ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
Spatial, Phase, And Temporal Distributions of Perfluorooctane Sulfonate (PFOS) and Perfluorooctanoate (PFOA) in Tokyo Bay, Japan
My Activity

Figure 1Loading Img
  • Open Access
Article

Spatial, Phase, And Temporal Distributions of Perfluorooctane Sulfonate (PFOS) and Perfluorooctanoate (PFOA) in Tokyo Bay, Japan
Click to copy article linkArticle link copied!

View Author Information
National Institute for Environmental Studies, Onogawa 16-2, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8506, Japan
* Corresponding author fax: +81 298 50 2920; e-mail: [email protected]
†Current address: Center for Marine Environmental Studies (CMES), Ehime University, Matsuyama, Japan.
‡Current address: Faculty of Fisheries, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan.
§Current address: Faculty of Agriculture, Ehime University, Matsuyama, Japan.
Open PDFSupporting Information (1)

Environmental Science & Technology

Cite this: Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44, 11, 4110–4115
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/es1007609
Published April 29, 2010

Copyright © 2010 American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under these Terms of Use.

Abstract

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The spatial distribution, partitioning, and time trends of perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoate (PFOA) were investigated in the water column and bottom sediment of Tokyo Bay, Japan, during 2004−2006. A total of 480 water and 60 sediment samples obtained by regular 20-station samplings ascertained the three-dimensional distributions of these compounds and changes in the seawater structure in the whole bay. The median of volume-based average water-borne concentrations of PFOS and PFOA was 3.7 and 12 ng/L, respectively. The median concentrations in sediment were 0.61 (PFOS) and 0.20 (PFOA) ng/g-dry. Vertical mixing of the water column probably affected the vertical distribution of these compounds. The negative correlations between PFOS and PFOA concentrations and water salinity and the horizontal distributions of their concentrations suggested that freshwater inputs into the bay were the source of these compounds. A mixing model estimated the average PFOS concentration in the freshwater inputs to be 29 ng/L. The common logarithm of the partition coefficients between the dissolved and suspended-particle-sorbed phases varied among samples, with the average of 4.2 (PFOS) and 3.5 (PFOA). Our analyses indicated no apparent time trends in the concentrations of these compounds during 2004−2006 in either the freshwater input or the bay.

Copyright © 2010 American Chemical Society

Synopsis

Seawater structure and freshwater inputs control PFOS and PFOA concentrations in Tokyo Bay. No time trends were observed in the concentrations during 2004−2006.

Introduction

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoate (PFOA) have been detected worldwide in humans (1, 2), wildlife (2, 3), ambient water (4-10), and aquatic sediment (11). These compounds have been a focus of concern because of their persistence in the environment (12), retention in human body (13), and toxicities (12, 14, 15). PFOS was recently added to the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants list (16). These compounds are members of perfluorinated alkylated substances which have been produced for more than 50 years (12). Product applications developed using perfluorooctanesulfonyl fluoride (POSF) through formation of N-alkyl perfluorooctane sulfonamides have been used in surfactants and surface coatings and protections. These POSF-based products may have ultimately degraded or metabolized to PFOS (13). Salts of PFOA, particularly ammonium perfluorooctanoate, have been used as surfactants and processing aids in the production of fluoropolymers and fluoroelastomers (13).
The purpose of our study was to comprehensively elucidate the spatial distribution, partitioning, and time trends of PFOS and PFOA in the water column and bottom sediment of Tokyo Bay, Japan, during 2004−2006, based on quarterly samplings at 20 stations. Ambient water and bottom sediment may be appropriate media for monitoring levels of these compounds in the environment because of their relatively low vapor pressures and high water solubilities (12, 17). The Tokyo Bay area is one of the world’s most populous areas with many kinds of human activities (18). Elevated PFOS and PFOA concentrations have been reported in the bay and its inflowing rivers (4-9), but their detailed spatial distribution and partitioning in the bay have not been elucidated. Seasonal samplings are necessary to fully understand their three-dimensional distributions because the seawater structure of the bay changes seasonally (19, 20). The extent of mixing of bay water with freshwater inputs may affect the concentrations of these compounds in the bay. Spatial distributions and partitioning of these compounds are an essential basis for predicting their transfer to and potential effects on aquatic organisms, whose habitats are generally localized both horizontally and vertically in the bay (21). Their spatial distributions can also provide information on their probable sources. Time trends in the concentrations of these persistent compounds in the environment are of particular interest, but reports of their time trends in ambient water are scarce.

Materials and Methods

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Sampling

Twenty sampling stations were established that covered Tokyo Bay horizontally and vertically (Figure 1, Table 1). Tokyo Bay and its catchment area are described in the Supporting Information (SI). One-day sampling campaigns were conducted quarterly during 2004−2006, using two or three boats, on 19 February, 26 May, 22 August, and 28 October 2004; 24 February, 12 May, 17 August, and 26 October 2005; and 22 February, 17 May, 16 August, and 16 November 2006. Water samples were collected with GO-FLO Water Samplers (model 1080, General Oceanics, Inc., Miami, FL) at 10% and 90% of water depths, representing the upper and lower water layers at each sampling station, immediately transferred to a solvent-rinsed glass bottle, cooled during transport, and stored in a cool and dark place. They were normally extracted within four days. Surface sediment samples (about 5 cm depth) were collected by using Smith-MacIntyre grab samplers once each year (August) at the same stations, transferred to a stainless-steel container, cooled during transport, and stored at −20 °C. The sediment samples can be viewed as representing sedimentation of roughly 10 years before sampling, considering the sedimentation rates (22) and surface mixing in the bay. To demonstrate water sample variability, triplicate samples were obtained by repeated deployment of a sampler at each depth at st. 8 on 17 May 2006 and analyzed separately. Salinity and water temperature, which are important measures of water-column structure and freshwater mixing, were recorded at the sampling depths at each station with a conductivity, temperature and depth profiler (XR 420-CTD, RBR Ltd., ON, Canada; or Sonde 4a, HYDROLAB, Loveland, CO). Additionally, during the May, August, and November 2006 samplings, continuous vertical profiles of salinity and water temperature were recorded at st. 1−10. Suspicious salinity measurements were removed before data analysis. Seawater density was calculated (23) from the measured temperature and salinity.

Figure 1

Figure 1. Tokyo Bay and the sampling stations.

Table 1. Sampling Stations, Water Depth, Suspended Solid (SS) Concentration in Water, Total Organic Carbon (TOC) Content in Sediment, and PFOS and PFOA Concentrations in the Upper (10% depth) and Lower (90% Depth) Water Layers and in Sedimenta
sampling stationlongitude (°N)latitude (°E)depth (m)SS upper (mg/L)SS lower (mg/L)TOC (mg/g-dry)PFOS upper (ng/L)PFOS lower (ng/L)PFOS sediment (ng/g-dry)PFOA upper (ng/L)PFOA lower (ng/L)PFOA sediment (ng/g-dry)
135.6172139.966711157.4226.33.50.7422150.35
235.5975140.0344128.38.2125.53.30.6325110.31
335.5900139.846712118.2239.03.90.4616110.22
435.5794139.8897148.57.4316.53.11.4149.20.29
535.5644139.9431166.66.5336.42.91.1169.10.27
635.5481139.9931177.28.0345.73.20.71169.70.26
735.5478139.826419118.6228.52.90.35167.70.17
835.5358139.858121107.8316.42.60.77157.90.23
935.5250139.8953229.17.3314.92.50.60173.50.21
1035.5033139.9531208.19.1335.22.60.66177.70.27
1135.4658139.7775328.07.5296.02.00.65164.80.11
12b35.4639139.8367318.18.4295.11.80.57174.30.16
1335.4500139.8725238.47.9274.42.00.55175.30.20
1435.4158139.7183378.210176.11.40.21162.90.11
1535.4083139.7614198.16.99.64.52.60.43175.00.39
1635.3856139.8150146.97.03.54.03.20.25138.60.11
1735.3528139.6881446.811185.21.00.31132.10.15
1835.3486139.7253267.16.53.33.32.20.13116.30.19
1935.3433c139.7753147.68.62.73.12.40.20126.60.19
2035.3103139.7167d528.06.27.34.70.880.13141.70.16
a

Medians of measured values among samplings during 2004−2006 are shown for depth, SS, TOC, PFOS, and PFOA.

b

35.4603°N, 139.8267°E in 2004 and February 2005.

c

35.3389°N in 2004 and February 2005.

d

139.7081°E in 2004 and February 2005.

