Policy Analysis

    Carbon, Land, and Water Footprint Accounts for the European Union: Consumption, Production, and Displacements through International Trade
    Click to copy article linkArticle link copied!

    View Author Information
    Industrial Ecology Programme and Department of Energy and Process Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway
    Global Footprint Network, Geneva, Switzerland
    § University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
    Other Access OptionsSupporting Information (2)

    Environmental Science & Technology

    Cite this: Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46, 20, 10883–10891
    Click to copy citationCitation copied!
    https://doi.org/10.1021/es301949t
    Published September 26, 2012
    Copyright © 2012 American Chemical Society

    Abstract

    Click to copy section linkSection link copied!
    Abstract Image

    A nation’s consumption of goods and services causes various environmental pressures all over the world due to international trade. We use a multiregional input–output model to assess three kinds of environmental footprints for the member states of the European Union. Footprints are indicators that take the consumer responsibility approach to account for the total direct and indirect effects of a product or consumption activity. We quantify the total environmental pressures (greenhouse gas emissions: carbon footprint; appropriation of biologically productive land and water area: land footprint; and freshwater consumption: water footprint) caused by consumption in the EU. We find that the consumption activities by an average EU citizen in 2004 led to 13.3 tCO2e of induced greenhouse gas emissions, appropriation of 2.53 gha (hectares of land with global-average biological productivity), and consumption of 179 m3 of blue water (ground and surface water). By comparison, the global averages were 5.7 tCO2e, 1.23 gha, and 163 m3 blue water, respectively. Overall, the EU displaced all three types of environmental pressures to the rest of the world, through imports of products with embodied pressures. Looking at intra-EU displacements only, the UK was the most important displacer overall, while the largest net exporters of embodied environmental pressures were Poland (greenhouse gases), France (land), and Spain (freshwater).

    Copyright © 2012 American Chemical Society

    Read this article

    To access this article, please review the available access options below.

    Get instant access

    Purchase Access

    Read this article for 48 hours. Check out below using your ACS ID or as a guest.

    Recommended

    Access through Your Institution

    You may have access to this article through your institution.

    Your institution does not have access to this content. Add or change your institution or let them know you’d like them to include access.

    Supporting Information

    Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

    Further explanation of the extended MRIO model and the footprint indicators; discussion of validity and limitations; complete lists of regions and sectors included in the MRIO model, and countries and primary products included in the physical system; extensive footprint results including detailed displacements between all 27 EU countries; results for the complete EF and WF indicators. This information is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org. A version of the model can be accessed at www.eureapa.net.

    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

    Cited By

    Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

    This article is cited by 374 publications.

