ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
My Activity
Recently Viewed
You have not visited any articles yet, Please visit some articles to see contents here.
CONTENT TYPES

Figure 1Loading Img

Quantifying and Mapping Ecosystem Services Supplies and Demands: A Review of Remote Sensing Applications

View Author Information
Faculty of Biology, Chemistry and Earth Sciences, Professorship of Ecological Services, University of Bayreuth, 95440 Bayreuth, Germany
Remote Sensing Unit, Department of Geography, University of Wuerzburg, Am Hubland, 97074 Wuerzburg, Germany
§ German Aerospace Centre (DLR)−German Remote Sensing Data Centre (DFD), Oberpfaffenhofen, 82234 Wessling, Germany
Department of Geography, Environmental Informatics Unit, University of Marburg, 35032 Marburg, Germany
*E-mail: [email protected]; tel: +49 921 55 4648.
Cite this: Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46, 16, 8529–8541
Publication Date (Web):July 20, 2012
https://doi.org/10.1021/es300157u
Copyright © 2012 American Chemical Society
Article Views
3895
Altmetric
-
Citations
LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICS
Read OnlinePDF (1 MB)
Supporting Info (1)»

Abstract

Abstract Image

Ecosystems provide services necessary for the livelihoods and well-being of people. Quantifying and mapping supplies and demands of ecosystem services is essential for continuous monitoring of such services to support decision-making. Area-wide and spatially explicit mapping of ecosystem services based on extensive ground surveys is restricted to local scales and limited due to high costs. In contrast, remote sensing provides reliable area-wide data for quantifying and mapping ecosystem services at comparatively low costs, and with the option of fast, frequent, and continuous observations for monitoring. In this paper, we review relevant remote sensing systems, sensor types, and methods applicable in quantifying selected provisioning and regulatory services. Furthermore, opportunities, challenges, and future prospects in using remote sensing for supporting ecosystem services’ quantification and mapping are discussed.

Supporting Information

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

Tables S1 and S2 provide a critical review of other relevant remote sensing data sources and their properties; detailed description of methods and assumptions with examples on remote sensing application for quantifying and mapping ecosystem services. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Cited By

This article is cited by 93 publications.