Chemical Analysis

See SI for details (4, 5, 24). For determination of total (dissolved + particulate) concentrations of PFOS and PFOA in water, about 100 mL aliquots of the samples were filtered through a precombusted glass-fiber filter. The methanol extract of the freeze-dried filter was obtained by sonication and centrifuged, and the supernatant was concentrated. The filtrate and the concentrated supernatant were combined, spiked with labeled surrogate compound(s) in methanol (depending on the sampling date; 5 ng of sodium dodecyl-d25 sulfate, 1 ng of 13C2-labeled PFOA, or 1 ng each of13C4-labeled PFOS and 13C2-labeled PFOA), and then purified by using a C18 solid-phase extraction (SPE). The SPE eluate was concentrated and finally dissolved in 500 μL of 1:1 (v/v) methanol in Milli-Q water. For the separate determination of dissolved and particulate concentrations, about 500 mL aliquots of the water samples were filtered through a precombusted glass-fiber filter. The filtrate and filter were spiked with the surrogate compound(s), and then separately purified similarly as described above. Freeze-dried sediment samples of about 1.0 g-dry were extracted and purified by the same procedure used for the filter samples. All samples were acidified just prior to SPE. Identification and quantification were conducted by injecting an aliquot of the final concentrated extract into a liquid chromatograph (LC) connected to a triple-quadrupole-type tandem mass spectrometer equipped with a C18 LC column. Quantification was based on the internal standard method. Concentrations were reported when the signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) of the peak was >8. Phase-separated concentrations were measured in 62 samples (31 upper layer samples) collected at the May (n = 2), August (40), and November (20) 2006 samplings. Total concentrations are reported unless otherwise specified. Suspended solids (SS) were determined by passing the water sample through a precombusted glass-fiber filter and weighing the dried residue on the filter. The particulate organic carbon (POC) content in water and the organic carbon (OC) content in the sediment were measured with an elemental analyzer after removing inorganic carbonate with hydrochloric acid.

Data Quality Assurance and Quality Control

See SI for details. Analytical reproducibility and method recovery of PFOS and PFOA in the water and sediment samples were confirmed to be satisfactory. Method and sampling blanks were confirmed to be negligible. The agreement between the total concentration and the sum of the separately determined dissolved and particulate concentrations was good.

Data Analysis

Median values are adopted as representative of the central tendency of the observed concentrations, considering the data distribution (see Results). The difference in concentrations between the two layers was examined by the Wilcoxon signed rank test (i.e., sampling stations matched) against the null hypothesis that the central tendencies of the distributions were equal, and the associated Hodges−Lehmann estimator (25). To focus on relative horizontal spatial trends in each layer at each sampling, the 20 sampling stations were ranked in descending order according to the observed concentrations of each compound, and the ranks of each sampling station were averaged over the 12 water or three sediment samplings. These average ranks were used to assess the spatial distributions, in addition to the median concentrations at each sampling station. To assess the central tendency of ratios, the geometric mean and the 95% confidence interval (95% CI) based on the t-statistic of the log-transformed ratios were used. The 95% CI of population correlation coefficients was estimated by Fisher’s z transformation. These 95% CIs are indicated in square brackets. Statistical analyses were carried out with Microsoft Excel (ver. 2003, Microsoft, Redmond, WA), SPSS for Windows (ver. 15.0J, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL), Statistica (ver. 7.1, StatSoft, Inc., Tulsa, OK), and StatXact (ver. 8, Cytel Inc., Cambridge, MA).
Linear regression analysis was conducted to assess the possible dependence of PFOS and PFOA concentrations on salinity: (1) where C, Cfresh, and Cocean are the concentration of PFOS or PFOA in each sample, in the freshwater inputs to the bay, and in Pacific Ocean water, respectively. αfresh and αocean are the respective ratios of freshwater and ocean water in the water samples (αfresh + αocean = 1). Equation 1 transforms to eq 2 by assuming that αocean equals salinity of each sample (S) divided by salinity of Pacific Ocean seawater (Socean). The parameters a0 and a1 in eq 2 were estimated by weighted least-squares (WLS) regression by using C−2 as the weight. (2) Equation 2 was then used to estimate Cfresh by setting S = 0 and Cocean by setting S = Socean. In this study, Socean was set to 35.5 because the maximum observed salinity in the bay was 35.4. Another least-squares regression without weighting (OLS) of log(PFOS concentration) was conducted against log(freshwater ratio (1 − S/Socean)) to confirm the WLS regression results.
To evaluate partitioning between the suspended-particle-sorbed (or OC-sorbed) and apparently dissolved phases, observed partition coefficients were calculated for particle−water (KPlinear, eq 3) and OC-water (KOClinear, eq 4), assuming linear relationships. (3) where Cparticulate (/kg dry matter) is the concentration in the particulate phase and Cdis (/L water) is the concentration in the apparently dissolved phase. Similarly, (4) where [OC] (−) is the OC content (dry mass basis) of the suspended particles.
Volume-based average concentrations of PFOS and PFOA in Tokyo Bay water were calculated by taking into account their three-dimensional distributions and the seawater structure of the bay. The total mass of each compound in the bay water was first estimated, and then divided by the volume of water in the bay. The mass of each compound in the bay water was estimated by dividing the bay horizontally into 500 × 500 m grid squares and coastal subareas, and vertically into two layers corresponding to the upper and lower layer samples, and by summing the masses present in each grid square or subarea. The water column was divided into two layers when stratification was present, by using observed and reported vertical density profiles (19, 26-28). PFOS and PFOA concentrations and pycnocline depth at the closest sampling station were assigned to each grid square or subarea. See SI for details. The total mass of each compound in the water column was divided by the estimated water residence-time in the bay (1.0−1.6 months ( (19, 29))) to estimate their fluxes through the water column. Their sedimentation fluxes were calculated by multiplying the concentrations in the sediment by the reported sedimentation rates in the bay (22).

Results

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Concentration

Table 1 shows the median values at each sampling station of the SS concentration in water, the total organic carbon (TOC) content in sediment, and the PFOS and PFOA concentrations in the upper and lower water layers and sediment. SI Figure S1 shows the data distributions of the PFOS and PFOA concentrations in the upper and lower layers of the water column and in the sediment. The data distributions in normal scale have a long tail to higher values but are roughly symmetrical in log scale. As the median concentrations of both compounds were clearly higher in the upper water layer than in the lower layer (SI Figure S1), data from the two layers were analyzed separately. The median concentrations (range) were PFOS, upper layer, 5.5 ng/L (0.78−17), and lower layer, 2.5 ng/L (not detected [ND]-14); PFOA, upper layer, 16 ng/L (2.7−63), and lower layer, 6.2 ng/L (0.29−35); PFOS, sediment, 0.61 ng/g-dry (0.062−3.6); and PFOA, sediment, 0.20 ng/g-dry (ND-1.4). In the lower layer, log(PFOS concentration) and log(PFOA concentration) were relatively highly correlated (r = 0.83 [0.79−0.87], n = 240) compared with the other correlations between the log concentrations of each compound in each layer (0.22−0.55).
The variability, including both sampling and analytical variability, was demonstrated to be roughly 10% in the water data, as the three consecutive deployment of the water sampler yielded coefficient of variation (CV) in concentration of 2.1% (average = 7.5 ng/L), 6.2% (3.1 ng/L), 3.2% (36 ng/L), and 12% (17 ng/L) for PFOS in the upper and lower layers and PFOA in the upper and lower layers, respectively. In the case of one PFOS ND value in water and four PFOA ND values in sediment, the detection limits (S/N = 8) were estimated to be about 0.4 ng/L and 0.05−0.08 ng/g-dry, respectively. Half the detection limit was assigned to these ND values when necessary in the data analysis.

