ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
My Activity
CONTENT TYPES

Figure 1Loading Img

Indoor Secondary Pollutants from Household Product Emissions in the Presence of Ozone:  A Bench-Scale Chamber Study

View Author Information
Indoor Environment and Atmospheric Sciences Departments, Environmental Energy Technologies Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, Civil & Environmental Engineering Department, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720-1710, Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences Institute, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey & Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854, and International Centre for Indoor Environment and Energy, Technical University of Denmark
Cite this: Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40, 14, 4421–4428
Publication Date (Web):June 9, 2006
https://doi.org/10.1021/es052198z
Copyright © 2006 American Chemical Society

    Article Views

    2097

    Altmetric

    -

    Citations

    LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICS
    Other access options
    Supporting Info (2)»

    Abstract

    Ozone-driven chemistry is a source of indoor secondary pollutants of potential health concern. This study investigates secondary air pollutants formed from reactions between constituents of household products and ozone. Gas-phase product emissions were introduced along with ozone at constant rates into a 198-L Teflon-lined reaction chamber. Gas-phase concentrations of reactive terpenoids and oxidation products were measured. Formaldehyde was a predominant oxidation byproduct for the three studied products, with yields for most conditions of 20−30% with respect to ozone consumed. Acetaldehyde, acetone, glycolaldehyde, formic acid, and acetic acid were each also detected for two or three of the products. Immediately upon mixing of reactants, a scanning mobility particle sizer detected particle nucleation events that were followed by a significant degree of secondary particle growth. The production of secondary gaseous pollutants and particles depended primarily on the ozone level and was influenced by other parameters such as the air-exchange rate. Hydroxyl radical concentrations in the range 0.04−200 × 105 molecules cm-3 were determined by an indirect method. OH concentrations were observed to vary strongly with residual ozone level in the chamber, which was in the range 1−25 ppb, as is consistent with expectations from a simplified kinetic model. In a separate chamber study, we exposed the dry residue of two products to ozone and observed the formation of gas-phase and particle-phase secondary oxidation products.

    Read this article

    To access this article, please review the available access options below.

    Get instant access

    Purchase Access

    Read this article for 48 hours. Check out below using your ACS ID or as a guest.

    Recommended

    Access through Your Institution

    You may have access to this article through your institution.

    Your institution does not have access to this content. You can change your affiliated institution below.

    *

     Corresponding author e-mail:  [email protected].

     Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.

     University of California, Berkeley.

    §

     University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey & Rutgers University, and International Centre for Indoor Environment and Energy, Technical University of Denmark.

    Supporting Information Available

    ARTICLE SECTIONS
    Jump To

    Additional experimental information and tables of reaction data. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.

    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

    Cited By

    This article is cited by 190 publications.

