ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
Highly Selective p-Xylene Separation from Mixtures of C8 Aromatics by a Nonporous Molecular Apohost
My Activity

Figure 1Loading Img
  • Open Access
Article

Highly Selective p-Xylene Separation from Mixtures of C8 Aromatics by a Nonporous Molecular Apohost
Click to copy article linkArticle link copied!

Open PDFSupporting Information (5)

Journal of the American Chemical Society

Cite this: J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2023, 145, 50, 27316–27324
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.3c07198
Published December 6, 2023

Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under

CC-BY 4.0 .

Abstract

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

High and increasing production of separation of C8 aromatic isomers demands the development of purification methods that are efficient, scalable, and inexpensive, especially for p-xylene, PX, the largest volume C8 commodity. Herein, we report that 4-(1H-1,2,4-triazol-1-yl)-phenyl-1H-benzo[de]isoquinoline-1,3(2H)-dione (TPBD), a molecular compound that can be prepared and scaled up via solid-state synthesis, exhibits exceptional PX selectivity over each of the other C8 isomers, o-xylene (OX), m-xylene (MX), and ethylbenzene (EB). The apohost or α form of TPBD was found to exhibit conformational polymorphism in the solid state enabled by rotation of its triazole and benzene rings. TPBD-αI and TPBD-αII are nonporous polymorphs that transformed to the same PX inclusion compound, TPBD-PX, upon contact with liquid PX. TPBD enabled highly selective capture of PX, as established by competitive slurry experiments involving various molar ratios in binary, ternary, and quaternary mixtures of C8 aromatics. Binary selectivity values for PX as determined by 1H NMR spectroscopy and gas chromatography ranged from 22.4 to 108.4, setting new benchmarks for both PX/MX (70.3) and PX/EB (59.9) selectivity as well as close to benchmark selectivity for PX/OX (108.4). To our knowledge, TPBD is the first material of any class to exhibit such high across-the-board PX selectivity from quaternary mixtures of C8 aromatics under ambient conditions. Crystallographic and computational studies provide structural insight into the PX binding site in TPBD-PX, whereas thermal stability and capture kinetics were determined by variable-temperature powder X-ray diffraction and slurry tests, respectively. That TPBD offers benchmark PX selectivity and facile recyclability makes it a prototypal molecular compound for PX purification or capture under ambient conditions.

This publication is licensed under

CC-BY 4.0 .
  • cc licence
  • by licence
Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society

Introduction

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Purification of the C8 aromatic isomers o-xylene (OX), m-xylene (MX), p-xylene (PX), and ethylbenzene (EB) occurs at an industrial scale as each is a high-volume product of the chemical industry. (1−3) Among these isomers, PX is of note as it is a precursor for terephthalic acid, which in turn is used to produce polyester and polyethylene terephthalate. Demand for PX is increasing at 6–8% per year and accounts for >86% of the global mixed xylenes market in 2021. (4) The similarity of the C8 aromatic isomers with respect to their physicochemical properties (Table S1) (5) complicates their separation from each other, and conventional purification methods such as distillation or fractional crystallization require controlled environments with either high or low temperatures, respectively. Therefore, there is interest in the development of novel sorbents or membrane-based technologies that can provide more energy-efficient purification of PX. (6,7) Whereas selective PX adsorption using FAU-type zeolites has been validated, relatively high temperatures and pressures on simulated moving beds (SMBs) are required and PX selectivity is usually <10. (5)
Physisorbents such as metal–organic materials (MOMs), (8−14) especially flexible MOMs (FMOMs), (15−19) have exhibited promising characteristics for C8 separation. (18,20−27) Notably, two-dimensional (2D) layered coordination networks, (28,29) one-dimensional (1D) chain coordination polymers, (30,31) and zero-dimensional (0D) coordination complexes (32−35) can offer selective binding of C8 guests through C8-induced structural phase transformations from guest-free apohosts (α-phases) to inclusion compounds (β-phases). (36) Organic molecular solids can also undergo phase transformations induced by guest molecules (37−41) and offer selective binding of C8 isomers. (32,33,42−46) In terms of selectivity, a cage host with intrinsic porosity was found to offer across-the-board PX selectivity ranging between 6.60 and 12.10. (36) In addition, studies suggest that flexibility in molecular compounds can enable selective clathration and accelerated diffusion of PX through porous structures. (43,47,48) Stimuli-induced phase transformations of 0D apohosts conducted by the Atwood and Barbour groups provided insight into how external stimuli can trigger structural changes and their potential applications. (33,44,49,50) We have recently coined the term switching adsorbent molecular materials (SAMMs) (32) for those molecular compounds that switch between nonporous and porous phases when exposed to gas, vapor, or liquid adsorbates.
Organic inclusion compounds, exemplified by urea, thiourea, quinol, phenol, and Dianin’s compound, have been extensively studied with respect to their host–guest chemistry (51−55) and selective enclathration of guest molecules. However, despite combining low cost and comparative simplicity, this class of materials remains understudied in the context of C8 separations. It has been reported that nonporous molecular solids, e.g., bishydrazones, (56) can distinguish one isomer from a mixture of C8 aromatics, highlighting the significance of phase transformations and conformational flexibility in adapting host cavities to fit guest molecules. (57) We herein report the C8 aromatic inclusion properties of a hitherto unstudied molecular compound, 4-(1H-1,2,4-triazol-1-yl)-phenyl-1H-benzo[de]isoquinoline-1,3(2H)-dione, TPBD, which was prepared by cocrystal-controlled solid-state synthesis (58−60) (solvent-drop grinding, SDG, (61−63) followed by heating). TPBD’s selection is rooted in its inherent structural features and the aforementioned studies on molecular compounds such as Werner complexes. (32−34) The studies of Werner clathrates highlight that molecular compounds comprising aromatic rings and conformational diversity can form host–guest complexes with C8 isomers. TPBD is also attractive because it can be prepared in high yield using mechanochemistry. (64) Single-crystal X-ray diffraction (SCXRD), powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD), and solubility studies provide insight into phase switching of TPBD upon exposure to liquid C8 aromatic mixtures at room temperature.

Results and Discussion

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Crystal Structure of TPBD and its Polymorphism

A 1:1 mixture of 1,8-naphthalic anhydride (1,8-NA) and 4-(1,2,4-triazol-1-yl) aniline (4-TA) was wet ground with EtOH before heating at 270 °C for 1 h to form TPBD (Figures 1 and S1a). SCXRD data revealed that the colorless blocks, grown by crystallizing TPBD from EtOH, belong to the monoclinic space group P21/c with one TPBD in the asymmetric unit (Tables S2 and S3). This crystal form, TPBD-αI, was also crystallized from water, methanol, ethanol, acetone, acetonitrile, n-hexane, isopropanol, and n-propanol (Figure S2). Recrystallization of TPBD-αI from dimethylformamide and dichloromethane afforded colorless needle-like crystals of a second polymorph, TPBD-αII, which adopted orthorhombic space group P21212 (Figures 2a, S1b and Table S3). The main difference between TPBD-αI and TPBD-αII is the orientation of the triazole and benzene moieties, resulting in different unit cell parameters and a slightly reduced unit cell volume (Table S3). During a study of reaction conditions to optimize the synthesis of TPBD (Figures S3a,b), two additional polymorphs were found. TPBD-αIII and TPBD-αIV were isolated as minor crystalline impurities from the bulk reaction product but could not be reproduced with bulk phase purity using solvent-mediated methods, which consistently afforded TPBD-αI or TPBD-αII. TPBD-αIII crystallized in the orthorhombic space group P21212, whereas TPBD-αIV crystallized in the triclinic space group P1̅ (Table S3). The relative stability of these polymorphs is suggested by their respective densities (65,66) of 1.495, 1.533, 1.423, and 1.506 g/cm3.

Figure 1

Figure 1. Synthesis of TPBD-αI via solid-state synthesis.

Figure 2

Figure 2. (a) Solvent and temperature-mediated conformational polymorphism of TPBD. (a) Illustration of the formation of TPBD-αII from the recrystallization of TPBD-αI in DMF or DCM and subsequent recovery of TPBD-αI by heating. (b) VT-PXRD indicates that conversion of TPBD-αII to TPBD-αI occurs after heating to temperatures ≥200 °C and that this structure is maintained when cooled to 25 °C.

To simplify the analysis of TPBD’s conformational features, we label the 1,2,4-triazole ring A, the benzene ring B, and the rest of the structure C (Figure 1). TPBD’s structural flexibility is evident from rotation of the triazole and benzene rings as depicted in Table S4 and Figure S4. The magnitude of the torsion angles formed between the planes of A and B are 33.6, 4.9, 14.6, and 32.4° in TPBD-αI-αIV, respectively. Figure S4 shows that TPBD-αI and TPBD-αII have opposite orientations for rings A and B compared to TPBD-αIII and TPBD-αIV. TPBD-αI and TPBD-αII have similar orientations, but the triazole ring in TPBD-αI is twisted more significantly, while TPBD-αIII and TPBD-αIV have similar conformations. The conformational variability of the A/B rings and B/C moieties (Figure S4) can explain the conformational polymorphism seen herein. CH···π and π···π stacking interactions play a key role in the crystal packing in TPBD-αI-αIV (Figure S5).
The four TPBD polymorphs were optimized with density functional theory (DFT) to determine their relative stability in kilojoules per molTPBD at 0 K. The cell parameters for structures before and after cell optimization are displayed in Tables S5 and S6. In decreasing order of stability, we found TPBD-αII (0.0) > TPBD-αI (1.3) > TPBD-αIII (3.4) > TPBD-αIV (4.4). The relative energy differences between these four cell-optimized TPBD polymorphs are thus small, and with the cell-optimized structures, qualitative stability trends at different temperatures can be predicted (Table S7). Furthermore, other synthesis parameters, such as temperature, pressure, and solvation, will also contribute to the relative stability, as observed experimentally.
Following unsuccessful attempts to reproduce TPBD-αIII and TPBD-αIV, our focus shifted to preparing bulk samples of TPBD-αI and TPBD-αII and an analysis of their properties. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) revealed that TPBD-αI and TPBD-αII did not exhibit weight loss below 300 °C (Figure S6a). Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) (closed pan) revealed one endothermic event in the DSC curve of TPBD-αI (Figure S6b), which we attribute to melting at 328 °C. The DSC curve of TPBD-αII showed two endotherms, the first consistent with a phase transition at 185 °C, followed by a sharp endothermic peak at 334 °C consistent with melting. Interestingly, the free energies of formation for both TPBD-αI and TPBD-αII polymorphs become endergonic at approximately 330 °C, which agrees with the experimentally observed melting temperatures (Figure S7). Variable-temperature powder X-ray diffraction (VT-PXRD) revealed that TPBD-αII converted to TPBD-αI at 175–200 °C (Figure 2b). This experimentally observed stability reversal is also observed computationally: the Helmholtz free energy differences between TPBD-αI and TPBD-αII are negligible at 50 °C; however, at higher temperatures, TPBD-αI becomes the thermodynamically stable polymorph (Table S7). Furthermore, accelerated stability testing (67,68) in a humidity chamber (75% RH, 40 °C) revealed that TPBD-αI and TPBD-αII are hydrolytically stable, as confirmed by PXRD patterns remaining unchanged (Figure S8).

