ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
CONTENT TYPES

Figure 1Loading Img

Electric Vehicles in China: Emissions and Health Impacts

View Author Information
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996-2010, United States
Department of Civil Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, United States
§ School of Environment, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, P R China
*Phone: 865-974-7710. Fax: 865-974-2669. E-mail: [email protected]
Cite this: Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46, 4, 2018–2024
Publication Date (Web):December 22, 2011
https://doi.org/10.1021/es202347q
Copyright © 2011 American Chemical Society
Article Views
7586
Altmetric
-
Citations
LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICS
Read OnlinePDF (3 MB)
Supporting Info (1)»

Abstract

Abstract Image

E-bikes in China are the single largest adoption of alternative fuel vehicles in history, with more than 100 million e-bikes purchased in the past decade and vehicle ownership about 2× larger for e-bikes as for conventional cars; e-car sales, too, are rapidly growing. We compare emissions (CO2, PM2.5, NOX, HC) and environmental health impacts (primary PM2.5) from the use of conventional vehicles (CVs) and electric vehicles (EVs) in 34 major cities in China. CO2 emissions (g km–1) vary and are an order of magnitude greater for e-cars (135–274) and CVs (150–180) than for e-bikes (14–27). PM2.5 emission factors generally are lower for CVs (gasoline or diesel) than comparable EVs. However, intake fraction is often greater for CVs than for EVs because combustion emissions are generally closer to population centers for CVs (tailpipe emissions) than for EVs (power plant emissions). For most cities, the net result is that primary PM2.5 environmental health impacts per passenger-km are greater for e-cars than for gasoline cars (3.6× on average), lower than for diesel cars (2.5× on average), and equal to diesel buses. In contrast, e-bikes yield lower environmental health impacts per passenger-km than the three CVs investigated: gasoline cars (2×), diesel cars (10×), and diesel buses (5×). Our findings highlight the importance of considering exposures, and especially the proximity of emissions to people, when evaluating environmental health impacts for EVs.

Supporting Information

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

Methods and data sources supporting the findings of this paper. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Cited By


This article is cited by 140 publications.

