ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
An Inhibitor’s-Eye View of the ATP-Binding Site of CDKs in Different Regulatory States
My Activity
  • Open Access
  • Editors Choice
Letters

An Inhibitor’s-Eye View of the ATP-Binding Site of CDKs in Different Regulatory States
Click to copy article linkArticle link copied!

View Author Information
Laboratory of Molecular Biophysics, Department of Biochemistry, Oxford University, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QU, United Kingdom
Department of Chemical Sciences, University of Padua, via Marzolo 1, 35131 Padova, Italy
Open PDFSupporting Information (1)

ACS Chemical Biology

Cite this: ACS Chem. Biol. 2014, 9, 6, 1251–1256
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/cb500135f
Published March 26, 2014

Copyright © 2014 American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under CC-BY.

Abstract

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

We have used a chemically diverse panel of kinase inhibitors to assess the chemical similarity of the ATP-binding sites of cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) subfamily members in a range of activation states. Using this approach, we find that different activation states of a particular CDK may differ from each other as much as different CDKs in the same activation state. We also find that inhibitors discriminate more effectively among CDK family members in their monomeric state than in their cyclin-bound state, providing direct evidence for the belief that selective binding to inactive kinase states might be more readily achieved than selective binding to active states.

Copyright © 2014 American Chemical Society

Protein kinases represent attractive targets for therapeutic intervention against a wide variety of human diseases, most notably cancer (1, 2) and chronic inflammatory diseases. (3) A number of drugs that selectively target the protein kinase ATP binding site have been successfully introduced into the clinic, and many more are in clinical trials. (2, 4) However, a significant requirement for the further development of therapeutically useful compounds is a more complete understanding of the factors that dictate inhibitor selectivity across the protein kinase family. (5, 2, 6)
The eukaryotic serine/threonine and tyrosine protein kinase family is characterized by a conserved fold in which residues from both the N- and C-terminal lobes contribute to the active site. (7, 8) The identities of the residues that line the ATP binding pocket and the structural plasticity of the protein kinase fold constitute two key elements that together determine the inhibitor-binding profile of a protein kinase. Both of these elements have been successfully exploited to generate clinically useful drugs. (1, 2)
The cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) constitute a subfamily of ca. 13 members in humans (9) that play important roles in both the control of cell cycle progression (CDKs 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6) and in the regulation of transcription (CDKs 7, 8, 9, 12, and 13). (10-12) CDK2 has provided a structural paradigm for the CDK family and has been widely exploited for structure-aided CDK inhibitor design. (13, 14) The prevailing structural model for CDK regulation by cyclin and CDK inhibitor (CKI) binding and by phosphorylation has been elaborated through a series of structures of CDK2/cyclin A complexes. (15, 16) Monomeric CDK2 is inactive as a result of the disposition of active site residues, in turn dependent on the pose of the C-helix, and the conformation of the activation segment. (17) Cyclin A binding and Thr160 phosphorylation within the activation segment rearrange the CDK2 active site to orientate key ATP binding and catalytic residues and create the peptide substrate binding site. (15, 18) This model for the mechanism of regulation appears not to apply across the entire CDK subfamily. The determination of structures for CDK4/cyclin D3 (19) and CDK4/cyclin D1 phosphorylated on Thr172 (pCDK4/D) (20) revealed that CDK4 adopts an inactive C-helix out conformation despite being cyclin-bound. Two further examples are CDK5 (21) and CDK8 (22) that both adopt active conformations upon p25 and cyclin C binding, respectively, in the absence of activation loop phosphorylation.
Differential scanning fluorimetry (DSF) can be used to characterize inhibitor binding. (23) Here we define ΔTm as the difference between the apparent melting temperature (Tm) of the protein in the presence of the ligand and the Tm of the protein alone. The value is related to the concentration and binding affinity of the ligand for the protein and to thermodynamic properties of the ligand binding event. (23) The profile of ΔTm values measured for a protein in the presence of a sufficiently diverse range of inhibitors is characteristic of the inhibitor binding properties of that protein and therefore represents a fingerprint of the physicochemical properties of the active site. (24) We have used such fingerprints to assess the chemical similarity of a number of CDK subfamily members, namely, CDK2, CDK4, CDK7, and CDK9. Additionally, we have explored the inhibitor binding profiles of CDKs in different activation states to assess the extent to which CDK activation affects inhibitor binding.

Results and Discussion

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The discriminative power of this fingerprinting approach relies on including a sufficiently diverse panel of inhibitors to sense the chemical diversity apparent in the family of kinase active sites. To validate the use of our selected inhibitor set (Figure 1a and Supplementary Table 1) for this purpose, we confirmed that our set is able to target representative kinases from across the kinome. This analysis was achieved by mapping each inhibitor onto those kinases in the kinome phylogenetic tree that they are best documented to target (Supplementary Methods and Figure 1b). The approximately uniform distribution obtained confirms ours to be a relatively unbiased set of inhibitors.

Figure 1

Figure 1. Explored chemical space. (a) Representative inhibitor scaffolds. Examples of the inhibitor scaffolds included in the panel are shown. All inhibitor structures are provided in the Supporting Information (Supplementary Table 1). (b) Chemical space explored by the panel of inhibitors used in this study. The target(s) in the human kinome for each of the inhibitors of the panel are identified by a red rectangle on the kinome tree. This figure was adapted from the phylogenetic tree published in ref 9.

We included four members of the CDK subfamily in the study. CDK2 was prepared in four different conformational states: monomeric unphosphorylated (CDK2), monomeric phosphorylated on Thr160 (pCDK2), unphosphorylated in complex with human cyclin A175–432 (CDK2/A), and Thr160-phosphorylated in complex with human cyclin A175–432 (pCDK2/A). CDK4 was characterized both as an inactive, nonphosphorylated monomer (CDK4) and as the fully activated binary complex (CDK4/cyclin D3 phosphorylated on Thr172, pCDK4/D). CDK7 and CDK9 were prepared in either a monomeric unphosphorylated (CDK7) or a cyclin-bound phosphorylated (CDK9/cyclin T1 phosphorylated on T186, pCDK9/T) state, respectively (Figure 2a). The identities of the CDKs together with their activation states define a search space within the functional kinome that has been explored by this study and is summarized in Figure 2b. CDK2, CDK7, CDK4, and CDK9 are highly homologous across their entire sequence (Supplementary Figure 1), and this similarity is particularly marked at the catalytic site (Figure 2c,d).