C8 Aromatic Inclusion and Separation Studies

Single-Component Enclathration of C8 Aromatic Isomers

The flexibility of TPBD prompted us to study its potential to serve as a host for C8 aromatic isomers. We first studied the effect of subjecting TPBD-αI and TPBD-αII to pure C8 isomers at room temperature (25 ± 3 °C) by slurry or liquid immersion in sealed vials. We observed through PXRD, 1H NMR, and SCXRD analyses that only PX induced transformation to an inclusion compound, TPBD-PX, despite prolonged exposure to the C8 isomers (ambient conditions for 4 days, Figures 3a and S9–S15): TPBD-PX crystallized in the space group P21/n with two TPBD molecules and one PX in the asymmetric unit (Table S3). Saturation was attained in 20 min for TPBD-αI and within 25 min for TPBD-αII (Figure S16). Slurry experiments revealed that whereas both polymorphs are practically insoluble after several hours, 3.7 and 8.6 ng/mL for TPBD-αI and TPBD-αII, respectively, the dissolution profiles revealed a rapid initial increase in solubility (Cmax = 66.8 ± 28.1 ng/mL for TPBD-αI; Cmax = 82.1 ± 17.5 ng/mL for TPBD-αII). This “spring-and-parachute” effect (Figure S24 and Table S8) is well-known in pharmaceutical science and is consistent with dissolution followed by recrystallization of a less soluble phase, e.g., a hydrate, solvate, or more stable polymorph. (69) In this case, it indicates dissolution of TPBD followed by the crystallization of TPBD-PX. PXRD analysis (Figure S16) of aliquots removed from TPBD slurries indicates that conversion from TPBD-αI or TPBD-αII to TPBD-PX had occurred. To investigate the mechanism of phase change, time-lapse photomicroscopy experiments were conducted (Movies S1, S2, S3, S4 and Figures S17–S22). These PX immersion experiments revealed that smaller particles (<100 μm) of TPBD-αI and all particles of TPBD-αII dissolved during PX exposure (1300 min) before recrystallizing as TPBD-PX. Larger particles of TPBD-αI did not dissolve, and SCXRD analysis (Figure S23) of a single crystal after PX exposure (15 h) revealed that transformation to TPBD-PX had occurred in the solid state (see SI for details). These data are consistent with concomitant recrystallization and adsorption. PX desorption from TPBD-PX was studied by using VT-PXRD under N2 flow. Peaks corresponding to TPBD-αI appeared after heating to ca. 60–90 °C, and phase transformation was complete by ca. 100 °C (Figure 3b). Upon cooling the sample to 25 °C, TPBD-αI was maintained (Figure 3b). TGA analysis revealed that loss of PX occurred at 120 °C with a weight loss of 13.5% and that the apohost remained stable up to 297 °C (Figure S25a). The DSC curve of TPBD-PX (closed pan) revealed a first endothermic event at approximately 185 °C, corresponding to loss of PX, and a second endotherm at ca. 328 °C that we attribute to melting (Figure S25b). Conducting PX dynamic vapor sorption tests on TPBD-αI did not result in a phase transformation (Figure S26). However, exposing TPBD-αI to pure PX vapor or the vapor formed from an equimolar mixture of C8 isomers at 25 °C (30 days) and 50 °C (14 days) resulted in phase transformation to TPBD-PX (Figure S27).

Figure 3

Figure 3. (a) Interconversion of TPBD-αI, TPBD-αII, and TPBD-PX; (b) VT-PXRD study of TPBD-PX reveals transformation to TPBD-αI upon heating.

Multicomponent Enclathration of C8 Aromatic Isomers

Since C8 aromatics are usually separated in the liquid phase at an industrial scale, we evaluated the specificity of the apohost by immersing TPBD-αI in binary liquid mixtures of different ratios (1:1, 1:4, 1:9, 1:19, 1:49, and 1:99 mol/mol, Figures S28–S30). 1H NMR was employed to determine selectivity after slurry-assisted immersion of ca. 34 mg of TPBD-αI in ca. 1 mL of liquid mixture for 4 days at ambient temperature. For PX-containing mixtures, the apohost displayed strong preference toward PX. Equimolar binary separations revealed selectivity of 76.1, 22.1, and 49.2 for PX/OX, PX/MX, and PX/EB, respectively (Table 1 and Figures S31–S33). High selectivity of TPBD-αI toward PX was corroborated by exposing it to binary mixtures with lower PX concentration. It was determined that TPBD-αI exhibited PX/OX selectivity of 108.4, 105.6, and 97.1 for PX/OX mixtures with ratios of 1:4, 1:9, and 1:19, respectively (Table 1 and Figures S34–S38). Additionally, PX/MX selectivity values of 45.9, 65.8, and 70.3 for mixtures with ratios of 1:4, 1:9, and 1:19 were observed (Table 1 and Figures S39–S43).
Table 1. Selectivity Coefficients for Liquid Mixtures of C8 Isomers at 25 °C
compositionratio in liquidratio absorbedselectivity coefficient
TPBD-αI
PX/MX1:159.7:1.250.6G
1:122.122.1N
1:411.645.9N
1:97.365.8N
1:193.770.3N
1:49No C8 uptakeNo C8 uptake
1:99No C8 uptakeNo C8 uptake
PX/OX1:149.6:0.954.1G
1:176.176.1N
1:427.5108.4N
1:910.8105.6N
1:195.097.1N
1:49No C8 uptakeNo C8 uptake
1:99No C8 uptakeNo C8 uptake
PX/EB1:152.0:1.147.3G
1:149.249.2N
1:414.659.9N
1:96.558.4N
1:193.057.1N
1:490.946.0N
1:99No C8 uptakeNo C8 uptake
PX/OX/MX1:1:149.4:0.9:0.84d60.4G
66.3:1.0:2.4lh39.4N
104.2:1.0:2.74d56.3N
PX/OX/MX/EB1:1:1:187.1:1.0:1.1:0.94d85.7G
89.6:1.0:3.1:1.54d48.5N
50.7:1.2:1.9:1.0a37.5N
TPBD-αII
PX/OX/MX1:1:178.7:1.0:2.61h43.7N
82.4:1.0:2.84d43.6N
PX/OX/MX/EB1:1:1:184.6:1.0:2.5:1.84d47.9N
a

Selectivity after 10 cycles in 2 h′ immersion. N = 1H NMR G = GC.

Overlapping of PX and MX 1H NMR peaks impact the accuracy of values at higher amounts of PX. For PX/EB; selectivities were determined to be 59.9, 58.4, 57.1, and 46.0 for 1:4, 1:9, 1:19, and 1:49 mixtures, respectively (Table 1 and Figures S44–S49).
No PX uptake was observed for PX/MX or PX/OX in 1:49 and 1:99 binary mixtures or with PX/EB in 1:99 binary mixtures. In the absence of PX, TPBD does not form inclusion compounds with the other C8 isomers, further emphasizing the high selectivity of TPBD for PX. For binary C8 mixtures, PX selectivity increased for PX/MX mixtures as a function of MX concentration (Figure S50a), while for other mixture compositions (PX/OX, PX/EB), no clear trend was observed. TGA showed PX uptake from the binary mixtures consistent with that of single-component PX (14.8 wt % loss), indicating preferential PX enclathration from binary mixtures (Table 1 and Figure S50a). TPBD-αI displayed selectivities, ranging from 76 to 108, that exceed the current benchmarks for PX/OX binary mixtures: Previously, the highest selectivities were reported for a 0D Cu-metallocycle, (44) a 1D coordination polymer, Mn-dhbq, (31) and three-dimensional (3D) MOFs ZIF-67 and ZIF-8, (22) with PX/OX selectivities of 51.6, 66.8, 98.9, and 81.2, respectively. MAF-89, comprised of 3D-connected quasi-discrete pores, shows PX/OX selectivity of 221 that surpasses TPBD-αI (Figure S50b and Table S9).
The separation performances of TPBD-αI and TPBD-αII for ternary and quaternary mixtures (Figure S51) were also investigated by using slurries at 25 °C (Figure S52). TPBD-αI and TPBD-αII were immersed in equimolar PX/MX/OX and PX/MX/OX/EB mixtures, filtered, and air-dried under ambient conditions. TGA curves of TPBD-αI after exposure to ternary and quaternary mixtures resulted in weight losses consistent with the PX loading obtained from binary mixtures and pure PX (14.9 wt %, Figure S53). TPBD-αI exhibited a selectivity of 56.3 (104.2/2.7/1.0) for equimolar ternary PX/MX/OX mixtures (Table 1 and Figure S54). These values surpass the selectivity of current benchmark sorbents MAF-36–3C (51.3 at 25 °C), (19) Mn-dhbq (48.3 at 120 °C), (31) and MAF-89 (46.4 at 35 °C). (20) Furthermore, while TPBD-αII (SPX/OX/MX = 43.6) displayed a slightly lower selectivity than previous benchmarks, its performance remains high (Figures 4a and S55).

Figure 4

Figure 4. (a) Comparison of nonporous (●) and porous (⧫) absorbents for PX separation from ternary and quaternary mixtures. The experimental conditions may vary, like temperature and composition (E: equimolar, NE: nonequimolar mixture). (b) Gas chromatograms used to quantify the composition of TPBD crystals exposed to pure C8 isomers or approximately equimolar mixtures of C8 isomers at RT.

Concerning purification of PX from EB, literature reports are limited, likely reflecting that sorbents tend to exhibit relatively low PX/EB selectivity, making them unsuitable for purifying PX when EB is present. (70) TPBD retained its high PX selectivity in the presence of EB in binary, ternary, and even quaternary mixtures (Table 1 and S9). According to our findings, TPBD sets a new benchmark for the extraction of PX from EB despite their similar kinetic diameters, not only in equimolar binary mixtures but also at low PX concentrations (2%). At ambient conditions, TPBD-αI and TPBD-αII yielded PX/OX/MX/EB selectivities of 48.5 and 47.9 (Figures S56 and S57), respectively, higher than the value of 25.1 for Mn-dhbq (Figure 4a, Tables 1 and S9). Owing to the consistent presence of EB in industrial feed mixtures, the affinity of TPBD toward PX compared to EB enables both forms of TPBD to outperform existing sorbents. Our data reveal that one cycle of uptake/release involving TPBD-αI afforded PX with purity levels of 96.6 and 94.1% from equimolar mixtures of PX/OX/MX and PX/OX/MX/EB, respectively. Values of 95.6 and 94.1% were obtained for TPBD-αII (Figure 5a). Notably, molecular solids, as exemplified by EtP6β, can exhibit higher PX purity in equimolar ternary mixtures, but this purity decreases in the presence of EB in quaternary mixtures. (41,43,45,71) However, due to a lack of data on selectivities of current benchmark sorbents under ambient conditions, it is challenging to compare their overall performance with TPBD.