    1. Yuhan Liang, Qiumeng Zhong, Zijun Deng, Hui Li, Jetashree, Zhifeng Yang, Sai Liang. Multiperspective Decoupling Analyses between Global Embodied Carbon Chains and Global Value Chains. Environmental Science & Technology 2023, 57 (48) , 19690-19701. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c06715
    2. Shaojian Wang, Jieyu Wang, Xiangjie Chen, Chuanglin Fang, Klaus Hubacek, Xiaoping Liu, Chunshan Zhou, Kuishuang Feng, Zhu Liu. Impact of International Trade on the Carbon Intensity of Human Well-Being. Environmental Science & Technology 2023, 57 (17) , 6898-6909. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c07582
    3. Jixuan Li, Kai Huang, Yajuan Yu, Shen Qu, Ming Xu. Telecoupling China’s City-Level Water Withdrawal with Distant Consumption. Environmental Science & Technology 2023, 57 (10) , 4332-4341. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c00757
    4. Qian Zhang, Jianchuan Qi, Baodong Cheng, Chang Yu, Sai Liang, Thomas O. Wiedmann, Yu Liu, Qiumeng Zhong. Planetary Boundaries for Forests and Their National Exceedance. Environmental Science & Technology 2021, 55 (22) , 15423-15434. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c02513
    5. Takako Wakiyama, Manfred Lenzen, Taku Kadoya, Yayoi Takeuchi, Keisuke Nansai. Forest Tax Payment Responsibility from the Forest Service Footprint Perspective. Environmental Science & Technology 2021, 55 (5) , 3165-3174. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c04327
    6. Meng Jiang, Lin Liu, Paul Behrens, Tao Wang, Zhipeng Tang, Dingjiang Chen, Yadong Yu, Zijian Ren, Shengjun Zhu, Arnold Tukker, Bing Zhu. Improving Subnational Input–Output Analyses Using Regional Trade Data: A Case-Study and Comparison. Environmental Science & Technology 2020, 54 (19) , 12732-12741. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c04728
    7. Masaharu Motoshita, Stephan Pfister, Matthias Finkbeiner. Regional Carrying Capacities of Freshwater Consumption—Current Pressure and Its Sources. Environmental Science & Technology 2020, 54 (14) , 9083-9094. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c01544
    8. Guang Shi, Xi Lu, Yu Deng, Johannes Urpelainen, Lan-Cui Liu, Zhonghua Zhang, Wendong Wei, Haikun Wang. Air Pollutant Emissions Induced by Population Migration in China. Environmental Science & Technology 2020, 54 (10) , 6308-6318. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c00726
    9. Lin Zeng, Anu Ramaswami. Impact of Locational Choices and Consumer Behaviors on Personal Land Footprints: An Exploration Across the Urban–Rural Continuum in the United States. Environmental Science & Technology 2020, 54 (6) , 3091-3102. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b06024
    10. Ranran Wang, Julie B. Zimmerman, Chunyan Wang, David Font Vivanco, and Edgar G. Hertwich . Freshwater Vulnerability beyond Local Water Stress: Heterogeneous Effects of Water-Electricity Nexus Across the Continental United States. Environmental Science & Technology 2017, 51 (17) , 9899-9910. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b01942
    11. Ranran Wang, Edgar Hertwich, and Julie B. Zimmerman . (Virtual) Water Flows Uphill toward Money. Environmental Science & Technology 2016, 50 (22) , 12320-12330. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b03343
    12. Yuanchao Hu, Jianyi Lin, Shenghui Cui, and Nina Zheng Khanna . Measuring Urban Carbon Footprint from Carbon Flows in the Global Supply Chain. Environmental Science & Technology 2016, 50 (12) , 6154-6163. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b00985
    13. Ranran Wang and Julie Zimmerman . Hybrid Analysis of Blue Water Consumption and Water Scarcity Implications at the Global, National, and Basin Levels in an Increasingly Globalized World. Environmental Science & Technology 2016, 50 (10) , 5143-5153. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b00571
    14. Shauhrat S. Chopra, Bhavik R. Bakshi, and Vikas Khanna . Economic Dependence of U.S. Industrial Sectors on Animal-Mediated Pollination Service. Environmental Science & Technology 2015, 49 (24) , 14441-14451. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b03788
    15. Keisuke Nansai, Kenichi Nakajima, Shigemi Kagawa, Yasushi Kondo, Yosuke Shigetomi, and Sangwon Suh . Global Mining Risk Footprint of Critical Metals Necessary for Low-Carbon Technologies: The Case of Neodymium, Cobalt, and Platinum in Japan. Environmental Science & Technology 2015, 49 (4) , 2022-2031. https://doi.org/10.1021/es504255r
    16. Shan Guo and Geoffrey Qiping Shen . Multiregional Input–Output Model for China’s Farm Land and Water Use. Environmental Science & Technology 2015, 49 (1) , 403-414. https://doi.org/10.1021/es503637f
