Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

You’ve supercharged your research process with ACS and Mendeley!

STEP 1:
Click to create an ACS ID

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

MENDELEY PAIRING EXPIRED
Your Mendeley pairing has expired. Please reconnect
ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
An Azobenzene-Based Single-Component Supramolecular Polymer Responsive to Multiple Stimuli in Water
My Activity

Figure 1Loading Img
  • Open Access
Article

An Azobenzene-Based Single-Component Supramolecular Polymer Responsive to Multiple Stimuli in Water
Click to copy article linkArticle link copied!

  • Edgar Fuentes
    Edgar Fuentes
    Institute for Bioengineering of Catalonia (IBEC), The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology (BIST), Barcelona 08036, Spain
  • Marieke Gerth
    Marieke Gerth
    Laboratory of Self-Organizing Soft Matter, Department of Chemical Engineering and Chemistry & Institute of Complex Molecular Systems (ICMS), Eindhoven University of Technology (TUE), Eindhoven 5612 AZ, The Netherlands
    Laboratory of Physical Chemistry, Department of Chemical Engineering and Chemistry, Eindhoven University of Technology (TUE), Eindhoven 5612 AZ, The Netherlands
  • José Augusto Berrocal
    José Augusto Berrocal
    Adolphe Merkle Institute, Polymer Chemistry and Materials, University of Fribourg, Chemin des Verdiers 4, 1700 Fribourg, Switzerland
  • Carlo Matera
    Carlo Matera
    Institute for Bioengineering of Catalonia (IBEC), The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology (BIST), Barcelona 08036, Spain
    Network Biomedical Research Centre in Biomaterials, Bioengineering and Nanomedicine (CIBER-BBN), Madrid 28029, Spain
    More by Carlo Matera
  • Pau Gorostiza
    Pau Gorostiza
    Institute for Bioengineering of Catalonia (IBEC), The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology (BIST), Barcelona 08036, Spain
    Network Biomedical Research Centre in Biomaterials, Bioengineering and Nanomedicine (CIBER-BBN), Madrid 28029, Spain
    Catalan Institution for Research and Advanced Studies (ICREA), Barcelona 08011, Spain
  • Ilja K. Voets
    Ilja K. Voets
    Laboratory of Physical Chemistry, Department of Chemical Engineering and Chemistry, Eindhoven University of Technology (TUE), Eindhoven 5612 AZ, The Netherlands
  • Silvia Pujals*
    Silvia Pujals
    Institute for Bioengineering of Catalonia (IBEC), The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology (BIST), Barcelona 08036, Spain
    Department of Electronics and Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Physics, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona 08011, Spain
    *[email protected]
  • Lorenzo Albertazzi*
    Lorenzo Albertazzi
    Institute for Bioengineering of Catalonia (IBEC), The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology (BIST), Barcelona 08036, Spain
    Department of Biomedical Engineering, Institute of Complex Molecular Systems (ICMS), Eindhoven University of Technology (TUE), Eindhoven 5612 AZ, The Netherlands
    *[email protected]/[email protected]
Open PDFSupporting Information (1)

Journal of the American Chemical Society

Cite this: J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 22, 10069–10078
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.0c02067
Published May 12, 2020

Copyright © 2020 American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under these Terms of Use.

Abstract

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

One of the most appealing features of supramolecular assemblies is their ability to respond to external stimuli due to their noncovalent nature. This provides the opportunity to gain control over their size, morphology, and chemical properties and is key toward some of their applications. However, the design of supramolecular systems able to respond to multiple stimuli in a controlled fashion is still challenging. Here we report the synthesis and characterization of a novel discotic molecule, which self-assembles in water into a single-component supramolecular polymer that responds to multiple independent stimuli. The building block of such an assembly is a C3-symmetric monomer, consisting of a benzene-1,3,5-tricarboxamide core conjugated to a series of natural and non-natural functional amino acids. This design allows the use of rapid and efficient solid-phase synthesis methods and the modular implementation of different functionalities. The discotic monomer incorporates a hydrophobic azobenzene moiety, an octaethylene glycol chain, and a C-terminal lysine. Each of these blocks was chosen for two reasons: to drive the self-assembly in water by a combination of H-bonding and hydrophobicity and to impart specific responsiveness. With a combination of microscopy and spectroscopy techniques, we demonstrate self-assembly in water and responsiveness to temperature, light, pH, and ionic strength. This work shows the potential to integrate independent mechanisms for controlling self-assembly in a single-component supramolecular polymer by the rational monomer design and paves the way toward the use of multiresponsive systems in water.

Copyright © 2020 American Chemical Society

1. Introduction

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Supramolecular polymers are promising self-assembled structures for a variety of applications. In particular, water-soluble assemblies (1) show great potential for medical applications such as drug delivery systems, (2−6) contrast agents, (7) or hydrogels for tissue engineering. (8−11)
Inspired by naturally existing supramolecular polymers, e.g., actin filaments, chemists attempt to create synthetic materials with life-like properties. In this framework, the design of dynamic structures capable of mimicking the polymerization–depolymerization equilibrium of biological polymers allows the preparation of functional adaptive materials that change properties in response to a specific stimulus. This responsiveness is interesting at a fundamental level, but is also appealing for a variety of applications. For example, the possibility to disassemble supramolecular drug carriers in a controlled fashion allows for spatiotemporal control over the release of drugs. (12) Many efforts have been carried out to explore new responsive materials and new strategies to impart responsivity into the monomer design. The groups of Besenius, Schmuck, and Stupp designed systems using pH as a trigger to change stability and promote disassembly. (13−16) Yagai and co-workers explored the use of light, temperature, and ultrasound as triggers to control foldability of supramolecular polymers. (17−19) Lee reported supramolecular nanotubules that undergo a contraction in response to temperature. (20) Voets reported salt-triggered changes in dimensions and cooperativity of the self-assembly. (21) Moreover, in light of biological applications, the possibility to obtain response to protein binding and enzyme activity has also been studied. (22−27)
Multiresponsivity, i.e., the ability to independently respond to different cues, in aqueous media proved to be more challenging to implement. Using multiple stimuli appears as a promising strategy to achieve fine control over supramolecular polymers’ properties. Moreover, it opens the way to logic-gate assemblies able to generate a response only when two stimuli are simultaneously present, increasing selectivity. (28−30) This is particularly interesting in the case of biological applications where the complex cellular environment provides multiple cues to the administered synthetic material.
Few pioneering examples of multiresponsivity have recently been reported. Besenius and co-workers designed a system responsive to pH and reactive oxygen species, which together with temperature was able to tune the gelating properties of the material. (31) Bhosale and co-workers reported supramolecular ribbons with both pH- and temperature-dependent helicity. (32) Thayumanavan and co-workers showed the possibility to incorporate different responsive moieties into polymeric amphiphiles through a postpolymerization step, enabling response to light, protein, and redox environment. (33) Li and co-workers designed a molecule that self-assembled into fibers, responsive to different ions and temperature. (34) However, these interesting properties come at the price of complex design, by incorporating either multiple components or synthetically challenging building blocks. Using multiple response mechanisms in the same monomer appears as a promising strategy to achieve fine control over supramolecular polymers.
Here we present the straightforward synthesis of a single-component supramolecular polymer, self-assembled in water, which is capable of independently responding to four stimuli, namely, light, pH, ionic strength, and temperature. This system is designed to offer control over self-assembly through distinct mechanisms, modifying the assembly state in terms of both length and configuration. By a combination of techniques including transmission electron microscopy (TEM), circular dichroism (CD), high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), and static light scattering (SLS), we demonstrate that the assembly/disassembly of supramolecular polymers in water is pursued through controlled stimulations.
Our results pave the way toward simpler and highly controllable supramolecular polymers, contributing to the fundamental development of self-assembly in water as well as to their biomedical applications.

2. Results and Discussion

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

2.1. Molecular Design and Synthesis

The discotic amphiphile was designed to self-assemble and to exhibit responsiveness to light, pH, salt concentration, and temperature. The design was based on a C3-symmetrical core, bearing three identical wedges. These wedges were designed to be modular, combining natural and non-natural amino acids chosen to induce self-assembly in water by a combination of hydrophobic effect and H-bonding as well as to imprint specific responsiveness. Notably, the choice of amino acid building blocks allows for a modular approach by using solid-phase synthesis. The synthetic route toward and structure of monomer 1 are shown in Figure 1a and b.

Figure 1

Figure 1. (a) Synthesis of monomer 1: (i) Coupling of Fmoc-Lys(Boc)-OH to 2-chlorotrityl chloride resin (represented by the gray circle), DCM, DIEA, 1 h. (ii) Fmoc removal, 20% piperidine in DMF. (iii) Coupling of Fmoc-octa(ethylene glycol)-OH, DCM–DMF (1:1), PyBOP, DIEA, 15 h. (iv) Fmoc removal, 20% piperidine in DMF. (v) Coupling of Fmoc-Azo, DCM–DMF (1:1), PyBOP, DIEA, 15 h. (vi) Fmoc removal, 20% piperidine in DMF. (vii) Cleavage, TFA 95% v/v in H2O. (viii) Core coupling, BT-Cl, CHCl3, DIEA PyBOP, 15 h. (ix) Boc removal, TFA 95% H2O. (b) Molecular structure of monomer 1. (c) Molecular structure of monomer 2. (d) Schematic representation of monomer 1 and its self-assembly into supramolecular fibers. The moieties responsible for responsiveness are highlighted in different colors: orange, light responsive moiety; blue, temperature responsive moiety; green, pH and ionic strength responsive moiety.

To promote self-assembly, benzene-1,3,5-tricarboxamide (BTA) was chosen as a core to drive aggregation due to the well-known H-bonding behavior. (35) The BTA core is functionalized with three amphiphilic wedges composed of amino acid modules that promote assembly in water and induce responsivity as well (Figure 1d). A non-natural azobenzene amino acid (l-phenylalanine-4′-azobenzene, Figure 1b highlighted in orange) was placed as the innermost block of the wedge to enhance self-assembly by increasing hydrophobicity and by shielding the intermolecular H-bonds of the BTA core from water. At the same time, the azobenzene moiety imparts light responsivity through the well-known EZ isomerization. Azobenzenes are a well-established class of molecular photoswitches in the fields of smart materials and photocontrol of biological systems because of some favorable characteristics, such as design flexibility, ease of synthesis, large changes in geometry upon isomerization, high quantum yields, and low photobleaching rates. (36,37) We hypothesized that the E form favors assembly due to its planar hydrophobic nature, while the nonplanar and more polar Z form will destabilize monomer stacking and increase monomer solubility. (38) The second module of the wedge is an octa(ethylene glycol) amino acid (Figure 1 b, highlighted in blue), which grants flexibility and solubility in water, while it confers thermal responsivity due to its temperature-dependent hydrophilicity. (39−42) Finally, a C-terminal lysine (Figure 1b, highlighted in green) was added to enhance water solubility owing to the charged groups and induce the ampholytic character of this particular amino acid, which can result in dual pH and ionic strength response.
The described monomer was designed to be synthesized through standard solid-phase peptide synthesis (SPPS), offering a modular and straightforward synthesis. All building blocks are commercially available or are synthesized as fluorenylmethyloxycarbonyl (Fmoc)-protected amino acids, allowing to iteratively repeat the same synthetic steps (Figure 1a). Following an Fmoc strategy, the wedge is grown sequentially on the resin from C-terminus to N-terminus using the proper Fmoc-protected building blocks. Both octa(ethylene glycol) and azobenzene couplings were not standard and were optimized (see SI). After its completion (steps i to vi, Figure 1a), the wedge was cleaved from the resin keeping the tert-butyloxycarbonyl (Boc) protecting group (step vii) and subsequently purified through H2O–DCM extraction (Figures S2, S3).
The final step, consisting of the convergent coupling to form the BTA, was performed in solution. The wedge was reacted with a benzene tricarbonyl chloride, thereby forming the Boc-protected monomer 1 (step viii). Boc deprotection was performed, and the final product was purified through reversed-phase HPLC (step ix). The purity and molecular weight of the desired product were confirmed using reversed-phase HPLC-MS, MALDI, and 1H NMR (Figure S6). Detailed synthetic procedures and material characterizations are provided in the SI.
This synthetic strategy allows the facile and precise control over the structure by using SPPS. The use of properly protected natural and non-natural amino acids reduces the number of necessary purifications in comparison with in-solution synthesis. Moreover, the sequence, the chemical nature, and the number of amino acids can be changed without modifying the synthetic procedure. This is a great advantage in light of structure optimization as well as for the generation of libraries of compounds.