    1. Shen Yang, Tatjana Müller, Nijing Wang, Gabriel Bekö, Meixia Zhang, Marouane Merizak, Pawel Wargocki, Jonathan Williams, Dusan Licina. Influence of Ventilation on Formation and Growth of 1–20 nm Particles via Ozone–Human Chemistry. Environmental Science & Technology 2024, 58 (10) , 4704-4715. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c08466
    2. Victor W. Or, Michael R. Alves, Michael Wade, Sarah Schwab, Richard L. Corsi, Vicki H. Grassian. Nanoscopic Study of Water Uptake on Glass Surfaces with Organic Thin Films and Particles from Exposure to Indoor Cooking Activities: Comparison to Model Systems. Environmental Science & Technology 2022, 56 (3) , 1594-1604. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c06260
    3. Roger Sheu, Claire F. Fortenberry, Michael J. Walker, Azin Eftekhari, Christof Stönner, Alexa Bakker, Jordan Peccia, Jonathan Williams, Glenn C. Morrison, Brent J. Williams, Drew R. Gentner. Evaluating Indoor Air Chemical Diversity, Indoor-to-Outdoor Emissions, and Surface Reservoirs Using High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry. Environmental Science & Technology 2021, 55 (15) , 10255-10267. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c01337
    4. Shan Zhou, Zhenlei Liu, Zixu Wang, Cora J. Young, Trevor C. VandenBoer, B. Beverly Guo, Jianshun Zhang, Nicola Carslaw, Tara F. Kahan. Hydrogen Peroxide Emission and Fate Indoors during Non-bleach Cleaning: A Chamber and Modeling Study. Environmental Science & Technology 2020, 54 (24) , 15643-15651. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c04702
    5. Sara M. Duncan, Sophie Tomaz, Glenn Morrison, Marc Webb, Joanna Atkin, Jason D. Surratt, Barbara J. Turpin. Dynamics of Residential Water-Soluble Organic Gases: Insights into Sources and Sinks. Environmental Science & Technology 2019, 53 (4) , 1812-1821. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b05852
    6. Victor W. Or, Michael R. Alves, Michael Wade, Sarah Schwab, Richard L. Corsi, Vicki H. Grassian. Crystal Clear? Microspectroscopic Imaging and Physicochemical Characterization of Indoor Depositions on Window Glass. Environmental Science & Technology Letters 2018, 5 (8) , 514-519. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.8b00355
    7. Charles J. Weschler, Nicola Carslaw. Indoor Chemistry. Environmental Science & Technology 2018, 52 (5) , 2419-2428. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b06387
    8. Somayeh Youssefi and Michael S. Waring . Transient Secondary Organic Aerosol Formation from Limonene Ozonolysis in Indoor Environments: Impacts of Air Exchange Rates and Initial Concentration Ratios. Environmental Science & Technology 2014, 48 (14) , 7899-7908. https://doi.org/10.1021/es5009906
    9. Michael S. Waring and Jeffrey A. Siegel . Indoor Secondary Organic Aerosol Formation Initiated from Reactions between Ozone and Surface-Sorbed d-Limonene. Environmental Science & Technology 2013, 47 (12) , 6341-6348. https://doi.org/10.1021/es400846d
    10. Meera Sidheswaran, Wenhao Chen, Agatha Chang, Robert Miller, Sebastian Cohn, Douglas Sullivan, William J. Fisk, Kazukiyo Kumagai, and Hugo Destaillats . Formaldehyde Emissions from Ventilation Filters Under Different Relative Humidity Conditions. Environmental Science & Technology 2013, 47 (10) , 5336-5343. https://doi.org/10.1021/es400290p
    11. Moshood O. Fadeyi, Charles J. Weschler, Kwok W. Tham, Wei Y. Wu, and Zuraimi M. Sultan . Impact of Human Presence on Secondary Organic Aerosols Derived from Ozone-Initiated Chemistry in a Simulated Office Environment. Environmental Science & Technology 2013, 47 (8) , 3933-3941. https://doi.org/10.1021/es3050828
    12. Brent Stephens, Elliott T. Gall, and Jeffrey A. Siegel . Measuring the Penetration of Ambient Ozone into Residential Buildings. Environmental Science & Technology 2012, 46 (2) , 929-936. https://doi.org/10.1021/es2028795
    13. Jie Guo, Ying Jiang, Xiaofang Hu, and Zhenming Xu . Volatile Organic Compounds and Metal Leaching from Composite Products Made from Fiberglass-Resin Portion of Printed Circuit Board Waste. Environmental Science & Technology 2012, 46 (2) , 1028-1034. https://doi.org/10.1021/es2029558
