ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read

OR SEARCH CITATIONS

My Activity
Publications
CONTENT TYPES

Figure 1Loading Img
Download Hi-Res ImageDownload to MS-PowerPointCite This:Environ. Sci. Technol. 1996, 30, 6, 1933-1938
RETURN TO ISSUEPREVArticleNEXT

Electrokinetic Remediation of Mercury-Contaminated Soils Using Iodine/Iodide Lixiviant

View Author Information
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Center for Environmental Biotechnology, 223 Perkins Hall, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996-2010
Cite this: Environ. Sci. Technol. 1996, 30, 6, 1933–1938
Publication Date (Web):May 23, 1996
https://doi.org/10.1021/es950633r
Copyright © 1996 American Chemical Society
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Article Views

894

Altmetric

-

Citations

76
LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICS
Read OnlinePDF (331 KB)
Get e-Alerts
SUBJECTS:

Abstract

In-situ remediation of mercury-contaminated soils, by electrokinetic or other means, is difficult because of the low solubility of mercury and its compounds. In this research, enhanced electrokinetic remediation of HgS-contaminated soils using I2/I- lixiviant was investigated using bench-scale electrokinetic cells. The thermodynamic conditions under which the lixiviant could be effective were determined by constructing a pE−pH diagram for the Hg−S−I system. Introduced near the cathode, the lixiviant migrated through the soil to the anode by electromigration. Mercury, released by the oxidation of HgS compounds by I2, was complexed as HgI42-. The negative complex continued to electromigrate toward the anode. Up to 99% of the Hg present in laboratory-contaminated soils could be removed. Electrokinetic treatment of a field-contaminated soil, containing more organic matter than the laboratory-contaminated soil, occurred much slower. The critical issues in determining the efficacy of the process are the oxidation of reduced Hg by I2 and I3- and the transport of the resultant HgI42- complex.

*

 To whom correspondence should be addressed; telephone:  (423) 974-7729; fax:  (423) 974-2669; e-mail address:  [email protected]

✗

 Abstract published in Advance ACS Abstracts, April 15, 1996.

Cited By

This article is cited by 76 publications.