Spatial Distributions

Observed differences in the density of seawater between the upper and the lower layers indicate the extent of stratification of the water column (SI Figure S2). The lower density of the upper layer was most pronounced in August, followed May, consistent with previous reports of seasonal changes in the seawater structure in the bay, and reflecting greater dilution of the salinity by freshwater from inflowing rivers and heating of the water’s surface in warmer seasons (19, 20).
The ranges of PFOS and PFOA concentrations in each layer as well as differences in the concentrations between the two layers were shown in Figure 2. Their concentrations in the upper layer were statistically significantly higher (p < 0.05, n = 20) than those in the lower layer at each of the 12 samplings, except for PFOS in November 2006 and PFOA in February 2005 at which the concentrations in the two layers were comparable. In addition, larger differences in PFOS and PFOA concentrations were observed between the two layers along with larger differences in seawater densities between the layers, particularly in August and May (Figure 2 and SI Figure S2), consistent with the greater stratification of the water column in August and May. The range of concentrations in the water column was 3.9, 6.4, 4.8, and 12 for PFOS in the upper layer, PFOS in the lower layer, PFOA in the upper layer, and PFOA in the lower layer, respectively, as represented by the median among the 12 samplings of the maximum-to-minimum concentration ratio at the 20 stations.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Seasonal distributions of PFOS (a) and PFOA (b) concentrations in the upper and lower layers of the water column of Tokyo Bay. Each point represents one sample. Horizontal offsets were chosen arbitrarily to minimize overlap of the points. For each sampling, the upper layer data (open symbols) are plotted on the left and the lower layer data (closed symbols) on the right. ND (⊕) is plotted as the detection limit of the sample.

The concentrations of PFOS and PFOA were generally higher at northern sampling stations (st. 1−10) (SI Figure S3). For both compounds in both layers, the three highest-ranking stations were among st. 1−11, and the three lowest-ranking stations were among st. 14−20. For both compound in the lower layer, the three highest-ranking stations were st. 4 or more northern stations, whereas in the upper layer, they were st. 11 or more northern stations. In the upper layer, PFOS concentrations during each sampling were higher at the northwestern stations (3, 7, and 11, in descending order of concentration), whereas PFOA concentrations were higher at the northeastern stations (2, 1, and 10). PFOS and PFOA concentrations in sediment were also generally higher at the northern sampling stations. However, correlations of the log concentrations of the two compounds between the sediment and the lower water layer were weak (PFOS, r = 0.39 [0.15−0.59], n = 60; PFOA, r = 0.42 [0.18−0.62], n = 56). The highest-ranking stations for PFOS concentrations in sediment were st. 4 and 5, which were different from those for PFOS concentrations in the lower layer water (st. 3 and 1). These relative horizontal trends based on the average ranks generally accord with the horizontal trends based on median concentrations (Table 1).
PFOS concentrations in both layers of the water column showed a clear increasing trend (r = 0.78 [0.73−0.81], log−log scale, n = 405) in relation to the freshwater ratio (1 − S/Socean) (Figure 3). The WLS regression of PFOS concentration against salinity (n = 405) yielded [PFOS concentration/(ng L−1)] = (29.2 ± 2.6) − (0.823 ± 0.077) × salinity (parameters: point estimates ± half of 95% CI). PFOS Cfresh was determined to be 29 ng/L [27−32], and Cocean to be close to zero (−0.011 ng/L [−0.14 to 0.12]), by extrapolation. Similar regressions for the seasonal data suggested that PFOS Cfresh was higher in winter (February) (48 ng/L versus about 29−32 ng/L in other seasons). The regression result for log(PFOS concentration) against log(freshwater ratio) supported these results by yielding an extrapolated PFOS Cfresh of 23 ng/L [20−27] (Figure 3), with similar differences among seasons. Yearly regression estimates of Cfresh were inconsistent between the two regression methods (WLS and OLS of log concentrations); the former suggested slightly higher Cfresh in 2006, whereas the latter suggested that Cfresh was highest in 2005. Although PFOA concentrations also tended to increase as the freshwater ratio increased, the correlation was lower (r = 0.57 [0.50−0.63], log−log scale) and the data were more scattered.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Relationship between the PFOS concentration and the freshwater ratio (FWR = 1 − ((sample salinity)/(Pacific Ocean seawater salinity))) in the water column. Open and closed symbols indicate upper and lower water layer samples, respectively. Circles, triangles, and squares indicate samples collected in 2004, 2005, and 2006, respectively. Blue, green, pink, and brown indicate samples collected in winter (February), spring (May), summer (August), and autumn (October or November), respectively. The equation of the regression line is log[PFOS concentration/(ng L−1)] = (1.36 ± 0.07) − (0.738 ± 0.059) × log FWR (parameters: point estimates ± half of 95% CI).

Partitioning

Partition coefficients were calculated for the 58 and 49 samples with detected concentrations in both phases, for PFOS and PFOA, respectively. These partition coefficients varied by more than 1 order of magnitude among samples. For PFOS and PFOA, logKPlinear ranged 3.4−5.0 (log of the geometric mean, 4.2) and 2.7−4.2 (3.5), respectively, and logKOClinear from 4.5−5.9 (5.2) and from 3.4−5.5 (4.5), respectively (SI Figure S4). KOC values were calculated under the assumption that these compounds were predominantly sorbed to the OC fraction of the particles. In November 2006, the water column was more vertically mixed, compared with the more stratified water column in May and August 2006. Therefore, the partition coefficients of samples from November 2006 may reflect more homogeneous conditions. The partition coefficients for this data subset (PFOS, n = 16; PFOA, n = 8; water temperature, 17.2−18.9 °C) did fall within a narrower range, but the median values were similar to those of the whole data set (see SI Figure S4).

Volume-Based Average Concentrations in the Water Column, And Fluxes through the Bay

The volume-based average concentrations of PFOS ranged 1.9−5.9 (median of 12 samplings, 3.7) ng/L and that of PFOA ranged 2.7−22 (median, 12) ng/L, whereas the mass of PFOS in the bay ranged 29−87 (median, 54) kg and that of PFOA 40−320 (median, 170) kg (Figure 4). The volume-based average concentrations of the two compounds changed similarly over time (r = 0.71 [0.23−0.91], n = 12), but neither showed any apparent or statistically significant linear trend in relation to time (n = 12; PFOS, r = −0.14 [−0.66 to 0.47]; PFOA, r = −0.24 [−0.71 to 0.39]). The estimated fluxes of PFOS and PFOA through the water column of Tokyo Bay were 210−1000 and 300−3900 kg/y, respectively, which were about 2−3 orders of magnitude higher than the sedimentation fluxes in the bay (0.84−4.2 and 0.23−0.83 kg/y, respectively).

Figure 4

Figure 4. Time series of masses and volume-based average concentrations of PFOS (a) and PFOA (b) in the water column of Tokyo Bay. Error bars indicate uncertainty due to assignment of pycnocline depth as well as that due to sampling and analytical variability.

