ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
Correlating the Influence of Disulfides in Monolayers across Photoelectron Spectroscopy Wettability and Tunneling Charge-Transport
My Activity

Figure 1Loading Img
  • Open Access
Article

Correlating the Influence of Disulfides in Monolayers across Photoelectron Spectroscopy Wettability and Tunneling Charge-Transport
Click to copy article linkArticle link copied!

  • Sumit Kumar
    Sumit Kumar
    Stratingh Institute for Chemistry, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 4, 9747 AG Groningen, The Netherlands
    Zernike Institute for Advanced Materials, Nijenborgh 4, 9747 AG Groningen, The Netherlands
    More by Sumit Kumar
  • Saurabh Soni
    Saurabh Soni
    Stratingh Institute for Chemistry, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 4, 9747 AG Groningen, The Netherlands
    Zernike Institute for Advanced Materials, Nijenborgh 4, 9747 AG Groningen, The Netherlands
    More by Saurabh Soni
  • Wojciech Danowski
    Wojciech Danowski
    Stratingh Institute for Chemistry, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 4, 9747 AG Groningen, The Netherlands
    Zernike Institute for Advanced Materials, Nijenborgh 4, 9747 AG Groningen, The Netherlands
  • Carlijn L. F. van Beek
    Carlijn L. F. van Beek
    Stratingh Institute for Chemistry, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 4, 9747 AG Groningen, The Netherlands
    Zernike Institute for Advanced Materials, Nijenborgh 4, 9747 AG Groningen, The Netherlands
  • Ben L. Feringa
    Ben L. Feringa
    Stratingh Institute for Chemistry, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 4, 9747 AG Groningen, The Netherlands
    Zernike Institute for Advanced Materials, Nijenborgh 4, 9747 AG Groningen, The Netherlands
  • Petra Rudolf*
    Petra Rudolf
    Zernike Institute for Advanced Materials, Nijenborgh 4, 9747 AG Groningen, The Netherlands
    *E-mail: [email protected]
    More by Petra Rudolf
  • Ryan C. Chiechi*
    Ryan C. Chiechi
    Stratingh Institute for Chemistry, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 4, 9747 AG Groningen, The Netherlands
    Zernike Institute for Advanced Materials, Nijenborgh 4, 9747 AG Groningen, The Netherlands
    *E-mail: [email protected]
Open PDFSupporting Information (1)

Journal of the American Chemical Society

Cite this: J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 35, 15075–15083
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.0c06508
Published August 10, 2020

Copyright © 2020 American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under CC-BY-NC-ND.

Abstract

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Despite their ubiquity, self-assembled monolayers (SAMs) of thiols on coinage metals are difficult to study and are still not completely understood, particularly with respect to the nature of thiol–metal bonding. Recent advances in molecular electronics have highlighted this deficiency due to the sensitivity of tunneling charge-transport to the subtle differences in the overall composition of SAMs and the chemistry of their attachment to surfaces. These advances have also challenged assumptions about the spontaneous formation of covalent thiol–metal bonds. This paper describes a series of experiments that correlate changes in the physical properties of SAMs to photoelectron spectroscopy to unambiguously assign binding energies of noncovalent interactions to physisorbed disulfides. These disulfides can be converted to covalent metal–thiolate bonds by exposure to free thiols, leading to the remarkable observation of the total loss and recovery of length-dependent tunneling charge-transport. The identification and assignment of physisorbed disulfides solve a long-standing mystery and reveal new, dynamic properties in SAMs of thiols.

Copyright © 2020 American Chemical Society

Introduction

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Organic monolayer films have found a wide variety of applications in the fields of chemistry, physics, molecular biology, biomedical engineering, and materials science, (1−3) including nanopatterning, (4,5) molecular-scale devices, (6,7) optical materials, (8,9) biosurfaces, (10) adhesion, (11) wettability, (12) and corrosion. (13) Self-assembled monolayers (SAMs) of thiols on gold are a particularly versatile and well-studied class of organic monolayer films that leverage the two-dimensional (2D) self-assembly of organic molecules mediated by the strong, but reversible, binding of thiols to metal surfaces. (14−19) The structural and interfacial properties of derivatives of alkanethiols in mixed monolayers were recently found to be closely related to the transport properties of tunneling junctions. (20−26) The special nature of this type of bonding is what imparts SAMs with some of their most useful properties, because it governs the dynamics of self-assembly and allows for the formation of densely packed monolayers as well as self-repair, in-place exchange, the formation of mixed monolayers, and responsiveness. Elucidating the special nature of covalent Au–S bonding on surfaces has, however, proven challenging. (1) Studies of the stability of thiol-based SAMs under various conditions of SAM formation, such as pH, (27) solvent effect, (28) influence of the roughness (29) of Au substrates, photoirradiation, (30) effects of redox environments, (31) etc., provide insight into the self-assembly process. Optical tweezers, magnetic tweezers, and single-molecule force spectroscopy (32) provide information about the properties of individual thiols bound to Au. It is, however, particularly challenging to investigate the nature of Au–S bonds in a SAM in a context in which it is useful, for example, on a macroscopic substrate under ambient conditions because they are, ultimately, self-assembled nanomaterials. (2)
The central challenge to studying large-area SAMs (as opposed to single-molecule or nanoscopic areas on Au single-crystals) is that they are heterogeneous and can comprise different types of Au–S bonds that affect the properties of the SAM. For example, thiolated-DNA physisorbed on Au as either Au···SH–R or Au···(S–S)···Au (where “–” represents a covalent bond, and “···” represents a noncovalent interaction; see Figure 1) resulted in SAMs with different properties than SAMs of the same thiolated-DNA comprising only covalent interactions. (33) Similarly, it has been shown that growing SAMs from solutions containing differing fractions of disulfides (S–S bonds) alters the rectification ratio in large-area tunneling junctions. (34) Likewise, there is also evidence that disulfide and thiol molecules pack and orient differently on Au. (35) In the field of molecular electronics, which is sensitive to small perturbations in structure/bonding, the nature and influence of Au–S bond(s) at the electrode interface are still not well understood. In their pioneering work on SAMs of thiols, Nuzzo et al. observed that S–S bonds are reduced spontaneously on Au surfaces to form Au–S bonds, finding no evidence of residual S–S bonds. (14,15) Subsequently, Whitesides et al. observed that thiols out-compete disulfides in the formation of SAMs and again did not observe any residual S–S bond. (17) However, Venkataraman et al. observed that, in single-molecule junctions, covalent Au–S and noncovalent Au···(S–S)···Au/Au···SH–R bonds affect injection currents differently, from which they further concluded that Au···(S–S)···Au and Au···SH–R interactions can coexist in SAMs formed from thiols. (36) In this paper, we reconcile the apparent discrepancies in the nature of gold–thiolate binding that have been revealed by molecular–electronic studies and overcome a long-standing challenge to spectroscopic studies on SAMs by unambiguously identifying and assigning Au···(S–S)···Au bonds using photoelectron spectroscopy and correlating their presence to transport properties in tunneling junctions comprising SAMs.

Figure 1

Figure 1. Three modes by which d-DTT can bind to Au: bidentate-physisorbed ((bp)d-DTT), monodentate-physisorbed ((mp)d-DTT), and bidentate-chemisorbed ((bc)-DTT) where “–” and “···” represent covalent and noncovalent interactions, respectively, and d stands for a dimerized S–S bond.

X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) is a powerful tool for identifying chemical species in SAMs. It can provide information about Au–S interactions, characterize the average thicknesses of monolayers, elucidate the tilt angles of molecules with respect to the surface normal, and determine the orientation and vertical positions of functional groups. In short, XPS is a comprehensive spectroscopy for interrogating SAMs of thiolates. (37) In the S 2p core level of an XPS spectrum at binding energies of 161.8–162.0 eV, an S 2p3/2 peak corresponds to a Au–S covalent bond. Shifts in this range of binding energies correspond to changes in the oxidation state of the sulfur atom, reflecting changes in interactions between Au and S, whether they be covalent or noncovalent in nature. However, in several XPS and high-resolution (HR) XPS studies (at a resolution limit of 0.05 eV), (33,35) Au···(S–S)···Au and Au···SH–R interactions have been interchangeably assigned to the same binding energies, ranging from 163 to 164 eV, e.g., a commonly occurring S 2p3/2 peak at (163.6 ± 0.2) eV. (38−42) The ambiguity of this assignment limits XPS to a qualitative measure of the quality of a SAM; a high-quality SAM lacks a peak at (163.6 ± 0.2) eV because it can only be ascribed to noncovalent binding. The assignment of this peak to a specific chemical species enables quantitative measures of quality and deeper insight into the overall structure of a SAM and its interaction with the substrate upon which it self-assembles both pro- and retroactively.
For this study, we returned to dithiolreitol ((2S,3S)-1,4-bis(sulfanyl)butane-2,3-diol, DTT, see Figure 1) because it is well-established and readily forms stable, internal disulfide bonds. We grew SAMs of pure DTT and mixed monolayers of DTT and ethanethiol (EtSH)—which is effectively half of a DTT molecule—and varied the growth conditions while monitoring the S 2p core-level spectra. These data were further correlated to surface hydrophobicity and tunneling charge-transport through the thickness of the monolayers.

Results and Discussion

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Owing to the formation of a stable six-membered ring, DTT readily forms internal disulfide bonds to form d-DTT, which can then be used to study Au–S interactions in the absence of free thiols. As depicted in Figure 1, d-DTT molecules can bind to the surface of Au in different configurations. Figure 1a,b depicts two possible binding modes in which the internal disulfide bond is preserved, and all Au–S interactions are, therefore, noncovalent. These are denoted as bidentate-physisorbed d-DTT, (bp)d-DTT (both sulfur atoms are interacting with Au), and monodentate-physisorbed d-DTT, (mp)d-DTT (only one sulfur atom is interacting with Au). In the third possible configuration, Figure 1c, both sulfur atoms are covalently bound to Au, which is denoted bidentate-chemisorbed DTT, (bc)-DTT. All of the SAMs of d-DTT on Au surfaces were prepared at room temperature from ethanolic solutions (0.1 mM) of d-DTT with varying immersion times, as explained below.

XPS and Contact Angle Measurement

To characterize the evolution of S/Au interactions, d-DTT SAMs were grown with different immersion times of 20, 120, and 720 min denoted as 20m, 120m, and 720m, respectively, as shown in Figure 2. The S 2p core-level spectra (shown in Figure 2c) comprise multiple doublets, confirming the presence of multiple oxidations states of S. The doublets peaked at 161.3, 162.0, and 163.6 eV correspond to S bound to Au hollow-sites (purple curve), (43) covalent Au–S bond (black curve), (40,41,43) and physisorbed disulfide (red curve), (40,44,45) respectively. The peak at 161.3 eV (purple curve) that is present in the spectra of 20m is absent in the 120m and 720m samples, which suggests that SAMs of d-DTT form by first filling Au hollow-sites to form a disordered monolayer. (43) However, rather than evolving into a single S–Au interaction with time, hollow-site bonding is replaced by a mix of Au–S and S–S species as indicated by the persistent presence of both red and black curves in 120m and 720m. Thus, at least two of the three species shown in Figure 1 persist at longer immersion times.

