Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

You’ve supercharged your research process with ACS and Mendeley!

STEP 1:
Click to create an ACS ID

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

MENDELEY PAIRING EXPIRED
Your Mendeley pairing has expired. Please reconnect
ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
POVME 2.0: An Enhanced Tool for Determining Pocket Shape and Volume Characteristics
My Activity
CONTENT TYPES

Figure 1Loading Img
  • Open Access
Article

POVME 2.0: An Enhanced Tool for Determining Pocket Shape and Volume Characteristics
Click to copy article linkArticle link copied!

View Author Information
Department of Chemistry & Biochemistry, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093, United States
National Biomedical Computation Resource, Center for Research in Biological Systems, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093, United States
*Phone: 858.534.9629. Fax: 858.534.9645. E-mail: [email protected]. Corresponding author address: Department of Chemistry & Biochemistry, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, Mail Code 0340, La Jolla, CA 92093-0340.
Open PDFSupporting Information (2)

Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation

Cite this: J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2014, 10, 11, 5047–5056
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/ct500381c
Published September 29, 2014

Copyright © 2014 American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under these Terms of Use.

Abstract

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Analysis of macromolecular/small-molecule binding pockets can provide important insights into molecular recognition and receptor dynamics. Since its release in 2011, the POVME (POcket Volume MEasurer) algorithm has been widely adopted as a simple-to-use tool for measuring and characterizing pocket volumes and shapes. We here present POVME 2.0, which is an order of magnitude faster, has improved accuracy, includes a graphical user interface, and can produce volumetric density maps for improved pocket analysis. To demonstrate the utility of the algorithm, we use it to analyze the binding pocket of RNA editing ligase 1 from the unicellular parasite Trypanosoma brucei, the etiological agent of African sleeping sickness. The POVME analysis characterizes the full dynamics of a potentially druggable transient binding pocket and so may guide future antitrypanosomal drug-discovery efforts. We are hopeful that this new version will be a useful tool for the computational- and medicinal-chemist community.

Copyright © 2014 American Chemical Society

Introduction

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Binding-pocket analysis is an active area of research that includes pocket detection and characterization, druggability prediction, and the study of binding-site flexibility. (1) The advent of the Protein Data Bank (PDB (2)) spurred the creation of a number of software packages aimed at facilitating the analysis of macromolecular pockets. (3-6) In recent years, additional programs have been developed with improved accuracy and increasingly advanced pocket-characterization algorithms, (7-16) as reviewed by Zheng et al. (17)
Pocket analysis is useful for studying receptor dynamics. (18-40) One can get a good sense of the full gamut of possible binding-pocket conformational states by obtaining multiple structures from X-ray crystallography, NMR spectroscopy, or molecular dynamics (MD) simulations and comparing pocket volumes and, in particular, shapes. These comparisons facilitate the identification of novel, pharmacologically relevant binding-pocket conformations, as well as transient binding pockets that are not evident when a limited number of static structures are considered.
Additionally, pocket analysis can also be applied to computer-aided drug discovery (CADD). Among the many complex factors that govern molecular recognition, (41, 42) pocket volume and shape are perhaps the most straightforward. Simply put, a ligand will not generally bind to a receptor if it cannot physically fit within the confines of the binding pocket, and receptor/ligand shape complementarity plays a key role in molecular recognition. (43) Consequently, pocket characterization has been used to inform CADD efforts aimed at predicting ligand binding, whether through virtual screening, QSAR, or volumetric similarity searching. (44-46) Given the astounding variety of pocket geometries possible, (47) this characterization is no trivial task.
To address this challenge, both ligand- and receptor-centric approaches have been developed. Ligand-based methods such as OpenEye’s Rapid Overlay of Chemical Structures (ROCS) algorithm (48) seek to identify novel small-molecule binders by querying a compound database for entries with three-dimensional shapes that are similar to that of a known template ligand, (49) as assessed by the degree of volume-overlap mismatch. These techniques perform comparably to more traditional virtual-screening methods (50) and have been used to successfully identify a number of experimentally validated ligands (see, for example, refs 51−53).
While ligand-based approaches will certainly continue to have high utility, (54) a more receptor-centric methodology is sometimes advantageous. Bound ligands often occupy only a portion of their respective pockets, (-43, 47) on average perhaps as little as a third of the total space available. (43) Analysis of ligand volume and shape alone cannot account for potential interactions with pocket regions that are not occupied by the template ligand itself. In contrast, receptor-based pocket analysis elucidates the volume and shape of the entire cavity, including regions not yet exploited by existing pharmacophores.
Receptor-centric techniques can also be used to select diverse pocket shapes for use in subsequent virtual-screening efforts. It is often helpful to dock a library of small molecules into multiple receptor conformations in order to account for receptor flexibility. Carefully selecting conformations with unique pocket geometries has been shown to enhance hit rates and subsequent ligand diversity. (55-58)
To simplify binding-pocket characterization, we recently developed an algorithm called POVME (POcket Volume MEasurer). (7) POVME floods a pocket-encompassing region with equidistant points, removes those points that are near receptor atoms, and calculates the volume from the remaining points. The points can themselves be saved, providing a specific description of the pocket shape as well. Inspired by the fairly widespread adoption of our program (at least 43 citations as of June 2014), we have now created a second, much improved version. POVME 2.0 is over an order of magnitude faster than POVME 1.0, includes a graphical user interface (Figure 1) that greatly improves usability, can calculate volumetric density maps to facilitate analysis, and has improved accuracy.

Figure 1

Figure 1. POVME 2.0 graphical user interface.

POVME 2.0 has been tested on all major operating systems with various versions of python, numpy, and scipy (Table 1). (59-63) A copy of the program, which is released under the terms of the GNU General Public License, can be obtained from http://nbcr.ucsd.edu/POVME. We are hopeful that POVME will be a useful tool for the computational- and medicinal-chemist community.
Table 1. Operating-System Compatibilitya
operating systempython versionnumpy versionscipy version
Scientific Linux 6.22.6.61.6.20.11.0
OS X 10.9.12.7.51.6.20.11.0
Windows 7 Home Premium2.7.61.8.00.13.3
a

POVME 2.0 has been successfully tested on all major operating systems with various versions of python, numpy, and scipy.

Materials and Methods

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The POVME Algorithm

Successful POVME use includes three required and two optional steps. Trajectory alignment, the construction of a pocket-encompassing region, and the subsequent identification of the pocket-occupying space are required. Optionally, the user can also instruct POVME to eliminate subregions that fall outside the receptor’s convex hull and/or are noncontiguous with the primary pocket. A detailed description of each of these steps follows.

1) Aligning the Trajectory

POVME accepts a multiframe PDB (Protein Data Bank) file as input. We expect that MD simulations will be the most common source of these files, but multiple crystal structures or NMR conformations can also be used. We have found that the computer program Visual Molecular Dynamics (VMD) (64) is useful for aligning trajectories and converting files to the PDB format, but other software packages can also be used for this purpose. Alignment is necessary because the POVME algorithm assumes the pocket being measured does not translate or rotate in space. Different alignment methodologies can subtly alter how this requirement is met, as discussed in the Results and Discussion. A tutorial showing how to align and convert trajectory files using VMD is included in the Supporting Information (Text S1). We note also that single-frame PDB files can likewise serve as POVME input if the user wishes only to characterize a single pocket.

2) Defining a Region That Encompasses All Trajectory Binding Pockets

The user must next define “inclusion” (Figure 2A) and “exclusion” (Figure 2B) regions, respectively. Both of these regions are constructed from a combination of user-specified spheres and rectangular prisms. The required inclusion region should entirely encompass all the binding-pocket conformations of the trajectory. POVME includes a helper script called “POVME Pocket ID,” described in greater detail below, to assist in identifying this region if necessary. The optional exclusion region defines portions of the inclusion region that should be ignored, perhaps because they are not truly associated with the pocket. To generate a grid of equidistant points that encompasses all the binding-pocket conformations of the trajectory (spaced 1.0 Å apart by default), POVME first floods the user-specified inclusion region with points and then removes any points also contained in the optional exclusion region (Figure 2C).

Figure 2

Figure 2. A graphical summary of the POVME 2.0 algorithm. A) The user defines an inclusion region. B) The user defines an exclusion region. C) The portion of the inclusion region that is not also in the exclusion region is flooded with equidistant points. D) Any of the points that are close to receptor atoms are deleted. E) Any points outside the convex hull are optionally deleted. F) The user can optionally define a contiguous-points region. G) All points that are not contiguous with that region are similarly deleted.

3) Removing Points That Are near Receptor Atoms

As the purpose of POVME is to measure the volume of the binding-pocket cavity, the program next removes any points that are close to receptor atoms, leaving only those points that are likely to be located within the binding pocket itself (Figure 2D). Specifically, the pairwise distances between all atoms and POVME points are calculated. Any point that is closer to a given atom than that atom’s van der Waals radius, plus a user-specified tolerance (1.09 Å, the radius of a hydrogen atom, by default), is removed. As POVME is written in python, users can easily modify the default radii or add new radius values for novel constituent atom types. If the user wishes to ignore all receptor hydrogen atoms when calculating pocket volumes, the hydrogen radius specified in the script can be set to 0.0 Å.

4) Removing Points Outside the Receptor’s Convex Hull

POVME 2.0 introduces an optional new feature for removing points that lie entirely outside the binding pocket. Specifically, the gift-wrapping algorithm is used in combination with the Akl-Toussaint heuristic (65) to define the convex hull of receptor atoms near the user-defined inclusion region. As the gift-wrapping algorithm runs in O(n2) time, where n is the number of atoms in the receptor structure, it is not necessarily the fastest algorithm for computing the convex hull. However, by coupling it with the Alk-Toussaint heuristic, the expected running time is lowered to O(n). Ultimately, any points that fall outside the convex hull are removed (Figure 2E). This feature is particularly useful when the user defines an inclusion region that protrudes into the surrounding solvent-occupying space.

5) Removing Points That Are Not Contiguous with the Primary Pocket

Like the original POVME program, version 2.0 retains the optional ability to remove isolated patches of points that are not contiguous with the primary binding pocket. This feature requires that the user define a third region, again using spheres and rectangular prisms, that always falls within the primary binding-pocket region regardless of the trajectory frame considered (Figure 2F). All pocket-occupying points within or contiguous to this region are retained, but isolated patches of points that are not directly connected are deleted (Figure 2G).
POVME Output
By default, POVME writes a number of files to the disk. The calculated pocket volumes, as well as user-defined parameters and progress messages, are saved to a simple text-based log file. POVME can also be instructed to save the volume measurements to a second file in a simple tabular format that can be easily pasted into popular spreadsheet programs. Pocket-occupying points are equidistant (1.0 Å by default), so each point is associated with an identical cubical volume (e.g., 1.0 Å3). The volume of a whole pocket is calculated by simply summing the individual volumes associated with each unique point.
POVME also optionally saves the pocket-occupying points of each frame to PDB file(s) on the disk. The user can instruct the program to save these points to separate files and/or to a single PDB trajectory. Some visualization programs (e.g., VMD) are only compatible with trajectories that have the same number of atoms in each frame. POVME can optionally write extra points to the origin (0.0, 0.0, 0.0) on a frame-by-frame basis to satisfy this requirement. As these POVME frames are formatted similarly to those produced by SiteMap, they are also compatible with the pocket-shape volumetric-overlap clustering tools produced by Schrödinger. (13, 14, 55, 56)
Finally, POVME also optionally saves a volumetric density map in the Data Explorer (DX) format, similar to the MDpocket algorithm. (12) A volumetric density value is associated with each of the pocket-occupying points by calculating the fraction of all trajectory pockets that include the given point. If the density map is displayed as an isosurface, the value of the isosurface expresses the fraction of time (e.g., over the course of the simulation) that the pocket included the displayed volume.

The POVME Pocket ID Algorithm

The POVME distribution file also includes POVME Pocket ID, a simple script that identifies binding pockets and generates appropriate POVME inclusion regions. After loading the heavy atoms from a PDB file, the algorithm identifies pockets by 1) covering the entire protein in a low-resolution 3D grid of equidistant points (spaced 4.0 Å apart by default), 2) removing points that come within a user-specified distance of any protein atom (3.0 Å by default), and 3) removing points that fall outside the convex hull defined by the protein alpha carbons. The remaining points tend to congregate in binding pockets.
These points are then replaced with smaller higher-resolution 3D grids of equidistant points (spaced 1.0 Å apart by default). These higher-resolution points are subjected to the same protocol (i.e., points are removed if they are too close to protein atoms or fall outside the convex hull), thus providing a more detailed description of binding-pocket geometries. As stray, isolated points often remain, the algorithm iteratively removes points that have fewer than a user-specified number of neighbors (4 by default) until no such points remain.
Finally, stretches of contiguous high-resolution points are grouped together, thus partitioning the points according to their associated pockets. The points of each pocket are further divided into a user-defined number of clusters (5 by default) using the k-means clustering algorithm, and encompassing spheres are generated for each cluster.
The script outputs a separate PDB file for the points of each pocket. Within each of these files, each cluster of points is assigned a unique PDB chain id. The PDB header describes the inclusion-region sphere associated with each chain/cluster, formatted for use in a POVME input file. Once the user has determined via visualization which of the identified pockets is of greatest interest, he or she can select which calculated spheres are required to entirely encompass that pocket.