Discussion

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This study elucidated the three-dimensional distributions of PFOS and PFOA in the whole bay taking into account the seasonal change in the seawater structure. 480 measurements were obtained from the water column and 60 from the sediment of Tokyo Bay for each of these compounds, among which only five were ND values. This comprehensive data set thus provides a basis for evaluating potential risks associated with these compounds in the aquatic environment of the bay. Previously reported concentrations of these compounds in Tokyo Bay (4-7) are within or close to the ranges observed in our study. All data analyses in this study assumed no degradation of the two compounds in the bay.
The correlations between [PFOS or PFOA concentration difference between the upper and lower layers] and [the density difference between the two layers] suggest that water column stratification or vertical mixing affects the vertical distributions of these compounds. The concentrations in the upper layer, however, were generally higher than those in the lower layer (although the difference was smaller), even when no vertical density gradient was present (e.g., at most stations at the February samplings), probably reflecting fresh water input into the upper layer and still incomplete vertical mixing.
The higher concentrations in the upper layer and at more northern stations suggest that these compounds enter the bay at its northern part and are input mainly into the upper layer. This inference is supported by the reported considerable input of these compounds via inflowing rivers and effluent of sewage treatment plants (STPs) (7, 8) mainly into the northern part of the bay. The higher PFOA concentrations in the northeastern part of the bay suggest that the geographical source distribution of PFOA or its behavior may be different from those of PFOS. North to south concentration gradients in the water column and sediment of Tokyo Bay have also been reported for other persistent organic chemicals of anthropogenic origin (dioxins (18), fluorescent whitening agents (20), and polychlorinated biphenyls (30)), so this horizontal distribution may be characteristic for such compounds in Tokyo Bay.
Our simple mixing model (eq 1) provided valuable information regarding the average concentration of PFOS and its seasonal change in the freshwater inputs to Tokyo Bay. The model assumes that the concentrations of PFOS or PFOA in each sample (C) result from mixing of freshwater and ocean water inputs in the bay. The conservative behavior of salinity and the persistence of PFOS and PFOA support the use of this model. The concentration of a compound in freshwater (Cfresh) represents the average of its concentration in the various freshwater inputs. Salinity, or the freshwater ratio, represents the extent of mixing of seawater with freshwater. Thus, the negative correlation between the PFOS concentration and salinity indicates that freshwater inputs were the predominant source of PFOS to the bay. The estimated PFOS Cfresh falls within its reported concentration ranges in rivers flowing into Tokyo Bay (2.1−140 ng/L) (5, 7-10), and within its concentration range in effluent from the STPs on the shore of the bay (17−1100 ng/L; Serizawa et al., National Institute for Environmental Studies, unpublished data). No data on seasonal differences in the PFOS concentrations of waters flowing into Tokyo Bay are available, however, if the PFOS load from the catchment is relatively constant, the lower water flow in winter due to lower precipitation would account for the higher estimated concentration in the freshwater input in winter. Our regression result for PFOS Cocean is consistent with the reported low concentrations in ocean water not affected by Tokyo Bay (40−75 pg/L in the offshore of Japan (6)). The similar trend of PFOA against salinity to that of PFOS and the similar trend between PFOS and PFOA over time suggest that these compounds in Tokyo Bay share a common major source. The greater variability of the PFOA concentration against the freshwater ratio may reflect a wider spatial distribution of emission sources or a higher variability in the emission rate.
Variability in particulate matter composition and the extent to which equilibrium had been obtained in the sampled waters may account for the variation in partition coefficients between dissolved and suspended-particle-sorbed phases. The partition coefficients of PFOS and PFOA in ambient seawater obtained in this study were several orders of magnitude higher than previously reported limited number of values measured using environmental samples. Odaka and Masunaga (7) reported a field-observed PFOS log Kd of 2.8 (Kd = 600 L/kg) in Tokyo Bay (we compared reported Kd values with our KPlinear values). The difference from our results is primarily due to the lower particulate-phase concentrations in their study (dissolved concentrations and SS levels were comparable). Since their samples used for Kd calculations were collected near the mouths of major inflowing rivers, their lower Kd values may reflect particular conditions in these rivers on the sampling day. Even lower partition coefficients (PFOS log Kd, 0.88 (31); PFOS log KOC, 2.4−2.7 (31, 32) PFOA log KOC, 2.11 (32)) have been obtained in experiments using freshwater sediments. However, these experimental values may not be directly comparable to ours because of the much higher ranges of concentrations used in these laboratory experiments (about 103−106 higher dissolved concentrations than those observed in this study), and the difference in cation concentrations (e.g., [Ca2+]) (32) between freshwater and seawater. It is interesting to note that PFOS and PFOA concentrations at the August 2006 sampling in the lower layer per particulate mass were respectively roughly 68 (geometric mean) (range, 9.5−780) and 82 (12−340) times those in the bottom sediment collected at the same station at the same time, and respectively 16 (4.4−59) and 20 (4.2−180) times on an OC basis, possibly reflecting differences in source or composition between sediment particles and suspended particulate matter.
Our results showed no apparent trend in the concentration of either compound in the freshwater input or the bay with time. This lack of a linear trend in PFOS during the 12 seasons is consistent with the PFOS Cfresh regression results showing no consistent yearly trend. No governmental regulations have been implemented on these compounds in Japan until 2009. Few domestic records of their industrial production, import, or emission are available. Since the fluxes of PFOS and PFOA through the water column were much higher than their sedimentation fluxes, the water column may be the more appropriate medium in which to monitor the levels of these compounds in Tokyo Bay. The potential relationships of the concentrations of these compounds with the stratification of the water column in Tokyo Bay and with the freshwater inputs as indicated by the salinity should be taken into account in the interpretation of such monitoring results. Investigation of degradation rates in the aquatic environment of precursor compounds of PFOS and PFOA may be necessary for a more precise evaluation of their fluxes and partitioning therein.

Supporting Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Additional information about the Materials and Methods. Figures S1−S4. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org/.

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Author Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

  • Corresponding Author
    • Takeo Sakurai - National Institute for Environmental Studies, Onogawa 16-2, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8506, Japan Email: [email protected]
  • Authors
    • Shigeko Serizawa - National Institute for Environmental Studies, Onogawa 16-2, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8506, Japan
    • Tomohiko Isobe - National Institute for Environmental Studies, Onogawa 16-2, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8506, Japan
    • Jun Kobayashi - National Institute for Environmental Studies, Onogawa 16-2, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8506, Japan
    • Keita Kodama - National Institute for Environmental Studies, Onogawa 16-2, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8506, Japan
    • Gen Kume - National Institute for Environmental Studies, Onogawa 16-2, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8506, Japan
    • Jeong-Hoon Lee - National Institute for Environmental Studies, Onogawa 16-2, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8506, Japan
    • Hideaki Maki - National Institute for Environmental Studies, Onogawa 16-2, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8506, Japan
    • Yoshitaka Imaizumi - National Institute for Environmental Studies, Onogawa 16-2, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8506, Japan
    • Noriyuki Suzuki - National Institute for Environmental Studies, Onogawa 16-2, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8506, Japan
    • Toshihiro Horiguchi - National Institute for Environmental Studies, Onogawa 16-2, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8506, Japan
    • Masatoshi Morita - National Institute for Environmental Studies, Onogawa 16-2, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8506, Japan
    • Hiroaki Shiraishi - National Institute for Environmental Studies, Onogawa 16-2, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8506, Japan

Acknowledgment

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Dr. Tomohiro Nishikawa, Mr. Masashi Hirota, and Mr. Masaaki Oyama helped in the sampling. Ms Izumi Hirai helped in the chemical analysis.

References

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article references 32 other publications.

  1. 1
    Hansen, K. J.; Clemen, L. A.; Ellefson, M. E.; Johnson, H. O. Compound-specific, quantitative characterization of organic fluorochemicals in biological matrices Environ. Sci. Technol. 2001, 35, 766 770
  2. 2
    Houde, M.; Martin, J. W.; Letcher, R. J.; Solomon, K. R.; Muir, D. C. G. Biological monitoring of polyfluoroalkyl substances: A review Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40, 3463 3473
  3. 3
    Giesy, J. P.; Kannan, K. Global distribution of perfluorooctane sulfonate in wildlife Environ. Sci. Technol. 2001, 35, 1339 1342
  4. 4
    Taniyasu, S.; Kannan, K.; Horii, Y.; Hanari, N.; Yamashita, N. A survey of perfluorooctane sulfonate and related perfluorinated organic compounds in water, fish, birds, and humans from Japan Environ. Sci. Technol. 2003, 37, 2634 2639
  5. 5
    Saito, N.; Harada, K.; Inoue, K.; Sasaki, K.; Yoshinaga, T.; Koizumi, A. Perfluorooctanoate and perfluorooctane sulfonate concentrations in surface water in Japan J. Occup. Health 2004, 46, 49 59
  6. 6
    Yamashita, N.; Kannan, K.; Taniyasu, S.; Horii, Y.; Petrick, G.; Gamo, T. A global survey of perfluorinated acids in oceans Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2005, 51, 658 668
  7. 7
    Odaka, R.; Masunaga, S. Environmental behavior of perfluorinated surfactants in Tokyo Bay J. Jpn. Soc. Water Environ. 2006, 29, 221 228

    (in Japanese)

