ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
The First Structure–Activity Relationship Studies for Designer Receptors Exclusively Activated by Designer Drugs
My Activity

Figure 1Loading Img
  • Open Access
Research Article

The First Structure–Activity Relationship Studies for Designer Receptors Exclusively Activated by Designer Drugs
Click to copy article linkArticle link copied!

View Author Information
Departments of Structural and Chemical Biology, Oncological Sciences, and Pharmacology and Systems Therapeutics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York 10029, United States
National Institute of Mental Health - Psychoactive Drug Screening Program, Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, United States
§ Center for Neuro-Medicine, Korea Institute of Science and Technology, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul 136-791, Republic of Korea
*(J.J.) Phone: 212-659-8699. E-mail: [email protected]
*(B.L.R.) Phone: 919-966-7535. E-mail: [email protected]
Open PDF

ACS Chemical Neuroscience

Cite this: ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2015, 6, 3, 476–484
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/cn500325v
Published January 14, 2015

Copyright © 2015 American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under these Terms of Use.

Abstract

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Over the past decade, two independent technologies have emerged and been widely adopted by the neuroscience community for remotely controlling neuronal activity: optogenetics which utilize engineered channelrhodopsin and other opsins, and chemogenetics which utilize engineered G protein-coupled receptors (Designer Receptors Exclusively Activated by Designer Drugs (DREADDs)) and other orthologous ligand–receptor pairs. Using directed molecular evolution, two types of DREADDs derived from human muscarinic acetylcholine receptors have been developed: hM3Dq which activates neuronal firing, and hM4Di which inhibits neuronal firing. Importantly, these DREADDs were not activated by the native ligand acetylcholine (ACh), but selectively activated by clozapine N-oxide (CNO), a pharmacologically inert ligand. CNO has been used extensively in rodent models to activate DREADDs, and although CNO is not subject to significant metabolic transformation in mice, a small fraction of CNO is apparently metabolized to clozapine in humans and guinea pigs, lessening the translational potential of DREADDs. To effectively translate the DREADD technology, the next generation of DREADD agonists are needed and a thorough understanding of structure–activity relationships (SARs) of DREADDs is required for developing such ligands. We therefore conducted the first SAR studies of hM3Dq. We explored multiple regions of the scaffold represented by CNO, identified interesting SAR trends, and discovered several compounds that are very potent hM3Dq agonists but do not activate the native human M3 receptor (hM3). We also discovered that the approved drug perlapine is a novel hM3Dq agonist with >10 000-fold selectivity for hM3Dq over hM3.

Copyright © 2015 American Chemical Society

To elucidate how neuronal ensembles interactively encode higher brain processes, new and improved methods for both recording and manipulating neuronal activity will be required. (1, 2) The ability to selectively modulate the activity of defined neuronal populations and to elucidate the behavioral consequences of this selective neuronal modulation affords powerful approaches for studying mammalian brain function in health and disease. Historically, important methods include Wilder Penfield’s pioneering studies of focal electrical stimulation of the human cortex. (3) The development of the optogenetics technology pioneered by Diesseroth and colleagues to visualize and activate neuronal activity with exquisite temporal resolution using engineered channelrhodopsin (4, 5) and other opsins (6) has provided an expanding toolbox for decoding the neuronal correlates of brain function. (4, 6-10) More recently, Designer Receptors Exclusively Activated by Designer Drugs (DREADDs) have been developed as a powerful chemogenetics technology for remotely controlling neuronal activity (11, 12) and have been widely adopted by the neuroscience and greater biological communities. (13-17)
DREADDs, first revealed in 2005, (5) were developed using directed molecular evolution of human muscarinic acetylcholine receptors. (11, 12) After multiple rounds of random mutagenesis, DREADDs derived from the human muscarinic acetylcholine M3 receptors (hM3Dq) to be insensitive to the endogenous ligand acetylcholine (ACh) but potently and selectively activated by the pharmacologically inert clozapine N-oxide (CNO) were discovered. Importantly, CNO lacks appreciable affinity (Ki > 1 μM) for all relevant native CNS (central nervous system) targets. (11, 18) The DREADDs have no detectable constitutive activity in vitro (11) and, thus, provide an attractive orthologous receptor-effector chemogenetic platform for modifying neuronal activity remotely with minimal invasiveness. In addition to hM3Dq, which activates neuronal firing upon the CNO stimulation in part by depolarization and elevation of intracellular calcium levels, (12) hM4Di was developed from human muscarinic acetylcholine M4 receptors for inhibiting neuronal firing via activation of G-protein inwardly rectifying potassium (GIRK) channels. (11) Since the introduction of the DREADD technology, a large number of papers have independently validated the utility of excitatory and inhibitory DREADDs. (12, 19-32) In addition, no effect related to the ectopic expression of hM3Dq or hM4Di has been observed.
In addition to being pharmacologically inert, CNO, the “chemical switch” of this chemogenetic approach, is orally bioavailability and CNS penetrant (19, 33-35) and is not subject to significant metabolic transformation in mice and rats. However, a small fraction of CNO is apparently metabolized to clozapine in humans, nonhuman primates and guinea pigs. (34, 36, 37) Because clozapine modulates the activity of many native CNS receptors, (38) thus interfering with the selective activation of the DREADDs in defined neuronal populations, the “back-metabolism” issue presents a hurdle for translating the DREADD technology forward. To ultimately develop the next generation of DREADD ligands that can selectively activate defined neuronal populations in primates including human, a thorough understanding of structure–activity relationships (SARs) of DREADDs is needed. To date, no SAR studies have been reported for any DREADDs including hM3Dq and hM4Di.
Here, we report the first SAR studies of hM3Dq. We extensively explored multiple regions of the scaffold represented by CNO, which resulted in the discovery of compounds 13 and 21 that are very potent hM3Dq agonists but do not activate the native human M3 receptor (hM3). We describe the design, synthesis, and pharmacological evaluation of new CNO analogues and discuss the interesting SAR trends revealed from the studies. We also report the discovery that perlapine, a hypnotic agent first reported in 1966, (39-41) is a novel, potent, and selective agonist of hM3Dq (>10 000-fold selective for hM3Dq over hM3).

Results and Discussion

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Design and Synthesis

To understand the SAR of CNO analogues as hM3Dq agonists, we explored several regions of the CNO scaffold. In particular, we focused on investigating the R1 and R2 substituents as well as modifications to the piperazine ring (highlighted in red in Figure 1). We also studied whether the chloro group (R3, highlighted in blue in Figure 1) on the tricyclic core is required and whether a different tricyclic core (e.g., the core of the perlapine scaffold, see below) can be tolerated.

Figure 1

Figure 1. SAR studies of the CNO scaffold.

We first explored the size of the alkyl group (R1) on the N4′ position of the CNO scaffold and synthesized a set of close analogues as outlined in Scheme 1. The commercially available 2-((2-amino-4-chlorophenyl)amino)benzoic acid (1) was refluxed in xylene for 48 h to give the cyclized compound 2, which was then treated with POCl3 and N,N-dimethylaniline in toluene at 95 °C for 2 h to afford the chloride 3. Compound 3 was reacted with various N-alkylpiperazines in toluene at 120 °C for 2 h to yield compounds 4a4d, which were then converted to their corresponding N-oxides 5a5d by treating with meta-chloroperoxybenzoic acid (mCPBA) at room temperature in CH2Cl2 for 10 min. The synthetic route to compounds 4a4d was described previously. (42, 43)

Scheme 1

Scheme 1. Synthesis of N4′-alkyl Substituted CNO Analoguesa

Scheme aReagents and conditions: (a) xylene, reflux, 48 h, 95% yield; (b) POCl3, N,N-dimethylaniline, toluene, 95 °C, 2 h, 67% yield; (c) N-alkylpiperazines, toluene, 120 °C, 2 h, 69–80% yield; and (d) mCPBA, CH2Cl2, rt, 10 min, 65–75% yield.

We next synthesized the analogues outlined in Scheme 2 to determine whether the positive charge of CNO is required for activating hM3Dq. For example, compound 6, which contains a quaternary ammonium moiety, has a permanent positive charge, while compounds 7, 9, 12, and 14 do not possess a basic amino group and therefore do not contain a positive charged group. As illustrated in Scheme 2, compound 4a (clozapine) was converted to the quaternary ammonium iodide 6 by stirring overnight with CH3I in acetone at room temperature. Compound 3 was treated with piperazin-2-one at 99 °C overnight in the 1:1 mixture of 1,4-dioxane and ethanol to give compound 7. Similarly, compound 9 was produced by treating compound 3 with commercially available 1,3,8-triazaspiro[4.5]decane-2,4-dione (8) in the 2:1 mixture of 1,4-dioxane and N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) at 130 °C for 24 h. Hydrolysis of compound 9 using 0.5 N aqueous NaOH solution in 1,2-dimethoxyethane under microwave irradiation afforded compound 10. Likewise, compound 11 was prepared from compound 3 and piperazine in toluene at 120 °C for 2 h. Acetylation of compound 11 by AcCl in CH2Cl2 at 0 °C in the presence of triethylamine (TEA) yielded compound 12, which was subsequently reduced to the deuterated compound 13 using LiAlD4 under reflux conditions, followed by quenching with CD3OD at 0 °C. In addition, compound 11 was reacted with MsCl in CH2Cl2 at 0 °C in the presence of diisopropylethylamine (DIPEA) to give the methylsulfonamide 14.

Scheme 2

Scheme 2. Synthesis of Compounds 6, 7, and 914a

Scheme aReagents and conditions: (a) CH3I, acetone, rt, overnight, 55% yield; (b) 2-oxypiperazine, 1,4-dioxane/ethanol 1:1, 99 °C, overnight, 65% yield; (c) 1,3,8-triazaspiro[4.5]decane-2,4-dione (8), 1,4-dioxane/DMF (2:1), 130 °C, 24 h, 66% yield; (d) 1,2-dimethoxyethane, 0.5 N NaOH, microwave, 150 °C, 10 min, 16% yield; (e) piperazine, toluene, 120 °C, 2 h, 69% yield; (f) AcCl, TEA, CH2Cl2, 0 °C, 1 h, 86% yield; (g) (1) LiAlD4, THF, N2, reflux, 2h, (2) CD3OD, 0 °C, (3) NH4OH, 0 °C, 84% yield; (h) MsCl, DIPEA, CH2Cl2, 0 °C, 1 h, 93% yield.

To determine whether the 8-Cl group on the tricyclic core is required to activate hM3Dq, we prepared compounds 2123 according to the synthetic route outlined in Scheme 3. (44) The commercially available 2-aminobenzoic acid (15) and 2-nitrophenyl iodide (16) were subjected to Ullmann coupling conditions (45) to afford the aniline 17. Reduction of the nitro moiety of compound 17 yielded compound 18, which was refluxed in xylene to generate the benzodiazepine 19. Treatment of compound 19 with POCl3 provided the chloride 20, which was then displaced with piperazine to afford compound 21. Similarly, compound 22 was prepared by the displacement reaction of the chloride 20 with 1-ethylpiperazine in toluene under reflux conditions. In addition, the oxidation of compound 22 by mCPBA in CH2Cl2 afforded the N-oxide 23.

Scheme 3

Scheme 3. Synthesis of Compounds 2224a

Scheme aReagents and conditions: (a) K2CO3, Cu, 3-methylbutan-1-ol, reflux, 4 h; (b) NaS2O4, NH4OH/H2O 3:2, 80 °C, 30 min, 75% yield in two steps; (c) xylene, reflux, Dean–Stark conditions, 48 h, 96% yield; (d) POCl3, N,N-dimethylaniline, toluene, reflux, 3 h, 52% yield; (e) piperazine, toluene, reflux, overnight, 63% yield; (f) 1-ethylpiperazine, toluene, reflux, 2 h, 72% yield; and (g) mCPBA, CH2Cl2, rt, 10 min, 78% yield.

Biological Evaluation

The newly synthesized compounds were evaluated in the hM3Dq and hM3 Ca2+ mobilization fluorometric imaging plate reader (FLIPRTETRA) assays according to the protocols reported previously. (11, 46, 47) Agonist activities of these compounds in the hM3Dq and hM3 functional assays are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1. Agonist Activities of New Compounds in hM3Dq and hM3 FLIPR Assaysa
 hM3DqhM3
compdEC50 (nM)Emax (relative to CNO)EC50 (nM)Emax (relative to acetylcholine)
4a1.19536088
4b7.091>30 000NA
4c1345>30 000NA
4d7150>30 000NA
5a6.0100>30 000NA
5b1950>30 000NA
5c19045>30 000NA
5d74079>30 000NA
60.0691009.592
7>30 000NA>30 000NA
9>30 000NA>30 000NA
10>30 000NA>30 000NA
112.19549086
12>30 000NA>30 000NA
139.686>30 000NA
14>30 000NA>30 000NA
211.7100NA∼20
221.381>30 000NA
2322059>30 000NA
a

EC50 values are the average of at least two duplicate experiments with standard deviation (SD) values that are 3-fold less than the average. NA: not applicable.