Figure 2

Figure 2. (a) Water contact angles on SAMs of pure DTT grown from d-DTT with immersion times of 20 min (20m), 120 min (120m), and 720 min (720m). Contact angles of SAM of pure ethanethiol (EtSH) serve as a reference. (b) Water contact angles (red) and normalized Au/S ratios from XPS (black) versus the immersion time for SAMs of DTT (squares) and EtSH (circles). (c) XPS spectra of the SAMs 20m, 120m, 720m. The left column shows the corresponding S 2p core-level spectra, which comprise multiple doublets corresponding to Au—S bonds (black curve), hollow-site bonds (purple curve), and S—S bonds (red curve). The right column shows the C 1s core-level spectra, which comprise peaks corresponding to C—C bonds (black curve), C—S/C—OH bonds (green curve), and C═O bonds (blue curve).

We ascribe the peak at 163.6 eV (red curve) exclusively to (bp)d-DTT using the following reasoning: Sulfur is more electronegative than hydrogen, meaning that the sulfur peak of a physisorbed organic thiol will appear at a lower binding energy than the corresponding disulfide, specifically in the range 163.0–164.0 eV; (33,35,46,47) thus, it cannot be physisorbed thiol. Moreover, d-DTT is a pure disulfide, meaning that the thiol protons would have to be provided by ethanol during the growth of the SAM. Formally, this is a redox reaction in which 2 equiv of H• are abstracted from ethanol to form the peroxide (CH3CH2O)2 and DTT, which is unlikely. Finally, binding energies for physisorbed and free thiols have been reported at 163.2 eV. (43,48) The absence of any such peaks near or below the peak at 163.6 eV supports our hypothesis that the red curve corresponds to a single sulfur species, specifically (bp)d-DTT (Figure 1a).
Further evidence that (mp)d-DTT is not present in the SAMs can be found in the carbon spectra. The C 1s core-level region comprises multiple singlets: 284.5 eV (black curve), (49) 286.5 eV (green curve), (50−52) and 288.8 eV (blue curve), (53−55) corresponding to C—C bonds, C—S/C—OH bonds, and adventitious C═O species, respectively. Although the number and relative intensities of the peaks do not change significantly with immersion time, the green peak shifts to a lower binding energy by 0.5 eV between 20m and 720m, indicating an increase in electron density around the carbon atoms. This increase could be due to the formal reduction of sulfur (from S—S to Auδ+—Sδ−), back-bonding in (bp)d-DTT (i.e., Au···S), hydrogen bonding between the OH groups as order within the SAM increases, or any combination thereof.
The density of organic thiols/disulfides in a SAM can be determined from the ratios of the integrated peak-areas of Au and S; the ratio of Au/S decreases as more thiol/disulfide adsorbs. Figure 2b compares this ratio for d-DTT (black squares), normalized to a SAM of EtSH grown for 720 min, showing that, indeed, the density of the SAM increases with immersion time commensurate with a decrease in water contact angle from the increasing density (and order) of the OH groups at the ambient interface. The water contact angle reaches a minimum of (40 ± 3)° for 720m, in agreement with the literature values. (14) Thus, although the water contact angle indicates a densely packed SAM of DTT, the persistence of the two doublets (black and red curves in Figure 2c) in the S 2p core-level region indicates that SAMs grown from d-DTT comprise a mixed phase of two distinct Au–S interactions.
For further insight into the nature of the two Au–S interactions, we prepared mixed monolayers of d-DTT and EtSH by exposing pure SAMs of DTT (120m) grown from d-DTT to 0.1 mM ethanolic solutions of EtSH for varying times. The data in Figure 3 are labeled with these exposure times (i.e., without varying the initial 120m used to form the starting pure SAM of DTT). The S 2p core-level region (which is identical to Figure 2b 120m) comprises two doublets at 161.8 eV (40) (black curve) and 163.6 eV (red curve) labeled as the Au–S and S–S bond. The relative amounts of S–S, calculated from the area under the red curve relative to the total S 2p core-level spectra, are (37 ± 2)%, (25 ± 3)%, (8 ± 2)%, and 0% for exchange times of 0, 6, 18, and 24 h, respectively. The overall trend shows a decrease in S–S with exchange time, eventually disappearing completely at 24 h. This trend indicates either that DTT is replaced completely by ethanethiol, or the S–S bond is reduced at the surface by exposure to ethanethiol, or a mixture of both. In any case, the commensurate reduction in the peak at 163.6 eV supports our hypothesis that this binding energy uniquely results from the presence of S–S bonds in the SAM.

Figure 3

Figure 3. (a) Water contact angles on mixed monolayers of DTT grown from pure d-DTT SAM immersed in ethanolic solutions of EtSH for 0, 6, 18, and 24 h (exchange time). (b) Water contact angles (red) and Au/S ratios of integrated peak-areas normalized to SAMs of pure EtSH from XPS (black) versus exchange time for SAMs of DTT with EtSH. (c) XPS spectra of the substrates pictured in part a. The left column shows the S 2p core-level spectra, which comprise two doublets corresponding to Au—S bonds (black curve) and S—S bonds (red curve). The right column shows the C 1s core-level spectra comprising peaks corresponding to C—C bonds (black curve), C—S/C—OH bonds (green curve), and adventitious C═O species (blue curve).

The C 1s core-level spectra in Figure 3 comprise three different singlets corresponding (as in the pure SAMs of DTT in Figure 2) to C—C (black curve), C—S/C—OH (green curve), and adventitious C═O (blue curve). Interestingly, the peak of the green curve again shifts to lower binding energy by 0.5 eV between 0 and 6 h and then remains unchanged for rest of the samples. As with the pure SAMs, this shift reflects an increase in electron density on the carbon atoms and could be due to increasing hydrogen bonding at the ambient interface and/or the formal reduction of sulfur. In addition, these SAMs are exposed to EtSH for increasing periods of time, which is reflected by the reduction in the relative amount of C—S/C—OH (in C 1s core-level spectra), sharply from 0 to 6 h, and then only slightly from 6 to 24 h. Thus, after pure SAMs of DTT are exposed to EtSH for 24 h, only one sulfur species (Au—S) is present in the XPS spectrum; however, the carbon spectra still show 36% of C—S/C—OH, indicating that DTT is still present.
Figure 3b shows the integrated peak-area ratios of Au/S (normalized to pure SAMs of EtSH) and water contact angles as a function of time exposed to EtSH. These data show that the exchange process can be divided into three different zones. In Zone-1 (0–6 h), the decreasing Au/S ratio and increasing contact angle suggest the replacement of weakly bound d-DTT by EtSH, decreasing the density of OH groups at the ambient interface. As described above, SAMs of DTT prepared by short immersion times (120m or 0 h sample) in solutions of d-DTT contain myriad defects and are disordered due to weakly bound d-DTT. Thus, after 6 h of exchange, EtSH fills the defects and displaces weakly bound d-DTT from the surface. In Zone-2 (6–8 h), the Au/S ratio increases slightly, while the water contact angle remains almost unchanged. This trend indicates that the amount of S (atoms) is nearly constant if not decreasing slightly, and the ratio of DTT:EtSH in the SAM remains constant. The XPS spectra (Figure 3c, red curve), however, indicate that the amount of S–S decreases by approximately 17% while the amount of C–S/C–OH remains constant. Together, these data suggest that over the 6–18 h time interval (Zone-2), the exchange process is dominated by the rearrangement of Au–S bonds on the surface. Over the same time interval, S–S bonds are cleaved at the surface, presumably reducing them to form covalent Au–S bonds. In Zone-3 (18–24 h), the Au/S increases sharply, and the water contact angle increases, indicating the desorption of DTT, presumably because it is displaced by EtSH. Over the same 18–24 h time interval, the S 2p core-level spectra show the complete loss of S–S, resulting in a single Au–S species in the mixed monolayer, but not complete replacement by EtSH, as substantial C–O/C–S peaks remain.
The O 1s spectrum (Figure S13a) confirms the presence of C–OH species at the ambient interface of all of the mixed SAMs, while there is no trace of C–OH in the spectra of SAMs of pure EtSH, which are shown in the bottom row of Figure S13b. The O 1s spectrum of mixed monolayers of DTT obtained after 6 h of exposure to EtSH is shifted to lower binding energies by 0.3 eV, consistent with the shift observed in the C 1s spectrum (Figure S12c). The variation of the O 1s (Figure S12a) spectral intensity with exchange time (0–24 h) further supports our assertions with respect to the relative amounts of C–S/C–OH species determined from the C 1s spectra (Figure S12c). Taken together, the data suggest that the disappearance of the peak at 163.6 eV occurs by different mechanisms. Exposure to EtSH results in the evolution of the peak at 162.0 eV in the S 2p core-level spectra; during these processes, the contact angle and Au:S ratio (Zone-3) clearly show the formal reduction of physisorbed S–S to chemisorbed Au–S, and we can unambiguously ascribe the peak at 163.6 eV in the core-level S 2p spectra to physisorbed S–S. The S 2p peaks of (mp)d-DTT and (bp)d-DTT are indistinguishable on the surface of Au only because of the resolution limit of XPS, but that does not preclude the assignment of the peak at 163.6 eV to S–S present on the surface of Au. Although we lack sufficient spectroscopic insight to prove the mechanism of disulfide–thiolate interconversion, Figure S11 presents a surface-analogue of disulfide metathesis in which EtSH converts S–S to Au–S, producing CH3CH2S2 to balance the stoichiometry. Such metathesis is well-known in solution. (56)

Tunneling Charge-transport Characterization

The tunneling charge-transport properties of SAM simple organic thiols (e.g., aliphatic molecules) are sufficiently well-characterized that the injection current density J0, tunneling decay coefficient β (from plots of log J vs molecular length according to eq 1, where d is the width of the tunneling barrier), and conductance can be used to evaluate their properties. (57) For example, differences in the conductance of mono- and dithiol and disulfide moieties can be used to ascertain whether molecules are physisorbed or chemisorbed on Au. (36) We employed a similar strategy, using a series of esters derived from (±)α-lipoic acid in which the thickness of the SAMs anchored identically to DTT can be varied. These compounds are labeled as C0 for the parent acid and C1, C5, and C9 for the methyl, pentyl, and nonyl esters, respectively, as shown in the inset of Figure 4a; e.g., R = CH3 for C1. Table 1 summarizes the R groups and their theoretical length and the thicknesses of SAMs of their respective Cn lipoic acid derivatives as determined by density functional theory (DFT) calculations and XPS.
(1)
Table 1. R Groups of the Cn Series Shown in Figure 4a and Corresponding Molecular Lengths Calculated Using DFT and Measured in SAMs by XPS
abbreviation (Cn)R groupcalculated molecular length (Å)XPS pure SAM thickness (Å)
C0H7.917.0 ± 0.7
C1CH39.258.0 ± 0.7
C5C5H1113.979.0 ± 0.8
C9C9H1918.9016.0 ± 1.0

Figure 4

Figure 4. (a) Semilog plots of current density versus voltage (J–V) of SAMs of pure C0, C1, C5, and C9 molecules on AuTS measured with an EGaIn tip (the R groups and commensurate molecular lengths are defined in Table 1). (b) Values of β at different applied bias computed from the J–V curves in panel a according to eq 1 showing no dependence on the length of the R group. (c) Semilog J–V curves of the same series as panel a in mixed monolayers with octanethiol. (d) Value of β at different applied biases computed from the J–V curves in panel c showing a clear dependence on the identity of the R group.

