ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
My Activity
CONTENT TYPES

Figure 1Loading Img

Mutagenic and Carcinogenic Hazards of Settled House Dust I: Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Content and Excess Lifetime Cancer Risk from Preschool Exposure

View Author Information
Safe Environments Programme, Healthy Environments and Consumer Safety Branch, Health Canada, Tunney’s Pasture 0803A, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1A 0K9
*Corresponding author e-mail: [email protected].
§Deceased April 2006.
Cite this: Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42, 5, 1747–1753
Publication Date (Web):January 23, 2008
https://doi.org/10.1021/es702449c

Copyright © Published 2008 by the American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under these Terms of Use.

  • Open Access

Article Views

3568

Altmetric

-

Citations

LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICS
PDF (151 KB)
Supporting Info (1)»

Abstract

Settled house dust (SHD) may be a significant source of children’s indoor exposure to hazardous substances including polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). In this study, organic extracts of sieved vacuum cleaner dust from 51 homes were examined for the presence of 13 PAHs via GC/MS. PAHs were found in all samples with levels of total PAHs ranging between 1.5 and 325 µg g−1. The PAH concentrations in the SHD were correlated with information contained in corresponding household questionnaires. Analyses showed levels of PAHs to be negatively associated with noncombustion activities such as vacuum cleaning frequency. A risk assessment was conducted to evaluate the excess lifetime cancer risks posed to preschool aged children who ingested PAHs in SHD. The assessment revealed that exposure to PAHs at levels found in 90% of the homes (<40 µg g−1) would result in excess cancer risks that are considered acceptable (i.e., 1–100 × 10−6). However, exposure to higher levels of PAHs found in five homes yielded risks that could be higher than 1 × 10−4.

Synopsis

Assessments of house dust PAH (polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon) contamination reveals that levels in some homes could yield unacceptable increases in excess cancer risk

Introduction

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

Previous studies have noted that concentrations of chemical contaminants may be higher in indoor air than in outdoor air (1). Indoors, many contaminants adsorb to particulate matter, which is initially suspended in air and later settles out as dust. Research suggests that settled house dust (SHD) may be a significant source for indoor exposures to many pollutants (2). Previous studies have revealed the presence of numerous chemical contaminants in SHD including pesticides, smoke residues, PCBs, flame retardants, plasticizers, heavy metals, and asbestos (3-8). With Canadians spending as much as 70% of their time at home and up to 90% of their time indoors (9), the health risks posed by exposure to contaminants indoors are of significant concern.
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) have also been detected in SHD (for a review, see Maertens et al. (10)), and many of these compounds are known mutagens or animal carcinogens (11). There exists a high potential for human exposure to PAHs because of the ubiquity of their sources in both indoor and outdoor environments. As products of incomplete combustion, indoor sources of PAHs include cooking (12, 13), heating (14), smoking (15), wood burning (16), candle burning (17), and incense burning (12, 18). Outdoor sources include vehicle exhaust (19), forest fires, volcanoes, and industrial processes such as aluminum smelting and coke production (20).
Exposure to PAHs in SHD are of particular concern for children who tend to crawl on the floor and place objects in their mouths that have been in direct contact with dusty floors (21). A small number of studies have assessed children’s exposure to PAHs in SHD as compared to other matrices (22-24). These assessments show that dietary ingestion of PAHs in food is often the primary exposure pathway for children. However, they also show that nondietary ingestion of carcinogenic PAHs in dust and soil is significant and is a more important exposure route than inhalation of PAHs in air. Exposure assessments indicate that toddlers playing on the floor and exhibiting hand-to-mouth behavior can ingest more than 2.5 times more PAHs than adults (25). Furthermore, since a child’s body weight is only about one-fifth that of an average adult, a child’s intake of PAHs in dust, in milligrams per kilogram of body weight per day, is likely to be far greater than that for an adult. In addition, early developmental stages of organ, immune, and nervous systems in children are thought to contribute to an enhanced contaminant sensitivity (26). Consequently, the adverse health risks for children exposed to PAHs in SHD are believed to be considerably greater than those for adults.
In Canada, PAHs are priority substances for assessment under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act (CEPA), and a number have been declared toxic under this Act (20). However, to our knowledge, there are no published studies that have evaluated PAH concentrations in SHD from Canadian homes. The objectives of this study, which includes a companion publication, are (i) to quantify levels of PAHs in SHD collected from homes in Ottawa, Canada, (ii) analyze relationships between these levels and various attributes of the households (e.g., home location, presence of smokers, percent carpet covering), and (iii) estimate the carcinogenic risks associated with preschool children’s nondietary ingestion of PAHs in SHD.

Experimental Section

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

Study Design and Dust Sample Collection

Vacuum cleaner bags were collected between November 2002 and March 2003 from 75 homes located in Ottawa, the capital city of Canada. A two-stage stratified sampling process was used to randomly select homes that were representative of both urban and suburban locations within the city. A description of the sampling design is provided elsewhere (27). The bags were removed from the vacuum cleaner, placed in zip-seal plastic bags (Fisher Scientific, Ottawa, Canada), and transported to the laboratory where they were stored at −20 °C.
All participants answered a detailed questionnaire that was designed to collect information on the house and any activities that might affect chemical loading. The majority of household occupants classified their home as being located in a quiet residential area (61%). Fewer homes were located in a main residential area (29%), and an even lower number were located in a main commercial (6%) or rural area (4%). Most of the households were characterized as nonsmoking households (85%). Only 15% contained occupants who smoked, and the median number of cigarettes smoked per day was eight. The primary heating source in most of the homes was natural gas (83%); oil and electric heat were less common (11% and 4%, respectively), and one home did not describe the heating source.

Sample Preparation

Prior to sieving, the vacuum cleaner bags were thawed overnight in a fume hood. The dust was removed from the bags using large forceps and placed into a USA Standard Testing Sieve, ASTM E-11 specification, with a 150 µm opening. The dust was shaken through the sieve using an AS200 Digit Analytical Sieve Shaker (Retsch GmbH & Co. KG, Haan, Germany). The shaker was run at 80% (amplitude = 20 mm) for 10 min. Any visible hairs were removed from the collection pan using tweezers, a paintbrush, or both. The sieved dust (<150 µm) was then resieved on the shaker for an additional 3 min. The sieved dust was transferred to a glass jar, and the weight of the sieved dust was recorded. The jars were sealed with Teflon tape and stored at −20 °C until analysis. Of the 75 dust samples that were collected, 51 samples contained sufficient dust for chemical analyses.

Extraction and Sample Cleanup Procedures

Approximately 0.3 g of each of the 51 dust samples were extracted with dichloromethane (DCM) and hexane (1:1) using an ASE 200 Accelerated Solvent Extractor (ASE) (Dionex, Oakville, ON, Canada). The ASE settings were 175 °C and 1500 PSI, with a preheat time of 7 min, a heat time of 5 min, and a static extract time of 10 min. The extracts were collected in vials containing 5 g of anhydrous sodium sulfate.
Extracts were filtered through 0.45 µm Whatman Teflon syringe filters, reduced to 0.5 mL under nitrogen at 30 °C, and brought up to 2 mL in DCM. Gel permeation chromatography (GPC), using a Waters Autopurification system with tandem Waters Envirogel GPC columns (19 × 300 mm and 19 × 150 mm, styrene/divinylbenzene) (Waters, Mississauga, ON, Canada) was used to remove high molecular weight compounds. The GPC was performed and calibrated according to EPA Method 3640a (28).

Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry

A solvent exchange to hexane was performed, and the dust extracts were analyzed for 13 PAHs including acenaphthylene, fluorene, phenanthrene, anthracene, pyrene, benz[a]anthracene, benzo[a]pyrene, benzo[b]fluoranthene, benzo[k]fluoranthene, chrysene, indeno[1,2,3-c,d]pyrene, dibenz[a,h]anthracene, and benzo[g,h,i]perylene via gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS). Analyses were conducted using a Hewlett-Packard 5890 gas chromatograph (GC) fitted with an HP-5MS capillary column (30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 µm film thickness) (J&W Scientific, Folsom, CA) and equipped with a HP5972 mass selective (MS) detector (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA). The initial GC temperature was held at 50 °C for 2 min, then ramped 8 °C min−1 to 300 °C, and held at 300 °C for 12 min. The injection port temperature was 270 °C, and the detector temperature was 280 °C. One microliter volumes were injected in splitless mode. The purge time was 2 min. The MS was operated in the selected ion monitoring mode. The masses monitored included the molecular ions and their associated characteristic fragment ions. A calibration standard consisting of a standard solution of 13 PAHs (EPA 525 PAH Mix A, Supelco, PA) and two deuterated PAHs (acenaphthene d10and benzo[a]pyrene d12) were run with each batch of samples. Prior to GC/MS analyses, each sample was spiked with two deuterated standards (acenaphthene-d10 and benzo[a]pyrene-d12) that permit the normalization of GC/MS peak area. Identification of the PAHs was based on their retention time relative to the calibration standard solution. Quantification of the PAHs, based on the internal standards, was conducted using MSD Productivity ChemStation (29).

QA/QC

A recovery efficiency study was conducted (N = 4) using 15 µg of the EPA 525 PAH Mix A, and recovery efficiencies ranged between 57 and 76%. All PAH concentration values were corrected for the recoveries. Empty cells were included as blanks with each batch of samples that was processed. No detectable amounts of PAHs were found in any of the blanks. Six randomly selected dust samples (10% of the samples) were subjected to duplicate analysis. The average relative percent difference (RPD) for the PAHs ranged from 3.4% to 9.5%. The method detection limit (MDL) in this study was defined as the instrument detection limit (IDL), which was calculated from repeats of low concentration standards, divided by the recoveries (MDL = IDL/recovery). The MDLs, recovery efficiencies and average RPD in duplicates are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1. Monitored Ions and Fragments, Method Detection Limits (MDL), Recovery Efficiencies, and Relative Percent Difference in Duplicates (RPD) for the Quantification of 13 PAHs in SHD Extracts by GC/MS
PAHmass to charge ratio of monitored ions and fragmentsIDL (ng µL−1)recovery efficiency (%)corrected MDL (µg g−1)aav RPDb
acenaphthylene152, 151, 760.001757.10.0115.5
fluorene166, 164, 820.002565.80.0146.7
phenanthrene178, 176, 890.002270.10.0116.9
anthracene178, 176, 890.001962.70.0119.5
pyrene202, 101, 1000.002574.70.0123.7
benz[a]anthracene228, 114, 1010.004172.40.0215.1
chrysene228, 114, 1010.005275.70.0253.8
benzo[b]fluoranthene252, 126, 1130.003972.10.0194.5
benzo[k]fluoranthene252, 126, 1130.007274.30.0355.5
benzo[a]pyrene252, 126, 1130.008057.10.0514.5
indeno[1,2,3-c,d]pyrene276, 138, 1370.007468.10.0403.4
dibenz[a,h]anthracene276, 138, 1370.010570.60.0544.0
benzo[g,h,i]perylene278, 139, 1380.006369.70.0333.6
a

Corrected MDL = IDL (ng µL−1) × 1000 (final volume, µL)/1000 (ng μg−1)/0.275 (sample mass, g)/recovery efficiency.

b

RPD = absolute difference between the duplicate divided by their average value times 100%.