Figure 5

Figure 5. (a, b) Separation performance of TPBD-αI and TPBD-αII upon exposure to equimolar ternary and quaternary mixture of C8 isomers at 293 K. (c) TPBD-αI recyclability after 11 consecutive cycles of PX enclathration/release. (d) Asymmetric unit and crystal packing of TPBD-PX.

Enclathration of PX from equimolar ternary mixtures after 1 or 4 days of slurrying revealed almost identical outcomes (Figures 5a, S54, and S55). This indicates that the PX inclusion compound is both the kinetic and thermodynamic product. Table 1 reveals that PX selectivity improved only slightly with time, corresponding to PXRD (Figure S16) and solubility test (Figure S24 and Table S8) analyses of slurry-assisted immersions, indicating that PX exposure for 1 h is sufficient for TPBD-αI to reach its capacity. PXRD data revealed that TPBD-αI had converted to TPBD-PX upon exposure to an equimolar quaternary mixture of C8 aromatic isomers within 35 min (Figure S58), indicating relatively fast kinetics under slurry-assisted immersion at room temperature. This sorption time is comparable to MOFs, PCPs, and PMCs with high selectivities. (20,31,44,72) In the liquid phase, MAF-36-3C (SPX/OX/MX = 51.3) and 3B (SPX/OX/MX = 16) exhibited varying adsorption rates, taking 24 and 3 h, respectively, whereas form 1B (SPX/OX/MX = 15) exhibited fast uptake in 2 min attributed to smaller crystal size. (19) MAF-89 achieved over 90% capacity of its equilibrium amount within 15 min upon exposure to an equimolar ternary xylene mixture. (20) We note that comparison to kinetics reported in the literature is only qualitative/indicative, as uptake kinetics depend on multiple factors such as sample mass, particle shape/size, and grain size. Carefully controlled experimental conditions are needed for quantitative comparison of sorption kinetics. (73,74)
For practical applications, stability over multiple sorption cycles is required, so recyclability of TPBD-αI was studied. TPBD-αI retained its working capacity (approximately 13.5 wt % or 156.5 mg/g uptake) after 11 consecutive cycles of static immersion in pure PX and enclathration, followed by PX removal by heating to 150 °C (Figure 5c and S59). TPBD-αI could be regenerated after 11 cycles as indicated by its unchanged PXRD pattern (Figure S60). TPBD-αI also maintained selectivity of SPX/OX/MX/EB = 37.5 from an equimolar mixture of PX/OX/MX/EB, confirming sustained enclathration performance after 11 cycles (Figure S61). The dynamic column separation performance of TPBD-αI toward liquid equimolar quaternary C8 mixtures at ambient conditions (25 ± 3 °C) was investigated and revealed selectivity of 27.39 (Figure S62). Despite the energy-efficient advantage of separation by enclathration over distillation, subjecting TPBD-αI to higher temperatures in contact with pure or mixed C8 isomers offers insights into its selectivity behavior under various conditions. Gas chromatography was also used to analyze the PX selectivity of TPBD-αI exposed to C8 mixtures at 25 and 80 °C (Table S10, Figure 4b and S63). Selectivity coefficients at 25 °C for binary (PX/MX, PX/OX, PX/EB), ternary (PX/OX/MX), and quaternary mixtures were determined to be 50.6, 54.1, 47.3, 60.4, and 85.7, respectively. At 80 °C, selectivity coefficients decreased compared to room temperature, with corresponding values of 32.6, 36.0, 25.4, 31.9, and 36.7, respectively. As revealed in Table 1, the values obtained by GC are consistent with those obtained by 1H NMR.
To gain insight into the PX selectivity of TPBD, we recrystallized TPBD from PX and determined the single-crystal structure of TPBD-PX (Figure 5d). The conformation of the two TPBD molecules differed due to slight rotation around the bond between the A and B rings (Table S4). TPBD dimers formed through CH···N interactions (C···N distances of 3.503 Å) between adjacent triazole rings (Figure S64a). TPBD molecules arrange to form 1D rectangular channels (5.44 Å × 9.07 Å) during PX uptake that propagate along [100], with void spaces of 20.1% that were sufficiently large to accommodate PX molecules (Figure S65). An analysis of the interactions in TPBD-PX revealed no significant π···π interactions in terms of guest–guest or host–guest binding. As shown in Figure S61b, the PX molecules do not interact with one another. Instead, PX molecules form several C–H···π interactions (Figure S64b) and CH···O hydrogen bonds (C···O distances of 3.503(3) and 3.529(3) Å with associated angles of 163.0(8) and 153.0(7)°), and CH···N (C···N distances of 3.785(3) and 3.859(3) Å with associated angles of 135.9(6) and 140.3(6)°) with TPBD molecules (Figures 6 and S64a).

Figure 6

Figure 6. Illustration depicting the arrangement of PX molecules in TPBD-PX, highlighting that multiple C–H···π interactions occur in the yellow area, along with CH···O interactions (PX guest molecules are purple).

Usually, enhanced binding of guest molecules occurs when pores exhibit a size and shape match for a specific molecule, allowing for improved selectivity over other guest species. Indeed, the 1D pores in TPBD-PX have dimensions of 10.30–9.07 Å at the solvent-accessible surface, comparable to the dimensions of PX (Table S1), making it a suitable match for PX inclusion but not for the other isomers. While simulation studies have previously reported the ideal dimensions of rectangular 1D channels for separating PX from other C8 isomers, (75,76) it is important to note that the ideal size also depends on supramolecular interactions within the host–guest system and the arrangement of PX molecules.
To corroborate the experimental results showing the preference for capture of PX over other C8 isomers, the relative stability of TPBD inclusion compounds was determined via DFT calculations. Since PX-loaded TPBD could be refined by XRD, i.e., (TPBD)8(PX)4, the other guest-loaded structures were built from TPBD-PX. These hypothetical C8-loaded structures and TPBD-PX were then optimized and subsequently cell-optimized to determine the crystallization energies and Gibbs free energies starting from TPBD-αI and the gas phase of C8 isomers (pC8 = 1 bar) at 25, 50, 100, and 150 °C (in kJ/molC8). The crystallization energies, i.e., −78.8 (PX), −67.8 (MX), −61.9 (OX), and −65.6 (EB) kJ/mol, are indicative of strongly exothermic crystallization processes and show a strong preference to enclathrate PX over the other C8 aromatic isomers (see Table S11). Analyses of various modeled TPBD-C8 aromatic structures revealed predominant H···O, H···N, and C···H interactions, which control crystal packing (Figure S66). Notably, in TPBD-PX, stronger CH···O hydrogen bonds compared with other models influence crystal packing and selectivity for PX over the other C8 aromatic isomers.
In previous work, sorbents that exhibit discrimination for PX, typically adapt to the size and shape of PX molecules, controlling their pore structure via a gating mechanism, leading to a guest-loaded complex with the lowest binding energy and preference for PX over other C8 aromatic isomers. (19,20,77) PX clathrate TPBD-PX offers precise size/shape matching to accommodate PX molecules, establishing favorable positions for C–H···π interactions along the a-axis. CH···O and CH···N interactions formed between the host and guest serve to anchor the PX molecules. The cavity in TPBD-PX formed by the triazole and benzene rings of the host is such that the second methyl group in MX and OX and the ethyl moiety of EB are hindered from the formation of favorable C–H···π, C–H···O, and CH···N interactions. We therefore attribute the separation performance of TPBD to its ability to adapt to PX molecules through a channel that is an excellent shape and size fit for PX vs the other C8 aromatic isomers. This feature enables TPBD to more selectively separate PX from the other C8 aromatic isomers in comparison to existing PX selective sorbents.

Conclusions

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

In summary, our results reveal that a nonporous molecular apohost (TPBD) enables the highly selective separation of PX from mixtures of C8 aromatics, setting new benchmark selectivity values. PX can thereby be separated by TPBD as a sole substrate, even in the presence of low concentrations (5%) of PX. Whereas separation of xylene isomers has tended to focus upon porous frameworks such as zeolites and MOFs, TPBD further highlights (7) that certain nonporous apohost molecules can form inclusion compounds with suitable binding sites that offer across-the-board selectivity for one of the C8 isomers. TPBD also offers low cost, facile synthesis, a metal-free composition, high thermal stability, high hydrolytic stability, and recyclability. Further, that the uptake kinetics in slurry are relatively rapid at room temperature means that PX can be isolated from OX, MX, and EB with high purity in only one cycle with a relatively low energy footprint. Our findings emphasize the potential utility of molecular compounds that, although nonporous as apohosts, can be highly selective through structural adaptability and induced fit, thereby enabling phase transformations to generate cavities that offer shape and size matching for a particular guest. Such sorbents are also advantageous as they are inherently facile to recycle, relying only upon weak noncovalent interactions.

Supporting Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/jacs.3c07198.

  • Experimental details; materials and methods; computational studies; summary of reported adsorbents for separation of C8 aromatics; modeling section (PDF)

  • Speed: 210× (AVI)

  • Speed: 600× (AVI)

  • Speed: 1331× (AVI)

  • Speed: 2650× (AVI)

Accession Codes

CCDC 22436592243664 contain the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif, or by emailing [email protected], or by contacting The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Center, 12 Union Road, Cambridge CB2 1EZ, UK; fax: +44 1223 336033.

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Author Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

  • Corresponding Author
  • Authors
    • Maryam Rahmani - Bernal Institute, Department of Chemical Sciences, University of Limerick, Limerick V94 T9PX, Republic of IrelandOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-9699-1317
    • Catiúcia R. M. O. Matos - Bernal Institute, Department of Chemical Sciences, University of Limerick, Limerick V94 T9PX, Republic of Ireland
    • Shi-Qiang Wang - Institute of Materials Research and Engineering (IMRE), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 2 Fusionopolis Way, 138634 SingaporeOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-1213-8317
    • Andrey A. Bezrukov - Bernal Institute, Department of Chemical Sciences, University of Limerick, Limerick V94 T9PX, Republic of Ireland
    • Alan C. Eaby - Bernal Institute, Department of Chemical Sciences, University of Limerick, Limerick V94 T9PX, Republic of Ireland
    • Debobroto Sensharma - Bernal Institute, Department of Chemical Sciences, University of Limerick, Limerick V94 T9PX, Republic of IrelandOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-4918-0730
    • Yassin Hjiej-Andaloussi - Bernal Institute, Department of Chemical Sciences, University of Limerick, Limerick V94 T9PX, Republic of Ireland
    • Matthias Vandichel - Bernal Institute, Department of Chemical Sciences, University of Limerick, Limerick V94 T9PX, Republic of IrelandOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-1592-0726
  • Funding

    This research was funded by Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) through Synthesis and Solid State Pharmaceutical Center (SSPC), 12/RC/2275_P2 and 16/IA/4624.

  • Notes
    The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Acknowledgments

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The authors gratefully acknowledge Science Foundation Ireland (SFI, 12/RC/2275_P2 and 16/IA/4624) for financial support. M.V. acknowledges the Irish Centre for High-End Computing (ICHEC) for providing computational facilities and support.

