Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

You’ve supercharged your research process with ACS and Mendeley!

STEP 1:
Click to create an ACS ID

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

MENDELEY PAIRING EXPIRED
Your Mendeley pairing has expired. Please reconnect
ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
Chromatographic Separation of Polymers
My Activity

Chromatographic Separation of Polymers

  • Taihyun Chang*
    Taihyun Chang
    Department of Chemistry and Division of Advanced Materials Science, Pohang University of Science and Technology, Pohang, 37673, Korea
    *E-mail: [email protected]
DOI: 10.1021/bk-2018-1281.ch001
  • Free to Read
Publication Date (Web):October 29, 2018
Copyright © 2018 American Chemical Society. This publication is available under these Terms of Use.
Recent Progress in Separation of Macromolecules and Particulates
Chapter 1pp 1-17
ACS Symposium SeriesVol. 1281
ISBN13: 9780841233096eISBN: 9780841233089

Chapter Views

2538

Citations

LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICS

Chapter Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

PDF (872 KB)

Abstract

Polymers are usually mixtures of molecules that are inhomogeneous in various molecular characteristics. For precise characterization of polymers, distributions in all of these molecular characteristics need to be addressed, which is generally an impossible task. However, it is often sufficient in practice to analyze a limited number of molecular characteristics. Liquid chromatography is the most widely used tool for this purpose and has made remarkable progress during the last half century in both instrumentation and understanding of the separation mechanism. In this chapter, various chromatographic techniques developed for polymer separation are briefly reviewed.

This publication is licensed for personal use by The American Chemical Society.

1 Introduction

CHAPTER SECTIONS
Jump To

Except for some biopolymers, most synthetic and natural polymers are not homogeneous in various molecular characteristics such as molecular weight (MW), chemical composition, chain architecture, etc. Distributions in the molecular characteristics are reflected in the final properties of polymeric materials and the precise characterization of these distributions is important in design and performance control of the polymeric materials. To analyze the multivariate distributions of a polymer sample, it is desirable to separate the polymer sample first according to the molecular characteristics of interest. For this purpose, liquid chromatography (LC) is the most commonly used technique.
Among numerous variations of the LC methods, size exclusion chromatography (SEC) has been used most widely for molecular weight distribution (MWD) analysis of polymers ( 1, 2, 3, 4). SEC separates polymer analytes using the distribution equilibrium of polymer chains between a common solvent in the pore and the interstitial volumes of the LC column packed with porous spherical particles. In an ideal SEC separation, the column packing materials should not adsorb the polymers and the distribution equilibrium of the polymers is solely due to the entropic exclusion of polymer chains from the pores ( 5). Therefore, the SEC eluent is commonly a strong (promoting desorption) solvent for the polymer analytes. (The solvent strength is a different concept from the thermodynamic solvent quality but a strong solvent is generally a good solvent.) SEC separation has advantages over other classical fractionation methods in speed and the amount of the sample required. SEC separation can be combined with a variety of detectors such as light scattering and viscosity detectors that allow measuring absolute MW and intrinsic viscosity online in conjunction with concentration detectors such as UV absorption or differential refractive index detectors.
Nonetheless, it is important to keep its limitation in mind. First, SEC separates the polymers according to their hydrodynamic size. While the separation being sensitive to one molecular characteristic is of course a distinct merit, as it is the principle of the universal calibration in SEC ( 6), SEC separation cannot distinguish between other molecular characteristics such as chain architecture or chemical composition beyond the chain size in the eluting solvent. Secondly, the resolution of SEC is limited due to the band broadening of the separation method. Although band broadening is a general phenomenon in chromatography, it needs to be considered carefully in the MWD characterization of polymers since the elution peak of a polymer sample is a convolution product of MWD and the instrumental band broadening ( 7).
To complement the limitation of SEC, another LC method utilizing the enthalpic interaction of analytes with the stationary phase, called liquid adsorption chromatography or interaction chromatography, has been increasingly used in recent years ( 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13). In principle, it is nothing but a typical HPLC method widely used for the separation of small molecules and the term of interaction chromatography (IC) will be used in contrast to SEC in this chapter. Since the IC separation is based on the interaction of polymer analytes with the stationary phase (surface of the packing materials in the column), the distribution equilibrium of the analytes between the mobile and the stationary phases is sensitive to not only MW but also the chemical nature of the polymers. The eluents used for IC separations are generally weak (promoting adsorption) to induce appropriate interaction strength. In terms of instrumentation, SEC and IC are essentially the same LC methods except for the choice of the stationary (column) and mobile (eluent) phase. IC and SEC separation modes can even be interconverted at the same stationary phase by changing either the eluent (composition if a mixed solvent is used) or column temperature. (Figure 1) shows the effect of solvent composition and column temperature on the SEC/IC retention of polystyrene samples with narrow MWD.

Figure 1

Figure 1. Chromatograms of six polystyrene standards (Mw: (1) 2.5k, (2) 12k, (3) 29k, (4) 165k, (5) 502k, (6) 1,800k). Single column (Nucleosil C18; 250 x 4.6 mm, 5 μm particle, 100 Å pore) was used and the flow rate was 0.5 mL/min. (Left) Solvent composition effect at a fixed column temperature of 30.5°C with the mixed eluents of CH2Cl2/CH3CN at different compositions as labeled in the plot. (Right) Temperature effect at a fixed eluent composition of 57/43 (v/v). The isothermal chromatograms were obtained at different column temperatures as labeled in the plot. The CAP condition is established at the composition of CH2Cl2/CH3CN = 57/43 (v/v) and the column temperature of 30.5°C. The vertical dashed lines indicate the elution time of the injection solvent peak.
From reference ( 14). This figure was reproduced with permission of Wiley and Sons.
In the LC separation of polymers, there exists an interesting transition behavior from the SEC mode to the IC mode, which is called the critical adsorption point (CAP) ( 15). This behavior is the result of compensation of the exclusion and the interaction effects of polymer chains with the porous stationary phase. At this point, polymer chains undergo a ‘phase transition’ from the unadsorbed state to the adsorbed state ( 16). The LC method utilizing this phenomenon is called as liquid chromatography at the critical condition (LCCC). In this chapter, various LC methods used in the separation of polymers will be briefly introduced. Since SEC is a well-established method, it will not be treated further.

2 Interaction Chromatography

CHAPTER SECTIONS
Jump To

The IC separation of polymers began in the late 1960’s using thin layer chromatography ( 17, 18). They demonstrated the successful separation of copolymers according to composition and the separation of homopolymers according to MW. Also the transition behavior between SEC and IC was observed by changing the solvent composition ( 19). Higher resolution IC separation using column LC followed later ( 20, 21). IC separation utilizes the interaction of polymeric solutes with the stationary phase and it is able to separate polymers according to their chemical composition distribution (CCD) and functionality as well as MWD. Also the band broadening in IC was found much smaller than SEC ( 22, 23). ((Figure 2))