  1. Riccardo Sprocati, Andrea Gallo, Rajandrea Sethi, Massimo Rolle. Electrokinetic Delivery of Reactants: Pore Water Chemistry Controls Transport, Mixing, and Degradation. Environmental Science & Technology 2021, 55 (1) , 719-729. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c06054
  2. Ikenna Onyido,, Albert R. Norris, and, Erwin Buncel. Biomolecule−Mercury Interactions:  Modalities of DNA Base−Mercury Binding Mechanisms. Remediation Strategies. Chemical Reviews 2004, 104 (12) , 5911-5930. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr030443w
  3. Liwei Cui, Xue Tian, Hongxin Xie, Xin Cong, Lihong Cui, Han Wu, Jianxu Wang, Bai Li, Jiating Zhao, Yanshan Cui, Xinbin Feng, Yu-Feng Li. Cardamine violifolia as a potential Hg hyperaccumulator and the cellular responses. Science of The Total Environment 2023, 863 , 160940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.160940
  4. Worood A. El-Mehalmey, Mohamed H. Alkordi. Electrokinetic remediation technique for soil contaminants. 2023, 229-258. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-823874-5.00005-X
  5. Larysa Lysenko, Nataliya Mishchuk, Volodymyr Kovalchuk. Basic principles and problems in decontamination of natural disperse systems. The electrokinetic treatment of soils. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science 2022, 310 , 102798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2022.102798
  6. Xiao-Jun Zheng, Qi Li, Hao Peng, Jian-Xiong Zhang, Wei-Jiang Chen, Bu-Chan Zhou, Ming Chen. Remediation of Heavy Metal-Contaminated Soils with Soil Washing: A Review. Sustainability 2022, 14 (20) , 13058. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142013058
  7. Chengwei Yin, Liguo Jiang, Keming Sun, Weiji Sun, Bing Liang. Influence of degree of compaction on electrokinetic remediation of unsaturated soil. Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering 2022, 39 (4) , 963-972. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-021-0999-6
  8. A.F. Ogundola, E.A. Adebayo, S.O. Ajao. Phytoremediation: The ultimate technique for reinstating soil contaminated with heavy metals and other pollutants. 2022, 19-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-85763-5.00012-X
  9. Ding Han, Xingyi Wu, Rui Li, Xianqiang Tang, Shangbin Xiao, Miklas Scholz. Critical Review of Electro-kinetic Remediation of Contaminated Soils and Sediments: Mechanisms, Performances and Technologies. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution 2021, 232 (8) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-021-05182-4
  10. Elahe Karami, Laura Kuhar, Andrej Bona, Aleksandar N. Nikoloski. A review of electrokinetic, ultrasonic and solution pulsing methods for mass transfer enhancement in in-situ processing. Minerals Engineering 2021, 170 , 107029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2021.107029
  11. Yuchen Wang, Ang Li, Chongwei Cui. Remediation of heavy metal-contaminated soils by electrokinetic technology: Mechanisms and applicability. Chemosphere 2021, 265 , 129071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.129071
  12. D. I. Trejo, V. E. Herrera, S. Solís, M. V. Paz, L. Chávez-Guerrero, S. Sepúlveda-Guzmán, J. Manríquez, E. Bustos. Electro-Phytoremediation of Cropland and Mine Tailings Polluted by Mercury, Using IrO2-Ta2O5/Ti Electrodes, Lavandula vera, and Solanum tuberosum. 2021, 263-295. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68140-1_11
  13. Min-oh Park, Moon-Hyun Kim, Yongseok Hong. The kinetics of mercury vaporization in soil during low-temperature thermal treatment. Geoderma 2020, 363 , 114150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.114150
  14. Mohamed Y. Hanfi, Mostafa Y. A. Mostafa, Michael V. Zhukovsky. Heavy metal contamination in urban surface sediments: sources, distribution, contamination control, and remediation. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 2020, 192 (1) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-019-7947-5
  15. Gordon C.C. Yang. Integrated electrokinetic processes for the remediation of phthalate esters in river sediments: A mini-review. Science of The Total Environment 2019, 659 , 963-972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.334
  16. Yuanan Hu, Hefa Cheng, Shu Tao. The growing importance of waste-to-energy (WTE) incineration in China's anthropogenic mercury emissions: Emission inventories and reduction strategies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2018, 97 , 119-137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.08.026
  17. Zhongchuang Liu, Li-ao Wang, Shimin Ding, Yuehan Li. Effects of growth agents and mercury on several herbs. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 2018, 25 (12) , 12012-12021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-1498-0
  18. Evelien Martens, Henning Prommer, Xianwen Dai, Ming Zhi Wu, Jing Sun, Paul Breuer, Andy Fourie. Feasibility of electrokinetic in situ leaching of gold. Hydrometallurgy 2018, 175 , 70-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2017.10.020
  19. Beata Smolinska, Agnieszka Szczodrowska. Antioxidative response of Lepidium sativum L. during assisted phytoremediation of Hg contaminated soil. New Biotechnology 2017, 38 , 74-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbt.2016.07.004
