ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read

OR SEARCH CITATIONS

My Activity
Publications
CONTENT TYPES

Figure 1Loading Img
Download Hi-Res ImageDownload to MS-PowerPointCite This:Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47, 22, 13132-13140
RETURN TO ISSUEPREVArticleNEXT

Interactive Effects of Environmental Change and Management Strategies on Regional Forest Carbon Emissions

View Author Information
† Department of Forest Ecosystems and Society, Oregon State University, 321 Richardson Hall, Corvallis, Oregon 97331, United States.
‡ Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat en de l’Environnement, CEA CNRS UVSQ, Centre d’Etudes Ormes des Merisiers, 91191 Gif Sur Yvette, France
§ Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Climate and Ecosystem Processes Environmental Sciences Division, P.O. Box 2008, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831-2008, United States
*Phone: 541-737-6111; fax: 541-737-1393; e-mail: [email protected]
Cite this: Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47, 22, 13132–13140
Publication Date (Web):October 18, 2013
https://doi.org/10.1021/es402903u
Copyright © 2013 American Chemical Society
Request reuse permissions

    Article Views

    1043

    Altmetric

    -

    Citations

    37
    LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICS
    Read OnlinePDF (2 MB)
    Get e-Alerts
    Supporting Info (1)»
    SUBJECTS:

    Abstract

    Abstract Image

    Climate mitigation activities in forests need to be quantified in terms of the long-term effects on forest carbon stocks, accumulation, and emissions. The impacts of future environmental change and bioenergy harvests on regional forest carbon storage have not been quantified. We conducted a comprehensive modeling study and life-cycle assessment of the impacts of projected changes in climate, CO2 concentration, and N deposition, and region-wide forest management policies on regional forest carbon fluxes. By 2100, if current management strategies continue, then the warming and CO2 fertilization effect in the given projections result in a 32–68% increase in net carbon uptake, overshadowing increased carbon emissions from projected increases in fire activity and other forest disturbance factors. To test the response to new harvesting strategies, repeated thinnings were applied in areas susceptible to fire to reduce mortality, and two clear-cut rotations were applied in productive forests to provide biomass for wood products and bioenergy. The management strategies examined here lead to long-term increased carbon emissions over current harvesting practices, although semiarid regions contribute little to the increase. The harvest rates were unsustainable. This comprehensive approach could serve as a foundation for regional place-based assessments of management effects on future carbon sequestration by forests in other locations.

    Supporting Information

    ARTICLE SECTIONS
    Jump To

    Additional methods explaining model forcing data sets and the life-cycle assessment, supporting figures and tables illustrating model simulations, model evaluation, life-cycle assessment parameters, and climate scenarios. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.

    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

    Cited By

    This article is cited by 37 publications.