Figure 2

Figure 2. Temperature Gradient Interaction Chromatography (TGIC) separation of 14 standard polystyrenes showing the high resolution separation of IC. The column temperature program is shown in the plot. Mobile phase was a mixture of CH2Cl2/CH3CN (57/43, v/v). Single C18 bonded silica column (Nucleosil C18, 250 x 2.1 mm, 5 μm, 100 Å) was used and the flow rate was 0.1 mL/min. TGIC shows much lower Mw/Mn values than SEC indicating higher resolution of IC than SEC.
From reference ( 24). This figure was reproduced with permission from American Laboratory.
The sensitivity of IC to multiple molecular characteristics is a merit over SEC, however, it often makes the result of the IC separation more complicated since the retention of polymers is controlled by multiple factors. Furthermore, the IC retention of a polymer sample can vary a lot for the polymers with wide distribution in the molecular characteristics. For an example, the interaction energy of a homopolymer solute is expected to be proportional to MW ( 25) and the retention of a polymer solute (proportional to the distribution equilibrium constant) increases exponentially with its MW. Therefore, an isocratic (constant eluent composition) and isothermal IC elution of a polymer sample having a wide MWD is practically impossible. To overcome this problem, the interaction strength is controlled during the elution by changing either the solvent composition (solvent gradient elution) or column temperature (temperature gradient elution) as demonstrated in (Figure 1).
In the solvent gradient interaction chromatography, solvent composition is changed from a weak to strong eluent condition so that the polymers elute in order of increasing interaction strength. This method is also called gradient polymer elution chromatography. Statistical copolymers of high MW elute near the CAP condition of corresponding chemical composition independent of MW and the solvent gradient IC is a powerful tool to separate random copolymers or polymer mixtures according to their chemical composition ( 26, 27, 28, 29, 30).
In temperature gradient interaction chromatography (TGIC), the eluent composition is fixed near the CAP condition, and the column temperature is programed to change the separation mode from IC to SEC ( 31, 32). The column temperature is usually raised to promote desorption during the separation under the presumption that the adsorption of polymer is an exothermic process and the solvent strength increases with the temperature raise. But an inverse temperature dependence is also observed in a few polymer-eluent-column systems. For a successful TGIC separation of the polymers showing the inverse temperature dependency, the column temperature needs to be decreased during the elution to increase the solvent strength. A representative example is the separation of polyethylene oxide-aqueous organic solvents-C18 bonded silica columns ( 33). The inverse temperature dependence (retention increases as the column temperature increases) indicates that the adsorption process is endothermic, i.e. energetically unfavorable. Similar inverse temperature dependency was also observed in polystyrene-chloroform/n-hexane-bare silica column ( 34) and poly(methyl methacrylate)-1,4 dioxane/CH2Cl2-bare silica column ( 35). It shows that the adsorption of polymer chains to the stationary phase is not a simple enthalpic interaction between the polymer chains with the surface of the porous medium. Hydrophobic interaction was proposed to explain the inverse temperature dependence of polyethylene oxide with C18 bonded silica stationary phase ( 36).
While solvent gradient elution is a common HPLC technique to separate the samples of wide MWD and/or CCD, the composition change of the mobile phase limits the utility of the detectors sensitive to the composition change (e.g. refractive index, light scattering, and viscosity detectors) due to the large background signal drift. On the other hand, temperature gradient elution is an isocratic elution method that allows more freedom in choosing detectors with appropriate temperature control. However, the temperature change cannot vary the solvent strength of the eluent as much as the solvent composition variation, and TGIC is suitable for the analysis of polymer systems that need a fine control instead of a large change of the solvent strength. TGIC has been successfully applied for high resolution separation of homopolymers according to MW ((Figure 2)) ( 22, 23), separation according to chemical composition ( 37), separation of polymer mixtures ((Figure 3)) ( 38, 39), fractionation of individual blocks in block copolymers ( 40, 41), separation of branched polymers ( 42, 43), separation according to the stereoregularity ( 44), and separation according to the isotopic content ( 45, 46).

Figure 3

Figure 3. TGIC separation of a mixture of 10 polystyrene (a-k: 1.7k, 5.1k, 11.6k, 22.0k, 37.3k, 68.0k, 114k, 208k, 502k, 1090k, 2890k) and 5 poly(methyl methacrylate) (1-5: 1500k, 501k, 77.5k, 8.5k, 2.0k) standards. S is the injection solvent peak. The temperature program is also shown in the plot. Three columns (Nucleosil C18, 250 x 4.5 mm, 100Ǻ & 500 Ǻ & 1,000Ǻ) are used and the mobile phase is a mixture of CH2Cl2/CH3CN(54/46 (v/v)).
From reference ( 38).
There are other LC techniques related to IC. One is the barrier method in which the separation mode is SEC and a narrow weak solvent plug (barrier) is injected prior to the sample injection ( 47, 48, 49). Since the polymer analytes are under SEC condition, they move faster than the barrier and catch up to the barrier in the separation column. Depending on the solvent strength of the barrier to the polymer species, some polymer species (for which the solvent strength of the plug is above the adsorption threshold) can pass the barrier while some cannot. The polymer species that cannot pass the barrier elute later with the barrier solvent plug. This method can be used effectively to separate polymer mixtures and multiple barriers of different solvent strength can be used to separate mixtures of more than two components ( 50). An evolution of the barrier method is the SEC-gradient elution. In this technique, instead of abrupt weak solvent plugs, a gradient of solvent strength (from strong to weak) is produced in the SEC column prior to the sample injection. The polymer species moves faster until it reaches the solvent composition of the adsorption threshold and then it moves together with the solvent. Polymer species can be separated depending on their adsorption threshold solvent composition ( 51, 52).

3 Critical Adsorption Point and Liquid Chromatography at Critical Condition

CHAPTER SECTIONS
Jump To

Critical adsorption point (CAP) is an interesting phenomenon playing an important role in the LC separation of polymers. At the CAP, the steric repulsion of the polymer segments from a solid surface is compensated by the attractive interaction with the surface. When a porous medium is used in the LC separation of polymers, the size exclusion effect of the polymers from the pores is balanced by the attractive interaction of the polymers with the surface of the packing materials ( 15, 53, 54), and the distribution of the polymer chains in the pores and at the interstitial space becomes the same at the CAP. The CAP condition is usually found at a separation condition (solvent composition and temperature) between the SEC mode and the IC mode elution as shown in (Figure 1). A collection of the critical conditions for various polymers was reported ( 55).

Figure 4

Figure 4. LCCC chromatograms of cyclic PSs and corresponding linear precursors at the CAP of linear PS. Linear precursors elute at about the same retention time (5.4 min) independent of the MW while the retention of cyclic polymer increases with molecular weight. The small peaks appearing near tR = 5 min are the injection solvent peaks. The elution peak of cyclic polymers is completely separated from the linear precursors down to the baseline. The chromatograms of cyclic PS (black line) show that most of the samples contain contaminants, mostly the linear precursors.
From reference ( 77).
A distinct feature observed at the CAP of a polymer species is the suppression of MW dependence in the LC retention, as the polymer elutes near the injection solvent peak independent of MW. This effect is sometimes called‘chromatographic invisibility’ and the ‘transparency’ of the polymer chain helps monitor the other molecular characteristics free from the MWD of the polymer under the critical condition. The LC technique utilizing this phenomenon is called LCCC and LCCC has been successfully employed for the separation and characterization of complex polymer systems such as the separation of individual components in polymer mixtures ( 56, 57, 58), the characterization of the individual blocks in block copolymers ( 59, 60, 61, 62, 63), and the separation of polymers according to the functionality ( 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71).
Another merit of LCCC is the ability to separate polymers by chain architecture. It was found that the polymers of different architecture show CAP at different temperatures ( 72, 73). This means that at the CAP of a linear polymer, branched polymers or cyclic polymers are retained differently and could be resolved from linear polymers. For a good example, LCCC can separate cyclic polymers from their linear precursors better than SEC or IC((Figure 4)). It was theoretically predicted ( 15, 74) and experimentally demonstrated that LCCC separation is the best available method for the purification of cyclic polymers from linear polymer byproducts present in samples synthesized by a ring-closure reaction of telechelic precursors ( 75, 76, 77, 78, 79). It was found that very small contamination of the linear chains changes the melt viscoelasticity of cyclic polymers dramatically ( 80). It was also found that the difference in the chain ends (the presence of different chemical groups) generated a small but noticeable effect on the CAP condition in addition to the effect of the chain architecture ( 72).

4 Two-Dimensional Liquid Chromatography (2D-LC)

CHAPTER SECTIONS
Jump To

In multidimensional chromatography, more than one chromatography methods are combined to separate the analytes. In practice, two-dimensional analysis using two different LC methods (2D-LC) is most widely used ( 81, 82, 83, 84, 85). Cross developments in thin layer chromatography is a good example of 2D-LC ( 18). In a comprehensive 2D-LC of a column chromatography, the effluent of the first dimension (1st-D) LC is injected to the second dimension (2nd-D) LC separation without loss. The chromatogram of a comprehensive 2D-LC is an overlay of the 2nd-D LC chromatograms. Therefore, repetitive 2nd-D LC separations need to be done rapidly to synchronize with the flow rate of the 1st-D LC separation and to reduce the total analysis time. Nonetheless, shortening the analysis time (achievable by high flow rate and/or by using a shorter column) may deteriorate the resolution and the analysis time and the resolution needs to be compromised for an optimum result.
Another important consideration for a successful 2D-LC separation is the solvent compatibility between the two LC separations. Since two different LC methods are combined, the injection solvent (1st-D LC solvent) is usually different from the eluent in the 2nd-D LC; poor transfer of the polymer species from the injection solvent to the eluent can deteriorate the 2nd-D LC separation. The most frequently observed problem is a break-through phenomenon in which the polymer species elute in the injection solvent plug without further separation in the 2nd-D LC ( 86). This problem occurs often when the 2nd-D LC eluent is weaker than the injection solvent (the eluent of the 1st-D LC). The compatibility problem is far less serious if the 2nd-D LC eluent is a stronger solvent for the polymer species.

