ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
Quantifying and Mapping Ecosystem Services Supplies and Demands: A Review of Remote Sensing Applications
My Activity

Figure 1Loading Img
    Critical Review

    Quantifying and Mapping Ecosystem Services Supplies and Demands: A Review of Remote Sensing Applications
    Click to copy article linkArticle link copied!

    View Author Information
    Faculty of Biology, Chemistry and Earth Sciences, Professorship of Ecological Services, University of Bayreuth, 95440 Bayreuth, Germany
    Remote Sensing Unit, Department of Geography, University of Wuerzburg, Am Hubland, 97074 Wuerzburg, Germany
    § German Aerospace Centre (DLR)−German Remote Sensing Data Centre (DFD), Oberpfaffenhofen, 82234 Wessling, Germany
    Department of Geography, Environmental Informatics Unit, University of Marburg, 35032 Marburg, Germany
    *E-mail: [email protected]; tel: +49 921 55 4648.
    Other Access OptionsSupporting Information (1)

    Environmental Science & Technology

    Cite this: Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46, 16, 8529–8541
    Click to copy citationCitation copied!
    https://doi.org/10.1021/es300157u
    Published July 20, 2012
    Copyright © 2012 American Chemical Society

    Abstract

    Click to copy section linkSection link copied!
    Abstract Image

    Ecosystems provide services necessary for the livelihoods and well-being of people. Quantifying and mapping supplies and demands of ecosystem services is essential for continuous monitoring of such services to support decision-making. Area-wide and spatially explicit mapping of ecosystem services based on extensive ground surveys is restricted to local scales and limited due to high costs. In contrast, remote sensing provides reliable area-wide data for quantifying and mapping ecosystem services at comparatively low costs, and with the option of fast, frequent, and continuous observations for monitoring. In this paper, we review relevant remote sensing systems, sensor types, and methods applicable in quantifying selected provisioning and regulatory services. Furthermore, opportunities, challenges, and future prospects in using remote sensing for supporting ecosystem services’ quantification and mapping are discussed.

    Copyright © 2012 American Chemical Society

    Read this article

    To access this article, please review the available access options below.

    Get instant access

    Purchase Access

    Read this article for 48 hours. Check out below using your ACS ID or as a guest.

    Recommended

    Access through Your Institution

    You may have access to this article through your institution.

    Your institution does not have access to this content. Add or change your institution or let them know you’d like them to include access.

    Supporting Information

    Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

    Tables S1 and S2 provide a critical review of other relevant remote sensing data sources and their properties; detailed description of methods and assumptions with examples on remote sensing application for quantifying and mapping ecosystem services. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.

    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

    Cited By

    Click to copy section linkSection link copied!
    Citation Statements
    Explore this article's citation statements on scite.ai

    This article is cited by 120 publications.