  1. Julio C. Zambrano-Gutiérrez, Sean Nicholson-Crotty, Sanya Carley, Saba Siddiki. The Role of Public Policy in Technology Diffusion: The Case of Plug-in Electric Vehicles. Environmental Science & Technology 2018, 52 (19) , 10914-10922. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b01149
  2. Wenwei Ke, Shaojun Zhang, Ye Wu, Bin Zhao, Shuxiao Wang, and Jiming Hao . Assessing the Future Vehicle Fleet Electrification: The Impacts on Regional and Urban Air Quality. Environmental Science & Technology 2017, 51 (2) , 1007-1016. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b04253
  3. Shuguang Ji, Christopher R. Cherry, Wenjun Zhou, Rapinder Sawhney, Ye Wu, Siyi Cai, Shuxiao Wang, and Julian D. Marshall . Environmental Justice Aspects of Exposure to PM2.5 Emissions from Electric Vehicle Use in China. Environmental Science & Technology 2015, 49 (24) , 13912-13920. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b04927
  4. Mili-Ann M. Tamayao, Jeremy J. Michalek, Chris Hendrickson, and Inês M. L. Azevedo . Regional Variability and Uncertainty of Electric Vehicle Life Cycle CO2 Emissions across the United States. Environmental Science & Technology 2015, 49 (14) , 8844-8855. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b00815
  5. Wei Shen, Weijian Han, and Timothy J. Wallington . Current and Future Greenhouse Gas Emissions Associated with Electricity Generation in China: Implications for Electric Vehicles. Environmental Science & Technology 2014, 48 (12) , 7069-7075. https://doi.org/10.1021/es500524e
  6. Joshua S. Apte, Emilie Bombrun, Julian D. Marshall, and William W. Nazaroff . Global Intraurban Intake Fractions for Primary Air Pollutants from Vehicles and Other Distributed Sources. Environmental Science & Technology 2012, 46 (6) , 3415-3423. https://doi.org/10.1021/es204021h
  7. Zulqarnain H. Khattak, Asad J. Khattak. Using behavioral data to understand shared mobility choices of electric and hybrid vehicles. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation 2021, 77 , 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2021.2004627
  8. Xiurui Guo, Yaqian Shen, Dongsheng Chen, Lijuan Zhao, Xiaolei Tian. Quantification of reduced disease burden resulting from air quality improvement by clean energy deployment in Hebei Province, China. Energy Policy 2021, 159 , 112584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112584
  9. Ashish Kumar, Haseeb Hakkim, Sachin D. Ghude, Vinayak Sinha. Probing wintertime air pollution sources in the Indo-Gangetic Plain through 52 hydrocarbons measured rarely at Delhi & Mohali. Science of The Total Environment 2021, 801 , 149711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149711
  10. C.M. Costa, J.C. Barbosa, H. Castro, R. Gonçalves, S. Lanceros-Méndez. Electric vehicles: To what extent are environmentally friendly and cost effective? – Comparative study by european countries. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2021, 151 , 111548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111548
  11. Zulqarnain H. Khattak, Asad J. Khattak. Spatial and unobserved heterogeneity in consumer preferences for adoption of electric and hybrid vehicles: A Bayesian hierarchical modeling approach. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation 2021, 25 , 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2021.1975327
  12. Chuyue Lu. Techno-economic Analysis and Comparative Study for the Sustainability of Private Motor Vehicles in China. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 2021, 835 (1) , 012015. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/835/1/012015
  13. Wenqiu Liu, He Liu, Wei Liu, Zhaojie Cui. Life cycle assessment of power batteries used in electric bicycles in China. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2021, 139 , 110596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110596
  14. Hyunhong Choi, Yoonmo Koo. Effectiveness of battery electric vehicle promotion on particulate matter emissions reduction. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 2021, 93 , 102758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.102758
  15. Mohamed Amine Masmoudi, Manar Hosny, Çağrı Koç. The fleet size and mix vehicle routing problem with synchronized visits. Transportation Letters 2021, 103 , 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/19427867.2021.1888196
  16. Rusul L. Abduljabbar, Sohani Liyanage, Hussein Dia. The role of micro-mobility in shaping sustainable cities: A systematic literature review. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 2021, 92 , 102734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.102734
  17. Siying Zhu, . Optimal Fleet Deployment Strategy: Model the Effect of Shared E-Bikes on Bike-Sharing System. Journal of Advanced Transportation 2021, 2021 , 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6678637