Figure 4 summarizes the tunneling charge-transport properties of SAMs of the lipoic acid derivatives and the corresponding mixed monolayers with octanethiol on template-stripped Au (AuTS) substrates (58) using eutectic Ga–In (EGaIn) top-contacts. (59) In ordered, densely packed SAMs, the expectation is that the magnitude of J will vary exponentially with molecular length according to the Simmons model (eq 1, eqs S2, S3, and S5) (60) for SAMs of n-alkanethiolates on Au β ≈ 0.75 Å–1 and does not depend strongly on applied bias. (61) Although the lipoic acid series contains either a terminal carboxylic acid or internal ester, neither has a significant impact on β; (62,63) however, Figure 4a,b shows almost no length-dependence, with β = 0.01 Å–1 and an approximately linear dependence on applied bias despite the very good agreement between the theoretical molecular length and experimental thicknesses of the SAMs (Table 1). The same data are shown in Figure 4c,d for mixed monolayers prepared by exposing pure SAMs of the lipoic acid derivatives (Cn) to octanethiol. The mixed monolayers show a clear length-dependence and β = 0.53 Å–1. Since the length of octanethiol is invariant, this value of β reflects the changing width of a tunneling barrier imposed by the R groups in the Cn series. This is in agreement with the work by Yoon et al. showing the reduction of defect-induced conductance in mixed SAMs compared to pure SAMs. (23) In both the pure and mixed monolayers (Figure 4c,d), we observe rectification in JV curves, most significantly for C9 SAMs, which indicates that this is a molecular property, consistent with observations by Whitesides et al. (64,65)
The S 2p core-level spectra (Figure 5) of SAMs of pure C1 exhibit two main doublets at 163.6 and 161.8 eV, corresponding to S–S (40%) and Au–S (60%). In contrast, the mixed monolayers of C1 and octanethiol exhibit only one doublet at 161.8 eV, which is indicative of Au–S. The C 1s spectra are (qualitatively) unchanged in both mixed monolayers and pure SAMs. We chose octanethiol to form the mixed monolayers because it is slightly shorter than the molecular length of extended C0, which is a strategy that we have employed previously to ensure that the “background SAM” (octanethiol) does not directly contribute to the tunneling barrier. (40,66,67) The recovery of the length-dependence of the tunneling currents is accompanied by the disappearance of the peak at 163.6 eV (labeled S–S in Figure 5). Jiang et al. demonstrated that even a relative intensity of 10% of a peak at 163.6 eV can alter the rectification ratio of tunneling junctions comprising ferrocene-terminated SAMs. (68) They ascribed the peak (correctly) to S–S and reasoned that the presence of disulfides in the SAM increases the leakage current, which reduces the rectification ratio. In our study, the relative intensity of the peak at 163.6 eV is 40% in pure SAMs of C1, which is significant enough to reduce β to near-zero. It also reduces the yield of working junctions to 30% (compared to 70% for the mixed monolayers), which implies a morphological effect as well, but our results support the hypothesis that the magnitude of a peak at 163.6 eV correlates to a contribution of nontunneling (leakage) current. However, eq 1 clearly shows that, whatever the morphological effects, they do not affect the thickness of the SAMs vis-à-vis the length of the R group. As we established above, exposure to octanethiol reduces S–S to Au–S; thus, we conclude that the peak at 163.6 eV is the result of physisorbed S–S, and that difference between that and chemisorbed Au–S is sufficient not just to affect β but also to mask the length-dependence entirely.

Figure 5

Figure 5. Representative XPS spectra of SAMs of pure C1 (top) and mixed monolayers of C1 and octanethiol (bottom). The left column shows the respective S 2p core-level spectra and fits revealing two doublets corresponding to Au—S (black) and S—S (red). The right column shows the respective C 1s core-level spectra and fits of the data revealing peaks ascribed to C—C (black), C—S/C—O (green), and O—C═O/C═O species (blue).

Conclusions

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The presence of a peak at (163.6 ± 0.2) eV in the S 2p3/2 region of XPS spectra of SAMs grown from thiols is generally associated with SAMs of poor quality. Its presence is correlated to subtle changes in the physical properties of SAMs, including their behavior in tunneling junctions. However, it has not previously been assigned to a single, well-defined chemical species. We have shown, experimentally, that it results from the presence of physisorbed S–S species and that these species can be reduced to Au–S by exposure to an n-alkanethiol which, over the course of 24 h, eliminates S–S and reorganizes the SAM without replacing it. Our results also provide valuable insight into the role of disulfides in tunneling junctions comprising SAMs and reveal the surprising result that the chemical coupling of a SAM to the bottom electrode (and any associated conformational changes) can affect the length-dependence of tunneling currents to such an extent that the presence of disulfides can eliminate length-dependence entirely. While further study is needed to elucidate the exact nature of physisorbed S–S interactions, the assignment of the peaks at (163.6 ± 0.2) eV will aid these studies. The ubiquity of SAMs of thiols in science and engineering reflects their utility and versatility, and yet the nature of the chemical bonding between thiols and metal surfaces remains a source of controversy and a topic of research. The unambiguous elucidation of the chemical nature of the species that gives rise to the characteristic peak at (163.6 ± 0.2) eV enables further studies into the self-assembly process and the development of a more complete description of SAMs of thiols. The benefits of these insights are potentially as far-reaching as the impact of SAMs themselves.

Experimental Section

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Patterned Gold Electrode (AuTS)

The 100 nm thick Au (99.99% pure, Schöne Edelmetaal B.V.) was thermally deposited (0.5–2 Å/s) onto a 3.5 in silicon wafer (purchased from ePAK). For template stripping, glass substrates were cleaned with soap (Multi Purpose Detergent, Teepol), acetone, and ethanol in an ultrasonic bath for 10 min. Once the substrates were dried with a N2 gun, we deposited a droplet of UV adhesive (Norland Optical Adhesive 61) on the glass substrate. Those were then placed on the metal surface, and the entire wafer was cured with UV light for 300 s (50% intensity, IntelliRay 600) to activate the adhesive.

SAM Preparation and Treatments

SAMs of DTT were prepared by immersing a freshly stripped AuTS substrate in a 1 mM solution of DTT in degassed, absolute ethanol (Macron Fine Chemicals) under Ar conditions, which was left for the specified incubation time in dark conditions. For J–V and XPS measurements, pure SAMs of the derivatives of (±)α-lipoic acid (C0C9) were prepared from a 0.1 mM ethanolic solution of the respective molecules for 12 h. Mixed SAMs were prepared in two steps, where first, AuTS substrates were immersed in a 0.1 mM ethanolic solution for 120 min of the respective molecules, and then, second, these pure SAMs were immersed in 1 mM ethanolic solution of octanethiol for 24 h at room temperature. All these samples were then washed three times in 3 mL of ethanol and blown dry with Ar gas.

EGaIn//SAM/AuTS Measurements

The JV traces were collected using a setup (described elsewhere (69)) placed inside a flowbox (N2 atm of <5% relative humidity and O2 1–3%) using LabView (National Instruments) with 5 sweeping cycles between +1 V and −1 V using a subfemtoamperometer (6430 SourceMeter, Keithley) and were analyzed using the GaussFit package.

XPS Analysis

XPS was performed using a Surface Science SSX-100 ESCA instrument, using monochromatic Al Kα as the X-ray source (hν = 1486.6 eV). The pressure inside the measurement chamber was maintained below 10–9 mbar. The electron takeoff angle with respect to the surface normal was 37°. The diameter of the analyzed area was 1000 μm; the energy resolution was set to 1.1 eV to minimize data acquisition times. XPS spectra were analyzed with the fitting program Winspec (from LISE laboratory of the Facultés Universitaires Notre-Dame de la Paix, Namur, Belgium).

Computational Methodologies

To calculate the molecular lengths, geometry optimizations were performed using the Orca 4.0.1 software package. (70,71) We used the B3LYP functional in combination with the default def2-SVP basis sets, and the lengths of the optimized geometry of the Cn molecules were measured using the distance between the terminal C/O atom of the alkyl chain and the sulfur atom next to the carbon atom to which the alkyl tail is attached.

Supporting Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/jacs.0c06508.

  • Synthetic detail and full characterization data for all new compounds, description of measurement techniques, and additional spectroscopic data on monolayers (PDF)

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Author Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

  • Corresponding Authors
  • Authors
    • Sumit Kumar - Stratingh Institute for Chemistry, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 4, 9747 AG Groningen, The NetherlandsZernike Institute for Advanced Materials, Nijenborgh 4, 9747 AG Groningen, The Netherlands
    • Saurabh Soni - Stratingh Institute for Chemistry, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 4, 9747 AG Groningen, The NetherlandsZernike Institute for Advanced Materials, Nijenborgh 4, 9747 AG Groningen, The NetherlandsOrcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-8159-9128
    • Wojciech Danowski - Stratingh Institute for Chemistry, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 4, 9747 AG Groningen, The NetherlandsZernike Institute for Advanced Materials, Nijenborgh 4, 9747 AG Groningen, The NetherlandsOrcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-8588-8912
    • Carlijn L. F. van Beek - Stratingh Institute for Chemistry, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 4, 9747 AG Groningen, The NetherlandsZernike Institute for Advanced Materials, Nijenborgh 4, 9747 AG Groningen, The Netherlands
    • Ben L. Feringa - Stratingh Institute for Chemistry, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 4, 9747 AG Groningen, The NetherlandsZernike Institute for Advanced Materials, Nijenborgh 4, 9747 AG Groningen, The NetherlandsOrcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0003-0588-8435
  • Notes
    The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Acknowledgments

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

R.C.C. and S.K. acknowledge the European Research Council for the ERC Starting Grant 335473 (MOLECSYNCON). S.S. acknowledges the Zernike Institute for Advanced Materials. We thank the Center for Information Technology of the University of Groningen for their support and for providing access to the Peregrine high-performance computing cluster.

References

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article references 71 other publications.