  1. Zhizhong Xing, Shuanfeng Zhao, Wei Guo, Xiaojun Guo, Shenquan Wang, Junjie Ma, Haitao He. Coal Wall and Roof Segmentation in the Coal Mine Working Face Based on Dynamic Graph Convolution Neural Networks. ACS Omega 2021, 6 (47) , 31699-31715. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.1c04393
  2. Nicolas Dietrich, Kalyani Kentheswaran, Aras Ahmadi, Johanne Teychené, Yolaine Bessière, Sandrine Alfenore, Stéphanie Laborie, Dominique Bastoul, Karine Loubière, Christelle Guigui, Mathieu Sperandio, Ligia Barna, Etienne Paul, Corinne Cabassud, Alain Liné, Gilles Hébrard. Attempts, Successes, and Failures of Distance Learning in the Time of COVID-19. Journal of Chemical Education 2020, 97 (9) , 2448-2457. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00717
  3. Husi Letu, Takashi Y. Nakajima, and Fumihiko Nishio . Regional-Scale Estimation of Electric Power and Power Plant CO2 Emissions Using Defense Meteorological Satellite Program Operational Linescan System Nighttime Satellite Data. Environmental Science & Technology Letters 2014, 1 (5) , 259-265. https://doi.org/10.1021/ez500093s
  4. Saptarshi Mondal, C. Jeganathan. Effect of scale, landscape heterogeneity and terrain complexity on agriculture mapping accuracy from time-series NDVI in the Western-Himalaya region. Landscape Ecology 2022, 37 (11) , 2757-2781. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-022-01533-6
  5. Hanshou Zhu, Jun Zhai, Peng Hou, Haifeng Gao, Yingli He, Diandian Jin, Ningning Xu. Divergent trends of ecosystem status and services in the Hexi Corridor. Frontiers in Environmental Science 2022, 10 https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.1008441
  6. Yalan Ji, Xiaopeng Hao, Yandong Sun, Zhao Xing, Jian Song, Jingjing Zhou, Ruiheng Sima, Shuangcheng Sun, Guangjun Wang. Research on Large-Area Blackbody Radiation Source for Infrared Remote Sensor Calibration. International Journal of Thermophysics 2022, 43 (9) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10765-022-03067-0
  7. Denise Boehnke, Alice Krehl, Kai Mörmann, Rebekka Volk, Thomas Lützkendorf, Elias Naber, Ronja Becker, Stefan Norra. Mapping Urban Green and Its Ecosystem Services at Microscale—A Methodological Approach for Climate Adaptation and Biodiversity. Sustainability 2022, 14 (15) , 9029. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159029
  8. Igor Bendoym, Lori A. Lepak, James Leitch, Jeff Applegate, David Crouse, , , , . Low SWaP-C hyperspectral metamaterial spectrometer (MMS) for narrow-band, wide angle-of-Incidence MWIR atmospheric sensing. 2022,,, 34. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2632794
  9. Nesisa Analisa Nyathi, Walter Musakwa, Ruth Delzeit, Nikolaus J. Kuhn. Ecosystem Services in Southern Africa: Current and Emerging Trends—A Bibliometric Review. Diversity 2022, 14 (5) , 359. https://doi.org/10.3390/d14050359
  10. Tegegne Molla Sitotaw, Louise Willemen, Derege Tsegaye Meshesha, Andrew Nelson. Sacred church forests as sources of wild pollinators for the surrounding smallholder agricultural farms in Lake Tana Basin, Ethiopia. Ecological Indicators 2022, 137 , 108739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108739
  11. Wei Shui, Kexin Wu, Yong Du, Haifeng Yang. The Trade-Offs between Supply and Demand Dynamics of Ecosystem Services in the Bay Areas of Metropolitan Regions: A Case Study in Quanzhou, China. Land 2022, 11 (1) , 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11010022
  12. Yongge Li, Wei Liu, Qi Feng, Meng Zhu, Linshan Yang, Jutao Zhang. Quantitative Assessment for the Spatiotemporal Changes of Ecosystem Services, Tradeoff–Synergy Relationships and Drivers in the Semi-Arid Regions of China. Remote Sensing 2022, 14 (1) , 239. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14010239
  13. Dawei Wen, Xin Huang, Francesca Bovolo, Jiayi Li, Xinli Ke, Anlu Zhang, Jon Atli Benediktsson. Change Detection From Very-High-Spatial-Resolution Optical Remote Sensing Images: Methods, applications, and future directions. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine 2021, 9 (4) , 68-101. https://doi.org/10.1109/MGRS.2021.3063465