Figure 2

Figure 2. CDK space explored in this study. (a) Representative melting curves for cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK)/cyclin complexes used to derive ΔTm values in the presence of an ATP-competitive inhibitor. The shift in Tm upon staurosporine binding (red) is illustrated for each of the CDK/cyclin complexes in this study. Black curves, CDK/cyclin complexes in the absence of added inhibitor. Curves with closed triangle symbols correspond to pCDK9/T, closed diamonds to CDK7, closed circles to CDK4, closed squares to pCDK4/D, open squares to CDK2/A, open diamonds to CDK2, and open triangles to pCDK2. (b) The full set of different phosphorylated and/or cyclin-associated states of the four CDKs characterized in this study are shown, with those members for which measurements were made highlighted by shaded boxes. Color intensity for these protein species reflects activation state (more saturated, more active). (c) The ATP binding site of CDKs. The CDK2 ATP-binding site residues from a pCDK2/A structure (PDB code: 1QMZ) are colored according to the degree of sequence conservation between the 4 CDK sequences, calculated as described in the Supplementary Methods, from blue (highly conserved) to red (highly variable). The ATP molecule is represented in ball-and-stick mode for context. (d) The ATP-binding site pocket is highly conserved in CDK2, CDK7, CDK4, and CDK9. Residues that constitute the first shell of the CDK2 ATP-binding site (CDK2 numbering) were identified as defined in Supplementary Methods and used to construct a pseudosequence alignment. This alignment is displayed together with the associated consensus sequence, with X representing any residue, and ϕ a hydrophobic amino acid. Sequence motifs that are highly conserved across the protein kinase family are identified by numbered bars. Bar 1, the glycine-rich loop (residues 11–16 in CDK2) that defines the general consensus sequence GXGXXG that recognizes the phosphate moieties of ATP; bar 2, the “hinge” sequence composed of residues 80–84 that links the N- and C-terminal lobes and contributes to the ATP adenine binding site; bar 3, the “DFG motif” that defines the start of the activation segment. Asterisks below E51 and D127 highlight the conserved glutamate in the C-helix and the catalytic aspartate, respectively. A full sequence alignment is presented in Supplementary Figure 1.

We have adopted the linear correlation coefficient of the inhibitory profiles of two kinases as a measure of the chemical similarity of those kinases (Tm values tabulated in Supplementary Table 1, Supplementary Figure 2). By this criterion, we find that the set of kinases studied in the monomeric, unphosphorylated state (CDK2, CDK4, and CDK7) demonstrate significantly different inhibitory profiles, with a lowest correlation coefficient of 0.39 (CDK4 vs CDK7) and a highest correlation coefficient of 0.74 (CDK2 vs CDK7) (Figure 3a). That the inhibitor binding fingerprint discriminates so effectively between highly related CDK subfamily members confirms that it provides a sensitive measure of active site similarity.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Comparison of the inhibitor-binding profiles of various cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) subfamily members in different states of activation. Each block represents a CDK in a particular activation state: CDK (monomeric, unphosphorylated), pCDK (monomeric, phosphorylated), CDK/[A or D or T] (unphosphorylated binary complex between a CDK and the corresponding cyclin), and pCDK/[A or D or T] (phosphorylated binary complex between a CDK and the corresponding cyclin). The internal consistency of inhibitory fingerprints for each CDK/state pair, evaluated over two or three repeat measurements, is indicated by a value within the corresponding block. The correlation of fingerprints between different CDK/state pairs is indicated by a value on the line that connects them. (a) Comparison of the inhibitor fingerprints of CDK subfamily members in the monomeric form. (b) Comparison of the inhibitor fingerprints of CDK subfamily members in the phosphorylated binary forms. (c) Comparison of CDK2 inhibitor fingerprints in different activation states. Color intensity as in Figure 2b reflects activation state (more saturated, more active).

One application of this measure is to assess the chemical similarity of the active sites of orthologous proteins from different species. For example, the correlation coefficients obtained for the comparison of human monomeric, unphosphorylated CDKs with the closest CDK orthologue from Plasmodium falciparum, protein kinase 5 (PfPK5), range from 0.42 (PfPK5 vs CDK4) to 0.69 (PfPK5 vs CDK2). This result demonstrates that the active sites of orthologous proteins from highly diverged species may be more similar to each other than are the active sites of close paralogues within a species.
For context, the equivalent comparison of each of the monomeric, unphosphorylated CDKs with an “unrelated” kinase, P. falciparum protein kinase 7 (PfPK7), (25) yields correlation coefficients in the range 0.33 (PfPK7 vs CDK2) to 0.31 (PfPK7 vs CDK2/A).
Next we investigated the apparent active-site similarity of a set of fully activated CDK subfamily members (pCDK2/A, pCDK4/D, and pCDK9/T). Although this comparison also yielded quantitatively different inhibitor fingerprints, our results suggest that the inhibitor-binding properties of the set of fully activated CDKs are more similar to each other than are those of the set of inactive monomeric forms (Figure 3b). The lowest correlation coefficient of 0.73 and the highest correlation coefficient of 0.78 were measured for comparisons of pCDK2/A vs pCDK9/T and pCDK2/A vs pCDK4/D, respectively. This result has two implications: first, it demonstrates that the inhibitor binding properties of CDK subfamily members depend not only on their respective sequence but also on the conformational state in which they are found. Second, it demonstrates that, in adopting an active conformation, two different CDKs assume more similar inhibitor binding properties. This latter point is most directly demonstrated by comparison of the correlations coefficients CDK2 vs CDK4 (CC = 0.69) and pCDK2/A vs pCDK4/D (CC = 0.78).
The inhibitor fingerprints of four different CDK2 activation states were recorded, and the resulting comparison is shown in Figure 3c. As expected from comparative structural studies, (26, 27) phosphorylation of the activation segment has little effect on the inhibitor-binding fingerprint (correlation coefficient for the comparison CDK2 vs pCDK2 is 0.94 and for the comparison of CDK2/A vs pCDK2/A is 0.96). Indeed, sequence and structural comparisons demonstrate that phosphorylation of CDK2 or CDK2/A on Thr160 introduces only minor changes to the identity and structure of the amino acids that line the extended inhibitor binding site (Supplementary Figure 3).
By contrast, when pCDK2 associates with cyclin A, the CDK2 inhibitor-binding fingerprint changes significantly (correlation coefficient for pCDK2 vs pCDK2/A is 0.79). Interestingly, the equivalent comparison for unphosphorylated CDK2 demonstrates somewhat less of a response: when cyclin A associates with the unphosphorylated form of CDK2, it perturbs its inhibitor binding profile to a lesser extent (correlation coefficient for CDK2 vs CDK2/A = 0.91). Comparison of the ATP binding site topology highlights a similar degree of conservation between the closest pairs considered, as summarized in Supplementary Figure 3.
For the CDKs analyzed in this study, the abundance of each conformational state within a cell will depend on a large number of factors that include CDK identity, cell type, cell environment, and cell cycle stage. Targeting a specific conformation of a protein kinase is a validated route to the design of selective and potent inhibitors and has been particularly successful in the design of tyrosine kinase inhibitors. (28) Cell cycle CDKs of differing phosphorylation status and in monomeric and cyclin-bound forms can be detected in cells, suggesting that such states are accessible for targeting. (29)
In summary, by using DSF we have demonstrated that it is possible to discriminate between closely related CDKs by comparing their inhibitor-binding profiles. We have shown that activation state can have a significant effect on inhibitor-binding profile, with cyclin binding having more profound consequences than phosphorylation at least in the case of CDK2. Our results further suggest that the inhibitor binding properties of a set of fully activated, cyclin-bound CDKs are more similar to each other than are those of a set of inactive, monomeric forms. These data provide direct evidence that, as has been proposed elsewhere, (13) protein kinases may be more amenable to selective inhibitor binding in their inactive states.