Figure 5

Figure 5. 2D-LC chromatograms recorded by a UV absorption detector (260 nm) showing polymer MW (SEC) vs. 1st-D LC retention time at different column temperatures; SEC (T = 63.0 °C), LCCC (T = 37.2 °C), IC (T = 28.0 °C). PS standards: 3.3k, 10k, 31k, 113k, 384k, 1800k. 1st-D IC (abscissa): Nucleosil C18 150 x 4.6 mm, 7 μm, 500 Å); Eluent: CH2Cl2/CH3CN = 57/43 (v/v); Flow rate: 0.05 mL/min. 2nd-D SEC (ordinate): PL PolyPore (250 × 4.6 mm); Eluent: THF; Flow rate: 1.7 mL/min; Column temperature: 110 °C.
From the reference ( 92). This figure was reproduced with permission from Elsevier.
The most common configuration of 2D-LC for polymer analysis is a combination of IC and SEC (IC x SEC): IC is used as the 1st-D LC to separate the polymers in terms of molecular characteristics sensitive to the IC separation and SEC is used for the 2nd-D LC for a further separation according to the chain size. SEC is suitable for a 2nd-D LC separation since the SEC eluent is a strong solvent and the solvent compatibility problem is not serious. In addition, by virtue of being an isocratic/isothermal elution, SEC separation can be repeated rapidly and multiple detection is possible. Furthermore, the SEC elution volume is always smaller than the total void volume of a column (total permeation limit for the column set), which is good for rapid/repetitive runs of the 2nd-D LC separation. Size dependent SEC separation is often affected by molecular characteristics other than MW, but once homogeneity of the sample is improved after the 1st-D separation, SEC separation can be better correlated with MW ( 43, 87). Furthermore, with recent developments, a reasonable SEC separation can be completed in a few minutes ( 88, 89, 90, 91). (Figure 5) shows 2D-LC (IC x SEC) contour plots of PS standards demonstrating the three different chromatographic elution modes ( 92).

Figure 6

Figure 6. NP-TGIC × RPLC 2D-LC chromatogram of a low MW polystyrene-block-polyisoprene (1.7k-0.7k, Mw/Mn: 1.06) (1st-D NP-TGIC: Nucleosil Diol, 250 x 7.8 mm, 7 μm, 100 Å, Eluent: isooctane/THF=97/3 (v/v); Flow rate: 0.05 mL/min. 2nd-D RPLC: Kromasil C18, 150 x 4.6 mm, 5 μm, 100 Å, Eluent: CH2Cl2/CH3CN=53/47 (v/v), Flow rate: 1.1 mL/min, Trap column: Alltech C18, 3 μm, 100 Å, 33 × 70 mm).
From reference ( 93).
Although the use of other LC methods as a 2nd-D LC is not as popular as SEC, IC x IC and IC x LCCC have been used for more efficient characterizations of complex polymers than IC x SEC. (Figure 6) shows the IC x IC 2D-LC separation of a low MW block copolymer in which a full resolution of invidual oligomers is achieved. IC as a 2nd-D LC is relatively rare since IC separation is usually not operated in an isocratic/isothermal elution mode, making it difficult for rapid/repetitive runs. Furthermore, IC eluents are usually weak solvents and the solvent compatibility problem is more serious. Therefore, extra measures are often needed to connect two ICs without solvent compatibility problems ( 46, 93). On the other hand, LCCC can be used more easily as a 2nd-D LC since it is operated in isocratic/isothermal elution mode. If the 1st-D IC elution is done near the CAP condition, as in most TGIC separations, the solvent compatibility problem is not serious since the 1st-D IC and the 2nd-D LCCC uses a common solvent ( 69, 94)-96.

5 Epilogue

CHAPTER SECTIONS
Jump To

In this brief review, the discussion is restricted toseparation with respect to the molecular characteristics of polymers, however, identification of the polymer species after the separation is important as well. Multiple detection provides with much more information for a given separation. Various methods have been developed for the detection of the HPLC effluent beyond the common concentration detectors such as UV, RI and evaporative light scattering detectors. Light scattering and viscosity detectors are no longer new detection methods but their use is still largely limited to SEC. Other useful spectroscopic methods for structural identification are infrared and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopic detections.97-98 Mass spectrometry has made rapid progress in polymer analysis in recent years due to the development of soft ionization methods.99-100 It is a powerful tool to do both separation with respect to mass and structural identification of polymers but is still limited to relatively low MW range, and various discriminations in the ionization process need to be improved to be a general tool for polymer characterization. Current use of mass spectrometry is more or less limited to the identification of narrowly dispersed fractions obtained by an adequate separation method.
Although LC separation methods are widely used for the polymer characterization at the moment, other separation methods such as hydrodynamic chromatography101 and field flow fractionation102-103 have their own merits where the LC methods do not work satisfactorily, e.g. very high molecular weight polymers, strongly adsorbing polymers, nanoparticles, etc. Polymers are complex mixtures and a precise characterization of the multivariate distributions is an extremely difficult, if not impossible, task. In many cases, however, the information in need can be obtained by judiciously selecting right separation and detection methods.

References

CHAPTER SECTIONS
Jump To

This chapter references 94 other publications.