    14. Xi Chen, Philip K. Hopke, and William P. L. Carter. Secondary Organic Aerosol from Ozonolysis of Biogenic Volatile Organic Compounds: Chamber Studies of Particle and Reactive Oxygen Species Formation. Environmental Science & Technology 2011, 45 (1) , 276-282. https://doi.org/10.1021/es102166c
    15. Yungang Wang, Philip K. Hopke, David C. Chalupa and Mark J. Utell . Long-Term Characterization of Indoor and Outdoor Ultrafine Particles at a Commercial Building. Environmental Science & Technology 2010, 44 (15) , 5775-5780. https://doi.org/10.1021/es1001677
    16. Tunga Salthammer, Sibel Mentese and Rainer Marutzky . Formaldehyde in the Indoor Environment. Chemical Reviews 2010, 110 (4) , 2536-2572. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr800399g
    17. Asger W. Nørgaard, Keld A. Jensen, Christian Janfelt, Frants R. Lauritsen, Per A. Clausen and Peder Wolkoff . Release of VOCs and Particles During Use of Nanofilm Spray Products. Environmental Science & Technology 2009, 43 (20) , 7824-7830. https://doi.org/10.1021/es9019468
    18. T. Salthammer and, F. Fuhrmann. Photocatalytic Surface Reactions on Indoor Wall Paint. Environmental Science & Technology 2007, 41 (18) , 6573-6578. https://doi.org/10.1021/es070057m
    19. Charles J. Weschler,, Armin Wisthaler,, Shannon Cowlin,, Gyöngyi Tamás,, Peter Strøm-Tejsen,, Alfred T. Hodgson,, Hugo Destaillats,, Jason Herrington,, Junfeng (Jim) Zhang, and, William W Nazaroff. Ozone-Initiated Chemistry in an Occupied Simulated Aircraft Cabin. Environmental Science & Technology 2007, 41 (17) , 6177-6184. https://doi.org/10.1021/es0708520
    20. Ahmad Alshawa,, Ashley R. Russell, and, Sergey A. Nizkorodov. Kinetic Analysis of Competition between Aerosol Particle Removal and Generation by Ionization Air Purifiers. Environmental Science & Technology 2007, 41 (7) , 2498-2504. https://doi.org/10.1021/es061760y
    21. Miranda M. Loh,, E. Andres Houseman,, George M. Gray,, Jonathan I. Levy,, John D. Spengler, and, Deborah H. Bennett. Measured Concentrations of VOCs in Several Non-Residential Microenvironments in the United States. Environmental Science & Technology 2006, 40 (22) , 6903-6911. https://doi.org/10.1021/es060197g
    22. Zuraimi Sultan, Jiayu Li, Jovan Pantelic, Stefano Schiavon. Particle characterization in commercial buildings: A cross-sectional study in 40 offices in Singapore. Science of The Total Environment 2024, 927 , 172126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.172126
    23. Dustin Poppendieck, Rileigh Robertson, Michael F. Link. Jingle bells, what are those smells? Indoor VOC emissions from a live Christmas tree. Indoor Environments 2024, 1 (1) , 100002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indenv.2023.100002
    24. Wei Liu, Li Zhou, Wenting Yuan, Ling Ruan, Xinkai Wang, Yucong Guo, Zhouqing Xie, Qifan Liu, Chen Wang. Tracking indoor volatile organic compounds with online mass spectrometry. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry 2024, 171 , 117514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2023.117514
    25. Klaudia Pytel, Bożena Zabiegała. Investigation of RH effect on uncommon limonene ozonolysis products and SOA formation in indoor air with real time measurement techniques. Chemosphere 2024, 349 , 140854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.140854
    26. Michael J. Davern, Gabrielle V. West, Clara M. A. Eichler, Barbara J. Turpin, Yue Zhang, Jason D. Surratt. External liquid calibration method for iodide chemical ionization mass spectrometry enables quantification of gas-phase per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) dynamics in indoor air. The Analyst 2024, 307 https://doi.org/10.1039/D4AN00100A
    27. Alexis M. Temkin, Samara L. Geller, Sydney A. Swanson, Nneka S. Leiba, Olga V. Naidenko, David Q. Andrews. Volatile organic compounds emitted by conventional and “green” cleaning products in the U.S. market. Chemosphere 2023, 341 , 139570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.139570
    28. Xinyang Guo, Ya-Chun Chan, Tania Gautam, Ran Zhao. Autoxidation of glycols used in inhalable daily products: implications for the use of artificial fogs and e-cigarettes. Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts 2023, 25 (10) , 1657-1669. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3EM00214D