Methods

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Inhibitor Set

A full description of the inhibitor set is provided in the Supporting Information.

CDK Expression and Purification

Human CDK4 and cyclin D3, (19) CDK9 and cyclin T1 (30) were all expressed in insect cells and purified as described. CDK2 phosphorylated on Thr160 in association with cyclin A2 (pCDK2/A), (18) unphosphorylated CDK2 in association with cyclin A2 (CDK2/A), monomeric Thr160pCDK2 (pCDK2), (26) monomeric unphosphorylated CDK2 (CDK2), and CDK7 were prepared as described. (31) Monomeric CDK4 was expressed in Sf9 cells as a GST fusion and purified by affinity chromatography followed by 3C cleavage of the GST tag and subsequent size-exclusion chromatography. The proteins were concentrated to 2 mg mL–1 and flash frozen in liquid nitrogen prior to storage at −80 °C until further use.

Differential Scanning Fluorimetry

Thermal melting experiments were carried out using an Mx3005p Real Time PCR machine (Stratagene) essentially as described. (32, 33) A full description of the method is provided in the Supporting Information.

Kinase Targets of the Molecules Contained in the Inhibitor Set

The kinase targeted by each of the inhibitors was identified from either the supplier’s information or by literature analysis, mainly via the work reported in refs 34−36.

Computation

Residues corresponding to the first coordination shell of the ATP-binding sites were identified in ref 37. Sequence conservation scores were calculated using the ConSurf webserver (http://consurf.tau.ac.il).

Supporting Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Author Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

  • Corresponding Author
    • Martin E. M. Noble - Laboratory of Molecular Biophysics, Department of Biochemistry, Oxford University, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QU, United Kingdom Email: [email protected]
  • Authors
    • Aude Echalier - Laboratory of Molecular Biophysics, Department of Biochemistry, Oxford University, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QU, United Kingdom
    • Alison J. Hole - Laboratory of Molecular Biophysics, Department of Biochemistry, Oxford University, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QU, United Kingdom
    • Graziano Lolli - Department of Chemical Sciences, University of Padua, via Marzolo 1, 35131 Padova, Italy
    • Jane A. Endicott - Laboratory of Molecular Biophysics, Department of Biochemistry, Oxford University, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QU, United Kingdom
  • Notes
    The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Acknowledgment

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

We thank I. Taylor for technical assistance, E. Lowe and D. Staunton for crystallography and biophysics support, and TTP LabTech for help with inhibitor dispensing. We also thank R. Griffin and colleagues in the Department of Chemistry, Newcastle University and S. Knapp (SGC, Oxford) for providing reagents. We are grateful to S. Baumli (Merck Serono) for the gift of purified pCDK9/T and help with thermal denaturation data collection. This research was supported by Framework Program 6 (FP6) of the European Commission (PROKINASE Project, A.E.), and the MRC (J.A.E., A.H., and M.E.M.N.). A.J.H. was supported by a Wellcome Trust studentship (Grant 083113/Z/07/A).

Abbreviations

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

CDK

cyclin-dependent kinase

DSF

differential scanning fluorimetry

pCDK4/D

Thr172-phosphorylated CDK4/cyclin D3

pCDK9/T

Thr186-phosphorylated CDK9/cyclin T1

pCDK2/A

Thr160-phosphorylated CDK2/cyclin A2

References

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article references 37 other publications.

