ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
Synthesis, Characterization, and Electronic Structure of Single-Crystal SnS, Sn2S3, and SnS2
My Activity
  • Open Access
Article

Synthesis, Characterization, and Electronic Structure of Single-Crystal SnS, Sn2S3, and SnS2
Click to copy article linkArticle link copied!

View Author Information
Centre for Sustainable Chemical Technologies, Department of Chemistry, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom
Laboratory for Energy Materials, Université du Luxembourg, 41, rue du Brill, L-4422 Belvaux, Luxembourg
§ Opto-Electronic Materials Section, Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Delft University of Technology, Julianalaan 136, 2628 BL Delft, The Netherlands
Department Energy and the Environment, IMRA Europe SAS, 220 rue Albert Caquot, BP213, F-06904 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France
Open PDFSupporting Information (1)

Chemistry of Materials

Cite this: Chem. Mater. 2013, 25, 24, 4908–4916
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/cm403046m
Published November 27, 2013

Copyright © 2013 American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under CC-BY.

Abstract

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Tin sulfide is being widely investigated as an earth-abundant light harvesting material, but recorded efficiencies for SnS fall far below theoretical limits. We describe the synthesis and characterization of the single-crystal tin sulfides (SnS, SnS2, and Sn2S3) through chemical vapor transport, and combine electronic structure calculations with time-resolved microwave conductivity measurements to shed light on the underlying electrical properties of each material. We show that the coexistence of the Sn(II) and Sn(IV) oxidation states would limit the performance of SnS in photovoltaic devices due to the valence band alignment of the respective phases and the “asymmetry” in the underlying point defect behavior. Furthermore, our results suggest that Sn2S3, in addition to SnS, is a candidate material for low-cost thin-film solar cells.

Copyright © 2013 American Chemical Society

Introduction

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

In order for photovoltaic (PV) technology to provide a significant fraction of the world’s energy demands, devices must be composed of cheap and abundant materials. (1) Tin monosulfide (SnS) is increasingly being investigated as a photoconverter because it is neither scarce, expensive, nor toxic, (2) unlike commercially available cadmium telluride (CdTe) or copper–indium–gallium–diselenide (CIGS). (3) It is also a binary component of the popular copper–zinc−tin–sulfide (CZTS) absorber system. (4)
SnS exhibits almost ideal electronic properties for PV applications, including a higher optical absorption coefficient than CdTe, (5, 6) and an effective onset of optical absorption that coincides with the optimum band gap for maximum efficiency according to the Shockley–Queisser limit within the AM 1.5 solar spectrum. (7-11) As a result, a theoretical conversion efficiency of 24% for SnS single-junction devices is predicted from Prince–Loferski diagrams. (8, 12-14) SnS also does not require extrinsic doping because of intrinsic p-type conductivity brought about by the formation of tin vacancies. (15) All of this suggests that the application of SnS in thin film photovoltaics could lead to devices with low cost and high market penetration. (16) In practice, however, the highest certified light-to-electricity conversion efficiency of SnS devices is still only 2.0%, (17) despite the first SnS PV device being reported in 1997 with a 0.5% efficiency. (18)
The poor performance of SnS solar cells to date could be related to a number of materials issues including: (i) low quality single phase materials, i.e. single phase SnS with defect and carrier concentrations and/or morphology that is not optimal. (ii) Device architecture, i.e. the commonly used electrical contacts and buffer layer materials are unsuitable for high conversion efficiencies. (19, 20) (iii) Mixed phases, i.e., the presence of alternate SnS polytypes, Sn2S3 or SnS2, may be detrimental to the photovoltaic performance. (21, 22) The first issue could be avoidable under suitable synthesis conditions, (23-25) and the second could be investigated by varying the materials used as electrical contacts. (19, 20) We address the third outstanding issue in this work, investigating the three distinct stoichiometries of tin sulfide and the properties of each.
As a heavier element in Group 14 of the Periodic Table, Sn has two accessible oxidation states: divalent (electronic configuration [Kr]4d105s25p0) and tetravalent (electronic configuration [Kr]4d105s05p0). The thermodynamic balance between these two oxidation states is subtle, and both Sn(II) and Sn(IV) compounds are known to exist. SnS and SnS2 are formed from a single oxidation state, while Sn2S3 is a multivalent compound, which can be described as Sn(II)Sn(IV)S3. The lower oxidation state is associated with a Sn lone pair, (26) which is the origin of the structural distortion found in the ground-state orthorhombic phase of SnS (Figure 1). (27)
In terms of conductivity, a reducible cation (i.e., tetravalent Sn) is generally associated with electron conduction (n-type), while an oxidizable cation (i.e., divalent Sn) is associated with hole conduction (p-type). Indeed, SnS2 and Sn2S3 have been reported to be n-type semiconductors, whereas SnS exhibits p-type behavior. (28-31) It has been observed that a 15% deviation from ideal stoichiometry is sufficient to change the conduction of SnS from p- to n-type, (32) and it is thought that with appropriate control of the stoichiometry, a p–n junction can be formed from just tin and sulfur. (33, 34) These factors re-enforce the hypothesis that deviations from ideal stoichiometry could be the cause of poor device performances recorded thus far.

Figure 1

Figure 1. Ground-state crystal structures of the three phases of tin (gray) sulfide (yellow): (a) SnS, (b) SnS2, and (c) Sn2S3.

There is confusion in the literature with respect to the assignment of distinct phases and the presence of alternate stoichiometries that cannot necessarily be discerned by common diffraction methods. (27, 32, 34) Indeed, as we will discuss, fundamental properties such as color, band gap, and the origin of free-carriers are still under debate and the current treatment of these materials is clearly not amenable to high performance applications. To understand the behavior of these materials in thin-films and nanoparticles, it is important to isolate the separate phases and to consider the distinct properties of each. (31)
We approach the problem by combining high-quality experiment and computation. The targeted synthesis of SnS, SnS2, and Sn2S3 by chemical vapor transport (CVT) is used to produce macroscopic crystals, which have been characterized in terms of structure, morphology, and conductivity. The electronic structure and defect chemistry of the three materials have been modeled using density functional theory (DFT). Several inconsistencies are found with respect to phase-assignments and materials properties in the literature. Our results provide a platform to achieving sustainable light harvesting devices from Sn and S.

Methods

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Chemical Vapor Transport

Single crystals of tin sulfide have been grown previously by the Bridgman method (31) and chemical vapor transport, (35) and thin films formed by many different deposition methods. (24, 32, 36-42) CVT was first proposed by Schäfer as a way to vaporise metals at lower temperatures by forming a volatile chemical intermediate. (43) For tin, iodine has been shown as an optimum carrier agent, (44) which has also been successfully applied to CZTS single crystals. (45)
The crystal growth apparatus consists of a horizontal tubular furnace (Elite Thermal Systems Ltd.) with four independently controlled zones within the furnace. The temperature components were chosen after calibration with a thermocouple drawn along inside of the furnace, such that the desired gradient was obtained across the length of the ampule (further details can be found in ref 45).
Tin (>99% powder, Aldrich) and stoichiometric amounts of sulfur (>99.999% pieces, Puratronic, hand crushed with an agate pestle and mortar) were placed in silica ampules that are 15 cm in length and 2 cm in diameter. Iodine (99.999% pieces, Aldrich) was placed in the same ampule, in quantities corresponding to the 5 mg cm–3 as recommended by Nitsche et al. to deliver the solid more slowly than the rate of crystal growth. (44) This ampule was then evacuated under the effect of liquid nitrogen in order to prevent the I2 from evaporating under vacuum. Prior to ampule evacuation, all components were exposed to air and the associated content thereof, which represents a potential source of impurities, for example, oxidation or the inclusion of moisture. A schematic representation of the experimental system, and the chemical processes that this induces, is shown in Figure 2.

Composition and Structural Characterization

The crystal structure for each of the phases was confirmed with X-ray Diffraction (XRD). Single-crystal XRD was performed on a Xcalibur, Atlas, Geminiultra X-ray diffractometer, for a Cu Kα radiation source. Powder-diffraction measurements were performed on a Bruker D8-Advance machine for a Cu Kα radiation source.
To assess the stoichiometries and morphology, a low-vacuum, high-performance JEOL-JSM-6610LV scanning electron microscope (SEM) fitted with an Oxford Instruments X-Max 800 mm energy-dispersive spectrometer (EDS) was used for multiple point-scans of the single crystals. The crystals were unpolished and unsputtered, but were washed with chloroform to remove any residual iodine from the CVT method.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Schematic of the CVT process, with red showing higher and blue showing cooler temperatures. The crystals are in yellow and the solid components black. Tin migrates as tin iodide toward the cooler end of the ampule, where Sn–S stoichiometries form and release the iodine. I2 diffuses back toward the tin to create a cycle.

Time-Resolved Microwave Conductivity

In pulse-radiolysis time-resolved microwave conductivity experiments (PR-TRMC), charges are generated in the sample by irradiation with high-energy electrons. The SnS, SnS2, and Sn2S3 samples consisted of micrometer-sized crystallites that were diluted approximately ten times by mixing them with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) powder. To measure the conductivity, we inserted the sample into a microwave conductivity cell with the dimensions of a rectangular Ka band microwave waveguide. The SnxSy samples were irradiated with nanosecond electron pulses of 3 MeV. The incident high-energy electrons undergo scattering within the sample and transfer energy by inducing ionisations. In this way a close to uniform distribution of positive charges (holes) and (secondary, ternary etc.) electrons is produced. The penetration depth of 3 MeV electrons is approximately 1.5 cm, which exceeds the thickness of the microwave cavity (0.5 cm), hence, the incident 3 MeV electrons pass through the sample and charging does not occur. After the nanosecond electron pulse, the change in conductivity of the sample is probed as a function of time by monitoring the attenuation of reflected microwave power (frequency range between 28 and 38 GHz, maximum electric field strength in the sample 10 V/m). The fractional change in microwave power reflected by the cell (ΔP/P) is directly proportional to the change in conductivity, Δ σ by(1)in which A is the sensitivity factor, n is the concentration of charges, and μ their mobility. The initial value of n, can be deduced using dosimetry measurements combined with an approximation of the average energy required to generate one electron–hole pair. Knowledge of n allows quantification of μ. A more detailed description of the PR-TRMC method can be found elsewhere. (46, 47)

Computational Methods

The bulk phases of SnS, SnS2, and Sn2S3 were simulated using Kohn–Sham DFT (48, 49) within the plane-wave project-augmented wave formalism as implemented in the Vienna ab initio simulation package (VASP). (50, 51) Electron exchange and correlation were described with the semilocal generalized gradient approximation (GGA) within the functional of Perdew, Burke and Ernzerhof optimized for solids (PBEsol). (52) The shallow core 4d states of Sn were explicitly treated as valence electrons. A plane-wave basis set (400 eV kinetic energy cutoff) was employed with well converged k-point sampling. To provide a quantitative prediction of the band gaps, hybrid-DFT was employed, incorporating 25% screened Hartree–Fock exchange to produce the HSE06 functional. (53)
All calculations were performed in closed-shell configurations (restricted spin), with geometry relaxations undertaken using the Broyden–Fletcher–Goldfarb–Shanno algorithm and a force convergence criterion tolerance in all cases of at least 0.01 eV/Å. (54) The equilibrium crystal structures and thermochemical data at this level of theory have previously been reported with good agreement with available experiment. (27)
The formation enthalpy of intrinsic point defects, tin and sulfur vacancies, was calculated using the supercell approach within the FHI-AIMS package, (55) and a previously reported method. (27) Lattice expansions of (2 × 4 × 4), (4 × 4 × 2), and (2 × 4 × 1) were used for SnS, SnS2, and Sn2S3 respectively. k-point sampling of at least 2 × 2 × 2 was performed, consistent with the lengths of the reciprocal lattice vectors. The defect formation energies were calculated with respect to the elemental standard states (Sn metal and solid S8).

Results

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Thermodynamics of Sn–I Transport

To guide the synthesis of the Sn–S phases by iodide vapor transport and help understand the underlying growth processes, a thermodynamic model of the relevant reactions was calculated. The stability region for each compound was found by minimizing the sum of the chemical potentials of the possible species on each side of the chemical equations as a function of the temperature, as taken from the database of Knacke et al. (56) We refer to previous work for detailed derivation of the equilibrium temperature ranges of stability for the species involved (e.g., iodine in the form of either atomic I or I2). (57) The following reactions are assumed to be taking place (x, y, w; 1 ≤ x ≤ 2; 1 ≤ y ≤ 8; 0 ≤ w ≤ 1):

SnS(s) + (4/x – 2(1 – w)/x) Ix(g) + 1/y Sy(g) → SnI2(w+1)(g) + 2/ySy(g)

SnS2(s) + 24/xIx(g) → 6SnI2(w+1)(g) + 12/ySy(g) + 6(2 + 2w)/xIx(g)

3Sn2S3(s) + 24/xIx(g) + 3/ySy(g) → 6SnI2(w+1)(g) + 12/ySy(g) + 6(2 + 2w)/xIx(g)

The Gibbs free energies of reaction as a function of the temperature are shown for each process in Figure 3.
Assuming thermodynamic equilibrium among the species in reactions 1–3 above, we can conclude that the equilibria involved in the transport of SnS, Sn2S3, and SnS2 via tin iodide vapor are remarkably different. Therefore we foresee no thermodynamic hindrance to the effective separation of the crystallized phases given careful synthetic control.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Standard Gibbs free energies of the reactions involved in the tin iodide formation for the vapor transport of SnS, Sn2S3, and SnS2 as a function of the temperature.