Test System: RNA Editing Ligase 1

The 1XDN crystal structure, (66) which includes enzyme residues 52–365 as well as an active-site ATP molecule and magnesium ion, was obtained from the Protein Data Bank. (2) Selenomethionine residues were replaced with methionine. All crystallographic water molecules were retained. The AMBER LEaP module was used to submerge the protein in a rectangular box of water molecules that extended 10 Å beyond the system atoms in all three Cartesian dimensions. Monovalent ions were added to neutralize the system and to bring it to a 0.1 M salt concentration. The protein and water atoms were parameterized using the Amber99SB force field (67) and the TIP4P-ew water model, (68) respectively. Additionally, the parameters for ATP, magnesium, and monovalent ions developed by Meagher et al., (69) Allner et al., (70) and Joung and Cheatham (71) were used, respectively.
The REL1 system was subjected to five 5000-step energy minimizations using the NAMD molecular-dynamics simulation package (72, 73) to gradually introduce full flexibility. We first allowed only hydrogen atoms to move, second released all water molecules, third released ions and ATP, fourth released the protein amino-acid side chains, and fifth removed all constraints. The system was then heated from 0 to 310 K in an NVT ensemble for 500 ps, with the protein backbone restrained. Equilibration was achieved in two segments, each consisting of a 250 ps simulation in the NPT ensemble. In the first segment, the protein backbone was restrained; in the second, no restraints were applied.
Five production simulations were performed, starting from the fully equilibrated structure. A total of 650 ns were simulated (one simulation of 250 ns and four of 100 ns). Different random seeds were used for each productive simulation to generate different starting velocities.
To study the flexibility of the REL1 active site, we extracted 6,500 frames from the simulations, evenly spaced 100 ps apart. All waters, counterions, ATP molecules, and magnesium ions were removed. VMD’s RMSD Trajectory Tool (64) was used to align the extracted frames. In order to determine how differing alignment methodologies would impact the POVME analysis, we used several different protocols. The extracted frames were concatenated and aligned by 1) the atoms of the bound ATP ligand; 2) the atoms of the active-site residues (e.g., any residue within 5 Å of the crystallographic ligand); 3) the alpha-carbon atoms (Cα) of the active-site residues; and 4) the Cα of the entire protein. Each of these four aligned trajectories was saved as a separate multiframe PDB file (Text S1).
Separate POVME analyses were performed for each aligned trajectory. In each case, we characterized the combined ATP/transient pockets using an inclusion region defined by 10 carefully positioned spheres, chosen by visualizing the system in VMD. This region was filled with equidistant points spaced 1.0 Å apart. No exclusion regions were required. Points that were not contiguous with those contained within a small sphere centered at the opening of the ATP-binding pocket were discarded. The new convex-hull feature was enabled.
To benchmark POVME 1.0 and POVME 2.0, we further considered the REL1 trajectory aligned by all Cα. Additional analyses of this trajectory were performed using POVME 1.0 and POVME 2.0 with the new convex-hull feature disabled.

Results and Discussion

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

As pocket volume and shape play critical roles in determining small-molecule binding, they are often the focus of computer-docking campaigns, QSAR studies, and molecular-dynamics analyses. We previously created a novel algorithm for characterizing macromolecular pockets called POVME (POcket Volume MEasurer) that has been widely adopted. (7) We here present a much-improved version of the algorithm, POVME 2.0.
POVME 2.0 has four primary advantages over previous versions. First, it is an order of magnitude faster because it relies on the numpy and scipy python modules to perform matrix-based calculations at nearly the speed of compiled C programs. (59-63) Additionally, the user can instruct POVME 2.0 to take advantage of multiple processors to further improve the speed of the calculation.
Second, POVME 2.0 comes with an optional graphical user interface (GUI) to facilitate usability (Figure 1). The GUI requires that Tkinter, (74) a python binding to the Tk GUI toolkit, (75) be installed. Fortunately, Tkinter is included in the standard Windows and OS X python distributions, as well as many Linux distributions.
Third, POVME 2.0 includes a new convex-hull-clipping option that improves the accuracy of the volume calculation. Portions of the binding pocket that fall outside the convex hull of nearby receptor atoms are discarded; consequently, only portions of the pocket that are truly interior to the protein surface are considered.
Fourth, unlike the original version, POVME 2.0 can analyze entire trajectories in addition to single protein conformations. With POVME 1.0, users were required to save each trajectory frame as a separate PDB file in order to study changes in pocket volume and shape over the course of a MD trajectory. In contrast, POVME 2.0 can read multiframe trajectory files without requiring that each frame be saved separately. When analyzing MD trajectories, POVME outputs both frame-by-frame and whole-trajectory analyses. For frame-by-frame analysis, POVME saves the individual pocket shapes in the PDB format. For whole-trajectory analysis, POVME creates a volumetric density map showing the frequency with which different regions of the protein are included in the pocket over the course of the trajectory.

Test Case: Trypanosoma brucei RNA Editing Ligase 1 (REL1)

To demonstrate the utility of this new POVME implementation, we used it to analyze an MD simulation of RNA editing ligase 1 (REL1) from the parasite Trypanosoma brucei, the etiological agent of African sleeping sickness. REL1 is a critical component of the T. brucei editosome, which edits transcriptional RNA prior to translation. This extensive RNA-editing process is essential for trypanosomatid survival, and REL1 has been shown to be a viable drug target. (76, 77) Indeed, REL1 inhibitors have been identified that kill the whole-cell parasite. (78)
Previous studies of related crystal structures have hinted at the existence of a transient subpocket connected to the distal portion of the primary ATP-binding site that may provide unique opportunities for drug discovery. (79) Compounds that bind to the REL1 primary site may also target other ATP-binding proteins with structurally similar pockets; however, compounds that bind to the unique transient pocket may prove more target specific.
To better characterize the dynamics of the REL1 pockets, we examined 6,500 combined ATP-transient pockets extracted from 650 ns of MD simulations. We first aligned the trajectory to ensure that the binding pocket was consistently in the same location. As with other pocket-analysis programs, (12, 17, 80) simulation-trajectory alignment impacts the calculation of the average volumetric density maps. To demonstrate this sensitivity, we performed four separate POVME analyses, aligning the REL1 trajectory by 1) all ATP-ligand atoms; 2) all the atoms of the active-site residues; 3) the alpha-carbon (Cα) atoms of the active-site residues; and 4) the Cα atoms of the entire protein. Volumetric density maps were calculated for each of these aligned trajectories and were visualized superimposed on the receptor structure using VMD. When displayed as an isosurface, these density maps show the fraction of frames with measured pockets that included the displayed volume.
For the purposes of comparison, we judged the utility of each alignment protocol by how consistently the associated POVME analysis captured the ATP-binding-pocket region over the course of the entire trajectory. As our simulations included a bound ATP ligand, the ATP-binding subpocket should always be open (i.e., the region of the volumetric map corresponding to ATP in our simulations should have a high density, in excess of 95%).
When the trajectory was aligned by all active-site Cα atoms, the POVME-identified pocket consistently included the ATP-binding region (Figure 3B). We also found that aligning by all active-site atoms or even the atoms of the bound ligand itself led to similar POVME results (Figure S1). In contrast, the pocket analysis was less than optimal when the trajectory was aligned by the Cα atoms of the whole receptor (Figure 3C), likely because substantial protein motions distant from the active site led to poor binding-pocket alignment. Consequently, the transient pocket was identified as open only half as often when the trajectory was aligned by all Cα atoms vs active-site Cα atoms.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Volumetric density maps of the REL1 active site. Some regions of the protein have been removed to facilitate visualization. A) The crystallographic pose of the bound ATP molecule. Crystallographic water molecules indicate the location of a secondary binding pocket that is transiently accessible from the ATP-binding pocket. B) The region of the binding pocket identified as “open” at least 95% of the time when the trajectory was aligned by the active-site Cα atoms. C) The same region when the trajectory was aligned by the Cα atoms of the whole protein. D) The region of the binding pocket identified as “open” at least 25% of the time when the active-site-Cα alignment was again used.

While the best protocol to use is likely system dependent, based on these REL1 results we concur with others in recommending that trajectories be aligned by active-site Cα atoms. (80) This alignment 1) consistently identified the ATP-binding pocket; 2) does not rely on the presence of a bound ligand and so can be applied to apo systems as well; and 3) requires fewer atoms. When the binding pocket is partly composed of flexible loops, aligning by pocket Cα atoms that belong to stable secondary-structure elements may be more appropriate.
When the active-site-Cα alignment was used, POVME analysis revealed the full dynamics of the transient REL1 pocket, as indicated by the density maps in Figures 3B and 3D at isovalues of 95% and 25%, respectively. As expected given that we simulated the holo protein, the primary ATP-binding pocket was persistently open throughout the entire simulation (Figure 3D, 95% isovalue). The intermittent transient pocket was open at least 25% of the time (Figure 3D), suggesting a persistence sufficient to support our hypothesis of druggability.

Benchmarking/Insights into Use

To verify that the results of POVME 2.0 are comparable to those of the previous version, we similarly analyzed a REL1 trajectory using POVME 1.0. When the convex-hull algorithm was disabled, both POVME 1.0 and 2.0 gave nearly identical volume measurements (Figure 4 graph, in black). When the new convex-hull feature was enabled, POVME-calculated volumes were lower, as expected (Figure 4 graph, in gray). To verify that the volumes calculated both with and without the convex-hull feature were correlated, we performed a linear regression. A two-tailed t-test suggested that the correlation was statistically significant (Pearson correlation coefficient: 0.19; p-value: 0.0).

Figure 4

Figure 4. POVME 1.0 and 2.0 benchmarks. The graph shows benchmark REL1 pocket volumes as a function of simulation time. POVME 1.0 and 2.0 give nearly the same volume measurements (in black). When the POVME 2.0 convex-hull option is enabled, the volumes are smaller (in gray). The bottom panel, generated using the 1XDN crystal structure, illustrates the difference. When the convex-hull option is enabled, the region of the binding pocket is more accurately captured (solid gray) than when it is deactivated (black wireframe). Some portions of the protein have been removed to facilitate visualization.

Although the convex-hull feature does add computational expense, in some contexts it may lead to more accurate characterizations. If the user’s ultimate goal is to calculate pocket volumes in absolute terms, clearly discarding volumes that lie outside the convex hull leads to improved accuracy (Figure 4, bottom panel). In contrast, if the goal is to determine how frequently different pocket regions are open vs closed by calculating volumetric density maps, the convex-hull feature, which discards only volumes that fall outside the pocket, will have little impact.
Finally, if the goal is to compare changes in the total pocket volume over the course of a trajectory, the convex-hull feature should be used with caution. Arbitrary movements of surface side chains near pocket openings can subtly affect the specific convex hull calculated for each frame. If the POVME inclusion region includes many points that lie outside the convex hull, and if the system being studied has highly flexible pocket-adjacent surface residues, using the convex-hull feature can introduce substantial “noise” into the total-volume calculations. This noise can make it difficult to detect subtle changes in the total volume caused by actual pocket dynamics, especially if the pocket itself is relatively stable. To overcome this challenge, we recommend carefully defining the POVME inclusion region to encompass only the pocket itself. If the convex-hull feature is used at all, rely on it only as a secondary refinement to better account for those rare frames when the pocket opening “pulls back,” causing a few POVME points that are typically located within the pocket to barely fall outside the pocket boundaries.

Software Comparison

Pocket Identification

Many approaches have been developed to identify and measure protein pockets (see recent reviews (81, 82)). These approaches are commonly divided into geometry- and energy-based detection algorithms. (17, 81, 82) We here limit our comparison to free software packages that natively process ensembles of structures, whether derived from multiple crystal structures or MD simulations, without requiring custom scripting. Software packages with this native support, including POVME 2.0, EPOSBP, (9) MDpocket, (12) PocketAnalyzerPCA, (80) and trj_cavity, (83) can output ensemble-dependent features such as the frequency of transient subpocket opening and the pocket size over multiple frames.
For all these programs, pocket identification is the initial step. POVME 2.0 pocket-defining regions can be generated automatically using the new grid-based POVME Pocket ID helper script described above. PocketAnalyzerPCA and trj_cavity use similar grid-based detection algorithms. PocketAnalyzerPCA implements a variant of the LIGSITE algorithm, (84, 85) and trj_cavity employs a novel neighbor-search method. In contrast, MDpocket uses fpocket to detect and calculate pocket properties. Fpocket calls the Qhull algorithm (86) to perform a Voronoi tessellation of the receptor; the coordinates of each Voronoi vertex, together with the associated atomic and vertex neighbors, constitute an “α-sphere” with a distinct radius. The collection of all α-spheres is then used to locate protein pockets. Finally, EPOSBP relies on the PASS algorithm, which first covers the entire protein surface with spheres and then removes spheres with low burial counts. As a second step, the algorithm covers the remaining spheres from the first step with an additional layer of spheres. Pockets are enumerated once repeating this process iteratively has successfully filled all cavities. EPOSBP also maps the identified pockets to a set of pocket-lining atoms (PLAs), avoiding the need to align the trajectory.

Volume Measurements

Pocket volumetric analysis follows the initial identification step. In order to facilitate comparison, we repeated the trajectory-based analysis of the REL1 ATP-binding pocket using several programs (active-site-Cα alignment). For each program, a grid resolution of 1.0 Å was used where appropriate. The remaining parameters were set to their default values.
Given the set of POVME inclusion and exclusion spheres chosen, POVME 2.0 without the convex-hull algorithm generally calculated pocket volumes that were larger than those determined by other codes. In contrast, when the convex-hull algorithm was used to ignore regions of space outside the confines of the pocket, the POVME-calculated volumes decreased substantially (see Table 2 and Figure S2).
Table 2. Program Comparisonsa
programaverage volume ± SDrun time (1 thread)run time (24 threads)
POVME 1.0 10500 
POVME 2.02071.3 ± 129.1162
POVME 2.0/convex hull1021.8 ± 154.8928
trj_cavity814.4 ± 254.616 
MDpocket523.2 ± 60.511 
PocketAnalyzerPCA811.5 ± 100.296* 
EPOSBP without clustering 43 
EPOSBP with clustering 259 
a

The average pocket volume (in Å3), plus or minus the standard deviation, measured over the course of a REL1 trajectory using several pocket-analysis programs. Note that the POVME 1.0 results were, for all intents and purposes, identical to the POVME 2.0 results with the convex-hull feature disabled. Additionally, EPOSBP volume measurements are not included because that program does not output volume-per-frame data. The total run times for each program are given in minutes. A PCA calculation accounted for approximately 6 min of the PocketAnalyzerPCA run time (marked with an asterisk). As POVME 2.0 is designed to use multiple processors, the run times for parallel POVME 2.0 calculations are also shown.