For the size of the N-alkyl group in compounds 4a4d and 5a5d, we observed a clear trend showing that the longer and/or bulkier the N-alkyl group, the weaker the compounds’ potency for hM3Dq. The replacement of the methyl group in compounds 4a and 5a with the n-propyl group in compounds 4d and 5d resulted in a potency decrease of approximately 70- and 100-fold, respectively. In addition to the loss in potency, the compounds with a longer or bulkier N-alkyl group (e.g., compounds 4b4d and 5b5d) in general displayed lower agonist efficacy for hM3Dq and became partial agonists of hM3Dq rather than full agonists as seen for compounds 4a and 5a. Interestingly, compounds 4c and 5c, which contain an i-propyl group, were more potent than compounds 4d and 5d, which contain a n-propyl group, suggesting that the length of the N-alkyl group plays a more significant role than the bulkiness of the N-alkyl group in reducing agonist potency. We were also pleased to find that compounds 4b4d and 5b5d did not display any agonist activity (EC50 > 30 000 nM) for the native human M3 receptor (hM3), in contrast to compound 4a (clozapine), which was a hM3 agonist with sub-μM potency. In addition, compounds 4a4d were in general more potent than their corresponding N-oxides 5a5d at activating hM3Dq, suggesting that the negative charge on the N-oxides is not only not required for activating hM3Dq, but also reduces agonist potency.
The quaternary ammonium salt 6 was an extremely potent full agonist of hM3Dq with an EC50 value of 69 pM and about 15-fold more potent than compound 4a (clozapine). However, compound 6 was also a potent full agonist of hM3 (EC50 = 9.5 nM, Emax = 92) even though it achieves >100-fold higher potency for hM3Dq over hM3. On the other hand, compounds 7, 12, and 14, which do not contain a basic amino group or a group with permanent positive charge, did not display any agonist activity for hM3Dq. As expected, these compounds did not activate hM3 either. Taken together, these results suggest that either a basic amino group as in compounds 4a and 4b or a group with permanent positive charge as in compounds 5a and 6 is required to retain hM3Dq agonist activity. In addition, compound 9 that contains a hydantoin moiety and compound 10 that contains an amino acid moiety in this region did not activate hM3Dq and hM3. On the other hand, compound 11, which is the des-methyl clozapine, showed similar potency and efficacy for hM3Dq and hM3 as clozapine, suggesting that the N-methyl group is not required for activating hM3Dq. Interestingly, compound 13, which is a deuterated analogue of compound 4b, exhibited similar potency and efficacy (EC50 = 9.6 nM, Emax = 86%) for hM3Dq as compounds 4b and 5a (CNO) (Figure 2). Importantly, compound 13 did not display any agonist activity for hM3. Because compound 13 contains an α,α-dideutero ethyl group, it is likely that the N-dealkylation, the major metabolic pathway that converts clozapine to des-methyl clozapine, (34, 36) will be significantly reduced on the basis of the well-documented primary kinetic isotope effect (48) in similar systems. (49, 50)

Figure 2

Figure 2. Compounds 13 and 21 are potent hM3Dq agonists and do not activate hM3 being similar to compound 5a (CNO). The endogenous ligand acetylcholine (ACh), on the other hand, is a potent hM3 agonist and does not activate hM3Dq.

We were also pleased to find that the 8-chloro group was not required to maintain high agonist potency and efficacy for hM3Dq. In particular, compound 21 was a potent full agonist (EC50 = 1.7 nM, Emax = 100%) of hM3Dq (Figure 2). In contrast to compound 11, a full hM3 agonist with sub-micromolar potency, compound 21 displayed little agonist activity for hM3 (Emax = ∼20%). In addition, compound 22 was found to be a potent hM3Dq agonist (EC50 = 1.3 nM, Emax = 81%), which was more potent than the corresponding chloro analogue, compound 4b (EC50 = 7.0 nM, Emax = 91%). On the other hand, the N-oxide 23 (EC50 = 220 nM, Emax = 59%) was about 10-fold less potent for hM3Dq than compound 5b, the corresponding chloro analog (EC50 = 19 nM, Emax = 50%). Similar to compound 21, both compounds 22 and 23 did not exhibit any agonist activity for hM3.
We next selected a subset of the above hM3Dq agonists that are inactive against hM3 and assessed their binding affinities to other aminergic GPCRs. Because compound 4a (clozapine) showed high binding affinities to 5HT2A and 5HT2C serotonin, α1A adrenergic, and H1 histamine receptors with Ki values of 5.4, 9.4, 1.6, and 1.1 nM, respectively (Table 2), we tested compounds 4b, 4c, 5b, 5c, 13, and 21 in 5HT2A, 5HT2C, α1A, and H1 radioligand binding assays. The assay results are summarized in Table 2.
Table 2. Binding Affinities of Selected hM3Dq Agonists to Other GPCRsa
 Ki (nM)
compd5HT2A5HT2Cα1AH1
4a5.49.41.61.1
4b2924461.9
4c1617374.6
5b19005100>10 000160
5c520067003206200
1371280675.0
21661702806.0
a

Ki values are the average of at least 2 duplicate experiments with standard deviation (SD) values that are 3-fold less than the average.

Compounds 4b and 4c had reduced binding affinities to 5HT2A, 5HT2C, and α1A (Ki = 16–46 nM) compared with compound 4a (clozapine), but retained high binding affinities to H1 (Ki < 5.0 nM). On the other hand, the N-oxide 5b displayed weak binding affinities for 5HT2A, 5HT2C, and α1A (Ki > 1000 nM) and was about 8-fold selective for hM3Dq over H1, while the N-oxide 5c displayed poor binding affinities to 5HT2A, 5HT2C, and H1 (Ki > 5000 nM) but was only about 2-fold selective for hM3Dq over α1A. Interestingly, compound 13, a deuterated analogue of compound 4b, exhibited reduced binding affinities to all four receptors compared with compound 4b. Compound 13 was selective for hM3Dq over 5HT2A (7-fold), 5HT2C (29-fold), and α1A (7-fold), but was not selective over H1. We were pleased to find that compound 21 displayed much improved selectivity compared with compound 4a (clozapine). In addition to being inactive at hM3, compound 21, a potent full agonist of hM3Dq (EC50 = 1.7 nM), was 40-fold selective over 5HT2A, 100-fold selective over 5HT2C, and 165-fold selective over α1A. Although it was only 3.5-fold selective for hM3Dq over H1, the overall selectivity profile of compound 21 is significantly better than compound 4a (clozapine).
Lastly, to identify an alternative compound that might activate hM3Dq, we conducted a screen of the commercially available Library Of Pharmaceutically Active Compounds (LOPAC; N = 1280 compounds) and Prestwick Chemical Library (N = 1280 compounds) using the hM3Dq FLIPR assay. From this screen, we discovered perlapine as a novel, potent agonist of hM3Dq (Figure 3). Importantly, perlapine was >10 000-fold selective for hM3Dq over hM3. Interestingly, perlapine contains a different tricyclic core in comparison with CNO. The high hM3Dq potency of perlapine suggests that the benzodiazepine tricyclic core of the CNO (compound 5a) scaffold is not required for maintaining high hM3Dq agonist activity.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Perlapine is a potent full agonist of hM3Dq and does not activate hM3. CNO (compound 5a) was used as a positive control in the hM3Dq FLIPR assay, and acetylcholine (ACh) was used as a positive control in the hM3 FLIPR assay.

Conclusion

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

In summary, we conducted the first SAR studies for hM3Dq, a chemogenetic platform for activating neuronal firing, by the design, synthesis, and pharmacological evaluation of new CNO analogues. We explored multiple regions of the CNO scaffold and observed the following interesting SAR trends: (1) a longer or bulkier N-alkyl group as in compounds 4c, 4d, 5c, and 5d reduces both potency and efficacy for hM3Dq; (2) a basic amino group as in compounds 4a and 4b or a permanent positive charge group as in compounds 5a and 6 is required to retain hM3Dq agonist activity; (3) the negative change on the N-oxides such as 5a5d reduces hM3Dq agonist potency; (4) the 8-chloro group is not required to maintain high agonist potency and efficacy for hM3Dq; and (5) modifications to the benzodiazepine tricyclic core of CNO is tolerated. From these SAR studies, we discovered several compounds such as 13 and 21, which are very potent full agonists of hM3Dq but do not activate the native human M3 receptor (hM3). In addition, the selectivity of compound 21 against a number of aminergic GPCRs is significantly improved compared with clozapine. Furthermore, we discovered perlapine as a novel, potent hM3Dq agonist, which is >10 000-fold selective for hM3Dq over hM3. These SAR studies lay the foundation for developing the next generation of DREADD ligands that can selectively activate defined neuronal populations in primates.