    1. Hanxi Chen, Lu Wang, Yafei Wang, Zhuobiao Ni, Beicheng Xia, Rongliang Qiu. New Perspective to Evaluate the Carbon Offsetting by Urban Blue-Green Infrastructure: Direct Carbon Sequestration and Indirect Carbon Reduction. Environmental Science & Technology 2024, 58 (29) , 12966-12975. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c07337
    2. Zhizhong Xing, Shuanfeng Zhao, Wei Guo, Xiaojun Guo, Shenquan Wang, Junjie Ma, Haitao He. Coal Wall and Roof Segmentation in the Coal Mine Working Face Based on Dynamic Graph Convolution Neural Networks. ACS Omega 2021, 6 (47) , 31699-31715. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.1c04393
    3. Nicolas Dietrich, Kalyani Kentheswaran, Aras Ahmadi, Johanne Teychené, Yolaine Bessière, Sandrine Alfenore, Stéphanie Laborie, Dominique Bastoul, Karine Loubière, Christelle Guigui, Mathieu Sperandio, Ligia Barna, Etienne Paul, Corinne Cabassud, Alain Liné, Gilles Hébrard. Attempts, Successes, and Failures of Distance Learning in the Time of COVID-19. Journal of Chemical Education 2020, 97 (9) , 2448-2457. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00717
    4. Husi Letu, Takashi Y. Nakajima, and Fumihiko Nishio . Regional-Scale Estimation of Electric Power and Power Plant CO2 Emissions Using Defense Meteorological Satellite Program Operational Linescan System Nighttime Satellite Data. Environmental Science & Technology Letters 2014, 1 (5) , 259-265. https://doi.org/10.1021/ez500093s
    5. Gonzalo Camba Sans, Pablo Baldassini, Federico Gallego, José María Paruelo. Cropland functional diversity increases ecosystem services supply in watersheds of the Rio de la Plata Grasslands. Landscape Ecology 2024, 39 (12) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-024-02011-x
    6. Muhammad Akmal Roslani, Mohd Hasmadi Ismail, Norizah Kamarudin. Potential applications of remote sensing and Earth observation approaches to monitor mangrove ecosystem services: A review. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 2024, 1412 (1) , 012040. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1412/1/012040
    7. Hui Li, Shichao Cui, Chengyi Zhao, Haidong Zhang. Assessing Trade-Offs and Synergies in Ecosystem Services within the Tianshan Mountainous Region. Water 2024, 16 (20) , 2921. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16202921
    8. Gonzalo Camba Sans, Pablo Baldassini, Federico Gallego, José María Paruelo. Cropland functional diversity increases ecosystem services supply in watersheds of the Rio de la Plata Grasslands. 2024https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4751516/v1
    9. Yunrui Yang, Jiaying Zhang, Yi’na Hu. Land Use Intensity Alters Ecosystem Service Supply and Demand as Well as Their Interaction: A Spatial Zoning Perspective. Sustainability 2024, 16 (16) , 7224. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16167224
    10. Rebecca W. Composto, Mirela G. Tulbure, Varun Tiwari, Mollie D. Gaines, Júlio Caineta. Quantifying urban flood extent using satellite imagery and machine learning. Natural Hazards 2024, 16 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-024-06817-5
    11. Monde Rapiya, Abel Ramoelo, Wayne Truter. Seasonal monitoring of biochemical variables in natural rangelands using Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 data. International Journal of Remote Sensing 2024, 45 (14) , 4737-4763. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2024.2368929
    12. Zhihui Tian, John Upchurch, G. Austin Simon, José Dubeux, Alina Zare, Chang Zhao, Joel B. Harley. Quantifying Heterogeneous Ecosystem Services with Multi-Label Soft Classification. 2024, 427-431. https://doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS53475.2024.10642804
    13. Xiaoyan Ren, Fengying Yan. Integrating the social utilization status of ecological assets for spatial optimization management: a comprehensive framework. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 2024, 12 https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2024.1411290
    14. Stoyan Nedkov, Vanya Stoycheva, Hristina Prodanova, Ivaylo Ananiev, Yordan Yordanov. Twenty years of ecosystem services research in Bulgaria: lessons learned and future directions from a geographical perspective. BioRisk 2024, 22 , 33-52. https://doi.org/10.3897/biorisk.22.125194