  1. 1
    Häkkinen, H. The gold–sulfur interface at the nanoscale. Nat. Chem. 2012, 4, 443455,  DOI: 10.1038/nchem.1352
  2. 2
    Love, J. C.; Estroff, L. A.; Kriebel, J. K.; Nuzzo, R. G.; Whitesides, G. M. Self-Assembled Monolayers of Thiolates on Metals as a Form of Nanotechnology. Chem. Rev. 2005, 105, 11031170,  DOI: 10.1021/cr0300789
  3. 3
    Boisselier, E.; Astruc, D. Gold Nanoparticles in Nanomedicine: Preparations, Imaging, Diagnostics, Therapies and Toxicity. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009, 38, 17591782,  DOI: 10.1039/b806051g
  4. 4
    Kumar, A.; Biebuyck, H. A.; Whitesides, G. M. Patterning Self-Assembled Monolayers: Applications in Materials Science. Langmuir 1994, 10, 14981511,  DOI: 10.1021/la00017a030
  5. 5
    Liao, W.-S.; Cheunkar, S.; Cao, H. H.; Bednar, H. R.; Weiss, P. S.; Andrews, A. M. Subtractive Patterning via Chemical Lift-Off Lithography. Science 2012, 337, 15171521,  DOI: 10.1126/science.1221774
  6. 6
    Motesharei, K.; Myles, D. C. Molecular Recognition on Functionalized Self-Assembled Monolayers of Alkanethiols on Gold. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 73287336,  DOI: 10.1021/ja973166h
  7. 7
    Schliwa, M.; Woehlke, G. Molecular Motors. Nature 2003, 422, 759765,  DOI: 10.1038/nature01601
  8. 8
    Yao, H.; Miki, K.; Nishida, N.; Sasaki, A.; Kimura, K. Large Optical Activity of Gold Nanocluster Enantiomers Induced by a Pair of Optically Active Penicillamines. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 1553615543,  DOI: 10.1021/ja053504b
  9. 9
    Gautier, C.; Bürgi, T. Chiral N-Isobutyryl-Cysteine Protected Gold Nanoparticles: Preparation, Size Selection, and Optical Activity in the UV-vis and Infrared. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128 (34), 1107911087,  DOI: 10.1021/ja058717f
  10. 10
    Yeung, S. Y.; Ederth, T.; Pan, G.; Cicėnaitė, J.; Cárdenas, M.; Arnebrant, T.; Sellergren, B. Reversible Self-Assembled Monolayers (rSAMs) as Robust and Fluidic Lipid Bilayer Mimics. Langmuir 2018, 34, 41074115,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b00226
  11. 11
    Sethuraman, A.; Han, M.; Kane, R. S.; Belfort, G. Effect of Surface Wettability on the Adhesion of Proteins. Langmuir 2004, 20, 77797788,  DOI: 10.1021/la049454q
  12. 12
    Samuel, B.; Zhao, H.; Law, K.-Y. Study of Wetting and Adhesion Interactions Between Water and Various Polymer and Superhydrophobic Surfaces. J. Phys. Chem. C 2011, 115, 1485214861,  DOI: 10.1021/jp2032466
  13. 13
    Ramachandran, S.; Tsai, B.-L.; Blanco, M.; Chen, H.; Tang, Y.; Goddard, W. A. Self-Assembled Monolayer Mechanism for Corrosion Inhibition of Iron by Imidazolines. Langmuir 1996, 12, 64196428,  DOI: 10.1021/la960646y
  14. 14
    Nuzzo, R. G.; Allara, D. L. Adsorption of Bifunctional Organic Disulfides on Gold Surfaces. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983, 105, 44814483,  DOI: 10.1021/ja00351a063
  15. 15
    Nuzzo, R. G.; Zegarski, B. R.; Dubois, L. H. Fundamental Studies of the Chemisorption of Organosulfur Compounds on Gold(111). Implications for Molecular Self-Assembly on Gold Surfaces. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 733740,  DOI: 10.1021/ja00237a017
  16. 16
    Bain, C. D.; Evall, J.; Whitesides, G. M. Formation of Monolayers by the Coadsorption of Thiols on Gold: Variation in the Head Group, Tail Group, and Solvent. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 71557164,  DOI: 10.1021/ja00200a039
  17. 17
    Bain, C. D.; Biebuyck, H. A.; Whitesides, G. M. Comparison of Self-Assembled Monolayers on Gold: Coadsorption of Thiols and Disulfides. Langmuir 1989, 5, 723727,  DOI: 10.1021/la00087a027
  18. 18
    Ulman, A. Self-Assembled Monolayers of Thiols; Thin Films; Academic Press, 1998; Vol. 24.
  19. 19
    Xue, Y.; Li, X.; Li, H.; Zhang, W. Quantifying thiol–gold interactions towards the efficient strength control. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 19,  DOI: 10.1038/ncomms5348
  20. 20
    Kong, G. D.; Byeon, S. E.; Park, S.; Song, H.; Kim, S.-Y.; Yoon, H. J. Mixed Molecular Electronics: Tunneling Behaviors and Applications of Mixed Self-Assembled Monolayers. Advanced Electronic Materials 2020, 6, 1901157,  DOI: 10.1002/aelm.201901157
  21. 21
    Jin, J.; Kong, G. D.; Yoon, H. J. Deconvolution of Tunneling Current in Large-Area Junctions Formed with Mixed Self-Assembled Monolayers. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2018, 9, 45784583,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.8b01997
  22. 22
    Kong, G. D.; Kim, M.; Cho, S. J.; Yoon, H. J. Gradients of Rectification: Tuning Molecular Electronic Devices by the Controlled Use of Different-Sized Diluents in Heterogeneous Self-Assembled Monolayers. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 1030710311,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201604748
  23. 23
    Kong, G. D.; Jin, J.; Thuo, M.; Song, H.; Joung, J. F.; Park, S.; Yoon, H. J. Elucidating the Role of Molecule–Electrode Interfacial Defects in Charge Tunneling Characteristics of Large-Area Junctions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 1230312307,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.8b08146
  24. 24
    Ben Amara, F.; Dionne, E. R.; Kassir, S.; Pellerin, C.; Badia, A. Molecular Origin of the Odd–Even Effect of Macroscopic Properties of n-Alkanethiolate Self-Assembled Monolayers: Bulk or Interface?. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 1305113061,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.0c04288
  25. 25
    Chen, J.; Giroux, T. J.; Nguyen, Y.; Kadoma, A. A.; Chang, B. S.; VanVeller, B.; Thuo, M. M. Understanding interface (odd–even) effects in charge tunneling using a polished EGaIn electrode. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2018, 20, 48644878,  DOI: 10.1039/C7CP07531F
  26. 26
    Chen, J.; Chang, B.; Oyola-Reynoso, S.; Wang, Z.; Thuo, M. Quantifying Gauche Defects and Phase Evolution in Self-Assembled Monolayers through Sessile Drops. ACS Omega 2017, 2, 20722084,  DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.7b00355
  27. 27
    Rooth, M.; Shaw, A. M. pH-Controlled Formation Kinetics of Self-Assembled Layers of Thioctic Acid on Gold Nanoparticles. J. Phys. Chem. C 2007, 111, 1536315369,  DOI: 10.1021/jp075083l
  28. 28
    Han, S.; Park, H.; Han, J. W.; Yoshizawa, K.; Hayashi, T.; Hara, M.; Noh, J. Solvent Effect on the Formation of Octaneselenocyanate Self-Assembled Monolayers on Au(111). J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2019, 19, 47954798,  DOI: 10.1166/jnn.2019.16706
  29. 29
    Ivashenko, O.; van Herpt, J.; Feringa, B.; Browne, W.; Rudolf, P. Rapid Reduction of Self-Assembled Monolayers of a Disulfide Terminated Para-Nitrophenyl Alkyl Ester on Roughened Au Surfaces During XPS Measurements. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2013, 559, 7681,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cplett.2012.12.060
  30. 30
    Kong, G. D.; Yoon, H. J. Influence of Air-Oxidation on Rectification in Thiol-Based Molecular Monolayers. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2016, 163, G115G121,  DOI: 10.1149/2.0091609jes
  31. 31
    Lee, L. Y. S.; Lennox, R. B. Electrochemical Desorption of N-Alkylthiol SAMs on Polycrystalline Gold: Studies Using a Ferrocenylalkylthiol Probe. Langmuir 2007, 23, 292296,  DOI: 10.1021/la061684c
  32. 32
    Neuman, K. C.; Nagy, A. Single-Molecule Force Spectroscopy: Optical Tweezers, Magnetic Tweezers and Atomic Force Microscopy. Nat. Methods 2008, 5, 491505,  DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.1218
  33. 33
    Martínez, L.; Carrascosa, L. G.; Huttel, Y.; Lechuga, L. M.; Román, E. Influence of the Linker Type on the Au–S Binding Properties of Thiol and Disulfide-Modified DNA Self-Assembly on Polycrystalline Gold. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2010, 12, 33013308,  DOI: 10.1039/b924504a
  34. 34
    Souto, M.; Yuan, L.; Morales, D. C.; Jiang, L.; Ratera, I.; Nijhuis, C. A.; Veciana, J. Tuning the Rectification Ratio by Changing the Electronic Nature (Open-Shell and Closed-Shell) in Donor–Acceptor Self-Assembled Monolayers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 42624265,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.6b12601
  35. 35
    Vericat, C.; Vela, M. E.; Benitez, G.; Carro, P.; Salvarezza, R. C. Self-Assembled Monolayers of Thiols and Dithiols on Gold: New Challenges for a Well-Known System. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010, 39, 18051834,  DOI: 10.1039/b907301a
  36. 36
    Inkpen, M. S.; Liu, Z.-F.; Li, H.; Campos, L. M.; Neaton, J. B.; Venkataraman, L. Non-Chemisorbed Gold-Sulfur Binding Prevails in Self-Assembled Monolayers. Nat. Chem. 2019, 11, 351358,  DOI: 10.1038/s41557-019-0216-y
  37. 37
    Zotti, L. A.; Kirchner, T.; Cuevas, J.-C.; Pauly, F.; Huhn, T.; Scheer, E.; Erbe, A. Revealing the Role of Anchoring Groups in the Electrical Conduction Through Single-Molecule Junctions. Small 2010, 6, 15291535,  DOI: 10.1002/smll.200902227
  38. 38
    Zharnikov, M.; Grunze, M. Spectroscopic Characterization of Thiol-Derived Self-Assembling Monolayers. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 2001, 13, 1133311365,  DOI: 10.1088/0953-8984/13/49/314
