ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
The Atomic Mass Unit, the Avogadro Constant, and the Mole: A Way To Understanding
My Activity
    Article

    The Atomic Mass Unit, the Avogadro Constant, and the Mole: A Way To Understanding
    Click to copy article linkArticle link copied!

    View Author Information
    Faculty of Chemistry, Jagiellonian University, Ingardena 3, 30-060 Kraków, Poland
    Other Access Options

    Journal of Chemical Education

    Cite this: J. Chem. Educ. 2012, 89, 1, 97–102
    Click to copy citationCitation copied!
    https://doi.org/10.1021/ed2001957
    Published November 1, 2011
    Copyright © 2011 The American Chemical Society and Division of Chemical Education, Inc.

    Abstract

    Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

    Numerous articles have been published that address problems encountered in teaching basic concepts of chemistry such as the atomic mass unit, Avogadro’s number, and the mole. The origin of these problems is found in the concept definitions. If these definitions are adjusted for teaching purposes, understanding could be improved. In the present article, the definitions are discussed, and the following adjustments are suggested: (i) the feature that classifies carbon-12 for the definition as the standard be its abundance, (ii) Avogadro’s number should refer directly to the standard nuclide sample, (iii) the definition of the mole be based on Avogadro’s number, and (iv) the term amount of substance be replaced by the collection or quantity of microentities. It is also proposed that the definition of the mole is first presented for nuclides and then generalized for poly-isotopic elements and chemical compounds. A possible redefinition of kilogram as a multiple of the standard nuclide mass is also briefly discussed.

    Copyright © 2011 The American Chemical Society and Division of Chemical Education, Inc.

    Read this article

    To access this article, please review the available access options below.

    Get instant access

    Purchase Access

    Read this article for 48 hours. Check out below using your ACS ID or as a guest.

    Recommended

    Access through Your Institution

    You may have access to this article through your institution.

    Your institution does not have access to this content. Add or change your institution or let them know you’d like them to include access.

    Cited By

    Click to copy section linkSection link copied!
    Citation Statements
    Explore this article's citation statements on scite.ai

    This article is cited by 10 publications.

    1. Klaus Schmidt-Rohr. Analysis of Two Definitions of the Mole That Are in Simultaneous Use, and Their Surprising Consequences. Journal of Chemical Education 2020, 97 (3) , 597-602. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.9b00467
    2. Andrzej Barański . Comment on “Unpacking the Meaning of the Mole Concept for Secondary School Teachers and Students”. Journal of Chemical Education 2014, 91 (8) , 1098-1098. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed5002398
    3. Sandra Cotes and José Cotuá . Using Audience Response Systems during Interactive Lectures To Promote Active Learning and Conceptual Understanding of Stoichiometry. Journal of Chemical Education 2014, 91 (5) , 673-677. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed400111m
    4. Elena Ghibaudi, Marco Ghirardi, Alberto Regis. Are there distinct views of chemistry behind the old and the new definition of mole?. Foundations of Chemistry 2024, 26 (3) , 385-398. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10698-024-09515-z
    5. Emmanuel Mweshi, Onesmus Munyati, Kabunga Nachiyunde. Teachers’ Understanding of the Link between the Atomic Theory and the Mole Concept. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2020, 24 (3) , 411-422. https://doi.org/10.1080/18117295.2020.1845462
    6. Paul De Bièvre. Clarity about the base quantity “amount of substance” is required before (re)definition of the associated base unit mole is meaningful. Accreditation and Quality Assurance 2015, 20 (5) , 441-443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-015-1159-7
    7. Su-Chi Fang, Christina Hart, David Clarke. Redefining the mole: the perspective of teaching and learning. Accreditation and Quality Assurance 2015, 20 (3) , 215-217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-014-1102-3
    8. Paul De Bièvre. CCQM owes chemists a description of the concept ‘amount of substance’. Accreditation and Quality Assurance 2014, 19 (4) , 323-325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-014-1068-1
    9. Kevin C. de Berg. The Place of the History of Chemistry in the Teaching and Learning of Chemistry. 2014, 317-341. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7654-8_11
    10. A. Barański. The prospect of the dalton in the new SI: an educator’s point of view. Accreditation and Quality Assurance 2013, 18 (5) , 441-445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-013-1004-9

    Journal of Chemical Education

    Cite this: J. Chem. Educ. 2012, 89, 1, 97–102
    Click to copy citationCitation copied!
    https://doi.org/10.1021/ed2001957
    Published November 1, 2011
    Copyright © 2011 The American Chemical Society and Division of Chemical Education, Inc.

    Article Views

    4267

    Altmetric

    -

    Citations

    Learn about these metrics

    Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

    Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

    The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.