Cancer Risk Assessment of PAHs in Settled House Dust

The following equation was used to estimate the excess lifetime cancer risks associated with nondietary ingestion of PAHs in SHD during preschool years (30) for B2 PAHs 1 through n, where C = concentration (µg g−1) of each carcinogenic PAH in the SHD samples. The PAHs included in this assessment were benzo[a]anthracene (BaA), benzo[a]pyrene (BaP), benzo[b]fluoranthene (BbF), benzo[k]fluoranthene (BkF), chrysene (CHRY), dibenz[a,h]anthracene (DBahA), and indeno[1,2,3-c,d]pyrene (I123cdP). All of these PAHs are categorized as probable human carcinogens (B2) on the basis of U.S. EPA classifications (31). PEF = Potency equivalency factor. These factors are applied to the individual PAH concentrations to express the potency of each PAH in terms of benzo[a]pyrene. The PEFs were BaA = 0.1, BbF = 0.1, BkF = 0.1, CHRY = 0.001, I123cdP = 0.1, DBahA = 5. All PEFs were taken from Collins et al. (32), except for DbahA, which was taken from Nisbet and Lagoy (33). IR = Daily ingestion rate of dust (g day−1). Three ingestion rates were considered: 0.01, 0.05, and 0.1 g day−1. Investigators estimate that children ingest between 0.05 and 0.1 g of dust per day depending on the season and the amount of time spent indoors (34). Both 0.05 and 0.1 g day−1 are considered to be conservative estimates, erring on the side of greater exposure. On the basis of studies with tracer elements, other researchers have suggested that children likely ingest closer to 0.04 g day−1 of soil and dust combined (35). Dust is estimated to account for only a quarter of this value (35, 36). Consequently, a lower ingestion rate of 0.01 g day−1 was also used. EF = exposure factor. The average proportion of a seventy year lifetime that preschoolchildren are exposed to dust via nondietary ingestion. Seven hours per day was considered an average exposure rate based on the fact that preschool-aged children spend approximately 19–20 h day−1 indoors (37, 38) and sleep for approximately 12–13 h day−1 (38, 39). It was assumed that preschool-aged children would be exposed from birth up to the fifth birthday. BW = average body weight (kg). A standard value of 13 kg was used (40). SF = slope factor ((mg kg−1 day−1)−1). This is the estimate of the probability of a response occurring per unit intake of the PAH over a lifetime. For these analyses, an oral slope factor for benzo[a]pyrene of 7.3 (mg kg−1 d−1)−1was used (31). Slope factors represent the upper-bound estimate of risk per unit dose for an average population (41). AF = adjustment factor. This factor accounts for exposures taking place during early life stages when children are more susceptible to the effects of chemical toxins (26). For exposure to carcinogens with a mutagenic mode of action, the U.S. EPA recommends an adjustment factor of 10 for children less than 2 years of age and an adjustment factor of 3 for children between 2 and 15 years of age (42). Therefore, a composite adjustment factor of 5.8 was used for this risk assessment where exposures occur from birth to 5 years of age.

Data Analyses

All descriptive statistics (e.g., minimum, maximum, mean), ordinary least-squares linear regression, and Pearson correlations were performed using the SAS System, version 8.2, for Windows (43). PAH concentration data, as well as the data for two variables contained in the homeowner survey (vacuum frequency and number of people living in the house), were log transformed to equalize the variance across the range of observations. The Shapiro−Wilk statistic and inspection of normal probability plots were used to assess normality of residuals. Significant outliers were identified by calculation of the studentized deleted residual (44). In those cases where PAH values were below the detection limit, a value of one-half the detection limit was substituted into the data set for statistical analyses.

Results and Discussion

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

Levels of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs)

The dust extracts were evaluated for the presence of 13 targeted PAHs (Table 2). The individual concentrations of the 13 PAHs spanned between 2 and 3 orders of magnitude both for a single PAH and between different PAHs. Acenaphthylene was detected in the lowest concentrations, while benzo[b]fluoranthene was detected in the highest. With a molecular weight of 152.2 and a vapor pressure of 0.378 Pa (45), acenaphthylene is more readily volatilized and generally found only at low levels in dust samples (23, 46-48). In contrast, benzo[b]fluoranthene is heavier and less volatile and has previously been detected in the highest concentrations in dust samples (47, 49). Although PAHs with a higher number of rings generally have lower volatilities, there were no consistent trends in concentration of the PAHs based on the number of rings.
Table 2. Minimum, Maximum, and Mean Values of 13 PAHs Measured in the Extracts of Settled House Dust Collected from Homes in Ottawa, ONa
PAHMDLb(µg g−1)no. of samples below MDLminimum (µg g−1)maximum (µg g−1)median (µg g−1)arithmetic mean (µg g−1)SEMcgeometric mean (µg g−1)
acenaphthylene0.011300.0050.1710.0050.0390.0070.015
fluorene0.01370.0071.370.0930.1700.0320.084
phenanthrene0.01200.14921.01.482.780.5581.53
anthracene0.01120.0066.620.1960.4850.1360.222
pyrene0.01200.20746.01.464.361.151.91
benz[a]anthracene0.02100.10532.10.6962.380.7070.956
chrysene0.02500.15035.11.193.290.8581.46
benzo[b]fluoranthene0.01900.16054.01.664.871.312.01
benzo[k]fluoranthene0.03400.04919.00.5321.600.4420.674
benzo[a]pyrene0.05100.04038.80.8032.910.8990.963
indeno[1,2,3-c,d]pyrene0.03900.10033.50.9113.070.8191.29
dibenz[a,h]anthracene0.05400.0226.270.1850.5490.1480.250
benzo[g,h,i]perylene0.03400.11831.40.7932.790.7641.13
total PAHsd  1.503259.5329.37.7812.9
B2 PAHse  0.6562196.0618.75.177.68
a

Values are corrected for recovery efficiencies.

b

Method detection limit. Samples below the MDL were assigned a value of one half of the MDL.

c

Standard error of the arithmetic mean.

d

Sum of the 13 targeted PAHs.

e

Sum of the PAHs classified as probable human carcinogens by the U.S. EPA (31).

The sum of the 13 PAHs, referred to hereafter as total PAHs, ranged between 1.5 and 325 µg g−1, with a geometric mean of 12.9 µg g−1. These values are similar to the findings of a previous review in which the total PAHs for samples collected from urban, rural, and suburban homes ranged between 0.4–544 µg g−1 with a geometric mean of 4.5 µg g−1 (10). The distribution of the total PAHs in the samples was positively skewed (skewness = 4.00).
The sum of the seven PAHs classified as probable human carcinogens by the U.S. EPA (2003), referred to hereafter as the B2 PAHs, accounted for approximately 60% of the total PAHs. Similar results were observed in other studies where the concentrations of the B2 PAHs, were shown to be approximately one-half of the total PAH concentrations (24, 50).
The house with the lowest total PAH concentration (1.5 µg g−1) was a newly constructed home whose owners moved in shortly before the sampling took place. The house with the highest total PAH level (325 µg g−1) was an 18-year-old residence whose only distinguishing feature was that it was 90% carpeted. Lewis et al. (1994) noted that contaminants have the potential to accumulate in carpet dust (21), and therefore, a high percentage of carpeting in this home may have resulted in high PAH levels.
The German Federal Environmental Agency’s Commission for Indoor Air Quality has established the only current guideline for PAHs in house dust. It states that exposure to concentrations above 10 µg of benzo[a]pyrene per gram of household dust should be minimized to prevent adverse health effects (51). In the present study, three samples (11% of total) contained concentrations of benzo[a]pyrene that were above 10 µg g−1 (ppm), with maximum values reaching 39 µg g−1. Although there are currently no Canadian guidelines for PAH contaminants in SHD, guidelines for PAHs in residential soils, a comparable particulate matrix, do exist. The 2003 Canadian Environmental Quality Guideline for benzo[a]pyrene in residential soil is 0.7 µg g−1 (ppm) (52). More than half of the SHD samples examined in this study contained concentrations above this value. The Environmental Quality Guideline for benzo[b]fluoranthene in residential soils is 1 µg g−1. The geometric mean value for benzo[b]fluoranthene in SHD was 2 µg g−1, and the maximum value was 54 µg g−1. Similarly, other PAHs were also observed to exceed Canadian Environmental Quality Guidelines for residential soils.

Empirical Relationships Between Dust PAH Content and Household Attributes

Empirical relationships between dust PAH content and the attributes of the homes from which the dust was collected (see Table 1, Supporting Information) were investigated. Previous studies have shown that PAH concentrations in the indoor environment are related to PAH source activities such as smoking (15, 24), cooking (13), fireplace and woodstove use (53, 54), and urban location (10). However, in the present analyses, no significant relationships were observed between dust PAH concentrations and the PAH sources identified in the homeowner survey. This was unexpected because an earlier review by our group, based on 132 observations from 18 publications (10), showed that both cigarette smoking and an urban home location were weakly but significantly related to PAH contamination of dust. The absence of empirical relationships in the present study may be the result of a relatively small sample size.
Relationships were also evaluated between PAH concentrations and other survey variables (i.e., not combustion related). Weak, but significant, negative relationships (r = −0.29 to −0.32, p < 0.05) were found between the concentrations of PAHs with four rings or more and the frequency of vacuuming. This finding suggests that the cleaning habits of the inhabitants in some way reduces the PAH concentration of the dust. It is possible that homeowners who vacuum more frequently do so because their homes are noticeably dustier. Dustier homes may contain more diluted PAH concentrations. Alternatively, vacuum frequency may be an indicator of general cleanliness, and “cleaner” residents may engage in activities that reduce the likelihood of PAH contamination in the indoor area (e.g., removal of shoes, more ventilation during PAH generating events).

Cancer Risk Assessment of PAHs in Settled House Dust

To assess the potential consequences associated with exposure to carcinogenic PAHs, a risk assessment was conducted using the concentration data for PAHs classified as probable human carcinogens (B2) by the U.S. EPA (31). Specifically, the risk assessment evaluated the excess lifetime cancer risk resulting from nondietary ingestion of carcinogenic PAHs in SHD during preschool years.
Figure 1 shows the levels of excess cancer risk plotted against the concentration of B2 PAHs found in each house dust sample. Risk curves are shown for low, medium, and high dust ingestion scenarios. The results indicate that exposure to carcinogenic PAHs at levels found in 90% of the sampled households (i.e., <40 µg g−1) results in excess cancer risks that are generally between 1 × 10−6 and 1 × 10−4. Five of the house dust samples contained levels of carcinogenic PAHs that were higher than 40 µg g−1. Examination of the household survey results for these homes did not reveal any distinguishing characteristics that could account for the higher PAH levels.