2.2. Self-Assembly and Spectroscopic Behavior

To investigate the self-assembly behavior, monomer 1 was first dissolved in DMSO at a concentration of 2.5–10 mM, in which it is molecularly dissolved, eliminating any possible pre-existing aggregates. Next, the concentrated stock solution was diluted with Milli-Q water to obtain a 25–100 μM monomer, triggering the self-assembly. Unless stated otherwise, a temperature cycle (70 °C for 1 h + 24 h at rt) was applied to obtain a reproducible equilibrium.
TEM showed the absence of aggregates in DMSO (Figure 2a), confirming, together with the resolved 1H NMR, the molecularly dissolved state in this solvent. In water, monomer 1 assembled into μm-long and flexible fibers as shown in Figure 2b. A quantitative analysis of the TEM images reveals a diameter of 6.48 ± 1.15 nm, in good agreement with other reported water-soluble BTAs. (43)

Figure 2

Figure 2. TEM image of 100 μM monomer 1 (a) in DMSO and (b) in water (scale bar: 500 nm). E–Z photoisomerization of monomer 1 at 25 μM in (c) DMSO and (d) water, with UV (λ = 365 nm) irradiations of 30 s. HPLC chromatogram of monomer 1 in (e) DMSO and (f) water at 280 nm (measured isosbestic point).

Initially, two discotic amphiphiles were synthesized following the same design, differing only in the azobenzene amino acid. In monomer 1 (Figure 1b), which contains a l-phenylalanine-4′-azobenzene, the azobenzene is placed as a side chain of the wedge. In monomer 2 (Figure 1c), which comprises a [3-(3-aminomethyl)phenylazo]phenylacetic acid, the azobenzene is placed as backbone of the wedge. Since the azobenzene moiety is in close proximity to the core in both cases, very different behaviors can be expected for monomer 1 (Figure 1b) and 2 (Figure 1c). Remarkably, despite the similar structures of both monomers, monomer 2 did not self-assemble under any of the tested conditions of concentration, temperature, and light irradiation. We hypothesize that the orientation and proximity to the core of the azobenzene moiety of monomer 2 prevent effective stacking. All the work reported in the following sections will therefore focus exclusively on monomer 1.
In order to characterize the monomer isomerization state and switching ability inside the assemblies, we performed UV–vis spectroscopy and HPLC of monomer 1 prepared in in both DMSO and water (Figure 2). Azobenzene has a characteristic absorbance spectrum that allows studying the relative population of the two isomers, namely, for the E isomer λmax = 330 nm and for Z λmax = 430 nm. The UV–vis spectra were recorded in DMSO (nonstacked monomer) and milli-Q (mainly stacked monomer) at different UV irradiation (λ = 365 nm) times (Figure 2c and d). Initially, one absorbance peak was visible at λ = 330 nm, corresponding to the E-configured azobenzene, the most stable isomer at standard conditions. Upon UV irradiation, the E-azobenzene peak decreases while the Z-azobenzene peak at 440 nm appears, resulting in two isosbestic points, at 280 and 387 nm, indicating that the isomerization took place. Moreover, we were able to compare the kinetics of photoisomerization by plotting the ratio between the peaks at 430 and 330 nm in time, which as a first approximation we define as the “E/Z ratio”. This shows a maximum conversion in less than 5 min and concludes that the azobenzene moiety can efficiently isomerize as a free molecule in solution (DMSO) and in the assembled state (water) (Figure S9). Interestingly, the Z configuration is stable when kept in the dark at 25 °C at least for 24 h (Figure S10), confirming the measured isomer distribution is not affected by the thermal back-isomerization. This is an important feature to consider when using photochromic ligands, especially for functional biological assays. (44,45) Finally, monomers in the Z configuration can isomerize back to E-azobenzene by irradiating with blue light (455 nm). It was possible to reproduce 10 isomerization cycles, showing no signs of fatigue in both DMSO and water (Figure S11).
Altogether, these observations highlight a number of crucial features of our system. First, the azobenzenes can isomerize both in the molecularly dissolved state and inside the fibers. This is far from trivial, as the steric hindrance and interactions inside the assembly can prevent isomerization. (46−48) Second, the very slow thermal recovery allows the photocontrol of the system in time. Lastly, the system is fully reversible and can undergo multiple photoisomerization cycles.
Interestingly, even though spectroscopically we differentiate two states (E and Z), the monomer can actually be found in four different configurations. Considering that each monomer has three independent azobenzene moieties, which can be either E or Z, the monomer can be found as EEE, EEZ, EZZ, and ZZZ. Indeed, the analysis of samples of 1 in both DMSO and water by HPLC-UV-MS (Figure 2e,f) displayed four peaks, in agreement with previous reports. (43) HPLC also allowed the analysis of the relative distribution in population of the isomers, which is valuable information since the isomers’ distribution can have an impact on the self-assembly. (49) As shown in Figure 2e,f, monomers start mostly with azobenzenes in the E configuration (EEE), while a significant population of EEZ is present in the nonirradiated state. UV irradiation will change the distribution of these populations, which can be recovered through irradiation with blue light (455 nm). With these premises we proceed in studying the responsive behavior of these fibers.

2.3. Light Responsive Self-Assembly

As discussed, we hypothesized that the E–Z isomerization of an azobenzene placed close to the BTA would disrupt the self-assembly, due to the decreased propensity of the bent Z-azobenzenes to stack and the higher solubility in water. (38,50) Thus, UV irradiation would result in dissolution of the fibers, and visible irradiation would promote fiber reassociation.
To confirm this hypothesis, a combination of HPLC, TEM, and CD was used. In Figure 3a–i we report a comparison among samples before/after irradiation with UV light and after irradiation with blue light, making use of the three different techniques. The pristine sample contains a large fraction of EEE monomer (about 60%), as indicated by HPLC (Figure 3a), which results in the assembly of long fibers as observed by TEM (Figure 3b). Due to the chirality of the azobenzene-containing amino acid, a helical stack with a preferred helicity is formed, which can be followed by CD. (51)Figure 3c shows the CD spectrum of the fibers, revealing a band at 260–380 nm, centered at 330 nm, corresponding to the stacking of the azobenzene moieties.

Figure 3

Figure 3. HPLC-UV at 280 nm of the sample at 25 μM (a) before UV, (b) after UV irradiation (365 nm, 8 s 100% at 1000 mA of the LED intensity), and (c) after blue light (455 nm, 10 s, 100% at 1000 mA of the LED intensity). TEM of the sample at 25 μM (d) before UV, (e) after UV, and (f) after blue light irradiation (scale bar: 500 nm). CD of the sample at 25 μM (g) before UV, (h) after 365 nm irradiation for 8 s, and (i) after 455 nm irradiation for 10 s. (j) HPLC-UV analysis of isomer distribution at different UV irradiation times. (k) CD at 304 nm at different E isomer % (the line was added to guide the eye).

After UV irradiation several dramatic changes can be observed. First, significant isomerization takes place as shown by HPLC. Before UV treatment the photostationary state is primarily (>90%) composed of EEE and EEZ monomers, while Z-rich monomers are the majority species (EZZ 42% and ZZZ 42%) after UV irradiation. This photoisomerization is accompanied by the disappearance of the CD peak at 330 nm (Figure 3f), indicating loss of helical order, and most strikingly by the complete disappearance of long fibrillar aggregates in the TEM characterization (Figure 3e). These observations showed that the EZ isomerization of the azobenzene moieties results in the disassembly of the supramolecular polymers. Notably, after irradiation with blue light, recovery of the initial supramolecular polymers was obtained: HPLC shows that the population of isomers is reverted (Figure 3g), the CD signal is restablished (Figure 3i, and TEM again shows the presence of fibers of the same length and morphology (Figure 3h). Therefore, the material designed here is photoresponsive, the response is reversible, and a correlation between monomer configuration and assembly state is established.
To demonstrate that this switch is not abrupt but is gradual and therefore controllable, we performed a kinetic study to evaluate the isomer distribution and the assembly state at different irradiation times by HPLC and CD. In Figure 3j a plot of the distribution of isomers after stepwise UV irradiation is presented. Initially, the system contains predominantly monomers in EEE configuration, while very gradually Z-forms are enriched. This shows the potential to precisely control relative abundance of the isomers by irradiation time. Interestingly, the CD signal, and therefore the amount of monomers in a helical fiber, is proportional to the amount of E form of monomers (Figure 3k). This tendency points out that the crucial feature for the self-assembly of the monomers is the amount of E isomers. This indicates that there is a constructive interaction between azobenzenes in E inside the assembly, favoring the stacking of EEE, over EEZ or EZZ.
These results demonstrate a strong relationship between self-assembly and concentration of the EEE isomer, as well as fine-tuning the self-assembly by UV irradiation. By this means, specific degrees of assembly are accessible by controlling the concentration of the EEE monomer (Figures 3k, S12).
In brief, we demonstrated by a combination of HPLC, TEM, and CD that self-assembly in our system can be finely modulated by irradiation with UV and blue light to tune the isomer population distribution.

2.4. Temperature Responsiveness

Due to the weak nature of the noncovalent bonding, supramolecular polymers generally display temperature-dependent behavior, typically disassembling at high temperatures, a property that is often used to study the self-assembly mechanism. (52) However, it has also been extensively reported that polyethylene glycol-containing supramolecular structures exhibit a different temperature response in water, showing a transition to an enhanced aggregation state at higher temperatures due to entropic effects. (31,53−56) Aiming to elucidate the temperature responsiveness of our system, we studied the assembly state at different temperatures by TEM, CD, and SLS.
First, a temperature cycle (25–75–25 °C) was performed on the sample, and TEM images were taken at the three different temperature points. Before heating, TEM showed few fibers per field with a length in the range of 300 nm (Figure 4a). When increasing the temperature to 75 °C, an increase in both number and length of the fibers can be clearly observed (Figure 4b). After cooling and subsequent equilibration for 24 h, the number of fibers decreased again, resembling the situation before heating (Figure 4c) and strongly suggesting a reversible character of the response. In all cases, the sample preserved the fiber-like shape and diameter, although an increase in number, length, and degree of entanglements can be observed at the higher temperature.

Figure 4

Figure 4. TEM of monomer 1 at 20 μM at (a) 20 °C, (b) 75 °C, and (c) 20 °C after cooling from 75 °C. (d) SLS temperature cycle on the sample at 100 μM at 60 °C/h measuring in steps of 5 °C (the line was added to guide the eye). (e) CD heating ramp experiment on the sample at 25 μM at 60 °C/h, measuring in steps of 5 °C.