  1. 1
    Moore J. C. Gel Permeation Chromatography. I. A New Method for Molecular Weight Distribution of High Polymers J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Gen. Pap. 1964 2 835 843
  2. 2
    Mori, S.; Barth, H. G. Size Exclusion Chromatography; Springer-Verlag: New York, 1999; 208pp.
  3. 3
    Striegel, A. M.; Yau, W. W.; Kirkland, J. J.; Bly, D. D. Modern Size-Exclusion Chromatography, Practice of Gel Permeation Chromatography and Gel Filtration Chromatography; Wiley: Hoboken, 2009.
  4. 4
    Berek D. Size exclusion chromatography - A blessing and a curse of science and technology of synthetic polymers J. Sep. Sci. 2010 33 315 335
  5. 5
    Casassa E. F. Equilibrium distribution of flexible polymer chains between a macroscopic solution phase and small voids Polym. Lett 1967 5 773 778
  6. 6
    Grubisic Z. Rempp P. Benoit H. A Universal Calibration for Gel Permeation Chromatography Polym. Lett. 1967 5 753 759
  7. 7
    Tung L. H. Method of Calculating Molecular Weight Distribution Function from Gel Permeation Chromatograms J. Appl. Polym. Phys. 1966 10 375 385
  8. 8
    Gröckner, G. Gradient HPLC of Copolymers and Chromatographic Cross-Fractionation; Springer -Verlag: Berlin, 1992.
  9. 9
    Pasch H. Analysis of complex polymers by interaction chromatography Adv. Polym. Sci. 1997 128 1 45
  10. 10
    Berek D. Coupled liquid chromatographic techniques for the separation of complex polymers Prog. Polym. Sci. 2000 25 873 908
  11. 11
    Chang T. Recent Advances in Liquid Chromatography Analysis of Synthetic Polymers Adv. Polym. Sci. 2003 163 1 60
  12. 12
    Uliyanchenko E. van der Wal S. Schoenmakers P. J. Challenges in polymer analysis by liquid chromatography Polym. Chem. 2012 3 2313 2335
  13. 13
    Radke W. Polymer separations by liquid interaction chromatography: Principles - prospects - limitations J. Chromatogr. A 2014 1335 62 79
  14. 14
    Chang T. Lee H. C. Lee W. Park S. Ko C. H. Polymer characterization by temperature gradient interaction chromatography Macromol. Chem. Phys. 1999 200 2188 2204
  15. 15
    Gorbunov A. A. Skvortsov A. M. Statistical properties of confined macromolecules Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 1995 62 31 108
  16. 16
    Skvortsov A. M. Gorbunov A. A. Phase transitions in liquid chromatography of polymers Polym. Sci. U.S.S.R. 1989 31 1307 1313
  17. 17
    Inagaki H. Matsuda H. Kamiyama F. Determination of compositional heterogeneity in copolymers by thin-layer chromatography. I. Preliminary results for styrene-acrylate copolymers Macromolecules 1968 1 520 5
  18. 18
    Belenkii B. G. Gankina E. S. Thin-Layer Chromatography of Polymers Introductory Lecture J. Chromatogr. 1970 53 3 25
  19. 19
    Belenkii B. G. Gankina E. S. Tennikov M. B. Vilenchik L. Z. Fundamental Aspects of Adsorption Chromatography of Polymers and their Experimental Verification by Thin-Layer Chromatography J. Chromatogr. 1978 147 99 110
  20. 20
    Teramachi S. Hasegawa A. Shima Y. Akatsuka M. Nakajima M. Separation of Styrene-Methyl Acrylate Copolymer According to Chemical Composition, Using High-Speed Liquid Chromatography Macromolecules 1979 12 992
  21. 21
    Armstrong D. W. Bui K. H. Nonaqueous Reversed-Phase Liquid Chromatographic Fractionation of Polystyrene Anal. Chem. 1982 54 706 708
  22. 22
    Lee H. C. Chang T. Polymer Molecular Weight Characterization By Temperature Gradient High Performance Liquid Chromatography Polymer 1996 37 5747 5749
  23. 23
    Lee W. Lee H. Cha J. Chang T. Hanley K. J. Lodge T. P. Molecular weight distribution of polystyrene made by anionic polymerization Macromolecules 2000 33 5111 5115
  24. 24
    Chang T. Lee W. Lee H. C. Cho D. Park S. Polymer characterization by non-size exclusion chromatography: Temperature gradient interaction chromatography Am. Lab. 2002 34 39
  25. 25
    Martin A. J. P. Biochim. Soc. Symp. 1949 3 4
  26. 26
    Klumperman B. Cools P. Philipsen H. Staal W. A qualitative study to the influence of molar mass on retention in gradient polymer elution chromatography Macromol. Symp. 1996 110 1 13
  27. 27
    Berek D. Liquid adsorption chromatography of copolymers: Molar mass (In)dependent retention Macromolecules 1999 32 3671 3673
  28. 28
    Brun Y. The mechanism of copolymer retention in interactive polymer chromatography. I. Critical point of adsorption for statistical copolymers J. Liq. Chromatogr. Relat. Technol. 1999 22 3027 3065
  29. 29
    Brun Y. The mechanism of copolymer retention in interactive polymer chromatography. II. Gradient separation J. Liq. Chromatogr. Relat. Technol. 1999 22 3067 3090
  30. 30
    Bashir M. A. Radke W. Predicting the chromatographic retention of polymers: Application of the polymer model to poly(styrene/ethylacrylate) copolymers J. Chromatogr. A 2012 1225 107 112
  31. 31
    Ryu J. Chang T. Thermodynamic prediction of polymer retention in temperature-programmed HPLC Anal. Chem. 2005 77 6347 6352
  32. 32
    Chang T. Polymer characterization by interaction chromatography J. Polym. Sci., Part B: Polym. Phys. 2005 43 1591 1607
  33. 33
    Lochmüller C. H. Moebus M. A. Liu Q. C. Jiang C. Elomaa M. Temperature Effect On Retention and Separation of Poly(Ethylene Glycol)S in Reversed-Phase Liquid Chromatography J. Chromatogr. Sci. 1996 34 69 76
  34. 34
    Teramachi S. Matsumoto H. Kawai T. Direction of temperature gradient for normal-phase temperature gradient interaction chromatography in polystyrene fractionation J. Chromatogr. A 2005 1100 40 44
  35. 35
    Matsumoto H. Kawai T. Teramachi S. Direction of temperature gradient and retention mechanism in normal-phase temperature gradient interaction chromatography for poly(methyl methacrylate) fractionation Polym. J. 2007 39 458 463
  36. 36
    Cho D. Park S. Hong J. Chang T. Retention mechanism of poly(ethylene oxide) in reversed-phase and normal-phase liquid chromatography J. Chromatogr. A 2003 986 191 198
  37. 37
    Cong R. J. deGroot W. Parrott A. Yau W. Hazlitt L. Brown R. Miller M. Zhou Z. A New Technique for Characterizing Comonomer Distribution in Polyolefins: High-Temperature Thermal Gradient Interaction Chromatography (HT-TGIC) Macromolecules 2011 44 3062 3072
  38. 38
    Lee H. C. Chang T. Characterization of Binary Polymer Mixtures by Simultaneous Size-Exclusion Chromatography and Interaction Chromatography Macromolecules 1996 29 7294 7296
  39. 39
    Park S. Park I. Chang T. Ryu C. Y. Interaction-controlled HPLC for block copolymer analysis and separation J. Amer. Chem. Soc. 2004 126 8906 8907
  40. 40
    Park S. Cho D. Ryu J. Kwon K. Lee W. Chang T. Fractionation of block copolymers prepared by anionic polymerization into fractions exhibiting three different morphologies Macromolecules 2002 35 5974 5979
  41. 41
    Chung B. H. Park S. Chang T. HPLC fractionation and surface micellization behavior of polystyrene-b-poly(methyl methacrylate) Macromolecules 2005 38 6122 6127
  42. 42
    Lee H. C. Lee W. Chang T. Yoon J. S. Frater D. J. Mays J. W. Linking-reaction kinetics of star shaped polystyrene by temperature gradient interaction chromatography Macromolecules 1998 31 4114 4119
  43. 43
    Ahn S. Lee H. Lee S. Chang T. Characterization of Branched Polymers by Comprehensive Two-Dimensional Liquid Chromatography with Triple Detection Macromolecules 2012 45 3550 3556
  44. 44
    Cho D. Park S. Chang T. Ute K. Fukuda I. Kitayama T. Temperature gradient interaction chromatography and MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry analysis of stereoregular poly(ethyl methacrylate)s Anal. Chem. 2002 74 1928 1931
  45. 45
    Perny S. Allgaier J. Cho D. Lee W. Chang T. Synthesis and Structural Analysis of an H-Shaped Polybutadiene Macromolecules 2001 34 5408 5415
  46. 46
    Ahn S. Im K. Chang T. Chambon P. Fernyhough C. M. 2D-LC Characterization of Comb-Shaped Polymers Using Isotope Effect Anal. Chem. 2011 83 4237 4242
  47. 47
    Berek D. Liquid chromatography of macromolecules under limiting conditions of desorption. 1. Principles of the method Macromolecules 1998 31 8517 8521
  48. 48
    Rollet M. Pelletier B. Berek D. Maria S. Phan T. N. T. Gigmes D. Separation of parent homopolymers from polystyrene and poly(ethylene oxide) based block copolymers by liquid chromatography under limiting conditions of desorption-3. Study of barrier efficiency according to block copolymers’ chemical composition J. Chromatogr. A 2016 1462 63 72
  49. 49
    Chatterjee T. Rickard M. A. Pearce E. Pangburn T. O. Li Y. F. Lyons J. W. Cong R. J. deGroot A. W. Meunier D. M. Separating effective high density polyethylene segments from olefin block copolymers using high temperature liquid chromatography with a preloaded discrete adsorption promoting solvent barrier J. Chromatogr. A 2016 1465 107 116
