Framework for Evaluating Anthrax Risk in BuildingsClick to copy article linkArticle link copied!
Abstract
If Bacillus anthracis (BA), the organism that causes anthrax, is known or suspected to have contaminated a building, a critical decision is what level of contamination is unacceptable. This decision has two components: (1) what is the relationship between the degree of contamination and the risk to occupants, (2) and what is an acceptable risk to occupants? These lead to a further decision: (3) how many samples must be taken to determine whether a building is unacceptably contaminated? We discuss existing data that bear on these questions, and introduce a nomogram that can be used to investigate the relationship between risk of contracting anthrax, the surface concentration of BA, the probability of detection, and the number of samples needed to ensure detection with a given degree of certainty. The same approach could be used for other agents that are dangerous due to resuspension of deposited particles.
Cited By
This article is cited by 14 publications.
- Joseph P. Wood, Alden Charles Adrion. Review of Decontamination Techniques for the Inactivation of Bacillus anthracis and Other Spore-Forming Bacteria Associated with Building or Outdoor Materials. Environmental Science & Technology 2019, 53
(8)
, 4045-4062. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b05274
- Tao Hong and Patrick L. Gurian . Updating a B. anthracis Risk Model with Field Data from a Bioterrorism Incident. Environmental Science & Technology 2015, 49
(11)
, 6701-6711. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b00010
- Sang Don Lee, M. Worth Calfee, Leroy Mickelsen, Stephen Wolfe, Jayson Griffin, Matt Clayton, Nicole Griffin-Gatchalian, and Abderrahmane Touati . Evaluation of Surface Sampling for Bacillus Spores Using Commercially Available Cleaning Robots. Environmental Science & Technology 2013, 47
(6)
, 2595-2601. https://doi.org/10.1021/es4000356
- Tao Hong and Patrick L. Gurian . Characterizing Bioaerosol Risk from Environmental Sampling. Environmental Science & Technology 2012, 46
(12)
, 6714-6722. https://doi.org/10.1021/es300197n
- Igor Linkov, John B. Coles, Paul Welle, Matthew Bates, and Jeffrey Keisler . Anthrax Cleanup Decisions: Statistical Confidence or Confident Response. Environmental Science & Technology 2011, 45
(22)
, 9471-9472. https://doi.org/10.1021/es203479t
- Sergey A. Grinshpun, Angela M. Weber, Michael Yermakov, Reshmi Indugula, Yousef Elmashae, Tiina Reponen, Laura Rose. Evaluation of personal inhalable aerosol samplers with different filters for use during anthrax responses. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene 2017, 14
(8)
, 583-593. https://doi.org/10.1080/15459624.2017.1304645
- Erin E Silvestri, Cynthia Yund, Sarah Taft, Charlena Yoder Bowling, Daniel Chappie, Kevin Garrahan, Eletha Brady-Roberts, Harry Stone, Tonya L Nichols. Considerations for estimating microbial environmental data concentrations collected from a field setting. Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology 2017, 27
(2)
, 141-151. https://doi.org/10.1038/jes.2016.3
- Bradford W. Gutting, Andrey Rukhin, David Marchette, Ryan S. Mackie, Brandolyn Thran. Dose‐Response Modeling for Inhalational Anthrax in Rabbits Following Single or Multiple Exposures. Risk Analysis 2016, 36
(11)
, 2031-2038. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12564
- Siming You, Man Pun Wan. A Risk Assessment Scheme of Infection Transmission Indoors Incorporating the Impact of Resuspension. Risk Analysis 2015, 35
(8)
, 1488-1502. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12350
- Bradford Gutting. Deterministic Models of Inhalational Anthrax in New Zealand White Rabbits. Biosecurity and Bioterrorism: Biodefense Strategy, Practice, and Science 2014, 12
(1)
, 29-41. https://doi.org/10.1089/bsp.2013.0067
- G.F. Piepel, B.G. Amidan, R. Hu. Laboratory studies on surface sampling of
Bacillus anthracis
contamination: summary, gaps and recommendations. Journal of Applied Microbiology 2012, 113
(6)
, 1287-1304. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2012.05381.x
- Tao Hong, Patrick L. Gurian, Yin Huang, Charles N. Haas, . Prioritizing Risks and Uncertainties from Intentional Release of Selected Category A Pathogens. PLoS ONE 2012, 7
(3)
, e32732. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0032732
- Paula A. Krauter, Greg F. Piepel, Raymond Boucher, Matt Tezak, Brett G. Amidan, Wayne Einfeld. False-Negative Rate and Recovery Efficiency Performance of a Validated Sponge Wipe Sampling Method. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 2012, 78
(3)
, 846-854. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.07403-11
- Tao Hong, Patrick L. Gurian, Nicholas F. Dudley Ward. Setting Risk-Informed Environmental Standards for Bacillus Anthracis Spores. Risk Analysis 2010, 30
(10)
, 1602-1622. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01443.x
Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.
Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.
The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.