If accuracy is judged by consistency with other programs, using POVME 2.0 together with the convex-hull algorithm leads to substantial improvements when the user wishes to measure pocket volume in absolute terms. Nevertheless, the POVME-calculated volumes are still somewhat larger than those calculated by other algorithms, even with the convex-hull algorithm enabled. This discrepancy does not necessarily mean that POVME volumes are overestimated, as determining the accuracy of these varied methods is not straightforward. Binding pockets are not uniquely defined; they often have an opening toward the solvent, and no commonly agreed upon criteria exists for delineating the exact boundary between the pocket and solvent-filled spaces.
The tunable parameters of each algorithm may also contribute to the differences in calculated volumes. Although it is useful to allow the user to adjust key parameters as required to best analyze a specific pocket of interest, doing so often presents a problem when the parameters are not intuitive. With the end user in mind, POVME 2.0 requires only a small number of parameters with straightforward physical interpretations. We believe this is a distinct advantage of our code. While useful, parameters such as degree of buriedness and minimal cluster size (PocketAnalyzerPCA); PASS input (EPOSBP); and allowed range of α-sphere radii and number of α-spheres per pocket (MDpocket) are less intuitive.
PocketAnalyzerPCA and trj_cavity volumes are somewhat smaller than the POVME volumes obtained when the convex-hull feature is enabled; in contrast, MDpocket volumes are substantially smaller and have only minor fluctuations (Table 2 and Figure S2), possibly because MDpocket uses α-spheres rather than equidistant points. To determine if the volumes calculated using these four methods were even correlated, we first reduced the noise in the data using a simple moving average with a 40-point sample window. We then performed linear regressions to explore the relationships between these averaged POVME volumes and the averaged volumes obtained using PocketAnalyzerPCA, trj_cavity, and MDpocket, respectively. A two-tailed t-test was applied to the Pearson’s correlation coefficients to judge significance. The p-values were 0.46, 0.00, and 0.00 for POVME vs PocketAnalyzerPCA, trj_cavity, and MDpocket, respectively, suggesting that the correlations between POVME volumes and both trj_cavity and MDpocket volumes are statistically significant.
Future efforts will focus on expanding POVME analysis beyond simple volume and shape calculations. We intend to implement other pocket metrics (e.g., pocket surface-area calculations) and analysis tools (e.g., volume-based pharmacophore modeling).

Execution Time

The trajectory-based pocket calculations were also used to compare the execution times of each program (Table 2). All calculations were run on the same machine (2 Intel Xeon X5690 3.47Ghz processors, 6 CPU cores per processor, 2 threads per core = 24 threads total). On a single thread, POVME 2.0 is several orders of magnitude faster than its predecessor. When the convex-hull feature is disabled, POVME 2.0 is also faster than EPOSBP and PocketAnalyzerPCA, comparable to trj_cavity, and only slightly slower than MDpocket. We are exploring alternative methods for optimizing the optional convex-hull feature. Fortunately, the current POVME implementation is highly parallelized; when 24 threads are used rather than one, POVME 2.0 is substantially faster than all other packages tested, even with the convex-hull feature enabled.

Program Input and Output

POVME 2.0, trj_cavity, MDpocket, PocketAnalyzerPCA, and EPOSBP all output simple PDB file(s) that are easily visualized with other software packages. POVME 2.0 and MDpocket also output volumetric density maps in the DX format to make exploration of potentially druggable transient subpockets with varying opening frequencies simpler to interpret. Finally, EPOSBP and PocketAnalyzerPCA both have built-in features to cluster pocket shapes. Similarly, POVME output is easily clustered using utilities like the volume-overlap tool in Schrödinger’s Maestro suite. (55, 56)
POVME 2.0 accepts a multiframe PDB file as input. As the PDB format is general purpose and universally accepted, POVME is independent of any specific simulation package or force field. Nevertheless, PDB trajectories can become quite large, so being able to read binary formats specific to selected simulation software packages would also be useful. Indeed, trj_cavity can be compiled to read binary trajectories saved in the Gromacs format. Future implementations of POVME may include support for additional formats, though we do wish to avoid limiting our software to a specific simulation engine. We note that POVME trajectories do not include water molecules, substantially cutting down on the file size even when the PDB format is used. Additionally, freely available software can easily convert binary formats to PDB. A helpful tutorial is included in the Supporting Information that describes how to perform this conversion using VMD (64) (Text S1).

Conclusion

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

POVME 2.0 is a much improved version of our popular algorithm for characterizing the volumes and shapes of macromolecular (e.g., protein) binding pockets. Version 2.0 implements a number of enhancements, including speed improvements due to numpy/scipy integration and the optional use of multiple processors; better accuracy due to an optional convex-hull implementation; additional volumetric-analysis tools (i.e., volumetric density maps); and a graphical user interface that improves usability.
Although pocket-shape and volumetric analyses are not novel, factors such as the high computational cost of most algorithms have discouraged widespread adoption. POVME 2.0 significantly reduces the amount of time required, allowing users to more rapidly analyze large ensembles of pocket shapes derived from multiple experimental structures or simulation methods, such as MD. The added volumetric-density-map analysis feature provides a pocket-centric view of receptor flexibility with potentially useful drug-discovery applications. Indeed, others have shown that docking into structurally distinct binding pockets can lead to enhanced hit rates and chemical diversity. (55-58)
To demonstrate how POVME 2.0 can provide pharmacologically relevant information about pocket flexibility, we used it to analyze the dynamics of an essential, ATP-binding component of the T. brucei editosome, REL1. (76, 77) Given that ATP-binding pockets are ubiquitous, small-molecule inhibitors that bind exclusively to the primary REL1 pocket may also bind to the ATP pockets of critical human enzymes, leading to undesirable side effects. Consequently, we considered a unique secondary binding pocket that is transiently accessible from the primary REL1 ATP-binding pocket. POVME suggests this transient pocket assumes an open conformation roughly 25% of the time. Identifying less promiscuous REL1 inhibitors that exploit this unique pocket is an important component of our ongoing efforts to target this crucial enzyme.

Supporting Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The Supporting Information contains two files. The first contains Figures S1 and S2. Figure S1 shows the POVME volumetric density maps generated when the REL1 trajectory was aligned by all active-site atoms and the atoms of the bound ligand. Figure S2 shows the pocket volumes calculated over the course of a REL1 molecular dynamics simulation, using several different software packages. The second file, Text S1, contains a tutorial that shows how VMD can be used to align a trajectory. The same tutorial also shows how to save a trajectory in the multiframe PDB format for subsequent POVME analysis. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Author Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

  • Corresponding Author
    • Rommie E. Amaro - Department of Chemistry & Biochemistry, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093, United StatesNational Biomedical Computation Resource, Center for Research in Biological Systems, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093, United States Email: [email protected]
  • Authors
    • Jacob D. Durrant - Department of Chemistry & Biochemistry, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093, United StatesNational Biomedical Computation Resource, Center for Research in Biological Systems, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093, United States
    • Lane Votapka - Department of Chemistry & Biochemistry, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093, United States
    • Jesper Sørensen - Department of Chemistry & Biochemistry, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093, United States
  • Notes
    The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Acknowledgment

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

We would like to thank Dr. Victoria A. Feher and Mr. Jeffrey R. Wagner for helpful discussions, as well as Mr. Cam Farnell for developing Rapyd-Tk, a python-based program used to develop the POVME 2.0 graphical user interface. This work was funded by the National Institutes of Health through the NIH Director’s New Innovator Award Program DP2-OD007237 and the NSF XSEDE Supercomputer resources grant RAC CHE060073N to R.E.A. L.V. is funded by the National Science Foundation’s Graduate Research Fellowship Program. J.S. thanks the Alfred Benzon Foundation for generous postdoctoral funding. In addition, this work was also supported by the National Biomedical Computation Resource (NBCR), P41 GM103426.

References

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article references 86 other publications.