  50. 50
    Berek D. Macova E. Liquid chromatography under limiting conditions of desorption 6: Separation of a four-component polymer blend J. Sep. Sci. 2015 38 543 549
  51. 51
    Schollenberger M. Radke W. SEC-Gradients, an alternative approach to polymer gradient chromatography: 1. Proof of the concept Polymer 2011 52 3259 3262
  52. 52
    Maier H. Malz F. Reinhold G. Radke W. SEC Gradients: An Alternative Approach to Polymer Gradient Chromatography. Separation of Poly(methyl methacrylate-stat-methacrylic acid) by Chemical Composition Macromolecules 2013 46 1119 1123
  53. 53
    Skvortsov A. M. Gorbunov A. A. Adsorption Effects in the Chromatogrpahy of Polymers J. Chromatogr. 1986 358 77 83
  54. 54
    Ziebarth J. D. Wang Y. M. Interactions of complex polymers with nanoporous substrate Soft Matter 2016 12 5245 5256
  55. 55
    Macko T. Hunkeler D. Liquid chromatography under critical and limiting conditions: A survey of experimental systems for synthetic polymers Adv. Polym. Sci. 2003 163 61 136
  56. 56
    Pasch H. Chromatographic investigations of macromolecules in the critical range of liquid chromatography: 3. Analysis of polymer blends Polymer 1993 34 4095 4099
  57. 57
    Pasch H. Rode K. Chaumien N. Chromatographic Investigations of Macromolecules in the Critical Range of Liquid Chromatography .9. Separation of Methacrylate-Based Polymer Blends Polymer 1996 37 4079 4083
  58. 58
    Bashir M. A. Radke W. Predicting the chromatographic retention of polymers: Poly(methyl methacrylate)s and polyacryate blends J. Chromatogr. A 2007 1163 86 95
  59. 59
    Zimina T. M. Kever J. J. Melenevskaya E. Y. Fell A. F. Analysis of Block Copolymers by High-Performance Liquid Chromatography under Critical Condition J. Chromatogr. 1992 593 233 241
  60. 60
    Pasch H. Brinkmann C. Much H. Just U. Chromatographic investigations of macromolecules in the “critical range” of liquid chromatography II. Two-dimensional separations of poly(ethylene oxide-block-propylene oxide) J. Chromatogr. 1992 623 315
  61. 61
    Pasch, H.; Trathnigg, B. HPLC of Polymers; Springer-Verlag: Berlin, 1997.
  62. 62
    Falkenhagen J. Much H. Stauf W. Muller A. H. E. Characterization of block copolymers by liquid adsorption chromatography at critical conditions. 1. Diblock copolymers Macromolecules 2000 33 3687 3693
  63. 63
    Lee W. Cho D. Chang T. Hanley K. J. Lodge T. P. (LCCC)Characterization of polystyrene-b-polyisoprene diblock copolymers by liquid chromatography at the chromatographic critical condition Macromolecules 2001 34 2353 2358
  64. 64
    Belenky B. G. Valchikhina M. D. Vakhtina I. A. Gankina E. S. Tarakanov O. G. Thin-Layer Chromatography of Oligomers J. Chromatogr. 1976 129 115 124
  65. 65
    Entelis S. G. Evreinov V. V. Gorshkov A. V. Functionality and molecular weight distribution of Telechelic polymers Adv. Polym. Sci. 1986 76 129 175
  66. 66
    Gorshkov A. V. Much H. Becker H. Pasch H. Evreinov V. V. Entelis S. G. Chromatographic investigations of macromolecules in the “critical range” of liquid chromatography I. Functionality type and composition distribution in polyethylene oxide and polypropylene oxide copolymers J. Chromatogr. A 1990 523 91 102
  67. 67
    Baran K. Laugier S. Cramail H. Fractionation of functional polystyrenes, poly(ethylene oxide)s and poly(styrene)-b-poly(ethylene oxide) by liquid chromatography at the exclusion-adsorption transition point J. Chromatogr. B 2001 753 139 149
  68. 68
    Jiang X. L. Schoenmakers P. J. Lou X. W. Lima V. van Dongen J. L. J. Brokken-Zijp J. Separation and characterization of functional poly(n-butyl acrylate) by critical liquid chromatography J. Chromatogr. A 2004 1055 123 133
  69. 69
    Im K. Kim Y. Chang T. Lee K. Choi N. Separation of branched polystyrene by comprehensive two-dimensional liquid chromatography J. Chromatogr. A 2006 1103 235 242
  70. 70
    Petit C. Luneau B. Beaudoin E. Gigmes D. Bertin D. Liquid chromatography at the critical conditions in pure eluent: An efficient tool for the characterization of functional polystyrenes J. Chromatogr. A 2007 1163 128 137
  71. 71
    Oh J. Kuk J. Lee T. Ye J. Paik H. J. Lee H. W. Chang T. Molecular Weight Distribution of Living Chains in Polystyrene Prepared by Atom Transfer Radical Polymerization ACS Macro Lett. 2017 6 758 761
  72. 72
    Ziebarth J. D. Gardiner A. A. Wang Y. M. Jeong Y. Ahn J. Jin Y. Chang T. Comparison of Critical Adsorption Points of Ring Polymers with Linear Polymers Macromolecules 2016 49 8780 8788
  73. 73
    Ahn J. Chang T. Wang X. Limpouchova Z. Prochazka K. Influence of the Chain Architecture and the Presence of End-Groups or Branching Units Chemically Different from Repeating Structural Units on the Critical Adsorption Point in Liquid Chromatography Macromolecules 2017 50 8720 8730
  74. 74
    Gorbunov A. A. Skvortsov A. M. Theory of Chromatographic Separation of Linear and Ring Macromolecules Polym. Sci. USSR 1987 29 1025 1031
  75. 75
    Pasch H. Deffieux A. Henze I. Schappacher M. Riquelurbet L. Analysis of Macrocyclic Polystyrenes .1. Liquid Chromatographic Investigations Macromolecules 1996 29 8776 8782
  76. 76
    Lepoittevin B. Dourges M. A. Masure M. Hemery P. Baran K. Cramail H. Synthesis and characterization of ring-shaped polystyrenes Macromolecules 2000 33 8218 8224
  77. 77
    Lee H. C. Lee H. Lee W. Chang T. Roovers J. Fractionation of cyclic polystyrene from linear precursor by HPLC at the chromatographic critical condition Macromolecules 2000 33 8119 8121
  78. 78
    Lee W. Lee H. Lee H. C. Cho D. Chang T. Gorbunov A. A. Roovers J. Retention Behavior of linear and ring polystyrene at the chromatographic critical condition Macromolecules 2002 35 529 538
  79. 79
    Takano A. Kushida Y. Aoki K. Masuoka K. Hayashida K. Cho D. Kawaguchi D. Matsushita Y. HPLC Characterization of Cyclization Reaction Product Obtained by End-to-End Ring Closure Reaction of a Telechelic Polystyrene Macromolecules 2007 40 679 681
  80. 80
    Kapnistos M. Lang M. Vlassopoulos D. Pyckhout-Hintzen W. Richter D. Cho D. Chang T. Rubinstein M. Unexpected power-law stress relaxation of entangled ring polymers Nat. Mater. 2008 7 997 1002
  81. 81
    Pasch H. Analysis of complex polymers by multidimensional techniques. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 1999 1 3879 3890
  82. 82
    Kilz P. Two-dimensional chromatography as an essential means for understanding macromolecular structure Chromatographia 2004 59 3 14
  83. 83
    Berek D. Two-dimensional liquid chromatography of synthetic polymers Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2010 396 421 441
  84. 84
    Baumgaertel A. Altuntaş E. Schubert U. S. Recent developments in the detailed characterization of polymers by multidimensional chromatography J. Chromatogr. A 2012 1240 1 20
  85. 85
    Schoenmakers P. Aarnoutse P. Multi-Dimensional Separations of Polymers Anal. Chem. 2014 86 6172 6179
  86. 86
    Jiang X. L. van der Horst A. Schoenmakers P. J. Breakthrough of polymers in interactive liquid chromatography J. Chromatogr. A 2002 982 55 68
  87. 87
    Gerber J. Radke W. Separation of linear and star-shaped polystyrenes by two-dimensional chromatography E-Polymers 2005
  88. 88
    Pasch H. Kilz P. Fast liquid chromatography for high-throughput screening of polymers Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2003 24 104 108
  89. 89
    Popovici S. T. Schoenmakers P. J. Fast size-exclusion chromatography - Theoretical and practical considerations J. Chromatogr. A 2005 1099 92 102
  90. 90
    Cho H. Park S. Ree M. Chang T. Y. Jung J. C. Zin W. C. High temperature size exclusion chromatography Macromol. Res. 2006 14 383 386
  91. 91
    Uliyanchenko E. Schoenmakers P. J. van der Wal S. Fast and efficient size-based separations of polymers using ultra-high-pressure liquid chromatography J. Chromatogr. A 2011 1218 1509 1518
  92. 92
    Im K. Park H.-w. Lee S. Chang T. Two-dimensional liquid chromatography analysis of synthetic polymers using fast size exclusion chromatography at high column temperature J. Chromatogr. A 2009 1216 4606 4610
  93. 93
    Im K. Park H. W. Kim Y. Chung B. H. Ree M. Chang T. Comprehensive two-dimensional liquid chromatography analysis of a block copolymer Anal. Chem. 2007 79 1067 1072
  94. 94
    Murphy R. E. Schure M. R. Foley J. P. One- and two dimensional chromatographic analysis of alcohol ethoxylates Anal. Chem. 1998 70 4353 4360
  • Figure 1