  8. 8
    Murakami, M.; Imamura, E.; Shinohara, H.; Kiri, K.; Muramatsu, Y.; Harada, A.; Takada, H. Occurrence and sources of perfluorinated surfactants in rivers in Japan Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42, 6566 6572
  9. 9
    Zushi, Y.; Takeda, T.; Masunaga, S. Existence of nonpoint source of perfluorinated compounds and their loads in the Tsurumi River basin, Japan Chemosphere 2008, 71, 1566 1573
  10. 10
    Takazawa, Y.; Nishino, T.; Sasaki, Y.; Yamashita, H.; Suzuki, N.; Tanabe, K.; Shibata, Y. Occurrence and distribution of perfluorooctane sulfonate and perfluorooctanoic acid in the rivers of Tokyo Water, Air, Soil Pollut. 2009, 202, 57 67
  11. 11
    Higgins, C. P.; Field, J. A.; Criddle, C. S.; Luthy, R. G. Quantitative determination of perfluorochemicals in sediments and domestic sludge Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005, 39, 3946 3956
  12. 12
    Giesy, J. P.; Kannan, K. Perfluorochemical surfactants in the environment Environ. Sci. Technol. 2002, 36, 146A 152A
  13. 13
    Olsen, G. W.; Burris, J. M.; Ehresman, D. J.; Froehlich, J. W.; Seacat, A. M.; Butenhoff, J. L.; Zobel, L. R. Half-life of serum elimination of perfluorooctanesulfonate, perfluorohexanesulfonate, and perfluorooctanoate in retired fluorochemical production workers Environ Health Perspect. 2007, 115, 1298 1305
  14. 14
    Hekster, F. M.; Laane, R. W. P. M.; de Voogt, P., Environmental and toxicity effects of perfluoroalkylated substances. In Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology; Ware, G., Ed.; Springer-Verlag: New York, 2003; Vol. 179, pp 99121.
  15. 15
    Ankley, G. T.; Kuehl, D. W.; Kahl, M. D.; Jensen, K. M.; Butterworth, B. C.; Nichols, J. W. Partial life-cycle toxicity and bioconcentration modeling of perfluorooctanesulfonate in the northern leopard frog (Rana pipiens) Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2004, 23, 2745 2755
  16. 16
    Adoption of Amendments to Annexes A, B and C of Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants, Stockholm, 22 May 2001, XXVII.15; 26 August 2009; United Nations: New York, 2009.
  17. 17
    Prevedouros, K.; Cousins, I. T.; Buck, R. C.; Korzeniowski, S. H. Sources, fate, and transport of perfluorocarboxylates Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40, 32 44
  18. 18
    Sakurai, T.; Kim, J. G.; Suzuki, N.; Matsuo, T.; Li, D. Q.; Yao, Y. A.; Masunaga, S.; Nakanishi, J. Polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans in sediment, soil, fish, shellfish and crab samples from Tokyo Bay area, Japan Chemosphere 2000, 40, 627 640
  19. 19
    Unoki, S., Water and its flow in Tokyo Bay. In Topography, Geology and Hydrology of Tokyo Bay; Kaizuka, S., Ed.; Tsukiji Shokan Publishing: Tokyo, Japan, 1993; pp 135186

    (in Japanese).

  20. 20
    Managaki, S.; Takada, H.; Kim, D.-M.; Horiguchi, T.; Shiraishi, H. Three-dimensional distributions of sewage markers in Tokyo Bay water—fluorescent whitening agents (FWAs) Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2006, 52, 281 292
  21. 21
    Kume, G.; Horiguchi, T.; Goto, A.; Shiraishi, H.; Shibata, Y.; Morita, M.; Shimizu, M. Seasonal distribution, age, growth, and reproductive biology of marbled sole Pleuronectes yokohamae in Tokyo Bay, Japan Fisheries Science 2006, 72, 289 298
  22. 22
    Matsumoto, E. The sedimentary environment in the Tokyo Bay Chikyukagaku 1983, 17, 27 32

    (in Japanese)

  23. 23
    Tenth report of the joint panel on oceanographic tables and standards. In UNESCO Technical Papers in Marine Science; United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization: Paris, 1981; Vol. 36, pp 125.
  24. 24
    Hansen, K. J.; Johnson, H. O.; Eldridge, J. S.; Butenhoff, J. L.; Dick, L. A. Quantitative characterization of trace levels of PFOS and PFOA in the Tennessee River Environ. Sci. Technol. 2002, 36, 1681 1685
  25. 25
    Hollander, M.; Wolfe, D. A., Nonparametric Statistical Methods., 2nd ed.; John Wiley & Sons, Inc: New York, 1999; p 816.
  26. 26
    Yazawa, K.;; Ikeda, F. Distribution of the anoxic water mass in Tokyo Bay and effect of dissolved oxygen on mantis shrimp (Oratosquilla oratoria De Haan). In Research Report of the Kanagawa Prefectural Fisheries Experimental Station, 1988; pp 95100 (

    in Japanese

    ).
  27. 27
    Koike, Y.; Matsuyama, M.; Hayashi, T.; Kitade, Y.; Kitazawa, A.; Yoshida, J. Distribution and behavior of bottom water in Tokyo Bay in summer J. Tokyo Univ. Fish. 1997, 84, 43 51

    (in Japanese)

  28. 28
    Hibino, T.; Nakayama, K.; Okada, T. Current field in Tokyo Bay during stratification period Proc. Coast. Eng., JSCE 2000, 47, 1056 1060

    (in Japanese)

  29. 29
    Okada, T.; Takao, T.; Nakayama, K.; Furukawa, K. Change in freshwater discharge and residence time of seawater in Tokyo Bay J. Hydraul., Coastal Environ. Eng. 2007, 63, 67 72

    (in Japanese)

  30. 30
    Kobayashi, J.; Serizawa, S.; Sakurai, T.; Imaizumi, Y.; Suzuki, N.; Horiguchi, T. Spatial distribution and partitioning of polychlorinated biphenyls in Tokyo Bay, Japan J. Environ. Monit. 2010, 12, 838 845
  31. 31
    Johnson, R. L.; Anschutz, A. J.; Smolen, J. M.; Simcik, M. F.; Penn, R. L. The adsorption of perfluorooctane sulfonate onto sand, clay, and iron oxide surfaces J. Chem. Eng. Data 2007, 52, 1165 1170
  32. 32
    Higgins, C. P.; Luthy, R. G. Sorption of perfluorinated surfactants on sediments Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40, 7251 7256

Cited By

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article is cited by 51 publications.