To corroborate this, a temperature cycling experiment was performed with SLS (Figure 4d). We observed a very low scattering intensity (close to the limit of detection) at low temperatures. However, a linear increase was obtained ramping up from 25 °C to 30 °C to 70 °C. This trend is also reversible, matching with TEM results, but shows a hysteresis because of the long time required to reach equilibrium (S13). In order to confirm that the increase in scattering intensity is due to an increase in aggregation and not due to an increase in the refractive index at higher temperatures, we made use of the UV response of the system. We proceeded to warm the sample at 40 °C and equilibrate, obtaining the increase in scattering, and then we irradiated the sample with UV light. The experiment resulted in a decrease of the scattering signal to detection limits (S13), for which the only explanation can be a loss in aggregation. Thus, the UV irradiation can trigger the disassembly even when the polymerization is enhanced.
To further investigate the mechanism of this phenomenon, a temperature cycling experiment was performed also with CD, showing two transitions: first, a signal inversion for the stacked azobenzene from 5 to 40 °C and, second, a decrease in signal intensity above 50 °C (Figures 4e, S14). The spectrum showed a positive Cotton effect between 260 and 380 nm (corresponding to the azobenzene absorbance) below rt, which changed to a negative Cotton effect at 20–25 °C. On the contrary the CD signal corresponding to the BTA cores (λmax = 220 nm, only a peak shoulder can be observed, S15) did not seem altered even though the cutoff wavelength of DMSO prevented a detailed analysis. Therefore, a full helix inversion seems unlikely, while a change in the packing and helicity of the azobenzenes along the fibers seems responsible for the observed transition. The signal kept increasing until 50 °C and then started decreasing in a reversible manner (S14). This inflection could imply a “classical” loss in aggregation due to temperature-induced depolymerization.
Interestingly, this unusual temperature-enhanced polymerization is the consequence of the synergistic response of the azobenzene moiety and the octa(ethylene glycol) chain together. First, temperature modifies the distribution of E and Z isomers of the azobenzene moiety, favoring the more thermodynamically stable EEE isomer at high temperatures (S14) and thus increasing aggregation. However, this increase in the concentration (+20%) on its own cannot explain the increased SLS signal (+2000%) or the signal inversion observed in CD spectroscopy. Second, octa(ethylene glycol) hydrophobicity is increased upon heating because of loss of solvating water molecules, (40,42) thereby increasing the driving forces for self-assembly driving forces. We hypothesize that the monomer rearrangement inside the fibers is related to the desolvation of octa(ethylene glycol), because it leads to an increased hydrophobicity and a reduced steric hindrance between octa(ethylene glycol) chains. Analogous results have been reported before in similar scenarios. (20)
Together, these two effects are amplified. The temperature increases at the same time as the hydrophobicity of each monomer and the distribution of azobenzene moieties in the E configuration. Therefore, there are more monomers able to stack than at rt and their hydrophobicity is higher. The sum brings the systems to the highest aggregation state at 40–50 °C.
Summarizing, we have a supramolecular system with a reversible response to temperature, enhancing monomer aggregation above room temperature and changing the internal conformation of the lateral chain packing. Furthermore, even when the polymerization is enhanced, the assemblies remain responsive to light. Considering that the kinetics of the photoisomerization is much faster than the kinetics of the thermal back-isomerization, the light response dominates over the temperature response.

2.5. pH and Ionic Strength Responsiveness

Previous work highlighted that the stability of a supramolecular polymer can be affected by the repulsion between charged monomers. (57) An elegant strategy to design responsive systems using this phenomenon consists of introducing specific groups, whose protonation, and consequently charge, depends on pH. (13)
Inspired by this work and aiming for an ampholytic behavior in a single component, we included a C-terminal lysine in our design, exposing a carboxylic acid and a primary amine at the periphery of the monomer. Considering the pKa’s of both amino (10.79) and carboxylic groups (2.20), we can delimit three pH ranges in which the net charge of the discotic monomer undergoes significant variations. Approximately, between pH 3.9 and pH 9.6 monomers are zwitterionic, comprising three carboxylate groups and three ammonium groups, with a net charge of 0 (Figure S16). When approaching pH 2.2, the carboxylate groups become protonated, resulting in a net positive charge, which would destabilize the aggregates and promote disassembly. A similar process would happen when approaching pH 12, when the ammonium moieties are deprotonated, resulting in a net negative charge. Therefore, the system can evolve from a zwitterionic monomer, where the assembly would be favored through potential ionic bridges between stacked discs, to electrostatic repulsion-induced disassembly.
In order to demonstrate that this ampholytic behavior has an impact on self-assembly, we performed a series of experiments including TEM, CD, and SLS. We prepared samples at three different pH values and compared the self-assembly of zwitterionic monomers (+3/–3 at pH 7.2 ± 0.8) with positively charged monomers (+3 at pH 2.2 ± 0.2) and negatively charged monomers (−3 at pH 12.0 ± 0.2). These pH values were chosen according to the expected maximum of population of each charged species (Figure S16).
TEM revealed the formation of fibers at neutral pH, while very few were observed at low pH and none at high pH (Figure 5a). This indicates that the repulsion at high and low pH values is sufficient to destabilize the aggregates, resulting in monomers or small aggregates. In order to reinforce this result and explore the combination of the temperature and pH responses, a temperature ramping experiment with CD and SLS was performed at the different pH values. Very low signal was obtained for nonzwitterionic samples using CD, showing also a very weak temperature response (Figure 5b). This can be attributed to the few monomers still zwitterionic and, hence, able to aggregate. SLS showed a low count rate that did not increase upon heating (Figure 5c), indicating no (significant) aggregation, confirming the TEM and CD results. In addition, we irradiated the samples with UV light at the different pH’s to demonstrate the compatibility of the two responsiveness (S17), showing higher degrees of disassembly. These indications altogether support the pH responsiveness of our fibers and the existence of three pH windows in which the system’s net charge changes, producing a dramatic change in aggregation. Furthermore, it demonstrated that the temperature effect on the self-assembly at extreme pH’s, where the increased hydrophobicity due to desolvation of the octaethylene glycol chain competes against the electrostatic repulsion, is too subtle to make a change. Thus, in this scenario the pH response dominates over the temperature response.

Figure 5

Figure 5. TEM image of monomer 1 at 100 μM (a) at pH 2.0 ± 0.2, 7.0 ± 0.2, and 11.6 ± 0.2 (scale bar: 250 nm). CD heating experiment at 25 μM (b) at pH 2.2 ± 0.2, 7.2 ± 0.8, and 12.0 ± 0.2 (60 °C/h, measuring in steps of 5 °C). SLS heating experiment at 100 μM (c) at pH 2.0 ± 0.2, 7.0 ± 0.2, and 11.6 ± 0.2 (60 °C/h measuring in steps of 5 °C) (the line was added to guide the eye). CD at 5 °C with and without NaCl 150 mM (d) at pH 2.2 ± 0.2, 7.2 ± 0.8, and 12.0 ± 0.2.

Previous reports have also shown that ionic strength can modulate monomer repulsion through shielding of charges. (56) Here, we tested if our fibers respond to changes in ionic strength in the three pH windows. In particular, we added NaCl at a physiological concentration (150 mM) with the purpose of shielding the charges. In Figure 5d we compare CD spectra from samples at pH 2.2, 7.2, and 12.0, with and without salt. In all cases, we observe an increase in CD signal, associated with an increased aggregation. Under the acidic and basic conditions, the influence is more pronounced, because the sample changes from a disassembled to an assembled state. Interestingly, we did this experiment at two different temperatures, 5 and 20 °C, observing a reduced signal at 20 °C due to the proximity to the signal inversion temperature (Figure S18). These results demonstrate that the repulsion can be modified by the ionic strength, confirming the mechanism of the responsiveness to pH and its reversibility, and indicate the temperature response remains.

3. Conclusions

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

In conclusion, we demonstrated the possibility to condense different response mechanisms in single-component supramolecular polymers through a rational monomer design. Following a modular synthesis, we incorporate moieties in the monomer design that, simultaneously, drive the self-assembly and introduce responsiveness to different stimuli (Figure 6). Our system responds in a controlled and reversible fashion to light, temperature, pH, and ionic strength, modulating the assembly–disassembly equilibrium. By these means, we describe a system with multiple equilibria (Figure 6) in which each state is accessible through different pathways, applying the stimuli either orthogonally or in combination, thereby facilitating a sophisticated degree of control.

Figure 6

Figure 6. Schematic representation of the system. Above, molecular responsiveness to light and pH. Below, supramolecular responsiveness to light, pH, ionic strength, and temperature.

Our results pave the way toward effective and highly controllable supramolecular materials in which the responsiveness is fully imprinted in a single monomer. This is especially interesting for biological applications, such as drug delivery or tissue engineering, where controlling the material performance in a complex environment is challenging.

Supporting Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/jacs.0c02067.

  • Experimental procedure for the synthesis of 1 and 2 as well as analytical, spectral, and self-assembly characterization data (PDF)

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Author Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

  • Corresponding Authors
    • Silvia Pujals - Institute for Bioengineering of Catalonia (IBEC), The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology (BIST), Barcelona 08036, SpainDepartment of Electronics and Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Physics, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona 08011, Spain Email: [email protected]
    • Lorenzo Albertazzi - Institute for Bioengineering of Catalonia (IBEC), The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology (BIST), Barcelona 08036, SpainDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Institute of Complex Molecular Systems (ICMS), Eindhoven University of Technology (TUE), Eindhoven 5612 AZ, The NetherlandsOrcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-6837-0812 Email: [email protected] [email protected]
  • Authors
    • Edgar Fuentes - Institute for Bioengineering of Catalonia (IBEC), The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology (BIST), Barcelona 08036, Spain
    • Marieke Gerth - Laboratory of Self-Organizing Soft Matter, Department of Chemical Engineering and Chemistry & Institute of Complex Molecular Systems (ICMS), Eindhoven University of Technology (TUE), Eindhoven 5612 AZ, The NetherlandsLaboratory of Physical Chemistry, Department of Chemical Engineering and Chemistry, Eindhoven University of Technology (TUE), Eindhoven 5612 AZ, The NetherlandsPresent Address: Van’t Hoff Laboratory for Physical and Colloid Chemistry, Debye Institute for Nanomaterials Science, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8, Utrecht 3584 CH, The Netherlands
    • José Augusto Berrocal - Adolphe Merkle Institute, Polymer Chemistry and Materials, University of Fribourg, Chemin des Verdiers 4, 1700 Fribourg, SwitzerlandOrcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0003-3435-8310
    • Carlo Matera - Institute for Bioengineering of Catalonia (IBEC), The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology (BIST), Barcelona 08036, SpainNetwork Biomedical Research Centre in Biomaterials, Bioengineering and Nanomedicine (CIBER-BBN), Madrid 28029, SpainOrcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0001-6939-3859
    • Pau Gorostiza - Institute for Bioengineering of Catalonia (IBEC), The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology (BIST), Barcelona 08036, SpainNetwork Biomedical Research Centre in Biomaterials, Bioengineering and Nanomedicine (CIBER-BBN), Madrid 28029, SpainCatalan Institution for Research and Advanced Studies (ICREA), Barcelona 08011, SpainOrcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-7268-5577
    • Ilja K. Voets - Laboratory of Physical Chemistry, Department of Chemical Engineering and Chemistry, Eindhoven University of Technology (TUE), Eindhoven 5612 AZ, The NetherlandsOrcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0003-3543-4821
  • Notes
    The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Acknowledgments

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This work was financially supported by the EURONANOMED (NANOVAX: PCIN-2016-025), MINECO-FPI (BES-2017-080188), TARGESTORM (SAF2016-75241-R), and the Generalitat de Catalunya (2017 SGR 01536) to E.F., S.P., and L.A. The AGAUR/Generalitat de Catalunya (CERCA Programme 2017-SGR-1442); FEDER funds; Human Brain Project (SGA3 Grant Agreement 945539); MINECO (Deepred); “la Caixa” Foundation (ID 100010434) under the agreement LCF/PR/HR19/52160010); and the CECH project that is co-financed by the European Union Regional Development Fund within the framework of the ERDF Operational Program of Catalonia 2014-2020 with a grant of 50% of total eligible cost. L.A. and I.K.V. acknowledge The Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO VIDI Grants 723.014.006 and 192.028) for financial support.

References

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article references 57 other publications.