References

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article references 77 other publications.

  1. 1
    Sholl, D. S.; Lively, R. P. Seven chemical separations to change the world. Nature 2016, 532 (7600), 435437,  DOI: 10.1038/532435a
  2. 2
    Guisnet, M.; Gilson, J.-P. Zeolites for Cleaner Technologies; Imperial College Press: London, 2002; Vol. 3.
  3. 3
    Wicht, M. M.; Báthori, N. B.; Nassimbeni, L. R. Isoquinoline-based Werner clathrates with xylene isomers: aromatic interactions vs. molecular flexibility. Dalton Trans. 2015, 44 (15), 68636870,  DOI: 10.1039/C5DT00084J
  4. 4
    IHS Markit. Chemical Economics Handbook:Para-Xylene. https://www.spglobal.com/commodityinsights/en/ci/products/paraxylene-chemical-economics-handbook.html. (accessed Jan 2022).
  5. 5
    Yang, Y.; Bai, P.; Guo, X. Separation of Xylene Isomers: A Review of Recent Advances in Materials. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2017, 56 (50), 1472514753,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.7b03127
  6. 6
    Li, J.-R.; Sculley, J.; Zhou, H.-C. Metal–Organic Frameworks for Separations. Chem. Rev. 2012, 112 (2), 869932,  DOI: 10.1021/cr200190s
  7. 7
    Zhang, G.; Ding, Y.; Hashem, A.; Fakim, A.; Khashab, N. M. Xylene isomer separations by intrinsically porous molecular materials. Cell Rep. Phys. Sci. 2021, 2 (6), 100470  DOI: 10.1016/j.xcrp.2021.100470
  8. 8
    Liu, Q.-K.; Ma, J.-P.; Dong, Y.-B. Reversible Adsorption and Separation of Aromatics on CdII–Triazole Single Crystals. Chem. - Eur. J. 2009, 15 (40), 1036410368,  DOI: 10.1002/chem.200901023
  9. 9
    Jin, Z.; Zhao, H.-Y.; Zhao, X.-J.; Fang, Q.-R.; Long, J. R.; Zhu, G.-S. A novel microporous MOF with the capability of selective adsorption of xylenes. Chem. Commun. 2010, 46 (45), 86128614,  DOI: 10.1039/c0cc01031f
  10. 10
    Li, K.; Olson, D. H.; Lee, J. Y.; Bi, W.; Wu, K.; Yuen, T.; Xu, Q.; Li, J. Multifunctional Microporous MOFs Exhibiting Gas/Hydrocarbon Adsorption Selectivity, Separation Capability and Three-Dimensional Magnetic Ordering. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2008, 18 (15), 22052214,  DOI: 10.1002/adfm.200800058
  11. 11
    Nicolau, M. P. M.; Bárcia, P. S.; Gallegos, J. M.; Silva, J. A. C.; Rodrigues, A. E.; Chen, B. Single- and Multicomponent Vapor-Phase Adsorption of Xylene Isomers and Ethylbenzene in a Microporous Metal–Organic Framework. J. Phys. Chem. C 2009, 113 (30), 1317313179,  DOI: 10.1021/jp9006747
  12. 12
    Kim, S.-I.; Lee, S.; Chung, Y. G.; Bae, Y.-S. The Origin of p-Xylene Selectivity in a DABCO Pillar-Layered Metal–Organic Framework: A Combined Experimental and Computational Investigation. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11 (34), 3122731236,  DOI: 10.1021/acsami.9b11343
  13. 13
    Bae, H. J.; Kim, S.-I.; Choi, Y.; Kim, K.-M.; Bae, Y.-S. High p-xylene selectivity in aluminum-based metal–organic framework with 1-D channels. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2023, 117, 333341,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jiec.2022.10.021
  14. 14
    Cui, W.-G.; Hu, T.-L.; Bu, X.-H. Metal–Organic Framework Materials for the Separation and Purification of Light Hydrocarbons. Adv. Mater. 2020, 32 (3), 1806445  DOI: 10.1002/adma.201806445
  15. 15
    Wang, S.-Q.; Mukherjee, S.; Zaworotko, M. J. Spiers Memorial Lecture: Coordination networks that switch between nonporous and porous structures: an emerging class of soft porous crystals. Faraday Discuss. 2021, 231, 950,  DOI: 10.1039/D1FD00037C
  16. 16
    Schneemann, A.; Bon, V.; Schwedler, I.; Senkovska, I.; Kaskel, S.; Fischer, R. A. Flexible metal–organic frameworks. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43 (16), 60626096,  DOI: 10.1039/C4CS00101J
  17. 17
    Chang, Z.; Yang, D.-H.; Xu, J.; Hu, T.-L.; Bu, X.-H. Flexible Metal–Organic Frameworks: Recent Advances and Potential Applications. Adv. Mater. 2015, 27 (36), 54325441,  DOI: 10.1002/adma.201501523
  18. 18
    Mukherjee, S.; Joarder, B.; Manna, B.; Desai, A. V.; Chaudhari, A. K.; Ghosh, S. K. Framework-Flexibility Driven Selective Sorption of p-Xylene over Other Isomers by a Dynamic Metal-Organic Framework. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4 (1), 5761  DOI: 10.1038/srep05761
  19. 19
    Yang, X.; Zhou, H.-L.; He, C.-T.; Mo, Z.-W.; Ye, J.-W.; Chen, X.-M.; Zhang, J.-P. Flexibility of Metal-Organic Framework Tunable by Crystal Size at the Micrometer to Submillimeter Scale for Efficient Xylene Isomer Separation. Research 2019, 2019, 9463719  DOI: 10.34133/2019/9463719
  20. 20
    Ye, Z.-M.; Zhang, X.-F.; Liu, D.-X.; Xu, Y.-T.; Wang, C.; Zheng, K.; Zhou, D.-D.; He, C.-T.; Zhang, J.-P. A gating ultramicroporous metal-organic framework showing high adsorption selectivity, capacity and rate for xylene separation. Sci. China Chem. 2022, 65 (8), 15521558,  DOI: 10.1007/s11426-022-1304-1
  21. 21
    Sapianik, A. A.; Dudko, E. R.; Kovalenko, K. A.; Barsukova, M. O.; Samsonenko, D. G.; Dybtsev, D. N.; Fedin, V. P. Metal–Organic Frameworks for Highly Selective Separation of Xylene Isomers and Single-Crystal X-ray Study of Aromatic Guest–Host Inclusion Compounds. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13 (12), 1476814777,  DOI: 10.1021/acsami.1c02812
  22. 22
    Polyukhov, D. M.; Poryvaev, A. S.; Sukhikh, A. S.; Gromilov, S. A.; Fedin, M. V. Fine-Tuning Window Apertures in ZIF-8/67 Frameworks by Metal Ions and Temperature for High-Efficiency Molecular Sieving of Xylenes. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13 (34), 4083040836,  DOI: 10.1021/acsami.1c12166
  23. 23
    Polyukhov, D. M.; Poryvaev, A. S.; Gromilov, S. A.; Fedin, M. V. Precise Measurement and Controlled Tuning of Effective Window Sizes in ZIF-8 Framework for Efficient Separation of Xylenes. Nano Lett. 2019, 19 (9), 65066510,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b02730
  24. 24
    Mukherjee, S.; Desai, A. V.; Ghosh, S. K. Potential of metal–organic frameworks for adsorptive separation of industrially and environmentally relevant liquid mixtures. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2018, 367, 82126,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2018.04.001
  25. 25
    Vermoortele, F.; Maes, M.; Moghadam, P. Z.; Lennox, M. J.; Ragon, F.; Boulhout, M.; Biswas, S.; Laurier, K. G. M.; Beurroies, I.; Denoyel, R.; Roeffaers, M.; Stock, N.; Düren, T.; Serre, C.; De Vos, D. E. p-Xylene-Selective Metal–Organic Frameworks: A Case of Topology-Directed Selectivity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133 (46), 1852618529,  DOI: 10.1021/ja207287h
  26. 26
    Gonzalez, M. I.; Kapelewski, M. T.; Bloch, E. D.; Milner, P. J.; Reed, D. A.; Hudson, M. R.; Mason, J. A.; Barin, G.; Brown, C. M.; Long, J. R. Separation of Xylene Isomers through Multiple Metal Site Interactions in Metal–Organic Frameworks. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140 (9), 34123422,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.7b13825
  27. 27
    Peng, B.; Wang, S. Separation of p-xylene and m-xylene by simulated moving bed chromatography with MIL-53(Fe) as stationary phase. J. Chromatogr. A 2022, 1673, 463091  DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2022.463091
  28. 28
    Kumar, N.; Wang, S.-Q.; Mukherjee, S.; Bezrukov, A. A.; Patyk-Kaźmierczak, E.; O’Nolan, D.; Kumar, A.; Yu, M.-H.; Chang, Z.; Bu, X.-H.; Zaworotko, M. J. Crystal engineering of a rectangular sql coordination network to enable xylenes selectivity over ethylbenzene. Chem. Sci. 2020, 11 (26), 68896895,  DOI: 10.1039/D0SC02123G
  29. 29
    Wang, S.-Q.; Mukherjee, S.; Patyk-Kaźmierczak, E.; Darwish, S.; Bajpai, A.; Yang, Q.-Y.; Zaworotko, M. J. Highly Selective, High-Capacity Separation of o-Xylene from C8 Aromatics by a Switching Adsorbent Layered Material. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2019, 58 (20), 66306634,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201901198
  30. 30
    Wright, J. S.; Vitórica-Yrezábal, I. J.; Thompson, S. P.; Brammer, L. Arene Selectivity by a Flexible Coordination Polymer Host. Chem. - Eur. J. 2016, 22 (37), 1312013126,  DOI: 10.1002/chem.201601870
  31. 31
    Li, L.; Guo, L.; Olson, D. H.; Xian, S.; Zhang, Z.; Yang, Q.; Wu, K.; Yang, Y.; Bao, Z.; Ren, Q.; Li, J. Discrimination of xylene isomers in a stacked coordination polymer. Science 2022, 377 (6603), 335339,  DOI: 10.1126/science.abj7659
  32. 32
    Kałuża, A. M.; Mukherjee, S.; Wang, S.-Q.; O’Hearn, D. J.; Zaworotko, M. J. [Cu(4-phenylpyridine)4(trifluoromethanesulfonate)2], a Werner complex that exhibits high selectivity for o-xylene. Chem. Commun. 2020, 56 (13), 19401943,  DOI: 10.1039/C9CC09525J
  33. 33
    Lusi, M.; Barbour, L. J. Solid–Vapor Sorption of Xylenes: Prioritized Selectivity as a Means of Separating All Three Isomers Using a Single Substrate. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51 (16), 39283931,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201109084
  34. 34
    Lusi, M.; Barbour, L. J. Solid–vapour reactions as a post-synthetic modification tool for molecular crystals: the enclathration of benzene and toluene by Werner complexes. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49 (26), 26342636,  DOI: 10.1039/c3cc40521d
  35. 35
    Sun, N.; Wang, S.-Q.; Zou, R.; Cui, W.-G.; Zhang, A.; Zhang, T.; Li, Q.; Zhuang, Z.-Z.; Zhang, Y.-H.; Xu, J.; Zaworotko, M. J.; Bu, X.-H. Benchmark selectivity p-xylene separation by a non-porous molecular solid through liquid or vapor extraction. Chem. Sci. 2019, 10 (38), 88508854,  DOI: 10.1039/C9SC02621E
  36. 36
    Nassimbeni, L. R. Physicochemical Aspects of Host–Guest Compounds. Acc. Chem. Res. 2003, 36 (8), 631637,  DOI: 10.1021/ar0201153
  37. 37
    Barbour, L. J. Crystal porosity and the burden of proof. Chem. Commun. 2006, (11), 11631168,  DOI: 10.1039/b515612m
  38. 38
    Wang, Z.; Sikdar, N.; Wang, S.-Q.; Li, X.; Yu, M.; Bu, X.-H.; Chang, Z.; Zou, X.; Chen, Y.; Cheng, P.; Yu, K.; Zaworotko, M. J.; Zhang, Z. Soft Porous Crystal Based upon Organic Cages That Exhibit Guest-Induced Breathing and Selective Gas Separation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141 (23), 94089414,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.9b04319