  14. Fang Wang, Xingzhong Yuan, Lilei Zhou, Shuangshuang Liu, Mengjie Zhang, Dan Zhang. Detecting the Complex Relationships and Driving Mechanisms of Key Ecosystem Services in the Central Urban Area Chongqing Municipality, China. Remote Sensing 2021, 13 (21) , 4248. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13214248
  15. Da Lü, Yihe Lü. Spatiotemporal variability of water ecosystem services can be effectively quantified by a composite indicator approach. Ecological Indicators 2021, 130 , 108061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108061
  16. Zhuangzhuang Wang, Liwei Zhang, Xupu Li, Yingjie Li, Bojie Fu. Integrating ecosystem service supply and demand into ecological risk assessment: a comprehensive framework and case study. Landscape Ecology 2021, 36 (10) , 2977-2995. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-021-01285-9
  17. C. Jullian, L. Nahuelhual, P. Laterra. The Ecosystem Service Provision Index as a generic indicator of ecosystem service supply for monitoring conservation targets. Ecological Indicators 2021, 129 , 107855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107855
  18. Donghui Shi, Yishao Shi, Qiusheng Wu. Multidimensional Assessment of Lake Water Ecosystem Services Using Remote Sensing. Remote Sensing 2021, 13 (17) , 3540. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13173540
  19. Jing-jing LIU, Jing WANG, Jian-wang DAI, Tian-lin ZHAI, Ze-hui LI. The relationship between supply and demand of ecosystem services and its spatio-temporal variation in the Yellow River Basin. JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES 2021, 36 (1) , 148. https://doi.org/10.31497/zrzyxb.20210110
  20. Maciej M. Nowak, Katarzyna Pędziwiatr, Katarzyna Słupecka, Rafał Wawer. Parcel-based layout as a factor affecting the potential availability of ecosystem services provided by tree belts. Ecological Indicators 2020, 119 , 106836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106836
  21. Adrienne Grêt-Regamey, Bettina Weibel. Global assessment of mountain ecosystem services using earth observation data. Ecosystem Services 2020, 46 , 101213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101213
  22. Kai M. A. Chan, Terre Satterfield, . The maturation of ecosystem services: Social and policy research expands, but whither biophysically informed valuation?. People and Nature 2020, 2 (4) , 1021-1060. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10137
  23. Bo Jiang, Yang Bai, Junyu Chen, Juha M. Alatalo, Xibao Xu, Gang Liu, Qing Wang. Land management to reconcile ecosystem services supply and demand mismatches—A case study in Shanghai municipality, China. Land Degradation & Development 2020, 31 (17) , 2684-2699. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.3614
  24. Jiangbo Gao. Editorial for the Special Issue “Ecosystem Services with Remote Sensing”. Remote Sensing 2020, 12 (14) , 2191. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12142191
  25. Adrienne Grêt-Regamey, Marcelo Galleguillos-Torres, Angela Dissegna, Bettina Weibel. How urban densification influences ecosystem services—a comparison between a temperate and a tropical city. Environmental Research Letters 2020, 15 (7) , 075001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab7acf
  26. Jian Peng, Yi’na Hu, Jianquan Dong, Qi Mao, Yanxu Liu, Yueyue Du, Jiansheng Wu, Yanglin Wang. Linking spatial differentiation with sustainability management: Academic contributions and research directions of physical geography in China. Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment 2020, 44 (1) , 14-30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133319878107
  27. Trinidad del Río-Mena, Louise Willemen, Anton Vrieling, Andy Nelson. Understanding Intra-Annual Dynamics of Ecosystem Services Using Satellite Image Time Series. Remote Sensing 2020, 12 (4) , 710. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12040710
  28. Davide Longato, Mattias Gaglio, Mirco Boschetti, Elena Gissi. Bioenergy and ecosystem services trade-offs and synergies in marginal agricultural lands: A remote-sensing-based assessment method. Journal of Cleaner Production 2019, 237 , 117672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117672
