Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

You’ve supercharged your research process with ACS and Mendeley!

STEP 1:
Click to create an ACS ID

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

MENDELEY PAIRING EXPIRED
Your Mendeley pairing has expired. Please reconnect
ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
Exposure to Particles from Laser Printers Operating within Office Workplaces
My Activity

Figure 1Loading Img
    Article

    Exposure to Particles from Laser Printers Operating within Office Workplaces
    Click to copy article linkArticle link copied!

    View Author Information
    International Laboratory for Air Quality and Health, Queensland University of Technology, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, GPO Box 2424, Brisbane, Queensland 4001, Australia
    Workplace Health and Safety Queensland, Department of Justice and Attorney General, Queensland, Australia
    Phone: +61 7 3138 2616; E-mail: [email protected]
    Other Access OptionsSupporting Information (1)

    Environmental Science & Technology

    Cite this: Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45, 15, 6444–6452
    Click to copy citationCitation copied!
    https://doi.org/10.1021/es200249n
    Published June 9, 2011
    Copyright © 2011 American Chemical Society

    Abstract

    Click to copy section linkSection link copied!
    Abstract Image

    While recent research has provided valuable information as to the composition of laser printer particles, their formation mechanisms, and explained why some printers are emitters while others are low emitters, questions relating to the potential exposure of office workers remained unanswered. In particular, (i) what impact does the operation of laser printers have on the background particle number concentration (PNC) of an office environment over the duration of a typical working day? (ii) What is the airborne particle exposure to office workers in the vicinity of laser printers? (iii) What influence does the office ventilation have upon the transport and concentration of particles? (iv) Is there a need to control the generation of, and/or transport of particles arising from the operation of laser printers within an office environment? (v) What instrumentation and methodology is relevant for characterizing such particles within an office location? We present experimental evidence on printer temporal and spatial PNC during the operation of 107 laser printers within open plan offices of five buildings. The 8 h time-weighted average printer particle exposure is significantly less than the 8 h time-weighted local background particle exposure, but that peak printer particle exposure can be greater than 2 orders of magnitude higher than local background particle exposure. The particle size range is predominantly ultrafine (<100 nm diameter). In addition we have established that office workers are constantly exposed to nonprinter derived particle concentrations, with up to an order of magnitude difference in such exposure among offices, and propose that such exposure be controlled along with exposure to printer derived particles. We also propose, for the first time, that peak particle reference values be calculated for each office area analogous to the criteria used in Australia and elsewhere for evaluating exposure excursion above occupational hazardous chemical exposure standards. A universal peak particle reference value of 2.0 × 104 particles cm–3 has been proposed.

    Copyright © 2011 American Chemical Society

    Read this article

    To access this article, please review the available access options below.

    Get instant access

    Purchase Access

    Read this article for 48 hours. Check out below using your ACS ID or as a guest.

    Recommended

    Access through Your Institution

    You may have access to this article through your institution.

    Your institution does not have access to this content. Add or change your institution or let them know you’d like them to include access.

    Supporting Information

    Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

    Additional information including two figures. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.

    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

    Cited By

    Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

    This article is cited by 50 publications.