    17. Sofie Huysman, Thomas Schaubroeck, and Jo Dewulf . Quantification of Spatially Differentiated Resource Footprints for Products and Services through a Macro-Economic and Thermodynamic Approach. Environmental Science & Technology 2014, 48 (16) , 9709-9716. https://doi.org/10.1021/es500777k
    18. Kuishuang Feng, Klaus Hubacek, Stephan Pfister, Yang Yu, and Laixiang Sun . Virtual Scarce Water in China. Environmental Science & Technology 2014, 48 (14) , 7704-7713. https://doi.org/10.1021/es500502q
    19. Iñaki Arto and Erik Dietzenbacher . Drivers of the Growth in Global Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Environmental Science & Technology 2014, 48 (10) , 5388-5394. https://doi.org/10.1021/es5005347
    20. Luis-Antonio López, Guadalupe Arce, and Jorge Zafrilla . Financial Crisis, Virtual Carbon in Global Value Chains, and the Importance of Linkage Effects. The Spain–China Case. Environmental Science & Technology 2014, 48 (1) , 36-44. https://doi.org/10.1021/es403708m
    21. Ningkang Chen, Zounachuan Sun, Zhenci Xu, Junying Xu. A review of international trade impacts on sustainable development. Marine Development 2025, 3 (1) https://doi.org/10.1007/s44312-025-00053-6
    22. Angelos Tsaligopoulos, Francesco Aletta, Gianluca Maracchini, Simone Torresin. Rethinking environmental noise assessment through a noise footprint framework. Noise Mapping 2025, 12 (1) https://doi.org/10.1515/noise-2025-0019
    23. Qiting Zuo, Zhizhuo Zhang, Qingsong Wu, Yihu Ji, Junxia Ma. Revealing environmental inequality based on three-dimensional extended input-output analysis: An integrated perspective of embodied water consumption, fossil energy use and carbon emissions. Energy 2025, 330 , 136898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2025.136898
    24. Salaheddine Sari-Hassoun, Hicham Ayad, Abderrahim Chibi, Sidi Mohamed Chekouri. Assessing the spatial interactions between development sustainability, renewable energy, and economic growth in selected European nations. Renewable Energy 2025, 250 , 123324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2025.123324
    25. Murilo Mazzotti Silvestrini, Thiago Joel Angrizanes Rossi, Flavia Mori Sarti. Socioeconomic and Environmental Dimensions of Agriculture, Livestock, and Fisheries: A Network Study on Carbon and Water Footprints in Global Food Trade. Standards 2025, 5 (3) , 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/standards5030019
    26. Elena Benedetti, Luca Panzone, Livia Cabernard, John Wildman, Chris Seal. Border regulation and greenhouse gas emissions from EU-UK food trade. Sustainable Production and Consumption 2025, 58 , 251-266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2025.06.020
    27. Tinghui Zhang, Chang Hwan Choi. The Dual Effects of Green Trade on Boosting Sustainability and Challenging Productivity. Journal of Asian and African Studies 2025, 32 https://doi.org/10.1177/00219096251345404
    28. Harry C. Wilting, Daan in 't Veld. An overview of accounting approaches for national greenhouse gas emissions; comparing consumption and production footprints in the European Union. Economic Systems Research 2025, 37 (3) , 402-426. https://doi.org/10.1080/09535314.2025.2463954
    29. Thomas Hennequin, Jelle P. Hilbers, Harry C. Wilting, Olga Ivanova, Jeroen J.P. Kuenen, Mara Hauck, Rosalie van Zelm, Mark A.J. Huijbregts. Greenhouse gas footprints of economic sectors at the subnational European scale. Journal of Cleaner Production 2025, 514 , 145761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.145761
    30. Gabriel Felbermayr, Sonja Peterson, Joschka Wanner. Trade and the environment, trade policies and environmental policies—How do they interact?. Journal of Economic Surveys 2025, 39 (3) , 1148-1184. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12628
    31. Melisa Bulut, Songül Çağlar. Contribution of psychology to sustainable development goals: a bibliometric analysis. Current Psychology 2025, 44 (11) , 9911-9924. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-025-07836-6
    32. Antoine Teixeira, Julien Lefèvre. Global supply chains and domestic climate policy: Addressing the substantial material‐related carbon footprint of final consumption in France. Journal of Industrial Ecology 2025, 29 (3) , 733-745. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.70001
    33. Dariusz Sala, Oksana Liashenko, Michał Pyzalski, Kostiantyn Pavlov, Olena Pavlova, Karol Durczak, Roman Chornyi. The Energy Footprint in the EU: How CO2 Emission Reductions Drive Sustainable Development. Energies 2025, 18 (12) , 3110. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18123110
    34. Tianqi Rong, Mingzhou Qin, Pengyan Zhang, Yinghui Chang, Zhenyue Liu, Zhanfei Zhang. Spatiotemporal evolution of land use carbon emissions and multi scenario simulation in the future—Based on carbon emission fair model and PLUS model. Environmental Technology & Innovation 2025, 38 , 104087. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2025.104087