  1. Derek Muir, Luc T. Miaz. Spatial and Temporal Trends of Perfluoroalkyl Substances in Global Ocean and Coastal Waters. Environmental Science & Technology 2021, 55 (14) , 9527-9537. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c08035
  2. Paulo Casal, Yifeng Zhang, Jonathan W. Martin, Mariana Pizarro, Begoña Jiménez, and Jordi Dachs . Role of Snow Deposition of Perfluoroalkylated Substances at Coastal Livingston Island (Maritime Antarctica). Environmental Science & Technology 2017, 51 (15) , 8460-8470. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b02521
  3. Yin Liu, Gaoxing Su, Fei Wang, Jianbo Jia, Shuhuan Li, Linlin Zhao, Yali Shi, Yaqi Cai, Hao Zhu, Bin Zhao, Guibin Jiang, Hongyu Zhou, and Bing Yan . Elucidation of the Molecular Determinants for Optimal Perfluorooctanesulfonate Adsorption Using a Combinatorial Nanoparticle Library Approach. Environmental Science & Technology 2017, 51 (12) , 7120-7127. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b01635
  4. Shigeki Masunaga Yasuyuki Zushi . Status and Trends of Perfluoroalkyl Substances in Japan with Special Emphasis on the Tokyo Bay Basin. 2016, 157-179. https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-2016-1244.ch007
  5. Belén González-Gaya, Jordi Dachs, Jose L. Roscales, Gemma Caballero, and Begoña Jiménez . Perfluoroalkylated Substances in the Global Tropical and Subtropical Surface Oceans. Environmental Science & Technology 2014, 48 (22) , 13076-13084. https://doi.org/10.1021/es503490z
  6. Yasuyuki Zushi, Feng Ye, Mamoru Motegi, Kiyoshi Nojiri, Shigeo Hosono, Toshinari Suzuki, Yuki Kosugi, Kumiko Yaguchi, and Shigeki Masunaga . Spatially Detailed Survey on Pollution by Multiple Perfluorinated Compounds in the Tokyo Bay Basin of Japan. Environmental Science & Technology 2011, 45 (7) , 2887-2893. https://doi.org/10.1021/es103917r
  7. Xu Zhu, Hui Li, Yu Luo, Yu Li, Jin Zhang, Zhenyu Wang, Wenyu Yang, Ruifei Li. Evaluation and prediction of anthropogenic impacts on long-term multimedia fate and health risks of PFOS and PFOA in the Elbe River Basin. Water Research 2024, 257 , 121675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2024.121675
  8. Jing Chen, Hong Huang, Ruijing Li, Jinchen Yu, Zhiming Hu, Xu Zhao, Yang Li, Wenqian Wang. Perfluorooctane sulfonate in water and sediment from the Yangtze Estuary and coastal waters: Occurrence, partitioning and diffusion behavior and risk assessment. Emerging Contaminants 2023, 9 (4) , 100260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emcon.2023.100260
  9. Yang Liu, Yong He, BingJun Han, HuiJuan Liu, Shu Tao, WenXin Liu. Sewage discharge and organic matter affect the partitioning behaviors of different polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in a river surface sediment-pore water system. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2023, 446 , 130757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.130757
  10. Yan Wu, Ruihe Jin, Qiqing Chen, Xinyu Du, Jing Yang, Min Liu. Organic contaminants of emerging concern in global estuaries: Environmental occurrence, fate, and bioavailability. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology 2023, 53 (4) , 550-575. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2022.2077062
  11. Huiting Chen, Martin Reinhard, Luhua You, Karina Yew-Hoong Gin. Effect of repeated sorption–desorption on irreversible and reversible absorption of hydrophobic perfluoroalkyl acids to freshwater sediment. Environmental Technology & Innovation 2022, 28 , 102673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2022.102673
  12. Xuehua Li, Ruohan Zhang, Tian Tian, Xiaochen Shang, Xu Du, Yingying He, Naoki Matsuura, Tianlie Luo, Ya Wang, Jingwen Chen, Kiwao Kadokami. Screening and ecological risk of 1200 organic micropollutants in Yangtze Estuary water. Water Research 2021, 201 , 117341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2021.117341
  13. Francisco Sánchez-Soberón, Rebecca Sutton, Margaret Sedlak, Donald Yee, Marta Schuhmacher, June-Soo Park. Multi-box mass balance model of PFOA and PFOS in different regions of San Francisco Bay. Chemosphere 2020, 252 , 126454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126454
  14. Siquan Wang, Liya Ma, Can Chen, Yongyu Li, Yuling Wu, Yihao Liu, Zhiyuan Dou, Eriko Yamazaki, Nobuyoshi Yamashita, Bin-Le Lin, Xinhong Wang. Occurrence and partitioning behavior of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) in water and sediment from the Jiulong Estuary-Xiamen Bay, China. Chemosphere 2020, 238 , 124578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.124578
  15. Hongru Feng, Yuefei Ruan, Kai Zhang, Paul K.S. Lam. Current analytical methodologies and gaps for per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances determination in the marine environment. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry 2019, 121 , 115372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2018.12.026
  16. Mayumi Allinson, Nobuyoshi Yamashita, Sachi Taniyasu, Eriko Yamazaki, Graeme Allinson. Occurrence of perfluoroalkyl substances in selected Victorian rivers and estuaries: An historical snapshot. Heliyon 2019, 5 (9) , e02472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02472
  17. Qian Yao, Rong Shi, Caifeng Wang, Wenchao Han, Yu Gao, Yan Zhang, Yijun Zhou, Guodong Ding, Ying Tian. Cord blood Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, placental steroidogenic enzyme, and cord blood reproductive hormone. Environment International 2019, 129 , 573-582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2019.03.047
  18. Dauren Mussabek, Lutz Ahrens, Kenneth M. Persson, Ronny Berndtsson. Temporal trends and sediment–water partitioning of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in lake sediment. Chemosphere 2019, 227 , 624-629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.04.074
  19. Xianghui Cao, Chenchen Wang, Yonglong Lu, Meng Zhang, Kifayatullah Khan, Shuai Song, Pei Wang, Cong Wang. Occurrence, sources and health risk of polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) in soil, water and sediment from a drinking water source area. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 2019, 174 , 208-217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.02.058
  20. Dong-Xing Guan, Ya-Qing Li, Nan-Yang Yu, Guang-Hui Yu, Si Wei, Hao Zhang, William Davison, Xin-Yi Cui, Lena Q. Ma, Jun Luo. In situ measurement of perfluoroalkyl substances in aquatic systems using diffusive gradients in thin-films technique. Water Research 2018, 144 , 162-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2018.07.031
  21. Zhen Zhao, Jianhui Tang, Lijie Mi, Chongguo Tian, Guangcai Zhong, Gan Zhang, Shaorui Wang, Qilu Li, Ralf Ebinghaus, Zhiyong Xie, Hongwen Sun. Perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances in the lower atmosphere and surface waters of the Chinese Bohai Sea, Yellow Sea, and Yangtze River estuary. Science of The Total Environment 2017, 599-600 , 114-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.04.147
  22. Akitoshi Goto, Nguyen Minh Tue, Masayuki Someya, Tomohiko Isobe, Shin Takahashi, Shinsuke Tanabe, Tatsuya Kunisue. Spatio-temporal trends of polybrominated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans in archived sediments from Tokyo Bay, Japan. Science of The Total Environment 2017, 599-600 , 340-347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.04.166
  23. Takeo Sakurai, Jun Kobayashi, Nozomi Ito, Shigeko Serizawa, Hiroaki Shiraishi, Tohru Yabe, Yuichi Ishii, Noriyuki Suzuki. Respiratory Uptake and Depuration Kinetics of Perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS) in a Marine Sandworm Species. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 2017, 99 (2) , 203-207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-017-2124-4
  24. Nguyen Hoang Lam, Chon-Rae Cho, Kurunthachalam Kannan, Hyeon-Seo Cho. A nationwide survey of perfluorinated alkyl substances in waters, sediment and biota collected from aquatic environment in Vietnam: Distributions and bioconcentration profiles. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2017, 323 , 116-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.04.010
  25. David E. Powell, Noriyuki Suganuma, Keiji Kobayashi, Tsutomu Nakamura, Kouzo Ninomiya, Kozaburo Matsumura, Naoki Omura, Satoshi Ushioka. Trophic dilution of cyclic volatile methylsiloxanes (cVMS) in the pelagic marine food web of Tokyo Bay, Japan. Science of The Total Environment 2017, 578 , 366-382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.189
  26. Qifeng Li, Tieyu Wang, Zhaoyun Zhu, Jing Meng, Pei Wang, Sarvajayakesavalu Suriyanarayanan, Yueqing Zhang, Yunqiao Zhou, Shuai Song, Yonglong Lu, Baninla Yvette. Using hydrodynamic model to predict PFOS and PFOA transport in the Daling River and its tributary, a heavily polluted river into the Bohai Sea, China. Chemosphere 2017, 167 , 344-352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.09.119
  27. A. Koskela, M.A. Finnilä, M. Korkalainen, S. Spulber, J. Koponen, H. Håkansson, J. Tuukkanen, M. Viluksela. Effects of developmental exposure to perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) on long bone morphology and bone cell differentiation. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology 2016, 301 , 14-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.taap.2016.04.002
  28. Xiuxian Gong, Ruixia Liu, Bin Li, Yonghui Song, Yuying Liu. Perfluoroalkyl acids in Daliao River system of northeast China: determination, distribution and ecological risk. Environmental Earth Sciences 2016, 75 (6) https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-016-5345-7
  29. Ignacio A. Rodriguez-Jorquera, Cecilia Silva-Sanchez, Mark Strynar, Nancy D. Denslow, Gurpal S. Toor, . Footprints of Urban Micro-Pollution in Protected Areas: Investigating the Longitudinal Distribution of Perfluoroalkyl Acids in Wildlife Preserves. PLOS ONE 2016, 11 (2) , e0148654. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148654
  30. Takeo Sakurai, Shigeko Serizawa, Jun Kobayashi, Keita Kodama, Jeong-Hoon Lee, Hideaki Maki, Yasuyuki Zushi, Janice Beltran Sevilla-Nastor, Yoshitaka Imaizumi, Noriyuki Suzuki, Toshihiro Horiguchi, Hiroaki Shiraishi. Temporal trends for inflow of perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoate (PFOA) to Tokyo Bay, Japan, estimated by a receptor-oriented approach. Science of The Total Environment 2016, 539 , 277-285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.08.142
  31. Shiliang Wang, Hui Wang, Wei Zhao, Yuanxin Cao, Yi Wan. Investigation on the distribution and fate of perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoate (PFOA) in a sewage-impacted bay. Environmental Pollution 2015, 205 , 186-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2015.05.042
  32. Alfredo C. Alder, Juergen van der Voet. Occurrence and point source characterization of perfluoroalkyl acids in sewage sludge. Chemosphere 2015, 129 , 62-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.07.045
  33. Yan Gao, Jianjie Fu, Lixi Zeng, An Li, Huijuan Li, Nali Zhu, Runzeng Liu, Aifeng Liu, Yawei Wang, Guibin Jiang. Occurrence and fate of perfluoroalkyl substances in marine sediments from the Chinese Bohai Sea, Yellow Sea, and East China Sea. Environmental Pollution 2014, 194 , 60-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2014.07.018
  34. Nguyen-Hoang Lam, Chon-Rae Cho, Jung-Sick Lee, Ho-Young Soh, Byoung-Cheun Lee, Jae-An Lee, Norihisa Tatarozako, Kazuaki Sasaki, Norimitsu Saito, Katsumi Iwabuchi, Kurunthachalam Kannan, Hyeon-Seo Cho. Perfluorinated alkyl substances in water, sediment, plankton and fish from Korean rivers and lakes: A nationwide survey. Science of The Total Environment 2014, 491-492 , 154-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.01.045
  35. Xiuli Zhao, Xinghui Xia, Shangwei Zhang, Qiong Wu, Xuejun Wang. Spatial and vertical variations of perfluoroalkyl substances in sediments of the Haihe River, China. Journal of Environmental Sciences 2014, 26 (8) , 1557-1566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2014.05.023
  36. Guoqiang Shan, Mingcui Wei, Lingyan Zhu, Zhengtao Liu, Yahui Zhang. Concentration profiles and spatial distribution of perfluoroalkyl substances in an industrial center with condensed fluorochemical facilities. Science of The Total Environment 2014, 490 , 351-359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.05.005
  37. Keisuke Kuroda, Michio Murakami, Kumiko Oguma, Hideshige Takada, Satoshi Takizawa. Investigating sources and pathways of perfluoroalkyl acids (PFAAs) in aquifers in Tokyo using multiple tracers. Science of The Total Environment 2014, 488-489 , 51-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.04.066
  38. Shuangye Pan, Kiwao Kadokami, Xuehua Li, Hanh Thi Duong, Toshihiro Horiguchi. Target and screening analysis of 940 micro-pollutants in sediments in Tokyo Bay, Japan. Chemosphere 2014, 99 , 109-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.10.038
  39. Holly Lee, Scott A. Mabury. Global Distribution of Polyfluoroalkyl and Perfluoroalkyl Substances and their Transformation Products in Environmental Solids. 2014, 797-826. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118339558.ch27
  40. Shusuke Takemine, Chisato Matsumura, Katsuya Yamamoto, Motoharu Suzuki, Masahiro Tsurukawa, Hiromasa Imaishi, Takeshi Nakano, Akira Kondo. Discharge of perfluorinated compounds from rivers and their influence on the coastal seas of Hyogo prefecture, Japan. Environmental Pollution 2014, 184 , 397-404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2013.09.016
  41. Jun Kobayashi, Takeo Sakurai, Kaoruko Mizukawa, Kyoko Kinoshita, Nozomi Ito, Shunji Hashimoto, Daisuke Nakajima, Toru Kawai, Yoshitaka Imaizumi, Hideshige Takada, Noriyuki Suzuki. Respiratory uptake kinetics of neutral hydrophobic organic chemicals in a marine benthic fish, Pseudopleuronectes yokohamae. Chemosphere 2013, 93 (8) , 1479-1486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.07.031
  42. Takeo Sakurai, Jun Kobayashi, Kyoko Kinoshita, Nozomi Ito, Shigeko Serizawa, Hiroaki Shiraishi, Jeong-Hoon Lee, Toshihiro Horiguchi, Hideaki Maki, Kaoruko Mizukawa, Yoshitaka Imaizumi, Toru Kawai, Noriyuki Suzuki. Transfer kinetics of perfluorooctane sulfonate from water and sediment to a marine benthic fish, the marbled flounder ( Pseudopleuronectes yokohamae ). Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 2013, 32 (9) , 2009-2017. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.2270
  43. Joon-Woo Kim, Nguyen Minh Tue, Tomohiko Isobe, Kentaro Misaki, Shin Takahashi, Pham Hung Viet, Shinsuke Tanabe. Contamination by perfluorinated compounds in water near waste recycling and disposal sites in Vietnam. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 2013, 185 (4) , 2909-2919. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-012-2759-x
  44. Xiao Lu Xu, Hui Ying Xu, De Yong Zhang, Xiu Ying Shen, Guo Zhang Tong, Yin Lu, Wei Wang. Occurrence of Perfluorooctane Sulfonate (PFOS) and Perfluorooctanoate (PFOA) in Aquatic Systems from Asia. Applied Mechanics and Materials 2013, 295-298 , 513-519. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.295-298.513
  45. Y.G. Zhao, C.K.C. Wong, M.H. Wong. Environmental contamination, human exposure and body loadings of perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS), focusing on Asian countries. Chemosphere 2012, 89 (4) , 355-368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.05.043
  46. Tieyu Wang, Jong Seong Khim, Chunli Chen, Jonathan E. Naile, Yonglong Lu, Kurunthachalam Kannan, Jinsoon Park, Wei Luo, Wentao Jiao, Wenyou Hu, John P. Giesy. Perfluorinated compounds in surface waters from Northern China: Comparison to level of industrialization. Environment International 2012, 42 , 37-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2011.03.023
  47. Tieyu Wang, Yonglong Lu, Chunli Chen, Jonathan E. Naile, Jong Seong Khim, John P. Giesy. Perfluorinated compounds in a coastal industrial area of Tianjin, China. Environmental Geochemistry and Health 2012, 34 (3) , 301-311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-011-9422-2
  48. Heqing Tang, Qingqing Xiang, Min Lei, Jingchun Yan, Lihua Zhu, Jing Zou. Efficient degradation of perfluorooctanoic acid by UV–Fenton process. Chemical Engineering Journal 2012, 184 , 156-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2012.01.020
  49. Tieyu Wang, Yonglong Lu, Chunli Chen, Jonathan E. Naile, Jong Seong Khim, Jinsoon Park, Wei Luo, Wentao Jiao, Wenyou Hu, John P. Giesy. Perfluorinated compounds in estuarine and coastal areas of north Bohai Sea, China. Marine Pollution Bulletin 2011, 62 (8) , 1905-1914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2011.05.029
  50. Tieyu Wang, Chunli Chen, Jonathan E. Naile, Jong Seong Khim, John P. Giesy, Yonglong Lu. Perfluorinated Compounds in Water, Sediment and Soil from Guanting Reservoir, China. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 2011, 87 (1) , 74-79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-011-0307-y
  51. I. Stemmler, G. Lammel. Pathways of PFOA to the Arctic: variabilities and contributions of oceanic currents and atmospheric transport and chemistry sources. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 2010, 10 (20) , 9965-9980. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-9965-2010