    15. Lixian Peng, Liwei Zhang, Xupu Li, Wudong Zhao, Yu Liu, Zhuangzhuang Wang, Hao Wang, Lei Jiao. A spatially explicit framework for assessing ecosystem service supply risk under multiple land‐use scenarios in the Xi'an Metropolitan Area of China. Land Degradation & Development 2024, 35 (8) , 2754-2770. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.5091
    16. Seyed Vahid Razavi-Termeh, Abolghasem Sadeghi-Niaraki, Armin Sorooshian, Tamer Abuhmed, Soo-Mi Choi. Spatial mapping of land susceptibility to dust emissions using optimization of attentive Interpretable Tabular Learning (TabNet) model. Journal of Environmental Management 2024, 358 , 120682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120682
    17. Hanna Fors, Anna Berlin, Uliana Gottlieb, Mari Kågström, James Weldon, Jasmine Zhang. Interdisciplinary insights into navigating the maze of landscape multifunctionality. People and Nature 2024, 64 https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10610
    18. Jan Haas. Ecosystem Services from Space as Evaluation Metric of Human Well-Being in Deprived Urban Areas of the Majority World. 2024, 259-285. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-49183-2_13
    19. Trinidad del Río-Mena, Louise Willemen, Anton Vrieling, Andy Nelson. How remote sensing choices influence ecosystem services monitoring and evaluation results of ecological restoration interventions. Ecosystem Services 2023, 64 , 101565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2023.101565
    20. Nishan Nazer, K Chithra, P Bimal. Framework for the application of ecosystem services based urban ecological carrying capacity assessment in the urban decision-making process. Environmental Challenges 2023, 13 , 100745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2023.100745
    21. María Victoria Marinelli, Jorge Sanchez, Franco García, Diego Hernán Pons. Integration of Classification Techniques and Remote Sensing for Periurban Horticulture Analysis. 2023, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1109/RPIC59053.2023.10530755
    22. Uta Schirpke, Andrea Ghermandi, Michael Sinclair, Derek Van Berkel, Nathan Fox, Leonardo Vargas, Louise Willemen. Emerging technologies for assessing ecosystem services: A synthesis of opportunities and challenges. Ecosystem Services 2023, 63 , 101558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2023.101558
    23. Qiqi Jia, Limin Jiao, Xihong Lian, Weilin Wang. Linking supply-demand balance of ecosystem services to identify ecological security patterns in urban agglomerations. Sustainable Cities and Society 2023, 92 , 104497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2023.104497
    24. David Crouse, Igor Bendoym, Lori A. Lepak, James Leitch, Jeff Applegate, , , . Metamaterial spectrometer on a chip for hyperspectral imaging and atmospheric sounding. 2023, 37. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2650486
    25. Xintao Li, Shuhan Li, Minxiao Zhao, Xin Guo, Tingjun Zhang. Mapping the Shifting Focus in Remote Sensing Literature: Technology, Methodology, and Applications. Processes 2023, 11 (2) , 571. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11020571
    26. Amit Kumar Tiwari, Rinku Singh, Sudhanshu Kumar, Gopal Shankar Singh. Ecosystem Services in the Riverine Landscapes. 2023, 273-303. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-3660-1_16
    27. Xiaonan Niu, Huan Ni, Qun Ma, Shangxiao Wang, Leli Zong. Identifying Ecological Security Patterns Based on Ecosystem Service Supply and Demand Using Remote Sensing Products (Case Study: The Fujian Delta Urban Agglomeration, China). Sustainability 2023, 15 (1) , 578. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010578
    28. Saptarshi Mondal, C. Jeganathan. Effect of scale, landscape heterogeneity and terrain complexity on agriculture mapping accuracy from time-series NDVI in the Western-Himalaya region. Landscape Ecology 2022, 37 (11) , 2757-2781. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-022-01533-6
    29. Igor Bendoym, Lori Lepak, James Leitch, Jeff Applegate, David Crouse, , , . Low SWaP hyperspectral imaging sensor for CubeSat applications. 2022, 91. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2633886
    30. Hanshou Zhu, Jun Zhai, Peng Hou, Haifeng Gao, Yingli He, Diandian Jin, Ningning Xu. Divergent trends of ecosystem status and services in the Hexi Corridor. Frontiers in Environmental Science 2022, 10 https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.1008441