    1. Kelsey N Bryant, Jeffrey Stenzel, Justin Mathias, Hyojung Kwon, Crystal A Kolden, Laurel Lynch, Tara Hudiburg. Boosts in leaf-level photosynthetic capacity aid Pinus ponderosa recovery from wildfire. Environmental Research Letters 2022, 17 (11) , 114034. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac9cf2
    2. Lucas E. Nave, Kendall DeLyser, Grant M. Domke, Scott M. Holub, Maria K. Janowiak, Brian Kittler, Todd A. Ontl, Eric Sprague, Eric B. Sucre, Brian F. Walters, Christopher W. Swanston. Disturbance and management effects on forest soil organic carbon stocks in the Pacific Northwest. Ecological Applications 2022, 32 (6) https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.2611
    3. Syed Tufail Ahmad, Ahmad Hussain, Saif Ullah, Aitezaz Muhammad Khan, Muhammad Sadiq Khan, Inam Ullah. Change in forest biomass with altitudinal variations in dry temperate forest of Dir Kohistan, Pakistan. Modeling Earth Systems and Environment 2022, 8 (2) , 2011-2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-021-01206-4
    4. Kristina J. Bartowitz, Eric S. Walsh, Jeffrey E. Stenzel, Crystal A. Kolden, Tara W. Hudiburg. Forest Carbon Emission Sources Are Not Equal: Putting Fire, Harvest, and Fossil Fuel Emissions in Context. Frontiers in Forests and Global Change 2022, 5 https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2022.867112
    5. Beverly E. Law, William R. Moomaw, Tara W. Hudiburg, William H. Schlesinger, John D. Sterman, George M. Woodwell. Creating Strategic Reserves to Protect Forest Carbon and Reduce Biodiversity Losses in the United States. Land 2022, 11 (5) , 721. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11050721
    6. Beverly E. Law, Logan T. Berner, Polly C. Buotte, David J. Mildrexler, William J. Ripple. Strategic Forest Reserves can protect biodiversity in the western United States and mitigate climate change. Communications Earth & Environment 2021, 2 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-021-00326-0
    7. Eric S. Walsh, Tara W. Hudiburg. Response of avian cavity nesters and carbon dynamics to forest management and climate change in the Northern Rockies. Ecosphere 2021, 12 (7) https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.3636
    8. Yabo Zhao, Shifa Ma, Jianhong Fan, Yunnan Cai. Examining the Effects of Land Use on Carbon Emissions: Evidence from Pearl River Delta. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2021, 18 (7) , 3623. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18073623
    9. Michael J. Case, Brittany G. Johnson, Kristina J. Bartowitz, Tara W. Hudiburg. Forests of the future: Climate change impacts and implications for carbon storage in the Pacific Northwest, USA. Forest Ecology and Management 2021, 482 , 118886. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118886
    10. Mark E. Capron, Jim R. Stewart, Antoine de Ramon N’Yeurt, Michael D. Chambers, Jang K. Kim, Charles Yarish, Anthony T. Jones, Reginald B. Blaylock, Scott C. James, Rae Fuhrman, Martin T. Sherman, Don Piper, Graham Harris, Mohammed A. Hasan. Restoring Pre-Industrial CO2 Levels While Achieving Sustainable Development Goals. Energies 2020, 13 (18) , 4972. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13184972
    11. Steffen E. Eikenberry, . Hybrids are an effective transitional technology for limiting US passenger fleet carbon emissions. AIMS Environmental Science 2020, 7 (2) , 117-139. https://doi.org/10.3934/environsci.2020007
    12. Jeffrey E. Stenzel, Kristina J. Bartowitz, Melannie D. Hartman, James A. Lutz, Crystal A. Kolden, Alistair M. S. Smith, Beverly E. Law, Mark E. Swanson, Andrew J. Larson, William J. Parton, Tara W. Hudiburg. Fixing a snag in carbon emissions estimates from wildfires. Global Change Biology 2019, 25 (11) , 3985-3994. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14716
    13. Eric S. Walsh, Kerri T. Vierling, Eva Strand, Kristina Bartowitz, Tara W. Hudiburg. Climate change, woodpeckers, and forests: Current trends and future modeling needs. Ecology and Evolution 2019, 9 (4) , 2305-2319. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4876
    14. Andres Schmidt, Whitney Creason, Beverly E. Law. Estimating regional effects of climate change and altered land use on biosphere carbon fluxes using distributed time delay neural networks with Bayesian regularized learning. Neural Networks 2018, 108 , 97-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2018.08.004
    15. Beverly E. Law, Tara W. Hudiburg, Logan T. Berner, Jeffrey J. Kent, Polly C. Buotte, Mark E. Harmon. Land use strategies to mitigate climate change in carbon dense temperate forests. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2018, 115 (14) , 3663-3668. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1720064115
    16. Chad Hanson. Wildfire in the Age of Climate Change. BioScience 2018, 68 (2) , 146-148. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/bix166
    17. D.A. DellaSala, M. Koopman. Thinning Combined With Biomass Energy Production Impacts Fire-Adapted Forests in Western United States and May Increase Greenhouse Gas Emissions. 2018, 491-498. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809665-9.09587-2
    18. Guangzai Nong, Yanyan Liu, Hongxiang Zhu, Yijing Li, Pengbo Li. Energy analysis for an artificial tree generating polymer fuels from water and CO 2. Energy Conversion and Management 2017, 151 , 465-471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2017.08.094
    19. Shelley D. Crausbay, Philip E. Higuera, Douglas G. Sprugel, Linda B. Brubaker. Fire catalyzed rapid ecological change in lowland coniferous forests of the Pacific Northwest over the past 14,000 years. Ecology 2017, 98 (9) , 2356-2369. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.1897