Figure 1

Figure 1. Excess cancer risks resulting from nondietary ingestion of B2 PAHs in SHD during preschool years. Three ingestion rates (IR) are considered. Arrow denotes the 90th percentile of the B2 PAH concentrations.

To interpret the outcome of the risk assessment, the results can be evaluated against “acceptable risk” levels. One cancer case per million people is commonly used as a baseline level of acceptable risk. However, depending on exposure scenarios, agencies assessing risk frequently build upon this level and adopt ranges of acceptable risk. When the risk assessment outcomes of the present study are compared to the Canadian maximum acceptable level of risk (i.e., 1 × 10−5) (55), the interpretation varies substantially according to ingestion rate. If the lowest ingestion rate is considered, only 5 homes (10%) contain PAH levels that result in unacceptable risk. If the middle ingestion rate is considered, 21 homes (41%) contain levels of carcinogenic PAHs (>8 µg g−1) resulting in unacceptable risk. Similarly, at the highest ingestion rate, 34 homes (67%) contain levels of carcinogenic PAHs (>4.2 µg g−1) resulting in unacceptable risk.
These results can be compared to a previously conducted assessment by Roberts et al. which also evaluated the lifetime cancer risks associated with the ingestion of PAHs in SHD (2). The exact number, type, and proportion of individual PAHs that made up the total PAH concentration in the Roberts et al. study are unknown; however, general comparisons can still be made with houses in the present study that had similar levels of total carcinogenic PAHs. The results in Table 3 show that the risk values calculated in the Roberts et al. study are consistently higher (approximately six times higher) than in the present study. The higher values may be partially accounted for by the use of a higher slope factor (i.e., 11.3 instead of 7.3).
Table 3. Comparisons of Levels of Excess Cancer Risk Resulting from the Nondietary Ingestion of PAHs in Settled House Dust
 ingestion rate = 0.05 g day−1ingestion rate = 0.1 g day−1
PAH concentrationRoberts et al.athis studyroberts et al.athis study
0.97 µg g−17.8 × 10−61.6 × 10−61.6 × 10−53.2 × 10−6
4.2 µg g−13.4 × 10−55.1 × 10−66.8 × 10−51.0 × 10−5
21 µg g−11.7 × 10−42.6 × 10−53.4 × 10−45.1 × 10−5
a

Values taken from ref 2.

The BaP slope factor employed for the risk assessment calculations in this study represents the risk of gastric cancer following dietary ingestion (56). Therefore, it is also useful to compare the excess lifetime risk values calculated in the present study with incidence and mortality rates of gastric cancer in Canada (Table 4).
Table 4. Comparison of Gastric Cancer Incidence and Mortality in Canada with Calculated Risk Estimates
statisticper 100 000
new cases of stomach cancer in Canada (2001 raw values)a12.8
  
age-adjusted incidence of stomach cancer in Canada (2001)a16.8
  
age-adjusted mortality from stomach cancer in Canada (2002)a11.0
  
excess risk at 50th percentile PAH concentration for 0.01 g day−1ingestion0.1
  
excess risk at 50th percentile PAH concentration for 0.05 g day−1ingestion0.7
  
excess risk at 50th percentile PAH concentration for 0.10 g day−1ingestion1.3
  
excess risk at maximum PAH concentration for 0.01 g day−1ingestion5.5
  
excess risk at maximum PAH concentration for 0.05 g day−1ingestion27.4
  
excess risk at maximum PAH concentration for 0.10 g day−1ingestion54.9
a

Cancer statistics from Canadian Cancer Society/National Cancer Institute of Canada (57). Values are totals that include both sexes. Values for total new cases is incidence per 100 000 adults 20 years or older. Population statistics from Statistics Canada (58).

The data show that exposures to SHD in houses where the PAH concentration is at the 50th percentile will result in essentially a negligible risk. However, the risk associated with the highest ingestion rate and the most contaminated sample is more than 3-fold greater than the age-adjusted incidence. Therefore, although excess risk of this magnitude would be relatively infrequent, concern is certainly justified.
As with all risk assessments, the calculation of risk involves a number of assumptions and uncertainties that have the potential to influence the outcome of the assessment. Future estimates of risk would benefit from more accurate, age-specific estimates of dust ingestion rates, including in relation to dust loading. In addition, since human exposure to compounds such as PAHs occurs in mixtures, additional information on the cumulative (geno)toxicity of compounds in real mixtures would provide a more accurate indication of actual risk.
This work, which characterized the PAH contamination of SHD, is part of a larger effort investigating the contamination, mutagenic activity and carcinogenic risk of SHD collected from homes in Ottawa, Canada. Specifically, this portion of the study assessed the levels of 13 priority PAHs, investigated empirical relationships between household attributes and PAH levels, and calculated the excess cancer risk posed by the detected carcinogenic PAHs to preschool children. Not surprisingly, the distribution of total PAH concentration was heavily skewed, and most (e.g., 90%) SHD samples contained less than 40 µg g−1. Moreover, the geometric mean PAH concentration (12.9 µg g−1) was in the same range as those described in other house dust studies (10). Empirical analyses failed to detect relationships between PAH concentration and combustion activity, and the source(s) of the detected PAHs remain unclear.
It should be noted that this study only investigated PAH contamination and excess risk posed by seven carcinogenic PAHs, and toxicity data is lacking on PAHs with higher molecular weights (i.e., larger than BaP). It is likely that SHD, a highly complex environmental matrix, contains dozens, perhaps even hundreds, of chemical contaminants that can contribute to the risk of adverse health effects. It would prove interesting to use a nontargeted approach to investigate the toxicological activity of chemical fractions derived from SHD. Moreover, a strategy such as effect-directed fractionation (59) could be employed to track and eventually identify toxic substances in highly complex environmental matrices such as SHD. In our companion paper (60), we use a nontargeted, bioassay-based approach to investigate the mutagenic activity of SHD extracts.

Supporting Information

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

Table containing additional details regarding the topics included in the Health Canada Indoor Air Study of November 2002−March 2003. Survey questions were abbreviated and include only those relevant to settled house dust. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Author Information

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

  • Corresponding Author
    • Paul A. White - Safe Environments Programme, Healthy Environments and Consumer Safety Branch, Health Canada, Tunney’s Pasture 0803A, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1A 0K9
  • Authors
    • Rebecca M. Maertens - Safe Environments Programme, Healthy Environments and Consumer Safety Branch, Health Canada, Tunney’s Pasture 0803A, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1A 0K9
    • Xiaofeng Yang - Safe Environments Programme, Healthy Environments and Consumer Safety Branch, Health Canada, Tunney’s Pasture 0803A, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1A 0K9
    • Jiping Zhu - Safe Environments Programme, Healthy Environments and Consumer Safety Branch, Health Canada, Tunney’s Pasture 0803A, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1A 0K9
    • Rémi W. Gagne - Safe Environments Programme, Healthy Environments and Consumer Safety Branch, Health Canada, Tunney’s Pasture 0803A, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1A 0K9
    • George R. Douglas - Safe Environments Programme, Healthy Environments and Consumer Safety Branch, Health Canada, Tunney’s Pasture 0803A, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1A 0K9

Acknowledgment

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

Funding for this work was provided under the Canadian Regulatory Strategy for Biotechnology and the Canadian Environmental Protection Act. We are grateful to Jennifer Bailey for technical assistance in dust preparation, Ron Newhook and Leonora Marro for questionnaire design and house selection, and Peter Bothwell, Ed Sieradzinski, and Yong-lai Feng for field work. We would also like to thank Guosheng Chen and Rocio Aranda-Rodriguez for valuable comments and criticisms.

References

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

This article references 60 other publications.

  1. 1
    EPA Indoor Air Quality Implementation Plan; EPA/600/8-87/031; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, 1987.
  2. 2
    Roberts, J. W.; Budd, W. T.; Ruby, M. G.; Camann, D.; Fortmann, R. C.; Lewis, R. G.; Wallace, L. A.; Spittler, T. M. Human exposure to pollutants in the floor dust of homes and offices J. Exposure Anal. Environ. Epidemiol. 1992, 2, 127 146
  3. 3
    Butte, W.; Heinzow, B. Pollutants in house dust as indicators of indoor contamination Rev. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2002, 175, 1 46
  4. 4
    Lioy, P. J.; Freeman, N. C.; Millette, J. R. Dust: A metric for use in residential and building exposure assessment and source characterization Environ. Health Perspect. 2002, 110, 969 983
  5. 5
    Consuming Chemicals: Hazardous Chemicals in House Dust as an Indicator of Chemical Exposure in the Home; Greenpeace Research Laboratories: Exeter, U.K., 2003.
  6. 6
    Rudel, R. A.; Camann, D. E.; Spengler, J. D.; Korn, L. R.; Brody, J. G. Phthalates, alkylphenols, pesticides, polybrominated diphenyl ethers, and other endocrine-disrupting compounds in indoor air and dust Environ. Sci. Technol. 2003, 37, 4543 4553
  7. 7
    Rasmussen, P. E.; Subramanian, K. S.; Jessiman, B. J. A multi-element profile of housedust in relation to exterior dust and soils in the city of Ottawa, Canada Sci. Total Environ. 2001, 267, 125 140
  8. 8
    Wilford, B. H.; Shoeib, M.; Harner, T.; Zhu, J.; Jones, K. C. Polybrominated diphenyl ethers in indoor dust in Ottawa, Canada: implications for sources and exposure Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005, 39, 7027 7035
  9. 9
    Exposure Guidelines for Residential Indoor Air Quality: A Report of the Federal-Provincial Advisory Committee on Environmental and Occupational Health; Health Canada: Ottawa, Canada, 1989.
  10. 10
    Maertens, R. M.; Bailey, J.; White, P. A. The mutagenic hazards of settled house dust: A review Mutat. Res. 2004, 567, 401 425
  11. 11
    Polynuclear Aromatic Compounds, Part 1, Chemical, Environmental and Experimental Data; IARC Monographs on the Evaluations of the Carcinogenic Risk of Chemicals to Humans; IARC: Lyon, France, 1983.
  12. 12
    Koo, L. C.; Matsushita, H.; Ho, J. H. C.; Wong, M. C.; Shimizu, H.; Mori, T.; Matsuki, H.; Tominaga, S. Carcinogens in the indoor air of Hong Kong homes: Levels, sources, and ventilation effects on 7 polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons Environ. Technol. 1994, 15, 401 418
  13. 13
    Zhu, L.; Wang, J. Sources and patterns of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons pollution in kitchen air, China Chemosphere 2003, 50, 611 618
  14. 14
    Moriske, H. J.; Drews, M.; Ebert, G.; Menk, G.; Scheller, C.; Schondube, M.; Konieczny, L. Indoor air pollution by different heating systems: Coal burning, open fireplace and central heating Toxicol. Lett. 1996, 88, 349 354
  15. 15
    Mitra, S.; Ray, B. Patterns and sources of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and their derivatives in indoor air Atmos. Environ. 1995, 29, 3345 3356
  16. 16
    Rogge, W. F.; Hildemann, L. M.; Mazurek, M. A.; Cass, G. R. Sources of fine organic aerosol. Pine, oak, and synthetic log combustion in residential fireplaces Environ. Sci. Technol. 1998, 32, 13 22
  17. 17
    Lau, C.; Fiedler, H.; Hutzinger, O.; Schwind, K. H.; Hosseinpour, J. Levels of selected organic compounds in materials for candle production and human exposure to candle emissions Chemosphere 1997, 34, 1623 1630
  18. 18
    Lung, S. C.; Hu, S. Generation rates and emission factors of particulate matter and particle-bound polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons of incense sticks Chemosphere 2003, 50, 673 679
  19. 19
    Dubowsky, S. D.; Wallace, L. A.; Buckley, T. J. The contribution of traffic to indoor concentrations of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons J. Exposure Anal. Environ. Epidemiol. 1999, 9, 312 321
  20. 20
    Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons; Priority Substances List Assessment Report; Environment Canada, Health Canada: Ottawa, Canada, 1994.
  21. 21
    Lewis, R. G.; Fortmann, R. C.; Camann, D. Evaluation of methods for monitoring the exposure of small children to pesticides in the residential environment Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 1994, 26, 37 46
  22. 22
    Wilson, N. K.; Chuang, J.; Lyu, C.; Menton, R. G.; Morgan, M. K. Aggregate exposures of nine preschool children to persistent organic pollutants at day care and at home J. Exposure Anal. Environ. Epidemiol. 2003, 13, 187 202
  23. 23
    Wilson, N. K.; Chuang, J. C.; Lyu, C. Levels of persistent organic pollutants in several child day care centers J. Exposure Anal. Environ. Epidemiol. 2001, 11, 449 458
  24. 24
    Chuang, J. C.; Callahan, P. J.; Lyu, C. W.; Wilson, N. K. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon exposures of children in low-income families J. Exposure Anal. Environ. Epidemiol. 1999, 9, 85 98
  25. 25
    Roberts, J. W.; Budd, W. T.; Ruby, M. G.; Bond, A. E.; Lewis, R. G.; Wiener, W.; Camann, D. Development and field testing of a high volume sampler for pesticides and toxics in dust J. Exposure Anal. Environ. Epidemiol. 1991, 1, 143 155
  26. 26
    IPCS. Principles for Evaluating Health Risks from Chemicals during Infancy and Early Childhood: The Need for a Special Approach; United Nations Environment Programme, International Labour Organisation, World Health Organization: Geneva, 1986.
  27. 27
    Zhu, J.; Newhook, R.; Marro, L.; Chan, C. C. Selected volatile organic compounds in residential air in the city of Ottawa, Canada Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005, 39, 3964 71
  28. 28
    Method 3640a, Gel Permeation Cleanup. Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste. Laboratory Manual of Physical/Chemical Methods, 3rd ed.; Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, 1986; Vol. 1B.
  29. 29
    Agilent Technologies. MSD Productivity ChemStation,