Methods

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Chemistry

General Methods

HPLC spectra of all compounds were acquired from an Agilent 6110 Series system with UV detector set to at 220 nm. Samples were injected (5 μL) onto an Agilent Eclipse Plus 4.6 × 50 mm, 1.8 μM, C18 column at room temperature. A linear gradient from 10% to 100% B (MeOH + 0.1% acetic acid) in 5.0 min was followed by pumping 100% B for another 2 min with A being H2O + 0.1% acetic acid. The flow rate was 1.0 mL/min. Mass spectra (MS) data were acquired in positive ion mode using an Agilent 6110 single quadrupole mass spectrometer with an electrospray ionization (ESI) source. HRMS analysis was conducted on an Agilent Technologies G1969A high-resolution API-TOF mass spectrometer attached to an Agilent Technologies 1200 HPLC system. Samples were ionized by electrospray ionization (ESI) in positive mode. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra were recorded on a Varian Mercury spectrometer with 400 MHz for proton (1H NMR) and 100 MHz for carbon (13C NMR); chemical shifts are reported in ppm (δ). Preparative HPLC was performed on Agilent Prep 1200 series with UV detector set to at 220 nm. Samples were injected onto a Phenomenex Luna 75 × 30 mm, 5 μM, C18 column at room temperature. The flow rate was 30 mL/min. Different linear gradient for different compounds were used with A being H2O + 0.5% TFA and B being MeOH.
Compounds 2, (42, 43)3, (42, 43)4a, (42, 43)4b, (42) and 5a (33, 51) were prepared according to the procedures described previously.
8-Chloro-11-(4-isopropylpiperazin-1-yl)-5H-dibenzo[b,e][1,4]diazepine (4c)
A solution of 8,11-dichloro-5H-dibenzo[b,e][1,4]diazepine (3, 0.397 g, 1.44 mmol) and 1-isopropylpiperazine (1 g, 7.799 mmol) in 1,4-dioxane (20 mL) was stirred overnight at 120 °C. After cooling down, the reaction mixture was concentrated and the residue was dissolved with 50 mL of EtOAc. The resulting solution was washed with 30 mL of aqueous NaHCO3. The organic layer was dried over Na2SO4, and the filtrate was concentrated and the residue was purified by flash column chromatography with 5–10% MeOH in CH2Cl2 to give the desired product 4c (0.410 g) in 80% yield: 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.38–7.16 (m, 2H), 7.04 (d, J = 1.5 Hz, 1H), 6.99 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 6.88–6.72 (m, 2H), 6.58 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 4.86 (s, 1H), 3.46 (br, s, 4H), 2.70 (quin, J = 6.5 Hz, 1H), 2.58 (br s, 4H), 1.06 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 6H). 13C NMR (101 MHz,, CDCl3) δ 162.84, 152.90, 142.13, 140.59, 132.00, 130.55, 129.24, 126.94, 123.69, 123.18, 123.13, 120.25, 120.15, 54.80 (2C), 48.95 (2C), 47.77, 18.80 (2C). HPLC purity 100%, RT 4.099 min. MS (ESI) 355.2 [M + H]+. HRMS (ESI) calcd for C20H24ClN4+ [M + H]+: 355.1689. Found: 355.1693.
8-Chloro-11-(4-propylpiperazin-1-yl)-5H-dibenzo[b,e][1,4]diazepine (4d)
Compound 4d (0.380 g, 70% yield) was prepared via the same procedure as preparing compound 4c from 8,11-dichloro-5H-dibenzo[b,e][1,4]diazepine (3, 0.400 g, 1.52 mmol), 1-propylpiperazine HCl salt (0.500 g, 3.04 mmol), and DIPEA (2 mL, 11.48 mmol) in 1,4-dioxane (20 mL). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.31–7.19 (m, 2H), 7.04 (d, J = 2.3 Hz, 1H), 6.99 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 6.79 (dd, J = 8.2, 2.0 Hz, 2H), 6.58 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 4.86 (s, 1H), 3.45 (br s, 4H), 2.50 (br s, 4H), 2.33 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 1.52 (sixtet, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 0.90 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 162.93, 152.90, 142.08, 140.59, 132.03, 130.52, 129.25, 126.96, 123.69, 123.21, 123.20, 120.26, 120.16, 60.93 (2C), 53.40 (2C), 47.47, 20.21, 12.18. HPLC purity 100%, RT 4.113 min. MS (ESI) 355.2 [M + H]+. HRMS (ESI) calcd for C20H24ClN4+ [M + H]+: 355.1689. Found: 355.1687.
4-(8-Chloro-5H-dibenzo[b,e][1,4]diazepin-11-yl)-1-ethylpiperazine N-oxide (5b)
A solution of compound 4b (0.100 g, 0.293 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (5 mL) was treated with mCPBA (0.064 g, 0.371 mmol) at room temperature. After 10 min, the reaction was completed. The resulting mixture was concentrated and purified by flash column chromatography with 5–15% C (2% NH4OH in MeOH) in CH2Cl2 to give the desired N-oxide compound 5b (0.073 g,) in 70% yield: 1H NMR (400 MHz, MeOH-d4) δ 7.39–7.34 (m, 1H), 7.32 (dd, J = 7.8, 1.2 Hz, 1H), 7.05 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.01 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 6.97 (d, J = 2.3 Hz, 1H), 6.87 (dd, J = 8.4, 2.4 Hz, 1H), 6.81 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 3.88 (br s, 2H), 3.74 (t, J = 12.1 Hz, 2H), 3.55–3.43 (m, 2H), 3.367 (q, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 3.19–3.09 (m, 2H), 1.38 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 162.06, 153.18, 141.54, 140.62, 132.57, 130.29, 129.35, 126.98, 123.90, 123.56, 122.96, 120.45, 120.43, 66.73 (2C), 63.23 (2C), 42.23, 7.69. HPLC purity 100%, RT 4.394 min. MS (ESI) 357.2 [M + H]+. HRMS (ESI) calcd for C19H22ClN4O+ [M + H]+: 357.1482. Found: 357.1481.
4-(8-Chloro-5H-dibenzo[b,e][1,4]diazepin-11-yl)-1-isopropylpiperazine N-oxide (5c)
Compound 5c (0.068 g, 65% yield) was prepared similarly as 5b from compound 4c (0.100 g, 0.282 mmol) and mCPBA (0.063 g, 0.365 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (5 mL). 1H NMR (400 MHz, MeOH-d4) δ 7.39–7.30 (m, 2H), 7.05 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.01 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 6.97 (d, J = 2.3 Hz, 1H), 6.87 (dd, J = 8.4, 2.4 Hz, 1H), 6.81 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 3.90 (br s, 2H), 3.73 (t, J = 11.9 Hz, 1H), 3.57–3.40 (m, 3H), 3.19–3.12 (m, 2H), 1.38 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 162.02, 153.15, 141.64, 140.61, 132.51, 130.31, 129.38, 126.97, 123.81, 123.55, 123.01, 120.43, 120.39, 70.99 (2C), 60.41 (2C), 42.27, 16.54 (2C). HPLC purity 100%, RT 4.305 min. MS (ESI) 371.2 [M + H]+. HRMS (ESI) calcd for C20H24ClN4O+ [M + H]+: 371.1639. Found: 371.1642.
4-(8-Chloro-5H-dibenzo[b,e][1,4]diazepin-11-yl)-1-propylpiperazine N-oxide (5d)
Compound 5d (0.075 g, 72% yield) was prepared using the same procedure as preparing 5b from compound 4d (0.100 g, 0.282 mmol) and mCPBA (0.063 g, 0.365 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (5 mL). 1H NMR (400 MHz, MeOH-d4) δ 7.39–7.34 (m, 1H), 7.32 (dd, J = 7.8, 1.2 Hz, 1H), 7.05 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.00 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 6.97 (d, J = 2.3 Hz, 1H), 6.87 (dd, J = 8.4, 2.4 Hz, 1H), 6.81 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 3.86 (br s, 2H), 3.74 (t, J = 11.9 Hz, 3H), 3.57–3.44 (m, 2H), 3.29–3.21 (m, 2H), 3.20–3.10 (m, 2H), 2.00–1.84 (m, 2H), 1.00 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, MeOH-d4) δ 164.31, 155.62, 143.36, 142.96, 133.85, 131.29, 129.72, 127.45, 124.99, 124.29, 124.04, 121.68, 121.53, 73.69 (2C), 64.26 (2C), 43.23, 16.42, 11.37. HPLC purity 100%, RT 4.439 min. MS (ESI) 371.2 [M + H]+. HRMS (ESI) calcd for C20H24ClN4O+ [M + H]+: 371.1639. Found: 371.1640.
4-(8-Chloro-5H-dibenzo[b,e][1,4]diazepin-11-yl)-1,1-dimethylpiperazin-1-ium iodide (6)
A solution of 4a (0.100 g, 0.306 mmol) in acetone (5 mL) was treated with methyl iodide (21 μL, 0.337 mmol) at room temperature. After overnight, the resulting mixture was concentrated, dissolved in 1 mL of MeOH, and diluted with 10 mL of distilled water. The aqueous solution was washed with EtOAc (2 × 10 mL) and concentrated. The residue was purified by preparative HPLC to give the compound 6 (0.079 g) in 55% yield: 1H NMR (400 MHz, MeOH-d4) δ 7.57 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.49 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 7.26 (d, J = 2.3 Hz, 1H), 7.27–7.13 (m, 3H), 7.00 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 4.03 (br s, 4H), 3.72 (br s, 4H), 3.33 (s, 6H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, MeOH-d4) δ 166.47, 156.55, 145.82, 136.58, 135.26, 132.80, 130.24, 128.46, 126.86, 125.08, 122.75, 122.70, 119.64, 61.86 (2C), 52.46 (2C), 44.44 (2C). HPLC purity 100%, RT 3.893 min. MS (ESI) 341.2 [M − I]+.
4-(8-Chloro-5H-dibenzo[b,e][1,4]diazepin-11-yl)piperazin-2-one (7)
A solution of compound 3 (0.200 g, 0.760 mmol) and 2-oxypiperazine (0.152 g, 1.52 mmol) in a 1:1 mixture of 1,4-dioxane and ethanol (15 mL) was stirred overnight at 99 °C. After concentration, the residue was diluted with EtOAc (50 mL) and the solution was washed with 20 mL of aqueous NaHCO3. The organic layer was dried over Na2SO4 and the filtrate was concentrated. The residue was purified by flash column chromatography with 30–50% EtOAc in hexanes to afford the desired product (0.162 g) in 65% yield: 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.30 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.23 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.05 (s, 1H), 7.02 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 6.84 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 6.81 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 6.60 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 6.03 (s, 1H), 4.90 (s, 1H), 4.10 (s, 2H), 3.67 (br s, 2H), 3.50 (br s, 2H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 168.89, 161.84, 153.15, 141.39, 140.49, 132.63, 130.04, 129.37, 127.19, 124.02, 123.52, 122.99, 120.48, 120.39, 51.47, 44.12, 41.15; HPLC purity 100%, RT 4.681 min. MS (ESI) 327.1 [M + H]+. HRMS (ESI) calcd for C17H16ClN4O+ [M + H]+: 327.1007. Found: 327.1006.
8-(8-Chloro-5H-dibenzo[b,e][1,4]diazepin-11-yl)-1,3,8-triazaspiro[4.5]decane-2,4-dione (9)
A mixture of compound 3 (0.250 g, 0.951 mmol) and commercially available compound 8 (0.200 g, 1.18 mmol) in 20 mL of a mixture of 1,4-dioxane and DMF (2:1) was heated to 130 °C for 24 h. The reaction mixture was cooled down to room temperature and concentrated. The residue was purified by flash column chromatography with 0–10% MeOH in CH2Cl2 to give the desired product 9 (0.250 g) in 66% yield: 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.62 (s, 1H), 7.37–7.17 (m, 2H), 7.10–7.03 (m, 2H), 7.01 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 6.85–6.76 (m, 2H), 6.62 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 5.06 (s, 1H), 3.90 (br s, 2H), 3.20 (br s, 2H), 2.18–2.05 (m, 2H), 1.74 (s, 2H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 176.84, 163.26, 156.74, 152.90, 141.62, 140.70, 132.47, 130.29, 129.42, 126.97, 123.82, 123.59, 123.43, 120.48, 62.15 (2C), 43.28, 33.19 (2C). HPLC purity 100%, RT 4.289 min. MS (ESI) 396.1 [M + H]+. HRMS (ESI) calcd for C20H19ClN5O2+ [M + H]+: 396.1222. Found: 396.1221.
4-Amino-1-(8-chloro-5H-dibenzo[b,e][1,4]diazepin-11-yl)piperidine-4-carboxylic acid (10)
A solution of compound 9 (0.100 g, 0.253 mmol) in 1,2-dimethoxyethane (5 mL) was treated with 5 mL of 0.5 N NaOH at room temperature. The resulting mixture was heated under microwave for 10 min (max power 100 W, max temperature 150 °C, max pressure 17.0 bar). After cooling down to room temperature, the reaction mixture was quenched with 10% citric acid and filtered. The filtrated was purified with preparative HPLC to afford the desired product (0.015 g) in 16% yield: 1H NMR (400 MHz, MeOH-d4) δ 7.63 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.54 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.34 (d, J = 19.4 Hz, 1H), 7.25 (t, J = 7.9 Hz, 3H), 7.08 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 1H), 4.36–3.59 (m, 4H), 2.70–2.40 (m, 2H), 2.40–2.01 (m, 2H). HPLC purity 100%, RT 3.585 min. MS (ESI) 371.2 [M + H]+. HRMS (ESI) calcd for C19H20ClN4O2+ [M + H]+: 371.1269. Found: 371.1264.
Compound 11 was prepared according to the previously published procedures. (42)
1-(4-(8-Chloro-5H-dibenzo[b,e][1,4]diazepin-11-yl)piperazin-1-yl)ethanone (12)
To the solution of compound 10 (0.400 g, 1.28 mmol) and TEA (0.27 mL, 2.0 mmol) in CH2Cl2 was added AcCl (0.10 mL, 1.4 mmol) at 0 °C. The resulting mixture was then stirred at 0 °C for 1 h. After removing the solvents, the residue was purified by flash column chromatography with 0–5% MeOH in CH2Cl2 to give the desired product 12 (0.390 g, 1.10 mmol) in 86% yield: 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.30 (td, J = 7.7, 1.5 Hz, 1H), 7.26–7.22 (m, 1H), 7.04 (d, J = 2.4 Hz, 1H), 7.02 (td, J = 7.6, 1.0 Hz, 1H), 6.86–6.77 (m, J = 2.4 Hz, 2H), 6.60 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 4.89 (s, 1H), 3.67 (br s, 2H), 3.59–3.46 (m, 4H), 3.34 (br s, 2H), 2.11 (s, J = 11.5 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 169.41, 162.90, 153.15, 141.57, 140.65, 132.40, 130.20, 129.25, 126.97, 123.75, 123.39, 123.32, 120.42, 120.34, 47.80, 47.26, 46.13, 41.50, 21.62. HPLC purity 100%, RT 4.919 min. MS (ESI) 355.2 [M + H]+. HRMS (ESI) calcd for C19H20ClN4O+ [M + H]+: 355.1320. Found: 355.1315.
8-Chloro-11-[4-(1,1-dideutrioethyl)piperazin-1-yl]-5H-dibenzo[b,e][1,4]diazepine (13)
To the solution of compound 12 (0.100 g, 0.282 mmol) in 15 mL of anhydrous THF was added LiAlD4 (0.024 g, 0.572 mmol) at room temperature under N2 atmosphere. The reaction mixture was heated under reflux conditions for 2 h. The reaction was quenched with 0.1 mL of CD3OD at 0 °C. The resulting mixture was treated with 0.5 mL of NH4OH at 0 °C and filtered through Celite and the filtrate was concentrated. The residue was purified by flash column chromatography with 0–10% MeOH in CH2Cl2 to give the desired product 13 (0.081 g) in 84% yield: 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.33–7.23 (m, 3H), 7.06 (d, J = 2.4 Hz, 1H), 7.01 (td, J = 7.6, 1.0 Hz, 1H), 6.81 (dd, J = 8.3, 2.4 Hz, 2H), 6.60 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 4.88 (s, 1H), 3.49 (br, s, 4H), 2.54 (br, s, 4H), 1.10 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 162.90, 152.87, 142.03, 140.59, 132.02, 130.46, 129.17, 126.91, 123.60, 123.17, 120.24, 120.16, 52.87 (2C), 51.78 (q, J = 20.0 Hz), 47.44, 11.86 (2C). HPLC purity 100%, RT 4.072 min; MS (ESI) 343.2 [M+1]+. HRMS (ESI) calcd for C19H20D2ClN4+ [M + H]+: 343.1653. Found: 343.1653.
8-Chloro-11-(4-(methylsulfonyl)piperazin-1-yl)-5H-dibenzo[b,e][1,4]diazepine (14)
To a solution of compound 11 (0.102 g, 0.326 mmol) and DIPEA (87 μL, 0.907 mmol) in 10 mL of CH2Cl2, MsCl (27.8 μL, 0.359 mmol) was added at 0 °C. After 1 h, the reaction was completed. The reaction mixture was diluted with 50 mL of CH2Cl2 and washed with 10 mL of aqueous NaHCO3. The organic layer was dried over Na2SO4, and the filtrate was concentrated and the residue was purified by flash column chromatography with 50% EtOAc in hexanes to give the desired product 14 (0.118 g) in 93% yield: 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.31 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.22 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.08–6.96 (m, 2H), 6.87–6.78 (m, 2H), 6.61 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 4.90 (s, 1H), 3.57 (br s, 4H), 3.29 (br s, 4H), 2.79 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 162.44, 154.11, 142.23, 141.48, 132.24, 129.80, 126.69, 125.58, 122.88, 122.64, 122.40, 120.69, 120.40, 46.33, 45.14 (2C), 33.85 (2C). HPLC purity 100%, RT 4.752 min. MS (ESI) 391.1 [M + H]+. HRMS (ESI) calcd for C18H20ClN4O2S+ [M + H]+: 391.0990. Found: 391.0994.
Compounds 1721 were prepared according to the previously reported procedures. (44)
11-(Piperazin-1-yl)-5H-dibenzo[b,e][1,4]diazepine (21)
1H NMR (400 MHz, MeOH-d4) δ 7.39–7.24 (m, 1H), 7.06–6.95 (m, 3H), 6.94–6.82 (m, 3H), 3.34 (br s, 1H), 2.96–2.85 (m, 2H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, MeOH-d4) δ 165.39, 156.04, 145.04, 141.55, 133.31, 131.47, 127.85, 125.34, 124.88, 124.66, 123.78, 121.26, 120.71, 46.47. HPLC purity 99%, RT 2.772 min. MS (ESI) 279.2 [M+1]+. HRMS (ESI) calcd for C17H19N4+ [M + H]+: 279.1604. Found: 279.1610.
11-(4-Ethylpiperazin-1-yl)-5H-dibenzo[b,e][1,4]diazepine (22)
A solution of compound 20 (0.420 g, 1.84 mmol) and 1-ethylpiperazine (1.5 mL, 11.81 mmol) in toluene (20 mL) was heated under reflux conditions for 2 h. After cooling down to room temperature and concentration, the residue was purified by flash column chromatography with 0–10% MeOH in CH2Cl2 to give the desired product 22 (0.409 g) in 72% yield: 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.30–7.18 (m, 2H), 7.06 (dd, J = 7.8, 1.5 Hz, 1H), 7.00–6.90 (m, 2H), 6.84 (tt, J = 7.3, 3.7 Hz, 1H), 6.80 (dd, J = 7.4, 1.1 Hz, 1H), 6.67 (dd, J = 7.7, 1.4 Hz, 1H), 4.89 (s, 1H), 3.45 (br s, 4H), 2.53 (br s, 4H), 2.46 (q, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 1.10 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ 162.52, 153.35, 141.97, 140.73, 131.82, 130.54, 127.40, 124.46, 123.86, 123.82, 122.93, 120.16, 119.48, 53.06 (2C), 52.65 (2C), 47.56, 12.18. HPLC purity 100%, RT 3.122 min. MS (ESI) 307.2 [M + H]+. HRMS (ESI) calcd for C19H23N4+ [M + H]+: 307.1917. Found: 307.1918.
4-(5H-Dibenzo[b,e][1,4]diazepin-11-yl)-1-ethylpiperazine N-oxide (23)
A solution of compound 22 (0.095 g, 0.31 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (10 mL) was treated with mCPBA (0.069 g) at room temperature. After 10 min, the reaction mixture was concentrated and the residue was purified with 0–10% C (5% NH4OH in MeOH) in CH2Cl2 to afford the desired product 23 (0.078 g) in 78% yield: 1H NMR (400 MHz, MeOH-d4) δ 7.39–7.29 (m, 2H), 7.07–6.97 (m, 3H), 6.96–6.82 (m, 3H), 3.84 (br s, 2H), 3.79–3.66 (m, 2H), 3.56–3.43 (m, 2H), 3.35 (q, J = 7.0 Hz, 2H), 3.18–3.07 (m, 2H), 1.37 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, MeOH-d4) δ 163.66, 155.93, 144.50, 141.44, 133.64, 131.23, 127.98, 125.69, 125.05, 124.16, 124.13, 121.44, 120.80, 66.90 (2C), 63.79 (2C), 43.32, 7.70. HPLC purity 100%, RT 3.312 min. MS (ESI) 323.2 [M + H]+. HRMS (ESI) calcd for C19H23N4O+ [M + H]+: 323.1866. Found: 323.1863.