  29. Dorothy Furberg, Yifang Ban, Andrea Nascetti. Monitoring of Urbanization and Analysis of Environmental Impact in Stockholm with Sentinel-2A and SPOT-5 Multispectral Data. Remote Sensing 2019, 11 (20) , 2408. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11202408
  30. Jennifer Hodbod, Emma Tebbs, Kristofer Chan, Shubhechchha Sharma. Integrating Participatory Methods and Remote Sensing to Enhance Understanding of Ecosystem Service Dynamics Across Scales. Land 2019, 8 (9) , 132. https://doi.org/10.3390/land8090132
  31. Agathe Colléony, Assaf Shwartz. Beyond Assuming Co-Benefits in Nature-Based Solutions: A Human-Centered Approach to Optimize Social and Ecological Outcomes for Advancing Sustainable Urban Planning. Sustainability 2019, 11 (18) , 4924. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11184924
  32. Lisanne Hölting, Michael Beckmann, Martin Volk, Anna F. Cord. Multifunctionality assessments – More than assessing multiple ecosystem functions and services? A quantitative literature review. Ecological Indicators 2019, 103 , 226-235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.04.009
  33. Xin Huang, Xiaopeng Han, Song Ma, Tianjia Lin, Jianya Gong. Monitoring ecosystem service change in the City of Shenzhen by the use of high‐resolution remotely sensed imagery and deep learning. Land Degradation & Development 2019, 30 (12) , 1490-1501. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.3337
  34. Cristina Herrero-Jáuregui, Cecilia Arnaiz-Schmitz, Lorena Herrera, Simon M. Smart, Carlos Montes, Francisco D. Pineda, Maria Fe Schmitz. Aligning landscape structure with ecosystem services along an urban–rural gradient. Trade-offs and transitions towards cultural services. Landscape Ecology 2019, 34 (7) , 1525-1545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-018-0756-3
  35. Yuanyuan Chen, Xueting Li, Min Min. Mapping for terrestrial ecosystem services: a review. 2019,,, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1109/Agro-Geoinformatics.2019.8820234
  36. J.R. Brook, S.G. Cober, M. Freemark, T. Harner, S.M. Li, J. Liggio, P. Makar, B. Pauli. Advances in science and applications of air pollution monitoring: A case study on oil sands monitoring targeting ecosystem protection. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association 2019, 69 (6) , 661-709. https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2019.1607689
  37. Laura Giordano, Giuseppe Portacci, Carmela Caroppo. Multidisciplinary tools for sustainable management of an ecosystem service: The case study of mussel farming in the Mar Piccolo of Taranto (Mediterranean, Ionian Sea). Ocean & Coastal Management 2019, 176 , 11-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2019.04.013
  38. Carlos Ramirez-Reyes, Kate A. Brauman, Rebecca Chaplin-Kramer, Gillian L. Galford, Susana B. Adamo, Christopher B. Anderson, Clarissa Anderson, Ginger R.H. Allington, Kenneth J. Bagstad, Michael T. Coe, Anna F. Cord, Laura E. Dee, Rachelle K. Gould, Meha Jain, Virginia A. Kowal, Frank E. Muller-Karger, Jessica Norriss, Peter Potapov, Jiangxiao Qiu, Jesse T. Rieb, Brian E. Robinson, Leah H. Samberg, Nagendra Singh, Sabrina H. Szeto, Brian Voigt, Keri Watson, T. Maxwell Wright. Reimagining the potential of Earth observations for ecosystem service assessments. Science of The Total Environment 2019, 665 , 1053-1063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.150
  39. Paulo Amador Tavares, Norma Beltrão, Ulisses Silva Guimarães, Ana Teodoro, Paulo Gonçalves. Urban Ecosystem Services Quantification through Remote Sensing Approach: A Systematic Review. Environments 2019, 6 (5) , 51. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments6050051
  40. Sérgio G. Milheiras, Georgina M. Mace. Assessing ecosystem service provision in a tropical region with high forest cover: Spatial overlap and the impact of land use change in Amapá, Brazil. Ecological Indicators 2019, 99 , 12-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.12.013
  41. Jerome B. Gilleron, Marc Muehlberg, Alexia Payan, Youngjun Choi, Simon I. Briceno, Dimitri N. Mavris. Framework for Multi-Asset Comparison and Rapid Down-selection for Earth Observation Missions. 2019,,https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2019-0508