    revision D.00.00;

    Microsoft: Redmond, WA, 2001.
  30. 30
    Masters, G. Introduction to Environmental Engineering and Science; Prentice Hall Inc.: Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1991; p 460.
  31. 31
    U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Integrated Risk Information System, http://www.epa.gov/iriswebp/iris/.
  32. 32
    Collins, J. F.; Brown, J. P.; Alexeeff, G. V.; Salmon, A. G. Potency equivalency factors for some polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon derivatives Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 1998, 28, 45 54
  33. 33
    Nisbet, I. C.; LaGoy, P. K. Toxic equivalency factors (TEFs) for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 1992, 16, 290 300
  34. 34
    Hawley, J. K. Assessment of health risk from exposure to contaminated soil Risk Anal. 1985, 5, 289 302
  35. 35
    Calabrese, E. J.; Barnes, R.; Stanek III, E. J.; Pastides, H.; Gilbert, C. E.; Veneman, P.; Wang, X.; Lasztity, A.; Kostecki, P. T. How much soil do young children ingest: An epidemiologic study Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 1989, 10, 123 137
  36. 36
    Calabrese, E. J.

    Presented at the Environmental and Occupational Toxicology Division of Health Canada, March 24

    , 2005.
  37. 37
    Child Specific Exposure Factors Handbook;

     EPA-6000-P-00-002B;

    National Center for Environmental Assessment, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, D.C., 2002.
  38. 38
    Exposure Factors Handbook;

     EPA/600/P-95/002Fa;

    National Center for Environmental Assessment, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, D.C., 1997.
  39. 39
    Iglowstein, I.; Jenni, O. G.; Molinari, L.; Largo, R. H. Sleep duration from infancy to adolescence: reference values and generational trends Pediatrics 2003, 111, 302 307
  40. 40
    Investigating Human Exposure to Contaminants in the Environment: A Handbook for Exposure Calculations. Health Protection Branch, Health Canada: Ottawa, Canada, 1995.
  41. 41
    Guidelines for Carcinogen Risk Assessment;

     EPA/630/P-03/001B;

    U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, D.C., 2005.
  42. 42
    Supplemental Guidance For Assessing Cancer Susceptibility From Early-Life Exposure to Carcinogens;

     EPA/630/R-03/003F;

    Risk Assessment Forum, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, D.C., 2005.
  43. 43
    The SAS System for Windows, release 8.02; SAS Institute: Cary, NC, 2001.
  44. 44
    Neter, J.; Wasserman, W.; Kuner, M. H. Applied Linear Statistical Models. Regression, Analysis of Variance, and Experimental Designs; Richard D. Irwin, Inc.: Boston, MA, 1990.
  45. 45
    Harvey, R. G. Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons: Chemistry and Carcinogenicity; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, U.K., 1991.
  46. 46
    Chuang, J. C.; Chou, Y. L.; Nishioka, M.; Andrews, K.; Pollard, M.; Menton, R. Field Evaluation of Screening Techniques for Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons, 2,4-Diphenoxyacetic Acid, and Pentachlorophenol in Air, House Dust, Soil, and Total Diet;

     EPA/600/R-97/109;

    U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Columbus, OH, 1997.
  47. 47
    Chuang, J. C.; Callahan, P. J.; Menton, R. G.; Gordon, S. M.; Lewis, R. G.; Wilson, N. K. Monitoring methods for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and their distribution in house dust and track-in soil Environ. Sci. Technol. 1995, 29, 494 500
  48. 48
    Simrock, S. Polyzyklische aromatische Kohlenwasserstoffe im Hausstaub von Privathaushalten (Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) in house dust from private homes) Umweltmed 1998, 6, 243 246
  49. 49
    Lewis, R. G.; Fortune, C. R.; Willis, R. D.; Camann, D. E.; Antley, J. T. Distribution of pesticides and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in house dust as a function of particle size Environ. Health Perspect. 1999, 107, 721 726
  50. 50
    Chuang, J. C. Analysis of Soil and House Dust for Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons;

     EPA/600/SR-96/060;

    U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Cincinnati, OH, 1996.
  51. 51
    Heudorf, U.; Angerer, J. Internal exposure to PAHs of children and adults living in homes with parquet flooring containing high levels of PAHs in the parquet glue Int. Arch. Occ. Env. Health 2001, 74, 91 101
  52. 52
    Summary of Existing Canadian Environmental Quality Guidelines; Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment: Winnipeg, Canada, 2003.
  53. 53
    Alfheim, I.; Ramdahl, T. Contribution of wood combustion to indoor air pollution as measured by mutagenicity in Salmonella and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon concentration Environ. Mutagen. 1984, 6, 121 30
  54. 54
    Daisey, J. M.; Spengler, J. D.; Kaarakka, P. A comparison of the organic chemical composition of indoor aerosols during woodburning and non-woodburning periods Environ. Int. 1989, 15, 435 442
  55. 55
    Health Canada. Federal Contaminated Site Risk Assessment in Canada. Part 1: Guidance on Human Health Preliminary Quantitative Risk Assessment (PQRA);

     Environmental Health Assessment Services, Safe Environments Programme, Health Canada:

    Ottawa, Canada, 2004.
  56. 56
    Dose-Response Analysis of Ingested Benzo[a]pyrene (CAS No. 50-32-8);

     EPA/600/R-92/045; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency:

    Washington, DC, 1991.
  57. 57
    Canadian Cancer Statistics 2006;

     Canadian Cancer Society/National Cancer Institute of Canada:

    Toronto, Canada, 2006.
  58. 58

    Statistics Canada, Population and Dwelling Counts, for Canada, Provinces and Territories

    , 2001, and 1996 Censuses—100% Data, www12.statcan.ca/english/census01/products/standard/popdwell/tables.cfm.
  59. 59
    Grote, M.; Brack, W.; Altenburger, R. Identification of toxicants from marine sediment using effect-directed analysis Environ Toxicol 2005, 20, 475 86
  60. 60
    Maertens, R. M.; Zhu, J.; Gagné, R.; Douglas, G. R.; White, P. A. Mutagenic and carcinogenic hazards of settled house dust II: Salmonella Mutagenicity. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42, 17541760.

Cited By

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

This article is cited by 128 publications.