  1. 1
    Krieg, E.; Bastings, M. M. C.; Besenius, P.; Rybtchinski, B. Supramolecular Polymers in Aqueous Media. Chem. Rev. 2016, 116 (4), 24142477,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00369
  2. 2
    Albertazzi, L.; Martinez-Veracoechea, F. J.; Leenders, C. M. A.; Voets, I. K.; Frenkel, D.; Meijer, E. W. Spatiotemporal Control and Superselectivity in Supramolecular Polymers Using Multivalency. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2013, 110 (30), 1220312208,  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1303109110
  3. 3
    Matson, J. B.; Stupp, S. I. Drug Release from Hydrazone-Containing Peptide Amphiphiles. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47 (28), 79627964,  DOI: 10.1039/c1cc12570b
  4. 4
    Bakker, M. H.; Lee, C. C.; Meijer, E. W.; Dankers, P. Y. W.; Albertazzi, L. Multicomponent Supramolecular Polymers as a Modular Platform for Intracellular Delivery. ACS Nano 2016, 10 (2), 18451852,  DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.5b05383
  5. 5
    Su, H.; Zhang, W.; Wang, H.; Wang, F.; Cui, H. Paclitaxel-Promoted Supramolecular Polymerization of Peptide Conjugates. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141 (30), 1199712004,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.9b04730
  6. 6
    Su, H.; Wang, F.; Wang, Y.; Cheetham, A. G.; Cui, H. Macrocyclization of a Class of Camptothecin Analogues into Tubular Supramolecular Polymers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141 (43), 1710717111,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.9b09848
  7. 7
    Besenius, P.; Heynens, J. L.; Straathof, R.; Niuwenhuizen, M. M.; Bomans, P.; Terreno, E.; Aime, S.; Strijkers, G.; Nicolay, K.; Meijer, E. W. Paramagnetic self-assembled nanoparticles as supramolecular MRI contrast agents. Contrast Media Mol. Imaging 2012, 7 (3), 356361,  DOI: 10.1002/cmmi.498
  8. 8
    Orbach, R.; Adler-Abramovich, L.; Zigerson, S.; Mironi-Harpaz, I.; Seliktar, D.; Gazit, E. Self-Assembled Fmoc-Peptides as a Platform for the Formation of Nanostructures and Hydrogels. Biomacromolecules 2009, 10 (9), 26462651,  DOI: 10.1021/bm900584m
  9. 9
    Mata, A.; Geng, Y.; Henrikson, K. J.; Aparicio, C.; Stock, S. R.; Stacher, R. L.; Stupp, S. I. Bone regeneration mediated by biomimetic mineralization of a nanofiber matrix. Biomaterials 2010, 31 (23), 60046012,  DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.04.013
  10. 10
    Choe, S.; Bond, C. W.; Harrington, D. A.; Stupp, S. I.; McVary, K. T.; Podlasek, C. A. Peptide Amphiphile Nanofiber Hydrogel Delivery of Sonic Hedgehog Protein to the Cavernous Nerve to Promote Regeneration and Prevent Erectile Dysfunction. Nanomedicine 2017, 13 (1), 95101,  DOI: 10.1016/j.nano.2016.08.032
  11. 11
    Saunders, L.; Ma, P. X. Self-Healing Supramolecular Hydrogels for Tissue Engineering Applications. Macromol. Biosci. 2019, 19, 1800313,  DOI: 10.1002/mabi.201800313
  12. 12
    Blum, A. P.; Kammeyer, J. K.; Rush, A. M.; Callmann, C. E.; Hahn, M. E.; Gianneschi, N. C. Stimuli-Responsive Nanomaterials for Biomedical Applications. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137 (6), 21402154,  DOI: 10.1021/ja510147n
  13. 13
    Frisch, H.; Unsleber, J. P.; Lüdeker, D.; Peterlechner, M.; Brunklaus, G.; Waller, M.; Besenius, P. pH-Switchable Ampholytic Supramolecular Copolymers. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2013, 52 (38), 1009710101,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201303810
  14. 14
    Gröger, G.; Meyer-Zaika, W.; Böttcher, C.; Gröhn, F.; Ruthard, C.; Schmuck, C. Switchable Supramolecular Polymers from the Self-Assembly of a Small Monomer with Two Orthogonal Binding Interactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133 (23), 89618971,  DOI: 10.1021/ja200941a
  15. 15
    Moyer, T. J.; Finbloom, J. A.; Chen, F.; Toft, D. J.; Cryns, V. L.; Stupp, S. I. pH and Amphiphilic Structure Direct Supramolecular Behavior in Biofunctional Assemblies. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136 (42), 1474614752,  DOI: 10.1021/ja5042429
  16. 16
    Ahlers, P.; Frisch, H.; Holm, R.; Spitzer, D.; Barz, M.; Besenius, P. Tuning the pH-Switch of Supramolecular Polymer Carriers for siRNA to Physiologically Relevant pH. Macromol. Biosci. 2017, 17 (10), 1700111,  DOI: 10.1002/mabi.201700111
  17. 17
    Adhikari, B.; Yamada, Y.; Yamauchi, M.; Wakita, K.; Lin, X.; Aratsu, K.; Ohba, T.; Karatsu, T.; Hollamby, M. J.; Shimizu, N.; Takagi, H.; Haruki, R.; Adachi, S.; Yagai, S. Light-induced unfolding and refolding of supramolecular polymer nanofibers. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 15254,  DOI: 10.1038/ncomms15254
  18. 18
    Yagai, S.; Yamauchi, M.; Kobayashi, A.; Karatsu, T.; Kitamura, A.; Ohba, T.; Kikkawa, Y. Control over Hierarchy Levels in the Self-Assembly of Stackable Nanotoroids. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134 (44), 1820518208,  DOI: 10.1021/ja308519b
  19. 19
    Prabhu, D. D.; Aratsu, K.; Kitamoto, Y.; Ouchi, H.; Ohba, T.; Hollamby, M. J.; Shimizu, N.; Takagi, H.; Haruki, R.; Adachi, S.; Yagai, S. Self-folding of supramolecular polymers into bioinspired topology. Sci. Adv. 2018, 4 (9), 8466,  DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aat8466
  20. 20
    Huang, Z.; Lee, E.; Kim, H.-J.; Lee, M. Aqueous Nanofibers with Switchable Chirality Formed of Self-Assembled Dumbbell-Shaped Rod Amphiphiles. Chem. Commun. 2009, 44, 68196821,  DOI: 10.1039/b913286d
  21. 21
    Feijter, I.; Besenius, P.; Albertazzi, L.; Meijer, E. W.; Palmans, A. R. A.; Voets, I. K. Mechanistic control over morphology: self-assembly of a discotic amphiphile in water. Soft Matter 2013, 9 (42), 1002510030,  DOI: 10.1039/C3SM52104D
  22. 22
    Alemán García, M. Á.; Magdalena Estirado, E.; Milroy, L.-G.; Brunsveld, L. Dual-Input Regulation and Positional Control in Hybrid Oligonucleotide/Discotic Supramolecular Wires. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2018, 57 (18), 49764980,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201800148
  23. 23
    Kumar, M.; Brocorens, P.; Tonnelé, C.; Beljonne, D.; Surin, M.; George, S. J. A Dynamic Supramolecular Polymer with Stimuli-Responsive Handedness for in Situ Probing of Enzymatic ATP Hydrolysis. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 5793,  DOI: 10.1038/ncomms6793
  24. 24
    Mishra, A.; Korlepara, D. B.; Balasubramanian, S.; George, S. J. Bioinspired, ATP-driven co-operative supramolecular polymerization and its pathway dependence. Chem. Commun. 2020, 56, 15051508,  DOI: 10.1039/C9CC08790G
  25. 25
    Albertazzi, L.; van der Veeken, N.; Baker, M. B.; Palmans, A. R. A.; Meijer, E. W. Supramolecular Copolymers with Stimuli-Responsive Sequence Control. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51 (90), 1616616168,  DOI: 10.1039/C5CC06951C
  26. 26
    Molla, M. R.; Prasad, P.; Thayumanavan, S. Protein-Induced Supramolecular Disassembly of Amphiphilic Polypeptide Nanoassemblies. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137 (23), 72867289,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.5b04285
  27. 27
    van Dun, S.; Ottmann, C.; Milroy, L.; Brunsveld, L. Supramolecular Chemistry Targeting Proteins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139 (40), 1396013968,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.7b01979
  28. 28
    Guo, J.; Zhuang, J.; Wang, F.; Raghupathi, K. R.; Thayumanavan, S. Protein AND Enzyme Gated Supramolecular Disassembly. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136 (6), 22202223,  DOI: 10.1021/ja4108676
  29. 29
    Erbas-Cakmak, S.; Kolemen, S.; Sedgwick, A. C.; Gunnlaugsson, T.; James, T. D.; Yoon, J.; Akkaya, E. U. Molecular logic gates: the past, present and future. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018, 47, 2228,  DOI: 10.1039/C7CS00491E
  30. 30
    Gao, J.; Wu, P.; Fernandez, A.; Zhuang, J.; Thayumanavan, S. Cellular AND Gates: Synergistic Recognition to Boost Selective Uptake of Polymeric Nanoassemblies. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 16,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.202002748
  31. 31
    Spitzer, D.; Rodrigues, L. L.; Straßburger, D.; Mezger, M.; Besenius, P. Tuneable Transient Thermogels Mediated by a pH- and Redox-Regulated Supramolecular Polymerization. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2017, 56 (48), 1546115465,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201708857
  32. 32
    Goskulwad, S.; La, D. D.; Kobaisi, M. A.; Bhosale, S. V.; Bansal, V.; Vinu, A.; Ariga, K.; Bhosale, S. V. Dynamic multistimuli-responsive reversible chiral transformation in supramolecular helices. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8 (1), 111,  DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-29152-9
  33. 33
    Liu, X.; Hu, D.; Jiang, Z.; Zhuang, J.; Xu, Y.; Guo, X.; Thayumanavan, S. Multi-Stimuli-Responsive Amphiphilic Assemblies through Simple Postpolymerization Modifications. Macromolecules 2016, 49 (17), 61866192,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.macromol.6b01397
  34. 34
    Chen, J.; Zhang, S.; Sun, F.; Li, N.; Cui, K.; He, J.; Niu, D.; Li, Y. Multi-stimuli responsive supramolecular polymers and their electrospun nanofibers. Polym. Chem. 2016, 7 (17), 29472954,  DOI: 10.1039/C6PY00445H
  35. 35
    Cantekin, S.; Nakano, Y.; Everts, J. C.; van der Schoot, P.; Meijer, E. W.; Palmans, A. R. A. A Stereoselectively Deuterated Supramolecular Motif to Probe the Role of Solvent during Self-Assembly Processes. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48 (32), 38033805,  DOI: 10.1039/c2cc17284d
  36. 36
    Pianowski, Z. L. Recent Implementations of Molecular Photoswitches into Smart Materials and Biological Systems. Chem. - Eur. J. 2019, 25 (20), 51285144,  DOI: 10.1002/chem.201805814
  37. 37
    Szymański, W.; Beierle, J. M.; Kistemaker, H. A. V.; Velema, W. A.; Feringa, B. L. Reversible Photocontrol of Biological Systems by the Incorporation of Molecular Photoswitches. Chem. Rev. 2013, 113 (8), 61146178,  DOI: 10.1021/cr300179f
  38. 38
    Ishikawa, M.; Ohzono, T.; Yamaguchi, T.; Norikane, Y. Photo-Enhanced Aqueous Solubilization of an Azo-Compound. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7 (1), 16,  DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-06947-w
  39. 39
    Vancoillie, G.; Frank, D.; Hoogenboom, R. Thermoresponsive Poly(oligo Ethylene Glycol Acrylates). Prog. Polym. Sci. 2014, 39 (6), 10741095,  DOI: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2014.02.005
  40. 40
    Lüsse, S.; Arnold, K. The Interaction of Poly(ethylene Glycol) with Water Studied by 1H and 2H NMR Relaxation Time Measurements. Macromolecules 1996, 29 (12), 42514257,  DOI: 10.1021/ma9508616
  41. 41
    Chandler, D. Interfaces and the Driving Force of Hydrophobic Assembly. Nature 2005, 437 (7059), 640647,  DOI: 10.1038/nature04162
  42. 42
    Smith, G. D.; Bedrov, D. Roles of Enthalpy, Entropy, and Hydrogen Bonding in the Lower Critical Solution Temperature Behavior of Poly(ethylene oxide)/Water Solutions. J. Phys. Chem. B 2003, 107 (14), 30953097,  DOI: 10.1021/jp0270046
  43. 43
    Besenius, P.; Goedegebure, Y.; Driesse, M.; Koay, M.; Bomans, P.; Palmans, A. R. A.; Dankers, P. Y. W.; Meijer, E. W. Peptide functionalised discotic amphiphiles and their self-assembly into supramolecular nanofibres. Soft Matter 2011, 7 (18), 79807983,  DOI: 10.1039/c1sm05896g
  44. 44
    Volgraf, M.; Gorostiza, P.; Szobota, S.; Helix, M. R.; Isacoff, E. Y.; Trauner, D. Reversibly Caged Glutamate: A Photochromic Agonist of Ionotropic Glutamate Receptors. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 260261,  DOI: 10.1021/ja067269o
  45. 45
    Riefolo, F.; Matera, C.; Garrido-Charles, A.; Gomila, A. M. J.; Sortino, R.; Agnetta, L.; Claro, E.; Masgrau, R.; Holzgrabe, U.; Batlle, M.; Decker, M.; Guasch, E.; Gorostiza, P. Optical Control of Cardiac Function with a Photoswitchable Muscarinic Agonist. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 76287636,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.9b03505
  46. 46
    Bandara, H. M. D.; Burdette, S. C. Photoisomerization in Different Classes of Azobenzene. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41 (5), 18091825,  DOI: 10.1039/C1CS15179G
  47. 47
    Titov, E.; Granucci, G.; Götze, J. P.; Persico, M.; Saalfrank, P. Dynamics of Azobenzene Dimer Photoisomerization: Electronic and Steric Effects. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2016, 7 (18), 35913596,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b01401
  48. 48
    Cocchi, C.; Draxl, C. Understanding the Effects of Packing and Chemical Terminations on the Optical Excitations of Azobenzene-Functionalized Self-Assembled Monolayers. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 2017, 29 (39), 394005,  DOI: 10.1088/1361-648X/aa7ca7
  49. 49
    Galanti, A.; Diez-Cabanes, V.; Santoro, J.; Valasek, M.; Minoia, A.; Mayor, M.; Cornil, J.; Samorì, P. Electronic Decoupling in C3-Symmetrical Light-Responsive Tris(Azobenzene) Scaffolds: Self-Assembly and Multiphotochromism. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140 (47), 1606216070,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.8b06324
  50. 50
    Tong, X.; Wang, G.; Soldera, A.; Zhao, Y. How Can Azobenzene Block Copolymer Vesicles Be Dissociated and Reformed by Light?. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109 (43), 2028120287,  DOI: 10.1021/jp0524274
  51. 51
    Liu, M.; Zhang, L.; Wang, T. Supramolecular Chirality in Self-Assembled Systems. Chem. Rev. 2015, 115 (15), 73047397,  DOI: 10.1021/cr500671p
  52. 52
    Casellas, N. M.; Pujals, S.; Bochicchio, D.; Pavan, G. M.; Torres, T.; Albertazzi, L.; García-Iglesias, M. From isodesmic to highly cooperative: reverting the supramolecular polymerization mechanism in water by fine monomer design. Chem. Commun. 2018, 54 (33), 41124115,  DOI: 10.1039/C8CC01259H
  53. 53
    Hamley, I. W.; Cheng, G.; Castelletto, V. A. Thermoresponsive Hydrogel Based on Telechelic PEG End-Capped with Hydrophobic Dipeptides. Macromol. Biosci. 2011, 11 (8), 10681078,  DOI: 10.1002/mabi.201100022
  54. 54
    Fuller, J. M.; Raghupathi, K. R.; Ramireddy, R. R.; Subrahmanyam, A. V.; Yesilyurt, V.; Thayumanavan, S. Temperature-Sensitive Transitions below LCST in Amphiphilic Dendritic Assemblies: Host–Guest Implications. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135 (24), 89478954,  DOI: 10.1021/ja402019c
  55. 55
    Engel, S.; Spitzer, D.; Rodrigues, L. L.; Fritz, E.; Straßburger, D.; Schönhoff, M.; Ravoo, B. J.; Besenius, P. Kinetic control in the temperature-dependent sequential growth of surface-confined supramolecular copolymers. Faraday Discuss. 2017, 204 (0), 5367,  DOI: 10.1039/C7FD00100B
  56. 56
    Frisch, H.; Fritz, E.; Stricker, F.; Schmüser, L.; Spitzer, D.; Weidner, T.; Ravoo, B. J.; Besenius, P. Kinetically Controlled Sequential Growth of Surface-Grafted Chiral Supramolecular Copolymers. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2016, 55 (25), 72427246,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201601048
  57. 57
    Besenius, P.; Portale, G.; Bomans, P.; Janssen, H. M.; Palmans, A. R. A.; Meijer, E. W. Controlling the Growth and Shape of Chiral Supramolecular Polymers in Water. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2010, 107 (42), 1788817893,  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1009592107