  42. Leonardo Vargas, Louise Willemen, Lars Hein. Assessing the Capacity of Ecosystems to Supply Ecosystem Services Using Remote Sensing and An Ecosystem Accounting Approach. Environmental Management 2019, 63 (1) , 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-018-1110-x
  43. Rajarshi DasGupta, Shizuka Hashimoto, Haripriya Gundimeda. Biodiversity/ecosystem services scenario exercises from the Asia–Pacific: typology, archetypes and implications for sustainable development goals (SDGs). Sustainability Science 2019, 14 (1) , 241-257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0647-1
  44. Ana Stritih, Peter Bebi, Adrienne Grêt-Regamey. Quantifying uncertainties in earth observation-based ecosystem service assessments. Environmental Modelling & Software 2019, 111 , 300-310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.09.005
  45. Clémence Vannier, Rémy Lasseur, Emilie Crouzat, Coline Byczek, Valentine Lafond, Thomas Cordonnier, Pierre-Yves Longaretti, Sandra Lavorel. Mapping ecosystem services bundles in a heterogeneous mountain region. Ecosystems and People 2019, 15 (1) , 74-88. https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2019.1570971
  46. Emilie Crouzat, Mégane Zawada, Karl Grigulis, Sandra Lavorel. Design and implementation of a national ecosystem assessment – insights from the French mountain systems’ experience. Ecosystems and People 2019, 15 (1) , 288-302. https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2019.1674383
  47. Mat Santamouris, George Ban-Weiss, Paul Osmond, Riccardo Paolini, Afroditi Synnefa, Constantinos Cartalis, Alberto Muscio, Michele Zinzi, Tobi Eniolu Morakinyo, Edward Ng, Zheng Tan, Hideki Takebayashi, David Sailor, P. Crank, Haider Taha, Anna Laura Pisello, Federico Rossi, Jiong Zhang, Denia Kolokotsa. PROGRESS IN URBAN GREENERY MITIGATION SCIENCE – ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGIES ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES AND IMPACT ON CITIES. JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT 2018, 24 (8) , 638-671. https://doi.org/10.3846/jcem.2018.6604
  48. A. Kangas, K.T. Korhonen, T. Packalen, J. Vauhkonen. Sources and types of uncertainties in the information on forest-related ecosystem services. Forest Ecology and Management 2018, 427 , 7-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2018.05.056
  49. Rémy Lasseur, Clémence Vannier, Jérémie Lefebvre, Pierre-Yves Longaretti, Sandra Lavorel. Landscape-scale modeling of agricultural land use for the quantification of ecosystem services. Journal of Applied Remote Sensing 2018, 12 (04) , 1. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JRS.12.046024
  50. Lin Huang, Wei Cao, Xinliang Xu, Jiangwen Fan, Junbang Wang. Linking the benefits of ecosystem services to sustainable spatial planning of ecological conservation strategies. Journal of Environmental Management 2018, 222 , 385-395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.05.066
  51. Simone Quatrini, Neville D. Crossman. Most finance to halt desertification also benefits multiple ecosystem services: A key to unlock investments in Land Degradation Neutrality?. Ecosystem Services 2018, 31 , 265-277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.04.003
  52. K.R. Koopman, M.W. Straatsma, D.C.M. Augustijn, A.M. Breure, H.J.R. Lenders, S.J. Stax, R.S.E.W. Leuven. Quantifying biomass production for assessing ecosystem services of riverine landscapes. Science of The Total Environment 2018, 624 , 1577-1585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.044
  53. Keith Ronald Skene. Circles, spirals, pyramids and cubes: why the circular economy cannot work. Sustainability Science 2018, 13 (2) , 479-492. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-017-0443-3
  54. Jan Haas, Yifang Ban. Urban Land Cover and Ecosystem Service Changes based on Sentinel-2A MSI and Landsat TM Data. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing 2018, 11 (2) , 485-497. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2017.2786468
  55. Kerstin Böck, Renate Polt, Lisa Schülting. Ecosystem Services in River Landscapes. 2018,,, 413-433. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73250-3_21
