ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
The 1.1 Å Resolution Crystal Structure of [Tyr15]EpI, a Novel α-Conotoxin from Conus episcopatus, Solved by Direct Methods
My Activity

Figure 1Loading Img
    Article

    The 1.1 Å Resolution Crystal Structure of [Tyr15]EpI, a Novel α-Conotoxin from Conus episcopatus, Solved by Direct Methods
    Click to copy article linkArticle link copied!

    View Author Information
    Centre for Drug Design and Development, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072 Australia, Department of Computer Science, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York 14260, and Hauptman-Woodward Medical Research Institute, 73 High Street, Buffalo, New York 14203
    Other Access Options

    Biochemistry

    Cite this: Biochemistry 1998, 37, 33, 11425–11433
    Click to copy citationCitation copied!
    https://doi.org/10.1021/bi9806549
    Published July 25, 1998
    Copyright © 1998 American Chemical Society

    Abstract

    Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

    Conotoxins are valuable probes of receptors and ion channels because of their small size and highly selective activity. α-Conotoxin EpI, a 16-residue peptide from the mollusk-hunting Conus episcopatus, has the amino acid sequence GCCSDPRCNMNNPDY(SO3H)C-NH2 and appears to be an extremely potent and selective inhibitor of the α3β2 and α3β4 neuronal subtypes of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR). The desulfated form of EpI ([Tyr15]EpI) has a potency and selectivity for the nAChR receptor similar to those of EpI. Here we describe the crystal structure of [Tyr15]EpI solved at a resolution of 1.1 Å using SnB. The asymmetric unit has a total of 284 non-hydrogen atoms, making this one of the largest structures solved de novo by direct methods. The [Tyr15]EpI structure brings to six the number of α-conotoxin structures that have been determined to date. Four of these, [Tyr15]EpI, PnIA, PnIB, and MII, have an α4/7 cysteine framework and are selective for the neuronal subtype of the nAChR. The structure of [Tyr15]EpI has the same backbone fold as the other α4/7-conotoxin structures, supporting the notion that this conotoxin cysteine framework and spacing give rise to a conserved fold. The surface charge distribution of [Tyr15]EpI is similar to that of PnIA and PnIB but is likely to be different from that of MII, suggesting that [Tyr15]EpI and MII may have different binding modes for the same receptor subtype.

    Copyright © 1998 American Chemical Society

    Read this article

    To access this article, please review the available access options below.

    Get instant access

    Purchase Access

    Read this article for 48 hours. Check out below using your ACS ID or as a guest.

    Recommended

    Access through Your Institution

    You may have access to this article through your institution.

    Your institution does not have access to this content. Add or change your institution or let them know you’d like them to include access.

     This work was supported by the Australian Industry Research and Development Board, AMRAD Operations Pty. Ltd., and the Australian Research Council. J.L.M. is supported by a Queen Elizabeth II Fellowship.

     University of Queensland.

    §

     State University of New York at Buffalo.

     Hauptman-Woodward Medical Research Institute.

    *

     To whom correspondence should be addressed. Phone:  +61 7 3365 4942. Fax:  +61 7 3365 1990. E-mail:  [email protected].

    Cited By

    Click to copy section linkSection link copied!
    Citation Statements
    Explore this article's citation statements on scite.ai

    This article is cited by 35 publications.