Cited By

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article is cited by 66 publications.

  1. Yuncong Xue, Yu Jin, Yifei Zhang, Fengmin Han, Feng Wang. Stimuli-Triggered Dynamic Transformations in Supramolecular Polymers. Chemistry of Materials 2024, 36 (13) , 6347-6369. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.4c01265
  2. Leong-Hung Cheung, Jeffrey C. To, Wai-Ki Wong, Marc C. A. Stuart, Takashi Kajitani, Vincent W. Keng, Franco King-Chi Leung. Tailoring Multicontrolled Supramolecular Assemblies of Stiff-Stilbene Amphiphiles into Macroscopic Soft Scaffolds as Cell-Material Interfaces. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2024, 16 (3) , 4056-4070. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.3c16795
  3. Alexander Zika, Mohit Agarwal, Ralf Schweins, Franziska Gröhn. Double-Wavelength-Switchable Molecular Self-Assembly of a Photoacid and Spirooxazine in an Aqueous Solution. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 2023, 14 (43) , 9563-9568. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.3c02392
  4. Kamalpreet Kaur, Gagandeep Singh, Navneet Kaur, Narinder Singh. Polyether Sulfone-Based Organic Nanoparticle Coupled Membrane for Detection and Purification of Amoxicillin Antibiotic from Wastewater. ACS ES&T Water 2023, 3 (10) , 3387-3397. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestwater.3c00357
  5. Edgar Fuentes, Yeray Gabaldón, Mario Collado, Shikha Dhiman, José Augusto Berrocal, Silvia Pujals, Lorenzo Albertazzi. Supramolecular Stability of Benzene-1,3,5-tricarboxamide Supramolecular Polymers in Biological Media: Beyond the Stability–Responsiveness Trade-off. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2022, 144 (46) , 21196-21205. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.2c08528
  6. Wanbing Li, Haibo Zhang, Zhaolan Zhai, Xujuan Huang, Shibin Shang, Zhanqian Song. Fast and Reversible Photoresponsive Self-Assembly Behavior of Rosin-Based Amphiphilic Polymers. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 2022, 70 (40) , 12885-12896. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.2c04389
  7. Marta Dudek, Anna Kaczmarek-Kędziera, Radosław Deska, Jakub Trojnar, Patryk Jasik, Piotr Młynarz, Marek Samoć, Katarzyna Matczyszyn. Linear and Nonlinear Optical Properties of Azobenzene Derivatives Modified with an (Amino)naphthalene Moiety. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 2022, 126 (32) , 6063-6073. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.2c03078
  8. Deepika Gupta, Aashish Bhatt, Varun Gupta, Chirag Miglani, Jojo P. Joseph, Jahanvi Ralhan, Dipankar Mandal, Md. Ehesan Ali, Asish Pal. Photochemically Sequestered Off-Pathway Dormant States of Peptide Amphiphiles for Predictive On-Demand Piezoresponsive Nanostructures. Chemistry of Materials 2022, 34 (10) , 4456-4470. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.2c00228
  9. Akash J. Vaidya, Kevin V. Solomon. Surface Functionalization of Rod-Shaped Viral Particles for Biomedical Applications. ACS Applied Bio Materials 2022, 5 (5) , 1980-1989. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsabm.1c01204
  10. Qian Wang, Zhen Wu, Penghua Qin, Jing Ji, Liming Lai, Meizhen Yin. Photoregulated Morphological Transformation of Spiropyran Derivatives Achieving the Tunability of Interfacial Hydrophilicity. Langmuir 2021, 37 (37) , 11170-11175. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.1c02053
  11. Liang Ren, Jianxin Chen, Qing Lu, Jian Han, Hong Wu. Antifouling Nanofiltration Membrane Fabrication via Surface Assembling Light-Responsive and Regenerable Functional Layer. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2020, 12 (46) , 52050-52058. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.0c16858
  12. Wenmin Xiong, Na Song, Xiaowei Mo, Zeyu Zhang, Jinyan Song, Yushi Wang, Junyu Li, Zhilin Yu. In situ formulation of biomaterials for disease therapy: Recent advances in peptide assembly strategies. Coordination Chemistry Reviews 2025, 523 , 216251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2024.216251
  13. Hirohito Yamazaki, Ryusei Sugawara, Yurito Takayama. Development of label-free light-controlled gene expression technologies using mid-IR and terahertz light. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology 2024, 12 https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2024.1324757
  14. Grace C. Thaggard, Buddhima K. P. Maldeni Kankanamalage, Kyoung Chul Park, Jaewoong Lim, Molly A. Quetel, Mamata Naik, Natalia B. Shustova. Switching from Molecules to Functional Materials: Breakthroughs in Photochromism With MOFs. Advanced Materials 2024, 146 https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202410067
  15. Hui Liu, Rui Hu, Zi-Qing Hu, Xiao-Fan Ji. The New Methods for Characterization of Molecular Weight of Supramolecular Polymers. Chinese Journal of Polymer Science 2024, 42 (10) , 1403-1413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10118-024-3153-1
  16. Zi‐Hao Liao, Feng Wang. Light‐controlled smart materials: Supramolecular regulation and applications. Smart Molecules 2024, 122 https://doi.org/10.1002/smo.20240036
  17. Luke Harvey, Ralf Schweins, Isabelle Morfin, Gilbert Chahine, Guillaume Brotons, Laurent Bouteiller, Erwan Nicol, Olivier Colombani. Photo-responsive supramolecular polymer bottle-brushes: The key role of the solvent on self-assembly and responsiveness. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 2024, 670 , 409-416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2024.05.040
  18. Weiren Zhong, Yanchen Wu, Yuting Lin, Shouji Li, Jianyu Zhang, Xu-Min Cai. Fabrication of efficient and red-emissive salicylaldehyde Schiff base isomers for multi-scenario information decryption. Journal of Materials Chemistry C 2024, 12 (30) , 11394-11401. https://doi.org/10.1039/D4TC01287A
  19. Xuanyu Wang, Zhao Gao, Wei Tian. An enzymolysis-induced energy transfer co-assembled system for spontaneously recoverable supramolecular dynamic memory. Chemical Science 2024, 15 (28) , 11084-11091. https://doi.org/10.1039/D4SC02756F
  20. Etienne Bequet‐Ermoy, Virginie Silvestre, Stéphane Cuenot, Eléna Ishow. Reversible Light‐Triggered Stretching of Small‐Molecule Photochromic Organic Nanoparticles. Small 2024, https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202403912
  21. Zi'an Lin, Xuemei Xu, Yiwei Shi, Yuzhou Wu. Precision fabrication of polymer nanostructures on recyclable DNA template. Smart Molecules 2024, 2 (2) https://doi.org/10.1002/smo.20240006
  22. Xiaowei Mo, Zeyu Zhang, Jinyan Song, Yushi Wang, Zhilin Yu. Self-assembly of peptides in living cells for disease theranostics. Journal of Materials Chemistry B 2024, 12 (18) , 4289-4306. https://doi.org/10.1039/D4TB00365A
  23. Zichao Sun, Lingrong Zhu, Jingze Liu, Fan Liu, Pengchao Wu, Pengliang Sui, Haibao Jin, Shaoliang Lin. Azobenzene-based ultrathin peptoid nanoribbons for the potential on highly efficient artificial light-harvesting. Science China Chemistry 2024, 67 (5) , 1680-1686. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11426-023-1931-3
  24. Zixiang He, Xiaoxiao Cheng, Zhao Wang, Wei Zhang. Chiral structures in azobenzene‐containing systems: Construction, regulation, and application. Responsive Materials 2024, 2 (2) https://doi.org/10.1002/rpm.20240010
  25. Chris van Ewijk, Fan Xu, Sourav Maity, Jinyu Sheng, Marc C. A. Stuart, Ben L. Feringa, Wouter H. Roos. Light‐Triggered Disassembly of Molecular Motor‐based Supramolecular Polymers Revealed by High‐Speed AFM. Angewandte Chemie 2024, 136 (14) https://doi.org/10.1002/ange.202319387
  26. Chris van Ewijk, Fan Xu, Sourav Maity, Jinyu Sheng, Marc C. A. Stuart, Ben L. Feringa, Wouter H. Roos. Light‐Triggered Disassembly of Molecular Motor‐based Supramolecular Polymers Revealed by High‐Speed AFM. Angewandte Chemie International Edition 2024, 63 (14) https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202319387
  27. Mónica Martínez-Orts, Silvia Pujals. Responsive Supramolecular Polymers for Diagnosis and Treatment. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024, 25 (7) , 4077. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25074077
  28. Fang Zhang, Zhaocun Shen, Kunyan Sui, Minghua Liu. Disassembly of spherical structures into nanohelices by good solvent dilution. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 2024, 657 , 853-857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2023.12.061
  29. Grace C. Thaggard, Buddhima K. P. Maldeni Kankanamalage, Kyoung Chul Park, Johanna Haimerl, Roland A. Fischer, Natalia B. Shustova. Switching in harmony: Tailoring the properties of functional materials with orthogonal stimuli. Chemical Physics Reviews 2024, 5 (1) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0189069
  30. Xiao-Feng Wang, Chen-Yan Xu, Rui-Lian Lin, Wen-Qi Sun, Ming-Fu Ye, Li-Xin Xu, Jing-Xin Liu. Acid–base regulated inclusion complexes of β-cyclodextrin with 1-[2-(4-fluorophenyl)-2-oxoethyl]-4,4′-bipyridinium dichloride displaying multistimuli-responsive chromic behaviors and photomodulable fluorescence. Journal of Materials Chemistry C 2024, 12 (8) , 2764-2771. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3TC04555B
  31. Miroslava Čonková, Grzegorz Markiewicz, Łukasz Majchrzycki, Adrianna Szmulewicz, Artur R. Stefankiewicz. Chiral versus Achiral Assemblies in Multi‐Stimuli Responsive Supramolecular Polymerization of Tetra‐Substituted Azobenzene Dye. Small Methods 2024, https://doi.org/10.1002/smtd.202301681
  32. Marle E. J. Vleugels, Rik Bosman, Piers H. da Camino Soligo, Stefan Wijker, Bence Fehér, A. J. H. Spiering, Laura Rijns, Riccardo Bellan, Patricia Y. W. Dankers, Anja R. A. Palmans. Bisurea‐Based Supramolecular Polymers for Tunable Biomaterials. Chemistry – A European Journal 2024, 30 (6) https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.202303361