  56. Zhenyu Wang, Alex Lechner, Thomas Baumgartl. Ecosystem Services Mapping Uncertainty Assessment: A Case Study in the Fitzroy Basin Mining Region. Water 2018, 10 (1) , 88. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10010088
  57. Benjamin Denjean, Mónica A. Altamirano, Nina Graveline, Raffaele Giordano, Peter van der Keur, David Moncoulon, Josh Weinberg, María Máñez Costa, Zdravko Kozinc, Mark Mulligan, Polona Pengal, John Matthews, Nora van Cauwenbergh, Elena López Gunn, David N. Bresch. Natural Assurance Scheme: A level playing field framework for Green-Grey infrastructure development. Environmental Research 2017, 159 , 24-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2017.07.006
  58. Rebecca Spake, Rémy Lasseur, Emilie Crouzat, James M. Bullock, Sandra Lavorel, Katherine E. Parks, Marije Schaafsma, Elena M. Bennett, Joachim Maes, Mark Mulligan, Maud Mouchet, Garry D. Peterson, Catharina J.E. Schulp, Wilfried Thuiller, Monica G. Turner, Peter H. Verburg, Felix Eigenbrod. Unpacking ecosystem service bundles: Towards predictive mapping of synergies and trade-offs between ecosystem services. Global Environmental Change 2017, 47 , 37-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.08.004
  59. Jan Haas, Yifang Ban. Sentinel-1A SAR and sentinel-2A MSI data fusion for urban ecosystem service mapping. Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment 2017, 8 , 41-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsase.2017.07.006
  60. Dandan Yu, Nan Lu, Bojie Fu. Establishment of a comprehensive indicator system for the assessment of biodiversity and ecosystem services. Landscape Ecology 2017, 32 (8) , 1563-1579. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-017-0549-0
  61. Hui Zhang, Qiao Wang, Guangyu Li, Hanpei Zhang, Jue Zhang. Losses of ecosystem service values in the Taihu Lake Basin from 1979 to 2010. Frontiers of Earth Science 2017, 11 (2) , 310-320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-016-0612-1
  62. Anna F. Cord, Kate A. Brauman, Rebecca Chaplin-Kramer, Andreas Huth, Guy Ziv, Ralf Seppelt. Priorities to Advance Monitoring of Ecosystem Services Using Earth Observation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 2017, 32 (6) , 416-428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2017.03.003
  63. Leonardo Vargas, Lars Hein, Roy P. Remme. Accounting for ecosystem assets using remote sensing in the Colombian Orinoco River Basin lowlands. Journal of Applied Remote Sensing 2017, 11 (2) , 026008. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JRS.11.026008
  64. Sandra Lavorel, Anita Bayer, Alberte Bondeau, Sven Lautenbach, Ana Ruiz-Frau, Nynke Schulp, Ralf Seppelt, Peter Verburg, Astrid van Teeffelen, Clémence Vannier, Almut Arneth, Wolfgang Cramer, Nuria Marba. Pathways to bridge the biophysical realism gap in ecosystem services mapping approaches. Ecological Indicators 2017, 74 , 241-260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.11.015
  65. Jan Haas, Yifang Ban. Mapping and Monitoring Urban Ecosystem Services Using Multitemporal High-Resolution Satellite Data. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing 2017, 10 (2) , 669-680. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2016.2586582
  66. José M. Paruelo, Marcos Texeira, Luciana Staiano, Matías Mastrángelo, Laura Amdan, Federico Gallego. An integrative index of Ecosystem Services provision based on remotely sensed data. Ecological Indicators 2016, 71 , 145-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.06.054
  67. A. Lausch, L. Bannehr, M. Beckmann, C. Boehm, H. Feilhauer, J.M. Hacker, M. Heurich, A. Jung, R. Klenke, C. Neumann, M. Pause, D. Rocchini, M.E. Schaepman, S. Schmidtlein, K. Schulz, P. Selsam, J. Settele, A.K. Skidmore, A.F. Cord. Linking Earth Observation and taxonomic, structural and functional biodiversity: Local to ecosystem perspectives. Ecological Indicators 2016, 70 , 317-339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.06.022
  68. , , , , , Leonardo Vargas, Lars Hein, Roy P. Remme. Accounting for ecosystem assets using remote sensing in the Colombian Orinoco River basin lowlands. 2016,,, 1000510. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2245293