    35. Sara Miranda-Buetas, Rosa Duarte, Cristina Sarasa. Blue Water Footprint Across EU Households: Technology and Consumer Behavior as Main Drivers. Water Economics and Policy 2025, https://doi.org/10.1142/S2382624X25400028
    36. Carlos A. López Morales. The Water Requirements to Feed a Megacity: Explorations for Mexico City with a Multi-regional Input–Output Database. Water Economics and Policy 2025, 35 https://doi.org/10.1142/S2382624X24400071
    37. Pasquale Garofalo, Anna Rita Bernadette Cammerino. Modeling the Performance of a Continuous Durum Wheat Cropping System in a Mediterranean Environment: Carbon and Water Footprint at Different Sowing Dates, Under Rainfed and Irrigated Water Regimes. Agriculture 2025, 15 (3) , 259. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15030259
    38. Haishan Meng, Dewei Yang, Tian Zhou, Shuai Zhang, Min Wan, Yijia Ji, Junmei Zhang, Hang Yang, Ruifang Guo. Carbon loss and inequality exacerbated by embodied land redistribution in international trade. Ecological Economics 2025, 228 , 108453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108453
    39. Letícia Sarmento dos Muchangos, Cristian Mejia, Ranjit Gupta, Shuan Sadreghazi, Yuya Kajikawa. A systematic review of life cycle assessment and environmental footprint for the global coffee value chain. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 2025, 111 , 107740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2024.107740
    40. Xinlei Wu, Yunfei Fan, Yongfang Bao, Sufen Wang. An integrated analysis for spatio-temporal evolution of food water-carbon-energy footprint and its sustainable production in northwest China. Journal of Environmental Management 2025, 373 , 123754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123754
    41. Hong Lam Tong, Thanh Cong Nguyen, Thanh An Nguyen. Determinants of Household Carbon Emissions: An Empirical Study in Vietnam. SAGE Open 2025, 15 (3) https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251359417
    42. Van Toi Pham, Hiep Hoang Van, Oanh Nguyen Thi, Nguyen Vo Chau Ngan, Dang Thi Thom, Le Van Giang, Luu The Anh, Nguyen Thi Thanh Huyen, Lê Thi Trang, Tuan-Dung Hoang. Water Resources and Bioenergy. 2025, 1041-1067. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-91114-9_44
    43. Mesfin M. Mekonnen, Mahlet M. Kebede, Betelhem W. Demeke, Joel A. Carr, Ashok Chapagain, Carole Dalin, Peter Debaere, Paolo D’Odorico, Landon Marston, Chittaranjan Ray, Lorenzo Rosa, La Zhuo. Trends and environmental impacts of virtual water trade. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment 2024, 5 (12) , 890-905. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-024-00605-2
    44. Xidong Zhang, Juan Zhang, Wenhao Fu, Ziting Pei, Bin Zhang, Mufan Zhuang, . Analysis on agricultural carbon emissions transfer of inter-provincial trade in China. PLOS ONE 2024, 19 (11) , e0311744. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0311744
    45. Pengdong Yan, Li He, Tong Sun, Yizhong Chen, Yuanning Zhang, Ziheng Li, Mengxi He, Yuxuan Wang, Zimeng Qiu. Water–carbon–economy multivariate spatial–temporal collaborative relationships and nonlinear projections in urban agglomerations. Journal of Hydrology 2024, 644 , 132040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.132040
    46. Zhenguo Wang, Tengyun Li, Wei Liang, Bojie Fu, Junyi Li, Jianwu Yan. Uncovering the structure and evolution of global virtual water and agricultural land network. Sustainable Production and Consumption 2024, 51 , 599-611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2024.08.017
    47. Honglin Zhong, Yanxian Li, Jiaying Ding, Benedikt Bruckner, Kuishuang Feng, Laixiang Sun, Christina Prell, Yuli Shan, Klaus Hubacek. Global spillover effects of the European Green Deal and plausible mitigation options. Nature Sustainability 2024, 7 (11) , 1501-1511. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-024-01428-1
    48. N. R. Park, H. S. Yun, C. H. Choi. Green Trade and Cultural Innovation: Examining the Impact on GTFP and Greenhouse Gas Emissions in OECD Countries. Sustainability 2024, 16 (19) , 8339. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16198339
    49. Yali Zhang, Saiya Li, Qing Zhou, Feng Wu. The economic benefits and environmental costs of trans-eastern tourism in China. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 2024, 108 , 107603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2024.107603
    50. Muhammad Awais Anwar, Shajara Ul-Durar, Noman Arshed. Relationships between economic complexity, renewable energy uptake and environmental degradation: A global study. Journal of Tropical Futures: Sustainable Business, Governance & Development 2024, 1 (2) , 182-202. https://doi.org/10.1177/27538931241240845