Environmental Science & Technology

Cite this: Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44, 11, 4110–4115
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/es1007609
Published April 29, 2010

Copyright © 2010 American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under these Terms of Use.

Article Views

3031

Altmetric

-

Citations

Learn about these metrics

Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.

  • Figure 1

    Figure 1. Tokyo Bay and the sampling stations.

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. Seasonal distributions of PFOS (a) and PFOA (b) concentrations in the upper and lower layers of the water column of Tokyo Bay. Each point represents one sample. Horizontal offsets were chosen arbitrarily to minimize overlap of the points. For each sampling, the upper layer data (open symbols) are plotted on the left and the lower layer data (closed symbols) on the right. ND (⊕) is plotted as the detection limit of the sample.

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. Relationship between the PFOS concentration and the freshwater ratio (FWR = 1 − ((sample salinity)/(Pacific Ocean seawater salinity))) in the water column. Open and closed symbols indicate upper and lower water layer samples, respectively. Circles, triangles, and squares indicate samples collected in 2004, 2005, and 2006, respectively. Blue, green, pink, and brown indicate samples collected in winter (February), spring (May), summer (August), and autumn (October or November), respectively. The equation of the regression line is log[PFOS concentration/(ng L−1)] = (1.36 ± 0.07) − (0.738 ± 0.059) × log FWR (parameters: point estimates ± half of 95% CI).

    Figure 4

    Figure 4. Time series of masses and volume-based average concentrations of PFOS (a) and PFOA (b) in the water column of Tokyo Bay. Error bars indicate uncertainty due to assignment of pycnocline depth as well as that due to sampling and analytical variability.