  20. E. Kokkinos, I. Kellartzis, Ir. Diamantopoulou, G. Stavropoulos, G. Vourlias, M. Mitrakas. Study of elemental mercury removal from flue gases using Tetravalent manganese Feroxyhyte. Chemical Engineering Journal 2017, 315 , 152-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.01.013
  21. V. Valdovinos, F. Monroy-Guzmán, E. Bustos. Electrokinetic removal of radionuclides contained in scintillation liquids absorbed in soil type Phaeozem. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 2016, 162-163 , 80-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2016.05.017
  22. A. Santhana Krishna Kumar, Shiuh-Jen Jiang, Wei-Lung Tseng. Facile synthesis and characterization of thiol-functionalized graphene oxide as effective adsorbent for Hg(II). Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 2016, 4 (2) , 2052-2065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2016.03.034
  23. María J. Sierra, Rocio Millán, Félix A. López, Francisco J. Alguacil, Inmaculada Cañadas. Sustainable remediation of mercury contaminated soils by thermal desorption. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 2016, 23 (5) , 4898-4907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-5688-8
  24. Shashi Kant Shukla, Rohit Kumar Mishra, Manisha Pandey, Vani Mishra, Ashutosh Pathak, Anand Pandey, Rajesh Kumar, Anupam Dikshit. Land Reformation Using Plant Growth–Promoting Rhizobacteria in the Context of Heavy Metal Contamination. 2016, 499-529. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-803158-2.00021-7
  25. Fujun Ma, Changsheng Peng, Deyi Hou, Bin Wu, Qian Zhang, Fasheng Li, Qingbao Gu. Citric acid facilitated thermal treatment: An innovative method for the remediation of mercury contaminated soil. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2015, 300 , 546-552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.07.055
  26. Feng He, Jie Gao, Eric Pierce, P. J. Strong, Hailong Wang, Liyuan Liang. In situ remediation technologies for mercury-contaminated soil. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 2015, 22 (11) , 8124-8147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-4316-y
  27. Cristian Tunsu, Christian Ekberg, Mark Foreman, Teodora Retegan. Investigations regarding the wet decontamination of fluorescent lamp waste using iodine in potassium iodide solutions. Waste Management 2015, 36 , 289-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2014.10.023
  28. Shadi H. Hamdan, Gomotsegang Fred Molelekwa, Bart Van der Bruggen. Electrokinetic Remediation Technique: An Integrated Approach to Finding New Strategies for Restoration of Saline Soil and to Control Seawater Intrusion. ChemElectroChem 2014, 1 (7) , 1104-1117. https://doi.org/10.1002/celc.201402071
  29. Lisbeth M. Ottosen. Electrokinetics in the Removal of Metal Ions from Soils. 2014, 742-746. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6996-5_87
  30. M. Devasena, Indumathi M. Nambi. In situ stabilization of entrapped elemental mercury. Journal of Environmental Management 2013, 130 , 185-191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.08.066
  31. E. Méndez, M. Pérez, O. Romero, E.D. Beltrán, S. Castro, J.L. Corona, A. Corona, M.C. Cuevas, E. Bustos. Effects of electrode material on the efficiency of hydrocarbon removal by an electrokinetic remediation process. Electrochimica Acta 2012, 86 , 148-156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2012.04.042
  32. G. Belardi, R. Lavecchia, F. Medici, L. Piga. Thermal treatment for recovery of manganese and zinc from zinc–carbon and alkaline spent batteries. Waste Management 2012, 32 (10) , 1945-1951. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2012.05.008
  33. Juan Almeira, Chang-sheng Peng, Ahmed Abou-Shady. Enhancement of ion transport in porous media by the use of a continuously reoriented electric field. Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE A 2012, 13 (7) , 546-558. https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.A1200017
  34. Jianxu Wang, Xinbin Feng, Christopher W.N. Anderson, Ying Xing, Lihai Shang. Remediation of mercury contaminated sites – A review. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2012, 221-222 , 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.04.035
  35. Albert T. Yeung, Ying-Ying Gu. Use of Chelating Agents in Electrochemical Remediation of Contaminated Soil. 2012, 212-280. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784412183.ch09
  36. M.T. Alcántara, J. Gómez, M. Pazos, M.A. Sanromán. Electrokinetic remediation of lead and phenanthrene polluted soils. Geoderma 2012, 173-174 , 128-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2011.12.009
  37. Zhitong Yao, Jinhui Li, Henghua Xie, Conghai Yu. Review on Remediation Technologies of Soil Contaminated by Heavy Metals. Procedia Environmental Sciences 2012, 16 , 722-729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2012.10.099
  38. Albert T. Yeung, Ying-Ying Gu. A review on techniques to enhance electrochemical remediation of contaminated soils. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2011, 195 , 11-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.08.047