  69. Stephanie Pau, Laura E. Dee, , . Remote sensing of species dominance and the value for quantifying ecosystem services. Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation 2016, 2 (3) , 141-151. https://doi.org/10.1002/rse2.23
  70. Paul Schumacher, Bunafsha Mislimshoeva, Alexander Brenning, Harald Zandler, Martin Brandt, Cyrus Samimi, Thomas Koellner. Do Red Edge and Texture Attributes from High-Resolution Satellite Data Improve Wood Volume Estimation in a Semi-Arid Mountainous Region?. Remote Sensing 2016, 8 (7) , 540. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8070540
  71. Xuefeng Zhang, Jianming Niu, Alexander Buyantuev, Qing Zhang, Jianjun Dong, Sarula Kang, Jing Zhang. Understanding Grassland Degradation and Restoration from the Perspective of Ecosystem Services: A Case Study of the Xilin River Basin in Inner Mongolia, China. Sustainability 2016, 8 (7) , 594. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8070594
  72. Nathalie Pettorelli, Harry Jon Foord Owen, Clare Duncan, . How do we want Satellite Remote Sensing to support biodiversity conservation globally?. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 2016, 7 (6) , 656-665. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12545
  73. Ying Xu, Haiping Tang, Bojie Wang, Jiao Chen. Effects of land-use intensity on ecosystem services and human well-being: a case study in Huailai County, China. Environmental Earth Sciences 2016, 75 (5) https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-5103-2
  74. Clémence Vannier, Jérémie Lefebvre, Pierre-Yves Longaretti, Sandra Lavorel. Patterns of landscape change in a rapidly urbanizing mountain region. Cybergeo 2016, https://doi.org/10.4000/cybergeo.27800
  75. Mercy Ojoyi, Onisimo Mutanga, John Odindi, Elfatih M. Abdel-Rahman. Application of topo-edaphic factors and remotely sensed vegetation indices to enhance biomass estimation in a heterogeneous landscape in the Eastern Arc Mountains of Tanzania. Geocarto International 2016, 31 (1) , 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2015.1041557
  76. Clare Duncan, Julian R. Thompson, Nathalie Pettorelli. The quest for a mechanistic understanding of biodiversity–ecosystem services relationships. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 2015, 282 (1817) , 20151348. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2015.1348
  77. Zisis I. Petrou, Ioannis Manakos, Tania Stathaki. Remote sensing for biodiversity monitoring: a review of methods for biodiversity indicator extraction and assessment of progress towards international targets. Biodiversity and Conservation 2015, 24 (10) , 2333-2363. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-015-0947-z
  78. P. D. Blanco, G. I. Metternicht, H. F. del Valle, P. Laterra, L. A. Hardtke, P. J. Bouza. A remote sensing and fuzzy multi-objective linear programming approach to model impact of land management decisions on ecosystem services of rangelands. 2015,,, 3369-3372. https://doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS.2015.7326541
  79. Sarah M. Durant, Matthew S. Becker, Scott Creel, Sultana Bashir, Amy J. Dickman, Roseline C. Beudels-Jamar, Laly Lichtenfeld, Ray Hilborn, Jake Wall, George Wittemyer, Lkhagvasuren Badamjav, Stephen Blake, Luigi Boitani, Christine Breitenmoser, Femke Broekhuis, David Christianson, Gabriele Cozzi, Tim R. B. Davenport, James Deutsch, Pierre Devillers, Luke Dollar, Stephanie Dolrenry, Iain Douglas-Hamilton, Egil Dröge, Emily FitzHerbert, Charles Foley, Leela Hazzah, J. Grant C. Hopcraft, Dennis Ikanda, Andrew Jacobson, Dereck Joubert, Marcella J. Kelly, James Milanzi, Nicholas Mitchell, Jassiel M'Soka, Maurus Msuha, Thandiwe Mweetwa, Julius Nyahongo, Elias Rosenblatt, Paul Schuette, Claudio Sillero-Zubiri, Anthony R. E. Sinclair, Mark R. Stanley Price, Alexandra Zimmermann, Nathalie Pettorelli, . Developing fencing policies for dryland ecosystems. Journal of Applied Ecology 2015, 52 (3) , 544-551. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12415