  39. 39
    Jie, K.; Zhou, Y.; Li, E.; Huang, F. Nonporous Adaptive Crystals of Pillararenes. Acc. Chem. Res. 2018, 51 (9), 20642072,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.accounts.8b00255
  40. 40
    Jie, K.; Zhou, Y.; Li, E.; Zhao, R.; Liu, M.; Huang, F. Linear Positional Isomer Sorting in Nonporous Adaptive Crystals of a Pillar[5]arene. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140 (9), 31903193,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.7b13156
  41. 41
    Zhang, G.; Hua, B.; Dey, A.; Ghosh, M.; Moosa, B. A.; Khashab, N. M. Intrinsically Porous Molecular Materials (IPMs) for Natural Gas and Benzene Derivatives Separations. Acc. Chem. Res. 2021, 54 (1), 155168,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.accounts.0c00582
  42. 42
    Moosa, B.; Alimi, L. O.; Shkurenko, A.; Fakim, A.; Bhatt, P. M.; Zhang, G.; Eddaoudi, M.; Khashab, N. M. A Polymorphic Azobenzene Cage for Energy-Efficient and Highly Selective p-Xylene Separation. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2020, 59 (48), 2136721371,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.202007782
  43. 43
    Jie, K.; Liu, M.; Zhou, Y.; Little, M. A.; Pulido, A.; Chong, S. Y.; Stephenson, A.; Hughes, A. R.; Sakakibara, F.; Ogoshi, T.; Blanc, F.; Day, G. M.; Huang, F.; Cooper, A. I. Near-Ideal Xylene Selectivity in Adaptive Molecular Pillar[n]arene Crystals. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140 (22), 69216930,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.8b02621
  44. 44
    du Plessis, M.; Nikolayenko, V. I.; Barbour, L. J. Record-Setting Selectivity for p-Xylene by an Intrinsically Porous Zero-Dimensional Metallocycle. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142 (10), 45294533,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.9b11314
  45. 45
    Barton, B.; Caira, M. R.; de Jager, L.; Hosten, E. C. N,N′-Bis(9-phenyl-9-thioxanthenyl)ethylenediamine: Highly Selective Host Behavior in the Presence of Xylene and Ethylbenzene Guest Mixtures. Cryst. Growth Des. 2017, 17 (12), 66606667,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.cgd.7b01284
  46. 46
    Barton, B.; Senekal, U.; Hosten, E. C. trans-α,α,α′,α′-Tetraphenyl-9,10-dihydro-9,10-ethanoanthracene-11,12-dimethanol and its tetra(p-chlorophenyl) derivative: roof-shaped host compounds for the purification of aromatic C8H10 isomeric guest mixtures. J. Inclusion Phenom. Macrocyclic Chem. 2022, 102 (1), 7787,  DOI: 10.1007/s10847-021-01102-5
  47. 47
    Little, M. A.; Cooper, A. I. The Chemistry of Porous Organic Molecular Materials. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020, 30 (41), 1909842  DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201909842
  48. 48
    Mitra, T.; Jelfs, K. E.; Schmidtmann, M.; Ahmed, A.; Chong, S. Y.; Adams, D. J.; Cooper, A. I. Molecular shape sorting using molecular organic cages. Nat. Chem. 2013, 5 (4), 276281,  DOI: 10.1038/nchem.1550
  49. 49
    Ye, J.; du Plessis, M.; Loots, L.; van Wyk, L. M.; Barbour, L. J. Solid–Liquid Separation of Xylene Isomers Using a Cu-Based Metallocycle. Cryst. Growth Des. 2022, 22 (4), 26542661,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.cgd.2c00082
  50. 50
    Atwood, J. L.; Barbour, L. J.; Jerga, A.; Schottel, B. L. Guest Transport in a Nonporous Organic Solid via Dynamic van der Waals Cooperativity. Science 2002, 298 (5595), 10001002,  DOI: 10.1126/science.1077591
  51. 51
    Barrer, R. M.; Shanson, V. H. Dianin’s compound as a zeolitic sorbent. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1976, (9), 333334,  DOI: 10.1039/c39760000333
  52. 52
    Enright, G. D.; Ratcliffe, C. I.; Ripmeester, J. A. Crystal structure and 13C CP/MAS NMR of the p-xylene clathrate of Dianin’s compound. Mol. Phys. 1999, 97 (11), 11931196,  DOI: 10.1080/00268979909482920
  53. 53
    Harris, K. D. M. Meldola Lecture: understanding the properties of urea and thiourea inclusion compounds. Chem. Soc. Rev. 1997, 26 (4), 279289,  DOI: 10.1039/cs9972600279
  54. 54
    Palin, D. E.; Powell, H. M. 50. The structure of molecular compounds. Part III. Crystal structure of addition complexes of quinol with certain volatile compounds. J. Chem. Soc. (Resumed) 1947, 0, 208221,  DOI: 10.1039/jr9470000208
  55. 55
    Terres, E.; Vollmer, W. Solubility of Mineral Oil and tar constituents in liquid Hydrogen Sulphide. Petroleum 1935, 31, 112
  56. 56
    Dwivedi, B.; Kumar, S.; Das, D. Selective inclusion of p-xylene by bis-hydrazone compounds. CrystEngComm 2022, 24 (6), 11611165,  DOI: 10.1039/D1CE01569A
  57. 57
    Pivovar, A. M.; Holman, K. T.; Ward, M. D. Shape-Selective Separation of Molecular Isomers with Tunable Hydrogen-Bonded Host Frameworks. Chem. Mater. 2001, 13 (9), 30183031,  DOI: 10.1021/cm0104452
  58. 58
    Matos, C. R. M. O.; Sanii, R.; Wang, S.-Q.; Ronconi, C. M.; Zaworotko, M. J. Reversible single-crystal to single-crystal phase transformation between a new Werner clathrate and its apohost. Dalton Trans. 2021, 50 (37), 1292312930,  DOI: 10.1039/D1DT01839F
  59. 59
    Cheney, M. L.; McManus, G. J.; Perman, J. A.; Wang, Z.; Zaworotko, M. J. The Role of Cocrystals in Solid-State Synthesis: Cocrystal-Controlled Solid-State Synthesis of Imides. Cryst. Growth Des. 2007, 7 (4), 616617,  DOI: 10.1021/cg0701729
  60. 60
    Sanii, R.; Bajpai, A.; Patyk-Kaźmierczak, E.; Zaworotko, M. J. High Yield, Low-Waste Synthesis of a Family of Pyridyl and Imidazolyl-Substituted Schiff Base Linker Ligands. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 2018, 6 (11), 1458914598,  DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b03204
  61. 61
    Friščić, T.; Trask, A. V.; Jones, W.; Motherwell, W. S. Screening for inclusion compounds and systematic construction of three-component solids by liquid-assisted grinding. Angew. Chem. 2006, 118 (45), 77087712,  DOI: 10.1002/ange.200603235
  62. 62
    Shan, N.; Toda, F.; Jones, W. Mechanochemistry and co-crystal formation: effect of solvent on reaction kinetics. Chem. Commun. 2002, (20), 23722373,  DOI: 10.1039/b207369m
  63. 63
    Bowmaker, G. A. Solvent-assisted mechanochemistry. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49 (4), 334348,  DOI: 10.1039/C2CC35694E
  64. 64
    Cheney, M. L.; Zaworotko, M. J.; Beaton, S.; Singer, R. D. Cocrystal Controlled Solid-State Synthesis. A Green Chemistry Experiment for Undergraduate Organic Chemistry. J. Chem. Educ. 2008, 85 (12), 1649  DOI: 10.1021/ed085p1649
  65. 65
    Burger, A.; Ramberger, R. On the polymorphism of pharmaceuticals and other molecular crystals. I. Microchim. Acta 1979, 72 (3), 259271,  DOI: 10.1007/BF01197379
  66. 66
    Burger, A.; Ramberger, R. On the polymorphism of pharmaceuticals and other molecular crystals. II. Microchim. Acta 1979, 72 (3), 273316,  DOI: 10.1007/BF01197380
  67. 67
    Burtch, N. C.; Jasuja, H.; Walton, K. S. Water Stability and Adsorption in Metal–Organic Frameworks. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114 (20), 1057510612,  DOI: 10.1021/cr5002589
  68. 68
    Waterman, K. C.; Huynh-Ba, K. Understanding and Predicting Pharmaceutical Product Shelf-Life. In Handbook of Stability Testing in Pharmaceutical Development: Regulations, Methodologies, and Best Practices; Springer New York: New York, NY, 2009; pp 115135.
  69. 69
    Brouwers, J.; Brewster, M. E.; Augustijns, P. Supersaturating drug delivery systems: the answer to solubility-limited oral bioavailability?. J. Pharm. Sci. 2009, 98 (8), 25492572,  DOI: 10.1002/jps.21650
  70. 70
    Peralta, D.; Chaplais, G.; Paillaud, J.-L.; Simon-Masseron, A.; Barthelet, K.; Pirngruber, G. D. The separation of xylene isomers by ZIF-8: A demonstration of the extraordinary flexibility of the ZIF-8 framework. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2013, 173, 15,  DOI: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2013.01.012
  71. 71
    Barton, B.; de Jager, L.; Hosten, E. C. Minor modifications afford improved host selectivities in xanthenyl-type host systems. CrystEngComm 2019, 21 (19), 30003013,  DOI: 10.1039/C9CE00265K
  72. 72
    Gee, J. A.; Zhang, K.; Bhattacharyya, S.; Bentley, J.; Rungta, M.; Abichandani, J. S.; Sholl, D. S.; Nair, S. Computational Identification and Experimental Evaluation of Metal–Organic Frameworks for Xylene Enrichment. J. Phys. Chem. C 2016, 120 (22), 1207512082,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b03349
  73. 73
    Wang, J.-Y.; Mangano, E.; Brandani, S.; Ruthven, D. M. A review of common practices in gravimetric and volumetric adsorption kinetic experiments. Adsorption 2021, 27 (3), 295318,  DOI: 10.1007/s10450-020-00276-7
  74. 74
    Bezrukov, A. A.; O’Hearn, D. J.; Gascón-Pérez, V.; Darwish, S.; Kumar, A.; Sanda, S.; Kumar, N.; Francis, K.; Zaworotko, M. J. Metal-organic frameworks as regeneration optimized sorbents for atmospheric water harvesting. Cell Rep. Phys. Sci. 2023, 4 (2), 101252  DOI: 10.1016/j.xcrp.2023.101252
  75. 75
    Snurr, R. Q.; Bell, A. T.; Theodorou, D. N. Prediction of adsorption of aromatic hydrocarbons in silicalite from grand canonical Monte Carlo simulations with biased insertions. J. Phys. Chem. A 1993, 97 (51), 1374213752,  DOI: 10.1021/j100153a051
  76. 76
    Torres-Knoop, A.; Krishna, R.; Dubbeldam, D. Separating Xylene Isomers by Commensurate Stacking of p-Xylene within Channels of MAF-X8. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2014, 53 (30), 77747778,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201402894
  77. 77
    Yan, H.; Quan, J.; Qu, H.; Zhu, F.; Wang, Y.; Dhinakaran, M. K.; Han, T.; Li, H. Membranes with Nanochannels Based on Pillar[6]arenes to Separate Xylenes. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2022, 5 (12), 1863718644,  DOI: 10.1021/acsanm.2c04408

Cited By

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!
Citation Statements
Explore this article's citation statements on scite.ai

This article is cited by 15 publications.