    31. Yalan Ji, Xiaopeng Hao, Yandong Sun, Zhao Xing, Jian Song, Jingjing Zhou, Ruiheng Sima, Shuangcheng Sun, Guangjun Wang. Research on Large-Area Blackbody Radiation Source for Infrared Remote Sensor Calibration. International Journal of Thermophysics 2022, 43 (9) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10765-022-03067-0
    32. Amal Louail, François Messner, Yamna Djellouli, Rachid Gharzouli. Remote Sensing and Phytoecological Methods for Mapping and Assessing Potential Ecosystem Services of the Ouled Hannèche Forest in the Hodna Mountains, Algeria. Forests 2022, 13 (8) , 1159. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13081159
    33. Denise Boehnke, Alice Krehl, Kai Mörmann, Rebekka Volk, Thomas Lützkendorf, Elias Naber, Ronja Becker, Stefan Norra. Mapping Urban Green and Its Ecosystem Services at Microscale—A Methodological Approach for Climate Adaptation and Biodiversity. Sustainability 2022, 14 (15) , 9029. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159029
    34. Corrigeux Brice, Marche Brunelle, Camargo Mauricio, Bachmann Christophe, Chaudron Clemence. Identification of sensor technologies with the potential to support roadside ecosystem services. 2022, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICE/ITMC-IAMOT55089.2022.10033185
    35. Igor Bendoym, Lori A. Lepak, James Leitch, Jeff Applegate, David Crouse, , , , . Low SWaP-C hyperspectral metamaterial spectrometer (MMS) for narrow-band, wide angle-of-Incidence MWIR atmospheric sensing. 2022, 34. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2632794
    36. Nesisa Analisa Nyathi, Walter Musakwa, Ruth Delzeit, Nikolaus J. Kuhn. Ecosystem Services in Southern Africa: Current and Emerging Trends—A Bibliometric Review. Diversity 2022, 14 (5) , 359. https://doi.org/10.3390/d14050359
    37. Tegegne Molla Sitotaw, Louise Willemen, Derege Tsegaye Meshesha, Andrew Nelson. Sacred church forests as sources of wild pollinators for the surrounding smallholder agricultural farms in Lake Tana Basin, Ethiopia. Ecological Indicators 2022, 137 , 108739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108739
    38. João David, Felipe S. Campos, Pedro Cabral. The Asebio Index for Monitoring Ecosystem Services: Comparison of Data-Based Modelling with Stakeholders’ Approach. SSRN Electronic Journal 2022, 218 https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4098735
    39. Wei Shui, Kexin Wu, Yong Du, Haifeng Yang. The Trade-Offs between Supply and Demand Dynamics of Ecosystem Services in the Bay Areas of Metropolitan Regions: A Case Study in Quanzhou, China. Land 2022, 11 (1) , 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11010022
    40. Yongge Li, Wei Liu, Qi Feng, Meng Zhu, Linshan Yang, Jutao Zhang. Quantitative Assessment for the Spatiotemporal Changes of Ecosystem Services, Tradeoff–Synergy Relationships and Drivers in the Semi-Arid Regions of China. Remote Sensing 2022, 14 (1) , 239. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14010239
    41. Dawei Wen, Xin Huang, Francesca Bovolo, Jiayi Li, Xinli Ke, Anlu Zhang, Jon Atli Benediktsson. Change Detection From Very-High-Spatial-Resolution Optical Remote Sensing Images: Methods, applications, and future directions. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine 2021, 9 (4) , 68-101. https://doi.org/10.1109/MGRS.2021.3063465
    42. Da Lü, Yihe Lü. Spatiotemporal variability of water ecosystem services can be effectively quantified by a composite indicator approach. Ecological Indicators 2021, 130 , 108061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108061
    43. Fang Wang, Xingzhong Yuan, Lilei Zhou, Shuangshuang Liu, Mengjie Zhang, Dan Zhang. Detecting the Complex Relationships and Driving Mechanisms of Key Ecosystem Services in the Central Urban Area Chongqing Municipality, China. Remote Sensing 2021, 13 (21) , 4248. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13214248
    44. Zhuangzhuang Wang, Liwei Zhang, Xupu Li, Yingjie Li, Bojie Fu. Integrating ecosystem service supply and demand into ecological risk assessment: a comprehensive framework and case study. Landscape Ecology 2021, 36 (10) , 2977-2995. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-021-01285-9
    45. C. Jullian, L. Nahuelhual, P. Laterra. The Ecosystem Service Provision Index as a generic indicator of ecosystem service supply for monitoring conservation targets. Ecological Indicators 2021, 129 , 107855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107855