Single-Crystal Growth

The CVT conditions required to synthesize SnS, SnS2, and Sn2S3 are listed in Table 1, corresponding to the stoichiometric amounts of solid reagents.
The reaction conditions agree well with the work of others, (35, 44) but have the intriguing implication that in order to obtain phase pure SnS, rapid cooling may be necessary to escape the temperature window needed to synthesize Sn2S3 and/or SnS2. Indeed rapid quenching of SnS below 650 °C was a practice observed by Lambros et al. in their isolation of “almost perfect” crystals. (58)
In our case, it was found that during the experiment for the synthesis of SnS2, i.e., with highest sulfur load, both SnS2 yellow flakes and Sn2S3 black needles were both obtained but were spatially separated within the ampule, with Sn2S3 being closer to the hotter side of the vessel compared to SnS2. These findings are noteworthy because they agree with the thermochemical model derived in the previous section. The Gibbs free energy curves for the formation of tin iodide vapor from Sn2S3 and SnS2 in Figure 3 show that the stability of SnS2 against iodide formation is lower in the higher temperature side of the gradient applied, which is why this phase is expected to crystallize closer to the cold side of the reaction vessel. Conversely, the opposite argument can be applied for Sn2S3.

Stoichiometry and Structure Identification

The crystal structures of each material were confirmed using XRD. For Sn2S3 and SnS2 single-crystal diffraction was possible, which confirmed the ground-state Pnma structure of Sn2S3 with structural parameters in agreement with previous reports. (59) For SnS2 an extended R3̅ polytype was identified, which is closely related to the known ground state Pm1 phase but with an AAB layer stacking. (60) The ill-defined morphology of bulk SnS, resulting from the rapid cooling process from above its melting temperature, was not conducive to single-crystal diffraction; however, powder diffraction of a ground sample resulted in the expected Pnma phase. (61) To provide further evidence of the phase identities, we performed EDS analysis on our samples with results that are in agreement with the structural assignment (Table 2).
From XRD and EDS analysis, the phase assignment of the three materials is clear, with dark gray SnS, black needles of Sn2S3, and yellow flakes of SnS2. However, this assignment is in contradiction to previous studies. Nitsche et al. reported their black needlelike crystals as SnS when following the same procedure we isolated Sn2S3. (44) Price et al. described yellow plates of Sn2S3 and black needles of SnS2, the opposite of what we observe here. (62) Many more report on the tunability of SnS properties with different Sn:S ratio, when our results indicate that this is more likely to be a mechanical mixture of obtained phases rather than a homogeneous transition. (63, 64)

Transport Properties

As previously discussed SnS is a natural p-type material with hole mediated transport. Reported conductivities range from 10–5 to 0.07 Ω –1 cm–1, (65, 66) carrier concentrations from 1015 to 1018 cm–3, and hole mobilities from 4 to 139 cm2 V–1 s–1. (65, 67-69)
SnS2 is an intrinsic n-type material. Reported conductivities range from 10–7 to 0.90 Ω –1 cm–1, (67, 70) carrier concentrations from 1013 to 1017 cm–3, and electron mobilities from 15 to 52 cm2 V–1 s–1. (67, 71)
Table 1. Reaction Conditions Used to Synthesize the Phases of Tin Sulfide Using CVTa
phasetemperature gradient (°C)mass of tin (g)mass of sulfur (g)time (days)
SnS850–9501.5790.42710
SnS2600–8501.6910.89712
Sn2S3500–6501.7810.72310
a

In all reactions, approximately 250 mg of iodine was used as a carrier agent.

Table 2. Elemental Composition of Single Crystals Obtained As Atomic Percent Using Energy-Dispersive Spectroscopy and Their Macroscopic Appearance
Sn2S3 has also been reported as an intrinsic n-type material with conductivities ranging from 10–5 to 10–3 Ω –1, (29, 30) carrier concentrations around 1015 cm–3, (30) with no information available for charge carrier mobilities. (67)
All of these factors, listed in Table 3, will be crucial for optimization of the device applications of tin sulfide.

Microwave Conductivity

For photovoltaic applications, the charge carrier drift length is an important parameter, the value of which is given by the square root of the product of the lifetime of the light-induced charge carriers (τ) and their mobility (μ). To obtain these values for the tin sulfides, we performed pulse-radiolysis time-resolved microwave conductivity measurements.
Formation of mobile charges induces a rise in the electrical conductivity, which results in increased microwave absorption. The reduced amount of microwave power is detected on a nanosecond time scale as shown for SnS2 and Sn2S3 in Figure 4. For SnS, the high dark conductivity of our crystals, i.e., the conductivity in absence of a pulse, does not allow microwave measurements using this setup.
During the pulse, the signal rapidly increases because of the formation of mobile charge carriers (Fgure 4). The maximum signal size can be converted into a mobility using eq 1 as given in the experimental section, yielding for both materials a value of the order of 150 cm2 V–1 s–1. These are comparable to the highest values reported in the literature for these materials. Directly after the pulse, a fast decay is observable for both semiconductors; however, the decays are very different. The decay can be explained by the immobilization of charge carriers due to, for example, electron trapping. Alternatively recombination of charge carriers also leads to a reduction in signal size. For Sn2S3, the signal decays to almost zero within a period of less than 50 ns. In contrast, the decay for SnS2 is far slower and extends into the microsecond time scale.

Figure 4

Figure 4. Normalized pulse radiolysis TRMC traces recorded for SnS2 and Sn2S3 using a pulsed 3 MeV electron beam.

Table 3. Reported Electron Transport Properties for the Tin Sulfides, Collected from Various Sources
phaseconductivity (Ω–1 cm–1)carrier concentration (cm–3)mobilities (cm2 V–1 s–1)
SnS0.077, (72) 0.069, (65) 0.05, (63) 0.033, (68) 0.030, (69) 6 × 10–5, 5.3 × 10–5, (66) 4 × 10–5, (73)1–3 × 1018, (15) 1.16 × 1017, (65) 1 × 1017, (74) 1.5 × 1016, (24) 1.2 × 1015, (72) 1 × 1015, (68, 69)400–500, (72) 385, (74) 139, (69) 130, (68) 90, (15, 67) 15.3, (24) 3.73 (65)
SnS20.90, (67) 1.3 × 10–2, (29) 2.4 × 10–5, (71) 3.9 × 10–7, (70)2 × 1017, (67) 1 × 1013, (71)51.5, (67) 15 (71)
Sn2S34.4 × 10–3, (30) 2.5 × 10–5, (29)9.42 × 1014, (30)“little information available” (67)

Figure 5

Figure 5. Dose-normalized change in conductivity for SnS2 and Sn2S3. The x-axis shows time in nanoseconds and the y-axis shows the fractional change in microwave power reflected by the cell divided by the integrated beam charge per pulse (Q) in nano-Coulombs.

The origin of the decay can be studied in more detail by changing the dose of the electron beam and comparing the dose normalized TRMC traces as shown in Figure 5. For SnS2, the signal decreases more rapidly as the dose increases. This is a clear sign of charge-carrier recombination according to second-order electron–hole kinetics. For Sn2S3, the decay is independent of the dose, indicating that trapping or recombination is a first-order process.
At the lowest pulse of 2 ns, for SnS2, lifetime (τ1/2) is 50 ns and mobility (μ) is around 150 V–1 s–1, giving a mobility lifetime product of 7.5 × 10–6 cm2 V–1. For Sn2S3, τ1/2 ≈ 5 ns and mobility is around 150 V–1 s–1, giving a mobility lifetime product 7.5 × 10–7 cm2 V–1. These values are somewhat lower than those found for other materials, e.g., 7 ×10–5 cm2 V–1 for CdTe. (75)
The signal for SnS2 did decay to zero after a very long time (as shown in the Supporting Information). The long lifetimes can be attributed to the fact that the mobilities in different directions of the lattice vary by 4 orders of magnitude. (76) This large anisotropy in mobility is attributed to the two-dimensional sheet like structures of the lattice in SnS2 crystals. Interaction of the high energetic electrons of the accelerator pulse with the material induces the formation of charges over different sheets. Because the charge transport perpendicular to the sheets is slow, recombination of opposite charges is retarded.
The Einstein–Smoluchowski relation relates charge diffusion coefficient D to(2)where μ is mobility, kB is the Boltzmann constant, T is temperature, and q is the electrical charge. Using the measured values of 150 cm2 V–1 s–1 and 298 K for T, the charge diffusion coefficient is found to be 3.85 cm2 s–1 for both samples.
For SnS, an important conclusion can be made from the absence of TRMC data. The promotion of electrons into higher energy states, necessary for the TRMC method, is also responsible for the splitting of the quasi Fermi levels, which dictates the open-circuit voltage in photovoltaic devices. (77) The background conductivity is a potential contributor to the poor Voc observed to date. (17) As such, SnS devices might benefit from reducing the intrinsic conductivity through control of the growth conditions or extrinsic doping, as demonstrated with Sb recently. (25)

Defect Theory

To understand the microscopic origin of the conductivity in these undoped materials, we computed the energies associated with plausible defect reactions for each material at the DFT level of electronic structure methods. Defect concentrations were calculated following the law of mass action, under the assumption of thermal equilibrium at the growth temperature. (78) In SnS (SnS2), a fully ionized tin vacancy would generate two (four) positive charge carriers (i.e., holes) and one sulfur vacancy would generate two negative charge carriers (i.e., electrons). These are expected to be the dominant native point defects.
As shown in Table 4, we corroborate the dependency of conductivity on defect stabilities and by extension predict typical charge carrier concentrations for each phase. The Sn vacancy has the lowest formation energy and highest concentration in SnS, which is consistent with that being the dominant acceptor defect. The S vacancy (in SnS) was thought to potentially act as an electron trap, but it has been shown that the sulfur vacancies themselves do not compensate for the p-type contribution of tin vacancies (due to defect levels deep in the band gap). (23)
For SnS2, the S vacancy dominates, which is consistent with its observed n-type behavior from charge balancing considerations . For Sn2S3, our results agree with observed behavior and go further to elucidate the intermediate behavior of Sn2S3, as a species containing both Sn(II) and Sn(IV) oxidation states. For SnS and SnS2 the dominance of tin and sulfur vacancies, respectively, is unambiguous, which manifests as the observed longer carrier lifetimes and a second-order decay behavior for SnS2. In Sn2S3, the formation energies of the two vacancy defects are very close in energy, which indicates that carrier concentrations should be sensitive to the growth or annealing conditions, and furthermore, the major carrier type might be subject to change. This prediction also explains the rapid recombination behavior shown in the previous section: the high concentration of donor sites can effectively compensate the n-type carriers and vice versa.

Electronic Structure

Because thin-film SnS samples typically show lower levels of conductivity than our crystals, we further explore the possibility that other phases could be present in “tin monosulfide” samples and films, corroborated by the persistent observation of “brown” films in literature and the wide variety of properties observed (see Tables 3 and 6). (79, 80) Besides this, the fact that tin monosulfide and sesquisulfide have the same space group and similar XRD diffraction patterns means it is possible that the disappointing performance of SnS is due to an intrinsic alloy or mechanical mixture with Sn2S3. As mentioned in the introduction, it has been suggested that sulfur-rich conditions would be needed to avoid this occurrence, but such conditions alone were not sufficient to prevent off-stoichiometric phases of FeS2 forming; another material that has so far failed to deliver as a PV absorber layer. (81)
The physical appearance of the single crystals suggests band gaps close to the IR region of the spectrum for SnS and Sn2S3 and a larger gap closer to the UV region for SnS2 (i.e., yellow). Previous experimental measurements of the band gaps for each material are collected in Table 6. The values are wide-ranging: 1.08–1.70 eV for SnS, 1.82–2.41 eV for SnS2, and 0.95–2.20 eV for Sn2S3. In addition to the form of materials, variation can also be attributed to fitting process, where the optical absorption spectrum is subject to a linear fit according to an idealized parabolic band dispersion. Of note are the number of fits to dipole forbidden transitions for fundamental band gaps. Formally, these can occur only in centrosymmetric structures, (82) which does not correspond to any of the common tin sulfide phases. The results of our band structure calculations are included in Table 5. These are calculated at the experimental lattice constants to avoid any errors from the underlying structure.
Table 4. Point Defect Formation Energies and Concentrations Calculated under Sulfur-Rich Conditions (Atomic Exchange with a Resevoir of α-S) for the Neutral Defects at the Respective Synthesis Temperaturesa
phasespace groupspeciesdefect energy (eV)concentration (cm–3)type
SnSPnmaVSn0.682.28 × 1019acceptor
 PnmaVS2.176.57 × 1012 
SnS2Pm1VSn3.162.54 × 1004 
 Pm1VS1.802.21 × 1012donor
Sn2S3PnmaVSn(1)1.177.08 × 1014acceptor
 PnmaVSn(2)2.682.04 × 1005 
 PnmaVS(1)1.677.72 × 1011 
 PnmaVS(2)1.385.13 × 1013donor
 PnmaVS(3)1.771.63 × 1011 
a

Multiple inequivalent sites for defect formation are distinguished with numerical subscripts. The dominant defects are indicated by their type.