  1. Kyriaki Koupepidou, Shi-Qiang Wang, Varvara I. Nikolayenko, Dominic C. Castell, Catiúcia R. M. O. Matos, Matthias Vandichel, Michael J. Zaworotko. Gate-opening Induced by C8 Aromatics in a Double Diamondoid Coordination Network. ACS Materials Letters 2024, 6 (6) , 2197-2204. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsmaterialslett.4c00511
  2. Yao Wang, Xiyu Song, Guanglai Mo, Xiangyu Gao, Enyu Wu, Bin Li, Yunbo Bi, Peng Li. Hydration/Dehydration Induced Reversible Transformation between a Porous Hydrogen-Bonded Organic Framework and a Nonporous Molecular Crystal for Highly Efficient Gas Dehydration. Chem & Bio Engineering 2024, 1 (4) , 283-288. https://doi.org/10.1021/cbe.3c00114
  3. Kyriaki Koupepidou, Aizhamal Subanbekova, Michael J. Zaworotko. Functional flexible adsorbents and their potential utility. Chemical Communications 2025, 61 (15) , 3109-3126. https://doi.org/10.1039/D4CC05393A
  4. Ming Xu, Wen-Qi Tang, Sha-Sha Meng, Zhi-Yuan Gu. Metal–organic frameworks for the separation of xylene isomers. Chemical Society Reviews 2025, 54 (3) , 1613-1633. https://doi.org/10.1039/D4CS00796D
  5. Yixin Kuang, Suxin Zhou, Cheng Mao, Xiaoying Feng, Juan Zheng, Gangfeng Ouyang. Cascading in-situ grown UiO-66 and alternative calix[n]arenes for high-resolution isomer separation. Separation and Purification Technology 2025, 354 , 129313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2024.129313
  6. Fu‐An Guo, Manglai Gao, Hao Wang. Tailoring Metal–Organic Frameworks for One‐Step Separation of Alkane/Alkene/Alkyne Mixtures. Chemistry – An Asian Journal 2025, 26 https://doi.org/10.1002/asia.202401529
  7. Ying Liu, Chao Wang, Qiwei Yang, Qilong Ren, Zongbi Bao. Separation of xylene isomers using metal-organic frameworks: Addressing challenges in the petrochemical industry. Coordination Chemistry Reviews 2025, 523 , 216229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2024.216229
  8. Shoushun Chen, Xin Du, Yuzhen Liu, Jun Xu, Xingbao Han, Bryan E. G. Lucier, Yining Huang. NMR Investigations of Host–Guest Interactions in MOFs and COFs. 2024, 153-234. https://doi.org/10.1039/9781839167287-00153
  9. Yudai Ono, Takehiro Hirao, Naomi Kawata, Takeharu Haino. Latent porosity of planar tris(phenylisoxazolyl)benzene. Nature Communications 2024, 15 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-52526-9
  10. Qingju Wang, Yijian Li, Zhensong Qiu, Dengzhuo Zhou, Lifeng Yang, Xian Suo, Xili Cui, Huabin Xing. Highly Efficient Separation of Intermediate‐Size m ‐Xylene from Xylenes via a Length‐Matched Metal–Organic Framework with Optimal Oxygen Sites Distribution. Angewandte Chemie 2024, 136 (46) https://doi.org/10.1002/ange.202408817
  11. Qingju Wang, Yijian Li, Zhensong Qiu, Dengzhuo Zhou, Lifeng Yang, Xian Suo, Xili Cui, Huabin Xing. Highly Efficient Separation of Intermediate‐Size m ‐Xylene from Xylenes via a Length‐Matched Metal–Organic Framework with Optimal Oxygen Sites Distribution. Angewandte Chemie International Edition 2024, 63 (46) https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202408817
  12. Baoqiu Yu, Xu Ding, Xinlei Huang, Xiaolin Liu, Hailong Wang, Hui Wu, Wei Zhou, Zhijie Shang, Yucheng Jin, Xiao Wang, Xin Xiao, Zongbi Bao, Jianzhuang Jiang. A charge-assisted hydrogen-bonded organic framework with polar porosities for selective separation of o-xylene from C8H10 aromatic isomers. Science China Chemistry 2024, 117 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11426-024-2377-9
  13. Danhua Song, Zhenyu Ji, Shuixiang Zou, Hengbo Li, Yunzhe Zhou, Cheng Chen, Mingyan Wu, Maochun Hong. Incorporation of Multiple Binding Sites into an Adaptive MOF for Sieving Butane Isomers. Advanced Functional Materials 2024, 5 https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202416384
  14. Si-Tong Wu, Zhijun Ruan, Zhengfang Tian, Le Shi, Jiong Yang, Dong Shao. Construction, structures, and magnetic studies of two cobalt( ii ) and nickel( ii ) coordination polymers displaying bex topology. CrystEngComm 2024, 26 (41) , 5850-5858. https://doi.org/10.1039/D4CE00935E
  15. Shi-Qiang Wang, Shaza Darwish, Catiúcia R. M. O. Matos, Zicong Marvin Wong, Anjaiah Nalaparaju, Yifei Luo, Jun Zhu, Xiaofei Zhang, Zhengtao Xu, Michael J. Zaworotko. Phase switching and shape-memory effect in a molecular material: revisiting the Werner complex [Ni(4-MePy) 4 (NCS) 2 ]. Inorganic Chemistry Frontiers 2024, 11 (11) , 3254-3262. https://doi.org/10.1039/D4QI00636D

Journal of the American Chemical Society

Cite this: J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2023, 145, 50, 27316–27324
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.3c07198
Published December 6, 2023

Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under

CC-BY 4.0 .

Article Views

4825

Altmetric

-

Citations

Learn about these metrics

Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.

  • Abstract

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. Synthesis of TPBD-αI via solid-state synthesis.

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. (a) Solvent and temperature-mediated conformational polymorphism of TPBD. (a) Illustration of the formation of TPBD-αII from the recrystallization of TPBD-αI in DMF or DCM and subsequent recovery of TPBD-αI by heating. (b) VT-PXRD indicates that conversion of TPBD-αII to TPBD-αI occurs after heating to temperatures ≥200 °C and that this structure is maintained when cooled to 25 °C.

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. (a) Interconversion of TPBD-αI, TPBD-αII, and TPBD-PX; (b) VT-PXRD study of TPBD-PX reveals transformation to TPBD-αI upon heating.

    Figure 4

    Figure 4. (a) Comparison of nonporous (●) and porous (⧫) absorbents for PX separation from ternary and quaternary mixtures. The experimental conditions may vary, like temperature and composition (E: equimolar, NE: nonequimolar mixture). (b) Gas chromatograms used to quantify the composition of TPBD crystals exposed to pure C8 isomers or approximately equimolar mixtures of C8 isomers at RT.

    Figure 5

    Figure 5. (a, b) Separation performance of TPBD-αI and TPBD-αII upon exposure to equimolar ternary and quaternary mixture of C8 isomers at 293 K. (c) TPBD-αI recyclability after 11 consecutive cycles of PX enclathration/release. (d) Asymmetric unit and crystal packing of TPBD-PX.

    Figure 6

    Figure 6. Illustration depicting the arrangement of PX molecules in TPBD-PX, highlighting that multiple C–H···π interactions occur in the yellow area, along with CH···O interactions (PX guest molecules are purple).

  • References


    This article references 77 other publications.