  1. 1
    Zhang, J., Yang, P. L., and Gray, N. S. (2009) Targeting cancer with small molecule kinase inhibitors Nat. Rev. Cancer 9, 28 39
  2. 2
    Fabbro, D., Cowan-Jacob, S. W., Mobitz, H., and Martiny-Baron, G. (2012) Targeting cancer with small-molecular-weight kinase inhibitors Methods Mol. Biol. (N. Y.) 795, 1 34
  3. 3
    Cohen, P. (2009) Targeting protein kinases for the development of anti-inflammatory drugs Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 21, 317 324
  4. 4
    Janne, P. A., Gray, N., and Settleman, J. (2009) Factors underlying sensitivity of cancers to small-molecule kinase inhibitors Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery 8, 709 723
  5. 5
    Karaman, M. W., Herrgard, S., Treiber, D. K., Gallant, P., Atteridge, C. E., Campbell, B. T., Chan, K. W., Ciceri, P., Davis, M. I., Edeen, P. T., Faraoni, R., Floyd, M., Hunt, J. P., Lockhart, D. J., Milanov, Z. V., Morrison, M. J., Pallares, G., Patel, H. K., Pritchard, S., Wodicka, L. M., and Zarrinkar, P. P. (2008) A quantitative analysis of kinase inhibitor selectivity Nat. Biotechnol. 26, 127 132
  6. 6
    Smyth, L. A. and Collins, I. (2009) Measuring and interpreting the selectivity of protein kinase inhibitors J. Chem. Biol. 2, 131 151
  7. 7
    Huse, M. and Kuriyan, J. (2002) The conformational plasticity of protein kinases Cell 109, 275 282
  8. 8
    Cowan-Jacob, S. W. (2006) Structural biology of protein tyrosine kinases Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 63, 2608 2625
  9. 9
    Manning, G., Whyte, D. B., Martinez, R., Hunter, T., and Sudarsanam, S. (2002) The protein kinase complement of the human genome Science 298, 1912 1934
  10. 10
    Morgan, D. O. (2007) The Cell Cycle, Principles of Control (Primers in Biology), New Science Press Ltd., London.
  11. 11
    Bartkowiak, B., Liu, P., Phatnani, H. P., Fuda, N. J., Cooper, J. J., Price, D. H., Adelman, K., Lis, J. T., and Greenleaf, A. L. (2010) CDK12 is a transcription elongation-associated CTD kinase, the metazoan ortholog of yeast Ctk1 Genes Dev. 24, 2303 2316
  12. 12
    Chen, H. H., Wong, Y. H., Geneviere, A. M., and Fann, M. J. (2007) CDK13/CDC2L5 interacts with L-type cyclins and regulates alternative splicing Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 354, 735 740
  13. 13
    Noble, M. E., Endicott, J. A., and Johnson, L. N. (2004) Protein kinase inhibitors: insights into drug design from structure Science 303, 1800 1805
  14. 14
    Ali, S., Heathcote, D. A., Kroll, S. H., Jogalekar, A. S., Scheiper, B., Patel, H., Brackow, J., Siwicka, A., Fuchter, M. J., Periyasamy, M., Tolhurst, R. S., Kanneganti, S. K., Snyder, J. P., Liotta, D. C., Aboagye, E. O., Barrett, A. G., and Coombes, R. C. (2009) The development of a selective cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor that shows antitumor activity Cancer Res. 69, 6208 6215
  15. 15
    Pavletich, N. P. (1999) Mechanisms of cyclin-dependent kinase regulation: structures of Cdks, their cyclin activators, and Cip and INK4 inhibitors J. Mol. Biol. 287, 821 828
  16. 16
    Echalier, A., Endicott, J. A., and Noble, M. E. (2010) Recent developments in cyclin-dependent kinase biochemical and structural studies Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1804, 511 519
  17. 17
    De Bondt, H. L., Rosenblatt, J., Jancarik, J., Jones, H. D., Morgan, D. O., and Kim, S. H. (1993) Crystal structure of cyclin-dependent kinase 2 Nature 363, 595 602
  18. 18
    Brown, N. R., Noble, M. E., Endicott, J. A., and Johnson, L. N. (1999) The structural basis for specificity of substrate and recruitment peptides for cyclin-dependent kinases Nat. Cell Biol. 1, 438 443
  19. 19
    Takaki, T., Echalier, A., Brown, N. R., Hunt, T., Endicott, J. A., and Noble, M. E. (2009) The structure of CDK4/cyclin D3 has implications for models of CDK activation Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 4171 4176
  20. 20
    Day, P. J., Cleasby, A., Tickle, I. J., O’Reilly, M., Coyle, J. E., Holding, F. P., McMenamin, R. L., Yon, J., Chopra, R., Lengauer, C., and Jhoti, H. (2009) Crystal structure of human CDK4 in complex with a D-type cyclin Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 4166 4170
  21. 21
    Tarricone, C., Dhavan, R., Peng, J., Areces, L. B., Tsai, L. H., and Musacchio, A. (2001) Structure and regulation of the CDK5-p25(nck5a) complex Mol. Cell 8, 657 669
  22. 22
    Schneider, E. V., Bottcher, J., Blaesse, M., Neumann, L., Huber, R., and Maskos, K. (2011) The structure of CDK8/CycC implicates specificity in the CDK/cyclin family and reveals interaction with a deep pocket binder J. Mol. Biol. 412, 251 266
  23. 23
    Lo, M. C., Aulabaugh, A., Jin, G., Cowling, R., Bard, J., Malamas, M., and Ellestad, G. (2004) Evaluation of fluorescence-based thermal shift assays for hit identification in drug discovery Anal. Biochem. 332, 153 159
  24. 24
    Najmanovich, R. J., Allali-Hassani, A., Morris, R. J., Dombrovsky, L., Pan, P. W., Vedadi, M., Plotnikov, A. N., Edwards, A., Arrowsmith, C., and Thornton, J. M. (2007) Analysis of binding site similarity, small-molecule similarity and experimental binding profiles in the human cytosolic sulfotransferase family Bioinformatics 23, e104 109
  25. 25
    Merckx, A., Echalier, A., Langford, K., Sicard, A., Langsley, G., Joore, J., Doerig, C., Noble, M., and Endicott, J. (2008) Structures of P. falciparum protein kinase 7 identify an activation motif and leads for inhibitor design Structure 16, 228 238
  26. 26
    Brown, N. R., Noble, M. E., Lawrie, A. M., Morris, M. C., Tunnah, P., Divita, G., Johnson, L. N., and Endicott, J. A. (1999) Effects of phosphorylation of threonine 160 on cyclin-dependent kinase 2 structure and activity J. Biol. Chem. 274, 8746 8756
  27. 27
    Russo, A. A., Jeffrey, P. D., and Pavletich, N. P. (1996) Structural basis of cyclin-dependent kinase activation by phosphorylation Nat. Struct. Biol. 3, 696 700
  28. 28
    Fang, Z., Grutter, C., and Rauh, D. (2013) Strategies for the selective regulation of kinases with allosteric modulators: exploiting exclusive structural features ACS Chem. Biol. 8, 58 70
  29. 29
    Schachter, M. M., Merrick, K. A., Larochelle, S., Hirschi, A., Zhang, C., Shokat, K. M., Rubin, S. M., and Fisher, R. P. (2013) A Cdk7-Cdk4 T-loop phosphorylation cascade promotes G1 progression Mol. Cell 50, 250 260
  30. 30
    Baumli, S., Lolli, G., Lowe, E. D., Troiani, S., Rusconi, L., Bullock, A. N., Debreczeni, J. E., Knapp, S., and Johnson, L. N. (2008) The structure of P-TEFb (CDK9/cyclin T1), its complex with flavopiridol and regulation by phosphorylation EMBO J. 27, 1907 1918
  31. 31
    Lolli, G., Lowe, E. D., Brown, N. R., and Johnson, L. N. (2004) The crystal structure of human CDK7 and its protein recognition properties Structure 12, 2067 2079
  32. 32
    Matulis, D., Kranz, J. K., Salemme, F. R., and Todd, M. J. (2005) Thermodynamic stability of carbonic anhydrase: measurements of binding affinity and stoichiometry using ThermoFluor Biochemistry 44, 5258 5266
  33. 33
    Bullock, A. N., Debreczeni, J. E., Fedorov, O. Y., Nelson, A., Marsden, B. D., and Knapp, S. (2005) Structural basis of inhibitor specificity of the human protooncogene proviral insertion site in moloney murine leukemia virus (PIM-1) kinase J. Med. Chem. 48, 7604 7614
  34. 34
    Bain, J., McLauchlan, H., Elliott, M., and Cohen, P. (2003) The specificities of protein kinase inhibitors: an update Biochem. J. 371, 199 204
  35. 35
    Bain, J., Plater, L., Elliott, M., Shpiro, N., Hastie, C. J., McLauchlan, H., Klevernic, I., Arthur, J. S., Alessi, D. R., and Cohen, P. (2007) The selectivity of protein kinase inhibitors: a further update Biochem. J. 408, 297 315
  36. 36
    Davies, S. P., Reddy, H., Caivano, M., and Cohen, P. (2000) Specificity and mechanism of action of some commonly used protein kinase inhibitors Biochem. J. 351, 95 105
  37. 37
    Pratt, D. J., Bentley, J., Jewsbury, P., Boyle, F. T., Endicott, J. A., and Noble, M. E. (2006) Dissecting the determinants of cyclin-dependent kinase 2 and cyclin-dependent kinase 4 inhibitor selectivity J. Med. Chem. 49, 5470 5477