Biological Assays

hM3Dq and hM3 FLIPR assays were performed according to the protocols reported previously. (11, 46, 47) Protocols for 5-HT2A, 5-HT2C, α1A, and H1 radioligand binding assays are available at the National Institute of Mental Health–Psychoactive Drug Screening Program Web site (http://pdsp.med.unc.edu/UNC-CH%20Protocol%20Book.pdf).

Author Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

  • Corresponding Authors
    • Bryan L. Roth - National Institute of Mental Health - Psychoactive Drug Screening Program, Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, United States Email: [email protected]
    • Jian Jin - Departments of Structural and Chemical Biology, Oncological Sciences, and Pharmacology and Systems Therapeutics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York 10029, United States Email: [email protected]
  • Authors
    • Xin Chen - Departments of Structural and Chemical Biology, Oncological Sciences, and Pharmacology and Systems Therapeutics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York 10029, United States
    • Hyunah Choo - National Institute of Mental Health - Psychoactive Drug Screening Program, Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, United StatesCenter for Neuro-Medicine, Korea Institute of Science and Technology, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul 136-791, Republic of Korea
    • Xi-Ping Huang - National Institute of Mental Health - Psychoactive Drug Screening Program, Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, United States
    • Xiaobao Yang - Departments of Structural and Chemical Biology, Oncological Sciences, and Pharmacology and Systems Therapeutics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York 10029, United States
    • Orrin Stone - National Institute of Mental Health - Psychoactive Drug Screening Program, Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, United States
  • Author Contributions

    X.C. and H.C. contributed equally to this work. X.C., H.C., X.P.H., X.Y., and O.S. performed the experiments. J.J. and B.L.R. designed the studies. J.J., B.L.R., and X.C. wrote the manuscript.

  • Funding

    This work was supported by the NIH Grant U01MH105892 (to B.L.R. and J.J.) and Korea NRF grant NRF-2013-R1A1A2A10009907 (to H.C.).

  • Notes
    The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Acknowledgment

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

We thank Dr. H. Ümit Kaniskan for checking synthetic procedures and NMR spectra of novel compounds.

References

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article references 51 other publications.

  1. 1
    Sternson, S. M. and Roth, B. L. (2014) Chemogenetic Tools to Interrogate Brain Functions Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 37, 387 407
  2. 2
    Urban, D. J. and Roth, B. L. (2015) DREADDs (Designer Receptors Exclusively Activated by Designer Drugs): Chemogenetic Tools with Therapeutic Utility Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 55, 399 417
  3. 3
    Penfield, W. and Jasper, H. H. (1954) Epilepsy and the Functional Anatomy of the Human Brain (First ed.), Little Brown, Boston.
  4. 4
    Boyden, E. S., Zhang, F., Bamberg, E., Nagel, G., and Deisseroth, K. (2005) Millisecond-timescale, genetically targeted optical control of neural activity Nat. Neurosci. 8, 1263 1268
  5. 5
    Armbruster, B. N. and Roth, B. L. (2005) Mining the receptorome J. Biol. Chem. 280, 5129 5132
  6. 6
    Zhang, F., Wang, L. P., Brauner, M., Liewald, J. F., Kay, K., Watzke, N., Wood, P. G., Bamberg, E., Nagel, G., Gottschalk, A., and Deisseroth, K. (2007) Multimodal fast optical interrogation of neural circuitry Nature 446, 633 639
  7. 7
    Airan, R. D., Thompson, K. R., Fenno, L. E., Bernstein, H., and Deisseroth, K. (2009) Temporally precise in vivo control of intracellular signalling Nature 458, 1025 1029
  8. 8
    Berndt, A., Yizhar, O., Gunaydin, L. A., Hegemann, P., and Deisseroth, K. (2009) Bi-stable neural state switches Nat. Neurosci. 12, 229 234
  9. 9
    Li, X., Gutierrez, D. V., Hanson, M. G., Han, J., Mark, M. D., Chiel, H., Hegemann, P., Landmesser, L. T., and Herlitze, S. (2005) Fast noninvasive activation and inhibition of neural and network activity by vertebrate rhodopsin and green algae channelrhodopsin Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 102, 17816 17821
  10. 10
    Zhang, F., Prigge, M., Beyriere, F., Tsunoda, S. P., Mattis, J., Yizhar, O., Hegemann, P., and Deisseroth, K. (2008) Red-shifted optogenetic excitation: a tool for fast neural control derived from Volvox carteri Nat. Neurosci. 11, 631 633
  11. 11
    Armbruster, B. N., Li, X., Pausch, M. H., Herlitze, S., and Roth, B. L. (2007) Evolving the lock to fit the key to create a family of G protein-coupled receptors potently activated by an inert ligand Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 104, 5163 5168
  12. 12
    Alexander, G. M., Rogan, S. C., Abbas, A. I., Armbruster, B. N., Pei, Y., Allen, J. A., Nonneman, R. J., Hartmann, J., Moy, S. S., Nicolelis, M. A., McNamara, J. O., and Roth, B. L. (2009) Remote Control of Neuronal Activity in Transgenic Mice Expressing Evolved G Protein-Coupled Receptors Neuron 63, 27 39
  13. 13
    Rogan, S. C. and Roth, B. L. (2011) Remote control of neuronal signaling Pharmacol. Rev. 63, 291 315
  14. 14
    Farrell, M. S. and Roth, B. L. (2012) Pharmacosynthetics: Reimagining the pharmacogenetic approach Brain Res. 1511, 6 20
  15. 15
    Jennings, J. H. and Stuber, G. D. (2014) Tools for Resolving Functional Activity and Connectivity within Intact Neural Circuits Curr. Biol. 24, R41 50
  16. 16
    Lee, H. M., Giguere, P. M., and Roth, B. L. (2013) DREADDs: Novel tools for drug discovery and development Drug Discovery Today 19, 469 473
  17. 17
    Giguere, P. M., Kroeze, W. K., and Roth, B. L. (2014) Tuning up the right signal: Chemical and genetic approaches to study GPCR functions Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 27, 51 55
  18. 18
    Armbruster, B. N., Li, X., Pausch, M. H., Herlitze, S., and Roth, B. L. (2007) Evolving the lock to fit the key to create a family of G protein-coupled receptors potently activated by an inert ligand Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 104, 5163 5168
  19. 19
    Ray, R. S., Corcoran, A. E., Brust, R. D., Kim, J. C., Richerson, G. B., Nattie, E., and Dymecki, S. M. (2011) Impaired Respiratory and Body Temperature Control Upon Acute Serotonergic Neuron Inhibition Science 333, 637 642
  20. 20
    Garner, A. R., Rowland, D. C., Hwang, S. Y., Baumgaertel, K., Roth, B. L., Kentros, C., and Mayford, M. (2012) Generation of a synthetic memory trace Science 335, 1513 1516
  21. 21
    Atasoy, D., Betley, J. N., Su, H. H., and Sternson, S. M. (2012) Deconstruction of a neural circuit for hunger Nature 488, 172 177
  22. 22
    Krashes, M. J., Shah, B. P., Madara, J. C., Olson, D. P., Strochlic, D. E., Garfield, A. S., Vong, L., Pei, H., Watabe-Uchida, M., Uchida, N., Liberles, S. D., and Lowell, B. B. (2014) An excitatory paraventricular nucleus to AgRP neuron circuit that drives hunger Nature 507, 238 242
  23. 23
    Kuhlman, S. J., Olivas, N. D., Tring, E., Ikrar, T., Xu, X., and Trachtenberg, J. T. (2013) A disinhibitory microcircuit initiates critical-period plasticity in the visual cortex Nature 501, 543 546
  24. 24
    Carter, M. E., Soden, M. E., Zweifel, L. S., and Palmiter, R. D. (2013) Genetic identification of a neural circuit that suppresses appetite Nature 503, 111 114
  25. 25
    Vrontou, S., Wong, A. M., Rau, K. K., Koerber, H. R., and Anderson, D. J. (2013) Genetic identification of C fibres that detect massage-like stroking of hairy skin in vivo Nature 493, 669 673
  26. 26
    Kozorovitskiy, Y., Saunders, A., Johnson, C. A., Lowell, B. B., and Sabatini, B. L. (2012) Recurrent network activity drives striatal synaptogenesis Nature 485, 646 650
  27. 27
    Ferguson, S. M., Eskenazi, D., Ishikawa, M., Wanat, M. J., Phillips, P. E., Dong, Y., Roth, B. L., and Neumaier, J. F. (2011) Transient neuronal inhibition reveals opposing roles of indirect and direct pathways in sensitization Nat. Neurosci. 14, 22 24
  28. 28
    Silva, B. A., Mattucci, C., Krzywkowski, P., Murana, E., Illarionova, A., Grinevich, V., Canteras, N. S., Ragozzino, D., and Gross, C. T. (2013) Independent hypothalamic circuits for social and predator fear Nat. Neurosci. 16, 1731 1733
  29. 29
    Bock, R., Shin, J. H., Kaplan, A. R., Dobi, A., Markey, E., Kramer, P. F., Gremel, C. M., Christensen, C. H., Adrover, M. F., and Alvarez, V. A. (2013) Strengthening the accumbal indirect pathway promotes resilience to compulsive cocaine use Nat. Neurosci. 16, 632 638
  30. 30
    Parnaudeau, S., O’Neill, P. K., Bolkan, S. S., Ward, R. D., Abbas, A. I., Roth, B. L., Balsam, P. D., Gordon, J. A., and Kellendonk, C. (2013) Inhibition of mediodorsal thalamus disrupts thalamofrontal connectivity and cognition Neuron 77, 1151 1162
  31. 31
    Brancaccio, M., Maywood, E. S., Chesham, J. E., Loudon, A. S., and Hastings, M. H. (2013) A Gq-Ca2+ axis controls circuit-level encoding of circadian time in the suprachiasmatic nucleus Neuron 78, 714 728
  32. 32
    Kong, D., Tong, Q., Ye, C., Koda, S., Fuller, P. M., Krashes, M. J., Vong, L., Ray, R. S., Olson, D. P., and Lowell, B. B. (2012) GABAergic RIP-Cre neurons in the arcuate nucleus selectively regulate energy expenditure Cell 151, 645 657
  33. 33
    Bender, D., Holschbach, M., and Stocklin, G. (1994) Synthesis of n.c.a. carbon-11 labelled clozapine and its major metabolite clozapine-N-oxide and comparison of their biodistribution in mice Nucl. Med. Biol. 21, 921 925
  34. 34
    Chang, W. H., Lin, S. K., Lane, H. Y., Wei, F. C., Hu, W. H., Lam, Y. W. F., and Jann, M. W. (1998) Reversible metabolism of clozapine and clozapine N-oxide in schizophrenic patients Prog. Neuro-Psychopharmacol. 22, 723 739
  35. 35
    Massey, C. A., Kim, G., Corcoran, A. E., Haynes, R. L., Paterson, D. S., Cummings, K. J., Dymecki, S. M., Richerson, G. B., Nattie, E. E., Kinney, H. C., and Commons, K. G. (2013) Development of brainstem 5HT(1A) receptor-binding sites in serotonin-deficient mice J. Neurochem. 126, 749 757
  36. 36
    Jann, M. W., Lam, Y. W., and Chang, W. H. (1994) Rapid formation of clozapine in guinea-pigs and man following clozapine-N-oxide administration Arch. Int. Pharmacodyn. Ther. 328, 243 250
  37. 37
    Loffler, S., Korber, J., Nubbemeyer, U., and Fehsel, K. (2012) Comment on “Impaired Respiratory and Body Temperature Control Upon Acute Serotonergic Neuron Inhibition” Science 337, 646
  38. 38
    Roth, B. L., Sheffler, D. J., and Kroeze, W. K. (2004) Magic shotguns versus magic bullets: selectively non-selective drugs for mood disorders and schizophrenia Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery 3, 353 359
  39. 39
    Hunziker, F., Kuenzle, F., and Schmutz, J. (1966) Helv. Chim. Acta 49, 1433 1439
  40. 40
    Schmutz, J. (1975) Neuroleptic piperazinyl-dibenzo-azepines. Chemistry and structure–activity relationships Arzneimittelforschung 25, 712 720
  41. 41
    Steiner, G., Franke, A., Hadicke, E., Lenke, D., Teschendorf, H. J., Hofmann, H. P., Kreiskott, H., and Worstmann, W. (1986) Tricyclic epines. Novel (E)- and (Z)-11H-dibenz[b,e]azepines as potential central nervous system agents. Variation of the basic side chain J. Med. Chem. 29, 1877 1888
  42. 42
    Hunziker, F., Fischer, E., and Schmutz, J. (1967) 11-Amino-5H-Dibenzo[b,e]-1,4-diazepine 0.10. Mitteilung Uber Siebengliedrige Heterocyclen Helv. Chim. Acta 50, 1588 1599
  43. 43
    Wenthur, C. J. and Lindsley, C. W. (2013) Classics in Chemical Neuroscience: Clozapine ACS Chem. Neurosci. 4, 1018 1025
  44. 44
    Kalhapure, R. S., Patil, B. P., Jadhav, M. N., Kawle, L. A., and Wagh, S. B. (2011) Synthesis of 11-(Piperazin-1-yl)-5H-dibenzo[b,e] [1,4]diazepine on Kilo Scale E-J. Chem. 8, 1747 1749
  45. 45
    Ullmann, F. and Bielecki, J. (1901) Synthesis in the Biphenyl series. (I. Announcement) Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 34, 2174 2185
  46. 46
    Davies, M. A., Compton-Toth, B. A., Hufeisen, S. J., Meltzer, H. Y., and Roth, B. L. (2005) The highly efficacious actions of N-desmethylclozapine at muscarinic receptors are unique and not a common property of either typical or atypical antipsychotic drugs: is M1 agonism a pre-requisite for mimicking clozapine’s actions? Psychopharmacology 178, 451 460
  47. 47
    Besnard, J., Ruda, G. F., Setola, V., Abecassis, K., Rodriguiz, R. M., Huang, X. P., Norval, S., Sassano, M. F., Shin, A. I., Webster, L. A., Simeons, F. R., Stojanovski, L., Prat, A., Seidah, N. G., Constam, D. B., Bickerton, G. R., Read, K. D., Wetsel, W. C., Gilbert, I. H., Roth, B. L., and Hopkins, A. L. (2012) Automated design of ligands to polypharmacological profiles Nature 492, 215 220
  48. 48
    Wiberg, K. B. (1955) The Deuterium Isotope Effect Chem. Rev. 55, 713 743
  49. 49
    Elison, C., Rapoport, H., Laursen, R., and Elliott, H. W. (1961) Effect of Deuteration of N-CH3 Group on Potency and Enzymatic N-Demethylation of Morphine Science 134, 1078 1079
  50. 50
    Shao, L., Abolin, C., Hewitt, M. C., Koch, P., and Varney, M. (2006) Derivatives of tramadol for increased duration of effect Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 16, 691 694
  51. 51
    Korber, J., Loffler, S., Schollmeyer, D., and Nubbemeyer, U. (2013) Synthesis and Oxidant Properties of Phase 1 Benzepine N-Oxides of Common Antipsychotic Drugs Synthesis 45, 2875 2887

