ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
CONTENT TYPES

Figure 1Loading Img

Incorporating Land-Use Requirements and Environmental Constraints in Low-Carbon Electricity Planning for California

View Author Information
Energy and Resources Group, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720, United States
Earth Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, United States
§ Energy and Environmental Economics, 101 Montgomery Street, Suite 1600, San Francisco, California 94104, United States
*Phone: +1 626-388-5257; e-mail: [email protected]
Cite this: Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 49, 4, 2013–2021
Publication Date (Web):December 26, 2014
https://doi.org/10.1021/es502979v
Copyright © 2014 American Chemical Society
Article Views
848
Altmetric
-
Citations
LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICS
Read OnlinePDF (6 MB)
Supporting Info (1)»

Abstract

Abstract Image

The land-use implications of deep decarbonization of the electricity sector (e.g., 80% below 1990 emissions) have not been well-characterized quantitatively or spatially. We assessed the operational-phase land-use requirements of different low-carbon scenarios for California in 2050 and found that most scenarios have comparable direct land footprints. While the per MWh footprint of renewable energy (RE) generation is initially higher, that of fossil and nuclear generation increases over time with continued fuel use. We built a spatially explicit model to understand the interactions between resource quality and environmental constraints in a high RE scenario (>70% of total generation). We found that there is sufficient land within California to meet the solar and geothermal targets, but areas with the highest quality wind and solar resources also tend to be those with high conservation value. Development of some land with lower conservation value results in lower average capacity factors, but also provides opportunity for colocation of different generation technologies, which could significantly improve land-use efficiency and reduce permitting, leasing, and transmission infrastructure costs. Basing siting decisions on environmentally-constrained long-term RE build-out requirements produces significantly different results, including better conservation outcomes, than implied by the current piecemeal approach to planning.

Supporting Information

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

Equations for calculating electricity generation, and additional tables, figures, and maps. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org/.

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Cited By


This article is cited by 12 publications.

  1. Venktesh V. Katkar, Jeffrey A. Sward, Alex Worsley, K. Max Zhang. Strategic land use analysis for solar energy development in New York State. Renewable Energy 2021, 173 , 861-875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.03.128
  2. Dylan Harrison-Atlas, Galen Maclaurin, Eric Lantz. Spatially-Explicit Prediction of Capacity Density Advances Geographic Characterization of Wind Power Technical Potential. Energies 2021, 14 (12) , 3609. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14123609
  3. Trieu Mai, Anthony Lopez, Matthew Mowers, Eric Lantz. Interactions of wind energy project siting, wind resource potential, and the evolution of the U.S. power system. Energy 2021, 223 , 119998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.119998
  4. James H. Williams, Ryan A. Jones, Ben Haley, Gabe Kwok, Jeremy Hargreaves, Jamil Farbes, Margaret S. Torn. Carbon‐Neutral Pathways for the United States. AGU Advances 2021, 2 (1) https://doi.org/10.1029/2020AV000284
  5. Grace C Wu, Emily Leslie, Oluwafemi Sawyerr, D Richard Cameron, Erica Brand, Brian Cohen, Douglas Allen, Marcela Ochoa, Arne Olson. Low-impact land use pathways to deep decarbonization of electricity. Environmental Research Letters 2020, 15 (7) , 074044. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab87d1
  6. D.A. Devitt, M.H. Young, J.P. Pierre. Assessing the potential for greater solar development in West Texas, USA. Energy Strategy Reviews 2020, 29 , 100490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2020.100490
  7. Amalesh Dhar, M. Anne Naeth, P. Dev Jennings, Mohamed Gamal El-Din. Perspectives on environmental impacts and a land reclamation strategy for solar and wind energy systems. Science of The Total Environment 2020, 718 , 134602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134602
  8. Kevin Palmer-Wilson, James Donald, Bryson Robertson, Benjamin Lyseng, Victor Keller, McKenzie Fowler, Cameron Wade, Sven Scholtysik, Peter Wild, Andrew Rowe. Impact of land requirements on electricity system decarbonisation pathways. Energy Policy 2019, 129 , 193-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.01.071
  9. Ranjit Deshmukh, Grace C. Wu, Duncan S. Callaway, Amol Phadke. Geospatial and techno-economic analysis of wind and solar resources in India. Renewable Energy 2019, 134 , 947-960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.11.073
  10. Kenji Shiraishi, Rebekah G. Shirley, Daniel M. Kammen. Geospatial multi-criteria analysis for identifying high priority clean energy investment opportunities: A case study on land-use conflict in Bangladesh. Applied Energy 2019, 235 , 1457-1467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.10.123
  11. Kirby E. Calvert. Measuring and modelling the land-use intensity and land requirements of utility-scale photovoltaic systems in the Canadian province of Ontario. The Canadian Geographer / Le Géographe canadien 2018, 62 (2) , 188-199. https://doi.org/10.1111/cag.12444
  12. Dustin Mulvaney. Identifying the roots of Green Civil War over utility-scale solar energy projects on public lands across the American Southwest. Journal of Land Use Science 2017, 12 (6) , 493-515. https://doi.org/10.1080/1747423X.2017.1379566

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

You’ve supercharged your research process with ACS and Mendeley!

STEP 1:
Click to create an ACS ID

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

MENDELEY PAIRING EXPIRED
Your Mendeley pairing has expired. Please reconnect

This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By continuing to use the site, you are accepting our use of cookies. Read the ACS privacy policy.

CONTINUE