Cited By

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!
Citation Statements
Explore this article's citation statements on scite.ai

This article is cited by 25 publications.

  1. Zhenfeng Shi, Lei Tian, Taotao Qiang, Jingyi Li, Yue Xing, Xiaodong Ren, Chang Liu, Chengyuan Liang. From Structure Modification to Drug Launch: A Systematic Review of the Ongoing Development of Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitors for Multiple Cancer Therapy. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2022, 65 (9) , 6390-6418. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.1c02064
  2. Annamarie B. Allnutt, Ariana K. Waters, Santosh Kesari, Venkata Mahidhar Yenugonda. Physiological and Pathological Roles of Cdk5: Potential Directions for Therapeutic Targeting in Neurodegenerative Disease. ACS Chemical Neuroscience 2020, 11 (9) , 1218-1230. https://doi.org/10.1021/acschemneuro.0c00096
  3. Solomon Tadesse, Elizabeth C. Caldon, Wayne Tilley, Shudong Wang. Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 2 Inhibitors in Cancer Therapy: An Update. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2019, 62 (9) , 4233-4251. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.8b01469
  4. Radek Jorda, Denisa Hendrychová, Jiří Voller, Eva Řezníčková, Tomáš Gucký, Vladimír Kryštof. How Selective Are Pharmacological Inhibitors of Cell-Cycle-Regulating Cyclin-Dependent Kinases?. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2018, 61 (20) , 9105-9120. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.8b00049
  5. Yan Zhang, Xiya Liu, Ziming Li, Xia Wang, Chunlei Tang. Development of 9H-purine scaffold as novel CDK2 inhibitors: Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters 2025, 122 , 130166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmcl.2025.130166
  6. Tejaswi Somarowthu, Rohan R. Patekar, Sandip B. Bharate. Identification of mitoxantrone as a potent inhibitor of CDK7/Cyclin H via structure-based virtual screening and In-Vitro validation by ADP-Glo kinase assay. Bioorganic Chemistry 2025, 155 , 108111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioorg.2024.108111
  7. Navid Jamali, Roohollah Mohseni, Mansoor Zareei, Javad Saffari-Chaleshtori. The Molecular Docking and Molecular Dynamic Effects of Omeprazole on CDKs 2, 4, and 6 as a Potential CDK Inhibitor in Cancer Treatment. Current Cancer Therapy Reviews 2025, 21 (1) , 110-117. https://doi.org/10.2174/0115733947274344231116113325
  8. Elloise H. Stephenson, Jonathan M. G. Higgins. Pharmacological approaches to understanding protein kinase signaling networks. Frontiers in Pharmacology 2023, 14 https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2023.1310135
  9. Polina Rusina, Erik Gandalipov, Yana Abdusheva, Maria Panova, Alexandra Burdenkova, Vasiliy Chaliy, Maria Brachs, Oleg Stroganov, Ksenia Guzeeva, Igor Svitanko, Alexander Shtil, Fedor Novikov. Imidazole-4-N-acetamide Derivatives as a Novel Scaffold for Selective Targeting of Cyclin Dependent Kinases. Cancers 2023, 15 (15) , 3766. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15153766
  10. Polina V. Rusina, Alexey A. Lisov, Alexandra A. Denisova, Erik R. Gandalipov, Fedor N. Novikov, Alexander A. Shtil. Clinical CDK2 Inhibitors: Trends to Selectivity and Efficacy. Recent Patents on Anti-Cancer Drug Discovery 2023, 18 (2) , 102-107. https://doi.org/10.2174/1574892817666220617091700
  11. Gina Bouchard, Fernando Jose Garcia-Marques, Loukia Georgiou Karacosta, Weiruo Zhang, Abel Bermudez, Nicholas McIlvain Riley, Sushama Varma, Lindsey Catherine Mehl, Jalen Anthony Benson, Joseph B. Shrager, Carolyn Ruth Bertozzi, Sharon J. Pitteri, Amato J. Giaccia, Sylvia Katina Plevritis. Multiomics Analysis of Spatially Distinct Stromal Cells Reveals Tumor-Induced O-Glycosylation of the CDK4–pRB Axis in Fibroblasts at the Invasive Tumor Edge. Cancer Research 2022, 82 (4) , 648-664. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-21-1705
  12. Yi Liu, Leilei Fu, Junhao Wu, Ming Liu, Guan Wang, Bo Liu, Lan Zhang. Transcriptional cyclin-dependent kinases: Potential drug targets in cancer therapy. European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2022, 229 , 114056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2021.114056
  13. Mingfei Wu, Jianfei Han, Zhicheng Liu, Yilong Zhang, Cheng Huang, Jun Li, Zeng Li. Identification of novel CDK 9 inhibitors based on virtual screening, molecular dynamics simulation, and biological evaluation. Life Sciences 2020, 258 , 118228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lfs.2020.118228