  33. Ka-Lung Hung, Leong-Hung Cheung, Yikun Ren, Ming-Hin Chau, Yan-Yi Lam, Takashi Kajitani, Franco King-Chi Leung. Supramolecular assemblies of amphiphilic donor–acceptor Stenhouse adducts as macroscopic soft scaffolds. Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry 2024, 20 , 1590-1603. https://doi.org/10.3762/bjoc.20.142
  34. Luyao Xu, Yingyi Hu, Dongbing Zhao, Wangqing Zhang, Hong Wang. A Versatile Assembly Approach toward Multifunctional Supramolecular Poly(Ionic Liquid) Nanoporous Membranes in Water. Macromolecular Rapid Communications 2023, 44 (23) https://doi.org/10.1002/marc.202300189
  35. Yong-Fu Li, Xin Wang, Chun-Yu Wang, Yan Wang, Ying-Wei Yang. Multi-stimuli-responsive supramolecular polymer via orthogonal pillararene-based host−guest and π−π interactions. Tetrahedron 2023, 149 , 133718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tet.2023.133718
  36. Luke Harvey, Jean-Michel Guigner, Laurent Bouteiller, Erwan Nicol, Olivier Colombani. Photo-responsive disassembly of supramolecular polymer bottlebrushes in water. Polymer Chemistry 2023, 14 (44) , 4970-4978. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3PY00963G
  37. Leong-Hung Cheung, Brian Boyan Liu, Franco King-Chi Leung. Photocontrolled chiral supramolecular assembly of azobenzene amphiphiles in aqueous media. Polymer Journal 2023, 55 (11) , 1189-1198. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41428-023-00792-7
  38. Muhammad Younis, Sadia Ahmad, Atia Atiq, Muhammad Amjad Farooq, Mu‐Hua Huang, Manzar Abbas. Recent Progress in Azobenzene‐Based Supramolecular Materials and Applications. The Chemical Record 2023, 23 (11) https://doi.org/10.1002/tcr.202300126
  39. Qingbin Yang, Jing Ge, Mengmeng Qin, Hui Wang, Xiaoyu Yang, Xinlei Zhou, Bo Zhang, Yiyu Feng, Wei Feng. Controllable heat release of phase-change azobenzenes by optimizing molecular structures for low-temperature energy utilization. Science China Materials 2023, 66 (9) , 3609-3620. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40843-023-2477-x
  40. Mengmeng Li, Biao Yu, Sicheng Wang, Fengjin Zhou, Jin Cui, Jiacan Su. Microenvironment-responsive nanocarriers for targeted bone disease therapy. Nano Today 2023, 50 , 101838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nantod.2023.101838
  41. Ester Maria Di Tommaso, Melanie Walther, Anne Staubitz, Berit Olofsson. ortho -Functionalization of azobenzenes via hypervalent iodine reagents. Chemical Communications 2023, 59 (34) , 5047-5050. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3CC01060K
  42. Bohang Wu, Yutao Tong, Jiahua Wang, Yuening Qiu, Yifan Gao, Martien A. Cohen Stuart, Junyou Wang. Hierarchical self-assembly of metal–organic supramolecular fibers with lanthanide-derived functionalities. Soft Matter 2023, 19 (14) , 2579-2587. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3SM00084B
  43. Fan Xu, Ben L. Feringa. Photoresponsive Supramolecular Polymers: From Light‐Controlled Small Molecules to Smart Materials. Advanced Materials 2023, 35 (10) https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202204413
  44. Yosuke Hisamatsu, Fangzhou Cheng, Katsuhiro Yamamoto, Hiroshi Takase, Naoki Umezawa, Tsunehiko Higuchi. Control of the stepwise self-assembly process of a pH-responsive amphiphilic 4-aminoquinoline-tetraphenylethene conjugate. Nanoscale 2023, 15 (7) , 3177-3187. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2NR05756E
  45. Hui-Qing Peng, Wenping Zhu, Wu-Jie Guo, Qingyun Li, Shixiang Ma, Christophe Bucher, Bin Liu, Xiaofan Ji, Feihe Huang, Jonathan L. Sessler. Supramolecular polymers: Recent advances based on the types of underlying interactions. Progress in Polymer Science 2023, 137 , 101635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2022.101635
  46. Qais M. Al‐Bataineh, Ahmad D. Telfah, Ahmad A. Ahmad, Areen A. Bani‐Salameh, Rund Abu‐Zurayk, Roland Hergenröder. E / Z reversible photoisomerization of methyl orange doped polyacrylic acid‐based polyelectrolyte brush films. Journal of Applied Polymer Science 2022, 139 (46) https://doi.org/10.1002/app.53138
  47. Satyajit Das, Dipak Patra, Sreejith Shankar, Ayyappanpillai Ajayaghosh. Photocycloaddition as a Tool for Modulation of the Lower Critical Solution Temperature in a Molecular π‐System to Control Transmission of Solar Radiation. Angewandte Chemie 2022, 134 (35) https://doi.org/10.1002/ange.202207641
  48. Satyajit Das, Dipak Patra, Sreejith Shankar, Ayyappanpillai Ajayaghosh. Photocycloaddition as a Tool for Modulation of the Lower Critical Solution Temperature in a Molecular π‐System to Control Transmission of Solar Radiation. Angewandte Chemie International Edition 2022, 61 (35) https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202207641
  49. Yabi Yang, Shuang Liu, Hui Liu, Qingyun Li, Hanwei Zhang, Ziqing Hu, Xiang Lu, Xiaofan Ji. Water-soluble fluorescent supramolecular polymer network with sustainable “Fluorescence on” based on AIEgen-containing host-guest interactions. Giant 2022, 11 , 100112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giant.2022.100112
  50. Qais M. Al‐Bataineh, Ahmad Telfah, Norman Ahlmann, Elen Tolstik, Carlos J. Tavares, Roland Hergenröder. Photoisomerization kinetics of a novel photoswitchable film based on methyl red doped with sodium hexachloroplatinate hosted in polyethylene oxide. Journal of Applied Polymer Science 2022, 139 (25) https://doi.org/10.1002/app.52387
  51. Ahmad A. Ahmad, Qais M. Al‐Bataineh, Dima M. Al‐Nawafleh, Ahmad D. Telfah. Photoisomerization Kinetics of Photoswitchable Thin Films Based on Nanostructure/Molecular Layers of AlN‐AO7. Photochemistry and Photobiology 2022, 98 (4) , 831-842. https://doi.org/10.1111/php.13535
  52. Ziyuan Li, Yanzi Zhou, Tianyue Li, Junji Zhang, He Tian. Stimuli‐responsive hydrogels: Fabrication and biomedical applications. VIEW 2022, 3 (2) https://doi.org/10.1002/VIW.20200112
  53. Qin Wang, Kun Zhang, Rui-Lian Lin, Wen-Qi Sun, Ming-Fu Ye, Xin Xiao, Jing-Xin Liu. A light-responsive molecular switch based on cucurbit[7]uril and 1,1′-bis(benzyl)-4-[2-(4-pyridyl)-vinyl]-pyridinium dibromide displaying white light emission. Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry 2022, 20 (6) , 1253-1259. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1OB02420E
  54. Wanbing Li, Haibo Zhang, Zhaolan Zhai, Xujuan Huang, Shibin Shang, Zhanqian Song. Photo-controlled self-assembly behavior of novel amphiphilic polymers with a rosin-based azobenzene group. New Journal of Chemistry 2022, 46 (3) , 1399-1408. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1NJ04575J
  55. Yuanxin Deng, Qi Zhang, Ting Nie, Fan Xu, Romain Costil, Xue‐Qing Gong, He Tian, Ben L. Feringa, Da‐Hui Qu. Light‐Driven Spiral Deformation of Supramolecular Helical Microfibers by Localized Photoisomerization. Advanced Optical Materials 2022, 10 (1) https://doi.org/10.1002/adom.202101267
  56. Franco King-Chi Leung. Aqueous Supramolecular Assemblies of Photocontrolled Molecular Amphiphiles. 2022, 267-308. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-00657-9_9
  57. Oleh Vybornyi, Shi‐Xia Liu, Robert Häner. Stimuli‐Responsive Supramolecular Polymers from Amphiphilic Phosphodiester‐Linked Azobenzene Trimers. Angewandte Chemie 2021, 133 (49) , 26076-26081. https://doi.org/10.1002/ange.202108745
  58. Oleh Vybornyi, Shi‐Xia Liu, Robert Häner. Stimuli‐Responsive Supramolecular Polymers from Amphiphilic Phosphodiester‐Linked Azobenzene Trimers. Angewandte Chemie International Edition 2021, 60 (49) , 25872-25877. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202108745
  59. Deniz Çakal, Atilla Cihaner, Ahmet M. Önal. Synthesis and electropolymerization of donor-acceptor-donor type monomers based on azobenzene-substituted thieno[3,4-c]pyrrole-4,6-dione acceptors. Electrochimica Acta 2021, 398 , 139325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2021.139325
  60. Hongyu Zhu, Dongxu Gu, Zikun Rao, Yang Li, Yu Liu, Jianyuan Hao. Design of gel-to-sol UCST transition peptides by controlling polypeptide β-sheet nanostructures. Polymer Journal 2021, 53 (8) , 943-949. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41428-021-00490-2
  61. Hong‐Bo Cheng, Shuchun Zhang, Ji Qi, Xing‐Jie Liang, Juyoung Yoon. Advances in Application of Azobenzene as a Trigger in Biomedicine: Molecular Design and Spontaneous Assembly. Advanced Materials 2021, 33 (26) https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202007290
  62. Taotao Hao, Yongsheng Yang, Wenting Liang, Chunying Fan, Xin Wang, Wanhua Wu, Xiaochuan Chen, Haiyan Fu, Hua Chen, Cheng Yang. Trace mild acid-catalysed Z → E isomerization of norbornene-fused stilbene derivatives: intelligent chiral molecular photoswitches with controllable self-recovery. Chemical Science 2021, 12 (7) , 2614-2622. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0SC05213B
  63. Johannes Karcher, Susanne Kirchner, Anna-Lena Leistner, Christian Hald, Philipp Geng, Tobias Bantle, Peter Gödtel, Juliana Pfeifer, Zbigniew L. Pianowski. Selective release of a potent anticancer agent from a supramolecular hydrogel using green light. RSC Advances 2021, 11 (15) , 8546-8551. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0RA08893E
  64. Junwen Tang, Yiyu Feng, Wei Feng. Photothermal storage and controllable release of a phase-change azobenzene/aluminum nitride aerogel composite. Composites Communications 2021, 23 , 100575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coco.2020.100575
  65. Marieke Gerth, José Augusto Berrocal, Davide Bochicchio, Giovanni M. Pavan, Ilja K. Voets. Discordant Supramolecular Fibres Reversibly Depolymerised by Temperature and Light. Chemistry – A European Journal 2021, 27 (5) , 1829-1838. https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.202004115
  66. Ya Qun Zou, Bowen Hu, Ling Chen, Tuo Ji, Ming Yang, Chang An Yang. Novel pH- and thermoresponsive supramolecular dendronized copolymer. Iranian Polymer Journal 2021, 30 (1) , 47-56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13726-020-00873-x
Open PDF