    29. Mahmut Kayar, Yalçin Boztoprak, Belma Gjergjizi Nallbani. Cigarette smoke uptake by different woven fabrics: Analysis of mechanical and colour properties. Coloration Technology 2023, 6 https://doi.org/10.1111/cote.12723
    30. Saumya Srivastava, Tripti Sharma, Manish Deshwal. Study of Nanostructured Metal Oxide Semiconductor Based Gas Sensors for Toxic Gas Detection. 2023, 657-662. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSEIET58677.2023.10303596
    31. William W Nazaroff. Ten questions concerning indoor ultrafine particles. Building and Environment 2023, 243 , 110641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.110641
    32. Marc Webb, Liyong Cui, Glenn Morrison, Karsten Baumann, Jason D. Surratt, Zhenfa Zhang, Joanna Atkin, Barbara J. Turpin. The fate of organic peroxides indoors: quantifying humidity-dependent uptake on naturally soiled indoor window glass. Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts 2023, 25 (6) , 1031-1048. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3EM00041A
    33. Georgios Dabanlis, Glykeria Loupa, Georgios Archimidis Tsalidis, Evangelia Kostenidou, Spyridon Rapsomanikis. The Interplay between Air Quality and Energy Efficiency in Museums, a Review. Applied Sciences 2023, 13 (9) , 5535. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13095535
    34. Hermann Fromme. Indoor Environment: Background Information. 2023, 1-36. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-40078-0_1
    35. Mengjia Tang, Jeffrey A. Siegel, Richard L. Corsi, Atila Novoselac. Evaluation of ozone removal devices applied in ventilation systems. Building and Environment 2022, 225 , 109582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109582
    36. Klaudia Pytel, Renata Marcinkowska, Małgorzata Rutkowska, Bożena Zabiegała. Recent advances on SOA formation in indoor air, fate and strategies for SOA characterization in indoor air - A review. Science of The Total Environment 2022, 843 , 156948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156948
    37. Xinyang Guo, Toluwatise Ehindero, Chester Lau, Ran Zhao. Impact of glycol‐based solvents on indoor air quality—Artificial fog and exposure pathways of formaldehyde and various carbonyls. Indoor Air 2022, 32 (9) https://doi.org/10.1111/ina.13100
    38. Mengjia Tang, Kathleen Owen, Atila Novoselac. Evaluating test method of air cleaning devices for ozone removal (ASHRAE RP-1579). Science and Technology for the Built Environment 2022, 28 (7) , 886-895. https://doi.org/10.1080/23744731.2022.2080109
    39. Shiqi Peng, Yongfang Rao, Yu Huang, Tan Li, Rong Li, Jun-ji Cao, Shuncheng Lee. N-Coordinated Ir single atoms anchored on carbon octahedrons for catalytic oxidation of formaldehyde under ambient conditions. Catalysis Science & Technology 2022, 12 (12) , 4001-4011. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2CY00743F
    40. Mehdi Amouei Torkmahalleh, Kamila Turganova, Zhuldyz Zhigulina, Tomiris Madiyarova, Enoch Kwasi Adotey, Milad Malekipirbazari, Giorgio Buonanno, Luca Stabile. Formation of cluster mode particles (1–3 nm) in preschools. Science of The Total Environment 2022, 818 , 151756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151756
    41. Mehdi Amouei Torkmahalleh. Cooking Aerosol. 2022, 1-40. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5155-5_13-1
    42. Nigel Goodman, Neda Nematollahi. Fragranced Consumer Products as Sources. 2022, 1-33. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5155-5_14-1
    43. Mehdi Amouei Torkmahalleh. Cooking Aerosol. 2022, 387-425. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-7680-2_13
    44. Nigel Goodman, Neda Nematollahi. Fragranced Consumer Products as Sources. 2022, 129-161. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-7680-2_14
    45. Wenjuan Wei, John C. Little, Olivier Ramalho, Corinne Mandin. Predicting chemical emissions from household cleaning and personal care products: A review. Building and Environment 2022, 207 , 108483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108483