  14. Shovonlal Bhowmick, Nora Abdullah AlFaris, Jozaa Zaidan ALTamimi, Zeid A. ALOthman, Tahany Saleh Aldayel, Saikh Mohammad Wabaidur, Md Ataul Islam. Screening and analysis of bioactive food compounds for modulating the CDK2 protein for cell cycle arrest: Multi-cheminformatics approaches for anticancer therapeutics. Journal of Molecular Structure 2020, 1216 , 128316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2020.128316
  15. Marc Hafner, Caitlin E. Mills, Kartik Subramanian, Chen Chen, Mirra Chung, Sarah A. Boswell, Robert A. Everley, Changchang Liu, Charlotte S. Walmsley, Dejan Juric, Peter K. Sorger. Multiomics Profiling Establishes the Polypharmacology of FDA-Approved CDK4/6 Inhibitors and the Potential for Differential Clinical Activity. Cell Chemical Biology 2019, 26 (8) , 1067-1080.e8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chembiol.2019.05.005
  16. Przemysław Czeleń. Investigation of the Inhibition Potential of New Oxindole Derivatives and Assessment of Their Usefulness for Targeted Therapy. Symmetry 2019, 11 (8) , 974. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym11080974
  17. Przemysław Czeleń, Beata Szefler. The Immobilization of ChEMBL474807 Molecules Using Different Classes of Nanostructures. Symmetry 2019, 11 (8) , 980. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym11080980
  18. Amy B Heptinstall, IWS Adiyasa, Céline Cano, Ian R Hardcastle. Recent Advances in CDK Inhibitors for Cancer Therapy. Future Medicinal Chemistry 2018, 10 (11) , 1369-1388. https://doi.org/10.4155/fmc-2017-0246
  19. , , Mathew P. Martin, Jane A. Endicott, Martin E.M. Noble. Structure-based discovery of cyclin-dependent protein kinase inhibitors. Essays in Biochemistry 2017, 61 (5) , 439-452. https://doi.org/10.1042/EBC20170040
  20. Gabrielle Stetz, Amanda Tse, Gennady M. Verkhivker, . Ensemble-based modeling and rigidity decomposition of allosteric interaction networks and communication pathways in cyclin-dependent kinases: Differentiating kinase clients of the Hsp90-Cdc37 chaperone. PLOS ONE 2017, 12 (11) , e0186089. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186089
  21. Jimma Likisa Lenjisa, Solomon Tadesse, Nishat Zareen Khair, Malika Kumarasiri, Mingfeng Yu, Hugo Albrecht, Robert Milne, Shudong Wang. Cdk5 in Oncology: Recent Advances and Future Prospects. Future Medicinal Chemistry 2017, 9 (16) , 1939-1962. https://doi.org/10.4155/fmc-2017-0097
  22. G. M. Verkhivker. Network-based modelling and percolation analysis of conformational dynamics and activation in the CDK2 and CDK4 proteins: dynamic and energetic polarization of the kinase lobes may determine divergence of the regulatory mechanisms. Molecular BioSystems 2017, 13 (11) , 2235-2253. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7MB00355B
  23. Tinghan Li, Tianwei Weng, Minzan Zuo, Zhihui Wei, Ming Chen, Zhiyu Li. Recent Progress of Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitors as Potential Anticancer Agents. Future Medicinal Chemistry 2016, 8 (17) , 2047-2076. https://doi.org/10.4155/fmc-2016-0129
  24. Carl S. Rye, Nicola E. A. Chessum, Scott Lamont, Kurt G. Pike, Paul Faulder, Julie Demeritt, Paul Kemmitt, Julie Tucker, Lorenzo Zani, Matthew D. Cheeseman, Rosie Isaac, Louise Goodwin, Joanna Boros, Florence Raynaud, Angela Hayes, Alan T. Henley, Emmanuel de Billy, Christopher J. Lynch, Swee Y. Sharp, Robert te Poele, Lisa O’ Fee, Kevin M. Foote, Stephen Green, Paul Workman, Keith Jones. Discovery of 4,6-disubstituted pyrimidines as potent inhibitors of the heat shock factor 1 (HSF1) stress pathway and CDK9. MedChemComm 2016, 7 (8) , 1580-1586. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6MD00159A
  25. Marion Peyressatre, Camille Prével, Morgan Pellerano, May Morris. Targeting Cyclin-Dependent Kinases in Human Cancers: From Small Molecules to Peptide Inhibitors. Cancers 2015, 7 (1) , 179-237. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers7010179

ACS Chemical Biology

Cite this: ACS Chem. Biol. 2014, 9, 6, 1251–1256
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/cb500135f
Published March 26, 2014

Copyright © 2014 American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under CC-BY.

Article Views

3897

Altmetric

-

Citations

Learn about these metrics

Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.

  • Abstract

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. Explored chemical space. (a) Representative inhibitor scaffolds. Examples of the inhibitor scaffolds included in the panel are shown. All inhibitor structures are provided in the Supporting Information (Supplementary Table 1). (b) Chemical space explored by the panel of inhibitors used in this study. The target(s) in the human kinome for each of the inhibitors of the panel are identified by a red rectangle on the kinome tree. This figure was adapted from the phylogenetic tree published in ref 9.