Table 5. Calculated Fundamental Band Gaps of the Tin Sulfides Using the HSE06 Technique
phaseEg (eV)
SnS1.11 (indirect)
SnS22.24 (indirect)
Sn2S31.09 (indirect)
Recent papers have reported calculated band gaps of SnS using G0W0 many-body perturbation theory based on local density approximation (LDA) structures or wave functions. (23, 83) Our result of 1.11 eV would correspond to a room temperature band gap of 0.98 eV following the method outlined by Malone et al. (58, 83) This value agrees well with the experimental observations of Zainal et al. (84)
The calculated valence band maxima, conduction band minima and vacuum potentials allow us construct a natural band offset diagram for each of the tin sulfide phases, which is shown in Figure 6. The procedure is detailed in ref 19, where electrostatic alignment is performed using the nonpolar (100) surface of SnS, a reconstructed (001) surface of Sn2S3, and a reconstructed (001) surface of SnS2.

Figure 6

Figure 6. Calculated band offset diagram, using the HSE06 functional, for each of the three tin sulfide phases using a vacuum alignment procedure and that of CZTS for reference. (92)

The lowest ionization potential is found for SnS (Figure 6), with a monotonic increase from Sn2S3 to SnS2. Similarly, the electron affinity increases from 3.59 eV for SnS, to 4.24 eV for SnS2, and 5.02 eV for Sn2S3. The calculations predict that the SnS/Sn2S3 and Sn2S3/SnS2 interfaces would form p–n junctions of Type II nature, driving the separation of electrons and holes. However, the alignment between SnS and SnS2 is of Type IIb, i.e., spontaneous electron and hole transfer would occur toward SnS. (93) With respect to SnS solar cells, a dispersion of these secondary phases (reported by multiple authors) (42, 62, 94-96) could decrease the open circuit voltage by mitigating the desired rectifying behavior across the cell. This could explain the limiting properties seen in devices as small-scale secondary phases and point defects have shown to be of macroscopic importance for Cu2ZnSnS4 (CZTS) cells. (97) Also of importance is the relatively low ionization potential of SnS compared to other photo absorbers (e.g., CZTS), which suggests that commonly used contacts such as molybdenum might not allow the effective separation of charges necessary for PV performance. The importance of appropriate contacts for SnS based solar cells has recently been highlighted. (19)
Table 6. Reported Optical Band Gaps of the Tin Sulfides from Thin-Film and Single Crystal Samplesa
phasereported optical Eg (eV)
SnS0.9 −1.1 (indirect); (84) 1.08 (indirect); (15) 1.27 (allowed indirect); (85) 1.32 (direct), (65, 69) 1.43 (direct); (41) 1.70 (direct); (34, 66) 1.79 (direct) (86)
SnS21.82 (forbidden indirect); (70) 2.07 (indirect); (87) 2.2 (forbidden indirect); (29) 2.41 (no further details) (88)
Sn2S30.95 eV (forbidden direct); (89) 1.05 (forbidden direct); (29) 1.16 (forbidden direct); (90) 1.6–1.9 (79) 2 (direct); (30) 2.2 (indirect) (91)
a

The type of band gap used in the fitting process is shown in parentheses.

Discussion and Conclusions

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Detailed examination of the tin sulfides has shown that the intrinsic material properties of the individual phases do not pose any insurmountable obstacles to the realization of their potential in respective photovoltaic or photochemical applications. Our characterization leads to the conclusion that the three stoichiometries of tin sulfide have been isolated and the identification of suitable methods allows for bulk production of phase-pure crystals.
Results obtained for SnS could provide an explanation as to the absence of high-efficiency PV devices with SnS as an absorber layer. Usually, the reported short circuit current is acceptable, yet the open circuit voltage is low. Indeed, due to a high background conductivity, the splitting of the quasi Fermi level will be difficult under illumination, and this will contribute to a low Voc (typically lower than 200 mV). Careful control of the Sn:S stoichiometry is required to ensure that the concentration of Sn vacancies is sufficiently low; however, experimentally a low Sn content could also correspond to the formation of the alternative S-rich phases.
Our results for SnS2 confirm that this material could be a good n-type buffer layer in thin-film solar cells, and could be quite thick, as the drift length of the electron carriers is sufficiently long. However, SnS2 would form a metallic type IIb heterojunction with SnS that would be detrimental to a SnS/SnS2 photovoltaic device as no depletion layer would form, although this may be overcome by tuning the morphology (e.g., dipoles) at the interface.
Finally, for Sn2S3, we confirm that it does not suffer from the same behavior as SnS (i.e., no large density of carriers in the dark), yet its carrier mobility is high (larger than amorphous silicon for example), (98) and its band gap is also attractive, more so than, for example, FeS2. (99) The nature of Sn2S3 means that its presence in SnS films would inhibit transport physics, as a Type II junction would form between the two; similarly, any SnS present in an Sn2S3 sample would act as a hole trap and also limit performance. Because of the similarity in structural and vibrational (Raman/IR) properties of the various phases of tin sulfide, in order to assign the presence of Sn(II) and Sn(IV) in thin-film samples, characterization tools such as XPS and EXAFS could play an important role in the future.
In conclusion, we have synthesized single crystals of SnS, Sn2S3, and SnS2 and investigated their electronic structure. The different semiconducting behavior of each phase can be explained from the underlying defect chemistry: p-type SnS (low energy Sn vacancies), n-type SnS2 (low-energy S vacancies), and mixed-type Sn2S3 (accessible Sn and S vacancies). On the basis of analysis of the valence band alignments, we show that if phase pure samples are not obtained, and either of the other two known phases are present, then these would also be detrimental to transport properties and subsequently lower the photovoltaic device performance.

Supporting Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Full X-ray crystallographic data for the three phases discussed in this paper and additional TRMC results for SnS2. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org/.

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Author Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

  • Corresponding Author
    • Aron Walsh - Centre for Sustainable Chemical Technologies, Department of Chemistry, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom Email: [email protected]
  • Authors
    • Lee A. Burton - Centre for Sustainable Chemical Technologies, Department of Chemistry, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom
    • Diego Colombara - Laboratory for Energy Materials, Université du Luxembourg, 41, rue du Brill, L-4422 Belvaux, Luxembourg
    • Ruben D. Abellon - Opto-Electronic Materials Section, Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Delft University of Technology, Julianalaan 136, 2628 BL Delft, The Netherlands
    • Ferdinand C. Grozema - Opto-Electronic Materials Section, Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Delft University of Technology, Julianalaan 136, 2628 BL Delft, The Netherlands
    • Laurence M. Peter - Centre for Sustainable Chemical Technologies, Department of Chemistry, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom
    • Tom J. Savenije - Opto-Electronic Materials Section, Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Delft University of Technology, Julianalaan 136, 2628 BL Delft, The Netherlands
    • Gilles Dennler - Department Energy and the Environment, IMRA Europe SAS, 220 rue Albert Caquot, BP213, F-06904 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France
  • Notes
    The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Acknowledgment

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The authors thank C. R. Bowen, C. H. Hendon, and K. C. Molloy (Bath) for useful discussions; P. Jones for glass-blowing expertise; and C. Woodhall for XRD measurements. A.W. acknowledges support from the Royal Society University Research Fellowship scheme and L.A.B. is funded by the EPSRC (Grant number EP/G03768X/1, EP/J017361/1 and EP/I019693/1). D.C. and L.M.P. acknowledge EPSRC funding through the Supergen grant (Photovoltaic Materials for the 21st Century EP/F029624/1). Access to the HECToR supercomputer was facilitated through membership of the HPC Materials Chemistry Consortium, which is funded by EPSRC (Grant EP/F067496). Images of chemical structure were made using VESTA software. (100)

References

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article references 100 other publications.

  1. 1
    Wadia, C.; Alivisatos, A. P.; Kammen, D. M. Energy Environ. Sci. 2009, 43, 2072 2077
  2. 2
    Peter, L. M. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 2011, 369, 1840 1856
  3. 3
    Scragg, J. J.; Dale, P. J.; Peter, L. M.; Zoppi, G.; Forbes, I. Physica Status Solidi (b) 2008, 245, 1772 1778
  4. 4
    Chen, S.; Gong, X. G.; Walsh, A.; Wei, S. H. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2010, 96, 021902 3
  5. 5
    Reddy, K. R.; Reddy, N. K.; Miles, R. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2006, 90, 3041 3046
  6. 6
    Ferekides, C. S.; Balasubramanian, U.; Mamazza, R.; Viswanathan, V.; Zhao, H.; Morel, D. L. Sol. Energy 2004, 77, 823 830
  7. 7
    Abou-Helal, M.; Boshta, M. J. Am. Sci. 2012, 8, 61 63
  8. 8
    Reddy, K. R.; Reddy, P. P.; Datta, P.; Miles, R. Thin Solid Films 2002, 403–404, 116 119
  9. 9
    Parenteau, M.; Carlone, C. Phys. Rev. B 1990, 41, 5227 5234
  10. 10
    Anderson, J. S.; Morton, C. M. Proc. Russ. Soc. A 1945, 184, 873
  11. 11
    Shockley, W.; Queisser, H. J. J. Appl. Phys. 1961, 32, 510 520
  12. 12
    Nair, M. T. S.; Nair, P. K. Semicond. Sci. Technol. 1991, 6, 132
  13. 13
    Prince, M. B. J. Appl. Phys. 1955, 26, 534 540
  14. 14
    Loferski, J. J. J. Appl. Phys. 1956, 27, 777 784
  15. 15
    Albers, W.; Haas, C.; J. Vink, H.; Wasscher, J. D. J. Appl. Phys. 1961, 32, 2220
  16. 16
    Fthenakis, V. Renew. Sust. Energy Rev. 2009, 13, 2746 2750
  17. 17
    Sinsermsuksakul, P.; Hartman, K.; Kim, S. B.; Heo, J.; Sun, L.; Park, H. H.; Chakraborty, R.; Buonassisi, T.; Gordon, R. G. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2013, 102, 053901
  18. 18
    Reddy, N.; Reddy, K. T. R.Conference Record of the Twenty Sixth IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference;