  39. 39
    Rodriguez-Douton, M. J.; Mannini, M.; Armelao, L.; Barra, A.-L.; Tancini, E.; Sessoli, R.; Cornia, A. One-Step Covalent Grafting of Fe4 Single-Molecule Magnet Monolayers on Gold. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 14671469,  DOI: 10.1039/C0CC04583G
  40. 40
    Kumar, S.; van Herpt, J. T.; Gengler, R. Y. N.; Feringa, B. L.; Rudolf, P.; Chiechi, R. C. Mixed Monolayers of Spiropyrans Maximize Tunneling Conductance Switching by Photoisomerization at the Molecule–Electrode Interface in EGaIn Junctions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 1251912526,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.6b06806
  41. 41
    Ivashenko, O.; van Herpt, J. T.; Feringa, B. L.; Rudolf, P.; Browne, W. R. UV/Vis and NIR Light-Responsive Spiropyran Self-Assembled Monolayers. Langmuir 2013, 29, 42904297,  DOI: 10.1021/la400192c
  42. 42
    Hamoudi, H.; Esaulov, V. A. Selfassembly of α,ω-Dithiols on Surfaces and Metal Dithiol Heterostructures. Ann. Phys. 2016, 528, 242263,  DOI: 10.1002/andp.201500280
  43. 43
    Ishida, T.; Hara, M.; Kojima, I.; Tsuneda, S.; Nishida, N.; Sasabe, H.; Knoll, W. High Resolution X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy Measurements of Octadecanethiol Self-Assembled Monolayers on Au(111). Langmuir 1998, 14, 20922096,  DOI: 10.1021/la971104z
  44. 44
    Cortés, E.; Rubert, A. A.; Benitez, G.; Carro, P.; Vela, M. E.; Salvarezza, R. C. Enhanced Stability of Thiolate Self-Assembled Monolayers (SAMs) on Nanostructured Gold Substrates. Langmuir 2009, 25, 56615666,  DOI: 10.1021/la804251a
  45. 45
    Watcharinyanon, S.; Nilsson, D.; Moons, E.; Shaporenko, A.; Zharnikov, M.; Albinsson, B.; Mårtensson, J.; Johansson, L. S. O. A Spectroscopic Study of Self-Assembled Monolayer of Porphyrin-Functionalized Oligo(phenyleneethynylene)s on Gold: The Influence of the Anchor Moiety. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2008, 10, 52645275,  DOI: 10.1039/b802914h
  46. 46
    Grumelli, D.; Cristina, L. J.; Maza, F. L.; Carro, P.; Ferrón, J.; Kern, K.; Salvarezza, R. C. Thiol Adsorption on the Au(100)-Hex and Au(100)-(1 × 1) Surfaces. J. Phys. Chem. C 2015, 119, 1424814254,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b03931
  47. 47
    Park, J.-W.; Shumaker-Parry, J. S. Strong Resistance of Citrate Anions on Metal Nanoparticles to Desorption Under Thiol Functionalization. ACS Nano 2015, 9, 16651682,  DOI: 10.1021/nn506379m
  48. 48
    Cristina, L. J.; Ruano, G.; Salvarezza, R.; Ferrón, J. Thermal Stability of Self-Assembled Monolayers of N-Hexanethiol on Au(111)-(1 × 1) and Au(001)-(1 × 1). J. Phys. Chem. C 2017, 121, 2789427904,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b05883
  49. 49
    Rani, J. R.; Lim, J.; Oh, J.; Kim, D.; Lee, D.; Kim, J.-W.; Shin, H. S.; Kim, J. H.; Jun, S. C. Substrate and Buffer Layer Effect on the Structural and Optical Properties of Graphene Oxide Thin Films. RSC Adv. 2013, 3, 59265936,  DOI: 10.1039/c3ra00028a
  50. 50
    Ivashenko, O.; Logtenberg, H.; Areephong, J.; Coleman, A. C.; Wesenhagen, P. V.; Geertsema, E. M.; Heureux, N.; Feringa, B. L.; Rudolf, P.; Browne, W. R. Remarkable Stability of High Energy Conformers in Self-Assembled Monolayers of a Bistable Electro- And Photoswitchable Overcrowded Alkene. J. Phys. Chem. C 2011, 115, 2296522975,  DOI: 10.1021/jp206889y
  51. 51
    Wang, Z.; Dong, Y.; Li, H.; Zhao, Z.; Bin Wu, H.; Hao, C.; Liu, S.; Qiu, J.; Lou, X. W. (Enhancing Lithium-Sulphur Battery Performance by Strongly Binding the Discharge Products on Amino-Functionalized Reduced Graphene Oxide. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 5002,  DOI: 10.1038/ncomms6002
  52. 52
    Wang, H.; Zhou, H.; Gestos, A.; Fang, J.; Niu, H.; Ding, J.; Lin, T. Robust, Electro-Conductive, Self-Healing Superamphiphobic Fabric Prepared by One-Step Vapour-Phase Polymerisation of Poly(3,4-Ethylenedioxythiophene) in the Presence of Fluorinated Decyl Polyhedral Oligomeric Silsesquioxane and Fluorinated Alkyl Silane. Soft Matter 2013, 9, 277282,  DOI: 10.1039/C2SM26871J
  53. 53
    Bazylewski, P.; Boukhvalov, D. W.; Kukharenko, A. I.; Kurmaev, E. Z.; Hunt, A.; Moewes, A.; Lee, Y. H.; Cholakh, S. O.; Chang, G. S. The Characterization of Co-Nanoparticles Supported on Graphene. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 7560075606,  DOI: 10.1039/C5RA12893E
  54. 54
    Tao, C.-a.; Wang, J.; Qin, S.; Lv, Y.; Long, Y.; Zhu, H.; Jiang, Z. Fabrication of pH-sensitive Graphene Oxide–Drug Supramolecular Hydrogels as Controlled Release Systems. J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 2485624861,  DOI: 10.1039/c2jm34461k
  55. 55
    Haubner, K.; Murawski, J.; Olk, P.; Eng, L. M.; Ziegler, C.; Adolphi, B.; Jaehne, E. The Route to Functional Graphene Oxide. ChemPhysChem 2010, 11, 21312139,  DOI: 10.1002/cphc.201000132
  56. 56
    Lees, W. J.; Whitesides, G. M. Equilibrium constants for thiol-disulfide interchange reactions: a coherent, corrected set. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 642647,  DOI: 10.1021/jo00055a016
  57. 57
    Vilan, A.; Aswal, D.; Cahen, D. Large-Area, Ensemble Molecular Electronics: Motivation and Challenges. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 42484286,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00595
  58. 58
    Weiss, E. A.; Kaufman, G. K.; Kriebel, J. K.; Li, Z.; Schalek, R.; Whitesides, G. M. Si/SiO2-Templated Formation of Ultraflat Metal Surfaces on Glass, Polymer, and Solder Supports: Their Use as Substrates for Self-Assembled Monolayers. Langmuir 2007, 23, 96869694,  DOI: 10.1021/la701919r
  59. 59
    Chiechi, R. C.; Weiss, E. A.; Dickey, M. D.; Whitesides, G. M. Eutectic Gallium-Indium (EGaIn): A Moldable Liquid Metal for Electrical Characterization of Self-Assembled Monolayers. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 142144,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.200703642
  60. 60
    Wang, W.; Lee, T.; Reed, M. A. Mechanism of Electron Conduction in Self-Assembled Alkanethiol Monolayer Devices. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2003, 68, 035416,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.68.035416
  61. 61
    Simeone, F. C.; Yoon, H. J.; Thuo, M. M.; Barber, J. R.; Smith, B.; Whitesides, G. M. Defining the Value of Injection Current and Effective Electrical Contact Area for EGaIn-Based Molecular Tunneling Junctions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 1813118144,  DOI: 10.1021/ja408652h
  62. 62
    Thuo, M. M.; Reus, W. F.; Simeone, F. C.; Kim, C.; Schulz, M. D.; Yoon, H. J.; Whitesides, G. M. Replacing -CH2CH2- With -CONH- Does Not Significantly Change Rates of Charge Transport Through AgTS-SAM//Ga2O3/EGaIn Junctions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 1087610884,  DOI: 10.1021/ja301778s
  63. 63
    Ai, Y.; Kovalchuk, A.; Qiu, X.; Zhang, Y.; Kumar, S.; Wang, X.; Kühnel, M.; Nørgaard, K.; Chiechi, R. C. In-Place Modulation of Rectification in Tunneling Junctions Comprising Self-Assembled Monolayers. Nano Lett. 2018, 18, 75527559,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b03042
  64. 64
    Yoon, H. J.; Shapiro, N. D.; Park, K. M.; Thuo, M. M.; Soh, S.; Whitesides, G. M. The Rate of Charge Tunneling through Self-Assembled Monolayers Is Insensitive to Many Functional Group Substitutions. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 46584661,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201201448
  65. 65
    Baghbanzadeh, M.; Belding, L.; Yuan, L.; Park, J.; Al-Sayah, M. H.; Bowers, C. M.; Whitesides, G. M. Dipole-Induced Rectification Across AgTS/SAM//Ga2O3/EGaIn Junctions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 89698980,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.9b02891
  66. 66
    Kumar, S.; Merelli, M.; Danowski, W.; Rudolf, P.; Feringa, B. L.; Chiechi, R. C. Chemical Locking in Molecular Tunneling Junctions Enables Nonvolatile Memory With Large On–Off Ratios. Adv. Mater. 2019, 31, 1807831,  DOI: 10.1002/adma.201807831
  67. 67
    Qiu, L.; Zhang, Y.; Krijger, T. L.; Qiu, X.; Hof, P. v.; Hummelen, J. C.; Chiechi, R. C. Rectification of current responds to incorporation of fullerenes into mixed-monolayers of alkanethiolates in tunneling junctions. Chem. Sci. 2017, 8, 23652372,  DOI: 10.1039/C6SC04799H
  68. 68
    Jiang, L.; Yuan, L.; Cao, L.; Nijhuis, C. A. Controlling Leakage Currents: The Role of the Binding Group and Purity of the Precursors for Self-Assembled Monolayers in the Performance of Molecular Diodes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 19821991,  DOI: 10.1021/ja411116n
  69. 69
    Fracasso, D.; Valkenier, H.; Hummelen, J. C.; Solomon, G. C.; Chiechi, R. C. Evidence for Quantum Interference in SAMs of Arylethynylene Thiolates in Tunneling Junctions With Eutectic Ga–In (EGaIn) Top-Contacts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 95569563,  DOI: 10.1021/ja202471m
  70. 70
    Neese, F. The ORCA Program System. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev.: Comput. Mol. Sci. 2012, 2, 7378,  DOI: 10.1002/wcms.81
  71. 71
    Neese, F. Software update: the ORCA program system, verison 4.0. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev.: Comput. Mol. Sci. 2018, 8, e1327,  DOI: 10.1002/wcms.1327