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. CDK space explored in this study. (a) Representative melting curves for cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK)/cyclin complexes used to derive ΔTm values in the presence of an ATP-competitive inhibitor. The shift in Tm upon staurosporine binding (red) is illustrated for each of the CDK/cyclin complexes in this study. Black curves, CDK/cyclin complexes in the absence of added inhibitor. Curves with closed triangle symbols correspond to pCDK9/T, closed diamonds to CDK7, closed circles to CDK4, closed squares to pCDK4/D, open squares to CDK2/A, open diamonds to CDK2, and open triangles to pCDK2. (b) The full set of different phosphorylated and/or cyclin-associated states of the four CDKs characterized in this study are shown, with those members for which measurements were made highlighted by shaded boxes. Color intensity for these protein species reflects activation state (more saturated, more active). (c) The ATP binding site of CDKs. The CDK2 ATP-binding site residues from a pCDK2/A structure (PDB code: 1QMZ) are colored according to the degree of sequence conservation between the 4 CDK sequences, calculated as described in the Supplementary Methods, from blue (highly conserved) to red (highly variable). The ATP molecule is represented in ball-and-stick mode for context. (d) The ATP-binding site pocket is highly conserved in CDK2, CDK7, CDK4, and CDK9. Residues that constitute the first shell of the CDK2 ATP-binding site (CDK2 numbering) were identified as defined in Supplementary Methods and used to construct a pseudosequence alignment. This alignment is displayed together with the associated consensus sequence, with X representing any residue, and ϕ a hydrophobic amino acid. Sequence motifs that are highly conserved across the protein kinase family are identified by numbered bars. Bar 1, the glycine-rich loop (residues 11–16 in CDK2) that defines the general consensus sequence GXGXXG that recognizes the phosphate moieties of ATP; bar 2, the “hinge” sequence composed of residues 80–84 that links the N- and C-terminal lobes and contributes to the ATP adenine binding site; bar 3, the “DFG motif” that defines the start of the activation segment. Asterisks below E51 and D127 highlight the conserved glutamate in the C-helix and the catalytic aspartate, respectively. A full sequence alignment is presented in Supplementary Figure 1.

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. Comparison of the inhibitor-binding profiles of various cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) subfamily members in different states of activation. Each block represents a CDK in a particular activation state: CDK (monomeric, unphosphorylated), pCDK (monomeric, phosphorylated), CDK/[A or D or T] (unphosphorylated binary complex between a CDK and the corresponding cyclin), and pCDK/[A or D or T] (phosphorylated binary complex between a CDK and the corresponding cyclin). The internal consistency of inhibitory fingerprints for each CDK/state pair, evaluated over two or three repeat measurements, is indicated by a value within the corresponding block. The correlation of fingerprints between different CDK/state pairs is indicated by a value on the line that connects them. (a) Comparison of the inhibitor fingerprints of CDK subfamily members in the monomeric form. (b) Comparison of the inhibitor fingerprints of CDK subfamily members in the phosphorylated binary forms. (c) Comparison of CDK2 inhibitor fingerprints in different activation states. Color intensity as in Figure 2b reflects activation state (more saturated, more active).

  • References


    This article references 37 other publications.