  1. Steven Kutarna, Song Tang, Xiaojian Hu, Hui Peng. Enhanced Nontarget Screening Algorithm Reveals Highly Abundant Chlorinated Azo Dye Compounds in House Dust. Environmental Science & Technology 2021, 55 (8) , 4729-4739. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c06382
  2. Ivan A. Titaley, Anna Chlebowski, Lisa Truong, Robert L. Tanguay, and Staci L. Massey Simonich . Identification and Toxicological Evaluation of Unsubstituted PAHs and Novel PAH Derivatives in Pavement Sealcoat Products. Environmental Science & Technology Letters 2016, 3 (6) , 234-242. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.6b00116
  3. E. Spencer Williams, Barbara J. Mahler, and Peter C. Van Metre . Cancer Risk from Incidental Ingestion Exposures to PAHs Associated with Coal-Tar-Sealed Pavement. Environmental Science & Technology 2013, 47 (2) , 1101-1109. https://doi.org/10.1021/es303371t
  4. Eunha Hoh, Richard N. Hunt, Penelope J. E. Quintana, Joy M. Zakarian, Dale A. Chatfield, Beth C. Wittry, Edgar Rodriguez, and Georg E. Matt . Environmental Tobacco Smoke as a Source of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Settled Household Dust. Environmental Science & Technology 2012, 46 (7) , 4174-4183. https://doi.org/10.1021/es300267g
  5. Fabien Mercier, Philippe Glorennec, Olivier Thomas, and Barbara Le Bot . Organic Contamination of Settled House Dust, A Review for Exposure Assessment Purposes. Environmental Science & Technology 2011, 45 (16) , 6716-6727. https://doi.org/10.1021/es200925h
  6. Barbara J. Mahler, Peter C. Van Metre, Jennifer T. Wilson and MaryLynn Musgrove, Teresa L. Burbank, Thomas E. Ennis, Thomas J. Bashara. Coal-Tar-Based Parking Lot Sealcoat: An Unrecognized Source of PAH to Settled House Dust. Environmental Science & Technology 2010, 44 (3) , 894-900. https://doi.org/10.1021/es902533r
  7. Rebecca M. Maertens, Rémi W. Gagné, George R. Douglas, Jiping Zhu and Paul A. White. Mutagenic and Carcinogenic Hazards of Settled House Dust II: Salmonella Mutagenicity. Environmental Science & Technology 2008, 42 (5) , 1754-1760. https://doi.org/10.1021/es702448x
  8. Rebecca Castel, Raquel Bertoldo, Stéphanie Lebarillier, Yves Noack, Thierry Orsière, Laure Malleret. Toward an interdisciplinary approach to assess the adverse health effects of dust-containing polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and metal(loid)s on preschool children. Environmental Pollution 2023, 336 , 122372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2023.122372
  9. Wenhui Zhang, Na Zheng, Sujing Wang, Siyu Sun, Qirui An, Xiaoqian Li, Zimeng Li, Yining Ji, Yunyang Li, Jiamin Pan. Characteristics and health risks of population exposure to phthalates via the use of face towels. Journal of Environmental Sciences 2023, 130 , 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2022.10.016
  10. Baolin Liu, Xin Yu, Linyang Lv, Weihua Dong, Lina Chen, Wenling Wu, Yong Yu. A nationwide survey of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in household dust in China: spatial distribution, sources, and health risk assessment. Environmental Geochemistry and Health 2023, 45 (7) , 4979-4993. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-023-01563-2
  11. Alireza Ghadrshenas, Tayebeh Tabatabaie, Fazel Amiri, Abdul Rahim Pazira. Spatial distribution, sources identification, and health risk assessment polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon compounds and polychlorinated biphenyl compounds in total suspended particulates (TSP) in the air of South Pars Industrial region-Iran. Environmental Geochemistry and Health 2023, 45 (5) , 1635-1653. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-022-01286-w
  12. Chun-Yan Huo, Wen-Long Li, Li-Yan Liu, Yu Sun, Jia-Qi Guo, Liang Wang, Hayley Hung, Yi-Fan Li. Seasonal variations of airborne phthalates and novel non-phthalate plasticizers in a test residence in cold regions: Effects of temperature, humidity, total suspended particulate matter, and sources. Science of The Total Environment 2023, 863 , 160852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.160852
  13. Li Hua, Danyang Zhao, Huining Wang, Ting Wei. Residues and Bioavailability of Neonicotinoid Pesticide in Shaanxi Agricultural Soil. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution 2023, 234 (2) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-023-06159-1
  14. Hermann Fromme. Semi-volatile Organic Compounds (SVOC). 2023, 157-330. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-40078-0_4
  15. Xi Cui, Nuerla Ailijiang, Yusuyunjiang Mamitimin, Naifu Zhong, Wenhu Cheng, Nanxin Li, Qiongfang Zhang, Miao Pu. Pollution levels, sources and risk assessment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in farmland soil and crops near Urumqi Industrial Park, Xinjiang, China. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment 2023, 37 (1) , 361-374. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-022-02299-8
  16. Ioannis Sakellaris, Giannis Papadopoulos, Dikaia Saraga, Thalia Xenofontos, Evangelos Tolis, Giorgos Panaras, John Bartzis. Air Quality Versus Perceived Comfort and Health in Office Buildings at Western Macedonia Area, Greece during the Pandemic Period. Applied Sciences 2023, 13 (2) , 1137. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13021137
  17. Shuangde Li, Li Wang, Shanyue Guan, Shuyun Zhou, Yunfa Chen. In vitro and in vivo low-dose exposure of simulated cooking oil fumes to assess adverse biological effects. Scientific Reports 2022, 12 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-19558-x
  18. Salwa K. Hassan, Asmaa El-Mekawy, Mansour A. Alghamdi, Mamdouh I. Khoder. Insights into the house dust-bound polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and their potential human health risk in Greater Cairo, Egypt. Indoor and Built Environment 2022, 31 (9) , 2312-2330. https://doi.org/10.1177/1420326X221092130
  19. Rahul Kashyap. Vegetation stress as chief indicator for detection of hydrocarbon microseepage in regions of north-eastern India. Spatial Information Research 2022, 30 (5) , 571-584. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41324-022-00453-6
  20. Ying Liu, Yao Mao, Jun Xu, Wenmin Chen, Tianpeng Hu, Chengyan Xu, Weijie Liu, Chengkai Qu, Wei Chen, Jiaquan Zhang, Xinli Xing, Shihua Qi. Health Risks Associated with Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) in Dustfall Collected from Universities in Wuhan, China. Atmosphere 2022, 13 (10) , 1707. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13101707
  21. Ivana Jakovljević, Marija Dvoršćak, Karla Jagić, Darija Klinčić. Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Indoor Dust in Croatia: Levels, Sources, and Human Health Risks. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2022, 19 (19) , 11848. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191911848
  22. Mauricius Marques dos Santos, Megan Tan Pei Fei, Caixia Li, Shenglan Jia, Shane Allen Snyder. Cell-line and culture model specific responses to organic contaminants in house dust: Cell bioenergetics, oxidative stress, and inflammation endpoints. Environment International 2022, 167 , 107403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2022.107403
  23. Jelena Živančev, Igor Antić, Maja Buljovčić, Nataša Đurišić-Mladenović. A case study on the occurrence of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in indoor dust of Serbian households: Distribution, source apportionment and health risk assessment. Chemosphere 2022, 295 , 133856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.133856
  24. Michail Pachoulis, Thomas Maggos, Panagiotis Panagopoulos, Maria Dasopoulou, Dimitra Balla, Asimina Stamatelopoulou, Manousos Ioannis Manousakas, Konstantinos Eleftheriadis, Dikaia Saraga. Population Health Risks Assessment from Air Pollution Exposure in an Industrialized Residential Area in Greece. Atmosphere 2022, 13 (4) , 615. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13040615
  25. Qi Huang, Tong Zhao, Anan Qi, Hongliang Gao, Wan Zhang, Shengfei Duan, Pengcheng Wang, Yiming Wang, Xiongfei Zhang, Wenxing Wang, Lingxiao Yang. Comparison of indoor and outdoor polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from multiple urban residences in Northern China: Coastal versus inland area. Building and Environment 2022, 212 , 108800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.108800
  26. Yuchao Wan, Michelle L. North, Garthika Navaranjan, Anne K. Ellis, Jeffrey A. Siegel, Miriam L. Diamond. Indoor exposure to phthalates and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) to Canadian children: the Kingston allergy birth cohort. Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology 2022, 32 (1) , 69-81. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41370-021-00310-y
  27. Jamiu Adetayo Adeniran, Maimuna Orire Abdulraheem, Hafsat Abolore Ameen, Emmanuel Toluwalope Odediran, Muhammad-Najeeb O. Yusuf. Source identification and health risk assessments of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in settled dusts from different population density areas of Ilorin, Nigeria. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 2021, 193 (12) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-021-09566-1
  28. Athanasios Besis, Elisavet Botsaropoulou, Dimitra Balla, Dimitra Voutsa, Constantini Samara. Toxic organic pollutants in Greek house dust: Implications for human exposure and health risk. Chemosphere 2021, 284 , 131318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131318
  29. B. Basaran, M. Yılmaz Civan. Investigating of primary components and source apportionment of persistent organic pollutants of indoor dust. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology 2021, 18 (8) , 2145-2160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-020-02973-w
  30. Hua Zhang, Kui Shen, Ruan Wu, Zhiyong Li, Xiao Wang, Desheng Wang, Meixiao Zhan, Weiguo Xu, Yunfei Gao, Ligong Lu. Occurrence and distribution of neonicotinoids and characteristic metabolites in paired urine and indoor dust from young adults: Implications for human exposure. Environmental Research 2021, 199 , 111175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2021.111175
  31. Kenta Matsumura, Kei Hamazaki, Akiko Tsuchida, Hidekuni Inadera, . House Dust Avoidance during Pregnancy and Subsequent Infant Development: The Japan Environment and Children’s Study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2021, 18 (8) , 4277. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18084277
  32. Sultan Hassan Alamri, Nadeem Ali, Hussain Mohammed Salem Ali Albar, Muhammad Imtiaz Rashid, Nisreen Rajeh, Majdy Mohammed Ali Qutub, Govindan Malarvannan. Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Indoor Dust Collected during the COVID-19 Pandemic Lockdown in Saudi Arabia: Status, Sources and Human Health Risks. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2021, 18 (5) , 2743. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18052743
  33. Hwanmi Lim, Ioannis Sadiktsis, Marcos Felipe de Oliveira Galvão, Roger Westerholm, Kristian Dreij. Polycyclic aromatic compounds in particulate matter and indoor dust at preschools in Stockholm, Sweden: Occurrence, sources and genotoxic potential in vitro. Science of The Total Environment 2021, 755 , 142709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142709
  34. A. Stamatelopoulou, M. Dasopoulou, K. Bairachtari, S. Karavoltsos, A. Sakellari, T. Maggos. Contamination and Potential Risk Assessment of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) and Heavy Metals in House Settled Dust Collected from Residences of Young Children. Applied Sciences 2021, 11 (4) , 1479. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11041479