Journal of the American Chemical Society

Cite this: J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 22, 10069–10078
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.0c02067
Published May 12, 2020

Copyright © 2020 American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under these Terms of Use.

Article Views

8385

Altmetric

-

Citations

Learn about these metrics

Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.

  • Abstract

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. (a) Synthesis of monomer 1: (i) Coupling of Fmoc-Lys(Boc)-OH to 2-chlorotrityl chloride resin (represented by the gray circle), DCM, DIEA, 1 h. (ii) Fmoc removal, 20% piperidine in DMF. (iii) Coupling of Fmoc-octa(ethylene glycol)-OH, DCM–DMF (1:1), PyBOP, DIEA, 15 h. (iv) Fmoc removal, 20% piperidine in DMF. (v) Coupling of Fmoc-Azo, DCM–DMF (1:1), PyBOP, DIEA, 15 h. (vi) Fmoc removal, 20% piperidine in DMF. (vii) Cleavage, TFA 95% v/v in H2O. (viii) Core coupling, BT-Cl, CHCl3, DIEA PyBOP, 15 h. (ix) Boc removal, TFA 95% H2O. (b) Molecular structure of monomer 1. (c) Molecular structure of monomer 2. (d) Schematic representation of monomer 1 and its self-assembly into supramolecular fibers. The moieties responsible for responsiveness are highlighted in different colors: orange, light responsive moiety; blue, temperature responsive moiety; green, pH and ionic strength responsive moiety.

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. TEM image of 100 μM monomer 1 (a) in DMSO and (b) in water (scale bar: 500 nm). E–Z photoisomerization of monomer 1 at 25 μM in (c) DMSO and (d) water, with UV (λ = 365 nm) irradiations of 30 s. HPLC chromatogram of monomer 1 in (e) DMSO and (f) water at 280 nm (measured isosbestic point).

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. HPLC-UV at 280 nm of the sample at 25 μM (a) before UV, (b) after UV irradiation (365 nm, 8 s 100% at 1000 mA of the LED intensity), and (c) after blue light (455 nm, 10 s, 100% at 1000 mA of the LED intensity). TEM of the sample at 25 μM (d) before UV, (e) after UV, and (f) after blue light irradiation (scale bar: 500 nm). CD of the sample at 25 μM (g) before UV, (h) after 365 nm irradiation for 8 s, and (i) after 455 nm irradiation for 10 s. (j) HPLC-UV analysis of isomer distribution at different UV irradiation times. (k) CD at 304 nm at different E isomer % (the line was added to guide the eye).

    Figure 4

    Figure 4. TEM of monomer 1 at 20 μM at (a) 20 °C, (b) 75 °C, and (c) 20 °C after cooling from 75 °C. (d) SLS temperature cycle on the sample at 100 μM at 60 °C/h measuring in steps of 5 °C (the line was added to guide the eye). (e) CD heating ramp experiment on the sample at 25 μM at 60 °C/h, measuring in steps of 5 °C.

    Figure 5

    Figure 5. TEM image of monomer 1 at 100 μM (a) at pH 2.0 ± 0.2, 7.0 ± 0.2, and 11.6 ± 0.2 (scale bar: 250 nm). CD heating experiment at 25 μM (b) at pH 2.2 ± 0.2, 7.2 ± 0.8, and 12.0 ± 0.2 (60 °C/h, measuring in steps of 5 °C). SLS heating experiment at 100 μM (c) at pH 2.0 ± 0.2, 7.0 ± 0.2, and 11.6 ± 0.2 (60 °C/h measuring in steps of 5 °C) (the line was added to guide the eye). CD at 5 °C with and without NaCl 150 mM (d) at pH 2.2 ± 0.2, 7.2 ± 0.8, and 12.0 ± 0.2.

    Figure 6

    Figure 6. Schematic representation of the system. Above, molecular responsiveness to light and pH. Below, supramolecular responsiveness to light, pH, ionic strength, and temperature.

  • References


    This article references 57 other publications.