    46. Klaudia Pytel, Bożena Zabiegała. Investigation of RH Effect on Uncommon Limonene Ozonolysis Products and SOA Formation in Indoor Air with Real Time Measurement Techniques. SSRN Electronic Journal 2022, 106 https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4160355
    47. Peeyush Khare, Jordan E. Krechmer, Jo E. Machesky, Tori Hass-Mitchell, Cong Cao, Junqi Wang, Francesca Majluf, Felipe Lopez-Hilfiker, Sonja Malek, Will Wang, Karl Seltzer, Havala O. T. Pye, Roisin Commane, Brian C. McDonald, Ricardo Toledo-Crow, John E. Mak, Drew R. Gentner. Ammonium adduct chemical ionization to investigate anthropogenic oxygenated gas-phase organic compounds in urban air. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 2022, 22 (21) , 14377-14399. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-14377-2022
    48. Sumbule Koksoy Vayisoglu, Emine Oncu. The use of cleaning products and its relationship with the increasing health risks during the COVID‐19 pandemic. International Journal of Clinical Practice 2021, 75 (10) https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcp.14534
    49. D. Vakalis, C. Lepine, H. L. MacLean, J. A. Siegel. Can green schools influence academic performance?. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology 2021, 51 (13) , 1354-1396. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2020.1753631
    50. Mohamed Bayati, Danh C. Vu, Phuc H. Vo, Elizabeth Rogers, Jihyun Park, Thi L. Ho, Alexandra N. Davis, Zehra Gulseven, Gustavo Carlo, Francisco Palermo, Jane A. McElroy, Susan C. Nagel, Chung‐Ho Lin. Health risk assessment of volatile organic compounds at daycare facilities. Indoor Air 2021, 31 (4) , 977-988. https://doi.org/10.1111/ina.12801
    51. Georg E Matt, Penelope J E Quintana, Eunha Hoh, Joy M Zakarian, Nathan G Dodder, Rachael A Record, Melbourne F Hovell, E Melinda Mahabee-Gittens, Samuel Padilla, Laura Markman, Kayo Watanabe, Thomas E Novotny. Remediating Thirdhand Smoke Pollution in Multiunit Housing: Temporary Reductions and the Challenges of Persistent Reservoirs. Nicotine & Tobacco Research 2021, 23 (2) , 364-372. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntaa151
    52. F. Thevenet, M. Verriele, P. Harb, S. Thlaijeh, R. Brun, M. Nicolas, S. Angulo-Milhem. The indoor fate of terpenes: Quantification of the limonene uptake by materials. Building and Environment 2021, 188 , 107433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.107433
    53. Luca Stabile, Gianmarco De Luca, Antonio Pacitto, Lidia Morawska, Pasquale Avino, Giorgio Buonanno. Ultrafine particle emission from floor cleaning products. Indoor Air 2021, 31 (1) , 63-73. https://doi.org/10.1111/ina.12713
    54. Adam Laycock, Matthew D. Wright, Isabella Römer, Alison Buckley, Rachel Smith. Characterisation of particles within and aerosols produced by nano-containing consumer spray products. Atmospheric Environment: X 2020, 8 , 100079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeaoa.2020.100079
    55. Evdokia Stratigou, Sébastien Dusanter, Joel Brito, Véronique Riffault. Investigation of PM10, PM2.5, PM1 in an unoccupied airflow-controlled room: How reliable to neglect resuspension and assume unreactive particles?. Building and Environment 2020, 186 , 107357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.107357
    56. Andrew P. Ault, Vicki H. Grassian, Nicola Carslaw, Douglas B. Collins, Hugo Destaillats, D. James Donaldson, Delphine K. Farmer, Jose L. Jimenez, V. Faye McNeill, Glenn C. Morrison, Rachel E. O’Brien, Manabu Shiraiwa, Marina E. Vance, J.R. Wells, Wei Xiong. Indoor Surface Chemistry: Developing a Molecular Picture of Reactions on Indoor Interfaces. Chem 2020, 6 (12) , 3203-3218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chempr.2020.08.023
    57. Yining Wang, Wenbo Wang, Zufeng Zhang, Ping Zhou, Haowen Jiang. Design and Research of Intelligent Air Purifier System. 2020, 1822-1826. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMA49215.2020.9233851
    58. Nagendra Kumar Rai, Anushruti Ashok, Butchi Raju Akondi. Consequences of chemical impact of disinfectants: safe preventive measures against COVID-19. Critical Reviews in Toxicology 2020, 50 (6) , 513-520. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408444.2020.1790499
    59. William W Nazaroff, Charles J. Weschler. Indoor acids and bases. Indoor Air 2020, 30 (4) , 559-644. https://doi.org/10.1111/ina.12670
