applications to the electrostatic properties of polynucleotides Q. Rev. Biophys. 11, 179 246
    11. 11
      Olmsted, M. C., Anderson, C. F., and Record, M. T., Jr (1991) Importance of oligoelectrolyte end effects for the thermodynamics of conformational transitions of nucleic acid oligomers: a grand canonical Monte Carlo analysis Biopolymers 31, 1593 1604
    12. 12
      Pack, G. R., Wong, L., and Lamm, G. (1999) Divalent cations and the electrostatic potential around DNA: Monte Carlo and Poisson-Boltzmann calculations Biopolymers 49, 575 590
    13. 13
      Williams, A. P., Longfellow, C. E., Freier, S. M., Kierzek, R., and Turner, D. H. (1989) Laser temperature-jump, spectroscopic, and thermodynamic study of salt effects on duplex formation by dGCATGC Biochemistry 28, 4283 4291
    14. 14
      Nakano, S., Fujimoto, M., Hara, H., and Sugimoto, N. (1999) Nucleic acid duplex stability: influence of base composition on cation effects Nucleic Acids Res. 27, 2957 2965
    15. 15
      von Ahsen, N., Wittwer, C. T., and Schütz, E. (2001) Oligonucleotide melting temperatures under PCR conditions: nearest-neighbor corrections for Mg2+, deoxynucleotide triphosphate, and dimethyl sulfoxide concentrations with comparison to alternative empirical formulas Clin. Chem. 47, 1956 1961
    16. 16
      Peyret, N. (2000)