    1. 1
      Sholl, D. S.; Lively, R. P. Seven chemical separations to change the world. Nature 2016, 532 (7600), 435437,  DOI: 10.1038/532435a
    2. 2
      Guisnet, M.; Gilson, J.-P. Zeolites for Cleaner Technologies; Imperial College Press: London, 2002; Vol. 3.
    3. 3
      Wicht, M. M.; Báthori, N. B.; Nassimbeni, L. R. Isoquinoline-based Werner clathrates with xylene isomers: aromatic interactions vs. molecular flexibility. Dalton Trans. 2015, 44 (15), 68636870,  DOI: 10.1039/C5DT00084J
    4. 4
      IHS Markit. Chemical Economics Handbook:Para-Xylene. https://www.spglobal.com/commodityinsights/en/ci/products/paraxylene-chemical-economics-handbook.html. (accessed Jan 2022).
    5. 5
      Yang, Y.; Bai, P.; Guo, X. Separation of Xylene Isomers: A Review of Recent Advances in Materials. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2017, 56 (50), 1472514753,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.7b03127
    6. 6
      Li, J.-R.; Sculley, J.; Zhou, H.-C. Metal–Organic Frameworks for Separations. Chem. Rev. 2012, 112 (2), 869932,  DOI: 10.1021/cr200190s
    7. 7
      Zhang, G.; Ding, Y.; Hashem, A.; Fakim, A.; Khashab, N. M. Xylene isomer separations by intrinsically porous molecular materials. Cell Rep. Phys. Sci. 2021, 2 (6), 100470  DOI: 10.1016/j.xcrp.2021.100470
    8. 8
      Liu, Q.-K.; Ma, J.-P.; Dong, Y.-B. Reversible Adsorption and Separation of Aromatics on CdII–Triazole Single Crystals. Chem. - Eur. J. 2009, 15 (40), 1036410368,  DOI: 10.1002/chem.200901023
    9. 9
      Jin, Z.; Zhao, H.-Y.; Zhao, X.-J.; Fang, Q.-R.; Long, J. R.; Zhu, G.-S. A novel microporous MOF with the capability of selective adsorption of xylenes. Chem. Commun. 2010, 46 (45), 86128614,  DOI: 10.1039/c0cc01031f
    10. 10
      Li, K.; Olson, D. H.; Lee, J. Y.; Bi, W.; Wu, K.; Yuen, T.; Xu, Q.; Li, J. Multifunctional Microporous MOFs Exhibiting Gas/Hydrocarbon Adsorption Selectivity, Separation Capability and Three-Dimensional Magnetic Ordering. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2008, 18 (15), 22052214,  DOI: 10.1002/adfm.200800058
    11. 11
      Nicolau, M. P. M.; Bárcia, P. S.; Gallegos, J. M.; Silva, J. A. C.; Rodrigues, A. E.; Chen, B. Single- and Multicomponent Vapor-Phase Adsorption of Xylene Isomers and Ethylbenzene in a Microporous Metal–Organic Framework. J. Phys. Chem. C 2009, 113 (30), 1317313179,  DOI: 10.1021/jp9006747
    12. 12
      Kim, S.-I.; Lee, S.; Chung, Y. G.; Bae, Y.-S. The Origin of p-Xylene Selectivity in a DABCO Pillar-Layered Metal–Organic Framework: A Combined Experimental and Computational Investigation. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11 (34), 3122731236,  DOI: 10.1021/acsami.9b11343
    13. 13
      Bae, H. J.; Kim, S.-I.; Choi, Y.; Kim, K.-M.; Bae, Y.-S. High p-xylene selectivity in aluminum-based metal–organic framework with 1-D channels. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2023, 117, 333341,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jiec.2022.10.021
    14. 14
      Cui, W.-G.; Hu, T.-L.; Bu, X.-H. Metal–Organic Framework Materials for the Separation and Purification of Light Hydrocarbons. Adv. Mater. 2020, 32 (3), 1806445  DOI: 10.1002/adma.201806445
    15. 15
      Wang, S.-Q.; Mukherjee, S.; Zaworotko, M. J. Spiers Memorial Lecture: Coordination networks that switch between nonporous and porous structures: an emerging class of soft porous crystals. Faraday Discuss. 2021, 231, 950,  DOI: 10.1039/D1FD00037C
    16. 16
      Schneemann, A.; Bon, V.; Schwedler, I.; Senkovska, I.; Kaskel, S.; Fischer, R. A. Flexible metal–organic frameworks. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43 (16), 60626096,  DOI: 10.1039/C4CS00101J
    17. 17
      Chang, Z.; Yang, D.-H.; Xu, J.; Hu, T.-L.; Bu, X.-H. Flexible Metal–Organic Frameworks: Recent Advances and Potential Applications. Adv. Mater. 2015, 27 (36), 54325441,  DOI: 10.1002/adma.201501523
    18. 18
      Mukherjee, S.; Joarder, B.; Manna, B.; Desai, A. V.; Chaudhari, A. K.; Ghosh, S. K. Framework-Flexibility Driven Selective Sorption of p-Xylene over Other Isomers by a Dynamic Metal-Organic Framework. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4 (1), 5761  DOI: 10.1038/srep05761
    19. 19
      Yang, X.; Zhou, H.-L.; He, C.-T.; Mo, Z.-W.; Ye, J.-W.; Chen, X.-M.; Zhang, J.-P. Flexibility of Metal-Organic Framework Tunable by Crystal Size at the Micrometer to Submillimeter Scale for Efficient Xylene Isomer Separation. Research 2019, 2019, 9463719  DOI: 10.34133/2019/9463719
    20. 20
      Ye, Z.-M.; Zhang, X.-F.; Liu, D.-X.; Xu, Y.-T.; Wang, C.; Zheng, K.; Zhou, D.-D.; He, C.-T.; Zhang, J.-P. A gating ultramicroporous metal-organic framework showing high adsorption selectivity, capacity and rate for xylene separation. Sci. China Chem. 2022, 65 (8), 15521558,  DOI: 10.1007/s11426-022-1304-1
    21. 21
      Sapianik, A. A.; Dudko, E. R.; Kovalenko, K. A.; Barsukova, M. O.; Samsonenko, D. G.; Dybtsev, D. N.; Fedin, V. P. Metal–Organic Frameworks for Highly Selective Separation of Xylene Isomers and Single-Crystal X-ray Study of Aromatic Guest–Host Inclusion Compounds. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13 (12), 1476814777,  DOI: 10.1021/acsami.1c02812
    22. 22
      Polyukhov, D. M.; Poryvaev, A. S.; Sukhikh, A. S.; Gromilov, S. A.; Fedin, M. V. Fine-Tuning Window Apertures in ZIF-8/67 Frameworks by Metal Ions and Temperature for High-Efficiency Molecular Sieving of Xylenes. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13 (34), 4083040836,  DOI: 10.1021/acsami.1c12166
    23. 23
      Polyukhov, D. M.; Poryvaev, A. S.; Gromilov, S. A.; Fedin, M. V. Precise Measurement and Controlled Tuning of Effective Window Sizes in ZIF-8 Framework for Efficient Separation of Xylenes. Nano Lett. 2019, 19 (9), 65066510,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b02730
    24. 24
      Mukherjee, S.; Desai, A. V.; Ghosh, S. K. Potential of metal–organic frameworks for adsorptive separation of industrially and environmentally relevant liquid mixtures. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2018, 367, 82126,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2018.04.001
    25. 25
      Vermoortele, F.; Maes, M.; Moghadam, P. Z.; Lennox, M. J.; Ragon, F.; Boulhout, M.; Biswas, S.; Laurier, K. G. M.; Beurroies, I.; Denoyel, R.; Roeffaers, M.; Stock, N.; Düren, T.; Serre, C.; De Vos, D. E. p-Xylene-Selective Metal–Organic Frameworks: A Case of Topology-Directed Selectivity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133 (46), 1852618529,  DOI: 10.1021/ja207287h
    26. 26
      Gonzalez, M. I.; Kapelewski, M. T.; Bloch, E. D.; Milner, P. J.; Reed, D. A.; Hudson, M. R.; Mason, J. A.; Barin, G.; Brown, C. M.; Long, J. R. Separation of Xylene Isomers through Multiple Metal Site Interactions in Metal–Organic Frameworks. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140 (9), 34123422,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.7b13825
    27. 27
      Peng, B.; Wang, S. Separation of p-xylene and m-xylene by simulated moving bed chromatography with MIL-53(Fe) as stationary phase. J. Chromatogr. A 2022, 1673, 463091  DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2022.463091
    28. 28
      Kumar, N.; Wang, S.-Q.; Mukherjee, S.; Bezrukov, A. A.; Patyk-Kaźmierczak, E.; O’Nolan, D.; Kumar, A.; Yu, M.-H.; Chang, Z.; Bu, X.-H.; Zaworotko, M. J. Crystal engineering of a rectangular sql coordination network to enable xylenes selectivity over ethylbenzene. Chem. Sci. 2020, 11 (26), 68896895,  DOI: 10.1039/D0SC02123G
    29. 29
      Wang, S.-Q.; Mukherjee, S.; Patyk-Kaźmierczak, E.; Darwish, S.; Bajpai, A.; Yang, Q.-Y.; Zaworotko, M. J. Highly Selective, High-Capacity Separation of o-Xylene from C8 Aromatics by a Switching Adsorbent Layered Material. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2019, 58 (20), 66306634,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201901198
    30. 30
      Wright, J. S.; Vitórica-Yrezábal, I. J.; Thompson, S. P.; Brammer, L. Arene Selectivity by a Flexible Coordination Polymer Host. Chem. - Eur. J. 2016, 22 (37), 1312013126,  DOI: 10.1002/chem.201601870
    31. 31
      Li, L.; Guo, L.; Olson, D. H.; Xian, S.; Zhang, Z.; Yang, Q.; Wu, K.; Yang, Y.; Bao, Z.; Ren, Q.; Li, J. Discrimination of xylene isomers in a stacked coordination polymer. Science 2022, 377 (6603), 335339,  DOI: 10.1126/science.abj7659
    32. 32
      Kałuża, A. M.; Mukherjee, S.; Wang, S.-Q.; O’Hearn, D. J.; Zaworotko, M. J. [Cu(4-phenylpyridine)4(trifluoromethanesulfonate)2], a Werner complex that exhibits high selectivity for o-xylene. Chem. Commun. 2020, 56 (13), 19401943,  DOI: 10.1039/C9CC09525J
    33. 33
      Lusi, M.; Barbour, L. J. Solid–Vapor Sorption of Xylenes: Prioritized Selectivity as a Means of Separating All Three Isomers Using a Single Substrate. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51 (16), 39283931,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201109084
    34. 34
      Lusi, M.; Barbour, L. J. Solid–vapour reactions as a post-synthetic modification tool for molecular crystals: the enclathration of benzene and toluene by Werner complexes. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49 (26), 26342636,  DOI: 10.1039/c3cc40521d
    35. 35
      Sun, N.; Wang, S.-Q.; Zou, R.; Cui, W.-G.; Zhang, A.; Zhang, T.; Li, Q.; Zhuang, Z.-Z.; Zhang, Y.-H.; Xu, J.; Zaworotko, M. J.; Bu, X.-H. Benchmark selectivity p-xylene separation by a non-porous molecular solid through liquid or vapor extraction. Chem. Sci. 2019, 10 (38), 88508854,  DOI: 10.1039/C9SC02621E
    36. 36
      Nassimbeni, L. R. Physicochemical Aspects of Host–Guest Compounds. Acc. Chem. Res. 2003, 36 (8), 631637,  DOI: 10.1021/ar0201153
    37. 37
      Barbour, L. J. Crystal porosity and the burden of proof. Chem. Commun. 2006, (11), 11631168,  DOI: 10.1039/b515612m
    38. 38
      Wang, Z.; Sikdar, N.; Wang, S.-Q.; Li, X.; Yu, M.; Bu, X.-H.; Chang, Z.; Zou, X.; Chen, Y.; Cheng, P.; Yu, K.; Zaworotko, M. J.; Zhang, Z. Soft Porous Crystal Based upon Organic Cages That Exhibit Guest-Induced Breathing and Selective Gas Separation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141 (23), 94089414,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.9b04319
    39. 39
      Jie, K.; Zhou, Y.; Li, E.; Huang, F. Nonporous Adaptive Crystals of Pillararenes. Acc. Chem. Res. 2018, 51 (9), 20642072,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.accounts.8b00255