    1. Nan Jiang and Jing Ma. Influence of Disulfide Connectivity, Electrostatics, and Hydrophobicity on the Conformational Variations of α-Conotoxin GI Single-Disulfide Analogues: Simulations with Polarizable Force Field. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 2010, 114 (34) , 11241-11250. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp102844h
    2. John Gehrmann,, Norelle L. Daly,, Paul F. Alewood, and, David J. Craik. Solution Structure of α-Conotoxin ImI by 1H Nuclear Magnetic Resonance. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 1999, 42 (13) , 2364-2372. https://doi.org/10.1021/jm990114p
    3. Thao N. T. Ho, Han Siean Lee, Shilpa Swaminathan, Lewis Goodwin, Nishant Rai, Brianna Ushay, Richard J. Lewis, K. Johan Rosengren, Anne C. Conibear. Posttranslational modifications of α-conotoxins: sulfotyrosine and C-terminal amidation stabilise structures and increase acetylcholine receptor binding. RSC Medicinal Chemistry 2021, 12 (9) , 1574-1584. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1MD00182E
    4. Jordi Rius, Xavier Torrelles. A new density-modification procedure extending the application of the recent |ρ|-based phasing algorithm to larger crystal structures. Acta Crystallographica Section A Foundations and Advances 2021, 77 (4) , 339-347. https://doi.org/10.1107/S2053273321004915
    5. David J. Craik, Quentin Kaas, Conan K. Wang. A Practical Guide to Structural Aspects of Macrocycles (NMR, X‐Ray, and Modeling). 2017, 25-57. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119092599.ch2
    6. Eline Lebbe, Steve Peigneur, Isuru Wijesekara, Jan Tytgat. Conotoxins Targeting Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors: An Overview. Marine Drugs 2014, 12 (5) , 2970-3004. https://doi.org/10.3390/md12052970
    7. Che-Wook Lee, Si-Hyung Lee, Do-Hyoung Kim, Kyou-Hoon Han. Molecular docking study on the α3β2 neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptor complexed with α-Conotoxin GIC. BMB Reports 2012, 45 (5) , 275-280. https://doi.org/10.5483/BMBRep.2012.45.5.275
    8. Robert Capon. Biologically Active Natural Products from Australian Marine Organisms. 2011, 579-602. https://doi.org/10.1201/b11196-18
    9. A. Townsend, B. G. Livett, J.-P. Bingham, H.-T. Truong, J. A. Karas, P. O’Donnell, N. A. Williamson, A. W. Purcell, D. Scanlon. Mass Spectral Identification of Vc1.1 and Differential Distribution of Conopeptides in the Venom Duct of Conus victoriae. Effect of Post-Translational Modifications and Disulfide Isomerisation on Bioactivity. International Journal of Peptide Research and Therapeutics 2009, 15 (3) , 195-203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10989-009-9173-4
    10. Reena Halai, David J. Craik. Conotoxins: natural product drug leads. Natural Product Reports 2009, 26 (4) , 526. https://doi.org/10.1039/b819311h
    11. Estuardo López‐Vera, Manuel B. Aguilar, Emanuele Schiavon, Chiara Marinzi, Ernesto Ortiz, Rita Restano Cassulini, Cesar V. F. Batista, Lourival D. Possani, Edgar P. Heimer de la Cotera, Francesco Peri, Baltazar Becerril, Enzo Wanke. Novel α‐conotoxins from Conus spurius and the α‐conotoxin EI share high‐affinity potentiation and low‐affinity inhibition of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. The FEBS Journal 2007, 274 (15) , 3972-3985. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-4658.2007.05931.x
    12. Seung-Wook Chi, Do-Hyoung Kim, Baldomero M. Olivera, J. Michael McIntosh, Kyou-Hoon Han. NMR structure determination of α-conotoxin BuIA, a novel neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptor antagonist with an unusual 4/4 disulfide scaffold. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 2006, 349 (4) , 1228-1234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.08.164
    13. Richard J. Clark, Harald Fischer, Simon T. Nevin, David J. Adams, David J. Craik. The Synthesis, Structural Characterization, and Receptor Specificity of the α-Conotoxin Vc1.1. Journal of Biological Chemistry 2006, 281 (32) , 23254-23263. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M604550200
    14. Seung-Wook Chi, Do-Hyoung Kim, Baldomero M. Olivera, J. Michael McIntosh, Kyou-Hoon Han. Solution conformation of a neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptor antagonist α-conotoxin OmIA that discriminates α3 vs. α6 nAChR subtypes. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 2006, 345 (1) , 248-254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.04.099
    15. I. E. Kasheverov, Yu. N. Utkin, V. I. Tsetlin. Natural α-conotoxins and their synthetic analogues in study of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Russian Journal of Bioorganic Chemistry 2006, 32 (2) , 103-115. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1068162006020014
    16. Jon-Paul Bingham, Natalie M. Broxton, Bruce G. Livett, John G. Down, Alun Jones, Edward G. Moczydlowski. Optimizing the connectivity in disulfide-rich peptides: α-conotoxin SII as a case study. Analytical Biochemistry 2005, 338 (1) , 48-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ab.2004.10.001
    17. Emma L. Millard, Norelle L. Daly, David J. Craik. Structure‐activity relationships of α‐conotoxins targeting neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. European Journal of Biochemistry 2004, 271 (12) , 2320-2326. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1432-1033.2004.04148.x
    18. Sadasivannair Sudarslal, Govindaswamy Singaravadivelan, Palanisamy Ramasamy, Kuppanna Ananda, Siddhartha P Sarma, Sujit K Sikdar, K.S Krishnan, Padmanabhan Balaram. A novel 13 residue acyclic peptide from the marine snail, Conus monile, targets potassium channels. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 2004, 317 (3) , 682-688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.03.100