    Anaheim, CA, Sept 29–Oct 3, 2007

    IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, 1997.
  19. 19
    Burton, L. A.; Walsh, A. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2013, 102, 132111
  20. 20
    Scragg, J. J.; Watjen, J. T.; Edoff, M.; Ericson, T.; Kubart, T.; Platzer-Bjorkman, C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 19330 19333
  21. 21
    Richard, A. P. Single Crystal Growth, Powder Synthesis and Characterization of Layered Chalcogenide Semiconductors. Ph.D. thesis, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, 2011.
  22. 22
    Reddy, K. R.; Reddy, P. P.; Miles, R.; Datta, P. Opt. Mater. 2001, 17, 295 298
  23. 23
    Vidal, J.; Lany, S.; d’Avezac, M.; Zunger, A.; Zakutayev, A.; Francis, J.; Tate, J. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2012, 100, 032104
  24. 24
    Sinsermsuksakul, P.; Heo, J.; Noh, W.; Hock, A. S.; Gordon, R. G. Adv. Energy Mater. 2011, 1116 1125
  25. 25
    Sinsermsuksakul, P.; Chakraborty, R.; Kim, S. B.; Heald, S. M.; Buonassisi, T.; Gordon, R. G. Chem. Mater. 2012, 24, 4556
  26. 26
    Walsh, A.; Woodley, S. M.Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2010, 12.
  27. 27
    Burton, L. A.; Walsh, A. J. Phys. Chem. C 2012, 116, 24262 24267
  28. 28
    P. Boudjouk, S. R. B.; Seidler, D. J.; McCarthey, G. J. Chem. Mater. 1994, 6, 2108
  29. 29
    Sanchez-Juarez, A.; Ortiz, A. Semicond. Sci. Technol. 2002, 17, 931
  30. 30
    Khadraoui, M.; Benramdane, N.; Mathieu, C.; Bouzidi, A.; Miloua, R.; Kebbab, Z.; Sahraoui, K.; Desfeux, R. Solid State Commun. 2010, 150, 297 300
  31. 31
    Nassary, M. J. Alloys Compd. 2005, 398, 21 25
  32. 32
    Huang, C.-C.; Lin, Y.-J.; Chuang, C.-Y.; Liu, C.-J.; Yang, Y.-W. J. Alloys Compd. 2013, 553, 208 211
  33. 33
    Sanchez-Juarez, A.; Tiburcio-Silver, A.; Ortiz, A. Thin Solid Films 2005, 480?481, 452 456
  34. 34
    Ogah, O. E.; Zoppi, G.; Forbes, I.; Miles, R. Thin Solid Films 2009, 517, 2485 2488
  35. 35
    Cruz, M.; Morales, J.; Espinos, J. P.; Sanz, J. J. Solid State Chem. 2003, 175, 359 365
  36. 36
    Kana, A. T.; Hibbert, T. G.; Mahon, M. F.; Molloy, K. C.; Parkin, I. P.; Price, L. S. Polyhedron 2001, 20, 2989 2995
  37. 37
    Nair, P. K.; Nair, M. T. S.; Garcia, V. M.; Arenas, O. L.; Pena, Y.; Castillo, A.; Ayala, I. T.; Gomezdaza, O.; Sanchez, A.; Campos, J.; Hu, H.; Suarez, R.; Rincon, M. E. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 1998, 52, 313 344
  38. 38
    Ghazali, A.; Zainal, Z.; Hussein, M. Z.; Kassim, A. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 1998, 55, 237 249
  39. 39
    Sugiyama, M.; Miyauchi, K.; Minemura, T.; Ohtsuka, K.; Noguchi, K.; Nakanishi, H. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2008, 47, 4494 4495
  40. 40
    Xu, Z.; Chen, Y. Semicond. Sci. Technol. 2012, 27, 035007
  41. 41
    Ghosh, B.; Das, M.; Banerjee, P.; Das, S. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2008, 254, 6436 6440
  42. 42
    Hartman, K.; Johnson, J.; Bertoni, M. I.; Recht, D.; Aziz, M. J.; Scarpulla, M. A.; Buonassisi, T. Thin Solid Films 2011, 519, 7421 7424
  43. 43
    Schafer, H. Z. Anorg. Chem 1956, 286, 42
  44. 44
    Nitsche, R.; Bolsterli, H. U.; Lichtensteiger, M. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 1961, 21, 199 205
  45. 45
    Colombara, D.; Delsante, S.; Borzone, G.; Mitchels, J.; Molloy, K.; Thomas, L.; Mendis, B.; Cummings, C.; Marken, F.; Peter, L. J. Cryst. Growth 2013, 364, 101 110
  46. 46
    Schouten, P. G.; Warman, J. M.; de Haas, M. P. J. Phys. Chem. 1993, 97, 9863 9870
  47. 47
    Warman, J. M.; de Haas, M. P.; Dicker, G.; Grozema, F. C.; Piris, J.; Debije, M. G. Chem. Mater. 2004, 16, 4600 4609
  48. 48
    Hohenberg, P.; Kohn, W. Phys. Rev. 1964, 136, B864 B871
  49. 49
    Kohn, W.; Sham, L. J. Phys. Rev. 1965, 140, A1133 A1138
  50. 50
    Kresse, G.; Furthmüller, J. Phys. Rev. B 1996, 54, 11169
  51. 51
    Kresse, G.; Joubert, D. Phys. Rev. B 1999, 59, 1758
  52. 52
    Perdew, J. P.; Ruzsinszky, A.; Csonka, G. I.; Vydrov, O. A.; Scuseria, G. E.; Constantin, L. A.; Zhou, X.; Burke, K. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2008, 100, 136406
  53. 53
    Heyd, J.; Scuseria, G. E.; Ernzerhof, M. J. Chem. Phys. 2006, 124, 219906
  54. 54
    Head, J. D.; Zerner, M. C. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1985, 122, 264 270
  55. 55
    Blum, V.; Gehrke, R.; Hanke, F.; Havu, P.; Havu, V.; Ren, X.; Reuter, K.; Scheffler, M. Comput. Phys. Commun. 2009, 180, 2175 2196
  56. 56
    Knacke, O.; Kubaschewski, O. Thermochemical Properties of Inorganic Substances, 2nd ed.; Springer-Verlag: Dusseldorf, Germany, 1991.
  57. 57
    Colombara, D. Investigation of Chalcogenide Absorber Materials for Photovoltaic Applications. Ph.D. thesis,University of Bath, Bath, U.K., 2012.
  58. 58
    Lambros, A.; Geraleas, D.; Economou, N. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 1974, 35, 537 541
  59. 59
    Kniep, R.; Mootz, D.; Severin, U.; Wunderlich, H. Acta Crystallogr., Sect. B 1982, 38, 2022 2023
  60. 60
    Hazen, M. R.; Finger, L. W. Am. Mineral. 1978, 63, 289 292
  61. 61
    Chattopadhyay, T.; Pannetier, J.; Von Schnering, H. G. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 1986, 47, 879 885
  62. 62
    Price, L. S.; Parkin, I. P.; Hardy, A. M. E.; Clark, R. J. H.; Hibbert, T. G.; Molloy, K. C. Chem. Mater. 1999, 11, 1792 1799
  63. 63
    Guang-Pu, W.; Zhi-Lin, Z.; Wei-Ming, Z.; Xiang-Hong, G.; Wei-Qun, C.; Tanamura, H.; Yamaguchi, M.; Noguchi, H.; Nagatomo, T.; Omoto, O.Photovoltaic Energy Conversion, 1994, Conference Record of the Twenty Fourth IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference;

    Waikoloa, HI, Dec 5–9, 1994

    ; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, 1994.
  64. 64
    Ristova, M.; Ristov, M. Sol. Energ. Mat. Sol. C. 1998, 53, 95 102
  65. 65
    Yanuar; Guastavino, F.; Llinares, C.; Djessas, K.; Masse, G. J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 2000, 19, 2135 2137
  66. 66
    Calixto-Rodriguez, M.; Martinez, H.; Sanchez-Juarez, A.; Campos-Alvarez, J.; Tiburcio-Silver, A.; Calixto, M. Thin Solid Films 2009, 517, 2497 2499
  67. 67
    Madelung, O. Semiconductors: Data Handbook, 3rd ed.; Springer: New York, 2004.
  68. 68
    Reddy, N. K.; Reddy, K. R. Solid-State Electron. 2005, 49, 902 906
  69. 69
    Reddy, N. K.; Reddy, K. T. R. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2007, 102, 13 18
  70. 70
    Amalraj, L.; Sanjeeviraja, C.; Jayachandran, M. J. Cryst. Growth 2002, 234, 683 689
  71. 71
    Julien, C.; Eddrief, M.; Samaras, I.; Balkanski, M. Mater. Sci. Eng., B 1992, 15, 70 72
  72. 72
    Noguchi, H.; Setiyadi, A.; Tanamura, H.; Nagatomo, T.; Omoto, O. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 1994, 35, 325 331
  73. 73
    Nair, M. T. S.; Nair, P. K. Semicond. Sci. Technol. 1991, 6, 132
  74. 74
    Wangperawong, A.; Herron, S. M.; Runser, R. R.; Hägglund, C.; Tanskanen, J. T.; Lee, H.-B.-R.; Clemens, B. M.; Bent, S. F. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2013, 103052105
  75. 75
    Sellin, P.; Davies, A. W.; Lohstroh, A.; Ozsan, M.; Parkin, J. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 2005, 52, 3074 3078
  76. 76
    Patil, R. H.; Tredgold, S G J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 1971, 4, 718 722
  77. 77
    Markvart, T. Prog. Quant. Electron. 2000, 24, 107 186
  78. 78
    de Walle, C. G. V.; Neugebauer, J. J. Appl. Phys. 2004, 95, 3851 3879
  79. 79
    Engelken, R. D.; McCloud, H. E.; Lee, C.; Slayton, M.; Ghoreishi, H. J. Electrochem. Soc. 1987, 134, 2696 2707
  80. 80
    Cheng, S.; Zhang, H. Micro Nano Lett. 2011, 6, 473 475
  81. 81
    Yu, L.; Lany, S.; Kykyneshi, R.; Jieratum, V.; Ravichandran, R.; Pelatt, B.; Altschul, E.; Platt, H. A. S.; Wager, J. F.; Keszler, D. A.; Zunger, A. Adv. Energy Mater. 2011, 1, 748 753
  82. 82
    Atkins, P.; Overton, T.; Rourke, J.; Weller, M.; Armstrong, F. Inorganic Chemistry; Oxford University Press: Oxford, U.K., 2006.
  83. 83
    Malone, B. D.; Kaxiras, E. Phys. Rev. B 2013, 87, 245312
  84. 84
    Zainal, Z.; Hussein, M. Z.; Ghazali, A. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 1996, 40, 347 357
  85. 85
    Lopez, S.; Ortiz, A. Semicond. Sci. Technol. 1994, 9, 2130 2133
  86. 86
    Ragina, A. J.; Murali, K. V.; Preetha, K. C.; Deepa, K.; Remadevi, T. L. A Study of Optical Parameters of Tin Sulphide Thin Films Using the Swanepoel Method. Optics: Phenomena, Materials, Devices, and Characterization 2011: International Conference on Light ;

    Calicut, India, May 23–25, 2011

    ; American Institute of Physics: College Park, MD, 2011
  87. 87
    Domingo, G.; Itoga, R. S.; Kannewurf, C. R. Phys. Rev. 1966, 143, 536 541
  88. 88
    Shi, C.; Chen, Z.; Shi, G.; Sun, R.; Zhan, X.; Shen, X. Thin Solid Films 2012, 520, 4898 4901
  89. 89
    Alpen, U.; Fenner, J.; Gmelin, E. Mater. Res. Bull. 1975, 10, 175 180
  90. 90
    Lopez, S.; Granados, S.; Ortiz, A. Semicond. Sci. Technol. 1996, 11, 433
  91. 91
    Salah, H. B. H.; Bouzouita, H.; Rezig, B. Thin Solid Films 2005, 480?481, 439 442
  92. 92
    Walsh, A.; Chen, S.; Wei, S.-H.; Gong, X.-G. Adv. Energy Mater. 2012, 2, 400 409
  93. 93
    Yu, P. Y.; Cardona, M. Fundamentals of Semiconductors, 3rd ed.; Springer-Verlag: New York, 2003.
  94. 94
    Mathews, N. R.; Anaya, H. B. M.; Cortes-Jacome, M. A.; Angeles-Chavez, C.; Toledo-Antonio, J. A. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2010, 157, H337 H341
  95. 95
    Miles, R. W.; Ogah, O. E.; Zoppi, G.; Forbes, I. Thin Solid Films 2009, 517, 4702 4705
  96. 96
    Barone, G.; Hibbert, T. G.; Mahon, M. F.; Molloy, K. C.; Price, L. S.; Parkin, I. P.; Hardy, A. M. E.; Field, M. N. J. Mater. Chem. 2001, 11, 464 468
  97. 97
    Scragg, J. J.; Kubart, T.; Watjen, J. T.; Ericson, T.; Linnarsson, M. K.; Platzer-Bjorkman, C. Chem. Mater. 2013, 25, 3162 3171
  98. 98
    Moore, A. R. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1977, 31, 762 764
  99. 99
    Handbook of Optical Constants of Solids, 3rd ed.; Academic Press: London, 1998.
  100. 100
    Momma, K.; Izumi, F. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2011, 44, 1272 1276

Cited By

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!
Citation Statements
Explore this article's citation statements on scite.ai

This article is cited by 422 publications.