    40. 40
      Jie, K.; Zhou, Y.; Li, E.; Zhao, R.; Liu, M.; Huang, F. Linear Positional Isomer Sorting in Nonporous Adaptive Crystals of a Pillar[5]arene. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140 (9), 31903193,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.7b13156
    41. 41
      Zhang, G.; Hua, B.; Dey, A.; Ghosh, M.; Moosa, B. A.; Khashab, N. M. Intrinsically Porous Molecular Materials (IPMs) for Natural Gas and Benzene Derivatives Separations. Acc. Chem. Res. 2021, 54 (1), 155168,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.accounts.0c00582
    42. 42
      Moosa, B.; Alimi, L. O.; Shkurenko, A.; Fakim, A.; Bhatt, P. M.; Zhang, G.; Eddaoudi, M.; Khashab, N. M. A Polymorphic Azobenzene Cage for Energy-Efficient and Highly Selective p-Xylene Separation. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2020, 59 (48), 2136721371,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.202007782
    43. 43
      Jie, K.; Liu, M.; Zhou, Y.; Little, M. A.; Pulido, A.; Chong, S. Y.; Stephenson, A.; Hughes, A. R.; Sakakibara, F.; Ogoshi, T.; Blanc, F.; Day, G. M.; Huang, F.; Cooper, A. I. Near-Ideal Xylene Selectivity in Adaptive Molecular Pillar[n]arene Crystals. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140 (22), 69216930,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.8b02621
    44. 44
      du Plessis, M.; Nikolayenko, V. I.; Barbour, L. J. Record-Setting Selectivity for p-Xylene by an Intrinsically Porous Zero-Dimensional Metallocycle. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142 (10), 45294533,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.9b11314
    45. 45
      Barton, B.; Caira, M. R.; de Jager, L.; Hosten, E. C. N,N′-Bis(9-phenyl-9-thioxanthenyl)ethylenediamine: Highly Selective Host Behavior in the Presence of Xylene and Ethylbenzene Guest Mixtures. Cryst. Growth Des. 2017, 17 (12), 66606667,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.cgd.7b01284
    46. 46
      Barton, B.; Senekal, U.; Hosten, E. C. trans-α,α,α′,α′-Tetraphenyl-9,10-dihydro-9,10-ethanoanthracene-11,12-dimethanol and its tetra(p-chlorophenyl) derivative: roof-shaped host compounds for the purification of aromatic C8H10 isomeric guest mixtures. J. Inclusion Phenom. Macrocyclic Chem. 2022, 102 (1), 7787,  DOI: 10.1007/s10847-021-01102-5
    47. 47
      Little, M. A.; Cooper, A. I. The Chemistry of Porous Organic Molecular Materials. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020, 30 (41), 1909842  DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201909842
    48. 48
      Mitra, T.; Jelfs, K. E.; Schmidtmann, M.; Ahmed, A.; Chong, S. Y.; Adams, D. J.; Cooper, A. I. Molecular shape sorting using molecular organic cages. Nat. Chem. 2013, 5 (4), 276281,  DOI: 10.1038/nchem.1550
    49. 49
      Ye, J.; du Plessis, M.; Loots, L.; van Wyk, L. M.; Barbour, L. J. Solid–Liquid Separation of Xylene Isomers Using a Cu-Based Metallocycle. Cryst. Growth Des. 2022, 22 (4), 26542661,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.cgd.2c00082
    50. 50
      Atwood, J. L.; Barbour, L. J.; Jerga, A.; Schottel, B. L. Guest Transport in a Nonporous Organic Solid via Dynamic van der Waals Cooperativity. Science 2002, 298 (5595), 10001002,  DOI: 10.1126/science.1077591
    51. 51
      Barrer, R. M.; Shanson, V. H. Dianin’s compound as a zeolitic sorbent. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1976, (9), 333334,  DOI: 10.1039/c39760000333
    52. 52
      Enright, G. D.; Ratcliffe, C. I.; Ripmeester, J. A. Crystal structure and 13C CP/MAS NMR of the p-xylene clathrate of Dianin’s compound. Mol. Phys. 1999, 97 (11), 11931196,  DOI: 10.1080/00268979909482920
    53. 53
      Harris, K. D. M. Meldola Lecture: understanding the properties of urea and thiourea inclusion compounds. Chem. Soc. Rev. 1997, 26 (4), 279289,  DOI: 10.1039/cs9972600279
    54. 54
      Palin, D. E.; Powell, H. M. 50. The structure of molecular compounds. Part III. Crystal structure of addition complexes of quinol with certain volatile compounds. J. Chem. Soc. (Resumed) 1947, 0, 208221,  DOI: 10.1039/jr9470000208
    55. 55
      Terres, E.; Vollmer, W. Solubility of Mineral Oil and tar constituents in liquid Hydrogen Sulphide. Petroleum 1935, 31, 112
    56. 56
      Dwivedi, B.; Kumar, S.; Das, D. Selective inclusion of p-xylene by bis-hydrazone compounds. CrystEngComm 2022, 24 (6), 11611165,  DOI: 10.1039/D1CE01569A
    57. 57
      Pivovar, A. M.; Holman, K. T.; Ward, M. D. Shape-Selective Separation of Molecular Isomers with Tunable Hydrogen-Bonded Host Frameworks. Chem. Mater. 2001, 13 (9), 30183031,  DOI: 10.1021/cm0104452
    58. 58
      Matos, C. R. M. O.; Sanii, R.; Wang, S.-Q.; Ronconi, C. M.; Zaworotko, M. J. Reversible single-crystal to single-crystal phase transformation between a new Werner clathrate and its apohost. Dalton Trans. 2021, 50 (37), 1292312930,  DOI: 10.1039/D1DT01839F
    59. 59
      Cheney, M. L.; McManus, G. J.; Perman, J. A.; Wang, Z.; Zaworotko, M. J. The Role of Cocrystals in Solid-State Synthesis: Cocrystal-Controlled Solid-State Synthesis of Imides. Cryst. Growth Des. 2007, 7 (4), 616617,  DOI: 10.1021/cg0701729
    60. 60
      Sanii, R.; Bajpai, A.; Patyk-Kaźmierczak, E.; Zaworotko, M. J. High Yield, Low-Waste Synthesis of a Family of Pyridyl and Imidazolyl-Substituted Schiff Base Linker Ligands. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 2018, 6 (11), 1458914598,  DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b03204
    61. 61
      Friščić, T.; Trask, A. V.; Jones, W.; Motherwell, W. S. Screening for inclusion compounds and systematic construction of three-component solids by liquid-assisted grinding. Angew. Chem. 2006, 118 (45), 77087712,  DOI: 10.1002/ange.200603235
    62. 62
      Shan, N.; Toda, F.; Jones, W. Mechanochemistry and co-crystal formation: effect of solvent on reaction kinetics. Chem. Commun. 2002, (20), 23722373,  DOI: 10.1039/b207369m
    63. 63
      Bowmaker, G. A. Solvent-assisted mechanochemistry. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49 (4), 334348,  DOI: 10.1039/C2CC35694E
    64. 64
      Cheney, M. L.; Zaworotko, M. J.; Beaton, S.; Singer, R. D. Cocrystal Controlled Solid-State Synthesis. A Green Chemistry Experiment for Undergraduate Organic Chemistry. J. Chem. Educ. 2008, 85 (12), 1649  DOI: 10.1021/ed085p1649
    65. 65
      Burger, A.; Ramberger, R. On the polymorphism of pharmaceuticals and other molecular crystals. I. Microchim. Acta 1979, 72 (3), 259271,  DOI: 10.1007/BF01197379
    66. 66
      Burger, A.; Ramberger, R. On the polymorphism of pharmaceuticals and other molecular crystals. II. Microchim. Acta 1979, 72 (3), 273316,  DOI: 10.1007/BF01197380
    67. 67
      Burtch, N. C.; Jasuja, H.; Walton, K. S. Water Stability and Adsorption in Metal–Organic Frameworks. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114 (20), 1057510612,  DOI: 10.1021/cr5002589
    68. 68
      Waterman, K. C.; Huynh-Ba, K. Understanding and Predicting Pharmaceutical Product Shelf-Life. In Handbook of Stability Testing in Pharmaceutical Development: Regulations, Methodologies, and Best Practices; Springer New York: New York, NY, 2009; pp 115135.
    69. 69
      Brouwers, J.; Brewster, M. E.; Augustijns, P. Supersaturating drug delivery systems: the answer to solubility-limited oral bioavailability?. J. Pharm. Sci. 2009, 98 (8), 25492572,  DOI: 10.1002/jps.21650
    70. 70
      Peralta, D.; Chaplais, G.; Paillaud, J.-L.; Simon-Masseron, A.; Barthelet, K.; Pirngruber, G. D. The separation of xylene isomers by ZIF-8: A demonstration of the extraordinary flexibility of the ZIF-8 framework. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2013, 173, 15,  DOI: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2013.01.012
    71. 71
      Barton, B.; de Jager, L.; Hosten, E. C. Minor modifications afford improved host selectivities in xanthenyl-type host systems. CrystEngComm 2019, 21 (19), 30003013,  DOI: 10.1039/C9CE00265K
    72. 72
      Gee, J. A.; Zhang, K.; Bhattacharyya, S.; Bentley, J.; Rungta, M.; Abichandani, J. S.; Sholl, D. S.; Nair, S. Computational Identification and Experimental Evaluation of Metal–Organic Frameworks for Xylene Enrichment. J. Phys. Chem. C 2016, 120 (22), 1207512082,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b03349
    73. 73
      Wang, J.-Y.; Mangano, E.; Brandani, S.; Ruthven, D. M. A review of common practices in gravimetric and volumetric adsorption kinetic experiments. Adsorption 2021, 27 (3), 295318,  DOI: 10.1007/s10450-020-00276-7
    74. 74
      Bezrukov, A. A.; O’Hearn, D. J.; Gascón-Pérez, V.; Darwish, S.; Kumar, A.; Sanda, S.; Kumar, N.; Francis, K.; Zaworotko, M. J. Metal-organic frameworks as regeneration optimized sorbents for atmospheric water harvesting. Cell Rep. Phys. Sci. 2023, 4 (2), 101252  DOI: 10.1016/j.xcrp.2023.101252
    75. 75
      Snurr, R. Q.; Bell, A. T.; Theodorou, D. N. Prediction of adsorption of aromatic hydrocarbons in silicalite from grand canonical Monte Carlo simulations with biased insertions. J. Phys. Chem. A 1993, 97 (51), 1374213752,  DOI: 10.1021/j100153a051
    76. 76
      Torres-Knoop, A.; Krishna, R.; Dubbeldam, D. Separating Xylene Isomers by Commensurate Stacking of p-Xylene within Channels of MAF-X8. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2014, 53 (30), 77747778,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201402894
    77. 77
      Yan, H.; Quan, J.; Qu, H.; Zhu, F.; Wang, Y.; Dhinakaran, M. K.; Han, T.; Li, H. Membranes with Nanochannels Based on Pillar[6]arenes to Separate Xylenes. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2022, 5 (12), 1863718644,  DOI: 10.1021/acsanm.2c04408
  • Supporting Information

    Supporting Information


    The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/jacs.3c07198.

    • Experimental details; materials and methods; computational studies; summary of reported adsorbents for separation of C8 aromatics; modeling section (PDF)

    • Speed: 210× (AVI)

    • Speed: 600× (AVI)

    • Speed: 1331× (AVI)

    • Speed: 2650× (AVI)

    Accession Codes

    CCDC 22436592243664 contain the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif, or by emailing [email protected], or by contacting The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Center, 12 Union Road, Cambridge CB2 1EZ, UK; fax: +44 1223 336033.


    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.