  1. 1
    Perot, S.; Sperandio, O.; Miteva, M. A.; Camproux, A. C.; Villoutreix, B. O. Druggable pockets and binding site centric chemical space: a paradigm shift in drug discovery Drug Discovery Today 2010, 15, 656 667
  2. 2
    Berman, H. M.; Westbrook, J.; Feng, Z.; Gilliland, G.; Bhat, T. N.; Weissig, H.; Shindyalov, I. N.; Bourne, P. E. The Protein Data Bank Nucleic Acids Res. 2000, 28, 235 242
  3. 3
    Levitt, D. G.; Banaszak, L. J. Pocket - a Computer-Graphics Method for Identifying and Displaying Protein Cavities and Their Surrounding Amino-Acids J. Mol. Graphics 1992, 10, 229 234
  4. 4
    Smart, O. S.; Goodfellow, J. M.; Wallace, B. A. The Pore Dimensions of Gramicidin-A Biophys. J. 1993, 65, 2455 2460
  5. 5
    Kleywegt, G. J.; Jones, T. A. Detection, Delineation, Measurement and Display of Cavities in Macromolecular Structures Acta Crystallogr., Sect. D: Biol. Crystallogr. 1994, 50, 178 185
  6. 6
    Laskowski, R. A. Surfnet - a Program for Visualizing Molecular-Surfaces, Cavities, and Intermolecular Interactions J. Mol. Graphics 1995, 13, 323 330
  7. 7
    Durrant, J. D.; de Oliveira, C. A.; McCammon, J. A. POVME: An algorithm for measuring binding-pocket volumes J. Mol. Graphics Modell. 2011, 29, 773 776
  8. 8
    Chovancova, E.; Pavelka, A.; Benes, P.; Strnad, O.; Brezovsky, J.; Kozlikova, B.; Gora, A.; Sustr, V.; Klvana, M.; Medek, P.; Biedermannova, L.; Sochor, J.; Damborsky, J. CAVER 3.0: A Tool for the Analysis of Transport Pathways in Dynamic Protein Structures PLoS Comput. Biol. 2012, 8, e1002708
  9. 9
    Eyrisch, S.; Helms, V. Transient pockets on protein surfaces involved in protein-protein interaction J. Med. Chem. 2007, 50, 3457 3464
  10. 10
    Brady, G. P.; Stouten, P. F. W. Fast prediction and visualization of protein binding pockets with PASS J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 2000, 14, 383 401
  11. 11
    Le Guilloux, V.; Schmidtke, P.; Tuffery, P. Fpocket: An open source platform for ligand pocket detection BMC Bioinf. 2009, 10, 168
  12. 12
    Schmidtke, P.; Bidon-Chanal, A.; Luque, F. J.; Barril, X. MDpocket: open-source cavity detection and characterization on molecular dynamics trajectories Bioinformatics 2011, 27, 3276 3285
  13. 13
    Halgren, T. A. Identifying and Characterizing Binding Sites and Assessing Druggability J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2009, 49, 377 389
  14. 14
    Halgren, T. New method for fast and accurate binding-site identification and analysis Chem. Biol. Drug Des. 2007, 69, 146 148
  15. 15
    Brenke, R.; Kozakov, D.; Chuang, G. Y.; Beglov, D.; Hall, D.; Landon, M. R.; Mattos, C.; Vajda, S. Fragment-based identification of druggable ’hot spots’ of proteins using Fourier domain correlation techniques Bioinformatics 2009, 25, 621 627
  16. 16
    Votapka, L.; Amaro, R. E. Multistructural hot spot characterization with FTProd Bioinformatics 2013, 29, 393 394
  17. 17
    Zheng, X. L.; Gan, L. F.; Wang, E. K.; Wang, J. Pocket-Based Drug Design: Exploring Pocket Space AAPS J. 2013, 15, 228 241
  18. 18
    Amaro, R. E.; Swift, R. V.; Votapka, L.; Li, W. W.; Walker, R. C.; Bush, R. M. Mechanism of 150-cavity formation in influenza neuraminidase Nat. Commun. 2011, 2, 388
  19. 19
    Baron, R.; Vellore, N. A. LSD1/CoREST is an allosteric nanoscale clamp regulated by H3-histone-tail molecular recognition Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2012, 109, 12509 12514
  20. 20
    Fuchs, J. E.; Huber, R. G.; Von Grafenstein, S.; Wallnoefer, H. G.; Spitzer, G. M.; Fuchs, D.; Liedl, K. R. Dynamic Regulation of Phenylalanine Hydroxylase by Simulated Redox Manipulation PLoS One 2012, 7, e53005
  21. 21
    Sinko, W.; de Oliveira, C.; Williams, S.; Van Wynsberghe, A.; Durrant, J. D.; Cao, R.; Oldfield, E.; McCammon, J. A. Applying Molecular Dynamics Simulations to Identify Rarely Sampled Ligand-bound Conformational States of Undecaprenyl Pyrophosphate Synthase, an Antibacterial Target Chem. Biol. Drug Des. 2011, 77, 412 420
  22. 22
    Lindert, S.; McCammon, J. A. Dynamics of Plasmodium falciparum enoyl-ACP reductase and implications on drug discovery Protein Sci. 2012, 21, 1734 1745
  23. 23
    Boechi, L.; de Oliveira, C. A.; Da Fonseca, I.; Kizjakina, K.; Sobrado, P.; Tanner, J. J.; McCammon, J. A. Substrate-dependent dynamics of UDP-galactopyranose mutase: Implications for drug design Protein Sci. 2013, 22, 1490 1501
  24. 24
    Wu, Y.; Qin, G. R.; Gao, F.; Liu, Y.; Vavricka, C. J.; Qi, J. X.; Jiang, H. L.; Yu, K. Q.; Gao, G. F. Induced opening of influenza virus neuraminidase N2 150-loop suggests an important role in inhibitor binding Sci. Rep. 2013, 3, 1551
  25. 25
    Han, N. Y.; Mu, Y. G. Plasticity of 150-Loop in Influenza Neuraminidase Explored by Hamiltonian Replica Exchange Molecular Dynamics Simulations PLoS One 2013, 8, e60995
  26. 26
    Schultes, S.; Nijmeijer, S.; Engelhardt, H.; Kooistra, A. J.; Vischer, H. F.; de Esch, I. J. P.; Haaksma, E. E. J.; Leurs, R.; de Graaf, C. Mapping histamine H-4 receptor-ligand binding modes MedChemComm 2013, 4, 193 204
  27. 27
    Li, P.; Chen, Z.; Xu, H.; Sun, H.; Li, H.; Liu, H.; Yang, H.; Gao, Z.; Jiang, H.; Li, M. The gating charge pathway of an epilepsy-associated potassium channel accommodates chemical ligands Cell Res. 2013, 23, 1106 1118
  28. 28
    Kekenes-Huskey, P. M.; Metzger, V. T.; Grant, B. J.; McCammon, J. A. Calcium binding and allosteric signaling mechanisms for the sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ATPase Protein Sci. 2012, 21, 1429 1443
  29. 29
    Bung, N.; Pradhan, M.; Srinivasan, H.; Bulusu, G. Structural Insights into E. coli Porphobilinogen Deaminase during Synthesis and Exit of 1-Hydroxymethylbilane PLoS Comput. Biol. 2014, 10, e1003484
  30. 30
    Torres, R.; Swift, R. V.; Chim, N.; Wheatley, N.; Lan, B. S.; Atwood, B. R.; Pujol, C.; Sankaran, B.; Bliska, J. B.; Amaro, R. E.; Goulding, C. W. Biochemical, Structural and Molecular Dynamics Analyses of the Potential Virulence Factor RipA from Yersinia pestis PLoS One 2011, 6, e25084
  31. 31
    Grant, B. J.; Lukman, S.; Hocker, H. J.; Sayyah, J.; Brown, J. H.; McCammon, J. A.; Gorfe, A. A. Novel Allosteric Sites on Ras for Lead Generation PLoS One 2011, 6, e25711
  32. 32
    Mowrey, D. D.; Liu, Q.; Bondarenko, V.; Chen, Q.; Seyoum, E.; Xu, Y.; Wu, J.; Tang, P. Insights into Distinct Modulation of alpha 7 and alpha 7 beta 2 Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors by the Volatile Anesthetic Isoflurane J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288, 35793 35800
  33. 33
    Yi-Xin, A.; Jun-Rui, L.; Chun-Wei, X.; Jiang-Bei, M.; Xu-Yun, Y.; He, Z. Simulated Mechanism of Triclosan in Modulating the Active Site and Loop of FabI by Computer Acta Phys.-Chim. Sin. 2014, 30, 559 568
  34. 34
    Blachly, P. G.; de Oliveira, C. A. F.; Williams, S. L.; McCammon, J. A. Utilizing a Dynamical Description of IspH to Aid in the Development of Novel Antimicrobial Drugs PLoS Comput. Biol. 2013, 9, e1003395
  35. 35
    Demir, O.; Amaro, R. E. Elements of Nucleotide Specificity in the Trypanosoma brucei Mitochondrial RNA Editing Enzyme RET2 J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2012, 52, 1308 1318
  36. 36
    Mowrey, D.; Cheng, M. H.; Liu, L. T.; Willenbring, D.; Lu, X. H.; Wymore, T.; Xu, Y.; Tang, P. Asymmetric Ligand Binding Facilitates Conformational Transitions in Pentameric Ligand-Gated Ion Channels J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 2172 2180
  37. 37
    Bustamante, J. P.; Abbruzzetti, S.; Marcelli, A.; Gauto, D.; Boechi, L.; Bonamore, A.; Boffi, A.; Bruno, S.; Feis, A.; Foggi, P.; Estrin, D. A.; Viappiani, C. Ligand Uptake Modulation by Internal Water Molecules and Hydrophobic Cavities in Hemoglobins J. Phys. Chem. B 2014, 118, 1234 1245
  38. 38
    Selvam, B.; Porter, S. L.; Tikhonova, I. G. Addressing Selective Polypharmacology of Antipsychotic Drugs Targeting the Bioaminergic Receptors through Receptor Dynamic Conformational Ensembles J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2013, 53, 1761 1774
  39. 39
    Weinreb, V.; Li, L.; Chandrasekaran, S. N.; Koehl, P.; Delarue, M.; Carter, C. W., Jr. Enhanced Amino Acid Selection in Fully Evolved Tryptophanyl-tRNA Synthetase, Relative to Its Urzyme, Requires Domain Motion Sensed by the D1 Switch, a Remote Dynamic Packing Motif J. Biol. Chem. 2014, 289, 4367 4376
  40. 40
    Li, J. N.; Jonsson, A. L.; Beuming, T.; Shelley, J. C.; Voth, G. A. Ligand-Dependent Activation and Deactivation of the Human Adenosine A(2A) Receptor J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 8749 8759
  41. 41
    Baron, R.; McCammon, J. A. Molecular Recognition and Ligand Association Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 2013, 64, 151 175
  42. 42
    Ariga, K.; Ito, H.; Hill, J. P.; Tsukube, H. Molecular recognition: from solution science to nano/materials technology Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 5800 5835
  43. 43
    Kahraman, A.; Morris, R. J.; Laskowski, R. A.; Thornton, J. M. Shape variation in protein binding pockets and their ligands J. Mol. Biol. 2007, 368, 283 301
  44. 44
    Seddon, G.; Lounnas, V.; McGuire, R.; van den Bergh, T.; Bywater, R. P.; Oliveira, L.; Vriend, G. Drug design for ever, from hype to hope J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 2012, 26, 137 150
  45. 45
    Meng, X. Y.; Zhang, H. X.; Mezei, M.; Cui, M. Molecular Docking: A Powerful Approach for Structure-Based Drug Discovery Curr. Comput.-Aided Drug Des. 2011, 7, 146 157
  46. 46
    Golbraikh, A.; Wang, X. S.; Zhu, H.; Tropsha, A. Predictive QSAR Modeling: Methods and Applications in Drug Discovery and Chemical Risk Assessment. In Handbook of Computational Chemistry; Leszczynski, J., Ed.; Springer: Dordrecht, Netherlands, 2012; pp 1309 1342.
  47. 47
    Liang, J.; Edelsbrunner, H.; Woodward, C. Anatomy of protein pockets and cavities: measurement of binding site geometry and implications for ligand design Protein Sci. 1998, 7, 1884 1897
  48. 48
    Rush, T. S.; Grant, J. A.; Mosyak, L.; Nicholls, A. A shape-based 3-D scaffold hopping method and its application to a bacterial protein-protein interaction J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48, 1489 1495
  49. 49
    Wirth, M.; Volkamer, A.; Zoete, V.; Rippmann, F.; Michielin, O.; Rarey, M.; Sauer, W. H. B. Protein pocket and ligand shape comparison and its application in virtual screening J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 2013, 27, 511 524
  50. 50
    Hawkins, P. C. D.; Skillman, A. G.; Nicholls, A. Comparison of shape-matching and docking as virtual screening tools J. Med. Chem. 2007, 50, 74 82
  51. 51
    Distinto, S.; Esposito, F.; Kirchmair, J.; Cardia, M. C.; Gaspari, M.; Maccioni, E.; Alcaro, S.; Markt, P.; Wolber, G.; Zinzula, L.; Tramontano, E. Identification of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase dual inhibitors by a combined shape-, 2D-fingerprint- and pharmacophore-based virtual screening approach Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2012, 50, 216 229
  52. 52
    LaLonde, J. M.; Elban, M. A.; Courter, J. R.; Sugawara, A.; Soeta, T.; Madani, N.; Princiotto, A. M.; Do Kwon, Y.; Kwong, P. D.; Schon, A.; Freire, E.; Sodroski, J.; Smith, A. B. Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of small molecule inhibitors of CD4-gp120 binding based on virtual screening Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2011, 19, 91 101
  53. 53
    Tuccinardi, T.; Ortore, G.; Santos, M. A.; Marques, S. M.; Nuti, E.; Rossello, A.; Martinelli, A. Multitemplate Alignment Method for the Development of a Reliable 3D-QSAR Model for the Analysis of MMP3 Inhibitors J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2009, 49, 1715 1724
  54. 54
    Nicholls, A.; McGaughey, G. B.; Sheridan, R. P.; Good, A. C.; Warren, G.; Mathieu, M.; Muchmore, S. W.; Brown, S. P.; Grant, J. A.; Haigh, J. A.; Nevins, N.; Jain, A. N.; Kelley, B. Molecular Shape and Medicinal Chemistry: A Perspective J. Med. Chem. 2010, 53, 3862 3886
  55. 55
    Osguthorpe, D. J.; Sherman, W.; Hagler, A. T. Exploring Protein Flexibility: Incorporating Structural Ensembles From Crystal Structures and Simulation into Virtual Screening Protocols J. Phys. Chem. B 2012, 116, 6952 6959
  56. 56
    Osguthorpe, D. J.; Sherman, W.; Hagler, A. T. Generation of Receptor Structural Ensembles for Virtual Screening Using Binding Site Shape Analysis and Clustering Chem. Biol. Drug Des. 2012, 80, 182 193
  57. 57
    Ben Nasr, N.; Guillemain, H.; Lagarde, N.; Zagury, J. F.; Montes, M. Multiple Structures for Virtual Ligand Screening: Defining Binding Site Properties-Based Criteria to Optimize the Selection of the Query J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2013, 53, 293 311
  58. 58
    Nichols, S. E.; Swift, R. V.; Amaro, R. E. Rational Prediction with Molecular Dynamics for Hit Identification Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2012, 12, 2002 2012
  59. 59
    Ascher, D.; Dubois, P. F.; Hinsen, K.; James, J. H.; Oliphant, T. Numerical Python; UCRL-MA-128569 ed.; Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory: Livermore, CA, 1999.
  60. 60
    Dubois, P. F. Extending Python with Fortran Comput. Sci. Eng. 1999, 1, 66 73
  61. 61
    Jones, E.; Oliphant, T.; Peterson, P. Others SciPy: Open Source Scientific Tools for Python, 0.11.0; 2001.
  62. 62
    Oliphant, T. E. Guide to NumPy; Brigham Young University: Provo, UT, 2006.
  63. 63
    Peterson, P. F2PY: a tool for connecting Fortran and Python programs Int. J. Comput. Sci. Eng. 2009, 4, 296 305
  64. 64
    Humphrey, W.; Dalke, A.; Schulten, K. VMD: visual molecular dynamics J. Mol. Graphics 1996, 14, 33 38
  65. 65
    Akl, S. G.; Toussaint, G. T. In Efficient convex hull algorithms for pattern recognition applications, Proc. 4th. Int. Joint Conf. on Pattern Recognition (Kyoto, Japan), 1978; pp 483 487.
  66. 66
    Deng, J.; Schnaufer, A.; Salavati, R.; Stuart, K. D.; Hol, W. G. High resolution crystal structure of a key editosome enzyme from Trypanosoma brucei: RNA editing ligase 1 J. Mol. Biol. 2004, 343, 601 613
  67. 67
    Hornak, V.; Abel, R.; Okur, A.; Strockbine, B.; Roitberg, A.; Simmerling, C. Comparison of multiple Amber force fields and development of improved protein backbone parameters Proteins 2006, 65, 712 725
  68. 68
    Horn, H. W.; Swope, W. C.; Pitera, J. W.; Madura, J. D.; Dick, T. J.; Hura, G. L.; Head-Gordon, T. Development of an improved four-site water model for biomolecular simulations: TIP4P-Ew J. Chem. Phys. 2004, 120, 9665 9678
  69. 69
    Meagher, K. L.; Redman, L. T.; Carlson, H. A. Development of polyphosphate parameters for use with the AMBER force field J. Comput. Chem. 2003, 24, 1016 1025
  70. 70
    Allner, O.; Nilsson, L.; Villa, A. Magnesium Ion-Water Coordination and Exchange in Biomolecular Simulations J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2012, 8, 1493 1502
  71. 71
    Joung, I. S.; Cheatham, T. E. Determination of alkali and halide monovalent ion parameters for use in explicitly solvated biomolecular simulations J. Phys. Chem. B 2008, 112, 9020 9041
  72. 72
    Kale, L.; Skeel, R.; Bhandarkar, M.; Brunner, R.; Gursoy, A.; Krawetz, N.; Phillips, J.; Shinozaki, A.; Varadarajan, K.; Schulten, K. NAMD2: greater scalability for parallel molecular dynamics J. Comput. Phys. 1999, 151, 283 312
  73. 73
    Phillips, J. C.; Braun, R.; Wang, W.; Gumbart, J.; Tajkhorshid, E.; Villa, E.; Chipot, C.; Skeel, R. D.; Kale, L.; Schulten, K. Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD J. Comput. Chem. 2005, 26, 1781 1802
  74. 74
    Shipman, J. W. Tkinter reference: a GUI for Python; New Mexico Tech Computer Center: Socorro, NM, 2010.
  75. 75
    Welch, B. B.; Jones, K. Practical programming in Tcl/Tk, 4th ed.; Prentice Hall/PTR: Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2003.
  76. 76
    Schnaufer, A.; Panigrahi, A. K.; Panicucci, B.; Igo, R. P., Jr.; Salavati, R.; Stuart, K. An RNA Ligase Essential for RNA Editing and Survival of the Bloodstream Form of Trypanosoma brucei Science 2001, 291, 2159 2162
  77. 77
    Rusche, L. N.; Huang, C. E.; Piller, K. J.; Hemann, M.; Wirtz, E.; Sollner-Webb, B. The two RNA ligases of the Trypanosoma brucei RNA editing complex: cloning the essential band IV gene and identifying the band V gene Mol. Cell. Biol. 2001, 21, 979 989
  78. 78
    Durrant, J. D.; Hall, L.; Swift, R. V.; Landon, M.; Schnaufer, A.; Amaro, R. E. Novel Naphthalene-Based Inhibitors of Trypanosoma brucei RNA Editing Ligase 1 PLoS Neglected Trop. Dis. 2010, 4, e803
  79. 79
    Durrant, J. D.; Friedman, A. J.; McCammon, J. A. CrystalDock: a novel approach to fragment-based drug design J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2011, 51, 2573 2580
  80. 80
    Craig, I. R.; Pfleger, C.; Gohlke, H.; Essex, J. W.; Spiegel, K. Pocket-Space Maps To Identify Novel Binding-Site Conformations in Proteins J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2011, 51, 2666 2679
  81. 81
    Ghersi, D.; Sanchez, R. Beyond structural genomics: computational approaches for the identification of ligand binding sites in protein structures J. Struct. Funct. Genomics 2011, 12, 109 117
  82. 82
    Perot, S.; Sperandio, O.; Miteva, M. A.; Camproux, A. C.; Villoutreix, B. O. Druggable pockets and binding site centric chemical space: a paradigm shift in drug discovery Drug Discovery Today 2010, 15, 656 667
  83. 83
    Paramo, T.; East, A.; Garzon, D.; Ulmschneider, M. B.; Bond, P. J. Efficient Characterization of Protein Cavities within Molecular Simulation Trajectories: trj_cavity J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2014, 10, 2151 2164
  84. 84
    Hendlich, M.; Rippmann, F.; Barnickel, G. LIGSITE: Automatic and efficient detection of potential small molecule-binding sites in proteins J. Mol. Graphics Modell. 1997, 15, 359 363
  85. 85
    Stahl, M.; Taroni, C.; Schneider, G. Mapping of protein surface cavities and prediction of enzyme class by a self-organizing neural network Protein Eng. 2000, 13, 83 88
  86. 86
    Barber, C. B.; Dobkin, D. P.; Huhdanpaa, H. The Quickhull algorithm for convex hulls ACM Trans. Math. Software 1996, 22, 469 483

Cited By

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article is cited by 186 publications.