Cited By

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article is cited by 111 publications.

  1. Karen J. Thompson, Elham Khajehali, Sophie J. Bradley, Jovana S. Navarrete, Xi Ping Huang, Samuel Slocum, Jian Jin, Jing Liu, Yan Xiong, Reid H. J. Olsen, Jeffrey F. Diberto, Kristen M. Boyt, Melanie M. Pina, Dipanwita Pati, Colin Molloy, Christoffer Bundgaard, Patrick M. Sexton, Thomas L. Kash, Michael J. Krashes, Arthur Christopoulos, Bryan L. Roth, Andrew B. Tobin. DREADD Agonist 21 Is an Effective Agonist for Muscarinic-Based DREADDs in Vitro and in Vivo. ACS Pharmacology & Translational Science 2018, 1 (1) , 61-72. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsptsci.8b00012
  2. Laure Konnert, Frédéric Lamaty, Jean Martinez, and Evelina Colacino . Recent Advances in the Synthesis of Hydantoins: The State of the Art of a Valuable Scaffold. Chemical Reviews 2017, 117 (23) , 13757-13809. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00067
  3. Jessica Raper, Ryan D. Morrison, J. Scott Daniels, Leonard Howell, Jocelyne Bachevalier, Thomas Wichmann, and Adriana Galvan . Metabolism and Distribution of Clozapine-N-oxide: Implications for Nonhuman Primate Chemogenetics. ACS Chemical Neuroscience 2017, 8 (7) , 1570-1576. https://doi.org/10.1021/acschemneuro.7b00079
  4. Craig W. Lindsley, Kyle A. Emmitte, Corey R. Hopkins, Thomas M. Bridges, Karen J. Gregory, Colleen M. Niswender, and P. Jeffrey Conn . Practical Strategies and Concepts in GPCR Allosteric Modulator Discovery: Recent Advances with Metabotropic Glutamate Receptors. Chemical Reviews 2016, 116 (11) , 6707-6741. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00656
  5. Yoshio Iguchi, Ryoji Fukabori, Shigeki Kato, Kazumi Takahashi, Satoshi Eifuku, Yuko Maejima, Kenju Shimomura, Hiroshi Mizuma, Aya Mawatari, Hisashi Doi, Yilong Cui, Hirotaka Onoe, Keigo Hikishima, Makoto Osanai, Takuma Nishijo, Toshihiko Momiyama, Richard Benton, Kazuto Kobayashi. Chemogenetic activation of mammalian brain neurons expressing insect Ionotropic Receptors by systemic ligand precursor administration. Communications Biology 2024, 7 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-024-06223-4
  6. Julia B. Davenport, Ali D. Güler, Qi Zhang. Methodology for Studying Hypothalamic Regulation of Feeding Behaviors. Methods and Protocols 2024, 7 (6) , 86. https://doi.org/10.3390/mps7060086
  7. Yoshio Iguchi, Richard Benton, Kazuto Kobayashi. A chemogenetic technology using insect Ionotropic Receptors to stimulate target cell populations in the mammalian brain. Neuroscience Research 2024, 69 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neures.2024.11.003
  8. Takahito Miyake, Kaho Tanaka, Yutsuki Inoue, Yuji Nagai, Reo Nishimura, Takehito Seta, Shumpei Nakagawa, Ken-ichi Inoue, Emi Hasegawa, Takafumi Minamimoto, Masao Doi. Size-reduced DREADD derivatives for AAV-assisted multimodal chemogenetic control of neuronal activity and behavior. Cell Reports Methods 2024, 4 (10) , 100881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crmeth.2024.100881
  9. Tyler E. Billipp, Connie Fung, Lily M. Webeck, Derek B. Sargent, Matthew B. Gologorsky, Zuojia Chen, Margaret M. McDaniel, Darshan N. Kasal, John W. McGinty, Kaitlyn A. Barrow, Lucille M. Rich, Alessio Barilli, Mark Sabat, Jason S. Debley, Chuan Wu, Richard Myers, Michael R. Howitt, Jakob von Moltke. Tuft cell-derived acetylcholine promotes epithelial chloride secretion and intestinal helminth clearance. Immunity 2024, 57 (6) , 1243-1259.e8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2024.03.023
  10. Philip J. Clark, Zachary D. Brodnik, Rodrigo A. España. Chemogenetic Signaling in Space and Time: Considerations for Designing Neuroscience Experiments Using DREADDs. The Neuroscientist 2024, 30 (3) , 328-346. https://doi.org/10.1177/10738584221134587
  11. Ana Gonzalez-Ramos, Claudia Puigsasllosas-Pastor, Ainhoa Arcas-Marquez, Daniel Tornero. Updated Toolbox for Assessing Neuronal Network Reconstruction after Cell Therapy. Bioengineering 2024, 11 (5) , 487. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering11050487
  12. Valentina I. Cea Salazar, Melvin D. Perez, A.J. Robison, Brian C. Trainor. Impacts of sex differences on optogenetic, chemogenetic, and calcium-imaging tools. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 2024, 84 , 102817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2023.102817
  13. Yoshiatsu Aomine, Yoshinobu Oyama, Koki Sakurai, Tom Macpherson, Takaaki Ozawa, Takatoshi Hikida. Clozapine N-oxide, compound 21, and JHU37160 do not influence effortful reward-seeking behavior in mice. Psychopharmacology 2024, 241 (1) , 89-96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-023-06465-w
  14. Andrew Jo, Sercan Deniz, Suraj Cherian, Jian Xu, Daiki Futagi, Steven H. DeVries, Yongling Zhu. Modular interneuron circuits control motion sensitivity in the mouse retina. Nature Communications 2023, 14 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-43382-0
  15. Makiko Shimizu, Mitsuhiro Yoshimura, Kazuhiko Baba, Naofumi Ikeda, Yuki Nonaka, Takashi Maruyama, Tatsushi Onaka, Yoichi Ueta. Deschloroclozapine exhibits an exquisite agonistic effect at lower concentration compared to clozapine-N-oxide in hM3Dq expressing chemogenetically modified rats. Frontiers in Neuroscience 2023, 17 https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2023.1301515
  16. Kate A. Lawson, Christina M. Ruiz, Stephen V. Mahler. A head-to-head comparison of two DREADD agonists for suppressing operant behavior in rats via VTA dopamine neuron inhibition. Psychopharmacology 2023, 240 (10) , 2101-2110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-023-06429-0
  17. Jo Bossuyt, Yana Van Den Herrewegen, Liam Nestor, An Buckinx, Dimitri De Bundel, Ilse Smolders. Chemogenetic modulation of astrocytes and microglia: State‐of‐the‐art and implications in neuroscience. Glia 2023, 71 (9) , 2071-2095. https://doi.org/10.1002/glia.24390
  18. Maria João Pereira, Rajagopal Ayana, Matthew G. Holt, Lutgarde Arckens. Chemogenetic manipulation of astrocyte activity at the synapse— a gateway to manage brain disease. Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology 2023, 11 https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2023.1193130
  19. Janine Traut, Jose Prius Mengual, Elise J Meijer, Laura E McKillop, Hannah Alfonsa, Anna Hoerder-Suabedissen, Seo Ho Song, Kristoffer D Fehér, Dieter Riemann, Zoltan Molnar, Colin J Akerman, Vladyslav V Vyazovskiy, Lukas B Krone. Effects of clozapine-N-oxide and compound 21 on sleep in laboratory mice. eLife 2023, 12 https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.84740
  20. Maricela X. Martinez, Mitchell R. Farrell, Stephen V. Mahler. Pathway-Specific Chemogenetic Manipulation by Applying Ligand to Axonally Expressed DREADDs. 2023, 207-220. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-2918-5_11
  21. Adriana K. Cushnie, Daniel N. Bullock, Ana M.G. Manea, Wei Tang, Jan Zimmermann, Sarah R. Heilbronner. The use of chemogenetic actuator ligands in nonhuman primate DREADDs-fMRI. Current Research in Neurobiology 2023, 4 , 100072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crneur.2022.100072
  22. Raphaël Goutaudier, Fanny Joly, David Mallet, Magali Bartolomucci, Denis Guicherd, Carole Carcenac, Frédérique Vossier, Thibault Dufourd, Sabrina Boulet, Colin Deransart, Benoit Chovelon, Sebastien Carnicella. Hypodopaminergic state of the nigrostriatal pathway drives compulsive alcohol use. Molecular Psychiatry 2023, 28 (1) , 463-474. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-022-01848-5
  23. Shicheng Zhang, Ryan H. Gumpper, Xi-Ping Huang, Yongfeng Liu, Brian E. Krumm, Can Cao, Jonathan F. Fay, Bryan L. Roth. Molecular basis for selective activation of DREADD-based chemogenetics. Nature 2022, 612 (7939) , 354-362. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05489-0
  24. Stewart S. Cox, Angela M. Kearns, Samuel K. Woods, Brogan J. Brown, Samantha J. Brown, Carmela M. Reichel. The role of the anterior insula during targeted helping behavior in male rats. Scientific Reports 2022, 12 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-07365-3
  25. Ornela Kljakic, Aja E. Hogan-Cann, Hunster Yang, Briannee Dover, Mohammed Al-Onaizi, Marco A.M. Prado, Vania F. Prado. Chemogenetic activation of VGLUT3-expressing neurons decreases movement. European Journal of Pharmacology 2022, 935 , 175298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejphar.2022.175298
  26. Patrick A. Forcelli. Seizing Control of Neuronal Activity: Chemogenetic Applications in Epilepsy. Epilepsy Currents 2022, 22 (5) , 303-308. https://doi.org/10.1177/15357597221120348
  27. Muzi Du, Adrienne Santiago, Cenk Akiz, Chiye Aoki. GABAergic interneurons’ feedback inhibition of dorsal raphe-projecting pyramidal neurons of the medial prefrontal cortex suppresses feeding of adolescent female mice undergoing activity-based anorexia. Brain Structure and Function 2022, 227 (6) , 2127-2151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-022-02507-9
  28. Jessica Raper, Adriana Galvan. Applications of chemogenetics in non-human primates. Current Opinion in Pharmacology 2022, 64 , 102204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coph.2022.102204
  29. Zachary A. Rodd, Eric A. Engleman, William A. Truitt, Andrew R. Burke, Andrei I. Molosh, Richard L. Bell, Sheketha R. Hauser. CNO Administration Increases Dopamine and Glutamate in the Medial Prefrontal Cortex of Wistar Rats: Further Concerns for the Validity of the CNO-activated DREADD Procedure. Neuroscience 2022, 491 , 176-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2022.03.028
  30. Jon G. Dean, Christopher W. Fields, Michael A. Brito, Brian H. Silverstein, Chloe Rybicki-Kler, Anna M. Fryzel, Trent Groenhout, Tiecheng Liu, George A. Mashour, Dinesh Pal. Inactivation of Prefrontal Cortex Attenuates Behavioral Arousal Induced by Stimulation of Basal Forebrain During Sevoflurane Anesthesia. Anesthesia & Analgesia 2022, 28 https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000006011
  31. Marie Claes, Lies De Groef, Lieve Moons. The DREADDful Hurdles and Opportunities of the Chronic Chemogenetic Toolbox. Cells 2022, 11 (7) , 1110. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11071110
  32. Yuta Miura, Akinobu Senoo, Tomohiro Doura, Shigeki Kiyonaka. Chemogenetics of cell surface receptors: beyond genetic and pharmacological approaches. RSC Chemical Biology 2022, 3 (3) , 269-287. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1CB00195G
  33. Daicia C. Allen, Vanessa A. Jimenez, Timothy L. Carlson, Nicole A. Walter, Kathleen A. Grant, Verginia C. Cuzon Carlson. Characterization of DREADD receptor expression and function in rhesus macaques trained to discriminate ethanol. Neuropsychopharmacology 2022, 47 (4) , 857-865. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41386-021-01181-5
  34. Lívea Dornela Godoy, Tamiris Prizon, Matheus Teixeira Rossignoli, João Pereira Leite, José Luiz Liberato. Parvalbumin Role in Epilepsy and Psychiatric Comorbidities: From Mechanism to Intervention. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience 2022, 16 https://doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2022.765324
  35. Cooper D. Grossman, Bilal A. Bari, Jeremiah Y. Cohen. Serotonin neurons modulate learning rate through uncertainty. Current Biology 2022, 32 (3) , 586-599.e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2021.12.006
  36. Andrea de Bartolomeis, Licia Vellucci, Annarita Barone, Mirko Manchia, Vincenzo De Luca, Felice Iasevoli, Christoph Correll. Clozapine's Multiple Cellular Mechanisms: What Do We Know after More than Fifty Years? a Systematic Review and Critical Assessment of Translational Mechanisms Relevant for Innovative Strategies in Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia. SSRN Electronic Journal 2022, 4 https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4089530
  37. Jana Desloovere, Paul Boon, Lars Emil Larsen, Marie-Gabrielle Goossens, Jean Delbeke, Evelien Carrette, Wytse Wadman, Kristl Vonck, Robrecht Raedt. Chemogenetic Seizure Control with Clozapine and the Novel Ligand JHU37160 Outperforms the Effects of Levetiracetam in the Intrahippocampal Kainic Acid Mouse Model. Neurotherapeutics 2022, 19 (1) , 342-351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13311-021-01160-0
  38. Csilla Lea Fazekas, Manon Bellardie, Bibiána Török, Eszter Sipos, Blanka Tóth, Mária Baranyi, Beáta Sperlágh, Mihály Dobos-Kovács, Elodie Chaillou, Dóra Zelena. Pharmacogenetic excitation of the median raphe region affects social and depressive-like behavior and core body temperature in male mice. Life Sciences 2021, 286 , 120037. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lfs.2021.120037
  39. Vinod Kumar. Designed Synthesis of Diversely Substituted Hydantoins and Hydantoin-Based Hybrid Molecules: A Personal Account. Synlett 2021, 32 (19) , 1897-1910. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1480-6474
  40. Valérie Van Steenbergen, Florence M. Bareyre. Chemogenetic approaches to unravel circuit wiring and related behavior after spinal cord injury. Experimental Neurology 2021, 345 , 113839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expneurol.2021.113839
  41. Wei Guo, Xiayun Wan, Li Ma, Jiancheng Zhang, Kenji Hashimoto. Abnormalities in the composition of the gut microbiota in mice after repeated administration of DREADD ligands. Brain Research Bulletin 2021, 173 , 66-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresbull.2021.05.012
  42. Jaroslawna Meister, Lei Wang, Sai P. Pydi, Jürgen Wess. Chemogenetic approaches to identify metabolically important GPCR signaling pathways: Therapeutic implications. Journal of Neurochemistry 2021, 158 (3) , 603-620. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnc.15314
  43. P. Christiaan Klink, Jean-François Aubry, Vincent P. Ferrera, Andrew S. Fox, Sean Froudist-Walsh, Béchir Jarraya, Elisa E. Konofagou, Richard J. Krauzlis, Adam Messinger, Anna S. Mitchell, Michael Ortiz-Rios, Hiroyuki Oya, Angela C. Roberts, Anna Wang Roe, Matthew F.S. Rushworth, Jérôme Sallet, Michael Christoph Schmid, Charles E. Schroeder, Jordy Tasserie, Doris Y. Tsao, Lynn Uhrig, Wim Vanduffel, Melanie Wilke, Igor Kagan, Christopher I. Petkov. Combining brain perturbation and neuroimaging in non-human primates. NeuroImage 2021, 235 , 118017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118017
  44. Chiara Morelli, Laura Castaldi, Sam J. Brown, Lina L. Streich, Alexander Websdale, Francisco J. Taberner, Blanka Cerreti, Alessandro Barenghi, Kevin M. Blum, Julie Sawitzke, Tessa Frank, Laura K. Steffens, Balint Doleschall, Joana Serrao, Denise Ferrarini, Stefan G. Lechner, Robert Prevedel, Paul A. Heppenstall. Identification of a population of peripheral sensory neurons that regulates blood pressure. Cell Reports 2021, 35 (9) , 109191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109191
  45. Adrienne N Santiago, Emily A Makowicz, Muzi Du, Chiye Aoki. Food Restriction Engages Prefrontal Corticostriatal Cells and Local Microcircuitry to Drive the Decision to Run versus Conserve Energy. Cerebral Cortex 2021, 31 (6) , 2868-2885. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhaa394
  46. Akihiko Ozawa, Hiroyuki Arakawa. Chemogenetics drives paradigm change in the investigation of behavioral circuits and neural mechanisms underlying drug action. Behavioural Brain Research 2021, 406 , 113234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2021.113234
  47. Matthew A. Boehm, Jordi Bonaventura, Juan L. Gomez, Oscar Solís, Elliot A. Stein, Charles W. Bradberry, Michael Michaelides. Translational PET applications for brain circuit mapping with transgenic neuromodulation tools. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior 2021, 204 , 173147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbb.2021.173147