    60. Shadia Angulo Milhem, Marie Verriele, Melanie Nicolas, Frederic Thevenet. Does the ubiquitous use of essential oil-based products promote indoor air quality? A critical literature review. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 2020, 27 (13) , 14365-14411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08150-3
    61. George D. Leikauf. FORMALDEHYDE AND OTHER SATURATED ALDEHYDES. 2020, 555-626. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119438922.ch16
    62. Roger Sheu, Christof Stönner, Jenna C. Ditto, Thomas Klüpfel, Jonathan Williams, Drew R. Gentner. Human transport of thirdhand tobacco smoke: A prominent source of hazardous air pollutants into indoor nonsmoking environments. Science Advances 2020, 6 (10) https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aay4109
    63. Jolanda Palmisani, Asger W. Nørgaard, Vivi Kofoed-Sørensen, Per Axel Clausen, Gianluigi de Gennaro, Peder Wolkoff. Formation of ozone-initiated VOCs and secondary organic aerosol following application of a carpet deodorizer. Atmospheric Environment 2020, 222 , 117149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.117149
    64. Jonathan P. D. Abbatt, Chen Wang. The atmospheric chemistry of indoor environments. Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts 2020, 22 (1) , 25-48. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9EM00386J
    65. Mawuena A. Quarcoo, Pamela Ohman Strickland, Derek G. Shendell. Indoor ozone estimation from outdoor ozone and LBNL relocatable classroom study data. Atmospheric Environment 2019, 213 , 491-498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.06.036
    66. Claire Fortenberry, Michael Walker, Audrey Dang, Arun Loka, Gauri Date, Karolina Cysneiros de Carvalho, Glenn Morrison, Brent Williams. Analysis of indoor particles and gases and their evolution with natural ventilation. Indoor Air 2019, 29 (5) , 761-779. https://doi.org/10.1111/ina.12584
    67. Sara M. Duncan, Kenneth Sexton, Leonard Collins, Barbara J. Turpin. Residential water-soluble organic gases: chemical characterization of a substantial contributor to indoor exposures. Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts 2019, 21 (8) , 1364-1373. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9EM00105K
    68. Shan Zhou, Cora J. Young, Trevor C. VandenBoer, Tara F. Kahan. Role of location, season, occupant activity, and chemistry in indoor ozone and nitrogen oxide mixing ratios. Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts 2019, 21 (8) , 1374-1383. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9EM00129H
    69. D. K. Farmer, M. E. Vance, J. P. D. Abbatt, A. Abeleira, M. R. Alves, C. Arata, E. Boedicker, S. Bourne, F. Cardoso-Saldaña, R. Corsi, P. F. DeCarlo, A. H. Goldstein, V. H. Grassian, L. Hildebrandt Ruiz, J. L. Jimenez, T. F. Kahan, E. F. Katz, J. M. Mattila, W. W. Nazaroff, A. Novoselac, R. E. O'Brien, V. W. Or, S. Patel, S. Sankhyan, P. S. Stevens, Y. Tian, M. Wade, C. Wang, S. Zhou, Y. Zhou. Overview of HOMEChem: House Observations of Microbial and Environmental Chemistry. Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts 2019, 21 (8) , 1280-1300. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9EM00228F
    70. Jordan D. Clark, Brennan D. Less, Spencer M. Dutton, Iain S. Walker, Max H. Sherman. Efficacy of occupancy-based smart ventilation control strategies in energy-efficient homes in the United States. Building and Environment 2019, 156 , 253-267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.03.002
    71. Jun Guan, Yabin Jia, Zhiyi Wei, Xiufeng Tian. Temporal variations of ultrafine particle concentrations in aircraft cabin: A field study. Building and Environment 2019, 153 , 118-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.02.025
    72. Jamiu Adetayo Adeniran, Dauda Olurotimi Araromi, Rafiu Olasunkanmi Yusuf, Lukuman Adekilekun Jimoda, Emmanuel Olusola Oke, Jacob Ademola Sonibare. Analytical modeling of human exposure from short-term point source releases of aerosols from household spray products. Science and Technology for the Built Environment 2019, 25 (1) , 83-90. https://doi.org/10.1080/23744731.2018.1499383