  80. Zongming Wang, Dehua Mao, Lin Li, Mingming Jia, Zhangyu Dong, Zhenghong Miao, Chunying Ren, Changchun Song. Quantifying changes in multiple ecosystem services during 1992–2012 in the Sanjiang Plain of China. Science of The Total Environment 2015, 514 , 119-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.01.007
  81. Bojie Fu, Liwei Zhang, Zhihong Xu, Yan Zhao, Yongping Wei, Dominic Skinner. Ecosystem services in changing land use. Journal of Soils and Sediments 2015, 15 (4) , 833-843. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-015-1082-x
  82. Jose V. Roces-Díaz, Ramón A. Díaz-Varela, Pedro Álvarez-Álvarez, Carmen Recondo, Emilio R. Díaz-Varela. A multiscale analysis of ecosystem services supply in the NW Iberian Peninsula from a functional perspective. Ecological Indicators 2015, 50 , 24-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.10.027
  83. Philip A. Stephens, Nathalie Pettorelli, Jos Barlow, Mark J. Whittingham, Marc W. Cadotte. Management by proxy? The use of indices in applied ecology. Journal of Applied Ecology 2015, 52 (1) , 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12383
  84. Yohannes Ayanu, Anke Jentsch, Detlef Müller-Mahn, Simone Rettberg, Clemens Romankiewicz, Thomas Koellner. Ecosystem engineer unleashed: Prosopis juliflora threatening ecosystem services?. Regional Environmental Change 2015, 15 (1) , 155-167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-014-0616-x
  85. Hongji Li, Zhihui Li, Zhaohua Li, Jing Yu, Bing Liu. Evaluation of ecosystem services: A case study in the middle reach of the Heihe River Basin, Northwest China. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C 2015, 89-90 , 40-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2015.07.003
  86. Zhaoqin Li, Dandan Xu, Xulin Guo. Remote Sensing of Ecosystem Health: Opportunities, Challenges, and Future Perspectives. Sensors 2014, 14 (11) , 21117-21139. https://doi.org/10.3390/s141121117
  87. Linhai Zhu, Zhongxin Chen, Jianjian Wang, Jinzhi Ding, Yunjiang Yu, Junsheng Li, Nengwen Xiao, Lianhe Jiang, Yuanrun Zheng, Glyn M. Rimmington. Monitoring plant response to phenanthrene using the red edge of canopy hyperspectral reflectance. Marine Pollution Bulletin 2014, 86 (1-2) , 332-341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2014.06.046
  88. L. Homolová, M. E. Schaepman, P. Lamarque, J. G. P. W. Clevers, F. de Bello, W. Thuiller, S. Lavorel. Comparison of remote sensing and plant trait-based modelling to predict ecosystem services in subalpine grasslands. Ecosphere 2014, 5 (8) , art100. https://doi.org/10.1890/ES13-00393.1
  89. Margaret E. Andrew, Michael A. Wulder, Trisalyn A. Nelson. Potential contributions of remote sensing to ecosystem service assessments. Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment 2014, 38 (3) , 328-353. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133314528942
  90. Megan F. King, Vivian F. Renó, Evlyn M. L. M. Novo. The Concept, Dimensions and Methods of Assessment of Human Well-Being within a Socioecological Context: A Literature Review. Social Indicators Research 2014, 116 (3) , 681-698. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0320-0
  91. J. Schellberg, E. Verbruggen. Frontiers and perspectives on research strategies in grassland technology. Crop and Pasture Science 2014, 65 (6) , 508. https://doi.org/10.1071/CP13429
  92. Lucie Homolová, Zbyněk Malenovský, Jan G.P.W. Clevers, Glenda García-Santos, Michael E. Schaepman. Review of optical-based remote sensing for plant trait mapping. Ecological Complexity 2013, 15 , 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2013.06.003
  93. Kristine T. Nemec, Ciara Raudsepp-Hearne. The use of geographic information systems to map and assess ecosystem services. Biodiversity and Conservation 2013, 22 (1) , 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-012-0406-z

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

You’ve supercharged your research process with ACS and Mendeley!

STEP 1:
Click to create an ACS ID

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

MENDELEY PAIRING EXPIRED
Your Mendeley pairing has expired. Please reconnect

This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By continuing to use the site, you are accepting our use of cookies. Read the ACS privacy policy.

CONTINUE