    Figure 1. Chromatograms of six polystyrene standards (Mw: (1) 2.5k, (2) 12k, (3) 29k, (4) 165k, (5) 502k, (6) 1,800k). Single column (Nucleosil C18; 250 x 4.6 mm, 5 μm particle, 100 Å pore) was used and the flow rate was 0.5 mL/min. (Left) Solvent composition effect at a fixed column temperature of 30.5°C with the mixed eluents of CH2Cl2/CH3CN at different compositions as labeled in the plot. (Right) Temperature effect at a fixed eluent composition of 57/43 (v/v). The isothermal chromatograms were obtained at different column temperatures as labeled in the plot. The CAP condition is established at the composition of CH2Cl2/CH3CN = 57/43 (v/v) and the column temperature of 30.5°C. The vertical dashed lines indicate the elution time of the injection solvent peak.
    From reference ( 14). This figure was reproduced with permission of Wiley and Sons.

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. Temperature Gradient Interaction Chromatography (TGIC) separation of 14 standard polystyrenes showing the high resolution separation of IC. The column temperature program is shown in the plot. Mobile phase was a mixture of CH2Cl2/CH3CN (57/43, v/v). Single C18 bonded silica column (Nucleosil C18, 250 x 2.1 mm, 5 μm, 100 Å) was used and the flow rate was 0.1 mL/min. TGIC shows much lower Mw/Mn values than SEC indicating higher resolution of IC than SEC.
    From reference ( 24). This figure was reproduced with permission from American Laboratory.

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. TGIC separation of a mixture of 10 polystyrene (a-k: 1.7k, 5.1k, 11.6k, 22.0k, 37.3k, 68.0k, 114k, 208k, 502k, 1090k, 2890k) and 5 poly(methyl methacrylate) (1-5: 1500k, 501k, 77.5k, 8.5k, 2.0k) standards. S is the injection solvent peak. The temperature program is also shown in the plot. Three columns (Nucleosil C18, 250 x 4.5 mm, 100Ǻ & 500 Ǻ & 1,000Ǻ) are used and the mobile phase is a mixture of CH2Cl2/CH3CN(54/46 (v/v)).
    From reference ( 38).

    Figure 4

    Figure 4. LCCC chromatograms of cyclic PSs and corresponding linear precursors at the CAP of linear PS. Linear precursors elute at about the same retention time (5.4 min) independent of the MW while the retention of cyclic polymer increases with molecular weight. The small peaks appearing near tR = 5 min are the injection solvent peaks. The elution peak of cyclic polymers is completely separated from the linear precursors down to the baseline. The chromatograms of cyclic PS (black line) show that most of the samples contain contaminants, mostly the linear precursors.
    From reference ( 77).

    Figure 5

    Figure 5. 2D-LC chromatograms recorded by a UV absorption detector (260 nm) showing polymer MW (SEC) vs. 1st-D LC retention time at different column temperatures; SEC (T = 63.0 °C), LCCC (T = 37.2 °C), IC (T = 28.0 °C). PS standards: 3.3k, 10k, 31k, 113k, 384k, 1800k. 1st-D IC (abscissa): Nucleosil C18 150 x 4.6 mm, 7 μm, 500 Å); Eluent: CH2Cl2/CH3CN = 57/43 (v/v); Flow rate: 0.05 mL/min. 2nd-D SEC (ordinate): PL PolyPore (250 × 4.6 mm); Eluent: THF; Flow rate: 1.7 mL/min; Column temperature: 110 °C.
    From the reference ( 92). This figure was reproduced with permission from Elsevier.

    Figure 6

    Figure 6. NP-TGIC × RPLC 2D-LC chromatogram of a low MW polystyrene-block-polyisoprene (1.7k-0.7k, Mw/Mn: 1.06) (1st-D NP-TGIC: Nucleosil Diol, 250 x 7.8 mm, 7 μm, 100 Å, Eluent: isooctane/THF=97/3 (v/v); Flow rate: 0.05 mL/min. 2nd-D RPLC: Kromasil C18, 150 x 4.6 mm, 5 μm, 100 Å, Eluent: CH2Cl2/CH3CN=53/47 (v/v), Flow rate: 1.1 mL/min, Trap column: Alltech C18, 3 μm, 100 Å, 33 × 70 mm).
    From reference ( 93).
  • References

    CHAPTER SECTIONS
    Jump To

    This chapter references 94 other publications.