  1. Qiyue Luo, Siwu Li, Chaochao Wei, Zhongkai Wu, Chen Liu, Ziling Jiang, Lin Li, Shaoqing Chen, Chuang Yu. Local Charge Distribution Regulation toward Sulfide Superionic Conductor for Superior Electrochemical Performance in All-Solid-State Batteries. ACS Applied Energy Materials 2025, 8 (4) , 2465-2476. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaem.4c03020
  2. Rohit Dahule, Bo Gao, Kenta Hongo, Emila Panda, Yanming Ma, Ryo Maezono. Stability and Electronic Properties of SnS/ZnS Interfaces: A First-Principles Investigation. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2025, 129 (6) , 3158-3167. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.4c06319
  3. Francisco Yarur Villanueva, Minhal Hasham, Philippe B. Green, Christian J. Imperiale, Samihat Rahman, Darcy C. Burns, Mark W. B. Wilson. A Stepwise Reaction Achieves Ultrasmall Ag2ZnSnS4 Nanocrystals. ACS Nano 2024, 18 (52) , 35182-35201. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.4c02762
  4. Agata K. Tołłoczko, Maciej Peter, Miłosz Rybak, Sandeep Gorantla, Alicja Bachmatiuk, Robert Kudrawiec. Influence of Native Defects on the Optical Properties of SnX2 (X = S and Se) van der Waals Crystals. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2024, 128 (39) , 16640-16651. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.4c03005
  5. Bartholomew Richard, Kannankuzhiyan Niyas, Manjusha Mathew, P Abdul Rasheed. Lab on a Syringe: Strategic Design of 1T SnS2/MXene Embedded Single-Stranded Carbon Yarn for Real-Time Stress Biomarker Detection. ACS Applied Electronic Materials 2024, 6 (9) , 6905-6915. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaelm.4c01265
  6. Heenang Choi, Young Eun Song, Dongseong Park, Chanwoo Park, Bo Keun Park, Seung Uk Son, Jongsun Lim, Taek-Mo Chung. Germanium and Tin Precursors for Chalcogenide Materials Containing N-Alkoxy Thioamide Ligands. ACS Omega 2024, 9 (26) , 28707-28714. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.4c03019
  7. Seema Rani, Subhabrata Das, Shumile Ahmed Siddiqui, Ayushi Jain, Daya Rani, Mansi Pahuja, Nikita Chaudhary, Mohd Afshan, Rishita Ghosh, Devansh Swadia, S. k. Riyajuddin, Chandan Bera, Kaushik Ghosh. Harnessing Environmental Sensitivity in SnSe-Based Metal–Semiconductor–Metal Devices: Unveiling Negative Photoconductivity for Enhanced Photodetector Performance and Humidity Sensing. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2024, 16 (20) , 26899-26914. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.4c02539
  8. Md. Tarikul Islam, Mohammad Imran Hossain, Kentaro Aoki, Yuki Nagao, Md. Mahmudul Hasan, Mostafizur Rahaman, Ali Aldalbahi, Mohammad A. Hasnat. Electrochemical Reduction of CO2 by the SnS| PTFE| Pt Surface in an Aqueous Imidazole Medium: Catalysis and Kinetics. ACS Applied Energy Materials 2024, 7 (8) , 3125-3136. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaem.3c03142
  9. Femi Mathew, Järi Van den Hoek, Nithin Poonkottil, Bo Zhao, Geert Rampelberg, Daniel Choukroun, Jonas Hereijgers, Zeger Hens, Dirk Poelman, Tom Breugelmans, Christophe Detavernier, Jolien Dendooven. Crystalline Tin Disulfide by Low-Temperature Plasma-Enhanced Atomic Layer Deposition as an Electrode Material for Li-Ion Batteries and CO2 Electroreduction. ACS Applied Energy Materials 2023, 6 (24) , 12526-12538. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaem.3c02470
  10. Meiqiu Xie, Yi Shang, Xing’ao Li, Yun Da, Xuhai Liu. An Ab Initio Study of Two Dimensional SnX2 and Janus SnXY (X = S, Se) Nanosheets as Potential Photocatalysts for Water Splitting. ACS Applied Nano Materials 2023, 6 (12) , 10569-10580. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.3c01529
  11. Manash P. Nath, Hrishikesh Sarma, Tridip Chutia, Dhruba Jyoti Kalita, Biswajit Choudhury. Self-Assembled p–n Homojunction in SnS2 Nanosheets for Enhanced Visible Light-Driven Photocatalysis. ACS Applied Nano Materials 2023, 6 (7) , 5325-5335. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.2c05430
  12. Xingang Kong, Xiongtao Wu, Jiayin Li, Lifeng Zhang, Haibo Ouyang, Qi Feng. One-Step Urothermal Synthesis of Li+-Intercalated SnS2 Anodes with High Initial Coulombic Efficiency for Li-Ion Batteries. ACS Applied Nano Materials 2023, 6 (2) , 946-952. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.2c04326
  13. Siwon Oh, Soo Yeon Lim, Dae-Ho Son, Jin-Kyu Kang, Hyesun Yoo, Dae-Hwan Kim, Hyeonsik Cheong. Optical Detection of SnSe2 Formation on CZTSSe Thin-Film Solar Cells. ACS Applied Energy Materials 2022, 5 (9) , 11774-11779. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaem.2c02280
  14. Ran Eitan Abutbul, Elad Segev, Uri Argaman, Noy Zakay, Inbal Berkovich, Guy Makov, Yuval Golan. Amidation-Controlled Polymorphism in SnS Nanoparticles. Crystal Growth & Design 2022, 22 (7) , 4366-4374. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.cgd.2c00335
  15. Zhi Li, Xianli Su, Xinfeng Tang. Doping Achieves High Thermoelectric Performance in SnS: A First-Principles Study. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2022, 14 (5) , 6916-6925. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.1c24028
  16. Zhi Li, Hongyao Xie, Yi Xia, Shiqiang Hao, Koushik Pal, Mercouri G. Kanatzidis, Christopher Wolverton, Xinfeng Tang. Weak-Bonding Elements Lead to High Thermoelectric Performance in BaSnS3 and SrSnS3: A First-Principles Study. Chemistry of Materials 2022, 34 (3) , 1289-1301. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.1c03987
  17. Yuxiang Qin, Shuhan Chen, Yinan Bai. Adsorption and Sensing Performance toward Methanol Vapor on SnS/SnS2 In-Plane Heterostructures. ACS Applied Electronic Materials 2022, 4 (1) , 158-167. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaelm.1c00911
  18. Ashmita Biswas, Surajit Nandi, Navpreet Kamboj, Jaysree Pan, Arghya Bhowmik, Ramendra Sundar Dey. Alteration of Electronic Band Structure via a Metal–Semiconductor Interfacial Effect Enables High Faradaic Efficiency for Electrochemical Nitrogen Fixation. ACS Nano 2021, 15 (12) , 20364-20376. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.1c08652
  19. Francisco Yarur Villanueva, Philippe B. Green, Chenyue Qiu, Shahnaj R. Ullah, Kirstin Buenviaje, Jane Y. Howe, Marek B. Majewski, Mark W. B. Wilson. Binary Cu2–xS Templates Direct the Formation of Quaternary Cu2ZnSnS4 (Kesterite, Wurtzite) Nanocrystals. ACS Nano 2021, 15 (11) , 18085-18099. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.1c06730
  20. Yanan Liu, Alan J. McCue, Dianqing Li. Metal Phosphides and Sulfides in Heterogeneous Catalysis: Electronic and Geometric Effects. ACS Catalysis 2021, 11 (15) , 9102-9127. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.1c01718
  21. Xiaoshan Wang, Qian Chen, Chuang Shen, Jie Dai, Chao Zhu, Jinyan Zhang, Zhiwei Wang, Qingsong Song, Lin Wang, Hai Li, Qiang Wang, Zheng Liu, Zhimin Luo, Xiao Huang, Wei Huang. Spatially Controlled Preparation of Layered Metallic–Semiconducting Metal Chalcogenide Heterostructures. ACS Nano 2021, 15 (7) , 12171-12179. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.1c03688
  22. Wooseok Yang, Xi Zhang, S. David Tilley. Emerging Binary Chalcogenide Light Absorbers: Material Specific Promises and Challenges. Chemistry of Materials 2021, 33 (10) , 3467-3489. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.1c00741
  23. Hadallia Bergeron, Dmitry Lebedev, Mark C. Hersam. Polymorphism in Post-Dichalcogenide Two-Dimensional Materials. Chemical Reviews 2021, 121 (4) , 2713-2775. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00933
  24. Chun-Yuan Wu, Chia-Ju Lee, Yi-Hsing Yu, Hui-Wen Tsao, Yen-Hsun Su, Chao-Cheng Kaun, Jen-Sue Chen, Jih-Jen Wu. Efficacious CO2 Photoconversion to C2 and C3 Hydrocarbons on Upright SnS–SnS2 Heterojunction Nanosheet Frameworks. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2021, 13 (4) , 4984-4992. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.0c18420
  25. Shaoping Zhan, Lei Zheng, Yu Xiao, Li-Dong Zhao. Phonon and Carrier Transport Properties in Low-Cost and Environmentally Friendly SnS2: A Promising Thermoelectric Material. Chemistry of Materials 2020, 32 (24) , 10348-10356. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.0c04184
  26. Yecheng Cheng, Pengtao Tang, Pei Liang, Xueyin Liu, Dan Cao, Xiaoshuang Chen, Haibo Shu. Sulfur-Driven Transition from Vertical to Lateral Growth of 2D SnS–SnS2 Heterostructures and Their Band Alignments. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2020, 124 (50) , 27820-27828. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c09101
  27. Hyo Seok Lee, Jae Yu Cho, Raju Nandi, Pravin S. Pawar, KrishnaRao Eswar Neerugatti, Cuc Thi Kim Mai, Doh-Kwon Lee, Jaeyeong Heo. Influence of the Temperature Ramping Rate on the Performance of Vapor Transport Deposited SnS Thin-Film Solar Cells. ACS Applied Energy Materials 2020, 3 (11) , 10393-10401. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaem.0c01164
  28. Zhen Lei, Yuanyuan Huang, Wanyi Du, Zeyu Fan, Jiawei Chang, He Wang, Yanping Jin, Xinlong Xu. Nonlinear Optical Response on the Surface of Semiconductor SnS2 Probed by Terahertz Emission Spectroscopy. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2020, 124 (39) , 21559-21567. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c06370
  29. Sakiko Kawanishi, Issei Suzuki, Takeo Ohsawa, Naoki Ohashi, Hiroyuki Shibata, Takahisa Omata. Growth of Large Single Crystals of n-Type SnS from Halogen-Added Sn Flux. Crystal Growth & Design 2020, 20 (9) , 5931-5939. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.cgd.0c00617
  30. Deependra Kumar Singh, Rohit Pant, Basanta Roul, Arun Malla Chowdhury, Karuna Kar Nanda, Saluru Baba Krupanidhi. Temperature-Dependent Electrical Transport and Optoelectronic Properties of SnS2/p-Si Heterojunction. ACS Applied Electronic Materials 2020, 2 (7) , 2155-2163. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaelm.0c00362
  31. Yan Lei, Jie Luo, Xiaogang Yang, Tuo Cai, Ruijuan Qi, Longyan Gu, Zhi Zheng. Thermal Evaporation of Large-Area SnS2 Thin Films with a UV-to-NIR Photoelectric Response for Flexible Photodetector Applications. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2020, 12 (22) , 24940-24950. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.0c01781
  32. Yifan Huang, Weicheng Jiao, Zhenming Chu, Xinmiao Nie, Rongguo Wang, Xiaodong He. SnS2 Quantum Dot-Based Optoelectronic Flexible Sensors for Ultrasensitive Detection of NO2 Down to 1 ppb. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2020, 12 (22) , 25178-25188. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.0c05240
  33. Rachel Woods-Robinson, Yanbing Han, Hanyu Zhang, Tursun Ablekim, Imran Khan, Kristin A. Persson, Andriy Zakutayev. Wide Band Gap Chalcogenide Semiconductors. Chemical Reviews 2020, 120 (9) , 4007-4055. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00600
  34. Hyungsoo Lee, Wooseok Yang, Jeiwan Tan, Jaemin Park, Sang Gi Shim, Young Sun Park, Ju Won Yun, Kyung Min Kim, Jooho Moon. High-Performance Phase-Pure SnS Photocathodes for Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting Obtained via Molecular Ink-Derived Seed-Assisted Growth of Nanoplates. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2020, 12 (13) , 15155-15166. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b23045
  35. Kenjiro Hayashi, Masako Kataoka, Hideyuki Jippo, Mari Ohfuchi, Shintaro Sato. Vacancy-Assisted Selective Detection of Low-ppb Formaldehyde in Two-Dimensional Layered SnS2. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2020, 12 (10) , 12207-12214. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b16552
  36. Mengjuan Diao, Hui Li, Ruipeng Hou, Ying Liang, Jun Wang, Zhishan Luo, Zhipeng Huang, Chi Zhang. Vertical Heterostructure of SnS–MoS2 Synthesized by Sulfur-Preloaded Chemical Vapor Deposition. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2020, 12 (6) , 7423-7431. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b19495
  37. Jung Joon Pyeon, In-Hwan Baek, Woo Chul Lee, Hansol Lee, Sung Ok Won, Ga-Yeon Lee, Taek-Mo Chung, Jeong Hwan Han, Seung-Hyub Baek, Jin-Sang Kim, Ji-Won Choi, Chong-Yun Kang, Seong Keun Kim. Wafer-Scale, Conformal, and Low-Temperature Synthesis of Layered Tin Disulfides for Emerging Nonplanar and Flexible Electronics. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2020, 12 (2) , 2679-2686. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b19471
  38. Shuai Wei, Chuanyang Ge, Lijie Zhou, Shichao Zhang, Mingjin Dai, Feng Gao, Yi Sun, Yunfeng Qiu, Zhenlong Wang, Jia Zhang, PingAn Hu. Performance Improvement of Multilayered SnS2 Field Effect Transistors through Synergistic Effect of Vacancy Repairing and Electron Doping Introduced by EDTA. ACS Applied Electronic Materials 2019, 1 (11) , 2380-2388. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaelm.9b00550
  39. Xueting Wang, Zhun Liu, Xin-Gang Zhao, Jian Lv, Koushik Biswas, Lijun Zhang. Computational Design of Mixed-Valence Tin Sulfides as Solar Absorbers. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2019, 11 (28) , 24867-24875. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b01223
  40. Dharmapura H. K. Murthy, Hiroyuki Matsuzaki, Jingyuan Liu, Yohichi Suzuki, Takashi Hisatomi, Kazuhiko Seki, Kazunari Domen, Akihiro Furube. Transient Absorption Spectroscopy Reveals Performance-Limiting Factors in a Narrow-Bandgap Oxysulfide La5(Ti0.99Mg0.01)2CuS5O6.99 Photocatalyst for H2 Generation. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2019, 123 (23) , 14246-14252. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b02668
  41. David S. D. Gunn, Jonathan M. Skelton, Lee A. Burton, Sebastian Metz, Stephen C. Parker. Thermodynamics, Electronic Structure, and Vibrational Properties of Snn(S1–xSex)m Solid Solutions for Energy Applications. Chemistry of Materials 2019, 31 (10) , 3672-3685. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.9b00362
  42. Prashant Bhaskar, Alexander W. Achtstein, Martien J. W. Vermeulen, Laurens D. A. Siebbeles. Unconventional Thermally Activated Indirect to Direct Radiative Recombination of Electrons and Holes in Tin Disulfide Two-Dimensional van der Waals Material. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2019, 123 (18) , 11968-11973. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b01842
  43. Eli Sutter, Jia Wang, Peter Sutter. Nanoparticle-Templated Thickness Controlled Growth, Thermal Stability, and Decomposition of Ultrathin Tin Sulfide Plates. Chemistry of Materials 2019, 31 (7) , 2563-2570. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.9b00177
  44. Raja Sen, Priya Johari. One-Dimensional-Sn2X3 (X = S, Se) as Promising Optoelectronic and Thermoelectronic Materials: A Comparison with Three-Dimensional-Sn2X3. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2019, 11 (13) , 12733-12744. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.8b18430
  45. Meng Cao, Kefeng Yao, Chuangsheng Wu, Jian Huang, Weiguang Yang, Lei Zhang, Fang Lei, Yan Sun, Linjun Wang, Yue Shen. Facile Synthesis of SnS and SnS2 Nanosheets for FTO/SnS/SnS2/Pt Photocathode. ACS Applied Energy Materials 2018, 1 (11) , 6497-6504. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaem.8b01414
  46. Adam J. Biacchi, Son T. Le, Brian G. Alberding, Joseph A. Hagmann, Sujitra J. Pookpanratana, Edwin J. Heilweil, Curt A. Richter, Angela R. Hight Walker. Contact and Noncontact Measurement of Electronic Transport in Individual 2D SnS Colloidal Semiconductor Nanocrystals. ACS Nano 2018, 12 (10) , 10045-10060. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.8b04620
  47. Peter Sutter, Eli Sutter. Growth Mechanisms of Anisotropic Layered Group IV Chalcogenides on van der Waals Substrates for Energy Conversion Applications. ACS Applied Nano Materials 2018, 1 (6) , 3026-3034. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.8b00660
  48. Yuki Iguchi, Kazutoshi Inoue, Taiki Sugiyama, Hiroshi Yanagi. Single-Crystal Growth of Cl-Doped n-Type SnS Using SnCl2 Self-Flux. Inorganic Chemistry 2018, 57 (12) , 6769-6772. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.8b00646
  49. Bo-In Park, Yoon Hee Jang, Seung Yong Lee, Doh-Kwon Lee. Mechanochemically Synthesized SnS Nanocrystals: Impact of Nonstoichiometry on Phase Purity and Solar Cell Performance. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering 2018, 6 (3) , 3002-3009. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b02711