  • References


    This article references 32 other publications.

    1. 1
      Hansen, K. J.; Clemen, L. A.; Ellefson, M. E.; Johnson, H. O. Compound-specific, quantitative characterization of organic fluorochemicals in biological matrices Environ. Sci. Technol. 2001, 35, 766 770
    2. 2
      Houde, M.; Martin, J. W.; Letcher, R. J.; Solomon, K. R.; Muir, D. C. G. Biological monitoring of polyfluoroalkyl substances: A review Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40, 3463 3473
    3. 3
      Giesy, J. P.; Kannan, K. Global distribution of perfluorooctane sulfonate in wildlife Environ. Sci. Technol. 2001, 35, 1339 1342
    4. 4
      Taniyasu, S.; Kannan, K.; Horii, Y.; Hanari, N.; Yamashita, N. A survey of perfluorooctane sulfonate and related perfluorinated organic compounds in water, fish, birds, and humans from Japan Environ. Sci. Technol. 2003, 37, 2634 2639
    5. 5
      Saito, N.; Harada, K.; Inoue, K.; Sasaki, K.; Yoshinaga, T.; Koizumi, A. Perfluorooctanoate and perfluorooctane sulfonate concentrations in surface water in Japan J. Occup. Health 2004, 46, 49 59
    6. 6
      Yamashita, N.; Kannan, K.; Taniyasu, S.; Horii, Y.; Petrick, G.; Gamo, T. A global survey of perfluorinated acids in oceans Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2005, 51, 658 668
    7. 7
      Odaka, R.; Masunaga, S. Environmental behavior of perfluorinated surfactants in Tokyo Bay J. Jpn. Soc. Water Environ. 2006, 29, 221 228

      (in Japanese)

    8. 8
      Murakami, M.; Imamura, E.; Shinohara, H.; Kiri, K.; Muramatsu, Y.; Harada, A.; Takada, H. Occurrence and sources of perfluorinated surfactants in rivers in Japan Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42, 6566 6572
    9. 9
      Zushi, Y.; Takeda, T.; Masunaga, S. Existence of nonpoint source of perfluorinated compounds and their loads in the Tsurumi River basin, Japan Chemosphere 2008, 71, 1566 1573
    10. 10
      Takazawa, Y.; Nishino, T.; Sasaki, Y.; Yamashita, H.; Suzuki, N.; Tanabe, K.; Shibata, Y. Occurrence and distribution of perfluorooctane sulfonate and perfluorooctanoic acid in the rivers of Tokyo Water, Air, Soil Pollut. 2009, 202, 57 67
    11. 11
      Higgins, C. P.; Field, J. A.; Criddle, C. S.; Luthy, R. G. Quantitative determination of perfluorochemicals in sediments and domestic sludge Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005, 39, 3946 3956
    12. 12
      Giesy, J. P.; Kannan, K. Perfluorochemical surfactants in the environment Environ. Sci. Technol. 2002, 36, 146A 152A
    13. 13
      Olsen, G. W.; Burris, J. M.; Ehresman, D. J.; Froehlich, J. W.; Seacat, A. M.; Butenhoff, J. L.; Zobel, L. R. Half-life of serum elimination of perfluorooctanesulfonate, perfluorohexanesulfonate, and perfluorooctanoate in retired fluorochemical production workers Environ Health Perspect. 2007, 115, 1298 1305
    14. 14
      Hekster, F. M.; Laane, R. W. P. M.; de Voogt, P., Environmental and toxicity effects of perfluoroalkylated substances. In Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology; Ware, G., Ed.; Springer-Verlag: New York, 2003; Vol. 179, pp 99121.
    15. 15
      Ankley, G. T.; Kuehl, D. W.; Kahl, M. D.; Jensen, K. M.; Butterworth, B. C.; Nichols, J. W. Partial life-cycle toxicity and bioconcentration modeling of perfluorooctanesulfonate in the northern leopard frog (Rana pipiens) Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2004, 23, 2745 2755
    16. 16
      Adoption of Amendments to Annexes A, B and C of Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants, Stockholm, 22 May 2001, XXVII.15; 26 August 2009; United Nations: New York, 2009.
    17. 17
      Prevedouros, K.; Cousins, I. T.; Buck, R. C.; Korzeniowski, S. H. Sources, fate, and transport of perfluorocarboxylates Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40, 32 44
    18. 18
      Sakurai, T.; Kim, J. G.; Suzuki, N.; Matsuo, T.; Li, D. Q.; Yao, Y. A.; Masunaga, S.; Nakanishi, J. Polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans in sediment, soil, fish, shellfish and crab samples from Tokyo Bay area, Japan Chemosphere 2000, 40, 627 640
    19. 19
      Unoki, S., Water and its flow in Tokyo Bay. In Topography, Geology and Hydrology of Tokyo Bay; Kaizuka, S., Ed.; Tsukiji Shokan Publishing: Tokyo, Japan, 1993; pp 135186

      (in Japanese).

    20. 20
      Managaki, S.; Takada, H.; Kim, D.-M.; Horiguchi, T.; Shiraishi, H. Three-dimensional distributions of sewage markers in Tokyo Bay water—fluorescent whitening agents (FWAs) Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2006, 52, 281 292
    21. 21
      Kume, G.; Horiguchi, T.; Goto, A.; Shiraishi, H.; Shibata, Y.; Morita, M.; Shimizu, M. Seasonal distribution, age, growth, and reproductive biology of marbled sole Pleuronectes yokohamae in Tokyo Bay, Japan Fisheries Science 2006, 72, 289 298
    22. 22
      Matsumoto, E. The sedimentary environment in the Tokyo Bay Chikyukagaku 1983, 17, 27 32

      (in Japanese)

    23. 23
      Tenth report of the joint panel on oceanographic tables and standards. In UNESCO Technical Papers in Marine Science; United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization: Paris, 1981; Vol. 36, pp 125.
    24. 24
      Hansen, K. J.; Johnson, H. O.; Eldridge, J. S.; Butenhoff, J. L.; Dick, L. A. Quantitative characterization of trace levels of PFOS and PFOA in the Tennessee River Environ. Sci. Technol. 2002, 36, 1681 1685
    25. 25
      Hollander, M.; Wolfe, D. A., Nonparametric Statistical Methods., 2nd ed.; John Wiley & Sons, Inc: New York, 1999; p 816.
    26. 26
      Yazawa, K.;; Ikeda, F. Distribution of the anoxic water mass in Tokyo Bay and effect of dissolved oxygen on mantis shrimp (Oratosquilla oratoria De Haan). In Research Report of the Kanagawa Prefectural Fisheries Experimental Station, 1988; pp 95100 (

      in Japanese

      ).
    27. 27
      Koike, Y.; Matsuyama, M.; Hayashi, T.; Kitade, Y.; Kitazawa, A.; Yoshida, J. Distribution and behavior of bottom water in Tokyo Bay in summer J. Tokyo Univ. Fish. 1997, 84, 43 51

      (in Japanese)

    28. 28
      Hibino, T.; Nakayama, K.; Okada, T. Current field in Tokyo Bay during stratification period Proc. Coast. Eng., JSCE 2000, 47, 1056 1060

      (in Japanese)

    29. 29
      Okada, T.; Takao, T.; Nakayama, K.; Furukawa, K. Change in freshwater discharge and residence time of seawater in Tokyo Bay J. Hydraul., Coastal Environ. Eng. 2007, 63, 67 72

      (in Japanese)

    30. 30
      Kobayashi, J.; Serizawa, S.; Sakurai, T.; Imaizumi, Y.; Suzuki, N.; Horiguchi, T. Spatial distribution and partitioning of polychlorinated biphenyls in Tokyo Bay, Japan J. Environ. Monit. 2010, 12, 838 845
    31. 31
      Johnson, R. L.; Anschutz, A. J.; Smolen, J. M.; Simcik, M. F.; Penn, R. L. The adsorption of perfluorooctane sulfonate onto sand, clay, and iron oxide surfaces J. Chem. Eng. Data 2007, 52, 1165 1170
    32. 32
      Higgins, C. P.; Luthy, R. G. Sorption of perfluorinated surfactants on sediments Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40, 7251 7256
  • Supporting Information

    Supporting Information


    Additional information about the Materials and Methods. Figures S1−S4. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org/.


    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.