  48. Weida Shen, Shishuo Chen, Yining Liu, Pufan Han, Tianyu Ma, Ling-Hui Zeng. Chemogenetic manipulation of astrocytic activity: Is it possible to reveal the roles of astrocytes?. Biochemical Pharmacology 2021, 186 , 114457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcp.2021.114457
  49. Feng Hu, Patrick J. Morris, Jordi Bonaventura, Hong Fan, William B. Mathews, Daniel P. Holt, Sherry Lam, Matthew Boehm, Robert F. Dannals, Martin G. Pomper, Michael Michaelides, Andrew G. Horti. 18F-labeled radiotracers for in vivo imaging of DREADD with positron emission tomography. European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2021, 213 , 113047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2020.113047
  50. R. Maldonado, P. Calvé, A. García-Blanco, L. Domingo-Rodriguez, E. Senabre, E. Martín-García. Vulnerability to addiction. Neuropharmacology 2021, 186 , 108466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropharm.2021.108466
  51. Marie‐Gabrielle Goossens, Paul Boon, Wytse Wadman, Chris Van den Haute, Veerle Baekelandt, Alain G. Verstraete, Kristl Vonck, Lars E. Larsen, Mathieu Sprengers, Evelien Carrette, Jana Desloovere, Alfred Meurs, Jean Delbeke, Christian Vanhove, Robrecht Raedt. Long‐term chemogenetic suppression of seizures in a multifocal rat model of temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsia 2021, 62 (3) , 659-670. https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.16840
  52. Jongwook Cho, Seungjun Ryu, Sunwoo Lee, Junsoo Kim, Hyoung-Ihl Kim. Optimizing clozapine for chemogenetic neuromodulation of somatosensory cortex. Scientific Reports 2020, 10 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-62923-x
  53. Julia B. Kahn, Russell G. Port, Stewart A. Anderson, Douglas A. Coulter. Modular, Circuit-Based Interventions Rescue Hippocampal-Dependent Social and Spatial Memory in a 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome Mouse Model. Biological Psychiatry 2020, 88 (9) , 710-718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2020.04.028
  54. Nicholas A. Upright, Mark G. Baxter. Effect of chemogenetic actuator drugs on prefrontal cortex-dependent working memory in nonhuman primates. Neuropsychopharmacology 2020, 45 (11) , 1793-1798. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41386-020-0660-9
  55. Raphaël Goutaudier, Véronique Coizet, Carole Carcenac, Sebastien Carnicella, . Compound 21, a two-edged sword with both DREADD-selective and off-target outcomes in rats. PLOS ONE 2020, 15 (9) , e0238156. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238156
  56. Yuji Nagai, Naohisa Miyakawa, Hiroyuki Takuwa, Yukiko Hori, Kei Oyama, Bin Ji, Manami Takahashi, Xi-Ping Huang, Samuel T. Slocum, Jeffrey F. DiBerto, Yan Xiong, Takuya Urushihata, Toshiyuki Hirabayashi, Atsushi Fujimoto, Koki Mimura, Justin G. English, Jing Liu, Ken-ichi Inoue, Katsushi Kumata, Chie Seki, Maiko Ono, Masafumi Shimojo, Ming-Rong Zhang, Yutaka Tomita, Jin Nakahara, Tetsuya Suhara, Masahiko Takada, Makoto Higuchi, Jian Jin, Bryan L. Roth, Takafumi Minamimoto. Deschloroclozapine, a potent and selective chemogenetic actuator enables rapid neuronal and behavioral modulations in mice and monkeys. Nature Neuroscience 2020, 23 (9) , 1157-1167. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-020-0661-3
  57. Seven E. Tomek, Gabriela M. Stegmann, Jonna M. Leyrer-Jackson, Jose Piña, M. Foster Olive. Restoration of prosocial behavior in rats after heroin self-administration via chemogenetic activation of the anterior insular cortex. Social Neuroscience 2020, 15 (4) , 408-419. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2020.1746394
  58. Michael D. Sunshine, Tommy W. Sutor, Emily J. Fox, David D. Fuller. Targeted activation of spinal respiratory neural circuits. Experimental Neurology 2020, 328 , 113256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expneurol.2020.113256
  59. Rifka C. Derman, Caroline E. Bass, Carrie R. Ferrario. Effects of hM4Di activation in CamKII basolateral amygdala neurons and CNO treatment on sensory-specific vs. general PIT: refining PIT circuits and considerations for using CNO. Psychopharmacology 2020, 237 (5) , 1249-1266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-020-05453-8
  60. O. Keifer, K. Kambara, A. Lau, S. Makinson, D. Bertrand. Chemogenetics a robust approach to pharmacology and gene therapy. Biochemical Pharmacology 2020, 175 , 113889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcp.2020.113889
  61. Xinzhu Yu, Jun Nagai, Baljit S. Khakh. Improved tools to study astrocytes. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2020, 21 (3) , 121-138. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41583-020-0264-8
  62. Lore M. Peeters, Stephan Missault, Aneta J. Keliris, Georgios A. Keliris. Combining designer receptors exclusively activated by designer drugs and neuroimaging in experimental models: A powerful approach towards neurotheranostic applications. British Journal of Pharmacology 2020, 177 (5) , 992-1002. https://doi.org/10.1111/bph.14885
  63. Nhan C. Huynh, Baher A. Ibrahim, Christopher M. Lee, Mickeal N. Key, Daniel A. Llano. Injection of Adeno-Associated Virus Containing Optogenetic and Chemogenetic Probes into the Neonatal Mouse Brain. 2020, 19-43. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-9944-6_2
  64. Wilder Doucette, Elizabeth B. Smedley. Emerging Translational Treatments to Target the Neural Networks of Binge Eating. 2020, 103-118. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43562-2_8
  65. Jordi Bonaventura, Mark A. G. Eldridge, Feng Hu, Juan L. Gomez, Marta Sanchez-Soto, Ara M. Abramyan, Sherry Lam, Matthew A. Boehm, Christina Ruiz, Mitchell R. Farrell, Andrea Moreno, Islam Mustafa Galal Faress, Niels Andersen, John Y. Lin, Ruin Moaddel, Patrick J. Morris, Lei Shi, David R. Sibley, Stephen V. Mahler, Sadegh Nabavi, Martin G. Pomper, Antonello Bonci, Andrew G. Horti, Barry J. Richmond, Michael Michaelides. High-potency ligands for DREADD imaging and activation in rodents and monkeys. Nature Communications 2019, 10 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-12236-z
  66. Martin Jendryka, Monika Palchaudhuri, Daniel Ursu, Bastiaan van der Veen, Birgit Liss, Dennis Kätzel, Wiebke Nissen, Anton Pekcec. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic actions of clozapine-N-oxide, clozapine, and compound 21 in DREADD-based chemogenetics in mice. Scientific Reports 2019, 9 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-41088-2
  67. Sascha R. A. Alles, Anne-Marie Malfait, Richard J. Miller. Chemo- and Optogenetic Strategies for the Elucidation of Pain Pathways. 2019, 817-832. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190860509.013.33
  68. Dong-oh Seo, Laura E. Motard, Michael R. Bruchas. Contemporary strategies for dissecting the neuronal basis of neurodevelopmental disorders. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory 2019, 165 , 106835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nlm.2018.03.015
  69. Sarah Mondoloni, Romain Durand-de Cuttoli, Alexandre Mourot. Cell-Specific Neuropharmacology. Trends in Pharmacological Sciences 2019, 40 (9) , 696-710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tips.2019.07.007
  70. Julia B Kahn, Russell G Port, Cuiyong Yue, Hajime Takano, Douglas A Coulter. Circuit-based interventions in the dentate gyrus rescue epilepsy-associated cognitive dysfunction. Brain 2019, 142 (9) , 2705-2721. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awz209
  71. Raphaël Goutaudier, Véronique Coizet, Carole Carcenac, Sebastien Carnicella. DREADDs: The Power of the Lock, the Weakness of the Key. Favoring the Pursuit of Specific Conditions Rather than Specific Ligands. eneuro 2019, 6 (5) , ENEURO.0171-19.2019. https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0171-19.2019
  72. Bryan L Roth. How structure informs and transforms chemogenetics. Current Opinion in Structural Biology 2019, 57 , 9-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbi.2019.01.016
  73. Ofer Yizhar, J. Simon Wiegert. Designer Drugs for Designer Receptors: Unlocking the Translational Potential of Chemogenetics. Trends in Pharmacological Sciences 2019, 40 (6) , 362-364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tips.2019.04.010
  74. Andreas Lieb, Mikail Weston, Dimitri M. Kullmann. Designer receptor technology for the treatment of epilepsy. EBioMedicine 2019, 43 , 641-649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2019.04.059
  75. Christopher J. Magnus, Peter H. Lee, Jordi Bonaventura, Roland Zemla, Juan L. Gomez, Melissa H. Ramirez, Xing Hu, Adriana Galvan, Jayeeta Basu, Michael Michaelides, Scott M. Sternson. Ultrapotent chemogenetics for research and potential clinical applications. Science 2019, 364 (6436) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aav5282
  76. Mikail Weston, Teresa Kaserer, Angela Wu, Alexandre Mouravlev, Jenna C. Carpenter, Albert Snowball, Samuel Knauss, Melanie von Schimmelmann, Matthew J. During, Gabriele Lignani, Stephanie Schorge, Deborah Young, Dimitri M. Kullmann, Andreas Lieb. Olanzapine: A potent agonist at the hM4D(Gi) DREADD amenable to clinical translation of chemogenetics. Science Advances 2019, 5 (4) https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaw1567
  77. Simone Bærentzen, Agata Casado-Sainz, Denise Lange, Vladimir Shalgunov, Isabel Martinez Tejada, Mengfei Xiong, Elina T. L’Estrade, Fraser G. Edgar, Hedok Lee, Matthias M. Herth, Mikael Palner. The Chemogenetic Receptor Ligand Clozapine N-Oxide Induces in vivo Neuroreceptor Occupancy and Reduces Striatal Glutamate Levels. Frontiers in Neuroscience 2019, 13 https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2019.00187
  78. Tanvi Paretkar, Eugene Dimitrov. Activation of enkephalinergic (Enk) interneurons in the central amygdala (CeA) buffers the behavioral effects of persistent pain. Neurobiology of Disease 2019, 124 , 364-372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbd.2018.12.005
  79. Annika Højrup Runegaard, Ciarán Martin Fitzpatrick, David Paul Drucker Woldbye, Jesper Tobias Andreasen, Andreas Toft Sørensen, Ulrik Gether, Lynette C. Daws. Modulating Dopamine Signaling and Behavior with Chemogenetics: Concepts, Progress, and Challenges. Pharmacological Reviews 2019, 71 (2) , 123-156. https://doi.org/10.1124/pr.117.013995
  80. Yifeng Cheng, Jun Wang. The use of chemogenetic approaches in alcohol use disorder research and treatment. Alcohol 2019, 74 , 39-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alcohol.2018.05.012
  81. Michael V. Baratta, Steven F. Maier. New tools for understanding coping and resilience. Neuroscience Letters 2019, 693 , 54-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2017.09.049
  82. Patrick Aldrin-Kirk, Tomas Björklund. Practical Considerations for the Use of DREADD and Other Chemogenetic Receptors to Regulate Neuronal Activity in the Mammalian Brain. 2019, 59-87. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-9065-8_4
  83. Stephanie M. Perez, Daniel J. Lodge. Convergent Inputs from the Hippocampus and Thalamus to the Nucleus Accumbens Regulate Dopamine Neuron Activity. The Journal of Neuroscience 2018, 38 (50) , 10607-10618. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2629-16.2018
  84. Daniel F. Manvich, Kevin A. Webster, Stephanie L. Foster, Martilias S. Farrell, James C. Ritchie, Joseph H. Porter, David Weinshenker. The DREADD agonist clozapine N-oxide (CNO) is reverse-metabolized to clozapine and produces clozapine-like interoceptive stimulus effects in rats and mice. Scientific Reports 2018, 8 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-22116-z
  85. Jayme R. McReynolds, John P. Christianson, Jordan M. Blacktop, John R. Mantsch. What does the Fos say? Using Fos-based approaches to understand the contribution of stress to substance use disorders. Neurobiology of Stress 2018, 9 , 271-285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ynstr.2018.05.004
  86. Ying Wang, Jiao Liang, Liying Chen, Yating Shen, Junli Zhao, Cenglin Xu, Xiaohua Wu, Heming Cheng, Xiaoying Ying, Yi Guo, Shuang Wang, Yudong Zhou, Yi Wang, Zhong Chen. Pharmaco-genetic therapeutics targeting parvalbumin neurons attenuate temporal lobe epilepsy. Neurobiology of Disease 2018, 117 , 149-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbd.2018.06.006
  87. Ann-Kathrin Ilg, Thomas Enkel, Dusan Bartsch, Florian Bähner. Behavioral Effects of Acute Systemic Low-Dose Clozapine in Wild-Type Rats: Implications for the Use of DREADDs in Behavioral Neuroscience. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience 2018, 12 https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2018.00173
  88. Sophie J. Bradley, Andrew B. Tobin, Rudi Prihandoko. The use of chemogenetic approaches to study the physiological roles of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors in the central nervous system. Neuropharmacology 2018, 136 , 421-426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropharm.2017.11.043
  89. Yasmin Padovan-Hernandez, Lori A. Knackstedt. Dose-dependent reduction in cocaine-induced locomotion by Clozapine-N-Oxide in rats with a history of cocaine self-administration. Neuroscience Letters 2018, 674 , 132-135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2018.03.045
  90. Stephen V Mahler, Gary Aston-Jones. CNO Evil? Considerations for the Use of DREADDs in Behavioral Neuroscience. Neuropsychopharmacology 2018, 43 (5) , 934-936. https://doi.org/10.1038/npp.2017.299
  91. Erin J Campbell, Nathan J Marchant. The use of chemogenetics in behavioural neuroscience: receptor variants, targeting approaches and caveats. British Journal of Pharmacology 2018, 175 (7) , 994-1003. https://doi.org/10.1111/bph.14146
  92. Adriana Galvan, Michael J. Caiola, Daniel L. Albaugh. Advances in optogenetic and chemogenetic methods to study brain circuits in non-human primates. Journal of Neural Transmission 2018, 125 (3) , 547-563. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00702-017-1697-8
  93. Christophe Varin, Patricia Bonnavion. Pharmacosynthetic Deconstruction of Sleep-Wake Circuits in the Brain. 2018, 153-206. https://doi.org/10.1007/164_2018_183
  94. Puneet Sharma, Ilse S. Pienaar. The Use of DREADDs for Dissecting the Contribution of Cellular and Neural Circuit Mechanisms in Models of Neurodegenerative Disease. 2018, 565-596. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-804078-2.00024-6
  95. Patrick Aldrin-Kirk, Andreas Heuer, Daniella Rylander Ottosson, Marcus Davidsson, Bengt Mattsson, Tomas Björklund. Chemogenetic modulation of cholinergic interneurons reveals their regulating role on the direct and indirect output pathways from the striatum. Neurobiology of Disease 2018, 109 , 148-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbd.2017.10.010
  96. Deniz Atasoy, Scott M. Sternson. Chemogenetic Tools for Causal Cellular and Neuronal Biology. Physiological Reviews 2018, 98 (1) , 391-418. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00009.2017
  97. Yevgen Yudin, Tibor Rohacs. Inhibitory G i/O -coupled receptors in somatosensory neurons: Potential therapeutic targets for novel analgesics. Molecular Pain 2018, 14 https://doi.org/10.1177/1744806918763646
  98. Patrick A. Forcelli. Applications of optogenetic and chemogenetic methods to seizure circuits: Where to go next?. Journal of Neuroscience Research 2017, 95 (12) , 2345-2356. https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.24135
  99. Jingwei Jiang, Huxing Cui, Kamal Rahmouni. Optogenetics and pharmacogenetics: principles and applications. American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology 2017, 313 (6) , R633-R645. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpregu.00091.2017
  100. C. James Howell, Michael P. Sceniak, Min Lang, Wenceslas Krakowiecki, Fatimah E. Abouelsoud, Saloni U. Lad, Heping Yu, David M. Katz. Activation of the Medial Prefrontal Cortex Reverses Cognitive and Respiratory Symptoms in a Mouse Model of Rett Syndrome. eneuro 2017, 4 (6) , ENEURO.0277-17.2017. https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0277-17.2017
Load all citations