  18. Lai Yang, Biying Yu, Bo Yang, Hao Chen, Gabriel Malima, Yi-Ming Wei. Life cycle environmental assessment of electric and internal combustion engine vehicles in China. Journal of Cleaner Production 2021, 285 , 124899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124899
  19. Bo Bai, Yihan Wang, Siqin Xiong, Xiaoming Ma. Electric vehicle-attributed environmental injustice: Pollutant transfer into regions with poor traffic accessibility. Science of The Total Environment 2021, 756 , 143853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143853
  20. V. Dhinakaran, R. Surendran, M. Varsha Shree, Parul Gupta. Study on Electric Vehicle (EV) and Its Developments Based on Batteries, Drive System and Charging Methodologies in Modern World. 2021,,, 103-118. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-9251-5_6
  21. Alfred Söderberg f.k.a. Andersson, Emeli Adell, Lena Winslott Hiselius. What is the substitution effect of e-bikes? A randomised controlled trial. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 2021, 90 , 102648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102648
  22. Helaine M. Alessio, Timothy Reiman, Brett Kemper, Winston von Carlowitz, A. John Bailer, Kyle L. Timmerman. Metabolic and Cardiovascular Responses to a Simulated Commute on an E-Bike. Translational Journal of the American College of Sports Medicine 2021, 6 (2) https://doi.org/10.1249/TJX.0000000000000155
  23. Abdul Samad Abdul-Rahim, Azeem Oluwaseyi Zubair. Regulatory and Economic Determinants of a Cleaner Biofuel Production: An Empirical Evidence from Selected Producing Countries. 2021,,https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-819727-1.00056-X
  24. Han Yue, Shuming Zhang, Xinqi Tang, Wenmin Wang, , . Energy Consumption, Pollutant Emissions and Cost of Electric Vehicles and Fuel Vehicles. E3S Web of Conferences 2021, 308 , 01018. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202130801018
  25. Cristiano Martins Monteiro, Cláudia Aparecida Soares Machado, Adelaide Cassia Nardocci, Fernando Tobal Berssaneti, José Alberto Quintanilha, Clodoveu Augusto Davis. Shared Mobility Opportunities and Their Computational Challenges for Improving Health-Related Quality of Life. 2021,,, 376-383. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102671-7.10754-7
  26. Erfan Ghorbani, Mahdi Alinaghian, Gevork. B. Gharehpetian, Sajad Mohammadi, Guido Perboli. A Survey on Environmentally Friendly Vehicle Routing Problem and a Proposal of Its Classification. Sustainability 2020, 12 (21) , 9079. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12219079
  27. Longgang Ye, Lianghong Duan, Wei Liu, Yujie Hu, Zhen Ouyang, Shenghai Yang, Zhimei Xia. Facile method for preparing a nano lead powder by vacuum decomposition from spent lead-acid battery paste: leaching and desulfuration in tartaric acid and sodium tartrate mixed lixivium. Hydrometallurgy 2020, 197 , 105450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2020.105450
  28. Xiao Lin, Benjamin K. Sovacool. Inter-niche competition on ice? Socio-technical drivers, benefits and barriers of the electric vehicle transition in Iceland. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 2020, 35 , 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2020.01.013
  29. Adam Mayer. Motivations and barriers to electric bike use in the U.S.: views from online forum participants. International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development 2020, 12 (2) , 160-168. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463138.2019.1672696
  30. Lu Bai, N.N. Sze, Pan Liu, Amy Guo Haggart. Effect of environmental awareness on electric bicycle users’ mode choices. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 2020, 82 , 102320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102320
  31. M. Lacey-Barnacle, R. Robison, C. Foulds. Energy justice in the developing world: a review of theoretical frameworks, key research themes and policy implications. Energy for Sustainable Development 2020, 55 , 122-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2020.01.010
  32. ModesteKameni Nematchoua, Caroline Deuse, Mario Cools, Sigrid Reiter. Evaluation of the potential of classic and electric bicycle commuting as an impetus for the transition towards environmentally sustainable cities: A case study of the university campuses in Liege, Belgium. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2020, 119 , 109544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.109544
  33. Wen-Yinn Lin, Min-Chuan Hsiao, Pei-Chih Wu, Joshua S. Fu, Li-Wei Lai, Hsin-Chih Lai. Analysis of air quality and health co-benefits regarding electric vehicle promotion coupled with power plant emissions. Journal of Cleaner Production 2020, 247 , 119152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119152