  39. A. García-Rubio, J.M. Rodríguez-Maroto, C. Gómez-Lahoz, F. García-Herruzo, C. Vereda-Alonso. Electrokinetic remediation: The use of mercury speciation for feasibility studies applied to a contaminated soil from Almadén. Electrochimica Acta 2011, 56 (25) , 9303-9310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2011.08.012
  40. Albert T. Yeung. Milestone developments, myths, and future directions of electrokinetic remediation. Separation and Purification Technology 2011, 79 (2) , 124-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2011.01.022
  41. Cheng-non Hsu, Albert T. Yeung, Rajendra M. Menon. Electrokinetic extraction of lead from kaolinites: II. Experimental investigation. The Environmentalist 2011, 31 (1) , 33-38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-010-9298-1
  42. Reena Amatya Shrestha, Thuy Duong Pham, Mika Sillanpää. Electro ultrasonic remediation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from contaminated soil. Journal of Applied Electrochemistry 2010, 40 (7) , 1407-1413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10800-010-0117-7
  43. Zhemin Shen, Jianda Zhang, Liya Qu, Zeqin Dong, Shenshen Zheng, Wenhua Wang. A modified EK method with an I−/I2 lixiviant assisted and approaching cathodes to remedy mercury contaminated field soils. Environmental Geology 2009, 57 (6) , 1399-1407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-008-1418-6
  44. A. K. Darban, B. Ayati, R. N. Yong, A. Khodadadi, A. Kiayee, Rosa Galvez, Mark Dyer, S. W. Dean. Enhanced Electrokinetic Remediation of Mercury-Contaminated Tailing Dam Sediments. Journal of ASTM International 2009, 6 (5) , 102141. https://doi.org/10.1520/JAI102141
  45. Lisbeth M. Ottosen, Iben V. Christensen, Inge Rörig-Dalgård, Pernille E. Jensen, Henrik K. Hansen. Utilization of electromigration in civil and environmental engineering—Processes, transport rates and matrix changes. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A 2008, 43 (8) , 795-809. https://doi.org/10.1080/10934520801973949
  46. M. Pazos, S. Gouveia, M. A. Sanromán, C. Cameselle. Electromigration of Mn, Fe, Cu and Zn with citric acid in contaminated clay. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A 2008, 43 (8) , 823-831. https://doi.org/10.1080/10934520801974004
  47. Naglaa Eid, Walid Elshorbagy. Moisture and Nitrate Variation in Electrochemically-Controlled Drip Irrigation System in Sandy Soil. 2008, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1061/40976(316)114
  48. Jérémie Langlet, Fabien Gaboriaud, Christophe Gantzer, Jérôme F.L. Duval. Impact of Chemical and Structural Anisotropy on the Electrophoretic Mobility of Spherical Soft Multilayer Particles: The Case of Bacteriophage MS2. Biophysical Journal 2008, 94 (8) , 3293-3312. https://doi.org/10.1529/biophysj.107.115477
  49. T. Håkansson, P. Suer, B. Mattiasson, B. Allard. Sulphate reducing bacteria to precipitate mercury after electrokinetic soil remediation. International Journal of Environmental Science & Technology 2008, 5 (2) , 267-274. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03326021
  50. Songhu Yuan, Zhimin Xi, Yi Jiang, Jinzhong Wan, Chan Wu, Zhonghua Zheng, Xiaohua Lu. Desorption of copper and cadmium from soils enhanced by organic acids. Chemosphere 2007, 68 (7) , 1289-1297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.01.046
  51. M. García Nogueira, M. Pazos, M.A. Sanromán, C. Cameselle. Improving on electrokinetic remediation in spiked Mn kaolinite by addition of complexing agents. Electrochimica Acta 2007, 52 (10) , 3349-3354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2006.03.115
  52. XUE J. CHEN, ZHE M. SHEN, TAO YUAN, SHEN S. ZHENG, BING X. JU, WEN H. WANG. Enhancing Electrokinetic Remediation of Cadmium- Contaminated Soils with Stepwise Moving Anode Method. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A 2006, 41 (11) , 2517-2530. https://doi.org/10.1080/10934520600927690
  53. Xuejun Chen, Zhemin Shen, Yangming Lei, Bingxin Ju, Wenhua Wang. Enhanced electrokinetic remediation of Cd and Pb spiked soil coupled with cation exchange membrane. Soil Research 2006, 44 (5) , 523. https://doi.org/10.1071/SR05117
  54. Albert T. Yeung. Contaminant Extractability by Electrokinetics. Environmental Engineering Science 2006, 23 (1) , 202-224. https://doi.org/10.1089/ees.2006.23.202
  55. Dong-Mei Zhou, Chang-Fen Deng, Akram N. Alshawabkeh, Long Cang, Chang-Fen Deng. Effects of catholyte conditioning on electrokinetic extraction of copper from mine tailings. Environment International 2005, 31 (6) , 885-890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2005.05.040
  56. M. M. Teutli-León, M. T. Oropeza, I. González, A. Soria. Mathematical modeling of a galvanostatic soil electroremediation process. AIChE Journal 2005, 51 (6) , 1822-1833. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.10490
  57. Lisbeth M. Ottosen, Anne J. Pedersen, Alexandra B. Ribeiro, Henrik K. Hansen. Case study on the strategy and application of enhancement solutions to improve remediation of soils contaminated with Cu, Pb and Zn by means of electrodialysis. Engineering Geology 2005, 77 (3-4) , 317-329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2004.07.021