    1. Lidia Morawska, Meng Xiu, Congrong He, Giorgio Buonanno, Peter McGarry, Bastien Maumy, Luca Stabile, Phong K Thai. Particle Emissions from Laser Printers: Have They Decreased?. Environmental Science & Technology Letters 2019, 6 (5) , 300-305. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.9b00176
    2. Marina E. Vance, Valerie Pegues, Schuyler Van Montfrans, Weinan Leng, and Linsey C. Marr . Aerosol Emissions from Fuse-Deposition Modeling 3D Printers in a Chamber and in Real Indoor Environments. Environmental Science & Technology 2017, 51 (17) , 9516-9523. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b01546
    3. Hongbo Wang, Yun Wang. Research progress on human health effects of exposure to nanoparticles emitted from laser printing devices. Building and Environment 2024, 262 , 111833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.111833
    4. Gopinath Kalaiarasan, Prashant Kumar, Mamatha Tomson, Juan C. Zavala-Reyes, Alexandra E. Porter, Gloria Young, Mark A. Sephton, Hisham Abubakar-Waziri, Christopher C. Pain, Ian M. Adcock, Sharon Mumby, Claire Dilliway, Fangxing Fang, Rossella Arcucci, Kian Fan Chung. Particle Number Size Distribution in Three Different Microenvironments of London. Atmosphere 2024, 15 (1) , 45. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15010045
    5. Shenglan Jia, Magdiel Inggrid Setyawati, Min Liu, Tengfei Xu, Joachim Loo, Meilin Yan, Jicheng Gong, Sanjay H. Chotirmall, Philip Demokritou, Kee Woei Ng, Mingliang Fang. Association of nanoparticle exposure with serum metabolic disorders of healthy adults in printing centers. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2022, 432 , 128710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.128710
    6. Prashant Kumar, Hamid Omidvarborna, Arvind Tiwari, Lidia Morawska. The nexus between in-car aerosol concentrations, ventilation and the risk of respiratory infection. Environment International 2021, 157 , 106814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2021.106814
    7. Hao Wang, Congrong He, Rob L. Modini, Wenlu Wang, Haoxian Lu, Lidia Morawska. Mixing state of printer generated ultrafine particles: Implications for the complexity of indoor aerosols. Atmospheric Environment 2021, 259 , 118550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118550
    8. Hyun Sik Ko, Sang Bin Jeong, Sooyeol Phyo, Jiwon Lee, Jae Hee Jung. Emission of particulate and gaseous pollutants from household laser processing machine. Journal of Environmental Sciences 2021, 103 , 148-156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2020.10.018
    9. John P. Springston, Elliott Horner, Joseph Lstiburek. Indoor Air Quality in Nonindustrial Occupational Environments. 2021, 1-57. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471435139.hyg065.pub3
    10. M. Abbas Virji, Laura Kurth. Peak Inhalation Exposure Metrics Used in Occupational Epidemiologic and Exposure Studies. Frontiers in Public Health 2021, 8 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.611693
    11. Jianwei Gu, Stefan Karrasch, Tunga Salthammer. Review of the characteristics and possible health effects of particles emitted from laser printing devices. Indoor Air 2020, 30 (3) , 396-421. https://doi.org/10.1111/ina.12646
    12. Rong Cao, Bai Li, Hong-Wei Wang, Shikang Tao, Zhong-Ren Peng, Hong-di He. Vertical and Horizontal Profiles of Particulate Matter and Black Carbon Near Elevated Highways Based on Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Monitoring. Sustainability 2020, 12 (3) , 1204. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12031204
    13. Taisuke Tomonaga, Hiroto Izumi, Yukiko Yoshiura, Takashi Marui, Ke-Yong Wang, Chinatsu Nishida, Kazuhiro Yatera, Yasuo Morimoto. Long-term observation of pulmonary toxicity of toner with external additives following a single intratracheal instillation in rats. Journal of Occupational Health 2020, 62 (1) https://doi.org/10.1002/1348-9585.12146
    14. Supreme Jain, Divyam Garg, Anubha Goel. Comparison of Indoor Air Quality for Air-Conditioned and Naturally Ventilated Office Spaces in Urban Area. 2020, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1334-3_1
    15. Ioar Rivas, Julia C. Fussell, Frank J. Kelly, Xavier Querol. Indoor Sources of Air Pollutants. 2019, 1-34. https://doi.org/10.1039/9781788016179-00001
    16. Nirmala M. Thomas, Leonardo Calderón, Jennifer Senick, MaryAnn Sorensen-Allacci, Deborah Plotnik, Mengyang Guo, Yi Yu, Jie Gong, Clinton J. Andrews, Gediminas Mainelis. Investigation of indoor air quality determinants in a field study using three different data streams. Building and Environment 2019, 154 , 281-295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.03.022
    17. Sandra V. Pirela, Kunal Bhattacharya, Yun Wang, Yipei Zhang, Guanghe Wang, Costas A. Christophi, John Godleski, Treye Thomas, Yong Qian, Marlene S. Orandle, Jennifer D. Sisler, Dhimiter Bello, Vincent Castranova, Philip Demokritou. A 21-day sub-acute, whole-body inhalation exposure to printer-emitted engineered nanoparticles in rats: Exploring pulmonary and systemic effects. NanoImpact 2019, 15 , 100176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.impact.2019.100176
    18. Jianlin Ren, Junjie Liu. Fine particulate matter control performance of a new kind of suspended fan filter unit for use in office buildings. Building and Environment 2019, 149 , 468-476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.12.047