    73. Georg E. Matt, Eunha Hoh, Penelope J.E. Quintana, Joy M. Zakarian, Jayson Arceo. Cotton pillows: A novel field method for assessment of thirdhand smoke pollution. Environmental Research 2019, 168 , 206-210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2018.09.025
    74. Heidi Salonen, Tunga Salthammer, Lidia Morawska. Human exposure to ozone in school and office indoor environments. Environment International 2018, 119 , 503-514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2018.07.012
    75. Torkan Fazli, Brent Stephens. Development of a nationally representative set of combined building energy and indoor air quality models for U.S. residences. Building and Environment 2018, 136 , 198-212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.03.047
    76. Jialei Shen, Zhi Gao. Ozone removal on building material surface: A literature review. Building and Environment 2018, 134 , 205-217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.02.046
    77. Brian C. McDonald, Joost A. de Gouw, Jessica B. Gilman, Shantanu H. Jathar, Ali Akherati, Christopher D. Cappa, Jose L. Jimenez, Julia Lee-Taylor, Patrick L. Hayes, Stuart A. McKeen, Yu Yan Cui, Si-Wan Kim, Drew R. Gentner, Gabriel Isaacman-VanWertz, Allen H. Goldstein, Robert A. Harley, Gregory J. Frost, James M. Roberts, Thomas B. Ryerson, Michael Trainer. Volatile chemical products emerging as largest petrochemical source of urban organic emissions. Science 2018, 359 (6377) , 760-764. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaq0524
    78. Peeyush Khare, Drew R. Gentner. Considering the future of anthropogenic gas-phase organic compound emissions and the increasing influence of non-combustion sources on urban air quality. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 2018, 18 (8) , 5391-5413. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-5391-2018
    79. Maurizio Manigrasso, Matteo Vitali, Carmela Protano, Pasquale Avino. Temporal evolution of ultrafine particles and of alveolar deposited surface area from main indoor combustion and non-combustion sources in a model room. Science of The Total Environment 2017, 598 , 1015-1026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.02.048
    80. T. Hoang, R. Castorina, F. Gaspar, R. Maddalena, P. L. Jenkins, Q. Zhang, T. E. McKone, E. Benfenati, A. Y. Shi, A. Bradman. VOC exposures in California early childhood education environments. Indoor Air 2017, 27 (3) , 609-621. https://doi.org/10.1111/ina.12340
    81. E. Darling, R. L. Corsi. Field-to-laboratory analysis of clay wall coatings as passive removal materials for ozone in buildings. Indoor Air 2017, 27 (3) , 658-669. https://doi.org/10.1111/ina.12345
    82. Aikaterini-Maria Zarogianni, Glykeria Loupa, Spyridon Rapsomanikis. A comparison of fragrance ingredients in green and nongreen detergents. Environmental Forensics 2017, 18 (2) , 110-121. https://doi.org/10.1080/15275922.2016.1263902
    83. Xinyi Niu, Steven Sai Hang Ho, Kin Fai Ho, Yu Huang, Junji Cao, Zhenxing Shen, Jian Sun, Xiumei Wang, Yu Wang, Shuncheng Lee, Rujin Huang. Indoor secondary organic aerosols formation from ozonolysis of monoterpene: An example of d-limonene with ammonia and potential impacts on pulmonary inflammations. Science of The Total Environment 2017, 579 , 212-220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.11.018
    84. A. Bradman, F. Gaspar, R. Castorina, J. Williams, T. Hoang, P. L. Jenkins, T. E. McKone, R. Maddalena. Formaldehyde and acetaldehyde exposure and risk characterization in California early childhood education environments. Indoor Air 2017, 27 (1) , 104-113. https://doi.org/10.1111/ina.12283
    85. S. Liu, R. Li, R. J. Wild, C. Warneke, J. A. de Gouw, S. S. Brown, S. L. Miller, J. C. Luongo, J. L. Jimenez, P. J. Ziemann. Contribution of human-related sources to indoor volatile organic compounds in a university classroom. Indoor Air 2016, 26 (6) , 925-938. https://doi.org/10.1111/ina.12272
    86. Somayeh Youssefi, Michael S. Waring. Predicting the evolution of secondary organic aerosol (SOA) size distributions due to limonene ozonolysis in indoor environments. Building and Environment 2016, 108 , 252-262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.08.017