    19. J. Michael McIntosh, Layla Azam, Sarah Staheli, Cheryl Dowell, Jon M Lindstrom, Alexander Kuryatov, James E Garrett, Michael J Marks, Paul Whiteaker. Analogs of α-Conotoxin MII Are Selective for α6-Containing Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors. Molecular Pharmacology 2004, 65 (4) , 944-952. https://doi.org/10.1124/mol.65.4.944
    20. Seung-Wook Chi, Kyu-Hwan Park, Jae-Eun Suk, Baldomero M. Olivera, J.Michael McIntosh, Kyou-Hoon Han. Solution Conformation of αA-conotoxin EIVA, a Potent Neuromuscular Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor Antagonist from Conus ermineus. Journal of Biological Chemistry 2003, 278 (43) , 42208-42213. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M303342200
    21. Annette Nicke, Marion L. Loughnan, Emma L. Millard, Paul F. Alewood, David J. Adams, Norelle L. Daly, David J. Craik, Richard J. Lewis. Isolation, Structure, and Activity of GID, a Novel α4/7-Conotoxin with an Extended N-terminal Sequence. Journal of Biological Chemistry 2003, 278 (5) , 3137-3144. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M210280200
    22. Julie L. Dutton, Paramjit S. Bansal, Ron C. Hogg, David J. Adams, Paul F. Alewood, David J. Craik. A New Level of Conotoxin Diversity, a Non-native Disulfide Bond Connectivity in α-Conotoxin AuIB Reduces Structural Definition but Increases Biological Activity. Journal of Biological Chemistry 2002, 277 (50) , 48849-48857. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M208842200
    23. Kellathur N. Srinivasan, Vaithiyalingam Sivaraja, Isabelle Huys, Toru Sasaki, Betty Cheng, Thallampuranam Krishnaswamy S. Kumar, Kazuki Sato, Jan Tytgat, Chin Yu, B. Chia Cheng San, Shoba Ranganathan, H. John Bowie, R. Manjunatha Kini, Ponnampalam Gopalakrishnakone. κ-Hefutoxin1, a Novel Toxin from the ScorpionHeterometrus fulvipes with Unique Structure and Function. Journal of Biological Chemistry 2002, 277 (33) , 30040-30047. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M111258200
    24. Robert Newcomb, George Miljanich. Neurotoxins of Cone Snail Venoms. 2002, 617-651. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59259-132-9_28
    25. Kyu-Hwan Park, Jae-Eun Suk, Richard Jacobsen, William R. Gray, J. Michael McIntosh, Kyou-Hoon Han. Solution Conformation of α-Conotoxin EI, a Neuromuscular Toxin Specific for the α1/δ Subunit Interface of Torpedo Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor. Journal of Biological Chemistry 2001, 276 (52) , 49028-49033. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M107798200
    26. Iain A. Sharpe, John Gehrmann, Marion L. Loughnan, Linda Thomas, Denise A. Adams, Ann Atkins, Elka Palant, David J. Craik, David J. Adams, Paul F. Alewood, Richard J. Lewis. Two new classes of conopeptides inhibit the α1-adrenoceptor and noradrenaline transporter. Nature Neuroscience 2001, 4 (9) , 902-907. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn0901-902
    27. David E. Metzler, Carol M. Metzler, David J. Sauke. Chemical Communication Between Cells. 2001, 1741-1829. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012492543-4/50033-7
    28. Jessica P. Rogers, Peter Luginbühl, Karen Pemberton, Patrick Harty, David E. Wemmer, Raymond C. Stevens. Structure-Activity Relationships in a Peptidic α7 Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor Antagonist. Journal of Molecular Biology 2000, 304 (5) , 911-926. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmbi.2000.4247
    29. Hugo R. Arias, Michael P. Blanton. α-Conotoxins. The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology 2000, 32 (10) , 1017-1028. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1357-2725(00)00051-0
    30. Jee-Hyun Cho, K.Hun Mok, Baldomero M. Olivera, J.Michael McIntosh, Kyu-Hwan Park, Kyou-Hoon Han. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Solution Conformation of α-Conotoxin AuIB, an α3β4 Subtype-selective Neuronal Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor Antagonist. Journal of Biological Chemistry 2000, 275 (12) , 8680-8685. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.275.12.8680
    31. J. M. Mcintosh. Toxin Antagonists of the Neuronal Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor. 2000, 455-476. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-57079-7_17
    32. Aldo Franco, Frank Marí. Three-dimensional structure of α-conotoxin EI determined by1H NMR spectroscopy. Letters in Peptide Science 1999, 6 (4) , 199-207. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02443507
    33. J. Michael McIntosh, Ameurfina D. Santos, Baldomero M. Olivera. Conus Peptides Targeted to Specific Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor Subtypes. Annual Review of Biochemistry 1999, 68 (1) , 59-88. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.biochem.68.1.59
    34. David J. Adams, Paul F. Alewood, David J. Craik, Roger D. Drinkwater, Richard J. Lewis. Conotoxins and their potential pharmaceutical applications. Drug Development Research 1999, 46 (3-4) , 219-234. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2299(199903/04)46:3/4<219::AID-DDR7>3.0.CO;2-S
    35. Innokenty V Maslennikov, Zakhar O Shenkarev, Maxim N Zhmak, Vadim T Ivanov, Christoph Methfessel, Victor I Tsetlin, Alexander S Arseniev. NMR spatial structure of α‐conotoxin ImI reveals a common scaffold in snail and snake toxins recognizing neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors 1. FEBS Letters 1999, 444 (2-3) , 275-280. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-5793(99)00069-1

    Biochemistry

    Cite this: Biochemistry 1998, 37, 33, 11425–11433
    Click to copy citationCitation copied!
    https://doi.org/10.1021/bi9806549
    Published July 25, 1998
    Copyright © 1998 American Chemical Society

    Article Views

    257

    Altmetric

    -

    Citations

    Learn about these metrics

    Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

    Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

    The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.