    46. Donghui Shi, Yishao Shi, Qiusheng Wu. Multidimensional Assessment of Lake Water Ecosystem Services Using Remote Sensing. Remote Sensing 2021, 13 (17) , 3540. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13173540
    47. Jing-jing LIU, Jing WANG, Jian-wang DAI, Tian-lin ZHAI, Ze-hui LI. The relationship between supply and demand of ecosystem services and its spatio-temporal variation in the Yellow River Basin. JOURNAL OF NATURAL RESOURCES 2021, 36 (1) , 148. https://doi.org/10.31497/zrzyxb.20210110
    48. Kai M. A. Chan, Terre Satterfield, . The maturation of ecosystem services: Social and policy research expands, but whither biophysically informed valuation?. People and Nature 2020, 2 (4) , 1021-1060. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10137
    49. Maciej M. Nowak, Katarzyna Pędziwiatr, Katarzyna Słupecka, Rafał Wawer. Parcel-based layout as a factor affecting the potential availability of ecosystem services provided by tree belts. Ecological Indicators 2020, 119 , 106836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106836
    50. Adrienne Grêt-Regamey, Bettina Weibel. Global assessment of mountain ecosystem services using earth observation data. Ecosystem Services 2020, 46 , 101213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101213
    51. Bo Jiang, Yang Bai, Junyu Chen, Juha M. Alatalo, Xibao Xu, Gang Liu, Qing Wang. Land management to reconcile ecosystem services supply and demand mismatches—A case study in Shanghai municipality, China. Land Degradation & Development 2020, 31 (17) , 2684-2699. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.3614
    52. Adrienne Grêt-Regamey, Marcelo Galleguillos-Torres, Angela Dissegna, Bettina Weibel. How urban densification influences ecosystem services—a comparison between a temperate and a tropical city. Environmental Research Letters 2020, 15 (7) , 075001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab7acf
    53. Jiangbo Gao. Editorial for the Special Issue “Ecosystem Services with Remote Sensing”. Remote Sensing 2020, 12 (14) , 2191. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12142191
    54. Trinidad del Río-Mena, Louise Willemen, Anton Vrieling, Andy Nelson. Understanding Intra-Annual Dynamics of Ecosystem Services Using Satellite Image Time Series. Remote Sensing 2020, 12 (4) , 710. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12040710
    55. Jian Peng, Yi’na Hu, Jianquan Dong, Qi Mao, Yanxu Liu, Yueyue Du, Jiansheng Wu, Yanglin Wang. Linking spatial differentiation with sustainability management: Academic contributions and research directions of physical geography in China. Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment 2020, 44 (1) , 14-30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133319878107
    56. Davide Longato, Mattias Gaglio, Mirco Boschetti, Elena Gissi. Bioenergy and ecosystem services trade-offs and synergies in marginal agricultural lands: A remote-sensing-based assessment method. Journal of Cleaner Production 2019, 237 , 117672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117672
    57. Dorothy Furberg, Yifang Ban, Andrea Nascetti. Monitoring of Urbanization and Analysis of Environmental Impact in Stockholm with Sentinel-2A and SPOT-5 Multispectral Data. Remote Sensing 2019, 11 (20) , 2408. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11202408
    58. Jennifer Hodbod, Emma Tebbs, Kristofer Chan, Shubhechchha Sharma. Integrating Participatory Methods and Remote Sensing to Enhance Understanding of Ecosystem Service Dynamics Across Scales. Land 2019, 8 (9) , 132. https://doi.org/10.3390/land8090132
    59. Agathe Colléony, Assaf Shwartz. Beyond Assuming Co-Benefits in Nature-Based Solutions: A Human-Centered Approach to Optimize Social and Ecological Outcomes for Advancing Sustainable Urban Planning. Sustainability 2019, 11 (18) , 4924. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11184924
    60. Lisanne Hölting, Michael Beckmann, Martin Volk, Anna F. Cord. Multifunctionality assessments – More than assessing multiple ecosystem functions and services? A quantitative literature review. Ecological Indicators 2019, 103 , 226-235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.04.009
    61. Xin Huang, Xiaopeng Han, Song Ma, Tianjia Lin, Jianya Gong. Monitoring ecosystem service change in the City of Shenzhen by the use of high‐resolution remotely sensed imagery and deep learning. Land Degradation & Development 2019, 30 (12) , 1490-1501. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.3337
