ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
Potential Dependence of Global Warming on the Residence Time (RT) in the Atmosphere of Anthropogenically Sourced Carbon Dioxide
My Activity
    Articles

    Potential Dependence of Global Warming on the Residence Time (RT) in the Atmosphere of Anthropogenically Sourced Carbon Dioxide
    Click to copy article linkArticle link copied!

    View Author Information
    Department of Mechanical Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210
    * To whom correspondence should be addressed. Fax: 614-292-3163. E-mail: [email protected]
    Other Access Options

    Energy & Fuels

    Cite this: Energy Fuels 2009, 23, 5, 2773–2784
    Click to copy citationCitation copied!
    https://doi.org/10.1021/ef800581r
    Published April 1, 2009
    Copyright © 2009 American Chemical Society

    Abstract

    Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

    The driver for this study is the wide-ranging published values of the CO2 atmospheric residence time (RT), τ, with the values differing by more than an order of magnitude, where the significance of the difference relates to decisions on whether (1) to attempt control of combustion-sourced (anthropogenic) CO2 emissions, if τ > 100 years, or (2) not to attempt control, if τ ∼ 10 years. This given difference is particularly evident in the IPCC First 1990 Climate Change Report where, in the opening policymakers summary of the report, the RT is stated to be in the range of 50−200 years, and (largely) on the basis of that, it was also concluded in the report and from subsequent related studies that the current rising level of CO2 was due to combustion of fossil fuels, thus carrying the, now widely accepted, rider that CO2 emissions from combustion should therefore be curbed. However, the actual data in the text of the IPCC report separately states a value of 4 years. The differential of these two times is then clearly identified in the relevant supporting documents of the report as being, separately (1) a long-term (∼100 years) adjustment or response time to accommodate imbalance increases in CO2 emissions from all sources and (2) the actual RT in the atmosphere of ∼4 years. As a check on that differentiation and its alternative outcome, the definition and determination of RT thus defined the need for and focus of this study. In this study, using the combustion/chemical-engineering perfectly stirred reactor (PSR) mixing structure or 0D box for the model basis, as an alternative to the more commonly used global circulation models (GCMs), to define and determine the RT in the atmosphere and then using data from the IPCC and other sources for model validation and numerical determination, the data (1) support the validity of the PSR model application in this context and, (2) from the analysis, provide (quasi-equilibrium) RTs for CO2 of ∼5 years carrying C12 and ∼16 years carrying C14, with both values essentially in agreement with the IPCC short-term (4 year) value and, separately, in agreement with most other data sources, notably, a 1998 listing by Segalstad of 36 other published values, also in the range of 5−15 years. Additionally, the analytical results also then support the IPCC analysis and data on the longer “adjustment time” (∼100 years) governing the long-term rising “quasi-equilibrium” concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere. For principal verification of the adopted PSR model, the data source used was the outcome of the injection of excess 14CO2 into the atmosphere during the A-bomb tests in the 1950s/1960s, which generated an initial increase of approximately 1000% above the normal value and which then declined substantially exponentially with time, with τ = 16 years, in accordance with the (unsteady-state) prediction from and jointly providing validation for the PSR analysis. With the short (5−15 year) RT results shown to be in quasi-equilibrium, this then supports the (independently based) conclusion that the long-term (∼100 year) rising atmospheric CO2 concentration is not from anthropogenic sources but, in accordance with conclusions from other studies, is most likely the outcome of the rising atmospheric temperature, which is due to other natural factors. This further supports the conclusion that global warming is not anthropogenically driven as an outcome of combustion. The economic and political significance of that conclusion will be self-evident.

    Copyright © 2009 American Chemical Society

    Read this article

    To access this article, please review the available access options below.

    Get instant access

    Purchase Access

    Read this article for 48 hours. Check out below using your ACS ID or as a guest.

    Recommended

    Access through Your Institution

    You may have access to this article through your institution.

    Your institution does not have access to this content. Add or change your institution or let them know you’d like them to include access.

    Cited By

    Click to copy section linkSection link copied!
    Citation Statements
    Explore this article's citation statements on scite.ai

    This article is cited by 14 publications.

    1. Gavin C. Cawley . On the Atmospheric Residence Time of Anthropogenically Sourced Carbon Dioxide. Energy & Fuels 2011, 25 (11) , 5503-5513. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef200914u
    2. Peter Stallinga. Residence Time vs. Adjustment Time of Carbon Dioxide in the Atmosphere. Entropy 2023, 25 (2) , 384. https://doi.org/10.3390/e25020384
    3. Pieter Tans. REMINISCING ON THE USE AND ABUSE OF 14 C AND 13 C IN ATMOSPHERIC CO 2. Radiocarbon 2022, 64 (4) , 747-760. https://doi.org/10.1017/RDC.2022.7
    4. Franz Mauelshagen, Walter Pfeiffer. The Complexity Trap: Skepticism, Denialism and the Political Epistemology of Climate Science. 2022, 65-83. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74458-8_4
    5. Arno Kleber, Jana Richter-Krautz. Sind wir Menschen überhaupt schuld am Klimawandel?. 2022, 193-322. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-64548-2_5
    6. Chao Bi, Jingjing Zeng. Nonlinear and Spatial Effects of Tourism on Carbon Emissions in China: A Spatial Econometric Approach. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2019, 16 (18) , 3353. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16183353
    7. Peter Köhler, Judith Hauck, Christoph Völker, Dieter A. Wolf-Gladrow, Martin Butzin, Joshua B. Halpern, Ken Rice, Richard E. Zeebe. Comment on “ Scrutinizing the carbon cycle and CO 2 residence time in the atmosphere ” by H. Harde. Global and Planetary Change 2018, 164 , 67-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2017.09.015
    8. Xingzhong Guo, Li Ding, Kazuyoshi Kanamori, Kazuki Nakanishi, Hui Yang. Functionalization of hierarchically porous silica monoliths with polyethyleneimine (PEI) for CO 2 adsorption. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials 2017, 245 , 51-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2017.02.076
    9. Hermann Harde. Scrutinizing the carbon cycle and CO2 residence time in the atmosphere. Global and Planetary Change 2017, 152 , 19-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2017.02.009
    10. Changchun Ji, Xin Huang, Lei Li, Fukui Xiao, Ning Zhao, Wei Wei. Pentaethylenehexamine-Loaded Hierarchically Porous Silica for CO2 Adsorption. Materials 2016, 9 (10) , 835. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma9100835
    11. François Gervais. Tiny warming of residual anthropogenic CO 2. International Journal of Modern Physics B 2014, 28 (13) , 1450095. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217979214500957
    12. Ole Humlum, Kjell Stordahl, Jan-Erik Solheim. The phase relation between atmospheric carbon dioxide and global temperature. Global and Planetary Change 2013, 100 , 51-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2012.08.008
    13. Alan Carlin. A Multidisciplinary, Science-Based Approach to the Economics of Climate Change. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2011, 8 (4) , 985-1031. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph8040985
    14. Ryunosuke Kikuchi. External Forces Acting on the Earth's Climate: An Approach to Understanding the Complexity of Climate Change. Energy & Environment 2010, 21 (8) , 953-968. https://doi.org/10.1260/0958-305X.21.8.953

    Energy & Fuels

    Cite this: Energy Fuels 2009, 23, 5, 2773–2784
    Click to copy citationCitation copied!
    https://doi.org/10.1021/ef800581r
    Published April 1, 2009
    Copyright © 2009 American Chemical Society

    Article Views

    1233

    Altmetric

    -

    Citations

    Learn about these metrics

    Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

    Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

    The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.