ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
My Activity
CONTENT TYPES

Figure 1Loading Img

Cottrell Scholars Collaborative New Faculty Workshop: Professional Development for New Chemistry Faculty and Initial Assessment of Its Efficacy

View Author Information
Department of Chemistry, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405, United States
Department of Chemistry, University of Nebraska—Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska 68588, United States
§ Department of Chemistry, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia 22904, United States
Department of Chemistry, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan 48202, United States
Department of Chemistry, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011, United States
# Department of Chemistry, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont 05405, United States
Education Division, American Chemical Society, Washington, D.C. 20036, United States
Cite this: J. Chem. Educ. 2014, 91, 11, 1874–1881
Publication Date (Web):October 24, 2014
https://doi.org/10.1021/ed500547n
Copyright © 2014 The American Chemical Society and Division of Chemical Education, Inc.

    Article Views

    1593

    Altmetric

    -

    Citations

    LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICS
    Other access options

    Abstract

    Abstract Image

    The Cottrell Scholars Collaborative New Faculty Workshop (CSC NFW) is a professional development program that was initiated in 2012 to address absences in the preparation of chemistry faculty at research universities as funded researchers and educators (i.e., teacher–scholars). The primary focus of the workshop is an introduction to evidence-based teaching methods; other topics including mentoring, work–life balance, time management, and grant writing are also addressed. A longer-term aim of the workshop is to develop lifelong teacher–scholars by encouraging workshop participants to engage with teaching-focused faculty learning communities through the CSC NFW and at their institutions. The workshop also provides a platform to investigate the adoption of student-centered pedagogies among new faculty, and a study of that process was initiated concurrently. Thus, the aim of the workshop program is to address professional development needs as well as understand the efficacy of that effort.

    Read this article

    To access this article, please review the available access options below.

    Get instant access

    Purchase Access

    Read this article for 48 hours. Check out below using your ACS ID or as a guest.

    Recommended

    Access through Your Institution

    You may have access to this article through your institution.

    Your institution does not have access to this content. You can change your affiliated institution below.

    Cited By

    This article is cited by 36 publications.