  34. Andrew Sudmant, Ersilia Verlinghieri, Haneen Khreis, Andrew Gouldson. The social, environmental, health, and economic impacts of low carbon transport policy: A review of the evidence. 2020,,, 471-493. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818122-5.00019-3
  35. Haneen Khreis. Traffic, air pollution, and health. 2020,,, 59-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-819136-1.00003-6
  36. Soo Chen Kwan, Jamal Hisham Hashim. Public transport and health. 2020,,, 149-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-819136-1.00006-1
  37. Mark J. Nieuwenhuijsen, Haneen Khreis, Natalie Mueller, David Rojas-Rueda. Health impact assessment of transport planning and policy. 2020,,, 309-328. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-819136-1.00014-0
  38. Hanghang Zhu, Zhi Pei. Data-driven layout design of regional battery swapping stations for electric bicycles. IFAC-PapersOnLine 2020, 53 (5) , 13-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2021.04.078
  39. Zhen Ouyang, Shefen Liu, Yujie Hu, Longgang Ye. Clean Recycling Process for Lead Oxide Preparation from Spent Lead–Acid Battery Pastes Using Tartaric Acid–Sodium Tartrate as a Transforming Agent. JOM 2019, 71 (12) , 4509-4517. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-019-03798-w
  40. Sabrina Kathrin Rechkemmer, Xiaoyun Zang, Weimin Zhang, Oliver Sawodny. Lifetime optimized charging strategy of Li-ion cells based on daily driving cycle of electric two-wheelers. Applied Energy 2019, 251 , 113415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113415
  41. Chuan Ding, Xinyu Cao, Meixuan Dong, Yi Zhang, Jiawen Yang. Non-linear relationships between built environment characteristics and electric-bike ownership in Zhongshan, China. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 2019, 75 , 286-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2019.09.005
  42. Juan F. Amaya, Fabian A. Rueda, Luis I. Silva, Agustin Bucciarelli, Javier Solano. Autonomy of an EPAC in Mountainous Cities under Different Assistance Modes Using Energetic Macroscopic Representation. 2019,,, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1109/VPPC46532.2019.8952569
  43. Nina Szamocki, Min-Koo Kim, Changbum R. Ahn, Ioannis Brilakis. Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emission of Construction Equipment at Construction Sites: Field Study Approach. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 2019, 145 (9) , 05019012. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001690
  44. Casper Boongaling Agaton, Charmaine Samala Guno, Resy Ordona Villanueva, Riza Ordona Villanueva. Diesel or Electric Jeepney? A Case Study of Transport Investment in the Philippines Using the Real Options Approach. World Electric Vehicle Journal 2019, 10 (3) , 51. https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj10030051
  45. Jordan L. Schnell, Vaishali Naik, Larry W. Horowitz, Fabien Paulot, Paul Ginoux, Ming Zhao, Daniel E. Horton. Air quality impacts from the electrification of light-duty passenger vehicles in the United States. Atmospheric Environment 2019, 208 , 95-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.04.003
  46. Antonella Petrillo, Salvatore Mellino, Fabio De Felice, Iolanda Scudo. Design of a Sustainable Electric Pedal-Assisted Bike: A Life Cycle Assessment Application in Italy. 2019,,https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.81737
  47. Benjamin K. Sovacool, Johannes Kester, Lance Noel, Gerardo Zarazua de Rubens. Energy Injustice and Nordic Electric Mobility: Inequality, Elitism, and Externalities in the Electrification of Vehicle-to-Grid (V2G) Transport. Ecological Economics 2019, 157 , 205-217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.11.013
  48. Stefan Bakker. Electric Two-Wheelers, Sustainable Mobility and the City. 2019,,https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.81460
  49. Sabrina Kathrin Rechkemmer, Xiaoyun Zang, Weimin Zhang, Oliver Sawodny. Empirical Li-ion aging model derived from single particle model. Journal of Energy Storage 2019, 21 , 773-786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2019.01.005
  50. Anthony D. May. Measure Selection for Urban Transport Policy. 2019,,, 307-324. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74983-9_16
  51. Haneen Khreis, Andrew Sudmant, Andy Gouldson, Mark Nieuwenhuijsen. Transport Policy Measures for Climate Change as Drivers for Health in Cities. 2019,,, 583-608. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74983-9_28
  52. Mark Nieuwenhuijsen, Haneen Khreis, Ersilia Verlinghieri, Natalie Mueller, David Rojas-Rueda. The Role of Health Impact Assessment for Shaping Policies and Making Cities Healthier. 2019,,, 609-624. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74983-9_29