ACS Chemical Neuroscience

Cite this: ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2015, 6, 3, 476–484
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/cn500325v
Published January 14, 2015

Copyright © 2015 American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under these Terms of Use.

Article Views

9187

Altmetric

-

Citations

Learn about these metrics

Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.

  • Abstract

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. SAR studies of the CNO scaffold.

    Scheme 1

    Scheme 1. Synthesis of N4′-alkyl Substituted CNO Analoguesa

    Scheme aReagents and conditions: (a) xylene, reflux, 48 h, 95% yield; (b) POCl3, N,N-dimethylaniline, toluene, 95 °C, 2 h, 67% yield; (c) N-alkylpiperazines, toluene, 120 °C, 2 h, 69–80% yield; and (d) mCPBA, CH2Cl2, rt, 10 min, 65–75% yield.

    Scheme 2

    Scheme 2. Synthesis of Compounds 6, 7, and 914a

    Scheme aReagents and conditions: (a) CH3I, acetone, rt, overnight, 55% yield; (b) 2-oxypiperazine, 1,4-dioxane/ethanol 1:1, 99 °C, overnight, 65% yield; (c) 1,3,8-triazaspiro[4.5]decane-2,4-dione (8), 1,4-dioxane/DMF (2:1), 130 °C, 24 h, 66% yield; (d) 1,2-dimethoxyethane, 0.5 N NaOH, microwave, 150 °C, 10 min, 16% yield; (e) piperazine, toluene, 120 °C, 2 h, 69% yield; (f) AcCl, TEA, CH2Cl2, 0 °C, 1 h, 86% yield; (g) (1) LiAlD4, THF, N2, reflux, 2h, (2) CD3OD, 0 °C, (3) NH4OH, 0 °C, 84% yield; (h) MsCl, DIPEA, CH2Cl2, 0 °C, 1 h, 93% yield.

    Scheme 3

    Scheme 3. Synthesis of Compounds 2224a

    Scheme aReagents and conditions: (a) K2CO3, Cu, 3-methylbutan-1-ol, reflux, 4 h; (b) NaS2O4, NH4OH/H2O 3:2, 80 °C, 30 min, 75% yield in two steps; (c) xylene, reflux, Dean–Stark conditions, 48 h, 96% yield; (d) POCl3, N,N-dimethylaniline, toluene, reflux, 3 h, 52% yield; (e) piperazine, toluene, reflux, overnight, 63% yield; (f) 1-ethylpiperazine, toluene, reflux, 2 h, 72% yield; and (g) mCPBA, CH2Cl2, rt, 10 min, 78% yield.