    1. Amanda L Patrick. Improving Soft Skills and Uncovering the Hidden Curriculum: Report on a Pilot Communication Workshop for Chemistry Students Engaged in Research. Journal of Chemical Education 2024, 101 (2) , 374-381. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00644
    2. Lisa Shah, Adan Fatima, Ahmad Syed, Eric Glasser. Investigating the Impact of Assessment Practices on the Performance of Students Perceived to Be at Risk of Failure in Second-Semester General Chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education 2022, 99 (1) , 14-24. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c01463
    3. Samuel Pazicni, Donald J. Wink, Ashley Donovan, John A. Conrad, Joshua P. Darr, Rachel A. Morgan Theall, Dana L. Richter-Egger, Adrian Villalta-Cerdas, Deborah Rush Walker. The American Chemical Society General Chemistry Performance Expectations Project: From Task Force to Distributed Process for Implementing Multidimensional Learning. Journal of Chemical Education 2021, 98 (4) , 1112-1123. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00986
    4. Rachel L. Rupnow, Nicole D. LaDue, Nicole M. James, Heather E. Bergan-Roller. A Perturbed System: How Tenured Faculty Responded to the COVID-19 Shift to Remote Instruction. Journal of Chemical Education 2020, 97 (9) , 2397-2407. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00802
    5. Candy S. Hwang. Using Continuous Student Feedback to Course-Correct during COVID-19 for a Nonmajors Chemistry Course. Journal of Chemical Education 2020, 97 (9) , 3400-3405. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00808
    6. Rebecca M. Broyer, Jessica Parr. AcademiNext: Mentoring the Next Generation of Chemistry Faculty. Journal of Chemical Education 2019, 96 (11) , 2403-2409. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.9b00160
    7. David R. Brown Stacey Brydges Stanley M. Lo Maya E. Denton Maura J. Borrego . A Collaborative Professional Development Program for Science Faculty and Graduate Students in Support of Education Reform at Two-Year Hispanic-Serving Institutions. 2019, 119-134. https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-2019-1335.ch010
    8. Ian L. Brown Thomas Wenzel Renée Cole . Supporting Faculty in Adopting Active Learning Pedagogies. 2019, 135-148. https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-2019-1335.ch011
    9. Justin K. Pagano, Leslie Jaworski, David Lopatto, Rory Waterman. An Inorganic Chemistry Laboratory Course as Research. Journal of Chemical Education 2018, 95 (9) , 1520-1525. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.7b00812
    10. Melanie M. Cooper, Ryan L. Stowe. Chemistry Education Research—From Personal Empiricism to Evidence, Theory, and Informed Practice. Chemical Reviews 2018, 118 (12) , 6053-6087. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00020
    11. Rory Waterman Andrew L. Feig . The Cottrell Scholars Collaborative New Faculty Workshop: Early Lessons for Change in Teaching. 2017, 23-34. https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-2017-1259.ch003
    12. Barbara A. Reisner, Sheila R. Smith, Joanne L. Stewart, Jeffrey R. Raker, Johanna L. Crane, Sabrina G. Sobel, and Lester L. Pesterfield . Great Expectations: Using an Analysis of Current Practices To Propose a Framework for the Undergraduate Inorganic Curriculum. Inorganic Chemistry 2015, 54 (18) , 8859-8868. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.5b01320
    13. Marilyne Stains, Matthew Pilarz, and Devasmita Chakraverty . Short and Long-Term Impacts of the Cottrell Scholars Collaborative New Faculty Workshop. Journal of Chemical Education 2015, 92 (9) , 1466-1476. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00324
    14. Saeed Rokooei, Alireza Shojaei, Reachsak Ly. Faculty development program to enhance teaching quality in construction. International Journal of Construction Management 2024, 78 , 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2024.2304475
    15. Haleigh Machost, Marilyne Stains, . Reflective Practices in Education: A Primer for Practitioners. CBE—Life Sciences Education 2023, 22 (2) https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.22-07-0148
    16. Annika Kraft, Maia Popova, Robert M. Erdmann, Jordan Harshman, Marilyne Stains. Tensions between depth and breadth: an exploratory investigation of chemistry assistant professors’ perspectives on content coverage. Chemistry Education Research and Practice 2023, 24 (2) , 567-576. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2RP00299J
    17. Amy J. Prunuske, Heather J. Evans-Anderson, Katherine L. Furniss, Carlos C. Goller, Jaime E. Mirowsky, Michael E. Moore, Samiksha A. Raut, Uma Swamy, Sue Wick, Michael J. Wolyniak. Using personas and the ADKAR framework to evaluate a network designed to facilitate sustained change toward active learning in the undergraduate classroom. Discover Education 2022, 1 (1) https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-022-00023-w
    18. Brandon J. Yik, Jeffrey R. Raker, Naneh Apkarian, Marilyne Stains, Charles Henderson, Melissa H. Dancy, Estrella Johnson. Evaluating the impact of malleable factors on percent time lecturing in gateway chemistry, mathematics, and physics courses. International Journal of STEM Education 2022, 9 (1) https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-022-00333-3
    19. Mallory A. Jackson, Sungmin Moon, Jennifer H. Doherty, Mary Pat Wenderoth. Which evidence-based teaching practices change over time? Results from a university-wide STEM faculty development program. International Journal of STEM Education 2022, 9 (1) https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-022-00340-4
    20. Devasmita Chakraverty, . Faculty Experiences of the Impostor Phenomenon in STEM Fields. CBE—Life Sciences Education 2022, 21 (4) https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.21-10-0307