    19. Toshio Nakadate, Yuko Yamano, Takenori Yamauchi, Shigeko Okubo, Daichi Nagashima. Assessing the chronic respiratory health risk associated with inhalation exposure to powdered toner for printing in actual working conditions: a cohort study on occupationally exposed workers over 10 years. BMJ Open 2018, 8 (10) , e022049. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022049
    20. Norbert Serfozo, Jakub Ondráček, Thodoros Glytsos, Mihalis Lazaridis. Evaluation of nanoparticle emissions from a laser printer in an experimental chamber and estimation of the human particle dose. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 2018, 25 (13) , 13103-13117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-1448-x
    21. Yu-Hsiang Cheng. Measuring indoor particulate matter concentrations and size distributions at different time periods to identify potential sources in an office building in Taipei City. Building and Environment 2017, 123 , 446-457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.07.025
    22. Sandra Vanessa Pirela, John Martin, Dhimiter Bello, Philip Demokritou. Nanoparticle exposures from nano-enabled toner-based printing equipment and human health: state of science and future research needs. Critical Reviews in Toxicology 2017, 47 (8) , 683-709. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408444.2017.1318354
    23. Sofia Eirini Chatoutsidou, Norbert Serfozo, Thodoros Glytsos, Mihalis Lazaridis. Multi-zone measurement of particle concentrations in a HVAC building with massive printer emissions: influence of human occupation and particle transport indoors. Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health 2017, 10 (6) , 679-693. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-017-0461-4
    24. Tamás Szigeti, Christina Dunster, Andrea Cattaneo, Andrea Spinazzè, Corinne Mandin, Eline Le Ponner, Eduardo de Oliveira Fernandes, Gabriela Ventura, Dikaia E. Saraga, Ioannis A. Sakellaris, Yvonne de Kluizenaar, Eric Cornelissen, John G. Bartzis, Frank J. Kelly. Spatial and temporal variation of particulate matter characteristics within office buildings — The OFFICAIR study. Science of The Total Environment 2017, 587-588 , 59-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.01.013
    25. Mauro Scungio, Tania Vitanza, Luca Stabile, Giorgio Buonanno, Lidia Morawska. Characterization of particle emission from laser printers. Science of The Total Environment 2017, 586 , 623-630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.02.030
    26. Peter McGarry, Sam Clifford, Luke D. Knibbs, Congrong He, Lidia Morawska. Application of multi-metric approach to characterization of particle emissions from nanotechnology and non-nanotechnology processes. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene 2016, 13 (10) , D175-D197. https://doi.org/10.1080/15459624.2016.1200194
    27. Kazunori IKEGAMI, Masayuki HASEGAWA, Hajime ANDO, Koichi HATA, Hiroko KITAMURA, Akira OGAMI, Toshiaki HIGASHI. A cohort study of the acute and chronic respiratory effects of toner exposure among handlers: a longitudinal analyses from 2004 to 2013. INDUSTRIAL HEALTH 2016, 54 (5) , 448-459. https://doi.org/10.2486/indhealth.2015-0202
    28. C. Desmond, C. Verdun-Esquer, M. Rinaldo, A. Courtois, M. Labadie. Mise au point sur les risques toxiques lors de l’utilisation professionnelle des photocopieurs. Archives des Maladies Professionnelles et de l'Environnement 2015, 76 (5) , 498-507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.admp.2015.04.045
    29. Sofia Eirini Chatoutsidou, Jakub Ondráček, Ondrej Tesar, Kjetil Tørseth, Vladimír Ždímal, Mihalis Lazaridis. Indoor/outdoor particulate matter number and mass concentration in modern offices. Building and Environment 2015, 92 , 462-474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.05.023
    30. Hyojin Kweon, Sotira Yiacoumi, Costas Tsouris. The role of electrostatic charge in the adhesion of spherical particles onto planar surfaces in atmospheric systems. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects 2015, 481 , 583-590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2015.06.030
    31. Jennifer D. Sisler, Sandra V. Pirela, Sherri Friend, Mariana Farcas, Diane Schwegler-Berry, Anna Shvedova, Vincent Castranova, Philip Demokritou, Yong Qian. Small airway epithelial cells exposure to printer-emitted engineered nanoparticles induces cellular effects on human microvascular endothelial cells in an alveolar-capillary co-culture model. Nanotoxicology 2015, 9 (6) , 769-779. https://doi.org/10.3109/17435390.2014.976603
    32. H Kitamura, N Terunuma, S Kurosaki, K Hata, M Masuda, T Kochi, N Yanagi, T Murase, A Ogami, T Higashi. A cohort study of toner-handling workers on inflammatory, allergic, and oxidative stress markers. Human & Experimental Toxicology 2015, 34 (4) , 337-344. https://doi.org/10.1177/0960327113512339
    33. H Kitamura, N Terunuma, S Kurosaki, K Hata, M Masuda, T Kochi, N Yanagi, T Murase, A Ogami, T Higashi. A cohort study using pulmonary function tests and x-ray examination in toner-handling workers. Human & Experimental Toxicology 2015, 34 (4) , 345-356. https://doi.org/10.1177/0960327113520018