  1. Ledong Zhu, Guochao Xu, Qingzhu Zhang, Guoqiang Wang, Wenxing Wang, Qiao Wang. Semirational Design Strategy To Enhance the Thermostability and Catalytic Activity of Cytochrome P450 105D7 for the Degradation of the Pharmaceutically Active Compounds: Diclofenac. Environmental Science & Technology 2024, 58 (35) , 15681-15690. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c10482
  2. Christian Seitz, Surl-Hee Ahn, Haixin Wei, Matson Kyte, Gregory M. Cook, Kurt L. Krause, J. Andrew McCammon. Targeting Tuberculosis: Novel Scaffolds for Inhibiting Cytochrome bd Oxidase. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 2024, 64 (13) , 5232-5241. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.4c00344
  3. Nan Lv, Zexing Cao. Subpocket-Based Analysis Approach for the Protein Pocket Dynamics. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 2024, 20 (11) , 4909-4920. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.4c00476
  4. Stefano Bosio, Mattia Bernetti, Walter Rocchia, Matteo Masetti. Similarities and Differences in Ligand Binding to Protein and RNA Targets: The Case of Riboflavin. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 2024, 64 (11) , 4570-4586. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.4c00420
  5. Ying Zheng, Nianhang Chen, Zhongju Ji, Qiongyu Ye, Pingping Huang, Xiaodie Chen, Guanghong Cui, Lixin Duan, Fan Zhang. Adjusting Catalytic Activity of β-Amyrin Synthase GgBAS by Utilizing the Plasticity Residues of an Active Site. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 2024, 64 (9) , 3933-3941. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.4c00297
  6. Hong Ha Nguyen, Jim Tufts, David D. L. Minh. On Inactivation of the Coronavirus Main Protease. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 2024, 64 (5) , 1644-1656. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.3c01518
  7. Rahul Dani, Westley Pawloski, Dhruv Kumar Chaurasiya, Nonavinakere Seetharam Srilatha, Sonal Agarwal, David Fushman, Athi N. Naganathan. Conformational Tuning Shapes the Balance between Functional Promiscuity and Specialization in Paralogous Plasmodium Acyl-CoA Binding Proteins. Biochemistry 2023, 62 (20) , 2982-2996. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biochem.3c00449
  8. João V. S. Guerra, Luiz F. G. Alves, Didier Bourissou, Paulo S. Lopes-de-Oliveira, György Szalóki. Cavity Characterization in Supramolecular Cages. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 2023, 63 (12) , 3772-3785. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.3c00328
  9. Xiaoyue Ji, Xiaochen Cui, Zhengxin Li, Taeyoung Choi, Ying Wang, Wen Xiao, Yunshuo Zhao, Jinyin Zha, Jian Zhang, Hai-Feng Chen, Zhengtian Yu. Research and Evaluation of the Allosteric Protein-Specific Force Field Based on a Pre-Training Deep Learning Model. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 2023, 63 (8) , 2456-2468. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.2c01369
  10. Daniel G. Droege, A. Leila Parker, Griffin M. Milligan, Robert Jenkins, Timothy C. Johnstone. Synthesis and Functionalization of Challenging meso-Substituted Aryl Bis-pocket Porphyrins Accessed via Suzuki–Miyaura Cross-Coupling. The Journal of Organic Chemistry 2022, 87 (17) , 11783-11795. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.joc.2c01538
  11. Zhihua Nie, Pi Liu, Yu Wang, Xuan Guo, Zijian Tan, Jie Shen, Zijing Tang, Jianping Lin, Jibin Sun, Ping Zheng, Leilei Zhu. Directed Evolution and Rational Design of Mechanosensitive Channel MscCG2 for Improved Glutamate Excretion Efficiency. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 2021, 69 (51) , 15660-15669. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.1c07086
  12. Xuan Wu, Yu Chen, Xin Wang, Wanqing Wei, Yong Liang. Origin of Site Selectivity in Toluene Hydroxylation by Cytochrome P450 Enzymes. The Journal of Organic Chemistry 2021, 86 (19) , 13768-13773. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.joc.1c01295
  13. Yuma Goto, Shun Omagari, Ryuma Sato, Takuya Yamakado, Ryo Achiwa, Nilanjan Dey, Kensuke Suga, Martin Vacha, Shohei Saito. Dynamic Polymer Free Volume Monitored by Single-Molecule Spectroscopy of a Dual Fluorescent Flapping Dopant. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2021, 143 (35) , 14306-14313. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.1c06428
  14. Terra Sztain, Rommie Amaro, J. Andrew McCammon. Elucidation of Cryptic and Allosteric Pockets within the SARS-CoV-2 Main Protease. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 2021, 61 (7) , 3495-3501. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.1c00140
  15. Daniel J. Evans, Remy A. Yovanno, Sanim Rahman, David W. Cao, Morgan Q. Beckett, Milan H. Patel, Afif F. Bandak, Albert Y. Lau. Finding Druggable Sites in Proteins Using TACTICS. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 2021, 61 (6) , 2897-2910. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.1c00204
  16. Michel F. Sanner, Khalid Zoghebi, Samara Hanna, Saghar Mozaffari, Simin Rahighi, Rakesh K. Tiwari, Keykavous Parang. Cyclic Peptides as Protein Kinase Inhibitors: Structure–Activity Relationship and Molecular Modeling. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 2021, 61 (6) , 3015-3026. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.1c00320
  17. Sandra Codony, Carla Calvó-Tusell, Elena Valverde, Sílvia Osuna, Christophe Morisseau, M. Isabel Loza, José Brea, Concepción Pérez, María Isabel Rodríguez-Franco, Javier Pizarro-Delgado, Rubén Corpas, Christian Griñán-Ferré, Mercè Pallàs, Coral Sanfeliu, Manuel Vázquez-Carrera, Bruce D. Hammock, Ferran Feixas, Santiago Vázquez. From the Design to the In Vivo Evaluation of Benzohomoadamantane-Derived Soluble Epoxide Hydrolase Inhibitors for the Treatment of Acute Pancreatitis. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2021, 64 (9) , 5429-5446. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.0c01601
  18. Mrityunjay Singh, Mitul Srivastava, Sharad R. Wakode, Shailendra Asthana. Elucidation of Structural Determinants Delineates the Residues Playing Key Roles in Differential Dynamics and Selective Inhibition of Sirt1–3. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 2021, 61 (3) , 1105-1124. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.0c01193
  19. André Fischer, Florian Häuptli, Markus A. Lill, Martin Smieško. Computational Assessment of Combination Therapy of Androgen Receptor-Targeting Compounds. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 2021, 61 (2) , 1001-1009. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.0c01194
  20. André Fischer, Gabriela Frehner, Markus A. Lill, Martin Smieško. Conformational Changes of Thyroid Receptors in Response to Antagonists. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 2021, 61 (2) , 1010-1019. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.0c01403
  21. Ryan H. B. Smith, Zaigham M. Khan, Peter Man-Un Ung, Alex P. Scopton, Lisa Silber, Seshat M. Mack, Alexander M. Real, Avner Schlessinger, Arvin C. Dar. Type II Binders Targeting the “GLR-Out” Conformation of the Pseudokinase STRADα. Biochemistry 2021, 60 (4) , 289-302. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biochem.0c00714
  22. Zi-Jing Zhao, Xin-Ying Gao, Jia-Cheng Zeng, Shao-Long Zhang, Xian-Mai Meng, Yan-Jun Shen, Xie-Huang Sheng. Theoretical Insights into the Cotransport Mechanism of GSH with Anticancer Drugs by MRP1. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 2020, 124 (44) , 9803-9811. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.0c06662
  23. Jingyuan Zhuang, Fan Zhang, Jingwei Zhou, Wenbin Deng, Ruibo Wu. Residue-Orientation-Dependent Dynamics and Selectivity of Active Pocket in Microbe Class I Terpene Cyclases. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 2020, 60 (10) , 4985-4994. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00159
  24. Sandra Codony, Eugènia Pujol, Javier Pizarro, Ferran Feixas, Elena Valverde, M. Isabel Loza, José M. Brea, Elena Saez, Julen Oyarzabal, Antonio Pineda-Lucena, Belén Pérez, Concepción Pérez, María Isabel Rodríguez-Franco, Rosana Leiva, Sílvia Osuna, Christophe Morisseau, Bruce D. Hammock, Manuel Vázquez-Carrera, Santiago Vázquez. 2-Oxaadamant-1-yl Ureas as Soluble Epoxide Hydrolase Inhibitors: In Vivo Evaluation in a Murine Model of Acute Pancreatitis. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 2020, 63 (17) , 9237-9257. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.0c00310
  25. Guido Todde, Ran Friedman. Pattern and Dynamics of FLT3 Duplications. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 2020, 60 (8) , 4005-4020. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00544
  26. Dimitris Gazgalis, Mehreen Zaka, Bilal Haider Abbasi, Diomedes E. Logothetis, Mihaly Mezei, Meng Cui. Protein Binding Pocket Optimization for Virtual High-Throughput Screening (vHTS) Drug Discovery. ACS Omega 2020, 5 (24) , 14297-14307. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.0c00522
  27. Jacob D. Durrant, Sarah E. Kochanek, Lorenzo Casalino, Pek U. Ieong, Abigail C. Dommer, Rommie E. Amaro. Mesoscale All-Atom Influenza Virus Simulations Suggest New Substrate Binding Mechanism. ACS Central Science 2020, 6 (2) , 189-196. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscentsci.9b01071
  28. Alexander J. Bryer, Jodi A. Hadden-Perilla, John E. Stone, Juan R. Perilla. High-Performance Analysis of Biomolecular Containers to Measure Small-Molecule Transport, Transbilayer Lipid Diffusion, and Protein Cavities. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 2019, 59 (10) , 4328-4338. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.9b00324
  29. Emilia P. Barros, Jamie M. Schiffer, Anastassia Vorobieva, Jiayi Dou, David Baker, Rommie E. Amaro. Improving the Efficiency of Ligand-Binding Protein Design with Molecular Dynamics Simulations. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 2019, 15 (10) , 5703-5715. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.9b00483
  30. Damien Monet, Nathan Desdouits, Michael Nilges, Arnaud Blondel. mkgridXf: Consistent Identification of Plausible Binding Sites Despite the Elusive Nature of Cavities and Grooves in Protein Dynamics. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 2019, 59 (8) , 3506-3518. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.9b00103
  31. Sami T. Kurkinen, Sakari Lätti, Olli T. Pentikäinen, Pekka A. Postila. Getting Docking into Shape Using Negative Image-Based Rescoring. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 2019, 59 (8) , 3584-3599. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.9b00383
  32. Ana R. Calixto, Cátia Moreira, Anna Pabis, Carsten Kötting, Klaus Gerwert, Till Rudack, Shina C.L. Kamerlin. GTP Hydrolysis Without an Active Site Base: A Unifying Mechanism for Ras and Related GTPases. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2019, 141 (27) , 10684-10701. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.9b03193
  33. Guido Todde, Ran Friedman. Activation and Inactivation of the FLT3 Kinase: Pathway Intermediates and the Free Energy of Transition. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 2019, 123 (26) , 5385-5394. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.9b01567
  34. Jeffrey R. Wagner, Özlem Demir, Michael A. Carpenter, Hideki Aihara, Daniel A. Harki, Reuben S. Harris, Rommie E. Amaro. Determinants of Oligonucleotide Selectivity of APOBEC3B. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 2019, 59 (5) , 2264-2273. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.8b00427
  35. Rodrigo Cossio-Pérez, Gustavo Pierdominici-Sottile, Pablo Sobrado, Juliana Palma. Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Substrate Release from Trypanosoma cruzi UDP-Galactopyranose Mutase. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 2019, 59 (2) , 809-817. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.8b00675
  36. Ge Qu, Mingxing Fu, Lili Zhao, Beibei Liu, Pi Liu, Wenchao Fan, Jun-An Ma, Zhoutong Sun. Computational Insights into the Catalytic Mechanism of Bacterial Carboxylic Acid Reductase. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 2019, 59 (2) , 832-841. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.8b00763
  37. Yonca Ural-Blimke, Ali Flayhan, Jan Strauss, Vasileios Rantos, Kim Bartels, Rolf Nielsen, Els Pardon, Jan Steyaert, Jan Kosinski, Esben M. Quistgaard, Christian Löw. Structure of Prototypic Peptide Transporter DtpA from E. coli in Complex with Valganciclovir Provides Insights into Drug Binding of Human PepT1. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2019, 141 (6) , 2404-2412. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.8b11343
  38. Clarisse G. Ricci, J. Andrew McCammon. Heterogeneous Solvation in Distinctive Protein–Protein Interfaces Revealed by Molecular Dynamics Simulations. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 2018, 122 (49) , 11695-11701. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.8b07773
  39. Tavina L. Offutt, Pek U. Ieong, Özlem Demir, Rommie E. Amaro. Dynamics and Molecular Mechanisms of p53 Transcriptional Activation. Biochemistry 2018, 57 (46) , 6528-6537. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biochem.8b01005
  40. Pengfei Li, Alexander V. Soudackov, Sharon Hammes-Schiffer. Impact of Mutations on the Binding Pocket of Soybean Lipoxygenase: Implications for Proton-Coupled Electron Transfer. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 2018, 9 (22) , 6444-6449. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.8b02945
  41. Lingyun Wang, Feng Yan. Trans and Cis Conformations of the Antihypertensive Drug Valsartan Respectively Lock the Inactive and Active-like States of Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor: A Molecular Dynamics Study. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 2018, 58 (10) , 2123-2130. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.8b00364
  42. André Fischer, Charleen G. Don, Martin Smieško. Molecular Dynamics Simulations Reveal Structural Differences among Allelic Variants of Membrane-Anchored Cytochrome P450 2D6. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 2018, 58 (9) , 1962-1975. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.8b00080
  43. Bing Xie, John D. Clark, David D. L. Minh. Efficiency of Stratification for Ensemble Docking Using Reduced Ensembles. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 2018, 58 (9) , 1915-1925. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.8b00314
  44. Fu-Long Li, Xu-Dong Kong, Qi Chen, Yu-Cong Zheng, Qin Xu, Fei-Fei Chen, Li-Qiang Fan, Guo-Qiang Lin, Jiahai Zhou, Hui-Lei Yu, Jian-He Xu. Regioselectivity Engineering of Epoxide Hydrolase: Near-Perfect Enantioconvergence through a Single Site Mutation. ACS Catalysis 2018, 8 (9) , 8314-8317. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.8b02622
  45. Yao Nie, Shanshan Wang, Yan Xu, Shenggan Luo, Yi-Lei Zhao, Rong Xiao, Gaetano T. Montelione, John F. Hunt, Thomas Szyperski. Enzyme Engineering Based on X-ray Structures and Kinetic Profiling of Substrate Libraries: Alcohol Dehydrogenases for Stereospecific Synthesis of a Broad Range of Chiral Alcohols. ACS Catalysis 2018, 8 (6) , 5145-5152. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.8b00364
  46. Ting Shi, Lanxuan Liu, Wentao Tao, Shenggan Luo, Shuobing Fan, Xiao-Lei Wang, Linquan Bai, Yi-Lei Zhao. Theoretical Studies on the Catalytic Mechanism and Substrate Diversity for Macrocyclization of Pikromycin Thioesterase. ACS Catalysis 2018, 8 (5) , 4323-4332. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.8b01156
  47. Fangfang Fan, Nanhao Chen, Yongheng Wang, Ruibo Wu, and Zexing Cao . QM/MM and MM MD Simulations on the Pyrimidine-Specific Nucleoside Hydrolase: A Comprehensive Understanding of Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Uridine. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 2018, 122 (3) , 1121-1131. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.7b10524
  48. Zhoutong Sun, Lian Wu, Marco Bocola, H. C. Stephen Chan, Richard Lonsdale, Xu-Dong Kong, Shuguang Yuan, Jiahai Zhou, and Manfred T. Reetz . Structural and Computational Insight into the Catalytic Mechanism of Limonene Epoxide Hydrolase Mutants in Stereoselective Transformations. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2018, 140 (1) , 310-318. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.7b10278