       Prediction of Nucleic Acid Hybridization: Parameters and Algorithms

      , Ph.D. Thesis, Section 5.4.2, pp 128, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI.
    17. 17
      Dove, W. F. and Davidson, N. (1962) Cation effects on the denaturation of DNA J. Mol. Biol. 5, 467 478
    18. 18
      Lyons, J. W. and Kotin, L. (1965) The effect of magnesium ion on the secondary structure of deoxyribonucleic acid J. Am. Chem. Soc. 87, 1781 1785
    19. 19
      Ott, G. S., Ziegler, R., and Bauer, W. R. (1975) The DNA melting transition in aqueous magnesium salt solutions Biochemistry 14, 3431 3438
    20. 20
      Krakauer, H. (1971) The binding of Mg+2 ions to polyadenylate, polyuridylate, and their complexes Biopolymers 10, 2459 2490
    21. 21
      Krakauer, H. (1974) A thermodynamic analysis of the influence of simple mono- and divalent cations on conformational transitions of polynucleotide complexes Biochemistry 13, 2579 2589
    22. 22
      Kankia, B. I. (2003) Binding of Mg2+ to single-stranded polynucleotides: hydration and optical studies Biophys. Chem. 104, 643 654
    23. 23
      Draper, D. E. (2004) A guide to ions and RNA structure RNA 10, 335 343
    24. 24
      Zubay, G. and Doty, P. (1958) Nucleic acid interactions with metal ions and amino acids Biochim. Biophys. Acta 29, 47 58
    25. 25
      Rychlik, W., Spencer, W. J., and Rhoads, R. E. (1990) Optimization of the annealing temperature for DNA amplification in vitro Nucleic Acids Res. 18, 6409 6412
    26. 26
      Harris, S. and Jones, D. B. (1997) Optimisation of the polymerase chain reaction Br. J. Biomed. Sci. 54, 166 173
    27. 27
      Henegariu, O., Heerema, N. A., Dlouhy, S. R., Vance, G. H., and Vogt, P. H. (1997) Multiplex PCR: critical parameters and step-by-step protocol BioTechniques 23, 504 511
    28. 28
      Markoulatos, P., Siafakas, N., and Moncany, M. (2002) Multiplex polymerase chain reaction: a practical approach J. Clin. Lab. Anal. 16, 47 51
    29. 29
      Ignatov, K. B., Miroshnikov, A. I., and Kramarov, V. M. (2003) A new approach to enhanced PCR specificity Rus. J. Bioorg. Chem. 29, 368 371
    30. 30
      Owczarzy, R., Vallone, P. M., Gallo, F. J., Paner, T. M., Lane, M. J., and Benight, A. S. (1997) Predicting sequence-dependent melting stability of short duplex DNA oligomers Biopolymers 44, 217 239
    31. 31
      SantaLucia, J., Jr. and Hicks, D. (2004) The thermodynamics of DNA structural motifs Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 33, 415 440
    32. 32
      Mitsuhashi, M. (1996) Technical Report: Part 1. Basic requirements for designing optimal oligonucleotide probe sequences J. Clin. Lab. Anal. 10, 277 284
    33. 33
      Owczarzy, R., You, Y., Moreira, B. G., Manthey, J. A., Huang, L., Behlke, M. A., and Walder, J. A. (2004) Effects of sodium ions on DNA duplex oligomers: improved predictions of melting temperatures Biochemistry 43, 3537 3554
    34. 34
      Moreira, B. G., You, Y., Behlke, M. A., and Owczarzy, R. (2005) Effects of fluorescent dyes, quenchers, and dangling ends on DNA duplex stability Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 327, 473 484
    35. 35
      Owczarzy, R. (2005) Melting temperatures of nucleic acids: discrepancies in analysis Biophys. Chem. 117, 207 215
    36. 36
      Bevington, P. R. and Robinson, D. K. (1992) Data Reduction and Error Analysis for the Physical Sciences, WCB/McGraw-Hill, Boston, MA.
    37. 37
      Press, W. H., Teukolsky, S. A., Vetterling, W. T., and Flannery, B. P. (1996) Numerical Recipes in Fortran 77: The Art of Scientific Computing, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
    38. 38
      Good, N. E., Winget, G. D., Winter, W., Connolly, T. N., Izawa, S., and Singh, R. M. M. (1966) Hydrogen ion buffers for biological research Biochemistry 5, 467 477
    39. 39
      Dawson, R. M. C., Elliot, D. C., Elliot, W. H., and Jones, K. M. (1986) Data for Biochemical Research, Oxford University Press, Oxford, U.K., pp 424.
    40. 40
      Fukada, H. and Takahashi, K. (1998) Enthalpy and heat capacity changes for the proton dissociation of various buffer components in 0.1M potassium chloride Proteins 33, 159 166
    41. 41
      Plum, G. E. and Breslauer, K. J. (1995) Thermodynamics of an intramolecular DNA triple helix: a calorimetric and spectroscopic study of pH and salt dependence of thermally induced structural transitions J. Mol. Biol. 248, 679 695
    42. 42
      Privalov, P. L. and Ptitsyn, O. B. (1969) Determination of stability of the DNA double helix in an aqueous medium Biopolymers 8, 559 571
    43. 43
      Record, M. T., Jr (1967) Electrostatic effects on polynucleotide transitions. II. Behavior of titrated systems Biopolymers 5, 993 1008
    44. 44
      Gray, D. M. (1997) Derivation of nearest-neighbor properties from data on nucleic acid oligomers. I. Simple sets of independent sequences and the influence of absent nearest neighbors Biopolymers 42, 783 793
    45. 45
      Schildkraut, C. and Lifson, S. (1965) Dependence of the melting temperature of DNA on salt concentration Biopolymers 3, 195 208
    46. 46
      Tan, Z.-J. and Chen, S.-J. (2007) RNA helix stability in mixed Na+/Mg2+ solution Biophys. J. 92, 3615 3632
    47. 47
      Efron, B. and Tibshirani, R. J. (1993) . An Introduction to the Bootstrap, Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL.
    48. 48
      Völker, J., Klump, H. H., Manning, G. S., and Breslauer, K. J. (2001) Counterion association with native and denatured nucleic acids: an experimental approach J. Mol. Biol. 310, 1011 1025
    49. 49
      Philips, R. (1966) Adenosine and the adenine nucleotides. Ionization, metal complex formation, and conformation in solution Chem. Rev. 66, 501 527
    50. 50
      Sigel, H. (1993) Interactions of metal ions with nucleotides and nucleic acids and their constituents Chem. Soc. Rev. 22, 255 267
    51. 51
      Pecoraro, V. L., Hermes, J. D., and Cleland, W. W. (1984) Stability constants of Mg2+ and Cd2+ complexes of adenine nucleotides and thionucleotides and rate constants for formation and dissociation of MgATP and MgADP Biochemistry 23, 5262 5271
    52. 52
      Hudson, R. H. E., Uddin, A. H., and Damha, M. J. (1995) Association of branched nucleic acids: structural and physicochemical analysis of antiparallel T•AT triple-helical DNA J. Am. Chem. Soc. 117, 12470 12477
    53. 53
      Rose, D. M., Bleam, M. L., Record, M. T., Jr., and Bryant, R. G. (1980) 25Mg NMR in DNA solutions: dominance of site binding effects Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 77, 6289 6292
    54. 54
      Ma, C. and Bloomfield, V. A. (1995) Gel electrophoresis measurement of counterion condensation on DNA Biopolymers 35, 211 216
    55. 55
      Cowan, J. A., Huang, H.-W., and Hsu, L. Y. (1993) Sequence selective coordination of Mg2+(aq) to DNA J. Inorg. Biochem. 52, 121 129
    56. 56
      Buckin, V. A., Kankiya, B. I., Rentzeperis, D., and Marky, L. A. (1994) Mg2+ recognizes the sequence of DNA through its hydration shell J. Am. Chem. Soc. 116, 9423 9429
    57. 57
      Black, C. B. and Cowan, J. A. (1994) Quantitative evaluation of electrostatic and hydrogen-bonding contributions to metal cofactor binding to nucleic acids J. Am. Chem. Soc. 116, 1174 1178
    58. 58
      Gessner, R. V., Quigley, G. J., Wang, A. H.-J., van der Marel, G. A., van Boom, J. H., and Rich, A. (1985) Structural basis for stabilization of Z-DNA by cobalt hexaammine and magnesium cations Biochemistry 24, 237 240
    59. 59
      Sines, C. C., McFail-Isom, L., Howerton, S. B., VanDerveer, D., and Willimas, L. D. (2000) Cation mediate B-DNA conformational heterogeneity J. Am. Chem. Soc. 122, 11048 11056
    60. 60
      Blagoi, Y. U. P., Sorokin, V. A., Valeyev, V. A., Khomenko, S. A., and Gladchenko, G. O. (1978) Magnesium ion effect on the helix-coil transition of DNA Biopolymers 17, 1103 1118
    61. 61
      Anderson, C. F. and Record, M. T., Jr (1995) Salt-nucleic acid interactions Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 46, 657 700
    62. 62
      Shkel, I. A. and Record, M. T., Jr (2004) Effect of the number of nucleic acid oligomer charges on the salt dependence of stability (ΔG°37) and melting temperature (Tm): NLPB analysis of experimental data Biochemistry 43, 7090 7101
    63. 63
      Elson, E. L., Scheffler, I. E., and Baldwin, R. L. (1970) Helix formation by d(TA) oligomers. III. Electrostatic effects J. Mol. Biol. 54, 401 415
    64. 64
      Rouzina, I. and Bloomfield, V. A. (1997) Competitive electrostatic binding of charged ligands to polyelectrolytes: practical approach using the non-linear Poisson-Boltzmann equation Biophys. Chem. 64, 139 155
    65. 65
      Bacquet, R. J. and Rossky, P. J. (1988) Ionic distributions and competitive association in DNA/mixed salt solutions J. Phys. Chem. 92, 3604 3612
    66. 66
      SantaLucia, J., Jr (1998) A unified view of polymer, dumbbell, and oligonucleotide DNA nearest-neighbor thermodynamics Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 95, 1460 1465
    67. 67
      Stellwagen, E., Dong, Q., and Stellwagen, N. C. (2007) Quantitative analysis of monovalent counterion binding to random-sequence, double-stranded DNA using the replacement ion method Biochemistry 46, 2050 2058
    68. 68
      Bai, Y., Greenfeld, M., Travers, K. J., Chu, V. B., Lipfert, J., Doniach, S., and Herschlag, D. (2007) Quantitative and comprehensive decomposition of the ion atmosphere around nucleic acids J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129, 14981 14988
  • Supporting Information