    34. Jianjun Niu, Pat E. Rasmussen, Robert Magee, Gregory Nilsson. Spatial and temporal variability of incidental nanoparticles in indoor workplaces: impact on the characterization of point source exposures. Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts 2015, 17 (1) , 98-109. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4EM00478G
    35. Athanasios Katsoyiannis, Erik Eik Anda, Alessandra Cincinelli, Tania Martellini, Paolo Leva, Arntraut Goetsch, Torkjel M. Sandanger, Sandra Huber. Indoor air characterization of various microenvironments in the Arctic. The case of TromsØ, Norway. Environmental Research 2014, 134 , 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2014.06.011
    36. Rusdin Laiman, Congrong He, Mandana Mazaheri, Samuel Clifford, Farhad Salimi, Leigh R. Crilley, Megat Azman Megat Mokhtar, Lidia Morawska. Characteristics of ultrafine particle sources and deposition rates in primary school classrooms. Atmospheric Environment 2014, 94 , 28-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.05.013
    37. Sandra V. Pirela, Georgios Pyrgiotakis, Dhimiter Bello, Treye Thomas, Vincent Castranova, Philip Demokritou. Development and characterization of an exposure platform suitable for physico-chemical, morphological and toxicological characterization of printer-emitted particles (PEPs). Inhalation Toxicology 2014, 26 (7) , 400-408. https://doi.org/10.3109/08958378.2014.908987
    38. Tunga Salthammer. Release of Organic Compounds and Particulate Matter from Products, Materials, and Electrical Devices in the Indoor Environment. 2014, 1-35. https://doi.org/10.1007/698_2014_258
    39. Nithya Elango, Vallikkannu Kasi, Bhuvaneswari Vembhu, Jeyanthi Govindasamy Poornima. Chronic exposure to emissions from photocopiers in copy shops causes oxidative stress and systematic inflammation among photocopier operators in India. Environmental Health 2013, 12 (1) https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-069X-12-78
    40. Tran Ngoc Quang, Congrong He, Lidia Morawska, Luke D. Knibbs. Influence of ventilation and filtration on indoor particle concentrations in urban office buildings. Atmospheric Environment 2013, 79 , 41-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.06.009
    41. Peter McGarry, Lidia Morawska, Luke D. Knibbs, Howard Morris. Excursion Guidance Criteria to Guide Control of Peak Emission and Exposure to Airborne Engineered Particles. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene 2013, 10 (11) , 640-651. https://doi.org/10.1080/15459624.2013.831987
    42. Madhu Khatri, Dhimiter Bello, Anoop K. Pal, Susan Woskie, Thomas H. Gassert, Philip Demokritou, Peter Gaines. Toxicological effects of PM 0.25–2.0 particles collected from a photocopy center in three human cell lines. Inhalation Toxicology 2013, 25 (11) , 621-632. https://doi.org/10.3109/08958378.2013.824525
    43. Dhimiter Bello, John Martin, Christopher Santeufemio, Qingwei Sun, Kristin Lee Bunker, Martin Shafer, Philip Demokritou. Physicochemical and morphological characterisation of nanoparticles from photocopiers: implications for environmental health. Nanotoxicology 2013, 7 (5) , 989-1003. https://doi.org/10.3109/17435390.2012.689883
    44. Prashant Kumar, Liisa Pirjola, Matthias Ketzel, Roy M. Harrison. Nanoparticle emissions from 11 non-vehicle exhaust sources – A review. Atmospheric Environment 2013, 67 , 252-277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.11.011
    45. Sushil Kumar, Mukesh K. Verma, Anup K. Srivastava. Ultrafine particles in urban ambient air and their health perspectives. Reviews on Environmental Health 2013, 28 (2-3) https://doi.org/10.1515/reveh-2013-0008
    46. Paul T. Cutrufello, James M. Smoliga, Kenneth W. Rundell. Small Things Make a Big Difference. Sports Medicine 2012, 42 (12) , 1041-1058. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03262311
    47. Tao Tang, Julia Hurraß, Richard Gminski, Volker Mersch-Sundermann. Fine and ultrafine particles emitted from laser printers as indoor air contaminants in German offices. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 2012, 19 (9) , 3840-3849. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-011-0647-5
    48. Tunga Salthammer, Tobias Schripp, Erik Uhde, Michael Wensing. Aerosols generated by hardcopy devices and other electrical appliances. Environmental Pollution 2012, 169 , 167-174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2012.01.028
    49. E.R. Jayaratne, X. Ling, C. He, L. Morawska. Monitoring charged particle and ion emissions from a laser printer. Journal of Electrostatics 2012, 70 (3) , 333-338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elstat.2012.04.006
    50. Prashant Kumar, Mike Mulheron, Claudia Som. Release of ultrafine particles from three simulated building processes. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 2012, 14 (4) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-012-0771-2

    Environmental Science & Technology

    Cite this: Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45, 15, 6444–6452
    Click to copy citationCitation copied!
    https://doi.org/10.1021/es200249n
    Published June 9, 2011
    Copyright © 2011 American Chemical Society

    Article Views

    1662

    Altmetric

    -

    Citations

    Learn about these metrics

    Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

    Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

    The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.