Cited By

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!
Citation Statements
Explore this article's citation statements on scite.ai

This article is cited by 29 publications.

  1. Kristina Fidanovski, Modi Gu, Jiaxin Wu, Antonio Lauto, Daniel Ta, David Miskovic, Pawel Wagner, Klaudia Wagner, Zezhong Deng, David Officer, Damia Mawad. A Self-Acid-Doped and Self-Cross-Linked PEDOT Derivative Using a Simple and Effective Thiosulfate Addition. ACS Materials Letters 2025, 7 (5) , 1837-1844. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsmaterialslett.5c00051
  2. Hao Yang, Xiaolin Liu, Moeen Meigooni, Li Zhang, Jitong Ren, Qian Chen, Mark Losego, Emad Tajkhorshid, Jeffrey S. Moore, Charles M. Schroeder. Amino Acid Sequence Controls Enhanced Electron Transport in Heme-Binding Peptide Monolayers. ACS Central Science 2025, 11 (4) , 612-621. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscentsci.4c01849
  3. Jiajun Feng, Ioan Bâldea, Jiajie Gao, Gookyeong Jeong, C. Daniel Frisbie, Zuoti Xie. Investigating Molecular Junctions Based on Mixed Self-Assembled Monolayers to Understand the Impact of Intermolecular Interactions on Transport. ACS Nano 2024, 18 (46) , 32016-32022. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.4c09956
  4. Christina D. M. Trang, Carlos Mora Perez, Jingyi Ran, Oleg V. Prezhdo, Michael S. Inkpen. Counterion Loss from Charged Surface-Bound Complexes Drives the Formation of Loosely Packed Monolayers. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2024, 146 (37) , 25625-25639. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.4c07327
  5. Krishna Halder, Kabira Sabnam, Abhirup Das, Dipak K. Goswami, Swagata Dasgupta. Thin Film Formation of HSA in the Presence of CTAB-Capped Gold Nanorods through Phase Separation. Langmuir 2024, 40 (29) , 14847-14862. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.4c00694
  6. Carlos J. Mingoes, Bob C. Schroeder, Ana B. Jorge Sobrido. Electron Spin Selective Iridium Electrocatalysts for the Oxygen Evolution Reaction. ACS Materials Au 2024, 4 (2) , 204-213. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsmaterialsau.3c00084
  7. Waleed Azzam, Abdu Subaihi, Nathir A. F. Al-Rawashdeh, Ali Al-Nawaiseh. Imaging of Terphenyldithiol Molecules in Highly Orientated and Ordered Aromatic Dithiol SAMs on Au(111). The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2024, 128 (9) , 4093-4103. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.4c00102
  8. Mingyu Wan, Zhengyang Yang, Heba Morgan, Jinquan Shi, Fan Shi, Mengxia Liu, Hsi-Wu Wong, Zhiyong Gu, Fanglin Che. Enhanced CO2 Reactive Capture and Conversion Using Aminothiolate Ligand–Metal Interface. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2023, 145 (48) , 26038-26051. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.3c06888
  9. Sonatan Das, Akanksha Singh, V. Ramgopal Rao, Tapanendu Kundu. Self-Functional Off-Stoichiometry Polymeric Materials: Potential for Tunable Plasmonic Applications. ACS Applied Polymer Materials 2023, 5 (11) , 9456-9465. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsapm.3c01925
  10. Yiqun Su, Tiantian Wang, Fan Zhang, Junsen Huang, Zhehang Zhu, Faiz Ullah Shah, Feng Xu, Rong An. Effect of Electrode Surface Chemistry on Ion Structuring of Imidazolium Ionic Liquids. Langmuir 2023, 39 (24) , 8463-8474. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.3c00710
  11. Livio Oliveira de Miranda, Baptiste Maillot, Margarita Bosmi, Laurent Galmiche, Jean-Frédéric Audibert, Philippe Decorse, Vitor Brasiliense, Léa Berthelier, Isabelle Bonnamour, Ulrich Darbost, Fabien Miomandre. Photophysical and Electrochemical Study of New Luminescent and Redox-Active Tetrazine Derivatives Grafted on Gold Nanoparticles. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2023, 127 (7) , 3660-3670. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.2c07004
  12. Jose M. Abad, Marcos Pita, Antonio L. De Lacey. Single-Electron Charging of Thioctic Acid Monolayer-Protected Gold Clusters. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 2023, 14 (6) , 1452-1456. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.2c03940
  13. Essam M. Dief, Yan B. Vogel, Chandramalika R. Peiris, Anton P. Le Brun, Vinicius R. Gonçales, Simone Ciampi, Jeffrey R. Reimers, Nadim Darwish. Covalent Linkages of Molecules and Proteins to Si–H Surfaces Formed by Disulfide Reduction. Langmuir 2020, 36 (49) , 14999-15009. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.0c02391
  14. Pegah Zahedifar, Rino Morent, Sheida Aliakbarshirazi, Rouba Ghobeira, Nathalie De Geyter. Enhancement of the Bio-Responsiveness of PCL Nanofibers via the Combination of a Thiol Plasma-Polymerized Coating and Fibronectin Immobilization. Applied Surface Science Advances 2025, 27 , 100752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsadv.2025.100752
  15. Jin‐Liang Lin, Ang Zheng, Yu Xie, Ningyue Chen, Rui‐Lin He, Bangchen Yin, Wenkun Lv, Yongge Wei, Yuan Li. Transition from Tunneling to Schottky Barriers in Molecular Junctions Based on Polyoxometalate Monolayers. Angewandte Chemie International Edition 2025, 13 https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202501763
  16. Jin-Liang Lin, Ang Zheng, Yu Xie, Ningyue Chen, Rui-Lin He, Bangchen Yin, Wenkun Lv, Yongge Wei, Yuan Li. Transition from Tunneling to Schottky Barriers in Molecular Junctions Based on Polyoxometalate Monolayers. Angewandte Chemie 2025, https://doi.org/10.1002/ange.202501763
  17. Kwanjira Wangpimool, Subramanian Palanisamy, SangGuan You, Jin‐Chul Kim. Methylene Blue‐Loaded Self‐Assembled Nanoparticles and Their Temperature, Reduction, and Near‐Infrared‐Responsive Release Property for Doxorubicin Delivery. Polymers for Advanced Technologies 2025, 36 (1) https://doi.org/10.1002/pat.70086
  18. Warisha Naseeb, Muhammad Kaleem Khosa, Awal Noor, Sadaf Qayyum, Shaowei Chen, . Graphene nanosheets decorated with heterostructured ruthenium sulfide as catalyst for enhanced hydrogen evolution reaction. PLOS ONE 2024, 19 (12) , e0311885. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0311885
  19. Namsheer K, Gopal Sanyal, K. Pramoda, Brahmananda Chakraborty, Jung Sang Cho, Sang Mun Jeong, Chandra Sekhar Rout. 2D/2D Molybdenum Sulfo Selenides/Black Phosphorus Heterostructures for Supercapacitors and Light‐Driven Hydrogen Generation Applications. Advanced Sustainable Systems 2024, 8 (8) https://doi.org/10.1002/adsu.202300572
  20. Carlos Redondo-Gómez, Paula Parreira, M. Cristina L. Martins, Helena S. Azevedo. Peptide-based self-assembled monolayers (SAMs): what peptides can do for SAMs and vice versa. Chemical Society Reviews 2024, 53 (8) , 3714-3773. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3CS00921A
  21. Giulio Casula, Marzia Fantauzzi, Bernhard Elsener, Antonella Rossi. XPS and ARXPS for Characterizing Multilayers of Silanes on Gold Surfaces. Coatings 2024, 14 (3) , 327. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings14030327
  22. Weizheng Wang, Sundaram Gunasekaran. MXene/Gold nanoparticles heterostructure as catalase mimic for colorimetric detection of penicillin G. Chemical Engineering Journal 2024, 482 , 148693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2024.148693
  23. Raman Khurana, Fuad Alami, Christian A. Nijhuis, Ehud Keinan, Jurriaan Huskens, Ofer Reany. Selective Perchlorate Sensing Using Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy with Self‐Assembled Monolayers of semiaza ‐Bambusurils. Chemistry – A European Journal 2024, 30 (3) https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.202302968
  24. Nikita Sugak, Hien Pham, Abhaya Datye, Shomeek Mukhopadhyay, Haiyan Tan, Min Li, Lisa D. Pfefferle. Controlling the spacing of the linked graphene oxide system with dithiol linkers under confinement. Nanoscale Advances 2023, 5 (17) , 4553-4562. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3NA00324H
  25. Hairong Wu, Genglin Li, Jirui Hou, Kai Sotthewes. Probing surface properties of organic molecular layers by scanning tunneling microscopy. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science 2023, 318 , 102956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2023.102956
  26. Tianming Li, Vineeth Kumar Bandari, Oliver G. Schmidt. Molecular Electronics: Creating and Bridging Molecular Junctions and Promoting Its Commercialization. Advanced Materials 2023, 35 (22) https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202209088
  27. B. Naidji, L. Hallez, A. Et Taouil, M. Rebetez, J-Y. Hihn. Effect of cavitation intensity control on self-assembling of alkanethiols on gold in room temperature ionic liquids. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry 2021, 75 , 105610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2021.105610
  28. Yuru Liu, Xinkai Qiu, Saurabh Soni, Ryan C. Chiechi. Charge transport through molecular ensembles: Recent progress in molecular electronics. Chemical Physics Reviews 2021, 2 (2) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0050667
  29. Jerry A. Fereiro, Israel Pecht, Mordechai Sheves, David Cahen. Inelastic Electron Tunneling Spectroscopic Analysis of Bias‐Induced Structural Changes in a Solid‐State Protein Junction. Small 2021, 17 (19) https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202008218

Journal of the American Chemical Society

Cite this: J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 35, 15075–15083
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.0c06508
Published August 10, 2020

Copyright © 2020 American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under CC-BY-NC-ND.

Article Views

5281

Altmetric

-

Citations

Learn about these metrics

Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.

  • Abstract

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. Three modes by which d-DTT can bind to Au: bidentate-physisorbed ((bp)d-DTT), monodentate-physisorbed ((mp)d-DTT), and bidentate-chemisorbed ((bc)-DTT) where “–” and “···” represent covalent and noncovalent interactions, respectively, and d stands for a dimerized S–S bond.

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. (a) Water contact angles on SAMs of pure DTT grown from d-DTT with immersion times of 20 min (20m), 120 min (120m), and 720 min (720m). Contact angles of SAM of pure ethanethiol (EtSH) serve as a reference. (b) Water contact angles (red) and normalized Au/S ratios from XPS (black) versus the immersion time for SAMs of DTT (squares) and EtSH (circles). (c) XPS spectra of the SAMs 20m, 120m, 720m. The left column shows the corresponding S 2p core-level spectra, which comprise multiple doublets corresponding to Au—S bonds (black curve), hollow-site bonds (purple curve), and S—S bonds (red curve). The right column shows the C 1s core-level spectra, which comprise peaks corresponding to C—C bonds (black curve), C—S/C—OH bonds (green curve), and C═O bonds (blue curve).

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. (a) Water contact angles on mixed monolayers of DTT grown from pure d-DTT SAM immersed in ethanolic solutions of EtSH for 0, 6, 18, and 24 h (exchange time). (b) Water contact angles (red) and Au/S ratios of integrated peak-areas normalized to SAMs of pure EtSH from XPS (black) versus exchange time for SAMs of DTT with EtSH. (c) XPS spectra of the substrates pictured in part a. The left column shows the S 2p core-level spectra, which comprise two doublets corresponding to Au—S bonds (black curve) and S—S bonds (red curve). The right column shows the C 1s core-level spectra comprising peaks corresponding to C—C bonds (black curve), C—S/C—OH bonds (green curve), and adventitious C═O species (blue curve).

    Figure 4

    Figure 4. (a) Semilog plots of current density versus voltage (J–V) of SAMs of pure C0, C1, C5, and C9 molecules on AuTS measured with an EGaIn tip (the R groups and commensurate molecular lengths are defined in Table 1). (b) Values of β at different applied bias computed from the J–V curves in panel a according to eq 1 showing no dependence on the length of the R group. (c) Semilog J–V curves of the same series as panel a in mixed monolayers with octanethiol. (d) Value of β at different applied biases computed from the J–V curves in panel c showing a clear dependence on the identity of the R group.