  49. Claire Colas, Masayuki Masuda, Kazuaki Sugio, Seiji Miyauchi, Yongjun Hu, David E. Smith, and Avner Schlessinger . Chemical Modulation of the Human Oligopeptide Transporter 1, hPepT1. Molecular Pharmaceutics 2017, 14 (12) , 4685-4693. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.7b00775
  50. Giuseppina La Sala, Sergio Decherchi, Marco De Vivo, and Walter Rocchia . Allosteric Communication Networks in Proteins Revealed through Pocket Crosstalk Analysis. ACS Central Science 2017, 3 (9) , 949-960. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscentsci.7b00211
  51. Jeffrey R. Wagner, Jesper Sørensen, Nathan Hensley, Celia Wong, Clare Zhu, Taylor Perison, and Rommie E. Amaro . POVME 3.0: Software for Mapping Binding Pocket Flexibility. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 2017, 13 (9) , 4584-4592. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.7b00500
  52. Stefan G. Krimmer, Jonathan Cramer, Johannes Schiebel, Andreas Heine, and Gerhard Klebe . How Nothing Boosts Affinity: Hydrophobic Ligand Binding to the Virtually Vacated S1′ Pocket of Thermolysin. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2017, 139 (30) , 10419-10431. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.7b05028
  53. Stefano Motta and Laura Bonati . Modeling Binding with Large Conformational Changes: Key Points in Ensemble-Docking Approaches. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 2017, 57 (7) , 1563-1578. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.7b00125
  54. Lane W. Votapka, Benjamin R. Jagger, Alexandra L. Heyneman, and Rommie E. Amaro . SEEKR: Simulation Enabled Estimation of Kinetic Rates, A Computational Tool to Estimate Molecular Kinetics and Its Application to Trypsin–Benzamidine Binding. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 2017, 121 (15) , 3597-3606. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.6b09388
  55. Tavina L. Offutt, Robert V. Swift, and Rommie E. Amaro . Enhancing Virtual Screening Performance of Protein Kinases with Molecular Dynamics Simulations. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 2016, 56 (10) , 1923-1935. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.6b00261
  56. Peter Man-Un Ung, Wenxin Song, Lili Cheng, Xinbin Zhao, Hailin Hu, Ligong Chen, and Avner Schlessinger . Inhibitor Discovery for the Human GLUT1 from Homology Modeling and Virtual Screening. ACS Chemical Biology 2016, 11 (7) , 1908-1916. https://doi.org/10.1021/acschembio.6b00304
  57. Jeffrey R. Wagner, Christopher T. Lee, Jacob D. Durrant, Robert D. Malmstrom, Victoria A. Feher, and Rommie E. Amaro . Emerging Computational Methods for the Rational Discovery of Allosteric Drugs. Chemical Reviews 2016, 116 (11) , 6370-6390. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00631
  58. Robert V. Swift, Siti A. Jusoh, Tavina L. Offutt, Eric S. Li, and Rommie E. Amaro . Knowledge-Based Methods To Train and Optimize Virtual Screening Ensembles. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 2016, 56 (5) , 830-842. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.5b00684
  59. Lucía Álvarez, Ariel Lewis-Ballester, Adrián Roitberg, Darío A. Estrin, Syun-Ru Yeh, Marcelo A. Marti, Luciana Capece. Structural Study of a Flexible Active Site Loop in Human Indoleamine 2,3-Dioxygenase and Its Functional Implications. Biochemistry 2016, 55 (19) , 2785-2793. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biochem.6b00077
  60. Kevin K. K. Leung and Brian H. Shilton . Binding of DNA-Intercalating Agents to Oxidized and Reduced Quinone Reductase 2. Biochemistry 2015, 54 (51) , 7438-7448. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biochem.5b00884
  61. Cheng Shang, Chris S. Whittleston, Kyle H. Sutherland-Cash, and David J. Wales . Analysis of the Contrasting Pathogenicities Induced by the D222G Mutation in 1918 and 2009 Pandemic Influenza A Viruses. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 2015, 11 (5) , 2307-2314. https://doi.org/10.1021/ct5010565
  62. Sirish Kaushik Lakkaraju, Wenbo Yu, E. Prabhu Raman, Alena V. Hershfeld, Lei Fang, Deepak A. Deshpande, and Alexander D. MacKerell, Jr. . Mapping Functional Group Free Energy Patterns at Protein Occluded Sites: Nuclear Receptors and G-Protein Coupled Receptors. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 2015, 55 (3) , 700-708. https://doi.org/10.1021/ci500729k
  63. Rajesh Singh, Navjeet Ahalawat, and Rajesh K. Murarka . Activation of Corticotropin-Releasing Factor 1 Receptor: Insights from Molecular Dynamics Simulations. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 2015, 119 (7) , 2806-2817. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp509814n
  64. Paola Moyano-Gómez, Jukka V. Lehtonen, Olli T. Pentikäinen, Pekka A. Postila. Building shape-focused pharmacophore models for effective docking screening. Journal of Cheminformatics 2024, 16 (1) https://doi.org/10.1186/s13321-024-00857-6
  65. Zhi-Zheng Wang, Min-Jie Cao, Junjie Yan, Jin Dong, Mo-Xian Chen, Jing-Fang Yang, Jian-Hong Li, Rui-Ning Ying, Yang-Yang Gao, Li Li, Ya-Nan Leng, Yuan Tian, Kamalani Achala H. Hewage, Rong-Jie Pei, Zhi-You Huang, Ping Yin, Jian-Kang Zhu, Ge-Fei Hao, Guang-Fu Yang. Stabilization of dimeric PYR/PYL/RCAR family members relieves abscisic acid-induced inhibition of seed germination. Nature Communications 2024, 15 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-52426-y
  66. Yiyang Sun, Yinian Tang, Jing Zhou, Bingchen Guo, Feiyan Yuan, Bo Yao, Yang Yu, Chun Li. Computational design of myoglobin-based carbene transferases for monoterpene derivatization. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 2024, 722 , 150160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2024.150160
  67. Baerlike Wujieti, Xinping Feng, Erxia Liu, Deqing Li, Mingtian Hao, Luqi Zhou, Wei Cui. A theoretical study on the activity and selectivity of IDO/TDO inhibitors. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 2024, 26 (23) , 16747-16764. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3CP06036E
  68. A. W. Peshala Amarajeewa, Aslihan Özcan, Alveena Mukhtiar, Xu Ren, Qianyu Wang, Pemra Ozbek, Malgorzata A. Garstka, Onur Serçinoğlu. Polymorphism in F pocket affects peptide selection and stability of type 1 diabetes‐associated HLA‐B39 allotypes. European Journal of Immunology 2024, 163 https://doi.org/10.1002/eji.202350683
  69. Gustavo Avelar Molina, Luis Felipe Santos Mendes, Carlos Alessandro Fuzo, Antonio José Costa‐Filho, Richard John Ward. Mapping secondary substrate‐binding sites on the GH11 xylanase from Bacillus subtilis. FEBS Letters 2024, 598 (3) , 363-376. https://doi.org/10.1002/1873-3468.14799
  70. Anupam Anand Ojha, Lane William Votapka, Rommie Elizabeth Amaro. QMrebind: incorporating quantum mechanical force field reparameterization at the ligand binding site for improved drug-target kinetics through milestoning simulations. Chemical Science 2023, 14 (45) , 13159-13175. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3SC04195F
  71. Arie van Wieren, Jacob D. Durrant, Sudipta Majumdar. Computational and experimental analyses of alanine racemase suggest new avenues for developing allosteric small‐molecule antibiotics. Drug Development Research 2023, 84 (5) , 999-1007. https://doi.org/10.1002/ddr.22068
  72. Zhongbiao Tan, Gang Chen, Silu Chen, Jiaoyang Zhang, Junjie Liu, Xincheng Ma, Hualan Liao, Zhixuan Hu, Feiyin Ge, Fang Ju, Hao Shi, Muhammad Bilal. Engineering lipase at the molecular scale for cleaner biodiesel production - A review. Molecular Catalysis 2023, 546 , 113271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcat.2023.113271
  73. Belal O. Al-Najjar, Fadi G. Saqallah. Unlocking the Conformational Changes of P2Y12: Exploring an Acridinone Compound’s Effect on Receptor Activity and Conformation. Molecules 2023, 28 (9) , 3878. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28093878
  74. Ashish Kumar Agrahari, Mitul Srivastava, Mrityunjay Singh, Shailendra Asthana. SARS-CoV-2 envelope protein attain K ac mediated dynamical interaction network to adopt ‘histone mimic’ at BRD4 interface. Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics 2023, 2007 , 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/07391102.2023.2188430
  75. Ali Rasouli, Qin Yu, Sepehr Dehghani-Ghahnaviyeh, Po-Chao Wen, Julia Kowal, Kaspar P. Locher, Emad Tajkhorshid. Differential dynamics and direct interaction of bound ligands with lipids in multidrug transporter ABCG2. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2023, 120 (1) https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2213437120
  76. Amar Pratap Singh, Rakesh Kumar, Dinesh Gupta. Structural insights into the mechanism of human methyltransferase hPRMT4. Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics 2022, 40 (21) , 10821-10834. https://doi.org/10.1080/07391102.2021.1950567
  77. Jia Duan, Dan-Dan Shen, Tingting Zhao, Shimeng Guo, Xinheng He, Wanchao Yin, Peiyu Xu, Yujie Ji, Li-Nan Chen, Jinyu Liu, Huibing Zhang, Qiufeng Liu, Yi Shi, Xi Cheng, Hualiang Jiang, H. Eric Xu, Yan Zhang, Xin Xie, Yi Jiang. Molecular basis for allosteric agonism and G protein subtype selectivity of galanin receptors. Nature Communications 2022, 13 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-29072-3
  78. Jingjing Wang, Meng Wu, Zhangcheng Chen, Lijie Wu, Tian Wang, Dongmei Cao, Huan Wang, Shenhui Liu, Yueming Xu, Fei Li, Junlin Liu, Na Chen, Suwen Zhao, Jianjun Cheng, Sheng Wang, Tian Hua. The unconventional activation of the muscarinic acetylcholine receptor M4R by diverse ligands. Nature Communications 2022, 13 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-30595-y
  79. Yann Waltenspühl, Janosch Ehrenmann, Santiago Vacca, Cristian Thom, Ohad Medalia, Andreas Plückthun. Structural basis for the activation and ligand recognition of the human oxytocin receptor. Nature Communications 2022, 13 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-31325-0
  80. Àlex L. González, Daniel Fernández-Remacha, José Ignacio Borrell, Jordi Teixidó, Roger Estrada-Tejedor. Cognate RNA-Binding Modes by the Alternative-Splicing Regulator MBNL1 Inferred from Molecular Dynamics. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2022, 23 (24) , 16147. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232416147
  81. Anita Kumari, Lovika Mittal, Mitul Srivastava, Shailendra Asthana. Binding mode characterization of 13b in the monomeric and dimeric states of SARS-CoV-2 main protease using molecular dynamics simulations. Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics 2022, 40 (19) , 9287-9305. https://doi.org/10.1080/07391102.2021.1927844
  82. Vishnu Nayak Badavath, Abhishek Thakur, Deepak Shilkar, Chandrani Nath, Orlando Acevedo, Gulberk Ucar, Venkatesan Jayaprakash. Brain permeable curcumin-based pyrazoline analogs: MAO inhibitory and antioxidant activity. Journal of Molecular Structure 2022, 1268 , 133681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2022.133681
  83. Lingyun Wang, Lingling Wang, Feng Yan. Understanding the molecular mechanism of endothelin ETA receptor selecting isopeptides endothelin-1 and -3. Biophysical Journal 2022, 121 (13) , 2490-2502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2022.06.006
  84. Erich Hellemann, Jennifer L. Walker, Mitchell A. Lesko, Dakshayini G. Chandrashekarappa, Martin C. Schmidt, Allyson F. O’Donnell, Jacob D. Durrant, . Novel mutation in hexokinase 2 confers resistance to 2-deoxyglucose by altering protein dynamics. PLOS Computational Biology 2022, 18 (3) , e1009929. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009929
  85. David Horn, . A profile of research on the parasitic trypanosomatids and the diseases they cause. PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases 2022, 16 (1) , e0010040. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010040
  86. Xinheng He, Jia Duan, Yujie Ji, Lifen Zhao, Hualiang Jiang, Yi Jiang, H. Eric Xu, Xi Cheng. Hinge region mediates signal transmission of luteinizing hormone and chorionic gonadotropin receptor. Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal 2022, 20 , 6503-6511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csbj.2022.11.039
  87. Quynh N. Vo, Paween Mahinthichaichan, Jana Shen, Christopher R. Ellis. How μ-opioid receptor recognizes fentanyl. Nature Communications 2021, 12 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-21262-9
  88. Hyo Jin Gim, Jiyong Park, Michael E. Jung, K. N. Houk. Conformational dynamics of androgen receptors bound to agonists and antagonists. Scientific Reports 2021, 11 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-94707-2
  89. Marius Gonse Zoh, Jean-Marc Bonneville, Jordan Tutagata, Frederic Laporte, Behi K. Fodjo, Chouaibou S. Mouhamadou, Christabelle Gba Sadia, Justin McBeath, Frederic Schmitt, Sebastian Horstmann, Stephane Reynaud, Jean-Philippe David. Experimental evolution supports the potential of neonicotinoid-pyrethroid combination for managing insecticide resistance in malaria vectors. Scientific Reports 2021, 11 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-99061-x
  90. Wei Xiong, Bo Liu, Yujiao Shen, Keju Jing, Thomas R. Savage. Protein engineering design from directed evolution to de novo synthesis. Biochemical Engineering Journal 2021, 174 , 108096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2021.108096
  91. Jiming Chen, Alexandra White, David C. Nelson, Diwakar Shukla. Role of substrate recognition in modulating strigolactone receptor selectivity in witchweed. Journal of Biological Chemistry 2021, 297 (4) , 101092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbc.2021.101092
  92. Qing-Hu Mo, Meng-Qi Yan, Xian-Li Zhou, Qin Luo, Xi-Shan Huang, Cheng-Qin Liang. Phloroglucinol derivatives rhotomensones A-G from Rhodomyrtus tomentosa. Phytochemistry 2021, 190 , 112890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2021.112890
  93. Tao Cai, Hongbing Sun, Jing Qiao, Leilei Zhu, Fan Zhang, Jie Zhang, Zijing Tang, Xinlei Wei, Jiangang Yang, Qianqian Yuan, Wangyin Wang, Xue Yang, Huanyu Chu, Qian Wang, Chun You, Hongwu Ma, Yuanxia Sun, Yin Li, Can Li, Huifeng Jiang, Qinhong Wang, Yanhe Ma. Cell-free chemoenzymatic starch synthesis from carbon dioxide. Science 2021, 373 (6562) , 1523-1527. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abh4049
  94. Yu-ming M. Huang. Multiscale computational study of ligand binding pathways: Case of p38 MAP kinase and its inhibitors. Biophysical Journal 2021, 120 (18) , 3881-3892. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2021.08.026
  95. Juan Huang, Qin Xu, Zhuo Liu, Nitin Jain, Madhusudan Tyagi, Dong-Qing Wei, Liang Hong. Controlling the Substrate Specificity of an Enzyme through Structural Flexibility by Varying the Salt-Bridge Density. Molecules 2021, 26 (18) , 5693. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26185693
  96. Anita Kumari, Lovika Mittal, Mitul Srivastava, Dharam Pal Pathak, Shailendra Asthana. Conformational Characterization of the Co-Activator Binding Site Revealed the Mechanism to Achieve the Bioactive State of FXR. Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences 2021, 8 https://doi.org/10.3389/fmolb.2021.658312
  97. Shan Du, Xin-hua Lu, Wei-Ya Li, Li-Peng Li, Yang-Chun Ma, Liang Zhou, Jing-Wei Wu, Ying Ma, Run-Ling Wang. Exploring the dynamic mechanism of allosteric drug SHP099 inhibiting SHP2E69K. Molecular Diversity 2021, 25 (3) , 1873-1887. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11030-020-10179-y
  98. Jacob O. Spiegel, Bennett Van Houten, Jacob D. Durrant. PARP1: Structural insights and pharmacological targets for inhibition. DNA Repair 2021, 103 , 103125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2021.103125
  99. Cheng-Chia Tang, Christian D Castro Andrade, Maureen J O'Meara, Sung-Hee Yoon, Tadatoshi Sato, Daniel J Brooks, Mary L Bouxsein, Janaina da Silva Martins, Jinhua Wang, Nathanael S Gray, Barbara Misof, Paul Roschger, Stephane Blouin, Klaus Klaushofer, Annegreet Velduis-Vlug, Yosta Vegting, Clifford J Rosen, Daniel O'Connell, Thomas B Sundberg, Ramnik J Xavier, Peter Ung, Avner Schlessinger, Henry M Kronenberg, Rebecca Berdeaux, Marc Foretz, Marc N Wein. Dual targeting of salt inducible kinases and CSF1R uncouples bone formation and bone resorption. eLife 2021, 10 https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.67772
  100. Musa M. Musa, Claire Vieille, Robert S. Phillips. Secondary Alcohol Dehydrogenases from Thermoanaerobacter pseudoethanolicus and Thermoanaerobacter brockii as Robust Catalysts. ChemBioChem 2021, 22 (11) , 1884-1893. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbic.202100043
Load all citations
Open PDF

Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation

Cite this: J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2014, 10, 11, 5047–5056
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/ct500381c
Published September 29, 2014

Copyright © 2014 American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under these Terms of Use.

Article Views

10k

Altmetric

-

Citations

Learn about these metrics

Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.

  • Abstract

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. POVME 2.0 graphical user interface.

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. A graphical summary of the POVME 2.0 algorithm. A) The user defines an inclusion region. B) The user defines an exclusion region. C) The portion of the inclusion region that is not also in the exclusion region is flooded with equidistant points. D) Any of the points that are close to receptor atoms are deleted. E) Any points outside the convex hull are optionally deleted. F) The user can optionally define a contiguous-points region. G) All points that are not contiguous with that region are similarly deleted.

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. Volumetric density maps of the REL1 active site. Some regions of the protein have been removed to facilitate visualization. A) The crystallographic pose of the bound ATP molecule. Crystallographic water molecules indicate the location of a secondary binding pocket that is transiently accessible from the ATP-binding pocket. B) The region of the binding pocket identified as “open” at least 95% of the time when the trajectory was aligned by the active-site Cα atoms. C) The same region when the trajectory was aligned by the Cα atoms of the whole protein. D) The region of the binding pocket identified as “open” at least 25% of the time when the active-site-Cα alignment was again used.

    Figure 4

    Figure 4. POVME 1.0 and 2.0 benchmarks. The graph shows benchmark REL1 pocket volumes as a function of simulation time. POVME 1.0 and 2.0 give nearly the same volume measurements (in black). When the POVME 2.0 convex-hull option is enabled, the volumes are smaller (in gray). The bottom panel, generated using the 1XDN crystal structure, illustrates the difference. When the convex-hull option is enabled, the region of the binding pocket is more accurately captured (solid gray) than when it is deactivated (black wireframe). Some portions of the protein have been removed to facilitate visualization.

  • References


    This article references 86 other publications.