    51. Keyi Lyu, Jin Tian, Jiayu Zheng, Cuiling Zhang, Ling Yu. Evaluation of Water–Carbon–Ecological Footprint and Its Spatial–Temporal Changes in the North China Plain. Land 2024, 13 (8) , 1327. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13081327
    52. Johannes Többen, Britta Stöver, Saskia Reuschel, Martin Distelkamp, Christian Lutz. Sustainability implications of the EU's bioeconomy transition along global supply chains. Journal of Cleaner Production 2024, 461 , 142565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142565
    53. Joan Sanchez-Matos, Ian Vázquez-Rowe, Ramzy Kahhat. Estimating carbon and plastic emissions of seafood products in trade routes between the European Union and South America. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 2024, 205 , 107539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.107539
    54. Janis Brizga, Tarmo Räty. Production, consumption and trade-based forest land and resource footprints in the Nordic and Baltic countries. Forest Policy and Economics 2024, 161 , 103166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2024.103166
    55. Wenjing Li, Min Bai, Jing Wang. Ecological burden shifting associated with land transfer embodied in global trade: An ecological network analysis. Land Use Policy 2024, 139 , 107071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2024.107071
    56. Weijing Ma, Chengyi Li, Jingwen Kou, Xiaoya Wang, Haijiang Yang, Bing Xue, Xiaohua Gou. The Sino-US trade friction would exacerbate global inequalities in achieving SDGs. Journal of Cleaner Production 2024, 446 , 141218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141218
    57. Arjen Y. Hoekstra. Water Footprint Assessment in Supply Chains. 2024, 77-98. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-45565-0_4
    58. Marta Antonelli, Pierangelo Isernia. A primer to understand the link between food sustainability and the role of the media. 2024, 3-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-91227-3.00007-X
    59. Zhen Liu, Renjie Cai, Ruotong Li, Jing Lan. The effects of agricultural product exports on agricultural environmental pollution: evidence from OECD countries and China. Economic Change and Restructuring 2023, 56 (6) , 4071-4098. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10644-023-09563-z
    60. Peng Qi, Jianlei Lang, Haoyun Qi, Xiaoqi Wang. Emissions leakage embodied in inter-provincial trade brings unexpected air quality and health benefits. Science of The Total Environment 2023, 905 , 167085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167085
    61. Alexandra Leclerc, Etienne Berthet, Konstantin Stadler, Richard Wood, Alexis Laurent. Toward global and national toxicity footprints. Journal of Industrial Ecology 2023, 27 (6) , 1521-1537. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.13436
    62. P Skrypchuk, O Suduk, H Shpak, M Skrypchuk. Land footprint: theory, methodology, and applied ecological-economic principles in Ukraine. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 2023, 1269 (1) , 012004. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1269/1/012004
    63. Xiaowei Chuai, Mengyao Xia, Mei Zhang, Helen Huifen Cai, Xin Ye. Reveal the inequality hidden in industry land use by integrating domestic trade and the industry efficiency. Journal of Environmental Management 2023, 344 , 118716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118716
    64. Han Sun, Xueyuan Hu, Xiaohui Yang, Hai Wang, Jinhua Cheng. Estimating water pollution and economic cost embodied in the mining industry: An interprovincial analysis in China. Resources Policy 2023, 86 , 104284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.104284
    65. Çağla PINARLI, Rabia Melda KARAAĞAÇ. Besin Ögesi Yoğunluğuna Genel Bakış. Sağlık Bilimlerinde Değer 2023, 13 (3) , 491-495. https://doi.org/10.33631/sabd.1202191
    66. Yinwen Huang, Dechun Huang, Jinqiu Li, . Ecological Network Analysis of the Water-Energy-Food Metabolic System Based on the MRIO Model: A Case Study for China’s Yangtze River Delta Region. Complexity 2023, 2023 , 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/1418370
    67. Masaharu Motoshita, Stephan Pfister, Takahiro Sasaki, Keisuke Nansai, Seiji Hashimoto, Ryosuke Yokoi, Kamrul Islam, Matthias Finkbeiner. Responsibility for sustainable water consumption in the global supply chains. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 2023, 196 , 107055. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2023.107055
    68. Sofia G. Simoes, A.T.M. Lima. Materials, resources, and CO2 impacts of building new renewable power plants to reach EU's goals of carbon neutrality. Journal of Cleaner Production 2023, 418 , 138138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138138