  35. Rongguang Shi, Xiaohua Li, Yanying Yang, Ying Fan, Zongshan Zhao. Contamination and human health risks of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in surface soils from Tianjin coastal new region, China. Environmental Pollution 2021, 268 , 115938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115938
  36. Shanti Priya Ghosh, Deep Raj, Subodh Kumar Maiti. Risks Assessment of Heavy Metal Pollution in Roadside Soil and Vegetation of National Highway Crossing through Industrial Area. Environmental Processes 2020, 7 (4) , 1197-1220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40710-020-00463-2
  37. Bo Li, Li-Xin Ma, Shao-Jing Sun, Samit Thapa, Lu Lu, Kun Wang, Hong Qi. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and their nitro-derivatives in urban road dust across China: Spatial variation, source apportionment, and health risk. Science of The Total Environment 2020, 747 , 141194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141194
  38. Meshari Al-Harbi, Ibrahim Alhajri, Joann K. Whalen. Health risks associated with the polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in indoor dust collected from houses in Kuwait. Environmental Pollution 2020, 266 , 115054. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115054
  39. Alireza Mahdavi, Jeffrey A. Siegel. Extraction of dust collected in HVAC filters for quantitative filter forensics. Aerosol Science and Technology 2020, 54 (11) , 1282-1292. https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2020.1774492
  40. Fufu Li, Shaohua Wu, Yuanmin Wang, Daohao Yan, Lefeng Qiu, Zhenci Xu. A new spatially explicit model of population risk level grid identification for children and adults to urban soil PAHs. Environmental Pollution 2020, 263 , 114547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114547
  41. Lochan Singh, Tripti Agarwal. Quantification of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in kitchen depositions by SUPRAS-LC-FLR and human health risk assessment. Environmental Research 2020, 187 , 109648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.109648
  42. M. Velázquez-Gómez, S. Lacorte. Organic pollutants in indoor dust from Ecuadorian Amazonia areas affected by oil extractivism. Environmental Research 2020, 186 , 109499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.109499
  43. Hua Zhang, Qiang Quan, Mingyue Zhang, Nan Zhang, Wu Zhang, Meixiao Zhan, Weiguo Xu, Ligong Lu, Jun Fan, Qian Wang. Occurrence of bisphenol A and its alternatives in paired urine and indoor dust from Chinese university students: Implications for human exposure. Chemosphere 2020, 247 , 125987. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.125987
  44. Taraneh Mihankhah, Mohsen Saeedi, Abdolreza Karbassi. Contamination and cancer risk assessment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in urban dust from different land-uses in the most populated city of Iran. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 2020, 187 , 109838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.109838
  45. Shahrokh Nazmara, Armin Sorooshian, Mahdieh Delikhoon, Abbas Norouzian Baghani, Qadir Ashournejad, Abdullah Barkhordari, Niloufar Basmehchi, Mahboobeh Kasraee. Characteristics and health risk assessment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons associated with dust in household evaporative coolers. Environmental Pollution 2020, 256 , 113379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113379
  46. E. D. Vicente, A. Vicente, T. Nunes, A. Calvo, C. del Blanco-Alegre, F. Oduber, A. Castro, R. Fraile, F. Amato, C. Alves. Household Dust: Loadings and PM10-Bound Plasticizers and Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons. Atmosphere 2019, 10 (12) , 785. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos10120785
  47. Behnam Abbasnejad, Behnam Keshavarzi, Zargham Mohammadi, Farid Moore, Ahmad Abbasnejad. Characteristics, distribution, source apportionment, and potential health risk assessment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in urban street dust of Kerman metropolis, Iran. International Journal of Environmental Health Research 2019, 29 (6) , 668-685. https://doi.org/10.1080/09603123.2019.1566523
  48. Junjie Ao, Tao Yuan, Hui Xia, Yuning Ma, Zhemin Shen, Rong Shi, Ying Tian, Jun Zhang, Wenjin Ding, Li Gao, Xiaodong Zhao, Xiaodan Yu. Characteristic and human exposure risk assessment of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances: A study based on indoor dust and drinking water in China. Environmental Pollution 2019, 254 , 112873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.07.041
  49. Mohamed M. Mahfouz, Hassan M. Hassan, Elnaiem A. Elobaid, Oguz Yigiterhan, Balint Alfoldy. PAH concentrations and exposure assessment from house dust retained in air-conditioning filters collected from Greater Doha, Qatar. Environmental Geochemistry and Health 2019, 41 (5) , 2251-2263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-019-00271-0
  50. Chukwujindu M. A. Iwegbue, Elo-Oghene C. Iteku-Atata, Eze W. Odali, Francis E. Egobueze, Godswill O. Tesi, Godwin E. Nwajei, Bice S. Martincigh. Distribution, Sources and Health Risks of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) in Household Dusts from Rural, Semi-urban and Urban Areas in the Niger Delta, Nigeria. Exposure and Health 2019, 11 (3) , 209-225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12403-018-0276-z
  51. Hai-Ling Li, Wan-Li Ma, Li-Yan Liu, Zhi Zhang, Ed Sverko, Zi-Feng Zhang, Wei-Wei Song, Yu Sun, Yi-Fan Li. Phthalates in infant cotton clothing: Occurrence and implications for human exposure. Science of The Total Environment 2019, 683 , 109-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.132
  52. Hai-Ling Li, Li-Yan Liu, Zi-Feng Zhang, Wan-Li Ma, Ed Sverko, Zhi Zhang, Wei-Wei Song, Yu Sun, Yi-Fan Li. Semi-volatile organic compounds in infant homes: Levels, influence factors, partitioning, and implications for human exposure. Environmental Pollution 2019, 251 , 609-618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.05.048
  53. Shouming Zhou, Brian C. H. Hwang, Pascale S. J. Lakey, Andreas Zuend, Jonathan P. D. Abbatt, Manabu Shiraiwa. Multiphase reactivity of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons is driven by phase separation and diffusion limitations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2019, 116 (24) , 11658-11663. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1902517116
  54. Navid Ghanavati, Ahad Nazarpour, Michael J. Watts. Status, source, ecological and health risk assessment of toxic metals and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in street dust of Abadan, Iran. CATENA 2019, 177 , 246-259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2019.02.022
  55. Hale Demirtepe, Lisa Melymuk, Miriam L. Diamond, Lola Bajard, Šimon Vojta, Roman Prokeš, Ondřej Sáňka, Jana Klánová, Ľubica Palkovičová Murínová, Denisa Richterová, Vladimíra Rašplová, Tomáš Trnovec. Linking past uses of legacy SVOCs with today's indoor levels and human exposure. Environment International 2019, 127 , 653-663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2019.04.001
  56. Zhiguo Cao, Mengmeng Wang, Qiaoying Chen, Chunyou Zhu, Janye Jie, Xiaoxiao Li, Xiayan Dong, Zheng Miao, Mohai Shen, Qingwei Bu. Spatial, seasonal and particle size dependent variations of PAH contamination in indoor dust and the corresponding human health risk. Science of The Total Environment 2019, 653 , 423-430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.413
  57. Lukas Kohl, Meng Meng, Joan de Vera, Bridget Bergquist, Colin A. Cooke, Sarah Hustins, Brian Jackson, Chung‐Wai Chow, Arthur W. H. Chan. Limited Retention of Wildfire‐Derived PAHs and Trace Elements in Indoor Environments. Geophysical Research Letters 2019, 46 (1) , 383-391. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL080473
  58. Chukwujindu M.A. Iwegbue, Grace Obi, Stephen A. Uzoekwe, Francis E. Egobueze, Eze W. Odali, Godswill O. Tesi, Godwin E. Nwajei, Bice S. Martincigh. Distribution, sources and risk of exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in indoor dusts from electronic repair workshops in southern Nigeria. Emerging Contaminants 2019, 5 , 23-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emcon.2018.12.003
  59. M. Velázquez-Gómez, E. Hurtado-Fernández, S. Lacorte. Differential occurrence, profiles and uptake of dust contaminants in the Barcelona urban area. Science of The Total Environment 2019, 648 , 1354-1370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.058
  60. Yankun Liu, Yingpeng Yu, Min Liu, Min Lu, Rongrong Ge, Shuwen Li, Xinran Liu, Wenbo Dong, Abdul Qadeer. Characterization and source identification of PM2.5-bound polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in different seasons from Shanghai, China. Science of The Total Environment 2018, 644 , 725-735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.049
  61. Yuan Kang, Diya Zeng, Yu Bon Man, Jing Liu, Yang Yang, Shuwei Li, Kaiqiao Situ, Wei Xiong, Lixuan Zeng, Qiuyun Zhang, Jiwen Luo, Weijian Pan, Feng Jiang, Ming Hung Wong. Comparison of sorption kinetics of PAHs by sorptive sinks and caco-2 cell and the correlation between bioaccessibility and bioavailability of PAHs in indoor dust. Science of The Total Environment 2018, 645 , 170-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.102
  62. Hyung-Gue Park, Na-Young Ha, Dae Hwan Kim, Jeong-Ho Kim, Chae-Kwan Lee, Kunhyung Kim, Ji Young Ryu. Relationship between residence characteristics and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon exposure in housewives: second Korean National Environmental Health Survey (2012–2014). Annals of Occupational and Environmental Medicine 2018, 30 (1) https://doi.org/10.1186/s40557-018-0236-x
  63. Behnam Keshavarzi, Sajjad Abbasi, Farid Moore, Soheila Mehravar, Armin Sorooshian, Naghmeh Soltani, Ali Najmeddin. Contamination Level, Source Identification and Risk Assessment of Potentially Toxic Elements (PTEs) and Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) in Street Dust of an Important Commercial Center in Iran. Environmental Management 2018, 62 (4) , 803-818. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-018-1079-5
  64. Karen Arnold, João Paulo Teixeira, Ana Mendes, Joana Madureira, Solange Costa, Amina Salamova. A pilot study on semivolatile organic compounds in senior care facilities: Implications for older adult exposures. Environmental Pollution 2018, 240 , 908-915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.05.017
  65. Huanyu Bao, Shaowei Hou, Hao Niu, Kai Tian, Xueping Liu, Fuyong Wu. Status, sources, and risk assessment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in urban soils of Xi’an, China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 2018, 25 (19) , 18947-18959. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-1928-z
  66. Yanan Chen, Jiquan Zhang, Feng Zhang, Xingpeng Liu, Mo Zhou. Contamination and health risk assessment of PAHs in farmland soils of the Yinma River Basin, China. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 2018, 156 , 383-390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.03.020
  67. Michele Fabri de Resende, Taila Figueredo Brasil, Beata Emoke Madari, Annibal Duarte Pereira Netto, Etelvino Henrique Novotny. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in biochar amended soils: Long-term experiments in Brazilian tropical areas. Chemosphere 2018, 200 , 641-648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.02.139