    62. Cristina Herrero-Jáuregui, Cecilia Arnaiz-Schmitz, Lorena Herrera, Simon M. Smart, Carlos Montes, Francisco D. Pineda, Maria Fe Schmitz. Aligning landscape structure with ecosystem services along an urban–rural gradient. Trade-offs and transitions towards cultural services. Landscape Ecology 2019, 34 (7) , 1525-1545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-018-0756-3
    63. Yuanyuan Chen, Xueting Li, Min Min. Mapping for terrestrial ecosystem services: a review. 2019, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1109/Agro-Geoinformatics.2019.8820234
    64. J.R. Brook, S.G. Cober, M. Freemark, T. Harner, S.M. Li, J. Liggio, P. Makar, B. Pauli. Advances in science and applications of air pollution monitoring: A case study on oil sands monitoring targeting ecosystem protection. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association 2019, 69 (6) , 661-709. https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2019.1607689
    65. Laura Giordano, Giuseppe Portacci, Carmela Caroppo. Multidisciplinary tools for sustainable management of an ecosystem service: The case study of mussel farming in the Mar Piccolo of Taranto (Mediterranean, Ionian Sea). Ocean & Coastal Management 2019, 176 , 11-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2019.04.013
    66. Carlos Ramirez-Reyes, Kate A. Brauman, Rebecca Chaplin-Kramer, Gillian L. Galford, Susana B. Adamo, Christopher B. Anderson, Clarissa Anderson, Ginger R.H. Allington, Kenneth J. Bagstad, Michael T. Coe, Anna F. Cord, Laura E. Dee, Rachelle K. Gould, Meha Jain, Virginia A. Kowal, Frank E. Muller-Karger, Jessica Norriss, Peter Potapov, Jiangxiao Qiu, Jesse T. Rieb, Brian E. Robinson, Leah H. Samberg, Nagendra Singh, Sabrina H. Szeto, Brian Voigt, Keri Watson, T. Maxwell Wright. Reimagining the potential of Earth observations for ecosystem service assessments. Science of The Total Environment 2019, 665 , 1053-1063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.150
    67. Paulo Amador Tavares, Norma Beltrão, Ulisses Silva Guimarães, Ana Teodoro, Paulo Gonçalves. Urban Ecosystem Services Quantification through Remote Sensing Approach: A Systematic Review. Environments 2019, 6 (5) , 51. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments6050051
    68. Sérgio G. Milheiras, Georgina M. Mace. Assessing ecosystem service provision in a tropical region with high forest cover: Spatial overlap and the impact of land use change in Amapá, Brazil. Ecological Indicators 2019, 99 , 12-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.12.013
    69. Jerome B. Gilleron, Marc Muehlberg, Alexia Payan, Youngjun Choi, Simon I. Briceno, Dimitri N. Mavris. Framework for Multi-Asset Comparison and Rapid Down-selection for Earth Observation Missions. 2019https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2019-0508
    70. Leonardo Vargas, Louise Willemen, Lars Hein. Assessing the Capacity of Ecosystems to Supply Ecosystem Services Using Remote Sensing and An Ecosystem Accounting Approach. Environmental Management 2019, 63 (1) , 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-018-1110-x
    71. Rajarshi DasGupta, Shizuka Hashimoto, Haripriya Gundimeda. Biodiversity/ecosystem services scenario exercises from the Asia–Pacific: typology, archetypes and implications for sustainable development goals (SDGs). Sustainability Science 2019, 14 (1) , 241-257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0647-1
    72. Ana Stritih, Peter Bebi, Adrienne Grêt-Regamey. Quantifying uncertainties in earth observation-based ecosystem service assessments. Environmental Modelling & Software 2019, 111 , 300-310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.09.005
    73. Clémence Vannier, Rémy Lasseur, Emilie Crouzat, Coline Byczek, Valentine Lafond, Thomas Cordonnier, Pierre-Yves Longaretti, Sandra Lavorel. Mapping ecosystem services bundles in a heterogeneous mountain region. Ecosystems and People 2019, 15 (1) , 74-88. https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2019.1570971
    74. Emilie Crouzat, Mégane Zawada, Karl Grigulis, Sandra Lavorel. Design and implementation of a national ecosystem assessment – insights from the French mountain systems’ experience. Ecosystems and People 2019, 15 (1) , 288-302. https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2019.1674383