  58. Akram N. Alshawabkeh, R. Mark Bricka, David B. Gent. Pilot-Scale Electrokinetic Cleanup of Lead-Contaminated Soils. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 2005, 131 (3) , 283-291. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2005)131:3(283)
  59. Andrea Manni, Paolo Massacci, Luigi Piga, Silvia Serranti. Screening and Thermal Desorption for Remediation of a Sediment Polluted by the Mercury of a Chlor-Alkaly Plant. Soil and Sediment Contamination: An International Journal 2004, 13 (4) , 391-404. https://doi.org/10.1080/10588330490466003
  60. Rudolph A. Abramovitch, Lu ChangQing, Evan Hicks, Joseph Sinard. In situ remediation of soils contaminated with toxic metal ions using microwave energy. Chemosphere 2003, 53 (9) , 1077-1085. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-6535(03)00572-1
  61. Krishna R. Reddy, Carlos Chaparro, Richard E. Saichek. Iodide-Enhanced Electrokinetic Remediation of Mercury-Contaminated Soils. Journal of Environmental Engineering 2003, 129 (12) , 1137-1148. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2003)129:12(1137)
  62. Reena Shrestha, R. Fischer, D. Rahner. Behavior of cadmium, lead and zinc at the sediment–water interface by electrochemically initiated processes. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects 2003, 222 (1-3) , 261-271. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0927-7757(03)00231-0
  63. Pascal Suèr, Thomas Lifvergren. Mercury-Contaminated Soil Remediation by Iodide and Electroreclamation. Journal of Environmental Engineering 2003, 129 (5) , 441-446. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2003)129:5(441)
  64. Krishna R. Reddy, Carlos Chaparro, Richard E. Saichek. Removal of Mercury from Clayey Soils Using Electrokinetics. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A 2003, 38 (2) , 307-338. https://doi.org/10.1081/ESE-120016897
  65. Masakazu NIINAE, Kenji AOKI. Electrokinetic Remediation of Contaminated Soils. Shigen-to-Sozai 2003, 119 (4/5) , 142-148. https://doi.org/10.2473/shigentosozai.119.142
  66. Chih-Huang Weng, Ching Yuan, Hung-Hsu Tu. Removal of Trichloroethylene from Clay Soil by Series-Electrokinetic Process. Practice Periodical of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste Management 2003, 7 (1) , 25-30. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-025X(2003)7:1(25)
  67. Brian M. Desharnais, Barbara Ann G. Lewis. Electrochemical Water Splitting at Bipolar Interfaces of Ion Exchange Membranes and Soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal 2002, 66 (5) , 1518-1525. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2002.1518
  68. Jurate Virkutyte, Mika Sillanpää, Petri Latostenmaa. Electrokinetic soil remediation — critical overview. Science of The Total Environment 2002, 289 (1-3) , 97-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-9697(01)01027-0
  69. Mary M. Page, Christopher L. Page. Electroremediation of Contaminated Soils. Journal of Environmental Engineering 2002, 128 (3) , 208-219. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2002)128:3(208)
  70. W. Calmano, S. Mangold, H. Stichnothe, J. Thöming. Clean-Up and Assessment of Metal Contaminated Soils. 2001, 471-490. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-04643-2_30
  71. P. Massacci, L. Piga, M. Ferrini. Applications of physical and thermal treatment for the removal of mercury from contaminated materials. Minerals Engineering 2000, 13 (8-9) , 963-967. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0892-6875(00)00081-9
  72. Fabienne Baraud, Sylvaine Tellier, Michel Astruc. Temperature effect on ionic transport during soil electrokinetic treatment at constant pH. Journal of Hazardous Materials 1999, 64 (3) , 263-281. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3894(98)00190-3
  73. M. Hempel, J. Thoeming. Remediation Techniques for Hg-Contaminated Sites. 1999, 113-130. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03754-6_5
  74. Pascal Marceau, Paul Broquet, Pascal Baticle. Dépollution par méthode électrocinétique d'un matériau argileux dopé au cadmium. essai pilote. Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences - Series IIA - Earth and Planetary Science 1999, 328 (1) , 37-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1251-8050(99)80085-8
  75. Akram N. Alshawabkeh, Albert T. Yeung, Mark R. Bricka. Practical Aspects of In-Situ Electrokinetic Extraction. Journal of Environmental Engineering 1999, 125 (1) , 27-35. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(1999)125:1(27)
  76. J.A.Q. Antunes, T.C.M. Capucho, A.M.M. Pereira, C.A.C. Sequeira. ELECTROCHEMICAL REMEDIATION: A MODERN OPTION FOR CLEANING UP CONTAMINATED LAND. 1998, 407-416. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-85573-801-0.50042-X

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

You’ve supercharged your research process with ACS and Mendeley!

STEP 1:
Click to create an ACS ID

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

MENDELEY PAIRING EXPIRED
Your Mendeley pairing has expired. Please reconnect