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. Compounds 13 and 21 are potent hM3Dq agonists and do not activate hM3 being similar to compound 5a (CNO). The endogenous ligand acetylcholine (ACh), on the other hand, is a potent hM3 agonist and does not activate hM3Dq.

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. Perlapine is a potent full agonist of hM3Dq and does not activate hM3. CNO (compound 5a) was used as a positive control in the hM3Dq FLIPR assay, and acetylcholine (ACh) was used as a positive control in the hM3 FLIPR assay.

  • References


    This article references 51 other publications.

    1. 1
      Sternson, S. M. and Roth, B. L. (2014) Chemogenetic Tools to Interrogate Brain Functions Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 37, 387 407
    2. 2
      Urban, D. J. and Roth, B. L. (2015) DREADDs (Designer Receptors Exclusively Activated by Designer Drugs): Chemogenetic Tools with Therapeutic Utility Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 55, 399 417
    3. 3
      Penfield, W. and Jasper, H. H. (1954) Epilepsy and the Functional Anatomy of the Human Brain (First ed.), Little Brown, Boston.
    4. 4
      Boyden, E. S., Zhang, F., Bamberg, E., Nagel, G., and Deisseroth, K. (2005) Millisecond-timescale, genetically targeted optical control of neural activity Nat. Neurosci. 8, 1263 1268
    5. 5
      Armbruster, B. N. and Roth, B. L. (2005) Mining the receptorome J. Biol. Chem. 280, 5129 5132
    6. 6
      Zhang, F., Wang, L. P., Brauner, M., Liewald, J. F., Kay, K., Watzke, N., Wood, P. G., Bamberg, E., Nagel, G., Gottschalk, A., and Deisseroth, K. (2007) Multimodal fast optical interrogation of neural circuitry Nature 446, 633 639
    7. 7
      Airan, R. D., Thompson, K. R., Fenno, L. E., Bernstein, H., and Deisseroth, K. (2009) Temporally precise in vivo control of intracellular signalling Nature 458, 1025 1029
    8. 8
      Berndt, A., Yizhar, O., Gunaydin, L. A., Hegemann, P., and Deisseroth, K. (2009) Bi-stable neural state switches Nat. Neurosci. 12, 229 234
    9. 9
      Li, X., Gutierrez, D. V., Hanson, M. G., Han, J., Mark, M. D., Chiel, H., Hegemann, P., Landmesser, L. T., and Herlitze, S. (2005) Fast noninvasive activation and inhibition of neural and network activity by vertebrate rhodopsin and green algae channelrhodopsin Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 102, 17816 17821
    10. 10
      Zhang, F., Prigge, M., Beyriere, F., Tsunoda, S. P., Mattis, J., Yizhar, O., Hegemann, P., and Deisseroth, K. (2008) Red-shifted optogenetic excitation: a tool for fast neural control derived from Volvox carteri Nat. Neurosci. 11, 631 633
    11. 11
      Armbruster, B. N., Li, X., Pausch, M. H., Herlitze, S., and Roth, B. L. (2007) Evolving the lock to fit the key to create a family of G protein-coupled receptors potently activated by an inert ligand Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 104, 5163 5168
    12. 12
      Alexander, G. M., Rogan, S. C., Abbas, A. I., Armbruster, B. N., Pei, Y., Allen, J. A., Nonneman, R. J., Hartmann, J., Moy, S. S., Nicolelis, M. A., McNamara, J. O., and Roth, B. L. (2009) Remote Control of Neuronal Activity in Transgenic Mice Expressing Evolved G Protein-Coupled Receptors Neuron 63, 27 39
    13. 13
      Rogan, S. C. and Roth, B. L. (2011) Remote control of neuronal signaling Pharmacol. Rev. 63, 291 315
    14. 14
      Farrell, M. S. and Roth, B. L. (2012) Pharmacosynthetics: Reimagining the pharmacogenetic approach Brain Res. 1511, 6 20
    15. 15
      Jennings, J. H. and Stuber, G. D. (2014) Tools for Resolving Functional Activity and Connectivity within Intact Neural Circuits Curr. Biol. 24, R41 50
    16. 16
      Lee, H. M., Giguere, P. M., and Roth, B. L. (2013) DREADDs: Novel tools for drug discovery and development Drug Discovery Today 19, 469 473
    17. 17
      Giguere, P. M., Kroeze, W. K., and Roth, B. L. (2014) Tuning up the right signal: Chemical and genetic approaches to study GPCR functions Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 27, 51 55
    18. 18
      Armbruster, B. N., Li, X., Pausch, M. H., Herlitze, S., and Roth, B. L. (2007) Evolving the lock to fit the key to create a family of G protein-coupled receptors potently activated by an inert ligand Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 104, 5163 5168
    19. 19
      Ray, R. S., Corcoran, A. E., Brust, R. D., Kim, J. C., Richerson, G. B., Nattie, E., and Dymecki, S. M. (2011) Impaired Respiratory and Body Temperature Control Upon Acute Serotonergic Neuron Inhibition Science 333, 637 642
    20. 20
      Garner, A. R., Rowland, D. C., Hwang, S. Y., Baumgaertel, K., Roth, B. L., Kentros, C., and Mayford, M. (2012) Generation of a synthetic memory trace Science 335, 1513 1516
    21. 21
      Atasoy, D., Betley, J. N., Su, H. H., and Sternson, S. M. (2012) Deconstruction of a neural circuit for hunger Nature 488, 172 177
    22. 22
      Krashes, M. J., Shah, B. P., Madara, J. C., Olson, D. P., Strochlic, D. E., Garfield, A. S., Vong, L., Pei, H., Watabe-Uchida, M., Uchida, N., Liberles, S. D., and Lowell, B. B. (2014) An excitatory paraventricular nucleus to AgRP neuron circuit that drives hunger Nature 507, 238 242
    23. 23
      Kuhlman, S. J., Olivas, N. D., Tring, E., Ikrar, T., Xu, X., and Trachtenberg, J. T. (2013) A disinhibitory microcircuit initiates critical-period plasticity in the visual cortex Nature 501, 543 546
    24. 24
      Carter, M. E., Soden, M. E., Zweifel, L. S., and Palmiter, R. D. (2013) Genetic identification of a neural circuit that suppresses appetite Nature 503, 111 114
    25. 25
      Vrontou, S., Wong, A. M., Rau, K. K., Koerber, H. R., and Anderson, D. J. (2013) Genetic identification of C fibres that detect massage-like stroking of hairy skin in vivo Nature 493, 669 673
    26. 26
      Kozorovitskiy, Y., Saunders, A., Johnson, C. A., Lowell, B. B., and Sabatini, B. L. (2012) Recurrent network activity drives striatal synaptogenesis Nature 485, 646 650
    27. 27
      Ferguson, S. M., Eskenazi, D., Ishikawa, M., Wanat, M. J., Phillips, P. E., Dong, Y., Roth, B. L., and Neumaier, J. F. (2011) Transient neuronal inhibition reveals opposing roles of indirect and direct pathways in sensitization Nat. Neurosci. 14, 22 24
    28. 28
      Silva, B. A., Mattucci, C., Krzywkowski, P., Murana, E., Illarionova, A., Grinevich, V., Canteras, N. S., Ragozzino, D., and Gross, C. T. (2013) Independent hypothalamic circuits for social and predator fear Nat. Neurosci. 16, 1731 1733
    29. 29
      Bock, R., Shin, J. H., Kaplan, A. R., Dobi, A., Markey, E., Kramer, P. F., Gremel, C. M., Christensen, C. H., Adrover, M. F., and Alvarez, V. A. (2013) Strengthening the accumbal indirect pathway promotes resilience to compulsive cocaine use Nat. Neurosci. 16, 632 638
    30. 30
      Parnaudeau, S., O’Neill, P. K., Bolkan, S. S., Ward, R. D., Abbas, A. I., Roth, B. L., Balsam, P. D., Gordon, J. A., and Kellendonk, C. (2013) Inhibition of mediodorsal thalamus disrupts thalamofrontal connectivity and cognition Neuron 77, 1151 1162
    31. 31
      Brancaccio, M., Maywood, E. S., Chesham, J. E., Loudon, A. S., and Hastings, M. H. (2013) A Gq-Ca2+ axis controls circuit-level encoding of circadian time in the suprachiasmatic nucleus Neuron 78, 714 728
    32. 32
      Kong, D., Tong, Q., Ye, C., Koda, S., Fuller, P. M., Krashes, M. J., Vong, L., Ray, R. S., Olson, D. P., and Lowell, B. B. (2012) GABAergic RIP-Cre neurons in the arcuate nucleus selectively regulate energy expenditure Cell 151, 645 657
    33. 33
      Bender, D., Holschbach, M., and Stocklin, G. (1994) Synthesis of n.c.a. carbon-11 labelled clozapine and its major metabolite clozapine-N-oxide and comparison of their biodistribution in mice Nucl. Med. Biol. 21, 921 925
    34. 34
      Chang, W. H., Lin, S. K., Lane, H. Y., Wei, F. C., Hu, W. H., Lam, Y. W. F., and Jann, M. W. (1998) Reversible metabolism of clozapine and clozapine N-oxide in schizophrenic patients Prog. Neuro-Psychopharmacol. 22, 723 739
    35. 35
      Massey, C. A., Kim, G., Corcoran, A. E., Haynes, R. L., Paterson, D. S., Cummings, K. J., Dymecki, S. M., Richerson, G. B., Nattie, E. E., Kinney, H. C., and Commons, K. G. (2013) Development of brainstem 5HT(1A) receptor-binding sites in serotonin-deficient mice J. Neurochem. 126, 749 757
    36. 36
      Jann, M. W., Lam, Y. W., and Chang, W. H. (1994) Rapid formation of clozapine in guinea-pigs and man following clozapine-N-oxide administration Arch. Int. Pharmacodyn. Ther. 328, 243 250
    37. 37
      Loffler, S., Korber, J., Nubbemeyer, U., and Fehsel, K. (2012) Comment on “Impaired Respiratory and Body Temperature Control Upon Acute Serotonergic Neuron Inhibition” Science 337, 646
    38. 38
      Roth, B. L., Sheffler, D. J., and Kroeze, W. K. (2004) Magic shotguns versus magic bullets: selectively non-selective drugs for mood disorders and schizophrenia Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery 3, 353 359
    39. 39
      Hunziker, F., Kuenzle, F., and Schmutz, J. (1966) Helv. Chim. Acta 49, 1433 1439
    40. 40
      Schmutz, J. (1975) Neuroleptic piperazinyl-dibenzo-azepines. Chemistry and structure–activity relationships Arzneimittelforschung 25, 712 720
    41. 41
      Steiner, G., Franke, A., Hadicke, E., Lenke, D., Teschendorf, H. J., Hofmann, H. P., Kreiskott, H., and Worstmann, W. (1986) Tricyclic epines. Novel (E)- and (Z)-11H-dibenz[b,e]azepines as potential central nervous system agents. Variation of the basic side chain J. Med. Chem. 29, 1877 1888
    42. 42
      Hunziker, F., Fischer, E., and Schmutz, J. (1967) 11-Amino-5H-Dibenzo[b,e]-1,4-diazepine 0.10. Mitteilung Uber Siebengliedrige Heterocyclen Helv. Chim. Acta 50, 1588 1599
    43. 43
      Wenthur, C. J. and Lindsley, C. W. (2013) Classics in Chemical Neuroscience: Clozapine ACS Chem. Neurosci. 4, 1018 1025
    44. 44
      Kalhapure, R. S., Patil, B. P., Jadhav, M. N., Kawle, L. A., and Wagh, S. B. (2011) Synthesis of 11-(Piperazin-1-yl)-5H-dibenzo[b,e] [1,4]diazepine on Kilo Scale E-J. Chem. 8, 1747 1749
    45. 45
      Ullmann, F. and Bielecki, J. (1901) Synthesis in the Biphenyl series. (I. Announcement) Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 34, 2174 2185
    46. 46
      Davies, M. A., Compton-Toth, B. A., Hufeisen, S. J., Meltzer, H. Y., and Roth, B. L. (2005) The highly efficacious actions of N-desmethylclozapine at muscarinic receptors are unique and not a common property of either typical or atypical antipsychotic drugs: is M1 agonism a pre-requisite for mimicking clozapine’s actions? Psychopharmacology 178, 451 460
    47. 47
      Besnard, J., Ruda, G. F., Setola, V., Abecassis, K., Rodriguiz, R. M., Huang, X. P., Norval, S., Sassano, M. F., Shin, A. I., Webster, L. A., Simeons, F. R., Stojanovski, L., Prat, A., Seidah, N. G., Constam, D. B., Bickerton, G. R., Read, K. D., Wetsel, W. C., Gilbert, I. H., Roth, B. L., and Hopkins, A. L. (2012) Automated design of ligands to polypharmacological profiles Nature 492, 215 220
    48. 48
      Wiberg, K. B. (1955) The Deuterium Isotope Effect Chem. Rev. 55, 713 743
    49. 49
      Elison, C., Rapoport, H., Laursen, R., and Elliott, H. W. (1961) Effect of Deuteration of N-CH3 Group on Potency and Enzymatic N-Demethylation of Morphine Science 134, 1078 1079
    50. 50
      Shao, L., Abolin, C., Hewitt, M. C., Koch, P., and Varney, M. (2006) Derivatives of tramadol for increased duration of effect Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 16, 691 694
    51. 51
      Korber, J., Loffler, S., Schollmeyer, D., and Nubbemeyer, U. (2013) Synthesis and Oxidant Properties of Phase 1 Benzepine N-Oxides of Common Antipsychotic Drugs Synthesis 45, 2875 2887