    1. 1
      Krieg, E.; Bastings, M. M. C.; Besenius, P.; Rybtchinski, B. Supramolecular Polymers in Aqueous Media. Chem. Rev. 2016, 116 (4), 24142477,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00369
    2. 2
      Albertazzi, L.; Martinez-Veracoechea, F. J.; Leenders, C. M. A.; Voets, I. K.; Frenkel, D.; Meijer, E. W. Spatiotemporal Control and Superselectivity in Supramolecular Polymers Using Multivalency. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2013, 110 (30), 1220312208,  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1303109110
    3. 3
      Matson, J. B.; Stupp, S. I. Drug Release from Hydrazone-Containing Peptide Amphiphiles. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47 (28), 79627964,  DOI: 10.1039/c1cc12570b
    4. 4
      Bakker, M. H.; Lee, C. C.; Meijer, E. W.; Dankers, P. Y. W.; Albertazzi, L. Multicomponent Supramolecular Polymers as a Modular Platform for Intracellular Delivery. ACS Nano 2016, 10 (2), 18451852,  DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.5b05383
    5. 5
      Su, H.; Zhang, W.; Wang, H.; Wang, F.; Cui, H. Paclitaxel-Promoted Supramolecular Polymerization of Peptide Conjugates. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141 (30), 1199712004,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.9b04730
    6. 6
      Su, H.; Wang, F.; Wang, Y.; Cheetham, A. G.; Cui, H. Macrocyclization of a Class of Camptothecin Analogues into Tubular Supramolecular Polymers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141 (43), 1710717111,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.9b09848
    7. 7
      Besenius, P.; Heynens, J. L.; Straathof, R.; Niuwenhuizen, M. M.; Bomans, P.; Terreno, E.; Aime, S.; Strijkers, G.; Nicolay, K.; Meijer, E. W. Paramagnetic self-assembled nanoparticles as supramolecular MRI contrast agents. Contrast Media Mol. Imaging 2012, 7 (3), 356361,  DOI: 10.1002/cmmi.498
    8. 8
      Orbach, R.; Adler-Abramovich, L.; Zigerson, S.; Mironi-Harpaz, I.; Seliktar, D.; Gazit, E. Self-Assembled Fmoc-Peptides as a Platform for the Formation of Nanostructures and Hydrogels. Biomacromolecules 2009, 10 (9), 26462651,  DOI: 10.1021/bm900584m
    9. 9
      Mata, A.; Geng, Y.; Henrikson, K. J.; Aparicio, C.; Stock, S. R.; Stacher, R. L.; Stupp, S. I. Bone regeneration mediated by biomimetic mineralization of a nanofiber matrix. Biomaterials 2010, 31 (23), 60046012,  DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.04.013
    10. 10
      Choe, S.; Bond, C. W.; Harrington, D. A.; Stupp, S. I.; McVary, K. T.; Podlasek, C. A. Peptide Amphiphile Nanofiber Hydrogel Delivery of Sonic Hedgehog Protein to the Cavernous Nerve to Promote Regeneration and Prevent Erectile Dysfunction. Nanomedicine 2017, 13 (1), 95101,  DOI: 10.1016/j.nano.2016.08.032
    11. 11
      Saunders, L.; Ma, P. X. Self-Healing Supramolecular Hydrogels for Tissue Engineering Applications. Macromol. Biosci. 2019, 19, 1800313,  DOI: 10.1002/mabi.201800313
    12. 12
      Blum, A. P.; Kammeyer, J. K.; Rush, A. M.; Callmann, C. E.; Hahn, M. E.; Gianneschi, N. C. Stimuli-Responsive Nanomaterials for Biomedical Applications. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137 (6), 21402154,  DOI: 10.1021/ja510147n
    13. 13
      Frisch, H.; Unsleber, J. P.; Lüdeker, D.; Peterlechner, M.; Brunklaus, G.; Waller, M.; Besenius, P. pH-Switchable Ampholytic Supramolecular Copolymers. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2013, 52 (38), 1009710101,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201303810
    14. 14
      Gröger, G.; Meyer-Zaika, W.; Böttcher, C.; Gröhn, F.; Ruthard, C.; Schmuck, C. Switchable Supramolecular Polymers from the Self-Assembly of a Small Monomer with Two Orthogonal Binding Interactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133 (23), 89618971,  DOI: 10.1021/ja200941a
    15. 15
      Moyer, T. J.; Finbloom, J. A.; Chen, F.; Toft, D. J.; Cryns, V. L.; Stupp, S. I. pH and Amphiphilic Structure Direct Supramolecular Behavior in Biofunctional Assemblies. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136 (42), 1474614752,  DOI: 10.1021/ja5042429
    16. 16
      Ahlers, P.; Frisch, H.; Holm, R.; Spitzer, D.; Barz, M.; Besenius, P. Tuning the pH-Switch of Supramolecular Polymer Carriers for siRNA to Physiologically Relevant pH. Macromol. Biosci. 2017, 17 (10), 1700111,  DOI: 10.1002/mabi.201700111
    17. 17
      Adhikari, B.; Yamada, Y.; Yamauchi, M.; Wakita, K.; Lin, X.; Aratsu, K.; Ohba, T.; Karatsu, T.; Hollamby, M. J.; Shimizu, N.; Takagi, H.; Haruki, R.; Adachi, S.; Yagai, S. Light-induced unfolding and refolding of supramolecular polymer nanofibers. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 15254,  DOI: 10.1038/ncomms15254
    18. 18
      Yagai, S.; Yamauchi, M.; Kobayashi, A.; Karatsu, T.; Kitamura, A.; Ohba, T.; Kikkawa, Y. Control over Hierarchy Levels in the Self-Assembly of Stackable Nanotoroids. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134 (44), 1820518208,  DOI: 10.1021/ja308519b
    19. 19
      Prabhu, D. D.; Aratsu, K.; Kitamoto, Y.; Ouchi, H.; Ohba, T.; Hollamby, M. J.; Shimizu, N.; Takagi, H.; Haruki, R.; Adachi, S.; Yagai, S. Self-folding of supramolecular polymers into bioinspired topology. Sci. Adv. 2018, 4 (9), 8466,  DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aat8466
    20. 20
      Huang, Z.; Lee, E.; Kim, H.-J.; Lee, M. Aqueous Nanofibers with Switchable Chirality Formed of Self-Assembled Dumbbell-Shaped Rod Amphiphiles. Chem. Commun. 2009, 44, 68196821,  DOI: 10.1039/b913286d
    21. 21
      Feijter, I.; Besenius, P.; Albertazzi, L.; Meijer, E. W.; Palmans, A. R. A.; Voets, I. K. Mechanistic control over morphology: self-assembly of a discotic amphiphile in water. Soft Matter 2013, 9 (42), 1002510030,  DOI: 10.1039/C3SM52104D
    22. 22
      Alemán García, M. Á.; Magdalena Estirado, E.; Milroy, L.-G.; Brunsveld, L. Dual-Input Regulation and Positional Control in Hybrid Oligonucleotide/Discotic Supramolecular Wires. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2018, 57 (18), 49764980,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201800148
    23. 23
      Kumar, M.; Brocorens, P.; Tonnelé, C.; Beljonne, D.; Surin, M.; George, S. J. A Dynamic Supramolecular Polymer with Stimuli-Responsive Handedness for in Situ Probing of Enzymatic ATP Hydrolysis. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 5793,  DOI: 10.1038/ncomms6793
    24. 24
      Mishra, A.; Korlepara, D. B.; Balasubramanian, S.; George, S. J. Bioinspired, ATP-driven co-operative supramolecular polymerization and its pathway dependence. Chem. Commun. 2020, 56, 15051508,  DOI: 10.1039/C9CC08790G
    25. 25
      Albertazzi, L.; van der Veeken, N.; Baker, M. B.; Palmans, A. R. A.; Meijer, E. W. Supramolecular Copolymers with Stimuli-Responsive Sequence Control. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51 (90), 1616616168,  DOI: 10.1039/C5CC06951C
    26. 26
      Molla, M. R.; Prasad, P.; Thayumanavan, S. Protein-Induced Supramolecular Disassembly of Amphiphilic Polypeptide Nanoassemblies. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137 (23), 72867289,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.5b04285
    27. 27
      van Dun, S.; Ottmann, C.; Milroy, L.; Brunsveld, L. Supramolecular Chemistry Targeting Proteins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139 (40), 1396013968,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.7b01979
    28. 28
      Guo, J.; Zhuang, J.; Wang, F.; Raghupathi, K. R.; Thayumanavan, S. Protein AND Enzyme Gated Supramolecular Disassembly. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136 (6), 22202223,  DOI: 10.1021/ja4108676
    29. 29
      Erbas-Cakmak, S.; Kolemen, S.; Sedgwick, A. C.; Gunnlaugsson, T.; James, T. D.; Yoon, J.; Akkaya, E. U. Molecular logic gates: the past, present and future. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018, 47, 2228,  DOI: 10.1039/C7CS00491E
    30. 30
      Gao, J.; Wu, P.; Fernandez, A.; Zhuang, J.; Thayumanavan, S. Cellular AND Gates: Synergistic Recognition to Boost Selective Uptake of Polymeric Nanoassemblies. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 16,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.202002748
    31. 31
      Spitzer, D.; Rodrigues, L. L.; Straßburger, D.; Mezger, M.; Besenius, P. Tuneable Transient Thermogels Mediated by a pH- and Redox-Regulated Supramolecular Polymerization. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2017, 56 (48), 1546115465,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201708857
    32. 32
      Goskulwad, S.; La, D. D.; Kobaisi, M. A.; Bhosale, S. V.; Bansal, V.; Vinu, A.; Ariga, K.; Bhosale, S. V. Dynamic multistimuli-responsive reversible chiral transformation in supramolecular helices. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8 (1), 111,  DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-29152-9
    33. 33
      Liu, X.; Hu, D.; Jiang, Z.; Zhuang, J.; Xu, Y.; Guo, X.; Thayumanavan, S. Multi-Stimuli-Responsive Amphiphilic Assemblies through Simple Postpolymerization Modifications. Macromolecules 2016, 49 (17), 61866192,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.macromol.6b01397
    34. 34
      Chen, J.; Zhang, S.; Sun, F.; Li, N.; Cui, K.; He, J.; Niu, D.; Li, Y. Multi-stimuli responsive supramolecular polymers and their electrospun nanofibers. Polym. Chem. 2016, 7 (17), 29472954,  DOI: 10.1039/C6PY00445H
    35. 35
      Cantekin, S.; Nakano, Y.; Everts, J. C.; van der Schoot, P.; Meijer, E. W.; Palmans, A. R. A. A Stereoselectively Deuterated Supramolecular Motif to Probe the Role of Solvent during Self-Assembly Processes. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48 (32), 38033805,  DOI: 10.1039/c2cc17284d
    36. 36
      Pianowski, Z. L. Recent Implementations of Molecular Photoswitches into Smart Materials and Biological Systems. Chem. - Eur. J. 2019, 25 (20), 51285144,  DOI: 10.1002/chem.201805814
    37. 37
      Szymański, W.; Beierle, J. M.; Kistemaker, H. A. V.; Velema, W. A.; Feringa, B. L. Reversible Photocontrol of Biological Systems by the Incorporation of Molecular Photoswitches. Chem. Rev. 2013, 113 (8), 61146178,  DOI: 10.1021/cr300179f
    38. 38
      Ishikawa, M.; Ohzono, T.; Yamaguchi, T.; Norikane, Y. Photo-Enhanced Aqueous Solubilization of an Azo-Compound. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7 (1), 16,  DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-06947-w
    39. 39
      Vancoillie, G.; Frank, D.; Hoogenboom, R. Thermoresponsive Poly(oligo Ethylene Glycol Acrylates). Prog. Polym. Sci. 2014, 39 (6), 10741095,  DOI: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2014.02.005
    40. 40
      Lüsse, S.; Arnold, K. The Interaction of Poly(ethylene Glycol) with Water Studied by 1H and 2H NMR Relaxation Time Measurements. Macromolecules 1996, 29 (12), 42514257,  DOI: 10.1021/ma9508616
    41. 41
      Chandler, D. Interfaces and the Driving Force of Hydrophobic Assembly. Nature 2005, 437 (7059), 640647,  DOI: 10.1038/nature04162
    42. 42
      Smith, G. D.; Bedrov, D. Roles of Enthalpy, Entropy, and Hydrogen Bonding in the Lower Critical Solution Temperature Behavior of Poly(ethylene oxide)/Water Solutions. J. Phys. Chem. B 2003, 107 (14), 30953097,  DOI: 10.1021/jp0270046
    43. 43
      Besenius, P.; Goedegebure, Y.; Driesse, M.; Koay, M.; Bomans, P.; Palmans, A. R. A.; Dankers, P. Y. W.; Meijer, E. W. Peptide functionalised discotic amphiphiles and their self-assembly into supramolecular nanofibres. Soft Matter 2011, 7 (18), 79807983,  DOI: 10.1039/c1sm05896g
    44. 44
      Volgraf, M.; Gorostiza, P.; Szobota, S.; Helix, M. R.; Isacoff, E. Y.; Trauner, D. Reversibly Caged Glutamate: A Photochromic Agonist of Ionotropic Glutamate Receptors. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 260261,  DOI: 10.1021/ja067269o
    45. 45
      Riefolo, F.; Matera, C.; Garrido-Charles, A.; Gomila, A. M. J.; Sortino, R.; Agnetta, L.; Claro, E.; Masgrau, R.; Holzgrabe, U.; Batlle, M.; Decker, M.; Guasch, E.; Gorostiza, P. Optical Control of Cardiac Function with a Photoswitchable Muscarinic Agonist. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 76287636,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.9b03505
    46. 46
      Bandara, H. M. D.; Burdette, S. C. Photoisomerization in Different Classes of Azobenzene. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41 (5), 18091825,  DOI: 10.1039/C1CS15179G
    47. 47
      Titov, E.; Granucci, G.; Götze, J. P.; Persico, M.; Saalfrank, P. Dynamics of Azobenzene Dimer Photoisomerization: Electronic and Steric Effects. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2016, 7 (18), 35913596,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b01401
    48. 48
      Cocchi, C.; Draxl, C. Understanding the Effects of Packing and Chemical Terminations on the Optical Excitations of Azobenzene-Functionalized Self-Assembled Monolayers. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 2017, 29 (39), 394005,  DOI: 10.1088/1361-648X/aa7ca7
    49. 49
      Galanti, A.; Diez-Cabanes, V.; Santoro, J.; Valasek, M.; Minoia, A.; Mayor, M.; Cornil, J.; Samorì, P. Electronic Decoupling in C3-Symmetrical Light-Responsive Tris(Azobenzene) Scaffolds: Self-Assembly and Multiphotochromism. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140 (47), 1606216070,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.8b06324
    50. 50
      Tong, X.; Wang, G.; Soldera, A.; Zhao, Y. How Can Azobenzene Block Copolymer Vesicles Be Dissociated and Reformed by Light?. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109 (43), 2028120287,  DOI: 10.1021/jp0524274
    51. 51
      Liu, M.; Zhang, L.; Wang, T. Supramolecular Chirality in Self-Assembled Systems. Chem. Rev. 2015, 115 (15), 73047397,  DOI: 10.1021/cr500671p
    52. 52
      Casellas, N. M.; Pujals, S.; Bochicchio, D.; Pavan, G. M.; Torres, T.; Albertazzi, L.; García-Iglesias, M. From isodesmic to highly cooperative: reverting the supramolecular polymerization mechanism in water by fine monomer design. Chem. Commun. 2018, 54 (33), 41124115,  DOI: 10.1039/C8CC01259H
    53. 53
      Hamley, I. W.; Cheng, G.; Castelletto, V. A. Thermoresponsive Hydrogel Based on Telechelic PEG End-Capped with Hydrophobic Dipeptides. Macromol. Biosci. 2011, 11 (8), 10681078,  DOI: 10.1002/mabi.201100022
    54. 54
      Fuller, J. M.; Raghupathi, K. R.; Ramireddy, R. R.; Subrahmanyam, A. V.; Yesilyurt, V.; Thayumanavan, S. Temperature-Sensitive Transitions below LCST in Amphiphilic Dendritic Assemblies: Host–Guest Implications. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135 (24), 89478954,  DOI: 10.1021/ja402019c
    55. 55
      Engel, S.; Spitzer, D.; Rodrigues, L. L.; Fritz, E.; Straßburger, D.; Schönhoff, M.; Ravoo, B. J.; Besenius, P. Kinetic control in the temperature-dependent sequential growth of surface-confined supramolecular copolymers. Faraday Discuss. 2017, 204 (0), 5367,  DOI: 10.1039/C7FD00100B
    56. 56
      Frisch, H.; Fritz, E.; Stricker, F.; Schmüser, L.; Spitzer, D.; Weidner, T.; Ravoo, B. J.; Besenius, P. Kinetically Controlled Sequential Growth of Surface-Grafted Chiral Supramolecular Copolymers. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2016, 55 (25), 72427246,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201601048
    57. 57
      Besenius, P.; Portale, G.; Bomans, P.; Janssen, H. M.; Palmans, A. R. A.; Meijer, E. W. Controlling the Growth and Shape of Chiral Supramolecular Polymers in Water. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2010, 107 (42), 1788817893,  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1009592107
  • Supporting Information

    Supporting Information


    The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/jacs.0c02067.

    • Experimental procedure for the synthesis of 1 and 2 as well as analytical, spectral, and self-assembly characterization data (PDF)


    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.