    1. 1
      Zhang, J., Yang, P. L., and Gray, N. S. (2009) Targeting cancer with small molecule kinase inhibitors Nat. Rev. Cancer 9, 28 39
    2. 2
      Fabbro, D., Cowan-Jacob, S. W., Mobitz, H., and Martiny-Baron, G. (2012) Targeting cancer with small-molecular-weight kinase inhibitors Methods Mol. Biol. (N. Y.) 795, 1 34
    3. 3
      Cohen, P. (2009) Targeting protein kinases for the development of anti-inflammatory drugs Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 21, 317 324
    4. 4
      Janne, P. A., Gray, N., and Settleman, J. (2009) Factors underlying sensitivity of cancers to small-molecule kinase inhibitors Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery 8, 709 723
    5. 5
      Karaman, M. W., Herrgard, S., Treiber, D. K., Gallant, P., Atteridge, C. E., Campbell, B. T., Chan, K. W., Ciceri, P., Davis, M. I., Edeen, P. T., Faraoni, R., Floyd, M., Hunt, J. P., Lockhart, D. J., Milanov, Z. V., Morrison, M. J., Pallares, G., Patel, H. K., Pritchard, S., Wodicka, L. M., and Zarrinkar, P. P. (2008) A quantitative analysis of kinase inhibitor selectivity Nat. Biotechnol. 26, 127 132
    6. 6
      Smyth, L. A. and Collins, I. (2009) Measuring and interpreting the selectivity of protein kinase inhibitors J. Chem. Biol. 2, 131 151
    7. 7
      Huse, M. and Kuriyan, J. (2002) The conformational plasticity of protein kinases Cell 109, 275 282
    8. 8
      Cowan-Jacob, S. W. (2006) Structural biology of protein tyrosine kinases Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 63, 2608 2625
    9. 9
      Manning, G., Whyte, D. B., Martinez, R., Hunter, T., and Sudarsanam, S. (2002) The protein kinase complement of the human genome Science 298, 1912 1934
    10. 10
      Morgan, D. O. (2007) The Cell Cycle, Principles of Control (Primers in Biology), New Science Press Ltd., London.
    11. 11
      Bartkowiak, B., Liu, P., Phatnani, H. P., Fuda, N. J., Cooper, J. J., Price, D. H., Adelman, K., Lis, J. T., and Greenleaf, A. L. (2010) CDK12 is a transcription elongation-associated CTD kinase, the metazoan ortholog of yeast Ctk1 Genes Dev. 24, 2303 2316
    12. 12
      Chen, H. H., Wong, Y. H., Geneviere, A. M., and Fann, M. J. (2007) CDK13/CDC2L5 interacts with L-type cyclins and regulates alternative splicing Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 354, 735 740
    13. 13
      Noble, M. E., Endicott, J. A., and Johnson, L. N. (2004) Protein kinase inhibitors: insights into drug design from structure Science 303, 1800 1805
    14. 14
      Ali, S., Heathcote, D. A., Kroll, S. H., Jogalekar, A. S., Scheiper, B., Patel, H., Brackow, J., Siwicka, A., Fuchter, M. J., Periyasamy, M., Tolhurst, R. S., Kanneganti, S. K., Snyder, J. P., Liotta, D. C., Aboagye, E. O., Barrett, A. G., and Coombes, R. C. (2009) The development of a selective cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor that shows antitumor activity Cancer Res. 69, 6208 6215
    15. 15
      Pavletich, N. P. (1999) Mechanisms of cyclin-dependent kinase regulation: structures of Cdks, their cyclin activators, and Cip and INK4 inhibitors J. Mol. Biol. 287, 821 828
    16. 16
      Echalier, A., Endicott, J. A., and Noble, M. E. (2010) Recent developments in cyclin-dependent kinase biochemical and structural studies Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1804, 511 519
    17. 17
      De Bondt, H. L., Rosenblatt, J., Jancarik, J., Jones, H. D., Morgan, D. O., and Kim, S. H. (1993) Crystal structure of cyclin-dependent kinase 2 Nature 363, 595 602
    18. 18
      Brown, N. R., Noble, M. E., Endicott, J. A., and Johnson, L. N. (1999) The structural basis for specificity of substrate and recruitment peptides for cyclin-dependent kinases Nat. Cell Biol. 1, 438 443
    19. 19
      Takaki, T., Echalier, A., Brown, N. R., Hunt, T., Endicott, J. A., and Noble, M. E. (2009) The structure of CDK4/cyclin D3 has implications for models of CDK activation Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 4171 4176
    20. 20
      Day, P. J., Cleasby, A., Tickle, I. J., O’Reilly, M., Coyle, J. E., Holding, F. P., McMenamin, R. L., Yon, J., Chopra, R., Lengauer, C., and Jhoti, H. (2009) Crystal structure of human CDK4 in complex with a D-type cyclin Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 4166 4170
    21. 21
      Tarricone, C., Dhavan, R., Peng, J., Areces, L. B., Tsai, L. H., and Musacchio, A. (2001) Structure and regulation of the CDK5-p25(nck5a) complex Mol. Cell 8, 657 669
    22. 22
      Schneider, E. V., Bottcher, J., Blaesse, M., Neumann, L., Huber, R., and Maskos, K. (2011) The structure of CDK8/CycC implicates specificity in the CDK/cyclin family and reveals interaction with a deep pocket binder J. Mol. Biol. 412, 251 266
    23. 23
      Lo, M. C., Aulabaugh, A., Jin, G., Cowling, R., Bard, J., Malamas, M., and Ellestad, G. (2004) Evaluation of fluorescence-based thermal shift assays for hit identification in drug discovery Anal. Biochem. 332, 153 159
    24. 24
      Najmanovich, R. J., Allali-Hassani, A., Morris, R. J., Dombrovsky, L., Pan, P. W., Vedadi, M., Plotnikov, A. N., Edwards, A., Arrowsmith, C., and Thornton, J. M. (2007) Analysis of binding site similarity, small-molecule similarity and experimental binding profiles in the human cytosolic sulfotransferase family Bioinformatics 23, e104 109
    25. 25
      Merckx, A., Echalier, A., Langford, K., Sicard, A., Langsley, G., Joore, J., Doerig, C., Noble, M., and Endicott, J. (2008) Structures of P. falciparum protein kinase 7 identify an activation motif and leads for inhibitor design Structure 16, 228 238
    26. 26
      Brown, N. R., Noble, M. E., Lawrie, A. M., Morris, M. C., Tunnah, P., Divita, G., Johnson, L. N., and Endicott, J. A. (1999) Effects of phosphorylation of threonine 160 on cyclin-dependent kinase 2 structure and activity J. Biol. Chem. 274, 8746 8756
    27. 27
      Russo, A. A., Jeffrey, P. D., and Pavletich, N. P. (1996) Structural basis of cyclin-dependent kinase activation by phosphorylation Nat. Struct. Biol. 3, 696 700
    28. 28
      Fang, Z., Grutter, C., and Rauh, D. (2013) Strategies for the selective regulation of kinases with allosteric modulators: exploiting exclusive structural features ACS Chem. Biol. 8, 58 70
    29. 29
      Schachter, M. M., Merrick, K. A., Larochelle, S., Hirschi, A., Zhang, C., Shokat, K. M., Rubin, S. M., and Fisher, R. P. (2013) A Cdk7-Cdk4 T-loop phosphorylation cascade promotes G1 progression Mol. Cell 50, 250 260
    30. 30
      Baumli, S., Lolli, G., Lowe, E. D., Troiani, S., Rusconi, L., Bullock, A. N., Debreczeni, J. E., Knapp, S., and Johnson, L. N. (2008) The structure of P-TEFb (CDK9/cyclin T1), its complex with flavopiridol and regulation by phosphorylation EMBO J. 27, 1907 1918
    31. 31
      Lolli, G., Lowe, E. D., Brown, N. R., and Johnson, L. N. (2004) The crystal structure of human CDK7 and its protein recognition properties Structure 12, 2067 2079
    32. 32
      Matulis, D., Kranz, J. K., Salemme, F. R., and Todd, M. J. (2005) Thermodynamic stability of carbonic anhydrase: measurements of binding affinity and stoichiometry using ThermoFluor Biochemistry 44, 5258 5266
    33. 33
      Bullock, A. N., Debreczeni, J. E., Fedorov, O. Y., Nelson, A., Marsden, B. D., and Knapp, S. (2005) Structural basis of inhibitor specificity of the human protooncogene proviral insertion site in moloney murine leukemia virus (PIM-1) kinase J. Med. Chem. 48, 7604 7614
    34. 34
      Bain, J., McLauchlan, H., Elliott, M., and Cohen, P. (2003) The specificities of protein kinase inhibitors: an update Biochem. J. 371, 199 204
    35. 35
      Bain, J., Plater, L., Elliott, M., Shpiro, N., Hastie, C. J., McLauchlan, H., Klevernic, I., Arthur, J. S., Alessi, D. R., and Cohen, P. (2007) The selectivity of protein kinase inhibitors: a further update Biochem. J. 408, 297 315
    36. 36
      Davies, S. P., Reddy, H., Caivano, M., and Cohen, P. (2000) Specificity and mechanism of action of some commonly used protein kinase inhibitors Biochem. J. 351, 95 105
    37. 37
      Pratt, D. J., Bentley, J., Jewsbury, P., Boyle, F. T., Endicott, J. A., and Noble, M. E. (2006) Dissecting the determinants of cyclin-dependent kinase 2 and cyclin-dependent kinase 4 inhibitor selectivity J. Med. Chem. 49, 5470 5477
  • Supporting Information

    Supporting Information


    This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.


    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.