  68. Manash Gope, Reginald Ebhin Masto, Joshy George, Srinivasan Balachandran. Exposure and cancer risk assessment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in the street dust of Asansol city, India. Sustainable Cities and Society 2018, 38 , 616-626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.01.006
  69. Kai Tian, Huanyu Bao, Xuechen Zhang, Taoran Shi, Xueping Liu, Fuyong Wu. Residuals, bioaccessibility and health risk assessment of PAHs in winter wheat grains from areas influenced by coal combustion in China. Science of The Total Environment 2018, 618 , 777-784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.174
  70. Ishwar Chandra Yadav, Ningombam Linthoingambi Devi, Jun Li, Gan Zhang. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in house dust and surface soil in major urban regions of Nepal: Implication on source apportionment and toxicological effect. Science of The Total Environment 2018, 616-617 , 223-235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.313
  71. Sophie Plumejeaud, Amelia Paula Reis, Virginie Tassistro, Carla Patinha, Yves Noack, Thierry Orsière. Potentially harmful elements in house dust from Estarreja, Portugal: characterization and genotoxicity of the bioaccessible fraction. Environmental Geochemistry and Health 2018, 40 (1) , 127-144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-016-9888-z
  72. Gary L. Ginsberg, Giuliana Belleggia. Use of Monte Carlo analysis in a risk-based prioritization of toxic constituents in house dust. Environment International 2017, 109 , 101-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2017.06.009
  73. Junjie Ao, Tao Yuan, Yuning Ma, Li Gao, Ni Ni, Dan Li. Identification, characteristics and human exposure assessments of triclosan, bisphenol-A, and four commonly used organic UV filters in indoor dust collected from Shanghai, China. Chemosphere 2017, 184 , 575-583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.06.033
  74. Jin Zhang, Junwei Wu, Pei Hua, Zhonghua Zhao, Lei Wu, Gongduan Fan, Yun Bai, Thomas Kaeseberg, Peter Krebs. The influence of land use on source apportionment and risk assessment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in road-deposited sediment. Environmental Pollution 2017, 229 , 705-714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.07.019
  75. Siwatt Pongpiachan, Mattanawadee Hattayanone, Oramas Suttinun, Chukkapong Khumsup, Itthipon Kittikoon, Phoosak Hirunyatrakul, Junji Cao. Assessing human exposure to PM 10 -bound polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons during fireworks displays. Atmospheric Pollution Research 2017, 8 (5) , 816-827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2017.01.014
  76. Yanhong Liu, Yingqin Wu, Yanqing Xia, Tianzhu Lei, Chuntao Tian, Xiaohuan Hou. Aliphatic and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in soils of the northwest Qinling Mountains: Patterns, potential risk and an appraisal of the PAH ratios to infer their source. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A 2017, 52 (4) , 320-332. https://doi.org/10.1080/10934529.2016.1258865
  77. Yingxia Li, Ningning Song, Yang Yu, Zhifeng Yang, Zhenyao Shen. Characteristics of PAHs in street dust of Beijing and the annual wash-off load using an improved load calculation method. Science of The Total Environment 2017, 581-582 , 328-336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.12.133
  78. Zucheng Wang, Shengzhong Wang, Jiaqin Nie, Yuanhong Wang, Yuyan Liu. Assessment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in indoor dust from varying categories of rooms in Changchun city, northeast China. Environmental Geochemistry and Health 2017, 39 (1) , 15-27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-016-9802-8
  79. Jian Wang, Xiaofang Zhang, Wanting Ling, Rui Liu, Juan Liu, Fuxing Kang, Yanzheng Gao. Contamination and health risk assessment of PAHs in soils and crops in industrial areas of the Yangtze River Delta region, China. Chemosphere 2017, 168 , 976-987. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.10.113
  80. Shouming Zhou, Leo W. Y. Yeung, Matthew W. Forbes, Scott Mabury, Jonathan P. D. Abbatt. Epoxide formation from heterogeneous oxidation of benzo[a]pyrene with gas-phase ozone and indoor air. Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts 2017, 19 (10) , 1292-1299. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7EM00181A
  81. Mihriban Yılmaz Civan, U. Merve Kara. Risk assessment of PBDEs and PAHs in house dust in Kocaeli, Turkey: levels and sources. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 2016, 23 (23) , 23369-23384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-7512-5
  82. Aarif H. El-Mubarak, Ahmed I. Rushdi, Khalid F. Al-Mutlaq, Falah Z. Al Mdawi, Khalid Al-Hazmi, Ramil S. Dumenden, Rex A. Pascua. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and trace metals in mosque’s carpet dust of Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, and their health risk implications. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 2016, 23 (21) , 21273-21287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-7299-4
  83. Ata Shakeri, Maryam Madadi, Behzad Mehrabi. Health risk assessment and source apportionment of PAHs in industrial and bitumen contaminated soils of Kermanshah province; NW Iran. Toxicology and Environmental Health Sciences 2016, 8 (3) , 201-212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13530-016-0277-x
  84. Matthew J. Jenny, William C. Walton, Samantha L. Payton, John M. Powers, Robert H. Findlay, Britton O'Shields, Kirsten Diggins, Mark Pinkerton, Danielle Porter, Daniel M. Crane, Jeffrey Tapley, Charles Cunningham. Transcriptomic evaluation of the American oyster, Crassostrea virginica, deployed during the Deepwater Horizon oil spill: Evidence of an active hydrocarbon response pathway. Marine Environmental Research 2016, 120 , 166-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2016.08.006
  85. Lijun Wang, Li Wang, Wendong Tao, Richard C. Smardon, Xingmin Shi, Xinwei Lu. Characteristics, sources, and health risk of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in urban surface dust: a case study of the city of Xi’an in Northwest China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 2016, 23 (13) , 13389-13402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-6528-1
  86. Xin-Yi Cui, Ping Xiang, Rui-Wen He, Albert Juhasz, Lena Q. Ma. Advances in in vitro methods to evaluate oral bioaccessibility of PAHs and PBDEs in environmental matrices. Chemosphere 2016, 150 , 378-389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.02.041
  87. Dharmendra Kumar Singh, Tarun Gupta. Effect through inhalation on human health of PM 1 bound polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons collected from foggy days in northern part of India. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2016, 306 , 257-268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.11.049
  88. Yunjiang Yu, Qiong Wang, Liangzhong Li, Zien Liu, Peng Sun, Yanping Zhang, Haipeng Lin, Mingdeng Xiang, Hui Li, Bigui Lin. Particle-Associated Ambient Benzo[a]pyrene and Levels of Urinary 1-Hydroxypyrene in a Non-occupationally Exposed Population of Adults and Children in Lanzhou, China. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 2016, 96 (3) , 303-308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-016-1741-7
  89. Mohamed F. Yassin, Nawaf S. Alhajeri, Mohamed A. Kassem. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons collected from indoor built environments on heating, ventilation and air conditioning dust filters. Indoor and Built Environment 2016, 25 (1) , 137-150. https://doi.org/10.1177/1420326X14541557
  90. Atif Kamal, Alessandra Cincinelli, Tania Martellini, Ilaria Palchetti, Francesca Bettazzi, Riffat Naseem Malik. Health and carcinogenic risk evaluation for cohorts exposed to PAHs in petrochemical workplaces in Rawalpindi city (Pakistan). International Journal of Environmental Health Research 2016, 26 (1) , 37-57. https://doi.org/10.1080/09603123.2015.1007843
  91. Curt T. DellaValle, Nicole C. Deziel, Rena R. Jones, Joanne S. Colt, Anneclaire J. De Roos, James R. Cerhan, Wendy Cozen, Richard K. Severson, Abigail R. Flory, Lindsay M. Morton, Mary H. Ward. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: determinants of residential carpet dust levels and risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Cancer Causes & Control 2016, 27 (1) , 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-015-0660-y
  92. Karina Caballero-Gallardo, Angelica Guerrero-Castilla, Boris Johnson-Restrepo, Jesus de la Rosa, Jesus Olivero-Verbel. Chemical and toxicological characterization of sediments along a Colombian shoreline impacted by coal export terminals. Chemosphere 2015, 138 , 837-846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.07.062
  93. Yuning Ma, Stuart Harrad. Spatiotemporal analysis and human exposure assessment on polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in indoor air, settled house dust, and diet: A review. Environment International 2015, 84 , 7-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2015.07.006
  94. Yuan Kang, Dingding Shao, Ning Li, Gelin Yang, Qiuyun Zhang, Lixuan Zeng, Jiwen Luo, Wenfeng Zhong. Cancer risk assessment of human exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) via indoor and outdoor dust based on probit model. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 2015, 22 (5) , 3451-3456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-3588-y
  95. Siwatt Pongpiachan, Danai Tipmanee, Chukkapong Khumsup, Itthipon Kittikoon, Phoosak Hirunyatrakul. Assessing risks to adults and preschool children posed by PM2.5-bound polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) during a biomass burning episode in Northern Thailand. Science of The Total Environment 2015, 508 , 435-444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.12.019
  96. Naghmeh Soltani, Behnam Keshavarzi, Farid Moore, Tahereh Tavakol, Ahmad Reza Lahijanzadeh, Nemat Jaafarzadeh, Maryam Kermani. Ecological and human health hazards of heavy metals and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in road dust of Isfahan metropolis, Iran. Science of The Total Environment 2015, 505 , 712-723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.09.097
  97. Graham M Irvine, Jules M Blais, James R Doyle, Linda E Kimpe, Paul A White. Cancer risk to First Nations’ people from exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons near in-situ bitumen extraction in Cold Lake, Alberta. Environmental Health 2014, 13 (1) https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-069X-13-7
  98. Hong Qi, Wen-Long Li, Ning-Zheng Zhu, Wan-Li Ma, Li-Yan Liu, Feng Zhang, Yi-Fan Li. Concentrations and sources of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in indoor dust in China. Science of The Total Environment 2014, 491-492 , 100-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.01.119
  99. Atif Kamal, Riffat Naseem Malik, Tania Martellini, Alessandra Cincinelli. Cancer risk evaluation of brick kiln workers exposed to dust bound PAHs in Punjab province (Pakistan). Science of The Total Environment 2014, 493 , 562-570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.05.140
  100. Yufeng Jiang, Xuefei Hu, Uwamungu J. Yves, Huiying Zhan, Yingqin Wu. Status, source and health risk assessment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in street dust of an industrial city, NW China. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 2014, 106 , 11-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2014.04.031
Load all citations
  • Figure 1