    75. Mat Santamouris, George Ban-Weiss, Paul Osmond, Riccardo Paolini, Afroditi Synnefa, Constantinos Cartalis, Alberto Muscio, Michele Zinzi, Tobi Eniolu Morakinyo, Edward Ng, Zheng Tan, Hideki Takebayashi, David Sailor, P. Crank, Haider Taha, Anna Laura Pisello, Federico Rossi, Jiong Zhang, Denia Kolokotsa. PROGRESS IN URBAN GREENERY MITIGATION SCIENCE – ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGIES ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES AND IMPACT ON CITIES. JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT 2018, 24 (8) , 638-671. https://doi.org/10.3846/jcem.2018.6604
    76. A. Kangas, K.T. Korhonen, T. Packalen, J. Vauhkonen. Sources and types of uncertainties in the information on forest-related ecosystem services. Forest Ecology and Management 2018, 427 , 7-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2018.05.056
    77. Rémy Lasseur, Clémence Vannier, Jérémie Lefebvre, Pierre-Yves Longaretti, Sandra Lavorel. Landscape-scale modeling of agricultural land use for the quantification of ecosystem services. Journal of Applied Remote Sensing 2018, 12 (04) , 1. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JRS.12.046024
    78. Lin Huang, Wei Cao, Xinliang Xu, Jiangwen Fan, Junbang Wang. Linking the benefits of ecosystem services to sustainable spatial planning of ecological conservation strategies. Journal of Environmental Management 2018, 222 , 385-395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.05.066
    79. Simone Quatrini, Neville D. Crossman. Most finance to halt desertification also benefits multiple ecosystem services: A key to unlock investments in Land Degradation Neutrality?. Ecosystem Services 2018, 31 , 265-277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.04.003
    80. K.R. Koopman, M.W. Straatsma, D.C.M. Augustijn, A.M. Breure, H.J.R. Lenders, S.J. Stax, R.S.E.W. Leuven. Quantifying biomass production for assessing ecosystem services of riverine landscapes. Science of The Total Environment 2018, 624 , 1577-1585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.044
    81. Keith Ronald Skene. Circles, spirals, pyramids and cubes: why the circular economy cannot work. Sustainability Science 2018, 13 (2) , 479-492. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-017-0443-3
    82. Jan Haas, Yifang Ban. Urban Land Cover and Ecosystem Service Changes based on Sentinel-2A MSI and Landsat TM Data. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing 2018, 11 (2) , 485-497. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2017.2786468
    83. Kerstin Böck, Renate Polt, Lisa Schülting. Ecosystem Services in River Landscapes. 2018, 413-433. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73250-3_21
    84. Zhenyu Wang, Alex Lechner, Thomas Baumgartl. Ecosystem Services Mapping Uncertainty Assessment: A Case Study in the Fitzroy Basin Mining Region. Water 2018, 10 (1) , 88. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10010088
    85. Benjamin Denjean, Mónica A. Altamirano, Nina Graveline, Raffaele Giordano, Peter van der Keur, David Moncoulon, Josh Weinberg, María Máñez Costa, Zdravko Kozinc, Mark Mulligan, Polona Pengal, John Matthews, Nora van Cauwenbergh, Elena López Gunn, David N. Bresch. Natural Assurance Scheme: A level playing field framework for Green-Grey infrastructure development. Environmental Research 2017, 159 , 24-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2017.07.006
    86. Jan Haas, Yifang Ban. Sentinel-1A SAR and sentinel-2A MSI data fusion for urban ecosystem service mapping. Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment 2017, 8 , 41-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsase.2017.07.006
    87. Rebecca Spake, Rémy Lasseur, Emilie Crouzat, James M. Bullock, Sandra Lavorel, Katherine E. Parks, Marije Schaafsma, Elena M. Bennett, Joachim Maes, Mark Mulligan, Maud Mouchet, Garry D. Peterson, Catharina J.E. Schulp, Wilfried Thuiller, Monica G. Turner, Peter H. Verburg, Felix Eigenbrod. Unpacking ecosystem service bundles: Towards predictive mapping of synergies and trade-offs between ecosystem services. Global Environmental Change 2017, 47 , 37-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.08.004
    88. Dandan Yu, Nan Lu, Bojie Fu. Establishment of a comprehensive indicator system for the assessment of biodiversity and ecosystem services. Landscape Ecology 2017, 32 (8) , 1563-1579. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-017-0549-0