  53. Paola Astegiano, Francesca Fermi, Angelo Martino. Investigating the impact of e-bikes on modal share and greenhouse emissions: a system dynamic approach. Transportation Research Procedia 2019, 37 , 163-170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2018.12.179
  54. Xiawei Liao, Li Chai, Zhengqi Pang. Water resource impacts of future electric vehicle development in China. Journal of Cleaner Production 2018, 205 , 987-994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.091
  55. Weeberb J. Requia, Altaf Arain, Petros Koutrakis, Ron Dalumpines. Assessing particulate matter emissions from future electric mobility and potential risk for human health in Canadian metropolitan area. Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health 2018, 11 (9) , 1009-1019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-018-0608-y
  56. Dorota Burchart-Korol, Simona Jursova, Piotr Folęga, Jerzy Korol, Pavlina Pustejovska, Agata Blaut. Environmental life cycle assessment of electric vehicles in Poland and the Czech Republic. Journal of Cleaner Production 2018, 202 , 476-487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.145
  57. Yanyong Guo, Zhibin Li, Yao Wu, Chengcheng Xu. Evaluating factors affecting electric bike users’ registration of license plate in China using Bayesian approach. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 2018, 59 , 212-221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.09.008
  58. Nadine May. Local environmental impact assessment as decision support for the introduction of electromobility in urban public transport systems. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 2018, 64 , 192-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2017.07.010
  59. Y Gu, T W Wong, C K Law, G H Dong, K F Ho, Y Yang, S H L Yim. Impacts of sectoral emissions in China and the implications: air quality, public health, crop production, and economic costs. Environmental Research Letters 2018, 13 (8) , 084008. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aad138
  60. Alberto Boretti. Life Cycle Analysis Comparison of Electric and Internal Combustion Engine Based Mobility. 2018,,https://doi.org/10.4271/2018-28-0037
  61. Weeberb J. Requia, Moataz Mohamed, Christopher D. Higgins, Altaf Arain, Mark Ferguson. How clean are electric vehicles? Evidence-based review of the effects of electric mobility on air pollutants, greenhouse gas emissions and human health. Atmospheric Environment 2018, 185 , 64-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.04.040
  62. Esther Salmeron-Manzano, Francisco Manzano-Agugliaro. The Electric Bicycle: Worldwide Research Trends. Energies 2018, 11 (7) , 1894. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11071894
  63. P. Huertas-Leyva, M. Dozza, N. Baldanzini. Investigating cycling kinematics and braking maneuvers in the real world: e-bikes make cyclists move faster, brake harder, and experience new conflicts. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 2018, 54 , 211-222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.02.008
  64. Weeberb J. Requia, Matthew D. Adams, Altaf Arain, Stefania Papatheodorou, Petros Koutrakis, Moataz Mahmoud. Global Association of Air Pollution and Cardiorespiratory Diseases: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Investigation of Modifier Variables. American Journal of Public Health 2018, 108 (S2) , S123-S130. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2017.303839
  65. José M. Cansino, Rocio Yñiguez. Promoting electro mobility in Spain. Public measures and main data (2007–2012). Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 2018, 59 , 325-345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2018.01.022
  66. Weeberb J. Requia, Christopher D. Higgins, Matthew D. Adams, Moataz Mohamed, Petros Koutrakis. The health impacts of weekday traffic: A health risk assessment of PM2.5 emissions during congested periods. Environment International 2018, 111 , 164-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2017.11.025
  67. Yongxi Ma, Shuao Yu, Juanli Wang, Wei Yu. LCA/LCC analysis of starting-lighting-ignition lead-acid battery in China. PeerJ 2018, 6 , e5238. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5238
  68. Weeberb J. Requia, Matthew D. Adams, Altaf Arain, Mark Ferguson. Particulate matter intake fractions for vehicular emissions at elementary schools in Hamilton, Canada: an assessment of outdoor and indoor exposure. Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health 2017, 10 (10) , 1259-1267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-017-0510-z