    Figure 5

    Figure 5. Representative XPS spectra of SAMs of pure C1 (top) and mixed monolayers of C1 and octanethiol (bottom). The left column shows the respective S 2p core-level spectra and fits revealing two doublets corresponding to Au—S (black) and S—S (red). The right column shows the respective C 1s core-level spectra and fits of the data revealing peaks ascribed to C—C (black), C—S/C—O (green), and O—C═O/C═O species (blue).

  • References


    This article references 71 other publications.

    1. 1
      Häkkinen, H. The gold–sulfur interface at the nanoscale. Nat. Chem. 2012, 4, 443455,  DOI: 10.1038/nchem.1352
    2. 2
      Love, J. C.; Estroff, L. A.; Kriebel, J. K.; Nuzzo, R. G.; Whitesides, G. M. Self-Assembled Monolayers of Thiolates on Metals as a Form of Nanotechnology. Chem. Rev. 2005, 105, 11031170,  DOI: 10.1021/cr0300789
    3. 3
      Boisselier, E.; Astruc, D. Gold Nanoparticles in Nanomedicine: Preparations, Imaging, Diagnostics, Therapies and Toxicity. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009, 38, 17591782,  DOI: 10.1039/b806051g
    4. 4
      Kumar, A.; Biebuyck, H. A.; Whitesides, G. M. Patterning Self-Assembled Monolayers: Applications in Materials Science. Langmuir 1994, 10, 14981511,  DOI: 10.1021/la00017a030
    5. 5
      Liao, W.-S.; Cheunkar, S.; Cao, H. H.; Bednar, H. R.; Weiss, P. S.; Andrews, A. M. Subtractive Patterning via Chemical Lift-Off Lithography. Science 2012, 337, 15171521,  DOI: 10.1126/science.1221774
    6. 6
      Motesharei, K.; Myles, D. C. Molecular Recognition on Functionalized Self-Assembled Monolayers of Alkanethiols on Gold. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 73287336,  DOI: 10.1021/ja973166h
    7. 7
      Schliwa, M.; Woehlke, G. Molecular Motors. Nature 2003, 422, 759765,  DOI: 10.1038/nature01601
    8. 8
      Yao, H.; Miki, K.; Nishida, N.; Sasaki, A.; Kimura, K. Large Optical Activity of Gold Nanocluster Enantiomers Induced by a Pair of Optically Active Penicillamines. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 1553615543,  DOI: 10.1021/ja053504b
    9. 9
      Gautier, C.; Bürgi, T. Chiral N-Isobutyryl-Cysteine Protected Gold Nanoparticles: Preparation, Size Selection, and Optical Activity in the UV-vis and Infrared. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128 (34), 1107911087,  DOI: 10.1021/ja058717f
    10. 10
      Yeung, S. Y.; Ederth, T.; Pan, G.; Cicėnaitė, J.; Cárdenas, M.; Arnebrant, T.; Sellergren, B. Reversible Self-Assembled Monolayers (rSAMs) as Robust and Fluidic Lipid Bilayer Mimics. Langmuir 2018, 34, 41074115,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b00226
    11. 11
      Sethuraman, A.; Han, M.; Kane, R. S.; Belfort, G. Effect of Surface Wettability on the Adhesion of Proteins. Langmuir 2004, 20, 77797788,  DOI: 10.1021/la049454q
    12. 12
      Samuel, B.; Zhao, H.; Law, K.-Y. Study of Wetting and Adhesion Interactions Between Water and Various Polymer and Superhydrophobic Surfaces. J. Phys. Chem. C 2011, 115, 1485214861,  DOI: 10.1021/jp2032466
    13. 13
      Ramachandran, S.; Tsai, B.-L.; Blanco, M.; Chen, H.; Tang, Y.; Goddard, W. A. Self-Assembled Monolayer Mechanism for Corrosion Inhibition of Iron by Imidazolines. Langmuir 1996, 12, 64196428,  DOI: 10.1021/la960646y
    14. 14
      Nuzzo, R. G.; Allara, D. L. Adsorption of Bifunctional Organic Disulfides on Gold Surfaces. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983, 105, 44814483,  DOI: 10.1021/ja00351a063
    15. 15
      Nuzzo, R. G.; Zegarski, B. R.; Dubois, L. H. Fundamental Studies of the Chemisorption of Organosulfur Compounds on Gold(111). Implications for Molecular Self-Assembly on Gold Surfaces. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 733740,  DOI: 10.1021/ja00237a017
    16. 16
      Bain, C. D.; Evall, J.; Whitesides, G. M. Formation of Monolayers by the Coadsorption of Thiols on Gold: Variation in the Head Group, Tail Group, and Solvent. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 71557164,  DOI: 10.1021/ja00200a039
    17. 17
      Bain, C. D.; Biebuyck, H. A.; Whitesides, G. M. Comparison of Self-Assembled Monolayers on Gold: Coadsorption of Thiols and Disulfides. Langmuir 1989, 5, 723727,  DOI: 10.1021/la00087a027
    18. 18
      Ulman, A. Self-Assembled Monolayers of Thiols; Thin Films; Academic Press, 1998; Vol. 24.
    19. 19
      Xue, Y.; Li, X.; Li, H.; Zhang, W. Quantifying thiol–gold interactions towards the efficient strength control. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 19,  DOI: 10.1038/ncomms5348
    20. 20
      Kong, G. D.; Byeon, S. E.; Park, S.; Song, H.; Kim, S.-Y.; Yoon, H. J. Mixed Molecular Electronics: Tunneling Behaviors and Applications of Mixed Self-Assembled Monolayers. Advanced Electronic Materials 2020, 6, 1901157,  DOI: 10.1002/aelm.201901157
    21. 21
      Jin, J.; Kong, G. D.; Yoon, H. J. Deconvolution of Tunneling Current in Large-Area Junctions Formed with Mixed Self-Assembled Monolayers. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2018, 9, 45784583,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.8b01997
    22. 22
      Kong, G. D.; Kim, M.; Cho, S. J.; Yoon, H. J. Gradients of Rectification: Tuning Molecular Electronic Devices by the Controlled Use of Different-Sized Diluents in Heterogeneous Self-Assembled Monolayers. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 1030710311,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201604748
    23. 23
      Kong, G. D.; Jin, J.; Thuo, M.; Song, H.; Joung, J. F.; Park, S.; Yoon, H. J. Elucidating the Role of Molecule–Electrode Interfacial Defects in Charge Tunneling Characteristics of Large-Area Junctions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 1230312307,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.8b08146
    24. 24
      Ben Amara, F.; Dionne, E. R.; Kassir, S.; Pellerin, C.; Badia, A. Molecular Origin of the Odd–Even Effect of Macroscopic Properties of n-Alkanethiolate Self-Assembled Monolayers: Bulk or Interface?. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 1305113061,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.0c04288
    25. 25
      Chen, J.; Giroux, T. J.; Nguyen, Y.; Kadoma, A. A.; Chang, B. S.; VanVeller, B.; Thuo, M. M. Understanding interface (odd–even) effects in charge tunneling using a polished EGaIn electrode. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2018, 20, 48644878,  DOI: 10.1039/C7CP07531F
    26. 26
      Chen, J.; Chang, B.; Oyola-Reynoso, S.; Wang, Z.; Thuo, M. Quantifying Gauche Defects and Phase Evolution in Self-Assembled Monolayers through Sessile Drops. ACS Omega 2017, 2, 20722084,  DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.7b00355
    27. 27
      Rooth, M.; Shaw, A. M. pH-Controlled Formation Kinetics of Self-Assembled Layers of Thioctic Acid on Gold Nanoparticles. J. Phys. Chem. C 2007, 111, 1536315369,  DOI: 10.1021/jp075083l
    28. 28
      Han, S.; Park, H.; Han, J. W.; Yoshizawa, K.; Hayashi, T.; Hara, M.; Noh, J. Solvent Effect on the Formation of Octaneselenocyanate Self-Assembled Monolayers on Au(111). J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2019, 19, 47954798,  DOI: 10.1166/jnn.2019.16706
    29. 29
      Ivashenko, O.; van Herpt, J.; Feringa, B.; Browne, W.; Rudolf, P. Rapid Reduction of Self-Assembled Monolayers of a Disulfide Terminated Para-Nitrophenyl Alkyl Ester on Roughened Au Surfaces During XPS Measurements. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2013, 559, 7681,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cplett.2012.12.060
    30. 30
      Kong, G. D.; Yoon, H. J. Influence of Air-Oxidation on Rectification in Thiol-Based Molecular Monolayers. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2016, 163, G115G121,  DOI: 10.1149/2.0091609jes
    31. 31
      Lee, L. Y. S.; Lennox, R. B. Electrochemical Desorption of N-Alkylthiol SAMs on Polycrystalline Gold: Studies Using a Ferrocenylalkylthiol Probe. Langmuir 2007, 23, 292296,  DOI: 10.1021/la061684c
    32. 32
      Neuman, K. C.; Nagy, A. Single-Molecule Force Spectroscopy: Optical Tweezers, Magnetic Tweezers and Atomic Force Microscopy. Nat. Methods 2008, 5, 491505,  DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.1218
    33. 33
      Martínez, L.; Carrascosa, L. G.; Huttel, Y.; Lechuga, L. M.; Román, E. Influence of the Linker Type on the Au–S Binding Properties of Thiol and Disulfide-Modified DNA Self-Assembly on Polycrystalline Gold. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2010, 12, 33013308,  DOI: 10.1039/b924504a
    34. 34
      Souto, M.; Yuan, L.; Morales, D. C.; Jiang, L.; Ratera, I.; Nijhuis, C. A.; Veciana, J. Tuning the Rectification Ratio by Changing the Electronic Nature (Open-Shell and Closed-Shell) in Donor–Acceptor Self-Assembled Monolayers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 42624265,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.6b12601
    35. 35
      Vericat, C.; Vela, M. E.; Benitez, G.; Carro, P.; Salvarezza, R. C. Self-Assembled Monolayers of Thiols and Dithiols on Gold: New Challenges for a Well-Known System. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010, 39, 18051834,  DOI: 10.1039/b907301a
    36. 36
      Inkpen, M. S.; Liu, Z.-F.; Li, H.; Campos, L. M.; Neaton, J. B.; Venkataraman, L. Non-Chemisorbed Gold-Sulfur Binding Prevails in Self-Assembled Monolayers. Nat. Chem. 2019, 11, 351358,  DOI: 10.1038/s41557-019-0216-y
    37. 37
      Zotti, L. A.; Kirchner, T.; Cuevas, J.-C.; Pauly, F.; Huhn, T.; Scheer, E.; Erbe, A. Revealing the Role of Anchoring Groups in the Electrical Conduction Through Single-Molecule Junctions. Small 2010, 6, 15291535,  DOI: 10.1002/smll.200902227
    38. 38
      Zharnikov, M.; Grunze, M. Spectroscopic Characterization of Thiol-Derived Self-Assembling Monolayers. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 2001, 13, 1133311365,  DOI: 10.1088/0953-8984/13/49/314