    89. Hui Zhang, Qiao Wang, Guangyu Li, Hanpei Zhang, Jue Zhang. Losses of ecosystem service values in the Taihu Lake Basin from 1979 to 2010. Frontiers of Earth Science 2017, 11 (2) , 310-320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-016-0612-1
    90. Anna F. Cord, Kate A. Brauman, Rebecca Chaplin-Kramer, Andreas Huth, Guy Ziv, Ralf Seppelt. Priorities to Advance Monitoring of Ecosystem Services Using Earth Observation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 2017, 32 (6) , 416-428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2017.03.003
    91. Leonardo Vargas, Lars Hein, Roy P. Remme. Accounting for ecosystem assets using remote sensing in the Colombian Orinoco River Basin lowlands. Journal of Applied Remote Sensing 2017, 11 (2) , 026008. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JRS.11.026008
    92. Sandra Lavorel, Anita Bayer, Alberte Bondeau, Sven Lautenbach, Ana Ruiz-Frau, Nynke Schulp, Ralf Seppelt, Peter Verburg, Astrid van Teeffelen, Clémence Vannier, Almut Arneth, Wolfgang Cramer, Nuria Marba. Pathways to bridge the biophysical realism gap in ecosystem services mapping approaches. Ecological Indicators 2017, 74 , 241-260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.11.015
    93. Jan Haas, Yifang Ban. Mapping and Monitoring Urban Ecosystem Services Using Multitemporal High-Resolution Satellite Data. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing 2017, 10 (2) , 669-680. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2016.2586582
    94. José M. Paruelo, Marcos Texeira, Luciana Staiano, Matías Mastrángelo, Laura Amdan, Federico Gallego. An integrative index of Ecosystem Services provision based on remotely sensed data. Ecological Indicators 2016, 71 , 145-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.06.054
    95. A. Lausch, L. Bannehr, M. Beckmann, C. Boehm, H. Feilhauer, J.M. Hacker, M. Heurich, A. Jung, R. Klenke, C. Neumann, M. Pause, D. Rocchini, M.E. Schaepman, S. Schmidtlein, K. Schulz, P. Selsam, J. Settele, A.K. Skidmore, A.F. Cord. Linking Earth Observation and taxonomic, structural and functional biodiversity: Local to ecosystem perspectives. Ecological Indicators 2016, 70 , 317-339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.06.022
    96. , , , , , Leonardo Vargas, Lars Hein, Roy P. Remme. Accounting for ecosystem assets using remote sensing in the Colombian Orinoco River basin lowlands. 2016, 1000510. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2245293
    97. Stephanie Pau, Laura E. Dee, , . Remote sensing of species dominance and the value for quantifying ecosystem services. Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation 2016, 2 (3) , 141-151. https://doi.org/10.1002/rse2.23
    98. Xuefeng Zhang, Jianming Niu, Alexander Buyantuev, Qing Zhang, Jianjun Dong, Sarula Kang, Jing Zhang. Understanding Grassland Degradation and Restoration from the Perspective of Ecosystem Services: A Case Study of the Xilin River Basin in Inner Mongolia, China. Sustainability 2016, 8 (7) , 594. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8070594
    99. Paul Schumacher, Bunafsha Mislimshoeva, Alexander Brenning, Harald Zandler, Martin Brandt, Cyrus Samimi, Thomas Koellner. Do Red Edge and Texture Attributes from High-Resolution Satellite Data Improve Wood Volume Estimation in a Semi-Arid Mountainous Region?. Remote Sensing 2016, 8 (7) , 540. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8070540
    100. Nathalie Pettorelli, Harry Jon Foord Owen, Clare Duncan, . How do we want Satellite Remote Sensing to support biodiversity conservation globally?. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 2016, 7 (6) , 656-665. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12545
    Load all citations

    Environmental Science & Technology

    Cite this: Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46, 16, 8529–8541
    Click to copy citationCitation copied!
    https://doi.org/10.1021/es300157u
    Published July 20, 2012
    Copyright © 2012 American Chemical Society

    Article Views

    4602

    Altmetric

    -

    Citations

    Learn about these metrics

    Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

    Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

    The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.