  50. Juran Kim, Jayeong Kim, Seokhyun Yoon, Jeong-yoon Kang, Chan-Wook Jeon, and William Jo . Single Phase Formation of SnS Competing with SnS2 and Sn2S3 for Photovoltaic Applications: Optoelectronic Characteristics of Thin-Film Surfaces and Interfaces. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2018, 122 (6) , 3523-3532. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b00179
  51. Jonathan M. Skelton, Lee A. Burton, Fumiyasu Oba, and Aron Walsh . Chemical and Lattice Stability of the Tin Sulfides. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2017, 121 (12) , 6446-6454. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b12581
  52. Xinyi Chia, Petr Lazar, Zdeněk Sofer, Jan Luxa, and Martin Pumera . Layered SnS versus SnS2: Valence and Structural Implications on Electrochemistry and Clean Energy Electrocatalysis. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2016, 120 (42) , 24098-24111. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b06977
  53. Leith Samad, Sage M. Bladow, Qi Ding, Junqiao Zhuo, Robert M. Jacobberger, Michael S. Arnold, and Song Jin . Layer-Controlled Chemical Vapor Deposition Growth of MoS2 Vertical Heterostructures via van der Waals Epitaxy. ACS Nano 2016, 10 (7) , 7039-7046. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.6b03112
  54. Brian G. Alberding, Adam J. Biacchi, Angela R. Hight Walker, and Edwin J. Heilweil . Charge Carrier Dynamics and Mobility Determined by Time-Resolved Terahertz Spectroscopy on Films of Nano-to-Micrometer-Sized Colloidal Tin(II) Monosulfide. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2016, 120 (28) , 15395-15406. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b01684
  55. E. Sutter, Y. Huang, H.-P. Komsa, M. Ghorbani-Asl, A.V. Krasheninnikov, and P. Sutter . Electron-Beam Induced Transformations of Layered Tin Dichalcogenides. Nano Letters 2016, 16 (7) , 4410-4416. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b01541
  56. Y.-B. Yang, J. K. Dash, Y. Xiang, Y. Wang, J. Shi, P. H. Dinolfo, T.-M. Lu, and G.-C. Wang . Tuning the Phase and Optical Properties of Ultrathin SnSx Films. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2016, 120 (24) , 13199-13214. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b03529
  57. Guangmao Li, Kui Wu, Qiong Liu, Zhihua Yang, and Shilie Pan . Na2ZnGe2S6: A New Infrared Nonlinear Optical Material with Good Balance between Large Second-Harmonic Generation Response and High Laser Damage Threshold. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2016, 138 (23) , 7422-7428. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.6b03734
  58. Giovanni Altamura and Julien Vidal . Impact of Minor Phases on the Performances of CZTSSe Thin-Film Solar Cells. Chemistry of Materials 2016, 28 (11) , 3540-3563. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b00069
  59. Thomas J. Whittles, Lee A. Burton, Jonathan M. Skelton, Aron Walsh, Tim D. Veal, and Vin R. Dhanak . Band Alignments, Valence Bands, and Core Levels in the Tin Sulfides SnS, SnS2, and Sn2S3: Experiment and Theory. Chemistry of Materials 2016, 28 (11) , 3718-3726. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b00397
  60. Y.-B. Yang, J. K. Dash, A. J. Littlejohn, Y. Xiang, Y. Wang, J. Shi, L. H. Zhang, K. Kisslinger, T.-M. Lu, and G.-C. Wang . Large Single Crystal SnS2 Flakes Synthesized from Coevaporation of Sn and S. Crystal Growth & Design 2016, 16 (2) , 961-973. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.cgd.5b01512
  61. Ibbi Y. Ahmet, Michael S. Hill, Andrew L. Johnson, and Laurence M. Peter . Polymorph-Selective Deposition of High Purity SnS Thin Films from a Single Source Precursor. Chemistry of Materials 2015, 27 (22) , 7680-7688. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b03220
  62. Antoine de Kergommeaux, Miguel Lopez-Haro, Stéphanie Pouget, Jian-Min Zuo, Colette Lebrun, Frédéric Chandezon, Dmitry Aldakov, and Peter Reiss . Synthesis, Internal Structure, and Formation Mechanism of Monodisperse Tin Sulfide Nanoplatelets. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2015, 137 (31) , 9943-9952. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.5b05576
  63. Jie Ge, Junhao Chu, Yanfa Yan, Jinchun Jiang, and Pingxiong Yang . Co-electroplated Kesterite Bifacial Thin-Film Solar Cells: A Study of Sulfurization Temperature. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2015, 7 (19) , 10414-10428. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5b01641
  64. Guoxiong Su, Viktor G. Hadjiev, Phillip E. Loya, Jing Zhang, Sidong Lei, Surendra Maharjan, Pei Dong, Pulickel M. Ajayan, Jun Lou, and Haibing Peng . Chemical Vapor Deposition of Thin Crystals of Layered Semiconductor SnS2 for Fast Photodetection Application. Nano Letters 2015, 15 (1) , 506-513. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl503857r
  65. Yaqi Liu, Yichen Liu, Guicheng Luo, Wentao Zhu, Ning Li, Yi Song, Huaju Song, Yun Shan, Qifan Wu, Yanan Ding, Aiping Liang, Lizhe Liu. Photothermally inducing SnS2 phase transition in Cu2O@CuS@SnS2 core–shell heterostructure to trigger efficient photocatalytic CO2 reduction. Chemical Engineering Journal 2025, 510 , 161537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2025.161537
  66. Saurabh Mishra, Himanshu Meena, Horesh Kumar. Effect of sulphur (S) incorporation on structural and electrical properties of selenium-rich ternary chalcogenide Se97-xSn3Sx (x = 0, 4, 8, and 12) alloys. Journal of Alloys and Compounds 2025, 1020 , 179454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2025.179454
  67. Taichi Nogami, Issei Suzuki, Daiki Motai, Hiroshi Tanimura, Tetsu Ichitsubo, Takahisa Omata. Non-stoichiometry in SnS: How it affects thin-film morphology and electrical properties. APL Materials 2025, 13 (3) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0248310
  68. Liuping Liu, Sheng Ni, Fengyi Zhu, Yuling Zhu, Changlong Liu, Xutao Zhang, He Zhu, Jiazhen Zhang, Donghai Zhang, Changyi Pan, Li Han, Weiwei Tang, Guanhai Li, Haibo Shu, Xiaoshuang Chen. Highly sensitive multicolor uncooled photoresponse and imaging based on symmetry breaking heterojunction. InfoMat 2025, 7 (3) https://doi.org/10.1002/inf2.12641
  69. Mohd Arif Dar, M. Satgunam, Khalid Mujasam Batoo, S. Kalpnan, P. Arularasan, Umar Ali Dar, Selvakumar Suthakaran, L. Guganathan, Aafaq A. Rather, Madhulika Mishra, S. R. Majid. Future Photovoltaic Applications of Nanostructured Metal Chalcogenides. Comments on Inorganic Chemistry 2025, 1 , 1-54. https://doi.org/10.1080/02603594.2025.2464732
  70. Dwaipayan Chakraborty, Zubair Nabi Ganaie, Priya Johari. High-performance Sn 2 S 3 as a conversion-alloying anode material for lithium-ion batteries: insights from first-principles calculations. Journal of Materials Chemistry A 2025, 13 (6) , 4650-4661. https://doi.org/10.1039/D4TA05403B
  71. Premkumar Jayaraman, Hamed Pourzolfaghar, Yuan-Yao Li, Helen Annal Therese. Boosted ion switching at the electrode-electrolyte interfaces of architecture interdigitated flexible supercapacitors. Materials Today Physics 2025, 51 , 101668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtphys.2025.101668
  72. Yumo Zhu, Cheng Chang, Yanling Pei. SnxSey: New promising thermoelectric materials. Chinese Science Bulletin 2025, 70 (6) , 697-704. https://doi.org/10.1360/TB-2024-0810
  73. A. M. S. Arulanantham, K. V. Gunavathy, P. Mohanraj, S. Rex Rosario, S. Kumaresan, A. Mani. Influence of sulfur concentration on phase formation in SxnSy thin films deposited through nebulizer spray pyrolysis technique. Applied Physics A 2025, 131 (1) https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-024-08147-6
  74. Priyanka V. P., R. Venkatesh, S. S. Hegde, S. Valanarasu, K. S. Nivedhitha, N. R. Banapurmath. Remarkable fast-response visible light photodetectors based on SnS thin films on silicon substrates. Applied Physics A 2025, 131 (1) https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-024-08189-w
  75. R. Grijalva-Saavedra, G. Suárez-Campos, J. Fuentes-Ríos, M. Ruiz-Molina, J. Solís-Mosquera, M. A. Quevedo-Lopez, D. Cabrera-German, M. Sotelo-Lerma. Enhanced optical and electrical properties of Co-doped SnS thin films synthesized via chemical bath deposition. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics 2025, 36 (1) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-024-14126-7
  76. Yanping Lv, Zhuanzhuan Song, Ziyi Qin, Jun Zhang, Ming Yang, Hao Wu. Probing into the low efficiency of CdS/SnS-based solar cells and remediation through surface treatments. Vacuum 2025, 231 , 113776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vacuum.2024.113776
  77. Grzegorz Matyszczak, Krzysztof Krawczyk, Albert Yedzikhanau, Cezariusz Jastrzębski, Piotr Dłużewski, Aleksandra Fidler, Tomasz Płociński, Krystyna Lawniczak-Jablonska, Anna Wolska, Aleksandra Drzewiecka-Antosik. Ultrasound-Assisted Synthesis of SnS2 Quantum Dots Using Acetone as Solvent. Materials 2025, 18 (1) , 82. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18010082
  78. Yujuan Pei, Miaoran Kang, Weilong Deng, Qiang Fu, Xiangyu Fan, Yu Sui, Jubei Hu, Mengting Liu, Xianjie Wang, Bo Song. A self-powered photodetector of SnSeS/p-Si heterojunction with high-performance. Journal of Materials Chemistry C 2025, 19 https://doi.org/10.1039/D5TC00243E
  79. Akzhan Bekzhanov, Nurgul Daniyeva, Qixiang Jiang, Yuri Surace, Freddy Kleitz, Damian Cupid. Hydrothermally Synthesized SnS 2 Anode Materials with Selectively Tuned Crystallinity. Small Science 2024, 28 https://doi.org/10.1002/smsc.202400516
  80. Mudar Ahmed Abdulsattar. NO2 properties that affect its reaction with pristine and Pt-doped SnS2: a gas sensor study. Journal of Molecular Modeling 2024, 30 (12) https://doi.org/10.1007/s00894-024-06223-5
  81. M.S. Alkhalifah, I.M. El Radaf, M.S. El-Bana. Optical and optoelectrical characterizations of Cu2ZnSn3S8: A potential nominee for optoelectronic and photovoltaic applications. Journal of Alloys and Compounds 2024, 1008 , 176768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2024.176768
  82. Hikari Kitadai, Qishuo Tan, Lu Ping, Xi Ling. Raman enhancement induced by exciton hybridization in molecules and 2D materials. npj 2D Materials and Applications 2024, 8 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41699-024-00446-z
  83. Ritu Kumari, Rakesh Kumar. Enhanced photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants by randomly oriented 2D SnS 2 nanostructures. Semiconductor Science and Technology 2024, 39 (12) , 125003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6641/ad8a82
  84. Yu P Gnatenko, A P Bukivskii, V Yu Yevdokymenko, A S Opanasyuk, P M Bukivskij, S A Iliash, I G Vertegel, O I Ovcharenko, R V Gamernyk. Optical and photoelectric properties of nanostructured SnS films obtained by spraying ink using a nanoparticle suspension. Materials Research Express 2024, 11 (12) , 125002. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/ad9b73
  85. Roman Gajda, Sławomir Podsiadło, Cezariusz Jastrzębski, Piotr Dłużewski, Krzysztof Woźniak. Sn 3 S 4 : a new mixed-valence tin sulfide. CrystEngComm 2024, 26 (46) , 6553-6561. https://doi.org/10.1039/D4CE00629A
  86. Aleksandr V. Averchenko, Omar A. Abbas, Igor A. Salimon, Ekaterina V. Zharkova, Ekaterina D. Grayfer, Svetlana Lipovskikh, Paul McNaughter, David Lewis, Toby Hallam, Pavlos G. Lagoudakis, Sakellaris Mailis. Laser‐Induced Synthesis of Tin Sulfides. Small 2024, 20 (44) https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202401891
  87. Zeeshan Tariq, Haris Habib, Sajid Ur Rehman, Hafiz Muhammad Naeem Ullah, Ali Tariq, Faheem K. Butt, Chuanbo Li, Xiaoming Zhang. Promising two dimensional XSe2/SnS (X= Pt, Zr, Hf) vdW heterostructures for overall water splitting with higher carrier mobilities. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2024, 87 , 669-677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.08.492
  88. Asta Bronusiene, Ieva Barauskiene, Anton Popov, Boldizsar Zsiros, Attila Farkas, Jan Plšek, Ingrida Ancutiene. The Impact of Thermal Treatment on the Structural, Optical and Electrochemical Characteristics of Tin Sulfide Films. Coatings 2024, 14 (10) , 1284. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings14101284
  89. Shan Liu, Dongrui Liu, Yuting Qiu, Bingchao Qin, Li-Dong Zhao. Low-cost p-type SnS-based materials: Promising candidates for low-to-mid-temperature thermoelectrics. Chinese Science Bulletin 2024, 378 https://doi.org/10.1360/TB-2024-0806
  90. M. Arabieh, M.R. Basaadat. Adsorbtive removal of HF toxic gas via tinsulfide monolayer modification: A molecular perspective. Chemosphere 2024, 364 , 143231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.143231
  91. Dingding Jiang, Ya‐Nan Tang, Di Wang, Xiangpeng Xu, Jiang Sun, Rong Ma, Wenhao Li, Zhiya Han, Yunqi Liu, Dacheng Wei. Self‐Anchored Van‐Der‐Waals Stacking Growth of Transition‐Metal Dichalcogenide Nanoplates. Advanced Materials 2024, 160 https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202407586
  92. Benjamin Hudson Baby, Nirmal T Shajan, D. Paul Joseph, Fathima C A, Gincy K. Varghese, D. Bharathi Mohan. Phase stabilization of Fe doped SnS by solvothermal method and its structural, morphological and optoelectronic properties for photovoltaic applications. Solid State Communications 2024, 386 , 115525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssc.2024.115525
  93. M. S. Nithyapriya, S. Athithya, Sivalingam Muthu Mariappan, S. Harish, M. Navaneethan, J. Archana. Tailoring the work function of SnS2/SnO2 composites for improved counter electrode performance in dye-sensitized solar cells. Emergent Materials 2024, 7 (3) , 867-878. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42247-023-00618-5
  94. Amira Ben Hjal, Luca Pezzato, Elena Colusso, Giulia Bragaggia, Noah Tormena, Nicola Trivellin, Khaled Alouani, Manuele Dabalà, Katya Brunelli. Influence of deposition potential and substrate characteristics on the photovoltaic conversion efficiency of p-SnS absorbing layers. Journal of Alloys and Compounds 2024, 987 , 174150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2024.174150
  95. Benjamin Hudson Baby, Nirmal T. Shajan, N. Biju Balan, D. Paul Joseph, D. Bharathi Mohan, Sona Mumthas. Effect of Bi doping in tuning the structural, morphological and optoelectronic properties of solvothermally synthesized SnS nanorods. Materials Today Communications 2024, 39 , 109041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2024.109041
  96. Rajneesh Kumar Mishra, Gyu Jin Choi, Ranjana Verma, Sun Hun Jin, Rajesh Bhardwaj, Sandeep Arya, Jay Singh, Jin Seog Gwag. Revolutionizing energy evolution: SnS-Sn2S3 layered structures as exceptional electrocatalytic materials for H2 and O2 generation. Materials Science and Engineering: B 2024, 303 , 117292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mseb.2024.117292
  97. M.I. Khan, Shahar bano, Saddam Hussain, Norah Alwadai, Mahvish Fatima, Urram Shahzad, El Sayed Yousef, Munawar Iqbal. Heterostructure of TiO2 and SnS for enhancing the structural, optical and photovoltaic properties of solar cells. Optik 2024, 300 , 171625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2024.171625
  98. Bo Zhang, Yunjie Liu, Bing Hu, Fuhai Guo, Mingcong Zhang, Siqi Li, Weizhuo Yu, Lanzhong Hao. High-performance broadband SnS photodetector based on photoconductive-bolometric coupling effect. 2D Materials 2024, 11 (2) , 025024. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1583/ad2c11
  99. Yu Gao, Qiang Wu, Lining Pan, Xueheng Zhuang, Feng Tian, Xingjie Jia, Qikui Man, Baogen Shen. Ordered heterostructured aerogel for multi-spectra stealth in microwave, infrared and visible light bands. Chemical Engineering Journal 2024, 484 , 149422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2024.149422
  100. J. Navrátil, O. Caha, J. Kopeček, P. Čermák, J. Prokleška, V. Holý, V. Sechovský, L. Beneš, K. Carva, J. Honolka, Č. Drašar. Electronic properties of Fe impurities in SnS van der Waals crystals – Revealing high-mobility holes. Materials Science and Engineering: B 2024, 301 , 117148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mseb.2023.117148
Load more citations