    39. 39
      Rodriguez-Douton, M. J.; Mannini, M.; Armelao, L.; Barra, A.-L.; Tancini, E.; Sessoli, R.; Cornia, A. One-Step Covalent Grafting of Fe4 Single-Molecule Magnet Monolayers on Gold. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 14671469,  DOI: 10.1039/C0CC04583G
    40. 40
      Kumar, S.; van Herpt, J. T.; Gengler, R. Y. N.; Feringa, B. L.; Rudolf, P.; Chiechi, R. C. Mixed Monolayers of Spiropyrans Maximize Tunneling Conductance Switching by Photoisomerization at the Molecule–Electrode Interface in EGaIn Junctions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 1251912526,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.6b06806
    41. 41
      Ivashenko, O.; van Herpt, J. T.; Feringa, B. L.; Rudolf, P.; Browne, W. R. UV/Vis and NIR Light-Responsive Spiropyran Self-Assembled Monolayers. Langmuir 2013, 29, 42904297,  DOI: 10.1021/la400192c
    42. 42
      Hamoudi, H.; Esaulov, V. A. Selfassembly of α,ω-Dithiols on Surfaces and Metal Dithiol Heterostructures. Ann. Phys. 2016, 528, 242263,  DOI: 10.1002/andp.201500280
    43. 43
      Ishida, T.; Hara, M.; Kojima, I.; Tsuneda, S.; Nishida, N.; Sasabe, H.; Knoll, W. High Resolution X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy Measurements of Octadecanethiol Self-Assembled Monolayers on Au(111). Langmuir 1998, 14, 20922096,  DOI: 10.1021/la971104z
    44. 44
      Cortés, E.; Rubert, A. A.; Benitez, G.; Carro, P.; Vela, M. E.; Salvarezza, R. C. Enhanced Stability of Thiolate Self-Assembled Monolayers (SAMs) on Nanostructured Gold Substrates. Langmuir 2009, 25, 56615666,  DOI: 10.1021/la804251a
    45. 45
      Watcharinyanon, S.; Nilsson, D.; Moons, E.; Shaporenko, A.; Zharnikov, M.; Albinsson, B.; Mårtensson, J.; Johansson, L. S. O. A Spectroscopic Study of Self-Assembled Monolayer of Porphyrin-Functionalized Oligo(phenyleneethynylene)s on Gold: The Influence of the Anchor Moiety. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2008, 10, 52645275,  DOI: 10.1039/b802914h
    46. 46
      Grumelli, D.; Cristina, L. J.; Maza, F. L.; Carro, P.; Ferrón, J.; Kern, K.; Salvarezza, R. C. Thiol Adsorption on the Au(100)-Hex and Au(100)-(1 × 1) Surfaces. J. Phys. Chem. C 2015, 119, 1424814254,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b03931
    47. 47
      Park, J.-W.; Shumaker-Parry, J. S. Strong Resistance of Citrate Anions on Metal Nanoparticles to Desorption Under Thiol Functionalization. ACS Nano 2015, 9, 16651682,  DOI: 10.1021/nn506379m
    48. 48
      Cristina, L. J.; Ruano, G.; Salvarezza, R.; Ferrón, J. Thermal Stability of Self-Assembled Monolayers of N-Hexanethiol on Au(111)-(1 × 1) and Au(001)-(1 × 1). J. Phys. Chem. C 2017, 121, 2789427904,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b05883
    49. 49
      Rani, J. R.; Lim, J.; Oh, J.; Kim, D.; Lee, D.; Kim, J.-W.; Shin, H. S.; Kim, J. H.; Jun, S. C. Substrate and Buffer Layer Effect on the Structural and Optical Properties of Graphene Oxide Thin Films. RSC Adv. 2013, 3, 59265936,  DOI: 10.1039/c3ra00028a
    50. 50
      Ivashenko, O.; Logtenberg, H.; Areephong, J.; Coleman, A. C.; Wesenhagen, P. V.; Geertsema, E. M.; Heureux, N.; Feringa, B. L.; Rudolf, P.; Browne, W. R. Remarkable Stability of High Energy Conformers in Self-Assembled Monolayers of a Bistable Electro- And Photoswitchable Overcrowded Alkene. J. Phys. Chem. C 2011, 115, 2296522975,  DOI: 10.1021/jp206889y
    51. 51
      Wang, Z.; Dong, Y.; Li, H.; Zhao, Z.; Bin Wu, H.; Hao, C.; Liu, S.; Qiu, J.; Lou, X. W. (Enhancing Lithium-Sulphur Battery Performance by Strongly Binding the Discharge Products on Amino-Functionalized Reduced Graphene Oxide. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 5002,  DOI: 10.1038/ncomms6002
    52. 52
      Wang, H.; Zhou, H.; Gestos, A.; Fang, J.; Niu, H.; Ding, J.; Lin, T. Robust, Electro-Conductive, Self-Healing Superamphiphobic Fabric Prepared by One-Step Vapour-Phase Polymerisation of Poly(3,4-Ethylenedioxythiophene) in the Presence of Fluorinated Decyl Polyhedral Oligomeric Silsesquioxane and Fluorinated Alkyl Silane. Soft Matter 2013, 9, 277282,  DOI: 10.1039/C2SM26871J
    53. 53
      Bazylewski, P.; Boukhvalov, D. W.; Kukharenko, A. I.; Kurmaev, E. Z.; Hunt, A.; Moewes, A.; Lee, Y. H.; Cholakh, S. O.; Chang, G. S. The Characterization of Co-Nanoparticles Supported on Graphene. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 7560075606,  DOI: 10.1039/C5RA12893E
    54. 54
      Tao, C.-a.; Wang, J.; Qin, S.; Lv, Y.; Long, Y.; Zhu, H.; Jiang, Z. Fabrication of pH-sensitive Graphene Oxide–Drug Supramolecular Hydrogels as Controlled Release Systems. J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 2485624861,  DOI: 10.1039/c2jm34461k
    55. 55
      Haubner, K.; Murawski, J.; Olk, P.; Eng, L. M.; Ziegler, C.; Adolphi, B.; Jaehne, E. The Route to Functional Graphene Oxide. ChemPhysChem 2010, 11, 21312139,  DOI: 10.1002/cphc.201000132
    56. 56
      Lees, W. J.; Whitesides, G. M. Equilibrium constants for thiol-disulfide interchange reactions: a coherent, corrected set. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 642647,  DOI: 10.1021/jo00055a016
    57. 57
      Vilan, A.; Aswal, D.; Cahen, D. Large-Area, Ensemble Molecular Electronics: Motivation and Challenges. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 42484286,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00595
    58. 58
      Weiss, E. A.; Kaufman, G. K.; Kriebel, J. K.; Li, Z.; Schalek, R.; Whitesides, G. M. Si/SiO2-Templated Formation of Ultraflat Metal Surfaces on Glass, Polymer, and Solder Supports: Their Use as Substrates for Self-Assembled Monolayers. Langmuir 2007, 23, 96869694,  DOI: 10.1021/la701919r
    59. 59
      Chiechi, R. C.; Weiss, E. A.; Dickey, M. D.; Whitesides, G. M. Eutectic Gallium-Indium (EGaIn): A Moldable Liquid Metal for Electrical Characterization of Self-Assembled Monolayers. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 142144,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.200703642
    60. 60
      Wang, W.; Lee, T.; Reed, M. A. Mechanism of Electron Conduction in Self-Assembled Alkanethiol Monolayer Devices. Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2003, 68, 035416,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.68.035416
    61. 61
      Simeone, F. C.; Yoon, H. J.; Thuo, M. M.; Barber, J. R.; Smith, B.; Whitesides, G. M. Defining the Value of Injection Current and Effective Electrical Contact Area for EGaIn-Based Molecular Tunneling Junctions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 1813118144,  DOI: 10.1021/ja408652h
    62. 62
      Thuo, M. M.; Reus, W. F.; Simeone, F. C.; Kim, C.; Schulz, M. D.; Yoon, H. J.; Whitesides, G. M. Replacing -CH2CH2- With -CONH- Does Not Significantly Change Rates of Charge Transport Through AgTS-SAM//Ga2O3/EGaIn Junctions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 1087610884,  DOI: 10.1021/ja301778s
    63. 63
      Ai, Y.; Kovalchuk, A.; Qiu, X.; Zhang, Y.; Kumar, S.; Wang, X.; Kühnel, M.; Nørgaard, K.; Chiechi, R. C. In-Place Modulation of Rectification in Tunneling Junctions Comprising Self-Assembled Monolayers. Nano Lett. 2018, 18, 75527559,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b03042
    64. 64
      Yoon, H. J.; Shapiro, N. D.; Park, K. M.; Thuo, M. M.; Soh, S.; Whitesides, G. M. The Rate of Charge Tunneling through Self-Assembled Monolayers Is Insensitive to Many Functional Group Substitutions. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 46584661,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201201448
    65. 65
      Baghbanzadeh, M.; Belding, L.; Yuan, L.; Park, J.; Al-Sayah, M. H.; Bowers, C. M.; Whitesides, G. M. Dipole-Induced Rectification Across AgTS/SAM//Ga2O3/EGaIn Junctions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 89698980,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.9b02891
    66. 66
      Kumar, S.; Merelli, M.; Danowski, W.; Rudolf, P.; Feringa, B. L.; Chiechi, R. C. Chemical Locking in Molecular Tunneling Junctions Enables Nonvolatile Memory With Large On–Off Ratios. Adv. Mater. 2019, 31, 1807831,  DOI: 10.1002/adma.201807831
    67. 67
      Qiu, L.; Zhang, Y.; Krijger, T. L.; Qiu, X.; Hof, P. v.; Hummelen, J. C.; Chiechi, R. C. Rectification of current responds to incorporation of fullerenes into mixed-monolayers of alkanethiolates in tunneling junctions. Chem. Sci. 2017, 8, 23652372,  DOI: 10.1039/C6SC04799H
    68. 68
      Jiang, L.; Yuan, L.; Cao, L.; Nijhuis, C. A. Controlling Leakage Currents: The Role of the Binding Group and Purity of the Precursors for Self-Assembled Monolayers in the Performance of Molecular Diodes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 19821991,  DOI: 10.1021/ja411116n
    69. 69
      Fracasso, D.; Valkenier, H.; Hummelen, J. C.; Solomon, G. C.; Chiechi, R. C. Evidence for Quantum Interference in SAMs of Arylethynylene Thiolates in Tunneling Junctions With Eutectic Ga–In (EGaIn) Top-Contacts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 95569563,  DOI: 10.1021/ja202471m
    70. 70
      Neese, F. The ORCA Program System. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev.: Comput. Mol. Sci. 2012, 2, 7378,  DOI: 10.1002/wcms.81
    71. 71
      Neese, F. Software update: the ORCA program system, verison 4.0. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev.: Comput. Mol. Sci. 2018, 8, e1327,  DOI: 10.1002/wcms.1327
  • Supporting Information

    Supporting Information


    The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/jacs.0c06508.

    • Synthetic detail and full characterization data for all new compounds, description of measurement techniques, and additional spectroscopic data on monolayers (PDF)


    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.