    Figure 1. Excess cancer risks resulting from nondietary ingestion of B2 PAHs in SHD during preschool years. Three ingestion rates (IR) are considered. Arrow denotes the 90th percentile of the B2 PAH concentrations.

  • References

    ARTICLE SECTIONS
    Jump To

    This article references 60 other publications.

    1. 1
      EPA Indoor Air Quality Implementation Plan; EPA/600/8-87/031; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, 1987.
    2. 2
      Roberts, J. W.; Budd, W. T.; Ruby, M. G.; Camann, D.; Fortmann, R. C.; Lewis, R. G.; Wallace, L. A.; Spittler, T. M. Human exposure to pollutants in the floor dust of homes and offices J. Exposure Anal. Environ. Epidemiol. 1992, 2, 127 146
    3. 3
      Butte, W.; Heinzow, B. Pollutants in house dust as indicators of indoor contamination Rev. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2002, 175, 1 46
    4. 4
      Lioy, P. J.; Freeman, N. C.; Millette, J. R. Dust: A metric for use in residential and building exposure assessment and source characterization Environ. Health Perspect. 2002, 110, 969 983
    5. 5
      Consuming Chemicals: Hazardous Chemicals in House Dust as an Indicator of Chemical Exposure in the Home; Greenpeace Research Laboratories: Exeter, U.K., 2003.
    6. 6
      Rudel, R. A.; Camann, D. E.; Spengler, J. D.; Korn, L. R.; Brody, J. G. Phthalates, alkylphenols, pesticides, polybrominated diphenyl ethers, and other endocrine-disrupting compounds in indoor air and dust Environ. Sci. Technol. 2003, 37, 4543 4553
    7. 7
      Rasmussen, P. E.; Subramanian, K. S.; Jessiman, B. J. A multi-element profile of housedust in relation to exterior dust and soils in the city of Ottawa, Canada Sci. Total Environ. 2001, 267, 125 140
    8. 8
      Wilford, B. H.; Shoeib, M.; Harner, T.; Zhu, J.; Jones, K. C. Polybrominated diphenyl ethers in indoor dust in Ottawa, Canada: implications for sources and exposure Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005, 39, 7027 7035
    9. 9
      Exposure Guidelines for Residential Indoor Air Quality: A Report of the Federal-Provincial Advisory Committee on Environmental and Occupational Health; Health Canada: Ottawa, Canada, 1989.
    10. 10
      Maertens, R. M.; Bailey, J.; White, P. A. The mutagenic hazards of settled house dust: A review Mutat. Res. 2004, 567, 401 425
    11. 11
      Polynuclear Aromatic Compounds, Part 1, Chemical, Environmental and Experimental Data; IARC Monographs on the Evaluations of the Carcinogenic Risk of Chemicals to Humans; IARC: Lyon, France, 1983.
    12. 12
      Koo, L. C.; Matsushita, H.; Ho, J. H. C.; Wong, M. C.; Shimizu, H.; Mori, T.; Matsuki, H.; Tominaga, S. Carcinogens in the indoor air of Hong Kong homes: Levels, sources, and ventilation effects on 7 polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons Environ. Technol. 1994, 15, 401 418
    13. 13
      Zhu, L.; Wang, J. Sources and patterns of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons pollution in kitchen air, China Chemosphere 2003, 50, 611 618
    14. 14
      Moriske, H. J.; Drews, M.; Ebert, G.; Menk, G.; Scheller, C.; Schondube, M.; Konieczny, L. Indoor air pollution by different heating systems: Coal burning, open fireplace and central heating Toxicol. Lett. 1996, 88, 349 354
    15. 15
      Mitra, S.; Ray, B. Patterns and sources of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and their derivatives in indoor air Atmos. Environ. 1995, 29, 3345 3356
    16. 16
      Rogge, W. F.; Hildemann, L. M.; Mazurek, M. A.; Cass, G. R. Sources of fine organic aerosol. Pine, oak, and synthetic log combustion in residential fireplaces Environ. Sci. Technol. 1998, 32, 13 22
    17. 17
      Lau, C.; Fiedler, H.; Hutzinger, O.; Schwind, K. H.; Hosseinpour, J. Levels of selected organic compounds in materials for candle production and human exposure to candle emissions Chemosphere 1997, 34, 1623 1630
    18. 18
      Lung, S. C.; Hu, S. Generation rates and emission factors of particulate matter and particle-bound polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons of incense sticks Chemosphere 2003, 50, 673 679
    19. 19
      Dubowsky, S. D.; Wallace, L. A.; Buckley, T. J. The contribution of traffic to indoor concentrations of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons J. Exposure Anal. Environ. Epidemiol. 1999, 9, 312 321
    20. 20
      Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons; Priority Substances List Assessment Report; Environment Canada, Health Canada: Ottawa, Canada, 1994.
    21. 21
      Lewis, R. G.; Fortmann, R. C.; Camann, D. Evaluation of methods for monitoring the exposure of small children to pesticides in the residential environment Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 1994, 26, 37 46
    22. 22
      Wilson, N. K.; Chuang, J.; Lyu, C.; Menton, R. G.; Morgan, M. K. Aggregate exposures of nine preschool children to persistent organic pollutants at day care and at home J. Exposure Anal. Environ. Epidemiol. 2003, 13, 187 202
    23. 23
      Wilson, N. K.; Chuang, J. C.; Lyu, C. Levels of persistent organic pollutants in several child day care centers J. Exposure Anal. Environ. Epidemiol. 2001, 11, 449 458
    24. 24
      Chuang, J. C.; Callahan, P. J.; Lyu, C. W.; Wilson, N. K. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon exposures of children in low-income families J. Exposure Anal. Environ. Epidemiol. 1999, 9, 85 98
    25. 25
      Roberts, J. W.; Budd, W. T.; Ruby, M. G.; Bond, A. E.; Lewis, R. G.; Wiener, W.; Camann, D. Development and field testing of a high volume sampler for pesticides and toxics in dust J. Exposure Anal. Environ. Epidemiol. 1991, 1, 143 155
    26. 26
      IPCS. Principles for Evaluating Health Risks from Chemicals during Infancy and Early Childhood: The Need for a Special Approach; United Nations Environment Programme, International Labour Organisation, World Health Organization: Geneva, 1986.
    27. 27
      Zhu, J.; Newhook, R.; Marro, L.; Chan, C. C. Selected volatile organic compounds in residential air in the city of Ottawa, Canada Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005, 39, 3964 71
    28. 28
      Method 3640a, Gel Permeation Cleanup. Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste. Laboratory Manual of Physical/Chemical Methods, 3rd ed.; Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, 1986; Vol. 1B.
    29. 29
      Agilent Technologies. MSD Productivity ChemStation,

      revision D.00.00;

      Microsoft: Redmond, WA, 2001.
    30. 30
      Masters, G. Introduction to Environmental Engineering and Science; Prentice Hall Inc.: Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1991; p 460.
    31. 31
      U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Integrated Risk Information System, http://www.epa.gov/iriswebp/iris/.
    32. 32
      Collins, J. F.; Brown, J. P.; Alexeeff, G. V.; Salmon, A. G. Potency equivalency factors for some polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon derivatives Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 1998, 28, 45 54
    33. 33
      Nisbet, I. C.; LaGoy, P. K. Toxic equivalency factors (TEFs) for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 1992, 16, 290 300
    34. 34
      Hawley, J. K. Assessment of health risk from exposure to contaminated soil Risk Anal. 1985, 5, 289 302
    35. 35
      Calabrese, E. J.; Barnes, R.; Stanek III, E. J.; Pastides, H.; Gilbert, C. E.; Veneman, P.; Wang, X.; Lasztity, A.; Kostecki, P. T. How much soil do young children ingest: An epidemiologic study Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 1989, 10, 123 137
    36. 36
      Calabrese, E. J.

      Presented at the Environmental and Occupational Toxicology Division of Health Canada, March 24

      , 2005.
    37. 37
      Child Specific Exposure Factors Handbook;

       EPA-6000-P-00-002B;

      National Center for Environmental Assessment, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, D.C., 2002.
    38. 38
      Exposure Factors Handbook;

       EPA/600/P-95/002Fa;

      National Center for Environmental Assessment, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, D.C., 1997.
    39. 39
      Iglowstein, I.; Jenni, O. G.; Molinari, L.; Largo, R. H. Sleep duration from infancy to adolescence: reference values and generational trends Pediatrics 2003, 111, 302 307
    40. 40
      Investigating Human Exposure to Contaminants in the Environment: A Handbook for Exposure Calculations. Health Protection Branch, Health Canada: Ottawa, Canada, 1995.
    41. 41
      Guidelines for Carcinogen Risk Assessment;

       EPA/630/P-03/001B;

      U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, D.C., 2005.
    42. 42
      Supplemental Guidance For Assessing Cancer Susceptibility From Early-Life Exposure to Carcinogens;

       EPA/630/R-03/003F;

      Risk Assessment Forum, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, D.C., 2005.
    43. 43
      The SAS System for Windows, release 8.02; SAS Institute: Cary, NC, 2001.
    44. 44
      Neter, J.; Wasserman, W.; Kuner, M. H. Applied Linear Statistical Models. Regression, Analysis of Variance, and Experimental Designs; Richard D. Irwin, Inc.: Boston, MA, 1990.
    45. 45
      Harvey, R. G. Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons: Chemistry and Carcinogenicity; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, U.K., 1991.
    46. 46
      Chuang, J. C.; Chou, Y. L.; Nishioka, M.; Andrews, K.; Pollard, M.; Menton, R. Field Evaluation of Screening Techniques for Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons, 2,4-Diphenoxyacetic Acid, and Pentachlorophenol in Air, House Dust, Soil, and Total Diet;

       EPA/600/R-97/109;

      U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Columbus, OH, 1997.
    47. 47
      Chuang, J. C.; Callahan, P. J.; Menton, R. G.; Gordon, S. M.; Lewis, R. G.; Wilson, N. K. Monitoring methods for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and their distribution in house dust and track-in soil Environ. Sci. Technol. 1995, 29, 494 500
    48. 48
      Simrock, S. Polyzyklische aromatische Kohlenwasserstoffe im Hausstaub von Privathaushalten (Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) in house dust from private homes) Umweltmed 1998, 6, 243 246
    49. 49
      Lewis, R. G.; Fortune, C. R.; Willis, R. D.; Camann, D. E.; Antley, J. T. Distribution of pesticides and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in house dust as a function of particle size Environ. Health Perspect. 1999, 107, 721 726
    50. 50
      Chuang, J. C. Analysis of Soil and House Dust for Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons;

       EPA/600/SR-96/060;

      U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Cincinnati, OH, 1996.
    51. 51
      Heudorf, U.; Angerer, J. Internal exposure to PAHs of children and adults living in homes with parquet flooring containing high levels of PAHs in the parquet glue Int. Arch. Occ. Env. Health 2001, 74, 91 101
    52. 52
      Summary of Existing Canadian Environmental Quality Guidelines; Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment: Winnipeg, Canada, 2003.
    53. 53
      Alfheim, I.; Ramdahl, T. Contribution of wood combustion to indoor air pollution as measured by mutagenicity in Salmonella and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon concentration Environ. Mutagen. 1984, 6, 121 30
    54. 54
      Daisey, J. M.; Spengler, J. D.; Kaarakka, P. A comparison of the organic chemical composition of indoor aerosols during woodburning and non-woodburning periods Environ. Int. 1989, 15, 435 442
    55. 55
      Health Canada. Federal Contaminated Site Risk Assessment in Canada. Part 1: Guidance on Human Health Preliminary Quantitative Risk Assessment (PQRA);

       Environmental Health Assessment Services, Safe Environments Programme, Health Canada:

      Ottawa, Canada, 2004.
    56. 56
      Dose-Response Analysis of Ingested Benzo[a]pyrene (CAS No. 50-32-8);

       EPA/600/R-92/045; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency:

      Washington, DC, 1991.
    57. 57
      Canadian Cancer Statistics 2006;

       Canadian Cancer Society/National Cancer Institute of Canada:

      Toronto, Canada, 2006.
    58. 58

      Statistics Canada, Population and Dwelling Counts, for Canada, Provinces and Territories

      , 2001, and 1996 Censuses—100% Data, www12.statcan.ca/english/census01/products/standard/popdwell/tables.cfm.
    59. 59
      Grote, M.; Brack, W.; Altenburger, R. Identification of toxicants from marine sediment using effect-directed analysis Environ Toxicol 2005, 20, 475 86
    60. 60
      Maertens, R. M.; Zhu, J.; Gagné, R.; Douglas, G. R.; White, P. A. Mutagenic and carcinogenic hazards of settled house dust II: Salmonella Mutagenicity. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42, 17541760.
  • Supporting Information

    Supporting Information

    ARTICLE SECTIONS
    Jump To

    Table containing additional details regarding the topics included in the Health Canada Indoor Air Study of November 2002−March 2003. Survey questions were abbreviated and include only those relevant to settled house dust. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.


    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

You’ve supercharged your research process with ACS and Mendeley!

STEP 1:
Click to create an ACS ID

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

MENDELEY PAIRING EXPIRED
Your Mendeley pairing has expired. Please reconnect