    21. Brandon J. Yik, Jeffrey R. Raker, Naneh Apkarian, Marilyne Stains, Charles Henderson, Melissa H. Dancy, Estrella Johnson. Association of malleable factors with adoption of research-based instructional strategies in introductory chemistry, mathematics, and physics. Frontiers in Education 2022, 7 https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.1016415
    22. Sophia Jeong, Jakayla Clyburn, Nikhil S. Bhatia, Jill McCourt, Paula P. Lemons, . Student Thinking in the Professional Development of College Biology Instructors: An Analysis through the Lens of Sociocultural Theory. CBE—Life Sciences Education 2022, 21 (2) https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.21-01-0003
    23. Maia Popova, Annika Kraft, Jordan Harshman, Marilyne Stains. Changes in teaching beliefs of early-career chemistry faculty: a longitudinal investigation. Chemistry Education Research and Practice 2021, 22 (2) , 431-442. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0RP00313A
    24. Rachel J. Beane, Ellen R. Altermatt, Ellen R. Iverson, R. Heather Macdonald. Design and impact of the national workshop for early career geoscience faculty. Journal of Geoscience Education 2020, 68 (4) , 345-359. https://doi.org/10.1080/10899995.2020.1722787
    25. Beth Hundey, Lauren Anstey, Heather Cruickshank, Gavan P. L. Watson. Mentoring faculty online: a literature review and recommendations for web-based programs. International Journal for Academic Development 2020, 25 (3) , 232-246. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2020.1731815
    26. Maia Popova, Lu Shi, Jordan Harshman, Annika Kraft, Marilyne Stains. Untangling a complex relationship: teaching beliefs and instructional practices of assistant chemistry faculty at research-intensive institutions. Chemistry Education Research and Practice 2020, 21 (2) , 513-527. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9RP00217K
    27. Justin B. Houseknecht, Garrin J. Bachinski, Madelyn H. Miller, Sarah A. White, Douglas M. Andrews. Effectiveness of the active learning in organic chemistry faculty development workshops. Chemistry Education Research and Practice 2020, 21 (1) , 387-398. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9RP00137A
    28. Patricia Zagallo, Jill McCourt, Robert Idsardi, Michelle K. Smith, Mark Urban-Lurain, Tessa C. Andrews, Kevin Haudek, Jennifer K. Knight, John Merrill, Ross Nehm, Luanna B. Prevost, Paula P. Lemons, . Through the Eyes of Faculty: Using Personas as a Tool for Learner-Centered Professional Development. CBE—Life Sciences Education 2019, 18 (4) , ar62. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.19-06-0114
    29. Karen Miner-Romanoff, Yuerong Sweetland, Yi Yang, Barbara Fennema. Assessment of Professional Development and Research-Based Instructional Strategies for Instructors of Online Undergraduate STEM Courses. International Journal of Online Pedagogy and Course Design 2019, 9 (1) , 51-61. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJOPCD.2019010104
    30. Mary F. Durham, Jennifer K. Knight, Emily K. Bremers, Jameson D. DeFreece, Alex R. Paine, Brian A. Couch. Student, instructor, and observer agreement regarding frequencies of scientific teaching practices using the Measurement Instrument for Scientific Teaching-Observable (MISTO). International Journal of STEM Education 2018, 5 (1) https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0128-1
    31. Mary F. Durham, Jennifer K. Knight, Brian A. Couch, . Measurement Instrument for Scientific Teaching (MIST): A Tool to Measure the Frequencies of Research-Based Teaching Practices in Undergraduate Science Courses. CBE—Life Sciences Education 2017, 16 (4) , ar67. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.17-02-0033
    32. Jordan Harshman, Marilyne Stains. A review and evaluation of the internal structure and consistency of the Approaches to Teaching Inventory. International Journal of Science Education 2017, 39 (7) , 918-936. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1310411
    33. Heather L. Reynolds, Katherine Dowell Kearns. A Planning Tool for Incorporating Backward Design, Active Learning, and Authentic Assessment in the College Classroom. College Teaching 2017, 65 (1) , 17-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2016.1222575
    34. Stacy L. Stegall, Alexander Grushow, Robert Whitnell, Sally S. Hunnicutt. Evaluating the effectiveness of POGIL-PCL workshops. Chemistry Education Research and Practice 2016, 17 (2) , 407-416. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RP00225G
    35. Travis J Lund, Marilyne Stains. The importance of context: an exploration of factors influencing the adoption of student-centered teaching among chemistry, biology, and physics faculty. International Journal of STEM Education 2015, 2 (1) https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-015-0026-8
    36. Travis J. Lund, Matthew Pilarz, Jonathan B. Velasco, Devasmita Chakraverty, Kaitlyn Rosploch, Molly Undersander, Marilyne Stains, . The Best of Both Worlds: Building on the COPUS and RTOP Observation Protocols to Easily and Reliably Measure Various Levels of Reformed Instructional Practice. CBE—Life Sciences Education 2015, 14 (2) , ar18. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.14-10-0168

    Pair your accounts.

    Export articles to Mendeley

    Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

    Pair your accounts.

    Export articles to Mendeley

    Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

    You’ve supercharged your research process with ACS and Mendeley!

    STEP 1:
    Click to create an ACS ID

    Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

    Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

    Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

    MENDELEY PAIRING EXPIRED
    Your Mendeley pairing has expired. Please reconnect