    69. Yan Li, Yigang Wei, Hanxiao Xu, Huanwen Liu, Julien Chevallier. Carbon monoxide and multi‐pollutants flow between China and India: A multiregional input–output model. The World Economy 2023, 46 (8) , 2514-2537. https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.13342
    70. Davy Vanham, Martin Bruckner, Florian Schwarzmueller, Joep Schyns, Thomas Kastner. Multi-model assessment identifies livestock grazing as a major contributor to variation in European Union land and water footprints. Nature Food 2023, 4 (7) , 575-584. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-023-00797-8
    71. Yinwen Huang, Dechun Huang. Decoupling Economic Growth from Embodied Water–Energy–Food Consumption Based on a Modified MRIO Model: A Case Study of the Yangtze River Delta Region in China. Sustainability 2023, 15 (14) , 10779. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151410779
    72. Emre Kadir Özekenci. BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF ARTICLES PUBLISHED ON THE WEB OF SCIENCE (WoS) DATABASE ON SUSTAINABLE TRADE AND GREEN LOGISTICS. Akademik Yaklaşımlar Dergisi 2023, 14 (1) , 346-369. https://doi.org/10.54688/ayd.1244511
    73. Benedikt Bruckner, Yuli Shan, Christina Prell, Yannan Zhou, Honglin Zhong, Kuishuang Feng, Klaus Hubacek. Ecologically unequal exchanges driven by EU consumption. Nature Sustainability 2023, 6 (5) , 587-598. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-022-01055-8
    74. Jia Wang, Jun Li, Mengyu Zhai. A factorial-based dynamic distributive model for virtual-water management in multi-urban agglomerations — A case study of Yangtze River Economic Belt. Science of The Total Environment 2023, 871 , 162072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162072
    75. Hongxiao Yue, Jingyu Liu, Yuanjing Qi, Yongjuan Xie, Man Guo, Xudong Wu, Zhiqiang Zhang. Geographical displacement of arable land use for Yellow River regions via regional economic integration. Energy, Ecology and Environment 2023, 8 (2) , 178-193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40974-023-00270-z
    76. Gino Sturla, Lorenzo Ciulla, Benedetto Rocchi. Natural and social scarcity in water Footprint: A multiregional input–output analysis for Italy. Ecological Indicators 2023, 147 , 109981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.109981
    77. Lizhi Xing, Wen Chen. Structural Characteristics and Evolutionary Drivers of Global Virtual Water Trade Networks: A Stochastic Actor-Oriented Model for 2000–2015. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2023, 20 (4) , 3234. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20043234
    78. Boqiang Lin, Chonghao Wang. Does industrial relocation affect regional carbon intensity? Evidence from China's secondary industry. Energy Policy 2023, 173 , 113339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2022.113339
    79. Shinichiro Nakamura. The IO Model of a Simple Economy Without Fossil Fuel. 2023, 57-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-43684-0_3
    80. Lucia Mancini, Antonio Valente, Giulia Barbero Vignola, Esther Sanyé Mengual, Serenella Sala. Social footprint of European food production and consumption. Sustainable Production and Consumption 2023, 35 , 287-299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2022.11.005
    81. Osarumwense Osabuohien-Irabor, Igor M. Drapkin. Toward achieving zero-emissions in European Union countries: The contributions of trade and overseas direct investments in consumption-based carbon emissions. AIMS Environmental Science 2023, 10 (1) , 129-156. https://doi.org/10.3934/environsci.2023008
    82. Ziheng Li, Muntasir Murshed, Pengdong Yan. Driving force analysis and prediction of ecological footprint in urban agglomeration based on extended STIRPAT model and shared socioeconomic pathways (SSPs). Journal of Cleaner Production 2023, 383 , 135424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135424
    83. Qiumeng Zhong, Yumeng Li, Yao Wang, Jetashree, Heming Wang, Hui Li, Yuhan Liang, Sai Liang. Revisiting metal footprints of nations with a reserve-side scarcity indicator. Ecological Indicators 2022, 145 , 109677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109677
    84. Haoyuan Feng, Mengjie Yang, Peng Zeng, Yaoyi Liu, Fengyun Sun, Kun Wang, Kai Yang, Yue Che. Transprovincial water quality impacts and the environmental inequity of grey water footprint transfer in China. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 2022, 186 , 106537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106537
    85. Sharon Ravitz Wyngaard, Meidad Kissinger. Tomatoes from the desert: Environmental footprints and sustainability potential in a changing world. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems 2022, 6 https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2022.994920