    20. Logan T Berner, Beverly E Law, Arjan J H Meddens, Jeffrey A Hicke. Tree mortality from fires, bark beetles, and timber harvest during a hot and dry decade in the western United States (2003–2012). Environmental Research Letters 2017, 12 (6) , 065005. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa6f94
    21. Bing Xu, Yude Pan, Alain F. Plante, Kevin McCullough, Richard Birdsey. Modeling forest carbon cycle using long‐term carbon stock field measurement in the Delaware River Basin. Ecosphere 2017, 8 (5) https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.1802
    22. Megan K. Creutzburg, Robert M. Scheller, Melissa S. Lucash, Stephen D. LeDuc, Mark G. Johnson. Forest management scenarios in a changing climate: trade‐offs between carbon, timber, and old forest. Ecological Applications 2017, 27 (2) , 503-518. https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.1460
    23. Logan T. Berner, Beverly E. Law. Plant traits, productivity, biomass and soil properties from forest sites in the Pacific Northwest, 1999–2014. Scientific Data 2016, 3 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.2
    24. Zhenghui Xie, Linying Wang, Binghao Jia, Xing Yuan. Measuring and modeling the impact of a severe drought on terrestrial ecosystem CO 2 and water fluxes in a subtropical forest. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences 2016, 121 (10) , 2576-2587. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JG003437
    25. Andres Schmidt, Beverly E. Law, Mathias Göckede, Chad Hanson, Zhenlin Yang, Stephen Conley. Bayesian Optimization of the Community Land Model Simulated Biosphere–Atmosphere Exchange using CO2 Observations from a Dense Tower Network and Aircraft Campaigns over Oregon. Earth Interactions 2016, 20 (22) , 1-35. https://doi.org/10.1175/EI-D-16-0011.1
    26. Megan K. Creutzburg, Robert M. Scheller, Melissa S. Lucash, Louisa B. Evers, Stephen D. LeDuc, Mark G. Johnson. Bioenergy harvest, climate change, and forest carbon in the Oregon Coast Range. GCB Bioenergy 2016, 8 (2) , 357-370. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12255
    27. Matthew D. Hurteau, Shuang Liang, Katherine L. Martin, Malcolm P. North, George W. Koch, Bruce A. Hungate. Restoring forest structure and process stabilizes forest carbon in wildfire‐prone southwestern ponderosa pine forests. Ecological Applications 2016, 26 (2) , 382-391. https://doi.org/10.1890/15-0337
    28. Danelle M. Laflower, Matthew D. Hurteau, George W. Koch, Malcolm P. North, Bruce A. Hungate. Climate-driven changes in forest succession and the influence of management on forest carbon dynamics in the Puget Lowlands of Washington State, USA. Forest Ecology and Management 2016, 362 , 194-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2015.12.015
    29. D.A. DellaSala, M. Koopman. Thinning Combined With Biomass Energy Production Impacts Fire-Adapted Forests in Western United States and May Increase Greenhouse Gas Emissions. 2016https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-409548-9.09587-7
    30. Caren C. Dymond, Sarah Beukema, Craig R. Nitschke, K. David Coates, Robert M. Scheller. Carbon sequestration in managed temperate coniferous forests under climate change. Biogeosciences 2016, 13 (6) , 1933-1947. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-1933-2016
    31. David N. Wear, John W. Coulston. From sink to source: Regional variation in U.S. forest carbon futures. Scientific Reports 2015, 5 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/srep16518
    32. B.E. Law, R.H. Waring. Carbon implications of current and future effects of drought, fire and management on Pacific Northwest forests. Forest Ecology and Management 2015, 355 , 4-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2014.11.023
    33. Richard Birdsey, Yude Pan. Trends in management of the world’s forests and impacts on carbon stocks. Forest Ecology and Management 2015, 355 , 83-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2015.04.031
    34. Brendan M. Rogers, Dominique Bachelet, Raymond J. Drapek, Beverly E. Law, Ronald P. Neilson, John R. Wells. Drivers of Future Ecosystem Change in the US Pacific Northwest. 2015, 91-113. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119011705.ch7
    35. M. J. McGrath, S. Luyssaert, P. Meyfroidt, J. O. Kaplan, M. Bürgi, Y. Chen, K. Erb, U. Gimmi, D. McInerney, K. Naudts, J. Otto, F. Pasztor, J. Ryder, M.-J. Schelhaas, A. Valade. Reconstructing European forest management from 1600 to 2010. Biogeosciences 2015, 12 (14) , 4291-4316. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-4291-2015
    36. L. T. Berner, B. E. Law. Water limitations on forest carbon cycling and conifer traits along a steep climatic gradient in the Cascade Mountains, Oregon. Biogeosciences 2015, 12 (22) , 6617-6635. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-6617-2015
    37. Beverly E. Law. Regional analysis of drought and heat impacts on forests: current and future science directions. Global Change Biology 2014, 20 (12) , 3595-3599. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12651
    Download PDF

    Pair your accounts.

    Export articles to Mendeley

    Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

    Pair your accounts.

    Export articles to Mendeley

    Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

    You’ve supercharged your research process with ACS and Mendeley!

    STEP 1:
    Click to create an ACS ID

    Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

    Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

    Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

    MENDELEY PAIRING EXPIRED
    Your Mendeley pairing has expired. Please reconnect