    Supporting Information

    ARTICLE SECTIONS
    Jump To

    Additional sets of Tm values used to develop and validate new magnesium correction, results of DSC and CD experiments, nearest-neighbor model of Tm magnesium correction and Δn calculations for duplexes that melt in non-two-state fashion. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org. Further, the database of average melting profiles, fraction of melted base pairs versus temperature, is available at http://biophysics.idtdna.com/Paper7/Abstract7.html.


    Terms & Conditions

    Electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. The American Chemical Society holds a copyright ownership interest in any copyrightable Supporting Information. Files available from the ACS website may be downloaded for personal use only. Users are not otherwise permitted to reproduce, republish, redistribute, or sell any Supporting Information from the ACS website, either in whole or in part, in either machine-readable form or any other form without permission from the American Chemical Society. For permission to reproduce, republish and redistribute this material, requesters must process their own requests via the RightsLink permission system. Information about how to use the RightsLink permission system can be found at http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

You’ve supercharged your research process with ACS and Mendeley!

STEP 1:
Click to create an ACS ID

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

OOPS

You have to login with your ACS ID befor you can login with your Mendeley account.

MENDELEY PAIRING EXPIRED
Your Mendeley pairing has expired. Please reconnect

This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By continuing to use the site, you are accepting our use of cookies. Read the ACS privacy policy.

CONTINUE