    1. 1
      Moore J. C. Gel Permeation Chromatography. I. A New Method for Molecular Weight Distribution of High Polymers J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Gen. Pap. 1964 2 835 843
    2. 2
      Mori, S.; Barth, H. G. Size Exclusion Chromatography; Springer-Verlag: New York, 1999; 208pp.
    3. 3
      Striegel, A. M.; Yau, W. W.; Kirkland, J. J.; Bly, D. D. Modern Size-Exclusion Chromatography, Practice of Gel Permeation Chromatography and Gel Filtration Chromatography; Wiley: Hoboken, 2009.
    4. 4
      Berek D. Size exclusion chromatography - A blessing and a curse of science and technology of synthetic polymers J. Sep. Sci. 2010 33 315 335
    5. 5
      Casassa E. F. Equilibrium distribution of flexible polymer chains between a macroscopic solution phase and small voids Polym. Lett 1967 5 773 778
    6. 6
      Grubisic Z. Rempp P. Benoit H. A Universal Calibration for Gel Permeation Chromatography Polym. Lett. 1967 5 753 759
    7. 7
      Tung L. H. Method of Calculating Molecular Weight Distribution Function from Gel Permeation Chromatograms J. Appl. Polym. Phys. 1966 10 375 385
    8. 8
      Gröckner, G. Gradient HPLC of Copolymers and Chromatographic Cross-Fractionation; Springer -Verlag: Berlin, 1992.
    9. 9
      Pasch H. Analysis of complex polymers by interaction chromatography Adv. Polym. Sci. 1997 128 1 45
    10. 10
      Berek D. Coupled liquid chromatographic techniques for the separation of complex polymers Prog. Polym. Sci. 2000 25 873 908
    11. 11
      Chang T. Recent Advances in Liquid Chromatography Analysis of Synthetic Polymers Adv. Polym. Sci. 2003 163 1 60
    12. 12
      Uliyanchenko E. van der Wal S. Schoenmakers P. J. Challenges in polymer analysis by liquid chromatography Polym. Chem. 2012 3 2313 2335
    13. 13
      Radke W. Polymer separations by liquid interaction chromatography: Principles - prospects - limitations J. Chromatogr. A 2014 1335 62 79
    14. 14
      Chang T. Lee H. C. Lee W. Park S. Ko C. H. Polymer characterization by temperature gradient interaction chromatography Macromol. Chem. Phys. 1999 200 2188 2204
    15. 15
      Gorbunov A. A. Skvortsov A. M. Statistical properties of confined macromolecules Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 1995 62 31 108
    16. 16
      Skvortsov A. M. Gorbunov A. A. Phase transitions in liquid chromatography of polymers Polym. Sci. U.S.S.R. 1989 31 1307 1313
    17. 17
      Inagaki H. Matsuda H. Kamiyama F. Determination of compositional heterogeneity in copolymers by thin-layer chromatography. I. Preliminary results for styrene-acrylate copolymers Macromolecules 1968 1 520 5
    18. 18
      Belenkii B. G. Gankina E. S. Thin-Layer Chromatography of Polymers Introductory Lecture J. Chromatogr. 1970 53 3 25
    19. 19
      Belenkii B. G. Gankina E. S. Tennikov M. B. Vilenchik L. Z. Fundamental Aspects of Adsorption Chromatography of Polymers and their Experimental Verification by Thin-Layer Chromatography J. Chromatogr. 1978 147 99 110
    20. 20
      Teramachi S. Hasegawa A. Shima Y. Akatsuka M. Nakajima M. Separation of Styrene-Methyl Acrylate Copolymer According to Chemical Composition, Using High-Speed Liquid Chromatography Macromolecules 1979 12 992
    21. 21
      Armstrong D. W. Bui K. H. Nonaqueous Reversed-Phase Liquid Chromatographic Fractionation of Polystyrene Anal. Chem. 1982 54 706 708
    22. 22
      Lee H. C. Chang T. Polymer Molecular Weight Characterization By Temperature Gradient High Performance Liquid Chromatography Polymer 1996 37 5747 5749
    23. 23
      Lee W. Lee H. Cha J. Chang T. Hanley K. J. Lodge T. P. Molecular weight distribution of polystyrene made by anionic polymerization Macromolecules 2000 33 5111 5115
    24. 24
      Chang T. Lee W. Lee H. C. Cho D. Park S. Polymer characterization by non-size exclusion chromatography: Temperature gradient interaction chromatography Am. Lab. 2002 34 39
    25. 25
      Martin A. J. P. Biochim. Soc. Symp. 1949 3 4
    26. 26
      Klumperman B. Cools P. Philipsen H. Staal W. A qualitative study to the influence of molar mass on retention in gradient polymer elution chromatography Macromol. Symp. 1996 110 1 13
    27. 27
      Berek D. Liquid adsorption chromatography of copolymers: Molar mass (In)dependent retention Macromolecules 1999 32 3671 3673
    28. 28
      Brun Y. The mechanism of copolymer retention in interactive polymer chromatography. I. Critical point of adsorption for statistical copolymers J. Liq. Chromatogr. Relat. Technol. 1999 22 3027 3065
    29. 29
      Brun Y. The mechanism of copolymer retention in interactive polymer chromatography. II. Gradient separation J. Liq. Chromatogr. Relat. Technol. 1999 22 3067 3090
    30. 30
      Bashir M. A. Radke W. Predicting the chromatographic retention of polymers: Application of the polymer model to poly(styrene/ethylacrylate) copolymers J. Chromatogr. A 2012 1225 107 112
    31. 31
      Ryu J. Chang T. Thermodynamic prediction of polymer retention in temperature-programmed HPLC Anal. Chem. 2005 77 6347 6352
    32. 32
      Chang T. Polymer characterization by interaction chromatography J. Polym. Sci., Part B: Polym. Phys. 2005 43 1591 1607
    33. 33
      Lochmüller C. H. Moebus M. A. Liu Q. C. Jiang C. Elomaa M. Temperature Effect On Retention and Separation of Poly(Ethylene Glycol)S in Reversed-Phase Liquid Chromatography J. Chromatogr. Sci. 1996 34 69 76
    34. 34
      Teramachi S. Matsumoto H. Kawai T. Direction of temperature gradient for normal-phase temperature gradient interaction chromatography in polystyrene fractionation J. Chromatogr. A 2005 1100 40 44
    35. 35
      Matsumoto H. Kawai T. Teramachi S. Direction of temperature gradient and retention mechanism in normal-phase temperature gradient interaction chromatography for poly(methyl methacrylate) fractionation Polym. J. 2007 39 458 463
    36. 36
      Cho D. Park S. Hong J. Chang T. Retention mechanism of poly(ethylene oxide) in reversed-phase and normal-phase liquid chromatography J. Chromatogr. A 2003 986 191 198
    37. 37
      Cong R. J. deGroot W. Parrott A. Yau W. Hazlitt L. Brown R. Miller M. Zhou Z. A New Technique for Characterizing Comonomer Distribution in Polyolefins: High-Temperature Thermal Gradient Interaction Chromatography (HT-TGIC) Macromolecules 2011 44 3062 3072
    38. 38
      Lee H. C. Chang T. Characterization of Binary Polymer Mixtures by Simultaneous Size-Exclusion Chromatography and Interaction Chromatography Macromolecules 1996 29 7294 7296
    39. 39
      Park S. Park I. Chang T. Ryu C. Y. Interaction-controlled HPLC for block copolymer analysis and separation J. Amer. Chem. Soc. 2004 126 8906 8907
    40. 40
      Park S. Cho D. Ryu J. Kwon K. Lee W. Chang T. Fractionation of block copolymers prepared by anionic polymerization into fractions exhibiting three different morphologies Macromolecules 2002 35 5974 5979
    41. 41
      Chung B. H. Park S. Chang T. HPLC fractionation and surface micellization behavior of polystyrene-b-poly(methyl methacrylate) Macromolecules 2005 38 6122 6127
    42. 42
      Lee H. C. Lee W. Chang T. Yoon J. S. Frater D. J. Mays J. W. Linking-reaction kinetics of star shaped polystyrene by temperature gradient interaction chromatography Macromolecules 1998 31 4114 4119
    43. 43
      Ahn S. Lee H. Lee S. Chang T. Characterization of Branched Polymers by Comprehensive Two-Dimensional Liquid Chromatography with Triple Detection Macromolecules 2012 45 3550 3556
    44. 44
      Cho D. Park S. Chang T. Ute K. Fukuda I. Kitayama T. Temperature gradient interaction chromatography and MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry analysis of stereoregular poly(ethyl methacrylate)s Anal. Chem. 2002 74 1928 1931
    45. 45
      Perny S. Allgaier J. Cho D. Lee W. Chang T. Synthesis and Structural Analysis of an H-Shaped Polybutadiene Macromolecules 2001 34 5408 5415
    46. 46
      Ahn S. Im K. Chang T. Chambon P. Fernyhough C. M. 2D-LC Characterization of Comb-Shaped Polymers Using Isotope Effect Anal. Chem. 2011 83 4237 4242
    47. 47
      Berek D. Liquid chromatography of macromolecules under limiting conditions of desorption. 1. Principles of the method Macromolecules 1998 31 8517 8521
    48. 48
      Rollet M. Pelletier B. Berek D. Maria S. Phan T. N. T. Gigmes D. Separation of parent homopolymers from polystyrene and poly(ethylene oxide) based block copolymers by liquid chromatography under limiting conditions of desorption-3. Study of barrier efficiency according to block copolymers’ chemical composition J. Chromatogr. A 2016 1462 63 72
    49. 49