    87. Michael S. Waring. Secondary organic aerosol formation by limonene ozonolysis: Parameterizing multi-generational chemistry in ozone- and residence time-limited indoor environments. Atmospheric Environment 2016, 144 , 79-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.08.051
    88. Erin Darling, Glenn C. Morrison, Richard L. Corsi. Passive removal materials for indoor ozone control. Building and Environment 2016, 106 , 33-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.06.018
    89. Dustin G. Poppendieck, Lisa C. Ng, Andrew K. Persily, Alfred T. Hodgson. Long term air quality monitoring in a net-zero energy residence designed with low emitting interior products. Building and Environment 2015, 94 , 33-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.07.001
    90. Moshood Olawale Fadeyi. Ozone in indoor environments: Research progress in the past 15 years. Sustainable Cities and Society 2015, 18 , 78-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2015.05.011
    91. Satya Durga Ch., Sharad Gokhale. Monitoring and Assessment of O3 and PM1 in the Microenvironment of a Workplace. Environmental Modeling & Assessment 2015, 20 (5) , 521-534. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-014-9440-4
    92. Sean W. Harshman, Victoria L. Dershem, Maomian Fan, Brandy S. Watts, Grant M. Slusher, Laura E. Flory, Claude C. Grigsby, Darrin K. Ott. The stability of Tenax TA thermal desorption tubes in simulated field conditions on the HAPSITE ® ER. International Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry 2015, 86 , 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/03067319.2015.1077520
    93. Somayeh Youssefi, Michael S. Waring. Indoor transient SOA formation from ozone+α-pinene reactions: Impacts of air exchange and initial product concentrations, and comparison to limonene ozonolysis. Atmospheric Environment 2015, 112 , 106-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.04.001
    94. Glenn Morrison. Recent Advances in Indoor Chemistry. Current Sustainable/Renewable Energy Reports 2015, 2 (2) , 33-40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40518-015-0026-9
    95. V. Nahuel Montesinos, Mohamad Sleiman, Sebastian Cohn, Marta I. Litter, Hugo Destaillats. Detection and quantification of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in indoor air. Talanta 2015, 138 , 20-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2015.02.015
    96. A. Fischer, E. Ljungström, L. Hägerhed Engman, S. Langer. Ventilation strategies and indoor particulate matter in a classroom. Indoor Air 2015, 25 (2) , 168-175. https://doi.org/10.1111/ina.12133
    97. S. E. Frey, H. Destaillats, S. Cohn, S. Ahrentzen, M. P. Fraser. The effects of an energy efficiency retrofit on indoor air quality. Indoor Air 2015, 25 (2) , 210-219. https://doi.org/10.1111/ina.12134
    98. J. Bartzis, P. Wolkoff, M. Stranger, G. Efthimiou, E.I. Tolis, F. Maes, A.W. Nørgaard, G. Ventura, K.K. Kalimeri, E. Goelen, O. Fernandes. On organic emissions testing from indoor consumer products’ use. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2015, 285 , 37-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.11.024
    99. Aakash C. Rai, Chao-Hsin Lin, Qingyan Chen. Numerical modeling of particle generation from ozone reactions with human-worn clothing in indoor environments. Atmospheric Environment 2015, 102 , 145-155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.11.058
    100. Paul T. J. Scheepers, Stef van Hout. Health-Related Indicators of Indoor Air Quality. 2015, 925-944. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9499-2_52
    Load all citations

    Pair your accounts.

    Export articles to Mendeley

    Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

    Pair your accounts.

    Export articles to Mendeley

    Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

    You’ve supercharged your research process with ACS and Mendeley!

    STEP 1:
    Click to create an ACS ID

    Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

    Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

    Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

    MENDELEY PAIRING EXPIRED
    Your Mendeley pairing has expired. Please reconnect