  69. Aslak Fyhri, Eva Heinen, Nils Fearnley, Hanne Beate Sundfør. A push to cycling—exploring the e-bike's role in overcoming barriers to bicycle use with a survey and an intervention study. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation 2017, 11 (9) , 681-695. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2017.1302526
  70. Benjamin K. Sovacool, Jonn Axsen, Willett Kempton. The Future Promise of Vehicle-to-Grid (V2G) Integration: A Sociotechnical Review and Research Agenda. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 2017, 42 (1) , 377-406. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-030117-020220
  71. Shay Tenenbaum, Daniel Weltsch, Jason T. Bariteau, Adi Givon, Kobi Peleg, Ran Thein. Orthopaedic injuries among electric bicycle users. Injury 2017, 48 (10) , 2140-2144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2017.08.020
  72. Haneen Khreis, Anthony D. May, Mark J. Nieuwenhuijsen. Health impacts of urban transport policy measures: A guidance note for practice. Journal of Transport & Health 2017, 6 , 209-227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2017.06.003
  73. Ziwen Ling, Christopher Cherry, John MacArthur, Jonathan Weinert. Differences of Cycling Experiences and Perceptions between E-Bike and Bicycle Users in the United States. Sustainability 2017, 9 (9) , 1662. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9091662
  74. Kamila Romejko, Masaru Nakano, . Life Cycle Analysis of Emissions from Electric and Gasoline Vehicles in Different Regions. International Journal of Automation Technology 2017, 11 (4) , 572-582. https://doi.org/10.20965/ijat.2017.p0572
  75. Zhibin Li, Wei Wang, Chen Yang, Haoyang Ding. Bicycle mode share in China: a city-level analysis of long term trends. Transportation 2017, 44 (4) , 773-788. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-016-9676-8
  76. Paul A. Plazier, Gerd Weitkamp, Agnes E. van den Berg. The potential for e-biking among the younger population: A study of Dutch students. Travel Behaviour and Society 2017, 8 , 37-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2017.04.007
  77. Shukru Esmene, Timothy Taylor, Michael Leyshon. Knowledge, experience and the circus: academic perspectives on the processes of communicating the environmental and health impacts of electric vehicles. Local Environment 2017, 22 (6) , 651-666. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2016.1250736
  78. Weeberb J. Requia, Ron Dalumpines, Matthew D. Adams, Altaf Arain, Mark Ferguson, Petros Koutrakis. Modeling spatial patterns of link-based PM2.5 emissions and subsequent human exposure in a large canadian metropolitan area. Atmospheric Environment 2017, 158 , 172-180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.03.038
  79. Maria de Fatima Andrade, Prashant Kumar, Edmilson Dias de Freitas, Rita Yuri Ynoue, Jorge Martins, Leila D. Martins, Thiago Nogueira, Pedro Perez-Martinez, Regina Maura de Miranda, Taciana Albuquerque, Fabio Luiz Teixeira Gonçalves, Beatriz Oyama, Yang Zhang. Air quality in the megacity of São Paulo: Evolution over the last 30 years and future perspectives. Atmospheric Environment 2017, 159 , 66-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.03.051
  80. Mark J. Nieuwenhuijsen, Haneen Khreis, Ersilia Verlinghieri, Natalie Mueller, David Rojas-Rueda. Participatory quantitative health impact assessment of urban and transport planning in cities: A review and research needs. Environment International 2017, 103 , 61-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2017.03.022
  81. Taekwan Yoon, Christopher R. Cherry, Luke R. Jones. One-way and round-trip carsharing: A stated preference experiment in Beijing. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 2017, 53 , 102-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2017.04.009
  82. Ernani Francisco Choma, Cássia Maria Lie Ugaya. Environmental impact assessment of increasing electric vehicles in the Brazilian fleet. Journal of Cleaner Production 2017, 152 , 497-507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.07.091
  83. Husain Kanchwala, Pablo Luque Rodriguez, Daniel Alvarez Mantaras, Johan Wideberg, Sagar Bendre. Obtaining Desired Vehicle Dynamics Characteristics with Independently Controlled In-Wheel Motors: State of Art Review. SAE International Journal of Passenger Cars - Mechanical Systems 2017, 10 (2) , 413-425. https://doi.org/10.4271/2017-01-9680
  84. Gerard Vreugdenhil. Electric vehicles. A small step towards improving air quality and mortality?. European Journal of Internal Medicine 2017, 37 , e9-e10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejim.2016.10.015
  85. Yanyong Guo, Jibiao Zhou, Yao Wu, Jingxu Chen. Evaluation of Factors Affecting E-Bike Involved Crash and E-Bike License Plate Use in China Using a Bivariate Probit Model. Journal of Advanced Transportation 2017, 2017 , 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/2142659