Chemistry of Materials

Cite this: Chem. Mater. 2013, 25, 24, 4908–4916
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/cm403046m
Published November 27, 2013

Copyright © 2013 American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under CC-BY.

Article Views

25k

Altmetric

-

Citations

Learn about these metrics

Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.

  • Abstract

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. Ground-state crystal structures of the three phases of tin (gray) sulfide (yellow): (a) SnS, (b) SnS2, and (c) Sn2S3.

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. Schematic of the CVT process, with red showing higher and blue showing cooler temperatures. The crystals are in yellow and the solid components black. Tin migrates as tin iodide toward the cooler end of the ampule, where Sn–S stoichiometries form and release the iodine. I2 diffuses back toward the tin to create a cycle.

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. Standard Gibbs free energies of the reactions involved in the tin iodide formation for the vapor transport of SnS, Sn2S3, and SnS2 as a function of the temperature.

    Figure 4

    Figure 4. Normalized pulse radiolysis TRMC traces recorded for SnS2 and Sn2S3 using a pulsed 3 MeV electron beam.

    Figure 5

    Figure 5. Dose-normalized change in conductivity for SnS2 and Sn2S3. The x-axis shows time in nanoseconds and the y-axis shows the fractional change in microwave power reflected by the cell divided by the integrated beam charge per pulse (Q) in nano-Coulombs.

    Figure 6

    Figure 6. Calculated band offset diagram, using the HSE06 functional, for each of the three tin sulfide phases using a vacuum alignment procedure and that of CZTS for reference. (92)

  • References


    This article references 100 other publications.

    1. 1
      Wadia, C.; Alivisatos, A. P.; Kammen, D. M. Energy Environ. Sci. 2009, 43, 2072 2077
    2. 2
      Peter, L. M. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 2011, 369, 1840 1856
    3. 3
      Scragg, J. J.; Dale, P. J.; Peter, L. M.; Zoppi, G.; Forbes, I. Physica Status Solidi (b) 2008, 245, 1772 1778
    4. 4
      Chen, S.; Gong, X. G.; Walsh, A.; Wei, S. H. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2010, 96, 021902 3
    5. 5
      Reddy, K. R.; Reddy, N. K.; Miles, R. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2006, 90, 3041 3046
    6. 6
      Ferekides, C. S.; Balasubramanian, U.; Mamazza, R.; Viswanathan, V.; Zhao, H.; Morel, D. L. Sol. Energy 2004, 77, 823 830
    7. 7
      Abou-Helal, M.; Boshta, M. J. Am. Sci. 2012, 8, 61 63
    8. 8
      Reddy, K. R.; Reddy, P. P.; Datta, P.; Miles, R. Thin Solid Films 2002, 403–404, 116 119
    9. 9
      Parenteau, M.; Carlone, C. Phys. Rev. B 1990, 41, 5227 5234
    10. 10
      Anderson, J. S.; Morton, C. M. Proc. Russ. Soc. A 1945, 184, 873
    11. 11
      Shockley, W.; Queisser, H. J. J. Appl. Phys. 1961, 32, 510 520
    12. 12
      Nair, M. T. S.; Nair, P. K. Semicond. Sci. Technol. 1991, 6, 132
    13. 13
      Prince, M. B. J. Appl. Phys. 1955, 26, 534 540
    14. 14
      Loferski, J. J. J. Appl. Phys. 1956, 27, 777 784
    15. 15
      Albers, W.; Haas, C.; J. Vink, H.; Wasscher, J. D. J. Appl. Phys. 1961, 32, 2220
    16. 16
      Fthenakis, V. Renew. Sust. Energy Rev. 2009, 13, 2746 2750
    17. 17
      Sinsermsuksakul, P.; Hartman, K.; Kim, S. B.; Heo, J.; Sun, L.; Park, H. H.; Chakraborty, R.; Buonassisi, T.; Gordon, R. G. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2013, 102, 053901
    18. 18
      Reddy, N.; Reddy, K. T. R.Conference Record of the Twenty Sixth IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference;