    86. Maria Hingsamer, Veronika Kulmer, Matthew de Roode, Michael Kernitzkyi. Environmental and socio-economic impacts of new plant breeding technologies: A case study of root chicory for inulin production. Frontiers in Genome Editing 2022, 4 https://doi.org/10.3389/fgeed.2022.919392
    87. Muhammet Enis Bulak, Murat Kucukvar. How ecoefficient is European food consumption? A frontier‐based multiregional input–output analysis. Sustainable Development 2022, 30 (5) , 817-832. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2282
    88. Jieyu Wang, Shaojian Wang, Chunshan Zhou, Kuishuang Feng. Consumption-based carbon intensity of human well-being and its socioeconomic drivers in countries globally. Journal of Cleaner Production 2022, 366 , 132886. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132886
    89. Sharon Ravitz Wyngaard, Meidad Kissinger. Embracing a footprint assessment approach for analyzing desert-based agricultural systems: the case of Medjool dates. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 2022, 42 (4) https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-022-00802-7
    90. Bianbian Feng, La Zhuo, Mesfin M. Mekonnen, Landon T. Marston, Xi Yang, Zenghui Xu, Yilin Liu, Wei Wang, Zhibin Li, Meng Li, Xiangxiang Ji, Pute Wu. Inputs for staple crop production in China drive burden shifting of water and carbon footprints transgressing part of provincial planetary boundaries. Water Research 2022, 221 , 118803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2022.118803
    91. Jan Weinzettel. Aggregation error of the material footprint: the case of the EU. Economic Systems Research 2022, 34 (3) , 320-342. https://doi.org/10.1080/09535314.2021.1947782
    92. Biying Dong, Yingzhi Xu, Qiunan Li. Carbon transfer under China's inter-provincial trade: Evaluation and driving factors. Sustainable Production and Consumption 2022, 32 , 378-392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2022.04.031
    93. Hehua Zhao, Hongwen Chen, Ying Fang, Apei Song. Transfer Characteristics of Embodied Carbon Emissions in Export Trade—Evidence from China. Sustainability 2022, 14 (13) , 8034. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14138034
    94. Rongrong Li, Shuting Ge. Towards economic value-added growth without carbon emission embodied growth in North–North trade—An empirical analysis of US-German trade. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 2022, 29 (29) , 43874-43890. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17461-y
    95. Yating Dai, Hui Zhang, Jian Cheng, Xin Jiang, Xiuxiang Ji, Daolin Zhu. Whether ecological measures have influenced the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC)? An analysis using land footprint in the Weihe River Basin, China. Ecological Indicators 2022, 139 , 108891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108891
    96. Yingying Hu, Wei Wu. Spatiotemporal Variation and Driving Factors of Embodied Carbon in China-G7 Trade. Sustainability 2022, 14 (12) , 7478. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14127478
    97. Macarena Larrea Basterra, Roberto Alvaro-Hermana, Nuria Ceular-Villamandos, Noel M. Muniz. A purposeful approach for measuring greenhouse gas emissions of material flow accounts for the accomplishment of territorial sustainable development and cultural economy goals on climate. The case of the Basque Country. Environment, Development and Sustainability 2022, 24 (5) , 6630-6654. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01720-6
    98. Mariko L. Frame. Ecological Imperialism: A World‐Systems Approach. The American Journal of Economics and Sociology 2022, 81 (3) , 503-534. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajes.12472
    99. Guang Shi, Xi Lu, Hongxia Zhang, Haotian Zheng, Zhonghua Zhang, Shi Chen, Jia Xing, Shuxiao Wang. Air pollutant emissions induced by rural-to-urban migration during China's urbanization (2005–2015). Environmental Science and Ecotechnology 2022, 10 , 100166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ese.2022.100166
    100. Jingru Hu, Shoubing Wang, Kai Huang, Qi Wei, Hao Chen. Spillover-feedback effects of social, economic, and environmental footprints based on the “Belt and Road Initiative”. Journal of Environmental Management 2022, 305 , 114414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114414
    Load more citations

    Environmental Science & Technology

    Cite this: Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46, 20, 10883–10891
    Click to copy citationCitation copied!
    https://doi.org/10.1021/es301949t
    Published September 26, 2012
    Copyright © 2012 American Chemical Society

    Article Views

    5267

    Altmetric

    -

    Citations

    Learn about these metrics

    Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

    Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

    The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.