    1. 1
      Perot, S.; Sperandio, O.; Miteva, M. A.; Camproux, A. C.; Villoutreix, B. O. Druggable pockets and binding site centric chemical space: a paradigm shift in drug discovery Drug Discovery Today 2010, 15, 656 667
    2. 2
      Berman, H. M.; Westbrook, J.; Feng, Z.; Gilliland, G.; Bhat, T. N.; Weissig, H.; Shindyalov, I. N.; Bourne, P. E. The Protein Data Bank Nucleic Acids Res. 2000, 28, 235 242
    3. 3
      Levitt, D. G.; Banaszak, L. J. Pocket - a Computer-Graphics Method for Identifying and Displaying Protein Cavities and Their Surrounding Amino-Acids J. Mol. Graphics 1992, 10, 229 234
    4. 4
      Smart, O. S.; Goodfellow, J. M.; Wallace, B. A. The Pore Dimensions of Gramicidin-A Biophys. J. 1993, 65, 2455 2460
    5. 5
      Kleywegt, G. J.; Jones, T. A. Detection, Delineation, Measurement and Display of Cavities in Macromolecular Structures Acta Crystallogr., Sect. D: Biol. Crystallogr. 1994, 50, 178 185
    6. 6
      Laskowski, R. A. Surfnet - a Program for Visualizing Molecular-Surfaces, Cavities, and Intermolecular Interactions J. Mol. Graphics 1995, 13, 323 330
    7. 7
      Durrant, J. D.; de Oliveira, C. A.; McCammon, J. A. POVME: An algorithm for measuring binding-pocket volumes J. Mol. Graphics Modell. 2011, 29, 773 776
    8. 8
      Chovancova, E.; Pavelka, A.; Benes, P.; Strnad, O.; Brezovsky, J.; Kozlikova, B.; Gora, A.; Sustr, V.; Klvana, M.; Medek, P.; Biedermannova, L.; Sochor, J.; Damborsky, J. CAVER 3.0: A Tool for the Analysis of Transport Pathways in Dynamic Protein Structures PLoS Comput. Biol. 2012, 8, e1002708
    9. 9
      Eyrisch, S.; Helms, V. Transient pockets on protein surfaces involved in protein-protein interaction J. Med. Chem. 2007, 50, 3457 3464
    10. 10
      Brady, G. P.; Stouten, P. F. W. Fast prediction and visualization of protein binding pockets with PASS J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 2000, 14, 383 401
    11. 11
      Le Guilloux, V.; Schmidtke, P.; Tuffery, P. Fpocket: An open source platform for ligand pocket detection BMC Bioinf. 2009, 10, 168
    12. 12
      Schmidtke, P.; Bidon-Chanal, A.; Luque, F. J.; Barril, X. MDpocket: open-source cavity detection and characterization on molecular dynamics trajectories Bioinformatics 2011, 27, 3276 3285
    13. 13
      Halgren, T. A. Identifying and Characterizing Binding Sites and Assessing Druggability J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2009, 49, 377 389
    14. 14
      Halgren, T. New method for fast and accurate binding-site identification and analysis Chem. Biol. Drug Des. 2007, 69, 146 148
    15. 15
      Brenke, R.; Kozakov, D.; Chuang, G. Y.; Beglov, D.; Hall, D.; Landon, M. R.; Mattos, C.; Vajda, S. Fragment-based identification of druggable ’hot spots’ of proteins using Fourier domain correlation techniques Bioinformatics 2009, 25, 621 627
    16. 16
      Votapka, L.; Amaro, R. E. Multistructural hot spot characterization with FTProd Bioinformatics 2013, 29, 393 394
    17. 17
      Zheng, X. L.; Gan, L. F.; Wang, E. K.; Wang, J. Pocket-Based Drug Design: Exploring Pocket Space AAPS J. 2013, 15, 228 241
    18. 18
      Amaro, R. E.; Swift, R. V.; Votapka, L.; Li, W. W.; Walker, R. C.; Bush, R. M. Mechanism of 150-cavity formation in influenza neuraminidase Nat. Commun. 2011, 2, 388
    19. 19
      Baron, R.; Vellore, N. A. LSD1/CoREST is an allosteric nanoscale clamp regulated by H3-histone-tail molecular recognition Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2012, 109, 12509 12514
    20. 20
      Fuchs, J. E.; Huber, R. G.; Von Grafenstein, S.; Wallnoefer, H. G.; Spitzer, G. M.; Fuchs, D.; Liedl, K. R. Dynamic Regulation of Phenylalanine Hydroxylase by Simulated Redox Manipulation PLoS One 2012, 7, e53005
    21. 21
      Sinko, W.; de Oliveira, C.; Williams, S.; Van Wynsberghe, A.; Durrant, J. D.; Cao, R.; Oldfield, E.; McCammon, J. A. Applying Molecular Dynamics Simulations to Identify Rarely Sampled Ligand-bound Conformational States of Undecaprenyl Pyrophosphate Synthase, an Antibacterial Target Chem. Biol. Drug Des. 2011, 77, 412 420
    22. 22
      Lindert, S.; McCammon, J. A. Dynamics of Plasmodium falciparum enoyl-ACP reductase and implications on drug discovery Protein Sci. 2012, 21, 1734 1745
    23. 23
      Boechi, L.; de Oliveira, C. A.; Da Fonseca, I.; Kizjakina, K.; Sobrado, P.; Tanner, J. J.; McCammon, J. A. Substrate-dependent dynamics of UDP-galactopyranose mutase: Implications for drug design Protein Sci. 2013, 22, 1490 1501
    24. 24
      Wu, Y.; Qin, G. R.; Gao, F.; Liu, Y.; Vavricka, C. J.; Qi, J. X.; Jiang, H. L.; Yu, K. Q.; Gao, G. F. Induced opening of influenza virus neuraminidase N2 150-loop suggests an important role in inhibitor binding Sci. Rep. 2013, 3, 1551
    25. 25
      Han, N. Y.; Mu, Y. G. Plasticity of 150-Loop in Influenza Neuraminidase Explored by Hamiltonian Replica Exchange Molecular Dynamics Simulations PLoS One 2013, 8, e60995
    26. 26
      Schultes, S.; Nijmeijer, S.; Engelhardt, H.; Kooistra, A. J.; Vischer, H. F.; de Esch, I. J. P.; Haaksma, E. E. J.; Leurs, R.; de Graaf, C. Mapping histamine H-4 receptor-ligand binding modes MedChemComm 2013, 4, 193 204
    27. 27
      Li, P.; Chen, Z.; Xu, H.; Sun, H.; Li, H.; Liu, H.; Yang, H.; Gao, Z.; Jiang, H.; Li, M. The gating charge pathway of an epilepsy-associated potassium channel accommodates chemical ligands Cell Res. 2013, 23, 1106 1118
    28. 28
      Kekenes-Huskey, P. M.; Metzger, V. T.; Grant, B. J.; McCammon, J. A. Calcium binding and allosteric signaling mechanisms for the sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ATPase Protein Sci. 2012, 21, 1429 1443
    29. 29
      Bung, N.; Pradhan, M.; Srinivasan, H.; Bulusu, G. Structural Insights into E. coli Porphobilinogen Deaminase during Synthesis and Exit of 1-Hydroxymethylbilane PLoS Comput. Biol. 2014, 10, e1003484
    30. 30
      Torres, R.; Swift, R. V.; Chim, N.; Wheatley, N.; Lan, B. S.; Atwood, B. R.; Pujol, C.; Sankaran, B.; Bliska, J. B.; Amaro, R. E.; Goulding, C. W. Biochemical, Structural and Molecular Dynamics Analyses of the Potential Virulence Factor RipA from Yersinia pestis PLoS One 2011, 6, e25084
    31. 31
      Grant, B. J.; Lukman, S.; Hocker, H. J.; Sayyah, J.; Brown, J. H.; McCammon, J. A.; Gorfe, A. A. Novel Allosteric Sites on Ras for Lead Generation PLoS One 2011, 6, e25711
    32. 32
      Mowrey, D. D.; Liu, Q.; Bondarenko, V.; Chen, Q.; Seyoum, E.; Xu, Y.; Wu, J.; Tang, P. Insights into Distinct Modulation of alpha 7 and alpha 7 beta 2 Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors by the Volatile Anesthetic Isoflurane J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288, 35793 35800
    33. 33
      Yi-Xin, A.; Jun-Rui, L.; Chun-Wei, X.; Jiang-Bei, M.; Xu-Yun, Y.; He, Z. Simulated Mechanism of Triclosan in Modulating the Active Site and Loop of FabI by Computer Acta Phys.-Chim. Sin. 2014, 30, 559 568
    34. 34
      Blachly, P. G.; de Oliveira, C. A. F.; Williams, S. L.; McCammon, J. A. Utilizing a Dynamical Description of IspH to Aid in the Development of Novel Antimicrobial Drugs PLoS Comput. Biol. 2013, 9, e1003395
    35. 35
      Demir, O.; Amaro, R. E. Elements of Nucleotide Specificity in the Trypanosoma brucei Mitochondrial RNA Editing Enzyme RET2 J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2012, 52, 1308 1318
    36. 36
      Mowrey, D.; Cheng, M. H.; Liu, L. T.; Willenbring, D.; Lu, X. H.; Wymore, T.; Xu, Y.; Tang, P. Asymmetric Ligand Binding Facilitates Conformational Transitions in Pentameric Ligand-Gated Ion Channels J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 2172 2180
    37. 37
      Bustamante, J. P.; Abbruzzetti, S.; Marcelli, A.; Gauto, D.; Boechi, L.; Bonamore, A.; Boffi, A.; Bruno, S.; Feis, A.; Foggi, P.; Estrin, D. A.; Viappiani, C. Ligand Uptake Modulation by Internal Water Molecules and Hydrophobic Cavities in Hemoglobins J. Phys. Chem. B 2014, 118, 1234 1245
    38. 38
      Selvam, B.; Porter, S. L.; Tikhonova, I. G. Addressing Selective Polypharmacology of Antipsychotic Drugs Targeting the Bioaminergic Receptors through Receptor Dynamic Conformational Ensembles J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2013, 53, 1761 1774
    39. 39
      Weinreb, V.; Li, L.; Chandrasekaran, S. N.; Koehl, P.; Delarue, M.; Carter, C. W., Jr. Enhanced Amino Acid Selection in Fully Evolved Tryptophanyl-tRNA Synthetase, Relative to Its Urzyme, Requires Domain Motion Sensed by the D1 Switch, a Remote Dynamic Packing Motif J. Biol. Chem. 2014, 289, 4367 4376
    40. 40
      Li, J. N.; Jonsson, A. L.; Beuming, T.; Shelley, J. C.; Voth, G. A. Ligand-Dependent Activation and Deactivation of the Human Adenosine A(2A) Receptor J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 8749 8759
    41. 41
      Baron, R.; McCammon, J. A. Molecular Recognition and Ligand Association Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 2013, 64, 151 175
    42. 42
      Ariga, K.; Ito, H.; Hill, J. P.; Tsukube, H. Molecular recognition: from solution science to nano/materials technology Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 5800 5835
    43. 43
      Kahraman, A.; Morris, R. J.; Laskowski, R. A.; Thornton, J. M. Shape variation in protein binding pockets and their ligands J. Mol. Biol. 2007, 368, 283 301
    44. 44
      Seddon, G.; Lounnas, V.; McGuire, R.; van den Bergh, T.; Bywater, R. P.; Oliveira, L.; Vriend, G. Drug design for ever, from hype to hope J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 2012, 26, 137 150
    45. 45
      Meng, X. Y.; Zhang, H. X.; Mezei, M.; Cui, M. Molecular Docking: A Powerful Approach for Structure-Based Drug Discovery Curr. Comput.-Aided Drug Des. 2011, 7, 146 157
    46. 46
      Golbraikh, A.; Wang, X. S.; Zhu, H.; Tropsha, A. Predictive QSAR Modeling: Methods and Applications in Drug Discovery and Chemical Risk Assessment. In Handbook of Computational Chemistry; Leszczynski, J., Ed.; Springer: Dordrecht, Netherlands, 2012; pp 1309 1342.
    47. 47
      Liang, J.; Edelsbrunner, H.; Woodward, C. Anatomy of protein pockets and cavities: measurement of binding site geometry and implications for ligand design Protein Sci. 1998, 7, 1884 1897
    48. 48
      Rush, T. S.; Grant, J. A.; Mosyak, L.; Nicholls, A. A shape-based 3-D scaffold hopping method and its application to a bacterial protein-protein interaction J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48, 1489 1495
    49. 49
      Wirth, M.; Volkamer, A.; Zoete, V.; Rippmann, F.; Michielin, O.; Rarey, M.; Sauer, W. H. B. Protein pocket and ligand shape comparison and its application in virtual screening J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 2013, 27, 511 524
    50. 50
      Hawkins, P. C. D.; Skillman, A. G.; Nicholls, A. Comparison of shape-matching and docking as virtual screening tools J. Med. Chem. 2007, 50, 74 82
    51. 51
      Distinto, S.; Esposito, F.; Kirchmair, J.; Cardia, M. C.; Gaspari, M.; Maccioni, E.; Alcaro, S.; Markt, P.; Wolber, G.; Zinzula, L.; Tramontano, E. Identification of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase dual inhibitors by a combined shape-, 2D-fingerprint- and pharmacophore-based virtual screening approach Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2012, 50, 216 229
    52. 52
      LaLonde, J. M.; Elban, M. A.; Courter, J. R.; Sugawara, A.; Soeta, T.; Madani, N.; Princiotto, A. M.; Do Kwon, Y.; Kwong, P. D.; Schon, A.; Freire, E.; Sodroski, J.; Smith, A. B. Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of small molecule inhibitors of CD4-gp120 binding based on virtual screening Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2011, 19, 91 101
    53. 53
      Tuccinardi, T.; Ortore, G.; Santos, M. A.; Marques, S. M.; Nuti, E.; Rossello, A.; Martinelli, A. Multitemplate Alignment Method for the Development of a Reliable 3D-QSAR Model for the Analysis of MMP3 Inhibitors J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2009, 49, 1715 1724
    54. 54
      Nicholls, A.; McGaughey, G. B.; Sheridan, R. P.; Good, A. C.; Warren, G.; Mathieu, M.; Muchmore, S. W.; Brown, S. P.; Grant, J. A.; Haigh, J. A.; Nevins, N.; Jain, A. N.; Kelley, B. Molecular Shape and Medicinal Chemistry: A Perspective J. Med. Chem. 2010, 53, 3862 3886
    55. 55
      Osguthorpe, D. J.; Sherman, W.; Hagler, A. T. Exploring Protein Flexibility: Incorporating Structural Ensembles From Crystal Structures and Simulation into Virtual Screening Protocols J. Phys. Chem. B 2012, 116, 6952 6959
    56. 56
      Osguthorpe, D. J.; Sherman, W.; Hagler, A. T. Generation of Receptor Structural Ensembles for Virtual Screening Using Binding Site Shape Analysis and Clustering Chem. Biol. Drug Des. 2012, 80, 182 193
    57. 57
      Ben Nasr, N.; Guillemain, H.; Lagarde, N.; Zagury, J. F.; Montes, M. Multiple Structures for Virtual Ligand Screening: Defining Binding Site Properties-Based Criteria to Optimize the Selection of the Query J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2013, 53, 293 311
    58. 58
      Nichols, S. E.; Swift, R. V.; Amaro, R. E. Rational Prediction with Molecular Dynamics for Hit Identification Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2012, 12, 2002 2012
    59. 59
      Ascher, D.; Dubois, P. F.; Hinsen, K.; James, J. H.; Oliphant, T. Numerical Python; UCRL-MA-128569 ed.; Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory: Livermore, CA, 1999.
    60. 60
      Dubois, P. F. Extending Python with Fortran Comput. Sci. Eng. 1999, 1, 66 73
    61. 61
      Jones, E.; Oliphant, T.; Peterson, P. Others SciPy: Open Source Scientific Tools for Python, 0.11.0; 2001.
    62. 62
      Oliphant, T. E. Guide to NumPy; Brigham Young University: Provo, UT, 2006.
    63. 63
      Peterson, P. F2PY: a tool for connecting Fortran and Python programs Int. J. Comput. Sci. Eng. 2009, 4, 296 305
    64. 64
      Humphrey, W.; Dalke, A.; Schulten, K. VMD: visual molecular dynamics J. Mol. Graphics 1996, 14, 33 38
    65. 65
      Akl, S. G.; Toussaint, G. T. In Efficient convex hull algorithms for pattern recognition applications, Proc. 4th. Int. Joint Conf. on Pattern Recognition (Kyoto, Japan), 1978; pp 483 487.
    66. 66
      Deng, J.; Schnaufer, A.; Salavati, R.; Stuart, K. D.; Hol, W. G. High resolution crystal structure of a key editosome enzyme from Trypanosoma brucei: RNA editing ligase 1 J. Mol. Biol. 2004, 343, 601 613
    67. 67
      Hornak, V.; Abel, R.; Okur, A.; Strockbine, B.; Roitberg, A.; Simmerling, C. Comparison of multiple Amber force fields and development of improved protein backbone parameters Proteins 2006, 65, 712 725
    68. 68
      Horn, H. W.; Swope, W. C.; Pitera, J. W.; Madura, J. D.; Dick, T. J.; Hura, G. L.; Head-Gordon, T. Development of an improved four-site water model for biomolecular simulations: TIP4P-Ew J. Chem. Phys. 2004, 120, 9665 9678
    69. 69
      Meagher, K. L.; Redman, L. T.; Carlson, H. A. Development of polyphosphate parameters for use with the AMBER force field J. Comput. Chem. 2003, 24, 1016 1025
    70. 70
      Allner, O.; Nilsson, L.; Villa, A. Magnesium Ion-Water Coordination and Exchange in Biomolecular Simulations J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2012, 8, 1493 1502
    71. 71
      Joung, I. S.; Cheatham, T. E. Determination of alkali and halide monovalent ion parameters for use in explicitly solvated biomolecular simulations J. Phys. Chem. B 2008, 112, 9020 9041
    72. 72
      Kale, L.; Skeel, R.; Bhandarkar, M.; Brunner, R.; Gursoy, A.; Krawetz, N.; Phillips, J.; Shinozaki, A.; Varadarajan, K.; Schulten, K. NAMD2: greater scalability for parallel molecular dynamics J. Comput. Phys. 1999, 151, 283 312
    73. 73
      Phillips, J. C.; Braun, R.; Wang, W.; Gumbart, J.; Tajkhorshid, E.; Villa, E.; Chipot, C.; Skeel, R. D.; Kale, L.; Schulten, K. Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD J. Comput. Chem. 2005, 26, 1781 1802
    74. 74
      Shipman, J. W. Tkinter reference: a GUI for Python; New Mexico Tech Computer Center: Socorro, NM, 2010.
    75. 75
      Welch, B. B.; Jones, K. Practical programming in Tcl/Tk, 4th ed.; Prentice Hall/PTR: Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2003.
    76. 76
      Schnaufer, A.; Panigrahi, A. K.; Panicucci, B.; Igo, R. P., Jr.; Salavati, R.; Stuart, K. An RNA Ligase Essential for RNA Editing and Survival of the Bloodstream Form of Trypanosoma brucei Science 2001, 291, 2159 2162
    77. 77
      Rusche, L. N.; Huang, C. E.; Piller, K. J.; Hemann, M.; Wirtz, E.; Sollner-Webb, B. The two RNA ligases of the Trypanosoma brucei RNA editing complex: cloning the essential band IV gene and identifying the band V gene Mol. Cell. Biol. 2001, 21, 979 989
    78. 78
      Durrant, J. D.; Hall, L.; Swift, R. V.; Landon, M.; Schnaufer, A.; Amaro, R. E. Novel Naphthalene-Based Inhibitors of Trypanosoma brucei RNA Editing Ligase 1 PLoS Neglected Trop. Dis. 2010, 4, e803
    79. 79
      Durrant, J. D.; Friedman, A. J.; McCammon, J. A. CrystalDock: a novel approach to fragment-based drug design J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2011, 51, 2573 2580
    80. 80
      Craig, I. R.; Pfleger, C.; Gohlke, H.; Essex, J. W.; Spiegel, K. Pocket-Space Maps To Identify Novel Binding-Site Conformations in Proteins J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2011, 51, 2666 2679
    81. 81
      Ghersi, D.; Sanchez, R. Beyond structural genomics: computational approaches for the identification of ligand binding sites in protein structures J. Struct. Funct. Genomics 2011, 12, 109 117
    82. 82
      Perot, S.; Sperandio, O.; Miteva, M. A.; Camproux, A. C.; Villoutreix, B. O. Druggable pockets and binding site centric chemical space: a paradigm shift in drug discovery Drug Discovery Today 2010, 15, 656 667
    83. 83
      Paramo, T.; East, A.; Garzon, D.; Ulmschneider, M. B.; Bond, P. J. Efficient Characterization of Protein Cavities within Molecular Simulation Trajectories: trj_cavity J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2014, 10, 2151 2164
    84. 84
      Hendlich, M.; Rippmann, F.; Barnickel, G. LIGSITE: Automatic and efficient detection of potential small molecule-binding sites in proteins J. Mol. Graphics Modell. 1997, 15, 359 363
    85. 85
      Stahl, M.; Taroni, C.; Schneider, G. Mapping of protein surface cavities and prediction of enzyme class by a self-organizing neural network Protein Eng. 2000, 13, 83 88
    86. 86
      Barber, C. B.; Dobkin, D. P.; Huhdanpaa, H. The Quickhull algorithm for convex hulls ACM Trans. Math. Software 1996, 22, 469 483
  • Supporting Information

    Supporting Information


    The Supporting Information contains two files. The first contains Figures S1 and S2. Figure S1 shows the POVME volumetric density maps generated when the REL1 trajectory was aligned by all active-site atoms and the atoms of the bound ligand. Figure S2 shows the pocket volumes calculated over the course of a REL1 molecular dynamics simulation, using several different software packages. The second file, Text S1, contains a tutorial that shows how VMD can be used to align a trajectory. The same tutorial also shows how to save a trajectory in the multiframe PDB format for subsequent POVME analysis. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.


    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.