      Anaheim, CA, Sept 29–Oct 3, 2007

      IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, 1997.
    19. 19
      Burton, L. A.; Walsh, A. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2013, 102, 132111
    20. 20
      Scragg, J. J.; Watjen, J. T.; Edoff, M.; Ericson, T.; Kubart, T.; Platzer-Bjorkman, C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 19330 19333
    21. 21
      Richard, A. P. Single Crystal Growth, Powder Synthesis and Characterization of Layered Chalcogenide Semiconductors. Ph.D. thesis, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, 2011.
    22. 22
      Reddy, K. R.; Reddy, P. P.; Miles, R.; Datta, P. Opt. Mater. 2001, 17, 295 298
    23. 23
      Vidal, J.; Lany, S.; d’Avezac, M.; Zunger, A.; Zakutayev, A.; Francis, J.; Tate, J. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2012, 100, 032104
    24. 24
      Sinsermsuksakul, P.; Heo, J.; Noh, W.; Hock, A. S.; Gordon, R. G. Adv. Energy Mater. 2011, 1116 1125
    25. 25
      Sinsermsuksakul, P.; Chakraborty, R.; Kim, S. B.; Heald, S. M.; Buonassisi, T.; Gordon, R. G. Chem. Mater. 2012, 24, 4556
    26. 26
      Walsh, A.; Woodley, S. M.Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2010, 12.
    27. 27
      Burton, L. A.; Walsh, A. J. Phys. Chem. C 2012, 116, 24262 24267
    28. 28
      P. Boudjouk, S. R. B.; Seidler, D. J.; McCarthey, G. J. Chem. Mater. 1994, 6, 2108
    29. 29
      Sanchez-Juarez, A.; Ortiz, A. Semicond. Sci. Technol. 2002, 17, 931
    30. 30
      Khadraoui, M.; Benramdane, N.; Mathieu, C.; Bouzidi, A.; Miloua, R.; Kebbab, Z.; Sahraoui, K.; Desfeux, R. Solid State Commun. 2010, 150, 297 300
    31. 31
      Nassary, M. J. Alloys Compd. 2005, 398, 21 25
    32. 32
      Huang, C.-C.; Lin, Y.-J.; Chuang, C.-Y.; Liu, C.-J.; Yang, Y.-W. J. Alloys Compd. 2013, 553, 208 211
    33. 33
      Sanchez-Juarez, A.; Tiburcio-Silver, A.; Ortiz, A. Thin Solid Films 2005, 480?481, 452 456
    34. 34
      Ogah, O. E.; Zoppi, G.; Forbes, I.; Miles, R. Thin Solid Films 2009, 517, 2485 2488
    35. 35
      Cruz, M.; Morales, J.; Espinos, J. P.; Sanz, J. J. Solid State Chem. 2003, 175, 359 365
    36. 36
      Kana, A. T.; Hibbert, T. G.; Mahon, M. F.; Molloy, K. C.; Parkin, I. P.; Price, L. S. Polyhedron 2001, 20, 2989 2995
    37. 37
      Nair, P. K.; Nair, M. T. S.; Garcia, V. M.; Arenas, O. L.; Pena, Y.; Castillo, A.; Ayala, I. T.; Gomezdaza, O.; Sanchez, A.; Campos, J.; Hu, H.; Suarez, R.; Rincon, M. E. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 1998, 52, 313 344
    38. 38
      Ghazali, A.; Zainal, Z.; Hussein, M. Z.; Kassim, A. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 1998, 55, 237 249
    39. 39
      Sugiyama, M.; Miyauchi, K.; Minemura, T.; Ohtsuka, K.; Noguchi, K.; Nakanishi, H. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2008, 47, 4494 4495
    40. 40
      Xu, Z.; Chen, Y. Semicond. Sci. Technol. 2012, 27, 035007
    41. 41
      Ghosh, B.; Das, M.; Banerjee, P.; Das, S. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2008, 254, 6436 6440
    42. 42
      Hartman, K.; Johnson, J.; Bertoni, M. I.; Recht, D.; Aziz, M. J.; Scarpulla, M. A.; Buonassisi, T. Thin Solid Films 2011, 519, 7421 7424
    43. 43
      Schafer, H. Z. Anorg. Chem 1956, 286, 42
    44. 44
      Nitsche, R.; Bolsterli, H. U.; Lichtensteiger, M. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 1961, 21, 199 205
    45. 45
      Colombara, D.; Delsante, S.; Borzone, G.; Mitchels, J.; Molloy, K.; Thomas, L.; Mendis, B.; Cummings, C.; Marken, F.; Peter, L. J. Cryst. Growth 2013, 364, 101 110
    46. 46
      Schouten, P. G.; Warman, J. M.; de Haas, M. P. J. Phys. Chem. 1993, 97, 9863 9870
    47. 47
      Warman, J. M.; de Haas, M. P.; Dicker, G.; Grozema, F. C.; Piris, J.; Debije, M. G. Chem. Mater. 2004, 16, 4600 4609
    48. 48
      Hohenberg, P.; Kohn, W. Phys. Rev. 1964, 136, B864 B871
    49. 49
      Kohn, W.; Sham, L. J. Phys. Rev. 1965, 140, A1133 A1138
    50. 50
      Kresse, G.; Furthmüller, J. Phys. Rev. B 1996, 54, 11169
    51. 51
      Kresse, G.; Joubert, D. Phys. Rev. B 1999, 59, 1758
    52. 52
      Perdew, J. P.; Ruzsinszky, A.; Csonka, G. I.; Vydrov, O. A.; Scuseria, G. E.; Constantin, L. A.; Zhou, X.; Burke, K. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2008, 100, 136406
    53. 53
      Heyd, J.; Scuseria, G. E.; Ernzerhof, M. J. Chem. Phys. 2006, 124, 219906
    54. 54
      Head, J. D.; Zerner, M. C. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1985, 122, 264 270
    55. 55
      Blum, V.; Gehrke, R.; Hanke, F.; Havu, P.; Havu, V.; Ren, X.; Reuter, K.; Scheffler, M. Comput. Phys. Commun. 2009, 180, 2175 2196
    56. 56
      Knacke, O.; Kubaschewski, O. Thermochemical Properties of Inorganic Substances, 2nd ed.; Springer-Verlag: Dusseldorf, Germany, 1991.
    57. 57
      Colombara, D. Investigation of Chalcogenide Absorber Materials for Photovoltaic Applications. Ph.D. thesis,University of Bath, Bath, U.K., 2012.
    58. 58
      Lambros, A.; Geraleas, D.; Economou, N. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 1974, 35, 537 541
    59. 59
      Kniep, R.; Mootz, D.; Severin, U.; Wunderlich, H. Acta Crystallogr., Sect. B 1982, 38, 2022 2023
    60. 60
      Hazen, M. R.; Finger, L. W. Am. Mineral. 1978, 63, 289 292
    61. 61
      Chattopadhyay, T.; Pannetier, J.; Von Schnering, H. G. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 1986, 47, 879 885
    62. 62
      Price, L. S.; Parkin, I. P.; Hardy, A. M. E.; Clark, R. J. H.; Hibbert, T. G.; Molloy, K. C. Chem. Mater. 1999, 11, 1792 1799
    63. 63
      Guang-Pu, W.; Zhi-Lin, Z.; Wei-Ming, Z.; Xiang-Hong, G.; Wei-Qun, C.; Tanamura, H.; Yamaguchi, M.; Noguchi, H.; Nagatomo, T.; Omoto, O.Photovoltaic Energy Conversion, 1994, Conference Record of the Twenty Fourth IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference;

      Waikoloa, HI, Dec 5–9, 1994

      ; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, 1994.
    64. 64
      Ristova, M.; Ristov, M. Sol. Energ. Mat. Sol. C. 1998, 53, 95 102
    65. 65
      Yanuar; Guastavino, F.; Llinares, C.; Djessas, K.; Masse, G. J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 2000, 19, 2135 2137
    66. 66
      Calixto-Rodriguez, M.; Martinez, H.; Sanchez-Juarez, A.; Campos-Alvarez, J.; Tiburcio-Silver, A.; Calixto, M. Thin Solid Films 2009, 517, 2497 2499
    67. 67
      Madelung, O. Semiconductors: Data Handbook, 3rd ed.; Springer: New York, 2004.
    68. 68
      Reddy, N. K.; Reddy, K. R. Solid-State Electron. 2005, 49, 902 906
    69. 69
      Reddy, N. K.; Reddy, K. T. R. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2007, 102, 13 18
    70. 70
      Amalraj, L.; Sanjeeviraja, C.; Jayachandran, M. J. Cryst. Growth 2002, 234, 683 689
    71. 71
      Julien, C.; Eddrief, M.; Samaras, I.; Balkanski, M. Mater. Sci. Eng., B 1992, 15, 70 72
    72. 72
      Noguchi, H.; Setiyadi, A.; Tanamura, H.; Nagatomo, T.; Omoto, O. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 1994, 35, 325 331
    73. 73
      Nair, M. T. S.; Nair, P. K. Semicond. Sci. Technol. 1991, 6, 132
    74. 74
      Wangperawong, A.; Herron, S. M.; Runser, R. R.; Hägglund, C.; Tanskanen, J. T.; Lee, H.-B.-R.; Clemens, B. M.; Bent, S. F. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2013, 103052105
    75. 75
      Sellin, P.; Davies, A. W.; Lohstroh, A.; Ozsan, M.; Parkin, J. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 2005, 52, 3074 3078
    76. 76
      Patil, R. H.; Tredgold, S G J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 1971, 4, 718 722
    77. 77
      Markvart, T. Prog. Quant. Electron. 2000, 24, 107 186
    78. 78
      de Walle, C. G. V.; Neugebauer, J. J. Appl. Phys. 2004, 95, 3851 3879
    79. 79
      Engelken, R. D.; McCloud, H. E.; Lee, C.; Slayton, M.; Ghoreishi, H. J. Electrochem. Soc. 1987, 134, 2696 2707
    80. 80
      Cheng, S.; Zhang, H. Micro Nano Lett. 2011, 6, 473 475
    81. 81
      Yu, L.; Lany, S.; Kykyneshi, R.; Jieratum, V.; Ravichandran, R.; Pelatt, B.; Altschul, E.; Platt, H. A. S.; Wager, J. F.; Keszler, D. A.; Zunger, A. Adv. Energy Mater. 2011, 1, 748 753
    82. 82
      Atkins, P.; Overton, T.; Rourke, J.; Weller, M.; Armstrong, F. Inorganic Chemistry; Oxford University Press: Oxford, U.K., 2006.
    83. 83
      Malone, B. D.; Kaxiras, E. Phys. Rev. B 2013, 87, 245312
    84. 84
      Zainal, Z.; Hussein, M. Z.; Ghazali, A. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 1996, 40, 347 357
    85. 85
      Lopez, S.; Ortiz, A. Semicond. Sci. Technol. 1994, 9, 2130 2133
    86. 86
      Ragina, A. J.; Murali, K. V.; Preetha, K. C.; Deepa, K.; Remadevi, T. L. A Study of Optical Parameters of Tin Sulphide Thin Films Using the Swanepoel Method. Optics: Phenomena, Materials, Devices, and Characterization 2011: International Conference on Light ;

      Calicut, India, May 23–25, 2011

      ; American Institute of Physics: College Park, MD, 2011
    87. 87
      Domingo, G.; Itoga, R. S.; Kannewurf, C. R. Phys. Rev. 1966, 143, 536 541
    88. 88
      Shi, C.; Chen, Z.; Shi, G.; Sun, R.; Zhan, X.; Shen, X. Thin Solid Films 2012, 520, 4898 4901
    89. 89
      Alpen, U.; Fenner, J.; Gmelin, E. Mater. Res. Bull. 1975, 10, 175 180
    90. 90
      Lopez, S.; Granados, S.; Ortiz, A. Semicond. Sci. Technol. 1996, 11, 433
    91. 91
      Salah, H. B. H.; Bouzouita, H.; Rezig, B. Thin Solid Films 2005, 480?481, 439 442
    92. 92
      Walsh, A.; Chen, S.; Wei, S.-H.; Gong, X.-G. Adv. Energy Mater. 2012, 2, 400 409
    93. 93
      Yu, P. Y.; Cardona, M. Fundamentals of Semiconductors, 3rd ed.; Springer-Verlag: New York, 2003.
    94. 94
      Mathews, N. R.; Anaya, H. B. M.; Cortes-Jacome, M. A.; Angeles-Chavez, C.; Toledo-Antonio, J. A. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2010, 157, H337 H341
    95. 95
      Miles, R. W.; Ogah, O. E.; Zoppi, G.; Forbes, I. Thin Solid Films 2009, 517, 4702 4705
    96. 96
      Barone, G.; Hibbert, T. G.; Mahon, M. F.; Molloy, K. C.; Price, L. S.; Parkin, I. P.; Hardy, A. M. E.; Field, M. N. J. Mater. Chem. 2001, 11, 464 468
    97. 97
      Scragg, J. J.; Kubart, T.; Watjen, J. T.; Ericson, T.; Linnarsson, M. K.; Platzer-Bjorkman, C. Chem. Mater. 2013, 25, 3162 3171
    98. 98
      Moore, A. R. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1977, 31, 762 764
    99. 99
      Handbook of Optical Constants of Solids, 3rd ed.; Academic Press: London, 1998.
    100. 100
      Momma, K.; Izumi, F. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2011, 44, 1272 1276
  • Supporting Information

    Supporting Information


    Full X-ray crystallographic data for the three phases discussed in this paper and additional TRMC results for SnS2. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org/.


    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.