      Chatterjee T. Rickard M. A. Pearce E. Pangburn T. O. Li Y. F. Lyons J. W. Cong R. J. deGroot A. W. Meunier D. M. Separating effective high density polyethylene segments from olefin block copolymers using high temperature liquid chromatography with a preloaded discrete adsorption promoting solvent barrier J. Chromatogr. A 2016 1465 107 116
    50. 50
      Berek D. Macova E. Liquid chromatography under limiting conditions of desorption 6: Separation of a four-component polymer blend J. Sep. Sci. 2015 38 543 549
    51. 51
      Schollenberger M. Radke W. SEC-Gradients, an alternative approach to polymer gradient chromatography: 1. Proof of the concept Polymer 2011 52 3259 3262
    52. 52
      Maier H. Malz F. Reinhold G. Radke W. SEC Gradients: An Alternative Approach to Polymer Gradient Chromatography. Separation of Poly(methyl methacrylate-stat-methacrylic acid) by Chemical Composition Macromolecules 2013 46 1119 1123
    53. 53
      Skvortsov A. M. Gorbunov A. A. Adsorption Effects in the Chromatogrpahy of Polymers J. Chromatogr. 1986 358 77 83
    54. 54
      Ziebarth J. D. Wang Y. M. Interactions of complex polymers with nanoporous substrate Soft Matter 2016 12 5245 5256
    55. 55
      Macko T. Hunkeler D. Liquid chromatography under critical and limiting conditions: A survey of experimental systems for synthetic polymers Adv. Polym. Sci. 2003 163 61 136
    56. 56
      Pasch H. Chromatographic investigations of macromolecules in the critical range of liquid chromatography: 3. Analysis of polymer blends Polymer 1993 34 4095 4099
    57. 57
      Pasch H. Rode K. Chaumien N. Chromatographic Investigations of Macromolecules in the Critical Range of Liquid Chromatography .9. Separation of Methacrylate-Based Polymer Blends Polymer 1996 37 4079 4083
    58. 58
      Bashir M. A. Radke W. Predicting the chromatographic retention of polymers: Poly(methyl methacrylate)s and polyacryate blends J. Chromatogr. A 2007 1163 86 95
    59. 59
      Zimina T. M. Kever J. J. Melenevskaya E. Y. Fell A. F. Analysis of Block Copolymers by High-Performance Liquid Chromatography under Critical Condition J. Chromatogr. 1992 593 233 241
    60. 60
      Pasch H. Brinkmann C. Much H. Just U. Chromatographic investigations of macromolecules in the “critical range” of liquid chromatography II. Two-dimensional separations of poly(ethylene oxide-block-propylene oxide) J. Chromatogr. 1992 623 315
    61. 61
      Pasch, H.; Trathnigg, B. HPLC of Polymers; Springer-Verlag: Berlin, 1997.
    62. 62
      Falkenhagen J. Much H. Stauf W. Muller A. H. E. Characterization of block copolymers by liquid adsorption chromatography at critical conditions. 1. Diblock copolymers Macromolecules 2000 33 3687 3693
    63. 63
      Lee W. Cho D. Chang T. Hanley K. J. Lodge T. P. (LCCC)Characterization of polystyrene-b-polyisoprene diblock copolymers by liquid chromatography at the chromatographic critical condition Macromolecules 2001 34 2353 2358
    64. 64
      Belenky B. G. Valchikhina M. D. Vakhtina I. A. Gankina E. S. Tarakanov O. G. Thin-Layer Chromatography of Oligomers J. Chromatogr. 1976 129 115 124
    65. 65
      Entelis S. G. Evreinov V. V. Gorshkov A. V. Functionality and molecular weight distribution of Telechelic polymers Adv. Polym. Sci. 1986 76 129 175
    66. 66
      Gorshkov A. V. Much H. Becker H. Pasch H. Evreinov V. V. Entelis S. G. Chromatographic investigations of macromolecules in the “critical range” of liquid chromatography I. Functionality type and composition distribution in polyethylene oxide and polypropylene oxide copolymers J. Chromatogr. A 1990 523 91 102
    67. 67
      Baran K. Laugier S. Cramail H. Fractionation of functional polystyrenes, poly(ethylene oxide)s and poly(styrene)-b-poly(ethylene oxide) by liquid chromatography at the exclusion-adsorption transition point J. Chromatogr. B 2001 753 139 149
    68. 68
      Jiang X. L. Schoenmakers P. J. Lou X. W. Lima V. van Dongen J. L. J. Brokken-Zijp J. Separation and characterization of functional poly(n-butyl acrylate) by critical liquid chromatography J. Chromatogr. A 2004 1055 123 133
    69. 69
      Im K. Kim Y. Chang T. Lee K. Choi N. Separation of branched polystyrene by comprehensive two-dimensional liquid chromatography J. Chromatogr. A 2006 1103 235 242
    70. 70
      Petit C. Luneau B. Beaudoin E. Gigmes D. Bertin D. Liquid chromatography at the critical conditions in pure eluent: An efficient tool for the characterization of functional polystyrenes J. Chromatogr. A 2007 1163 128 137
    71. 71
      Oh J. Kuk J. Lee T. Ye J. Paik H. J. Lee H. W. Chang T. Molecular Weight Distribution of Living Chains in Polystyrene Prepared by Atom Transfer Radical Polymerization ACS Macro Lett. 2017 6 758 761
    72. 72
      Ziebarth J. D. Gardiner A. A. Wang Y. M. Jeong Y. Ahn J. Jin Y. Chang T. Comparison of Critical Adsorption Points of Ring Polymers with Linear Polymers Macromolecules 2016 49 8780 8788
    73. 73
      Ahn J. Chang T. Wang X. Limpouchova Z. Prochazka K. Influence of the Chain Architecture and the Presence of End-Groups or Branching Units Chemically Different from Repeating Structural Units on the Critical Adsorption Point in Liquid Chromatography Macromolecules 2017 50 8720 8730
    74. 74
      Gorbunov A. A. Skvortsov A. M. Theory of Chromatographic Separation of Linear and Ring Macromolecules Polym. Sci. USSR 1987 29 1025 1031
    75. 75
      Pasch H. Deffieux A. Henze I. Schappacher M. Riquelurbet L. Analysis of Macrocyclic Polystyrenes .1. Liquid Chromatographic Investigations Macromolecules 1996 29 8776 8782
    76. 76
      Lepoittevin B. Dourges M. A. Masure M. Hemery P. Baran K. Cramail H. Synthesis and characterization of ring-shaped polystyrenes Macromolecules 2000 33 8218 8224
    77. 77
      Lee H. C. Lee H. Lee W. Chang T. Roovers J. Fractionation of cyclic polystyrene from linear precursor by HPLC at the chromatographic critical condition Macromolecules 2000 33 8119 8121
    78. 78
      Lee W. Lee H. Lee H. C. Cho D. Chang T. Gorbunov A. A. Roovers J. Retention Behavior of linear and ring polystyrene at the chromatographic critical condition Macromolecules 2002 35 529 538
    79. 79
      Takano A. Kushida Y. Aoki K. Masuoka K. Hayashida K. Cho D. Kawaguchi D. Matsushita Y. HPLC Characterization of Cyclization Reaction Product Obtained by End-to-End Ring Closure Reaction of a Telechelic Polystyrene Macromolecules 2007 40 679 681
    80. 80
      Kapnistos M. Lang M. Vlassopoulos D. Pyckhout-Hintzen W. Richter D. Cho D. Chang T. Rubinstein M. Unexpected power-law stress relaxation of entangled ring polymers Nat. Mater. 2008 7 997 1002
    81. 81
      Pasch H. Analysis of complex polymers by multidimensional techniques. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 1999 1 3879 3890
    82. 82
      Kilz P. Two-dimensional chromatography as an essential means for understanding macromolecular structure Chromatographia 2004 59 3 14
    83. 83
      Berek D. Two-dimensional liquid chromatography of synthetic polymers Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2010 396 421 441
    84. 84
      Baumgaertel A. Altuntaş E. Schubert U. S. Recent developments in the detailed characterization of polymers by multidimensional chromatography J. Chromatogr. A 2012 1240 1 20
    85. 85
      Schoenmakers P. Aarnoutse P. Multi-Dimensional Separations of Polymers Anal. Chem. 2014 86 6172 6179
    86. 86
      Jiang X. L. van der Horst A. Schoenmakers P. J. Breakthrough of polymers in interactive liquid chromatography J. Chromatogr. A 2002 982 55 68
    87. 87
      Gerber J. Radke W. Separation of linear and star-shaped polystyrenes by two-dimensional chromatography E-Polymers 2005
    88. 88
      Pasch H. Kilz P. Fast liquid chromatography for high-throughput screening of polymers Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2003 24 104 108
    89. 89
      Popovici S. T. Schoenmakers P. J. Fast size-exclusion chromatography - Theoretical and practical considerations J. Chromatogr. A 2005 1099 92 102
    90. 90
      Cho H. Park S. Ree M. Chang T. Y. Jung J. C. Zin W. C. High temperature size exclusion chromatography Macromol. Res. 2006 14 383 386
    91. 91
      Uliyanchenko E. Schoenmakers P. J. van der Wal S. Fast and efficient size-based separations of polymers using ultra-high-pressure liquid chromatography J. Chromatogr. A 2011 1218 1509 1518
    92. 92
      Im K. Park H.-w. Lee S. Chang T. Two-dimensional liquid chromatography analysis of synthetic polymers using fast size exclusion chromatography at high column temperature J. Chromatogr. A 2009 1216 4606 4610
    93. 93
      Im K. Park H. W. Kim Y. Chung B. H. Ree M. Chang T. Comprehensive two-dimensional liquid chromatography analysis of a block copolymer Anal. Chem. 2007 79 1067 1072
    94. 94
      Murphy R. E. Schure M. R. Foley J. P. One- and two dimensional chromatographic analysis of alcohol ethoxylates Anal. Chem. 1998 70 4353 4360