  86. Yunhua Chang, Congrui Deng, Fang Cao, Chang Cao, Zhong Zou, Shoudong Liu, Xuhui Lee, Jun Li, Gan Zhang, Yanlin Zhang. Assessment of carbonaceous aerosols in Shanghai, China – Part 1: long-term evolution, seasonal variations, and meteorological effects. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 2017, 17 (16) , 9945-9964. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-9945-2017
  87. Erika von Schneidemesser, Rebecca D. Kutzner, Julia Schmale†, , , . A survey on the perceived need and value of decision-support tools for joint mitigation of air pollution and climate change in cities. Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene 2017, 5 https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.126
  88. Kamila Romejko, Masaru Nakano. Health Impact of Electric Vehicles Considering Environmental Leakage. The Case Study on Japan, China, UK and Poland. 2017,,, 390-398. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66926-7_45
  89. Billie Giles-Corti, Anne Vernez-Moudon, Rodrigo Reis, Gavin Turrell, Andrew L Dannenberg, Hannah Badland, Sarah Foster, Melanie Lowe, James F Sallis, Mark Stevenson, Neville Owen. City planning and population health: a global challenge. The Lancet 2016, 388 (10062) , 2912-2924. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30066-6
  90. Josh Andres, Julian de Hoog, Jürg von Känel, Julian Berk, Bach Le, Xizi Wang, Marcus Brazil, Florian 'Floyd' Mueller. Exploring Human. 2016,,, 85-92. https://doi.org/10.1145/2968120.2987719
  91. Prashant Kumar, Maria de Fatima Andrade, Rita Yuri Ynoue, Adalgiza Fornaro, Edmilson Dias de Freitas, Jorge Martins, Leila D. Martins, Taciana Albuquerque, Yang Zhang, Lidia Morawska. New directions: From biofuels to wood stoves: The modern and ancient air quality challenges in the megacity of São Paulo. Atmospheric Environment 2016, 140 , 364-369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.05.059
  92. Abigail Clarke-Sather, Yan Li, Jiansheng Qu. Lighting energy use in Anding District, Gansu Province, China. Energy for Sustainable Development 2016, 32 , 40-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2016.02.012
  93. N. Sheng, X. Zhou, Y. Zhou. Environmental impact of electric motorcycles: Evidence from traffic noise assessment by a building-based data mining technique. Science of The Total Environment 2016, 554-555 , 73-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.02.148
  94. L. Biggiero, F. Pagliara. A proposal for a self contained electric bus service for medium sized cities. 2016,,, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1109/EEEIC.2016.7555566
  95. Irina Tal, Bogdan Ciubotaru, Gabriel-Miro Muntean. Vehicular-Communications-Based Speed Advisory System for Electric Bicycles. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology 2016, 65 (6) , 4129-4143. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVT.2015.2442338
  96. Tim Jones, Lucas Harms, Eva Heinen. Motives, perceptions and experiences of electric bicycle owners and implications for health, wellbeing and mobility. Journal of Transport Geography 2016, 53 , 41-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2016.04.006
  97. Wanxia Ren, Bing Xue, Yong Geng, Chengpeng Lu, Yunsong Zhang, Liming Zhang, Tsuyoshi Fujita, Han Hao. Inter-city passenger transport in larger urban agglomeration area: emissions and health impacts. Journal of Cleaner Production 2016, 114 , 412-419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.03.102
  98. Samuel Pelletier, Ola Jabali, Gilbert Laporte. 50th Anniversary Invited Article—Goods Distribution with Electric Vehicles: Review and Research Perspectives. Transportation Science 2016, 50 (1) , 3-22. https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.2015.0646
  99. Elliot Fishman, Christopher Cherry. E-bikes in the Mainstream: Reviewing a Decade of Research. Transport Reviews 2016, 36 (1) , 72-91. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2015.1069907
  100. Pak Kin Wong, Hang Cheong Wong, Chi Man Vong, Zhengchao Xie, Shaojia Huang. Model predictive engine air-ratio control using online sequential extreme learning machine. Neural Computing and Applications 2016, 27 (1) , 79-92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-014-1555-7
Load all citations

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

You’ve supercharged your research process with ACS and Mendeley!

STEP 1:
Click to create an ACS ID

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

MENDELEY PAIRING EXPIRED
Your Mendeley pairing has expired. Please reconnect

This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By continuing to use the site, you are accepting our use of cookies. Read the ACS privacy policy.

CONTINUE